Exhibit 99.1
Mature Market Trends As of March 2005 P R E D I C T A B I L I T Y through H I G H P E R F O R M A N C E
Safe Harbor Statement Statements contained in this presentation, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company's use of words such as, "expects," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "believes," and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which can cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, unfavorable changes in apartment demand or supply in the Company's markets and the effect on occupancy and rental rates; changing economic conditions; changes in household growth or population; the impact of competition and competitive pricing; acquisitions or new developments may not achieve anticipated results; delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; difficulties in selling existing apartment communities on favorable terms or the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement; the shortage of available acquisition candidates; the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year; failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could create refinancing risk and impair debt service payments and shareholder distributions; increases in property and liability insurance costs; risks arising from environmental issues or natural disasters; effects of the Company's accounting or other policies and other risk factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are made as of today, based upon information known to management as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that indicated results or events will not be realized. |
Definitions 5 |
United Dominion Realty Trust
Rental Income and Fees by Market (Mature Communities)
Net Rent | Mar-04 | Apr-04 | May-04 | Jun-04 | Jul-04 | Aug-04 | Sep-04 | Oct-04 | Nov-04 | Dec-04 | Jan-05 | Feb-05 | Mar-05 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 1,426 | 797,158 | 795,581 | 805,290 | 817,015 | 800,604 | 815,903 | 812,277 | 801,926 | 795,110 | 795,532 | 798,699 | 823,961 | 814,162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,116 | 651,100 | 648,635 | 638,200 | 639,374 | 653,438 | 680,228 | 672,705 | 662,295 | 671,330 | 654,381 | 660,920 | 666,960 | 670,515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,470 | 1,290,140 | 1,292,500 | 1,295,201 | 1,284,359 | 1,299,316 | 1,313,916 | 1,321,308 | 1,317,569 | 1,321,386 | 1,312,221 | 1,333,806 | 1,324,002 | 1,330,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2,034 | 1,109,778 | 1,080,350 | 1,112,511 | 1,082,669 | 1,087,287 | 1,116,215 | 1,101,553 | 1,091,651 | 1,106,827 | 1,097,173 | 1,098,399 | 1,117,260 | 1,132,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 1,584 | 855,520 | 887,148 | 891,746 | 903,761 | 900,360 | 917,886 | 892,586 | 873,839 | 883,095 | 868,513 | 891,328 | 895,815 | 900,317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 1,580,146 | 1,570,198 | 1,574,071 | 1,570,984 | 1,523,329 | 1,524,471 | 1,565,727 | 1,547,108 | 1,537,856 | 1,539,261 | 1,561,009 | 1,572,205 | 1,594,813 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 3,123 | 1,845,160 | 1,848,449 | 1,854,060 | 1,829,874 | 1,850,930 | 1,829,739 | 1,818,794 | 1,821,994 | 1,828,101 | 1,812,026 | 1,868,622 | 1,819,399 | 1,833,948 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver, CO | 1,484 | 892,067 | 879,127 | 882,648 | 881,266 | 893,776 | 908,688 | 887,228 | 892,591 | 867,599 | 865,894 | 865,189 | 875,837 | 885,261 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2,656 | 1,571,153 | 1,555,437 | 1,544,279 | 1,533,335 | 1,547,015 | 1,572,609 | 1,565,178 | 1,558,755 | 1,538,768 | 1,543,135 | 1,557,812 | 1,558,803 | 1,581,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2,123 | 1,162,259 | 1,178,550 | 1,166,681 | 1,139,730 | 1,137,010 | 1,165,320 | 1,178,984 | 1,175,992 | 1,186,861 | 1,168,889 | 1,165,979 | 1,198,063 | 1,184,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 4,715 | 2,683,050 | 2,658,309 | 2,656,148 | 2,638,750 | 2,622,922 | 2,633,948 | 2,613,957 | 2,588,304 | 2,594,625 | 2,587,706 | 2,627,819 | 2,639,369 | 2,688,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,157 | 765,893 | 756,908 | 767,573 | 763,368 | 749,281 | 754,426 | 752,864 | 745,392 | 749,800 | 765,902 | 783,045 | 794,691 | 801,570 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 1,086 | 1,042,835 | 1,012,084 | 1,043,571 | 1,046,396 | 1,080,100 | 1,102,916 | 1,074,592 | 1,038,647 | 1,042,905 | 1,046,959 | 1,033,894 | 1,086,198 | 1,093,851 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 765 | 668,764 | 688,044 | 707,031 | 709,875 | 698,557 | 710,715 | 714,741 | 720,240 | 697,284 | 653,589 | 647,126 | 658,718 | 663,914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,220 | 1,392,903 | 1,392,954 | 1,380,546 | 1,415,210 | 1,389,219 | 1,409,945 | 1,399,855 | 1,395,858 | 1,384,091 | 1,377,740 | 1,384,960 | 1,414,383 | 1,403,217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 1,071,393 | 1,083,048 | 1,073,903 | 1,092,498 | 1,087,003 | 1,113,668 | 1,102,228 | 1,090,203 | 1,083,622 | 1,069,169 | 1,070,493 | 1,099,809 | 1,113,283 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 1,894 | 2,036,871 | 2,003,433 | 2,012,501 | 2,049,784 | 2,006,832 | 2,006,477 | 2,023,350 | 2,035,434 | 2,007,925 | 1,992,521 | 1,990,139 | 2,007,653 | 2,034,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 4,140 | 2,720,049 | 2,735,197 | 2,731,711 | 2,741,602 | 2,751,224 | 2,787,516 | 2,879,941 | 2,877,372 | 2,909,318 | 2,878,075 | 2,907,116 | 2,929,083 | 2,959,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 1,101 | 689,665 | 685,543 | 685,162 | 666,543 | 703,889 | 707,244 | 719,993 | 717,938 | 736,846 | 719,519 | 732,938 | 736,316 | 742,409 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1,156 | 868,171 | 894,347 | 904,206 | 896,760 | 899,361 | 917,262 | 935,971 | 913,175 | 872,477 | 865,630 | 887,681 | 911,007 | 906,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 282,752 | 289,621 | 288,199 | 273,087 | 262,119 | 293,683 | 297,219 | 291,243 | 283,937 | 287,123 | 285,089 | 297,963 | 289,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 1,893 | 1,124,014 | 1,136,560 | 1,130,209 | 1,121,582 | 1,126,213 | 1,132,424 | 1,145,667 | 1,122,651 | 1,132,178 | 1,110,290 | 1,097,494 | 1,114,007 | 1,128,674 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 798 | 386,307 | 381,889 | 385,330 | 378,407 | 367,153 | 373,472 | 373,480 | 376,708 | 373,801 | 373,413 | 376,513 | 386,424 | 392,172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 3,331 | 2,016,892 | 2,012,262 | 2,010,096 | 2,015,838 | 1,996,195 | 2,017,941 | 2,024,744 | 2,008,363 | 1,992,319 | 1,974,376 | 1,974,438 | 1,982,297 | 1,987,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 820 | 705,425 | 683,815 | 687,865 | 696,644 | 705,100 | 719,995 | 734,910 | 741,337 | 736,052 | 703,581 | 717,215 | 710,550 | 728,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 1,776 | 1,221,272 | 1,216,670 | 1,229,932 | 1,204,653 | 1,180,048 | 1,188,030 | 1,192,461 | 1,215,636 | 1,238,314 | 1,188,617 | 1,263,498 | 1,283,433 | 1,310,598 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 869 | 515,798 | 510,172 | 502,390 | 498,019 | 489,110 | 490,546 | 502,015 | 502,219 | 514,354 | 506,421 | 521,428 | 534,025 | 518,445 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,663 | 2,194,855 | 2,196,505 | 2,182,700 | 2,143,929 | 2,141,376 | 2,161,036 | 2,175,260 | 2,216,146 | 2,225,107 | 2,198,721 | 2,203,455 | 2,226,295 | 2,207,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,796 | 1,238,509 | 1,235,261 | 1,245,795 | 1,230,900 | 1,242,868 | 1,258,952 | 1,226,474 | �� | 1,228,103 | 1,230,076 | 1,218,896 | 1,248,005 | 1,276,643 | 1,293,082 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,575 | 1,138,830 | 1,134,165 | 1,131,265 | 1,127,659 | 1,085,024 | 1,078,375 | 1,098,909 | 1,093,172 | 1,113,152 | 1,085,241 | 1,083,302 | 1,093,372 | 1,127,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2,006 | 2,212,888 | 2,197,777 | 2,217,492 | 2,218,771 | 2,226,653 | 2,237,881 | 2,256,760 | 2,300,928 | 2,292,009 | 2,272,945 | 2,283,503 | 2,257,984 | 2,294,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 3,836 | 2,567,359 | 2,597,059 | 2,580,684 | 2,590,984 | 2,615,661 | 2,641,769 | 2,635,685 | 2,661,743 | 2,677,568 | 2,633,672 | 2,667,389 | 2,759,493 | 2,769,010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 1,111,362 | 1,116,163 | 1,150,625 | 1,159,872 | 1,166,201 | 1,218,312 | 1,211,747 | 1,200,046 | 1,193,516 | 1,188,799 | 1,196,809 | 1,218,948 | 1,202,950 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 63,893 | 42,410,340 | 42,353,763 | 42,469,624 | 42,363,497 | 42,285,175 | 42,801,508 | 42,909,164 | 42,824,578 | 42,818,208 | 42,355,930 | 42,785,111 | 43,270,967 | 43,584,339 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions as a % of Net Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 1,426 | 1.55 | % | 4.62 | % | 2.52 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.83 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.77 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.04 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,116 | 3.59 | % | 4.55 | % | 5.44 | % | 5.14 | % | 5.52 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.01 | % | 3.11 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.98 | % | 4.17 | % | 4.74 | % | 3.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,470 | 0.68 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.18 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.56 | % | 1.19 | % | 0.53 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.36 | % | 2.36 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.55 | % | 0.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2,034 | 1.15 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.98 | % | 1.67 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.83 | % | 2.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 1,584 | 3.99 | % | 3.56 | % | 3.70 | % | 2.52 | % | 3.10 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.36 | % | 2.14 | % | 2.72 | % | 3.22 | % | 2.93 | % | 2.30 | % | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 3.27 | % | 3.55 | % | 2.94 | % | 3.26 | % | 4.26 | % | 6.11 | % | 3.90 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.89 | % | 3.34 | % | 4.09 | % | 3.24 | % | 2.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 3,123 | 2.78 | % | 2.61 | % | 2.91 | % | 3.11 | % | 2.69 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.70 | % | 2.36 | % | 2.35 | % | 2.66 | % | 2.94 | % | 2.19 | % | 2.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver, CO | 1,484 | 22.49 | % | 22.49 | % | 21.88 | % | 22.98 | % | 22.56 | % | 22.65 | % | 22.58 | % | 23.04 | % | 26.08 | % | 26.18 | % | 22.24 | % | 19.44 | % | -10.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2,656 | 1.79 | % | 2.42 | % | 2.18 | % | 3.11 | % | 3.01 | % | 1.94 | % | 1.82 | % | 2.28 | % | 1.89 | % | 2.74 | % | 2.80 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2,123 | 0.99 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.77 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.66 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 4,715 | 1.76 | % | 2.05 | % | 2.39 | % | 2.43 | % | 3.22 | % | 2.57 | % | 2.87 | % | 3.18 | % | 2.94 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.59 | % | 3.23 | % | 2.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,157 | 0.76 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.53 | % | 2.13 | % | 1.88 | % | 2.01 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.66 | % | 3.59 | % | 2.51 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 1,086 | 1.96 | % | 2.80 | % | 2.26 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.41 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.34 | % | 2.80 | % | 5.28 | % | 4.76 | % | 3.19 | % | 1.93 | % | 0.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 765 | 1.52 | % | 1.55 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.71 | % | 1.40 | % | 2.41 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,220 | 1.64 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.03 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 0.59 | % | 0.87 | % | 1.34 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.54 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.61 | % | 1.05 | % | 2.11 | % | 3.90 | % | 1.62 | % | 1.93 | % | 0.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 1,894 | 2.50 | % | 3.55 | % | 3.67 | % | 2.85 | % | 3.93 | % | 3.57 | % | 2.20 | % | 1.73 | % | 3.71 | % | 3.98 | % | 3.88 | % | 3.07 | % | 2.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 4,140 | 2.16 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.94 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.41 | % | 0.97 | % | 0.93 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 1,101 | 1.76 | % | 1.80 | % | 2.10 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.11 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.76 | % | 1.71 | % | 0.95 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.06 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1,156 | 1.06 | % | 1.08 | % | 0.77 | % | 0.51 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.80 | % | 2.90 | % | 4.37 | % | 1.74 | % | 3.27 | % | 2.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 2.89 | % | 4.75 | % | 2.32 | % | 3.38 | % | 7.10 | % | 2.86 | % | 1.99 | % | 1.73 | % | 2.97 | % | 3.37 | % | 3.57 | % | 2.42 | % | 2.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 1,893 | 0.50 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.52 | % | 1.73 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.46 | % | 0.58 | % | 0.72 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.62 | % | 2.03 | % | 0.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 798 | 1.21 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.86 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.16 | % | 1.00 | % | 0.63 | % | 1.14 | % | 2.69 | % | 1.22 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 3,331 | 1.35 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.52 | % | 0.83 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 820 | 3.13 | % | 0.80 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.13 | % | 1.80 | % | 2.08 | % | 2.62 | % | 0.62 | % | 1.34 | % | 4.67 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.93 | % | 2.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 1,776 | 12.54 | % | 13.00 | % | 12.10 | % | 13.12 | % | 13.31 | % | 15.20 | % | 15.57 | % | 13.38 | % | 13.12 | % | 16.35 | % | 10.30 | % | 11.38 | % | 9.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 869 | 4.42 | % | 6.22 | % | 6.75 | % | 7.07 | % | 7.87 | % | 9.22 | % | 9.42 | % | 9.13 | % | 5.56 | % | 4.63 | % | 4.52 | % | 5.61 | % | 4.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,663 | 2.26 | % | 2.49 | % | 3.53 | % | 4.67 | % | 4.94 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.04 | % | 2.91 | % | 2.74 | % | 2.74 | % | 1.86 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,796 | 1.98 | % | 2.26 | % | 0.78 | % | 2.68 | % | 1.49 | % | 2.22 | % | 1.91 | % | 2.08 | % | 3.55 | % | 3.85 | % | 2.71 | % | 1.96 | % | 1.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,575 | 3.16 | % | 4.93 | % | 4.58 | % | 3.88 | % | 4.26 | % | 5.80 | % | 7.00 | % | 5.38 | % | 4.25 | % | 5.28 | % | 6.79 | % | 7.04 | % | 5.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2,006 | 1.93 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.05 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.80 | % | 2.78 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.60 | % | 2.24 | % | 2.48 | % | 3.50 | % | 2.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 3,836 | 4.41 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.66 | % | 3.91 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.49 | % | 3.03 | % | 3.48 | % | 3.79 | % | 3.32 | % | 2.64 | % | 2.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 2.14 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.46 | % | 1.39 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.46 | % | 1.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 63,893 | 2.86 | % | 3.02 | % | 2.98 | % | 3.10 | % | 3.27 | % | 3.15 | % | 2.94 | % | 2.75 | % | 3.11 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.09 | % | 2.94 | % | 1.90 | % |
United Dominion Realty Trust
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 1999 | 91.44 | % | 90.60 | % | 91.16 | % | 91.22 | % | 91.39 | % | 91.00 | % | 92.27 | % | 93.94 | % | 95.56 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2000 | 93.30 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.69 | % | 92.97 | % | 93.65 | % | 95.16 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.04 | % | 95.27 | % | 96.42 | % | 95.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2001 | 93.60 | % | 94.02 | % | 94.30 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.79 | % | 93.83 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.74 | % | 93.00 | % | 91.08 | % | 91.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2002 | 90.53 | % | 91.37 | % | 91.65 | % | 90.87 | % | 89.55 | % | 89.43 | % | 87.41 | % | 86.75 | % | 86.55 | % | 86.34 | % | 90.15 | % | 92.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2003 | 92.55 | % | 92.08 | % | 92.13 | % | 91.53 | % | 90.90 | % | 89.94 | % | 91.08 | % | 90.62 | % | 89.74 | % | 90.49 | % | 90.25 | % | 90.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2004 | 90.36 | % | 90.67 | % | 90.13 | % | 90.79 | % | 92.71 | % | 93.50 | % | 93.10 | % | 92.55 | % | 92.90 | % | 91.37 | % | 90.62 | % | 91.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta GA | 2005 | 91.70 | % | 92.76 | % | 92.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1999 | 95.11 | % | 96.26 | % | 94.17 | % | 91.97 | % | 91.61 | % | 90.89 | % | 91.65 | % | 94.58 | % | 96.91 | % | 98.06 | % | 96.97 | % | 97.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2000 | 95.02 | % | 94.58 | % | 95.71 | % | 96.86 | % | 96.90 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.85 | % | 96.61 | % | 96.82 | % | 97.79 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2001 | 97.16 | % | 96.36 | % | 91.20 | % | 85.71 | % | 80.29 | % | 76.43 | % | 72.99 | % | 73.01 | % | 72.77 | % | 76.87 | % | 81.96 | % | 83.05 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2002 | 85.24 | % | 86.32 | % | 86.81 | % | 86.06 | % | 89.11 | % | 88.69 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.45 | % | 89.25 | % | 86.54 | % | 83.87 | % | 82.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2003 | 80.57 | % | 80.44 | % | 81.43 | % | 84.91 | % | 85.62 | % | 82.66 | % | 82.42 | % | 84.61 | % | 85.24 | % | 86.20 | % | 89.56 | % | 91.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2004 | 92.01 | % | 90.79 | % | 90.95 | % | 92.33 | % | 91.67 | % | 91.60 | % | 94.07 | % | 96.53 | % | 96.04 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.41 | % | 94.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2005 | 94.71 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1999 | 95.41 | % | 95.11 | % | 96.09 | % | 96.11 | % | 95.75 | % | 96.78 | % | 96.93 | % | 98.00 | % | 98.00 | % | 97.55 | % | 98.22 | % | 97.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2000 | 96.59 | % | 97.37 | % | 97.42 | % | 97.44 | % | 97.77 | % | 98.18 | % | 98.47 | % | 98.34 | % | 98.55 | % | 99.13 | % | 98.72 | % | 98.18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2001 | 97.80 | % | 97.54 | % | 98.06 | % | 97.71 | % | 98.30 | % | 96.88 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.97 | % | 96.62 | % | 97.15 | % | 96.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2002 | 97.38 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.71 | % | 95.97 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.60 | % | 96.34 | % | 95.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2003 | 96.01 | % | 96.23 | % | 96.19 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.71 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2004 | 96.60 | % | 97.01 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.25 | % | 96.67 | % | 96.48 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.97 | % | 97.12 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.72 | % | 97.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2005 | 96.61 | % | 96.19 | % | 96.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 1999 | 92.13 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.02 | % | 90.69 | % | 90.55 | % | 90.63 | % | 91.27 | % | 92.02 | % | 90.70 | % | 91.35 | % | 90.65 | % | 90.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2000 | 87.56 | % | 87.30 | % | 87.71 | % | 88.24 | % | 90.93 | % | 91.28 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.48 | % | 90.80 | % | 91.11 | % | 90.79 | % | 90.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2001 | 89.94 | % | 90.62 | % | 91.45 | % | 91.00 | % | 89.83 | % | 88.04 | % | 87.66 | % | 86.62 | % | 86.82 | % | 88.13 | % | 88.10 | % | 88.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2002 | 89.41 | % | 89.07 | % | 86.53 | % | 85.97 | % | 88.51 | % | 89.89 | % | 91.22 | % | 92.51 | % | 91.95 | % | 92.42 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2003 | 96.86 | % | 95.68 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.16 | % | 96.21 | % | 95.35 | % | 94.31 | % | 92.93 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.34 | % | 91.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2004 | 90.93 | % | 92.16 | % | 91.75 | % | 91.23 | % | 91.38 | % | 90.25 | % | 91.03 | % | 93.12 | % | 92.81 | % | 92.88 | % | 93.05 | % | 92.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2005 | 92.21 | % | 94.17 | % | 94.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 1999 | 91.46 | % | 91.67 | % | 91.25 | % | 90.77 | % | 91.11 | % | 90.28 | % | 87.78 | % | 89.81 | % | 89.84 | % | 90.28 | % | 89.80 | % | 88.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2000 | 89.09 | % | 91.69 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.66 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.70 | % | 94.68 | % | 96.48 | % | 95.17 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.31 | % | 94.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2001 | 94.33 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.74 | % | 93.73 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.45 | % | 93.56 | % | 96.05 | % | 96.78 | % | 96.88 | % | 95.85 | % | 95.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2002 | 94.23 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.35 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.93 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.88 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.37 | % | 95.38 | % | 96.32 | % | 95.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2003 | 94.12 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.29 | % | 92.09 | % | 92.89 | % | 94.43 | % | 93.83 | % | 91.87 | % | 90.88 | % | 90.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2004 | 91.30 | % | 91.62 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.99 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.14 | % | 93.70 | % | 94.78 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.31 | % | 92.15 | % | 92.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbia SC | 2005 | 93.11 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.26 | % |
Columbus OH | 1999 | 91.89 | % | 90.99 | % | 89.18 | % | 86.82 | % | 86.21 | % | 87.44 | % | 89.26 | % | 90.73 | % | 92.80 | % | 95.01 | % | 94.83 | % | 93.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2000 | 93.59 | % | 94.43 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.79 | % | 94.77 | % | 94.22 | % | 96.01 | % | 96.11 | % | 95.94 | % | 94.63 | % | 93.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2001 | 91.62 | % | 91.51 | % | 91.57 | % | 92.33 | % | 93.47 | % | 93.22 | % | 92.35 | % | 94.09 | % | 95.06 | % | 95.34 | % | 94.89 | % | 93.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2002 | 93.87 | % | 94.77 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.10 | % | 92.70 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.04 | % | 93.06 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2003 | 93.74 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.83 | % | 93.17 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.85 | % | 94.51 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.27 | % | 92.96 | % | 91.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2004 | 90.64 | % | 90.86 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.38 | % | 91.86 | % | 92.05 | % | 91.38 | % | 92.10 | % | 92.69 | % | 91.52 | % | 91.56 | % | 92.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2005 | 93.45 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 1999 | 94.44 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.22 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.25 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.56 | % | 95.01 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.34 | % | 94.54 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2000 | 94.42 | % | 95.24 | % | 96.11 | % | 95.69 | % | 95.38 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.73 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.90 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2001 | 95.19 | % | 94.57 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.09 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.33 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.85 | % | 95.34 | % | 94.75 | % | 94.88 | % | 94.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2002 | 94.52 | % | 94.37 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.91 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.78 | % | 91.94 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.63 | % | 94.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2003 | 95.48 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.37 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.28 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.34 | % | 95.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2004 | 96.17 | % | 95.91 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.67 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.59 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.70 | % | 96.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2005 | 95.92 | % | 95.65 | % | 95.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 1999 | 92.95 | % | 91.21 | % | 91.64 | % | 90.67 | % | 92.47 | % | 92.67 | % | 94.52 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.86 | % | 95.02 | % | 95.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2000 | 93.95 | % | 94.06 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.24 | % | 94.36 | % | 93.52 | % | 92.55 | % | 93.58 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.70 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2001 | 96.83 | % | 95.83 | % | 95.58 | % | 96.49 | % | 97.74 | % | 96.86 | % | 94.81 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.03 | % | 94.89 | % | 89.96 | % | 87.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2002 | 82.96 | % | 82.37 | % | 82.19 | % | 83.20 | % | 88.01 | % | 88.01 | % | 85.78 | % | 84.18 | % | 83.52 | % | 82.88 | % | 83.54 | % | 84.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2003 | 84.41 | % | 85.83 | % | 86.83 | % | 88.11 | % | 88.78 | % | 90.68 | % | 91.32 | % | 90.94 | % | 90.63 | % | 89.47 | % | 89.91 | % | 89.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2004 | 91.81 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.36 | % | 92.69 | % | 92.62 | % | 93.53 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.98 | % | 92.33 | % | 92.30 | % | 92.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Denver CO | 2005 | 92.33 | % | 92.32 | % | 91.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 1999 | 94.58 | % | 95.20 | % | 94.79 | % | 94.80 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.55 | % | 95.41 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2000 | 94.93 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.46 | % | 95.99 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.14 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.33 | % | 96.30 | % | 97.25 | % | 96.83 | % | 96.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2001 | 96.92 | % | 96.88 | % | 96.75 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.53 | % | 96.37 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.16 | % | 95.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2002 | 94.92 | % | 94.69 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.04 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2003 | 94.84 | % | 94.61 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.46 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.46 | % | 93.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2004 | 93.76 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.82 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.71 | % | 92.96 | % | 93.01 | % | 93.45 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.02 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid-Cities TX | 2005 | 95.03 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 1999 | 87.79 | % | 87.42 | % | 88.35 | % | 90.34 | % | 90.13 | % | 88.84 | % | 87.40 | % | 89.20 | % | 91.02 | % | 90.18 | % | 91.33 | % | 91.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2000 | 91.91 | % | 92.94 | % | 93.15 | % | 93.38 | % | 93.39 | % | 92.55 | % | 91.93 | % | 93.69 | % | 92.49 | % | 92.29 | % | 91.39 | % | 90.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2001 | 91.54 | % | 92.52 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.18 | % | 92.24 | % | 90.22 | % | 89.34 | % | 90.16 | % | 91.75 | % | 91.07 | % | 89.29 | % | 90.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2002 | 90.25 | % | 90.17 | % | 89.83 | % | 89.80 | % | 91.11 | % | 90.39 | % | 89.42 | % | 89.02 | % | 88.80 | % | 90.68 | % | 92.57 | % | 93.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2003 | 93.67 | % | 93.61 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.26 | % | 94.56 | % | 93.48 | % | 93.29 | % | 93.76 | % | 93.15 | % | 92.82 | % | 92.88 | % | 92.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2004 | 92.76 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.18 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.17 | % | 92.11 | % | 90.47 | % | 93.61 | % | 94.32 | % | 94.56 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greensboro NC | 2005 | 93.66 | % | 96.00 | % | 96.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 1999 | 90.90 | % | 89.88 | % | 89.58 | % | 89.87 | % | 90.25 | % | 89.99 | % | 89.84 | % | 89.34 | % | 89.21 | % | 89.23 | % | 89.85 | % | 89.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2000 | 90.00 | % | 92.32 | % | 93.86 | % | 93.79 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.87 | % | 92.52 | % | 93.57 | % | 92.94 | % | 92.45 | % | 93.15 | % | 92.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2001 | 92.83 | % | 93.24 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.32 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.36 | % | 95.13 | % | 94.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2002 | 94.85 | % | 95.31 | % | 95.44 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.92 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.89 | % | 93.40 | % | 91.57 | % | 91.12 | % | 91.29 | % | 90.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2003 | 89.13 | % | 89.60 | % | 90.11 | % | 91.42 | % | 92.17 | % | 90.74 | % | 90.21 | % | 89.66 | % | 89.30 | % | 90.37 | % | 90.28 | % | 89.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2004 | 90.35 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.26 | % | 91.59 | % | 90.98 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.24 | % | 90.84 | % | 90.81 | % | 90.67 | % | 90.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2005 | 91.22 | % | 92.20 | % | 93.70 | % |
Jacksonville FL | 1999 | 87.88 | % | 87.99 | % | 88.35 | % | 89.95 | % | 91.38 | % | 90.60 | % | 89.95 | % | 91.98 | % | 92.46 | % | 93.04 | % | 92.10 | % | 90.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2000 | 90.73 | % | 91.03 | % | 90.04 | % | 90.28 | % | 89.58 | % | 89.71 | % | 89.76 | % | 90.54 | % | 90.54 | % | 90.13 | % | 90.04 | % | 89.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2001 | 88.76 | % | 89.52 | % | 90.73 | % | 91.31 | % | 91.86 | % | 93.54 | % | 94.30 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.79 | % | 95.14 | % | 95.33 | % | 94.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2002 | 93.71 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.49 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.45 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.26 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2003 | 96.85 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.09 | % | 96.46 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.90 | % | 95.33 | % | 94.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2004 | 94.57 | % | 93.47 | % | 93.71 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.90 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.07 | % | 91.08 | % | 92.01 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2005 | 95.37 | % | 96.02 | % | 96.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 1999 | 95.28 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.91 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.31 | % | 95.51 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.91 | % | 97.30 | % | 97.93 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2000 | 96.57 | % | 97.18 | % | 97.91 | % | 98.03 | % | 98.39 | % | 97.93 | % | 97.37 | % | 98.35 | % | 98.44 | % | 98.31 | % | 98.47 | % | 98.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2001 | 98.81 | % | 98.86 | % | 98.39 | % | 98.49 | % | 98.48 | % | 98.03 | % | 97.58 | % | 98.22 | % | 97.60 | % | 97.80 | % | 97.15 | % | 97.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2002 | 96.38 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.34 | % | 96.74 | % | 97.48 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.64 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2003 | 95.08 | % | 95.68 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.90 | % | 96.45 | % | 96.53 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2004 | 96.41 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.06 | % | 96.13 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.96 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.40 | % | 97.11 | % | 96.32 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2005 | 95.45 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 1999 | 92.31 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.48 | % | 92.16 | % | 94.26 | % | 94.04 | % | 93.24 | % | 94.58 | % | 93.74 | % | 92.41 | % | 90.93 | % | 87.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2000 | 86.93 | % | 88.75 | % | 92.29 | % | 94.81 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.87 | % | 95.59 | % | 96.95 | % | 97.13 | % | 97.33 | % | 96.60 | % | 95.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2001 | 95.18 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.79 | % | 96.88 | % | 96.09 | % | 95.56 | % | 95.33 | % | 95.57 | % | 94.85 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2002 | 92.16 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.53 | % | 92.54 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.69 | % | 90.80 | % | 91.57 | % | 92.47 | % | 94.01 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2003 | 93.14 | % | 92.98 | % | 91.75 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.11 | % | 93.73 | % | 92.66 | % | 91.74 | % | 90.38 | % | 90.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2004 | 91.08 | % | 90.00 | % | 90.13 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.99 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.19 | % | 93.95 | % | 91.27 | % | 87.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2005 | 87.97 | % | 88.69 | % | 90.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 1999 | 83.97 | % | 81.95 | % | 83.20 | % | 85.83 | % | 86.64 | % | 87.63 | % | 88.81 | % | 92.03 | % | 92.24 | % | 91.98 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2000 | 91.46 | % | 92.68 | % | 93.57 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.97 | % | 96.01 | % | 96.07 | % | 96.29 | % | 94.86 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.61 | % | 93.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2001 | 91.65 | % | 91.95 | % | 93.04 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.09 | % | 94.46 | % | 96.50 | % | 95.36 | % | 95.35 | % | 94.63 | % | 93.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2002 | 94.16 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.02 | % | 93.03 | % | 92.64 | % | 91.39 | % | 91.23 | % | 90.73 | % | 91.43 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.43 | % | 93.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2003 | 93.70 | % | 93.45 | % | 92.95 | % | 93.77 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.19 | % | 92.45 | % | 92.40 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.11 | % | 91.63 | % | 91.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2004 | 92.52 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.80 | % | 95.37 | % | 94.95 | % | 93.99 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2005 | 94.52 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1999 | 92.85 | % | 92.94 | % | 93.92 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.54 | % | 94.79 | % | 94.95 | % | 95.28 | % | 95.69 | % | 96.90 | % | 97.59 | % | 97.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2000 | 96.17 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.24 | % | 95.81 | % | 95.74 | % | 96.49 | % | 95.55 | % | 96.19 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.28 | % | 94.83 | % | 93.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2001 | 94.24 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.91 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.95 | % | 95.41 | % | 95.93 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.41 | % | 95.10 | % | 95.25 | % | 94.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2002 | 94.66 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.61 | % | 97.57 | % | 98.37 | % | 98.66 | % | 98.41 | % | 98.28 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.82 | % | 97.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2003 | 96.08 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.66 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.43 | % | 95.79 | % | 95.98 | % | 96.56 | % | 97.67 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2004 | 96.50 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.70 | % | 97.08 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.55 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2005 | 95.12 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 1999 | 97.68 | % | 98.27 | % | 97.92 | % | 98.31 | % | 98.01 | % | 97.80 | % | 97.87 | % | 98.28 | % | 98.79 | % | 99.14 | % | 98.57 | % | 98.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2000 | 99.14 | % | 99.36 | % | 98.36 | % | 98.38 | % | 98.37 | % | 98.18 | % | 98.10 | % | 98.57 | % | 99.10 | % | 99.30 | % | 99.19 | % | 98.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2001 | 99.06 | % | 98.60 | % | 98.01 | % | 97.27 | % | 96.58 | % | 96.81 | % | 97.72 | % | 97.35 | % | 97.35 | % | 97.28 | % | 96.36 | % | 94.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2002 | 94.36 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.77 | % | 96.27 | % | 97.23 | % | 95.70 | % | 95.22 | % | 96.13 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.66 | % | 95.06 | % | 95.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2003 | 94.65 | % | 94.55 | % | 95.13 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.48 | % | 93.09 | % | 93.82 | % | 93.14 | % | 93.92 | % | 94.64 | % | 93.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2004 | 93.81 | % | 93.91 | % | 93.66 | % | 94.23 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.65 | % | 94.82 | % | 95.04 | % | 94.84 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northern California | 2005 | 93.70 | % | 94.01 | % | 93.77 | % |
Orlando | 1999 | 92.36 | % | 92.33 | % | 93.17 | % | 94.30 | % | 94.15 | % | 93.85 | % | 94.02 | % | 95.57 | % | 94.60 | % | 94.26 | % | 93.60 | % | 92.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2000 | 92.05 | % | 92.25 | % | 92.24 | % | 91.99 | % | 92.62 | % | 93.59 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.29 | % | 94.55 | % | 94.65 | % | 94.27 | % | 93.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2001 | 93.12 | % | 92.56 | % | 92.92 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.13 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.42 | % | 92.49 | % | 91.93 | % | 90.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2002 | 90.06 | % | 90.87 | % | 91.19 | % | 92.51 | % | 93.18 | % | 92.54 | % | 92.60 | % | 92.02 | % | 91.18 | % | 91.07 | % | 91.81 | % | 92.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2003 | 93.16 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.82 | % | 93.60 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.95 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.57 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2004 | 92.51 | % | 92.69 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.93 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.94 | % | 95.05 | % | 96.92 | % | 97.26 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2005 | 95.86 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 1999 | 93.45 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.09 | % | 88.15 | % | 89.75 | % | 88.19 | % | 88.90 | % | 90.98 | % | 92.73 | % | 93.51 | % | 95.03 | % | 94.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2000 | 94.22 | % | 95.22 | % | 96.03 | % | 95.07 | % | 93.47 | % | 91.88 | % | 91.31 | % | 92.50 | % | 93.36 | % | 92.46 | % | 90.08 | % | 88.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2001 | 89.00 | % | 90.25 | % | 90.99 | % | 89.78 | % | 88.68 | % | 87.81 | % | 88.48 | % | 90.31 | % | 91.96 | % | 92.07 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2002 | 93.93 | % | 95.14 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.07 | % | 93.60 | % | 92.84 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.77 | % | 93.32 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2003 | 95.66 | % | 95.77 | % | 95.64 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.22 | % | 92.79 | % | 92.55 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.21 | % | 92.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2004 | 91.97 | % | 94.05 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.07 | % | 94.13 | % | 95.10 | % | 96.69 | % | 97.16 | % | 97.71 | % | 97.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2005 | 97.44 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1999 | 97.47 | % | 97.40 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.28 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.13 | % | 96.18 | % | 97.64 | % | 96.86 | % | 95.57 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2000 | 93.62 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.61 | % | 97.25 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.38 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.21 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.04 | % | 93.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2001 | 94.24 | % | 95.35 | % | 96.22 | % | 97.04 | % | 97.96 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.06 | % | 95.80 | % | 97.08 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.47 | % | 97.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2002 | 97.27 | % | 96.52 | % | 97.36 | % | 97.37 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.17 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.69 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2003 | 96.26 | % | 96.39 | % | 96.78 | % | 95.87 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.25 | % | 92.91 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2004 | 92.82 | % | 92.97 | % | 92.65 | % | 94.19 | % | 95.52 | % | 95.29 | % | 94.72 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.81 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2005 | 93.51 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 1999 | 92.39 | % | 93.05 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.46 | % | 94.14 | % | 93.93 | % | 93.94 | % | 95.42 | % | 96.35 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2000 | 94.54 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.91 | % | 94.76 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.00 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.45 | % | 93.36 | % | 92.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2001 | 93.48 | % | 92.98 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.16 | % | 93.36 | % | 95.45 | % | 94.87 | % | 95.44 | % | 94.27 | % | 94.44 | % | 94.27 | % | 94.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2002 | 93.62 | % | 93.67 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.42 | % | 94.30 | % | 95.84 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2003 | 94.68 | % | 95.39 | % | 94.55 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.27 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.29 | % | 91.38 | % | 91.89 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.43 | % | 92.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2004 | 94.41 | % | 92.40 | % | 93.36 | % | 95.45 | % | 94.26 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.48 | % | 95.05 | % | 93.51 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.37 | % | 95.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2005 | 94.23 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 1999 | 90.93 | % | 90.32 | % | 91.52 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.14 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.71 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.66 | % | 96.01 | % | 95.78 | % | 93.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2000 | 92.87 | % | 93.89 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.41 | % | 95.15 | % | 93.89 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.75 | % | 95.03 | % | 94.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2001 | 94.06 | % | 94.70 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.72 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.19 | % | 95.24 | % | 95.15 | % | 96.13 | % | 95.51 | % | 95.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2002 | 93.75 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.65 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.20 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.81 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2003 | 93.90 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.60 | % | 91.47 | % | 93.61 | % | 95.06 | % | 96.33 | % | 96.92 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.24 | % | 96.17 | % | 95.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2004 | 95.87 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.87 | % | 96.24 | % | 95.55 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.95 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other North Carolina | 2005 | 94.00 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 1999 | 91.59 | % | 91.88 | % | 92.55 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.86 | % | 92.49 | % | 92.83 | % | 92.84 | % | 92.86 | % | 93.74 | % | 92.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2000 | 91.97 | % | 92.84 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.45 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.01 | % | 95.80 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.26 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2001 | 92.12 | % | 92.06 | % | 92.41 | % | 93.78 | % | 94.32 | % | 94.10 | % | 92.61 | % | 93.63 | % | 93.65 | % | 92.04 | % | 90.08 | % | 89.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2002 | 88.02 | % | 88.90 | % | 90.23 | % | 92.28 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.77 | % | 91.00 | % | 90.57 | % | 89.74 | % | 88.31 | % | 87.95 | % | 88.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2003 | 88.98 | % | 90.21 | % | 90.82 | % | 90.96 | % | 91.18 | % | 90.51 | % | 90.34 | % | 89.72 | % | 90.82 | % | 91.29 | % | 92.38 | % | 92.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2004 | 93.51 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.71 | % | 94.86 | % | 94.33 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.42 | % | 93.56 | % | 92.92 | % | 93.51 | % | 94.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2005 | 94.64 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.93 | % |
Other Southwestern | 1999 | 92.86 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.02 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.62 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.58 | % | 94.84 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.56 | % | 96.34 | % | 96.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2000 | 94.57 | % | 94.27 | % | 95.37 | % | 96.85 | % | 97.63 | % | 97.15 | % | 96.20 | % | 97.48 | % | 97.82 | % | 98.06 | % | 97.51 | % | 96.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2001 | 97.61 | % | 97.30 | % | 94.66 | % | 90.80 | % | 87.56 | % | 84.70 | % | 82.58 | % | 81.62 | % | 81.07 | % | 83.95 | % | 86.74 | % | 87.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2002 | 89.55 | % | 90.48 | % | 90.67 | % | 89.64 | % | 91.83 | % | 91.46 | % | 94.15 | % | 93.98 | % | 92.12 | % | 90.34 | % | 88.51 | % | 87.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2003 | 86.19 | % | 86.04 | % | 86.95 | % | 89.19 | % | 89.43 | % | 87.32 | % | 87.27 | % | 88.81 | % | 89.34 | % | 89.94 | % | 92.25 | % | 93.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2004 | 95.92 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.77 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.10 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.81 | % | 95.57 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2005 | 94.49 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 1999 | 92.75 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.43 | % | 91.86 | % | 93.50 | % | 94.83 | % | 96.00 | % | 96.71 | % | 96.75 | % | 97.25 | % | 96.63 | % | 95.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2000 | 94.71 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.75 | % | 97.18 | % | 98.29 | % | 97.46 | % | 96.61 | % | 98.14 | % | 98.29 | % | 97.89 | % | 96.96 | % | 96.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2001 | 95.63 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.75 | % | 98.14 | % | 97.74 | % | 97.25 | % | 97.06 | % | 97.99 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.51 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2002 | 97.34 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.29 | % | 95.43 | % | 96.31 | % | 97.00 | % | 97.01 | % | 97.10 | % | 97.17 | % | 96.25 | % | 95.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2003 | 95.37 | % | 94.82 | % | 95.64 | % | 95.51 | % | 94.60 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.88 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.60 | % | 92.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2004 | 90.37 | % | 91.98 | % | 93.02 | % | 91.78 | % | 91.10 | % | 91.86 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.54 | % | 94.20 | % | 93.72 | % | 92.90 | % | 93.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Virginia | 2005 | 91.98 | % | 91.65 | % | 92.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 1999 | 91.71 | % | 91.89 | % | 91.15 | % | 90.24 | % | 89.73 | % | 89.12 | % | 88.42 | % | 90.37 | % | 90.75 | % | 90.07 | % | 90.86 | % | 91.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2000 | 92.96 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.33 | % | 92.93 | % | 92.89 | % | 93.30 | % | 92.56 | % | 92.10 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2001 | 92.35 | % | 92.00 | % | 92.10 | % | 92.98 | % | 93.10 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.50 | % | 93.09 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.43 | % | 93.71 | % | 93.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2002 | 93.45 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.23 | % | 93.48 | % | 93.17 | % | 92.61 | % | 92.17 | % | 92.81 | % | 94.37 | % | 94.47 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2003 | 91.50 | % | 91.68 | % | 92.14 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.46 | % | 92.07 | % | 91.94 | % | 91.58 | % | 90.46 | % | 90.33 | % | 89.45 | % | 88.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2004 | 92.03 | % | 91.63 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.01 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.36 | % | 92.10 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2005 | 93.13 | % | 93.96 | % | 94.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 1999 | 89.86 | % | 92.07 | % | 92.71 | % | 92.27 | % | 92.02 | % | 91.27 | % | 90.44 | % | 90.20 | % | 90.24 | % | 90.76 | % | 91.81 | % | 90.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2000 | 90.86 | % | 91.71 | % | 91.82 | % | 92.99 | % | 94.06 | % | 94.32 | % | 94.67 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.06 | % | 93.92 | % | 92.25 | % | 91.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2001 | 91.67 | % | 92.53 | % | 93.69 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.16 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.29 | % | 95.35 | % | 95.62 | % | 95.31 | % | 93.64 | % | 92.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2002 | 92.11 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.73 | % | 90.46 | % | 89.79 | % | 90.29 | % | 90.54 | % | 91.65 | % | 90.74 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2003 | 92.72 | % | 91.62 | % | 91.60 | % | 90.26 | % | 90.92 | % | 88.96 | % | 87.71 | % | 88.78 | % | 88.86 | % | 87.22 | % | 88.51 | % | 90.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2004 | 92.15 | % | 91.35 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.57 | % | 90.52 | % | 91.30 | % | 91.39 | % | 90.37 | % | 92.92 | % | 94.34 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2005 | 93.58 | % | 94.25 | % | 93.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 1999 | 92.93 | % | 92.34 | % | 92.66 | % | 92.48 | % | 92.27 | % | 91.18 | % | 91.69 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.01 | % | 92.19 | % | 91.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2000 | 91.06 | % | 91.30 | % | 91.28 | % | 91.83 | % | 92.77 | % | 90.98 | % | 88.79 | % | 89.68 | % | 89.05 | % | 88.08 | % | 88.47 | % | 87.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2001 | 86.55 | % | 85.47 | % | 84.87 | % | 86.33 | % | 87.74 | % | 88.66 | % | 87.55 | % | 88.36 | % | 88.37 | % | 90.09 | % | 89.06 | % | 87.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2002 | 86.56 | % | 86.62 | % | 87.03 | % | 87.29 | % | 88.24 | % | 87.76 | % | 88.68 | % | 90.19 | % | 91.05 | % | 92.90 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2003 | 92.78 | % | 92.75 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.49 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.73 | % | 92.19 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2004 | 93.39 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.45 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.28 | % | 92.78 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.34 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2005 | 94.16 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1999 | 90.45 | % | 90.87 | % | 91.44 | % | 91.79 | % | 93.13 | % | 94.24 | % | 95.23 | % | 96.48 | % | 96.84 | % | 97.16 | % | 97.23 | % | 96.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2000 | 95.64 | % | 95.73 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.68 | % | 96.40 | % | 96.96 | % | 97.05 | % | 97.20 | % | 96.16 | % | 96.48 | % | 95.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2001 | 95.60 | % | 95.74 | % | 97.03 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.44 | % | 95.87 | % | 94.52 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.29 | % | 94.93 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2002 | 96.14 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.62 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.61 | % | 91.80 | % | 92.89 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2003 | 95.13 | % | 95.85 | % | 96.47 | % | 95.62 | % | 95.46 | % | 94.31 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.90 | % | 92.16 | % | 92.88 | % | 94.99 | % | 93.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2004 | 93.16 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.42 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.79 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2005 | 95.06 | % | 94.67 | % | 95.66 | % |
Seattle,WA | 1999 | 87.75 | % | 88.73 | % | 89.92 | % | 90.82 | % | 90.32 | % | 92.35 | % | 93.45 | % | 95.92 | % | 97.78 | % | 97.18 | % | 97.24 | % | 96.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2000 | 93.92 | % | 95.06 | % | 95.00 | % | 94.94 | % | 95.72 | % | 94.84 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.70 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.05 | % | 94.89 | % | 94.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2001 | 94.82 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.40 | % | 96.74 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.06 | % | 96.26 | % | 95.06 | % | 93.73 | % | 93.26 | % | 93.71 | % | 94.61 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2002 | 92.75 | % | 93.07 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.38 | % | 95.36 | % | 89.10 | % | 91.46 | % | 90.94 | % | 89.21 | % | 89.27 | % | 90.30 | % | 90.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2003 | 91.11 | % | 90.32 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.11 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.57 | % | 93.26 | % | 92.78 | % | 92.37 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.44 | % | 93.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2004 | 94.08 | % | 93.62 | % | 92.95 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.40 | % | 92.48 | % | 91.62 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.70 | % | 91.72 | % | 91.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2005 | 92.24 | % | 92.43 | % | 95.05 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 1999 | 96.57 | % | 97.00 | % | 95.44 | % | 94.06 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.87 | % | 94.44 | % | 93.00 | % | 92.46 | % | 93.23 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2000 | 94.31 | % | 95.95 | % | 96.07 | % | 94.10 | % | 94.19 | % | 95.79 | % | 94.95 | % | 96.30 | % | 94.29 | % | 93.60 | % | 95.64 | % | 96.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2001 | 96.45 | % | 95.77 | % | 96.26 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.05 | % | 96.18 | % | 95.90 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.00 | % | 95.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2002 | 94.63 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.95 | % | 94.46 | % | 94.50 | % | 93.13 | % | 92.94 | % | 94.92 | % | 96.66 | % | 97.97 | % | 96.02 | % | 96.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2003 | 95.96 | % | 95.79 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.47 | % | 95.64 | % | 96.18 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.16 | % | 94.92 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2004 | 94.19 | % | 94.03 | % | 94.06 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.23 | % | 94.28 | % | 93.99 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.77 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California | 2005 | 93.60 | % | 93.08 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 1999 | 90.93 | % | 91.84 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.71 | % | 91.69 | % | 91.55 | % | 91.98 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.34 | % | 92.95 | % | 93.15 | % | 92.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2000 | 92.17 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.30 | % | 94.41 | % | 94.40 | % | 94.53 | % | 94.66 | % | 95.49 | % | 96.00 | % | 95.90 | % | 95.54 | % | 94.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2001 | 94.79 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.45 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.55 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.37 | % | 94.24 | % | 94.32 | % | 94.79 | % | 93.22 | % | 92.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2002 | 92.43 | % | 93.02 | % | 92.29 | % | 92.14 | % | 91.50 | % | 90.09 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.72 | % | 90.63 | % | 90.92 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2003 | 93.26 | % | 93.65 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.14 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.64 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.14 | % | 92.55 | % | 93.09 | % | 93.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2004 | 93.73 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.91 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.40 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2005 | 94.26 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1999 | 85.54 | % | 86.60 | % | 86.69 | % | 87.30 | % | 87.97 | % | 88.57 | % | 89.19 | % | 92.98 | % | 92.94 | % | 94.79 | % | 93.05 | % | 89.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2000 | 88.52 | % | 87.23 | % | 86.22 | % | 87.24 | % | 90.50 | % | 91.61 | % | 91.53 | % | 92.20 | % | 90.72 | % | 89.93 | % | 89.09 | % | 88.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2001 | 87.98 | % | 88.22 | % | 88.26 | % | 89.37 | % | 93.03 | % | 94.52 | % | 95.89 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.49 | % | 93.65 | % | 94.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2002 | 92.21 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.06 | % | 90.35 | % | 91.91 | % | 92.97 | % | 90.93 | % | 89.67 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2003 | 91.08 | % | 91.31 | % | 91.05 | % | 91.66 | % | 92.00 | % | 90.58 | % | 91.02 | % | 92.34 | % | 92.41 | % | 92.31 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2004 | 94.30 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.44 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.62 | % | 96.09 | % | 97.93 | % | 98.45 | % | 97.62 | % | 96.80 | % | 96.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2005 | 96.26 | % | 95.84 | % | 96.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 1999 | 91.79 | % | 91.67 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.74 | % | 91.89 | % | 91.65 | % | 91.78 | % | 93.29 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.62 | % | 92.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2000 | 92.64 | % | 93.51 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.98 | % | 94.35 | % | 93.97 | % | 93.84 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.56 | % | 94.39 | % | 94.05 | % | 93.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2001 | 93.31 | % | 93.38 | % | 93.62 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.13 | % | 93.74 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2002 | 93.02 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.19 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.53 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.57 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.80 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2003 | 93.33 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.23 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.07 | % | 92.89 | % | 92.83 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2004 | 93.21 | % | 93.29 | % | 93.53 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.88 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.87 | % | 94.26 | % | 94.42 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2005 | 94.03 | % | 94.42 | % | 94.77 | % |