board of directors after taking into account many factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansions. Any future dividends may also be restricted by our existing, as well as any future, debt agreements or by the terms of any preferred stock that we may issue in the future.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and under Delaware law may impede or discourage a takeover, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change in control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders, which, under certain circumstances, could reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, protective provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws or the implementation by our board of directors of a stockholder rights plan could prevent a takeover, which could harm our stockholders.
The terms of any future preferred equity or debt financing may give holders of any preferred securities or debt securities rights that are senior to the rights of our existing common stockholders or impose more stringent restrictions on our operations.
If we incur additional debt or raise equity through the issuance of preferred stock or convertible securities, the terms of the debt or the preferred stock issued may give the holders rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock, particularly in the event of liquidation. The terms of the debt may also impose additional and more stringent restrictions on our operations. If we raise funds through the issuance of additional equity, the ownership percentage of our existing stockholders would be diluted.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes will be limited.
In general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income may be limited. We have experienced an “ownership change” as a result of the Indigo Merger and, as a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset U.S. federal taxable income after the Indigo Merger was completed will be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us. We may experience ownership changes in the future, which may result in further limitations to our ability to use our NOL carryforwards.
Realization of NOL carryforwards also depends on future income, and there is a risk that our existing carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our operating results. Our NOL carryforward as of December 31, 2020 was $4.5 billion and $2 billion for federal and state reporting purposes, respectively, the majority of which will expire between 2035 and 2039. Federal NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 have an indefinite carryover period, but may be utilized to offset no more than 80% of taxable income generated annually for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
Changes to applicable U.S. tax laws and regulations could affect our business and future profitability.
New U.S. laws and policy relating to taxes may have an adverse effect on us and our business and future profitability. Further, existing U.S. tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted,
S-14