Ampal-american Israel 10-Q 2005 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from _______________________ to_______________

Commission file number 0-538

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

New York	13-0435685
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer)
Incorporation of Organization)	Identification Number

111 Arlozorov Street, Tel Aviv, Israel	62098
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (866) 447-8636

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) , and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso Nox

        The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Class A Stock, its only authorized common stock, is 19,958,161 (as of August 4, 2005).

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Form 10-Q

Part I. Financial Information

		Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Operations
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	1
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3-4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5-6
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity	7-8
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Gain (LOSS)	9
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of
	Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	15
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
	About Market Risk	21
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	22
Part II.	Other Information	23-24
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	23
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	24
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	24
Item 5.	Other Information	24
Item 6.	Exhibits	24

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005		2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
REVENUES
Equity in earnings of affiliates	$	6,179	$	1,399
Real estate income		4,649		4,433
Realized and unrealized gains on investments		5,082		4,742
Interest		695		279
Other		4,856		4,797
Total revenues		21,461		15,650
EXPENSES
Interest		3,151		2,230
Real estate expenses		4,352		4,259
Loss from impairment of investments		600		1,463
Translation loss		1,585		1,559
Other (mainly general and administrative)		4,362		5,071
Total expenses		14,050		14,582
Gain before income taxes		7,411		1,068
Provision for income taxes		2,517		1,624
Gain (loss) after income tax		4,894		(556	)
Minority interest		677		(29	)
Net Gain (loss)	$	4,217	$	(527	)
Basic EPS:
Gain (loss) per Class A share	$	0.20	$	(0.03	)
Shares used in calculation (in thousands)		19,937		19,814
Diluted EPS:
Gain (loss) per Class A share	$	0.19	$	(0.03	)
Shares used in calculation (in thousands)		22,346		19,814

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

1

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005			2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
REVENUES
Equity in earnings of affiliates	$	(454	)	$	(517	)
Real estate income		2,313			2,259
Realized and unrealized gains on investments		1,055			3,912
Interest		568			151
Other		2,345			2,376
Total revenues		5,827			8,181
EXPENSES
Interest		2,007			1,387
Real estate expenses		2,193			2,128
Loss from impairment of investments		600			-
Translation loss		1,021			332
Other (mainly general and administrative)		2,174			2,553
Total expenses		7,995			6,400
(Loss) gain before income taxes		(2,168	)		1,781
Provision for income taxes		11			1,151
(Loss) gain after income tax		(2,179	)		630
Minority interest		332			346
Net (Loss) gain	$	(2,511	)	$	284
Basic EPS:
(Loss) gain per Class A share	$	(0.13	)	$	0.01
Shares used in calculation (in thousands)		19,952			20,470
Diluted EPS:
(Loss) gain per Class A share	$	(0.13	)	$	0.01
Shares used in calculation (in thousands)		19,952			22,115

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS AS OF	June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)		(Audited)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,824	$	17,618
Deposits, notes and loans receivable		1,157		3,534
Marketable Securities		45,979		50,433
Other investments		116,446		127,023
Total Investments		162,425		177,456
Real estate property, less accumulated
depreciation of $13,034 and $12,190		71,325		63,191
Other assets		47,106		43,148
Total Assets	$	308,837	$	304,947

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AS OF	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
LIABILITIES
Notes and loans payable	$	124,371		$	118,760
Debentures		-			2,036
Deposits from tenants		51,492			52,152
Accounts payable, accrued expense and others		26,547			26,002
Total Liabilities		202,410			198,950
Minority interests		8,525			5,984
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
4% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $5
par value; authorized 189,287 shares; issued
121,112 and 124,024 shares; outstanding
117,762 and 120,674 shares		606			620
6-1/2% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
$5 par value; authorized 988,055 shares;
issued 642,925 and 662,219 shares; outstanding
520,389 and 539,683 shares		3,215			3,311
Class A Stock; $1 par value; authorized
60,000,000 shares; issued 25,787,745 and
25,715,303 shares; outstanding 19,956,081
and 19,883,639 shares		25,788			25,715
Additional paid-in capital		58,249			58,211
Retained earnings		61,741			57,524
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(20,601	)		(14,272	)
Treasury Stock, at cost		(31,096	)		(31,096	)
Total shareholders' equity		97,902			100,013
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	308,837		$	304,947

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005			2004
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net gain (loss)	$	4,217		$	(527	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Equity in earnings of affiliates		(6,179	)		(1,399	)
Realized and unrealized gain on investments		(5,082	)		(4,742	)
Depreciation expense		988			1,051
Amortization of deposits from tenants		(948	)		(939	)
Impairment of investments and loans		600			1,463
Translation loss		1,585			1,559
Minority interests		677			(29	)
Increase in other assets		(4,319	)		(2,224	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and others		5,802			(4,245	)
Investments made in trading securities		(12,868	)		(28,331	)
Proceeds from sale of trading securities		25,081			38,181
Dividends received from affiliates		2,395			273
Net cash provided by operating activities		11,949			91
Cash flows from investing activities:
Deposits, notes and loans receivable collected		2,066			13,974
Deposits, notes and loans receivable granted		(452	)		(5,195	)
Investments made in affiliates and others		(463	)		(6,212	)
Proceeds from sale of investments		1,066			8,918
Return of capital by partnership		-			35
Capital improvements		(8,678	)		(460	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities		(6,461	)		11,060

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30	2005			2004
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Notes and loans payable received	$	5,706		$	6,617
Notes and loans payable repaid		(1,856	)		(3,081	)
Debentures repaid		(2,023	)		(1,753	)
Contribution to partnership by minority		1,831			40
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,658			1,823
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and
Cash equivalents		60			(1,345	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		9,206			11,629
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period		17,618			4,572
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	26,824		$	16,201
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information
Cash paid during the period:
Interest paid to others	$	1,268		$	3,070
Income taxes paid	$	9		$	3,711
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash
Investing Activities:
Proceeds in tradable securities received from
realization of an investment		3,316			2,267
Dividend in kind from an affiliate		7,088			-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statement.

6

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
4% PREFERRED STOCK
Balance, beginning of year	$	620		$	660
Conversion of 2,912 and 7,928 shares into
Class A Stock		(14	)		(40	)
Balance, end of period	$	606		$	620
6-1/2% PREFERRED STOCK
Balance, beginning of year	$	3,311		$	3,487
Conversion of 19,294 and 35,161 shares into
Class A Stock		(96	)		(176	)
Balance, end of period	$	3,215		$	3,311
CLASS A STOCK
Balance beginning of year	$	25,715		$	25,567
Issuance of shares upon conversion of
Preferred Stock		73			148
Balance, end of period	$	25,788		$	25,715
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL
Balance, beginning of year	$	58,211		$	58,143
Conversion of Preferred Stock		38			68
Balance, end of period	$	58,249		$	58,211
RETAINED EARNINGS
Balance, beginning of year	$	57,524		$	76,109
Net gain (loss)		4,217			(18,385	)
Dividends:
4% Preferred Stock - $0.2 per share		-			(24	)
6-1/2% Preferred Stock - $0.325 per share		-			(176	)
Balance, end of period	$	61,741		$	57,524

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

7

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
TREASURY STOCK
4% PREFERRED STOCK
Balance, beginning of year		(84	)		(84	)
6-1/2% PREFERRED STOCK
Balance, end of period		(1,853	)		(1,853	)
CLASS A STOCK
Balance, end of period		(29,159	)		(29,159	)
Balance, end of period	$	(31,096	)	$	(31,096	)

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30	2005			2004_
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Cumulative translation adjustments:
Balance, beginning of year		(20,083	)		(20,597	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,383	)		(544	)
Balance, end of period		(21,466	)		(21,141	)
Unrealized gain on marketable securities:
Balance, beginning of year		5,811			2,750
Unrealized (loss) gain, net		(780	)		2,649
Sale of available-for-sale securities		(4,166	)		(334	)
Balance, end of period		865			5,065
Balance, end of period	$	(20,601	)	$	(16,076	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

8

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE GAIN (LOSS)

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005			2004
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Net Gain (loss)	$	4,217		$	(527	)
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1,383	)		(544	)
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities		(780	)		2,649
Other comprehensive (loss) income		(2,163	)		2,105
Comprehensive income	$	2,054		$	1,578
Related tax (expense) on other comprehensive
gain:
Foreign currency translation adjustments	$	(252	)	$	(27	)
Unrealized gain on securities	$	(2,663	)	$	(784	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

9

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. As used in these financial statements, the term the “Company” refers to Ampal-American Israel Corporation (“Ampal”) and its consolidated subsidiaries.

2. The June 30, 2005 consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Reference should be made to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a description of the accounting policies, which have been continued without change. Also, reference should be made to the notes to the Company’s December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements for additional details of the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The details in those notes have not changed except as a result of normal transactions in the interim. All adjustments (of a normal recurring nature), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair presentation of the results of the interim period have been included.

3. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2006. The Company expects to adopt the provisions of FAS 123R prospectively.

Under such transition method, upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, Ampal’s financial statements for periods prior to the effective date of the statement will not be restated. The impact of this statement on Ampal’s financial statements or its results of operations in 2006 and beyond will depend upon various factors, among them Ampal’s future compensation strategy. We expect that the effect of applying this statement on Ampal’s results of operations in 2006 as it relates to existing option plans would not be materially different from the SFAS 123 pro forma effect previously reported.

4. Employee Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for all employee stock options plans under APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation costs were incurred. SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) established a fair value-based method of accounting for employee stock options of similar equity instruments and encourages adoption of such method for stock compensation plans. However, it also allows companies to continue to account for those plans using the accounting treatment prescribed by APB No. 25 and accordingly discloses pro forma data assuming the Company had accounted for employee stock option grants using the fair value based method as defined in SFAS in No. 123.

If compensation cost for the options under plans in effect would have been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) and EPS would have been reduced as follows:

10

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005			2004
(In thousands, except per share data)
Basic EPS:
Net Gain (loss):
As reported(1)	$	4,117		$	(634	)
Less-stock based compensation expense
determined under fair value method		(438	)		(256	)
Pro forma	$	3,679		$	(890	)
As reported	$	0.20		$	(0.03	)
Pro forma	$	0.18		$	(0.04	)
Diluted EPS :
Net Gain (loss):
As reported	$	4,217		$	(634	)(2)
Less-stock based compensation expense
Determined under fair value method		(438	)		(256	)
Pro Forma	$	3,779		$	(890	)
As Reported	$	0.19		$	(0.03	)
Pro forma	$	0.17		$	(0.04	)

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30	2005			2004
(In thousands, except per share data)
Basic EPS:
Net (loss) gain:
As reported(1)	$	(2,561	)	$	231
Less-stock based compensation expense
Determined under fair value method		(219	)		(125	)
Pro forma	$	(2,780	)	$	106
As reported	$	(0.13	)	$	0.01
Pro forma	$	(0.14	)	$	0.01
Diluted EPS:
Net (loss) gain:
As reported	$	(2,561	)(2)	$	284
Less-stock based compensation expense
Determined under fair value method		(219	)		(125	)
Pro forma	$	(2,780	)	$	159
As Reported	$	(0.13	)	$	0.01
Pro forma	$	(0.14	)	$	0.01

⁽¹⁾ After deduction of accrued Preferred Stock Dividend of $100 and $107 (for the three months $50 and $53), respectively.

⁽²⁾ In 2005 and 2004, the effect of the conversion of the 4% and 6½% Preferred Stock was excluded from the basic and diluted EPS calculation due to its antidilutive effect.

Under SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: (1) expected life of options of 5 years (2) dividend yield of 0% (3) volatility ranging from 57% to 60% and (4) risk-free interest rate ranging from 3.3% to 3.46%.

11

5. Segment information presented below results

Segment information presented below results primarily from operations in Israel.

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,	2005			2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues:
Finance	$	9,601		$	8,808
Real Estate		4,649			4,433
Leisure-time		1,064			1,046
Intercompany adjustments		(32	)		(36	)
		15,282			14,251
Equity		6,179			1,399
Total	$	21,461		$	15,650
Pretax Operating Gain (Loss):
Finance	$	635		$	(576	)
Real Estate		498			110
Leisure-time		99			135
		1,232			(331	)
Equity		6,179			1,399
Total	$	7,411		$	1,068
Total Assets:
Finance	$	223,463		$	272,377
Real Estate		72,883			65,016
Leisure-Time		17,463			16,606
Intercompany adjustments		(4,972	)		(4,324	)
Total	$	308,837		$	349,675

Corporate office expense is principally applicable to the financing operations and has been charged to that segment above.

The real estate rental segment consists of rental property owned in Israel and leased in the United States and leased or subleased to unrelated parties, and of the operations of Am-Hal Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary which owns and operates a chain of senior citizen facilities located in Israel.

The leisure-time segment consists primarily of Coral World International Limited (marine parks located in Israel and around the world) and Country Club Kfar Saba, the Company’s 51%-owned subsidiary located in Israel.

6. The following table summarizes securities that were not included in the calculations of diluted earnings per Class A share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 because such shares are anti-dilutive.

(Shares in thousands)	JUNE 30,
	2005		2004
Options and Rights		70		1,333
6-1/2% Preferred Stock		-		666
4% Preferred Stock		-		126

12

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:

Ampal Communications L.P.

1. On May 10, 2004, Ampal Communications L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Ampal and in which Ampal holds a 75% equity interest, filed a claim in the Tel-Aviv District Court against Motorola Communications Israel Ltd., Motorola Israel Ltd., Elisha Yanai, Peter Brum, Rami Guzman, Nathan Gidron, Shimon Tal and MIRS Communications Ltd. (collectively, the “Defendants”), for injunctive and declaratory relief as described below. The claim is in connection with the exploitation by the defendants of Ampal Communications’ minority rights by virtue of its 33% holding in MIRS Communications Ltd.

Ampal Communications L.P. requested the Court to issue relief as follows:

A. Declaring that the business of MIRS Communications Ltd. is conducted in such a way as to be prejudicial to the rights of Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder;

B. Appointing an appraiser to conduct a valuation of MIRS Communications Ltd. and Ampal Communications L.P.‘s holdings therein, which will encompass a review of the way MIRS Communications Ltd. conducts its business, including a review of the related party transactions between MIRS Communications Ltd. and Motorola Israel Ltd. and/or any other of the Defendants;

C. Instructing each of the Defendants to acquire and purchase from Ampal Communications L.P. the shares it holds in MIRS Communications Ltd. at the highest of the following prices:

(1) based on a company valuation of MIRS Communications Ltd. as presented to Ampal Communications L.P. by Motorola prior to the signing of the Share Purchase Agreement for MIRS Communications Ltd.; or

(2) based on the amount paid by Ampal Communications L.P. for its share holding in MIRS Communications Ltd. plus linkage to the Israeli consumer index and interest; or

(3) based on the company valuation that will be determined by the valuation specified in Section B above, excluding any material negative effect brought about by the Defendants’ omissions and/or negligence in their management of MIRS Communications Ltd., all as may be assessed and computed by the appraiser specified in Section B above;

D. Determining that each of the individual Defendants, as officers in MIRS Communications Ltd., has violated his respective fiduciary obligations towards Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder in MIRS Communications Ltd.; and

E. Declaring that the Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Ampal Communications L.P. acquired its shareholding in MIRS Communications Ltd. and the Shareholders Agreement in respect thereof, are void.

13

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: (CONT.)

Ampal Communications L.P.

2. On May 24, 2004 and on May 31, 2004 the Defendants requested the district court to strike out the claim in limine, on the grounds that Ampal had allegedly not paid sufficient fees when filing the claim, and further requested an extension of the time for filing statements of defense until after the district court had reached a decision regarding the request to strike out the claim. Ampal and the Defendants filed various responses and on June 30, 2004, the district court requested the Attorney General to furnish an opinion regarding the Defendants’ request before issuing its own decision. On October 11, 2004 the Attorney General furnished its opinion that supported the Defendants’ request that Ampal should pay the fees calculated on the basis of the value of the requested remedies in the claim. On November 10, 2004 Ampal filed its response. The Court also decided that the statements of defense should be filed 10 days after it issues its decision regarding the striking out of the claim. The Court has scheduled a hearing on this matter for September 1, 2005.

3. On March 1, 2005, Ampal requested the district court to enter judgment against Peter Brum on the grounds that he failed to file a defense to the Company’s claim. On March 15, 2005, the district court granted Ampal’s request and entered judgment against Peter Brum. On March 17, 2005, the district court ordered Mr. Brum to acquire and purchase from Ampal the shares it holds in MIRS for a total company valuation of $ 765,998,000, which is the highest of the prices set forth in the complaint. The litigation with regard to the other defendants is ongoing. Peter Brum, Motorola and MIRS have appealed the district court’s judgment on numerous grounds. Ampal has filed responses to the appeal. The appellate court has not ruled on this appeal.

4. The Company has not received dividends from MIRS in the aggregate amount of $14.2 million, included among “other assets”, due March 31, 2004 ($7.1 million) and March 31, 2005 ($7.1 million). The dividends were not received due to the legal dispute discussed above. As a result of not receiving the dividends, the principal and the interest of the loan which were due March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 were only partially paid.

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 11, 2005, Ophir Holding Ltd., which is owned 42.5% by the Company, signed an agreement to sell all of its holdings in a real estate property located in the industrial park in Netanya, Israel for a total amount of approximately $ 11 million. Ampal expects to receive approximately $4.5 million in cash from that sale. Ampal expects that the sale of the property will have no material impact on its financial results.

14

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of Ampal’s consolidated financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To facilitate the understanding of Ampal’s business activities, described below are certain Ampal accounting policies that are relatively more important to the portrayal of its financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s subjective judgments. Ampal bases its judgments on its experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Please refer to Note 1 to Ampal’s consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a summary of all of Ampal’s significant accounting policies.

Portfolio Investments

The Company accounts for a number of its investments, including many of its investments in the high technology and communications industries, on the basis of the cost method. Application of this method requires the Company to periodically review these investments in order to determine whether to maintain the current carrying value or to write off some or all of the investment. While the Company uses some objective measurements in its review, such as the portfolio company’s liquidity, burn rate, termination of a substantial number of employees, achievement of milestones set forth in its business plan or projections and seeks to obtain relevant information from the company under review, the review process involves a number of judgments on the part of the Company’s management. These judgments include assessments of the likelihood of the company under review to obtain additional financing, to achieve future milestones, make sales and to compete effectively in its markets. In making these judgments the Company must also attempt to anticipate trends in the particular company’s industry as well as in the general economy. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be accurate in its assessments and judgments. To the extent that the Company is not correct in its conclusion it may decide to write down all or part of the particular investment.

Investment in MIRS

MIRS is our largest investment and is being accounted for at cost (our equity interest is 25%). The cost method is applied due to preference features we have been granted in our investment in preferred shares in MIRS. Revenues from guaranteed payments from Motorola are recognized as income. We perform annual tests for impairment regarding our investment.

Marketable Securities

We determine the appropriate classification of marketable securities at the time of purchase. We hold marketable securities classified as trading securities that are carried at fair value, and marketable securities classified as available-for-sale that are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in the component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. We classify investment in marketable securities as investment in trading securities, if those securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (held for only a short period of time). All the other securities are classified as available for sale securities.

15

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 59, Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, provides guidance on determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. Investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment. This determination requires significant judgment. In making this judgment, we evaluate, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost; the financial health of the investee; and our intent and ability to hold the investment. Investments with an indicator are further evaluated to determine the likelihood of a significant adverse effect on the fair value and amount of the impairment as necessary. If market, industry and/or investee conditions deteriorate, we may incur future impairments.

Long-Lived Assets

On January 1, 2002, Ampal adopted FAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long — Lived Assets.” FAS 144 requires that long- lived assets, to be held and used by an entity, be reviewed for impairment and, if necessary, written down to the estimated fair values, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows.

Accounting for Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the statement of operations. A valuation allowance is currently set against certain tax assets because management believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized through the generation of future taxable income. We also do not provide for taxes on undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as it is our intention to reinvest undistributed earnings indefinitely outside the United States.

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, our operating results and financial position could be materially affected.

16

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB revised Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to expense the estimated fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. On April 14, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a new rule amending the compliance dates for FAS 123R. In accordance with the new rule, the accounting provisions of FAS 123R will be effective for the Company in fiscal 2006. The Company expects to adopt the provisions of FAS 123R prospectively.

Under such transition method, upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, Ampal’s financial statements for periods prior to the effective date of the statement will not be restated. The impact of this statement on Ampal’s financial statements or its results of operations in 2006 and beyond will depend upon various factors, among them Ampal’s future compensation strategy. We expect that the effect of applying this statement on Ampal’s results of operations in 2006 as it relates to existing option plans would not be materially different from the SFAS 123 pro forma effect previously reported.

Results of Operations

Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004

Ampal-American Israel Corporation (“Ampal”) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) recorded a consolidated net gain of $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to a net loss of $0.5 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in net gain is primarily attributable to the increase of equity in earnings of affiliates, realized and unrealized gains on investments the decrease in loss from impairment of investments and the decrease in other expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This increase in net gain was partially offset by an increase in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

Equity in earnings of affiliates increased to $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to a gain of $1.4 million for the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to a $6.3 million gain recorded by Ophir Holding Ltd. as a result of the sale of all its holdings in Industrial Building Corporation Ltd..

In the six month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded $5.1 million of realized and unrealized gains on investments, as compared to $4.7 million of realized and unrealized gains in the same period in 2004. The gains recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2005 are mainly attributable to the sale of all of its shares of Modem Art Ltd. ($3.3 million gain) and to various tradable securities.

In the six month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company record $0.6 million loss from the impairment of its investments in Shiron Ltd. In the same period in 2004, the Company recorded a $1.5 million loss from impairment of certain of its investments.

In the six month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded $4.4 million of other expenses, as compared to $5.1 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in other expenses pertains to the closing of Ampal’s office in New York and to a decrease in professional fees.

The Company recorded higher interest expense of $3.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $2.2 million in the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of increases in interest rates.

17

Three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to three months ended June 30, 2004

The Company recorded a consolidated net loss of $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to a net gain of $0.3 million for the same period in 2004. The decrease in net loss is primarily attributable to the decrease in realized and unrealized gains on investments, the increase in interest expense, increase in loss from impairment of investments, and the increase in translation loss in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.

In the three month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded $1.1 million of realized and unrealized gains on investments, as compared to $3.9 million of realized and unrealized gains in the same period in 2004. The gains recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2005 are mainly attributable to the sale of various tradable securities while in 2004 the gain is attributable to the sale of PowerDsine ($3.9 million).

In the three month period ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded a $0.6 million loss from the impairment of its investments in Shiron Ltd.

The Company recorded higher interest expense of $2.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to $1.4 million in the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of an increase in interest rates.

The Company recorded a translation loss of $1.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to a translation loss of $0.3 million in the same period in 2004. The translation losses in 2005 and 2004 are attributable to the devaluation of the New Israeli Shekel against the U.S. dollar.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

The Company’s sources of cash include cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, which amount to $72.8 million as of June 30, 2005 as compared to $68.1 million in December 31, 2004. The Company also has sources of cash from operations, cash from investing activities and amounts available under credit facilities, as described below. The Company believes that these sources are sufficient to fund the current requirements of operations, capital expenditures, investing activities, dividends on preferred stock and other financial commitments of the Company for the next 12 months. However, to the extent that contingencies and payment obligations described below and in other parts of this Report require the Company to make unanticipated payments, the Company would need to further utilize these sources of cash. In the event of a decline in the market price of its marketable securities, the Company may need to draw upon its other sources of cash, which may include additional borrowing, refinancing of its existing indebtedness or liquidating other assets, the value of which may also decline.

In addition, the shares of MIRS owned by the Company, the shares of Ophir Holdings Ltd. and government debenture notes equal to $9 million have already been pledged as security for various loans provided to the Company for the purchase of these shares and would therefore be unavailable if the Company wished to pledge them in order to provide an additional source of cash.

        Cash flows from operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $0.1 million at the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to the $12.2 million net proceeds in trading securities ($25.1 million proceeds offset by $12.9 million invested) as compared to $9.9 million net proceeds in 2004, to the $2.4 million dividends received from affiliates as compared to $0.3 million in 2004 and to an increase in accounts payable.

18

        Cash flows from investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $11.1 million provided by investing activities for the same period in 2004. The cash used in investing activities during 2005 is primarily attributable to a payment of $8.7 million by Am-Hal Ltd. (Am-Hal), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to acquire real estate for a new project in Tel-Aviv.

        Cash flows from financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared to approximately $1.8 million of net cash provided by financing activities for the six months period ended June 30, 2004.

In the six months ended June 30, 2005, Am-Hal Ltd. and its minority partner in the new project borrowed $5.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively to finance the new project (see cash flow from investing activities) and Ampal used its own cash to pay down its existing notes payable and debentures in the amount of $3.9 million. In 2004, the Company paid down its notes payable and debentures in the amount of $4.8 million by borrowing funds in the amount of $6.6 million.

Investments

On June 30, 2005, the aggregate fair value of trading and available-for-sale securities was approximately $46.0 million, as compared to $50.4 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in 2005 is mainly attributable to the sale of various tradable securities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company made an additional investment of $0.5 million in Fimi Opportunity Fund, L.P. (“Fimi”).

During March 2005, Ampal sold all of its shares of Modem Art Ltd. for $4.4 million and recorded a gain of $3.3 million.

Debt

In connection with its investment in MIRS, the Company has two long-term loans from Bank Hapoalim Ltd. (“Hapoalim”) and Bank Leumi le-Israel B.M. (“Leumi”) in the outstanding amount of $38.6 million and $34.3 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2005. Both loans are due on March 31, 2008 and bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.8%. Other than as described in this paragraph, the loans are non-recourse to the Company and are secured by the Company’s shares in MIRS. A total payment of 10% and 15% of the principal of the loans were due on March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 respectively. The remaining principal payments are due as follows: 25% on each of the following dates – March 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Interest is payable annually on March 31 of each year from March 31, 2001 until and including March 31, 2008. As a result of not receiving dividends from MIRS on March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 (totaling $14.2 million) (see “Legal Proceedings”), the principal and the interest of the loans were only partially paid. Unpaid principal amounts are accruing interest at a higher interest rate.

As of the date hereof, the banks have not declared a default with respect to such unpaid amount. These loans are subject to the compliance by MIRS with covenants regarding its operations and financial results.

19

The Company financed a portion of the development of Am-Hal, a wholly-owned subsidiary which develops and operates luxury retirement centers for senior citizens, through bank loans from Hapoalim and others. At June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004 the amounts outstanding under these loans were $13.0 million and $7.7 million respectively. The loans mature in up to one year and have interest rates range between 5.3% and 6.3%. The Company generally repays these loans with the proceeds received from deposits and other payments from the apartments in Am-Hal facilities. The loans are secured by a lien on Am-Hal’s properties. The Company also issued guarantees in the amount of $3.9 million in favor of tenants of Am-Hal in order to secure their deposits.

The Company also finances its general operations and other financial commitments through bank loans from Bank Hapoalim. These loans in the amount of $31.3 million mature through 2006-2011.

The weighted average interest rates and the balances of these short-term borrowings at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were 5.7% on $18.2 million and 3.5% on $13.0 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2005, the Company had issued guarantees on certain outstanding loans to its investees and subsidiaries in the aggregate principal amount of $12.5 million. This includes:

1. $0.5 million guarantee to Leumi with respect to the MIRS loan as described above.

2. $5.6 million guarantee on indebtedness incurred by Bay Heart ($3.6 million of which is recorded as a liability in the Company’s financial statements as of June 30, 2005) in connection with the development of its property. Bay Heart recorded losses in 2005, in management’s belief, primarily as a result of decreased rental revenues. There can be no guarantee that Bay Heart will become profitable or that it will generate sufficient cash to repay its outstanding indebtedness without relying on the Company’s guarantee.

3. $3.9 million guarantee to Am-Hal tenants as described above.

4. $1.6 million guarantee to am-Hal for the new project in Tel-Aviv.

5. $0.9 million guarantee to Galha 1960 Ltd.

FOREIGN CURRENCY CONTRACTS

The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The Company, utilizes these contracts from time to time, to manage risk exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates. None of these contracts have been designated as hedging instruments. These contracts are recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at their fair value, which is the estimated amount at which they could be settled based on market prices or dealer quotes, where available, or based on pricing models. Changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had a $10 million open foreign currency forward exchange contract to purchase U.S Dollars in payment of N.I.S.

20

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report (including but not limited to factors discussed above, in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) includes forward-looking statements (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management of the Company as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the management of the Company. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or the management of the Company, identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events or future financial performance of the Company, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements, including among others, the economic and political conditions in Israel, the Middle East, and the global business and economic conditions in the different sectors and markets where the Company’s portfolio companies operate.

Should any of those risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results or outcome may vary from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or planned. Subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph and elsewhere described in this quarterly Report and other Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

MARKET RISKS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The Company is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency rates and equity price changes. The following analysis presents the hypothetical loss in earnings, cash flows and fair values of the financial instruments, which were held by the Company at June 30, 2005, and are sensitive to the above market risks.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, there have been no material changes in the market risk exposures facing the Company as compared to those the Company faced in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Interest Rate Risks

At June 30, 2005, the Company had financial assets totaling $25.9 million and financial liabilities totaling $124.4 million. For fixed rate financial instruments, interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate financial instruments, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant.

At June 30, 2005, the Company had fixed rate financial assets of $25.9 million and held no variable rate financial assets. Holding other variables constant, a ten percent increase in interest rates would decrease the unrealized fair value of the fixed financial assets by approximately $0.1 million.

21

At June 30, 2005, the Company had fixed rate debt of $3.6 million and variable rate debt of $120.8 million. A ten percent decrease in interest rates would increase the unrealized fair value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $0.1 million.

The net decrease in earnings for the next year resulting from a ten percent interest rate increase would be approximately $0.6 million, holding other variables constant.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The Company’s exchange rate exposure on its financial instruments results from its investments and ongoing operations in Israel. During 2005, the Company entered into a foreign exchange forward purchase contract to partially hedge this exposure. At June 30, 2005, the Company held a $10 million foreign exchange forward purchase contracts to purchase U.S. Dollars. Holding other variables constant, if there were a ten percent devaluation of the foreign currency, the Company’s cumulative translation (loss) reflected in the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive (loss) would increase by $1.3 million, and in the statements of operations, a ten percent devaluation of the foreign currency would decrease net earnings in the amount of approximately $3.3 million.

Securities Price Risk

The Company’s investments at June 30, 2005, included marketable securities (trading and available-for-sale), which are recorded at fair value of $46.0 million. Those securities have exposure to price risk. The estimated potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical ten percent decrease in prices quoted on stock exchanges is approximately $4.6 million.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s periodic reports.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

22

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings:

Ampal Communications L.P.

1. On May 10, 2004, Ampal Communications L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Ampal and in which Ampal holds a 75% equity interest, filed a claim in the Tel-Aviv District Court against Motorola Communications Israel Ltd., Motorola Israel Ltd., Elisha Yanai, Peter Brum, Rami Guzman, Nathan Gidron, Shimon Tal and MIRS Communications Ltd. (collectively, the “Defendants”), for injunctive and declaratory relief as described below. The claim is in connection with the exploitation by the defendants of Ampal Communications’ minority rights by virtue of its 33% holding in MIRS Communications Ltd.

Ampal Communications L.P. requested the Court to issue relief as follows:

A. Declaring that the business of MIRS Communications Ltd. is conducted in such a way as to be prejudicial to the rights of Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder;

B. Appointing an appraiser to conduct a valuation of MIRS Communications Ltd. and Ampal Communications L.P.‘s holdings therein, which will encompass a review of the way MIRS Communications Ltd. conducts its business, including a review of the related party transactions between MIRS Communications Ltd. and Motorola Israel Ltd. and/or any other of the Defendants;

C. Instructing each of the Defendants to acquire and purchase from Ampal Communications L.P. the shares it holds in MIRS Communications Ltd. at the highest of the following prices:

(1) based on a company valuation of MIRS Communications Ltd. as presented to Ampal Communications L.P. by Motorola prior to the signing of the Share Purchase Agreement for MIRS Communications Ltd.; or

(2) based on the amount paid by Ampal Communications L.P. for its share holding in MIRS Communications Ltd. plus linkage to the Israeli consumer index and interest; or

(3) based on the company valuation that will be determined by the valuation specified in Section B above, excluding any material negative effect brought about by the Defendants’ omissions and/or negligence in their management of MIRS Communications Ltd., all as may be assessed and computed by the appraiser specified in Section B above;

D. Determining that each of the individual Defendants, as officers in MIRS Communications Ltd., has violated his respective fiduciary obligations towards Ampal Communications L.P. as a minority shareholder in MIRS Communications Ltd.; and

E. Declaring that the Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Ampal Communications L.P. acquired its shareholding in MIRS Communications Ltd. and the Shareholders Agreement in respect thereof, are void.

2. On May 24, 2004 and on May 31, 2004 the Defendants requested the district court to strike out the claim in limine, on the grounds that Ampal had allegedly not paid sufficient fees when filing the claim, and further requested an extension of the time for filing statements of defense until after the district court had reached a decision regarding the request to strike out the claim. Ampal and the Defendants filed various responses and on June 30, 2004, the district court requested the Attorney General to furnish an opinion regarding the Defendants’ request before issuing its own decision. On October 11, 2004 the Attorney General furnished its opinion that supported the Defendants’ request that Ampal should pay the fees calculated on the basis of the value of the requested remedies in the claim.

23

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION (CONT.)

On November 10, 2004 Ampal filed its response. The Court called for a hearing in that matter for June 1, 2005. The Court also decided that the statements of defense should be filed 10 days after it issues its decision regarding the striking out of the claim. The court has scheduled a hearing on this matter for September 1, 2005.

3. On March 1, 2005, Ampal requested the district court to enter judgment against Peter Brum on the grounds that he failed to file a defense to the Company’s claim. On March 15, 2005, the district court granted Ampal’s request and entered judgment against Peter Brum. On March 17, 2005, the district court ordered Mr. Brum to acquire and purchase from Ampal the shares it holds in MIRS for a total company valuation of $ 765,998,000, which is the highest of the prices set forth in the complaint. The litigation with regard to the other defendants is ongoing. Peter Brum, Motorola and MIRS have appealed the district court’s judgment on numerous grounds. Ampal has filed responses to the appeal. The appellate court has not ruled on this appeal.

4. The Company has not received dividends from MIRS in the aggregate amount of $14.2 million, included among “other assets”, due March 31, 2004 ($7.1 million) and March 31, 2005 ($7.1 million). The dividends were not received due to the legal dispute discussed above. As a result of not receiving the dividends, the principal and the interest on the loan which were due March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 were only partially paid.

SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 11, 2005, Ophir Holding Ltd., which is owned 42.5% by the Company, signed an agreement to sell all of its holdings in a real estate property located in the industrial park in Netanya, Israel for a total amount of approximately $ 11 million. Ampal expects to receive approximately $4.5 million in cash from that sale. Ampal expects that the sale of the property will have no material impact on its financial results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.

Item 5. Other Information.
None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits:

11.1 Schedule Setting Forth Computation of Gain (Loss) per Share of Class A Stock.

31.1 Certification of Jack Bigio pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 Certification of Irit Eluz pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Jack Bigio and Irit Eluz pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

24

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION


BY: /S/ Jack Bigio
——————————————
Jack Bigio
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

BY: /S/ Irit Eluz
——————————————
Irit Eluz
CFO and Senior Vice President,
Finance and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

BY: /S/ Giora Bar-Nir
——————————————
Giora Bar-Nir
VP Accounting and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: August 10, 2005

25

AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No. Description

11.1 Schedule Setting Forth Computation of Earnings Per Share of Class A Stock

31.1 Certification of Jack Bigio pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 Certification of Irit Eluz pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Jack Bigio and Irit Eluz pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

26