Exhibit 99.1
Mature Market Trends As of June 2007 P R E D I C T A B I L I T Y through H I G H P E R F O R M A N C E |
Safe Harbor Statement Statements contained in this presentation, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company's use of words such as, "expects," "plans," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "believes," and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which can cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, unfavorable changes in apartment demand or supply in the Company's markets and the effect on occupancy and rental rates; changing economic conditions; changes in household growth or population; the impact of competition and competitive pricing; acquisitions or new developments may not achieve anticipated results; delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule; difficulties in selling existing apartment communities on favorable terms or the timing and closing of planned dispositions under agreement; the shortage of available acquisition candidates; the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year; failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could create refinancing risk and impair debt service payments and shareholder distributions; increases in property and liability insurance costs; risks arising from environmental issues or natural disasters; effects of the Company's accounting or other policies and other risk factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are made as of today, based upon information known to management as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that indicated results or events will not be realized. |
Definitions 3 |
UDR
Rental Income and Fees by Market (Mature Communities)
Units | Jun-06 | Jul-06 | Aug-06 | Sep-06 | Oct-06 | Nov-06 | Dec-06 | Jan-07 | Feb-07 | Mar-07 | Apr-07 | May-07 | Jun-07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,425 | 960,212 | 979,817 | 982,190 | 983,306 | 968,640 | 976,801 | 969,990 | 973,471 | 992,588 | 1,004,337 | 1,014,633 | 1,014,038 | 1,022,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,819 | 1,844,227 | 1,815,359 | 1,777,789 | 1,804,587 | 1,783,525 | 1,791,992 | 1,783,018 | 1,799,315 | 1,784,916 | 1,808,044 | 1,841,888 | 1,863,147 | 1,895,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 1,226 | 806,307 | 814,373 | 858,532 | 852,172 | 858,166 | 862,069 | 850,610 | 858,030 | 855,101 | 871,977 | 861,939 | 861,780 | 855,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 1,645,009 | 1,629,851 | 1,641,150 | 1,655,380 | 1,663,623 | 1,656,918 | 1,673,118 | 1,667,988 | 1,697,628 | 1,735,885 | 1,725,988 | 1,717,315 | 1,753,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 987 | 806,592 | 806,644 | 821,565 | 809,446 | 796,744 | 794,615 | 791,301 | 800,988 | 818,634 | 804,796 | 810,505 | 805,015 | 826,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 1,828 | 1,116,515 | 1,135,387 | 1,130,885 | 1,131,076 | 1,119,594 | 1,102,791 | 1,096,581 | 1,101,831 | 1,124,233 | 1,141,293 | 1,140,254 | 1,159,628 | 1,164,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 660 | 628,713 | 634,619 | 614,067 | 634,652 | 633,064 | 604,093 | 639,516 | 609,736 | 628,081 | 670,351 | 674,060 | 659,137 | 684,413 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 5,447 | 3,346,110 | 3,354,543 | 3,364,334 | 3,363,731 | 3,354,963 | 3,328,467 | 3,316,814 | 3,317,386 | 3,355,639 | 3,421,199 | 3,447,188 | 3,473,968 | 3,471,170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,557 | 1,179,835 | 1,189,374 | 1,233,797 | 1,215,793 | 1,190,809 | 1,173,534 | 1,166,499 | 1,157,651 | 1,157,187 | 1,185,314 | 1,189,107 | 1,188,205 | 1,191,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 1,052 | 1,340,013 | 1,277,826 | 1,313,825 | 1,385,012 | 1,410,833 | 1,413,622 | 1,412,861 | 1,379,302 | 1,389,705 | 1,392,190 | 1,407,734 | 1,387,515 | 1,411,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2,097 | 2,331,645 | 2,353,742 | 2,392,927 | 2,401,637 | 2,403,240 | 2,405,412 | 2,426,502 | 2,408,870 | 2,445,150 | 2,480,192 | 2,450,929 | 2,429,211 | 2,509,403 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 1,565 | 1,327,081 | 1,336,213 | 1,350,250 | 1,348,117 | 1,373,244 | 1,349,379 | 1,274,111 | 1,249,960 | 1,302,732 | 1,319,069 | 1,382,342 | 1,401,192 | 1,414,569 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,580 | 1,799,221 | 1,788,737 | 1,813,710 | 1,827,738 | 1,829,912 | 1,822,466 | 1,824,018 | 1,836,197 | 1,850,925 | 1,886,004 | 1,866,683 | 1,887,115 | 1,900,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 1,207,129 | 1,190,546 | 1,201,169 | 1,216,344 | 1,188,678 | 1,204,459 | 1,205,253 | 1,202,123 | 1,182,901 | 1,207,004 | 1,184,067 | 1,234,176 | 1,263,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 4,067 | 5,270,674 | 5,311,949 | 5,360,437 | 5,418,334 | 5,497,957 | 5,517,820 | 5,522,492 | 5,515,971 | 5,498,663 | 5,535,679 | 5,486,384 | 5,552,677 | 5,675,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2,820 | 2,343,104 | 2,381,119 | 2,421,212 | 2,407,947 | 2,404,459 | 2,391,723 | 2,371,903 | 2,370,452 | 2,372,759 | 2,404,657 | 2,400,387 | 2,385,986 | 2,431,328 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2,192 | 1,837,291 | 1,835,189 | 1,859,230 | 1,839,946 | 1,832,879 | 1,831,953 | 1,824,974 | 1,828,900 | 1,831,846 | 1,840,338 | 1,823,192 | 1,831,970 | 1,811,579 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2,817 | 2,267,167 | 2,245,492 | 2,240,606 | 2,238,640 | 2,262,867 | 2,247,089 | 2,193,084 | 2,187,481 | 2,142,582 | 2,187,234 | 2,224,640 | 2,234,284 | 2,286,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 280,843 | 281,684 | 299,210 | 296,797 | 290,194 | 296,188 | 301,638 | 292,325 | 292,254 | 304,042 | 285,252 | 295,603 | 303,174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 1,752 | 1,024,052 | 1,012,529 | 1,039,377 | 1,056,989 | 1,029,503 | 1,038,719 | 1,043,219 | 1,023,331 | 1,050,606 | 1,064,350 | 1,050,525 | 1,052,314 | 1,030,447 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2,302 | 1,548,301 | 1,563,676 | 1,586,033 | 1,579,484 | 1,587,991 | 1,610,840 | 1,599,231 | 1,590,317 | 1,593,431 | 1,649,925 | 1,624,951 | 1,625,165 | 1,627,897 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 914 | 774,992 | 774,977 | 773,562 | 795,312 | 786,603 | 781,219 | 772,670 | 777,848 | 781,160 | 769,351 | 780,342 | 774,651 | 775,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 1,365 | 920,506 | 930,107 | 954,527 | 949,880 | 928,189 | 919,578 | 954,414 | 957,337 | 960,801 | 1,008,183 | 990,256 | 1,001,559 | 1,012,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,463 | 2,154,125 | 2,162,278 | 2,193,150 | 2,204,295 | 2,196,333 | 2,200,137 | 2,143,177 | 2,190,409 | 2,216,847 | 2,237,645 | 2,264,532 | 2,270,702 | 2,302,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,807 | 1,488,889 | 1,470,556 | 1,472,407 | 1,494,941 | 1,446,643 | 1,461,369 | 1,478,117 | 1,472,088 | 1,495,444 | 1,527,547 | 1,536,568 | 1,515,724 | 1,515,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 914 | 701,705 | 704,790 | 693,946 | 679,303 | 718,178 | 699,824 | 703,035 | 702,996 | 705,530 | 722,996 | 698,112 | 705,620 | 710,942 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 873 | 976,344 | 971,811 | 935,484 | 985,813 | 1,002,974 | 1,017,332 | 977,578 | 999,064 | 995,203 | 1,032,997 | 1,027,674 | 1,037,911 | 1,019,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,074 | 929,741 | 931,345 | 954,685 | 969,485 | 939,812 | 947,068 | 938,377 | 932,865 | 919,712 | 949,070 | 961,814 | 969,296 | 966,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 1,775 | 2,579,226 | 2,569,593 | 2,624,843 | 2,600,069 | 2,596,356 | 2,624,386 | 2,627,716 | 2,668,964 | 2,662,601 | 2,665,024 | 2,675,339 | 2,732,978 | 2,734,118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2,873 | 2,389,132 | 2,441,215 | 2,464,526 | 2,486,799 | 2,454,342 | 2,407,569 | 2,410,080 | 2,415,140 | 2,446,990 | 2,499,196 | 2,472,421 | 2,477,803 | 2,448,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 1,319,008 | 1,298,377 | 1,336,731 | 1,323,464 | 1,328,235 | 1,314,559 | 1,305,014 | 1,283,068 | 1,272,896 | 1,332,180 | 1,335,776 | 1,328,063 | 1,348,769 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 59,531 | 49,143,710 | 49,193,719 | 49,706,156 | 49,956,488 | 49,878,550 | 49,793,992 | 49,596,912 | 49,571,402 | 49,824,743 | 50,658,070 | 50,635,483 | 50,873,748 | 51,364,802 |
UDR
Rental Income and Fees by Market (Mature Communities)
Units | Jun-06 | Jul-06 | Aug-06 | Sep-06 | Oct-06 | Nov-06 | Dec-06 | Jan-07 | Feb-07 | Mar-07 | Apr-07 | May-07 | Jun-07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concessions As a % of Net Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 1,425 | 1.35 | % | 1.18 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.66 | % | 1.10 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.15 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.86 | % | 0.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 1,819 | 0.50 | % | 0.14 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.83 | % | 1.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 1,226 | 3.94 | % | 2.86 | % | 2.69 | % | 1.23 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.72 | % | 2.58 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.70 | % | 1.64 | % | 2.45 | % | 2.15 | % | 3.06 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2,530 | 3.41 | % | 2.58 | % | 3.05 | % | 2.57 | % | 2.08 | % | 2.02 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.27 | % | 0.88 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 987 | 0.53 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.53 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.08 | % | 0.44 | % | 1.05 | % | 0.44 | % | 1.47 | % | 0.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 1,828 | 2.69 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.48 | % | 2.96 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.30 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.71 | % | 1.85 | % | 2.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 660 | 7.19 | % | 7.25 | % | 9.51 | % | 7.04 | % | 7.54 | % | 8.80 | % | 4.86 | % | 4.74 | % | 4.97 | % | 4.81 | % | 4.41 | % | 5.74 | % | 5.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 5,447 | 1.68 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.91 | % | 2.29 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 1,557 | 1.17 | % | 0.78 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.70 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.82 | % | 1.70 | % | 1.87 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 1,052 | 1.99 | % | 4.54 | % | 4.64 | % | 1.42 | % | 0.73 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.20 | % | 2.08 | % | 3.17 | % | 1.53 | % | 2.88 | % | 1.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2,097 | 1.61 | % | 2.03 | % | 2.32 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.84 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.13 | % | 0.69 | % | 1.06 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 1,565 | 2.43 | % | 3.76 | % | 2.58 | % | 2.10 | % | 1.47 | % | 1.40 | % | 2.13 | % | 2.35 | % | 2.06 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2,580 | 1.60 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.65 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.60 | % | 2.05 | % | 1.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 1,438 | 0.45 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.90 | % | 0.78 | % | 1.11 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.40 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.90 | % | 2.48 | % | 2.75 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 4,067 | 1.49 | % | 1.94 | % | 2.42 | % | 1.52 | % | 0.98 | % | 1.17 | % | 0.84 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.65 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.92 | % | 2.09 | % | 1.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2,820 | 0.59 | % | 0.83 | % | 1.09 | % | 0.77 | % | 1.23 | % | 2.30 | % | 2.31 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.71 | % | 1.87 | % | 2.97 | % | 2.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2,192 | 0.36 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.56 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.56 | % | 2.44 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2,817 | 1.36 | % | 1.49 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.66 | % | 2.58 | % | 4.22 | % | 4.28 | % | 2.69 | % | 3.44 | % | 2.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 444 | 4.57 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.30 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.67 | % | 1.17 | % | 0.81 | % | 0.78 | % | 2.88 | % | 2.63 | % | 3.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 1,752 | 2.26 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.48 | % | 0.98 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.52 | % | 2.06 | % | 1.49 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.34 | % | 2.19 | % | 2.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2,302 | 1.66 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.01 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.72 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.98 | % | 1.52 | % | 0.70 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 914 | 6.29 | % | 6.50 | % | 5.81 | % | 4.26 | % | 4.67 | % | 4.83 | % | 6.95 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.38 | % | 8.27 | % | 5.84 | % | 5.79 | % | 6.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland, OR | 1,365 | 3.62 | % | 3.21 | % | 2.96 | % | 2.58 | % | 3.50 | % | 7.29 | % | 3.02 | % | 3.04 | % | 3.41 | % | 2.74 | % | 3.31 | % | 3.33 | % | 2.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 3,463 | 3.12 | % | 3.43 | % | 3.72 | % | 1.90 | % | 1.81 | % | 2.63 | % | 3.95 | % | 2.64 | % | 1.95 | % | 2.38 | % | 1.76 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 1,807 | 1.48 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.17 | % | 2.64 | % | 2.66 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.64 | % | 2.14 | % | 2.18 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 914 | 4.44 | % | 5.06 | % | 5.86 | % | 5.34 | % | 2.75 | % | 5.65 | % | 3.82 | % | 3.10 | % | 5.09 | % | 4.21 | % | 4.62 | % | 5.37 | % | 4.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 873 | 2.27 | % | 2.69 | % | 4.87 | % | 2.49 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.98 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.13 | % | 0.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 1,074 | 1.26 | % | 1.06 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.51 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.45 | % | 0.78 | % | 2.64 | % | 2.65 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 1,775 | 0.55 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.53 | % | 1.02 | % | 1.26 | % | 0.72 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.07 | % | 0.86 | % | 0.90 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2,873 | 0.46 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.59 | % | 0.61 | % | 1.19 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 1,868 | 1.05 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.85 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.65 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.79 | % | 3.63 | % | 3.98 | % | 1.70 | % | 2.41 | % | 4.82 | % | 1.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 59,531 | 1.74 | % | 1.84 | % | 2.07 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.72 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.75 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.69 | % | 2.01 | % | 1.63 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2002 | 85.24 | % | 86.32 | % | 86.81 | % | 86.06 | % | 89.11 | % | 88.69 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.45 | % | 89.25 | % | 86.54 | % | 83.87 | % | 82.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2003 | 80.57 | % | 80.44 | % | 81.43 | % | 84.91 | % | 85.62 | % | 82.66 | % | 82.42 | % | 84.61 | % | 85.24 | % | 86.20 | % | 89.56 | % | 91.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2004 | 92.01 | % | 90.79 | % | 90.95 | % | 92.33 | % | 91.67 | % | 91.60 | % | 94.07 | % | 96.53 | % | 96.04 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.41 | % | 94.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2005 | 94.71 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.61 | % | 96.86 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.61 | % | 96.33 | % | 96.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2006 | 95.19 | % | 95.95 | % | 96.39 | % | 96.42 | % | 96.44 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.04 | % | 97.81 | % | 96.26 | % | 96.14 | % | 95.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin TX | 2007 | 97.07 | % | 97.93 | % | 97.79 | % | 97.85 | % | 97.79 | % | 96.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2002 | 97.38 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.71 | % | 95.97 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.60 | % | 96.34 | % | 95.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2003 | 96.01 | % | 96.23 | % | 96.19 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.71 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2004 | 96.60 | % | 97.01 | % | 96.63 | % | 97.25 | % | 96.67 | % | 96.48 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.97 | % | 97.12 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.72 | % | 97.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2005 | 96.16 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.27 | % | 95.35 | % | 96.03 | % | 96.12 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.86 | % | 97.06 | % | 97.43 | % | 96.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2006 | 95.66 | % | 95.57 | % | 96.78 | % | 96.85 | % | 96.88 | % | 97.35 | % | 96.21 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.64 | % | 96.04 | % | 95.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore | 2007 | 95.62 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.16 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2002 | 89.41 | % | 89.07 | % | 86.53 | % | 85.97 | % | 88.51 | % | 89.89 | % | 91.22 | % | 92.51 | % | 91.95 | % | 92.42 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2003 | 96.86 | % | 95.68 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.16 | % | 96.21 | % | 95.35 | % | 94.31 | % | 92.93 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.34 | % | 91.62 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2004 | 90.93 | % | 92.16 | % | 91.75 | % | 91.23 | % | 91.38 | % | 90.25 | % | 91.03 | % | 93.12 | % | 92.81 | % | 92.88 | % | 93.05 | % | 92.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2005 | 94.31 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.50 | % | 94.82 | % | 93.76 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.13 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.63 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.95 | % | 94.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2006 | 93.95 | % | 93.89 | % | 93.73 | % | 93.28 | % | 92.81 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.08 | % | 94.59 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.72 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte NC | 2007 | 94.43 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.35 | % | 93.58 | % | 92.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2002 | 93.87 | % | 94.77 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.10 | % | 92.70 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.04 | % | 93.06 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2003 | 93.74 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.83 | % | 93.17 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.56 | % | 93.85 | % | 94.51 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.27 | % | 92.96 | % | 91.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2004 | 90.64 | % | 90.86 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.38 | % | 91.86 | % | 92.05 | % | 91.38 | % | 92.10 | % | 92.69 | % | 91.52 | % | 91.56 | % | 92.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2005 | 93.45 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.25 | % | 91.98 | % | 91.60 | % | 90.72 | % | 90.42 | % | 91.71 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.72 | % | 94.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2006 | 94.17 | % | 94.44 | % | 94.55 | % | 93.61 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.76 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.21 | % | 93.81 | % | 92.82 | % | 93.16 | % | 93.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus OH | 2007 | 93.82 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.88 | % | 95.31 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2002 | 94.52 | % | 94.37 | % | 93.81 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.91 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.78 | % | 91.94 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.63 | % | 94.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2003 | 95.48 | % | 95.78 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.37 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.28 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.34 | % | 95.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2004 | 96.17 | % | 95.91 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.88 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.67 | % | 95.88 | % | 95.59 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.70 | % | 96.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2005 | 96.62 | % | 96.19 | % | 95.61 | % | 94.81 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.98 | % | 97.34 | % | 96.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2006 | 96.39 | % | 96.04 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.19 | % | 96.14 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.29 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.46 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.61 | % | 95.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas TX | 2007 | 94.86 | % | 95.61 | % | 94.37 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.71 | % | 95.59 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2002 | 94.92 | % | 94.69 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.04 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 94.74 | % | 95.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2003 | 94.84 | % | 94.61 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.46 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.69 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.46 | % | 93.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2004 | 93.76 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.82 | % | 91.96 | % | 91.71 | % | 92.96 | % | 93.01 | % | 93.45 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.02 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2005 | 94.35 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.36 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.56 | % | 94.35 | % | 96.33 | % | 95.52 | % | 94.58 | % | 95.07 | % | 95.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2006 | 96.37 | % | 96.59 | % | 95.14 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.50 | % | 94.95 | % | 95.12 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.89 | % | 92.87 | % | 92.21 | % | 92.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ft Worth TX | 2007 | 93.14 | % | 93.82 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.62 | % | 96.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2002 | 97.79 | % | 95.55 | % | 97.84 | % | 98.17 | % | 99.04 | % | 98.08 | % | 97.21 | % | 98.32 | % | 97.36 | % | 99.33 | % | 99.64 | % | 99.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2003 | 95.63 | % | 95.09 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.42 | % | 93.02 | % | 92.77 | % | 94.48 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.43 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2004 | 96.07 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.48 | % | 96.47 | % | 95.76 | % | 96.21 | % | 94.96 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.41 | % | 94.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2005 | 92.65 | % | 91.13 | % | 91.16 | % | 92.40 | % | 93.26 | % | 92.07 | % | 90.55 | % | 91.11 | % | 78.00 | % | 64.79 | % | 63.98 | % | 65.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2006 | 66.79 | % | 70.34 | % | 73.56 | % | 75.98 | % | 79.11 | % | 81.16 | % | 83.25 | % | 85.96 | % | 87.23 | % | 87.68 | % | 89.41 | % | 87.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Empire | 2007 | 85.63 | % | 87.45 | % | 91.65 | % | 92.85 | % | 93.56 | % | 94.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2002 | 94.85 | % | 95.31 | % | 95.44 | % | 96.07 | % | 95.92 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.89 | % | 93.40 | % | 91.57 | % | 91.12 | % | 91.29 | % | 90.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2003 | 89.13 | % | 89.60 | % | 90.11 | % | 91.42 | % | 92.17 | % | 90.74 | % | 90.21 | % | 89.66 | % | 89.30 | % | 90.37 | % | 90.28 | % | 89.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2004 | 90.35 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.26 | % | 91.59 | % | 90.98 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.24 | % | 90.84 | % | 90.81 | % | 90.67 | % | 90.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2005 | 91.72 | % | 92.42 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.36 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.11 | % | 93.27 | % | 95.09 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.24 | % | 95.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2006 | 95.07 | % | 95.35 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.39 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.63 | % | 94.20 | % | 93.83 | % | 93.39 | % | 92.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston TX | 2007 | 92.50 | % | 93.42 | % | 93.79 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.50 | % | 94.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2002 | 93.71 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.49 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.45 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.26 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.69 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2003 | 96.85 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.09 | % | 96.46 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.98 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.90 | % | 95.33 | % | 94.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2004 | 94.57 | % | 93.47 | % | 93.71 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.52 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.90 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.07 | % | 91.08 | % | 92.01 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2005 | 95.37 | % | 96.02 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.50 | % | 95.85 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.72 | % | 94.95 | % | 95.10 | % | 93.88 | % | 95.31 | % | 95.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2006 | 94.94 | % | 94.45 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.59 | % | 94.60 | % | 94.35 | % | 95.02 | % | 94.79 | % | 93.50 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jacksonville FL | 2007 | 91.52 | % | 91.32 | % | 92.75 | % | 92.96 | % | 93.28 | % | 91.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2002 | 96.58 | % | 96.99 | % | 94.62 | % | 92.15 | % | 90.66 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.14 | % | 93.67 | % | 97.47 | % | 98.86 | % | 98.73 | % | 98.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2003 | 98.86 | % | 99.53 | % | 98.73 | % | 98.48 | % | 97.78 | % | 95.73 | % | 95.95 | % | 94.94 | % | 93.04 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.72 | % | 94.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2004 | 93.80 | % | 95.41 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.89 | % | 96.99 | % | 95.70 | % | 91.14 | % | 91.27 | % | 95.25 | % | 94.28 | % | 92.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2005 | 90.89 | % | 91.02 | % | 92.25 | % | 93.06 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.37 | % | 93.13 | % | 93.97 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.81 | % | 94.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2006 | 94.94 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.03 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.99 | % | 92.35 | % | 89.87 | % | 92.59 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.26 | % | 94.79 | % | 95.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LA County | 2007 | 93.57 | % | 93.53 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.30 | % | 94.37 | % | 94.18 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2002 | 96.38 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.34 | % | 96.74 | % | 97.48 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.64 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2003 | 95.08 | % | 95.68 | % | 96.52 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.02 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.90 | % | 96.45 | % | 96.53 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2004 | 96.41 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.06 | % | 96.13 | % | 96.89 | % | 96.96 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.40 | % | 97.11 | % | 96.32 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2005 | 96.56 | % | 96.47 | % | 96.87 | % | 97.19 | % | 96.90 | % | 97.55 | % | 96.78 | % | 97.35 | % | 97.13 | % | 96.15 | % | 96.99 | % | 96.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2006 | 97.38 | % | 97.41 | % | 96.11 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.42 | % | 96.27 | % | 96.82 | % | 96.23 | % | 95.99 | % | 96.14 | % | 95.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Metro DC | 2007 | 96.05 | % | 96.84 | % | 97.00 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.47 | % | 97.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2002 | 92.16 | % | 91.46 | % | 91.53 | % | 92.54 | % | 91.76 | % | 91.69 | % | 90.80 | % | 91.57 | % | 92.47 | % | 94.01 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2003 | 93.14 | % | 92.98 | % | 91.75 | % | 93.12 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.90 | % | 94.11 | % | 93.73 | % | 92.66 | % | 91.74 | % | 90.38 | % | 90.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2004 | 91.08 | % | 90.00 | % | 90.13 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.99 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.64 | % | 95.19 | % | 93.95 | % | 91.27 | % | 87.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2005 | 88.95 | % | 90.00 | % | 90.66 | % | 93.57 | % | 93.38 | % | 92.56 | % | 93.08 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.81 | % | 92.73 | % | 90.95 | % | 88.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2006 | 88.09 | % | 88.44 | % | 88.39 | % | 88.30 | % | 89.71 | % | 89.54 | % | 90.72 | % | 91.72 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.24 | % | 90.54 | % | 86.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey (Salinas) | 2007 | 87.20 | % | 89.54 | % | 90.61 | % | 93.35 | % | 94.75 | % | 95.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2002 | 94.16 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.02 | % | 93.03 | % | 92.64 | % | 91.39 | % | 91.23 | % | 90.73 | % | 91.43 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.43 | % | 93.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2003 | 93.70 | % | 93.45 | % | 92.95 | % | 93.77 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.19 | % | 92.45 | % | 92.40 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.11 | % | 91.63 | % | 91.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2004 | 92.52 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.93 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.80 | % | 95.37 | % | 94.95 | % | 93.99 | % | 93.86 | % | 94.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2005 | 94.83 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.21 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.92 | % | 94.23 | % | 94.84 | % | 95.61 | % | 94.96 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2006 | 94.61 | % | 95.07 | % | 95.50 | % | 95.34 | % | 95.38 | % | 94.83 | % | 94.27 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.17 | % | 95.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nashville TN | 2007 | 94.89 | % | 95.45 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.42 | % | 95.48 | % | 95.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2002 | 94.66 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.61 | % | 97.57 | % | 98.37 | % | 98.66 | % | 98.41 | % | 98.28 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.82 | % | 97.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2003 | 96.08 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.66 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.43 | % | 95.79 | % | 95.98 | % | 96.56 | % | 97.67 | % | 97.83 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2004 | 96.50 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.70 | % | 97.08 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.55 | % | 96.70 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.74 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2005 | 95.12 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.91 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.51 | % | 96.36 | % | 95.55 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.69 | % | 95.22 | % | 94.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2006 | 95.02 | % | 95.31 | % | 96.21 | % | 95.62 | % | 96.29 | % | 95.65 | % | 95.11 | % | 96.61 | % | 95.43 | % | 94.25 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norfolk Va Beach NN | 2007 | 94.04 | % | 93.38 | % | 94.03 | % | 94.05 | % | 95.78 | % | 97.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2003 | 94.15 | % | 95.47 | % | 95.61 | % | 96.05 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2004 | 93.89 | % | 93.18 | % | 93.24 | % | 93.82 | % | 93.24 | % | 92.63 | % | 93.15 | % | 93.03 | % | 94.56 | % | 95.22 | % | 94.81 | % | 94.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2005 | 92.97 | % | 91.97 | % | 92.44 | % | 94.08 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.66 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.65 | % | 93.99 | % | 93.89 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2006 | 94.83 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.11 | % | 94.62 | % | 95.08 | % | 94.35 | % | 94.29 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.92 | % | 95.39 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orange County | 2007 | 94.89 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.53 | % | 94.84 | % | 95.10 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2002 | 90.06 | % | 90.87 | % | 91.19 | % | 92.51 | % | 93.18 | % | 92.54 | % | 92.60 | % | 92.02 | % | 91.18 | % | 91.07 | % | 91.81 | % | 92.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2003 | 93.16 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.82 | % | 93.60 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.13 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.95 | % | 92.80 | % | 92.57 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.03 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2004 | 92.51 | % | 92.69 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.93 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.94 | % | 95.05 | % | 96.92 | % | 97.26 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2005 | 95.86 | % | 95.94 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.63 | % | 95.73 | % | 94.93 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.51 | % | 96.65 | % | 95.72 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2006 | 95.60 | % | 95.57 | % | 95.65 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.16 | % | 94.30 | % | 93.89 | % | 93.77 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.30 | % | 93.89 | % | 92.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando | 2007 | 91.64 | % | 91.37 | % | 91.95 | % | 91.69 | % | 92.22 | % | 92.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2002 | 93.93 | % | 95.14 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.07 | % | 93.60 | % | 92.84 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.19 | % | 92.77 | % | 93.32 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2003 | 95.66 | % | 95.77 | % | 95.64 | % | 94.97 | % | 94.22 | % | 92.79 | % | 92.55 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.21 | % | 92.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2004 | 91.97 | % | 94.05 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.21 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.07 | % | 94.13 | % | 95.10 | % | 96.69 | % | 97.16 | % | 97.71 | % | 97.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2005 | 97.44 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.68 | % | 97.07 | % | 96.64 | % | 95.35 | % | 95.19 | % | 95.91 | % | 97.57 | % | 97.60 | % | 97.14 | % | 96.19 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2006 | 96.34 | % | 96.38 | % | 96.74 | % | 96.45 | % | 95.79 | % | 94.72 | % | 93.48 | % | 94.11 | % | 93.40 | % | 93.27 | % | 92.74 | % | 92.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Florida | 2007 | 92.11 | % | 91.65 | % | 91.19 | % | 91.03 | % | 91.53 | % | 90.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 1999 | 97.47 | % | 97.40 | % | 96.57 | % | 96.28 | % | 96.28 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.13 | % | 96.18 | % | 97.64 | % | 96.86 | % | 95.57 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2000 | 93.62 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.61 | % | 97.25 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.38 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.21 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.04 | % | 93.73 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2001 | 94.24 | % | 95.35 | % | 96.22 | % | 97.04 | % | 97.96 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.06 | % | 95.80 | % | 97.08 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.47 | % | 97.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2002 | 97.27 | % | 96.52 | % | 97.36 | % | 97.37 | % | 97.88 | % | 97.17 | % | 97.32 | % | 97.69 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2003 | 96.26 | % | 96.39 | % | 96.78 | % | 95.87 | % | 95.96 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.74 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.25 | % | 92.91 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2004 | 92.82 | % | 92.97 | % | 92.65 | % | 94.19 | % | 95.52 | % | 95.29 | % | 94.72 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.81 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.08 | % | 93.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2005 | 93.51 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.13 | % | 95.20 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.35 | % | 95.72 | % | 95.14 | % | 93.86 | % | 93.03 | % | 95.16 | % | 95.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2006 | 94.20 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.71 | % | 93.45 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.48 | % | 95.87 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.72 | % | 91.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other MidAtlantic | 2007 | 90.19 | % | 91.45 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.34 | % | 94.63 | % | 94.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2002 | 93.62 | % | 93.67 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.48 | % | 94.87 | % | 93.49 | % | 93.67 | % | 93.42 | % | 94.30 | % | 95.84 | % | 94.73 | % | 94.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2003 | 94.68 | % | 95.39 | % | 94.55 | % | 95.39 | % | 95.27 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.29 | % | 91.38 | % | 91.89 | % | 92.51 | % | 92.43 | % | 92.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2004 | 94.41 | % | 92.40 | % | 93.36 | % | 95.45 | % | 94.26 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.48 | % | 95.05 | % | 93.51 | % | 93.36 | % | 94.37 | % | 95.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2005 | 94.23 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.07 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.15 | % | 92.40 | % | 92.48 | % | 91.95 | % | 93.32 | % | 91.25 | % | 91.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2006 | 91.44 | % | 91.95 | % | 93.07 | % | 91.61 | % | 91.22 | % | 89.64 | % | 90.82 | % | 93.33 | % | 92.62 | % | 90.60 | % | 90.68 | % | 89.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Midwestern | 2007 | 90.79 | % | 90.53 | % | 89.87 | % | 88.69 | % | 89.69 | % | 91.62 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2002 | 88.02 | % | 88.90 | % | 90.23 | % | 92.28 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.77 | % | 91.00 | % | 90.57 | % | 89.74 | % | 88.31 | % | 87.95 | % | 88.11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2003 | 88.98 | % | 90.21 | % | 90.82 | % | 90.96 | % | 91.18 | % | 90.51 | % | 90.34 | % | 89.72 | % | 90.82 | % | 91.29 | % | 92.38 | % | 92.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2004 | 93.51 | % | 95.08 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.71 | % | 94.86 | % | 94.33 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.42 | % | 93.56 | % | 92.92 | % | 93.51 | % | 94.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2005 | 94.64 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.93 | % | 95.02 | % | 94.52 | % | 94.94 | % | 94.24 | % | 94.69 | % | 95.74 | % | 94.66 | % | 95.27 | % | 94.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2006 | 97.02 | % | 98.21 | % | 98.36 | % | 97.47 | % | 97.50 | % | 97.77 | % | 97.02 | % | 97.38 | % | 97.62 | % | 97.02 | % | 97.26 | % | 97.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southeastern | 2007 | 96.47 | % | 97.86 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.36 | % | 93.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2002 | 89.55 | % | 90.48 | % | 90.67 | % | 89.64 | % | 91.83 | % | 91.46 | % | 94.15 | % | 93.98 | % | 92.12 | % | 90.34 | % | 88.51 | % | 87.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2003 | 86.19 | % | 86.04 | % | 86.95 | % | 89.19 | % | 89.43 | % | 87.32 | % | 87.27 | % | 88.81 | % | 89.34 | % | 89.94 | % | 92.25 | % | 93.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2004 | 95.92 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.32 | % | 95.77 | % | 94.85 | % | 95.10 | % | 95.30 | % | 95.81 | % | 95.57 | % | 95.30 | % | 94.90 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2005 | 94.49 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.14 | % | 94.90 | % | 95.05 | % | 94.75 | % | 95.20 | % | 95.80 | % | 95.52 | % | 95.83 | % | 94.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2006 | 95.53 | % | 95.36 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.32 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.24 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.75 | % | 96.86 | % | 96.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Southwestern | 2007 | 96.44 | % | 96.34 | % | 97.00 | % | 96.25 | % | 96.24 | % | 96.41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2002 | 93.45 | % | 93.75 | % | 94.23 | % | 93.48 | % | 93.17 | % | 92.61 | % | 92.17 | % | 92.81 | % | 94.37 | % | 94.47 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2003 | 91.50 | % | 91.68 | % | 92.14 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.46 | % | 92.07 | % | 91.94 | % | 91.58 | % | 90.46 | % | 90.33 | % | 89.45 | % | 88.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2004 | 92.03 | % | 91.63 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.01 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.82 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.36 | % | 92.10 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.55 | % | 93.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2005 | 92.69 | % | 93.55 | % | 94.39 | % | 94.11 | % | 94.57 | % | 94.39 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.55 | % | 95.25 | % | 94.70 | % | 95.06 | % | 95.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2006 | 96.08 | % | 97.24 | % | 96.91 | % | 96.09 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.84 | % | 95.92 | % | 96.15 | % | 96.39 | % | 95.95 | % | 94.77 | % | 94.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phoenix, AZ | 2007 | 95.09 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.49 | % | 93.93 | % | 92.76 | % | 94.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2002 | 92.11 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.73 | % | 90.46 | % | 89.79 | % | 90.29 | % | 90.54 | % | 91.65 | % | 90.74 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2003 | 92.72 | % | 91.62 | % | 91.60 | % | 90.26 | % | 90.92 | % | 88.96 | % | 87.71 | % | 88.78 | % | 88.86 | % | 87.22 | % | 88.51 | % | 90.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2004 | 92.15 | % | 91.35 | % | 90.79 | % | 91.57 | % | 90.52 | % | 91.30 | % | 91.39 | % | 90.37 | % | 92.92 | % | 94.34 | % | 93.78 | % | 93.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2005 | 93.58 | % | 94.25 | % | 93.41 | % | 93.30 | % | 92.06 | % | 93.00 | % | 92.98 | % | 93.72 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.93 | % | 93.79 | % | 93.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2006 | 95.19 | % | 94.38 | % | 93.81 | % | 94.40 | % | 94.43 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.34 | % | 95.28 | % | 94.18 | % | 92.82 | % | 95.47 | % | 95.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland OR | 2007 | 94.75 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.79 | % | 95.89 | % | 95.76 | % | 95.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2002 | 86.56 | % | 86.62 | % | 87.03 | % | 87.29 | % | 88.24 | % | 87.76 | % | 88.68 | % | 90.19 | % | 91.05 | % | 92.90 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2003 | 92.78 | % | 92.75 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.49 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.73 | % | 92.19 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.64 | % | 93.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2004 | 93.39 | % | 92.67 | % | 92.45 | % | 93.22 | % | 93.28 | % | 92.78 | % | 93.25 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.34 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.48 | % | 94.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2005 | 94.16 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.10 | % | 93.95 | % | 94.03 | % | 93.04 | % | 92.81 | % | 93.23 | % | 93.15 | % | 93.54 | % | 93.31 | % | 93.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2006 | 93.45 | % | 93.49 | % | 94.10 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.98 | % | 93.53 | % | 93.53 | % | 94.18 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.10 | % | 93.18 | % | 92.72 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Raleigh Durham | 2007 | 93.28 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.32 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2002 | 96.14 | % | 95.60 | % | 95.09 | % | 95.62 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.61 | % | 91.80 | % | 92.89 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.20 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2003 | 95.13 | % | 95.85 | % | 96.47 | % | 95.62 | % | 95.46 | % | 94.31 | % | 93.41 | % | 92.90 | % | 92.16 | % | 92.88 | % | 94.99 | % | 93.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2004 | 93.16 | % | 94.82 | % | 94.42 | % | 95.19 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.00 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.39 | % | 93.84 | % | 93.79 | % | 94.08 | % | 95.04 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2005 | 94.74 | % | 94.60 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.44 | % | 95.34 | % | 96.36 | % | 96.18 | % | 96.63 | % | 95.66 | % | 96.47 | % | 97.38 | % | 96.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2006 | 96.65 | % | 96.69 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.94 | % | 96.58 | % | 96.51 | % | 95.67 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.20 | % | 94.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richmond Petersburg | 2007 | 94.75 | % | 95.48 | % | 96.02 | % | 96.35 | % | 96.04 | % | 95.33 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2002 | 92.65 | % | 92.37 | % | 92.40 | % | 94.38 | % | 95.60 | % | 93.90 | % | 93.94 | % | 94.99 | % | 95.82 | % | 95.82 | % | 93.98 | % | 93.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2003 | 92.12 | % | 92.94 | % | 94.61 | % | 94.95 | % | 94.64 | % | 91.60 | % | 91.20 | % | 92.12 | % | 92.61 | % | 92.89 | % | 92.94 | % | 91.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2004 | 90.61 | % | 91.68 | % | 91.58 | % | 92.84 | % | 94.50 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.50 | % | 93.68 | % | 93.09 | % | 91.99 | % | 92.93 | % | 92.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2005 | 91.68 | % | 91.55 | % | 91.00 | % | 92.04 | % | 91.82 | % | 92.23 | % | 91.41 | % | 92.89 | % | 91.71 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.47 | % | 91.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2006 | 92.78 | % | 91.66 | % | 91.58 | % | 93.27 | % | 93.79 | % | 92.53 | % | 92.26 | % | 92.21 | % | 91.14 | % | 92.29 | % | 94.16 | % | 94.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sacramento | 2007 | 94.35 | % | 94.84 | % | 94.42 | % | 93.41 | % | 95.58 | % | 95.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2002 | 96.74 | % | 98.78 | % | 99.59 | % | 99.46 | % | 99.32 | % | 99.73 | % | 99.35 | % | 99.59 | % | 99.05 | % | 99.67 | % | 95.24 | % | 94.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2003 | 93.15 | % | 91.85 | % | 91.98 | % | 95.22 | % | 95.79 | % | 93.75 | % | 96.41 | % | 98.23 | % | 96.88 | % | 95.11 | % | 91.85 | % | 90.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2004 | 90.65 | % | 93.07 | % | 96.06 | % | 96.30 | % | 96.47 | % | 96.88 | % | 95.69 | % | 93.42 | % | 92.86 | % | 91.63 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2005 | 93.65 | % | 93.26 | % | 93.23 | % | 94.25 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.15 | % | 94.86 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.69 | % | 94.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2006 | 95.11 | % | 95.21 | % | 93.39 | % | 93.78 | % | 94.12 | % | 93.66 | % | 93.43 | % | 94.31 | % | 94.22 | % | 94.76 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego County | 2007 | 95.37 | % | 95.23 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.29 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2002 | 92.75 | % | 93.07 | % | 93.76 | % | 94.38 | % | 95.36 | % | 89.10 | % | 91.46 | % | 90.94 | % | 89.21 | % | 89.27 | % | 90.30 | % | 90.52 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2003 | 91.11 | % | 90.32 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.11 | % | 92.87 | % | 93.57 | % | 93.26 | % | 92.78 | % | 92.37 | % | 93.46 | % | 92.44 | % | 93.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2004 | 94.08 | % | 93.62 | % | 92.95 | % | 94.58 | % | 94.40 | % | 93.40 | % | 92.48 | % | 91.62 | % | 92.85 | % | 92.70 | % | 91.72 | % | 91.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2005 | 92.24 | % | 92.43 | % | 95.05 | % | 95.22 | % | 93.75 | % | 93.42 | % | 92.87 | % | 92.72 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.22 | % | 94.30 | % | 95.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2006 | 94.41 | % | 95.11 | % | 95.78 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.63 | % | 96.35 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.63 | % | 96.65 | % | 94.97 | % | 95.97 | % | 96.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle,WA | 2007 | 94.71 | % | 93.78 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.97 | % | 95.66 | % | 95.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2002 | 95.96 | % | 97.14 | % | 96.99 | % | 98.04 | % | 98.75 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.41 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.53 | % | 97.45 | % | 96.07 | % | 97.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2003 | 97.00 | % | 96.05 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.27 | % | 95.77 | % | 95.23 | % | 94.86 | % | 95.41 | % | 93.62 | % | 94.88 | % | 96.22 | % | 96.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2004 | 96.80 | % | 95.99 | % | 95.61 | % | 95.53 | % | 95.18 | % | 95.87 | % | 96.04 | % | 96.15 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.07 | % | 96.18 | % | 96.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2005 | 95.53 | % | 96.31 | % | 96.17 | % | 96.24 | % | 95.72 | % | 96.27 | % | 96.49 | % | 96.93 | % | 96.18 | % | 97.03 | % | 97.65 | % | 97.60 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2006 | 97.19 | % | 96.65 | % | 96.79 | % | 96.69 | % | 97.19 | % | 97.35 | % | 96.97 | % | 97.50 | % | 96.48 | % | 95.93 | % | 96.54 | % | 96.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF Bay Area | 2007 | 97.09 | % | 96.58 | % | 95.92 | % | 96.20 | % | 96.78 | % | 96.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2002 | 92.43 | % | 93.02 | % | 92.29 | % | 92.14 | % | 91.50 | % | 90.09 | % | 90.23 | % | 90.72 | % | 90.63 | % | 90.92 | % | 91.92 | % | 92.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2003 | 93.26 | % | 93.65 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.91 | % | 94.14 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.64 | % | 93.35 | % | 93.14 | % | 92.55 | % | 93.09 | % | 93.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2004 | 93.73 | % | 94.04 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.91 | % | 94.72 | % | 94.89 | % | 95.40 | % | 95.49 | % | 95.17 | % | 94.87 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2005 | 93.90 | % | 95.73 | % | 96.22 | % | 95.51 | % | 94.52 | % | 94.19 | % | 94.28 | % | 94.36 | % | 94.96 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.71 | % | 94.87 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2006 | 96.13 | % | 97.00 | % | 96.50 | % | 96.65 | % | 96.27 | % | 95.37 | % | 94.82 | % | 95.43 | % | 95.71 | % | 95.50 | % | 94.57 | % | 93.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tampa FL | 2007 | 93.69 | % | 94.40 | % | 95.54 | % | 95.22 | % | 94.73 | % | 93.60 | % |
UDR
Monthly Occupancy By Market (Mature Communities)
Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2002 | 92.21 | % | 90.81 | % | 91.73 | % | 91.55 | % | 92.06 | % | 90.35 | % | 91.91 | % | 92.97 | % | 90.93 | % | 89.67 | % | 91.41 | % | 91.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2003 | 91.08 | % | 91.31 | % | 91.05 | % | 91.66 | % | 92.00 | % | 90.58 | % | 91.02 | % | 92.34 | % | 92.41 | % | 92.31 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2004 | 94.30 | % | 93.80 | % | 93.44 | % | 94.50 | % | 95.07 | % | 94.62 | % | 96.09 | % | 97.93 | % | 98.45 | % | 97.62 | % | 96.80 | % | 96.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2005 | 96.26 | % | 95.84 | % | 96.08 | % | 96.41 | % | 96.68 | % | 96.84 | % | 96.41 | % | 97.37 | % | 96.80 | % | 96.12 | % | 96.00 | % | 95.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2006 | 94.13 | % | 94.49 | % | 94.62 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.78 | % | 95.03 | % | 95.10 | % | 96.37 | % | 96.03 | % | 96.17 | % | 95.75 | % | 94.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wilmington NC | 2007 | 94.14 | % | 94.15 | % | 94.07 | % | 95.25 | % | 95.47 | % | 93.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2002 | 93.02 | % | 93.21 | % | 93.19 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.53 | % | 92.73 | % | 92.57 | % | 92.64 | % | 92.50 | % | 92.80 | % | 93.28 | % | 93.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2003 | 93.33 | % | 93.33 | % | 93.41 | % | 93.70 | % | 93.96 | % | 93.23 | % | 92.91 | % | 93.07 | % | 92.89 | % | 92.83 | % | 92.96 | % | 92.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2004 | 93.21 | % | 93.29 | % | 93.53 | % | 93.92 | % | 93.88 | % | 93.60 | % | 93.87 | % | 94.26 | % | 94.42 | % | 94.20 | % | 94.05 | % | 94.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2005 | 94.01 | % | 94.40 | % | 94.74 | % | 94.70 | % | 94.47 | % | 94.25 | % | 94.12 | % | 94.70 | % | 94.88 | % | 94.64 | % | 94.85 | % | 94.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2006 | 94.80 | % | 94.98 | % | 95.01 | % | 94.91 | % | 95.00 | % | 94.66 | % | 94.45 | % | 94.94 | % | 94.83 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.44 | % | 94.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Mature | 2007 | 93.72 | % | 94.01 | % | 94.38 | % | 94.51 | % | 94.76 | % | 94.73 | % |