UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-12138
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts |
| 04-2619298 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
| (I.R.S. employer |
|
|
|
39 Brighton Avenue, Allston, Massachusetts |
| 02134 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 783-0039
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Depositary Receipts |
| NYSE AMEX |
(Title of each Class) |
| (Name of each Exchange on which Registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class A
Limited Partnership Units
(Title of class)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
| Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
| Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of June 30, 2011, there were 105,188 of the registrant’s Class A units (1,051,876 Depositary Receipts) of limited partnership issued and outstanding and 24,982 Class B units issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.
PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in New England Realty Associates L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
| (Unaudited) |
| (Audited) |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rental Properties |
| $ | 100,683,709 |
| $ | 92,151,239 |
|
Property Held for Sale |
| — |
| 593,018 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 3,992,198 |
| 3,245,361 |
| ||
Rents Receivable |
| 558,952 |
| 622,944 |
| ||
Real Estate Tax Escrows |
| 310,015 |
| 301,853 |
| ||
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
| 3,693,374 |
| 3,337,886 |
| ||
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
| 18,542,211 |
| 20,076,957 |
| ||
Financing and Leasing Fees |
| 950,224 |
| 947,477 |
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 128,730,683 |
| $ | 121,276,735 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Notes Payable |
| $ | 8,667,173 |
| $ | 4,668,600 |
|
Mortgage Notes Payable |
| 134,662,239 |
| 137,680,660 |
| ||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
| 2,221,566 |
| 2,440,141 |
| ||
Advance Rental Payments and Security Deposits |
| 3,674,960 |
| 3,407,901 |
| ||
Total Liabilities |
| 149,225,938 |
| 148,197,302 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 3 and 9) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partners’ Capital 131,484 units outstanding in 2011 and 2010 |
| (20,495,255 | ) | (26,920,567 | ) | ||
Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital |
| $ | 128,730,683 |
| $ | 121,276,735 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Rental income |
| $ | 8,234,245 |
| $ | 7,896,010 |
| $ | 16,413,095 |
| $ | 15,864,854 |
|
Laundry and sundry income |
| 111,398 |
| 110,552 |
| 213,441 |
| 227,900 |
| ||||
|
| 8,345,643 |
| 8,006,562 |
| 16,626,536 |
| 16,092,754 |
| ||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Administrative |
| 399,845 |
| 415,370 |
| 825,588 |
| 893,311 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,451,795 |
| 1,403,905 |
| 2,808,616 |
| 2,769,558 |
| ||||
Management fees |
| 350,886 |
| 332,762 |
| 684,236 |
| 662,074 |
| ||||
Operating |
| 871,037 |
| 797,912 |
| 2,329,723 |
| 2,028,656 |
| ||||
Renting |
| 109,450 |
| 103,025 |
| 197,337 |
| 168,475 |
| ||||
Repairs and maintenance |
| 1,317,610 |
| 1,218,471 |
| 2,379,751 |
| 2,196,029 |
| ||||
Taxes and insurance |
| 1,008,219 |
| 1,014,754 |
| 2,060,745 |
| 2,066,189 |
| ||||
|
| 5,508,842 |
| 5,286,199 |
| 11,285,996 |
| 10,784,292 |
| ||||
Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations |
| 2,836,801 |
| 2,720,363 |
| 5,340,540 |
| 5,308,462 |
| ||||
Other Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
| 1,007 |
| 1,754 |
| 2,234 |
| 2,513 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
| (1,983,117 | ) | (2,015,348 | ) | (3,929,825 | ) | (4,012,697 | ) | ||||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (498,198 | ) | (1,019,074 | ) | (952,246 | ) | (2,018,571 | ) | ||||
|
| (2,480,308 | ) | (3,032,668 | ) | (4,879,837 | ) | (6,028,755 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 356,493 |
| (312,305 | ) | 460,703 |
| (720,293 | ) | ||||
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from discontinue operations |
| 29,035 |
| 57,763 |
| 97,636 |
| 122,890 |
| ||||
Gain on the sale of real estate |
| 7,707,757 |
| — |
| 7,707,757 |
| — |
| ||||
|
| 7,736,792 |
| 57,763 |
| 7,805,393 |
| 122,890 |
| ||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | 8,093,285 |
| $ | (254,542 | ) | $ | 8,266,096 |
| $ | (597,403 | ) |
Income per Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income (loss) before discontinued operations |
| $ | 2.71 |
| $ | (2.37 | ) | $ | 3.50 |
| $ | (5.46 | ) |
Income from discontinued operations |
| 58.84 |
| 0.44 |
| 59.36 |
| 0.93 |
| ||||
Net Income (Loss) per Unit |
| $ | 61.55 |
| $ | (1.93 | ) | $ | 62.86 |
| $ | (4.53 | ) |
Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |
| 131,484 |
| 131,512 |
| 131,484 |
| 131,911 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Partner’s Capital |
| ||||||||||
|
| Units |
| Limited |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| Class A |
| Class B |
| General |
| Subtotal |
| Treasury |
| Total |
| Class A |
| Class B |
| General |
| Total |
| ||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
| 144,180 |
| 34,243 |
| 1,802 |
| 180,225 |
| 47,879 |
| 132,346 |
| $ | (17,069,520 | ) | $ | (4,050,138 | ) | $ | (213,165 | ) | $ | (21,332,824 | ) |
Distribution to Partners |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1,477,454 | ) | (350,895 | ) | (18,468 | ) | (1,846,817 | ) | ||||
Stock Buyback |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 862 |
| (862 | ) | (432,920 | ) | (102,591 | ) | (5,400 | ) | (540,911 | ) | ||||
Net (Loss) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (477,923 | ) | (113,507 | ) | (5,974 | ) | (597,404 | ) | ||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
| 144,180 |
| 34,243 |
| 1,802 |
| 180,225 |
| 48,741 |
| 131,484 |
| $ | (19,457,817 | ) | $ | (4,617,131 | ) | $ | (243,007 | ) | $ | (24,317,955 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Balance January 1, 2011 |
| 144,180 |
| 34,243 |
| 1,802 |
| 180,225 |
| 48,741 |
| 131,484 |
| $ | (21,539,906 | ) | $ | (5,111,628 | ) | $ | (269,033 | ) | $ | (26,920,567 | ) |
Distribution to Partners |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (1,472,626 | ) | (349,749 | ) | (18,408 | ) | (1,840,783 | ) | ||||
Net Income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6,612,876 |
| 1,570,558 |
| 82,661 |
| 8,266,095 |
| ||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
| 144,180 |
| 34,243 |
| 1,802 |
| 180,225 |
| 48,741 |
| 131,484 |
| $ | (16,399,656 | ) | $ | (3,890,819 | ) | $ | (204,780 | ) | $ | (20,495,255 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 8,266,096 |
| $ | (597,403 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 2,808,616 |
| 2,769,558 |
| ||
Loss from investments in joint ventures |
| 952,246 |
| 2,018,571 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization, discontinued operations |
| 16,471 |
| 27,761 |
| ||
Gain on the sale of rental property |
| (7,707,757 | ) | — |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Decrease in rents receivable |
| 63,992 |
| 274,922 |
| ||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expense |
| (218,575 | ) | 2,626 |
| ||
(Increase) decrease in real estate tax escrow |
| (8,162 | ) | 2,799 |
| ||
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets |
| (355,486 | ) | (297,295 | ) | ||
Increase (decrease) in advance rental payments and security deposits |
| 267,059 |
| (2,498 | ) | ||
Total Adjustments |
| (4,181,596 | ) | 4,796,444 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
| 4,084,500 |
| 4,199,041 |
| ||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| 594,425 |
| 675,000 |
| ||
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
| (11,925 | ) | (25,000 | ) | ||
Purchase and improvement of rental properties |
| (11,271,717 | ) | (787,727 | ) | ||
Net proceeds from the sale of rental property |
| 8,284,839 |
| — |
| ||
Net cash (used in) investing activities |
| (2,404,378 | ) | (137,727 | ) | ||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Payment of financing costs |
| (72,652 | ) | (3,308 | ) | ||
Proceeds of notes payable |
| 3,998,573 |
| 904,122 |
| ||
Principal payments of mortgage notes payable |
| (3,018,422 | ) | (423,664 | ) | ||
Stock buyback |
| — |
| (540,911 | ) | ||
Distributions to partners |
| (1,840,784 | ) | (1,846,817 | ) | ||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
| (933,285 | ) | (1,910,578 | ) | ||
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 746,837 |
| 2,150,736 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of year |
| 3,245,361 |
| 2,879,663 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of period |
| $ | 3,992,198 |
| $ | 5,030,399 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Line of Business: New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (“NERA” or the “Partnership”) was organized in Massachusetts in 1977. NERA and its subsidiaries own and operate various residential apartment buildings, condominium units and commercial properties located in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. NERA has also made investments in other real estate partnerships and has participated in other real estate-related activities, primarily located in Massachusetts.
Accounting Standards: On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 105-10”), General Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105-10”). ASC 105-10 established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non -grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Partnership has implemented the Codification in this report by providing references to the Codification topics, as appropriate.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NERA and its subsidiaries. NERA has a 99.67% to 100% ownership interest in each subsidiary except for the nine limited liability companies (the “Investment Properties” or “Joint Ventures”) in which the Partnership has between a 40 - 50% ownership interest. The consolidated group is referred to as the “Partnerships.” Minority interests are not recorded, since they are insignificant. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership accounts for its investment in the above-mentioned Investment Properties using the equity method of consolidation. (See Note 14: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures).
The Partnership accounts for its investments in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The authoritative guidance on consolidation provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE (the “primary beneficiary”). Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.
On January 1, 2010, the Partnership adopted the updated provisions of ASC 810, pursuant to FASB No. 167, which amends FIN 46® to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Additionally, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both. FASB No. 167 amends certain guidance in Interpretation 46® for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Also, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to these financial statements.
Impairment: On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnership’s rental properties or investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries may be impaired. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property. The Partnership’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.
Accounting Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition: Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.
Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed —rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.
Rental Properties: Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Partnership’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.
Financing and Leasing Fees: Financing fees are capitalized and amortized, using the interest method, over the life of the related mortgages. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. Unamortized balances are expensed when the corresponding fee is no longer applicable.
Income Taxes: The financial statements have been prepared on the basis that NERA and its subsidiaries are entitled to tax treatment as partnerships. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded.
Cash Equivalents: The Partnership considers cash equivalents to be all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less.
Segment Reporting: Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the Partnership for which separate financial information is produced internally for management. Under the definition, NERA operated, for all periods presented, as one segment.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income is defined as changes in partners’ equity, exclusive of transactions with owners (such as capital contributions and dividends). NERA did not have any comprehensive income items in 2011 and 2010 other than net income as reported.
Income Per Unit: Net income per unit has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period presented. The Partnership has no dilutive units and, therefore, basic net income is the same as diluted net income per unit (see Note 7).
Concentration of Credit Risks and Financial Instruments: The Partnership’s properties are located in New England, and the Partnership is subject to the general economic risks related thereto. No single tenant accounted for more than 5% of the Partnership’s revenues in 2011or 2010. The Partnership makes its temporary cash investments with high-credit-quality financial institutions. At June 30, 2011and December 31, 2010, substantially all of the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents were held in interest-bearing accounts at financial institutions, earning interest at rates 0.05% to 0.75%. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, approximately $4,954,000, and $4,349,000 of cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits included in prepaid expenses and other assets exceeded federally insured amounts.
Advertising Expense: Advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $43,679 and $32,661for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Discontinued Operations and Rental Property Held for Sale: When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Partnership decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Interest Capitalized: The Partnership follows the policy of capitalizing interest as a component of the cost of rental property when the time of construction exceeds one year. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 there was no capitalized interest.
Extinguishment of Debt: When existing mortgages are refinanced with the same lender and it is determined that the refinancing is substantially different then they are recorded as an extinguishment of debt. However if it is determined that the refinancing is substantially the same then they are recorded as an exchange of debt. All refinancings qualify as extinguishment of debt.
Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform to current period presentation.
NOTE 2. RENTAL PROPERTIES
As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships owned 2,251 residential apartment units in 20 residential and mixed-use complexes (collectively, the “Apartment Complexes”). The Partnership also owns 19 condominium units in a residential condominium complex, all of which are leased to residential tenants (collectively referred to as the “Condominium Units”). The Apartment Complexes and Condominium Units are located primarily in the metropolitan Boston area of Massachusetts.
Additionally, as of June 30, 2011, the Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships owned a commercial shopping center in Framingham, commercial buildings in Newton and Brookline and mixed-use properties in Boston, Brockton and Newton, all in Massachusetts. These properties are referred to collectively as the “Commercial Properties”.
The Partnership also owned a 40% to 50% ownership interest in nine residential and mixed use complexes (the “Investment Properties”) at June 30, 2011 with a total of 799 units, accounted for using the equity method of consolidation.
See Note 14 for summary information on these investments.
Rental properties consist of the following:
|
| June 30, 2011 |
| December 31, 2010 |
| Useful Life |
| ||
Land, improvements and parking lots |
| $ | 27,543,484 |
| $ | 26,110,238 |
| 15—40 years |
|
Buildings and improvements |
| 118,915,440 |
| 110,106,179 |
| 15—40 years |
| ||
Kitchen cabinets |
| 4,148,300 |
| 3,923,029 |
| 5—10 years |
| ||
Carpets |
| 3,671,263 |
| 3,404,951 |
| 5—10 years |
| ||
Air conditioning |
| 870,877 |
| 857,375 |
| 7—10 years |
| ||
Laundry equipment |
| 335,099 |
| 331,002 |
| 5—7 years |
| ||
Elevators |
| 1,139,296 |
| 1,086,140 |
| 20 years |
| ||
Swimming pools |
| 155,442 |
| 155,442 |
| 10 years |
| ||
Equipment |
| 2,125,077 |
| 1,989,645 |
| 5—7 years |
| ||
Motor vehicles |
| 107,792 |
| 107,792 |
| 5 years |
| ||
Fences |
| 39,670 |
| 33,970 |
| 5—10 years |
| ||
Furniture and fixtures |
| 1,219,206 |
| 924,633 |
| 5—7 years |
| ||
Smoke alarms |
| 116,892 |
| 97,840 |
| 5—7 years |
| ||
Total fixed assets |
| 160,387,838 |
| 149,128,236 |
|
|
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
| (59,704,129 | ) | (56,976,997 | ) |
|
| ||
|
| $ | 100,683,709 |
| $ | 92,151,239 |
|
|
|
On May 18, 2011, the Partnership sold Avon Street Apartments, a 66 unit residential apartment complex located at 130 Avon Street, Malden, Massachusetts. The sales price was $8,750,000, which resulted in a gain of approximately $7,700,000. The net proceeds of the sale, of approximately $5,444,000 were held by a qualified intermediary in order for the Partnership to structure a tax free exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the IRS code. This tax free exchange was completed with the purchase of Battle Green Apartments. See Note 15.
On June 1, 2011, the Partnership purchased the Battle Green Apartments, a 48 unit residential apartment complex located at 34-42 Worthen Road, Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,000,000. The Partnership used cash reserves, the proceeds from the sale of Avon Street and borrowed $3,998,573 from Harold Brown, Treasurer of the General Partner to make this purchase. This loan has an interest rate of 6% and is secured by the Partnership’s ownership interest in Battle Green Apartments, LLC. The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand within six months of notice or prepay without penalty. See Note 16 — Subsequent events for information regarding the financing of Battle Green Apartments which occurred in July 2011 and payment of this loan.
NOTE 3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Partnership’s properties are managed by an entity that is owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental revenue and laundry income on the majority of the Partnership’s properties and 3% on Linewt. Total fees paid were approximately $700,000 and $680,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Partnership Agreement permits the General Partner or Management Company to charge the costs of professional services (such as counsel, accountants and contractors) to NERA. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 approximately $416,000 and $334,000 was charged to NERA for legal, accounting, construction, maintenance, rental and architectural services and supervision of capital improvements. Of the 2011 expenses referred to above, approximately $126,000 was for repairs and maintenance and $159,000 was for administrative expense. Approximately $126,000 of expenses for construction, architectural services and supervision of capital projects were capitalized in rental properties. Additionally in 2011, the Hamilton Company received approximately $344,000 from the Investment Properties of which approximately $279,000 was the management fee, approximately $52,000 was for maintenance services and approximately $13,000 was for administrative services. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental income on the majority of investment properties and 2% on Dexter Park.
On January 1, 2004, all employees were transferred to the Management Company’s payroll. The Partnership reimburses the management company for the payroll and related expenses of the employees who work at the properties. Total reimbursement was approximately $1,242,000 and $1,261,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Management Company maintains a 401K plan for all eligible employees whereby the employees may contribute the maximum allowed by law. The plan also provides for discretionary contributions by the employer. There were no employer contributions in 2011 and 2010.
Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by the Management Company’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Management Company charged the Partnership $62,500 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services included in administrative expenses of $410,000 previously discussed.
In 1996, prior to becoming an employee of the Management Company, the President of the Management Company performed asset management consulting services for the Partnership. This individual continues to perform this service and receives an asset management fee from the Partnership. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, this individual received $37,500.
The Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships, which have invested in mixed use residential apartment complexes. The Partnership has between a 40% and 50% ownership interest in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 57%. See Note 14 for a description of the properties and their operations.
See Note 8 for information regarding the repurchase of Class B and General Partnership Units.
On October 28, 2009, the Partnership borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”). The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice. The Partnership may also prepay the note without penalty. On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $141,000 and $216,000, respectively. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street. See Note 16 — Subsequent Events regarding the additional payment of $1,000,000 in August 2011.
As described in Note 2, the Partnership borrowed an additional $3,998,573 from Harold Brown to facilitate the acquisition of Battle Green. At June 30, 2011 the notes payable to Harold Brown were $8,667,173. See Note 16 for a description of $4,998,573 repaid in July and August 2011.
See Note 2 and Note 16 regarding the loan from Harold Brown in connection with the purchase of Battle Green Apartments.
NOTE 4. OTHER ASSETS
Approximately $1,837,000 and $1,729,000 of security deposits and prepaid rent deposits are included in prepaid expenses and other assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Included in prepaid expenses and other assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is approximately $972,000 and $896,000, respectively, held in escrow to fund future capital improvements. The security deposits and escrow accounts are restricted cash.
Financing and leasing fees of approximately $950,000 and $947,000 are net of accumulated amortization of approximately $574,000 and $541,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
NOTE 5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the mortgages payable consisted of various loans, all of which were secured by first mortgages on properties referred to in Note 2. At June 30, 2011, the fixed interest rates on these loans ranged from 4.84% to 7.07%, payable in monthly installments aggregating approximately $715,000, including principal, to various dates through 2023. The majority of the mortgages are subject to prepayment penalties. At June 30, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the above mortgages was 5.56%. The effective rate of 5.64% includes the amortization expense of deferred financing costs. See Note 12 for fair value information.
The Partnerships have pledged tenant leases as additional collateral for certain of these loans.
Approximate annual maturities at June 30, 2011 are as follows:
2012—current maturities |
| $ | 985,000 |
|
2013 |
| 19,861,000 |
| |
2014 |
| 29,424,000 |
| |
2015 |
| 9,066,000 |
| |
2016 |
| 98,000 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 75,228,000 |
| |
|
| $ | 134,662,000 |
|
The $2,550,000 mortgage secured by the Avon Street Apartments was repaid in full from the proceeds of the sale of Avon Street Apartments on May 18, 2011.
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the Brookside Apartments. The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%. The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000. There were no prepayment penalties.
See Note 16 - Subsequent Events for information regarding the financing of Battle Green Apartments.
NOTE 6. ADVANCE RENTAL PAYMENTS AND SECURITY DEPOSITS
The Partnership’s residential lease agreements may require tenants to maintain a one-month advance rental payment and/or a security deposit. At June 30, 2011, amounts received for prepaid rents of approximately $1,328,000 are included in cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits of approximately $1,838,000 are included in other assets and are restricted cash.
NOTE 7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
The Partnership has two classes of Limited Partners (Class A and B) and one category of General Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, distributions to holders of Class B Units and General Partnership Units must represent 19% and 1%, respectively, of the total units outstanding. All classes have equal profit sharing and distribution rights, in proportion to their ownership interests.
In 2011, the Partnership approved a quarterly distribution of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011.
In 2010, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt.)
The Partnership has entered into a deposit agreement with an agent to facilitate public trading of limited partners’ interests in Class A Units. Under the terms of this agreement, the holders of Class A Units have the right to exchange each Class A Unit for 10 Depositary Receipts. The following is information per Depositary Receipt:
|
| Six Months Ended June 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Income (loss) per Depositary Receipt before Discontinued Operations |
| $ | 0.35 |
| $ | (0.54 | ) |
Income from Discontinued Operations |
| 5.94 |
| 0.09 |
| ||
Net Income (loss) per Depositary Receipt after Discontinued Operations |
| $ | 6.29 |
| $ | (0.45 | ) |
Distributions per Depositary Receipt |
| $ | 1.40 |
| $ | 1.40 |
|
NOTE 8. TREASURY UNITS
Treasury Units at June 30, 2011 are as follows:
Class A |
| 38,993 |
|
Class B |
| 9,260 |
|
General Partnership |
| 488 |
|
|
| 48,741 |
|
On August 20, 2007, NewReal, Inc., the General Partner authorized an equity repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) under which the Partnership was permitted to purchase, over a period of twelve months, up to 100,000 Depositary Receipts (each of which is one-tenth of a Class A Unit). On January 15, 2008, the General Partner authorized an increase in the Repurchase Program from 100,000 to 200,000 Depositary Receipts. On January 30, 2008 the General Partner authorized an increase the Repurchase Program from 200,000 to 300,000 Depositary Receipts. On March 6, 2008, the General Partner authorized the increase in the total number of Depositary Receipts that could be repurchased pursuant to the Repurchase Program from 300,000 to 500,000. On August 8, 2008, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program for an additional 12-month period ended August 19, 2009. On March 22, 2010, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program that expired on August 19, 2009. Under the terms of the renewed Repurchase Program, the Partnership may purchase up to 500,000 Depositary Receipts from the start of the program in 2007 through March 31, 2015. The Repurchase Program requires the Partnership to repurchase a proportionate number of Class B Units and General Partner Units in connection with any repurchases of any Depositary Receipts by the Partnership based upon the 80%, 19% and 1% fixed distribution percentages of the holders of the Class A, Class B and General Partner Units under the Partnership’s Second Amended and Restate Contract of Limited Partnership. Repurchases of Depositary Receipts or Partnership Units pursuant to the Repurchase Program may be made by the Partnership from time to time in its sole discretion in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions. From August 20, 2007 through June 30, 2011, the Partnership has repurchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts at an average price of $73.86 per receipt (or $738.60 per underlying Class A Unit), 1,724 Class B Units and 91 General Partnership Units, both at an average price of $585.05 per Unit, totaling approximately $30,481,000 including brokerage fees paid by the Partnership.
On September 17, 2008, the Partnership completed the issuance of an aggregate of 6,642 Class A Units held in treasury to current holders of Class B and General Partner
Units upon the simultaneous retirement to treasury of 6,309 Class B Units and 333 General Partner Units pursuant to an equity distribution plan authorized by the Board of Directors of the General Partner on August 8, 2008 and as further described under Item 3.02 of the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Harold Brown, the treasurer of the General Partner, owns 75% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 75% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner, Ronald Brown, the brother of Harold Brown and the president of the General Partner, owns 25% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 25% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner.
The Partnership did not purchase any Depositary Receipts during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Partnerships are involved in various ordinary routine litigation incidental to their business. The Partnership either has insurance coverage or provides for any uninsured claims when appropriate. The Partnerships are not involved in any material pending legal proceedings.
NOTE 10. RENTAL INCOME
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 90% of rental income was related to residential apartments and condominium units with leases of one year or less. Approximately 10% was related to commercial properties, which have minimum future annual rental income on non-cancellable operating leases at June 30, 2011 as follows:
|
| Commercial |
| |
2012 |
| $ | 2,751,000 |
|
2013 |
| 2,136,000 |
| |
2014 |
| 1,914,000 |
| |
2015 |
| 1,322,000 |
| |
2016 |
| 1,071,000 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 474,000 |
| |
|
| $ | 9,668,000 |
|
The aggregate minimum future rental income does not include contingent rentals that may be received under various leases in connection with percentage rents, common area charges and real estate taxes. Aggregate contingent rentals from continuing operations were approximately $363,000 and $315,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 respectively.
Rents receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $559,000 at June 30, 2011 and $595,000 at December 31, 2010. Included in rents receivable at June 30, 2011 is approximately $322,000 resulting from recognizing rental income from non-cancelable commercial leases with future rental increases on a straight-line basis. The majority of this amount is for long-term leases with Staples and Trader Joe’s at Staples Plaza in Framingham, Massachusetts.
Rents receivable at June 30, 2011 also includes approximately $57,000 representing the deferral of rental concession primarily related to the residential properties.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 rent at the commercial properties includes approximately $5,600 of amortization of deferred rents arising from the fair values assigned to in-place leases upon the purchase of Cypress Street in Brookline, Massachusetts.
NOTE 11. CASH FLOW INFORMATION
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cash paid for interest was approximately $3,976,000, and $4,076,000, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes was approximately $28,000 and $22,000 respectively.
NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we do not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements.
Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and note payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or, the recent acquisition of these items.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we estimated the fair value of our mortgages payable and other notes based upon quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available. We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage debt that does not have current quoted market prices available by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 3). The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value are the result of differences in interest rates and/or borrowing spreads that were available to us at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or acquired. The secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Partnership in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
· For cash and cash equivalents, other assets, investment in partnerships, accounts payable, advance rents and security deposits: fair value approximates the carrying value of such assets and liabilities.
· For mortgage notes payable: fair value is generally based on estimated future cash flows, which are discounted using the quoted market rate from an independent source for similar obligations. Refer to the table below for the carrying amount and estimated fair value of such instruments.
The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our debt.
|
| Carrying Amount |
| Estimated Fair Value |
| ||
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partnership Properties |
|
|
|
|
| ||
At June 30, 2011 |
| $ | 134,662,238 |
| $ | 142,422,841 |
|
At December 31, 2010 |
| $ | 137,680,660 |
| $ | 142,896,706 |
|
Investment Properties |
|
|
|
|
| ||
At June 30, 2011 |
| $ | 140,624,120 |
| $ | 147,913,044 |
|
Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since December 31, 2010 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
NOTE 13. TAXABLE INCOME AND TAX BASIS
Taxable income reportable by the Partnership and includable in its partners’ tax returns is different than financial statement income because of tax free exchanges, accelerated depreciation, different tax lives, and timing differences related to prepaid rents, allowances and intangible assets at significant acquisitions. Taxable loss was approximately $450,000 greater than statement loss for the year ended December 31, 2010. The cumulative tax basis of the Partnership’s real estate at June 30, 2011 is approximately $10,000,000 less than the statement basis. The primary reason for the lower tax basis is the acquisition of Battle Green in the second quarter of 2011, Linewt and Cypress Street in 2008 utilizing tax free exchanges. The Partnership’s tax basis in its joint venture investments is approximately $1,500,000 greater than statement basis.
Taxable income in 2011 will be approximately $7,700,000 less that book income because the gain on the sale of Avon Street of approximately $7,700,000 is deferred utilizing a tax free exchange in the $10,000,000 acquisition of Battle Green. Taxable income in future
years may be greater than book income due to the reduced depreciation available on the above mentioned tax free exchanges and other reductions in depreciation from prior accelerated depreciation and other timing differences.
Certain entities included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements are subject to certain state taxes. These taxes are not significant and are recorded as operating expenses in the accompanying consolidates financial statements.
The Partnership adopted the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes. As a result of the implementation of the guidance, the Partnership recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment. The Partnership would recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which would be included in general and administrative expense.
In the normal course of business the Partnership or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable. As of June 30, 2011, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations is from the year 2003 forward.
NOTE 14. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
Since November 2001, the Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships and limited liability companies, the majority of which have invested in residential apartment complexes, with three partnerships investing in commercial property. The Partnership has a 40%-50% ownership interests in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 57%, with the balance owned by the others. A description of each investment is as follows:
On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts. The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000. The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019. The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter. In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”). The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice. On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $141,000 and $216,000, respectively. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street. A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership amortized the intangible assets associated with the “in place” leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009. The total monthly amortization was approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduced the Partnership’s income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the year ended December 31, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases was approximately $4,073,000, of which the Partnership’s share was approximately $1,629,000. The intangible asset was fully amortized effective November 2010. See Note 16 — Subsequent Events regarding the additional payment of $1,000,000 in August 2011 in connection with the loan from HBC Holdings. This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park.
On October 3, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,500,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 168-unit apartment complex in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $30,875,000. The Partnership plans to sell the majority of units as condominium and retain 48 units for long-term investment. Gains from the sales of units will be taxed at ordinary income rates (approximately $47,000 per unit). In February 2007, the Partnership refinanced the 48 units which will be retained with a new mortgage in the amount of $4,750,000 with an interest rate of 5.57%, interest only for five years. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay Apartments, LLC. The loan will be amortized over 30 years thereafter and matures in March 2017. In April 2008, the Partnership refinanced an additional 20 units and obtained a new mortgage in the amount of $2,368,000 with interest at 5.75%, interest only, which matures in 2013. As of July 25, 2011, 105 units have been sold, the proceeds of which went to pay down the mortgage on the property. The balance on the new mortgage is approximately $1,668,000 at June 30, 2011. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay, LLC.
On March 7, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a building comprising 49 apartments, one commercial space and a 50-car surface parking lot located in Boston, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $14,300,000, with a $10,750,000 mortgage. The Partnership plans to operate the building and initiate development of the parking lot. In June 2007, the
Partnership separated the parcels, formed an additional limited liability company for the residential apartments and obtained a mortgage on the property. The new limited liability company formed for the residential apartments and commercial space is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC. In August 2008, the Partnership restructured the mortgages on both parcels at Essex 81 and transferred the residential apartments to Hamilton Essex 81, LLC. The mortgage on Hamilton Essex 81, LLC is $8,600,000 with interest only at 5.79% due in August 2015. The mortgage on Essex Development, LLC, or the parking lot is $2,162,000 with a variable interest rate of 2.25% over the daily Libor rate (0.186% at June 30, 2011) and is due in August 2011. Harold Brown has issued a personal guaranty up to $1,000,000 of this mortgage. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lender as a result of this guaranty, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments. The investment in the parking lot is referred to as Hamilton Essex Development, LLC; the investment in the apartments is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.
On March 2, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,352,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 176-unit apartment complex with an additional small commercial building located in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $23,750,000. The Partnership sold 127 of the units as condominiums and retained 49 units for long-term investment. In November 2006, the Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,000,000 on the units to be retained by the Partnership. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the 10 year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan term. This investment is referred to as Hamilton 1025, LLC.
In September 2004, the Partnership invested approximately $5,075,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 42-unit apartment complex located in Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,100,000. In October 2004, the Partnership obtained a mortgage on the property in the amount of $8,025,000 and returned $3,775,000 to the Partnership. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,500,000 in January 2007. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the ten year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan. This loan required a cash contribution by the Partnership of $1,250,000 in December 2006. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Minuteman, LLC.
In August 2004, the Partnership invested $8,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 280-unit apartment complex located in Watertown, Massachusetts. This investment is referred to as Hamilton on Main, LLC.
In 2005, Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC obtained a ten year mortgage on the three buildings to be retained. The mortgage is $16,825,000, with interest only of 5.18% for three years and amortizing on a 30 year schedule for the remaining seven years when the balance is due. The net proceeds after funding escrow accounts and closing costs on the mortgage were approximately $16,700,000, which were used to reduce the existing mortgage. Hamilton on Main LLC paid a fee of approximately $400,000 in connection with this early extinguishment of debt. At June 30, 2011, the remaining balance on the mortgage is approximately $16,018,000.
In November 2001, the Partnership invested approximately $1,533,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 40-unit apartment building in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property has a 12-year mortgage, with a remaining balance at June 30, 2011 of approximately $7,099,000 at 6.9% which is amortized on a 30-year schedule, with a final payment of approximately $6,000,000 in 2014. This investment is referred to as 345 Franklin, LLC.
As required by the lender, the Treasurer of the General Partner has provided a limited repayment guaranty equal to fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding balance for the loan on the for sale units at Hamilton Bay and a limited guaranty of $1,000,000 for the loan on Hamilton Essex Development. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lenders as a result of these guaranties, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.
Summary financial information as of June 30, 2011
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Dexter |
| Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Rental Properties |
| $ | 9,643,573 |
| $ | 2,596,416 |
| $ | 8,437,172 |
| $ | 5,966,525 |
| $ | 1,968,516 |
| $ | 7,425,418 |
| $ | 7,464,615 |
| $ | 22,387,877 |
| $ | 115,685,885 |
| $ | 181,575,997 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
| 27,239 |
| 41,041 |
| 58,927 |
| 473 |
| 33,372 |
| 10,741 |
| 39,368 |
| 17,165 |
| 810,444 |
| 1,038,770 |
| ||||||||||
Rent Receivable |
| 19,130 |
| 3,050 |
| 8,086 |
| 11,165 |
| 539 |
| 5,972 |
| 5,591 |
| 12,813 |
| 249,184 |
| 315,528 |
| ||||||||||
Real Estate Tax Escrow |
| 88,832 |
|
|
| 18,847 |
| 56,360 |
| — |
| 83,396 |
| 43,720 |
| 99,613 |
| 604,893 |
| 995,661 |
| ||||||||||
Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets |
| 88,029 |
| 1,085 |
| 80,137 |
| 83,316 |
| 199,773 |
| 89,568 |
| 77,126 |
| 494,172 |
| 1,179,042 |
| 2,292,248 |
| ||||||||||
Financing & Leasing Fees |
| 84,509 |
| 1,048 |
| 20,413 |
| 27,185 |
| 9,102 |
| 35,786 |
| 21,903 |
| 24,873 |
| 488,737 |
| 713,555 |
| ||||||||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 9,951,313 |
| $ | 2,642,641 |
| $ | 8,623,582 |
| $ | 6,145,023 |
| $ | 2,211,300 |
| $ | 7,650,881 |
| $ | 7,652,322 |
| $ | 23,036,512 |
| $ | 119,018,186 |
| $ | 186,931,759 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable |
| $ | 8,513,163 |
| $ | 2,162,000 |
| $ | 7,099,329 |
| $ | 5,000,000 |
| $ | 1,668,000 |
| $ | 4,750,000 |
| $ | 5,500,000 |
| $ | 16,017,627 |
| $ | 89,914,000 |
|
| 140,624,120 |
|
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expense |
| 67,948 |
| 5,495 |
| 50,219 |
| 48,582 |
| 16,738 |
| 10,972 |
| 80,605 |
| 225,151 |
| 778,220 |
| 1,283,930 |
| ||||||||||
Advance Rental Pmts & Security Dep |
| 183,278 |
|
|
| 128,680 |
| 69,315 |
| 20,231 |
| 84,842 |
| 73,317 |
| 258,529 |
| 1,819,871 |
| 2,638,062 |
| ||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
| 8,764,390 |
| 2,167,495 |
| 7,278,229 |
| 5,117,897 |
| 1,704,969 |
| 4,845,814 |
| 5,653,922 |
| 16,501,306 |
| 92,512,091 |
| 144,546,112 |
| ||||||||||
Partners’ Capital |
| 1,186,923 |
| 475,146 |
| 1,345,353 |
| 1,027,126 |
| 506,331 |
| 2,805,067 |
| 1,998,400 |
| 6,535,206 |
| 26,506,095 |
| 42,385,648 |
| ||||||||||
Total Liabilities & Capital |
| $ | 9,951,313 |
| $ | 2,642,641 |
| $ | 8,623,582 |
| $ | 6,145,023 |
| $ | 2,211,300 |
| $ | 7,650,881 |
| $ | 7,652,322 |
| $ | 23,036,512 |
| $ | 119,018,186 |
| 186,931,759 |
| |
Partners’ Capital — NERA 50% |
| $ | 593,462 |
| $ | 237,573 |
| $ | 672,677 |
| $ | 513,563 |
| $ | 253,166 |
| $ | 1,402,534 |
| $ | 999,200 |
| $ | 3,267,603 |
|
|
| 7,939,776 |
| ||
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 10,602,438 |
| 10,602,438 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 18,542,214 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total units/ condominiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Apartments |
| 48 |
| — |
| 40 |
| 175 |
| 120 |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 1,030 |
| ||||||||||
Commercial |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3 |
| ||||||||||
Total |
| 49 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 176 |
| 120 |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 1,033 |
| ||||||||||
Units to be retained |
| 49 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 49 |
| — |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 786 |
| ||||||||||
Units to be sold |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 127 |
| 120 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 247 |
| ||||||||||
Units sold through July 25, 2011 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 127 |
| 105 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 0 |
| 232 |
| ||||||||||
Unsold units |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 15 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 15 |
| ||||||||||
Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of July 25 , 2011 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 0 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Summary financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton Bay |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton on |
| Dexter Park |
| Total |
| ||||||||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Rental Income |
| $ | 566,447 |
| $ | 141,050 |
| $ | 560,462 |
| $ | 401,308 |
| $ | 119,139 |
| $ | 426,205 |
| $ | 393,025 |
| $ | 1,230,819 |
| $ | 5,739,961 |
| $ | 9,578,416 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
| 7,202 |
| — |
| 1,228 |
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10,788 |
| 49,813 |
| 69,013 |
| ||||||||||
|
| 573,649 |
| 141,050 |
| 561,690 |
| 401,308 |
| 119,139 |
| 426,205 |
| 393,025 |
| 1,241,608 |
| 5,789,775 |
| 9,647,447 |
| ||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Administrative |
| 11,270 |
| 829 |
| 8,981 |
| 4,878 |
| 1,801 |
| 7,584 |
| 8,045 |
| 15,685 |
| 66,499 |
| 125,571 |
| ||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 211,570 |
| 3,127 |
| 221,293 |
| 129,404 |
| 44,832 |
| 157,214 |
| 162,659 |
| 481,690 |
| 2,847,426 |
| 4,259,214 |
| ||||||||||
Management Fees |
| 25,101 |
| 5,520 |
| 22,640 |
| 15,907 |
| 4,903 |
| 16,752 |
| 15,904 |
| 50,522 |
| 123,272 |
| 280,521 |
| ||||||||||
Operating |
| 65,071 |
|
|
| 36,031 |
| 868 |
| 95 |
| 219 |
| 20,571 |
| 210,067 |
| 494,144 |
| 827,066 |
| ||||||||||
Renting |
| 7,180 |
|
|
| 10,407 |
| 7,128 |
| 1,075 |
| 4,589 |
| 1,777 |
| 7,051 |
| 98,387 |
| 137,595 |
| ||||||||||
Repairs and Maintenance |
| 55,879 |
| 3,050 |
| 36,138 |
| 149,527 |
| 37,908 |
| 155,110 |
| 44,073 |
| 167,241 |
| 444,075 |
| 1,093,000 |
| ||||||||||
Taxes and Insurance |
| 94,238 |
| 23,818 |
| 47,268 |
| 73,559 |
| 22,779 |
| 78,513 |
| 43,552 |
| 160,236 |
| 606,241 |
| 1,150,205 |
| ||||||||||
|
| 470,308 |
| 36,344 |
| 382,758 |
| 381,271 |
| 113,394 |
| 419,981 |
| 296,581 |
| 1,092,492 |
| 4,680,044 |
| 7,873,173 |
| ||||||||||
Income Before Other Income |
| 103,341 |
| 104,706 |
| 178,932 |
| 20,036 |
| 5,744 |
| 6,224 |
| 96,444 |
| 149,116 |
| 1,109,730 |
| 1,774,274 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
| 45 |
| 269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,219 |
| 3,558 |
| ||||||||||
Interest Expense |
| (250,249 | ) | (30,688 | ) | (248,522 | ) | (143,397 | ) | (48,582 | ) | (134,521 | ) | (157,575 | ) | (422,124 | ) | (2,536,073 | ) | (3,971,730 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Interest income from Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,781 |
| ||||||||||
Other Income (Expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| (250,249 | ) | (30,688 | ) | (248,497 | ) | (143,352 | ) | (43,532 | ) | (134,520 | ) | (157,575 | ) | (422,124 | ) | (2,532,854 | ) | (3,963,391 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | (146,907 | ) | $ | 74,018 |
| $ | (69,565 | ) | $ | (123,316 | ) | $ | (37,788 | ) | $ | (128,296 | ) | $ | (61,030 | ) | $ | (273,008 | ) | $ | (1,423,124 | ) | (2,189,117 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Loss - NERA 50% |
| $ | (73,454 | ) | $ | 37,009 |
| $ | (34,783 | ) | $ | (61,658 | ) | $ | (18,894 | ) | $ | (64,148 | ) | $ | (30,565 | ) | $ | (136,504 | ) |
|
| (382,997 | ) | ||
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (569,250 | ) | (569,250 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (952,246 | ) |
Summary financial information for the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton Bay |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton on |
| Dexter Park |
| Total |
| ||||||||||
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Rental Income |
| $ | 277,595 |
| $ | 72,050 |
| $ | 278,692 |
| $ | 203,017 |
| $ | 61,849 |
| $ | 211,266 |
| $ | 200,020 |
| $ | 617,257 |
| $ | 2,847,881 |
| $ | 4,769,626 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
| 3,264 |
|
|
| 600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,698 |
| 24,223 |
| 32,785 |
| ||||||||||
|
| 280,859 |
| 72,050 |
| 279,292 |
| 203,017 |
| 61,849 |
| 211,266 |
| 200,020 |
| 621,955 |
| 2,872,104 |
| 4,802,410 |
| ||||||||||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Administrative | �� | 6,472 |
| 448 |
| 4,608 |
| 2,837 |
| 893 |
| 4,512 |
| 1,522 |
| 4,979 |
| 34,143 |
| 60,413 |
| ||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 105,872 |
| 1,563 |
| 110,706 |
| 65,193 |
| 22,416 |
| 79,079 |
| 82,205 |
| 241,739 |
| 1,424,349 |
| 2,133,121 |
| ||||||||||
Management Fees |
| 12,603 |
| 2,760 |
| 11,541 |
| 8,028 |
| 2,471 |
| 8,507 |
| 8,009 |
| 24,965 |
| 60,459 |
| 139,344 |
| ||||||||||
Operating |
| 26,655 |
|
|
| 12,955 |
| 250 |
| 51 |
| 169 |
| (1,904 | ) | 85,909 |
| 210,837 |
| 334,922 |
| ||||||||||
Renting |
| 2,080 |
|
|
| 4,407 |
| 3,669 |
| 1,075 |
| 3,663 |
| 524 |
| 3,833 |
| 43,661 |
| 62,913 |
| ||||||||||
Repairs and Maintenance |
| 29,217 |
| 3,050 |
| 22,350 |
| 72,274 |
| 23,078 |
| 91,589 |
| 23,074 |
| 95,414 |
| 279,864 |
| 639,909 |
| ||||||||||
Taxes and Insurance |
| 47,052 |
| 11,910 |
| 23,609 |
| 36,963 |
| 11,414 |
| 39,411 |
| 21,718 |
| 79,355 |
| 319,801 |
| 591,233 |
| ||||||||||
|
| 229,952 |
| 19,731 |
| 190,176 |
| 189,214 |
| 61,398 |
| 226,930 |
| 135,147 |
| 536,193 |
| 2,373,114 |
| 3,961,855 |
| ||||||||||
Income Before Other Income |
| 50,907 |
| 52,319 |
| 89,115 |
| 13,803 |
| 451 |
| (15,664 | ) | 64,873 |
| 85,762 |
| 498,990 |
| 840,556 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
| 23 |
| 128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 164 |
| ||||||||||
Interest Expense |
| (125,645 | ) | (15,242 | ) | (123,947 | ) | (72,124 | ) | (24,432 | ) | (67,642 | ) | (79,286 | ) | (211,960 | ) | (1,274,191 | ) | (1,994,467 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Interest income from Note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,310 |
| ||||||||||
Other Income (Expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| (125,645 | ) | (15,242 | ) | (123,934 | ) | (72,101 | ) | (21,994 | ) | (67,642 | ) | (79,285 | ) | (211,906 | ) | (1,274,191 | ) | (1,991,994 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
| $ | (74,738 | ) | $ | 37,077 |
| $ | (34,819 | ) | $ | (58,298 | ) | $ | (21,543 | ) | $ | (83,306 | ) | $ | (14,412 | ) | $ | (126,198 | ) | $ | (775,201 | ) | (1,151,438 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Net Loss - NERA 50% |
| $ | (37,369 | ) | $ | 18,538 |
| $ | (17,409 | ) | $ | (29,149 | ) | $ | (10,772 | ) | $ | (41,653 | ) | $ | (7,206 | ) | $ | (63,099 | ) |
|
| (188,119 | ) | ||
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | (310,080 | ) | (310,080 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 498,199 |
|
Summary financial information as of June 30, 2010
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Dexter Park |
| Total |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rental Properties |
| $ | 10,021,631 |
| 2,576,552 |
| 8,841,772 |
| 6,206,631 |
| 2,048,679 |
| 7,743,968 |
| 7,706,619 |
| 23,294,573 |
| 121,100,206 |
| 189,540,630 |
|
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
| 2,630 |
| 40,037 |
| 1,433 |
| 5,676 |
| 23,381 |
| 1,016 |
| 50,165 |
| 100,765 |
| 649,943 |
| 875,046 |
| |
Rent Receivable |
| 30,748 |
| — |
| 14,371 |
| 9,232 |
| 1,731 |
| 3,664 |
| 3,792 |
| 14,223 |
| 154,871 |
| 232,633 |
| |
Real Estate Tax Escrow |
| 67,262 |
| — |
| 18,929 |
| 50,556 |
| — |
| 78,948 |
| 33,480 |
| 97,753 |
| 381,920 |
| 728,847 |
| |
Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets |
| 85,714 |
| — |
| 91,827 |
| 96,763 |
| 233,502 |
| 86,797 |
| 68,650 |
| 387,322 |
| 2,637,834 |
| 3,688,408 |
| |
Financing & Leasing Fees |
| 107,701 |
| 7,302 |
| 28,579 |
| 32,211 |
| 14,167 |
| 42,147 |
| 25,871 |
| 31,734 |
| 548,053 |
| 837,766 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total Assets |
| $ | 10,315,687 |
| 2,623,891 |
| 8,996,909 |
| 6,401,069 |
| 2,321,459 |
| 7,956,541 |
| 7,888,577 |
| 23,926,371 |
| 125,472,827 |
| 195,903,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mortgage Notes Payable |
| $ | 8,600,000 |
| 2,162,000 |
| 7,251,704 |
| 5,000,000 |
| 1,668,000 |
| 4,750,000 |
| 5,500,000 |
| 16,275,058 |
| 89,914,000 |
| 141,120,762 |
|
Accounts Payable& Accrued Exp |
| 54,748 |
| 5,853 |
| 73,038 |
| 44,985 |
| 15,775 |
| 9,437 |
| 73,758 |
| 204,957 |
| 762,024 |
| 1,244,574 |
| |
Advance Rental Payments & Security Deposits |
| 164,643 |
| — |
| 149,341 |
| 61,992 |
| 20,143 |
| 79,758 |
| 65,760 |
| 241,928 |
| 1,504,128 |
| 2,287,693 |
| |
Total Liabilities |
| 8,819,391 |
| 2,167,853 |
| 7,474,083 |
| 5,106,977 |
| 1,703,918 |
| 4,839,196 |
| 5,639,517 |
| 16,721,944 |
| 92,180,152 |
| 144,653,029 |
| |
Partners’ Capital |
| 1,496,296 |
| 456,039 |
| 1,522,826 |
| 1,294,093 |
| 617,541 |
| 3,117,345 |
| 2,249,060 |
| 7,204,427 |
| 33,292,675 |
| 51,250,301 |
| |
Total Liabilities and Capital |
| $ | 10,315,687 |
| 2,623,891 |
| 8,996,909 |
| 6,401,069 |
| 2,321,459 |
| 7,956,541 |
| 7,888,577 |
| 23,926,371 |
| 125,472,827 |
| 195,903,331 |
|
Partners’ Capital NERA 50% |
| $ | 748,148 |
| 228,020 |
| 761,413 |
| 647,047 |
| 308,771 |
| 1,558,673 |
| 1,124,530 |
| 3,602,214 |
|
|
| 8,978,815 |
|
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13,317,070 |
| 13,317,070 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22,295,886 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total units/condominiums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apartments |
| 48 |
| — |
| 40 |
| 175 |
| 120 |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 1,030 |
| |
Commercial |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3 |
| |
Total |
| 49 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 176 |
| 120 |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 1,033 |
| |
Units to be retained |
| 49 |
| 1 |
| 40 |
| 49 |
| — |
| 48 |
| 42 |
| 148 |
| 409 |
| 786 |
| |
Units to be sold |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 127 |
| 120 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 247 |
| |
Units sold through July 26, 2010 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 127 |
| 105 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 232 |
| |
Unsold units |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 15 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
|
| 15 |
| |
Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of July 26, 2010 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Summary financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton Bay |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton on |
| Dexter Park |
| Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
| 567,486 |
| 138,000 |
| 551,869 |
| 398,369 |
| 106,940 |
| 418,116 |
| 381,019 |
| 1,223,349 |
| 5,622,380 |
| 9,407,527 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
| 7,827 |
| — |
| 702 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 265 |
| 10,656 |
| 48,784 |
| 68,233 |
|
|
| 575,312 |
| 138,000 |
| 552,570 |
| 398,369 |
| 106,940 |
| 418,116 |
| 381,284 |
| 1,234,005 |
| 5,671,164 |
| 9,475,760 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
| 7,723 |
| (166 | ) | 18,772 |
| 3,685 |
| 2,580 |
| 8,076 |
| 5,362 |
| 21,790 |
| 76,085 |
| 143,906 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 213,002 |
| 3,127 |
| 219,651 |
| 134,840 |
| 48,064 |
| 179,067 |
| 160,258 |
| 490,917 |
| 5,091,729 |
| 6,540,654 |
|
Management Fees |
| 24,175 |
| 5,520 |
| 23,422 |
| 15,735 |
| 4,682 |
| 16,560 |
| 15,944 |
| 49,048 |
| 120,505 |
| 275,589 |
|
Operating |
| 71,442 |
| (137 | ) | 30,631 |
| 947 |
| (138 | ) | 313 |
| 36,097 |
| 181,155 |
| 490,850 |
| 811,160 |
|
Renting |
| 10,413 |
| — |
| 35,100 |
| 2,968 |
| 200 |
| 2,043 |
| 1,892 |
| 8,967 |
| 123,286 |
| 184,869 | �� |
Repairs and Maintenance |
| 68,035 |
| — |
| 29,173 |
| 126,667 |
| 50,129 |
| 219,270 |
| 39,419 |
| 172,544 |
| 379,873 |
| 1,085,110 |
|
Taxes and Insurance |
| 94,361 |
| 24,244 |
| 50,567 |
| 63,423 |
| 21,524 |
| 75,265 |
| 50,500 |
| 159,532 |
| 766,817 |
| 1,306,233 |
|
|
| 489,152 |
| 32,587 |
| 407,316 |
| 348,264 |
| 127,041 |
| 500,593 |
| 309,472 |
| 1,083,953 |
| 7,049,145 |
| 10,347,522 |
|
Income Before Other Income |
| 86,161 |
| 105,413 |
| 145,255 |
| 50,106 |
| (20,101 | ) | (82,477 | ) | 71,812 |
| 150,052 |
| (1,137,981 | ) | (871,762 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 23 |
| 45 |
| 6,310 |
| — |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6,396 |
|
Interest Expense |
| (251,848 | ) | (30,943 | ) | (253,576 | ) | (143,317 | ) | (48,538 | ) | (134,628 | ) | (157,375 | ) | (428,388 | ) | (2,522,654 | ) | (3,971,267 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 9,478 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 9,478 |
|
Other Income (Expenses) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 7,721 |
| — |
| — |
| 2,168 |
| — |
| 9,889 |
|
|
| (251,846 | ) | (30,942 | ) | (253,554 | ) | (143,272 | ) | (34,507 | ) | (125,150 | ) | (157,373 | ) | (426,216 | ) | (2,522,649 | ) | (3,945,507 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
| (165,686 | ) | 74,471 |
| (108,299 | ) | (93,166 | ) | (54,608 | ) | (207,627 | ) | (85,561 | ) | (276,164 | ) | (3,900,630 | ) | (4,817,270 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss - NERA 50% |
| (82,843 | ) | 37,236 |
| (54,149 | ) | (46,583 | ) | (27,304 | ) | (103,813 | ) | (42,781 | ) | (138,082 | ) |
|
| (458,320 | ) |
NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,560,252 | ) | (1,560,252 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (2,018,572 | ) |
Summary financial information for the three months ended June 30, 2010
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| 345 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Dexter |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental Income |
| 286,638 |
| 69,000 |
| 282,484 |
| 201,108 |
| 56,173 |
| 210,849 |
| 193,792 |
| 605,336 |
| 2,759,204 |
| 4,664,584 |
|
Laundry and Sundry Income |
| 3,777 |
| — |
| 238 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 5,296 |
| 25,139 |
| 34,451 |
|
|
| 290,415 |
| 69,000 |
| 282,722 |
| 201,108 |
| 56,173 |
| 210,849 |
| 193,792 |
| 610,632 |
| 2,784,344 |
| 4,699,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative |
| 5,286 |
| 1,007 |
| 9,447 |
| 2,224 |
| 1,646 |
| 3,539 |
| 2,607 |
| 10,254 |
| 30,577 |
| 66,586 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 106,823 |
| 1,563 |
| 109,826 |
| 67,564 |
| 24,032 |
| 89,473 |
| 80,213 |
| 246,095 |
| 2,551,371 |
| 3,276,959 |
|
Management Fees |
| 12,497 |
| 2,760 |
| 12,303 |
| 7,773 |
| 2,448 |
| 8,272 |
| 7,863 |
| 24,614 |
| 58,987 |
| 137,517 |
|
Operating |
| 30,769 |
| — |
| 13,527 |
| 843 |
| 35 |
| 30 |
| 14,326 |
| 72,654 |
| 192,751 |
| 324,934 |
|
Renting |
| 10,413 |
| — |
| 29,100 |
| 2,833 |
| 200 |
| 1,439 |
| 794 |
| 5,564 |
| 74,578 |
| 124,920 |
|
Repairs and Maintenance |
| 27,177 |
| — |
| 16,224 |
| 62,855 |
| 13,188 |
| 110,703 |
| 14,885 |
| 92,776 |
| 219,866 |
| 557,675 |
|
Taxes and Insurance |
| 46,034 |
| 12,370 |
| 23,085 |
| 31,464 |
| 10,999 |
| 37,502 |
| 25,507 |
| 82,146 |
| 384,783 |
| 653,890 |
|
|
| 238,999 |
| 17,701 |
| 213,512 |
| 175,555 |
| 52,548 |
| 250,958 |
| 146,195 |
| 534,102 |
| 3,512,912 |
| 5,142,482 |
|
Income Before Other Income |
| 51,416 |
| 51,299 |
| 69,210 |
| 25,553 |
| 3,625 |
| (40,109 | ) | 47,597 |
| 76,530 |
| (728,568 | ) | (443,447 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 12 |
| 22 |
| 3,080 |
| — |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
| 3,119 |
|
Interest Expense |
| (126,604 | ) | (15,809 | ) | (126,482 | ) | (72,051 | ) | (24,404 | ) | (67,693 | ) | (79,127 | ) | (214,934 | ) | (1,270,537 | ) | (1,997,642 | ) |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
Other Income (Expenses) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
|
| (126,603 | ) | (15,808 | ) | (126,470 | ) | (72,029 | ) | (21,324 | ) | (67,693 | ) | (79,127 | ) | (214,932 | ) | (1,270,537 | ) | (1,994,523 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
| (75,187 | ) | 35,491 |
| (57,260 | ) | (46,476 | ) | (17,699 | ) | (107,802 | ) | (31,529 | ) | (138,402 | ) | (1,999,106 | ) | (2,437,970 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P&L- NERA 50% |
| (37,594 | ) | 17,746 |
| (28,630 | ) | (23,238 | ) | (8,849 | ) | (53,901 | ) | (15,765 | ) | (69,201 | ) |
|
| (219,432 | ) |
P&L- NERA 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (799,642 | ) | (799,642 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1,019,075 | ) |
Future annual mortgage maturities at June 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Franklin |
| 1025 |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton |
| Hamilton on |
| Dexter Park |
|
|
|
Period End |
| March |
| March |
| November |
| March |
| October |
| October |
| August |
| August 2004 |
| October |
| Total |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| 116,690 |
| 2,162,000 |
| 163,228 |
| 35,232 |
|
|
| 20,668 |
| 33,648 |
| 268,792 |
| 789,756 |
| 3,590,014 |
|
June 30, 2013 |
| 122,083 |
|
|
| 174,853 |
| 63,301 |
| 1,668,000 |
| 64,350 |
| 69,329 |
| 285,743 |
| 1,240,873 |
| 3,688,532 |
|
June 30, 2014 |
| 129,342 |
|
|
| 6,761,248 |
| 67,037 |
|
|
| 68,027 |
| 73,421 |
| 301,117 |
| 1,311,782 |
| 8,711,975 |
|
June 30, 2015 |
| 137,033 |
|
|
|
|
| 70,994 |
|
|
| 71,915 |
| 77,755 |
| 15,161,974 |
| 1,386,742 |
| 16,906,414 |
|
June 30, 2016 |
| 8,008,015 |
|
|
|
|
| 74,427 |
|
|
| 76,024 |
| 81,510 |
|
|
| 1,465,987 |
| 9,705,962 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,689,009 |
|
|
| 4,449,016 |
| 5,164,336 |
|
|
| 83,718,860 |
| 98,021,222 |
|
|
| 8,513,163 |
| 2,162,000 |
| 7,099,329 |
| 5,000,000 |
| 1,668,000 |
| 4,750,000 |
| 5,500,000 |
| 16,017,627 |
| 89,914,000 |
| 140,624,120 |
|
NOTE 15. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The following tables summarize income from discontinued operations for the Avon Street Apartments property sold in May 2011:
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Total Revenues |
| $ | 349,558 |
| $ | 455,292 |
|
Operating and other expenses |
| 235,450 |
| 304,641 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 16,472 |
| 27,761 |
| ||
|
| 251,922 |
| 332,402 |
| ||
Income from discontinued operations |
| $ | 97,636 |
| $ | 122,890 |
|
Gain on the sale of Avon Street: |
|
|
|
|
| |
Sale price |
| $ | 8,750,000 |
|
|
|
Net book value |
| (594,035 | ) |
|
| |
Expense of sale |
| (448,208 | ) |
|
| |
Gain on the sale of real estate |
| $ | 7,707,757 |
|
|
|
NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 27, 2011, the Partnership financed the Battle Green Apartments with a new $5,000,000 mortgage at 4.95% which matures in August 2026. Principal payments will be made using a 30 year amortization schedule. Deferred financing costs associated with this mortgage totaled approximately $90,000 and accordingly the effective interest rate is 5.07%. After payment of the existing loan of $3,998,573 described in Note 2, approximately $1,000,000 was received by the Partnership.
On August 1, 2011 the Partnership elected to pay an additional $1,000,000 on the $7,168,000 note described in Note 3 to reduce the outstanding loan balance to $3,668,600.
NOTE 17. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
None applicable.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward Looking Statements
Certain information contained herein includes forward looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward looking statements in this report, or which management may make orally or in written form from time to time, reflect management’s good faith belief when those statements are made, and are based on information currently available to management. Caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements,
the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnership’s control and which can materially affect the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements for 2011 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. If available acquisitions do not meet the Partnership’s criteria, the Partnership may purchase additional depositary receipts. The Partnership will consider the sale or refinancing of existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.
The general real estate market in the Greater Boston area has stabilized. Positive employment will continue to support commercial property cash flows as employers seek additional space. The multifamily sector has experienced improved occupancy and modest revenue increases are now being seen across all sectors. The properties have experienced higher occupancy earlier than management expected and management continues to believe that limited new multi-family housing and greater demand will result in low single digit vacancy rates and higher rents upon turnover during the next 18 to 36 months. Management is confident that the Partnership will benefit from this supply constraint and has already seen the elimination of free rent and commissions during this busy leasing season impacting net operating income now and the next few quarters. Management is confident that its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, finance current planned improvements to its properties, and continue distribution payments in the foreseeable future. Management believes that the continued improvement in the local unemployment rate, general stabilization of housing prices and stability in Massachusetts’s major industries will support a stronger multifamily market for the foreseeable future. The impact of the federal debt reduction on Massachusetts major industries is unpredictable. The impact of the federal debt reduction on Massachusetts’ major industries is unpredictable.
For 2011, the Partnership’s revenues are trending toward higher revenue growth as compared to 2010. Free rent concessions are less than 2010 and leasing commissions in the urban portfolio have also shown declines. Combined, these reductions will offset the unseasonably high snow plow and removal costs impacting this period’s results. If not for these unanticipated costs, operating expenses were well in line with 2010. As in previous quarters, occupancy continues to remain above the competition. Management is satisfied with staff efforts to balance tenant retention, curb appeal and the profitability of the properties while mitigating growth in the other expense categories. Management believes that bottom line growth, excluding depreciation, will surpass 2010 operating performance in its core holdings as well as the joint ventures.
Management anticipates that the purchasing power of the Management Company will continue to buffer large increases in operating expenses. In 2008, the Partnership financed approximately $65,000,000 of mortgage debt for 15 years at rates less than 6%. The Partnership has mitigated financing concerns and locked in interest rates to the benefit of the shareholders. The next significant round of refinancing, approximately $50,000,000, will not occur until 2013 and 2014. Management continues to monitor the existing debt markets and review them in contrast to the 2013/2014 mortgage maturities within the portfolio. The new 15 year mortgage on Battle Green has an effective interest rate of 5.07%.
As Management reviews property performance, it takes into consideration opportunities for property acquisitions and dispositions. The Partnership recently sold the Avon Street Apartments and purchased Battle Green. For additional information, see Note 2 and Note 16 to the financial statements.
The Stock Repurchase Program that was initiated in 2007 has purchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts through June 2011 or 29% of the outstanding class A Depositary Receipts. There have been no repurchases under the Stock Repurchase Program in 2011. The Partnership has retained The Hamilton Company (“Hamilton”) to manage and administer the Partnership’s and Joint Ventures’ Properties. Hamilton is a full-service real estate management company, which has legal, construction, maintenance, architectural, accounting and administrative departments. The Partnership’s properties represent approximately 40% of the total properties and 70% of the residential properties managed by Hamilton. Substantially all of the other properties managed by Hamilton are owned, wholly or partially, directly or indirectly, by Harold Brown. The Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Contract of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) expressly provides that the general partner may employ a management company to manage the properties, and that such management company may be paid a fee of up to 4% of rental receipts for administrative and management services (the “Management Fee”). The Partnership pays Hamilton the full annual Management Fee, in monthly installments.
At June 30, 2011, Harold Brown, his brother Ronald Brown and the President of Hamilton, Carl Valeri, collectively own approximately 39.50% of the Depositary Receipts representing the Partnership Class A Units (including Depositary Receipts held by trusts for the benefit of such persons’ family members). Harold Brown also owns 75% of the Partnership’s Class B Units, 75% of the capital stock of NewReal, Inc. (“NewReal”), the Partnership’s sole general partner, and all of the outstanding stock of Hamilton. Ronald Brown also owns 25% of the Partnership’s Class B Units and 25% of NewReal’s capital stock. In addition, Ronald Brown is the President and director of NewReal and Harold Brown is NewReal’s Treasurer and a director. One of NewReal’s directors, Roberta Ornstein also owns immaterial amounts of the Partnership’s Class A receipts.
On March 31, 2011 the Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation (the “Foundation”) purchased 8,000 Depositary Receipts of the Partnership at a price of $66.75 for a total cost of $534,000. The Foundation was formed under Sec. 501© (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. There are five trustees of the Foundation, all of whom are family members or associates of Harold Brown. Neither Harold Brown nor the Foundation’s Trustees have any economic interest in the Foundation.
In addition to the Management Fee, the Partnership Agreement further provides for the employment of outside professionals to provide services to the Partnership and allows NewReal to charge the Partnership for the cost of employing professionals to assist with the administration of the Partnership’s properties. Additionally, from time to time, the Partnership pays Hamilton for repairs and maintenance services, legal services, construction services and accounting services. The costs charged by Hamilton for these services are at the same hourly rate charged to all entities managed by Hamilton, and management believes such rates are competitive in the marketplace.
Hamilton accounted for approximately 5% of the repair and maintenance expense paid for by the Partnership in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to approximately 7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Of the funds paid to Hamilton for this purpose, the great majority was to cover the cost of services provided by the Hamilton maintenance department, including plumbing, electrical, carpentry services, and snow removal for those properties close to Hamilton’s headquarters. However, several of the larger Partnership properties have their own maintenance staff. Further, those properties that do not have their own maintenance staff and are located more than a reasonable distance from Hamilton’s headquarters in Allston, Massachusetts are generally serviced by local, independent companies.
Hamilton’s legal department handles most of the Partnership’s eviction and collection matters. Additionally, it prepares most long-term commercial lease agreements and represents the Partnership in selected purchase and sale transactions. Overall, Hamilton provided approximately 68% and 75% of the legal services paid for by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Additionally, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, The Hamilton Company receives similar fees from the Investment Properties.
The Partnership requires that three bids be obtained for construction contracts in excess of $5,000. Hamilton may be one of the three bidders on a particular project and may be awarded the contract if its bid and its ability to successfully complete the project are deemed appropriate. For contracts that are not awarded to Hamilton, Hamilton charges the Partnership a construction supervision fee equal to 5% of the contract amount. Hamilton’s architectural department also provides services to the Partnership on an as-needed basis. During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Hamilton provided the Partnership approximately $35,000 and $11,000, respectively, in construction and architectural services.
Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by Hamilton’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people. In 2011, Hamilton charges the Partnership $31,250 per quarter for bookkeeping and accounting services ($125,000 per year).
For more information on related party transactions, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires the Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Partnership regularly and continually evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties and its investments in and advances to joint ventures. The Partnership bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, because future events and their effects cannot be
determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Partnership’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about such matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Principles of Consolidation.
Revenue Recognition: Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.
Rental Properties: Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.
Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Partnership’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses. Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.
In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.
Impairment: On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnership’s rental properties may be impaired. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property. The Partnership’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.
Rental Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations: When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Investments in Partnerships: The Partnership accounts for its 40%-50% ownership in the Investment Properties under the equity method of accounting, as it exercises significant influence over, but does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and subsequently adjusted for the Partnership’s share in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. Under the equity method of accounting, our net equity is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of net income or loss from the Partnership is included on the consolidated statements of income.
With respect to investments in and advances to the Investment Properties, the Partnership looks to the underlying properties to assess performance and the recoverability of carrying amounts for those investments in a manner similar to direct investments in real estate properties. An impairment charge is recorded if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.
Legal Proceedings: The Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise, from time to time, in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it is determined that a loss is likely to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. Both the amount of the loss and the point at which its occurrence is considered likely can be difficult to determine.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010
The Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships earned income before interest expense, loss from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and other income and loss of approximately $2,837,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to approximately $2,721,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $116,000.
The rental activity is summarized as follows:
|
| Occupancy Date |
| ||
|
| July 25, 2011 |
| July 26, 2010 |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
| 2,270 |
| 2,288 |
|
Vacancies |
| 53 |
| 109 |
|
Vacancy rate |
| 2.3 | % | 4.9 | % |
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
Total square feet |
| 110,949 |
| 110,949 |
|
Vacancy |
| 0 |
| 0 |
|
Vacancy rate |
| 0 | % | 0 | % |
|
| Rental Income (in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
| Total |
| Continuing |
| Total |
| Continuing |
| ||||
Total rents |
| $ | 8,353 |
| $ | 8,234 |
| $ | 8,116 |
| $ | 7,896 |
|
Residential percentage |
| 90 | % | 90 | % | 90 | % | 90 | % | ||||
Commercial percentage |
| 10 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % | ||||
Contingent rentals |
| $ | 180 |
| $ | 180 |
| $ | 147 |
| $ | 147 |
|
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to three months ended June 30, 2010:
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| |||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Change |
| Change |
| |||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rental income |
| $ | 8,234,245 |
| $ | 7,896,010 |
| $ | 338,235 |
| 4.2 | % |
Laundry and sundry income |
| 111,398 |
| 110,552 |
| 846 |
| — |
| |||
|
| 8,345,643 |
| 8,006,562 |
| 339,081 |
| 4.2 | % | |||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Administrative |
| 399,845 |
| 415,370 |
| (15,525 | ) | (3.7 | )% | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 1,451,795 |
| 1,403,905 |
| 47,890 |
| 3.4 | % | |||
Management fees |
| 350,886 |
| 332,762 |
| 18,124 |
| 5.4 | % | |||
Operating |
| 871,037 |
| 797,912 |
| 73,125 |
| 9.2 | % | |||
Renting |
| 109,450 |
| 103,025 |
| 6,425 |
| 6.2 | % | |||
Repairs and maintenance |
| 1,317,610 |
| 1,218,471 |
| 99,139 |
| 8.1 | % | |||
Taxes and insurance |
| 1,008,219 |
| 1,014,754 |
| (6,535 | ) | (0.6 | )% | |||
|
| 5,508,842 |
| 5,286,199 |
| 222,643 |
| 4.2 | % | |||
Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations |
| 2,836,801 |
| 2,720,363 |
| 116,438 |
| 4.3 | % | |||
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest income |
| 1,007 |
| 1,754 |
| (747 | ) | (42.6 | )% | |||
Interest expense |
| (1,983,117 | ) | (2,015,348 | ) | 32,231 |
| (1.6 | )% | |||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (498,198 | ) | (1,019,074 | ) | 520,876 |
| (51.1 | )% | |||
|
| (2,480,308 | ) | (3,032,668 | ) | 552,360 |
| (18.2 | )% | |||
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 356,493 |
| (312,305 | ) | 668,798 |
| 214.1 | % | |||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gain on the sale of real estate from discontinued operations |
| 7,707,757 |
| — |
| 7,707,757 |
| N/A |
| |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 29,035 |
| 57,763 |
| (28,728 | ) | (49.7 | )% | |||
|
| 7,736,792 |
| 57,763 |
| 7,679,029 |
| 13294.0 | % | |||
Net Income (loss) |
| $ | 8,093,285 |
| $ | (254,452 | ) | $ | 8,347,737 |
| 3280.6 | % |
Rental income from continuing operations for the three months June 30, 2011 was approximately $8,234,000, compared to approximately $7,896,000 for the three months ended June 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $338,000 (4.2%). The increase in rental income is due to the decrease in the free rent incentives granted to tenants in 2010. The amortization of free rent was approximately $122,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010; and approximately $91,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011. In addition the Partnership has seen bad debt expense of approximately $70,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to approximately $94,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $24,000. Both of these factors have resulted in an increase in rental income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Operating expenses from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $5,509,000 compared with approximately $5,286,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $223,000 (4.2%). The most significant factors contributing to this increase is an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $99,000 (8.1%) due to significant repairs and refurbishments at properties to maintain occupancy levels; an increase in operating expenses of approximately $73,000 (9.2%) due to the increase in utilities and snow removal costs in 2011 compared to 2010; an increase in the management fees of approximately $18,000 (5.4%) due to the increase in rental income, and an increase in depreciation and amortization expense due to the acquisition of the Battle Green Apartments in June 2011 and other improvements.
These increases are offset by a decrease in administrative expenses of approximately $15,000 (3.7%) due to professional fees incurred in 2010 in connection with the stock buyback program as well as a decrease in taxes and insurance of approximately $6,500(0.6%) due to filings fees incurred in 2010 and a decrease in insurance premiums.
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $1,983,000 compared to approximately $2,015,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $32,000 (1.6%). This decrease is due to a lower average level of debt outstanding in 2011 compared to 2010 specifically the reduction in the notes payable.
At June 30, 2011, the Partnership has between a 40% and 50% ownership interests in nine different Investment Properties. See as Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.
As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership’s share of the net loss from the Investment Properties was approximately $498,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to approximately $1,019,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $521,000 (51.1%). Included in this loss is depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $924,000. The Partnership’s portion of the loss associated with the October 2009 investment in Dexter Park is approximately $310,000 of which approximately $570,000 is depreciation and amortization.
Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $1,000 compared to approximately $1,800 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $800. This slight decrease is due to an increase in cash available for investment
On May 18, 2011, the Partnership sold Avon Street Apartments, a 66 unit residential apartment complex located at 130 Avon Street, Malden, Massachusetts. The sales price was $8,750,000, which resulted in a gain of approximately $7,700,000. The proceeds of the sale of approximately $5,444,000 were held by a qualified intermediary in order for the Partnership to structure a tax free exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the IRS code. This tax free exchange was completed with the purchase of Battle Green Apartments.
On June 1, 2011, the Partnership purchased the Battle Green Apartments, a 48 unit residential apartment complex located at 34-42 Worthen Road, Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,000,000. The Partnership used cash reserves, the proceeds from the sale of Avon Street and borrowed $3,998,573 from Harold Brown, Treasurer of the General Partner to make this purchase. This loan has an interest rate of 6% interest only and is secured by the Partnership’s ownership interest in Battle Green Apartments, LLC. The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand within six months of notice or prepay without penalty. See Note 16 — Subsequent events for information regarding the financing of Battle Green Apartments which occurred in July 2011.
As a result of the changes discussed above, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $8,093,000 compared to a loss of approximately $255,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase in income of approximately $8,348,000.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to six months ended June 30, 2010
The Partnership and its subsidiary Partnerships earned income before other income and discontinued operations of $5,340,540 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $5,308,462 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $32,078 (0.6%). The following is a summary of the Partnership’s operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| Dollar |
| Percent |
| |||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Change |
| Change |
| |||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rental income |
| $ | 16,413,095 |
| $ | 15,864,854 |
| 548,241 |
| 3.4 | % | |
Laundry and sundry income |
| 213,441 |
| 227,900 |
| (14,459 | ) | (6.3 | )% | |||
|
| 16,626,536 |
| 16,092,754 |
| 533,782 |
| 3.3 | % | |||
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Administrative |
| 825,588 |
| 893,311 |
| (67,723 | ) | (7.6 | )% | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 2,808,616 |
| 2,769,558 |
| 39,058 |
| 1.4 | % | |||
Management fees |
| 684,236 |
| 662,074 |
| 22,162 |
| 3.3 | % | |||
Operating |
| 2,329,723 |
| 2,028,656 |
| 301,067 |
| 14.8 | % | |||
Renting |
| 197,337 |
| 168,475 |
| 28,862 |
| 17.1 | % | |||
Repairs and maintenance |
| 2,379,751 |
| 2,196,029 |
| 183,722 |
| 8.4 | % | |||
Taxes and insurance |
| 2,060,745 |
| 2,066,189 |
| (5,444 | ) | (0.3 | )% | |||
|
| 11,285,996 |
| 10,784,292 |
| 501,704 |
| 4.7 | % | |||
Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations |
| 5,340,540 |
| 5,308,462 |
| 32,078 |
| 0.6 | % | |||
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest income |
| 2,234 |
| 2,513 |
| 279 |
| (11.1 | )% | |||
Interest expense |
| (3,929,825 | ) | (40,12,697 | ) | 82,872 |
| (2.1 | )% | |||
(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
| (952,246 | ) | (2,018,571 | ) | 1,066,325 |
| (52.8 | )% | |||
|
| (4,879,837 | ) | (6,028,755 | ) | 1,148,918 |
| (19.1 | )% | |||
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 460,703 |
| (720,293 | ) | 1,180,996 |
| (163.9 | )% | |||
Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income from discontinued operations |
| 97,636 |
| 122,890 |
| (25,254 | ) | (20.5 | )% | |||
Gain on sale of real estate from discontinued operations |
| 7,707,757 |
| — |
| 7,707,757 |
| N/A |
| |||
|
| 7,805,393 |
| 122,890 |
| 7,682,503 |
| 6251.5 | % | |||
Net (loss) income |
| $ | 8,266,096 |
| $ | (597,403 | ) | $ | 8,863,499 |
| (1483.7 | )% |
Rental income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $16,413,000 compared to approximately $15,865,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $548,000 (3.4%). This increase in rental income is due to the amortization of approximately $176,000 2011 compared to $306,000 in 2010 in connection with the free rent granted to tenants, as well rental income of approximately $76,000 from the new acquisition of Battle Green Apartments in June 2011. In addition, the following properties experienced rental income increases: 62 Boylston Street, Hamilton Oaks, River Drive, 140 North Beacon Street, 1144 Commonwealth Avenue and 659 Worcester Road with increases of approximately $41,000, $40,000, $10,000, $9,000, $9,000 and $8,000 respectively. These increases are offset by a decrease of approximately $107,000 due to the sale of Avon Street in May 2011, as well as decreases in rental income at the Olde English of approximately $20,000, a decrease at Westgate Woburn of approximately $16,000, and a decrease at School Street of approximately $7,000.
Expenses from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $11,286,000 compared to approximately $10,784,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of approximately $502,000 (4.7%). The most significant factor contributing to this increase was an increase in operating expenses of approximately $301,000 (14.8%); an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $184,000 (8.4%); an increase in depreciation and amortization of approximately $39,000 (1.4%); an increase in renting expenses of approximately $29,000 (17.1%) and an increase in the management fee of approximately $22,000 (3.3%). The reasons for these changes are discussed in the section for the results for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
These increases in expenses are offset by a decrease in administrative expenses of approximately $68,000 (7.6%). Interest expense decreased approximately $83,000 (2.1%) due to a lower average level of debt in 2011 compared to 2010.
At June 30, 2011, the Partnership has between a 40 - 50% ownership interest in nine Investment Properties. See a description of these properties included in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.
As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership’s share of loss from these Investment Properties was approximately $952,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a loss of approximately $2,019,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $1,067,000. Included in the loss during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is depreciation and amortization of approximately $1,845,000.
As discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership acquired Dexter Park in October 2009. A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership amortized the intangible asset associated with the “in place” leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009. The total monthly amortization was approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduced the Partnership’s income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases is approximately $2,442,000, of which the Partnership’s share was approximately $976,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, there was no amortization expense on the intangible asset which resulted in higher net income. Interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $2,200 compared to approximately $2,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of approximately $300 (11%).
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership financed the Brookside Apartments. The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%. The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000. There were no prepayment penalties.
As a result of the changes discussed above, net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $8,266,096 including a gain of approximately $7,700,000 from the sale of Avon Street described above compared to net loss of $597,403 for six months ended June 30, 2010, a change of $8,863,499 (1483.7%)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Partnership’s principal source of cash during 2011 and 2010 was the collection of rents and refinancing and sales of Partnership properties. In 2011, the Partnership also borrowed $3,998,573 from Harold Brown in connection with the acquisition of the Battle Green Apartments as further described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The majority of cash and cash equivalents of $3,992,198 at June 30, 2011 and $3,245,361 at December 31, 2010 were held in interest bearing accounts at creditworthy financial institutions.
This increase of $746,837 at June 30, 2011 is summarized as follows:
|
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Cash provided by operating activities |
| $ | 4,084,500 |
| $ | 4,199,041 |
|
Cash (used in) investing activities |
| (2,404,378 | ) | (137,727 | ) | ||
Cash provided by financing activities |
| 907,499 |
| 477,150 |
| ||
Repurchase of Depositary Receipts, Class B and General Partner Units |
| — |
| (540,911 | ) | ||
Distributions paid |
| (1,840,784 | ) | (1,846,817 | ) | ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 746,837 |
| $ | 2,150,736 |
|
The cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the collection of rents less cash operating expenses. The increase in cash used in investing activities is due to acquisition and improvements to rental properties less proceeds from sales. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is due to refinancing of properties and other borrowing in 2010 resulting in an increase in cash. In 2010, the Partnership repurchased Depositary Receipts in the amount of approximately $541,000; no purchases were made in 2011.
On May 18, 2011, the Partnership sold Avon Street Apartments, a 66 unit residential apartment complex located at 130 Avon Street, Malden, Massachusetts. The sales price was $8,750,000, which resulted in a gain of approximately $7,700,000. The proceeds of the sale, of approximately $5,444,000 were held by a qualified intermediary in order for the Partnership to structure a tax free exchange in accordance with Section 1031 of the IRS code. This tax free exchange was completed with the purchase of Battle Green Apartments.
On June 1, 2011, the Partnership purchased the Battle Green Apartments, a 48 unit residential apartment complex located at 34-42 Worthen Road, Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,000,000. The Partnership used cash reserves, the proceeds from the sale of Avon Street and borrowed $3,998,573 from Harold Brown, Treasurer of the General Partner to make this purchase. This loan has an interest rate of 6% interest only and is secured by the Partnership’s ownership interest in Battle Green Apartments, LLC. The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand within six months of notice or prepay without penalty. See Note 16 — Subsequent events for information regarding the refinancing of Battle Green Apartments which occurred in July 2011.
During 2011, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships completed improvements to certain of the Properties at a total cost of approximately $1,454,000. These improvements were funded from cash reserves and, to some extent, escrow accounts established in connection with the financing or refinancing of the applicable Properties. These sources have been adequate to fully fund improvements. The most significant improvements were made at Westgate Woburn, Olde English Village, Redwood Hills, Clovelly, 62 Boylston Street, Nashoba and Hamilton Oaks at a cost of approximately $324,000, $197,000, $162,000, $133,000, $126,000, $100,000, and $74,000, respectively. The Partnership plans to invest approximately $475,000 in capital improvements during the remainder of 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 6,896 Class A Depositary Receipts for $432,920, 164 Class B Units for $102,591 and 9 General Partnership Units for $5,400. The purchase was funded from cash received from the refinancing of Partnership properties in 2010 and 2009. The Partnership did not repurchase any Depositary Receipts or Units during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the NERA Brookside Associates, LLC. The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%. The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000. There were no prepayment penalties. The Partnership and Joint Ventures do not separately reserve funds for the potential costs of refinancing their maturing mortgages.
On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts. The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000. The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019. The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter. In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”). The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice. On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $141,000 and approximately $216,000, respectively. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street. This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park. Dexter Park distributed $450,000 and $530,000 the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Monthly principal payments of approximately $100,000 on the Dexter Park mortgage begin in November 2011 which will result in a substantial reduction of distributions to the Partnership from Dexter Park. The Partnership’s share of the principal payments is approximately $440,000 per year.
In 2011, the Partnership approved distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011.
The Partnership anticipates that cash from operations and interest bearing accounts will be sufficient to fund its current operations, pay distributions, make required debt payments and finance current improvements to its properties. The Partnership may also sell or refinance properties. The Partnership’s net income and cash flow may fluctuate dramatically from year to year as a result of the sale or refinancing of properties, increases or decreases in rental income or expenses, or the loss of significant tenants.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements-Joint Venture Indebtedness
As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership had between a 40%-50% ownership interest in nine Joint Ventures, all of which have mortgage indebtedness. We do not have control of these joint ventures and therefore we account for them using the equity method of consolidation. At June 30, 2011, our proportionate share of the non-recourse debt related to these investments was equal to approximately $61,320,000. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations
See Note 5 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of mortgage notes payable. The Partnerships have no other material contractual obligations to be disclosed.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
Certain information contained herein includes forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). While forward looking statements reflect management’s good faith beliefs when those statements are made, caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward-looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnership’s control and which can materially affect the
Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements for 2011 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
Along with risks detailed from time to time in the Partnership’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, some factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:
The Partnership depends on the real estate markets where its properties are located, primarily in Eastern Massachusetts and these markets may be adversely affected by local economic market conditions, which are beyond the Partnership’s control.
The Partnership is subject to the general economic risks affecting the real estate industry, such as dependence on tenant’s financial condition and the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on terms favorable to tenants in order to generate rental revenues and our ability to collect rents from our tenants.
The Partnership is also impacted by changing economic conditions making alternative housing arrangements more or less attractive to the Partnership’s tenants, such as the interest rates on single family home mortgages and the availability and purchase price of single-family homes in the Greater Boston metropolitan area.
The Partnership is subject to significant expenditures associated with each investment, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property.
The Partnership is subject to increases in heating and utility costs that may arise as a result of economic and market conditions and fluctuations in seasonal weather conditions including snow removal expenses.
Civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters may result in uninsured or underinsured losses.
Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.
Financing or refinancing of Partnership properties may not be available to the extent necessary or desirable, or may not be available on favorable terms.
The Partnership properties face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect the Partnership’s ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents that can be charged.
Given the nature of the real estate business, the Partnership is subject to potential environmental liabilities. These include environmental contamination in the soil at the Partnership’s or neighboring real estate, whether caused by the Partnership, previous owners of the subject property or neighbors of the subject property, and the presence of hazardous materials in the Partnership’s buildings, such as asbestos, mold and radon gas. Management is not aware of any material environmental liabilities at this time.
Insurance coverage for and relating to commercial properties is increasingly costly and difficult to obtain. In addition, insurance carriers have excluded certain specific items from standard insurance policies, which have resulted in increased risk exposure for the Partnership. These include insurance coverage for acts of terrorism and war, and coverage for mold and other environmental conditions. Coverage for these items is either unavailable, or prohibitively expensive.
Market interest rates could adversely affect the market prices for Class A Partnership Units and Depositary Receipts as well as performance and cash flow.
Changes in income tax laws and regulations may affect the income taxable to owners of the Partnership. These changes may affect the after-tax value of future distributions.
The Partnership may fail to identify, acquire, construct, or develop additional properties; may develop or acquire properties that do not produce a desired or expected yield on invested capital; may be unable to sell poorly- performing or otherwise undesirable properties quickly; or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties.
Risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments.
Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.
Any weakness identified in the Partnership’s internal controls as part of the evaluation being undertaken by the Partnership and its independent public accountants pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have an adverse effect on the Partnership’s business.
Ongoing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may require additional personnel or system changes.
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Partnership prior to the date hereof or the effectiveness of said Act. The Partnership expressly disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The residential real estate market in the Greater Boston area has stabilized and the Partnership anticipates the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. This may result in increases in vacancy rates and/or a reduction in rents. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, and to finance current planned improvements to its properties and continue dividend payments in the foreseeable future.
Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership, its Subsidiary Partnerships and the Investment Properties collectively have approximately $283,953,000 in long-term debt, substantially all of which pays interest at fixed rates. Accordingly, the fair value of these debt instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. These mortgages and note payable mature through 2023. For information regarding the fair value and maturity dates of these debt obligations, see Item 2. Properties and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Mortgage Notes Payable,” Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.”
Market risk is defined as the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and stock prices. The primary market risk to the Partnership is exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in the general level of interest rates in the financial markets may affect the cost of funds and in turn may impact the Partnerships’ ability to make distributions to its investors.
Approximately $194 million of the Partnership’s long term debt at June 30, 2011 bears interest at fixed rates and therefore the fair value of these investments is affected by the changes in market interest rates. As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership has approximately $2,000,000 in variable rate debt. An increase or decrease in market interest rates of one percentage point would result in a change in interest expense of approximately $20,000 per year.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We have evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the disclosure of required information is timely made in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This evaluation was made under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of our General Partner as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. The CEO and CFO have concluded, based on their reviews, that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2010 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
The Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and their properties are not presently subject to any material litigation, and, to management’s knowledge, there is not any material litigation presently threatened against them. The Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships are occasionally subject to ordinary routine legal and administrative proceedings incident to the ownership of residential and commercial real estate. Some of the legal and other expenses related to these proceedings are covered by insurance and none of these costs and expenses are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership.
There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) None
(b) None.
(c) None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None
See the exhibit index below.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | |
| By: | /s/ NEWREAL, INC. |
|
|
|
|
| Its General Partner |
|
|
|
| By: | /s/ RONALD BROWN |
|
|
|
|
| Ronald Brown, President |
|
| |
| Dated: August 11, 2011 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
| Title |
| Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RONALD BROWN |
| President and Director of the General Partner (Principal |
| August 11, 2011 |
Ronald Brown |
| Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ HAROLD BROWN |
| Treasurer and Director of the General Partner (Principal |
| August 11, 2011 |
Harold Brown |
| Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ GUILLIAEM AERTSEN |
| Director of the General Partner |
| August 11, 2011 |
Guilliaem Aertsen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CONRAD DIGREGORIO |
| Director of the General Partner |
| August 11, 2011 |
Conrad DiGregorio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DAVID ALOISE |
| Director of the General Partner |
| August 11, 2011 |
David Aloise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERTA ORNSTEIN |
| Director of the General Partner |
| August 11, 2011 |
Roberta Ornstein |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
| Description of Exhibit |
10.1 |
| Purchase and Sale Agreement Dated May 20, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 26, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.2 |
| Promissory Note dated June 1, 2011 by and between Avon Street Apartments Limited Partnership, as Maker, and Harold Brown, as Lender (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
10.3 |
| Pledge Agreement dated June 1, 2011 by and between Avon Street Apartments Limited Partnership, as Pledgor, and Harold Brown, as Pledgee (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference). |
31.1 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) |
31.2 |
| Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) |
32.1 |
| Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) and Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership). |
101.1 |
| The following financial statements from New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited), tagged as blocks of text. |