Exhibit 99.1
U3K Opening doors to the future5 The Right Properties in the Right Markets Fourth Quarter 2008 |
Table of Contents 1 Portfolio Overview 3 Orange County, CA 7 Metro D.C. 11 San Francisco Bay Area, CA 15 Tampa, FL 19 Seattle, WA 23 Baltimore, MD 27 LA County, CA 31 Dallas, TX 35 Orlando, FL 39 Richmond, VA 43 Nashville, TN 47 Monterey, CA 51 San Diego County, CA 53 Jacksonville, FL 55 Norfolk / Virginia Beach, VA 57 Inland Empire, CA 59 Phoenix, AZ 61 Sacramento, CA 63 Portland, OR 65 Austin, TX |
UDR (NYSE:UDR) is a leading multifamily real estate investment trust (REIT) with a demonstrated performance history of delivering superior and dependable returns by successfully managing, buying, selling, developing and redeveloping attractive real estate properties in targeted U.S. markets. For over 35 years, UDR has delivered long-term value to shareholders, the best standard of service to residents, and the highest quality experience for associates .. Additional information can be found on the Company’s website atwww.udr.com. UDR Portfolio Characteristics Rank Market Pro forma NOI % of Total* Same Store Homes Non-Mature Homes Homes _____ Average in Active _____ Monthly Devt.** Income***•1 QT.E, ,ocu ooo lo ,4oo 9 n :::::: 18 19 20 Sacramento, CA Portland, OR Austin, TX 1-7 = 1.4 1.3 914 716 250 390 932 988 954 94.6% 1,797 $ 1,187 9,929 31,332 TOTAL****: *2009 pro forma full portfolio NOI, including jvs, planned acquisitions, developments, redevelopments, etc. **lncludes joint-venture properties ***Per occupied home, as of December 31, 2008 ****Excludes 2,108 SS homes, 1,019 non-mature homes and 719 homes in development in other markets |
1
UDR has transformed its portfolio by completing a $1.7 billion sale of 25,684 homes and reinvesting $1.1 billion to acquire 4,728 homes in 14 new communities.% 2008 NOI50%* MD5%1•**! DC 7% 24% «12%J _____ As a result of these transactions:· Our properties are concentrated in markets withabove average job growth expectations and low singlefamily home affordability, and UDR’s average monthlyrent has grown to nearly $1,200. · Nearly 95 percent of our net operating income comes from our top 20 markets — with 50 percent coming from the West Coast and 24 percent coming from the Washington DC corridor. We intend to create value through the following redevelopment and development i nitiatives. Redevelopment · In 2008, we completed the redevelopment of 1,678 homes in six communities, with a total incremental investment by the Company of $79 million, or $47,163 per home. · Going forward, our redevelopment pipeline includes 598 apartment homes in two communities, with a total incremental investment by the Company of $29 million, or $48,185 per home. Development · In 2008, we completed the development of 1,715homes in six communities (including one joint venturean d two pre-sale properties), at an average cost perhome of $162,000. · Going forward, the Company has approximately $454 million of active development and predevelopment projects underway, comprising 2,970 homes in nine communities, with two-thirds of the projects scheduled for delivery in 2010. To date, the Company has construction loans in place for all but one of the projects and is currently negotiating for the remaining $43 million of required financing. · Most of the Company’s future development opportunities involve increasing density on operating properties that are currently generating income, as well as five parcels of entitled land representing a total investment of $73 million, less than two percent of the Company’s total assets. Average Monthly Rents vs. PeersAVB $1,935 BRE• $1,508 ESS• $1,398 EQR ;! $1,362 PPS• $1,303UDR $1>187 HME ; $1,142’ CRT• $969 AIV _____ I; $964 CLP• j; $779 MAA ; $754 Source: Individual Company Reports *4Q 2008 data is not yet available for HME |
2
| | |
| | |
| | Orange County Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Orange County Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 4,067 | |
Non-Matures | | | 296 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 4,363 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Occ. Home (SS) | | $ | 1,590 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # Homes (SS) | | | Avg. Rent | |
UDR | | | 4,067 | | | $ | 1,590 | |
BRE | | | 2,997 | | | | 1,572 | |
CPT | | | 1,216 | | | | 1,539 | |
ESS | | | 2,016 | | | | 1,498 | |
EQR | | | 3,180 | | | | 1,477 | |
AVB | | | 1,174 | | | | 1,342 | |
AIV | | | 247 | | | | 1,303 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 14,897 | | | $ | 1,521 | |
Orange County is UDR’s#1
market and is expected to
contribute13.9%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Orange County Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,626 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,521 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -2.5 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 93.9 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘9F | | | -3.1 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -7.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 2,575 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | 0.9 | % | | Condo | | $ | 2,161 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 7.9 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 30% - 40 | % | | Renter | | | 364,220 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 500,000 | | | % of Total | | | 37.3 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 46 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,970 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 84,100 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 1,950 | |
| | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD) |
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3% |
Recent Activity
The Orange County, California market represents UDR’s largest concentration of apartment homes as measured by NOI. These homes are in premier costal locations; many communities are west of the 405 beltway, only minutes from the beach. The Company is creating value in this market through the following initiatives:
• | | Acquisitions: Mesa Verde Villas, a 296-home community, was purchased in Q2 in Costa Mesa, CA. This community is a twin to Pine Brook Village, a 200-home community. Both were constructed by the same builder and share the same architecture, design and floor plans. Pine Brook Village and Mesa Verde (now Pine Brook Village II) also share a main entry into both properties, making Mesa Verde an excellent candidate to be merged with Pine Brook. This merger creates value immediately through operating efficiencies in leasing staff, maintenance staff and purchasing. |
The local economy has recently softened due to the loss of jobs in the sub-prime lending industry, but long-term prospects are excellent. Orange County’s economy is larger than all but 31 nations in the world. The region enjoys employment diversity, a highly educated work force and an attractive year round climate affording a variety of recreational activities. The area is home to the world-famous Disneyland Resort and Knott’s Berry Farm; Newport Beach’s Fashion Island; and Huntington Beach (Surf City USA), featuring the longest recreational pier in the state.
3
Orange County
Market Fact Sheet
Villa Venetia Pine Brook Village Pine Brook Village IIAcquired 2Q 2008 Harbor at Mesa Verde Huntington Villas |
4
Orange County
Market Fact Sheet
Coronado North Coronado South |
5
Orange County
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Pacific Shores | | | 264 | | | | 2003 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.2 | % | | $ | 1,568 | |
2 Huntington Villas | | | 400 | | | | 1972 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.5 | % | | | 1,718 | |
3 Huntington Vista | | | 220 | | | | 1970 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.9 | % | | | 1,830 | |
4 Harbor at Mesa Verde | | | 384 | | | | 2003 | | | | K/B | | | | 93.7 | % | | | 1,659 | |
5 Pine Brook Village | | | 200 | | | | 1979 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.9 | % | | | 1,696 | |
7 Villa Venetia | | | 468 | | | | 2008 | | | Future | | | 95.2 | % | | | 1,685 | |
8 Missions at Back Bay | | | 104 | | | | 1969 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.7 | % | | | 1,537 | |
9 Coronado North | | | 732 | | | | 2000 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.2 | % | | | 1,460 | |
10 Coronado South | | | 715 | | | | 2000 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.3 | % | | | 1,499 | |
11 Pacific Palms | | | 149 | | | | 1962 | | | | — | | | | 96.9 | % | | | 1,375 | |
12 Foxborough | | | 90 | | | | 1969 | | | | — | | | | 95.0 | % | | | 1,852 | |
13 Vista del Rey | | | 116 | | | | 1969 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.4 | % | | | 1,457 | |
14 The Arboretum at Lake Forest | | | 225 | | | | 1970 | | | | K/B | | | | 91.8 | % | | | 1,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub Total | | | 4,067 | | | | | | | | | | | | 94.9 | % | | | 1,590 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6 Pine Brook Village II | | | 296 | | | | 1975 | | | | — | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,740 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub Total | | | 296 | | | | | | | | | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,740 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 4,363 | | | | | | | | | | | | 95.0 | % | | $ | 1,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying | | | | |
| | | | | | Est. | | | Value | | | Purchase Price | |
Future Development Opportunities | | Status | | | # Homes | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
15 Mission Viejo | | Entitled Land | | | 250 | | | $ | 19,038 | | | $ | 17,300 | |
6
| | |
| | |
| | Metro DC Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Metro DC Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 2,050 | |
Non-Matures | | | 1,935 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 3,985 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,420 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 96.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
PPS | | | 2,177 | | | $ | 1,841 | |
AVB | | | 3,213 | | | | 1,728 | |
CPT | | | 3,451 | | | | 1,513 | |
UDR | | | 2,050 | | | | 1,420 | |
EQR | | | 9,043 | | | | 1,409 | |
HME | | | 4,553 | | | | 1,289 | |
AIV | | | 6,663 | | | | 1,199 | |
CLP | | | 258 | | | | 1,044 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 31,408 | | | $ | 1,419 | |
Metro DC is UDR’s#2
market and is expected to
contribute11.4%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Metro DC Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,360 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,419 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 0.9 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.3 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | 1.1 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | 0.6 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,762 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | 4.2 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,464 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 4.8 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 3% - 19 | % | | Renter | | | 511,015 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 332,700 | | | % of Total | | | 33.3 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 104 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 5,532 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 99,000 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 10,750 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR has expanded its presence in this market by buying communities in lease-up and well-located properties with renovation potential:
• | | In the first quarter of 2008, we purchased Circle Towers, a mixed-use development that includes 606 apartment homes and more than 50,000 SF of office and retail space for $138.4M. Also in the first quarter, we purchased Delancey at Shirlington Village, a 241-home community in Alexandria, VA, for $85M. |
• | | In the second quarter of 2008, we completed the full redevelopment of Wellington Place, a 372-home community in Manassas, VA that we purchased for $50.1M, or $135,000 per home, in 2005. |
• | | In the second quarter of 2008, we began full redevelopment of Taylor Place, a 218-home mid-rise community, located in Arlington, VA. |
Marcus and Millichap Research Services ranked DC the #3 best market (out of 43) in 2009 based on a series of 12-month forward-looking supply and demand indicators, including forecast employment change, vacancy, construction, housing affordability and rents. According toApartment Finance Today(January/February 2009), Washington, DC is “the ultimate hold market when the economy struggles.”
7
Metro DC
Market Fact Sheet
Delancey at Shirlington —Acquired 1Q 2008 Sullivan Place —Acquired 4Q 2007 |
8
Metro DC
Market Fact Sheet
Wellington Place —Redeveloped 2008 Taylor PlaceUndergoing Redevelopment Andover HouseAcquired 1Q 2007 Circle TowersAcquired 1Q 2008 Waterside Towers |
9
Metro DC
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Ridgewood I | | | 274 | | | | 1988 | | | | K/B | | | | 93.5 | % | | $ | 1,395 | |
3 Andover House | | | 171 | | | | 2004 | | | | — | | | | 94.7 | % | | | 2,314 | |
4 Waterside Towers | | | 550 | | | | 1971 | | | | K/B | | | | 97.3 | % | | | 1,547 | |
7 Presidential Greens | | | 396 | | | | 1938 | | | | K/B | | | | 96.2 | % | | | 1,134 | |
8 The Calvert | | | 187 | | | | 1962 | | | | K/B | | | | 97.9 | % | | | 1,341 | |
12 Dominion Middle Ridge | | | 280 | | | | 1990 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.8 | % | | | 1,314 | |
13 Dominion Lake Ridge | | | 192 | | | | 1987 | | | | K/B | | | | 96.4 | % | | | 1,278 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 2,050 | | | | | | | | | | | | 96.1 | % | | | 1,420 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5 Circle Towers | | | 606 | | | | 1972 | | | Full | | | | 91.7 | % | | | 1,452 | |
6 Taylor Place — under redevelopment | | | 218 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | | 62.2 | % | | | 1,443 | |
9 Delancey at Shirlington — in lease-up | | | 241 | | | | 2008 | | | | — | | | | 92.1 | % | | | 2,123 | |
10 Sullivan Place — in lease-up | | | 498 | | | | 2007 | | | | — | | | | 95.7 | % | | | 1,692 | |
11 Wellington Place | | | 372 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | | 93.1 | % | | | 1,264 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,935 | | | | | | | | | | | | 89.7 | % | | | 1,565 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 3,985 | | | | | | | | | | | | 93.0 | % | | $ | 1,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Current | | | Est. | | | Est. Cost | | | Est. Cost | | | Est. | |
Development Opportunities | | Status | | # Homes | | | # Homes | | | ($000) | | | per Home | | | Completion | |
14 Signal Hill — Woodbridge, VA | | Active | | | — | | | | 360 | | | $ | 82,700 | | | $ | 229,722 | | | | 3Q10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Net | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Carrying | | | Purchase | |
| | | | Est. | | | Value | | | Price | |
Future Development Opportunities | | Status | | # Homes | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
2 2400 14thStreet | | Entitled Land | | | 255 | | | $ | 38,657 | | | $ | 31,750 | |
10
| | |
| | |
| | San Francisco Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
San Francisco Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,768 | |
Non-Matures | | | 571 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 2,339 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Occ. Home (SS) | | $ | 1,879 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
AVB | | | 2,328 | | | $ | 2,210 | |
BRE | | | 1,265 | | | | 2,150 | |
EQR | | | 736 | | | | 1,932 | |
UDR | | | 1,768 | | | | 1,879 | |
ESS | | | 765 | | | | 1,569 | |
AIV | | | 496 | | | | 1,546 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 7,358 | | | $ | 1,981 | |
San Francisco is UDR’s#3
market and is expected to
contribute8.6%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
San Francisco Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,994 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,981 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -0.4 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 95.4 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.3 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -3.7 | % | | Home | | $ | 3,720 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | 2.9 | % | | Condo | | $ | 3,142 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 8.0 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 37% - 47 | % | | Renter | | | 330,681 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 765,500 | | | % of Total | | | 49.1 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 52 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 2,578 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 94,300 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 2,125 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
In July 2008, the Company acquired Almaden Lake Village, a 250-home community in San Jose, located adjacent to the Almaden Station for the Valley Transit Authority (VTA). This station provides direct light rail access to Silicon Valley employment centers and downtown San Jose. The property is also located one mile from the popular Westfield Oakridge Regional Mall, and the property is adjacent to Lake Almaden, providing residents direct access to a popular recreational area.
In the first quarter of 2008, UDR acquired Edgewater, a 193-home community in the Mission Bay district of San Francisco. The property was constructed in 2007 and is strategically located near public transportation and entertainment venues.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expanded its presence in this market with the purchase of Crest Marin, a 104-home community in San Rafael. The community is located directly adjacent to Highlands of Marin, an existing UDR property. Both properties will be completely renovated with new exterior siding, kitchens, baths, and more with expected rent increases of approximately $200 - $250 per home.
San Francisco was ranked the #1 best market (out of 43) for 2009 by Marcus and Millichap Research Services, based on a series of 12-month forward-looking supply and demand indicators, including forecast employment change, vacancy, construction, housing affordability and rents. Major employers in the area include the University of California (San Francisco), United Airlines, Wells Fargo & Co., Kaiser Permanente, Genentech, Oracle and others. The region enjoys employment diversity, a highly educated work force and an attractive year round climate affording a variety of recreational activities. The median existing home price is $765,500 making this one of the least affordable markets in the U.S.
11
San Francisco
Market Fact Sheet
Edgewater —Acquired 1Q 2008 |
12
San Francisco
Market Fact Sheet
Almaden Lake VillageAcquired 3Q 2008 2000 Post- Redeveloped 2007 River Terrace Highlands of Marin- Acquired 4Q 2007 |
13
San Francisco
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Highlands of Marin | | | 220 | | | | 1991 | | | Future | | | 95.7 | % | | $ | 1,715 | |
2 Crossroads Apartments | | | 130 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 1,477 | |
3 2000 Post Street I | | | 304 | | | | 1987 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.6 | % | | | 2,305 | |
5 Bay Terrace | | | 120 | | | | 1962 | | | | — | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,981 | |
6 Lake Pines | | | 288 | | | | 1972 | | | Future | | | 93.2 | % | | | 1,590 | |
7 Birch Creek | | | 184 | | | | 1968 | | | | — | | | | 96.6 | % | | | 1,815 | |
8 River Terrace | | | 250 | | | | 2005 | | | | — | | | | 94.5 | % | | | 2,114 | |
9 Marina Playa | | | 272 | | | | 1971 | | | | — | | | | 96.6 | % | | | 1,730 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,768 | | | | | | | | | | | | 95.4 | % | | | 1,879 | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Highlands of Marin II | | | 104 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | | 98.1 | % | | | 1,390 | |
3 2000 Post Street II | | | 24 | | | | 2007 | | | | — | | | | 95.5 | % | | | 2,206 | |
4 Edgewater | | | 193 | | | | 2008 | | | | — | | | | 95.7 | % | | | 2,924 | |
10 Almaden Lake Village | | | 250 | | | | 1999 | | | | — | | | | 97.1 | % | | | 1,670 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 571 | | | | | | | | | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 2,060 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 2,339 | | | | | | | | | | | | 95.7 | % | | $ | 1,924 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14
| | |
| | |
| | Tampa Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Tampa Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 3,081 | |
Non-Matures | | | 595 | |
Homes in Development | | | 140 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 3,816 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Occ. Home (SS) | | $ | 942 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 93.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
PPS | | | 2,117 | | | $ | 1,293 | |
UDR | | | 3,081 | | | | 942 | |
CLP | | | 318 | | | | 921 | |
MAA | | | 1,120 | | | | 833 | |
EQR | | | 2,887 | | | | 811 | |
AIV | | | 3,307 | | | | 809 | |
CPT | | | 5,503 | | | | 795 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 18,333 | | | $ | 887 | |
Tampa is UDR’s#4
market and is expected to
contribute5.5%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Tampa Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | Home Affordability | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 824 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 887 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -2.3 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 91.2 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -2.8 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -6.3 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,091 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.9 | % | | Condo | | $ | 889 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 1.3 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 0% - 19 | % | | Renter | | | 321,771 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 173,400 | | | % of Total | | | 29.0 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | 108 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 4,275 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 56,500 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 7,300 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
The Company has demonstrated success in creating additional value from its Tampa properties in a variety of ways:
• | | New Development — In the third quarter of 2008, we completed the purchase of a 249-home community, Vintage Lofts, at North Hyde Park in Tampa, utilizing 1031 exchange funds from the March 2008 portfolio sale. This property is currently under development at a budgeted cost of $52M, with an expected completion date of 1Q ’09. |
• | | Redevelopment — we recently completed full redevelopment of The Breyley, a 209-home community in Clearwater. In addition to the redevelopment program, we have completed more than 1,600 kitchen and bath renovations. |
Recent issues in the housing and lending sectors have slowed Tampa’s economy but AXIOMetrics reported 2008 job growth in a number of sectors, including education and health services, government, other services, leisure and hospitality and trade, and construction, transportation and utilities.
15
Tampa
Market Fact Sheet
MacAlpine Place The Breyley —Redeveloped 2008 |
16
Tampa
Market Fact Sheet
Island WalkRedeveloped 2007 Sugar Mill Creek Gallery at Bayport Vintage Lofts- Acquired 3Q 2008 In Development-Expected Completion 1Q ‘09 |
17
Tampa
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 MacAlpine Place | | | 478 | | | | 2007 | | | | — | | | | 95.2 | % | | $ | 1,104 | |
3 Sugar Mill Creek | | | 212 | | | | 1988 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 902 | |
4 Bay Meadows | | | 288 | | | | 1985 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.1 | % | | | 973 | |
5 Inlet Bay at Gateway | | | 464 | | | | 1988 | | | Full | | | | 93.6 | % | | | 974 | |
6 Island Walk | | | 400 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | | 91.8 | % | | | 1,032 | |
9 Cambridge Woods | | | 275 | | | | 1985 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.7 | % | | | 852 | |
10 Summit West | | | 266 | | | | 1972 | | | | — | | | | 91.6 | % | | | 861 | |
11 Lakewood Place | | | 346 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.6 | % | | | 839 | |
12 Hunters Ridge | | | 352 | | | | 1992 | | | | K/B | | | | 90.1 | % | | | 800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 3,081 | | | | | | | | | | | | 93.5 | % | | | 942 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 The Breyley Apartments | | | 209 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | | 93.5 | % | | | 966 | |
7 Gallery at Bayport | | | 277 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | | 71.8 | % | | | 1,005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal1 | | | 595 | | | | | | | | | | | | 82.7 | % | | | 986 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total1 | | | 3,816 | | | | | | | | | | | | 89.1 | % | | $ | 947 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Current | | | Est. | | | Est. Cost | | | Est. Cost | |
Homes in Development | | Status | | | # Homes | | | # Homes | | | ($000) | | | per Home | |
8 Vintage Lofts2 | | Active | | | 109 | | | | 249 | | | $ | 52,000 | | | $ | 208,835 | |
(1) Includes 109 completed homes at Vintage Lofts
(2) Vintage Lofts is a presale development property purchased in Q3 2008 with an expected completion date of Q1 2009
18
| | |
| | Seattle Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Seattle Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,270 | |
Non-Matures | | | 455 | |
Homes in Development | | | 274 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,999 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Occ. Home (SS) | | $ | 1,210 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
AIV | | | 348 | | | $ | 1,286 | |
BRE | | | 3,211 | | | | 1,283 | |
UDR | | | 1,270 | | | | 1,210 | |
AVB | | | 2,159 | | | | 1,208 | |
ESS | | | 5,164 | | | | 1,151 | |
EQR | | | 6,886 | | | | 1,142 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 19,038 | | | $ | 1,183 | |
Seattle is UDR’s#5market
and is expected to
contribute5.4%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Seattle Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,162 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,183 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 0.5 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.0 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.8 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,935 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -2.7 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,612 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.4 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 27% – 39 | % | | Renter | | | 367,516 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 350,000 | | | % of Total | | | 36.0 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 76 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 7,226 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 81,400 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 9,350 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR has been expanding its presence in the Seattle market in a number of ways, including the acquisition of two new communities in 2008:
• | | Island Square, a mixed-use development with 235 apartment homes, 25K square feet of retail and 14K square feet of office space, located on Mercer Island, with access to both downtown Seattle and Bellevue job centers. |
• | | Hearthstone at Merrill Creek, a 220-home community located in Merrill Creek Business Park, home to employers including Campbell’s Soup, TRW Aeronautical Systems, The Fluke Company, and Boeing. |
• | | The acquisition of Borgata Apartments in May, 2007. This is a mixed-use community with 71-apartment homes and 5,358 square feet of retail space in Bellevue. |
• | | Closing on a 49% joint venture interest in 989elements in January, 2007. This is a recently completed 23-story high-rise mixed use property located in the central business district of Bellevue, with 166-apartment homes and 17,611 square feet of commercial space. |
• | | UDR has two joint venture developments with Su Development in which UDR has a 49% interest: |
| • | | Ashwood Commons, a 274-home high-rise community with ground floor retail. Construction is underway with expected completion in the third quarter of 2009. |
|
| • | | Bellevue Plaza, a 430-home high-rise community with ground floor retail. This property is planned for future development. |
19
Seattle
Market Fact Sheet
Island Square — Acquired 3Q 2008 Hearthstone at Merrill Creek Acquired 2Q 2008 The Borgata Acquired 2Q 2007 |
20
Seattle
Market Fact Sheet
The Kennedy The Hawthorne The Kennedy 989elements 989elements Operating Joint Venture Ashwood Commons Active Development — Unconsolidated Joint-Venture Estimated Completion 3Q 2009 |
21
Seattle
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
2 The Hawthorne Apartments | | | 284 | | | | 2003 | | | — | | | 97.7 | % | | $ | 1,404 | |
3 The Kennedy Building | | | 125 | | | | 2005 | | | — | | | 93.4 | % | | | 1,640 | |
4 Arbor Terrace | | | 276 | | | | 1996 | | | K/B | | | 92.1 | % | | | 847 | |
8 Borgata Apartment Homes | | | 71 | | | | 2001 | | | K/B | | | 96.6 | % | | | 2,231 | |
10 Crown Pointe | | | 196 | | | | 1987 | | | K/B | | | 94.4 | % | | | 958 | |
11 Hilltop | | | 156 | | | | 1985 | | | K/B | | | 94.1 | % | | | 1,017 | |
12 Aspen Creek | | | 162 | | | | 1996 | | | — | | | 96.8 | % | | | 981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,270 | | | | | | | | | | 94.9 | % | | | 1,210 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Hearthstone at Merrill Creek | | | 220 | | | | 2000 | | | — | | | 96.2 | % | | | 1,209 | |
5 989elements (Operating JV — 49%) | | | 166 | | | | 2007 | | | — | | | 94.0 | % | | | 1,927 | |
9 Island Square | | | 235 | | | | 2007 | | | — | | | 88.8 | % | | | 1,675 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal (UDR)1 | | | 455 | | | | | | | | | | 92.4 | % | | | 1,440 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total (UDR)1 | | | 1,725 | | | | | | | | | | 95.3 | % | | $ | 1,266 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Current | | | Est. # | | | Est. Cost | | | Cost per | | | Expected | |
Homes in Development | | Status | | | # Homes | | | Homes | | | ($000) | | | Home | | | Completion | |
7 Ashwood Commons (JV — 49%)2 | | Active | | | — | | | | 274 | | | $ | 49,000 | | | $ | 365,000 | | | | 3Q 09 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying | | | Purchase | |
| | | | | | Est. | | | Value | | | Price | |
Future Development Opportunities | | Status | | | # Homes | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
6 Bellevue Plaza (JV — 49%)2 | | Entitled Land | | | | 430 | | | $ | 20,884 | | | $ | 11,760 | |
1 Excludes joint venture homes.
2 Dollar amounts, except for cost per home, are calculated based on UDR’s ownership percentage of 49%.
22
| | |
| | Baltimore Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Baltimore Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,556 | |
Non-Matures | | | 564 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 2,120 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,178 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 96.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
CPT | | | 628 | | | $ | 1,392 | |
AEC | | | 316 | | | | 1,357 | |
AVB | | | 1,278 | | | | 1,272 | |
UDR | | | 1,556 | | | | 1,178 | |
AIV | | | 1,084 | | | | 1,110 | |
HME | | | 6,284 | | | | 1,014 | |
EQR | | | 884 | | | | 975 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 12,030 | | | $ | 1,097 | |
Baltimore is UDR’s#6
market and is expected to
contribute5.4%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Baltimore Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,041 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,097 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -0.2 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.0 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -0.6 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -0.4 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,009 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | 1.9 | % | | Condo | | $ | 818 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 2.7 | % | | | | | | | | Renter | | | 307,537 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 279,200 | | | % of Total | | | 30.9 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 98 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,922 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 78,200 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 4,650 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
In the first quarter of 2008, we acquired Dulaney Crescent, a 264-home community in Towson, MD. The Company has demonstrated success in creating additional value in this market in a variety of ways:
• | | Redevelopment — in the second quarter of 2008, we completed the full redevelopment of Dominion Great Oaks, a 300-home community now known as Ellicott Grove. |
|
• | | In addition to the redevelopment program, we have completed more than 1,000 kitchen and bath renovations. |
The area has a stable employment base led by substantial government jobs and institutional employment in the education and health sectors.
23
Baltimore
Market Fact Sheet
Dulaney Crescent —Acquired 1Q 2008 |
24
Baltimore
Market Fact Sheet
Arbor View Ellicott Grove Redeveloped 2008 Tamar Meadow |
25
Baltimore
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Dominion at Eden Brook | | | 232 | | | | 1984 | | | K/B | | | 97.0 | % | | $ | 1,224 | |
2 Dominion Kings Place | | | 170 | | | | 1983 | | | K/B | | | 97.2 | % | | | 1,219 | |
3 Tamar Meadow | | | 178 | | | | 1990 | | | K/B | | | 94.8 | % | | | 1,395 | |
5 Lakeside Mill | | | 192 | | | | 1989 | | | K/B | | | 97.8 | % | | | 1,143 | |
7 Calvert’s Walk | | | 276 | | | | 1988 | | | K/B | | | 95.8 | % | | | 1,091 | |
8 Dominion Constant Friendship | | | 136 | | | | 1990 | | | K/B | | | 95.9 | % | | | 1,136 | |
9 Arborview | | | 372 | | | | 1992 | | | K/B | | | 97.1 | % | | | 1,120 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,556 | | | | | | | | | | 96.6 | % | | | 1,178 | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4 Ellicott Grove | | | 300 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | 96.6 | % | | | 1,292 | |
6 Dulaney Crescent | | | 264 | | | | 2003 | | | — | | | 95.9 | % | | | 1,607 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 564 | | | | | | | | | | 96.3 | % | | | 1,439 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 2,120 | | | | | | | | | | 96.5 | % | | $ | 1,247 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
26
| | |
| | Los Angeles County Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
LA County Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,052 | |
Non-Matures | | | 626 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,678 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,536 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
AIV | | | 2,347 | | | $ | 2,328 | |
CPT | | | 538 | | | | 2,061 | |
AVB | | | 2,392 | | | | 1,789 | |
ESS | | | 3,312 | | | | 1,708 | |
BRE | | | 2,237 | | | | 1,704 | |
EQR | | | 6,346 | | | | 1,658 | |
UDR | | | 1,052 | | | | 1,536 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 18,224 | | | $ | 1,781 | |
LA County is UDR’s#7
market and is expected to
contribute5.4%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
LA County Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,744 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,781 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -0.6 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.0 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.5 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.5 | % | | Home | | $ | 2,041 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.7 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,703 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 2.2 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 0% – 13 | % | | Renter | | | 1,623,435 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ)
| | $ | 387,000 | | | % of Total | | | 51.0 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 62 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 8,370 | % |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 59,800 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 9,000 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR has expanded its presence in this market with one recent acquisition, one recently completed development and one recently completed redevelopment:
• | | Tierra del Rey, Marina del Rey, CA — a 170-home community acquired in the fourth quarter of 2007 for $76M. |
|
• | | Jefferson at Marina del Rey — 298 homes developed at an average cost of $463,000 per home. This property was completed in the third quarter of 2008 and is now in lease-up. |
|
• | | Pine@Sixth, a 158-home redevelopment community completed in the third quarter of 2008. |
Marcus and Millichap Research Services ranked LA the #4 best market (out of 43) in 2009 based on a series of 12-month forward-looking supply and demand indicators, including forecast employment change, vacancy, construction, housing affordability and rents. Major employers in LA include Kaiser Permanente, Northrup Grummon, Boeing, The Kroger Company, the University of Sothern California and others. The region enjoys a highly educated work force and an attractive year round climate affording a variety of recreational activities.
27
LA County
Market Fact Sheet
Tierra del Rey —Acquired 4Q 2007 Pine@Sixth — Redeveloped 3Q 2008 |
28
LA County
Market Fact Sheet
The Crest at Phillips Ranch Ocean Villas Development Completed 3Q 2008 Jefferson at Marina del Rey Villas at San Dimas Pine@Sixth – Redeveloped 3Q 2008 |
29
LA County
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Ocean Villas | | | 119 | | | | 1965 | | | — | | | 97.2 | % | | $ | 1,496 | |
6 Rosebeach | | | 174 | | | | 1970 | | | K/B | | | 93.7 | % | | | 1,454 | |
7 The Villas at San Dimas | | | 156 | | | | 1981 | | | K/B | | | 94.5 | % | | | 1,490 | |
8 The Villas at Bonita | | | 102 | | | | 1981 | | | — | | | 95.9 | % | | | 1,466 | |
9 The Crest at Phillips Ranch | | | 501 | | | | 1989 | | | K/B | | | 95.4 | % | | | 1,603 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,052 | | | | | | | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 1,536 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Jefferson at Marina del Rey (in lease-up) | | | 298 | | | | 2008 | | | — | | | 46.3 | % | | | 1,836 | |
3 Tierra del Rey | | | 170 | | | | 1999 | | | K/B | | | 92.8 | % | | | 2,434 | |
5 Pine@Sixth | | | 158 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | 95.6 | % | | | 1,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 626 | | | | | | | | | | 71.4 | % | | | 1,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,678 | | | | | | | | | | 86.4 | % | | $ | 1,645 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying | | | Purchase | |
| | | | | | Est. # | | | Value | | | Price | |
Future Development Opportunities | | Status | | | Homes | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
4 3033 Wilshire | | Entitled Land | | | | 190 | | | $ | 11,989 | | | $ | 11,027 | |
30
| | |
| | Dallas Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Dallas Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 305 | |
Non-Matures | | | 2,742 | |
Homes in Development | | | 1,001 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 4,048 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,633 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 97.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 305 | | | $ | 1,633 | |
PPS | | | 3,428 | | | | 1,088 | |
EQR | | | 3,191 | | | | 871 | |
CPT | | | 4,277 | | | | 765 | |
AIV | | | 1,561 | | | | 764 | |
CLP | | | 2,468 | | | | 721 | |
MAA | | | 3,391 | | | | 705 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 18,621 | | | $ | 840 | |
Dallas is UDR’s#8
market and is expected to
contribute5.2%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Dallas Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 816 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 840 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 1.4 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 92.4 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.4 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -1.4 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,009 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.3 | % | | Condo | | $ | 818 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.8 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 0% – 14 | % | | Renter | | | 529,053 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 150,200 | | | % of Total | | | 37.3 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 136 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 12,145 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 64,800 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 20,000 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
The Company has been active in the Dallas market in a variety of ways:
| • | | In the third quarter of 2008, we completed construction of 302 homes at Lincoln at Towne Square within the Company’s Texas joint-venture. |
|
| • | | In the first quarter of 2008, we acquired Legacy Village (three communities) consisting of 1,043 homes in the Plano submarket. |
|
| • | | In the fourth quarter of 2007, we completed construction of 202 homes at Riachi at One21 in the Dallas suburb of Plano. Construction of 198 units in Phase II of the community has begun and completion is anticipated in 2009. |
|
| • | | An assemblage of 99 acres in Addison, named Vitruvian Park, was completed in the second quarter of 2007, and the Company broke ground on Phase I of development in the second quarter of 2008. Currently, the Company is developing 320 homes at Vitruvian Park, with expected completion in 2010. The remaining land is home to operating properties with 1,013 homes delivering annual NOI of $3.7 million. |
The Dallas economy is diverse with significant employment in the energy sector, trade, transportation, government, education and the health sector.
31
Dallas
Market Fact Sheet
Legacy Village — Acquired 1Q 2008 THIRTY377 Lincoln at Towne Square (Texas JV) Development Completed 3Q 2008 |
32
Dallas
Market Fact Sheet
Riachi at One21 Phase I — Completed 2008 Phase II — Expected Completion 2009 The Meridian (Texas JV) Springhaven (Existing, Vitruvian Park) Vitruvian Park Phase I — Expected Completion 2010 |
33
Dallas
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
11 THIRTY377 | | | 305 | | | | 2007 | | | K/B | | | 97.0 | % | | $ | 1,633 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 305 | | | | | | | | | | 97.0 | % | | | 1,633 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Cliffs, The (JV) | | | 400 | | | | 1992 | | | — | | | 95.8 | % | | | 800 | |
2 Mandolin, The (JV) | | | 486 | | | | 2003 | | | — | | | 97.3 | % | | | 1,004 | |
3 Meridian II, The (JV) | | | 520 | | | | 2002 | | | — | | | 96.2 | % | | | 859 | |
5 Legacy Village | | | 1,043 | | | | '05-'07 | | | — | | | 96.1 | % | | | 1,019 | |
6 Lincoln at Towne Square (JV) | | | 769 | | | | 2008 | | | — | | | 95.5 | % | | | 965 | |
7 Villas at Ridgeview | | | 48 | | | | 2007 | | | — | | | 97.6 | % | | | 1,761 | |
8 Riachi at One21 | | | 258 | | | | 2007 | | | — | | | 95.4 | % | | | 1,004 | |
9 Highlands of Preston (in redevelopment) | | | 380 | | | | 2007 | | | — | | | 83.1 | % | | | 790 | |
10 Vitruvian Park | | | 1,013 | | | | | | | — | | | 93.6 | % | | | 672 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal (UDR)1 | | | 2,742 | | | | | | | | | | 93.3 | % | | | 874 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total (UDR)1 | | | 3,047 | | | | | | | | | | 93.7 | % | | $ | 953 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Current | | | Est. | | | Est, Cost | | | Est. Cost | | | Est. | |
Homes in Development | | Status | | | # Homes | | | # Homes | | | ($000) | | | per Home | | | Completion | |
4 Mustang Park (Presale) | | Active | | | | | | | 289 | | | $ | 29,000 | | | $ | 100,346 | | | | 3Q09 | |
8 Riachi at One21 — Phase II | | Active | | | 56 | | | | 200 | | | | 17,900 | | | | 89,500 | | | | 1Q09 | |
10 Vitruvian Park — Phase I | | Active | | | | | | | 392 | | | | 66,500 | | | | 169,643 | 2 | | | 3Q10 | |
12 Belmont (formerly Bennett) | | Active | | | | | | | 465 | | | | 62,900 | | | $ | 135,269 | | | | 2Q10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total3 | | | | | | | | | | | 1,001 | | | $ | 176,300 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Excludes unconsolidated JV homes.
2 Includes 16,050 square feet of retail space.
3 Excludes Mustang Park (pre-sale) and 56 completed homes at Riachi at One21.
34
| | |
| | Orlando Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Orlando Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 2,500 | |
Non-Matures | | | 667 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 3,167 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 954 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 92.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
PPS | | | 427 | | | $ | 1,351 | |
CLP | | | 1,755 | | | | 1,018 | |
AEC | | | 288 | | | | 976 | |
UDR | | | 2,500 | | | | 954 | |
EQR | | | 6,984 | | | | 874 | |
CPT | | | 3,296 | | | | 852 | |
AIV | | | 3,680 | | | | 820 | |
MAA | | | 288 | | | | 788 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 19,218 | | | $ | 894 | |
Orlando is UDR’s#9
market and is expected to
contribute4.9%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Orlando Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 830 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 894 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -1.1 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 90.8 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.9 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,281 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.7 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,052 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 1.3 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 15% - 30 | % | | Renter | | | 248,958 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 213,400 | | | % of Total | | | 32.8 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 96 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 5,086 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 59,200 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 7,300 | |
| | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD) |
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3% |
Recent Activity
UDR has demonstrated success in creating additional value from its Orlando properties in a variety of ways:
| • | | Redevelopment: In 2007, we completed full redevelopment of Canopy Villas (296 homes) and Altamira Place (360 homes). In 2008, Canopy Villas was awarded a beautification award by the city of Orlando and Keep Orlando Beautiful Inc., which recognized the success of the redevelopment. |
|
| • | | Development: In the first quarter of 2008, we completed the purchase of a 371-home presale community, The Place at Millenia. |
Orlando’s economy has been impacted by the housing slump and high fuel prices. The local economy is influenced by the leisure and hospitality industry but is diversified with significant employment in the transportation and utility sectors as well. Major employers include Walt Disney World, Wal-Mart Stores, Florida Hospital, Publix Supermarkets, Universal Orlando Resort, Orlando Regional Healthcare System, University of Central Florida and others.
35
Orlando
Market Fact Sheet
Ashton at Waterford Lakes |
36
Orlando
Market Fact Sheet
Altamira Place —Redeveloped 2007 |
Canopy Villas —Redeveloped 2007 |
The Place at MilleniaPresale Completed 2008 |
37
Orlando
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Regatta Shores | | | 256 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | 89.1 | % | | $ | 828 | |
2 Seville on the Green | | | 170 | | | | 2004 | | | — | | | 94.9 | % | | | 985 | |
3 Lotus Landing | | | 260 | | | | 2006 | | | K/B | | | 89.3 | % | | | 819 | |
4 Los Altos | | | 328 | | | | 2004 | | | K/B | | | 93.2 | % | | | 940 | |
5 Altamira Place | | | 360 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | 94.8 | % | | | 930 | |
6 Alafaya Woods | | | 296 | | | | 2006 | | | Full | | | 91.9 | % | | | 985 | |
7 Seabrook | | | 200 | | | | 2004 | | | — | | | 92.9 | % | | | 932 | |
8 Ashton at Waterford Lakes | | | 292 | | | | 2000 | | | Full | | | 94.0 | % | | | 1,144 | |
11 Arbors at Lee Vista | | | 338 | | | | 2007 | | | K/B | | | 93.4 | % | | | 993 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 2,500 | | | | | | | | | | 92.7 | % | | | 954 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9 Canopy Villas (in lease-up) | | | 296 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | 90.4 | % | | | 1,008 | |
10 The Place at Millenia (in lease-up) | | | 371 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | 84.9 | % | | | 989 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 667 | | | | | | | | | | 87.3 | % | | | 998 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 3,167 | | | | | | | | | | 91.6 | % | | $ | 963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
38
| | |
| | Richmond Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Richmond Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,958 | |
Non-Matures | | | 253 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 2,211 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,016 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 1,958 | | | $ | 1,016 | |
AEC | | | 240 | | | | 1,001 | |
AIV | | | 320 | | | | 855 | |
CLP | | | 1,654 | | | | 845 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 2,214 | | | $ | 864 | |
Richmond is UDR’s#10
market and is expected to
contribute4.6%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Richmond Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 884 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 864 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -0.7 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 93.7 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.8 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -2.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,291 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.6 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,060 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.9 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 18% - 33 | % | | Renter | | | 146,226 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 217,900 | | | % of Total | | | 31.2 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 116 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 825 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 69,300 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 3,800 | |
| | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD) |
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3% |
Recent Activity
UDR’s apartment communities in the Richmond market are in excellent locations and the Company has invested to modernize the homes with the following:
| • | | Redevelopment: Two communities, Legacy at Mayland and Gayton Pointe Townhomes, have been completely redeveloped. Legacy at Mayland, with 576 homes, was completed in 2007, and Gayton Pointe, with 253 homes, was completed in 2008. |
Richmond has a diversified economy with significant employment in the government sector and in trade, transportation and utilities.
39
Richmond
Market Fact Sheet
Carriage Homes at Wyndham |
Legacy at Mayland Redeveloped 2007 |
40
Richmond
Market Fact Sheet
Gayton Pointe Redeveloped 2008 |
41
Richmond
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Carriage Homes at Wyndham | | | 264 | | | | 1998 | | | K/B | | | 94.4 | % | | $ | 1,335 | |
2 Dominion West End | | | 350 | | | | 1989 | | | K/B | | | 96.8 | % | | | 967 | |
4 Legacy at Mayland | | | 576 | | | | 2007 | | | Full | | | 96.4 | % | | | 1,046 | |
5 Dominion Creekwood | | | 216 | | | | 1984 | | | K/B | | | 95.7 | % | | | 878 | |
6 Dominion Olde West | | | 287 | | | | 1978 | | | Full | | | 92.8 | % | | | 894 | |
7 Waterside at Ironbridge | | | 265 | | | | 1987 | | | K/B | | | 93.9 | % | | | 948 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,958 | | | | | | | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 1,016 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3 Gayton Pointe Townhomes | | | 253 | | | | 2008 | | | Full | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 253 | | | | | | | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,303 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 2,211 | | | | | | | | | | 95.5 | % | | $ | 1,049 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
42
| | |
| | Nashville Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Nashville Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,874 | |
Non-Matures | | | 386 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 2,260 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 893 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
CLP | | | 349 | | | $ | 945 | |
UDR | | | 1,874 | | | | 893 | |
EQR | | | 396 | | | | 893 | |
AIV | | | 1,830 | | | | 857 | |
MAA | | | 1,855 | | | | 770 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 6,304 | | | $ | 849 | |
Nashville is UDR’s#11
market and is expected to
contribute3.6%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Nashville Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 769 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 849 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -0.9 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 92.0 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.9 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -3.8 | % | | Home | | $ | 950 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.0 | % | | Condo | | $ | 768 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.6 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 0% – 11 | % | | Renter | | | 177,467 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 155,900 | | | % of Total | | | 30.3 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | N/A | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,204 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 63,200 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 6,000 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR has demonstrated success in creating additional value from its Nashville properties with the following:
| • | | Redevelopment – In 2008, we completed the full redevelopment of Polo Park, a 386-home community we purchased for $20.9M, or $54,082 per home, in 2006. |
Nashville has a diversified economy with significant employment in trade, transportation and utilities and education and health care.
43
Nashville
Market Fact Sheet
The Preserve at Brentwood |
44
Nashville
Market Fact Sheet
Polo Park Redeveloped 2008 |
45
Nashville
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Legacy Hill | | | 206 | | | | 1977 | | | K/B | | | 96.0 | % | | $ | 881 | |
2 Brookridge | | | 176 | | | | 1986 | | | K/B | | | 94.9 | % | | | 721 | |
3 Breckenridge | | | 190 | | | | 1986 | | | K/B | | | 94.0 | % | | | 761 | |
4 Hickory Run | | | 294 | | | | 1989 | | | K/B | | | 94.6 | % | | | 822 | |
6 The Colonnade | | | 288 | | | | 1998 | | | K/B | | | 94.8 | % | | | 832 | |
7 The Preserve at Brentwood | | | 360 | | | | 1998 | | | K/B | | | 96.7 | % | | | 1,023 | |
8 Carrington Hills | | | 360 | | | | 1999 | | | K/B | | | 96.8 | % | | | 1,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 1,874 | | | | | | | | | | 95.6 | % | | | 893 | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5 Polo Park | | | 386 | | | | 1987 | | | Full | | | 93.9 | % | | | 828 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 386 | | | | | | | | | | 93.9 | % | | | 828 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 2,260 | | | | | | | | | | 95.3 | % | | $ | 882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
46
| | |
| | Monterey/Salinas Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Monterey Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,565 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,565 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,113 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 1,565 | | | $ | 1,113 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 1,565 | | | $ | 1,113 | |
Monterey is UDR’s#12
market and is expected to
contribute3.5%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Monterey Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,168 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,113 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 0.1 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 95.4 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.7 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -0.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,557 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | 1.8 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,288 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 2.9 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 14% – 29 | % | | Renter | | | 61,203 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 290,000 | | | % of Total | | | 48.6 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | N/A | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 219 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 64,800 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 455 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR’s Monterey portfolio consists of 1,565 apartment homes in seven communities in Salinas, CA. Average monthly rents are $1,113.
The Salinas economy is heavily influenced by the agricultural industry and is known as “America’s Salad Bowl”. The market has heavy population fluctuations related to the seasonality of the farming industry with highs in the March-November months. UDR’s occupancy tends to fluctuate between 91% in the low season and as high as 98% in the high season.
47
| | |
| | Monterey/Salinas Market Fact Sheet |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 The Pointe at Harden Ranch | | | 439 | | | | 1973 | | | K/B | | | 95.2 | % | | $ | 1,266 | |
2 Boronda Manor | | | 204 | | | | 1977 | | | K/B | | | 95.5 | % | | | 1,078 | |
3 The Pointe at Northridge | | | 187 | | | | 1975 | | | K/B | | | 95.4 | % | | | 1,176 | |
4 Laurel Tree | | | 157 | | | | 1979 | | | K/B | | | 93.4 | % | | | 996 | |
5 Cambridge Court | | | 332 | | | | 1974 | | | K/B | | | 94.0 | % | | | 1,023 | |
6 Garden Court | | | 107 | | | | 1986 | | | — | | | 98.2 | % | | | 981 | |
7 The Pointe at Westlake | | | 139 | | | | 1979 | | | K/B | | | 93.2 | % | | | 1,034 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,565 | | | | | | | | | | 94.8 | % | | $ | 1,113 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
48
| | | | |
| | | San Diego County Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
San Diego Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,123 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,123 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,412 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
CPT | | | 879 | | | $ | 1,706 | |
EQR | | | 4,000 | | | | 1,548 | |
BRE | | | 3,957 | | | | 1,542 | |
AVB | | | 1,057 | | | | 1,457 | |
UDR | | | 1,123 | | | | 1,412 | |
AIV | | | 1,830 | | | | 1,408 | |
ESS | | | 2,984 | | | | 1,155 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 15,830 | | | $ | 1,449 | |
San Diego is UDR’s#13
market and is expected to
contribute3.1%of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
San Diego Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,440 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,449 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -1.1 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.8 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.9 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,996 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.1 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,665 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 1.5 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 13% – 27 | % | | Renter | | | 461,022 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 379,750 | | | % of Total | | | 44.1 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 68 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 2,997 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 72,100 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 3,800 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
San Diego was ranked the #2 best market for 2009 (out of 43) by Marcus and Millichap Research Services, based on a series of 12-month forward-looking supply and demand indicators, including forecast employment change, vacancy, construction, housing affordability and rents. Major employers in the area include Naval Base Coronado, University of California (San Diego), Sharp Health Care, Scripps Health, Qualcomm, San Diego State University and others. The local housing market has softened and home ownership is less attainable. While San Diego County experienced a loss of jobs in 2007 and 2008 due to the fall out of the sub prime market, as well as loss of construction starts, it continues to be an attractive place to live with its diverse population, and its highly skilled and educated workforce. In addition, the climate is very mild year round and provides multiple options for outdoor activities and tourism.
49
San Diego
Market Fact Sheet
50
San Diego
Market Fact Sheet
Rancho Vallecitos Presidio at Rancho del Oro Villas at Carlsbad Summit at Mission Bay |
51
San Diego
Market Fact Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Presidio at Rancho del Oro | | | 264 | | | | 1987 | | | | K/B | | | | 93.5 | % | | $ | 1,273 | |
2 Villas at Carlsbad | | | 102 | | | | 1966 | | | | — | | | | 93.7 | % | | | 1,565 | |
3 Rancho Vallecitos | | | 184 | | | | 1988 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.2 | % | | | 1,514 | |
4 Milazzo | | | 250 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.1 | % | | | 1,558 | |
5 Summit at Mission Bay | | | 323 | | | | 1953 | | | | — | | | | 97.2 | % | | | 1,304 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,123 | | | | | | | | | | | | 95.0 | % | | $ | 1,412 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Net | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Carrying | | | Purchase | |
| | | | | | Est. | | | Value | | | Price | |
Future Development Opportunities | | Status | | | # Homes | | | ($000s) | | | ($000s) | |
1 Presidio — Phase II | | Entitled Land | | | 65 | | | $ | 2,352 | | | $ | 1,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
52
| | | | |
| | | Jacksonville Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Jacksonville Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,857 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,857 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 858 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 92.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 1,857 | | | $ | 858 | |
AIV | | | 1,775 | | | | 836 | |
EQR | | | 3,954 | | | | 799 | |
MAA | | | 3,346 | | | | 760 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 9,075 | | | $ | 792 | |
Jacksonville is UDR’s#14
market and is expected to
contribute 2.6% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Jacksonville Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 781 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 792 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -1.9 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 89.6 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -2.3 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.0 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,076 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.4 | % | | Condo | | $ | 876 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.4 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 10% – 26 | % | | Renter | | | 157,002 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 175,600 | | | % of Total | | | 31.0 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 125 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,942 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 63,900 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 7,050 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR has demonstrated success in creating additional value from its Jacksonville properties in a variety of ways:
| • | | In 2007, we acquired The Kensley Apartment Homes, a 300-home community, for $34.2M, or $114,000 per home. |
|
| • | | We have also completed a limited scope reposition of 352 homes at Green Tree Place. |
Jacksonville’s household income is slightly above the US average. Annual job growth is expected to decline, feeling the pressure of the weakened national business climate. Most new jobs are coming from professional, business services, education, health services as well as leisure and hospitality industries.
53
| | | | |
| | | Jacksonville Market Fact Sheet | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 The Kensley Apartment Homes | | | 300 | | | | 2004 | | | | — | | | | 87.6 | % | | $ | 876 | |
2 Westland Park | | | 405 | | | | 1990 | | | | K/B | | | | 91.1 | % | | | 824 | |
3 St John’s Plantation | | | 400 | | | | 1989 | | | | K/B | | | | 92.8 | % | | | 901 | |
4 Green Tree Place | | | 352 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 859 | |
5 The Antlers | | | 400 | | | | 1985 | | | | — | | | | 94.8 | % | | | 836 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,857 | | | | | | | | | | | | 92.5 | % | | $ | 858 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
54
| | | | |
| | | Norfolk/VA Beach Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Norfolk/VA Beach Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,438 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,438 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 944 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 93.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
AEC | | | 268 | | | $ | 1,361 | |
AIV | | | 2,043 | | | | 950 | |
UDR | | | 1,438 | | | | 944 | |
CLP | | | 497 | | | | 794 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 4,246 | | | $ | 956 | |
Norfolk is UDR’s#15
market and is expected to
contribute 2.6% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Norfolk/VA Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 929 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 956 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 1.3 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 93.0 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -1.8 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,425 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.3 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,175 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.8 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 19% – 33 | % | | Renter | | | 217,725 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 242,200 | | | % of Total | | | 34.9 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 98 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,835 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 65,100 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 3,825 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
| | |
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3% |
Recent Activity
Norfolk/Virginia Beach apartment communities are in solid locations and the Company has invested to modernize the homes in the following way:
| • | | Kitchen and Bath Program: Over 1,400 kitchen and bath renovations have been completed at an average cost of $9,760. |
Virginia Beach has a diversified economy with significant employment in the government sector and in trade, transportation and utilities.
55
| | | | |
| | | Norfolk/VA Beach Market Fact Sheet | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Woodscape | | | 296 | | | | 1974 | | | | — | | | | 92.6 | % | | $ | 803 | |
2 Forest Lakes at Oyster Pt. | | | 296 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 96.7 | % | | | 969 | |
3 Dominion Yorkshire Downs | | | 202 | | | | 1987 | | | | K/B | | | | 90.5 | % | | | 946 | |
4 Heather Lake | | | 252 | | | | 1972 | | | | K/B | | | | 90.9 | % | | | 945 | |
5 Dominion Waterside/Lynnhaven | | | 192 | | | | 1966 | | | | K/B | | | | 93.9 | % | | | 971 | |
6 Eastwind | | | 200 | | | | 1970 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.3 | % | | | 1,080 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,438 | | | | | | | | | | | | 93.4 | % | | $ | 944 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
56
| | | | |
| | | Inland Empire, CA Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Inland Empire Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 1,074 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,074 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 1,302 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 93.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 1,074 | | | $ | 1,302 | |
CPT | | | 264 | | | | 1,230 | |
EQR | | | 4,441 | | | | 1,221 | |
BRE | | | 2,929 | | | | 1,175 | |
AVB | | | 320 | | | | 992 | |
AIV | | | 198 | | | | 900 | |
ESS | | | 276 | | | | 766 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 9,502 | | | $ | 1,189 | |
Inland Empire is UDR’s
#16market and is
expected to contribute
2.4% of the Company’s
2009 total pro forma NOI.
Inland Empire Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,161 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,189 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -2.6 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 93.4 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -3.3 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.5 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,296 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -0.1 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,065 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 2.6 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 0% – 8 | % | | Renter | | | 403,123 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 225,000 | | | % of Total | | | 32.4 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | N/A | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 2,956 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 62,000 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 7,575 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
In the Inland Empire market, UDR is improving existing homes though its Kitchen and Bath Program. Approximately 200 kitchen and bath renovations have been completed at an average cost of $8,802 and we are realizing an average annual return of 13.5%. Originally, we achieved average rent increases of 13.5% per home at Waterstone at Murrieta ($975 before and $1,075 after), and rents have continued to climb to $1,091.
San Bernardino County is known as the “transportation hub of the Southwestern United States,” according to Grubb & Ellis. With Ontario International Airport, the County hosts one of the 15 busiest cargo airports in the country. Freight trains roll through the region on two of the busiest transcontinental rail lines in the nation. This region offers a diversified economy, cultural amenities, and an attractive quality of life for individuals and families, as well as businesses, seeking to relocate. A safe, family-oriented environment and a well-educated work force combine to make Inland Empire an ideal place to live, work and play.
57
| | | | |
| | | Inland Empire Market Fact Sheet | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Verano at Town Square | | | 414 | | | | 2006 | | | | — | | | | 96.2 | % | | $ | 1,516 | |
2 Windemere/Sycamore Heights | | | 240 | | | | 2001 | | | | — | | | | 93.8 | % | | | 1,235 | |
3 Waterstone at Murietta | | | 420 | | | | 1990 | | | | K/B | | | | 91.5 | % | | | 1,091 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,074 | | | | | | | | | | | | 93.8 | % | | $ | 1,302 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
58
| | |
| | Phoenix Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Phoenix Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 914 | |
Non-Matures | | | 449 | |
Homes in Development | | | 382 | |
| | | |
Total | | | 1,745 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 940 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 914 | | | $ | 940 | |
BRE | | | 1,898 | | | | 850 | |
CPT | | | 1,729 | | | | 826 | |
CLP | | | 952 | | | | 821 | |
EQR | | | 11,066 | | | | 773 | |
MAA | | | 240 | | | | 751 | |
AIV | | | 5,012 | | | | 680 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 21,811 | | | $ | 771 | |
Phoenix is UDR’s#17
market and is expected to
contribute 2.0% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Phoenix Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 756 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 771 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -3.7 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 89.8 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -3.1 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.9 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,078 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.7 | % | | Condo | | $ | 877 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | -0.1 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 12% – 28 | % | | Renter | | | 456,220 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 185,100 | | | % of Total | | | 31.5 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 133 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 5,711 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 64,200 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 17,500 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR is expanding its presence in this market with the following:
| • | | In the third quarter of 2008, the Company purchased Waterford at Peoria — a 200-home presale development community completed in the third quarter. |
| • | | The Residences at Stadium Village is an active development project — with 382 homes being built at an estimated average cost of $124,000 per home, with an expected completion in 2010. |
Key local industries include trade, transportation and utilities, professional and business, education and health, leisure and hospitality and government. The market has outstanding recreational and extra-curricular activities, an attractive year round climate, a reasonable cost of living and a young educated work force. Phoenix offers ample room for continued job growth and population growth as the economy recovers.
59
| | |
| | Phoenix Market Fact Sheet |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
3 Sierra Canyon | | | 236 | | | | 2001 | | | | — | | | | 94.9 | % | | $ | 915 | |
4 Finisterra | | | 356 | | | | 1997 | | | | — | | | | 93.7 | % | | | 952 | |
5 Sierra Foothills | | | 322 | | | | 1998 | | | | — | | | | 94.0 | % | | | 945 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub Total | | | 914 | | | | | | | | | | | | 94.1 | % | | | 940 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-Mature | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2 Waterford Peoria (In lease-up) | | | 200 | | | | 2008 | | | | — | | | | 46.8 | % | | | 995 | |
6 Sierra Palms | | | 249 | | | | 1997 | | | | — | | | | 81.9 | % | | | 889 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub Total | | | 449 | | | | | | | | | | | | 66.3 | % | | | 922 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 1,363 | | | | | | | | | | | | 84.9 | % | | $ | 935 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | # of | | | Budgeted | | | Cost per | | | Expected | |
Development Opportunities | | Status | | | Homes | | | Cost (000) | | | Home | | | Completion | |
1 Residences/Stadium | | Active | | | 382 | | | $ | 47,400 | | | $ | 124,084 | | | | 1Q10 | |
Expected Completion 2010 Completed 3Q 2008 |
60
| | |
| | Sacramento Market Fact Sheet |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Sacramento Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 914 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 914 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 932 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
BRE | | | 1,152 | | | $ | 1,087 | |
AIV | | | 180 | | | | 1,018 | |
EQR | | | 272 | | | | 954 | |
UDR | | | 914 | | | | 932 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 2,518 | | | $ | 1,012 | |
Sacramento is UDR’s#18
market and is expected to
contribute 1.7% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Sacramento Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 1,005 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 1,012 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -1.9 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 92.6 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -2.0 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -4.5 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,301 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.3 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,068 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 1.1 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 5% – 22 | % | | Renter | | | 282,068 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 230,000 | | | % of Total | | | 36.8 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 113 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 1,395 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 71,000 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 3,850 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
The Company owns two properties comprised of 914 apartment homes in Sacramento. UDR’s Sacramento properties have average rents of $932. Sacramento is the state capitol of California and also is home to Sacramento State University.
The Company has no plans to expand in this market
61
| | |
| | Sacramento Market Fact Sheet |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Occ. Home | |
1 Woodlake Village | | | 646 | | | | 1979 | | | | K/B | | | | 93.3 | % | | $ | 872 | |
2 Foothills Tennis Village | | | 268 | | | | 1988 | | | | K/B | | | | 96.2 | % | | | 1,075 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 914 | | | | | | | | | | | | 94.2 | % | | $ | 932 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
62
| | | | |
| | | Portland Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Portland Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 716 | |
Non-Matures | | | — | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 716 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 988 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 94.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes (SS) | | | Ave. Rent | |
UDR | | | 716 | | | $ | 988 | |
EQR | | | 3,713 | | | | 856 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 4,429 | | | $ | 878 | |
Portland is UDR’s#19
market and is expected to
contribute 1.4% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Portland Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 850 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 878 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | -1.3 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 94.2 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -2.4 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -3.8 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,594 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.1 | % | | Condo | | $ | 1,320 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 1.4 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 33% – 45 | % | | Renter | | | 290,704 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 278,600 | | | % of Total | | | 34.9 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 87 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 3,772 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 67,500 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 7,150 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
UDR owns 716 apartment homes in three communities in the Portland market. The Company sold two of its Portland properties in the March, 2008 portfolio sale. Rents average $988 at UDR’s Portland communities with three bedroom homes renting for as much as $1,950. The Portland economy is fueled in large part by the technology industry and is home to Nike in the Portland suburb of Beaverton.
63
| | | | |
| | | Portland Market Fact Sheet | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
1 Andover Park | | | 240 | | | | 1989 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.7 | % | | $ | 1,031 | |
2 Hunt Club | | | 256 | | | | 1985 | | | | K/B | | | | 96.0 | % | | | 930 | |
2 Tualatin Heights | | | 220 | | | | 1989 | | | | K/B | | | | 94.0 | % | | | 1,009 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total | | | 716 | | | | | | | | | | | | 94.9 | % | | $ | 988 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
64
| | | | |
| | | Austin Market Fact Sheet | |
Market Statistics & Peer Comparison
| | | | |
Austin Portfolio | | Homes | |
Same Store Pool | | | 250 | |
Non-Matures | | | 390 | |
Homes in Development | | | — | |
| | | |
Total | | | 640 | |
MRQ Mo. Inc./ Home (SS) | | $ | 954 | |
MRQ Occupancy (SS) | | | 95.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Company | | # of Homes | | | Ave. Rent | |
PPS | | | 308 | | | $ | 1,329 | |
UDR | | | 250 | | | | 954 | |
CPT | | | 1,898 | | | | 896 | |
CLP | | | 1,910 | | | | 818 | |
MAA | | | 1,392 | | | | 783 | |
AIV | | | 1,145 | | | | 759 | |
| | | | | | |
Total | | | 6,903 | | | $ | 850 | |
Austin is UDR’s#20
market and is expected to
contribute 1.3% of the
Company’s 2009 total
pro forma NOI.
Austin Market Statistics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009 Market Forecast | | | Home Affordability | | | Supply/Demand | |
Effective Rent (MRQ) | | $ | 832 | | | Ave. Market Rent | | $ | 850 | | | Job Growth MRQ | | | 1.6 | % |
Occupancy (MRQ) | | | 93.1 | % | | Mo Payment: Entry Level*: | | | | | | Job Growth ‘09F | | | -1.8 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘09F | | | -3.1 | % | | Home | | $ | 1,215 | | | Job Growth Nat’l Avg. ‘09F | | | -2.2 | % |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘10F | | | -1.8 | % | | Condo | | $ | 995 | | | Housing Stock (MRQ) | | | | |
Eff. Rent Growth ‘11F | | | 0.9 | % | | % Discount/Rent to Own | | | 15% – 30 | % | | Renter | | | 234,574 | |
| | | | | | Median Home Price (MRQ) | | $ | 190,900 | | | % of Total | | | 40.2 | % |
| | | | | | Housing Affordability Score^ | | | 112 | | | Multifamily permits ‘08 | | | 5,304 | |
| | | | | | Median Income (MRQ) | | $ | 69,100 | | | Total permits ‘09F | | | 10,350 | |
Sources: AXIOMetrics and Company Reports, Most Recent Quarter (MRQ), ^Merrill Lynch Apartment Monitor, Latest Available Data (LAD)
* Assumes 30 yr fixed at 6.3%
Recent Activity
In the third quarter of 2008, UDR purchased Residences at The Domain, a 390-home community built in 2007. This property is located in Domain Urban Village, an attractive mixed-use development with 700,000 square feet of retail and 75,000 square feet of office space. It is located in close proximity to proposed rail lines, including Capital MetroRail and Union Pacific Rail Line and to Central Austin and Northwest Austin job centers.
The Company also co-owns two properties, Red Stone Ranch (324 homes) and Lakeline Villas (309 homes) that are part of the Company’s Texas joint venture.
65
| | |
| | Austin Market Fact Sheet |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Year Built | | | | | | | | | | | Inc. per Occ. | |
Operating Properties | | # Homes | | | ReDev | | | Redev. | | | Occupancy | | | Home | |
4 Barton Creek Landing | | | 250 | | | | 1986 | | | | K/B | | | | 95.8 | % | | $ | 954 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | | | 250 | | | | | | | | | | | | 95.8 | % | | | 954 | |
Non-Mature and Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Red Stone Ranch (Texas JV) | | | 324 | | | | 2001 | | | | — | | | | 96.1 | % | | | 848 | |
2 Lakeline Villas (Texas JV) | | | 309 | | | | 2002 | | | | — | | | | 95.6 | % | | | 808 | |
3 Residences at The Domain | | | 390 | | | | 2007 | | | | — | | | | 90.2 | % | | | 1,181 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal1 | | | 390 | | | | | | | | | | | | 90.2 | % | | | 1,181 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Grand Total (UDR)1 | | | 640 | | | | | | | | | | | | 92.4 | % | | $ | 1,089 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Excludes joint-venture homes
66
Transformation for Growth: UDR’s Strategies
| | |
| | • Strong portfolio, focused in markets with above average job growth expectations and low affordability • Excellent growth profile |
| | |
| | • Development pipeline geographically aligned with operating portfolio
• No new construction starts planned for 2009 due to economic conditions |
| | |
| | • Focused operating model
• Improved efficiency and effectiveness
• Continued execution of technology initiatives |
| | |
| | • Strong balance sheet
• $1.3 billion of cash and credit capacity (1/31/09) |
Safe Harbor:Statements contained in this publication, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements, as the term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the Company’s use of words such as, “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “believes,” and similar expressions that do not relate to historical matters. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which can cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated, due to a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, unfavorable changes in the apartment market, changing economic conditions, the impact of inflation/deflation on rental rates and property operating expenses, expectations concerning availability of capital and the stabilization of the capital markets, expectations concerning the collection of the note receivable from the 2008 portfolio sale, the impact of competition and competitive pricing, acquisitions or new developments not achieving anticipated results, delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule, expectations on job growth, home affordability and demand/supply ratio for multi-family housing, expectations concerning development and redevelopment activities, expectations on occupancy levels, expectations concerning the Vitruvian Park project, including expectations that the Company will be able to secure one of more institutional investor-partners, expectations that automation will help grow net operating income, expectations on post-renovated stabilized annual operating income, expectations on annualized net operating income and other risk factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. All forward-looking statements in this document are made as of February 9, 2009, based upon information known to management as of the date hereof. The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that indicated results or events will not be realized.