Nv Energy (NVE) 10-Q 2006 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2006

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                    TO                    

	Registrant, Address of	I.R.S. Employer
	Principal Executive Offices	Identification	State of
Commission File Number	and Telephone Number	Number	Incorporation
1-08788	SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES	88-0198358	Nevada
	P.O. Box 10100
	(6100 Neil Road)
	Reno, Nevada 89520-0400 (89511)
	(775) 834-4011
2-28348	NEVADA POWER COMPANY	88-0420104	Nevada
	6226 West Sahara Avenue
	Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
	(702) 367-5000
0-00508	SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY	88-0044418	Nevada
	P.O. Box 10100
	(6100 Neil Road)
	Reno, Nevada 89520-0400 (89511)
	(775) 834-4011

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o (Response applicable to all registrants)

Indicate by check mark whether any registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Sierra Pacific Resources:	Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o
Nevada Power Company:	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer þ
Sierra Pacific Power Company:	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ (Response applicable to all registrants)

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at November 1, 2006
Common Stock, $1.00 par value of Sierra Pacific Resources	220,936,987 Shares

Sierra Pacific Resources is the sole holder of the 1,000 shares of outstanding Common Stock, $1.00 stated value, of Nevada Power Company.

Sierra Pacific Resources is the sole holder of the 1,000 shares of outstanding Common Stock, $3.75 stated value, of Sierra Pacific Power Company.

This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is separately filed by Sierra Pacific Resources, Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power Company. Information contained in this document relating to Nevada Power Company is filed by Sierra Pacific Resources and separately by Nevada Power Company on its own behalf. Nevada Power Company makes no representation as to information relating to Sierra Pacific Resources or its subsidiaries, except as it may relate to Nevada Power Company. Information contained in this document relating to Sierra Pacific Power Company is filed by Sierra Pacific Resources and separately by Sierra Pacific Power Company on its own behalf. Sierra Pacific Power Company makes no representation as to information relating to Sierra Pacific Resources or its subsidiaries, except as it may relate to Sierra Pacific Power Company.

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
NEVADA POWER COMPANY
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

CONTENTS

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Sierra Pacific Resources —
Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	3
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	5
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	6
Nevada Power Company —
Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	8
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	9
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	10
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	11
Sierra Pacific Power Company —
Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	12
Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	13
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005	14
Consolidated Statements of Capitalization — September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	15
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	16
ITEM 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33
Sierra Pacific Resources	38
Nevada Power Company	41
Sierra Pacific Power Company	50
ITEM 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	64
ITEM 4.Controls and Procedures	65
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.Legal Proceedings	65
ITEM 1A.Risk Factors	66
ITEM 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	68
ITEM 5.Other Information.	68
ITEM 6.Exhibits	69
Signature Page and Certifications	70
Ex-3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Sierra Pacific Power Company
Ex-10.1 Financing Agreement, Clark County, dated August 1, 2006
Ex-10.2 Financing Agreement, Coconino County, dated August 1, 2006 (Series 2006A)
Ex-10.3 Financing Agreement, Coconino County, dated August 1, 2006 (Series 2006B)
Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification of CEO
Ex-31.2 Section 302 Certification of CEO
Ex-31.3 Section 302 Certification of CEO
Ex-31.4 Section 302 Certification of CFO
Ex-31.5 Section 302 Certification of CFO
Ex-31.6 Section 302 Certification of CFO
Ex-32.1 Section 906 Certification of CEO
Ex-32.2 Section 906 Certification of CEO
Ex-32.3 Section 906 Certification of CEO
Ex-32.4 Section 906 Certification of CFO
Ex-32.5 Section 906 Certification of CFO
Ex-32.6 Section 906 Certification of CFO

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Utility Plant at Original Cost:
Plant in service	$	7,850,176	$	6,801,916
Less accumulated provision for depreciation		2,327,923		2,169,316
		5,522,253		4,632,600
Construction work-in-progress		471,791		765,005
		5,994,044		5,397,605
Investments and other property, net		54,758		62,771
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		251,397		172,682
Restricted cash and investments		—		67,245
Accounts receivable less allowance for uncollectible accounts:
2006-$40,997; 2005-$36,021		499,252		413,171
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		153,504		253,697
Deferred energy costs — gas (Note 1)		—		5,825
Materials, supplies and fuel, at average cost		99,096		88,445
Risk management assets (Note 5)		28,257		50,226
Deposits and prepayments for energy		13,899		45,054
Other		21,300		26,544
		1,066,705		1,122,889
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:
Goodwill (Note 8)		3,989		22,877
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		463,189		255,312
Deferred energy costs — gas (Note 1)		—		845
Regulatory tax asset		266,347		249,261
Other regulatory assets		642,918		568,145
Risk management assets (Note 5)		159		—
Risk management regulatory assets — net (Note 5)		109,664		—
Unamortized debt issuance costs		66,990		63,395
Other		133,645		107,330
		1,686,901		1,267,165
Assets of Discontinued Operations		20,078		20,116
TOTAL ASSETS	$	8,822,486	$	7,870,546
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common shareholders’ equity	$	2,593,013	$	2,060,154
Preferred stock		—		50,000
Long-term debt		4,162,341		3,817,122
		6,755,354		5,927,276
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt		41,051		58,909
Accounts payable		238,037		252,900
Accrued interest		81,005		58,585
Dividends declared		74		1,043
Accrued salaries and benefits		37,412		32,186
Current income taxes payable		2,068		3,159
Deferred income taxes		31,256		129,041
Risk management liabilities (Note 5)		117,384		16,580
Accrued taxes		8,310		6,540
Contract termination liabilities		—		129,000
Other current liabilities		60,212		56,724
		616,809		744,667
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		695,704		451,924
Deferred investment tax credit		36,090		38,625
Regulatory tax liability		35,185		38,224
Customer advances for construction		189,465		170,061
Accrued retirement benefits		76,617		71,810
Risk management regulatory liability — net (Note 5)		—		15,605
Regulatory liabilities		286,790		284,438
Other		120,272		117,716
		1,440,123		1,188,403
Liabilities of Discontinued Operations		10,200		10,200
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES	$	8,822,486	$	7,870,546

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

3

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
OPERATING REVENUES:
Electric	$	1,060,574		$	943,290		$	2,468,512		$	2,193,017
Gas		21,106			15,574			141,128			115,248
Other		287			262			1,302			873
		1,081,967			959,126			2,610,942			2,309,138
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operation:
Purchased power		396,133			504,823			906,578			1,023,594
Fuel for power generation		256,688			153,721			613,965			371,561
Gas purchased for resale		13,492			12,906			105,240			89,410
Deferral of energy costs — electric — net		17,700			(94,313	)		74,721			(40,556	)
Deferral of energy costs — gas — net		1,130			(2,001	)		7,214			(997	)
Reinstatement of deferred energy costs (Note 6)		(178,825	)		—			(178,825	)		—
Other		91,232			96,850			264,501			271,639
Maintenance		23,784			16,937			69,140			64,040
Depreciation and amortization		56,029			53,862			170,112			159,949
Taxes:
Income taxes		108,994			42,171			107,431			32,658
Other than income		11,802			11,286			36,740			35,115
		798,159			796,242			2,176,817			2,006,413
OPERATING INCOME		283,808			162,884			434,125			302,725
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Allowance for other funds used during construction		3,343			5,548			13,649			14,246
Interest accrued on deferred energy		6,219			7,342			22,573			19,359
Early debt conversion fees		—			(54,000	)		—			(54,000	)
Carrying charge for Lenzie (Note 1)		10,040			—			23,206			—
Other income		9,430			9,452			28,027			28,795
Other expense		(4,534	)		(3,430	)		(13,968	)		(11,732	)
Income taxes		(8,262	)		12,132			(25,205	)		1,200
		16,236			(22,956	)		48,282			(2,132	)
Total Income Before Interest Charges		300,044			139,928			482,407			300,593
INTEREST CHARGES:
Long-term debt		74,444			75,820			225,106			232,826
Other		6,199			8,733			16,433			21,414
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(2,860	)		(6,752	)		(12,869	)		(17,283	)
		77,783			77,801			228,670			236,957
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		222,261			62,127			253,737			63,636
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
Loss from discontinued operations (net of income tax benefits of $8, $51, $39 and $48 respectively)		(15	)		(134	)		(72	)		(128	)
NET INCOME		222,246			61,993			253,665			63,508
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary and premium on redemption		—			975			2,341			2,925
EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK	$	222,246		$	61,018		$	251,324		$	60,583
Amount per share basic and diluted — (Note 7)
Income from continuing operations	$	1.05		$	0.34		$	1.24		$	0.35
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	1.05		$	0.33		$	1.23		$	0.33
Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding — basic		211,143,616			183,377,256			204,303,110			183,216,650
Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding — diluted		211,641,821			183,752,200			204,744,823			183,607,923

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

4

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	253,665		$	63,508
Non-cash items included in net income:
Depreciation and amortization		170,113			159,949
Deferred taxes and deferred investment tax credit		122,062			31,362
AFUDC and capitalized interest		(26,518	)		(31,529	)
Amortization of deferred energy costs — electric		130,279			140,554
Amortization of deferred energy costs — gas		4,773			(486	)
Reinstatement of deferred energy costs		(178,825	)		—
Carrying charge on Lenzie plant		(26,957	)		—
Other non-cash		(27,326	)		(33,018	)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(127,447	)		(88,718	)
Deferral of energy costs — electric		(77,908	)		(179,917	)
Deferral of energy costs — gas		1,897			(902	)
Deferral of energy costs — terminated suppliers		2,309			—
Materials, supplies and fuel		(10,651	)		(5,797	)
Other current assets		36,397			32,255
Accounts payable		(17,129	)		51,959
Payment to terminating supplier		(65,368	)		—
Proceeds from claim on terminating supplier		41,365			—
Other current liabilities		33,085			32,003
Discontinued operations — operating activities		38			169
Change in net assets of discontinued operations		—			—
Risk Management assets and liabilities		(2,654	)		3,606
Other assets		10,526			312
Other liabilities		(5,003	)		(4,111	)
Net Cash from Operating Activities		240,723			171,199
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to utility plant		(769,080	)		(528,315	)
AFUDC and other charges to utility plant		26,518			31,529
Customer advances for construction		19,402			20,640
Contributions in aid of construction		28,874			15,375
Net cash used for utility plant		(694,286	)		(460,771	)
Investments in subsidiaries and other property — net		13,559			8,105
Net Cash used by Investing Activities		(680,727	)		(452,666	)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in short-term borrowings		—			240,000
Change in restricted cash and investments		3,612			22,964
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		2,181,753			275,000
Retirement of long-term debt		(1,894,875	)		(597,236	)
Redemption of preferred stock		(51,366	)		—
Sale of common stock, net of issuance cost		281,539			250,366
Dividends paid		(1,944	)		(2,936	)
Net Cash from Financing Activities		518,719			188,158
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		78,715			(93,309	)
Beginning Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents		172,682			266,328
Ending Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	251,397		$	173,019
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest	$	227,418		$	238,944
Income taxes	$	4,726		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

5

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Common Shareholder’s Equity:
Common stock, $1.00 par value, authorized 350 million; issued and outstanding 2006: 220,922,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2005: 200,792,000 shares	$	220,922		$	200,792
Other paid-in capital		2,482,301			2,220,896
Retained Deficit		(104,563	)		(355,883	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,647	)		(5,651	)
Total Common Shareholder’s Equity		2,593,013			2,060,154
Preferred Stock of Subsidiaries:
Not subject to mandatory redemption; 2005: 2,000,000 shares outstanding; $25 stated value
SPPC Class A Series 1; $1.95 dividend		—			50,000
Long-Term Debt:
Secured Debt
First Mortgage Bonds
8.50% NPC Series Z due 2023		—			35,000
Debt Secured by First Mortgage Bonds
Revenue Bonds
Nevada Power Company
6.60% NPC Series 1992B due 2019		—			39,500
6.70% NPC Series 1992A due 2022		—			105,000
7.20% NPC Series 1992C due 2022		—			78,000
Sierra Pacific Power Company
6.35% SPPC Series 1992B due 2012		1,000			1,000
6.55% SPPC Series 1987 due 2013		39,500			39,500
6.30% SPPC Series 1987 due 2014		45,000			45,000
6.65% SPPC Series 1987 due 2017		92,500			92,500
6.55% SPPC Series 1990 due 2020		20,000			20,000
6.30% SPPC Series 1992A due 2022		10,250			10,250
5.90% SPPC Series 1993A due 2023		9,800			9,800
5.90% SPPC Series 1993B due 2023		30,000			30,000
6.70% SPPC Series 1992 due 2032		21,200			21,200
Medium Term Notes
Sierra Pacific Power Company
6.62% to 6.83% SPPC Series C due 2006		20,000			50,000
6.95% to 8.61% SPPC Series A due 2022		—			110,000
7.10% to 7.14% SPPC Series B due 2023		—			58,000
Subtotal		289,250			744,750
General and Refunding Mortgage Securities
Nevada Power Company
10.88% NPC Series E due 2009		12,554			162,500
8.25% NPC Series A due 2011		350,000			350,000
6.50% NPC Series I due 2012		130,000			130,000
9.00% NPC Series G due 2013		227,500			227,500
5.875% NPC Series L due 2015		250,000			250,000
5.95% NPC Series M due 2016		210,000			—
6.65% NPC Series N due 2036		370,000			—
6.50% NPC Series O due 2018		325,000			—
Subtotal		1,875,054			1,120,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

(Continued)

6

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Sierra Pacific Power Company
8.00% SPPC Series A due 2008		320,000			320,000
6.25% SPPC Series H due 2012		100,000			100,000
6.00% SPPC Series M due 2016		300,000			—
Subtotal		720,000			420,000
Variable Rate Notes
NPC PCRB Series 2000B due 2009		15,000			15,000
NPC IDRB Series 2000A due 2020		100,000			100,000
NPC PCRB Series 2006 due 2036		39,500			—
NPC PCRB Series 2006A due 2032		40,000			—
NPC PCRB Series 2006B due 2039		13,000			—
Subtotal		207,500			115,000
Debt Secured by General and Refunding Mortgage Securities NPC Revolving Credit Facility		50,000			150,000
5.00% SPPC Series 2001 due 2036		80,000			80,000
Subtotal		130,000			230,000
Unsecured Debt
Revenue Bonds
Nevada Power Company
5.30% NPC Series 1995D due 2011		14,000			14,000
5.35% NPC Series 1995E due 2022		—			13,000
5.45% NPC Series 1995D due 2023		6,300			6,300
5.50% NPC Series 1995C due 2030		44,000			44,000
5.60% NPC Series 1995A due 2030		76,750			76,750
5.90% NPC Series 1995B due 2030		85,000			85,000
5.80% NPC Series 1997B due 2032		—			20,000
5.90% NPC Series 1997A due 2032		52,285			52,285
6.38% NPC Series 1996 due 2036		—			20,000
Subtotal		278,335			331,335
Other Notes
Sierra Pacific Resources
7.803% SPR Senior Notes due 2012		99,142			99,142
8.625% SPR Notes due 2014		335,000			335,000
6.75% SPR Senior Notes due 2017		225,000			225,000
Subtotal, excluding current portion		659,142			659,142
Unamortized bond premium and discount, net		(12,058	)		(3,495	)
Nevada Power Company
8.2% Junior Subordinated Debentures of NPC, due 2037		—			122,548
7.75% Junior Subordinated Debentures of NPC, due 2038		—			72,165
Subtotal		—			194,713
Obligations under capital leases		50,206			56,921
Current maturities and sinking fund requirements		(41,051	)		(58,909	)
Other, excluding current portion		5,963			7,665
Total Long-Term Debt		4,162,341			3,817,122
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION	$	6,755,354		$	5,927,276

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

(Concluded)

7

NEVADA POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Utility Plant at Original Cost:
Plant in service	$	5,076,001	$	4,106,489
Less accumulated provision for depreciation		1,246,989		1,128,209
��		3,829,012		2,978,280
Construction work-in-progress		280,466		698,206
		4,109,478		3,676,486
Investments and other property, net		23,137		29,249
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		46,069		98,681
Restricted cash		—		52,374
Accounts receivable less allowance for uncollectible accounts:
2006-$34,490; 2005-$30,386		357,591		232,086
Accounts receivable, affiliated companies		11,368		3,738
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		117,856		186,355
Materials, supplies and fuel, at average cost		58,172		46,835
Risk management assets (Note 5)		17,311		22,404
Deposits and prepayments for energy		7,145		16,303
Other		12,365		16,075
		627,877		674,851
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		407,779		214,587
Regulatory tax asset		154,461		155,304
Other regulatory assets		417,347		362,567
Risk management regulatory assets — net (Note 5)		69,823		—
Unamortized debt issuance costs		39,503		37,157
Other		52,554		23,720
		1,141,467		793,335
TOTAL ASSETS	$	5,901,959	$	5,173,921
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common shareholder’s equity	$	2,166,719	$	1,762,089
Long-term debt		2,429,256		2,214,063
		4,595,975		3,976,152
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt		18,651		6,509
Accounts payable		149,463		164,169
Accrued interest		46,848		33,031
Dividends declared		74		397
Accrued salaries and benefits		18,377		15,537
Current income taxes payable		2,068		3,159
Intercompany Income taxes payable		10,182		—
Deferred income taxes		7,019		57,392
Risk management liabilities (Note 5)		74,283		10,125
Accrued taxes		3,875		2,817
Contract termination liabilities		—		89,784
Other current liabilities		48,863		46,425
		379,703		429,345
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		518,614		362,973
Deferred investment tax credit		15,617		16,832
Regulatory tax liability		14,096		15,068
Customer advances for construction		111,970		98,056
Accrued retirement benefits		22,125		22,203
Risk management regulatory liability — net (Note 5)		—		590
Regulatory liabilities		165,618		173,527
Other		78,241		79,175
		926,281		768,424
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES	$	5,901,959	$	5,173,921

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

8

NEVADA POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
OPERATING REVENUES:
Electric	$	776,235		$	675,181		$	1,701,379		$	1,480,699
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operation:
Purchased power		289,975			393,414			638,664			763,096
Fuel for power generation		183,622			86,282			425,138			195,134
Deferral of energy costs-net		19,960			(76,899	)		53,748			(32,965	)
Reinstatement of deferred energy costs (Note 6)		(178,825	)		—			(178,825	)		—
Other		54,927			55,760			156,765			155,971
Maintenance		15,719			10,624			44,307			43,976
Depreciation and amortization		34,955			31,258			104,076			92,421
Taxes:
Income taxes		103,853			42,092			103,617			40,054
Other than income		7,129			6,477			21,287			19,543
		531,315			549,008			1,368,777			1,277,230
OPERATING INCOME		244,920			126,173			332,602			203,469
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Allowance for other funds used during construction		1,986			5,119			10,140			13,017
Interest accrued on deferred energy		4,786			5,557			17,695			14,298
Carrying charge for Lenzie (Note 1)		10,040			—			23,206			—
Other income		4,080			5,238			12,831			17,600
Other expense		(2,050	)		(1,608	)		(6,353	)		(5,001	)
Income taxes		(6,735	)		(4,578	)		(19,785	)		(12,625	)
		12,107			9,728			37,734			27,289
Total Income Before Interest Charges		257,027			135,901			370,336			230,758
INTEREST CHARGES:
Long-term debt		43,355			38,587			132,285			121,729
Other		4,537			4,204			11,828			12,775
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(1,978	)		(6,362	)		(10,050	)		(16,154	)
		45,914			36,429			134,063			118,350
NET INCOME	$	211,113		$	99,472		$	236,273		$	112,408

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

9

NEVADA POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	236,273		$	112,408
Non-cash items included in net loss:
Depreciation and amortization		104,076			92,421
Deferred taxes and deferred investment tax credit		113,015			52,680
AFUDC		(20,190	)		(29,171	)
Amortization of deferred energy costs		95,830			108,480
Reinstatement of deferred energy costs		(178,825	)		—
Carrying charge on Lenzie plant		(26,957	)		—
Other non-cash		(26,129	)		(22,201	)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(159,526	)		(110,556	)
Deferral of energy costs		(59,765	)		(137,048	)
Deferral of energy costs — terminated suppliers		1,607			—
Materials, supplies and fuel		(11,336	)		(1,070	)
Other current assets		12,868			15,308
Accounts payable		(13,302	)		57,677
Payment to terminating supplier		(37,410	)		—
Proceeds from claim on terminating supplier		26,391			—
Other current liabilities		20,152			27,739
Risk Management assets and liabilities		(1,161	)		1,206
Other assets		10,205			312
Other liabilities		(7,977	)		(4,833	)
Net Cash from Operating Activities		77,839			163,352
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to utility plant		(555,786	)		(435,413	)
AFUDC and other charges to utility plant		20,190			29,171
Customer advances for construction		13,913			13,839
Contributions in aid of construction		19,673			6,971
Net cash used for utility plant		(502,010	)		(385,432	)
Investments in subsidiaries and other property — net		6,351			1,921
Net Cash used by Investing Activities		(495,659	)		(383,511	)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		1,689,134			50,000
Retirement of long-term debt		(1,491,958	)		(212,007	)
Additional investment by parent company		200,000			230,541
Dividends paid		(31,968	)		(27,098	)
Net Cash from Financing Activities		365,208			41,436
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(52,612	)		(178,723	)
Beginning Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents		98,681			243,323
Ending Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	46,069		$	64,600
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest	$	136,072		$	123,683
Income taxes	$	4,714		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

10

NEVADA POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Common Shareholder’s Equity:
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and Outstanding	$	1		$	1
Other paid-in capital		2,008,848			1,808,848
Retained Earning (Deficit)		161,210			(43,422	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,340	)		(3,338	)
Total Common Shareholder’s Equity		2,166,719			1,762,089
Long-Term Debt:
Secured Debt
First Mortgage Bonds
8.50% Series Z due 2023		—			35,000
Debt Secured by First Mortgage Bonds
Revenue Bonds
6.60% Series 1992B due 2019		—			39,500
6.70% Series 1992A due 2022		—			105,000
7.20% Series 1992C due 2022		—			78,000
Subtotal		—			257,500
General and Refunding Mortgage Securities
10.88% Series E due 2009		12,554			162,500
8.25% Series A due 2011		350,000			350,000
6.50% Series I due 2012		130,000			130,000
9.00% Series G due 2013		227,500			227,500
5.875% Series L due 2015		250,000			250,000
5.95% Series M due 2016		210,000			—
6.65% Series N due 2036		370,000			—
6.00% Series O due 2018		325,000			—
Subtotal		1,875,054			1,120,000
Variable Rate Notes
PCRB Series 2000B due 2009		15,000			15,000
IDRB Series 2000A due 2020		100,000			100,000
PCRB Series 2006 due 2036		39,500			—
PCRB Series 2006A due 2032		40,000			—
PCRB Series 2006B due 2039		13,000			—
Subtotal		207,500			115,000
Debt Secured by General and Refunding Mortgage Securities
Revolving Credit Facility		50,000			150,000
Unsecured Debt
Revenue Bonds
5.30% Series 1995D due 2011		14,000			14,000
5.35% Series 1995E due 2022		—			13,000
5.45% Series 1995D due 2023		6,300			6,300
5.50% Series 1995C due 2030		44,000			44,000
5.60% Series 1995A due 2030		76,750			76,750
5.90% Series 1995B due 2030		85,000			85,000
5.80% Series 1997B due 2032		—			20,000
5.90% Series 1997A due 2032		52,285			52,285
6.38% Series 1996 due 2036		—			20,000
Subtotal		278,335			331,335
Unamortized bond premium and discount, net		(13,222	)		(4,942	)
8.2% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2037		—			122,548
7.75% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2038		—			72,165
Subtotal		—			194,713
Obligations under capital leases		50,206			56,921
Current maturities and sinking fund requirements		(18,651	)		(6,509	)
Other, excluding current portion		34			45
Total Long-Term Debt		2,429,256			2,214,063
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION	$	4,595,975		$	3,976,152

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

11

SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Utility Plant at Original Cost:
Plant in service	$	2,774,175	$	2,695,427
Less accumulated provision for depreciation		1,080,934		1,041,107
		1,693,241		1,654,320
Construction work-in-progress		191,325		66,799
		1,884,566		1,721,119
Investments and other property, net		802		842
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		83,448		38,153
Restricted cash		—		14,871
Accounts receivable less allowance for uncollectible accounts:
2006-$6,507; 2005-$5,634		141,375		180,973
Accounts receivable, affiliated companies		—		40,278
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		35,648		67,342
Deferred energy costs — gas (Note 1)		—		5,825
Materials, supplies and fuel, at average cost		40,912		41,608
Risk management assets (Note 5)		10,946		27,822
Deposits and prepayments for energy		6,754		28,751
Other		8,712		9,547
		327,795		455,170
Deferred Charges and Other Assets:
Deferred energy costs — electric (Note 1)		55,410		40,725
Deferred energy costs — gas (Note 1)		—		845
Regulatory tax asset		111,886		93,957
Other regulatory assets		225,571		205,578
Risk management assets (Note 5)		159		—
Risk management regulatory assets — net (Note 5)		39,841		—
Unamortized debt issuance costs		14,884		12,693
Other		13,557		15,372
		461,308		369,170
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,674,471	$	2,546,301
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common shareholder’s equity	$	770,640	$	727,777
Preferred stock		—		50,000
Long-term debt		1,072,076		941,804
		1,842,716		1,719,581
Current Liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt		22,400		52,400
Accounts payable		59,351		56,661
Accounts payable, affiliated companies		13,894		—
Accrued interest		28,810		10,993
Dividends declared		—		968
Accrued salaries and benefits		16,421		14,032
Current income taxes payable		—		49,673
Intercompany income taxes payable		18,088		—
Deferred income taxes		8,438		21,832
Risk management liabilities (Note 5)		43,101		6,455
Accrued taxes		4,291		3,541
Contract termination liabilities		—		39,216
Other current liabilities		11,349		10,299
		226,143		266,070
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		283,149		244,244
Deferred investment tax credit		20,473		21,793
Regulatory tax liability		21,089		23,156
Customer advances for construction		77,495		72,005
Accrued retirement benefits		45,207		40,269
Risk management regulatory liability — net (Note 5)		—		15,015
Regulatory liabilities		121,172		110,911
Other		37,027		33,257
		605,612		560,650
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES	$	2,674,471	$	2,546,301

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

12

SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
OPERATING REVENUES:
Electric	$	284,339		$	268,109		$	767,133		$	712,318
Gas		21,106			15,574			141,128			115,248
		305,445			283,683			908,261			827,566
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Operation:
Purchased power		106,158			111,409			267,914			260,498
Fuel for power generation		73,066			67,439			188,827			176,427
Gas purchased for resale		13,492			12,906			105,240			89,410
Deferral of energy costs — electric — net		(2,260	)		(17,414	)		20,973			(7,591	)
Deferral of energy costs — gas — net		1,130			(2,001	)		7,214			(997	)
Other		34,119			29,334			101,413			97,872
Maintenance		8,065			6,313			24,833			20,064
Depreciation and amortization		21,075			22,610			66,037			67,534
Taxes:
Income taxes		9,435			10,186			19,162			19,540
Other than income		4,622			4,762			15,311			15,441
		268,902			245,544			816,924			738,198
OPERATING INCOME		36,543			38,139			91,337			89,368
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Allowance for other funds used during construction		1,357			429			3,509			1,229
Interest accrued on deferred energy		1,433			1,785			4,878			5,061
Other income		2,491			1,681			7,301			4,148
Other expense		(2,138	)		(1,476	)		(6,806	)		(4,709	)
Income taxes		(1,065	)		(782	)		(3,087	)		(1,997	)
		2,078			1,637			5,795			3,732
Total Income Before Interest Charges		38,621			39,776			97,132			93,100
INTEREST CHARGES:
Long-term debt		18,134			17,307			53,958			51,933
Other		1,341			1,001			3,694			3,402
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction and capitalized interest		(882	)		(390	)		(2,819	)		(1,129	)
		18,593			17,918			54,833			54,206
NET INCOME		20,028			21,858			42,299			38,894
Dividend Requirements and premium on redemption of preferred stock		—			975			2,341			2,925
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	20,028		$	20,883		$	39,958		$	35,969

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

13

SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income	$	42,299		$	38,894
Non-cash items included in net income:
Depreciation and amortization		66,037			67,534
Deferred taxes and deferred investment tax credit		(27,392	)		(548	)
AFUDC		(6,328	)		(2,358	)
Amortization of deferred energy costs — electric		34,449			32,074
Amortization of deferred energy costs — gas		4,773			(486	)
Other non-cash		2,470			(4,116	)
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		64,902			39,433
Deferral of energy costs — electric		(18,143	)		(42,869	)
Deferral of energy costs — gas		1,897			(902	)
Deferral of energy costs — terminated suppliers		702			—
Materials, supplies and fuel		695			(4,711	)
Other current assets		22,832			13,264
Accounts payable		12,914			(173	)
Payment to terminating supplier		(27,958	)		—
Proceeds from claim on terminating supplier		14,974			—
Other current liabilities		22,004			17,506
Risk Management assets and liabilities		(1,493	)		2,400
Other assets		321			—
Other liabilities		3,308			(1,975	)
Net Cash from Operating Activities		213,263			152,967
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to utility plant		(213,294	)		(92,904	)
AFUDC and other charges to utility plant		6,328			2,358
Customer advances for construction		5,489			6,801
Contributions in aid of construction		9,201			8,404
Net cash used for utility plant		(192,276	)		(75,341	)
Disposal of subsidiaries and other property — net		40			36
Net Cash used by Investing Activities		(192,236	)		(75,305	)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED BY) FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Change in restricted cash and investments		3,612			2,034
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		492,619			—
Retirement of long-term debt		(402,671	)		(1,998	)
Redemption of preferred stock		(51,366	)		—
Dividends paid		(17,926	)		(22,777	)
Net Cash from (used by) Financing Activities		24,268			(22,741	)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		45,295			54,921
Beginning Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents		38,153			19,319
Ending Balance in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	83,448		$	74,240
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest	$	42,358		$	39,380
Income taxes	$	12		$	—
Noncash Activities:
Transfer of Regulatory Asset (Note 8)	$	18,888		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

14

SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
Common Shareholder’s Equity:
Common stock, $3.75 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding	$	4		$	4
Other paid-in capital		828,991			810,103
Retained Deficit		(56,564	)		(80,538	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,791	)		(1,792	)
Total Common Shareholder’s Equity		770,640			727,777
Cumulative Preferred Stock:
Not subject to mandatory redemption; 2,000,000 shares outstanding; $25 stated value SPPC Class A Series 1; $1.95 dividend		—			50,000
Long-Term Debt:
Secured Debt
Debt Secured by First Mortgage Bonds
Revenue Bonds
6.35% Series 1992B due 2012		1,000			1,000
6.55% Series 1987 due 2013		39,500			39,500
6.30% Series 1987 due 2014		45,000			45,000
6.65% Series 1987 due 2017		92,500			92,500
6.55% Series 1990 due 2020		20,000			20,000
6.30% Series 1992A due 2022		10,250			10,250
5.90% Series 1993A due 2023		9,800			9,800
5.90% Series 1993B due 2023		30,000			30,000
6.70% Series 1992 due 2032		21,200			21,200
Medium Term Notes
6.62% to 6.83% Series C due 2006		20,000			50,000
6.95% to 8.61% Series A due 2022		—			110,000
7.10% to 7.14% Series B due 2023		—			58,000
Subtotal		289,250			487,250
General and Refunding Mortgage Securities
8.00% Series A due 2008		320,000			320,000
6.25% Series H due 2012		100,000			100,000
6.00% Series M due 2016		300,000			—
Subtotal		720,000			420,000
Debt Secured by General and Refunding Mortgage Securities
5.00% Series 2001 due 2036		80,000			80,000
Subtotal		80,000			80,000
Unamortized bond premium and discount, net		(704	)		(666	)
Current maturities and sinking fund requirements		(22,400	)		(52,400	)
Other, excluding current portion		5,930			7,620
Total Long-Term Debt		1,072,076			941,804
TOTAL CAPITALIZATION	$	1,842,716		$	1,719,581

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

15

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

     The consolidated financial statements of Sierra Pacific Resources (SPR) include the accounts of SPR and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Nevada Power Company (NPC) and Sierra Pacific Power Company (SPPC) (collectively, the “Utilities”), Tuscarora Gas Pipeline Company (TGPC), Sierra Gas Holding Company (SGHC), Sierra Pacific Energy Company (SPE), Lands of Sierra (LOS), Sierra Pacific Communications (SPC) and Sierra Water Development Company (SWDC). SPC is a discontinued operation, and as such, is reported separately in the financial statements. The consolidated financial statements of NPC include the accounts of NPC and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Nevada Electric Investment Company (NEICO). The consolidated financial statements of SPPC include the accounts of SPPC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, GPSF-B, Piñon Pine Corporation (PPC), Piñon Pine Investment Company, Piñon Pine Company, L.L.C. and Sierra Pacific Funding L.L.C. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

     The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions also affect the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

     In the opinion of the management of SPR, NPC, and SPPC, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. These consolidated financial statements do not contain the complete detail or footnote disclosure concerning accounting policies and other matters, which are included in full year financial statements; therefore, they should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in SPR’s, NPC’s, and SPPC’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “2005 Form 10-K”).

     The results of operations and cash flows of SPR, NPC and SPPC for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Reclassifications

     Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Previously reported net income and shareholders’ equity were not affected by these reclassifications.

16

Deferral of Energy Costs

     NPC and SPPC follow deferred energy accounting. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in NPC’s and SPPC’s 2005 Form 10-K, for additional information regarding the implementation of deferred energy accounting by the Utilities.

     The following deferred energy costs were included in the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands):

	September 30, 2006
	NPC		SPPC		SPPC			SPR
Description	Electric		Electric		Gas			Total
Unamortized balances approved for collection in current rates
Electric — NPC Period 1 (Reinstatement of deferred energy costs)(1)	$	178,825	$	—	$	—		$	178,825
Electric — NPC Period 3 (effective 4/05, 2 years)		6,152		—		—			6,152
Electric — SPPC Period 3 (effective 6/05, 27 months)		—		10,313		—			10,313
Electric — NPC Period 4 (effective 4/05, 2 years)		19,899		—		—			19,899
Electric — NPC Period 5 (effective 8/06, 2 years)		154,617		—		—			154,617
Electric — SPPC Period 5 (effective 7/06, 2 years)		—		34,080		—			34,080
Natural Gas — Period 5 (effective 11/05, 1 year)		—		—		(194	)		(194	)
LPG Gas — Period 3 (effective 11/04, 2 years)		—		—		1			1
Balances pending PUCN approval		—		—		1,075			1,075
Cumulative CPUC balance		—		11,015		—			11,015
Balances accrued since end of periods submitted for PUCN approval		83,757		15,241		(1,262	)		97,736
Claims for terminated supply contracts(2)		82,385		20,409		—			102,794
Total	$	525,635	$	91,058	$	(380	)(3)	$	616,313
Current Assets
Deferred energy costs — electric	$	117,856	$	35,648		—		$	153,504
Deferred energy costs — gas		—		—		—			—
Deferred Assets
Deferred energy costs — electric		407,779		55,410		—			463,189
Deferred energy costs — gas		—		—		—			—
Current Liabilities		—		—		(380	)		(380	)
Total	$	525,635	$	91,058	$	(380	)	$	616,313

(1)	Amount not in current rates. As discussed in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case, the recovery period for this amount has yet to be determined by the PUCN.
(2)	Amounts related to claims for terminated supply contracts are discussed in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies.
(3)	Credits represent over-collections, that is, the extent to which gas or fuel and purchased power costs recovered through rates exceed actual gas or fuel and purchased power costs. Accordingly, amounts are reflected in current liabilities.

Carrying Charge on the Lenzie Generating Station

     In 2004, the Public Utility Commission of Nevada (PUCN) granted NPC’s request to designate the Chuck Lenzie Generating Station (“Lenzie”) as a critical facility and allowed a 2% enhanced Return on Equity (ROE) to be applied to the Lenzie construction costs expended after acquisition. The order allowed for an additional 1% enhanced ROE if the two Lenzie generating units were brought on line early. In addition, the PUCN granted NPC’s request to begin accumulating a carrying charge as a regulatory asset including the 3% enhanced ROE (collectively referred to as “carrying charges”), until the plant is included in rates.

     Units 1 and 2 were declared commercially operable in January 2006 and April 2006, respectively, qualifying for the incentive ROE treatment. Based on the regulatory order, through September 30, 2006, NPC has accumulated approximately $27.0 million in carrying charges; however, $3.8 million of this amount has not been recorded for financial reporting purposes as it represents equity carrying costs that are not recognized until collected through regulated rates. For financial reporting purposes, through September 30, 2006, NPC recognized $23.2 million in other income, and recorded a corresponding regulatory asset, which represents only the carrying charge component associated with incurred debt costs. NPC expects to seek recovery of the $27.0 million in carrying charges in its next general rate case to be filed in mid-November.

17

Recent Pronouncements

     SFAS 123 (R)

          SPR adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share Based Payment” (SFAS 123 R) in the first quarter of 2006 using the modified prospective method. The Company had previously applied the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, in accounting for its stock compensation plans and in accordance with the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and the updated disclosure requirements set forth in SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure”. Accordingly, no compensation cost had been recognized previously.

          SPR’s executive long-term incentive plan for key management employees permits the following types of grants, separately or in combination: non-qualified and qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance units, performance shares and bonus stock. SPR currently issues Performance Shares and Non Qualified Stock Options (NQSO) under this plan. In addition, the Company also has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Please refer to Note 13, Stock Compensation Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K for additional information.

     The adoption of SFAS 123 (R) did not have a material impact on the results of operations for SPR, NPC or SPPC.

     SFAS 155

          In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (“SFAS 155”). This Statement amends FASB Statements No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” This Statement resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1, “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.” SFAS 155:

• permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation;

• clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133,

• establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;

• clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and

• amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument.

          This statement is effective for years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued financial statements, including financial statements for any interim period for that fiscal year. At adoption, any difference between the total carrying amount of the individual components of the existing bifurcated hybrid financial instrument and the fair value of the combined hybrid financial instrument should be recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings. SPR has early adopted SFAS 155, as of January 1, 2006, however, as of September 30, 2006, SPR and the Utilities do not have any financial instruments that meet the criteria specified under SFAS 155.

     SFAS 157

          In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 addresses the need for increased consistency in fair value measurements, defining fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements. SFAS 157 is effective for SPR and the Utilities beginning January 1, 2008. SPR and the Utilities are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 157 on their consolidated financial statements.

     SFAS 158

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158 (“SFAS 158”) “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132-(R).” SFAS 158 seeks to address certain important deficiencies the FASB finds in today’s pension accounting. Currently, changes in a plan’s assets and its benefit obligation are not being recognized as they occur and important information about postretirement plans is currently being relegated to the footnotes rather than being recognized in the financial statements. Specifically, the amendment will

18

require SPR and the Utilities to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in their Consolidated Balance Sheets. An overfunded status would result in the recognition of an asset and an underfunded status would result in the recognition of a liability. The adjustment to record an asset or liability would be offset by a regulatory asset or liability. SFAS 158’s requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and new disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SPR and the Utilities are currently assessing the impact SFAS 158 will have on their consolidated financial position, the outcome of which may be material. However, management does not currently believe that any adjustment for 2006 would affect SPR’s or the Utilities compliance with the covenants under their respective financing agreements or their ability to incur additional indebtedness.

     FIN 46(R)-6

          In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 46R-6,Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).This FSP addresses certain implementation issues related to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.Specifically, FSP FIN 46R-6 addresses how a reporting enterprise should determine the variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. The variability that is considered in applying FIN 46R affects the determination of (a) whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), (b) which interests are “variable interests” in the entity, and (c) which party, if any, is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. That variability affects any calculation of expected losses and expected residual returns, if such a calculation is necessary. SPR and the Utilities are required to apply the guidance in this FSP prospectively to all entities (including newly created entities) and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under FIN 46R when a “reconsideration event” has occurred, beginning July 1, 2006. SPR and the Utilities will evaluate the impact of this Staff Position at the time any such “reconsideration event” occurs, and for any new entities.

     FIN 48

          In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, to clarify certain aspects of accounting for uncertain tax positions, including issues related to the recognition and measurement of those tax positions. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. SPR and the Utilities are in the process of evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on their consolidated financial statements.

     SAB 108

          In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108), to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB 108 requires that SPR and the Utilities quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of its financial statements and related disclosures. SAB 108 is effective as of December 31, 2006, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB 108. SPR and the Utilities are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SAB 108 on their consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2.SEGMENT INFORMATION

          SPR’s Utilities operate three regulated business segments (as defined by SFAS 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”), which are NPC electric, SPPC electric and SPPC natural gas service. Electric service is provided to Las Vegas and surrounding Clark County by NPC, and to northern Nevada and the Lake Tahoe area of California by SPPC. Natural gas services are provided by SPPC in the Reno-Sparks area of Nevada. Other segment information includes segments below the quantitative threshold for separate disclosure.

          The net assets and operating results of SPC are reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements for 2006 and 2005. Accordingly, the segment information excludes financial information of SPC. NPC’s total assets changed from the amounts reported in the 2005 10-K, mainly due to the acquisition of the Silverhawk Generation Facility in the first quarter of 2006, costs to complete construction of Lenzie, and reinstated deferred energy costs of approximately $180 million as discussed in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case.

          Operational information of the different business segments is set forth below based on the nature of products and services offered. SPR evaluates performance based on several factors, of which, the primary financial measure is business segment operating income. The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K. Inter-segment revenues are not material.

19

Financial data for business segments is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended	NPC		SPPC		Total						Reconciling
September 30, 2006	Electric		Electric		Electric		Gas		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Operating Revenues	$	776,235	$	284,339	$	1,060,574	$	21,106	$	287	$	—	$	1,081,967
Operating Income1	$	244,920	$	36,056	$	280,976	$	487	$	2,345	$	—	$	283,808

Three Months Ended	NPC		SPPC		Total								Reconciling
September 30, 2005	Electric		Electric		Electric		Gas			Other			Eliminations		Consolidated
Operating Revenues	$	675,181	$	268,109	$	943,290	$	15,574		$	262		$	—	$	959,126
Operating Income	$	126,173	$	38,885	$	165,058	$	(746	)	$	(1,428	)	$	—	$	162,884

Nine Months Ended	NPC		SPPC		Total						Reconciling
September 30, 2006	Electric		Electric		Electric		Gas		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Operating Revenues	$	1,701,379	$	767,133	$	2,468,512	$	141,128	$	1,302	$	—	$	2,610,942
Operating Income1	$	332,602	$	84,866	$	417,468	$	6,471	$	10,186	$	—	$	434,125
Assets	$	5,901,959	$	2,333,342	$	8,235,301	$	255,401	$	246,056	$	85,728	$	8,822,486

Nine Months Ended	NPC		SPPC		Total						Reconciling
September 30, 2005	Electric		Electric		Electric		Gas		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Operating Revenues	$	1,480,699	$	712,318	$	2,193,017	$	115,248	$	873	$	—	$	2,309,138
Operating Income	$	203,469	$	83,824	$	287,293	$	5,544	$	9,888	$	—	$	302,725

	NPC		SPPC		Total						Reconciling
December 31, 2005	Electric		Electric		Electric		Gas		Other		Eliminations		Consolidated
Assets	$	5,173,921	$	2,218,938	$	7,392,859	$	245,707	$	150,324	$	81,656	$	7,870,546

¹ Operating income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased significantly from prior periods primarily due to the reinstatement of deferred energy costs as discussed further in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case.

NOTE 3.REGULATORY ACTIONS

     Nevada Power Company

2006 Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On January 17, 2006, NPC filed a Deferred Energy Accounting Adjustment (DEAA) rate case application with the PUCN seeking recovery for purchased fuel and power costs and to increase its going forward Base Tariff Energy Rate (BTER) to reflect future energy costs. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 12, 2006, the PUCN approved an agreement among the interveners and NPC, which, effective May 1, 2006, set NPC’s BTER rates such that an estimated $112 million (revised by June 28, 2006 DEAA agreement — see below) of new revenues would be collected for fuel and power purchases in addition to the start of an $8.4 million collection related to a previous DEAA rate case. Combined, the approximately $120 million increase represented an overall average rate increase of approximately 6.5%.

          In the Deferred Energy portion of the case, NPC had requested authorization to recover $171.5 million of previously incurred purchased fuel and power costs over a one year period. On June 28, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement, which specified (1) a reduction of $1.6 million to the BTER approved on April 12, 2006 based on an updated projection of costs and (2) granted NPC full recovery of the $171.5 million of deferred costs during a two year period beginning August 1, 2006. However, the $171.5 million was reduced by a $16.5 million payment previously received by NPC in connection with the Lenzie acquisition. Under this agreement, the DEAA rate changes required to asymmetrically recover the deferred balance are scheduled to be implemented during a two year period such that they will be offset by the expiration of previously approved DEAA rates. As a result, no rate increase was required.

20

     Sierra Pacific Power Company

2006 Natural Gas and Propane Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On May 15, 2006, SPPC’s gas distribution operation filed applications with the PUCN seeking recovery of deferred natural gas and propane costs accumulated between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. The applications sought to establish a new natural gas DEAA rate to recover $2.5 million of deferred natural gas costs and a new propane DEAA rate to recover $120 thousand of deferred propane costs. SPPC also requested authorization to increase going forward natural gas and propane BTER’s to reflect forecasted gas costs. The new natural gas BTER was expected to increase revenue by $24.5 million. Combined with the expiration of a previous DEAA rate, the requested natural gas rate increases (DEAA and BTER) totaled approximately 10%. The new propane BTER was expected to increase revenue by $66 thousand, which combined with the $120 thousand in deferred costs and the expiration of previously implemented DEAA rates, resulted in an overall requested propane rate increase of approximately 30%.

          On October 25, 2006, the PUCN approved negotiated natural gas and propane settlements which consolidated the deferred natural gas and propane balances for collection from all gas customers and reduced the combined balance to $1.1 million. The agreements transferred approximately $1.4 million to other deferral periods and $.1 million to expense accounts. The agreements called for the cost recovery to occur over a 12 month period beginning December 1, 2006.

          The negotiated going forward natural gas rate is expected to recover an additional $1.3 million in revenue, which is a decrease from the originally requested $24.5 million. The decrease reflects more current natural gas price expectations.

          These settlements, combined with the expiration of a previous natural gas DEAA rate will cause natural gas customer rates to decrease by 2.5% and cause propane customer rates to increase by 3.3 %.

December 2005 Electric Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On December 1, 2005, SPPC filed an electric DEAA rate case application with the PUCN. The application sought recovery of purchased fuel and power costs and requested an increase in SPPC’s going forward BTER to reflect future energy costs. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 12, 2006, the PUCN issued an order authorizing SPPC to increase its BTER on May 1, 2006, such that SPPC expects to collect $31 million in new revenues for purchased power. The change represented a 3.5% increase to customer rates.

          In the Deferred Energy portion of this case, SPPC had requested authorization to begin a one year recovery of the $46.7 million of previously incurred purchased fuel and power costs on July 1, 2006. On June 7, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement, which granted SPPC full recovery of the deferred costs during a two year period beginning July 1, 2006. Under this agreement, the DEAA rate changes required to asymmetrically recover the $46.7 million deferred balance are scheduled to be implemented such that they will be offset by the expiration of previously approved DEAA rates. As a result, no rate increase was required.

2005 Electric and Gas General Rate Cases

          On October 3, 2005, SPPC filed a gas general rate case along with its statutorily required electric general rate case. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 27, 2006, the PUCN issued its order to change electric and gas general rates. Although the order differed from our requested filing, the changes did not require material adjustments to net income. The PUCN vote resulted in the following significant items:

• Electric general revenue decrease: approximately $14 million annually or 1.5% effective May 1, 2006

• Gas general revenue increase: $4.5 million annually or 2.3%, effective May 1, 2006

• Electric Return on Equity and Rate of Return: 10.6% and 8.96% respectively

• Gas Return on Equity and Rate of Return: 10.6% and 7.98% respectively

• Approval to continue recovery of SPPC’s allocated amount of the 1999 NPC/SPPC merger costs and goodwill from Electric customers

• Approval to recover an allocated amount of the 1999 NPC/SPPC merger costs and goodwill from Gas customers

• New depreciation rates for Gas and Electric facilities

• Deferred recovery of legal expenses related to the Enron purchased power contract litigation

21

NOTE 4.  LONG-TERM DEBT

     As of September 30, 2006, NPC’s, SPPC’s and SPR’s aggregate annual amount of maturities for long-term debt (including obligations related to capital leases) for the balance of 2006, for the next four years and thereafter are shown below (dollars in thousands):

							SPR Holding Co. and
	NPC			SPPC			Other Subs.		SPR Consolidated
2006	$	16,882		$	20,530		$	—	$	37,412
2007		5,950			2,400			—		8,350
2008		7,066			322,400			—		329,466
2009		22,138			600			—		22,738
2010		57,843			—			—		57,843
		109,879			345,930			—		455,809
Thereafter		2,351,250			749,250			659,142		3,759,642
		2,461,129			1,095,180			659,142		4,215,451
Unamortized Premium(Discount) Amount		(13,222	)		(704	)		1,867		(12,059	)
Total	$	2,447,907		$	1,094,476		$	661,009	$	4,203,392

          Substantially all utility plant is subject to the liens of NPC’s and SPPC’s indentures under which their respective General and Refunding Mortgage bonds are issued and SPPC’s First Mortgage Bonds are issued.

Financing Transactions (NPC)

     Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 2006A and 2006B

          On August 17, 2006, on behalf of NPC, Clark County, Nevada (Clark County) issued $39.5 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, due January 1, 2036. On the same date, on behalf of NPC, Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation (Coconino County) issued $40 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, due September 1, 2032, and $13 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, due March 1, 2039.

          In connection with the issuance of these Bonds, NPC entered into financing agreements with Clark County and Coconino County, pursuant to which Clark County and Coconino County will lend the proceeds from the sales of the bonds to NPC. NPC’s payment obligations under the financing agreements are secured by NPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series P.

          The interest rates of the Bonds will be determined by an auction. The method of determining the interest rate on the Bonds may be converted from time to time so that such Bonds would thereafter bear interest at a daily, weekly, flexible, auction or term rate as designated.

          The proceeds of the offering were used to refund the following, all of which were previously issued for the benefit of NPC:

• $39.5 million principal amount of Clark County’s Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1992B,

• $20 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1996,

• $20 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1997B, and

• $13 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1995E.

     General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O

          On May 12, 2006, NPC issued and sold $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018. The Series O Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering, together with available cash, were utilized to:

•	fund the early redemption of $78 million aggregate principal amounts of NPC’s 7.2% Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 C, due 2022,
•	fund the early redemption, in June 2006, of approximately $72.2 million aggregate
	principal amount of NPC’s 7.75% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2038 (when the debentures were repaid upon redemption, the proceeds from the repayment were used to simultaneously redeem an equal amount of the 7.75% Cumulative Quarterly Preferred Securities of NVP Capital III, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NPC),
•	repay amounts outstanding under NPC’s revolving credit facility, and
•	pay related fees from the offering, and for general corporate purposes.

22

          On June 26, 2006, NPC issued an additional $75 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, as part of the same series as the original Notes. The aggregate principal amount of 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018, outstanding is $325 million as of September 30, 2006. The proceeds from the second issuance, along with the proceeds from an offering of $120 million of NPC’s 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due 2036 (described below) were used to pay the total consideration for the tender offer for the 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, described below. The remaining proceeds were used to pay related fees and expenses from this offering, and for general corporate purposes.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N

          On April 3, 2006, NPC issued and sold $250 million of its 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due April 1, 2036. The Series N Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering, together with available cash, were utilized to:

• fund the early redemption of $35 million aggregate principal amount of NPC’s 8.50% Series Z First Mortgage Bonds due 2023 plus approximately $1 million of associated redemption premiums,

• fund the early redemption of $105 million aggregate principal amount of 6.70% Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, due 2022, and

• fund the early redemption of approximately $122.5 million aggregate principal amount of NPC’s 8.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2037 (when the debentures were repaid upon redemption, the proceeds from the repayment were used to simultaneously redeem an equal amount of the 8.20% Cumulative Quarterly Preferred Securities of NVP Capital I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NPC).

          On June 26, 2006, NPC issued an additional $120 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, as part of the same series as the original Notes. The aggregate principal amount of 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due 2036, outstanding is $370 million as of September 30, 2006. The proceeds from the second issuance, along with the proceeds from an offering of $75 million of NPC’s 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018 (described above) were used to pay the total consideration for the tender offer on the 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, described below.

Tender Offer for General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E

          On June 1, 2006, NPC commenced a tender offer for all of its 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, due 2009. In conjunction with that offer, NPC solicited the consent of holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants contained in the officer’s certificate governing the Notes. Approximately $150 million of $162.5 million Series E Notes outstanding were validly tendered and accepted by NPC. Those holders who tendered the Notes and delivered their consents by June 14, 2006 were entitled to receive a consent payment of $30 per $1000 principal amount of Notes, plus tender consideration for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes validly tendered. Those holders who tendered the Notes after June 14, 2006, but prior to June 28, 2006, were entitled to receive the tender consideration only. This tender consideration was $1,038.45 in cash plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the June 29, 2006 settlement date per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes tendered. Proceeds from the June 26, 2006 issuance of Series N and Series O Notes (discussed above) were used to fund the tender offer. The total consideration (including the consent payment and accrued interest) paid on June 29, 2006 was approximately $163.6 million. As of September 30, 2006, approximately $12.6 million of the Series E Notes remained outstanding.

          On October 16, 2006, NPC redeemed the remaining $12.6 million aggregate principal amount of the Series E Notes, plus accrued interest, using available cash on hand.

Revolving Credit Facility

          On April 19, 2006, NPC increased the size of its second amended and restated revolving credit facility expiring 2010 to $600 million. The facility will provide additional liquidity for increased commodity prices and temporary bridge financing of capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2006, NPC had $55 million of letters of credit outstanding and had borrowed $50 million under the revolving credit facility. As of October 30, 2006, NPC had $55 million of letters of credit outstanding and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility.

          The NPC Credit Agreement contains two financial maintenance covenants. The first requires that NPC maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capital, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, not to exceed 0.68 to 1. The second requires that NPC maintain a ratio of consolidated cash flow to consolidated interest expense, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, not to be less than 2.0 to 1. As of September 30, 2006, NPC was in compliance with these covenants.

23

          The NPC Credit Agreement provides for an event of default if there is a failure under NPC’s other financing agreements to meet certain payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due.

          The NPC Credit Agreement places certain restrictions on debt incurrence, liens and dividends. These restrictions are discussed in Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M

          On January 18, 2006, NPC issued and sold $210 million of its 5.95% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due March 15, 2016. The Series M Notes were issued with registration rights. On February 10,2006 the net proceeds of the issuance plus available cash were used to repay $210 million of amounts outstanding under NPC’s revolving credit facility, which were borrowed to finance the purchase of a 75% ownership interest in the Silverhawk Generating Facility.

Financing Transactions (SPPC)

Humboldt County Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds

          On October 30, 2006, the 6.35% Humboldt County Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1992B, due August 1, 2022, in the amount of $1 million were redeemed at 100% of the stated principal amount, plus accrued interest.

Revolving Credit Facility

          On April 19, 2006, SPPC increased the size of its amended and restated revolving credit facility expiring 2010 to $350 million. The facility will provide additional liquidity for increased commodity prices and temporary bridge financing of capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC had $8 million of letters of credit outstanding and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility. As of October 30, 2006, SPPC had $8 million of letters of credit and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement contains two financial maintenance covenants. The first requires that SPPC maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capital, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, not to exceed 0.68 to 1. The second requires that SPPC maintain a ratio of consolidated cash flow to consolidated interest expense, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, not to be less than 2.0 to 1. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC was in compliance with these covenants.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement provides for an event of default if there is a failure under SPPC’s other financing agreements to meet certain payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement, similar to SPPC’s Series H Notes, places certain restrictions on debt incurrence, liens and dividends. These limitations are discussed in Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M

          On March 23, 2006, SPPC issued and sold $300 million of its 6.00% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due May 15, 2016. The Series M Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering were used to repay $173 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility that was utilized to:

• fund the early redemption of $110 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.95% to 8.61% Series A Notes due 2022,

• fund the early redemption of $58 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 7.10% to 7.14% Series B Notes due 2023,

• pay for maturing debt of $30 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.81% to 6.83% Series C Notes due 2006, and

• pay for $51 million in connection with the redemption of $50 million of SPPC’s Series A Preferred Stock (two million shares of stock were redeemed at a redemption price per share of $25.683, plus accrued dividends to the redemption date of $.4875 per share).

     The remaining $51 million of proceeds have been or will be used as follows:

• payment for maturing debt of $20 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.62% to 6.65% Series C Notes due November 2006; and

• payment of related fees and for general corporate purposes.

24

NOTE 5. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

          SPR, SPPC, and NPC apply SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138 and SFAS No. 149. As amended, SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivatives instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position, measure those instruments at fair value, and recognize changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments in earnings in the period of change, unless the derivative meets certain defined conditions and qualifies as an effective hedge. SFAS No. 133 also provides a scope exception for contracts that meet the normal purchase and sales criteria specified in the standard. The normal purchases and normal sales exception requires, among other things, physical delivery in quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that are designated as normal purchase and normal sales are accounted for under deferred energy accounting and not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. A majority of the contracts entered into by the Utilities meet the criteria specified for this exception.

          The energy supply function encompasses the reliable and efficient operation of the Utilities generation, the procurement of all fuels and power and resource optimization (i.e., physical and economic dispatch) and is exposed to risks relating to, but not limited to, changes in commodity prices. SPR’s and the Utilities’ objective in using derivative instruments is to reduce exposure to energy price risk. Energy price risks result from activities that include the generation, procurement and marketing of power and the procurement and marketing of natural gas. Derivative instruments used to manage energy price risk from time to time may include: forward contracts, which involve physical delivery of an energy commodity; options, which mitigate price risk by providing the right, but not the requirement, to buy or sell energy related commodities at a fixed price; and swaps, which require the Utilities to receive or make payments based on the difference between a specified price and the actual price of the underlying commodity. These contracts allow the Utilities to reduce the risks associated with volatile electricity and natural gas markets.

          The following table shows the fair value of the derivatives recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of SPR, NPC, and SPPC, and the related regulatory assets/liabilities. The fair values of the Utilities are determined using quoted exchange prices, external dealer prices and available market pricing curves. Due to deferred energy accounting treatment under which the Utilities operate, regulatory assets and liabilities are established to the extent that electricity and natural gas derivative gains and losses are recoverable or payable through future rates, once realized. This accounting treatment is intended to defer the recognition of mark-to-market gains and losses on energy commodity transactions until the period of settlement and to not recognize gains and losses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

	September 30, 2006						December 31, 2005
	SPR		NPC		SPPC		SPR			NPC			SPPC
Risk management assets	$	28.4	$	17.3	$	11.1	$	50.2		$	22.4		$	27.8
Risk management liabilities	$	117.4	$	74.3	$	43.1	$	16.6		$	10.1		$	6.5
Risk management regulatory assets (liabilities)	$	109.6	$	69.8	$	39.8	$	(15.6	)	$	(.6	)	$	(15.0	)

          The decrease in risk management assets and the increase in risk management liabilities as of September 30, 2006 as compared to December 31, 2005, are due to unfavorable positions on natural gas options held by the Utilities to hedge energy price risk for their customers, as a result of lower prices for natural gas in 2006.

          Also included in risk management assets were $20.7 million, $12.9 million, and $7.8 million in payments for electric and gas options by SPR, NPC, and SPPC, respectively, at September 30, 2006.

NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental

Nevada Power Company

Reid Gardner Station

          In May 1997, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) ordered NPC to submit a plan to eliminate the discharge of Reid Gardner Station wastewater to groundwater. The NDEP order also required a hydrological assessment of groundwater impacts in the area. In June 1999, NDEP determined that wastewater ponds had degraded groundwater quality. In August 1999, NDEP issued a discharge permit to Reid Gardner Station and an order that requires all wastewater ponds to be closed or lined with impermeable liners over the next 10 years. This order also required NPC to submit a Site Characterization Plan to NDEP to ascertain impacts. This plan has been reviewed and approved by NDEP. In collaboration with NDEP, NPC has evaluated remediation requirements. In May 2004, NPC submitted a schedule of remediation actions to NDEP which included proposed dates for corrective action plans and/or suggested additional assessment plans for each specified area. Pond

25

construction and lining costs expended to satisfy the NDEP order to date are approximately $30.8 million. Expenditures for 2006 through 2010 are projected to be approximately $21 million.

          In August 2004, NDEP conducted a Facility Air Quality Operating Permit (Title V permit) inspection at the Reid Gardner Station. NDEP requested monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting items and information pertaining to the sources identified in the Title V permit. NPC complied with the request and any subsequent requests that followed. In September and October 2004, NPC met with NDEP to review the results of NDEP’s inspection. NDEP informed NPC of possible non-compliance with some elements of its Title V permit, and on December 2, 2004 issued Notices of Alleged Violation (NOAVs) relating to record-keeping, monitoring and other alleged administrative infractions. Discussions between NPC and NDEP ensued. On July 20, 2005, NDEP issued new Notices of Alleged Violations (NOAVs). In part, these NOAVs represent reissuance of the previously issued NOAVs dated December 2, 2004 and address additional monitoring and reporting issues for the period September 2002 through December 2004. Additional NOAVs were issued concerning intermittent opacity emissions and the monitoring, record-keeping and reporting of such emissions. All NOAVs are subject to an administrative hearing before the Nevada State Environmental Commission and then to judicial review. In July, 2005 NPC received a letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requiring submittal of information relating to compliance of Reid Gardner Station with opacity emission limits and reporting requirements. NPC has responded to the EPA information request. In June, 2006, the EPA issued a Finding and Notice of Violation (NOV).

          NPC is engaged in an ongoing dialogue and settlement discussions with NDEP and the EPA and Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the NOVs and additional environmental controls and equipment changes, environmental benefit projects, monetary penalties, and/or other measures that may be required to achieve a settlement of the alleged violations. Management has booked an estimated minimum liability with respect to these matters. Any environmental controls and equipment changes needed to assure compliance with existing or modified regulations were submitted by NPC to the PUCN for approval in NPC’s latest Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) filing.

Clark Station

          In July 2000, NPC received a request from the EPA for information to determine the compliance of certain generation facilities at NPC’s Clark Station with the applicable State Implementation Plan. In November 2000, NPC and the Clark County Health District entered into a Corrective Action Order requiring, among other steps, capital expenditures at the Clark Station totaling approximately $3 million. In March 2001, the EPA issued an additional request for information that could result in remediation beyond that specified in the November 2000 Corrective Action Order. On October 31, 2003, the EPA issued a violation regarding turbine blade upgrades, which occurred in July 1993. A conference between the EPA and NPC occurred in December 2003. NPC presented evidence on the nature and finding of the alleged violations. In March 2004, the EPA issued another request for information regarding the turbine blade upgrades, and NPC provided information responsive to this request in April and May 2004. NPC’s position is that a violation did not occur. Monetary penalties and retrofit control cost, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. On May 3, 2006, the EPA, by letter from the DOJ, notified NPC that it intends to initiate an enforcement action against NPC seeking unspecified civil penalties, together with injunctive relief, for alleged violations of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements and Title V operating permit requirements of the Clean Air Act. NPC is continuing its discussions with the DOJ. NPC’s position is that a violation did not occur and is unable to predict the outcome of this action. Monetary penalties and retrofit control cost, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

NEICO

          NEICO, a wholly owned subsidiary of NPC, owns property in Wellington, Utah, which was the site of a coal washing and load-out facility. The site has a reclamation estimate supported by a bond of approximately $5 million with the Utah Division of Oil and Gas Mining, which management believes is sufficient to cover reclamation costs. Management is continuing to evaluate various options including reclamation and sale.

Sierra Pacific Power Company

PCB Treatment, Inc.

          In September 1994, Region VII of the EPA notified SPPC that it was being named as a potentially responsible party (PRP) regarding the past improper handling of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s) by PCB Treatment, Inc., in two buildings, one located in Kansas City, Kansas and the other in Kansas City, Missouri (the Sites). Prior to 1994, SPPC sent PCB contaminated material to PCB Treatment, Inc. for disposal. Certificates of disposal were issued to SPPC by PCB Treatment, Inc.; however, the contaminated material was not disposed of, but remained on-site. A number of the largest PRP’s formed a steering committee, which completed site investigations and along with the EPA determined that the Sites should be remediated by removing the buildings to the appropriate landfills. SPPC is a member of this steering committee. The cleanup has now been completed on both buildings and are pending inspection and sign off by EPA. The cleanup for the two buildings came in under budget, as such SPPC does not expect any further obligations.

26

Litigation

Nevada Power Company

Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case

          On November 30, 2001, NPC made a deferred energy filing with the PUCN seeking repayment for purchased fuel and power costs accumulated between March 1, 2001, and September 30, 2001, as required by law. The application sought to establish a rate to repay purchased fuel and power costs of $922 million and spread the recovery of the deferred costs, together with a carrying charge, over a period of not more than three years.

          On March 29, 2002, the PUCN issued its Order on the application, allowing NPC to recover $478 million over a three-year period, but disallowing $434 million of deferred purchased fuel and power costs and $30.9 million in carrying charges consisting of $10.1 million in carrying charges accrued through September 2001 and $20.8 million in carrying charges accrued from October 2001 through February 2002. The Order stated that the disallowance was based on alleged imprudence in incurring the disallowed costs. NPC and the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) both sought individual review of the PUCN Order in the First District Court of Nevada. The District Court affirmed the PUCN’s decision. Both NPC and the BCP filed Notices of Appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court.

          Oral argument was heard on February 23, 2006. On July 20, 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled NPC is allowed to recover $180 million of the disallowed deferred energy costs and directed the District Court to remand the issue back to the PUCN to determine the rate schedule that will be used to recover this amount. In all other respects, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the District Court’s decision on the PUCN disallowance. In the third quarter of 2006, as a result of the Nevada Supreme Court decision, NPC recorded approximately $180 million,before tax,of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs in its Statements of Operations as “Reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs.” NPC is unable to predict the terms of the rate schedule that the PUCN will provide for recovery of this amount.

Peabody Western Coal Company

          NPC owns an 11%, 255 MW interest in the Navajo Generating Station (Navajo) which includes three coal-fired electrical generating units and is located in Northern Arizona. Other participants in Navajo, are the Salt River Project (Salt River), Arizona Public Service Company, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and Tucson Electric Power Company (together the Joint Owners).

          On October 15, 2004, coal supplier Peabody Western Coal Co. (Peabody) filed a complaint against the Joint Owners in Missouri State Court in St. Louis, seeking reimbursement of royalties and other costs and damages for alleged breach of the coal supply agreement for the Navajo plant. In January 2005, the Joint Owners were served and operating agent, Salt River, has engaged counsel and is defending the suit on behalf of the Joint Owners. NPC believes Peabody’s claims are without merit and intends to contest these.

          On February 10, 2005, the Joint Owners filed Notice of Removal of the complaint to the U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri. On March 17, 2005, Peabody filed a motion to remand the case back to state court in St. Louis, Missouri. Joint Owners have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. On May 30, 2006, the Federal District Court granted Peabody’s motion and remanded the case back to state court. On June 29, 2006, Joint Owners filed a new motion to dismiss with the Missouri state court and requested a stay of the discovery proceedings pending the ruling on the new motion. On September 21, 2006, the Missouri state court heard oral arguments on the motion to dismiss. Parties are in the process of completing briefing on the motions. A decision is not expected until early 2007. Several discovery motions remain pending. NPC is unable to predict the outcome of the decisions.

Sierra Pacific Power Company

Farad Dam

          SPPC owns 4 hydro generating plants (10.3 MW capacity) located in California that were to be included in the sale of SPPC’s water business for $8 million to the Truckee Meadows Water Authority (TMWA) in June 2001. The contract with TMWA requires that SPPC transfer the hydro assets in working condition. However, one of the four hydro generating plants, Farad 2.8 MW, has been out of service since the summer of 1996 due to a collapsed flume. While planning the reconstruction, a flood on the Truckee River in January 1997 destroyed the diversion dam. The current estimate to rebuild the diversion dam, if management decides to proceed, is approximately $20 million.

27

          SPPC filed a claim with the insurers Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co. and Zurich-American Insurance Company (Insurers) for the flume and dam. In December, 2003, SPPC sued the Insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on a coverage dispute relating to potential rebuild costs. In May 2005, Insurers filed a motion for summary judgment on the coverage issue, which has been denied. In October 2005, Insurers filed another (partial) summary judgment motion with respect to coverage, which the court also denied. On June 16, 2006, Insurers filed new summary judgment motions, which SPPC opposed. A settlement conference, initially scheduled for September 27, 2006, was canceled by the court. A trial date has been set for November 14, 2006. Management believes that it has a valid insurance claim and is likely to recover the costs to rebuild the dam through the courts or from other sources.

          Management has not recorded a loss contingency for this matter, as the loss, if any, can not be estimated at this time.

Piñon Pine

          In its 2003 General Rate Case, SPPC sought recovery of its unreimbursed costs associated with the Piñon Pine Coal Gasification Demonstration Project (the “Project”). The Project represented experimental technology tested pursuant to a Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Coal Technology initiative. Under the terms of the Project agreement, SPPC and DOE agreed to each fund 50% of construction costs of the Project. SPPC’s participation in the Project had received PUCN approval as part of SPPC’s 1993 integrated electric resource plan. While the conventional portion of the plant, a gas-fired combined cycle unit, was installed and performed as planned, the coal gasification unit never became fully operational. After numerous attempts to re-engineer the coal gasifier, the technology was determined to be unworkable. In its order of May 25, 2004, the PUCN disallowed $43 million of unreimbursed costs associated with the Project. SPPC filed a Petition for Judicial Review with the Second Judicial District Court of Nevada (District Court) in June 2004 (CV04-01434). On January 25, 2006, the District Court vacated the PUCN’s disallowance in SPPC’s 2003 General Rate Case and remanded the case back to the PUCN for further review as to whether the costs were justly and reasonably incurred (Order). On March 27, 2006, the PUCN appealed the Order to the Nevada Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) and filed a motion to stay the Order pending the appeal to the Supreme Court. On June 12, 2006, the District Court granted PUCN’s motion to stay the Order. On July 20, 2006, the Supreme Court issued an order questioning the finality of the District Court’s decision and thus whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal and invited the parties to brief this matter. The BCP and PUCN responded in early August. Parties are awaiting a decision by the Supreme Court. SPPC is unable to predict the outcome of the appeal.

Other Legal Matters

          SPR and its subsidiaries, through the course of their normal business operations, are currently involved in a number of other legal actions, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a significant impact on their financial positions, results of operations, or cash flows.

Regulatory Contingencies

Nevada Power Company

Mohave Generation Station (Mohave)

          In 2005, NPC’s ownership interest in Mohave comprised approximately 10% of NPC’s peak generation capacity. Southern California Edison (SCE) is the operating partner of Mohave and NPC owns approximately 14% of the facility.

          When operating, Mohave obtained all of its coal supply from a mine in northeast Arizona on lands of the Navajo Nation and the Hopi Tribe (the “Tribes”). This coal was delivered from the mine to Mohave by means of a coal slurry pipeline, which requires water that is obtained from groundwater wells located on lands of the Tribes in the mine vicinity.

          The Grand Canyon Trust and Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada in February 1998 against the owners (including NPC) of the Mohave Generation Station (Mohave), alleging violations of the Clean Air Act regarding emissions of sulfur dioxide and particulates. An additional plaintiff, National Parks and Conservation Association, later joined the suit. In 1999, the plant owners and plaintiffs filed a settlement with the court, which resulted in a consent decree, approved by the court in November 1999. The consent decree established emission limits for sulfur dioxide and opacity and required installation of air pollution controls for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. Pursuant to the decree, Mohave Units 1 and 2 ceased operations as of January 1, 2006 as the new emission limits were not met. Due to the lack of resolution regarding continual availability of the coal and water supply with the Tribes, the Owners did not proceed with the Consent Decree.

          On December 31, 2005, the Owners of the Mohave plant suspended operation, pending resolution of these issues. However, on June 19, 2006, majority stake holder SCE announced it would no longer participate in the efforts to return the plant to service. As a result, NPC decided it is not economically feasible to continue its participation in the project. On September 28, 2006, Salt River Project announced it remains interested in restarting the Mohave generating station with a new ownership group, tentatively increasing its stake in the plant. Salt River Project currently owns 20% of the Mohave

28

facility. The co-tenancy agreement and the operating agreement between the Owners expired on July 1, 2006. The Owners are negotiating an extension of both agreements including a process that addresses how Owners may sell or assign their right, title, interest and obligations in Mohave.

          In NPC’s 2003 General Rate Case, the PUCN ordered the use of a regulatory asset to accumulate the costs and savings associated with Mohave in the event of its shutdown with recovery of any accumulated costs in a future rate case proceeding. NPC continues to recover the cost of Mohave in rates, as such, associated savings are currently recorded as a reduction in electric operating revenues-other. NPC continues to accumulate all costs and savings associated with the shut down of Mohave in Other Regulatory Assets which has a balance of $18.7 million as of September 30, 2006. In its next general rate case, NPC will seek further clarification on the regulatory treatment of Mohave. In the event any portion of Mohave is disallowed, NPC will have to evaluate the asset for impairment.

Contract Termination Liabilities

     At September 30, 2006 pursuant to the deferred energy accounting provisions of AB 369, included in NPC and SPPC deferred energy balances were approximately $82.4 million and $20.4 million of charges, respectively, for recovery in rates in future periods associated with the terminated power supply contracts. The Utilities will pursue recovery of the payments through future regulatory filings. To the extent that the Utilities are not permitted to recover any portion of these costs, the amounts not permitted would be charged as a current operating expense. A significant disallowance of these costs by the PUCN could have a material effect on the future financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of SPR, NPC, and SPPC.

NOTE 7. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) (SPR)

          The difference, if any, between basic EPS and diluted EPS is due to potentially dilutive common shares resulting from stock options, the employee stock purchase plan, performance and restricted stock plans, and the non-employee director stock plan.

          Emerging Issues Task Force, issue number 03-06, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, requires companies to use the “two-class” method to calculate basic EPS, and the “if-converted” method to calculate diluted EPS if the result was dilutive. On September 8, 2005, SPR issued approximately 65.7 million shares of common stock in connection with the early conversion of its 7.25% Convertible Notes. The weighted average shares outstanding were used for the shares from conversion of notes for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2005.

29

The following table outlines the calculation for earnings per share (EPS):

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Basic EPS
Numerator ($000)
Income from continuing operations	$	222,261		$	62,127		$	253,737		$	63,636
(Loss) from discontinued operations	$	(15	)	$	(134	)	$	(72	)	$	(128	)
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	222,246		$	44,372		$	251,324		$	40,594
Earnings applicable to convertible notes	$	—		$	16,646		$	—		$	19,989
Earnings used for basic calculation	$	222,246		$	61,018		$	251,324		$	60,583
Denominator
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		211,143,616			133,350,770			204,303,110			122,766,016
Shares from conversion of notes		—			50,026,486			—			60,450,634
		211,143,616			183,377,256			204,303,110			183,216,650
Per Share Amounts
Income from continuing operations	$	1.05		$	0.34		$	1.24		$	0.35
(Loss) from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	1.05		$	0.33		$	1.23		$	0.33
Earnings applicable to convertible notes	$	—		$	0.33		$	—		$	0.33
Diluted EPS
Numerator ($000)
Income from continuing operations	$	222,261		$	62,127		$	253,737		$	63,636
(Loss) from discontinued operations	$	(15	)	$	(134	)	$	(72	)	$	(128	)
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	222,246		$	61,018		$	251,324		$	60,583
Denominator (1)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding before dilution		211,143,616			133,350,770			204,303,110			122,766,016
Stock options		86,145			46,329			78,774			40,434
Executive long term incentive plan — restricted		125,432			164,603			114,189			197,310
Non-Employee Director stock plan		32,576			34,514			28,798			28,717
Employee stock purchase plan		3,604			9,920			3,016			5,234
Performance Shares		250,448			119,578			216,936			119,578
Convertible Stock		—			50,026,486			—			60,450,634
		211,641,821			183,752,200			204,744,823			183,607,923
Per Share Amounts
Income from continuing operations	$	1.05		$	0.34		$	1.24		$	0.35
(Loss) from discontinued operations	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Earnings applicable to common stock	$	1.05		$	0.33		$	1.23		$	0.33

(1) The denominator does not include stock equivalents resulting from the options issued under the nonqualified stock option plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, due to conversion prices being higher than market prices for all periods. Under the nonqualified stock option plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, 953,995 and 940,287 shares, respectively, would be included and 364,688 and 633,902 shares, respectively, would be included for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The denominator does not include stock equivalents resulting from the conversion of the Corporate PIES, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005. The amounts that would be included in the calculation, if the conversion price were met would be 17.3 million shares for each period.

30

NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND OTHER MERGER COSTS

          On April 27, 2006, the PUCN issued a decision on SPPC’s general rate case for the gas distribution business that included the recovery of goodwill and other merger costs allocated to SPPC resulting from the merger of SPR and NPC in 1999. In its decision, the PUCN affirmed that SPPC demonstrated merger savings exceeded merger costs, the requisite requirement for recovery of goodwill and merger costs. As a result of the PUCN decision, goodwill of approximately $18.9 million was reclassified as a regulatory asset and transferred from the financial statements of SPR to the financial statements of SPPC as of June 30, 2006. See Note 3 of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Regulatory Actions for more information regarding the SPPC general rate decision.

          The approximately $4 million of goodwill assigned to SPR’s unregulated operations were subject to impairment review under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Accounting for Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 provides that an impairment loss shall be recognized if the carrying value of each reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair value. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, a discounted cash flow model was developed for SPR’s unregulated businesses (TGPC and LOS) to determine the fair value of each reporting unit as of March 31, 2006. As a result, goodwill assigned to TGPC and LOS was determined not to be impaired.

          The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 and the allocation of the remaining balance is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Regulated			Unregulated
	Operations			Operations		Total
Balance as of December 31, 2005	$	18,888		$	3,989	$	22,877
Transfer to SPPC regulatory asset as of June 30, 2006		(18,888	)		—		(18,888	)
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	—		$	3,989	$	3,989
Goodwill Allocation to Reporting Units:
TGPC	$	—		$	3,520	$	3,520
LOS		—			469		469
Balance as of September 30, 2006	$	—		$	3,989	$	3,989

NOTE 9. PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

          A summary of the components of net periodic pension and other postretirement costs for the nine months ended September 30 follows. This summary is based on a September 30 measurement date (dollars in thousands):

	For the three months ended September 30,												For the nine months ended September 30,
							Other Postretirement												Other Postretirement
	Pension Benefits						Benefits						Pension Benefits						Benefits
	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Service cost	$	5,758		$	4,620		$	903		$	820		$	17,275		$	13,861		$	2,710		$	2,461
Interest cost		9,157			8,062			2,629			2,465			27,470			24,186			7,887			7,394
Expected return on plan assets		(10,182	)		(9,042	)		(1,258	)		(903	)		(30,547	)		(27,125	)		(3,773	)		(2,708	)
Amortization of prior service cost		473			428			31			16			1,419			1,285			94			47
Amortization of Transition Obligation		—			—			248			242			—			—			743			727
Amortization of net (gain)/loss		2,445			1,614			1,180			1,059			7,334			4,841			3,539			3,176
Special Termination Charges		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	7,651		$	5,682		$	3,733		$	3,699		$	22,951		$	17,048		$	11,200		$	11,097

          In the third quarter ended September 30, the company made contributions to the pension plan and the other postretirement benefits plan in the amount of $16 million and $8.4 million, respectively. At the present time, there is no commitment for further contributions to either plan in 2006.

31

NOTE 10. DEBT COVENANT AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS

Dividends Restrictions Applicable to the Utilities

          Since SPR is a holding company, substantially all of its cash flow is provided by dividends paid to SPR by NPC and SPPC on their common stock, all of which is owned by SPR. Since NPC and SPPC are public utilities, they are subject to regulation by state utility commissions, which impose limits on investment returns or otherwise impact the amount of dividends that the Utilities may declare and pay. In the PUCN order for Dockets 05-10024 and 05-10025, dated February 28, 2006, a dividend restriction was instituted for both utilities. Under this restriction, the combined amount that NPC and SPPC may pay to SPR each year is limited to the amount of SPR’s annual debt service. This restriction will expire when the Utilities’ senior secured debt is rated investment grade by two of the three credit rating agencies. On September 20, 2006, Fitch upgraded the senior secured debt of NPC and SPPC to investment grade. In September 2006, Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) upgraded the rating of NPC’s and SPPC’s senior secured debt from BB to BB+, one level below investment grade and Moody’s re-affirmed its rating for NPC’s and SPPC’s senior secured debt at Ba1, one level below investment grade.

          In addition, certain agreements entered into by the Utilities set restrictions on the amount of dividends they may declare and pay and restrict the circumstances under which such dividends may be declared and paid. The specific agreements entered into by the Utilities, restrictions on dividends contained in agreements to which NPC and SPPC are party, as well as specific regulatory limitations on dividends, are discussed in detail in the 2005 Form 10-K, Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Upon the redemption of NPC’s Series E General and Refunding Mortgage Notes on October 16, 2006, all of the restrictive covenants contained in the Series E Notes were terminated. After SPPC redeemed all of its outstanding Class A, Series 1 Preferred Stock (see Note 11, Preferred Stock, below), it amended and restated its articles of incorporation which, among other things, eliminated the dividend restriction previously contained in the articles of incorporation.

          As of September 30, 2006, each Utility was able to pay dividends, subject to a cap, under the most restrictive test in its financing agreements; however, the total amount of dividends that the Utilities can pay to SPR under their financing agreements does not currently significantly restrict their ability to pay dividends because the maximum amount of dividends that can be paid under their respective financing agreements is greater than the amount that the Utilities can pay under the PUCN dividend restrictions. Were it not for the PUCN dividend restriction, NPC would be permitted to pay up to a maximum of $615 million to SPR, and SPPC would be permitted to dividend up to a maximum of $43 million to SPR, as of September 30, 2006.

NOTE 11. PREFERRED STOCK

Sierra Pacific Power Company

Preferred Stock

          On June 1, 2006, SPPC redeemed $50 million of its Class A, Series 1 Preferred Stock. Two million shares of stock were redeemed at a redemption price per share of $25.683, plus accrued dividends at the redemption date of $0.4875 per share.

NOTE 12. COMMON STOCK AND OTHER PAID-IN CAPITAL

Increased Authorized Shares

          On May 1, 2006, SPR’s shareholders approved an amendment to SPR’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of SPR common stock by 100,000,000 shares for a total amount of 350,000,000 authorized shares.

          On August 15, 2006, SPR issued 20 million shares of its $1 par value common stock. Net proceeds from the issuance were $280.6 million. On August 15, 2006, SPR contributed capital to NPC of approximately $200 million. NPC used the proceeds to repay indebtedness under its revolving credit facility. SPR has invested the remaining proceeds in highly liquid short-term investments pending their use, which may be for additional capital contributions to NPC and/or SPPC, for repayment of a portion of SPR debt, or for general corporate purposes. As of September 30, 2006 SPR has 350 million shares of common stock authorized and 220.9 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

NOTE 13.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

          On November 2, 2006, SPR announced that its’ wholly owned subsidiary Tuscarora Gas Pipeline Company (TGPC) has entered into an agreement to sell TGPC’s 50% interest in the Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company for $100 million. The sale, subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close by year end 2006. The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
Investments and other property, net	$	29,873	$	30,898
Total Assets	$	29,873	$	30,898

32

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

          The information in thisForm 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to anticipated financial performance, management’s plans and objectives for future operations, business prospects, outcome of regulatory proceedings, market conditions and other matters.

          Words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and “objective” and other similar expressions identify those statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such statements, factors that could cause the actual results of Sierra Pacific Resources (SPR), Nevada Power Company (NPC), or Sierra Pacific Power Company (SPPC) to differ materially from those contemplated in any forward-looking statement include, among others, the following:

(1)	whether NPC and SPPC (the Utilities) will be able to continue to obtain fuel and power from their suppliers on favorable payment terms and favorable prices, particularly in the event of unanticipated power demands (for example, due to unseasonably hot weather), sharp increases in the prices for fuel and/or power or a ratings downgrade;
(2)	unfavorable or untimely rulings in rate cases filed or to be filed by the Utilities with the Public Utility Commission of Nevada (PUCN), including the periodic applications to recover costs for fuel and purchased power that have been recorded by the Utilities in their deferred energy accounts, and deferred natural gas costs recorded by SPPC for its gas distribution business;
(3)	the ability and terms upon which SPR, NPC and SPPC will be able to access the capital markets to support their requirements for working capital, including amounts necessary to finance deferred energy costs, as well as for construction and acquisition costs and other capital expenditures, particularly in the event of unfavorable rulings by the PUCN, a downgrade of the current debt ratings of SPR, NPC, or SPPC and/or adverse developments with respect to the Utilities’ power and fuel suppliers;
(4)	whether NPC will be successful in obtaining PUCN approval to recover the outstanding balance of its other regulatory assets and other merger costs recorded in connection with the 1999 merger between SPR and NPC in a future general rate case;
(5)	the timing of the PUCN’s decision regarding the time period NPC is to recover the $180 million of deferred energy costs that were disallowed in 2002 and were reinstated by the Nevada Supreme Court in July 2006;
(6)	the timing and final outcome of the PUCN’s decision regarding the Utilities’ recovery of deferred energy costs associated with claims for terminated supplier contracts;
(7)	wholesale market conditions, including availability of power on the spot market, which affect the prices the Utilities have to pay for power as well as the prices at which the Utilities can sell any excess power;
(8)	unseasonable weather and other natural phenomena, which, in addition to affecting the Utilities’ customers’ demand for power, can have a potentially serious impact on the Utilities’ ability to procure adequate supplies of fuel or purchased power to serve their respective customers and on the cost of procuring such supplies;
(9)	the final outcome of SPPC’s pending lawsuit in Nevada Supreme Court seeking to reverse the PUCN’s 2004 decision on SPPC’s 2003 General Rate Case disallowing the recovery of a portion of SPPC’s costs, expenses and investment in the Piñon Pine Project;
(10)	changes in the rate of industrial, commercial, and residential growth in the service territories of the Utilities;
(11)	whether the Utilities will be able to continue to pay SPR dividends under the terms of their respective financing and credit agreements, their regulatory order from the PUCN, and limitations imposed by the Federal Power Act;

33

(12)	employee workforce factors, including changes in collective bargaining unit agreements, strikes or work stoppages;
(13)	the effect that any construction defects or accidents may have on our business, such as the risk of equipment failure, work accidents, fire or explosions, each of which may result in personal injury or loss of life, business interruptions, delay of in-service dates, property and equipment damage, pollution and environmental damage;
(14)	changes in tax or accounting matters or other laws and regulations to which SPR or the Utilities are subject;
(15)	the effect of existing or future Nevada, California or federal legislation or regulations affecting electric industry restructuring, including laws or regulations which could allow additional customers to choose new electricity suppliers or change the conditions under which they may do so;
(16)	changes in the business or power demands of the Utilities’ major customers, including those engaged in gold mining or gaming, which may result in changes in the demand for services of the Utilities, including the effect on the Nevada gaming industry of the opening of additional Indian gaming establishments in California and other states;
(17)	changes in environmental laws or regulations, including the imposition of significant new limits on emissions from electric generating facilities, such as requirements to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in response to climate change legislation;
(18)	unusual or unanticipated changes in normal business operations, including unusual maintenance or repairs;
(19)	whether the Utilities can procure sufficient renewable energy sources in each compliance year to satisfy the Nevada Portfolio Standard;
(20)	the effect that any future terrorist attacks, wars, threats of war, or epidemics may have on the tourism and gaming industries in Nevada, particularly in Las Vegas, as well as on the economy in general;
(21)	future economic conditions, including inflation rates and monetary policy; and
(22)	financial market conditions, including changes in availability of capital or interest rate fluctuations.

          Other factors and assumptions not identified above may also have been involved in deriving these forward-looking statements, and the failure of those other assumptions to be realized, as well as other factors, may also cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. SPR, NPC and SPPC assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking statements.

34

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

          Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations explains the general financial condition and the results of operations for Sierra Pacific Resources (SPR) and its two primary subsidiaries, Nevada Power Company (NPC) and Sierra Pacific Power Company (SPPC), collectively referred to as the “Utilities” (references to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to SPR and the Utilities collectively), and includes the following for each of SPR, NPC and SPPC:

• Results of Operations

• Analysis of Cash Flows

• Liquidity and Capital Resources

• Regulatory Proceedings (Utilities)

• Recent Pronouncements

          SPR’s Utilities operate three regulated business segments: NPC electric, SPPC electric and SPPC natural gas service. Both Utilities provide electric service, and SPPC provides natural gas service. Other segment operations consist mainly of unregulated operations and the holding company operations. The Utilities are the principal operating subsidiaries of SPR and account for substantially all of SPR’s assets and revenues. SPR, NPC and SPPC are separate filers for SEC reporting purposes and accordingly, this discussion has been divided to reflect the individual filers (SPR, NPC and SPPC), except for discussions that relate to all three entities or the Utilities.

          The Utilities’ revenues and operating income are subject to fluctuations during the year due to the impacts of seasonal weather, rate changes, and customer usage patterns have on demand for electric energy and services. NPC is a summer peaking utility experiencing its highest retail energy sales in response to the demand for air conditioning. SPPC’s electric system peak typically occurs in the summer, with a slightly lower peak demand in the winter.

 ��        NPC’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased from the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of higher rates and to a lesser extent customer growth. Electric rates increased as a result of various deferred energy cases and Base Tariff Energy Rate (BTER) updates as discussed in the 2005 Form 10-K and later underRegulatory Proceedings. NPC’s net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased primarily as a result of the July 20, 2006, Nevada Supreme Court ruling which allows NPC to recover the approximate $180 million of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs, improved operating income (excluding the $180 million reinstatement) and the carrying charge associated with Lenzie.

          SPPC electric and gas revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased primarily as a result of higher rates and to a lesser extent customer growth. Electric and gas rates increased as a result of various deferred energy cases and BTER updates as discussed in the 2005 Form 10-K and later underRegulatory Proceedings.

          SPR recognized net income of $253.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to net income of $63.5 million for the same period in 2005. Net income increased primarily as a result of the July 20, 2006, Nevada Supreme Court ruling which allows NPC to recover the approximate $180 million of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs, an increase in operating income, a decrease in interest charges due to refinancing activities and the carrying charge associated with the Lenzie generating station.

Business Issues

          SPR continues to focus on a “back to the basics” strategy that emphasizes the Utilities’ core business. In order to concentrate more fully on its rapidly growing utility businesses, on July 10, 2006, SPR announced its decision to explore the potential sale of Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (TGTC). On November 2, 2006, SPR announced that its’ wholly owned subsidiary Tuscarora Gas Pipeline Company (TGPC) has entered into an agreement to sell TGPC’s 50% interest in the Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company. The sale, subject to customary closing conditions, is expected to close by year end 2006.

          SPR’s and the Utilities’ strategies are aimed at owning more generating facilities, thereby reducing dependence on purchased power while at the same time diversifying fuel mix while the Utilities’ service areas continue to grow. The Utilities will continue to be subject to fluctuations in the volatile energy markets to the extent that the requirements of their customers are in excess of the Utilities’ owned generation, as well as the natural gas markets for SPPC.

          Growth in Nevada continues to be strong. There are many large hotel/casino developments under construction in the vicinity of the Las Vegas Strip (e.g. Project City Center, Echelon Place), as well as many new commercial and residential developments that will support this continuing growth.

          With the significant amounts of construction costs in the Utilities’ future, SPR and the Utilities will need to raise substantial amounts of capital to fund the expenditures. As a result, reducing the cost of capital by attaining investment grade ratings for the Utilities’ secured debt has been and continues to be a significant business focus in 2006. The Utilities continue to make progress toward this goal. In September 2006 Fitch upgraded the senior secured debt of NPC and SPPC to the minimum level for investment grade. Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) and Moody’s currently rate NPC’s and SPPC’s senior secured debt at one level below investment grade.

35

Significant Third Quarter 2006 Events

          On July 20, 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled NPC is allowed to recover $180 million of the disallowed deferred energy costs and directed the District Court to remand the issue back to the PUCN to determine the rate schedule that will be used to recover this amount. In all other respects, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the District Court’s decision on the PUCN disallowance. In the third quarter of 2006, as a result of the Nevada Supreme Court decision, NPC recorded approximately $180 million,before tax,of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs in its Statements of Operations as “Reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs.” NPC is unable to predict the terms of the rate schedule that the PUCN will provide for recovery of this amount.

          On August 15, 2006, SPR issued 20 million shares of its $1 par value common stock. Net proceeds from the issuance were $280.6 million. On August 15, 2006, SPR made a capital contribution to NPC for approximately $200 million. NPC used the proceeds to repay indebtedness under its revolving credit facility which was used for capital expenditures. SPR has invested the remaining proceeds in highly liquid short-term investments pending their use, which may be for additional capital contributions to NPC and/or SPPC, for repayment of a portion of SPR debt, or for general corporate purposes. As of September 30, 2006 SPR has 350 million shares of common stock authorized and 220.9 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Generation Strategy

          In 2003, NPC and SPPC embarked on a strategy to build or acquire electric power plants in order to reduce their exposure to the energy markets, thereby reducing prices and volatility for its customers, and to provide an opportunity for increased earnings. In line with this strategy, in October 2004, upon PUCN approval, NPC purchased a partially constructed nominally rated 1,200 MW natural gas-fired high efficiency combined cycle power plant from Duke Energy (“Lenzie”).

          The PUCN granted NPC’s request that Lenzie be designated a critical facility and allowed a 2% enhancement above NPC’s authorized Return on Equity (ROE) to be applied to the rate base associated with the Lenzie construction costs expended after acquisition. The order allows for up to an additional 1%, or a total of 3% enhanced ROE if the two Lenzie generator units were brought on line on or before dates specified in the order. In January 2006, NPC declared Block 1 of Lenzie commercially operable and in April 2006 declared Block 2 commercially operable, both ahead of the dates specified by the PUCN to qualify for the additional enhancement.

          In January 2006, NPC completed the $208 million purchase of a 75% ownership interest in the Silverhawk Generating Facility (“Silverhawk”) from Pinnacle West Capital Corporation (“Pinnacle West”), Pinnacle West Energy Corporation (PWEC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle West, and GenWest, LLC. Silverhawk is a 560-megawatt, natural gas-fueled high efficiency combined-cycle electric generating facility located 20 miles northeast of Las Vegas.

          With the completion of Lenzie and an 80 MW combustion turbine at NPC’s Harry Allen site, plus the acquisition of Silverhawk, NPC more than doubled its owned capacity since the beginning of this year. As a result, NPC is less dependent upon the wholesale power markets for meeting the energy needs of its customers and expects to produce approximately 63% of its energy needs in 2006 from owned generation, up from about 39% last year.

          On December 14, 2005, the PUCN issued an order granting approval for SPPC to construct a 514 MW gas fired high efficiency combined cycle generator at the Tracy Plant. The PUCN also allowed SPPC to include construction work in progress balances in the rate base of any interim general rate cases, prior to the in-service date, and granted a 1.5% enhanced ROE for the estimated $421 million investment. In January 2006, SPPC signed contracts for construction of the unit and construction has begun. SPPC anticipates an in service date of June 2008. The unit will provide needed generation within SPPC’s control area to reliably serve the growing needs of Northern Nevada.

          Recently filed integrated resource plans (IRP), filed by the Utilities, requests PUCN approval to develop a major energy project located near Ely, Nevada (the “Ely Energy Center”). The project includes two 750 MW coal-fired units utilizing the latest, state-of-the-art, fully-environmental compliant, pulverized coal technologies, and the construction of a 250-mile transmission line to interconnect NPC and SPPC. If approved by the PUCN and subject to permitting requirements, it is anticipated the first coal plant would be operational in 2011 with the second unit in 2013. The total estimated capital expenditures associated with the two coal plants and the transmission line is approximately $3.7 billion. The IRP also requests approval to construct 600 MW of gas fired combustion turbines. The Utilities have also embarked on a strategy to invest in renewable energy that, along with contracts from third parties, will provide the opportunity for the Utilities to meet the Portfolio Standard as set forth by Nevada statute. A decision on the IRP by the PUCN is expected by mid-November 2006. See Regulatory Proceedings later for further details of the IRP.

36

Management of Energy Risk

          The Utilities buy coal, natural gas, and oil to operate generating plants as well as buy wholesale power to meet the energy requirements of their customers. The Utilities also have invested in and maintain extensive transmission systems that allow the Utilities to move energy to meet customers’ needs. While NPC has greatly reduced its dependence on wholesale power markets to meet its generation customers’ demand, both Utilities continue to have a significant need to tap energy markets due to the fact that the Utilities’ ownership is insufficient to meet their customers’ energy needs. This situation exposes the Utilities to energy risk and uncertainty as to the Utilities’ cash flow requirements for fuel and wholesale power, the expense the Utilities will incur as a result of their energy procurement efforts, and the rates the Utilities need to recover those costs. Energy risk also encompasses reliability risk — the prospect that energy supplies will not be sufficient to fulfill customer requirements.

          The Utilities systematically manage and control each of the energy-related risks through three primary vehicles — organization and governance, energy risk management programs, and energy risk control practices.

          The Utilities, through the purchases and sale of specified financial instruments and physical products, maintain an energy risk management program that limits energy risk to levels consistent with an approved energy supply plan. The energy risk management program provides for the systematic identification, quantification, evaluation, and management of the energy risk inherent in the Utilities’ operations.

          The Utilities follow PUCN-approved energy supply plans that encompass the reliable and efficient operation of the Utilities’ owned generation, the procurement of all fuels and purchased power and resource optimization. The process includes assessments of projected loads and resources, assessments of expected market prices, evaluations of relevant supply portfolio options available to the Utilities, and evaluations of the risk attributable to those supply portfolio options. Financial instruments for economic hedging in conjunction with energy purchases and sales are also used to mitigate these risks.

Liquidity and Access to Capital Markets

          With volatile energy costs and substantial commitments to construction, SPR and the Utilities’ liquidity needs and access to capital markets is a significant business issue. As such, management continues to evaluate opportunities to refinance high yield debt at lower interest rates. Management has been and continues to be focused on returning the Utilities’ senior secured debt to investment grade credit quality. Significant amounts of capital may be necessary to fund the construction costs of new power plants and, as such, management may be required to meet such financial obligation with a combination of internally generated funds, the use of the Utilities’ revolving credit facilities, the issuance of long-term debt and, if necessary, capital contributions from SPR. If energy costs rise at a rapid rate, and the Utilities do not recover in a timely manner, the cost of fuel and purchased power, the Utilities may need to issue more debt to support their operating costs or may need to delay capital expenditures.

          So far in 2006, the Utilities completed major financing transactions of approximately $1.3 billion that lowered our interest costs, improved liquidity and extended maturities which include:

• issuance of $325 million of NPC’s 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes

• issuance of $370 million of NPC’s 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due 2036

• issuance of $210 million of NPC’s 5.95% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due 2016

• issuance of $92.5 million of various NPC Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds

• increases to NPC’s and SPPC’s Revolving Credit facilities to $600 million and $350 million, respectively

• issuance of $300 million of SPPC’s 6.0% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due 2016

• redemptions of various NPC debt of approximately $667.8 million

• redemption and payments of various SPPC debt of approximately $249 million

          In addition, on October 27, 2006, SPPC announced notice of redemption for various tax-exempt bonds for approximately $91.3 million, to be redeemed on November 30, 2006.

Regulatory

          As is the case with most regulated entities, the Utilities are frequently involved in various regulatory proceedings. The Utilities are required to file for annual rate adjustments to provide recovery of their fuel and purchased power costs. They are also required to file rate cases every two years to adjust general rates that include their cost of service and return on investment in order to more closely align earned returns with those allowed by regulators. In addition, as necessary the Utilities can file for a change to their BTER rates to more closely match actual prices. The Utilities remain committed to maintaining a positive relationship with their regulators. Details regarding recently approved and pending rate cases are discussed below inRegulatory Proceedingsand in the 2005 Form 10-K.

37

SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Sierra Pacific Resources (Consolidated)

          The operating results of SPR primarily reflect those of NPC and SPPC, discussed later. The Holding Company’s (stand alone) operating results included approximately $39.8 million and $64.4 million of interest costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in interest costs were primarily due to the conversion of SPR’s $300 million 7.25% Convertible Notes due 2010, the repurchase of the 7.93% Senior Notes associated with the Old PIES, using proceeds from SPR’s 6.75% Senior Notes, and the reduced interest rate of 7.803% on the Senior Notes associated with the New PIES. See Note 7, Long-Term Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

          During the three months ended September 30, 2006, SPR had earnings applicable to common stock of approximately $222.2 million compared to $61.0 million for the same period in 2005. SPR’s consolidated results for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 increased primarily as a result of the July 20, 2006, Nevada Supreme Court ruling which allows NPC to recover the approximate $180 million of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs, for further discussion of the legal proceeding, see Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements. Additionally contributing to SPR’s increase in earnings applicable to common stock was improved operating income (excluding the $180 million reinstatement), the carrying charge on Lenzie and a charge recorded in 2005 for $54 million in early debt conversion fees associated with SPR’s convertible notes.

          During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, SPR had earnings applicable to common stock of approximately $251.3 million compared to $60.6 million for the same period in 2005. Earnings increased primarily due to the items noted above for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and a decrease in interest expense compared to the same period in the prior year.

ANALYSIS OF CASH FLOWS

          SPR’s consolidated net cash flows increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, primarily as a result of an increase in cash from financing and operating activities, offset partially by an increase in cash used for investing activities. SPR received net proceeds of approximately $280.6 million from the issuance of 20 million shares of common stock in August 2006, of which $200 million was transferred to NPC as a capital contribution.

          At various times within the first nine months of 2006, NPC borrowed a total of $710 million under its revolving credit facility and repaid a total of $810 million, including $150 million borrowed in 2005, using net proceeds from issuance of $905 million of NPC’s General Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, N and O and a $200 million capital contribution from SPR. The remainder of the proceeds, together with the draw on the credit facility and cash from operations, was utilized to redeem approximately $563 million of outstanding debt and to pay associated costs, and to finance net construction costs of $496 million. NPC also refinanced $92.5 million of Revenue Bonds with newly issued auction rate Revenue Bonds during 2006. During this period SPPC borrowed approximately $198 million under its revolving credit facility and also issued $300 million 6.0% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes Series M. The draw on the credit facility was used to retire approximately $198 million of SPPC’s Medium Term Notes Series A, B and C, and the net proceeds of the $300 million offering were used to pay off the amount borrowed under the revolving credit facility, to redeem $50 million of preferred stock and to pay associated costs, premium and dividends. The balance will be used to redeem $20 million in debt maturing in November 2006.

          Cash used for investing activities increased significantly when compared to the same period in 2005 due primarily to the acquisition of Silverhawk by NPC and for SPPC’s expansion of the Tracy Generating Station. This was offset by a reduction in construction at Lenzie which was placed in service in 2006.

          Cash from operations increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to increases in deferred energy and general rates offset partially by increases in accounts receivables, a decrease in collections for deferred energy balances due to the ending of collection periods, and the settlement with Enron. Also offsetting the increase in operating cash was a reduction in accounts payable primarily associated with purchase power suppliers.

38

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (SPR CONSOLIDATED)

Overall Liquidity

          SPR’s consolidated operating cash flows are primarily derived from the operations of NPC and SPPC. The primary source of operating cash flows for the Utilities is revenues (including the recovery of previously deferred energy costs and natural gas costs) from sales of electricity and natural gas. Significant uses of cash flows from operations include the purchase of electricity and natural gas, other operating expenses and interest.

          On August 15, 2006, SPR issued 20 million shares of common stock. Net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $280.6 million. The majority of the proceeds, approximately $200 million, were contributed to NPC, which used the proceeds to repay indebtedness on its revolving credit facility. SPR has invested the remaining proceeds in highly liquid short-term investments pending their use, which may be for additional capital contributions to NPC and/or SPPC, for repayment of a portion of SPR debt, or for general corporate purposes.

Available Liquidity as of September 30, 2006 (in millions)
	SPR		NPC		SPPC
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	121.2	$	46.1	$	83.5
Balance available on Revolving Credit Facility		N/A		495.0		342.0
Total Available Liquidity1	$	121.2	$	541.1	$	425.5

¹ On October 27, 2006, NPC paid $50 million on its’ revolving credit facility using cash on hand, as such, the available balance under the revolving credit facility as of October 30, 2006 is $545 million.

          SPR has approximately $51.8 million payable of debt service obligations for 2006 of which SPR paid approximately $47.9 million, through dividends from the Utilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. SPR has approximately $3.9 million payable of debt service obligations remaining during 2006, which SPR expects to meet through the payment of dividends by the Utilities to SPR. See Dividends from Subsidiaries below.

          SPR and the Utilities anticipate that they will be able to meet operating costs such as fuel and purchased power costs with internally generated funds, including the recovery of deferred energy and external borrowings. However, to fund capital requirements, as discussed in the 2005 Form 10-K, SPR and the Utilities may meet such financial obligations with a combination of internally generated funds, the use of the Utilities’ revolving credit facilities and if necessary, the issuance of long-term debt and/or capital contributions from SPR.

          During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, there were no material changes to contractual obligations as set forth in SPR’s 2005 Form 10-K for SPR (holding company). However, NPC and SPPC did enter into certain contractual obligations, which are discussed in their respective sections.

Capital Stock Transaction

          On May 1, 2006, SPR’s shareholders approved an amendment to SPR’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of SPR common stock by 100,000,000 shares for a total amount of 350,000,000 authorized shares.

          On August 15, 2006, SPR issued 20 million shares of its $1 par value common stock. Net proceeds from the issuance were $280.6 million. On August 15,2006, SPR contributed capital to NPC for approximately $200 million. NPC used the proceeds to repay indebtedness under its revolving credit facility. SPR has invested the remaining proceeds in highly liquid short-term investments pending their use, which may be for additional capital contributions to NPC and/or SPPC, for repayment of a portion of SPR debt, or for general corporate purposes. As of September 30, 2006 SPR has 350 million shares of common stock authorized and 220.9 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Factors Affecting Liquidity

Effect of Holding Company Structure

          As of September 30, 2006, SPR (on a stand-alone basis) has outstanding debt and other obligations including, but not limited to: $99 million of its unsecured 7.803% Senior Notes due 2012; $225 million of its 6.75% Senior Notes due 2017; and $335 million of its unsecured 8.625% Senior Notes due 2014.

39

          Due to the holding company structure, SPR’s right as a common shareholder to receive assets of any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is junior to the claims against the assets of such subsidiary by its creditors and preferred stockholders. Therefore, SPR’s debt obligations are effectively subordinated to all existing and future claims of the creditors of NPC and SPPC and its other subsidiaries, including trade creditors, debt holders, secured creditors, taxing authorities and guarantee holders.

          As of September 30, 2006, SPR, NPC, SPPC, and their subsidiaries had approximately $4.2 billion of debt and other obligations outstanding, consisting of approximately $2.45 billion of debt at NPC, approximately $1.09 billion of debt at SPPC and approximately $660 million of debt at the holding company and other subsidiaries. Although SPR and the Utilities are parties to agreements that limit the amount of additional indebtedness they may incur, SPR and the Utilities retain the ability to incur substantial additional indebtedness and other liabilities.

Dividends from Subsidiaries

          Since SPR is a holding company, substantially all of its cash flow is provided by dividends paid to SPR by NPC and SPPC on their common stock, all of which is owned by SPR. Since NPC and SPPC are public utilities, they are subject to regulation by state utility commissions, which impose limits on investment returns or otherwise impact the amount of dividends that the Utilities may declare and pay. In the PUCN order for Dockets 05-10024 and 05-10025, dated February 28, 2006, a dividend restriction was instituted for both utilities. Under this restriction, the combined amount that NPC and SPPC may pay to SPR each year is limited to the actual cash necessary to service SPR’s debt for the year. This restriction will expire when the Utilities’ senior secured debt is rated investment grade by two of the three credit rating agencies. See “Credit Ratings” below for discussion of current ratings.

          In addition, certain agreements entered into by the Utilities set restrictions on the amount of dividends they may declare and pay and restrict the circumstances under which such dividends may be declared and paid. The specific agreements entered into by the Utilities, restrictions on dividends contained in agreements to which NPC and SPPC are party, as well as specific regulatory limitations on dividends, are discussed in Note 10, Debt Covenant and Other Restrictions in the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report and in Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

          As of September 30, 2006, each Utility was able to pay dividends, subject to a cap, under the most restrictive test in its financing agreements; however, the total amount of dividends that the Utilities can pay to SPR under their financing agreements does not currently significantly restrict their ability to pay dividends because the maximum amount of dividends that can be paid under their financing agreements is greater than the amount that the Utilities can pay under the PUCN dividend restriction. As of September 30, 2006, NPC had paid $32 million in dividends to SPR and SPPC had paid $16 million in dividends to SPR. On October 24, 2006, NPC and SPPC declared a $17.3 million and $8.6 million common stock dividend, respectively, to SPR.

Limitations on Indebtedness

          The terms of SPR’s $335 million 8.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due March 15, 2014, $99 million 7.803% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2012 and $225 million 6.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2017 restrict SPR and any of its Restricted Subsidiaries (NPC and SPPC) from incurring any additional indebtedness unless:

          1. at the time the debt is incurred, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to fixed charges for SPR’s most recently ended four quarter period on a pro forma basis is at least 2 to 1, or

          2. the debt incurred is specifically permitted under the terms of the respective series of Senior Notes, which permits the incurrence of certain credit facility or letter of credit indebtedness, obligations incurred to finance property construction or improvement, indebtedness incurred to refinance existing indebtedness, certain intercompany indebtedness, hedging obligations, indebtedness incurred to support bid, performance or surety bonds, and certain letters of credit supporting SPR’s or any Restricted Subsidiary’s obligations to energy suppliers, or

          3. the indebtedness is incurred to finance capital expenditures pursuant to NPC’s 2003 Integrated Resource Plan and SPPC’s 2004 Integrated Resource Plan.

          If the respective series of Senior Notes are upgraded to investment grade by both Moody’s and S&P, these restrictions will be suspended and will no longer be in effect so long as the respective series of Senior Notes remain investment grade. As of September 30, 2006, SPR, NPC and SPPC would have been able to issue approximately $2.2 billion of additional indebtedness on a consolidated basis, assuming an interest rate of 7%, per the requirement stated in number 1 above.

40

Credit Ratings

          Fitch upgraded the ratings of SPR and the two Utilities on September 20, 2006. The ratings for the senior secured debt of NPC and SPPC were increased to BBB-, the minimum level for investment grade. The senior unsecured debt for all three companies was also upgraded. The rating outlook for SPR, NPC and SPPC was revised from Positive to Stable. On September 22, 2006, S&P upgraded the rating of NPC’s and SPPC’s senior secured debt from BB to BB+, one level below investment grade. On September 27, 2006, Moody’s re-affirmed its rating for NPC’s and SPPC’s senior secured debt at Ba1, one level below investment grade.

          A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Security ratings are subject to revision and withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Cross Default Provisions

          None of the Utilities’ financing agreements contain a cross-default provision that would result in an event of default by that Utility upon an event of default by SPR or the other Utility under any of their respective financing agreements. Certain of SPR’s financing agreements, however, do contain cross-default provisions that would result in event of default by SPR upon an event of default by the Utilities under their respective financing agreements. In addition, certain financing agreements of each of SPR and the Utilities provide for an event of default if there is a failure under other financing agreements of that entity to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due. Most of these default provisions (other than ones relating to a failure to pay other indebtedness) provide for a cure period of 30-60 days from the occurrence of a specified event, during which time SPR or the Utilities may rectify or correct the situation before it becomes an event of default. The primary cross-default provisions in SPR’s and the Utilities’ various financing agreements are summarized in the 2005 Form 10-K in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Sierra Pacific Resources — Liquidity and Capital Resources (SPR Consolidated),” and remain unchanged from their description in the 2005 Form 10-K.

NEVADA POWER COMPANY

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          During the three months ended September 30, 2006, NPC recognized net income of approximately $211.1 million compared to $99.5 million for the same period in 2005. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, NPC recognized net income of approximately $236.3 million compared to $112.4 million for the same period in 2005. NPC’s net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased significantly from prior periods primarily due to the reinstatement of deferred energy costs as discussed further in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case in the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements. As of September 30, 2006, NPC had paid $32.0 million in common stock dividends to SPR. On October 24, 2006, NPC declared a $17.3 million common stock dividend to SPR.

          Gross margin is presented by NPC in order to provide information by segment that management believes aids the reader in determining how profitable the electric business is at the most fundamental level. Gross margin, which is a “non-GAAP financial measure” as defined in accordance with SEC rules, provides a measure of income available to support the other operating expenses of the business and is utilized by management in its analysis of its business.

41

          The components of gross margin were (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months								Nine Months
	Ended September 30,								Ended September 30,
						Change from								Change from
	2006		2005			Prior Year %			2006		2005			Prior Year %
Operating Revenues:
Electric	$	776,235	$	675,181			15.0	%	$	1,701,379	$	1,480,699			14.9	%
Energy Costs:
Purchased Power		289,975		393,414			-26.3	%		638,664		763,096			-16.3	%
Fuel for Power generation		183,622		86,282			112.8	%		425,138		195,134			117.9	%
Deferral of energy costs-electric-net		19,960		(76,899	)		-126.0	%		53,748		(32,965	)		-263.0	%
		493,557		402,797			22.5	%		1,117,550		925,265			20.8	%
Gross Margin before reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs	$	282,678	$	272,384			3.8	%	$	583,829	$	555,434			5.1	%
Reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs1	$	178,825	$	—			N/A		$	178,825	$	—			N/A
Gross Margin after reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs	$	461,503	$	272,384			69.4	%	$	762,654	$	555,434			37.3	%

¹ Gross Margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased significantly from prior periods primarily due to the reinstatement of deferred energy costs as discussed further in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case in the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements.

          The causes for significant changes in specific lines comprising the results of operations for NPC are discussed below (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

Electric Operating Revenues

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential	$	402,746	$	332,621		21.1	%	$	811,100	$	668,927		21.3	%
Commercial		135,031		117,709		14.7	%		338,159		298,954		13.1	%
Industrial		218,301		195,355		11.7	%		495,829		435,979		13.7	%
Retail revenues		756,078		645,685		17.1	%		1,645,088		1,403,860		17.2	%
Other1		20,157		29,496		-31.7	%		56,291		76,839		-26.7	%
Total Revenues	$	776,235	$	675,181		15.0	%	$	1,701,379	$	1,480,699		14.9	%
Retail sales in thousands of megawatt-hours (MWH)		7,105		6,684		6.3	%		16,567		15,286		8.4	%
Average retail revenue per MWH	$	106.41	$	96.60		10.2	%	$	99.30	$	91.84		8.1	%

¹ Primarily wholesale.

          Nevada Power retail revenues increased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to the same periods in the prior year due to increases in retail rates, customer growth, and hotter weather. Retail rates increased as a result of NPC’s various BTER and Deferred Energy Cases (refer to “Regulatory Proceedings”). Retail customers increased by 4.8% and 5.0% for the three months ended and the nine months ended September 30, 2006 respectively.

42

          Based on NPC’s projected customer forecast, NPC expects retail electric customers in the Clark County area to continue to grow. On June 28, 2006, NPC announced that its electric rates are expected to remain stable until 2007 following the approval of a stipulation agreement by the PUCN. The approved agreement allows full recovery by NPC of its incurred fuel and purchase power costs, but did not affect rates on August 1, 2006, because of previously approved rate changes. For further discussion on the various cases see Regulatory Proceedings, later.

          Electric Operating Revenues — Other decreased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005, primarily due to revenues associated with Mojave which have been reclassified to Other Regulatory Assets as a result of the shut down of the Mohave Generating Station (“Mohave”). For further discussion of Mohave refer to Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies in the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements. Also contributing to the decrease were decreases in energy usage by public authority customers due to the transitioning to distribution-only service.

Purchased Power

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Purchased Power	$	289,975	$	393,414		-26.3	%	$	638,664	$	763,096		-16.3	%
Purchased Power in thousands of MWhs		3,441		4,834		-28.8	%		8,363		10,403		-19.6	%
Average cost per MWh of Purchased Power	$	84.27	$	81.38		3.6	%	$	76.37	$	73.35		4.1	%

          NPC’s purchased power costs declined for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, primarily due to an increase in internal generation. Earlier this year, NPC began operating Silverhawk and Lenzie. These stations provided generated energy, reducing the need for purchased power during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. Average costs per megawatt hour increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005, primarily due to fixed capacity charges and a decrease in megawatt hours.

Fuel For Power Generation

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Fuel for Power Generation	$	183,622	$	86,282		112.8	%	$	425,138	$	195,134		117.9	%
Thousands of MWhs generated		4,099		2,286		79.3	%		9,314		6,021		54.7	%
Average cost per MWh of Generated Power	$	44.80	$	37.74		18.7	%	$	45.65	$	32.41		40.8	%

          Fuel for power generation increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to several factors:

• With the addition of Silverhawk and Lenzie it was more economical for NPC to rely on its own generation rather than the purchase of power. As such, the increase in volume of MWh’s generated increased significantly compared to the same periods in the prior year.

• The shutdown of Mohave as of the beginning of the year increased the cost per MWh of generated power. Although Silverhawk and Lenzie are highly efficient generation stations, the cost of coal is substantially lower than the cost of natural gas. Mohave generation during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 represented approximately 18% of total generation.

43

• Hedging instruments purchased when gas prices were escalating as a result of the 2005 hurricanes in the southern United States increased fuel for power generation costs. The settlement of these instruments during the second and third quarters of 2006 negatively impacted the average cost per MWh as natural gas prices were decreasing during this period.

Deferred Energy Costs — Net

	Three Months									Nine Months
	Ended September 30,									Ended September 30,
							Change from									Change from
	2006			2005			Prior Year %			2006			2005			Prior Year %
Reinstatement of deferred energy costs	$	(178,825	)	$	—			N/A		$	(178,825	)	$	—			N/A
Deferred energy costs — net	$	19,960		$	(76,899	)		-125.9	%	$	53,748		$	(32,965	)		-263.0	%

          Reinstatement of deferred energy costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 represents the July 20, 2006 decision by the Nevada Supreme Court which ruled NPC is allowed to recover $180 million of the disallowed deferred energy costs and directed the District Court to remand the issue back to the PUCN to determine the rate schedule that will be used to recover this amount. In all other respects, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the District Court’s decision on the PUCN disallowance. As a result of the Nevada Supreme Court decision, NPC recorded approximately $180 million,before tax,of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs in its Statements of Operations as “Reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs.” NPC is unable to predict the terms of the rate schedule that the PUCN will provide for recovery of this amount.

          Deferred energy costs — net represents the difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs incurred during the period and amounts recoverable through current rates. To the extent actual costs exceed amounts recoverable through current rates, the excess is recognized as a reduction in costs. Conversely to the extent actual costs are less than amounts recoverable through current rates, the difference is recognized as an increase in costs. Deferred energy costs — net also include the current amortization of fuel and purchased power costs previously deferred. Reference Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Deferral of Energy Costs of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for further detail of deferred energy balances.

          Amounts include amortization of deferred energy costs for the three months ending September 30, 2006 and 2005 of $43.4 million and $36.3 million, respectively; and under-collections of amounts recoverable in rates of $23.5 million and $113.2 million, respectively. Amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 include amortization of deferred energy costs of $95.8 million and $108.5 million, respectively; and under-collections of amounts recoverable in rates of $42.1 million and $141.4 million, respectively.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC)

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Allowance for other funds used during construction	$	1,986	$	5,119		-61.2	%	$	10,140	$	13,017		-22.1	%
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction	$	1,978	$	6,362		-68.9	%	$	10,050	$	16,154		-37.8	%
	$	3,964	$	11,481		-65.5	%	$	20,190	$	29,171		-30.8	%

          AFUDC for NPC is lower for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005 due to a decrease in Construction Work in Progress (CWIP). The decrease is primarily due to the completion of Blocks 1 and 2 of Lenzie and Harry Allen Unit 4.

44

Other (Income) and Expenses

	Three Months									Nine Months
	Ended September 30,									Ended September 30,
							Change from									Change from
	2006			2005			Prior Year %			2006			2005			Prior Year %
Other operating expense	$	54,927		$	55,760			-1.5	%	$	156,765		$	155,971			0.5	%
Maintenance expense	$	15,719		$	10,624			48.0	%	$	44,307		$	43,976			0.8	%
Depreciation and amortization	$	34,955		$	31,258			11.8	%	$	104,076		$	92,421			12.6	%
Interest charges on long-term debt	$	43,355		$	38,587			12.4	%	$	132,285		$	121,729			8.7	%
Interest charges-other	$	4,537		$	4,204			7.9	%	$	11,828		$	12,775			-7.4	%
Carrying charge for Lenzie	$	(10,040	)	$	—			N/A		$	(23,206	)	$	—			N/A
Interest accrued on deferred energy	$	(4,786	)	$	(5,557	)		-13.9	%	$	(17,695	)	$	(14,298	)		23.8	%
Other income	$	(4,080	)	$	(5,238	)		-22.1	%	$	(12,831	)	$	(17,600	)		-27.1	%
Other expense	$	2,050		$	1,608			27.5	%	$	6,353		$	5,001			27.0	%

          Other operating expense for the three month period ending September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 decreased primarily due to lower operating expenses for Clark and Mohave as well as Enron legal fees incurred in 2005; partially offset by higher operating costs for Lenzie and Silverhawk.

          Other operating expense for the nine month period ending September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 increased primarily due to higher operating costs for Lenzie and Silverhawk; partially offset by lower operating expenses for Clark and Mohave and higher legal fees incurred in 2005.

          The increase in maintenance expense for the three month period ending September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 is due to the addition of Lenzie and Silverhawk in 2006 and forced outages at Reid Gardner Units 1, 2 and 3 due to tube leaks; partially offset by lower maintenance costs for Mohave.

          The increase in maintenance expense for the nine month period ending September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 is due to the addition of Lenzie and Silverhawk in 2006; partially offset by lower maintenance costs for Mohave.

          Depreciation and amortization expenses were higher for the three months and the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily as a result of increases to plant-in-service. The increase is primarily due to the purchase of Silverhawk and completion of the Harry Allen Unit IV.

          Interest charges on Long-Term Debt increased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same periods in 2005 primarily due to the issuance in January 2006 of $210 million Series M, General and Refunding Mortgage Notes and the use of the Revolving Credit facility. The $210 million was issued to fund the acquisition of the Silverhawk Generating Facility. Interest expense related to this issuance was approximately $8.7 million. NPC’s use of the Revolving Credit Facility increased in 2006 primarily due to increased capital expenditures related to the Lenzie Generating Station. Interest expense for the Revolving Credit Facility was approximately $12.3 million compared to $1.9 million in the prior year.

          The increase in interest charges on long-term debt was partially offset by a reduction in average interest rates as a result of financing transactions aimed at replacing high yield debt with lower interest rate debt. See Note 4, Long-Term Debt in the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for additional information regarding long-term debt.

          The change in interest charges-other for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same periods in 2005, were due to higher costs related to new debt issues and redemptions as discussed above, offset partially by settlements in 2005 with terminated energy suppliers which reduced associated interest costs.

          NPC’s interest accrued on deferred energy for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 changed when compared to the same periods in 2005, due to changes to deferred energy asset balances, excluding deferred energy assets of $179 million due to Nevada Supreme Court decision reversing the deferred energy costs disallowance. See Note 3, Regulatory Actions of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for further discussion of deferred energy accounting issues. See Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statement for further discussion of the Nevada Supreme Court Decision.

45

          Carrying charges on Lenzie for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 of $10 million and $23.2 million, respectively, represent carrying charges earned on the incurred debt component of the acquisition and construction costs of the completed Lenzie Generating Station. The PUCN authorized NPC to accrue a carrying charge for the cost of acquisition and construction until the plant is included in rates. See Note 1 of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for discussion of the accounting for the carrying charge for Lenzie.

          Other income decreased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to the lower amortization of gains associated with disposition of SO2 allowances and the expiration of the amortization associated with the disposition of property.

          Other expense increased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due to increases in pension costs, donations, lobbying and advertising expenses.

ANALYSIS OF CASH FLOWS

          NPC’s cash flows increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to an increase in cash from financing and operating activities offset partially by increased use of cash in investing activities.

          At various times within the first nine months of 2006, NPC borrowed a total of $710 million under its revolving credit facility and repaid a total of $810 million, including $150 million borrowed in 2005, using net proceeds of issuance of $905 million of NPC’s General Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, N and O and a $200 million capital contribution from SPR. The remainder of the proceeds, together with the draw on the credit facility and cash from operations, was utilized to redeem approximately $563 million of outstanding debt and to pay associated costs, and to finance net construction costs of $496 million. NPC also paid dividends to SPR of approximately $32 million and refinanced $92.5 million of Revenue Bonds with newly issued auction rate Revenue Bonds during 2006.

          Cash used by investing activities increased when compared to the same period in 2005 due primarily to the acquisition of Silverhawk, offset by a reduction in spending at Lenzie which was placed in service in 2006.

          Cash from operations decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, due primarily to increases in accounts receivable due to unseasonably warm weather, a decrease in collections for deferred energy balances due to the ending of collection periods, and the settlement with Enron. In addition, the decrease in cash was due to a reduction in accounts payable primarily associated with purchase power suppliers. These decreases in cash were partially offset by rate increases for deferred energy.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (NPC)

Overall Liquidity

          NPC’s primary source of operating cash flows are electric revenues, including the recovery of previously deferred energy costs. Significant uses of cash flows from operations include the purchase of electricity and natural gas, other operating expenses and the payment of interest on NPC’s outstanding indebtedness. On August 15, 2006, SPR issued 20 million shares of common stock. Net proceeds from the issuance were $280.6 million. On August 15, 2006, SPR contributed capital to NPC for approximately $200 million. NPC used the proceeds to repay indebtedness under its revolving credit facility.

Available Liquidity as of September 30, 2006 (in millions)
	NPC
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	46.1
Balance available on Revolving Credit Facility		495.0
Total Available Liquidity1	$	541.1

¹ On October 27, 2006, NPC paid $50 million on its’ revolving credit facility using cash on hand, as such, the available balance under the revolving credit facility as of October 30, 2006, is $545 million.

          NPC anticipates that it will be able to meet operating costs, such as fuel and purchased power costs with internally generated funds, including the recovery of deferred energy and external borrowings. However, to fund capital requirements, as discussed below, NPC may be required to meet such financial obligations with a combination of internally generated funds, the use of its revolving credit facility and if necessary, the issuance of long-term debt and/or capital contributions from SPR.

46

          During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, there were no material changes to the contractual obligations described in NPC’s 2005 Form 10-K except for a long-term maintenance contract for the Silverhawk Generating Station and certain financing transactions as discussed below.

Financing Transactions

Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 2006A and 2006B

          On August 17, 2006, on behalf of NPC, Clark County, Nevada (Clark County) issued $39.5 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, due January 1, 2036. On the same date, on behalf of NPC, Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation (Coconino County) issued $40 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, due September 1, 2032, and $13 million aggregate principal amount of its Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, due March 1, 2039.

          In connection with the issuance of these Bonds, NPC entered into financing agreements with Clark County and Coconino County, pursuant to which Clark County and Coconino County will lend the proceeds from the sales of the bonds to NPC. NPC’s payment obligations under the financing agreement are secured by NPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series P.

          The interest rates of the Bonds will be determined by an auction. The method of determining the interest rate on the Bonds may be converted from time to time so that such Bonds would thereafter bear interest at a daily, weekly, flexible, auction or term rate as designated.

          The proceeds of the offering were used to refund the following, all of which were previously issued for the benefit of NPC:

• $39.5 million principal amount of Clark County’s Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1992B,

• $20 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1996,

• $20 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1997B, and

• $13 million principal amount of Coconino County’s Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1995E.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O

          On May 12, 2006, NPC issued and sold $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018. The Series O Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering, together with available cash, were utilized to:

• fund the early redemption of $78 million aggregate principal amounts of NPC’s 7.2% Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 C, due 2022,

• fund the early redemption, in June 2006, of approximately $72.2 million aggregate principal amount of NPC’s 7.75% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2038 (when the debentures were repaid upon redemption, the proceeds from the repayment were used to simultaneously redeem an equal amount of the 7.75% Cumulative Quarterly Preferred Securities of NVP Capital III, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NPC),

• repay amounts outstanding under NPC’s revolving credit facility, and

• pay related fees from the offering, and for general corporate purposes.

          On June 26, 2006, NPC issued an additional $75 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, as part of the same series as the original Notes. The aggregate principal amount of 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018, outstanding is $325 million as of September 30, 2006. The proceeds from the second issuance, along with the proceeds from an offering of $120 million of NPC’s 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due 2036 (described below) were used to pay the total consideration for the tender offer for the 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, described below. The remaining proceeds were used to pay related fees and expenses from this offering, and for general corporate purposes.

47

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N

          On April 3, 2006, NPC issued and sold $250 million of its 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due April 1, 2036. The Series N Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering, together with available cash, were utilized to:

• fund the early redemption of $35 million aggregate principal amount of NPC’s 8.50% Series Z First Mortgage Bonds due 2023 plus approximately $1 million of associated redemption premiums,

• fund the early redemption of $105 million aggregate principal amount of 6.70% Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, due 2022, and

• fund the early redemption of approximately $122.5 million aggregate principal amount of NPC’s 8.20% Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2037 (when the debentures were repaid upon redemption, the proceeds from the repayment were used to simultaneously redeem an equal amount of the 8.20% Cumulative Quarterly Preferred Securities of NVP Capital I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NPC).

          On June 26, 2006, NPC issued an additional $120 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, as part of the same series as the original Notes. The aggregate principal amount of 6.65% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series N, due 2036, outstanding is $370 million as of September 30, 2006. The proceeds from the second issuance, along with the proceeds from an offering of $75 million of NPC’s 6.5% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series O, due 2018 (described above) were used to pay the total consideration for the tender offer on the 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, described below.

Tender Offer for General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E

          On June 1, 2006, NPC commenced a tender offer for all of its 10.875% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series E, due 2009. In conjunction with that offer, NPC solicited the consent of holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Notes to eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants contained in the officer’s certificate governing the Notes. Approximately $150 million of $162.5 million Series E Notes outstanding were validly tendered and accepted by NPC. Those holders who tendered the Notes and delivered their consents by June 14, 2006 were entitled to receive a consent payment of $30 per $1000 principal amount of Notes, plus tender consideration for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes validly tendered. Those holders who tendered the Notes after June 14, 2006, but prior to June 28, 2006, were entitled to receive the tender consideration only. This tender consideration was $1,038.45 in cash plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the June 29, 2006 settlement date per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes tendered. Proceeds from the June 26, 2006 issuance of Series N and Series O Notes (discussed above) were used to fund the tender offer. The total consideration (including the consent payment and accrued interest) paid on June 29, 2006 was approximately $163.6 million. At September 30, 2006, approximately $12.6 million of the Series E Notes remained outstanding. On October 16, 2006, NPC redeemed the remaining $12.6 million aggregate principal amount of the Series E Notes, plus accrued interest, using available cash on hand.

Revolving Credit Facility

          On April 19, 2006, NPC increased the size of its second amended and restated revolving credit facility expiring 2010 to $600 million. The facility will provide additional liquidity for increased commodity prices and temporary bridge financing of capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2006, NPC had $55 million of letters of credit outstanding and had borrowed $50 million under the revolving credit facility. As of October 30, 2006, NPC had $55 million of letters of credit outstanding and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility.

          The NPC Credit Agreement contains two financial maintenance covenants. The first requires that NPC maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capital, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, not to exceed 0.68 to 1. The second requires that NPC maintain a ratio of consolidated cash flow to consolidated interest expense, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, not to be less than 2.0 to 1. As of September 30, 2006, NPC was in compliance with these covenants.

          The NPC Credit Agreement provides for an event of default if there is a failure under NPC’s other financing agreements to meet certain payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due.

          The NPC Credit Agreement places certain restrictions on debt incurrence, liens and dividends. These restrictions are discussed in Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M

          On January 18, 2006, NPC issued and sold $210 million of its 5.95% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due March 15, 2016. The Series M Notes were issued with registration rights. On February 10,2006 the net proceeds of the issuance plus available cash were used to repay $210 million of amounts outstanding under NPC’s revolving credit facility, which were borrowed to finance the purchase of a 75% ownership interest in the Silverhawk Generating Facility.

48

Factors Affecting Liquidity

Limitations on Indebtedness

          Certain factors impact NPC’s ability to issue debt:

1. Financing Authority from the PUCN; In February 2006 NPC received PUCN authorization to enter into financings of $1.78 billion, which amount included $600 million for the revolving credit facility (described above). NPC has issued approximately $100 million of the new debt authorized under the PUCN Order. NPC’s only remaining authority under this PUCN Order allows NPC to refinance its existing debt and to use its $600 million revolving credit facility.

2. Limits on Bondable Property; To the extent that NPC has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, NPC’s ability to issue secured debt is still limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under the General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture. As of September 30, 2006, NPC had the capacity to issue $599 million of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities.

3. Financial Covenants in its financing agreements.

          The terms of certain SPR debt further prohibit NPC and SPPC from incurring additional indebtedness unless certain conditions have been met. See SPR’s Limitations on Indebtedness for details of these restrictions. In addition to the SPR debt, the terms of NPC’s Series G Notes, which mature in 2013, NPC’s Series I Notes, which mature in 2012, NPC’s Series L Notes, which mature in 2015, and NPC’s Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Facility restrict NPC from incurring any additional indebtedness unless certain covenants are satisfied. See Note 10, Debt Covenant and Other Restrictions of the Notes to Financial Statements in this report and Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions of the Notes to Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K. If NPC’s Series G Notes, Series I Notes, or the Series L Notes are upgraded to investment grade by both Moody’s and S&P, these restrictions will be suspended and will no longer be in effect so long as the applicable series of securities remains investment grade.

          As of September 30, 2006, the financial covenants under the revolving credit facility, which are more restrictive than the Series G, I and L Notes restrictions, would allow NPC to issue up to $2.1 billion of additional debt. The covenant limitations of certain SPR debt place a cap on additional indebtedness, on a consolidated basis, including SPPC and NPC, of $2.2 billion as of September 30, 2006. Therefore, NPC would not be materially limited by SPR’s cap on additional indebtedness. However, since NPC currently has no PUCN authority to issue new debt, NPC is limited to borrowing under its credit facility. As of October 30, 2006, the balance available under the credit facility is $545 million.

          Since SPR’s debt covenant limitations are calculated on a consolidated basis, SPR’s debt covenant limitations may allow for higher or lower borrowings than $2.2 billion, depending on the Utilities’ combined usage of their respective revolving credit facilities at the time of the covenant calculation.

Discharge of NPC’s First Mortgage Indenture

          On August 17, 2006, following the refunding of the $39.5 million aggregate principal amount of Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds (PCRBs), Series 1992B, (see above) the first mortgage bonds which secured the PCRBs were retired.

          On August 30, 2006, NPC exchanged $115 million in aggregate principal amount of First Mortgage Bonds, Series BB and Series CC, for $115 million in aggregate principal amount of General and Refunding Mortgage Bonds, Series Q. The first mortgage bonds had been issued as security for the $100 million Clark County, Nevada Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A, and the $15 million Clark County, Nevada Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B.

          With the conclusion of these two transactions, NPC had no first mortgage bonds outstanding as of August 30, 2006. On September 13, 2006, NPC’s First Mortgage Indenture was discharged and released by the trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. As of that date, NPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture became the first priority lien on substantially all of NPC’s properties in Nevada.

49

Limitations on Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Bonds

          As of September 30, 2006, $2.7 billion of NPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Securities were outstanding. As mentioned in (3) above under “Limitations on Indebtedness” additional securities may be issued under the General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture as of September 30, 2006. That amount is determined on the basis of:

1. 70% of net utility property additions

2. the principal amount of retired General and Refunding Mortgage Securities, and/or

3. the principal amount of first mortgage bonds retired after October 19, 2001.

          NPC also has the ability to release property from the lien of the mortgage indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash and/or retired bonds. To the extent NPC releases property from the lien of its General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under that indenture.

Credit Ratings

          Fitch upgraded the ratings of SPR and the two Utilities on September 20, 2006. The rating for the senior secured debt of NPC was increased to BBB-, the minimum level for investment grade. The senior unsecured debt for all three companies was also upgraded. The rating outlook for SPR, NPC and SPPC was revised from Positive to Stable. On September 22, 2006, S&P upgraded the rating of NPC’s senior secured debt from BB to BB+, one level below investment grade. On September 27, 2006, Moody’s re-affirmed its rating for NPC’s senior secured debt at Ba1, which is one level below investment grade.

          A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Security ratings are subject to revision and withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Cross Default Provisions

          None of the financing agreements of NPC contain a cross-default provision that would result in an event of default by NPC upon an event of default by SPR or SPPC under any of its financing agreements. In addition, certain financing agreements of NPC provide for an event of default if there is a failure under other financing agreements of NPC to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due. Most of these default provisions (other than ones relating to a failure to pay such other indebtedness when due) provide for a cure period of 30-60 days from the occurrence of a specified event during which time NPC may rectify or correct the situation before it becomes an event of default.

SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

          During the three months ended September 30, 2006, SPPC recognized net income of approximately $20.0 million compared to net income of approximately $21.9 million for the same period in 2005. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, SPPC recognized net income of approximately $42.3 million compared to a net income of approximately $38.9 million for the same period in 2005. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC had paid $16.0 million in common stock dividends to SPR and paid $975 thousand in dividends to holders of its preferred stock. On October 24, 2006, SPPC declared an $8.6 million common stock dividend to SPR.

          Gross margin is presented by SPPC in order to provide information by segment that management believes aids the reader in determining how profitable the electric and gas businesses are at the most fundamental level. Gross margin, which is a “non-GAAP financial measure” as defined in accordance with SEC rules, provides a measure of income available to support the other operating expenses of the business and is utilized by management in its analysis of its business.

50

          The components of gross margin were (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months									Nine Months
	Ended September 30,									Ended September 30,
							Change from								Change from
	2006			2005			Prior Year %			2006		2005			Prior Year %
Operating Revenues:
Electric	$	284,339		$	268,109			6.1	%	$	767,133	$	712,318			7.7	%
Gas		21,106			15,574			35.5	%		141,128		115,248			22.5	%
	$	305,445		$	283,683			7.7	%	$	908,261	$	827,566			9.8	%
Energy Costs:
Purchased Power		106,158			111,409			-4.7	%		267,914		260,498			2.8	%
Fuel for Power generation		73,066			67,439			8.3	%		188,827		176,427			7.0	%
Gas purchased for resale		13,492			12,906			4.5	%		105,240		89,410			17.7	%
Deferral of energy costs-electric-net		(2,260	)		(17,414	)		-87.0	%		20,973		(7,591	)		-376.3	%
Deferral of energy costs-gas-net		1,130			(2,001	)		-156.5	%		7,214		(997	)		-823.6	%
		191,586			172,339			11.2	%		590,168		517,747			14.0	%
Energy Costs by Segment:
Electric		176,964			161,434			9.6	%		477,714		429,334			11.3	%
Gas		14,622			10,905			34.1	%		112,454		88,413			27.2	%
	$	191,586		$	172,339			11.2	%	$	590,168	$	517,747			14.0	%
Gross Margin by Segment:
Electric	$	107,375		$	106,675			0.7	%	$	289,419	$	282,984			2.3	%
Gas		6,484			4,669			38.9	%		28,674		26,835			6.9	%
	$	113,859		$	111,344			2.3	%	$	318,093	$	309,819			2.7	%

          The causes of significant changes in specific lines comprising the results of operations are provided below (dollars in thousands, except for amounts per unit):

Electric Operating Revenues

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior year %			2006		2005		Prior year %
Electric Operating Revenues:
Residential	$	88,528	$	78,271		13.1	%	$	239,109	$	210,403		13.6	%
Commercial		107,502		93,491		15.0	%		280,740		241,758		16.1	%
Industrial		80,438		89,909		-10.5	%		222,755		240,547		-7.4	%
Retail		276,468		261,671		5.7	%		742,604		692,708		7.2	%
Other		7,871		6,438		22.3	%		24,529		19,610		25.1	%
Total Revenues	$	284,339	$	268,109		6.1	%	$	767,133	$	712,318		7.7	%
Retail sales in thousands of MWh		2,376		2,543		-6.6	%		6,546		7,015		-6.7	%
Average retail revenue per MWh	$	116.36	$	102.90		13.1	%	$	113.44	$	98.75		14.9	%

          SPPC’s retail revenues increased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increases in retail rates and to a lesser extent customer growth. Retail rates increased as a result of SPPC’s various BTER and Deferred Energy cases (refer to “Regulatory Proceedings”). Also contributing to the increase was the growth in retail customers for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 (2.8% and 2.8%, respectively). These increases were offset by lower industrial energy revenues and MWh’s as a result of SPPC’s largest industrial customer, Barrick Gold, moving to distribution-only services effective December 1, 2005. On October 5, 2006, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved the recovery of $11.2 million in fuel and purchased power costs under the Energy Cost Adjustment Clause. Effective November 1, 2006, SPPC will begin to collect $10.1 million over a one year period and the remaining amount over a two year period.

51

          Electric Operating Revenues — Other increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005 primarily as a result of Barrick becoming a distribution-only services customer.

Gas Operating Revenues

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior year %			2006		2005		Prior year %
Gas Operating Revenues:
Residential	$	11,369	$	7,110		59.9	%	$	78,901	$	61,204		28.9	%
Commercial		5,448		3,850		41.5	%		37,187		30,327		22.6	%
Industrial		2,895		1,999		44.8	%		14,643		11,121		31.7	%
Retail revenue		19,712		12,959		52.1	%		130,731		102,652		27.4	%
Wholesale revenue		776		1,939		-60.0	%		8,275		10,547		-21.5	%
Miscellaneous		618		676		-8.6	%		2,122		2,049		3.6	%
Total Revenues	$	21,106	$	15,574		35.5	%	$	141,128	$	115,248		22.5	%
Retail sales in thousands of decatherms		1,324		1,163		13.8	%		10,004		10,315		-3.0	%
Average retail revenues per decatherm	$	14.89	$	11.14		33.6	%	$	13.07	$	9.95		31.3	%

          SPPC’s retail gas revenues increased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 primarily due to increases in retail rates. Retail rates increased as a result of SPPC’s various general, energy and deferred energy rate cases (refer to “Regulatory Proceedings”). Also contributing to the increase was the growth in retail customers for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 (4.2% and 4.3%, respectively). Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in customer usage as a result of warmer weather. On May 15, 2006, SPPC filed an application with the PUCN to implement a new deferred energy account adjustment in order to recover natural gas costs and to reset the BTER. If approved by the PUCN, SPPC has requested rates to become effective December 2006 (refer to “Regulatory Proceedings”).

          The wholesale revenues for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, decreased compared to the same period of 2005 primarily due to decreased availability of gas for wholesale sales.

Purchased Power

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Purchased Power	$	106,158	$	111,409		-4.7	%	$	267,914	$	260,498		2.8	%
Purchased Power in thousands of MWhs		1,399		1,449		-3.5	%		4,103		4,228		-3.0	%
Average cost per MW of Purchased Power	$	75.88	$	76.89		-1.3	%	$	65.30	$	61.61		6.0	%

          Purchased power costs decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to a decrease in volume; which was attributed to the loss of a large industrial customer transitioning to distribution only services.

          Purchased power costs increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 primarily due to higher prices of purchased power. Volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased slightly as discussed above.

52

Fuel For Power Generation

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Fuel for Power Generation	$	73,066	$	67,439		8.3	%	$	188,827	$	176,427		7.0	%
Thousands of MWh generated		1,067		1,221		-12.6	%		2,916		3,310		-11.9	%
Average fuel cost per MWh of Generated Power	$	68.48	$	55.23		24.0	%	$	64.76	$	53.30		21.5	%

          Fuel for power generation and the average fuel cost per MWh increased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. The increase is primarily related to increases in natural gas costs during the first quarter of 2006 and hedging instruments that were purchased during the period when gas prices were escalating as a result of the 2005 hurricanes in the southern United States. The settlement of these instruments during the second and third quarters of 2006 negatively impacted the average cost per MWh as natural gas prices were decreasing during these periods. MWh’s generated decreased as compared to 2005 due primarily to a large industrial customer transitioning to distribution only service for 2006.

Gas Purchased for Resale

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
														��
Gas Purchased for Resale	$	13,492	$	12,906		4.5	%	$	105,240	$	89,410		17.7	%
Gas Purchased for Resale (in thousands of decatherms)		1,464		1,487		-1.6	%		11,470		11,874		-3.4	%
Average cost per decatherm	$	9.22	$	8.68		6.2	%	$	9.18	$	7.53		21.9	%

          The cost of gas purchased for resale for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 increased primarily due to hedging instruments that were purchased during the period when gas prices were escalating as a result of the 2005 hurricanes in the southern United States. The settlement of these instruments during the third quarter of 2006 negatively impacted the average cost per decatherm as natural gas prices were decreasing during this period. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in natural gas costs during the third quarter of 2006.

          The cost of gas purchased for resale for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 increased primarily due to higher natural gas prices in the first quarter of 2006, which is typically SPPC’s peak season for its’ gas operations.

53

Deferred Energy Costs

	Three Months									Nine Months
	Ended September 30,									Ended September 30,
							Change from								Change from
	2006			2005			Prior Year %			2006		2005			Prior Year %
Deferred energy costs — electric — net	$	(2,260	)	$	(17,414	)		87.0	%	$	20,973	$	(7,591	)		376.3	%
Deferred energy costs — gas — net		1,130			(2,001	)		-156.5	%		7,214		(997	)		-823.6	%
	$	(1,130	)	$	(19,415	)				$	28,187	$	(8,588	)

          Deferred energy costs — net represents the difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs incurred during the period and amounts recoverable through current rates. To the extent actual costs exceed amounts recoverable through current rates, the excess is recognized as a reduction in costs. Conversely to the extent actual costs are less than amounts recoverable through current rates, the difference is recognized as an increase in costs. Deferred energy costs — net also include the current amortization of fuel and purchased power costs previously deferred. Reference Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Deferral of Energy Costs of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for further detail of deferred energy balances.

          Deferred energy costs — electric net includes amortization of deferred energy costs for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 of $11.8 million and $13.4 million, respectively; and an under-collection of amounts recoverable in rates of $14.1 million and $30.8 million, respectively. Amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 include amortization of deferred energy costs of $34.4 million and $32.1 million, respectively; and an under-collection of amounts recoverable in rates of $13.5 million and $39.7 million, respectively.

          Deferred energy costs — gas — net for 2006 and 2005 include amortization of deferred energy costs for the three months ended September 30, 2006 of $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively; and an over-collection of amounts recoverable in rates of $0.5 million and an under-collection of $2.2 million, respectively. Amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 include amortization of deferred energy costs of $4.8 million and $(0.4) million, respectively; and an over-collection of amounts recoverable in rates of $2.4 million and an under-collection of $0.5 million, respectively.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC)

	Three Months							Nine Months
	Ended September 30,							Ended September 30,
					Change from							Change from
	2006		2005		Prior Year %			2006		2005		Prior Year %
Allowance for other funds used during construction	$	1,357	$	429		216.3	%	$	3,509	$	1,229		185.5	%
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction	$	882	$	390		126.2	%	$	2,819	$	1,129		149.7	%
	$	2,239	$	819		173.5	%	$	6,328	$	2,358		168.4	%

          AFUDC for SPPC is higher for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005 due to an increase in Construction Work-In-Progress (CWIP). The increase is primarily due to the expansion of the Tracy Generating Station.

54

Other (Income) and Expense

	Three Months									Nine Months
	Ended September 30,									Ended September 30,
							Change from									Change from
	2006			2005			Prior Year %			2006			2005			Prior Year %
Other operating expense	$	34,119		$	29,334			16.3	%	$	101,413		$	97,872			3.6	%
Maintenance expense	$	8,065		$	6,313			27.8	%	$	24,833		$	20,064			23.8	%
Depreciation and amortization	$	21,075		$	22,610			-6.8	%	$	66,037		$	67,534			-2.2	%
Interest charges on long-term debt	$	18,134		$	17,307			4.8	%	$	53,958		$	51,933			3.9	%
Interest charges-other	$	1,341		$	1,001			34.0	%	$	3,694		$	3,402			8.6	%
Interest accrued on deferred energy	$	(1,433	)	$	(1,785	)		-19.7	%	$	(4,878	)	$	(5,061	)		-3.6	%
Other income	$	(2,491	)	$	(1,681	)		48.2	%	$	(7,301	)	$	(4,148	)		76.0	%
Other expense	$	2,138		$	1,476			44.9	%	$	6,806		$	4,709			44.5	%

          Other operating expense for the three month and nine month periods ending September 30, 2006 increased from the prior year due to increased amortization of regulatory assets as a result of SPPC’s GRC, as discussed in Regulatory Proceedings. Also contributing to the increase was the recovery of a claim against Pacific Gas and Electric in 2005; partially offset by Enron legal fees incurred in 2005.

          Maintenance costs for the three month and nine month periods ending September 30, 2006 increased from the prior year due to the timing of scheduled and unscheduled plant maintenance at Valmy, Ft. Churchill and Tracy.

          Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 were lower due to the change in depreciation rates as ordered by the PUCN in SPPC’s General Electric and Gas Rate Case. For further information on SPPC’s General and Electric Rate Case see Regulatory Proceedings, later.

          Interest charges on Long-Term Debt increased for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 due primarily to interest on the $300 million Series M Note issued in March 2006, partially offset by debt redemptions in March 2006 of $188 million and an additional debt redemption in April 2006 of $10 million. See Note 4, Long-Term Debt of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for additional information regarding long-term debt.

          Interest charges-other for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased, when compared to the same period in 2005, due to higher costs for early redemptions in March 2006 of $188 million, new issue expenses for the $300 million Series M Note issued in March 2006, and expenses for the debt redemption in April 2006 of $10 million, offset partially by settlements in 2005 with terminated energy suppliers which reduced interest accruals for amounts owed.

          SPPC’s interest accrued on deferred energy for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased compared to the same period in 2005 due to lower deferred energy asset balances during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005. See Note 3, Regulatory Actions of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for further discussion of deferred energy accounting issues.

          SPPC’s other income increased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, primarily due to an increase in interest income associated with higher cash balances from the issuance of new debt in March, as well as gains from the sale of property.

          SPPC’s other expense increased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, due to various charges, all of which were not individually significant.

ANALYSIS OF CASH FLOWS

          SPPC’s cash flows decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, when compared to the same period in 2005, as a result of an increase in cash used in investing activities offset by increases in cash flows from operating and financing activities.

          Cash used by investing activities increased primarily as a result of the expansion of the Tracy plant during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005.

55

          At various times within the first nine months in 2006, SPPC borrowed approximately $198 million under its revolving credit facility and also issued $300 million 6.0% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes Series M. The draw on the credit facility was used to retire approximately $198 million of SPPC’s Medium Term Notes Series A, B and C, and the net proceeds of the $300 million offering were used to pay off the amount borrowed under the revolving credit facility, to redeem $50 million of preferred stock and to pay associated costs, premium and dividends. The balance will be used to redeem $20 million in debt maturing in November 2006. SPPC also paid dividends to SPR of approximately $16 million.

          Cash from operating activities were higher in 2006 mainly due to the settlement of balances outstanding for tax sharing agreements, a reduction in prepayments for energy and increases in general and energy rates, offset by the settlement with Enron during the first quarter.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (SPPC)

Overall Liquidity

          SPPC’s primary source of operating cash flows are electric and gas revenues, including the recovery of previously deferred energy and gas costs. Significant uses of cash flows from operations include the purchase of electricity and natural gas, other operating expenses and the payment of interest on SPPC’s outstanding indebtedness.

Available Liquidity as of September 30, 2006 (in millions)
	SPPC
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	83.5
Balance available on Revolving Credit Facility		342.0
Total Available Liquidity1	$	425.5

¹ As of October 30, 2006, SPPC had approximately $342 million available under its’ revolving credit facility. Additionally, if necessary, SPPC has the ability to issue additional debt, as discussed under Limitations on Indebtedness.

          SPPC anticipates that it will be able to meet operating costs, such as fuel and purchased power costs with internally generated funds, including the recovery of deferred energy. However, to fund capital requirements, as discussed in the 2005 Form 10-K, SPPC may be required to meet such financial obligations with a combination of internally generated funds, the use of its revolving credit facility, and if necessary, the issuance of long-term debt and/or capital contributions from SPR.

          During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, there were no material changes to the contractual obligations described in SPPC’s 2005 Form 10-K except for certain financing transactions as discussed below and the entering into certain equipment and construction service contracts to build SPPC’s 514 MW combined cycle natural gas power plant at its Tracy Generating Station, which is expected to be completed in 2008. Obligations under the contracts total approximately $329 million.

Financing Transactions

Redemption Notices

On October 27, 2006, SPPC provided notices of redemption to the holders of its:

• 6.30% Humboldt County Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Series 1992A, due 7/1/2022, in the amount of $10.3 million;

• 6.55% Washoe County Gas Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1990, due 9/1/2020, in the amount of $20 million;

• 6.70% Washoe County Gas Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1992, due 11/1/2032, in the amount of $21.2 million;

• 5.90% Washoe County Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993A, due 6/1/2023, in the amount of $9.8 million; and

• 5.90% Washoe County Gas and Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1993B, due 6/1/2023, in the amount of $30 million.

          The bonds are scheduled to be redeemed on November 30, 2006, at 100% of the stated principal amount (approximately $91.3 million), plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.

56

Humboldt County Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds

          On October 30, 2006, the 6.35% Humboldt County Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1992B, due August 1, 2022, in the amount of $1 million were redeemed at 100% of the stated principal amount, plus accrued interest.

Revolving Credit Facility

          On April 19, 2006, SPPC increased the size of its amended and restated revolving credit facility expiring 2010 to $350 million. The facility will provide additional liquidity for increased commodity prices and temporary bridge financing of capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC had $8 million of letters of credit outstanding and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility. As of October 30, 2006, SPPC had $8 million of letters of credit and had no amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement contains two financial maintenance covenants. The first requires that SPPC maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capital, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, not to exceed 0.68 to 1. The second requires that SPPC maintain a ratio of consolidated cash flow to consolidated interest expense, determined as of the last day of each fiscal quarter for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, not to be less than 2.0 to 1. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC was in compliance with these covenants.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement provides for an event of default if there is a failure under SPPC’s other financing agreements to meet certain payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due.

          The SPPC Credit Agreement, similar to SPPC’s Series H Notes, places certain restrictions on debt incurrence, liens and dividends. These limitations are discussed in Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M

          On March 23, 2006, SPPC issued and sold $300 million of its 6.00% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes, Series M, due May 15, 2016. The Series M Notes were issued with registration rights. Proceeds of the offering were used to repay $173 million borrowed under the revolving credit facility that was utilized to:

• fund the early redemption of $110 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.95% to 8.61% Series A Notes due 2022,

• fund the early redemption of $58 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 7.10% to 7.14% Series B Notes due 2023,

• pay for maturing debt of $30 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.81% to 6.83% Series C Notes due 2006, and

• pay for $51 million in connection with the redemption of $50 million of SPPC’s Series A Preferred Stock (two million shares of stock were redeemed at a redemption price per share of $25.683, plus accrued dividends to the redemption date of $.4875 per share).

     The remaining $51 million of proceeds have been or will be used as follows:

• payment for maturing debt of $20 million aggregate principal amount of SPPC’s Collateralized Medium Term 6.62% to 6.65% Series C Notes due November 2006; and

• payment of related fees and for general corporate purposes.

Factors Affecting Liquidity

Limitations on Indebtedness

Certain factors impact SPPC’s ability to issue debt:

1. Financing Authority from the PUCN; In February 2006, SPPC received PUCN authorization to enter into financings of $1.36 billion which amount includes $350 million for the revolving credit facility (described above). SPPC has issued $21 million of the new debt authorized in the PUCN Order. SPPC’s remaining authority under this PUCN Order allows SPPC to use its $350 million revolving credit facility to issue $349 million in new debt and to refinance existing debt as specified in the order.

2. Limits on Bondable Property; To the extent that SPPC has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, SPPC’s ability to issue secured debt is still limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under

57

the General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture. As of September 30, 2006, SPPC has the capacity to issue $151.6 million of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities.

3. Financial Covenants in its financing agreements.

          The terms of certain SPR debt further prohibit SPPC and NPC from incurring additional indebtedness unless certain conditions have been met. See SPR’s Limitations on Indebtedness for details of these restrictions. In addition to the SPR debt, the terms of SPPC’s Series H Notes and SPPC’s Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement restrict SPPC from issuing additional indebtedness unless certain covenants are satisfied. See Note 9, Debt Covenant Restrictions, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2005 Form 10-K.

          As of September 30, 2006, the financial covenants under the revolving credit facility, which are more restricitive than the Series H Notes restriction, would allow SPPC to issue up to $535 million of additional debt. The covenant limitations of certain SPR debt place a cap on additional indebtedness, on a consolidated basis, including SPPC and NPC, at $2.2 billion as of September 30, 2006. Therefore, SPPC would not be materially limited by SPR’s cap on additional indebtedness.

          Since SPR’s debt covenant limitations are calculated on a consolidated basis, SPR’s debt covenant limitations may allow for higher or lower borrowings than $2.2 billion, depending on the Utilities’ combined usage of their revolving credit facilities at the time of the covenant calculation.

Limitations on Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Bonds

          SPPC’s First Mortgage Indenture creates a first priority lien on substantially all of SPPC’s properties in Nevada and California. As of September 30, 2006, $289.3 million of SPPC’s first mortgage bonds were outstanding. SPPC agreed under the terms of various securities issued under its General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture that it would not issue any additional first mortgage bonds.

          SPPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture creates a lien on substantially all of SPPC’s properties in Nevada that is junior to the lien of the first mortgage indenture. As of September 30, 2006, $1.2 billion of SPPC’s General and Refunding Mortgage Securities were outstanding. As mentioned in (3) above under “Limitations on Indebtedness” additional securities may be issued under the General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture as of September 30, 2006. That amount has been determined on the basis of:

1.	70% of net utility property additions
2.	the principal amount of retired General and Refunding Mortgage Securities, and/or
3.	the principal amount of first mortgage bonds retired after October 19, 2001.

          SPPC also has the ability to release property from the liens of the two mortgage indentures on the basis of net property additions, cash and/or retired bonds. To the extent SPPC releases property from the lien of its General and Refunding Mortgage Indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under that indenture.

Credit Ratings

          Fitch upgraded the ratings of SPR and the two Utilities on September 20, 2006. The rating for the senior secured debt of SPPC was increased to BBB-, the minimum level for investment grade. The senior unsecured debt for all three companies was also upgraded. The ratings outlook for SPR, NPC and SPPC was revised from Positive to Stable. On September 22, 2006, S&P upgraded the rating of SPPC’s senior secured debt from BB to BB+, one level below investment grade. On September 27, 2006, Moody’s re-affirmed its rating for SPPC’s senior secured debt at Ba1, one level below investment grade.

          A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. Security ratings are subject to revision and withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

58

Cross Default Provisions

          SPPC’s financing agreements do not contain any cross-default provisions that would result in an event of default by SPPC upon an event of default by SPR or NPC under any of their respective financing agreements. Certain financing agreements of SPPC provide for an event of default if there is a failure under other financing agreements of SPPC to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that would result in an acceleration of payments due. Most of these default provisions (other than ones relating to a failure to pay such other indebtedness when due) provide for a cure period of 30-60 days from the occurrence of a specified event during which time SPPC may rectify or correct the situation before it becomes an event of default.

Other (SPPC)

          SPPC’s current contract with the IBEW Local No. 1245, which represents approximately 64% of SPPC’s workforce, was set to expire on December 31, 2005. Both SPPC and IBEW 1245 are currently in negotiations for a new contract which has not been reached as of November 1, 2006. Current contract language allows for the extension of the contract while negotiations on a new labor contract continue. All terms of the current collective bargaining agreement (CBA) will continue during the negotiating process and until a new contract is ratified by IBEW membership. If either party wishes to terminate the contract they must provide the other party 30 days’ written notice. Active negotiations have continued between the parties, who agreed to enlist the assistance of a federal mediator. SPPC is unable at this time to predict the timing of any agreement with the union or the terms of any such agreement.

REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS (UTILITIES)

          SPR is a “holding company” under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (PUHCA 2005). As a result, SPR and all of its subsidiaries (whether or not engaged in any energy related business) are required to maintain books, accounts and other records in accordance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulations and to make them available to the FERC, the PUCN and California Public Utility Commission (CPUC). In addition, the PUCN, CPUC, or the FERC have the authority to review allocations of costs of non-power goods and administrative services among SPR and its subsidiaries. The FERC has the authority generally to require that rates subject to its jurisdiction be just and reasonable and in this context would continue to be able to, among other things, review transactions between SPR, NPC and/or SPPC and/or any other affiliated company. SPR does not expect that the new PUHCA law or the regulations promulgated by the FERC will have a material impact on the company and how its public utility subsidiaries are regulated.

          The Utilities are subject to the jurisdiction of the PUCN and, in the case of SPPC, the CPUC with respect to rates, standards of service, siting of and necessity for generation and certain transmission facilities, accounting, issuance of securities and other matters with respect to electric distribution and transmission operations. NPC and SPPC submit IRPs to the PUCN for approval.

          Under federal law, the Utilities and TGPC are subject to certain jurisdictional regulation, primarily by the FERC. The FERC has jurisdiction under the Federal Power Act with respect to rates, service, interconnection, accounting and other matters in connection with the Utilities’ sale of electricity for resale and interstate transmission. The FERC also has jurisdiction over the natural gas pipeline companies from which the Utilities take service.

          As a result of regulation, many of the fundamental business decisions of the Utilities, as well as the rate of return they are permitted to earn on their utility assets, are subject to the approval of governmental agencies. The following regulatory proceedings have affected, or are expected to affect the utilities financial positions, results of operations and cash flows.

          The Utilities are required to file annual periodic Deferred Energy Accounting Adjustment (DEAA) cases and biennial General Rate Cases (GRCs) in Nevada. As of September 30, 2006, NPC’s and SPPC’s balance sheet included approximately $525.6 million and $90.7 million, respectively, of deferred energy costs of which approximately $359.5 million and $44.2 million has been previously approved for collection over various periods. The remaining amounts will be requested in future regulatory filings. Refer to Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements.

          The following summarizes rate case applications filed in 2005 and 2006. Each of these rate cases, as well as other regulatory matters such as, the Utilities’ Integrated Resource Plans and subsequent amendments, other Nevada matters, California matters and FERC matters, are discussed in more detail within this section.

Pending Rate Cases

• NPC 2006 Nevada General Rate Case (GRC) — Application to reset General Rates. Nevada Power expects to file its latest biennial general rate case in mid-November 2006.

Recently Approved Rate Cases

• SPPC 2006 Natural Gas and Propane Deferred Energy and BTER Update — On October 25, 2006, the PUCN approved negotiated settlements to recover $1.1 million in deferred natural gas and propane costs and to set the going forward energy rates such that $1.3 million of new revenues would be collected. The settlements, combined with the expiration of a previous natural gas DEAA rate, will yield a 2.5% rate reduction for natural gas customers and a 3.3% increase for propane customers.

59

• SPPC 2006 California Energy Cost Adjustment Clause Rate Case — Application to reset energy rates for SPPC’s California customers. The total request sought to collect an additional $11.2 million annually for deferred and going forward costs related to fuel and power purchases. The two requested rate increases total 16.5%. On October 5, 2006, the CPUC approved the application as filed, with an effective date of November 1, 2006.

• SPPC 2005 California General Rate Case (GRC) — Application to reset General Rates. On August 24, 2006, the CPUC approved a settlement agreement, which beginning on September 1, 2006, allowed SPPC to collect an estimated $4.1 million of additional general revenues.

• NPC 2006 BTER Update and Deferred Energy Rate Case — Application to create a new DEAA rate and to update the going forward BTER. On April 12, 2006, the PUCN approved a new BTER, which would increase purchased fuel and power revenues by an estimated $112 million. On June 28, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement of the deferred energy phase of the case, which, based on an updated forecast, reduced the previously approved BTER revenue by approximately $1.6 million and allowed full recovery of $171.5 million in deferred costs with an effective date of May 1, 2006.

• SPPC December 2005 Electric Deferred Energy and BTER Update — Application to create a new electric DEAA rate and to update the electric BTER. On April 12, 2006, the PUCN approved a new Electric BTER, which will increase purchased fuel and power revenues by an estimated $31 million. On June 7, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement, which granted SPPC full recovery of the deferred costs during a two year period beginning July 1, 2006.

• SPPC 2005 Electric General Rate Case — On April 27, 2006, the PUCN authorized a 10.6% ROE and 8.96% ROR and ordered SPPC to reduce general revenues for electric services by approximately $14 million.

• SPPC 2005 Gas General Rate Cases — On April 27, 2006, the PUCN authorized a 10.6% ROE and 7.98% ROR and ordered SPPC to increase general revenues for gas services by approximately $4.5 million.

Nevada Matters

Nevada Power Company

2006 Integrated Resource Plan

          On June 30, 2006, NPC filed its 2006 triennial Integrated Resource Plan with the PUCN. The filing requested approval to develop new conventional and renewable generation resources, improve NPC’s transmission system and increase demand side initiatives. The demand side programs are intended to help customers use electricity more efficiently and also contribute to NPC’s Renewable Portfolio requirements. The filing contained the following key elements:

• Requested approval to construct the following supply side resources:

• Two 750 MW super critical coal fired generation units at the proposed Ely Energy Center in White Pine County, Nevada estimated to be in service by 2011 and 2013 respectively. The Utilities are currently estimating that 80% of each unit will be allocated to NPC and 20% will be allocated to SPPC.

• A 250-mile 500 kV transmission line to integrate the new generation into both NPC’s and SPPC’s systems and to allow delivery of geothermal resources from Northern Nevada to NPC and solar powered generation from Southern Nevada to SPPC. The transmission line will be allocated to NPC and SPPC similar to the generating units above.

• 600 MW of gas fired combustion turbine peaking generation, 400 MW in service by 2008 and 200 MW in service by 2009.

• Requested the PUCN to designate the Ely Energy Center and the 500kV transmission intertie as critical facilities under Nevada regulations and requested incentive ratemaking treatment including “CWIP in rate base” during construction and, upon completion, a 2% enhanced ROE and accumulation of depreciation expense in a regulatory asset account from the time the plants are placed in service until they are included in rates.

• Outlined initiatives, including NPC ownership positions in renewable energy projects, which are expected to enable NPC to meet Nevada’s Portfolio Standards.

• Requested approval of four new demand side programs and to increase spending on eight existing demand side programs.

• Outlined NPC’s ten-year $4.7 billion budget for all of the proposed initiatives.

60

On September 14, 2006 the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement accepting NPC’s load forecast.

          On September 25, 2006, NPC provided testimony that modified its request for critical facility designations and associated incentive ratemaking treatments, which included the withdrawal of the following:

• incentive ratemaking treatment for the initial $300 million project development costs.

• NPC’s request for a specific enhanced ROE in this docket; however, NPC stated it would resubmit a request for an enhanced ROE in a future filing.

          On September 27, 2006 the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement of NPC’s 2007-2009 Energy Supply Plan, which was a component of its integrated resource plan filing.

          NPC expects a final order from the PUCN by mid-November 2006.

2006 Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On January 17, 2006, NPC filed a DEAA rate case application with the PUCN seeking recovery for purchased fuel and power costs and to increase its going forward BTER to reflect future energy costs. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 12, 2006, the PUCN approved an agreement among the interveners and NPC, which, effective May 1, 2006, set NPC’s BTER rates such that an estimated $112 million (revised by June 28, 2006 DEAA agreement — see below) of new revenues would be collected for fuel and power purchases in addition to the start of an $8.4 million collection related to a previous DEAA rate case. Combined, the approximately $120 million increase represented an overall average rate increase of approximately 6.5%.

          In the Deferred Energy portion of the case, NPC had requested authorization to recover $171.5 million of previously incurred purchased fuel and power costs over a one year period. On June 28, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement, which specified (1) a reduction of $1.6 million to the BTER approved on April 12, 2006 based on an updated projection of costs and (2) granted NPC full recovery of the $171.5 million of deferred costs during a two year period beginning August 1, 2006. However, the $171.5 million was reduced by a $16.5 million payment previously received by NPC in connection with the Lenzie acquisition. Under this agreement, the DEAA rate changes required to asymmetrically recover the deferred balance are scheduled to be implemented during a two year period such that they will be offset by the expiration of previously approved DEAA rates. As a result, no rate increase was required.

Enhanced ROE Due to Early Completion of Lenzie Generating Station

          The PUCN designated Lenzie a critical facility and allowed a 2% enhancement to the authorized ROE when the PUCN approved NPC’s request to acquire the facility. The PUCN further allowed up to an additional .5% enhanced ROE if the Lenzie Block #1 generator units (two combustion turbine/generators and one steam turbine/generator) were commercially operable before March 31, 2006 and another .5% ROE enhancement if Block #2 was completed before June 30, 2006.

          On January 29, 2006, the first 600 MW combined cycle unit (Block #1) was declared commercially operable. On April 17, 2006, NPC announced that Lenzie Block #2 was commercially operable. NPC’s construction costs are projected to be less than the amount authorized by the PUCN. NPC believes it is eligible to receive a 3% enhancement to the otherwise authorized ROE that will be decided as a result of its GRC filing to be made November 2006. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements for further discussion on the accounting for the enhancement.

Material Amendments to NPC’s 2003 Integrated Resource Plan

Request for Authorization to Acquire Land & Land Rights for Transmission Facilities

          On January 20, 2006, NPC filed an amendment to its 2003 Integrated Resource Plan requesting approval to acquire approximately $57 million of strategic investments in land and land rights necessary for future 500 kV and 230 kV transmission facilities. NPC also requested approval to accrue a carrying charge on the investments, which would be equal to the current Allowance for Funds Used During Construction.

          On April 26, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated agreement that authorizes NPC to invest $37 million in land and land rights and to include authorized investments in the rate base calculation for its next general rate case.

61

Sierra Pacific Power Company

Material Amendments to SPPC’s 2004 Integrated Resource Plan

          On June 14, 2006, SPPC filed an amendment to its 2004 Integrated Resource Plan. The filing contained the following key elements:

• Requested approval to construct the following supply side resources:

• Two 750 MW super critical coal fired generation units at the proposed Ely Energy Center in White Pine County, Nevada estimated to be in service by 2011 and 2013 respectively. The Utilities are currently estimating that 80% of each unit will be allocated to NPC and 20% will be allocated to SPPC.

• A 250-mile 500 kV transmission line to integrate the new generation into both NPC’s and SPPC’s systems and to allow delivery of geothermal resources from Northern Nevada to NPC and solar powered generation from Southern Nevada to SPPC. The transmission line will be allocated to NPC and SPPC similar to the generating units above.

• Requested the PUCN to designate the Ely Energy Center and the 500kV transmission intertie as critical facilities under Nevada regulations and requested incentive ratemaking treatment including “CWIP in rate base” during construction and, upon completion, a 2% enhanced ROE and accumulation of depreciation expense in a regulatory asset account from the time the plants are placed in service until they are included in rates.

• Requested approval to make certain enhancements to SPPC’s existing fleet of generators.

• Provided a $3.7 billion total estimate for the Ely Energy Center and outlines SPPC’s cost for other proposed initiatives totaling approximately $15 million.

          On September 14, 2006 the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement accepting SPPC’s load forecast.

          On September 25, 2006, SPPC provided testimony that modified its request for critical facility designations and associated incentive ratemaking treatments, which included the withdrawal of the following:

• incentive ratemaking treatment for the initial $300 million project development costs.

• SPPC’s request for a specific enhanced ROE in this docket; however, SPPC stated it would resubmit a request for an enhanced ROE in a future filing.

          On September 27, 2006 the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement of SPPC’s 2007 Energy Supply Plan Update, which was a component of its integrated resource plan amendment.

          SPPC expects a final order from the PUCN by mid-November 2006.

2006 Natural Gas and Propane Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On May 15, 2006, SPPC’s gas distribution operation filed applications with the PUCN seeking recovery of deferred natural gas and propane costs accumulated between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2006. The applications sought to establish a new natural gas DEAA rate to recover $2.5 million of deferred natural gas costs and a new propane DEAA rate to recover $120 thousand of deferred propane costs. SPPC also requested authorization to increase going forward natural gas and propane BTER’s to reflect forecasted gas costs. The new natural gas BTER was expected to increase revenue by $24.5 million. Combined with the expiration of a previous DEAA rate, the requested natural gas rate increases (DEAA and BTER) totaled approximately 10%. The new propane BTER was expected to increase revenue by $66 thousand, which combined with the $120 thousand in deferred costs and the expiration of previously implemented DEAA rates, resulted in an overall requested propane rate increase of approximately 30%.

          On October 25, 2006, the PUCN approved negotiated natural gas and propane settlements which consolidated the deferred natural gas and propane balances for collection from all gas customers and reduced the combined balance to $1.1 million. The agreements transferred approximately $1.4 million to other deferral periods and $.1 million to expense accounts. The agreements called for the cost recovery to occur over a 12 month period beginning December 1, 2006.

          The negotiated going forward natural gas rate is expected to recover an additional $1.3 million in revenue, which is a decrease from the originally requested $24.5 million. The decrease reflects more current natural gas price expectations.

          These settlements, combined with the expiration of a previous natural gas DEAA rate will cause natural gas customer rates to decrease by 2.5% and cause propane customer rates to increase by 3.3 %.

62

December 2005 Electric Deferred Energy and BTER Update

          On December 1, 2005, SPPC filed an electric DEAA rate case application with the PUCN. The application sought recovery of purchased fuel and power costs and requested an increase in SPPC’s going forward BTER to reflect future energy costs. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 12, 2006, the PUCN issued an order authorizing SPPC to increase its BTER on May 1, 2006, such that SPPC expects to collect $31 million in new revenues for purchased power. The change represented a 3.5% increase to customer rates.

          In the Deferred Energy portion of this case, SPPC had requested authorization to begin a one year recovery of the $46.7 million of previously incurred purchased fuel and power costs on July 1, 2006. On June 7, 2006, the PUCN approved a negotiated settlement, which granted SPPC full recovery of the deferred costs during a two year period beginning July 1, 2006. Under this agreement, the DEAA rate changes required to asymmetrically recover the $46.7 million deferred balance are scheduled to be implemented such that they will be offset by the expiration of previously approved DEAA rates. As a result, no rate increase was required.

2005 Electric and Gas General Rate Cases

          On October 3, 2005, SPPC filed a gas general rate case along with its statutorily required electric general rate case. Refer to the 2005 Form 10-K for specific details about this filing.

          On April 27, 2006, the PUCN issued its order to change electric and gas general rates. Although the order differed from our requested filing, the changes did not require material adjustments to net income for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The PUCN vote resulted in the following significant items:

• Electric general revenue decrease: approximately $14 million annually or 1.5% effective May 1, 2006

• Gas general revenue increase: $4.5 million annually or 2.3%, effective May 1, 2006

• Electric Return on Equity and Rate of Return: 10.6% and 8.96% respectively

• Gas Return on Equity and Rate of Return: 10.6% and 7.98% respectively

• Approval to continue recovery of SPPC’s allocated amount of the 1999 NPC/SPPC merger costs and goodwill from Electric customers

• Approval to recover an allocated amount of the 1999 NPC/SPPC merger costs and goodwill from Gas customers

• New depreciation rates for Gas and Electric facilities

• Deferred recovery of legal expenses related to the Enron purchased power contract litigation

Other Nevada Matters

Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power Company Renewable Portfolio Compliance

          In April 2006, the Utilities filed their 2005 Annual Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard Report with the PUCN (the “Report”). The Report indicates that the Utilities will meet the non-solar portfolio standard upon PUCN approval of a sale from SPPC to NPC of non-solar portfolio energy credits. The Utilities requested an exemption from the PUCN for the solar portion of the portfolio standard.

          On September 13, 2006, the PUCN approved a stipulated agreement allowing NPC to purchase from SPPC, non-solar portfolio energy credits to meet its 2005 compliance year requirements. The PUCN scheduled a hearing for November 16 and 17, 2006 to hear testimony on the Companies’ compliance report and specifically the calculation of Renewable Energy Credits available from Demand Side Management or energy conservation programs.

California Electric Matters (SPPC)

Sierra Pacific Power Company 2006 Energy Cost Adjustment Clause Rate Case

          On April 3, 2006, SPPC filed with the CPUC to reset its “balancing” rate to recover a forecasted deferred energy cost balance and to increase its “offset” rate for going-forward fuel and power purchases. The requested increase in the balancing rate is expected to result in $1.1 million additional revenue and the requested increase in the offset rate is expected to collect an additional $10.1 million. The total request represents an $11.2 million annual revenue increase or a 16.5% average increase to customer rates.

          On October 5, 2006, the CPUC authorized SPPC’s request as filed.

63

Sierra Pacific Power Company 2005 General Rate Case

          On June 3, 2005, SPPC filed a California general rate case requesting $8.1 million of new revenue from approximately 40,000 California customers. The request represents a 12.7% average increase. SPPC requested that the new rates become effective on January 1, 2006.

          On August 24, 2006, the CPUC approved a settlement agreement, which beginning September 1, 2006, allowed SPPC to collect an estimated $4.1 million of additional general revenues from its California customers.

ACCOUNTING MATTERS

Recent Pronouncements

          See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Condensed Notes to Financial Statements, for a discussion of accounting policies and recent pronouncements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

          As of September 30, 2006, SPR, NPC and SPPC have evaluated their risk related to financial instruments whose values are subject to market sensitivity. Such instruments are fixed and variable rate debt. Fair market value is determined using quoted market price for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining maturities (dollars in thousands).

	Expected Maturity Date
																						Fair
	2006			2007			2008			2009			2010			Thereafter			Total			Value
Long-term Debt
SPR
Fixed Rate	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	659,142		$	659,142		$	688,849
Average Interest Rate		—			—			—			—			—			7.86	%		7.86	%
																	��
NPC
Fixed Rate	$	12,558		$	17		$	13		$	—		$	—		$	2,140,835		$	2,153,423		$	2,245,347
Average Interest Rate		10.87	%		8.17	%		8.17	%		—			—			6.85	%		6.87	%
Variable Rate	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15,000		$	50,000		$	192,500		$	257,500		$	257,500
Average Interest Rate											3.49	%		6.33	%		3.45	%		4.01	%
SPPC
Fixed Rate	$	20,530		$	2,400		$	322,400		$	600		$	—		$	749,250		$	1,095,180		$	1,115,600
Average Interest Rate		6.62	%		6.40	%		7.99	%		6.40	%		—			6.09	%		6.66	%
Total Debt	$	33,088		$	2,417		$	322,413		$	15,600		$	50,000		$	3,741,727		$	4,165,245		$	4,307,296

Commodity Price Risk

          See the 2005 Form 10-K, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Commodity Price Risk, for a discussion of Commodity Price Risk. No material changes in commodity risk have occurred since December 31, 2005.

Credit Risk

          The Utilities monitor and manage credit risk with their trading counterparties. Credit risk is defined as the possibility that a counterparty to one or more contracts will be unable or unwilling to fulfill its financial or physical obligations to the Utilities because of the counterparty’s financial condition. The Utilities’ credit risk associated with trading counterparties was approximately $24.6 million as of September 30, 2006 which has substantially decreased from the September 30, 2005 balance of $272 million. This decrease reflects the continued decline in natural gas and wholesale power market prices relative to the fall 2005 — winter 2006 spikes following hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In the event that the trading counterparties are unable to deliver under their contracts, it may be necessary for the Utilities to purchase alternative energy at a higher market price.

64

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

          SPR, NPC and SPPC’s principal executive officers and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), have concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Change in internal controls over financial reporting.

          There were no changes in internal controls over SPR, NPC or SPPC’s financial reporting in the third quarter of 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect their respective internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

          For additional information regarding various pending administrative and judicial proceedings involving regulatory, environmental and other matters, which information is incorporated by reference into this Part II, see:

• “Item 3, Legal Proceedings” in the 2005 Form 10-K, and Item 1, Legal Proceedings, in the Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 and Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006; and

• Note 6 “Commitments and Contingencies of the Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part I of this report.

Nevada Power Company 2001 Deferred Energy Case

          On November 30, 2001, NPC made a deferred energy filing with the PUCN seeking repayment for purchased fuel and power costs accumulated between March 1, 2001, and September 30, 2001, as required by law. The application sought to establish a rate to repay purchased fuel and power costs of $922 million and spread the recovery of the deferred costs, together with a carrying charge, over a period of not more than three years.

          On March 29, 2002, the PUCN issued its Order on the application, allowing NPC to recover $478 million over a three-year period, but disallowing $434 million of deferred purchased fuel and power costs and $30.9 million in carrying charges consisting of $10.1 million in carrying charges accrued through September 2001 and $20.8 million in carrying charges accrued from October 2001 through February 2002. The Order stated that the disallowance was based on alleged imprudence in incurring the disallowed costs. NPC and the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) both sought individual review of the PUCN Order in the First District Court of Nevada. The District Court affirmed the PUCN’s decision. Both NPC and the BCP filed Notices of Appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court.

          Oral argument was heard on February 23, 2006. On July 20, 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled NPC is allowed to recover $180 million of the disallowed deferred energy costs and directed the District Court to remand the issue back to the PUCN to determine the rate schedule that will be used to recover this amount. In all other respects, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the District Court’s decision on the PUCN disallowance. In the third quarter of 2006, as a result of the Nevada Supreme Court decision, NPC recorded approximately $180 million,before tax,of the previously disallowed deferred energy costs in its Statements of Operations as “Reinstatement of Deferred Energy Costs.” NPC is unable to predict the terms of the rate schedule that the PUCN will provide for recovery of this amount.

Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power Company

Merrill Lynch/Allegheny Lawsuit

In May 2003, SPR and NPC filed suit against Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. (collectively, Merrill Lynch) and Allegheny Energy, Inc. and Allegheny Energy Supply Co., LLC (collectively, Allegheny) in the United States District Court, District of Nevada, for compensatory and punitive damages of $850 million for causing the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada to disallow a $180 million rate adjustment for NPC in its 2001 deferred energy case (as discussed above). The PUCN held that NPC acted imprudently when it refused to enter into an electricity supply contract with Merrill Lynch and subsequently paid too much for electricity from another source. SPR and NPC allege that Merrill Lynch and Allegheny’s fraudulent testimony and wrongful conduct caused the PUCN disallowance. Merrill Lynch filed motions to dismiss on May 6, 2003 and June 23, 2003. Thereafter, the case was stayed pending resolution of NPC’s appeal of the 2001 deferred energy case pending before the Nevada Supreme Court. The Nevada Supreme Court has since rendered its decision in the appeal.The Nevada District Court has yet to rule on the motions to dismiss. On October 17, 2006, the District Court

65

approved a stipulation continuing a stay of the proceeding pending final resolution of the PUCN remand proceedings in the 2001 deferred energy case.

Sierra Pacific Power Company

Piñon Pine

          In its 2003 General Rate Case, SPPC sought recovery of its unreimbursed costs associated with the Piñon Pine Coal Gasification Demonstration Project (the “Project”). The Project represented experimental technology tested pursuant to a Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Coal Technology initiative. Under the terms of the Project agreement, SPPC and DOE agreed to each fund 50% of construction costs of the Project. SPPC’s participation in the Project had received PUCN approval as part of SPPC’s 1993 integrated electric resource plan. While the conventional portion of the plant, a gas-fired combined cycle unit, was installed and performed as planned, the coal gasification unit never became fully operational. After numerous attempts to re-engineer the coal gasifier, the technology was determined to be unworkable. In its order of May 25, 2004, the PUCN disallowed $43 million of unreimbursed costs associated with the Project. SPPC filed a Petition for Judicial Review with the Second Judicial District Court of Nevada (District Court) in June 2004 (CV04-01434). On January 25, 2006, the District Court vacated the PUCN’s disallowance in SPPC’s 2003 General Rate Case and remanded the case back to the PUCN for further review as to whether the costs were justly and reasonably incurred (Order). On March 27, 2006, the PUCN appealed the Order to the Nevada Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) and filed a motion to stay the Order pending the appeal to the Supreme Court. On June 12, 2006, the District Court granted PUCN’s motion to stay the Order. On July 20, 2006, the Supreme Court issued an order questioning the finality of the District Court’s decision and thus whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal and invited the parties to brief this matter. The BCP and PUCN responded in early August. Parties are awaiting a decision by the Supreme Court. SPPC is unable to predict the outcome of the appeal.

ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS

          For the purposes of this section, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to SPR on a consolidated basis (including NPC and SPPC). The following information updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the information disclosed in Item1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2005 Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that we currently believe to be less significant may also adversely affect us.

If NPC and/or SPPC do not receive favorable rulings in the deferred energy applications that they file with the PUCN and they are unable to recover their deferred purchased power, gas and fuel costs, we will experience an adverse impact on cash flow and earnings. Any significant disallowance of deferred energy charges in the future could materially adversely affect our cash flow, financial condition and liquidity.

          The rates that the Utilities charge their customers and certain aspects of their operations are subject to the regulation of the PUCN, which significantly influences the Utilities’ operating environment and affects their ability to recover costs from their customers. Under Nevada law, purchased power, gas and fuel costs in excess of those included in base rates are deferred as an asset on their balance sheets and are not shown as an expense until recovered from their retail customers. The Utilities are required to file deferred energy applications with the PUCN at least once every twelve months so that the PUCN may verify the prudence of the energy costs and allow them to clear their deferred energy accounts. Nevada law also requires the PUCN to act on these cases within a specified time period. Any of these costs determined by the PUCN to have been imprudently incurred cannot be recovered from the Utilities’ customers. Past disallowances in the Utilities’ deferred energy cases have been significant.

          As of September 30, 2006, NPC’s and SPPC’s unapproved deferred energy costs, including claims for terminated energy supply contracts, were $166.1 million and $46.7 million, respectively.

          Material disallowances of deferred energy costs, gas costs or inadequate base tariff energy rates would have a significant adverse effect on the Utilities’ financial condition and future results of operations, could cause downgrades of SPR’s and the Utilities’ securities by the rating agencies and would make it more difficult to finance operations and construction projects and to buy fuel and purchased power from third parties.

If NPC and/or SPPC do not receive favorable rulings in their future general rate cases, it will have a significant adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and future results of operations.

          The Utilities’ revenues and earnings are subject to changes in regulatory proceedings known as general rate cases, which the Utilities file with the PUCN approximately every two years. In the Utilities’ general rate cases, the PUCN establishes, among other things, their recoverable rate base, their return on common equity, overall rate of return, depreciation rates and their cost of capital.

66

          We cannot predict what the PUCN will direct in their orders on the Utilities’ pending or future general rate cases. Inadequate base energy rates would have a significant adverse effect on the Utilities’ financial condition and future results of operations and could cause additional downgrades of their securities by the rating agencies and make it significantly more difficult to finance operations and construction projects and to buy fuel and purchased power from third parties.

SPR and the Utilities have substantial indebtedness that they may be required to refinance. The failure to refinance indebtedness would have an adverse effect on us.

          SPR and the Utilities have indebtedness that must be repaid, purchased, remarketed or refinanced. If the Utilities do not have sufficient funds from operations and/or SPR does not have sufficient funds from dividends to repay such indebtedness at maturity or when otherwise due, we will have to refinance the indebtedness through additional financings in private or public offerings. If, at the time of any financing or refinancing, prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates on the refinanced debt, the increase in interest expense associated with the refinancing could adversely affect our cash flow, and, consequently, the cash available for payments on our other indebtedness. If the Utilities are unable to refinance or extend outstanding borrowings on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, they may have to:

• reduce or delay capital expenditures planned for replacements, improvements and expansions; and/or

• dispose of assets on disadvantageous terms, potentially resulting in losses and adverse effects on cash flow from their operating activities.

          We cannot assure you that the Utilities could effect or implement any of these alternatives on satisfactory terms, if at all. If SPR or the Utilities are unable to refinance indebtedness as it matures, our cash flow, financial conditions and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.

If SPR is precluded from receiving dividends from the Utilities, its financial condition and ability to meet its debt service obligations will be materially adversely affected.

          SPR is a holding company with no significant operations of its own. Its cash flows are substantially derived from dividends paid to it by the Utilities, which are typically utilized to service SPR’s debt and pay SPR’s operating expenses. In the future, subject to various factors to be considered by SPR’s Board of Directors, a portion of SPR’s cash flow may be used to resume dividend payments on SPR’s common stock, with the balance, if any, reinvested in SPR’s subsidiaries as contributions to capital. The Utilities are subject to restrictions on their ability to pay dividends to SPR under the terms of certain of their respective financing agreements and their PUCN orders. In addition, certain provisions of the Federal Power Act could, depending on the interpretation thereof, limit or prohibit the payment of dividends to SPR.

          Assuming that the Utilities meet the requirements to pay dividends under the Federal Power Act and that any dividends paid to SPR are for SPR’s debt service obligations, under their material dividend restrictions, each of the Utilities may pay dividends to SPR if each such Utility can meet a 2 to 1 fixed charge coverage ratio test. If that condition is met, the amount of dividends that can be paid is less than 50% of such Utilities’ consolidated net income plus the amount of capital contributions made to such Utility by SPR for the period from the date of issuance of the respective series of Notes to the end of the most recently ended fiscal quarter. If they do not meet these conditions, the Utilities can still pay SPR’s reasonable fees and expenses, provided that each such Utility has a cash flow to fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.75:1 over the prior four fiscal quarters. Due to the cumulative calculation of this restriction, NPC’s Series L Notes and SPPC’s Series H Notes are effectively the most restrictive dividend limitations. In addition, under the most restrictive of their dividend restrictions, NPC and SPPC have a carve-out that permits them to pay up to $25 million to SPR, from the date of issuance of the applicable debt securities, regardless of whether the other conditions to paying dividends have been met. Although each Utility currently meets the conditions described above, a significant loss by either Utility could cause that Utility to be precluded from paying dividends to SPR until such time as that Utility again meets the coverage test. The dividend restriction in the PUCN order may be more restrictive than the Utilities’ individual dividend restrictions because the PUCN dividend restriction currently limits the amount of dividends paid to SPR collectively by the Utilities to SPR’s actual cash debt service payments, which amount may be less than the aggregate amount of the Utilities’ individual dividend restrictions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, SPR received approximately $48 million in dividends from the Utilities to meet its debt service obligations.

SPR’s indebtedness is effectively subordinated to the liabilities of its subsidiaries, particularly NPC and SPPC. SPR and the Utilities have the ability to issue a significant amount of additional indebtedness under the terms of their various financing agreements.

          Because SPR is a holding company, its indebtedness is effectively subordinated to the Utilities’ existing and future liabilities. SPR conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries, and thus SPR’s ability to meet its obligations under its indebtedness will be dependent on the earnings and cash flows of those subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay dividends or to advance or repay funds to SPR. Holders of SPR’s indebtedness will generally have a junior position to claims of SPR’s subsidiaries’ creditors, including trade creditors, debt holders, secured creditors, taxing authorities, and guarantee holders. As of October 30, 2006, the Utilities had approximately $3.5 billion of debt outstanding. Although the

67

terms of SPR’s indebtedness restrict the amount of additional indebtedness that SPR and the Utilities may issue, based on SPR’s September 30, 2006 financial statements, these restrictions do not materially limit the total amount of indebtedness that may be issued by SPR, NPC and SPPC in the aggregate. Assuming an interest rate of 7.0%, these restrictions would allow SPR and the Utilities to issue up to an aggregate amount of approximately $2.2 billion as of September 30, 2006. In addition, NPC and SPPC are subject to regulatory restrictions and restrictions under the terms of their various financing agreements on their ability to issue additional indebtedness.

If Federal and/or State requirements are imposed on NPC and SPPC mandating further emission reductions, including limitations on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, such requirements could make some electric generating units uneconomical to maintain or operate.

          Emissions of nitrogen and sulfur oxides, mercury and particulates from fossil fueled generating plants are potentially subject to increased regulations, controls and mitigation expenses. Environmental advocacy groups and regulatory agencies in the United States have also been focusing considerable attention on carbon dioxide emissions from power generation facilities and their potential role in climate change. Although several bills have been introduced in Congress that would compel CO2 emission reductions, none have advanced through the legislature. Future changes in environmental regulations governing these pollutants could make some electric generating units uneconomical to maintain or operate. In addition, any legal obligation that would require the Utilities to substantially reduce its emissions beyond present levels could require extensive mitigation efforts and, in the case of CO2 legislation, would raise uncertainty about the future viability of fossil fuels, particularly coal, as an energy source for new and existing electric generation facilities. While mandatory requirements for further emission reductions from our fossil fleet do not appear to be imminent, we continue to monitor regulatory and legislative developments in this area.

Whether SPR can procure sufficient renewable energy sources in each compliance year to comply with the Portfolio Standard for Renewable Energy.

          Currently, the State of Nevada requires compliance with its Portfolio Standard for Renewable Energy, which mandates that a share of the energy delivered to Nevada retail customers come from renewable energy resources. This energy is to be provided via direct generation, saved from portfolio energy systems or realized from implementation of efficiency measures. The Utilities continue to take affirmative actions to fulfill the Portfolio Standard requirements on their system. However, the Utilities’ success in meeting the standard remains dependent on creation of new renewable energy projects, both owned or via output which is purchased from third parties, as well as maintenance of an ongoing positive climate for renewable energy development across Nevada.

SPR and the Utilities may be negatively affected by changes in accounting principles, particularly SFAS 158, amending FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132-(R).

          Changes in accounting principles and practices required by the FASB, the SEC and/or the FERC can have a significant effect on SPR’s and the Utilities’ financial statements and results of operations.

          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158 (“SFAS 158”) “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132-(R).” SFAS 158 seeks to address certain important deficiencies the FASB finds in today’s pension accounting. Currently, changes in a plan’s assets and its benefit obligation are not being recognized as they occur and important information about postretirement plans is currently being relegated to the footnotes rather than being recognized in the financial statements. Specifically, the amendment would require SPR and the Utilities to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in their Consolidated Balance Sheets. An overfunded status would result in the recognition of an asset and an underfunded status would result in the recognition of a liability. The adjustment to record an asset or liability would be offset by a regulatory asset or liability. If SPR and/or the Utilities were required to record a substantial liability, it could, depending upon the magnitude thereof, affect the ability of SPR and/or the Utilities to meet certain financial covenants and incurrence tests. SFAS 158’s requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and new disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. SPR and the Utilities are currently assessing the impact SFAS 158 will have on their consolidated financial position, the outcome of which may be material. However, management does not currently believe that any adjustment for 2006 would affect SPR’s or the Utilities’ compliance with the covenants under their respective financing agreements or their ability to incur additional indebtedness.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

          None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

          On October 24, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors awarded Walter M. Higgins, CEO, 65,000 shares of SPR common stock pursuant to achievement of performance criteria consistent with his employment agreement dated August 4, 2006. The performance award was paid on October 26, 2006 as a combination of equivalent cash and SPR common stock.

          On November 1, 2006, Sierra Pacific Power Company filed its restated articles of incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. SPPC also filed a withdrawal of the certificate of designation for its’ previously issued but no longer outstanding series of preferred stock.

          The restated articles authorize the issuance of (i) Twenty million (20,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of $3.75 per share; and (ii) Ten million (10,000,000) shares of preferred stock with no par value per share. Currently, all of SPPC’s one thousand (1,000) shares of common stock outstanding are held by SPR. SPPC has no outstanding preferred stock.

          Under the restated articles, preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series in such amounts and with such terms and conditions as may be determined by the board of directors.

          The restated articles limit the liability of directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. The restated articles may be amended or altered by a vote of the holders of a majority of SPPC’s common stock then issued, outstanding and entitled to vote. SPPC may sell its assets upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors.

          The restated articles eliminate the restrictive covenants that were previously contained in SPPC’s articles of incorporation, including a limitation on the amount of dividends that may be paid on SPPC’s common stock and a limitation on the amount of secured debt that may be issued by SPPC.

68

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q:
Sierra Pacific Power Company
	3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of Sierra Pacific Power Company.
Nevada Power Company
	10.1	Financing Agreement between Clark County, Nevada and Nevada Power Company dated August 1, 2006 (relating to Clark County, Nevada $39,500,000 Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006).
	10.2	Financing Agreement between Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation and Nevada Power Company dated August 1, 2006 (relating to Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006A).
	10.3	Financing Agreement between Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation and Nevada Power Company dated August 1, 2006 (relating to Coconino County, Arizona Pollution Control Corporation $40,000,000 Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds Series 2006B).
Sierra Pacific Resources, Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power Company
	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Pacific Resources Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Nevada Power Company Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.3	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Pacific Power Company Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.4	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Sierra Pacific Resources Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.5	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Nevada Power Company Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.6	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Sierra Pacific Power Company Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Pacific Resources Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Nevada Power Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.3	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Pacific Power Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.4	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Sierra Pacific Resources Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.5	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Nevada Power Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.6	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Sierra Pacific Power Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

69

SIGNATURES

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Sierra Pacific Resources             (Registrant)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ Michael W. Yackira
		Michael W. Yackira
		Corporate Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ John E. Brown
		John E. Brown
		Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

	Nevada Power Company             (Registrant)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ Michael W. Yackira
		Michael W. Yackira
		Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ John E. Brown
		John E. Brown
		Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

	Sierra Pacific Power Company                  (Registrant)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ Michael W. Yackira
		Michael W. Yackira
		Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 2, 2006	By:	/s/ John E. Brown
		John E. Brown
		Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

70