UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 0-24630
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
222 First Avenue East
Oskaloosa, IA 52577
Registrant’s telephone number: 641-673-8448
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Iowa | 42-1003699 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-accelerated Filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
As of August 11, 2006, there were 3,692,267 shares of common stock $5 par value outstanding.
PART I — Item 1. Financial Statements
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 14,535 | $ | 13,103 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in banks | 465 | 417 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 15,000 | 13,520 | ||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||
Available for sale at fair value | 67,529 | 74,506 | ||||||
Held to maturity (fair value of $12,055 as of June 30, 2006 and $12,925 as of December 31, 2005) | 12,253 | 12,986 | ||||||
Loans | 476,310 | 433,437 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (5,679 | ) | (5,011 | ) | ||||
Net loans | 470,631 | 428,426 | ||||||
Loan pool participations | 92,593 | 103,570 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 11,628 | 10,815 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 5,596 | 5,334 | ||||||
Goodwill | 13,405 | 13,405 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 1,262 | 1,417 | ||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance | 7,657 | 7,523 | ||||||
Other real estate owned | 440 | 2,473 | ||||||
Other assets | 3,413 | 2,357 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 701,407 | $ | 676,332 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||
Demand | $ | 47,233 | $ | 50,309 | ||||
Interest-bearing checking | 64,764 | 65,435 | ||||||
Savings | 115,338 | 115,218 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 285,012 | 274,283 | ||||||
Total deposits | 512,347 | 505,245 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased | 14,670 | 7,575 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 94,100 | 83,100 | ||||||
Notes payable | 4,550 | 6,100 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 1,957 | 1,672 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 3,610 | 3,944 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 641,544 | 617,946 | ||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
Common stock, $5 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 4,912,849 shares as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 | 24,564 | 24,564 | ||||||
Capital surplus | 12,883 | 12,886 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost, 1,223,221 shares as of June 30, 2006, and 1,211,462 shares as of December 31, 2005 | (17,302 | ) | (16,951 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 40,908 | 38,630 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,190 | ) | (743 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 59,863 | 58,386 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 701,407 | $ | 676,332 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
PART I — Item 1. Financial Statements, Continued
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Interest income: | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 8,238 | $ | 6,533 | $ | 16,112 | $ | 12,662 | |||||||
Interest and discount on loan pool participations | 2,183 | 2,583 | 4,792 | 5,339 | |||||||||||
Interest on bank deposits | 8 | 1 | 15 | 3 | |||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold | — | 6 | 3 | 12 | |||||||||||
Interest on investment securities: | |||||||||||||||
Available for sale | 662 | 739 | 1,323 | 1,511 | |||||||||||
Held to maturity | 123 | 128 | 247 | 231 | |||||||||||
Total interest income | 11,214 | 9,990 | 22,492 | 19,758 | |||||||||||
Interest expense: | |||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits: | |||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking | 92 | 76 | 178 | 151 | |||||||||||
Savings | 656 | 390 | 1,197 | 747 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 2,728 | 1,802 | 5,254 | 3,508 | |||||||||||
Interest on federal funds purchased | 175 | 84 | 245 | 117 | |||||||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 1,044 | 957 | 1,991 | 1,974 | |||||||||||
Interest on notes payable | 89 | 124 | 194 | 250 | |||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt | 232 | 182 | 445 | 347 | |||||||||||
Total interest expense | 5,016 | 3,615 | 9,504 | 7,094 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 6,198 | 6,375 | 12,988 | 12,664 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | — | 108 | — | 299 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 6,198 | 6,267 | 12,988 | 12,365 | |||||||||||
Noninterest income: | |||||||||||||||
Deposit service charges | 586 | 392 | 1,060 | 743 | |||||||||||
Other customer service charges and fees | 157 | 197 | 313 | 375 | |||||||||||
Brokerage commissions | 288 | 137 | 539 | 290 | |||||||||||
Insurance commissions | 236 | 30 | 385 | 54 | |||||||||||
Data processing income | 57 | 54 | 109 | 102 | |||||||||||
Mortgage origination fees | 142 | 113 | 246 | 179 | |||||||||||
Other operating income | 136 | 212 | 515 | 396 | |||||||||||
Loss on sale of available for sale securities | — | (44 | ) | (126 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||
Total noninterest income | 1,602 | 1,091 | 3,041 | 2,085 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense: | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 2,981 | 2,921 | 6,128 | 5,332 | |||||||||||
Net occupancy expense | 852 | 848 | 1,739 | 1,734 | |||||||||||
Data processing expense | 123 | 124 | 230 | 223 | |||||||||||
Professional fees | 164 | 210 | 340 | 374 | |||||||||||
Other intangible asset amortization | 77 | 73 | 155 | 147 | |||||||||||
Other operating expense | 1,118 | 873 | 2,057 | 1,689 | |||||||||||
Total noninterest expense | 5,315 | 5,049 | 10,649 | 9,499 | |||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 2,485 | 2,309 | 5,380 | 4,951 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 830 | 778 | 1,806 | 1,690 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,655 | $ | 1,531 | $ | 3,574 | $ | 3,261 | |||||||
Earnings per common share - basic | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.87 | |||||||
Earnings per common share - diluted | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.85 | |||||||
Dividends per common share | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.34 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
PART I — Item 1. Financial Statements, Continued
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited) (in thousands) | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,655 | $ | 1,531 | $ | 3,574 | $ | 3,261 | |||||||
Other comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities available for sale: | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the period, net of tax | (402 | ) | 210 | (526 | ) | (334 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income, net of tax | — | 28 | 79 | 34 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) gain, net of tax | (402 | ) | 238 | (447 | ) | (300 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,253 | $ | 1,769 | $ | 3,127 | $ | 2,961 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
PART I — Item 1. Financial Statements, Continued
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited) (in thousands, except per share amounts) | Common Stock | Capital Surplus | Treasury Stock | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 | $ | 24,564 | 12,956 | (15,640 | ) | 35,085 | (35 | ) | 56,930 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 3,261 | — | 3,261 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses arising during the year on securities available for sale | — | — | — | — | (334 | ) | (334 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax | — | — | — | — | 34 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | 3,261 | (300 | ) | 2,961 | |||||||||||
Dividends paid ($.34 per share) | — | — | (1,280 | ) | — | (1,280 | ) | |||||||||||
Stock options exercised (28,979 shares) | — | (43 | ) | 391 | — | — | 348 | |||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased (40,000 shares) | — | — | (747 | ) | — | — | (747 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2005 | $ | 24,564 | 12,913 | (15,996 | ) | 37,066 | (335 | ) | 58,212 | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 | $ | 24,564 | 12,886 | (16,951 | ) | 38,630 | (743 | ) | 58,386 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 3,574 | — | 3,574 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses arising during the period on securities available for sale | — | — | — | — | (526 | ) | (526 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax | — | — | — | — | 79 | 79 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | — | 3,574 | (447 | ) | 3,127 | |||||||||||
Dividends paid ($.35 per share) | — | — | — | (1,296 | ) | — | (1,296 | ) | ||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | — | 10 | 112 | — | 122 | |||||||||||||
Stock options exercised (15,241 shares) | — | (13 | ) | 214 | — | — | 201 | |||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased (35,000 shares) | — | — | (677 | ) | — | — | (677 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2006 | $ | 24,564 | 12,883 | (17,302 | ) | 40,908 | (1,190 | ) | 59,863 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
PART I — Item 1. Financial Statements, Continued
MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited) (dollars in thousands) | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 3,574 | $ | 3,261 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 961 | 1,108 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | — | 299 | ||||||
Loss on sale of available for sale investment securities | 126 | 54 | ||||||
Gain on sale of premises and equipment | — | (2 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 122 | — | ||||||
Amortization of investment securities and loan premiums | 202 | 368 | ||||||
Accretion of investment securities and loan discounts | (42 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets | 581 | (1,270 | ) | |||||
Increase in other liabilities | 208 | 237 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 5,732 | 4,012 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Investment securities available for sale: | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales | 6,476 | 4,990 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities | 9,075 | 11,878 | ||||||
Purchases | (9,575 | ) | (9,072 | ) | ||||
Investment securities held to maturity: | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturities | 714 | 154 | ||||||
Purchases | — | (4,806 | ) | |||||
Net increase in loans | (42,183 | ) | (16,837 | ) | ||||
Purchases of loan pool participations | (11,767 | ) | (20,266 | ) | ||||
Resale of loan pool participations | — | 2,326 | ||||||
Principal recovery on loan pool participations | 22,744 | 20,581 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment | (1,619 | ) | (1,393 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment | — | 2 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (26,135 | ) | (12,443 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | 7,102 | (8,991 | ) | |||||
Net increase in federal funds purchased | 7,095 | 24,755 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 44,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances | (33,000 | ) | (22,000 | ) | ||||
Advances on notes payable | 450 | 1,600 | ||||||
Principal payments on notes payable | (2,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits related to stock options | 8 | — | ||||||
Dividends paid | (1,296 | ) | (1,280 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 201 | 348 | ||||||
Purchases of treasury stock | (677 | ) | (747 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 21,883 | 7,685 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,480 | (746 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 13,520 | 15,415 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 15,000 | $ | 14,669 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 9,219 | $ | 6,953 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 2,511 | $ | 2,262 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and the consolidated statements of condition as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 include the accounts and transactions of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (“Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, MidWestOne Bank (“Bank”), MidWestOne Investment Services, Inc. (“MWI”), Cook & Son Agency, Inc. (“Cook & Son”) and MIC Financial, Inc. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Although management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these interim consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s most recent audited financial statements and notes thereto. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2006, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
The results for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 may not be indicative of results for the year ending December 31, 2006, or for any other period.
2. | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
In the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks, and federal funds sold.
3. | Income Taxes |
Federal income tax expense for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was computed using the consolidated effective federal tax rate. The Company also recognized income tax expense pertaining to state franchise taxes payable individually by the subsidiary bank.
4. | Earnings Per Common Share |
Basic earnings per common share computations are based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock actually outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was 3,702,483 and 3,764,908, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was 3,704,396 and 3,764,315, respectively. Diluted earnings per share amounts are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding and all dilutive potential shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share used a weighted average number of shares outstanding of 3,775,948 and 3,844,517 for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding was 3,773,069 and 3,850,162 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The following table presents the computation of earnings per common share for the respective periods:
Quarter Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Earnings per Share Information: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period | 3,702,483 | 3,764,908 | 3,704,396 | 3,764,315 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period including all dilutive potential shares | 3,775,948 | 3,844,517 | 3,773,069 | 3,850,162 | ||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 1,655,000 | $ | 1,531,000 | $ | 3,574,000 | $ | 3,261,000 | ||||
Earnings per share – basic | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.41 | $ | .96 | $ | .87 | ||||
Earnings per share – diluted | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.40 | $ | .95 | $ | .85 |
7
5. | Effect of New Financial Accounting Standards |
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (“SFAS No. 154”), replacing APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting for Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” Unless specified in an accounting standard, SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principles and correction of errors. SFAS No. 154 became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 154 on January 1, 2006. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the results of operation or the financial condition of the Company.
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (“SFAS No. 155”). SFAS No. 155 is an amendment of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” This Statement eliminates the exemption from applying Statement No. 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments. The Statement also allows an entity to elect fair value measurement at acquisition, at issuance or when a previously recognized financial instrument is subject to a remeasurement event, at an instrument-by-instrument basis. SFAS No. 155 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2007. The Company does not expect this Statement to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets” (“SFAS No. 156”). SFAS No. 156 is an amendment of SFAS No. 140 that requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset and requires each servicing asset or liability to be initially measured at fair value. Entities are permitted to choose the fair value measurement method or the amortization method for subsequent reporting periods. SFAS No. 156 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2007. The Company does not expect this statement to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Income Tax Uncertainties” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 supplements SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” by defining the threshold for recognizing the benefits in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable taxing authority. The benefit recognized for a tax position that meets the “more-likely-than-not” criterion is measured based on the largest benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized, taking into consideration the amount and probabilities of the outcomes upon settlement. The Company will adopt FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. Adoption of FIN 48 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.
6. | Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A significant estimate that is particularly sensitive to change is the allowance for loan losses.
7. | Acquisition of Insurance Agency |
On September 1, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of Cook & Son, a full-service insurance agency in Pella, Iowa. The acquisition was a purchase transaction with the Company acquiring Cook & Son’s net assets of $396,000 in exchange for $830,000 in cash and 4,393 shares of the Company’s stock with a fair market value of $82,000, resulting in the recording of goodwill of $249,000 and other intangible assets of $404,000. Cook & Son’s results of operations from September 1, 2005 are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
8. | Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS No. 123R”) on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123R requires that the cost resulting from stock option awards be recognized in the financial statements. The Company is utilizing the “modified prospective” transition method to measure the cost of the awards over the remaining vesting period for those options that had been granted prior to January 1, 2006 and were not fully vested as of that date. The expense will be based on the fair value determined at the grant date. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for this plan. Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized in the financial statements for the stock options prior to January 1, 2006. Results for periods prior to January 1, 2006 have not been restated.
8
Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock incentive plan been determined in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, the Company’s net income and earnings per share for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2005 would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Moths Ended June 30, 2005 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 | |||||
Net income (dollars in thousands): | ||||||
As reported | $ | 1,531 | $ | 3,261 | ||
Pro forma | 1,446 | 3,091 | ||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||
As reported – basic | $ | .41 | $ | .87 | ||
As reported – diluted | $ | .40 | $ | .85 | ||
Pro forma – basic | $ | .38 | $ | .82 | ||
Pro forma – diluted | $ | .39 | $ | .83 |
The Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan reserved up to 550,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to options or other awards which may be granted to officers, key employees and certain non-employee directors of the Company. The compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors determines the award of options. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The options’ maximum term is ten years, with vesting occurring at the rate of thirty-three percent on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, sixty-six percent vesting on the two-year anniversary, and one hundred percent vesting on the three-year anniversary of the date of the grant. No awards were made pursuant to the 1998 Plan in the first six months of 2006. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a total of 88,478 shares available for future grants under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
The shareholders of the Company approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan at the annual meeting of shareholders on April 28, 2006. The Company’s board of directors had adopted the plan on February 16, 2006. The 2006 Plan reserves up to 250,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to options and restricted stock units which may be granted to officers and key employees of the Company as determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors. The plan also provides that each non-employee director of the Company be awarded 1,000 stock options as of the date of each annual meeting of shareholders of the Company. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The options’ maximum term is ten years, with vesting occurring at the rate of thirty-three percent on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, sixty-six percent vesting on the two-year anniversary, and one hundred percent vesting on the three-year anniversary of the date of the grant. The plan also provides that 1,000 shares of restricted stock are awarded to existing non-employee directors of the Company upon the adoption of the plan. Any non-employee director subsequently elected to the board will be awarded 1,000 restricted shares of stock upon their initial election to the board of directors. The restricted stock units awarded to non-employee directors will vest thirty-three percent upon the first anniversary of the date of grant, an additional thirty-three percent upon the second anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining thirty-four percent upon the third anniversary of the date of grant. Each portion of the restricted shares will not, however, be transferable until the third anniversary after such portion vests. Upon adoption of the plan by the shareholders on April 28, 2006, each of the eight existing non-employee directors was awarded 1,000 shares of restricted stock and 1,000 stock options at the exercise price of $19.07. A total of 16,000 shares were utilized for these awards. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had a total of 234,000 shares available for future grants under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.
A total of 8,000 stock options were issued to non-employee directors through the first six months of 2006 in accordance with the terms of 2006 Stock Option Plan. These options were granted at the exercise price of $19.07, which was the closing stock price on the date of grant. The fair value of each option of $2.64 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. The expected dividend yield of 3.92 percent was calculated based on the historical annual dividends paid by the Company and the average closing stock price for the 60 month-ends preceding the date of grant. Expected volatility of .169 was based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over the past five years preceding the date of grant. Historical experience was utilized to determine the expected life of the stock options, which is 5.2 years. The risk-free interest rate of 4.90 percent used was the rate on a 5 year Treasury bond as of the grant date. All inputs into the Black-Scholes model are estimates at the time of grant. Actual results in the future could differ from these estimates, however such results would not impact future reported net income. Compensation expense related to the options awarded is based on the fair value of the options and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period of the options.
9
As of June 30, 2006, the Company had $279,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested stock options. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
During the first six months of 2006 a total of 15,241 options were exercised. The weighted-average exercise price of these options was $12.62 and the intrinsic value totaled $93,000. The excess tax benefit recognized on the exercise of these options totaled $8,000.
Information concerning the issuance of stock options is presented in the following table:
Number of Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 | 571,732 | $ | 16.56 | |||
Granted | 8,000 | 19.07 | ||||
Exercised | (15,241 | ) | 12.62 | |||
Forfeited or Expired | (3,162 | ) | 22.00 | |||
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 561,329 | $ | 16.67 | |||
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 | 421,776 | $ | 15.88 |
As of June 30, 2006, exercisable stock options had a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 5.2 years and aggregate intrinsic value of $1,512,000.
In accordance with the provisions of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan adopted by the shareholders on April 28, 2006, the Company issued 1,000 restricted stock units to each of the 8 non-employee directors of the Company as of the date of adoption of the plan. A total of 8,000 restricted stock units were issued from shares held in treasury at the current market price of $19.07 per share. The vesting and terms of these restricted stock units is discussed previously in the description of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Total share-based compensation amount related to the issuance of these restricted stock units was $153,000. This amount will be recognized as share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the 3 years from the date of issuance to coincide with the vesting schedule of these restricted stock units. Unrecognized compensation cost of the restricted stock units was $145,000 as of June 30, 2006 that will be recognized over the remaining 34 months of the vesting period.
Total compensation expense recognized under share-based payment arrangements for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $64,000 and $121,000, respectively. The amount of related income tax benefit for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $6,000 and $9,000, respectively. Compensation expense related to the stock options awarded to employees and non-employee directors was $56,000 and $113,000 for the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Compensation expense related to the director restricted stock units totaled $8,000 for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006.
The Company has a policy of utilizing treasury stock to satisfy share option exercises and the award of restricted stock units. As of June 30, 2006, the Company held 1,223,221 shares in treasury. The Company has periodically repurchased shares on the open market for the treasury.
9. | Reclassifications |
Certain minor reclassifications of noninterest income have been made to prior year consolidated statements of income in order to conform to current year presentation.
10
PART I — Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
OVERVIEW
The following discussion is provided for the consolidated operations of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (“Company”), which includes its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, MidWestOne Bank (“Bank”), its wholly-owned investment brokerage subsidiary, MidWestOne Investment Services, Inc. (“MWI”) and its wholly-owned insurance agency, Cook & Son Agency, Inc. (“Cook & Son”). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company operated four wholly-owned banking subsidiaries that included MidWestOne Bank & Trust, Central Valley Bank, Pella State Bank and MidWestOne Bank. Effective January 1, 2006, the four bank subsidiaries were merged into MidWestOne Bank & Trust with the name of the resulting bank changed to MidWestOne Bank. The Company acquired Cook & Son on September 1, 2005. The results of operation for the second quarter and the first six months of 2005 do not include results from the insurance agency. On January 23, 2006, the Bank opened a branch location in Davenport, Iowa, which has contributed to the growth of loans in 2006. The discussion focuses on the consolidated results of operations for the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in 2005, and on the consolidated financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
QUARTER ended June 30, 2006
The Company earned net income of $1,655,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with net income of $1,531,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $124,000 or 8 percent. The increase in net income was primarily due to increased noninterest income and reduced provision for loan losses. These positive contributions to increased income were partially offset by reduced net interest income and higher noninterest expense. Interest income increased as a result of growth in the Company’s loans and higher interest rates, but was more than offset by higher interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds due to higher market interest rates and growth in deposits. Basic earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 were $.44 versus $.41 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Diluted earnings per share were $.44 for the second quarter of 2006 and $.40 for the second quarter of 2005. Weighted average shares outstanding were 3,702,483 and 3,764,908 for the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s return on average assets for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was .96 percent compared with a return of .95 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The Company’s return on average equity was 11.02 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2006 versus 10.55 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
The following table presents selected financial results and measures for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net Income | $ | 1,655,000 | $ | 1,531,000 | ||||
Average Assets | 688,353,000 | 645,891,000 | ||||||
Average Shareholders’ Equity | 60,214,000 | 58,200,000 | ||||||
Return on Average Assets | .96 | % | .95 | % | ||||
Return on Average Equity | 11.02 | % | 10.55 | % | ||||
Equity to Assets (end of period) | 8.53 | % | 8.80 | % |
11
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is computed by subtracting total interest expense from total interest income. Fluctuations in net interest income can result from the changes in the volumes of assets and liabilities as well as changes in interest rates. The Company’s net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 decreased $177,000 or 3 percent to $6,198,000 from $6,375,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Total interest income was $1,224,000 or 12 percent greater in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005 reflecting an increase in the volume and yields on loans. The additional interest income earned on loans was partially negated by a decrease in the interest and discount on loan pool participations. The overall increase in interest income was offset by higher interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds. Total interest expense for the second quarter of 2006 increased $1,401,000 or 39 percent compared with the same period in 2005 due to increased volumes and a higher cost of funds, reflecting the interest rate environment. The Company’s net interest margin on a federal tax-equivalent basis for the second quarter of 2006 declined to 3.98 percent from 4.33 percent in the second quarter of 2005. Net interest margin is a measure of the net return on interest-earning assets and is computed by dividing annualized net interest income by the average of total interest-earning assets for the period. The Company’s overall yield on earning assets rose to 7.12 percent for the second quarter of 2006 compared with 6.75 percent for the second quarter of 2005. The rate on interest-bearing liabilities increased in the second quarter of 2006 to 3.48 percent compared to 2.68 percent for the second quarter of 2005.
Interest income and fees on loans increased $1,705,000 or 26 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Average loans were $58,241,000 or 14 percent higher in the second quarter of 2006 compared with 2005, which contributed to the growth in interest income. The increase in loan volume reflects new loan originations primarily in the Cedar Falls/Waterloo and Davenport, Iowa markets. Higher interest rates in the second quarter of 2006 compared with 2005 also contributed to the additional interest income generated in 2006. The average yield on loans increased to 7.10 percent for the second quarter of 2006, compared to 6.40 percent in the second quarter of 2005. The yield on the Company’s loan portfolio is affected by the amount of nonaccrual loans (which do not earn interest income), the mix of the portfolio (real estate loans generally have a lower overall yield than commercial and agricultural loans), the effects of competition and the interest rate environment on the amounts and volumes of new loan originations, and the mix of variable rate versus fixed rate loans in the Company’s portfolio. As of June 30, 2006, approximately 44 percent of the Company’s loan portfolio is scheduled to reprice or mature within the next twelve months. Competition in the local markets served by the Company has caused the pricing of new and many existing loans to be at or near the national prime rate. Historically, the Company had been able to price many of these loans higher than prime. Recent increases in the prime rate have helped offset the competitive factors to increase the overall loan portfolio yield.
Interest and discount income on loan pool participations decreased $400,000 or 16 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. Interest income and discount collected on the loan pool participations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $2,183,000 compared with $2,583,000 collected in the three months ended June 30, 2005. The yield on loan pool
12
participations was 9.73 percent for the second quarter of 2006 compared with 10.86 percent for the same period in 2005. The average loan pool participation investment balance was $5,399,000 or 6 percent lower in the second quarter of 2006 than in 2005. These loan pool participations are pools of performing and distressed and nonperforming loans that the Company has purchased at a discount from the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the underlying loans. Income is derived from this investment in the form of interest collected and the repayment of the principal in excess of the purchase cost which is herein referred to as “discount recovery.” The Company recognizes interest income and discount recovery on the majority of its loan pool participations on a cash basis. The loan pool participations have traditionally been a high-yield activity for the Company, but this yield has fluctuated from period to period based on the amount of cash collections, discount recovery, and net collection expenses of the servicer in any given period. The income and yield on loan pool participations may vary in future periods due to the volume and discount rate on loan pools purchased. The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Position SOP 03-3, “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer,” (“SOP 03-3”)issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accounts on January 1, 2005. The adoption of SOP 03-3 has not had a material effect on the income recognized on loan pool participations. All loans that the Company had purchased prior to January 1, 2005 continue to utilize the cash basis for recognition of interest income and discount recovery. To date, the loan pool participations purchased subsequent to January 1, 2005 that are subject to the “accretable yield” income recognition requirements of SOP 03-3 have not generated significant amounts of income in excess of that which would have been recorded on a cash basis.
Interest income on investment securities decreased $82,000 or 9 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2005 due primarily to decreased balances in the portfolio. Interest income on investment securities totaled $785,000 for the second quarter of 2006 compared with $867,000 in 2005. The average balance of investments in the second quarter of 2006 was $81,355,000 versus $92,932,000 in the second quarter of 2005. The tax-equivalent yield on the Company’s investment portfolio in the second quarter of 2006 increased to 4.39 percent from 4.10 percent in the comparable period of 2005 reflecting reinvestment of maturing securities at higher market interest rates.
Interest expense on deposits was $1,208,000 or 53 percent greater in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005 due primarily to higher market interest rates and also due to increased deposit volumes. The weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 3.03 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared to 2.13 percent in the second quarter of 2005. Average interest-bearing deposits for the second quarter of 2006 were $33,994,000 or 8 percent greater compared with the same period in 2005. The Company has noted higher market rates and has increased the rates it pays on deposit accounts in response to its competition.
Interest expense on borrowed funds was $193,000 greater in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. The Company’s average borrowed funds balances were $3,108,000 higher in the second quarter of 2006 resulting in additional interest expense. Higher market interest rates in 2006 compared with 2005 also contributed to the increase in interest expense on borrowed funds. Federal funds purchased, notes payable and long-term debt are all variable-rate borrowings that are tied to various market indexes such as the federal funds rate, the national prime rate and the three-month LIBOR. Increases in all of these market rates contributed to the Company’s higher interest expense on borrowed funds in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005.
13
Federal home loan bank advances are typically fixed-rate borrowings subject to repricing at maturity. Maturing advances that were renewed were repriced at higher market rates which also contributed to the increased interest expense for the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. The weighted average rate paid on borrowed funds increased to 5.28 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared with 4.75 percent in the second quarter of 2005.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company recorded no provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2006 compared with $108,000 in the second quarter of 2005. The decrease in 2006 compared to 2005 was due to the recovery of $901,000 previously charged off agricultural loan credited to the reserve in January 2006. Loans charged off in the second quarter of 2006 totaled $114,000 or .10 percent of average loans outstanding. This compares with net charge-offs of $133,000 in the second quarter of 2005. Management determines an appropriate provision based on its evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in relationship to a continuing review of problem loans, the current economic conditions, actual loss experience and industry trends. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate based on the inherent risk in the portfolio as of June 30, 2006; however, growth in the loan portfolio and the uncertainty of the general economy require that management continue to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and make additional provisions in future periods as deemed necessary. In view of the anticipated growth in the Company’s loans and the uncertainty in the overall economic conditions, management anticipates that a quarterly provision for loan losses will likely be recorded for the remainder of the year 2006.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income results from the charges and fees collected by the Company from its customers for various services performed, data processing income received from nonaffiliated banks, miscellaneous other income, and gains (or losses) from the sale of investment securities held in the available for sale category. Total noninterest income was $511,000 or 47 percent greater in the second quarter of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $194,000 or 49 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2005 due to increased non-sufficient funds charges collected subsequent to the implementation of an overdraft protection plan late in 2005. Brokerage fees increased $151,000 from the quarter ended June 30, 2005 to $288,000 for the second quarter of 2006 due to increased sales of securities. Property and casualty insurance income (including credit life and accident & health income) was $236,000 in the second quarter of 2006 reflecting the acquisition of a full-service insurance agency on September 1, 2005. This compares with insurance commission income of $30,000 in the second quarter of 2005. Loan origination fees on single-family real estate loans that were originated by the Company and sold servicing-released to the secondary market increased to $142,000 in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $113,000 for the second quarter of 2005 due to increased origination activity. Other operating income decreased by $76,000. There were no recognized available for sale investment security losses in the second quarter of 2006 while $44,000 in recognized losses were incurred in the second quarter of 2005.
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was $266,000 or 5 percent greater compared to noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
14
Noninterest expense includes all the costs incurred to operate the Company except for interest expense, the loan loss provision and income taxes. Salaries and benefits expense for the second quarter of 2006 reflects an increase of $60,000 compared with the same period in 2005. Included in the salaries and benefits expense for the second quarter of 2005 was $136,000 in one-time cost associated with the early retirement of the executive vice president of MidWestOne Bank in Burlington. This individual was covered by an employment agreement that provided for payment of normal salary and fringe benefits for the remaining term of the employment agreement in the event of early retirement. Excluding the amount of this payout from the 2005 quarter, salaries and benefits expense for the second quarter of 2006 were $196,000 greater than in the second quarter of 2005. The increase was attributable to additional salaries and benefits expense for the acquired insurance agency, additional staff hired for the Davenport, Iowa branch location that opened on January 23, 2006, annual compensation adjustments, increased health-care insurance premium costs and share-based compensation expense. Share-based compensation expense for the second quarter of 2006 was $64,000 as a result of the adoption of FASB Statement 123R on January 1, 2006. Average full-time equivalent employees increased from 201 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 to 217 for the three months ended June 30, 2006. Other operating expenses rose $198,000 or 16 percent in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second quarter of 2005. Most of the additional expense was attributable to increased training and marketing expenditures.
Income Tax Expense
The Company incurred income tax expense of $830,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $778,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The effective income tax rate as a percent of income before taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was 33.4 percent and 33.7 percent, respectively. The effective tax rate varies from the statutory rate due to state taxes and the amount of tax-exempt income earned during the period.
SIX MONTHS ended June 30, 2006
The Company earned net income of $3,574,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with net income of $3,261,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, an increase of $313,000 or 10 percent. The increase in net income was primarily due to increased net interest income, reduced provision for loan losses and higher noninterest income. These positive contributions to increased income were partially offset by greater noninterest expense. Net interest income increased as a result of growth in the Company’s loans, higher interest rates on loans and the recovery of interest on a previously charged-off loan. Reduced interest income and discount on loan pools and higher interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds due to higher market interest rates and growth in deposits partially offset the increase in interest income attributable to loans. Basic earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $.96 versus $.87 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Diluted earnings per share were $.95 for the first half of 2006 and $.85 for the first half of 2005. Weighted average shares outstanding were 3,704,396 and 3,764,315 for the first half of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s return on average assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was 1.06 percent compared with a return of 1.02 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Company’s return on average equity was 12.06 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2006 versus 11.37 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
15
On January 6, 2006, the Company received the proceeds from the recovery of an agricultural loan that had been charged off in 2001. These proceeds included a loan principal recovery of $901,000 that was credited to the allowance for loan losses, $364,000 in interest that was recorded to interest income on loans and $50,000 credited to other loan income for the reimbursement of attorney fees incurred by the Company in 2001. The interest income and fees recovered contributed $.08 per share basic and diluted to the Company’s earnings in the first six months of 2006.
The following table presents selected financial results and measures for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Net Income | $ | 3,574,000 | $ | 3,261,000 | ||||
Average Assets | 682,230,000 | 644,948,000 | ||||||
Average Shareholders’ Equity | 59,771,000 | 57,808,000 | ||||||
Return on Average Assets | 1.06 | % | 1.02 | % | ||||
Return on Average Equity | 12.06 | % | 11.37 | % |
Net Interest Income
The Company’s net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 increased $324,000 or 3 percent to $12,988,000 from $12,664,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Total interest income was $2,734,000 or 14 percent greater in the first six months of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005 reflecting an increase in the volume and yields on loans and the recovery of the interest related to the previously charged-off loan. The additional interest income earned on loans was partially negated by a decrease in the interest and discount on loan pool participations. The overall increase in interest income was offset by higher interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds. Total interest expense for the first six months of 2006 increased $2,410,000 or 34 percent compared with the same period in 2005 due to increased volumes and a higher cost of funds, reflecting the interest rate environment. The Company’s net interest margin on a federal tax-equivalent basis for the six months ended June 30, 2006 declined to 4.25 percent from 4.32 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Company’s overall yield on earning assets rose to 7.29 percent for the first six months of 2006 compared with 6.71 percent for the first six months of 2005. The rate on interest-bearing liabilities increased in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to 3.39 percent compared to 2.65 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Interest income and fees on loans increased $3,450,000 or 27 percent in the first six months of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Included in the interest income and fees on loans for the first six months of 2006 was an additional $364,000 collected from a previously charged off loan, which contributed to the increase in interest income. Average loans were $60,799,000 or 15 percent higher in the first six months of 2006 compared with 2005, which contributed to the growth in interest income. The increase in loan volume reflects new loan originations primarily in the Cedar Falls/Waterloo and Davenport, Iowa markets. Higher interest rates in the first half of 2006 compared with 2005 also contributed to the additional interest income generated in 2006. Excluding the interest recovered on the previously charged off loan, the average yield on loans for the first six months of 2006 was 6.99 percent compared to 6.33 percent in the first half of 2005.
16
Interest and discount income on loan pool participations decreased $547,000 or 10 percent in the first half of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. Interest income and discount collected on the loan pool participations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $4,792,000 compared with $5,339,000 collected in the six months ended June 30, 2005. The yield on loan pool participations was 10.37 percent for the first half of 2006 compared with 10.88 percent for the same period in 2005. The average loan pool participation investment balance was $5,784,000 or 6 percent lower in the first half of 2006 than in 2005.
Interest income on investment securities decreased $172,000 or 10 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared with the six months ended June 30, 2005 due primarily to decreased balances in the portfolio. Interest income on investment securities totaled $1,570,000 for the first half of 2006 compared with $1,742,000 in 2005. The average balance of investments in the first half of 2006 was $81,906,000 versus $94,538,000 in the first half of 2005. The tax-equivalent yield on the Company’s investment portfolio in the first six months of 2006 increased to 4.36 percent from 4.03 percent in the comparable period of 2005 reflecting reinvestment of maturing securities at higher market interest rates.
Interest expense on deposits was $2,223,000 or 50 percent greater in the first half of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005 mainly due primarily to higher market interest rates and increased deposit volumes. The weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 2.94 percent in the first half of 2006 compared to 2.08 percent in the first half of 2005. Average interest-bearing deposits for the first six months of 2006 were $28,039,000 or 7 percent greater compared with the same period in 2005.
Interest expense on borrowed funds was $187,000 greater in the first half of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. The Company’s average borrowed funds balances were $2,853,000 lower in the first half of 2006 resulting in reduced interest expense related to volume. Higher market interest rates in 2006 compared with 2005 contributed to the overall increase in interest expense on borrowed funds. The weighted average rate paid on borrowed funds increased to 5.23 percent in the first half of 2006 compared with 4.77 percent in the first half of 2005.
Provision for Loan Losses
The Company recorded no provision for loan losses in the first six months of 2006 compared with $299,000 in the first half of 2005. The decrease in 2006 compared to 2005 was due to the recovery of the $901,000 previously charged off agricultural loan credited to the reserve in January 2006. Loans charged off in the first six months of 2006 totaled $378,000. In addition to the $901,000 recovery, other prior-period charge-offs of $145,000 were recovered, resulting in a net recovery for the first half of 2006 of $668,000. This compares with net charge-offs of $163,000 in the first half of 2005.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income was $956,000 or 46 percent greater in the first half of 2006 compared with the same period in 2005. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $317,000 or 43 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2005 due to increased non-sufficient funds charges collected subsequent to the implementation of an overdraft protection plan late in 2005. Brokerage fees increased $249,000 to $539,000 for the first half of 2006 due to increased sales of securities. Property and casualty insurance income (including credit life and accident & health income) totaled
17
$385,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with insurance commission income of $54,000 for the first six months of 2005. This increase reflects the acquisition of a full-service insurance agency on September 1, 2005. Loan origination fees on single-family real estate loans that were originated by the Company and sold servicing-released to the secondary market increased to $246,000 in the first half of 2006 compared to $179,000 for the first half of 2005 due to increased origination activity. Other operating income increased by $119,000 primarily due to the collection of attorney fees associated with the charge-off recovery. Recognized available for sale investment security losses in the first half of 2006 were $126,000 compared with $54,000 in recognized losses incurred in the first half of 2005.
Noninterest Expense
Total noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $1,150,000 or 12 percent greater compared to noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Salaries and benefits expense for the first half of 2006 reflects an increase of $796,000 or 15 percent compared with the same period in 2005. The increase was attributable to additional salaries and benefits expense for the acquired insurance agency, additional staff hired for the Davenport, Iowa branch location that opened on January 23, 2006, annual compensation adjustments, increased health-care insurance premium costs and share-based compensation expense. Share-based compensation expense for the first half of 2006 was $121,000 as a result of the adoption of FASB Statement 123R on January 1, 2006. Average full-time equivalent employees increased from 200 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 216 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Other operating expenses rose $341,000 or 15 percent in the first half of 2006 compared to the first half of 2005. Most of the increased expense in the first half of 2006 was attributable to increased training and marketing expenditures and to costs associated with the merger of the Company’s four banks into one bank charter on January 1, 2006.
Income Tax Expense
The Company incurred income tax expense of $1,806,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $1,690,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The effective income tax rate as a percent of income before taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was 33.6 percent and 34.1 percent, respectively. The effective tax rate varies from the statutory rate due to state taxes and the amount of tax-exempt income earned during the period.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets as of June 30, 2006 were $701,407,000 compared with $676,332,000 as of December 31, 2005, an increase of $25,075,000 or 4 percent. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had no federal funds sold and $14,670,000 in federal funds purchased compared with $7,575,000 purchased as of December 31, 2005. Federal funds are purchased on a short-term basis to meet liquidity needs.
Investment Securities
Investment securities available for sale totaled $67,529,000 as of June 30, 2006. This is a decrease of $6,977,000 from December 31, 2005. The proceeds from maturing and sold securities were utilized to fund growth in the Company’s loan portfolio. Investment securities classified as held to maturity declined to
18
$12,253,000 as of June 30, 2006, compared with $12,986,000 on December 31, 2005 due to maturity of municipal bonds.
Loans
Total loans were $476,310,000 as of June 30, 2006, compared with $433,437,000 as of December 31, 2005, an increase of $42,873,000 or 10 percent. Much of the growth in the first half of 2006 came from commercial and commercial real estate loans at the new Davenport, Iowa branch as well as continued growth in the Cedar Falls/Waterloo, Iowa area. As of June 30, 2006, the Company’s loan to deposit ratio was 93.0 percent compared with a year-end 2005 loan to deposit ratio of 85.8 percent. As of June 30, 2006, loans secured by real estate (including single-family, multi-family, commercial and agricultural) comprised the largest category in the portfolio at approximately 67 percent of total loans. Commercial loans were the next largest category at 18 percent. Agricultural loans were approximately 13 percent of the total loan portfolio and loans to individuals constituted approximately 3 percent.
Loan Pool Participations
As of June 30, 2006, the Company had loan pool participations of $92,593,000, a decrease of $10,977,000 or 11 percent from the December 31, 2005 balance of $103,570,000. The decrease in the loan pool participations is the result of collections of loan pool participations during the period. During the first six months of 2006, the Company purchased $11,767,000 in loan pool participations. The loan pool investment balance shown as an asset on the Company’s Statement of Condition represents the discounted purchase cost of the loan pool participations. The average loan pool participation balance of $93,169,000 for the first six months of 2006 was $5,784,000 or 6 percent lower than the average balance of $98,953,000 for the first six months of 2005.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill totaled $13,405,000 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. Goodwill is subject to testing at least annually for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” There have been no changes in the carrying value of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2006 due to impairment.
Other intangible assets decreased to $1,262,000 as of June 30, 2006 from the December 31, 2005 total of $1,417,000 reflecting the amortization of intangible assets. The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets and the associated accumulated amortization at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is presented in the table below. Amortization expense for other intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $77,000 and $73,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, intangible amortization expense was $155,000 and $147,000, respectively.
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Unamortized Intangible Assets | |||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
June 30, 2006 | |||||||||
Other intangible assets: | |||||||||
Core deposit premium | $ | 3,281 | 2,633 | 648 | |||||
Customer list intangible | $ | 786 | 172 | 614 | |||||
Total | $ | 4,067 | $ | 2,805 | $ | 1,262 | |||
December 31, 2005 | |||||||||
Other intangible assets: | |||||||||
Core deposit premium | $ | 3,281 | 2,532 | 749 | |||||
Customer list intangible | $ | 786 | 118 | 668 | |||||
Total | $ | 4,067 | $ | 2,650 | $ | 1,417 | |||
Amortization of intangible assets is recorded using an accelerated method based on the estimated life of the core deposit intangible. Projections of amortization expense are based on existing asset balances and the remaining useful lives. The following table shows the estimated future amortization expense.
Core Deposit Premium | Customer List Intangible | Totals | |||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Six months ended December 31, 2006 | $ | 83 | 51 | 134 | |||
Year ended December 31, | |||||||
2007 | 155 | 97 | 252 | ||||
2008 | 156 | 87 | 243 | ||||
2009 | 127 | 79 | 206 | ||||
2010 | 41 | 71 | 112 | ||||
2011 | 41 | 62 | 103 | ||||
Thereafter | 45 | 167 | 212 |
19
Deposits
Total deposits as of June 30, 2006 were $512,347,000 compared with $505,245,000 as of December 31, 2005, an increase of $7,102,000 or 1 percent. Certificates of deposit remain the largest category of deposits at June 30, 2006 representing approximately 56 percent of total deposits.
Borrowed Funds/Notes Payable
The Company had $14,670,000 in federal funds purchased on June 30, 2006. There were $7,575,000 in federal funds purchased on December 31, 2005. During the first six months of 2006, the Company had an average balance of federal funds purchased of $9,362,000. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaled $94,100,000 as of June 30, 2006 compared with $83,100,000 as of December 31, 2005. The Company utilizes Federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank advances as a supplement to customer deposits to fund earning assets. Notes payable decreased to $4,550,000 on June 30, 2006 compared to $6,100,000 as of December 31, 2005. Long-term debt in the form of a trust-preferred security was $10,310,000 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Nonperforming Assets
The Company’s nonperforming assets totaled $3,100,000 (.65 percent of total loans) as of June 30, 2006, compared to $5,825,000 (1.34 percent of total loans) as of December 31, 2005. The decrease in nonperforming assets is primarily due to two large credits. All nonperforming asset totals and related ratios exclude the loan pool participations. The following table presents the categories of nonperforming assets as of June 30, 2006 compared with December 31, 2005:
June 30, 2006 | December 31, 2005 | ||||
(in thousands) | |||||
Impaired loans and leases: | |||||
Nonaccrual | $ | 673 | 1,522 | ||
Restructured | 152 | 159 | |||
Total impaired loans and leases | 825 | 1,681 | |||
Loans and leases past due 90 days and more | 1,835 | 1,671 | |||
Total nonperforming loans | 2,660 | 3,352 | |||
Other real estate owned | 440 | 2,473 | |||
Total nonperforming assets | $ | 3,100 | 5,825 | ||
From December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006, the Company’s nonaccrual loans decreased $849,000. The largest portion of the decrease in nonaccrual loans is related to the remaining portion of the commercial real estate loan on a truck stop/convenience store that was placed on nonaccrual status during the third quarter of 2005. The nonaccrual portion of the loan as well as the other real estate portion of the credit was resolved during the first quarter of 2006 when the entire amount was assumed by a new borrower. No loss was incurred by the Company related to the resolution of this credit. Loans ninety days past due increased $163,000. Troubled debt restructurings decreased $6,000 from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006 as a result of payments received. Other real estate owned decreased $2,033,000 in the first half of 2006 reflecting the resolution of the truck stop/convenience store credit. The Company’s allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2006 was $5,679,000, which was 1.19 percent of total loans as of that date. This compares with an allowance for loan losses of $5,011,000 as of December 31, 2005, which was 1.16 percent of total loans. The allowance for loan losses increased $668,000 during the first half of 2006 primarily as a result of the $901,000 recovery of the previously charged-off agricultural loan received during the period. As of June 30, 2006, the allowance for loan losses was 183.22 percent of nonperforming assets compared with 86.01 percent as of December 31, 2005. Based on the inherent risk in the loan portfolio, management believes that as of June 30, 2006, the allowance for loan losses is adequate. In view of the anticipated growth in the Company’s loans and the uncertainty in the economy, management has determined that it will likely record a quarterly provision for loan losses during the second half of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recognized a net loan recovery of $668,000 compared with net charge-offs of $163,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
20
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
2006 | 2005 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 5,011 | 4,745 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | — | 299 | |||||
Recoveries on loans previously charged off | 1,046 | 227 | |||||
Loans charged off | (378 | ) | (390 | ) | |||
Balance at end of period | $ | 5,679 | 4,881 | ||||
Capital Resources
Total shareholders’ equity was 8.5 percent of total assets as of June 30, 2006 and was 8.6 percent as of December 31, 2005. The Company’s Tier 1 Capital Ratio was 10.2 percent of risk-weighted assets as of June 30, 2006 and was 10.4 percent as of December 31, 2005, compared to a 4.0 percent regulatory requirement. Risk-based capital guidelines require the classification of assets and some off-balance-sheet items in terms of credit-risk exposure and the measuring of capital as a percentage of the risk-adjusted asset totals. Tier 1 Capital is the Company’s total common shareholders’ equity plus the trust preferred security reduced by goodwill. Management believes that, as of June 30, 2006, the Company and its subsidiary bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. As of that date, the bank subsidiary was “well capitalized” under regulatory prompt corrective action provisions.
On October 20, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase of up to $2,000,000 until April 30, 2006. The Company repurchased 5,000 shares during April 2006 pursuant to this authorization. On April 30, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized another stock repurchase of up to $2,000,000 through December 31, 2006. Pursuant to this authorization, 30,000 shares totaling $581,750 were repurchased by the Company on the open market during May and June of 2006. This leaves a total of $1,419,250 available to repurchase stock through December 31, 2006. A total of 15,241 shares of common stock were issued during the first six months of 2006 for options exercised under previously awarded grants. A dividend of $.17 per share was paid to shareholders on March 15, 2006 and $.18 per share was paid on June 15, 2006.
Liquidity
Liquidity management involves meeting the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers. The Company conducts liquidity management on both a daily and long-term basis; and it adjusts its investments in liquid assets based on expected loan demand, projected loan maturities and payments, estimated cash flows from the loan pool participations, expected deposit flows, yields available on interest-bearing deposits, and the objectives of its asset/liability management program. The Company had liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents) of $15,000,000 as of June 30, 2006, compared with $13,520,000 as of December 31, 2005. Investment securities classified as available for sale could be sold to meet liquidity needs if necessary. Additionally, the bank subsidiary maintains lines of credit with correspondent banks and the Federal Home Loan Bank that would allow it to borrow federal funds on a short-term basis if necessary. The Company also maintains a line of credit with a major commercial bank that provides liquidity for the purchase of loan pool participations and other corporate needs. Management believes that the Company has sufficient liquidity as of June 30, 2006 to meet the needs of borrowers and depositors.
Commitments and Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is engaged in various issues involving litigation. Management believes that none of this litigation is material to the Company’s results of operations.
21
Acquisition of Insurance Agency
On September 1, 2005, the Company acquired Cook & Son Agency, Inc., a full-service insurance agency in Pella, Iowa. This new wholly-owned subsidiary provides property and casualty insurance services throughout the banking offices of the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company has identified two critical accounting policies and practices relative to the financial condition and results of operation. These two accounting policies relate to the allowance for loan losses and to loan pool accounting.
The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s estimate. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses in the existing portfolio. In evaluating the portfolio, management takes into consideration numerous factors, including current economic conditions, prior loan loss experience, the composition of the loan portfolio, and management’s estimate of probable credit losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loss based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio, specific impaired loans, and current economic conditions. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans on which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters, the estimated net realizable value or the fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loss experience, and other factors that warrant recognition in providing for an adequate allowance for loan losses.
The loan pool accounting practice relates to management’s estimate that the investment amount reflected on the Company’s financial statements does not exceed the estimated net realizable value or the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the purchased loans. In evaluating the purchased loan portfolio, management takes into consideration many factors, including the borrowers’ current financial situation, the underlying collateral, current economic conditions, historical collection experience, and other factors relative to the collection process.
In the event that management’s evaluation of the level of the allowance for loan losses is inadequate, the Company would need to increase its provision for loan losses. If the estimated realizable value of the loan pool participations is overstated, the Company’s yield on the loan pools would be reduced.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers, which include commitments to extend credit. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, outstanding commitments to extend credit totaled approximately $83,618,000 and $79,755,000, respectively.
22
Commitments under standby letters of credit outstanding aggregated $2,092,000 and $3,750,000 as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company does not anticipate any losses as a result of these transactions.
Contractual obligations and other commitments were presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Please refer to this discussion. There have been no material changes since that report was filed.
Part I – Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Market risk is the risk of earnings volatility that results from adverse changes in interest rates and market prices. The Company’s market risk is primarily comprised of interest rate risk arising from its core banking activities of lending and deposit taking. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates may adversely affect the Company’s net interest income. Management continually develops and applies strategies to mitigate this risk. The Company has not experienced any material changes to its market risk position since December 31, 2005, from that disclosed in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K Annual Report. Management does not believe that the Company’s primary market risk exposures and how those exposures were managed in the first six months of 2006 changed when compared to 2005.
The Company uses a third-party computer software simulation modeling program to measure its exposure to potential interest rate changes. For various assumed hypothetical changes in market interest rates, numerous other assumptions are made such as prepayment speeds on loans and securities backed by mortgages, the slope of the Treasury yield curve, the rates and volumes of the Company’s deposits and the rates and volumes of the Company’s loans. This analysis measures the estimated change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. The following table presents the Company’s projected changes in net interest income for the next twelve months for the various rate shock levels at June 30, 2006.
Rate Change | $ Change | % Change | |||||
+200 bp | $ | (635,000 | ) | -2.50 | % | ||
+100 bp | (310,000 | ) | -1.22 | ||||
BASE | 0 | 0.00 | |||||
-100 bp | 253,000 | 0.99 | |||||
-200 bp | 230,000 | 0.91 |
As shown above, at June 30, 2006, the effect of a ramped 200 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease the Company’s estimated net interest income for the next twelve months by approximately $635,000. The effect of a ramped 200 basis point decrease in rates would increase the Company’s estimated net interest income by approximately $230,000. An increase in interest rates would cause more of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities to reprice than interest-earning assets, thus reducing estimated net interest income.
Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions the Company may undertake in response to changes in interest rates.
Part I – Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive
23
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
“SAFE HARBOR” STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT
With the exception of the historical information contained in this report, the matters described herein contain forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties that individually or mutually impact the matters herein described, including but not limited to financial projections, product demand and market acceptance, the effect of economic conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, governmental regulations, results of litigation, technological difficulties and/or other factors outside the control of the Company, which are detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC reports. The Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Part II – Item 1A Risk Factors.
There were no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Part | II – Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
(a)-(b) Not Applicable
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||
April 2006 | 5,000 | $ | 19.330 | 5,000 | (a) | $ | 2,000,000 | (b) | ||||
May 2006 | 25,000 | 19.380 | 15,000 | 1,515,500 | ||||||||
June 2006 | 5,000 | 19.250 | 25,000 | 1,419,250 | ||||||||
Total | 35,000 | $ | 19.354 | 35,000 | $ | 1,419,250 | ||||||
(a) | These shares were purchased pursuant to a repurchase plan authorized on October 20, 2005. The Board had authorized the repurchase of up to $2,000,000 of the outstanding shares on the open market through April 30, 2006. As of the expiration date, $1,299,780 of the authorized repurchase was unfulfilled. |
(b) | On April 28, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $2,000,000 of the Company's common stock on the open market. This repurchase authorization expires on December 31, 2006. |
24
Part | II – Item 4. Submission of Matters to a vote of Security Holders. |
The Company’s annual meeting of shareholders was held on April 28, 2006. The record date for determination of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting was February 24, 2006. There were 3,707,308 shares outstanding as of that date, each such share being entitled to one vote. At the shareholders’ meeting the holders of 3,135,664 or 84.58 percent of the outstanding shares were represented in person or by proxy, which constituted a quorum. The following proposals were voted on at the meeting:
Proposal I - Election of Directors:
Six directors were to be elected to serve for the specified term or until their successors shall have been elected and qualified. At the shareholders’ meeting, the individuals received the number of votes set opposite their names:
FOR | VOTE WITHHELD | |||
One-year term (2007): | ||||
R. Scott Zaiser | 3,119,246 | 16,418 | ||
Two-year term (2008): | ||||
Donal D. Hill | 3,105,942 | 29,722 | ||
Three-year term (2009): | ||||
Barbara J. Kniff | 3,100,959 | 34,705 | ||
Michael R. Welter | 3,071,370 | 64,294 | ||
Robert D. Wersen | 3,113,732 | 21,932 | ||
Edward C. Whitham | 3,097,575 | 38,089 |
Proposal II - Approval of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan:
A vote was taken on the approval of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan authorizing 250,000 shares of common stock available for delivery pursuant to awards subsequent to February 16, 2006. The Plan authorizes the grant of stock option and restricted stock units. All non-employee directors were awarded 1,000 shares of restricted stock upon the shareholder approval of the 2006 Plan and all subsequent newly-elected non-employee directors will be awarded 1,000 shares upon their initial election to the board of directors. The results of the vote were as follows:
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON-VOTES | |||
1,778,992 | 287,450 | 65,760 | 1,003,462 |
Proposal III - Ratification of Auditors’ Appointment:
A vote was also taken on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The results of the vote were as follows:
FOR | AGAINST | ABSTAIN | BROKER NON-VOTES | |||
3,064,227 | 40,812 | 30,625 | 0 |
25
Part II – Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) The following exhibits and financial statement schedules are filed as part of this report:
Exhibits | ||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation, as amended through April 30, 1998, of Mahaska Investment Company. The Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of Mahaska Investment Company are incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998. | |
3.1.1 | Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Mahaska Investment Company changing the name of the corporation to MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. The Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Mahaska Investment Company are incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. | |
3.2 | Bylaws of MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (f/k/a Mahaska Investment Company). The Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mahaska Investment Company dated July 23, 1998, are incorporated by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 1998. | |
10.1 | Mahaska Investment Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust as restated and amended. This Plan & Trust is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994. | |
10.2.1 | 1993 Stock Incentive Plan. This 1993 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Form S-1 Registration Number 33-81922 of Mahaska Investment Company. | |
10.2.2 | 1996 Stock Incentive Plan. This 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996. | |
10.2.3 | 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. This 1998 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. | |
10.2.4 | 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. This 2006 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held April 28, 2006. | |
10.3 | States Resources Corp. Loan Participation and Servicing Agreement dated February 5, 1999 between States Resources Corp. and Mahaska Investment Company. This agreement is incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K report filed by Mahaska Investment Company for the Year ended December 31, 1999. | |
10.5 | Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 30, 2003 between MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank. This Agreement is incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K Annual Report filed by MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. for the Year ended December 31, 2003. |
26
10.5.1 | Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 28, 2006 between MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. and Harris N.A. | |
10.6 | Stock Purchase Agreement By and Between Mahaska Investment Company and Belle Plaine Service Corp. dated October 4, 2002. This agreement is incorporated herein by reference to the Form 10-K report filed by Mahaska Investment Company for the Year ended December 31, 2002. | |
11 | Computation of Per Share Earnings. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ Charles S. Howard | |
Charles S. Howard | ||
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer | ||
August 11, 2006 | ||
Dated | ||
By: | /s/ David A. Meinert | |
David A. Meinert | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||
August 11, 2006 | ||
Dated |
28