Exhibit 99.1
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/8-K/0001035704-07-000485/d47595d47595z0001.gif)
Mature Market Trends As of May 2007 P R E D I C T A B I L I T Y through H I G H P E R F O R M A N C E |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/8-K/0001035704-07-000485/d47595d47595z0002.gif)
Safe Harbor Statement Statements contained in this presentation, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company's use of words such as, "expects," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "believes," and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which can cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, unfavorable changes in apartment demand or supply in the Company's markets and the effect on occupancy and rental rates; changing economic conditions; changes in household growth or population; the impact of competition and competitive pricing; acquisitions or new developments may not achieve anticipated results; delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; difficulties in selling existing apartment communities on favorable terms or the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement; the shortage of available acquisition candidates; the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year; failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could create refinancing risk and impair debt service payments and shareholder distributions; increases in property and liability insurance costs; risks arising from environmental issues or natural disasters; effects of the Company's accounting or other policies and other risk factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are made as of today, based upon information known to management as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that indicated results or events will not be realized. |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/8-K/0001035704-07-000485/d47595d47595z0003.gif)
UDR
Rental Income and Fees by Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Units | | | May-06 | | | Jun-06 | | | Jul-06 | | | Aug-06 | | | Sep-06 | | | Oct-06 | | | Nov-06 | | | Dec-06 | | | Jan-07 | | | Feb-07 | | | Mar-07 | | | Apr-07 | | | May-07 | |
Net Rent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta GA | | | 1,426 | | | | 872,166 | | | | 881,204 | | | | 901,647 | | | | 890,184 | | | | 887,552 | | | | 892,944 | | | | 909,286 | | | | 918,578 | | | | 924,215 | | | | 916,145 | | | | 924,173 | | | | 904,285 | | | | 913,117 | |
Austin TX | | | 1,075 | | | | 737,089 | | | | 755,414 | | | | 769,657 | | | | 770,844 | | | | 771,174 | | | | 758,640 | | | | 770,561 | | | | 760,369 | | | | 775,827 | | | | 782,482 | | | | 787,740 | | | | 790,772 | | | | 790,993 | |
Baltimore | | | 1,819 | | | | 1,811,960 | | | | 1,844,227 | | | | 1,815,359 | | | | 1,777,789 | | | | 1,804,587 | | | | 1,783,525 | | | | 1,791,992 | | | | 1,783,018 | | | | 1,799,315 | | | | 1,784,916 | | | | 1,808,044 | | | | 1,841,888 | | | | 1,863,147 | |
Charlotte NC | | | 1,226 | | | | 794,863 | | | | 806,307 | | | | 814,373 | | | | 858,532 | | | | 852,172 | | | | 858,166 | | | | 862,069 | | | | 850,610 | | | | 858,030 | | | | 855,101 | | | | 871,977 | | | | 861,939 | | | | 861,780 | |
Columbus OH | | | 2,530 | | | | 1,617,746 | | | | 1,645,009 | | | | 1,629,851 | | | | 1,641,150 | | | | 1,655,380 | | | | 1,663,623 | | | | 1,656,918 | | | | 1,673,118 | | | | 1,667,988 | | | | 1,697,628 | | | | 1,735,885 | | | | 1,725,988 | | | | 1,717,315 | |
Dallas TX | | | 987 | | | | 792,576 | | | | 806,592 | | | | 806,644 | | | | 821,565 | | | | 809,446 | | | | 796,744 | | | | 794,615 | | | | 791,301 | | | | 800,988 | | | | 818,634 | | | | 804,796 | | | | 810,505 | | | | 805,015 | |
Denver, CO | | | 884 | | | | 560,066 | | | | 559,572 | | | | 575,390 | | | | 596,588 | | | | 613,793 | | | | 604,470 | | | | 602,475 | | | | 596,686 | | | | 576,001 | | | | 580,752 | | | | 598,871 | | | | 605,427 | | | | 591,598 | |
Ft Worth TX | | | 1,828 | | | | 1,101,204 | | | | 1,116,515 | | | | 1,135,387 | | | | 1,130,885 | | | | 1,131,076 | | | | 1,119,594 | | | | 1,102,791 | | | | 1,096,581 | | | | 1,101,831 | | | | 1,124,233 | | | | 1,141,293 | | | | 1,140,254 | | | | 1,159,628 | |
Inland Empire | | | 660 | | | | 622,941 | | | | 628,713 | | | | 634,619 | | | | 614,067 | | | | 634,652 | | | | 633,064 | | | | 604,093 | | | | 639,516 | | | | 609,736 | | | | 628,081 | | | | 670,351 | | | | 674,060 | | | | 659,137 | |
Houston TX | | | 5,447 | | | | 3,287,430 | | | | 3,346,110 | | | | 3,354,543 | | | | 3,364,334 | | | | 3,363,731 | | | | 3,354,963 | | | | 3,328,467 | | | | 3,316,814 | | | | 3,317,386 | | | | 3,355,639 | | | | 3,421,199 | | | | 3,447,188 | | | | 3,473,968 | |
Jacksonville FL | | | 1,557 | | | | 1,201,555 | | | | 1,179,835 | | | | 1,189,374 | | | | 1,233,797 | | | | 1,215,793 | | | | 1,190,809 | | | | 1,173,534 | | | | 1,166,499 | | | | 1,157,651 | | | | 1,157,187 | | | | 1,185,314 | | | | 1,189,107 | | | | 1,188,205 | |
LA County | | | 1,052 | | | | 1,352,470 | | | | 1,340,013 | | | | 1,277,826 | | | | 1,313,825 | | | | 1,385,012 | | | | 1,410,833 | | | | 1,413,622 | | | | 1,412,861 | | | | 1,379,302 | | | | 1,389,705 | | | | 1,392,190 | | | | 1,407,734 | | | | 1,387,515 | |
Metro DC | | | 2,097 | | | | 2,342,410 | | | | 2,331,645 | | | | 2,353,742 | | | | 2,392,927 | | | | 2,401,637 | | | | 2,403,240 | | | | 2,405,412 | | | | 2,426,502 | | | | 2,408,870 | | | | 2,445,150 | | | | 2,480,192 | | | | 2,450,929 | | | | 2,429,211 | |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 1,568 | | | | 1,303,663 | | | | 1,327,081 | | | | 1,336,213 | | | | 1,350,250 | | | | 1,348,117 | | | | 1,373,244 | | | | 1,349,379 | | | | 1,274,111 | | | | 1,249,960 | | | | 1,302,732 | | | | 1,319,069 | | | | 1,382,342 | | | | 1,401,192 | |
Nashville TN | | | 2,580 | | | | 1,771,579 | | | | 1,799,221 | | | | 1,788,737 | | | | 1,813,710 | | | | 1,827,738 | | | | 1,829,912 | | | | 1,822,466 | | | | 1,824,018 | | | | 1,836,197 | | | | 1,850,925 | | | | 1,886,004 | | | | 1,866,683 | | | | 1,887,115 | |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 1,438 | | | | 1,197,460 | | | | 1,207,129 | | | | 1,190,546 | | | | 1,201,169 | | | | 1,216,344 | | | | 1,188,678 | | | | 1,204,459 | | | | 1,205,253 | | | | 1,202,123 | | | | 1,182,901 | | | | 1,207,004 | | | | 1,184,067 | | | | 1,234,176 | |
Orange County | | | 4,067 | | | | 5,224,619 | | | | 5,270,674 | | | | 5,311,949 | | | | 5,360,437 | | | | 5,418,334 | | | | 5,497,957 | | | | 5,517,820 | | | | 5,522,492 | | | | 5,515,971 | | | | 5,498,663 | | | | 5,535,679 | | | | 5,486,384 | | | | 5,552,677 | |
Orlando | | | 2,820 | | | | 2,333,703 | | | | 2,343,104 | | | | 2,381,119 | | | | 2,421,212 | | | | 2,407,947 | | | | 2,404,459 | | | | 2,391,723 | | | | 2,371,903 | | | | 2,370,452 | | | | 2,372,759 | | | | 2,404,657 | | | | 2,400,387 | | | | 2,385,986 | |
Other Florida | | | 2,192 | | | | 1,867,790 | | | | 1,837,291 | | | | 1,835,189 | | | | 1,859,230 | | | | 1,839,946 | | | | 1,832,879 | | | | 1,831,953 | | | | 1,824,974 | | | | 1,828,900 | | | | 1,831,846 | | | | 1,840,338 | | | | 1,823,192 | | | | 1,831,970 | |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2,817 | | | | 2,226,461 | | | | 2,267,167 | | | | 2,245,492 | | | | 2,240,606 | | | | 2,238,640 | | | | 2,262,867 | | | | 2,247,089 | | | | 2,193,084 | | | | 2,187,481 | | | | 2,142,582 | | | | 2,187,234 | | | | 2,224,640 | | | | 2,234,284 | |
Other Midwestern | | | 444 | | | | 283,338 | | | | 280,843 | | | | 281,684 | | | | 299,210 | | | | 296,797 | | | | 290,194 | | | | 296,188 | | | | 301,638 | | | | 292,325 | | | | 292,254 | | | | 304,042 | | | | 285,252 | | | | 295,603 | |
Other Southeastern | | | 1,752 | | | | 1,010,997 | | | | 1,024,052 | | | | 1,012,529 | | | | 1,039,377 | | | | 1,056,989 | | | | 1,029,503 | | | | 1,038,719 | | | | 1,043,219 | | | | 1,023,331 | | | | 1,050,606 | | | | 1,064,350 | | | | 1,050,525 | | | | 1,052,314 | |
Other Southwestern | | | 2,302 | | | | 1,521,400 | | | | 1,548,301 | | | | 1,563,676 | | | | 1,586,033 | | | | 1,579,484 | | | | 1,587,991 | | | | 1,610,840 | | | | 1,599,231 | | | | 1,590,317 | | | | 1,593,431 | | | | 1,649,925 | | | | 1,624,951 | | | | 1,625,165 | |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 914 | | | | 762,883 | | | | 774,992 | | | | 774,977 | | | | 773,562 | | | | 795,312 | | | | 786,603 | | | | 781,219 | | | | 772,670 | | | | 777,848 | | | | 781,160 | | | | 769,351 | | | | 780,342 | | | | 774,651 | |
Portland, OR | | | 1,365 | | | | 878,033 | | | | 920,506 | | | | 930,107 | | | | 954,527 | | | | 949,880 | | | | 928,189 | | | | 919,578 | | | | 954,414 | | | | 957,337 | | | | 960,801 | | | | 1,008,183 | | | | 990,256 | | | | 1,001,559 | |
Raleigh Durham | | | 3,463 | | | | 2,178,448 | | | | 2,154,125 | | | | 2,162,278 | | | | 2,193,150 | | | | 2,204,295 | | | | 2,196,333 | | | | 2,200,137 | | | | 2,143,177 | | | | 2,190,409 | | | | 2,216,847 | | | | 2,237,645 | | | | 2,264,532 | | | | 2,270,702 | |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 1,807 | | | | 1,451,655 | | | | 1,488,889 | | | | 1,470,556 | | | | 1,472,407 | | | | 1,494,941 | | | | 1,446,643 | | | | 1,461,369 | | | | 1,478,117 | | | | 1,472,088 | | | | 1,495,444 | | | | 1,527,547 | | | | 1,536,568 | | | | 1,515,724 | |
Sacramento | | | 914 | | | | 694,393 | | | | 701,705 | | | | 704,790 | | | | 693,946 | | | | 679,303 | | | | 718,178 | | | | 699,824 | | | | 703,035 | | | | 702,996 | | | | 705,530 | | | | 722,996 | | | | 698,112 | | | | 705,620 | |
San Diego County | | | 873 | | | | 952,433 | | | | 976,344 | | | | 971,811 | | | | 935,484 | | | | 985,813 | | | | 1,002,974 | | | | 1,017,332 | | | | 977,578 | | | | 999,064 | | | | 995,203 | | | | 1,032,997 | | | | 1,027,674 | | | | 1,037,911 | |
Seattle,WA | | | 1,074 | | | | 913,257 | | | | 929,741 | | | | 931,345 | | | | 954,685 | | | | 969,485 | | | | 939,812 | | | | 947,068 | | | | 938,377 | | | | 932,865 | | | | 919,712 | | | | 949,070 | | | | 961,814 | | | | 969,296 | |
SF Bay Area | | | 1,775 | | | | 2,510,939 | | | | 2,579,226 | | | | 2,569,593 | | | | 2,624,843 | | | | 2,600,069 | | | | 2,596,356 | | | | 2,624,386 | | | | 2,627,716 | | | | 2,668,964 | | | | 2,662,601 | | | | 2,665,024 | | | | 2,675,339 | | | | 2,732,978 | |
Tampa FL | | | 2,873 | | | | 2,377,509 | | | | 2,389,132 | | | | 2,441,215 | | | | 2,464,526 | | | | 2,486,799 | | | | 2,454,342 | | | | 2,407,569 | | | | 2,410,080 | | | | 2,415,140 | | | | 2,446,990 | | | | 2,499,196 | | | | 2,472,421 | | | | 2,477,803 | |
Wilmington NC | | | 1,868 | | | | 1,285,638 | | | | 1,319,008 | | | | 1,298,377 | | | | 1,336,731 | | | | 1,323,464 | | | | 1,328,235 | | | | 1,314,559 | | | | 1,305,014 | | | | 1,283,068 | | | | 1,272,896 | | | | 1,332,180 | | | | 1,335,776 | | | | 1,328,063 | |
Total | | | 61,494 | | | | 49,840,673 | | | | 50,379,688 | | | | 50,460,595 | | | | 50,981,581 | | | | 51,245,701 | | | | 51,165,965 | | | | 51,099,512 | | | | 50,902,554 | | | | 50,873,975 | | | | 51,111,533 | | | | 51,964,517 | | | | 51,921,334 | | | | 52,155,418 | |
UDR
Rental Income and Fees by Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Units | | | May-06 | | | Jun-06 | | | Jul-06 | | | Aug-06 | | | Sep-06 | | | Oct-06 | | | Nov-06 | | | Dec-06 | | | Jan-07 | | | Feb-07 | | | Mar-07 | | | Apr-07 | | | May-07 | |
Concessions As a % of Net Rent | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta GA | | | 1,426 | | | | 2.16 | % | | | 2.29 | % | | | 2.16 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 2.79 | % | | | 2.70 | % | | | 3.02 | % | | | 2.03 | % | | | 1.24 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | | 2.81 | % | | | 3.42 | % | | | 2.83 | % |
Austin TX | | | 1,075 | | | | 1.67 | % | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.56 | % | | | 0.28 | % | | | 0.24 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.31 | % | | | 0.26 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.57 | % |
Baltimore | | | 1,819 | | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.14 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.81 | % | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.04 | % | | | 0.83 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 1,226 | | | | 3.04 | % | | | 3.94 | % | | | 2.86 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | | 1.23 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | | 2.58 | % | | | 1.83 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | | 2.15 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2,530 | | | | 3.16 | % | | | 3.41 | % | | | 2.58 | % | | | 3.05 | % | | | 2.57 | % | | | 2.08 | % | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.27 | % | | | 0.88 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.50 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 987 | | | | 1.05 | % | | | 0.53 | % | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.53 | % | | | 0.39 | % | | | 0.96 | % | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.08 | % | | | 0.44 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 0.44 | % | | | 1.47 | % |
Denver, CO | | | 884 | | | | 4.38 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | | 3.27 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | | 2.05 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.59 | % | | | 3.39 | % | | | 3.65 | % | | | 1.37 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 3.44 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 1,828 | | | | 2.14 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | | 1.35 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.48 | % | | | 2.96 | % | | | 3.03 | % | | | 2.30 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 2.71 | % | | | 1.85 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 660 | | | | 6.91 | % | | | 7.19 | % | | | 7.25 | % | | | 9.51 | % | | | 7.04 | % | | | 7.54 | % | | | 8.80 | % | | | 4.86 | % | | | 4.74 | % | | | 4.97 | % | | | 4.81 | % | | | 4.41 | % | | | 5.74 | % |
Houston TX | | | 5,447 | | | | 1.65 | % | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.88 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 2.29 | % | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.14 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 1,557 | | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.17 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 1.39 | % | | | 1.35 | % | | | 1.82 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | | 1.87 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.63 | % |
LA County | | | 1,052 | | | | 2.19 | % | | | 1.99 | % | | | 4.54 | % | | | 4.64 | % | | | 1.42 | % | | | 0.73 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 2.08 | % | | | 3.17 | % | | | 1.53 | % | | | 2.88 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2,097 | | | | 1.17 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 2.03 | % | | | 2.32 | % | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.13 | % | | | 0.69 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.87 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 1,568 | | | | 2.98 | % | | | 2.43 | % | | | 3.76 | % | | | 2.58 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.35 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | | 1.42 | % | | | 1.08 | % | | | 1.27 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2,580 | | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.08 | % | | | 1.21 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.65 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 2.05 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 1,438 | | | | 1.17 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 2.48 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 1.81 | % |
Orange County | | | 4,067 | | | | 2.47 | % | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 2.42 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.17 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.65 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.92 | % | | | 2.09 | % |
Orlando | | | 2,820 | | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.83 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 1.23 | % | | | 2.30 | % | | | 2.31 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.71 | % | | | 1.87 | % | | | 2.97 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2,192 | | | | 0.34 | % | | | 0.36 | % | | | 0.49 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.56 | % | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 2.44 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.90 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2,817 | | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.24 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.66 | % | | | 2.58 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 4.28 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | | 3.44 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 444 | | | | 4.04 | % | | | 4.57 | % | | | 3.44 | % | | | 3.30 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.36 | % | | | 0.67 | % | | | 1.17 | % | | | 0.81 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 2.88 | % | | | 2.63 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 1,752 | | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.26 | % | | | 2.31 | % | | | 2.48 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.34 | % | | | 2.19 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2,302 | | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.43 | % | | | 1.01 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.89 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 914 | | | | 5.56 | % | | | 6.29 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 5.81 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.67 | % | | | 4.83 | % | | | 6.95 | % | | | 6.09 | % | | | 5.38 | % | | | 8.27 | % | | | 5.84 | % | | | 5.79 | % |
Portland, OR | | | 1,365 | | | | 6.42 | % | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.21 | % | | | 2.96 | % | | | 2.58 | % | | | 3.50 | % | | | 7.29 | % | | | 3.02 | % | | | 3.04 | % | | | 3.41 | % | | | 2.74 | % | | | 3.31 | % | | | 3.33 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 3,463 | | | | 3.24 | % | | | 3.12 | % | | | 3.43 | % | | | 3.72 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.81 | % | | | 2.63 | % | | | 3.95 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | | 1.95 | % | | | 2.38 | % | | | 1.76 | % | | | 2.37 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 1,807 | | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.48 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.17 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | | 2.66 | % | | | 2.31 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | | 2.14 | % | | | 2.18 | % | | | 1.42 | % | | | 1.80 | % |
Sacramento | | | 914 | | | | 6.19 | % | | | 4.44 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | | 5.86 | % | | | 5.34 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 5.65 | % | | | 3.82 | % | | | 3.10 | % | | | 5.09 | % | | | 4.21 | % | | | 4.62 | % | | | 5.37 | % |
San Diego County | | | 873 | | | | 2.19 | % | | | 2.27 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | | 4.87 | % | | | 2.49 | % | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.98 | % | | | 2.07 | % | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.13 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 1,074 | | | | 1.02 | % | | | 1.26 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | | 2.65 | % | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.54 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 1,775 | | | | 1.38 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.53 | % | | | 1.02 | % | | | 1.26 | % | | | 0.72 | % | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.07 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 1.60 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2,873 | | | | 0.25 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.13 | % | | | 0.49 | % | | | 0.45 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 0.95 | % | | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.41 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 1,868 | | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 0.55 | % | | | 0.85 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 3.63 | % | | | 3.98 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | | 2.41 | % | | | 4.82 | % |
Total | | | 61,494 | | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 2.08 | % | | | 1.43 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.73 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.71 | % | | | 2.04 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Atlanta GA | | | 2002 | | | | 90.53 | % | | | 91.37 | % | | | 91.65 | % | | | 90.87 | % | | | 89.55 | % | | | 89.43 | % | | | 87.41 | % | | | 86.75 | % | | | 86.55 | % | | | 86.34 | % | | | 90.15 | % | | | 92.09 | % |
Atlanta GA | | | 2003 | | | | 92.55 | % | | | 92.08 | % | | | 92.13 | % | | | 91.53 | % | | | 90.90 | % | | | 89.94 | % | | | 91.08 | % | | | 90.62 | % | | | 89.74 | % | | | 90.49 | % | | | 90.25 | % | | | 90.81 | % |
Atlanta GA | | | 2004 | | | | 90.36 | % | | | 90.67 | % | | | 90.13 | % | | | 90.79 | % | | | 92.71 | % | | | 93.50 | % | | | 93.10 | % | | | 92.55 | % | | | 92.90 | % | | | 91.37 | % | | | 90.62 | % | | | 91.46 | % |
Atlanta GA | | | 2005 | | | | 91.70 | % | | | 92.76 | % | | | 92.74 | % | | | 92.86 | % | | | 93.22 | % | | | 91.47 | % | | | 90.57 | % | | | 91.49 | % | | | 91.99 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 95.39 | % | | | 96.21 | % |
Atlanta GA | | | 2006 | | | | 95.39 | % | | | 95.69 | % | | | 96.28 | % | | | 96.30 | % | | | 95.83 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 95.42 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 94.16 | % | | | 94.06 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 96.25 | % |
Atlanta GA | | | 2007 | | | | 95.13 | % | | | 94.81 | % | | | 94.53 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Austin TX | | | 2002 | | | | 85.24 | % | | | 86.32 | % | | | 86.81 | % | | | 86.06 | % | | | 89.11 | % | | | 88.69 | % | | | 92.80 | % | | | 92.45 | % | | | 89.25 | % | | | 86.54 | % | | | 83.87 | % | | | 82.46 | % |
Austin TX | | | 2003 | | | | 80.57 | % | | | 80.44 | % | | | 81.43 | % | | | 84.91 | % | | | 85.62 | % | | | 82.66 | % | | | 82.42 | % | | | 84.61 | % | | | 85.24 | % | | | 86.20 | % | | | 89.56 | % | | | 91.94 | % |
Austin TX | | | 2004 | | | | 92.01 | % | | | 90.79 | % | | | 90.95 | % | | | 92.33 | % | | | 91.67 | % | | | 91.60 | % | | | 94.07 | % | | | 96.53 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 94.13 | % | | | 94.41 | % | | | 94.58 | % |
Austin TX | | | 2005 | | | | 94.71 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 94.78 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 96.86 | % | | | 96.89 | % | | | 96.61 | % | | | 96.33 | % | | | 96.21 | % |
Austin TX | | | 2006 | | | | 95.19 | % | | | 95.95 | % | | | 96.39 | % | | | 96.42 | % | | | 96.44 | % | | | 96.74 | % | | | 96.63 | % | | | 97.04 | % | | | 97.81 | % | | | 96.26 | % | | | 96.14 | % | | | 95.84 | % |
Austin TX | | | 2007 | | | | 97.07 | % | | | 97.93 | % | | | 97.79 | % | | | 97.85 | % | | | 97.79 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Baltimore | | | 2002 | | | | 97.38 | % | | | 96.57 | % | | | 96.20 | % | | | 96.36 | % | | | 96.71 | % | | | 95.97 | % | | | 95.32 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 95.60 | % | | | 96.34 | % | | | 95.86 | % |
Baltimore | | | 2003 | | | | 96.01 | % | | | 96.23 | % | | | 96.19 | % | | | 95.45 | % | | | 95.78 | % | | | 95.76 | % | | | 95.74 | % | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.32 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 96.07 | % | | | 95.70 | % |
Baltimore | | | 2004 | | | | 96.60 | % | | | 97.01 | % | | | 96.63 | % | | | 97.25 | % | | | 96.67 | % | | | 96.48 | % | | | 96.39 | % | | | 95.97 | % | | | 97.12 | % | | | 96.70 | % | | | 96.72 | % | | | 97.28 | % |
Baltimore | | | 2005 | | | | 96.16 | % | | | 95.88 | % | | | 96.08 | % | | | 96.27 | % | | | 95.35 | % | | | 96.03 | % | | | 96.12 | % | | | 96.36 | % | | | 96.86 | % | | | 97.06 | % | | | 97.43 | % | | | 96.34 | % |
Baltimore | | | 2006 | | | | 95.66 | % | | | 95.57 | % | | | 96.78 | % | | | 96.85 | % | | | 96.88 | % | | | 97.35 | % | | | 96.21 | % | | | 94.99 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 95.64 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 95.55 | % |
Baltimore | | | 2007 | | | | 95.62 | % | | | 95.54 | % | | | 95.66 | % | | | 96.16 | % | | | 95.67 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Charlotte NC | | | 2002 | | | | 89.41 | % | | | 89.07 | % | | | 86.53 | % | | | 85.97 | % | | | 88.51 | % | | | 89.89 | % | | | 91.22 | % | | | 92.51 | % | | | 91.95 | % | | | 92.42 | % | | | 96.25 | % | | | 96.74 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 2003 | | | | 96.86 | % | | | 95.68 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | 95.88 | % | | | 96.16 | % | | | 96.21 | % | | | 95.35 | % | | | 94.31 | % | | | 92.93 | % | | | 91.82 | % | | | 91.34 | % | | | 91.62 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 2004 | | | | 90.93 | % | | | 92.16 | % | | | 91.75 | % | | | 91.23 | % | | | 91.38 | % | | | 90.25 | % | | | 91.03 | % | | | 93.12 | % | | | 92.81 | % | | | 92.88 | % | | | 93.05 | % | | | 92.49 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 2005 | | | | 94.31 | % | | | 96.29 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | 94.82 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 94.13 | % | | | 93.98 | % | | | 93.63 | % | | | 93.52 | % | | | 93.95 | % | | | 94.36 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 2006 | | | | 93.95 | % | | | 93.89 | % | | | 93.73 | % | | | 93.28 | % | | | 92.81 | % | | | 92.87 | % | | | 93.08 | % | | | 94.59 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 94.64 | % |
Charlotte NC | | | 2007 | | | | 94.43 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 94.35 | % | | | 93.63 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Columbus OH | | | 2002 | | | | 93.87 | % | | | 94.77 | % | | | 95.60 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | 95.32 | % | | | 94.10 | % | | | 92.70 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 93.21 | % | | | 93.04 | % | | | 93.06 | % | | | 93.36 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2003 | | | | 93.74 | % | | | 93.46 | % | | | 92.83 | % | | | 93.17 | % | | | 93.56 | % | | | 93.56 | % | | | 93.85 | % | | | 94.51 | % | | | 95.17 | % | | | 94.27 | % | | | 92.96 | % | | | 91.55 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2004 | | | | 90.64 | % | | | 90.86 | % | | | 92.51 | % | | | 92.38 | % | | | 91.86 | % | | | 92.05 | % | | | 91.38 | % | | | 92.10 | % | | | 92.69 | % | | | 91.52 | % | | | 91.56 | % | | | 92.20 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2005 | | | | 93.45 | % | | | 93.69 | % | | | 93.25 | % | | | 91.98 | % | | | 91.60 | % | | | 90.72 | % | | | 90.42 | % | | | 91.71 | % | | | 92.91 | % | | | 93.49 | % | | | 93.72 | % | | | 94.28 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2006 | | | | 94.17 | % | | | 94.44 | % | | | 94.55 | % | | | 93.61 | % | | | 93.70 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | 92.12 | % | | | 92.21 | % | | | 93.81 | % | | | 92.82 | % | | | 93.16 | % | | | 93.72 | % |
Columbus OH | | | 2007 | | | | 93.82 | % | | | 94.93 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 94.33 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Dallas TX | | | 2002 | | | | 94.52 | % | | | 94.37 | % | | | 93.81 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | 93.91 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 92.78 | % | | | 91.94 | % | | | 93.12 | % | | | 93.63 | % | | | 94.41 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 2003 | | | | 95.48 | % | | | 95.78 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 95.42 | % | | | 95.37 | % | | | 95.08 | % | | | 95.28 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 94.93 | % | | | 94.51 | % | | | 94.34 | % | | | 95.11 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 2004 | | | | 96.17 | % | | | 95.91 | % | | | 96.07 | % | | | 95.88 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | 96.20 | % | | | 96.67 | % | | | 95.88 | % | | | 95.59 | % | | | 95.66 | % | | | 95.70 | % | | | 96.04 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 2005 | | | | 96.62 | % | | | 96.19 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 94.81 | % | | | 94.78 | % | | | 95.66 | % | | | 96.22 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 96.49 | % | | | 96.98 | % | | | 97.34 | % | | | 96.64 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 2006 | | | | 96.39 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 95.98 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 96.14 | % | | | 96.54 | % | | | 96.29 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 96.46 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 94.61 | % | | | 95.01 | % |
Dallas TX | | | 2007 | | | | 94.86 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 94.37 | % | | | 94.20 | % | | | 93.40 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Denver CO | | | 2002 | | | | 82.96 | % | | | 82.37 | % | | | 82.19 | % | | | 83.20 | % | | | 88.01 | % | | | 88.01 | % | | | 85.78 | % | | | 84.18 | % | | | 83.52 | % | | | 82.88 | % | | | 83.54 | % | | | 84.21 | % |
Denver CO | | | 2003 | | | | 84.41 | % | | | 85.83 | % | | | 86.83 | % | | | 88.11 | % | | | 88.78 | % | | | 90.68 | % | | | 91.32 | % | | | 90.94 | % | | | 90.63 | % | | | 89.47 | % | | | 89.91 | % | | | 89.40 | % |
Denver CO | | | 2004 | | | | 91.81 | % | | | 93.23 | % | | | 93.70 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 92.69 | % | | | 92.62 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 93.98 | % | | | 92.33 | % | | | 92.30 | % | | | 92.99 | % |
Denver CO | | | 2005 | | | | 92.33 | % | | | 92.32 | % | | | 91.73 | % | | | 91.11 | % | | | 90.57 | % | | | 90.88 | % | | | 91.17 | % | | | 92.14 | % | | | 93.24 | % | | | 92.36 | % | | | 90.87 | % | | | 89.35 | % |
Denver CO | | | 2006 | | | | 89.32 | % | | | 88.26 | % | | | 89.14 | % | | | 90.70 | % | | | 90.93 | % | | | 90.64 | % | | | 91.71 | % | | | 94.03 | % | | | 95.96 | % | | | 94.99 | % | | | 94.43 | % | | | 92.19 | % |
Denver CO | | | 2007 | | | | 92.35 | % | | | 92.72 | % | | | 91.84 | % | | | 91.86 | % | | | 90.87 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ft Worth TX | | | 2002 | | | | 94.92 | % | | | 94.69 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 95.04 | % | | | 94.57 | % | | | 93.96 | % | | | 93.92 | % | | | 93.33 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 95.45 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 2003 | | | | 94.84 | % | | | 94.61 | % | | | 94.87 | % | | | 94.46 | % | | | 94.92 | % | | | 94.87 | % | | | 93.90 | % | | | 94.40 | % | | | 93.69 | % | | | 93.96 | % | | | 93.46 | % | | | 93.90 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 2004 | | | | 93.76 | % | | | 94.08 | % | | | 93.19 | % | | | 92.82 | % | | | 91.96 | % | | | 91.71 | % | | | 92.96 | % | | | 93.01 | % | | | 93.45 | % | | | 93.52 | % | | | 93.02 | % | | | 94.15 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 2005 | | | | 94.35 | % | | | 94.21 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | 93.12 | % | | | 93.22 | % | | | 93.56 | % | | | 94.35 | % | | | 96.33 | % | | | 95.52 | % | | | 94.58 | % | | | 95.07 | % | | | 95.28 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 2006 | | | | 96.37 | % | | | 96.59 | % | | | 95.14 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 94.50 | % | | | 94.95 | % | | | 95.12 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 94.89 | % | | | 92.87 | % | | | 92.21 | % | | | 92.72 | % |
Ft Worth TX | | | 2007 | | | | 93.14 | % | | | 93.82 | % | | | 94.01 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Inland Empire | | | 2002 | | | | 97.79 | % | | | 95.55 | % | | | 97.84 | % | | | 98.17 | % | | | 99.04 | % | | | 98.08 | % | | | 97.21 | % | | | 98.32 | % | | | 97.36 | % | | | 99.33 | % | | | 99.64 | % | | | 99.28 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 2003 | | | | 95.63 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 93.39 | % | | | 93.42 | % | | | 93.02 | % | | | 92.77 | % | | | 94.48 | % | | | 95.87 | % | | | 96.43 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 95.93 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 2004 | | | | 96.07 | % | | | 96.15 | % | | | 95.48 | % | | | 96.47 | % | | | 95.76 | % | | | 96.21 | % | | | 94.96 | % | | | 95.20 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 95.54 | % | | | 95.41 | % | | | 94.30 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 2005 | | | | 92.65 | % | | | 91.13 | % | | | 91.16 | % | | | 92.40 | % | | | 93.26 | % | | | 92.07 | % | | | 90.55 | % | | | 91.11 | % | | | 78.00 | % | | | 64.79 | % | | | 63.98 | % | | | 65.23 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 2006 | | | | 66.79 | % | | | 70.34 | % | | | 73.56 | % | | | 75.98 | % | | | 79.11 | % | | | 81.16 | % | | | 83.25 | % | | | 85.96 | % | | | 87.23 | % | | | 87.68 | % | | | 89.41 | % | | | 87.77 | % |
Inland Empire | | | 2007 | | | | 85.63 | % | | | 87.45 | % | | | 91.65 | % | | | 92.85 | % | | | 92.10 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Houston TX | | | 2002 | | | | 94.85 | % | | | 95.31 | % | | | 95.44 | % | | | 96.07 | % | | | 95.92 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 94.89 | % | | | 93.40 | % | | | 91.57 | % | | | 91.12 | % | | | 91.29 | % | | | 90.10 | % |
Houston TX | | | 2003 | | | | 89.13 | % | | | 89.60 | % | | | 90.11 | % | | | 91.42 | % | | | 92.17 | % | | | 90.74 | % | | | 90.21 | % | | | 89.66 | % | | | 89.30 | % | | | 90.37 | % | | | 90.28 | % | | | 89.37 | % |
Houston TX | | | 2004 | | | | 90.35 | % | | | 90.23 | % | | | 90.79 | % | | | 91.26 | % | | | 91.59 | % | | | 90.98 | % | | | 91.76 | % | | | 91.24 | % | | | 90.84 | % | | | 90.81 | % | | | 90.67 | % | | | 90.68 | % |
Houston TX | | | 2005 | | | | 91.72 | % | | | 92.42 | % | | | 93.68 | % | | | 93.96 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 93.23 | % | | | 93.11 | % | | | 93.27 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 94.91 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | 95.08 | % |
Houston TX | | | 2006 | | | | 95.07 | % | | | 95.35 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 94.51 | % | | | 94.39 | % | | | 94.58 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 94.63 | % | | | 94.20 | % | | | 93.83 | % | | | 93.39 | % | | | 92.94 | % |
Houston TX | | | 2007 | | | | 92.50 | % | | | 93.42 | % | | | 93.79 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | 94.03 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2002 | | | | 93.71 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 94.49 | % | | | 95.10 | % | | | 93.86 | % | | | 94.45 | % | | | 95.29 | % | | | 95.20 | % | | | 95.26 | % | | | 96.52 | % | | | 96.69 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2003 | | | | 96.85 | % | | | 96.28 | % | | | 96.31 | % | | | 96.08 | % | | | 96.09 | % | | | 96.46 | % | | | 95.45 | % | | | 95.98 | % | | | 95.94 | % | | | 95.90 | % | | | 95.33 | % | | | 94.53 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2004 | | | | 94.57 | % | | | 93.47 | % | | | 93.71 | % | | | 93.22 | % | | | 93.52 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 93.90 | % | | | 93.39 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 91.08 | % | | | 92.01 | % | | | 93.99 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2005 | | | | 95.37 | % | | | 96.02 | % | | | 96.54 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | 95.85 | % | | | 95.49 | % | | | 95.72 | % | | | 94.95 | % | | | 95.10 | % | | | 93.88 | % | | | 95.31 | % | | | 95.12 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2006 | | | | 94.94 | % | | | 94.45 | % | | | 94.04 | % | | | 94.47 | % | | | 94.59 | % | | | 94.60 | % | | | 94.35 | % | | | 95.02 | % | | | 94.79 | % | | | 93.50 | % | | | 92.64 | % | | | 92.02 | % |
Jacksonville FL | | | 2007 | | | | 91.52 | % | | | 91.32 | % | | | 92.75 | % | | | 92.96 | % | | | 92.94 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
LA County | | | 2002 | | | | 96.58 | % | | | 96.99 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 92.15 | % | | | 90.66 | % | | | 91.46 | % | | | 91.14 | % | | | 93.67 | % | | | 97.47 | % | | | 98.86 | % | | | 98.73 | % | | | 98.42 | % |
LA County | | | 2003 | | | | 98.86 | % | | | 99.53 | % | | | 98.73 | % | | | 98.48 | % | | | 97.78 | % | | | 95.73 | % | | | 95.95 | % | | | 94.94 | % | | | 93.04 | % | | | 92.53 | % | | | 92.72 | % | | | 94.30 | % |
LA County | | | 2004 | | | | 93.80 | % | | | 95.41 | % | | | 95.89 | % | | | 95.82 | % | | | 95.89 | % | | | 96.99 | % | | | 95.70 | % | | | 91.14 | % | | | 91.27 | % | | | 95.25 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 92.42 | % |
LA County | | | 2005 | | | | 90.89 | % | | | 91.02 | % | | | 92.25 | % | | | 93.06 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 94.37 | % | | | 93.13 | % | | | 93.97 | % | | | 94.07 | % | | | 95.34 | % | | | 95.81 | % | | | 94.98 | % |
LA County | | | 2006 | | | | 94.94 | % | | | 93.54 | % | | | 93.03 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 93.99 | % | | | 92.35 | % | | | 89.87 | % | | | 92.59 | % | | | 94.91 | % | | | 95.26 | % | | | 94.79 | % | | | 95.28 | % |
LA County | | | 2007 | | | | 93.57 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 94.30 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Metro DC | | | 2002 | | | | 96.38 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 96.84 | % | | | 96.34 | % | | | 96.74 | % | | | 97.48 | % | | | 95.89 | % | | | 95.39 | % | | | 95.64 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 95.33 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2003 | | | | 95.08 | % | | | 95.68 | % | | | 96.52 | % | | | 96.28 | % | | | 96.02 | % | | | 95.99 | % | | | 95.90 | % | | | 96.45 | % | | | 96.53 | % | | | 95.63 | % | | | 95.96 | % | | | 95.43 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2004 | | | | 96.41 | % | | | 95.72 | % | | | 96.06 | % | | | 96.13 | % | | | 96.89 | % | | | 96.96 | % | | | 97.77 | % | | | 97.40 | % | | | 97.11 | % | | | 96.32 | % | | | 96.22 | % | | | 96.02 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2005 | | | | 96.56 | % | | | 96.47 | % | | | 96.87 | % | | | 97.19 | % | | | 96.90 | % | | | 97.55 | % | | | 96.78 | % | | | 97.35 | % | | | 97.13 | % | | | 96.15 | % | | | 96.99 | % | | | 96.98 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2006 | | | | 97.38 | % | | | 97.41 | % | | | 96.11 | % | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.66 | % | | | 95.42 | % | | | 96.27 | % | | | 96.82 | % | | | 96.23 | % | | | 95.99 | % | | | 96.14 | % | | | 95.90 | % |
Metro DC | | | 2007 | | | | 96.05 | % | | | 96.84 | % | | | 97.00 | % | | | 96.70 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2002 | | | | 92.16 | % | | | 91.46 | % | | | 91.53 | % | | | 92.54 | % | | | 91.76 | % | | | 91.69 | % | | | 90.80 | % | | | 91.57 | % | | | 92.47 | % | | | 94.01 | % | | | 92.67 | % | | | 92.10 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2003 | | | | 93.14 | % | | | 92.98 | % | | | 91.75 | % | | | 93.12 | % | | | 93.67 | % | | | 93.90 | % | | | 94.11 | % | | | 93.73 | % | | | 92.66 | % | | | 91.74 | % | | | 90.38 | % | | | 90.67 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2004 | | | | 91.08 | % | | | 90.00 | % | | | 90.13 | % | | | 93.70 | % | | | 93.99 | % | | | 94.48 | % | | | 94.01 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 93.95 | % | | | 91.27 | % | | | 87.88 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2005 | | | | 88.95 | % | | | 90.00 | % | | | 90.66 | % | | | 93.57 | % | | | 93.38 | % | | | 92.56 | % | | | 93.08 | % | | | 93.72 | % | | | 93.81 | % | | | 92.73 | % | | | 90.95 | % | | | 88.09 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2006 | | | | 88.09 | % | | | 88.44 | % | | | 88.39 | % | | | 88.30 | % | | | 89.71 | % | | | 89.54 | % | | | 90.72 | % | | | 91.72 | % | | | 92.12 | % | | | 92.24 | % | | | 90.54 | % | | | 86.97 | % |
Monterey (Salinas) | | | 2007 | | | | 87.20 | % | | | 89.54 | % | | | 90.61 | % | | | 93.35 | % | | | 94.86 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Nashville TN | | | 2002 | | | | 94.16 | % | | | 93.77 | % | | | 93.02 | % | | | 93.03 | % | | | 92.64 | % | | | 91.39 | % | | | 91.23 | % | | | 90.73 | % | | | 91.43 | % | | | 91.55 | % | | | 92.43 | % | | | 93.27 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2003 | | | | 93.70 | % | | | 93.45 | % | | | 92.95 | % | | | 93.77 | % | | | 94.19 | % | | | 94.19 | % | | | 92.45 | % | | | 92.40 | % | | | 92.53 | % | | | 92.11 | % | | | 91.63 | % | | | 91.67 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2004 | | | | 92.52 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.49 | % | | | 94.93 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 94.80 | % | | | 95.37 | % | | | 94.95 | % | | | 93.99 | % | | | 93.86 | % | | | 94.32 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2005 | | | | 94.83 | % | | | 95.44 | % | | | 95.54 | % | | | 95.21 | % | | | 94.82 | % | | | 94.92 | % | | | 94.23 | % | | | 94.84 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 94.96 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | 94.87 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2006 | | | | 94.61 | % | | | 95.07 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 95.34 | % | | | 95.38 | % | | | 94.83 | % | | | 94.27 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 95.17 | % | | | 95.19 | % |
Nashville TN | | | 2007 | | | | 94.89 | % | | | 95.45 | % | | | 95.29 | % | | | 95.42 | % | | | 95.28 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2002 | | | | 94.66 | % | | | 96.49 | % | | | 96.61 | % | | | 97.57 | % | | | 98.37 | % | | | 98.66 | % | | | 98.41 | % | | | 98.28 | % | | | 97.83 | % | | | 97.37 | % | | | 96.82 | % | | | 97.08 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2003 | | | | 96.08 | % | | | 94.84 | % | | | 94.66 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 95.43 | % | | | 95.79 | % | | | 95.98 | % | | | 96.56 | % | | | 97.67 | % | | | 97.83 | % | | | 97.88 | % | | | 97.15 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2004 | | | | 96.50 | % | | | 96.49 | % | | | 96.70 | % | | | 96.70 | % | | | 97.08 | % | | | 96.30 | % | | | 96.55 | % | | | 96.70 | % | | | 96.51 | % | | | 95.74 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 95.34 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2005 | | | | 95.12 | % | | | 95.48 | % | | | 94.91 | % | | | 94.07 | % | | | 95.51 | % | | | 96.36 | % | | | 95.55 | % | | | 95.76 | % | | | 95.84 | % | | | 95.69 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 94.21 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2006 | | | | 95.02 | % | | | 95.31 | % | | | 96.21 | % | | | 95.62 | % | | | 96.29 | % | | | 95.65 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 96.61 | % | | | 95.43 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 94.48 | % | | | 94.80 | % |
Norfolk Va Beach NN | | | 2007 | | | | 94.04 | % | | | 93.38 | % | | | 94.03 | % | | | 94.05 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Orange County | | | 2002 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Orange County | | | 2003 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 94.15 | % | | | 95.47 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 96.05 | % | | | 95.63 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 94.02 | % |
Orange County | | | 2004 | | | | 93.89 | % | | | 93.18 | % | | | 93.24 | % | | | 93.82 | % | | | 93.24 | % | | | 92.63 | % | | | 93.15 | % | | | 93.03 | % | | | 94.56 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 94.81 | % | | | 94.14 | % |
Orange County | | | 2005 | | | | 92.97 | % | | | 91.97 | % | | | 92.44 | % | | | 94.08 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.66 | % | | | 93.43 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 94.65 | % | | | 93.99 | % | | | 93.89 | % | | | 94.43 | % |
Orange County | | | 2006 | | | | 94.83 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 95.08 | % | | | 94.35 | % | | | 94.29 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 95.92 | % | | | 95.39 | % |
Orange County | | | 2007 | | | | 94.89 | % | | | 94.31 | % | | | 94.87 | % | | | 94.53 | % | | | 94.00 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Orlando | | | 2002 | | | | 90.06 | % | | | 90.87 | % | | | 91.19 | % | | | 92.51 | % | | | 93.18 | % | | | 92.54 | % | | | 92.60 | % | | | 92.02 | % | | | 91.18 | % | | | 91.07 | % | | | 91.81 | % | | | 92.92 | % |
Orlando | | | 2003 | | | | 93.16 | % | | | 92.73 | % | | | 92.82 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.13 | % | | | 94.10 | % | | | 93.95 | % | | | 92.80 | % | | | 92.57 | % | | | 93.22 | % | | | 93.03 | % |
Orlando | | | 2004 | | | | 92.51 | % | | | 92.69 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 93.93 | % | | | 93.68 | % | | | 93.80 | % | | | 93.94 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 96.92 | % | | | 97.26 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 96.37 | % |
Orlando | | | 2005 | | | | 95.86 | % | | | 95.94 | % | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.63 | % | | | 95.73 | % | | | 94.93 | % | | | 95.87 | % | | | 96.51 | % | | | 96.65 | % | | | 95.72 | % | | | 95.58 | % | | | 95.56 | % |
Orlando | | | 2006 | | | | 95.60 | % | | | 95.57 | % | | | 95.65 | % | | | 95.58 | % | | | 95.16 | % | | | 94.30 | % | | | 93.89 | % | | | 93.77 | % | | | 93.92 | % | | | 93.30 | % | | | 93.89 | % | | | 92.83 | % |
Orlando | | | 2007 | | | | 91.64 | % | | | 91.37 | % | | | 91.95 | % | | | 91.69 | % | | | 91.08 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other Florida | | | 2002 | | | | 93.93 | % | | | 95.14 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 94.07 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 92.84 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | 93.19 | % | | | 92.77 | % | | | 93.32 | % | | | 94.99 | % | | | 95.27 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2003 | | | | 95.66 | % | | | 95.77 | % | | | 95.64 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 94.22 | % | | | 92.79 | % | | | 92.55 | % | | | 94.15 | % | | | 94.12 | % | | | 93.84 | % | | | 93.21 | % | | | 92.99 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2004 | | | | 91.97 | % | | | 94.05 | % | | | 95.14 | % | | | 94.21 | % | | | 94.10 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 94.13 | % | | | 95.10 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 97.16 | % | | | 97.71 | % | | | 97.75 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2005 | | | | 97.44 | % | | | 96.68 | % | | | 96.68 | % | | | 97.07 | % | | | 96.64 | % | | | 95.35 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 95.91 | % | | | 97.57 | % | | | 97.60 | % | | | 97.14 | % | | | 96.19 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2006 | | | | 96.34 | % | | | 96.38 | % | | | 96.74 | % | | | 96.45 | % | | | 95.79 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 93.48 | % | | | 94.11 | % | | | 93.40 | % | | | 93.27 | % | | | 92.74 | % | | | 92.71 | % |
Other Florida | | | 2007 | | | | 92.11 | % | | | 91.65 | % | | | 91.19 | % | | | 91.03 | % | | | 91.35 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other MidAtlantic | | | 1999 | | | | 97.47 | % | | | 97.40 | % | | | 96.57 | % | | | 96.28 | % | | | 96.28 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 95.13 | % | | | 96.18 | % | | | 97.64 | % | | | 96.86 | % | | | 95.57 | % | | | 94.29 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2000 | | | | 93.62 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 97.25 | % | | | 97.88 | % | | | 97.38 | % | | | 97.65 | % | | | 97.21 | % | | | 96.35 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 93.73 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2001 | | | | 94.24 | % | | | 95.35 | % | | | 96.22 | % | | | 97.04 | % | | | 97.96 | % | | | 97.19 | % | | | 97.06 | % | | | 95.80 | % | | | 97.08 | % | | | 97.32 | % | | | 97.47 | % | | | 97.95 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | �� | | 2002 | | | | 97.27 | % | | | 96.52 | % | | | 97.36 | % | | | 97.37 | % | | | 97.88 | % | | | 97.17 | % | | | 97.32 | % | | | 97.69 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 96.63 | % | | | 96.84 | % | | | 96.37 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2003 | | | | 96.26 | % | | | 96.39 | % | | | 96.78 | % | | | 95.87 | % | | | 95.96 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 93.74 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 92.91 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.29 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2004 | | | | 92.82 | % | | | 92.97 | % | | | 92.65 | % | | | 94.19 | % | | | 95.52 | % | | | 95.29 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 94.81 | % | | | 93.45 | % | | | 94.08 | % | | | 93.53 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2005 | | | | 93.51 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 95.13 | % | | | 95.20 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | 96.35 | % | | | 95.72 | % | | | 95.14 | % | | | 93.86 | % | | | 93.03 | % | | | 95.16 | % | | | 95.26 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2006 | | | | 94.20 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 94.16 | % | | | 94.71 | % | | | 93.45 | % | | | 94.16 | % | | | 94.48 | % | | | 95.87 | % | | | 94.03 | % | | | 93.72 | % | | | 91.44 | % |
Other MidAtlantic | | | 2007 | | | | 90.19 | % | | | 91.45 | % | | | 93.35 | % | | | 93.34 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Other Midwestern | | | 2002 | | | | 93.62 | % | | | 93.67 | % | | | 94.11 | % | | | 94.48 | % | | | 94.87 | % | | | 93.49 | % | | | 93.67 | % | | | 93.42 | % | | | 94.30 | % | | | 95.84 | % | | | 94.73 | % | | | 94.54 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 2003 | | | | 94.68 | % | | | 95.39 | % | | | 94.55 | % | | | 95.39 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 92.72 | % | | | 91.29 | % | | | 91.38 | % | | | 91.89 | % | | | 92.51 | % | | | 92.43 | % | | | 92.26 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 2004 | | | | 94.41 | % | | | 92.40 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 95.45 | % | | | 94.26 | % | | | 92.85 | % | | | 92.48 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 93.51 | % | | | 93.36 | % | | | 94.37 | % | | | 95.38 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 2005 | | | | 94.23 | % | | | 93.64 | % | | | 93.92 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 93.15 | % | | | 92.40 | % | | | 92.48 | % | | | 91.95 | % | | | 93.32 | % | | | 91.25 | % | | | 91.27 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 2006 | | | | 91.44 | % | | | 91.95 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 91.61 | % | | | 91.22 | % | | | 89.64 | % | | | 90.82 | % | | | 93.33 | % | | | 92.62 | % | | | 90.60 | % | | | 90.68 | % | | | 89.86 | % |
Other Midwestern | | | 2007 | | | | 90.79 | % | | | 90.53 | % | | | 89.87 | % | | | 88.69 | % | | | 89.09 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other Southeastern | | | 2002 | | | | 88.02 | % | | | 88.90 | % | | | 90.23 | % | | | 92.28 | % | | | 92.86 | % | | | 91.77 | % | | | 91.00 | % | | | 90.57 | % | | | 89.74 | % | | | 88.31 | % | | | 87.95 | % | | | 88.11 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 2003 | | | | 88.98 | % | | | 90.21 | % | | | 90.82 | % | | | 90.96 | % | | | 91.18 | % | | | 90.51 | % | | | 90.34 | % | | | 89.72 | % | | | 90.82 | % | | | 91.29 | % | | | 92.38 | % | | | 92.66 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 2004 | | | | 93.51 | % | | | 95.08 | % | | | 95.99 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 94.86 | % | | | 94.33 | % | | | 93.81 | % | | | 94.42 | % | | | 93.56 | % | | | 92.92 | % | | | 93.51 | % | | | 94.96 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 2005 | | | | 94.64 | % | | | 95.18 | % | | | 95.93 | % | | | 95.02 | % | | | 94.52 | % | | | 94.94 | % | | | 94.24 | % | | | 94.69 | % | | | 95.74 | % | | | 94.66 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 94.17 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 2006 | | | | 97.02 | % | | | 98.21 | % | | | 98.36 | % | | | 97.47 | % | | | 97.50 | % | | | 97.77 | % | | | 97.02 | % | | | 97.38 | % | | | 97.62 | % | | | 97.02 | % | | | 97.26 | % | | | 97.47 | % |
Other Southeastern | | | 2007 | | | | 96.47 | % | | | 97.86 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | 94.82 | % | | | 94.26 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Other Southwestern | | | 2002 | | | | 89.55 | % | | | 90.48 | % | | | 90.67 | % | | | 89.64 | % | | | 91.83 | % | | | 91.46 | % | | | 94.15 | % | | | 93.98 | % | | | 92.12 | % | | | 90.34 | % | | | 88.51 | % | | | 87.59 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2003 | | | | 86.19 | % | | | 86.04 | % | | | 86.95 | % | | | 89.19 | % | | | 89.43 | % | | | 87.32 | % | | | 87.27 | % | | | 88.81 | % | | | 89.34 | % | | | 89.94 | % | | | 92.25 | % | | | 93.83 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2004 | | | | 95.92 | % | | | 95.18 | % | | | 95.32 | % | | | 95.77 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 95.10 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | 95.81 | % | | | 95.57 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 94.82 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2005 | | | | 94.49 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 95.14 | % | | | 94.90 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 94.75 | % | | | 95.20 | % | | | 95.80 | % | | | 95.52 | % | | | 95.83 | % | | | 94.93 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2006 | | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.36 | % | | | 95.82 | % | | | 95.32 | % | | | 94.50 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | 96.31 | % | | | 96.39 | % | | | 95.44 | % | | | 95.75 | % | | | 96.86 | % | | | 96.38 | % |
Other Southwestern | | | 2007 | | | | 96.44 | % | | | 96.34 | % | | | 97.00 | % | | | 96.25 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2002 | | | | 93.45 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 94.23 | % | | | 93.48 | % | | | 93.17 | % | | | 92.61 | % | | | 92.17 | % | | | 92.81 | % | | | 94.37 | % | | | 94.47 | % | | | 92.86 | % | | | 91.48 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2003 | | | | 91.50 | % | | | 91.68 | % | | | 92.14 | % | | | 92.50 | % | | | 92.46 | % | | | 92.07 | % | | | 91.94 | % | | | 91.58 | % | | | 90.46 | % | | | 90.33 | % | | | 89.45 | % | | | 88.33 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2004 | | | | 92.03 | % | | | 91.63 | % | | | 92.87 | % | | | 93.01 | % | | | 92.86 | % | | | 91.82 | % | | | 91.41 | % | | | 91.36 | % | | | 92.10 | % | | | 93.28 | % | | | 93.55 | % | | | 93.94 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2005 | | | | 92.69 | % | | | 93.55 | % | | | 94.39 | % | | | 94.11 | % | | | 94.57 | % | | | 94.39 | % | | | 95.58 | % | | | 95.55 | % | | | 95.25 | % | | | 94.70 | % | | | 95.06 | % | | | 95.42 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2006 | | | | 96.08 | % | | | 97.24 | % | | | 96.91 | % | | | 96.09 | % | | | 95.84 | % | | | 95.84 | % | | | 95.92 | % | | | 96.15 | % | | | 96.39 | % | | | 95.95 | % | | | 94.77 | % | | | 94.78 | % |
Phoenix, AZ | | | 2007 | | | | 95.09 | % | | | 94.78 | % | | | 95.49 | % | | | 93.93 | % | | | 93.26 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Portland OR | | | 2002 | | | | 92.11 | % | | | 91.68 | % | | | 91.73 | % | | | 90.46 | % | | | 89.79 | % | | | 90.29 | % | | | 90.54 | % | | | 91.65 | % | | | 90.74 | % | | | 94.08 | % | | | 95.07 | % | | | 94.22 | % |
Portland OR | | | 2003 | | | | 92.72 | % | | | 91.62 | % | | | 91.60 | % | | | 90.26 | % | | | 90.92 | % | | | 88.96 | % | | | 87.71 | % | | | 88.78 | % | | | 88.86 | % | | | 87.22 | % | | | 88.51 | % | | | 90.54 | % |
Portland OR | | | 2004 | | | | 92.15 | % | | | 91.35 | % | | | 90.79 | % | | | 91.57 | % | | | 90.52 | % | | | 91.30 | % | | | 91.39 | % | | | 90.37 | % | | | 92.92 | % | | | 94.34 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | 93.36 | % |
Portland OR | | | 2005 | | | | 93.58 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 93.30 | % | | | 92.06 | % | | | 93.00 | % | | | 92.98 | % | | | 93.72 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 92.93 | % | | | 93.79 | % | | | 93.93 | % |
Portland OR | | | 2006 | | | | 95.19 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 93.81 | % | | | 94.40 | % | | | 94.43 | % | | | 94.05 | % | | | 94.34 | % | | | 95.28 | % | | | 94.18 | % | | | 92.82 | % | | | 95.47 | % | | | 95.35 | % |
Portland OR | | | 2007 | | | | 94.75 | % | | | 94.05 | % | | | 94.79 | % | | | 95.89 | % | | | 95.30 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2002 | | | | 86.56 | % | | | 86.62 | % | | | 87.03 | % | | | 87.29 | % | | | 88.24 | % | | | 87.76 | % | | | 88.68 | % | | | 90.19 | % | | | 91.05 | % | | | 92.90 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | 94.43 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2003 | | | | 92.78 | % | | | 92.75 | % | | | 93.43 | % | | | 94.22 | % | | | 94.49 | % | | | 92.72 | % | | | 91.73 | % | | | 92.19 | % | | | 93.27 | % | | | 93.25 | % | | | 93.64 | % | | | 93.24 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2004 | | | | 93.39 | % | | | 92.67 | % | | | 92.45 | % | | | 93.22 | % | | | 93.28 | % | | | 92.78 | % | | | 93.25 | % | | | 93.27 | % | | | 93.34 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 95.48 | % | | | 94.82 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2005 | | | | 94.16 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | 94.10 | % | | | 93.95 | % | | | 94.03 | % | | | 93.04 | % | | | 92.81 | % | | | 93.23 | % | | | 93.15 | % | | | 93.54 | % | | | 93.31 | % | | | 93.84 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2006 | | | | 93.45 | % | | | 93.49 | % | | | 94.10 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 94.18 | % | | | 93.68 | % | | | 93.10 | % | | | 93.18 | % | | | 92.72 | % |
Raleigh Durham | | | 2007 | | | | 93.28 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | 94.32 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2002 | | | | 96.14 | % | | | 95.60 | % | | | 95.09 | % | | | 95.62 | % | | | 94.39 | % | | | 93.61 | % | | | 91.80 | % | | | 92.89 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 94.69 | % | | | 94.50 | % | | | 95.20 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2003 | | | | 95.13 | % | | | 95.85 | % | | | 96.47 | % | | | 95.62 | % | | | 95.46 | % | | | 94.31 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 92.90 | % | | | 92.16 | % | | | 92.88 | % | | | 94.99 | % | | | 93.38 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2004 | | | | 93.16 | % | | | 94.82 | % | | | 94.42 | % | | | 95.19 | % | | | 94.15 | % | | | 94.00 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 94.39 | % | | | 93.84 | % | | | 93.79 | % | | | 94.08 | % | | | 95.04 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2005 | | | | 94.74 | % | | | 94.60 | % | | | 95.58 | % | | | 95.44 | % | | | 95.34 | % | | | 96.36 | % | | | 96.18 | % | | | 96.63 | % | | | 95.66 | % | | | 96.47 | % | | | 97.38 | % | | | 96.54 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2006 | | | | 96.65 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 96.49 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | 96.94 | % | | | 96.58 | % | | | 96.51 | % | | | 95.67 | % | | | 94.89 | % | | | 95.20 | % | | | 94.84 | % |
Richmond Petersburg | | | 2007 | | | | 94.75 | % | | | 95.48 | % | | | 96.02 | % | | | 96.35 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Sacramento | | | 2002 | | | | 92.65 | % | | | 92.37 | % | | | 92.40 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 95.60 | % | | | 93.90 | % | | | 93.94 | % | | | 94.99 | % | | | 95.82 | % | | | 95.82 | % | | | 93.98 | % | | | 93.27 | % |
Sacramento | | | 2003 | | | | 92.12 | % | | | 92.94 | % | | | 94.61 | % | | | 94.95 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 91.60 | % | | | 91.20 | % | | | 92.12 | % | | | 92.61 | % | | | 92.89 | % | | | 92.94 | % | | | 91.49 | % |
Sacramento | | | 2004 | | | | 90.61 | % | | | 91.68 | % | | | 91.58 | % | | | 92.84 | % | | | 94.50 | % | | | 93.35 | % | | | 93.50 | % | | | 93.68 | % | | | 93.09 | % | | | 91.99 | % | | | 92.93 | % | | | 92.29 | % |
Sacramento | | | 2005 | | | | 91.68 | % | | | 91.55 | % | | | 91.00 | % | | | 92.04 | % | | | 91.82 | % | | | 92.23 | % | | | 91.41 | % | | | 92.89 | % | | | 91.71 | % | | | 90.81 | % | | | 91.47 | % | | | 91.96 | % |
Sacramento | | | 2006 | | | | 92.78 | % | | | 91.66 | % | | | 91.58 | % | | | 93.27 | % | | | 93.79 | % | | | 92.53 | % | | | 92.26 | % | | | 92.21 | % | | | 91.14 | % | | | 92.29 | % | | | 94.16 | % | | | 94.09 | % |
Sacramento | | | 2007 | | | | 94.35 | % | | | 94.84 | % | | | 94.42 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
San Diego County | | | 2002 | | | | 96.74 | % | | | 98.78 | % | | | 99.59 | % | | | 99.46 | % | | | 99.32 | % | | | 99.73 | % | | | 99.35 | % | | | 99.59 | % | | | 99.05 | % | | | 99.67 | % | | | 95.24 | % | | | 94.43 | % |
San Diego County | | | 2003 | | | | 93.15 | % | | | 91.85 | % | | | 91.98 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 95.79 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 96.41 | % | | | 98.23 | % | | | 96.88 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 91.85 | % | | | 90.63 | % |
San Diego County | | | 2004 | | | | 90.65 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 96.06 | % | | | 96.30 | % | | | 96.47 | % | | | 96.88 | % | | | 95.69 | % | | | 93.42 | % | | | 92.86 | % | | | 91.63 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | 94.42 | % |
San Diego County | | | 2005 | | | | 93.65 | % | | | 93.26 | % | | | 93.23 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 94.89 | % | | | 95.15 | % | | | 94.86 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 94.04 | % | | | 94.69 | % | | | 94.10 | % |
San Diego County | | | 2006 | | | | 95.11 | % | | | 95.21 | % | | | 93.39 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | 94.12 | % | | | 93.66 | % | | | 93.43 | % | | | 94.31 | % | | | 94.22 | % | | | 94.76 | % | | | 95.17 | % | | | 94.76 | % |
San Diego County | | | 2007 | | | | 95.37 | % | | | 95.23 | % | | | 95.25 | % | | | 95.29 | % | | | 94.78 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Seattle,WA | | | 2002 | | | | 92.75 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 93.76 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 95.36 | % | | | 89.10 | % | | | 91.46 | % | | | 90.94 | % | | | 89.21 | % | | | 89.27 | % | | | 90.30 | % | | | 90.52 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 2003 | | | | 91.11 | % | | | 90.32 | % | | | 91.92 | % | | | 92.11 | % | | | 92.87 | % | | | 93.57 | % | | | 93.26 | % | | | 92.78 | % | | | 92.37 | % | | | 93.46 | % | | | 92.44 | % | | | 93.02 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 2004 | | | | 94.08 | % | | | 93.62 | % | | | 92.95 | % | | | 94.58 | % | | | 94.40 | % | | | 93.40 | % | | | 92.48 | % | | | 91.62 | % | | | 92.85 | % | | | 92.70 | % | | | 91.72 | % | | | 91.87 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 2005 | | | | 92.24 | % | | | 92.43 | % | | | 95.05 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 93.75 | % | | | 93.42 | % | | | 92.87 | % | | | 92.72 | % | | | 91.92 | % | | | 92.22 | % | | | 94.30 | % | | | 95.14 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 2006 | | | | 94.41 | % | | | 95.11 | % | | | 95.78 | % | | | 96.08 | % | | | 96.63 | % | | | 96.35 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 95.63 | % | | | 96.65 | % | | | 94.97 | % | | | 95.97 | % | | | 96.23 | % |
Seattle,WA | | | 2007 | | | | 94.71 | % | | | 93.78 | % | | | 95.25 | % | | | 95.97 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Jan | | | Feb | | | Mar | | | Apr | | | May | | | Jun | | | Jul | | | Aug | | | Sep | | | Oct | | | Nov | | | Dec | |
SF Bay Area | | | 2002 | | | | 95.96 | % | | | 97.14 | % | | | 96.99 | % | | | 98.04 | % | | | 98.75 | % | | | 97.37 | % | | | 96.41 | % | | | 97.19 | % | | | 97.53 | % | | | 97.45 | % | | | 96.07 | % | | | 97.17 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 2003 | | | | 97.00 | % | | | 96.05 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 95.27 | % | | | 95.77 | % | | | 95.23 | % | | | 94.86 | % | | | 95.41 | % | | | 93.62 | % | | | 94.88 | % | | | 96.22 | % | | | 96.02 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 2004 | | | | 96.80 | % | | | 95.99 | % | | | 95.61 | % | | | 95.53 | % | | | 95.18 | % | | | 95.87 | % | | | 96.04 | % | | | 96.15 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 95.07 | % | | | 96.18 | % | | | 96.08 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 2005 | | | | 95.53 | % | | | 96.31 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | 96.24 | % | | | 95.72 | % | | | 96.27 | % | | | 96.49 | % | | | 96.93 | % | | | 96.18 | % | | | 97.03 | % | | | 97.65 | % | | | 97.60 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 2006 | | | | 97.19 | % | | | 96.65 | % | | | 96.79 | % | | | 96.69 | % | | | 97.19 | % | | | 97.35 | % | | | 96.97 | % | | | 97.50 | % | | | 96.48 | % | | | 95.93 | % | | | 96.54 | % | | | 96.58 | % |
SF Bay Area | | | 2007 | | | | 97.09 | % | | | 96.58 | % | | | 95.92 | % | | | 96.20 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Tampa FL | | | 2002 | | | | 92.43 | % | | | 93.02 | % | | | 92.29 | % | | | 92.14 | % | | | 91.50 | % | | | 90.09 | % | | | 90.23 | % | | | 90.72 | % | | | 90.63 | % | | | 90.92 | % | | | 91.92 | % | | | 92.90 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2003 | | | | 93.26 | % | | | 93.65 | % | | | 93.80 | % | | | 93.91 | % | | | 94.14 | % | | | 92.96 | % | | | 92.64 | % | | | 93.35 | % | | | 93.14 | % | | | 92.55 | % | | | 93.09 | % | | | 93.34 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2004 | | | | 93.73 | % | | | 94.04 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 94.91 | % | | | 94.72 | % | | | 94.89 | % | | | 95.40 | % | | | 95.49 | % | | | 95.17 | % | | | 94.87 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.38 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2005 | | | | 93.90 | % | | | 95.73 | % | | | 96.22 | % | | | 95.51 | % | | | 94.52 | % | | | 94.19 | % | | | 94.28 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | 94.96 | % | | | 94.71 | % | | | 94.71 | % | | | 94.87 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2006 | | | | 96.13 | % | | | 97.00 | % | | | 96.50 | % | | | 96.65 | % | | | 96.27 | % | | | 95.37 | % | | | 94.82 | % | | | 95.43 | % | | | 95.71 | % | | | 95.50 | % | | | 94.57 | % | | | 93.80 | % |
Tampa FL | | | 2007 | | | | 93.69 | % | | | 94.40 | % | | | 95.54 | % | | | 95.22 | % | | | 94.57 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Wilmington NC | | | 2002 | | | | 92.21 | % | | | 90.81 | % | | | 91.73 | % | | | 91.55 | % | | | 92.06 | % | | | 90.35 | % | | | 91.91 | % | | | 92.97 | % | | | 90.93 | % | | | 89.67 | % | | | 91.41 | % | | | 91.58 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 2003 | | | | 91.08 | % | | | 91.31 | % | | | 91.05 | % | | | 91.66 | % | | | 92.00 | % | | | 90.58 | % | | | 91.02 | % | | | 92.34 | % | | | 92.41 | % | | | 92.31 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 93.99 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 2004 | | | | 94.30 | % | | | 93.80 | % | | | 93.44 | % | | | 94.50 | % | | | 95.07 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 96.09 | % | | | 97.93 | % | | | 98.45 | % | | | 97.62 | % | | | 96.80 | % | | | 96.76 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 2005 | | | | 96.26 | % | | | 95.84 | % | | | 96.08 | % | | | 96.41 | % | | | 96.68 | % | | | 96.84 | % | | | 96.41 | % | | | 97.37 | % | | | 96.80 | % | | | 96.12 | % | | | 96.00 | % | | | 95.01 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 2006 | | | | 94.13 | % | | | 94.49 | % | | | 94.62 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 94.78 | % | | | 95.03 | % | | | 95.10 | % | | | 96.37 | % | | | 96.03 | % | | | 96.17 | % | | | 95.75 | % | | | 94.70 | % |
Wilmington NC | | | 2007 | | | | 94.14 | % | | | 94.15 | % | | | 94.07 | % | | | 95.25 | % | | | 95.67 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Mature | | | 2002 | | | | 93.02 | % | | | 93.21 | % | | | 93.19 | % | | | 93.28 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 92.73 | % | | | 92.57 | % | | | 92.64 | % | | | 92.50 | % | | | 92.80 | % | | | 93.28 | % | | | 93.43 | % |
Total Mature | | | 2003 | | | | 93.33 | % | | | 93.33 | % | | | 93.41 | % | | | 93.70 | % | | | 93.96 | % | | | 93.23 | % | | | 92.91 | % | | | 93.07 | % | | | 92.89 | % | | | 92.83 | % | | | 92.96 | % | | | 92.77 | % |
Total Mature | | | 2004 | | | | 93.21 | % | | | 93.29 | % | | | 93.53 | % | | | 93.92 | % | | | 93.88 | % | | | 93.60 | % | | | 93.87 | % | | | 94.26 | % | | | 94.42 | % | | | 94.20 | % | | | 94.05 | % | | | 94.15 | % |
Total Mature | | | 2005 | | | | 94.01 | % | | | 94.40 | % | | | 94.74 | % | | | 94.70 | % | | | 94.47 | % | | | 94.25 | % | | | 94.12 | % | | | 94.70 | % | | | 94.88 | % | | | 94.64 | % | | | 94.85 | % | | | 94.57 | % |
Total Mature | | | 2006 | | | | 94.80 | % | | | 94.98 | % | | | 95.01 | % | | | 94.91 | % | | | 95.00 | % | | | 94.66 | % | | | 94.45 | % | | | 94.94 | % | | | 94.83 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 94.44 | % | | | 94.00 | % |
Total Mature | | | 2007 | | | | 93.72 | % | | | 94.01 | % | | | 94.38 | % | | | 94.51 | % | | | 94.36 | % | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |