CCUR 10Q 2012 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

	(Mark One)
	x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
	the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2011
	or
	o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
	the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from ____ to ____

Commission File No. 0-13150

CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		04-2735766
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4375 River Green Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, GA 30096

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Telephone: (678) 258-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨			Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)			Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of January 24, 2012 was 9,203,255.

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Form 10-Q

For the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2011

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
Part II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24

Item 6.	Exhibits	26
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CEO
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CFO

Table of Contents

Part I Financial Information

Item 1.

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in Thousands)

	December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,694		$	27,814
Short-term investments		-			5,497
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $82 at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011		11,605			8,033
Inventories, net		4,138			3,847
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,499			1,888
Total current assets		44,936			47,079

Property, plant and equipment, net		4,373			4,754
Intangible - purchased technology, net		1,290			1,653
Intangible - customer relationships, net		826			912
Other long-term assets, net		1,214			1,588
Total assets	$	52,639		$	55,986

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	9,624		$	7,534
Deferred revenue		6,893			9,266
Total current liabilities		16,517			16,800

Long-term liabilities:
Deferred revenue		3,768			3,655
Pension liability		2,000			2,164
Other		1,621			1,888
Total liabilities		23,906			24,507

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Stockholders' equity:
Shares of common stock, par value $.01; 14,000,000 authorized;8,678,539 and 8,481,643 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively		87			85
Capital in excess of par value		207,570			207,116
Accumulated deficit		(179,961	)		(176,528	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 37,788 at December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011		(255	)		(255	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,292			1,061
Total stockholders' equity		28,733			31,479

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	52,639		$	55,986

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Revenues:
Product	$	10,034		$	11,723		$	16,818		$	21,074
Service		6,376			6,129			12,480			12,324
Total revenues		16,410			17,852			29,298			33,398

Cost of sales:
Product		4,569			5,302			7,339			9,555
Service		2,843			3,066			5,680			5,854
Total cost of sales		7,412			8,368			13,019			15,409

Gross margin		8,998			9,484			16,279			17,989

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		4,296			4,256			8,598			8,306
Research and development		3,346			3,499			6,926			6,857
General and administrative		1,817			2,231			3,720			4,285
Total operating expenses		9,459			9,986			19,244			19,448

Operating loss		(461	)		(502	)		(2,965	)		(1,459	)

Interest income		34			19			95			43
Interest expense		(18	)		(20	)		(36	)		(38	)
Other expense, net		(196	)		(45	)		(226	)		(23	)

Loss before income taxes		(641	)		(548	)		(3,132	)		(1,477	)

Provision for income taxes		192			641			301			923

Net loss	$	(833	)	$	(1,189	)	$	(3,433	)	$	(2,400	)

Net loss per share
Basic	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.29	)
Diluted	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.29	)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic		8,621			8,409			8,554			8,388
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted		8,621			8,409			8,554			8,388

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	December 31,
	2011			2010

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(3,433	)	$	(2,400	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,791			1,666
Share-based compensation		456			512
Other non-cash expenses		284			(8	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(3,572	)		5,727
Inventories		(345	)		95
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(583	)		311
Other long-term assets		379			204
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,734			443
Deferred revenue		(2,260	)		(5,332	)
Other long-term liabilities		138			113
Total adjustments to net loss		(1,978	)		3,731
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(5,411	)		1,331

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to property and equipment		(907	)		(847	)
Proceeds from sale or maturity of short-term investments		7,634			-
Purchase of short-term investments		(2,226	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		4,501			(847	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		-			-

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(210	)		265

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,120	)		749
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,814			31,364
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	26,694		$	32,113

Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	14		$	12
Income taxes (net of refunds)	$	540		$	130

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Overview of Business and Basis of Presentation

We provide technology solutions, typically comprised of hardware and software, and professional services for the video and media data market and the high-performance, real-time market. Our business is comprised of two segments for financial reporting purposes, products and services, which we provide for each of these markets.

Our video solutions consist of software, hardware, and services for intelligently streaming video and collecting media data based on cross services data aggregation, logistics, and intelligence applications. Our video solutions and services are deployed by video service providers for distribution of video to consumers and collection of media data intelligence to fully manage their video business and operations.

Our real-time solutions consist of Linux® and other real-time operating systems and software development tools combined, in most cases, with hardware and services. These products are sold to a wide variety of companies seeking high-performance, real-time computer solutions in the military, aerospace, financial and automotive markets around the world.

Our condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited and reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.

There have been no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies as disclosed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2011, we have U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $116,340,000 for income tax purposes, of which $2,106,000 expire in fiscal year 2012, and the remainder expires at various dates through 2028. We completed an evaluation of the potential effect of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) on our ability to utilize these net operating losses. The study concluded that we have not had an ownership change for the period from July 22, 1993 to June 30, 2011. Therefore, we do not expect the U.S. Federal net operating losses to be subject to limitation under Section 382. We have established a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to our net operating loss carryforwards, as we have determined that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. We recorded $192,000 and $301,000 of income tax provision during the three and six months ended December 31, 2011, respectively, primarily due to taxable income earned by our Japan subsidiary, which does not have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Not yet adopted

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “Boards”) on fair value measurement. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We have evaluated the potential impact of these amendments and expect they will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

The FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)” (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. In addition, ASU 2011-05 requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 also requires an entity to present on the face of the financial statement reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. ASU 2011-05 should be applied retrospectively and is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We have evaluated the potential impact of ASU 2011-05 and expect it will not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenue from the sale of products and services. We commence revenue recognition when all of the following conditions are met:

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,

the system has been shipped or the services have been performed,

the fee is fixed or determinable, and

collectibility of the fee is probable.

Our standard multiple-element contractual arrangements with our customers generally include the delivery of systems with multiple components of hardware and software, certain professional services that typically involve installation and consulting, and ongoing software and hardware maintenance. Product revenue is generally recognized when the product is delivered. Professional services that are of a consultative nature may take place before, or after, delivery of the system, and installation services typically occur within 90 days after delivery of the system. Professional services revenue is typically recognized as the service is performed. Initial maintenance begins after delivery of the system and typically is provided for one to two years after delivery. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Our product sales are predominantly system sales whereby software and equipment function together to deliver the essential functionality of the combined product. Upon our adoption of ASU 2009-14 on July 1, 2010, sales of these systems were determined to typically be outside of the scope of the software revenue guidance in Topic 985 (previously included in SOP 97-2) and are accounted for under ASU 2009-13.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Our sales model for media data and advertising solutions (“MDAS”) products includes the option for customers to purchase: (1) a perpetual license with maintenance; (2) a term license with maintenance and managed services; or (3) software as a service. We expect that revenue from these sales generally will be recognized over the term of the various customer contracts. Professional services attributable to implementation of our media data and advertising products or managed services are essential to the customers’ use of these products and services. We defer commencement of revenue recognition for the entire arrangement until we have delivered the essential professional services or have made a determination that the remaining professional services are no longer essential to the customer. We recognize revenue for managed services and software as a service arrangements once we commence providing the managed or software services and recognize the service revenue ratably over the term of the various customer contracts. In circumstances whereby we sell a term license and managed services, we commence revenue recognition after both the software and service are made available to the customer and recognize the revenue from the entire arrangement ratably over the longer of the term license or managed service period.

We evaluate each element in a multiple-element arrangement to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when the delivered item has standalone value and delivery of the undelivered element is probable and within our control. Our various systems have standalone value because we have either routinely sold them on a standalone basis or we believe that our customers could resell the delivered system on a standalone basis. Professional services have standalone value because we have routinely sold them on a standalone basis and there are similar third party vendors that routinely provide similar professional services. Our maintenance has standalone value because we have routinely sold maintenance separately.

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we allocate revenue to each element in an arrangement based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available, third party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (“ESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We have typically been able to establish VSOE of fair value for our maintenance and services. We determine VSOE of fair value for professional services and maintenance by examining the population of selling prices for the same or similar services when sold separately, and determining that the pricing population for each VSOE classification is within a very narrow range of the median selling price. For each element, we evaluate at least annually whether or not we have maintained VSOE of fair value based on our review of the actual selling price of each element over the previous twelve month period.

Our product deliverables are typically complete systems comprised of numerous hardware and software components that operate together to provide essential functionality, and we are typically unable to establish VSOE or TPE of fair value for our products. Due to the custom nature of our products, we must determine ESP at the individual component level whereby our ESP for the total system is determined based on the sum of the individual components. ESP for components of our real-time products is typically based upon list price, which is representative of our actual selling price. ESP for components of our video products are based upon our most frequent selling price (“mode”) of standalone and bundled sales, based upon a 12 month historical analysis. If a mode selling price is not available, then ESP will be the median selling price of all such component sales based upon a twelve month historical analysis, unless facts and circumstances indicate that another selling price, other than the mode or median selling price, is more representative of our estimated selling price. Our methodology for determining ESP requires judgment, and any changes to pricing practices, the costs incurred to manufacture products, the nature of our relationships with our customers, and market trends could cause variability in our estimated selling prices or cause us to re-evaluate our methodology for determining ESP. We will update our analysis of mode and median selling price at least annually, unless facts and circumstances indicate that more frequent analysis is required.

Occasionally, we sell software under multiple element arrangements that do not include hardware. Under these software arrangements, we allocate revenue to the various elements based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value. Our VSOE of fair value is determined based on the price charged when the same element is sold separately. If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all elements in a multiple element arrangement, but does exist for undelivered elements, we recognize revenue using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement is recognized as revenue. Where fair value of undelivered elements has not been established, the total arrangement is recognized over the period during which the services are performed.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Fair Value Measurements

The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) requires certain disclosures around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

●

Level 1

Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

●

Level 2

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

●

Level 3

Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates.

During the three months ended December 31, 2011 we liquidated our $7.6 million balance of short-term investments and returned the proceeds to cash, as the yield on these investments in the current market did not justify the costs of maintaining the investment accounts and the costs of fair value audit and disclosure required for these investments. We have money market funds that are highly liquid and have a maturity of three months or less, thus are considered to be cash equivalents.

As of June 30, 2011 and during part of our six months ended December 31, 2011, our investment portfolio consisted of money market funds, commercial paper, agency bonds, and corporate bonds. Our investment portfolio had an average maturity of three months or less and no investments within the portfolio had an original maturity of one year or more. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. All cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. All investments with original maturities of more than three months are classified as short-term investments. Our marketable securities were classified as available-for-sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Interest on securities is recorded in interest income. Any realized gains or losses have been shown in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations in other income or expense. We provide fair value measurements disclosures of our available-for-sale securities in accordance with one of three levels of fair value measurement.

As of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, we did not have an outstanding balance on our bank line of credit. The average outstanding balance on our bank line of credit for the six months ended December 31, 2011 was zero.

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of December 31, 2011 Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Cash	$	16,678	$	16,678	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		10,016		10,016		-		-
Cash and cash equivalents	$	26,694	$	26,694	$	-	$	-

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2011 Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Cash	$	22,991	$	22,991	$	-	$	-
Money market funds		4,221		4,221		-		-
Commercial paper		300		-		300		-
Corporate bonds		302		-		302		-
Cash and cash equivalents		27,814		27,212		602		-
Commercial paper		2,099		-		2,099		-
Corporate bonds		3,398		-		3,398		-
Short-term investments		5,497		-		5,497		-
	$	33,311	$	27,212	$	6,099	$	-

The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

			Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value

Commercial paper	$	2,399	$	-	$	-		$	2,399
Corporate bonds		3,702		-		(2	)		3,700
Total marketable securities	$	6,101	$	-	$	(2	)	$	6,099

3. Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares including dilutive common share equivalents. Under the treasury stock method, incremental shares representing the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued are included in the computation. Diluted earnings per common share assumes exercise of outstanding stock options and vesting of restricted stock when the effects of such assumptions are dilutive. Common share equivalents of 806,000 and 987,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect was antidilutive. Common share equivalents of 815,000 and 1,001,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the calculation as their effect was antidilutive.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated (dollars and share data in thousands, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended December 31,						Six Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculation:
Net loss	$	(833	)	$	(1,189	)	$	(3,433	)	$	(2,400	)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		8,621			8,409			8,554			8,388
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock		-			-			-			-
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		8,621			8,409			8,554			8,388
Basic EPS	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.29	)
Diluted EPS	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.29	)

4. Share-Based Compensation

As of December 31, 2011, we had share-based employee compensation plans which are described in Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant. We recognize stock compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grantees, which generally equals the vesting period. As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 284,000 stock options outstanding and 562,500 restricted shares outstanding. No stock options were granted during the six months ended December 31, 2011.

During the three and six months ended December 31, 2011, we issued 27,500 and 66,500 shares of restricted stock, respectively, to employees and board members that vest over either a three or four year service period. Vesting is based solely on a service condition, and restrictions generally release ratably over the service period. A summary of the activity of our service condition restricted shares during the six months ended December 31, 2011, is presented below:

Restricted Stock Awards	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at July 1, 2011		330,644		$	5.05
Granted		66,500			5.29
Vested		(95,879	)		4.67
Forfeited		(16,028	)		5.69
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		285,237		$	5.20

During the three and six months ended December 31, 2011, we released restrictions on 13,563 and 101,017 performance based restricted shares, respectively, for certain shares granted to executive management and the board of directors that were eligible for release due to the company meeting performance criteria related to our fiscal 2011 financial results. We cancelled 30,772 and 73,771 performance based restricted shares during the three and six months ended December 31, 2011 for restricted shares granted to executive management that expired during the period because neither the performance criteria for our fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011 financial results, nor the market condition (achievement of certain share price) were met. A summary of the activity of our performance based restricted shares during the six months ended December 31, 2011, is presented below:

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Performance Stock Awards	Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at July 1, 2011		452,055		$	2.09
Granted		-			-
Vested		(101,017	)		1.96
Forfeited		(73,771	)		1.70
Non-vested at December 31, 2011		277,267		$	2.25

We recorded share-based compensation related to issuance of stock options and restricted stock to employees, board members, and non-employees, as follows (amounts in thousands of dollars):

	Three Months Ended December 31,				Six Months Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Share-based compensation expense included in the Statement of Operations:
Cost of sales	$	16	$	14	$	34	$	20
Sales and marketing		38		75		75		117
Research and development		30		49		74		83
General and administrative		102		175		273		292
Total		186		313		456		512
Tax benefit		-		-		-		-
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes	$	186	$	313	$	456	$	512

5. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by using the first-in, first-out method. We establish excess and obsolete inventory reserves based upon historical and anticipated usage. The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2011
Raw materials, net	$	3,543	$	2,238
Work-in-process		334		277
Finished goods		261		1,332
Total inventories	$	4,138	$	3,847

As of December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, some portion of our inventory was either obsolete or in excess of the current requirements based upon the planned level of sales for future years. Accordingly, we have reduced our gross raw materials inventory by $1,216,000 at December 31, 2011 and $1,176,000 at June 30, 2011 to the estimated net realizable value.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6. Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,			June 30,
	2011			2011
Purchased technology	$	7,700		$	7,700
Customer relationships		1,900			1,900
Patents		78			47
Total cost of intangibles		9,678			9,647

Purchased technology		(6,410	)		(6,047	)
Customer relationships		(1,074	)		(988	)
Patents		(3	)		(1	)
Total accumulated amortization		(7,487	)		(7,036	)
Total intangible assets, net	$	2,191		$	2,611

Amortization expense was $451,000 and $450,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

The components of accounts payable and accrued expenses are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,		June 30,
	2011		2011
Accounts payable, trade	$	4,958	$	1,866
Accrued payroll, vacation, severance
and other employee expenses		2,936		4,102
Other accrued expenses		1,730		1,566
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	9,624	$	7,534

8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Our total comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net loss	$	(833	)	$	(1,189	)	$	(3,433	)	$	(2,400	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment		117			90			228			146
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable
securities, net of tax		6			-			2			-

Total comprehensive loss	$	(710	)	$	(1,099	)	$	(3,203	)	$	(2,254	)

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Concentration of Credit Risk, Segment, and Geographic Information

We operate in two segments, products and services, as disclosed within our condensed consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not identify assets on a segment basis. We attribute revenues to individual countries and geographic areas based upon location of our selling operating subsidiaries. A summary of our revenues by geographic area is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	December 31,				December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
United States	$	10,934	$	11,604	$	19,222	$	23,334

Japan		3,637		5,225		6,826		7,441
Other Asia Pacific countries		22		83		53		488
Total Asia Pacific		3,659		5,308		6,879		7,929

Europe		1,817		940		3,197		2,135

Total revenue	$	16,410	$	17,852	$	29,298	$	33,398

In addition, the following summarizes revenues by significant customer where such revenue accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Customer A		17	%		24	%		17	%		17	%
Customer B		12	%	<10		%		10	%	<10		%
Customer C		12	%		13	%	<10		%		13	%
Customer D	<10		%	<10		%		12	%	<10		%

We assess credit risk through ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition, and collateral is generally not required. Three customers accounted for $1,792,000 or 15%, $1,628,000 or 14%, and $1,208,000 or 10% of trade receivables, respectively, at December 31, 2011. Three customers accounted for $1,024,000 or 13%, $1,011,000 or 12%, and $973,000 or 12% of trade receivables, respectively, at June 30, 2011. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of trade receivables as of December 31, 2011 or June 30, 2011.

The following summarizes purchases from significant vendors where such purchases accounted for 10% or more of total purchases for any one of the indicated periods:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Vendor A		31	%		<10	%		26	%		<10	%
Vendor B		<10	%	25		%		<10	%	22		%
Vendor C		<10	%		21	%	<10				20	%

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

10. Revolving Credit Facility

We have a $10,000,000 credit line (the “Revolver”) with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) that matures on December 31, 2013. Advances against the Revolver bear interest on the outstanding principal at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 4.0% or either: (1) the prime rate, or (2) the LIBOR rate plus a LIBOR rate margin of 2.75%. We have borrowing availability of up to $10,000,000 under this Revolver as long as we maintain cash at or through the Bank of $15,000,000 or more. At all times that we maintain cash at or through the Bank of less than $15,000,000, the amount available for advance under the Revolver is calculated from a formula that is primarily based upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, which may result in less than, but no more than, $10,000,000 of availability.

The interest rate on the Revolver was 4.0% as of December 31, 2011. The outstanding principal amount plus all accrued but unpaid interest is payable in full at the expiration of the credit facility on December 31, 2013. Based on our cash balance at the Bank as of December 31, 2011, $10,000,000 was available to us under the Revolver. As of December 31, 2011, $0 was drawn under the Revolver, and we did not draw against the Revolver at any time during the six months ended December 31, 2011.

Under the Revolver, we are obligated to maintain a consolidated tangible net worth (total assets minus total liabilities and intangible assets) of at least $11,984,000 as of the last day of each quarter, increasing by 100% of quarterly net income and 100% of issuances of equity, net of issuance costs, and a consolidated adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.00 (cash, short-term investments and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue). Additionally, we are subject to certain negative covenants whereby we must first receive the banks written consent prior to any dispositions, changes in business, management, or business locations, mergers or acquisitions, indebtedness, encumbrances, maintenance of collateral accounts, investments or subordinated debt. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with these covenants as our consolidated adjusted quick ratio was 3.98 to 1.00 and our tangible net worth was $26,542,000. The Revolver is secured by substantially all of the assets of the company.

11. Retirement Plans

The following table provides a detail of the components of net periodic benefit cost of our German subsidiary’s defined benefit pension plan for the three and six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	December 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Service cost	$	3		$	4		$	7		$	7
Interest cost		56			56			114			109
Expected return on plan assets		(23	)		(25	)		(48	)		(49	)
Amortization of net (gain) loss		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)		(1	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	35		$	34		$	72		$	66

We contributed $0 and $10,000 to our German subsidiary’s defined benefit plan during the three and six months ended December 31, 2011, respectively, and expect to make $30,000 of additional contributions during the remaining six months of fiscal 2012. We contributed $10,000 and $21,000 to our German subsidiary’s defined benefit plan during the three and six months ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

We maintain a U.S. employee retirement savings plan that qualifies as a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Code. For fiscal 2010, the Board of Directors approved a one-time profit sharing 401(k) contribution of $245,000 to be distributed pro-rata based on salary to 401(k) plan participants. The $245,000 contribution was accrued in fiscal year 2010 and paid during the six months ended December 31, 2010. We made no other contributions to the plan during the three and six months ended December 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

We also maintain a defined contribution plan (the “Stakeholder Plan”) for our U.K. based employees. For our U.K. based employees who contribute 4% or more of their salary to the Stakeholder Plan, we match 100% of employee contributions, up to 7% of their salary. During the three months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we contributed $31,000 and $35,000 to the Stakeholder Plan, respectively. During the six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we contributed $62,000 and $71,000 to the Stakeholder Plan, respectively.

Table of Contents

Concurrent Computer Corporation

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe that such pending litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the customer against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to our products. For example, we were notified that certain of our customers have settled with or been sued by the following companies, in the noted jurisdictions, regarding the listed patents:

Asserting Party	Jurisdiction	Patents at Issue
Pragmatus VOD LLC	U.S. District Court of Delaware	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,581,479 and 5,636,139

Olympic Developments AG, LLC	U.S. District Court Central District of California	U.S. Patents Nos. 5,475,585 and 6,246,400

We continue to review our potential obligations under our indemnification agreements with these customers and the indemnity obligations to these customers from other vendors that also provided systems and services to these customers. From time to time, we also indemnify customers and business partners for damages, losses and liabilities they may suffer or incur relating to personal injury, personal property damage, product liability, and environmental claims relating to the use of our products and services or resulting from our acts or omissions, our employees, authorized agents or subcontractors. We have one probable claim for indemnification of one of our customers. The amount and method of probable settlement with this customer has yet to be determined, but we expect that the amount will not be material. To date, we have not encountered any other material costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements. The maximum potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make is unlimited, and we are unable to estimate any possible loss or range of possible loss.

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with our executive officers, employment may be terminated by either the respective executive officer or us at any time. In the event the executive officer voluntarily resigns (except as described below) or is terminated for cause, compensation under the employment agreement will end. In the event an agreement is terminated by us without cause or in certain circumstances constructively by us, the terminated employee will receive severance compensation for a period from 6 to 12 months, depending on the officer, in an annualized amount equal to the respective employee's base salary then in effect. In the event our CEO’s agreement is terminated by us within one year of a change of control other than for due cause, disability or non-renewal by our CEO, our CEO will be entitled to severance compensation multiplied by two. Additionally, if terminated, our CEO and CFO may be entitled to bonuses during the severance period. At December 31, 2011, the maximum contingent liability under these agreements is $2,394,000. Our employment agreements with certain of our officers contain certain offset provisions, as defined in their respective agreements.

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto which appear elsewhere herein. Except for the historical financial information, many of the matters discussed in this Item 2 may be considered “forward-looking” statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” elsewhere herein and in other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. References herein to “Concurrent”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us” refer to Concurrent Computer Corporation and its subsidiaries.

Overview

The October 2011 floods in Thailand have impaired the supply chain from component suppliers to PC and server makers. We believe this will likely create a shortage of hardware components and increase prices for available hardware throughout calendar year 2012. Price increases may be passed on to us. Our ability to produce and deliver products to our customers, as well as our revenues and profitability, could be materially adversely affected by this natural disaster.

Application of Critical Accounting Estimates

The SEC defines “critical accounting estimates” as those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. For a complete description of our critical accounting policies, please refer to the “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 filed with the SEC on August 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The three months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended December 31, 2010

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2011			2010			$ Change			% Change

Product revenue	$	10,034		$	11,723		$	(1,689	)		(14.4	%)
Service revenue		6,376			6,129			247			4.0	%
Total revenue		16,410			17,852			(1,442	)		(8.1	%)

Product cost of sales		4,569			5,302			(733	)		(13.8	%)
Service cost of sales		2,843			3,066			(223	)		(7.3	%)
Total cost of sales		7,412			8,368			(956	)		(11.4	%)


Product gross margin		5,465			6,421			(956	)		(14.9	%)
Service gross margin		3,533			3,063			470			15.3	%
Total gross margin		8,998			9,484			(486	)		(5.1	%)

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		4,296			4,256			40			0.9	%
Research and development		3,346			3,499			(153	)		(4.4	%)
General and administrative		1,817			2,231			(414	)		(18.6	%)
Total operating expenses		9,459			9,986			(527	)		(5.3	%)

Operating loss		(461	)		(502	)		41			(8.2	%)

Interest income (expense) - net		16			(1	)		17		NM		(1)
Other expense - net		(196	)		(45	)		(151	)	NM		(1)

Loss before income taxes		(641	)		(548	)		(93	)		17.0	%

Provision for income taxes		192			641			(449	)		(70.0	%)

Net loss	$	(833	)	$	(1,189	)	$	356			(29.9	%)

(1) NM denotes percentage is not meaningful

Product Revenue. Total product revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was approximately $10.0 million, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 14.4%, from $11.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in product revenue resulted from the $1.7 million, or 21.7%, decrease in video product sales for the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease in video product sales was primarily attributable to revenue recognized in Japan during the prior year attributable to the completion and delivery of a custom product solution to our largest Japanese cable customer during the three months ended December 31, 2010, that did not recur in the current year period. We also experienced a $1.1 million decrease in video product sales in the United States during the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to lower video system purchasing volumes from our North American customers. However, our European video product sales increased by $0.9 million due to new system deployments to two new European video customers during the three months ended December 31, 2011. Fluctuation in video revenue is often due to the fact that we have a small number of customers making periodic large purchases that account for a significant percentage of revenue.

Service Revenue. Total service revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was $6.4 million, an increase of approximately $0.3 million, or 4.0%, from $6.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in service revenue was due to a $0.3 million, or 7.9%, increase in service revenue related to our video solutions product line, primarily due to increasing maintenance renewals from our growing base of deployed video systems.

Table of Contents

Product Gross Margin. Product gross margin was $5.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of approximately $0.9 million, or 14.9%, from $6.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2010. Product margin decreased in terms of dollars primarily due to lower product revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year. Product gross margin as a percentage of product revenue decreased to 54.5% for the three months ended December 31, 2011 from 54.8% for the three months ended December 31, 2010.

Service Gross Margin. Gross margin on service revenue increased to 55.4% of service revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2011 from 50.0% of service revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in service margin as a percentage of service revenue was primarily due to an increase in video system service revenue, coupled with a $0.2 million, or 7.3% decrease in service costs during the three months ended December 31, 2011. Decreasing service costs resulted from the decrease in support staff costs, as we have focused on managing costs of the infrastructure that is necessary to fulfill service and support for some of our real-time legacy products.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 4.4%, to $3.3 million in the three months ended December 31, 2011, from $3.5 million in the three months ended December 31, 2010. Research and development expenses were lower than the prior year period primarily due to mandatory vacations during the holidays within our second quarter of fiscal 2012 resulting in a $0.1 million reduction of expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $0.4 million, or 18.6%, to approximately $1.8 million in the three months ended December 31, 2011 from $2.2 million in the three months ended December 31, 2010. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.3 million due to the impact that lower revenue in the current year period had on the amount earned on bonus and performance-based restricted stock compensation arrangements. Furthermore, mandatory vacations during the holidays within our second quarter of fiscal 2012 resulted in a $0.1 million reduction of general administrative expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year.

Other expense, net. During the three months ended December 31, 2011, we incurred approximately $0.2 million of realized currency translation losses. These losses resulted from the decreasing value of the euro and the Japanese yen, relative to the U.S. dollar, during the period and the resulting impact on foreign currency transactions by our subsidiaries for which the euro and Japanese yen are the functional currency.

Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded a $0.2 million income tax provision during the three months ended December 31, 2011, compared to $0.6 million in the three months ended December 31, 2010. Our tax provision recorded during both periods was primarily attributable to the income tax provision recorded by our subsidiary in Japan as a result of its pretax income recorded during the period. We have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in the United States and in many of the foreign locations in which we operate, but do not have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in Japan. We have established a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to our net operating loss carryforwards, as we have determined that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Net Loss. The net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2011 was $0.8 million or $0.10 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2010 of $1.2 million, or $0.14 per basic and diluted share.

Table of Contents

The six months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2010

	Six Months Ended
	December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2011			2010			$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in Thousands)
Product revenue	$	16,818		$	21,074		$	(4,256	)		(20.2	%)
Service revenue		12,480			12,324			156			1.3	%
Total revenue		29,298			33,398			(4,100	)		(12.3	%)
Product cost of sales		7,339			9,555			(2,216	)		(23.2	%)
Service cost of sales		5,680			5,854			(174	)		(3.0	%)
Total cost of sales		13,019			15,409			(2,390	)		(15.5	%)


Product gross margin		9,479			11,519			(2,040	)		(17.7	%)
Service gross margin		6,800			6,470			330			5.1	%
Total gross margin		16,279			17,989			(1,710	)		(9.5	%)

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		8,598			8,306			292			3.5	%
Research and development		6,926			6,857			69			1.0	%
General and administrative		3,720			4,285			(565	)		(13.2	%)
Total operating expenses		19,244			19,448			(204	)		(1.0	%)

Operating loss		(2,965	)		(1,459	)		(1,506	)		103.2	%

Interest income - net		59			5			54		NM		(1)
Other expense - net		(226	)		(23	)		(203	)	NM		(1)

Loss before income taxes		(3,132	)		(1,477	)		(1,655	)		112.1	%

Provision for income taxes		301			923			(622	)		(67.4	%)

Net loss	$	(3,433	)	$	(2,400	)		(1,033	)		43.0	%

(1) NM denotes percentage is not meaningful

Product Revenue. Total product revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2011 was approximately $16.8 million, a decrease of $4.3 million, or 20.2%, from $21.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2010. Our video solutions product revenue decreased $3.8 million, or 29.9%, for the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease resulted from a $3.6 million decrease in video product sales in the United States during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to the prior year completion of a custom product deliverable to one of our largest domestic customers that did not recur in the current year. Additionally, we have experienced a decrease in spending from our two largest domestic video customers during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year. We believe the decrease was due to irregular spending patterns coupled with the economic slowdown in the United States. This decrease in video product sales was also attributable to a $1.0 million decrease in video product revenue in Japan primarily because in the prior year our subsidiary in Japan recognized revenue from the completion and delivery of a custom product solution to our largest Japanese cable customer during the six months ended December 31, 2010, that did not recur in the current year period. However, our European video product sales increased by $0.9 million due to new system deployments to two new European video customers during the six months ended December 31, 2011. Fluctuation in video revenue is often due to the fact that we have a small number of customers making periodic large purchases that account for a significant percentage of revenue.

Product revenue also decreased because of a $0.5 million, or 5.6%, decrease in real-time product sales for the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year. Real-time product sales decreased by $0.8 million in the United States during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower volume of imagen and legacy system sales during the current year period. Real-time product sales outside of the United States increased by $0.3 million, partially offsetting the decrease in sales volume within the United States.

Table of Contents

Service Revenue. Total service revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2011 was $12.5 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 1.3%, from $12.3 million for the six months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in service revenue was due to a $0.2 million, or 2.6%, increase in service revenue related to our video solutions product line, primarily due to increasing maintenance renewals from our growing base of deployed video systems.

Product Gross Margin. Product gross margin was $9.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 17.7%, from $11.5 million for the six months ended December 31, 2010. Product margin decreased in terms of dollars primarily due to lower product revenue during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year. Product gross margin as a percentage of product revenue increased to 56.4% for the six months ended December 31, 2011 from 54.7% for the six months ended December 31, 2010. Product gross margin, as a percentage of product revenue, increased primarily because, in the prior year period, we recognized revenue on a non-recurring, large custom video product deliverable that we completed for one of our largest domestic video customers that generated product margins lower than we have recently earned from our sale of video products.

Service Gross Margin. Gross margin on service revenue increased to 54.5% of service revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2011 from 52.5% of service revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2010. The increase in service margin as a percentage of service revenue was primarily due to an increase in video system service revenue, coupled with a $0.2 million, or 3.0% decrease in service costs during the six months ended December 31, 2011. Decreasing service costs resulted from decrease support staff costs, as we have focused on managing costs of the infrastructure that is necessary to fulfill service and support for some of our real-time legacy products.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased approximately $0.3 million, or 3.5% to $8.6 million in the six months ended December 31, 2011 from $8.3 million in the six months ended December 31, 2010. Sales and marketing expenses increased primarily because we incurred $0.2 million of additional severance costs as compared to the same period in the prior year, due to changes in our sales and marketing staff during the current period.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased $0.1 million, or 1.0%, to approximately $6.9 million in the six months ended December 31, 2011, from approximately $6.8 million in the six months ended December 31, 2010. Research and development expenses were lower in the prior year period primarily due to $0.8 million of prior year development staff costs related to customized solutions developed for and sold to certain customers being recorded to prior year product cost of sales, as compared to similar costs in the same period in the current year being recorded to research and development expenses. The increase in current year research and development expense was partially offset by $0.7 million reduction in current year expenses resulting from reduction in development staff, mandatory vacations during the holidays within our second quarter of fiscal 2012, lower incentive compensation expense due to lower revenue in the current year, and the non-recurrence of a purchase of developed technology in the prior year that had not reached technological feasibility and, at the time of purchase, was recorded to prior year research and development expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased approximately $0.6 million, or 13.2%, to approximately $3.7 million in the six months ended December 31, 2011 from $4.3 million in the six months ended December 31, 2010. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.3 million due the impact that lower revenue in the current year period had on the amount earned on bonus and performance-based restricted stock compensation arrangements. Furthermore, a reduction in headcount resulted in a $0.1 million reduction in period over period expenses and mandatory vacations during the holidays within our second quarter of fiscal 2012 resulted in an additional $0.1 million reduction of general administrative expenses during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to the same period of the prior year.

Other expense, net. During the six months ended December 31, 2011, we incurred approximately $0.2 million of realized currency translation losses. These losses resulted from the decreasing value of the euro and the Japanese yen, relative to the U.S. dollar, during the period and the resulting impact on foreign currency transactions by our subsidiaries for which the euro and Japanese yen are the functional currency.

Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes. We recorded a $0.3 million income tax provision during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to $0.9 million in the six months ended December 31, 2010. Our tax provision recorded during both periods was primarily attributable to the income tax provision recorded by our subsidiary in Japan as a result of its pretax income recorded during the period. We have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in the United States and in many of the foreign locations in which we operate, but do not have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset taxable income in Japan. We have established a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to our net operating loss carryforwards, as we have determined that it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Net Loss. The net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2011 was $3.4 million or $0.40 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2010 of $2.4 million, or $0.29 per basic and diluted share.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity is dependent upon many factors, including sales volume, product and service costs, operating results and the efficiency of asset use and turnover. Our future liquidity will be affected by, among other things:

the impact of the global economic conditions on our business and our customers;

the impact of the Thailand floods on our suppliers, cost of hardware components, and our ability to produce and deliver products to our customers;

the rate of growth or decline or change in market, if any, of video solutions market expansions and the pace that video service companies implement, upgrade or replace video solutions technology;

our ability to leverage the potential of our media data management to serve media data, advanced advertising and other related data initiatives;

the rate of growth or decline, if any, of deployment of our real-time operating systems and tools;

the actual versus anticipated decline in revenue from maintenance and product sales of real-time proprietary systems;

our ability to manage expenses consistent with the rate of growth or decline in our markets;

the success of our strategy to market our solutions for the internet and mobility markets;

ongoing cost control actions and expenses, including capital expenditures;

the margins on our product and service sales;

timing of product shipments, which typically occur during the last month of the quarter;

our reliance on a small customer base (three customers accounted for 39% and 40% of our revenue for the six months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, espectively);

the percentage of sales derived from outside the United States where there are generally longer accounts receivable collection cycles; and

the number of countries in which we operate, which may require maintenance of minimum cash levels in each country and, in certain cases, may restrict the repatriation of cash, by requiring us to maintain levels of capital.

Table of Contents

Uses and Sources of Cash

We used $5.4 million of cash in operating activities during the six months ended December 31, 2011 compared to generating $1.3 million of cash from operating activities during the six months ended December 31, 2010. Operating cash outflow during the six months ended December 31, 2011 was primarily attributable to the timing of accounts receivable collection, as well as operating losses generated by lower revenue volume during the period. Prior period operating cash flow was primarily generated by the timing of accounts receivable collection during the period.

We invested $2.2 million in short-term investments during the six months ended December 31, 2011, compared to $0 in the same period of the prior year. During the three months ended December 31, 2011 we liquidated the $7.6 million balance of short-term investments and returned the proceeds to cash, as the yield on these investments in the current market did not justify the costs of maintaining the investment accounts and the costs of fair value audit and disclosure required for these investments. Prior to liquidation, our short-term investments consisted of highly liquid commercial paper, agency bonds, and corporate bonds. Additionally, our short-term investments had original maturities of more than 3 months, but no more than 12 months.

We invested $0.9 million in property, plant and equipment during the six months ended December 31, 2011 compared to $0.8 million during the six months ended December 31, 2010. Capital additions during each of these periods were primarily related to development and test equipment and demonstration systems used by our sales and marketing group. We expect capital additions to continue at a similar rate as the six months ended December 31, 2011 during the remainder of this fiscal year.

We have a $10.0 million credit line (the “Revolver”) with Silicon Valley Bank (the “Bank”) that matures on December 31, 2013. Advances against the Revolver bear interest on the outstanding principal at a rate per annum equal to the greater of 4.0% or either: (1) the prime rate, or (2) the LIBOR rate plus a LIBOR rate margin of 2.75%. We have borrowing availability of up to $10.0 million under this Revolver as long as we maintain cash at or through the Bank of $15.0 million or more. At all times that we maintain cash at or through the Bank of less than $15.0 million, the amount available for advance under the Revolver is calculated from a formula that is primarily based upon a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, which may result in less than, but no more than $10.0 million of availability.

The interest rate on the Revolver was 4.0% as of December 31, 2011. The outstanding principal amount plus all accrued but unpaid interest is payable in full at the expiration of the credit facility on December 31, 2013. Based on our cash balance at the Bank as of December 31, 2011, $10.0 million was available to us under the Revolver. As of December 31, 2011, $0 was drawn under the Revolver, and we did not draw against the Revolver at any time during the six months ended December 31, 2011.

Under the Revolver, we are obligated to maintain a consolidated tangible net worth of at least $12.0 million as of the last day of each quarter, increasing by 100% of quarterly net income and 100% of issuances of equity, net of issuance costs, and a consolidated adjusted quick ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.00. As of December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with these covenants as our consolidated adjusted quick ratio (cash, short-term investments and accounts receivable divided by current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue) was 3.98 to 1.00 and our tangible net worth (total assets minus total liabilities and intangible assets) was $26.5 million. The Revolver is secured by substantially all of the assets of Concurrent.

At December 31, 2011, we had working capital (current assets less current liabilities) of $28.4 million, including cash and cash equivalents of approximately $26.7 million, and had no material commitments for capital expenditures. At June 30, 2011, we had working capital of $30.3 million, including cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $33.3 million. Based upon our existing cash balances and short-term investments, historical cash usage, available credit facility, and anticipated operating cash flow in the current fiscal year, we believe that existing cash balances will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We enter into agreements in the ordinary course of business with customers, resellers, distributors, integrators and suppliers that often require us to defend and/or indemnify the other party against intellectual property infringement claims brought by a third party with respect to our products. We evaluate estimated losses for such indemnifications under ASC 460-20 and ASC 460-10-25. We consider factors such as the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. We have one probable claim for indemnification of one of our customers. The amount and method of probable settlement with this customer has yet to be determined, but we expect that the amount will not be material. To date, we have not encountered any other material costs as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any material liabilities related to such indemnifications in our financial statements. See footnote 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the additional disclosures regarding indemnification.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments during the six months ended December 31, 2011.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements made or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. When used or incorporated by reference in this report, the words “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Statements regarding future events and developments, our future performance, market share, and new market growth, as well as our expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections relating to the future, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. Examples of our forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the impact of our new video solutions strategy on our business, anticipated managed service revenue and cost of sales from our Media Data and Advertising Solutions sales, expected level of capital additions, reduced product revenue due to the economic downturn, the expected timing of revenue recognition for Media Data and Advertising Solutions sales, our expected cash position, the impact of interest rate changes and fluctuation in currency exchange rates, our sufficiency of cash, the impact of litigation, and our trend of declining real-time service revenue. These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of our management, which are based on currently available information. All forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events to differ materially from those projected. The risks and uncertainties which could affect our financial condition or results of operations include, without limitation: delays or cancellations of customer orders; changes in product demand; economic conditions; various inventory risks due to changes in market conditions; margins of video business to capture new business; fluctuations and timing of large video orders; doing business in the People’s Republic of China; uncertainties relating to the development and ownership of intellectual property; uncertainties relating to our ability and the ability of other companies to enforce their intellectual property rights; the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories; the concentration of our customers; failure to effectively manage change; delays in testing and introductions of new products; rapid technology changes; system errors or failures; reliance on a limited number of suppliers and failure of components provided by those suppliers; uncertainties associated with international business activities, including foreign regulations, trade controls, taxes, and currency fluctuations; the impact of competition on the pricing of video solutions products; our ability to satisfy the financial covenants in the Revolver; failure to effectively service the installed base; the entry of new well-capitalized competitors into our markets; the success of new video solutions; the success of our relationships with technology and channel partners; capital spending patterns by a limited customer base; the current challenging macro-economic environment; continuing unevenness of the global economic recovery; privacy concerns over data collection; earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and other natural disasters in areas in which our customers and suppliers operate; and the availability of debt or equity financing to support our liquidity needs.

Other important risk factors are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

Table of Contents

Our forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and speak only as of the date of such statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on our short-term cash investments. We conduct business in the United States and around the world. Our most significant foreign currency transaction exposure relates to the United Kingdom, those Western European countries that use the euro as a common currency, and Japan. We do not hedge against fluctuations in exchange rates.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

As required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no significant changes to our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Part II Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

We are not presently involved in any material litigation. However, we are, from time to time, party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of our business. See footnote 12 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about legal proceedings.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Floods in Thailand during October 2011 could affect our supply chain, revenues and gross profit margins.

The October 2011 floods in Thailand have impaired the supply chain from component suppliers to PC and server makers. We believe this will likely create a shortage of hardware components and increase prices for available hardware throughout fiscal year 2012. In addition, the possible price increases may be passed on to us. Our ability to produce and deliver products to our customers, as well as our revenues and profitability, could be materially adversely affected by this natural disaster.

If we are unable to protect our information systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches, our operations could be disrupted.

We are dependent on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information in the conduct of our business. Security breaches of this infrastructure can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. If we are unable to prevent such breaches, our operations could be disrupted, or we may suffer financial damage or loss because of lost or misappropriated information.

Table of Contents

Some of our products are accessed through the internet and a security breach in connection with the delivery of these products and services could be detrimental to our reputation, business, operating results and financial condition. We cannot be certain that our defensive strategies against criminal and malicious attacks will be effective in all cases to protect us against compromise or breach of the technology protecting the networks that access our products and services.

Other risk factors are discussed in Part I, Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011. There have been no other material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed.

Table of Contents

Item 6.

Exhibits

3.1	--Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-62440)).

3.2	--Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy on Form DEFR14A filed on June 2, 2008).

3.3	--Certificate of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2011).

3.4	--Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2011).

3.5	--Certificate of Correction to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002).

3.6	--Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

3.7	--Amendment to Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003).

4.2	Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.3	Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.4	Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5	Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

11.1*	Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings.

31.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Data required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” is provided in the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

** Filed herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: January 31, 2012	CONCURRENT COMPUTER CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ Emory O. Berry
		Emory O. Berry
		Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
		President of Operations
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

3.1	--Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-62440)).

3.2	--Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy on Form DEFR14A filed on June 2, 2008).

3.3	--Certificate of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2011).

3.4	--Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2011).

3.5	--Certificate of Correction to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002).

3.6	--Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

3.7	--Amendment to Amended Certificate of Designations of Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-A/A, dated August 9, 2002).

4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003).

4.2	Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.3	Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 12, 2002).

4.4	Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
	dated May 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5	Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).

11.1*	Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings.

31.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Data required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings per Share,” is provided in the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

** Filed herewith.

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	H.S. freshman Avg

CCUR (CCUR) 10-Q2012 Q2 Quarterly report

Content analysis