UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
(mark one)
| | |
þ | | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2006
| | |
o | | Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number0-11454
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 59-2332857 |
| | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
2629 York Avenue | | |
Minden, LA 71055 | | 71055 |
| | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
(318) 382-4574
(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 15,538,165 par value $0.01 per share, shares of common stock outstanding as of August 14, 2006.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes o No þ
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Valentec Systems, Inc. (together with Valentec Operating Corp., the “Company” or “Valentec”) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B, and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. It is suggested that the following consolidated financial statements of the Company be read in conjunction with the year-end consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005. Operating results of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006 or for any other period.
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONTENTS
| | | | | | |
PAGE | | | 1 | | | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2006 |
| | | | | | |
PAGE | | | 2 | | | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 |
| | | | | | |
PAGE | | | 3 | | | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 |
| | | | | | |
PAGE | | | 4 | | | UNAUDITED NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
| | | | |
ASSETS | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | |
Cash | | | 205,771 | |
Accounts receivable and in-process billings, net | | | 15,637,964 | |
Inventories, net | | | 1,599,859 | |
Prepaid and other expenses | | | 173,695 | |
| | | | |
Total Current Assets | | | 17,617,289 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET | | | 1,485,138 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | | |
Advances – stockholder | | | 196,749 | |
Deferred income tax | | | 92,513 | |
Contract development cost, net | | | 6,037,661 | |
Deposits | | | 3,000 | |
| | | | |
Total Other Assets | | | 6,329,923 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | | 25,432,350 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
| | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 6,263,751 | |
Accrued salaries and payroll withholding | | | 266,392 | |
Lines of credit | | | 13,089,555 | |
Deferred revenue | | | 2,329,872 | |
Due to related party | | | 1,319,711 | |
Capital lease | | | 10,074 | |
Deferred income taxes payable | | | 475,241 | |
| | | | |
Total Current Liabilities | | | 23,754,596 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
LONG TERM LIABILITIES | | | | |
Notes Payable – stockholders | | | 433,274 | |
Capital lease – long term | | | 71,749 | |
| | | | |
Total Long Term Liabilities | | | 505,023 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 24,259,619 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | — | |
| | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 authorized, none issued and outstanding | | | — | |
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 260,000,000 shares authorized, 15,538,165 shares issued and outstanding | | | 155,382 | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 3,152,662 | |
Retained earnings | | | (1,487,601 | ) |
Less deferred offering cost | | | (647,712 | ) |
| | | | |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 1,172,731 | |
| | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | 25,432,350 | |
| | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contract revenues | | $ | 4,769,921 | | | $ | 4,382,326 | | | $ | 10,742,812 | | | $ | 8,263,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
COST OF GOODS SOLD | | | 4,222,136 | | | | 2,477,798 | | | | 8,243,607 | | | | 5,172,765 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GROSS PROFIT | | | 547,785 | | | | 1,904,528 | | | | 2,499,205 | | | | 3,090,609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fringe benefit expenses | | | 155,156 | | | | 202,966 | | | | 304,397 | | | | 277,206 | |
Overhead expenses | | | 1,169,308 | | | | 584,020 | | | | 1,947,613 | | | | 1,124,748 | |
General and administrative | | | 769,628 | | | | 652,333 | | | | 1,524,505 | | | | 1,082,848 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Operating Expenses | | | 2,094,092 | | | | 1,439,319 | | | | 3,776,515 | | | | 2,484,802 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INCOME/(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS | | | (1,546,307 | ) | | | 465,209 | | | | (1,277,310 | ) | | | 605,807 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 412 | | | | 14,523 | | | | 1,087 | | | | 21,725 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 4,003 | | | | 54,050 | | | | 6,384 | | | | (15,544 | ) |
Interest expense | | | (434,723 | ) | | | (76,750 | ) | | | (826,684 | ) | | | (108,008 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Other Income (Expense) | | | (430,308 | ) | | | (8,177 | ) | | | (819,213 | ) | | | (101,827 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | (1,976,615 | ) | | | 457,032 | | | | (2,096,523 | ) | | | 503,980 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Provision for Income Taxes | | | — | | | | (11,367 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | | (1,976,615 | ) | | | 445,665 | | | $ | (2,096,523 | ) | | $ | 503,980 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted | | | (.17 | ) | | | .07 | | | $ | (.23 | ) | | | .07 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Shares (Basic and Diluted) | | | 11,400,622 | | | | 6,997,072 | | | | 9,211,005 | | | | 6,997,072 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months | | | Six Months | |
| | Ended | | | Ended | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | | June 30, 2005 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Net income (Loss) | | $ | (2,096,523 | ) | | $ | 503,980 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 455,393 | | | | 461,397 | |
In-kind contribution, interest | | | 15,685 | | | | — | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
(Increase) decrease in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable and in-process billings | | | (3,031,036 | ) | | | (4,853,701 | ) |
Contract Development | | | — | | | | 2,011,584 | |
Inventory | | | 174,654 | | | | — | |
Prepaid expense | | | (20,396 | ) | | | (647 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | | 1,441,335 | | | | 1,316,984 | |
Due to related party | | | 327,473 | | | | — | |
Accrued expenses | | | (26,758 | ) | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | | — | | | | (5,079 | ) |
Deferred revenue | | | (1,012,909 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities | | | (3,773,082 | ) | | | (565,482 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property and equipment | | | (123,881 | ) | | | (26,069 | ) |
Distribution to Parent | | | — | | | | (125,000 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | | (123,881 | ) | | | (151,069 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 1,327,468 | |
Note payable | | | — | | | | 100,000 | |
Proceeds from line of credit | | | 4,025,934 | | | | 1,244,000 | |
Shareholder loan | | | — | | | | (658,239 | ) |
Payments to capital lease | | | (5,078 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities | | | 4,020,856 | | | | 2,013,229 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | | | 123,893 | | | | 1,296,678 | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD | | | 81,878 | | | | 262,195 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 205,771 | | | $ | 1,558,873 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | 826,041 | | | $ | 79,034 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
During March 2006 the Company acquired fixed assets under capital leases totaling $86,901 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
During June 2006 the Company converted $188,753 of accounts payable to 755,015 shares of Common Stock | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
| | |
NOTE 1 | | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION |
| | |
| | (A) Organization |
| | |
| | Valentec Systems, Inc. is a Delaware corporation incorporated on September 8, 1983. Prior to April 10, 2006, the name of the corporation was Acorn Holding Corp. |
| | |
| | Valentec Operating Corp., the wholly owned subsidiary of Valentec Systems, Inc., is an ammunition and systems integration company that provides ammunition to the United States Army and systems integration for foreign governments. Valentec Operating Corp. was incorporated on May 1, 1998 in the state of Delaware. Prior to April 10, 2006, Valentec Operating Corp. had the corporate name “Valentec Systems, Inc.” |
| | |
| | On May 27, 2005, Valentec Systems, Inc. consummated an agreement with Valentec Operating Corp, pursuant to which Valentec Operating Corp. exchanged all of its 100 shares then issued and outstanding shares of common stock for 5,423,130 shares or approximately 78% of the common stock of Valentec Systems, Inc. As a result of the agreement, the transaction was treated for accounting purposes as a recapitalization by the accounting acquirer Valentec Operating Corp. |
| | |
| | Accordingly, the financial statements include the following: |
| (1) | | The balance sheet consists of the net assets of the acquirer at historical cost and the net assets of the acquiree at historical cost. |
|
| (2) | | The statement of operations includes the operations of the acquirer for the periods presented and the operations of the acquiree from the date of the merger. |
| | |
| | Valentec Systems, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Valentec Operating Corp are hereafter collectively referred to as (the “Company”). |
| | |
| | (B) Use of Estimates |
| | |
| | The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates for 2006 and 2005 include amortization of development costs, estimation of cost to complete long term contracts, valuation allowance on deferred tax asset and allocation of overhead costs. |
| | |
| | (C) Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| | |
| | For purposes of financial statement presentation, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with initial maturities of ninety days or less to be cash equivalents. |
| | |
| | As of June 30, 2006, the Company had $102,901 in excess of federally insured limits. |
| | |
| | (D) Principles of Consolidation |
| | |
| | The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valentec Systems, Inc., and its subsidiary, Valentec Operating Corp. All significant inter company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
4
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
(E) Inventory
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Provision for potentially obsolete or slow moving inventory is made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and future sales forecasts.
(F) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at the original cost to the Company. Assets are being depreciated using the straight line balance method over predetermined lives of three to seven years.
(G) Contract Revenue
Revenue from fixed-price type contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion using the cost-to-cost method of accounting, with cost and estimated profits included in contract revenue as work is performed. If actual and estimated costs to complete a contract indicate a loss, a provision is made currently for the loss anticipated on the contract. Advance payments received are reported in the accompanying balance sheet as deferred revenue.
Revenue from time and materials type contracts is recognized as costs are incurred at amounts represented by the agreed-upon billing amounts.
Revenue recognized on contracts for which billings have not been presented to customers is included in the accounts receivable classification on the balance sheet
(H) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments including accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, capital leases, lines of credit and deferred revenue approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.
(I) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” As of June 30, 2006, the Company has 1,000,000 warrants outstanding that are not included in dilutive net earnings per share as the effect is anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2005, the Company did not have any outstanding dilutive securities.
(J) Segment Information
The company operates in three segments, systems management and integration, energetic manufacturing and metal parts.
Six months ended June 30, 2006
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Systems | | Energetic | | Metal Parts | | Total |
Revenues | | $ | 8,174,230 | | | $ | 2,318,670 | | | $ | 249,912 | | | $ | 10,742,812 | |
Gross Profit | | | 2,860,352 | | | | (498,943 | ) | | | 137,796 | | | | 2,499,205 | |
Order Backlog | | | 19,390,941 | | | | 2,121,233 | | | | 822,321 | | | | 22,334,495 | |
5
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, 2005
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Metal | | Facility | | |
| | Systems | | Energetic | | Parts | | Management | | Total |
Revenues | | $ | 3,464,144 | | | $ | 4,302,191 | | | $ | 85,578 | | | $ | 411,461 | | | $ | 8,263,374 | |
Gross Profit | | | 906,055 | | | | 2,053,024 | | | | 85,567 | | | | 45,963 | | | | 3,090,609 | |
Order Backlog | | | 32,894,437 | | | | 4,016,761 | | | | 1,883,922 | | | | — | | | | 38,795,120 | |
(K) Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for long-lived assets under the Statements of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 142 and 144 “Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 142 and 144”). In accordance with SFAS No. 142 and 144, long-lived assets, goodwill and certain identifiable intangible assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets.
(L) Reclassification
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
(M) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement 109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(N) Stock Option Policy
The Company accounts for stock options and warrants under SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, defines a fair value method of accounting for stock options and similar equity instruments. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period.
(O) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments and SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets were recently issued. SFAS 155 and 156 have no current applicability to the Company and have no effect on the financial statements.
6
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
| | |
NOTE 2 | | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND IN-PROCESS BILLINGS |
| | |
| | Accounts receivable consist of billed and unbilled accounts under contracts in progress with governmental units, principally with the Department of Defense and the Government of Israel. The components of accounts receivable at June 30, 2006 were: |
| | | | |
Billed | | $ | 2,806,677 | |
Unbilled | | | 12,840,691 | |
| | | |
| | | 15,647,368 | |
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (9,404 | ) |
| | | |
Total | | $ | 15,637,964 | |
| | | |
| | |
| | Unbilled accounts receivable relates to work that has been performed for which billings have not been presented to customers. It is anticipated that the unbilled amounts will be collected within the current fiscal year. |
| | |
| | Accounts receivable from the U.S. Government at June 30, 2006 was $1,773,589 which is included in billed receivables, and unbilled receivables of $3,118,492. |
| | |
| | Billed accounts receivable also includes $811,534 from a foreign government, the Department of Defense, Israel. Also, in billed accounts receivable is $72,000 from the Royal Saudi Navy, Saudi Arabia. Unbilled accounts receivable for foreign governments, both Israel and Saudi Arabia is $9,678,565 at June 30, 2006. |
| | |
| | The Company received advance payments from the Israeli Department of Defense and applied it to unbilled receivables as a percentage of unbilled accounts receivable to liquidate the advance payments upon completion of the contracts under the previsions of each contract. |
| | |
| | The Company recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $-0- and $-0- for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. |
| | |
NOTE 3 | | INVENTORY |
| | |
| | Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value using the average cost method. Inventories at June 30, 2006 consist of: |
| | | | |
Raw materials | | $ | 697,445 | |
Finished goods | | | 902,414 | |
| | | |
| | $ | 1,599,859 | |
| | | |
| | |
| | The Company reviews its inventory for impairment, and as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 there were none. |
| | |
NOTE 4 | | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
| | |
| | The following is a summary of property and equipment at June 30, 2006: |
| | | | |
Furniture and fixtures | | $ | 97,010 | |
Machinery and equipment | | | 2,572,544 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 451,132 | |
| | | |
| | | 3,120,686 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | (1,635,548 | ) |
| | | |
| | $ | 1,485,138 | |
| | | |
7
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
| | |
| | Depreciation expense was $215,936 and $179,110 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
| | |
NOTE 5 | | DEVELOPMENT COSTS |
| | |
| | The Company incurred development cost associated with the development of three new product lines of $6,261,979 in 2004 and an additional $512,961 in 2005 for a total of $6,774,940. These costs are being allocated to associated contracts beginning in 2005. The cost relates to the following product lines: |
| | | | |
Keshet – Systems Integration | | $ | 3,026,140 | |
Ammunition Mortar Rounds (60,81,120 mm) | | | 854,108 | |
40mm | | | 2,894,692 | |
| | | |
| | | 6,774,940 | |
Less development cost amortization | | | (737,279 | ) |
| | | |
| | | | |
| | $ | 6,037,661 | |
| | | |
| | |
| | Total amortization expense for the six months ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, is $239,457 and $282,287, respectively. |
| | |
NOTE 6 | | NOTE PAYABLE – LINE OF CREDIT |
| | |
| | The line of credit from Bank One in the amount of $2,000,000 accrues interest at a rate of Prime less 0.75% (at June 30, 2006 – 7.25% per annum). The line of credit is secured by a letter of credit from a related company and personal property of a stockholder. At June 30, 2006, $1,999,546 was outstanding under this line. |
| | |
| | The line of credit from Bank Hapoalim in the amount of $4,000,000 accrues interest at a rate of Libor plus 1.75% (at June 30, 2006 — 6.69% per annum). The line of credit is secured by a letter of credit from a stockholder. At June 30, 2006 $3,930,000 was outstanding under this line. This line of credit was increased from $3,000,000 at December 31, 2005 to $4,000,000 at March 31, 2006. |
| | |
| | The line of credit from Bank Leumi in the amount of $500,000 accrues interest at a rate of 6.94% per annum. The line of credit is secured by a letter of credit from a stockholder. At June 30, 2006, $500,000 was outstanding under this line. |
| | |
| | The line of credit from Rockland Credit Finance has a facility limit of $7,500,000 accruing interest at 1% per month on outstanding balances plus Prime plus 2% per annum (at June 30, 2006 – 10.25%). The line of credit is secured under a Master Factoring Agreement which includes a lien on all the assets of the Company. The total amounts available under the line vary based on the total billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The total available as of June 30, 2006 was $7,500,000 based on 60% of in-process receivables and 85% of accounts receivable. At June 30, 2006, $6,660,009 was outstanding under this line. The line of credit agreement requires the Company to submit monthly and annual financial reports and stay in compliance with various state and federal laws. |
| | |
NOTE 7 | | NOTE PAYABLE – STOCKHOLDERS |
| | |
| | The Company is indebted under notes payable to two stockholders of the Company. The notes bear interest at various rates based on prime rate per annum which was 7.93% as of June 30, 2006. The stockholders waived their rights to interest under the notes and the Company recorded an in-kind contribution in the |
8
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
| | |
| | amount of $15,685 at June 30, 2006. The notes are due on December 31, 2007 and have an outstanding balance of $433,274 as of June 30, 2006. |
| | |
NOTE 8 | | EQUITY |
| | |
| | On June 6, 2005, Valentec Operating became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valentec Systems. The stockholders of Valentec Operating exchanged 100% of their stock for 5,423,130 shares of common stock in Valentec Systems. The stockholders of Valentec Operating own approximately 85% of Valentec Systems after 7,786,090 additional shares of common stock were issued on April 14, 2006, upon completion of the amendment to the articles of incorporation increasing the number of shares authorized. |
| | |
| | The capital stock of the Company was increased to 260,000,000 shares, with 250,000,000 authorized shares of common stock and 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. Committed new shares were distributed under various agreements as follows: each of Armament Systems and Global Systems received 3,893,045 shares of common stock under the Stock Purchase and Share Exchange agreement, Mr. Papiri received 70,000 shares of common stock as a finders fee under the Stock Purchase and Share Exchange agreement and Knightsbridge Securities received 685,015 shares of common stock under the SEDA financing agreement. |
| | |
| | The Company also entered into an agreement in April 2005 with an investment firm to provide up to $15,000,000 of equity per a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (SEDA). The common stock issued under the SEDA would be at 98% of market value. In addition, each advance has a 5% transaction fee. In connection with this transaction, the Company or its surviving company, issued a warrant to the investment company to acquire 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.01 per share. The warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, term of 2 years, volatility of 130% and risk-free rate of 4.05%. The Company recorded $621,254 of fees associated with these various transactions as deferred offering costs. |
| | |
NOTE 9 | | WARRANTS |
| | |
| | On August 19, 2005,the Company issued 600,000 warrants to members of the Board of Directors for services to Purchase Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. The warrants were valued based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%, term of 2 years, volatility of 130% and risk-free interest rate of 4.05%. The Warrants became exercisable immediately and expire on August 19, 2008. |
| | |
| | Pursuant to the Stock Purchase and Share Exchange agreement between Valentec Systems and Valentec Operating, 200,000 warrants were issued to Montgomery Equity Partners at an exercise price of $0.01 per share that expire on April 28, 2007. |
| | |
| | Pursuant to the SEDA Agreement between Cornell Capital Partners and Valentec Systems, 200,000 warrants were issued to Cornell Capital Partners at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The fair value of $26,458 is recorded as deferred offering costs and will be amortized upon receipt of the SEDA funding that expire on April 28, 2007. |
| | |
NOTE 10 | | PROFIT SHARING PLAN |
| | |
| | The Company has adopted a qualified 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for all present and future eligible employees. The Company matches employee contributions, $0.50 cents for every dollar, up to 3% of salaries and may contribute a discretionary amount annually as determined by the Board of Directors. The contribution is limited to the maximum contribution allowed under the Internal Revenue Service regulations, which is presently 15% of their gross annual earnings limited to $7,000, as indexed for inflation. Employees |
9
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
vest 100% in all salary reduction contributions. The Company’s matching and discretionary contributions vest 100% after two years of service. The Company contributed $23,849 and $19,823 as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as a match to employees and did not make any annual discretionary contributions for either period.
NOTE 11RELATED PARTY
The Company’s principal stockholders also have interest in other companies whose operations are similar to those of the Company. The Company purchases and sells materials and services to these entities. Following is a summary of transactions and balances with affiliates for the periods ending June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005:
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2006 | | June 30, 2005 |
Sales to affiliates | | $ | 8,174,230 | | | $ | 1,380,105 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Due from affiliates (included in advances - stockholders in accompanying balance sheet) | | $ | 196,749 | | | $ | 196,749 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Due to related party | | $ | 1,319,711 | | | $ | 852,150 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Advance payment on a contract – related party | | $ | 2,329,872 | | | $ | 2,453,788 | |
For the period ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, consulting fees of $60,000 and $ -0- respectively, were paid to a related party, who is also a principal stockholder and director of the Company.
The Company paid consulting fees to TSC Consulting Services which is owned by a related party and a member of the Board of Directors. For the period ending June 30, 2006 and 2005, the consulting fees paid were $60,963 and $44,316, respectively.
NOTE 12CONTRACT STATUS
The Company has provided products and services to the government under fixed price contracts. In these types of contracts, prices are not subject to any adjustment on the basis of costs incurred to perform the required work under the technical data package (TDP). The award of any negotiated contract in excess of $100,000 ($500,000 for Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Coast Guard) with certain exemptions as provided by regulation, requires certification by the contractor that cost and pricing data used to negotiate the final price is current, accurate and complete. This certification entitles the government to a price adjustment, including profit or fee, of any significant amount by which the price was increased because of defective data. The Company is also restricted in the amount it can bill under each contract until it has passed its first article (inspection) test. That limit is 10% of the contract amount. The Company, in the normal course of business, periodically reviews its cost estimates on all contracts. In the opinion of management, the potential for any price adjustment on open contracts is remote and, if adjusted, would not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations for the period.
Backlog -The Company has authorized contracts on hand for which work is in progress at June 30, 2006 approximately as follows:
| | | | |
Total contract price of initial contract awards including exercised options and approved change orders (modifications) | | $ | 33,144,964 | |
Completed to date | | | 10,742,812 | |
| | | |
Authorized backlog | | $ | 22,334,495 | * |
| | | |
| | |
* | | Included in this amount is $19,390,941 in authorized backlog from a related party (Soltam Systems). |
10
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
NOTE 13COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
(A) Litigation
Prior to the expiration of the facilities management agreement with the Louisiana National Guard, certain employees involved in plant security duty were members of the International Guard Unit of America (I.G.U.A.) Local 81. With the expiration of the agreement and the resulting loss of employment, these employees filed a union membership grievance (December 28, 2004) with the Company, which has been turned over to the American Arbitration Association. The Company feels the claim is without merit and any ruling by the American Arbitration Association would have minimum impact on earnings.
Pursuant to a 1994 environmental class action settlement, Valentec Dayron Company (currently Valentec Operating Systems) along with Boise Cascade Company, Dictaphone Company, Harris Company, Martin Marietta Company, Medalist Industries, Inc and Rockwell International, Inc (herein Members) signed the Woodco Site Custody Account Agreement, dated October 5, 1994 as amended January 28, 2005 which established the “Woodco Site Custody Account” for the purposes of disbursing funds necessary to satisfy the obligations of the Members. Valentec’s current obligation is $3,474 per year for ten years from the date of the Amendment above.
There is no other litigation or outstanding claims by or against the Company.
(B) Employment Agreement
The Company entered into a two year employment agreement with Robert A. Zummo, CEO, effective as of January 1, 2006 with automatic one-year extensions. The Company agrees to pay Mr. Zummo a base salary of $520,000, and benefits such as an annual car allowance of approximately $10,380, reimbursement of telephone expenses, health, dental and life insurance as set forth in the employment agreement.
(C) Capital Lease
During March 2006, the Company entered into two capital leases. The lease for manufacturing equipment of $74,799 requires 60 monthly payments of $1,538 and the lease for computer equipment of $12,103 requires 48 payments of $300. Both leases are secured by the related assets and allow the company to purchase the assets at the end of the lease for $1. The effective interest rate on both leases is approximately 8.66%.
Future minimum lease payments are as follows:
| | | | |
Year ending December 31, | | Capital Leases | |
2006 | | $ | 11,223 | |
2007 | | | 22,055 | |
2008 | | | 22,055 | |
2009 | | | 22,055 | |
2010 | | | 18,500 | |
2011 | | $ | 5,718 | |
| | | |
Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 101,606 | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Less amounts representing interest | | | (19,783 | ) |
| | | |
Present value of net minimum capital lease payments | | $ | 81,823 | |
| | | |
Less current portion of capital lease obligations | | | (10,074 | ) |
| | | |
Capital lease obligations less current portion | | $ | 71,749 | |
| | | |
Interest expense related to capital lease obligations was $5,079 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
11
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
NOTE 14CONCENTRATIONS
The Company’s future operating results may be affected by a number of factors.
(A) Revenue and Receivables
The Company’s operations are dependent on governmental funding of defense and ammunition projects. Significant changes in the level of government funding of these projects could have a favorable or unfavorable impact on the operating results of the Company. During the first and second quarter of 2006, the Company had two customers which made up 98% of total sales in 2006 and 100% of total sales in 2005, the U.S. Army and the Israeli Department of Defense (through a related party entity located in Israel).
(B) Suppliers
The Company is dependent upon a number of major suppliers. If a major supplier were to cease doing business, the Company could be adversely affected to the extent the supplier could not be replaced. The Company is dependent on some sole source suppliers. As of June 30, 2006 and 2005, no one supplier represented more than 10% of purchases.
(C) Materials
If a critical supplier had operational problems or ceased making material available to the Company, operations could be adversely affected. In some cases, materials are supplied by sole source vendors, for which the Company does not have a replacement vendor.
(D) Foreign Operations
The Company sells to various foreign customers. The sales to one foreign customer were 76% in 2006 and 42% in 2005. Significant changes in the level of government funding of these projects could have a favorable or unfavorable impact on the operating results of the Company.
NOTE 15GOING CONCERN
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $6,137,307, net loss of $2,096,523 and negative cash flow from operations of $3,773,082. The Company currently does not have enough cash to continue operations for twelve months. However, management has made significant cost reductions to improve cash flow and working capital. The Company has increased the line of credit with Rockland Credit Finance from $7.5 million to $10 million and increased the base of borrowing from 80% to 90% on billed accounts receivable and 60% to 70% on unbilled accounts receivable. Lender will consider increases in the Total Facility up to $15 million. The Company plans to reduce overall outstanding lines of credit by 74% within the next twelve months with cash from operations on previously executed contracts. The Company is also considering a number of alternative financing arrangements that could provide a capital
12
VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
structure that would enable the Company to more efficiently manage its internal growth plans as well as providing funds for strategic acquisitions. Management believes that actions presently being taken will provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern and remain a viable growing Company.
NOTE 16SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 1, 2006, the Company has increased the line of credit with Rockland Credit Finance from $7.5 million to $10 million and increased the base of borrowing from 80% to 90% on billed accounts receivable and 60% to 70% on unbilled accounts receivable. Lender will consider increasing Total Facility up to $15 million based on collateral formula to support the Companies growth. The Company will provide the available funding needed to support future anticipated growth.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information included or incorporated by reference in this filing may contain forward-looking statements. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “believe”, “intend”, or “project”, or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.
This filing contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding, among other things, (a) our projected sales and profitability, (b) our growth strategies, (c) anticipated trends in our industry, (d) our future financing plans and (e) our anticipated needs for working capital. These statements may be found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations” and “Business”, as well as in this filing generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and matters described in this filing generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur.
OVERVIEW
Valentec Systems, Inc. is a proven supplier of conventional ammunition, pyrotechnic and related defense products, including systems management and integration programs. Valentec operates in three (3) segments:
| ¨ | | Systems Management/Integration segment consists of 120mm Mortar Weapon System with Electronic Fire Control and mortar ammunition consisting of 120mm, 81mm and 60mm. The Company will pursue contracts from foreign governments for vehicle integration and mortar ammunition. |
|
| ¨ | | Energetic Manufacturing segment consists of 40mm flares and simulators. Valentec is a producer of various flares and simulators with multiple end uses, such as illumination, signaling and, training purposes to simulate a battlefield environment. The Company will pursue contracts from the U. S. Army. |
|
| ¨ | | Metal Parts Manufacturing segment consists of 105mm Spiral Wrapped Cartridge Cases which are used by the U.S. Armed forces in battlefield. The Company is currently marketing this product with foreign governments and is also actively fulfilling a contract with the U. S. Army. The Company will pursue additional contracts with U. S. governments. |
Energetic Manufacturing accounted for 22% of the gross revenue with Systems Management/Systems Integration and Metal Parts Manufacturing accounting for 76% and 2% respectively as of June 30, 2006. The backlog at June 30, 2006 was Energetic Manufacturing $2,121,233 (9%), Systems/Management Systems Integration $19,390,941 (87%) and Metal Parts Manufacturing $822,321 (7%) for a total of $22,334,495.
Valentec plans to make investments in bids and proposal activity that, if successful, will significantly increase backlog, future sales and future profits. We intend to bid on new U.S. Army systems ammunition requirements as well as new energetic and metal component requirements. We also intend to make investments in automation equipment for the energetic production that may improve efficiencies and future profits.
The Company continues to evaluate potential acquisitions that could bring value added to Valentec in terms of increased revenue, profits, cost savings, management talent and diversification.
The name of the Company was changed from “Acorn Holding Corp. to “Valentec Systems, inc.” on April 10, 2006. The name of its owned subsidiary was changed from “Valentec Systems, Inc.” to “Valentec Operating Corp.” on the same date. The Company is a Delaware corporation.
14
RESULTS OF OPERATION
Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were $4,769,921 compared to $4,382,326 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 8.8%. Total gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $547,785 (or 11.4% of total revenue) compared to $1,904,528 (or 43.5% of total revenue) for the three months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of 32.1%. The increase in revenues is due to the commencement of sales of previously executed contracts. The decrease in gross profit is due to completion of contracts with lower margins and further development costs under these contracts, which incurred losses due to the Company incurring development cost to become a key supplier of certain United States Department of Defense ammunition. The Company has a backlog of $22,334,495 which does not include the options on the current contracts that have a reasonable chance of being exercised. This backlog excludes the Company’s projection for future Foreign Military Sales (FMS).
Cost of goods sold during the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $4,222,136 compared to $2,477,798 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 70.4%. Total indirect cost (overhead and general and administrative) for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $2,094,092 compared to $1,439,319 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 45.5%. The increase in cost of goods and indirect cost is due to increased production of previously executed contracts. General and administrative expenses also increased due to an increase in costs associated with public filings and exchange requirements. The Company has implemented cost reductions in overhead and general and administrative, which will significantly reduce these expenses for the remainder of 2006 and into 2007.
Other expense (interest expense less interest income and miscellaneous income) was $430,308 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $8,177 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 5,162%. The increase is due to an increase in the Company’s interest expense as a result of an increase in lines of credit used to finance current production.
The Company had a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2006 of $1,976,615 compared to a net income of $445,665 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The loss was due primarily to approximately $2.2 million of one-time development cost. Although these one-time development cost have a negative effect on the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company believes the process refinements and developments that caused these one-time costs are the primary reason that the Company was selected as a supplier for a major multi-year program to the United States Army. The Company also had an increase in interest expense and financing expense to support the foreign military programs. General and administrative expenses also increased due to an increase in costs associated with public filings and exchange requirements. On June 23, 2006, the Company activated cost saving elements to reduce overhead and general and administrative expenses to offset the losses incurred on these contracts over the next six months.
Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $10,742,812 compared to $8,263,374 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 30%. Total gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 2,499,205 (or 23.2% of total revenue) compared to $3,090,609 (or 37.4% of total revenue) for the six months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of 14.2%. The increase in revenues is due to the commencement of sales of previously executed contracts. The decrease in gross profit is due to completion of contracts with lower margins and further development costs under these contracts, which incurred losses due to the Company incurring development cost to become a key supplier of certain United States Department of Defense ammunitions. The Company has a strong backlog of $22,334,495 which does not include the options on the current contracts that have a reasonable chance of being exercised. This backlog excludes the Company’s projection for future Foreign Military Sales (FMS).
Cost of goods sold during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $8,243,607 compared to $5,172,765 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase 59.4%. Total indirect cost (overhead and general and administrative) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $3,776,515 compared to $2,484,802 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 52%. The increase of cost of goods and indirect cost is due to increased production of previously executed contracts. General and administrative expenses also increased due to an increase in costs associated with public filings and exchange requirements. The Company has implemented cost reductions in overhead and general and administrative, which will significantly reduce these expenses for the remainder of 2006 and into 2007.
Other expense (interest expense less interest income and miscellaneous income) was $819,213 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $101,827 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of 705%. The increase is due to an increase in the Company’s interest expense as a result of an increase in lines of credit used to finance current production.
The Company had a net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $2,096,524 compared to a net income of $503,980 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The loss was due primarily to approximately $2.2 million of one-time development cost. Although these one-time development cost have a negative effect on the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company believes the process refinements and developments that caused these one-time costs are the primary reason that
15
the Company was selected as a supplier for a major multi-year program to the United States Army. The Company also had an increase in interest expense and financing expense to support the foreign military programs. General and administrative expenses also increased due to an increase in costs associated with public filings and exchange requirements. On June 23, 2006, the Company activated cost saving elements to reduce overhead and general and administrative expenses to offset the losses incurred on these contracts over the next six months.
At June 30, 2006 the Company had total assets of $25,432,350. This is an increase from total assets of $22,676,291 at December 31, 2005.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company had a negative cash flow from operations of $3,773,082 as compared to a negative cash flow from operations of $565,482 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2006, the Company had outstanding borrowings (non-related party) of $13,089,555.
The Company’s sources and uses of funds were as follows: (1) it used net cash of $3,773,082 in its operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006; (2) it used cash of $123,881 in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006; and (3) it received $4,020,856 from financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006, consisting primarily of proceeds from the line of credit. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had net working capital deficiency of $6,137,307.
The Company is actively seeking financing alternatives for working capital, product development, marketing, and business opportunities that would enable the Company to more efficiently manage its rapid growth. In this regard, on April 28, 2005, the Company has entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (“SEDA”) with Cornell Capital Partners, L.P., (“Cornell”) whereby it can “put” to Cornell, for cash, up to $15 million in our common stock over a two-year period of time. This equity financing is viewed as increasing the Company’s chances of succeeding in its growth plans. The Company anticipates using the $15 million SEDA to support and fund expenditures for bids and proposals, capital equipment automation and acquisitions, as well as working capital growth. There can be no guarantee that it will be able to successfully “put” shares under this Standby Equity Distribution Agreement, or at what level it will be able to “put” shares, since there are numerous conditions precedent for each “put” of shares to Cornell. Therefore, the Company continues to explore additional equity and debt financings, vendor-financing programs, letters of credit for manufacturing, leasing arrangements for its products, and equity participation for media purchases that will advertise its products. Also, the Company believes that marketing and consumer awareness is central to generating monthly revenues. The Company believes that its products may have greater appeal to foreign consumers due to quality, performance and price. Over the next 24 months, the Company expects to use the Cornell proceeds to support operations and to expand its business.
The Company has entered into a Master Factoring Agreement with Rockland Credit Finance as an additional source of financing. A credit line of $7,500,000 was increased on July 1, 2006 to $10,000,000 to provide additional working capital for the Company’s operations. The Company plans to use the additional funding for facilitization, additional equipment needed to support the increased backlog. At June 30, 2006, $6,660,009 was outstanding under this line of credit. The Agreement with Rockland Credit Finance has the option to increase to $15,000,000 if the Company has the collateral of accounts receivable and unbilled accounts receivable to support the increase. The use of funds would assist in long term contracts in the interim until the Company collects through the milestone payment schedules for the long term contracts.
In addition, the Company has other lines of credit of $6,500,000 in the aggregate. At June 30, 2006, $6,429,546 was outstanding under these lines of credit.
The Company’s negative cash flow from operations and working capital deficiencies raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management has restructured the Company’s finances and improved cash flow through significant cost reductions and improved manufacturing performance to address this situation. The significant cost reductions in overhead and general and administrative expenses will significantly improve the cash flow by the year end December 31, 2006. Management believes the cost reductions that have been implemented will significantly improve cash flow and will give the Company the cash needed to continue operations. The Company plans to reduce lines of credit by 74% within the next twelve months with available operating cash generated from current backlog.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments and SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets were recently issued. SFAS 155 and 156 have no current applicability to the Company and have no effect on the financial statements.
16
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As part of our ongoing business, the Company does not participate in transactions that generate relationships which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. As of June 30, 2006, the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company re-evaluates its estimates on an on-going basis. The Company’s estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Company believes the following are its critical accounting policies which affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:
| • | | Revenue recognition via the percentage of completion method |
Revenue Recognition via the Percentage of Completion Method.We believe our most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition and cost estimation on fixed price contracts for which we use the percentage of completion method of accounting.
Under the percentage of completion method, revenue is recognized on these contracts as work progresses during the period, based on the amount of actual cost incurred during the period compared to total estimated cost to be incurred for the total contract (cost-to-cost method). Management reviews these estimates as work progresses and the effect of any change in cost estimates is reflected in cost of sales in the period in which the change is identified. If the contract is projected to create a loss, the loss accrued for and is charged to operations beginning in the period it first becomes known.
Accounting for the profit on a contract requires (1) the total contract value, (2) the estimated total cost to complete, which is equal to the sum of the actual incurred costs to date on the contract and the estimated costs to complete the contract’s scope of work, and (3) the measurement of progress towards completion. The estimated profit or loss on a contact is equal to the difference between the contract value and the estimated total cost at completion. Adjustments to original estimates are often required as work progresses under a contract, as experience is gained and as more information is obtained, even though the scope of work required under the contract may not change, or if contract modifications occur. A number of internal and external factors affect our cost of sales estimates, including labor rates and efficiency variances, material usage variances, delivery schedules and testing requirements. While we believe that the systems and procedures used by the Company, coupled with the experience of the management team, provide a sound basis for our estimates, actual results will differ from management’s estimates. The complexity of the estimation process and issues related to the assumptions, risks and uncertainties inherent with the application of the percentage of completion method affect the amounts reported in our financial statements.
17
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:
As of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to produce a reasonable level of assurance of achieving the Company’s disclosure control objectives. The Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were, in fact, adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in rules of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes In Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the evaluation of the Company’s internal controls during the Company’s last fiscal quarter, the Company‘s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer have determined that there are no changes to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
18
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On December 28, 2004, former employees of the Company, who were members of the International Guard Union of America I.G.U.A. Local 81, filed a union membership grievance. The grievance alleges violation of the collective bargaining agreement in that Valentec did not provide severance pay upon the termination of the guards. In total, the grievance asks for approximately $30,000 in termination pay to be distributed among the affected guards. The dispute has been turned over to the American Arbitration Association. We believe that the claim is without merit and any ruling by the American Arbitration Association would have minimum impact on earnings.
Pursuant to a 1994 environmental class action settlement, Valentec Dayron Corporation (currently Valentec Systems, Inc.) along with Boise Cascade Corporation, Dictaphone Corporation, Harris Corporation, Martin Marietta Corporation, Medalist Industries, Inc and Rockwell International, Inc (herein Members) signed the Woodco Site Custody Account Agreement, dated October 5, 1994 as amended January 28, 2005 which established the “Woodco Site Custody Account” for the purposes of disbursing funds necessary to satisfy the obligations of the Members. Valentec’s current obligation is $3,474 per year for ten years from the date of the Amendment above.
There is no other litigation or outstanding claims by or against the Company other than disputes arising in the ordinary course of business.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
19
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB
(a) The following exhibits are filed as part of this filing:
| | | | |
Exhibit No | | Description | | Location |
| | | | |
10.1 | | Adendum No. 2 to Master Factoring Agreement with Rockland Credit Finance. | | Provided herewith |
| | | | |
10.2 | | Rockland Credit Finance Proposed Credit Facility for Valentec Systems, Inc. | | Provided herewith |
| | | | |
31.1 | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Provided herewith |
| | | | |
32.1 | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | Provided herewith |
| (b) | | Reports of Form 8-K: |
|
| | | On April 10, 2006, the Company filed a Form 8-K reporting the Written Consent obtained by the Company on February 15, 2006, from the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting power of its common stock. The Company further reported the Definitive Information Statement and that on April 10, 2006, Valentec Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, filed an amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State to change its name from ‘Valentec Systems, Inc.’ to ‘Valentec Operating Corp.’ |
|
| | | On June, 2006, a Form 8-K was filed to report that the common stock of the Company began trading on the Nasdaq-operated Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), when the market opened on Friday, June 30, 2006. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed in its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| VALENTEC SYSTEMS, INC. | |
August 14, 2006 | By: | /s/ Robert A. Zummo | |
| | Robert A. Zummo | |
| | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | |
|
21