PACCAR (PCAR) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(AMENDMENT NO.   )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement
☒	Definitive Proxy Statement
☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☐	Definitive Additional Materials
☐	Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
PACCAR INC
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒	No fee required.
☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

March 16, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PACCAR Inc, which will be held at the PACCAR Parts Distribution Center, located at 405 Houser Way North, Renton, Washington, at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. PACCAR may have its annual meeting virtually, similar to 2020, if required by state health mandates regarding COVID-19 restrictions.

The principal business of the Annual Meeting is stated on the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We will also provide an update on the Company’s activities. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Item 1 and a vote AGAINST Item 2.

Your VOTE is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your proxy either by mail, telephone or the internet.

Sincerely,

Mark C. Pigott

Executive Chairman of the Board

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of PACCAR Inc will be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at the PACCAR Parts Distribution Center, located at 405 Houser Way North, Renton, Washington, or, if required by state health mandates regarding COVID-19 restrictions, in a virtual-only format, for these purposes:

1. To elect as directors the eleven nominees named in the attached proxy statement to serve a one-year term ending in 2022.

2. To vote on a stockholder proposal regarding supermajority vote provisions if properly presented at the meeting.

3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Stockholders entitled to vote at this meeting are those of record as of the close of business on March 2, 2021.

IMPORTANT: The vote of each stockholder is important regardless of the number of shares held. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please complete and return your proxy form.

Directions to the PACCAR Parts Distribution Center can be found on the back cover of the attached proxy statement. If the meeting is held virtually, you can register for the meeting at register.proxypush.com/pcar.

By order of the Board of Directors

I. E. Song

Secretary

Bellevue, Washington

March 16, 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

General Information	1
Voting Rights	1
Voting by Proxy	1
Proxy Voting Procedures	1
Online Availability of Annual Meeting Materials	2
Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address	2
Vote Required and Method of Counting Votes	2
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners	3
Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers	4
Expenses for Solicitation	5
Item 1: Election of Directors	5
Board Governance	8
Compensation of Directors	12
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors	13
Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons	13
Compensation of Executive Officers	14
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”)	14
Compensation Committee Report	24
Summary Compensation	25
Grants of Plan-Based Awards	26
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End	27
Option Exercises and Stock Vested	28
Pension Benefits	28
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation	30
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control	30
CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure	33
Audit Committee Report	33
Independent Auditors	34
Stockholder Return Performance Graph	35
Item  2: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Supermajority Vote Provisions	36
Board of Directors’ Response	37
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for 2022	39
Other Business	39
Directions to PACCAR Parts Distribution Center	Back Cover

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of PACCAR Inc issues this proxy statement to solicit proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders at 10:30 a.m., local time, on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at the PACCAR Parts Distribution Center in Renton, Washington. This proxy statement includes information about the business matters that will be voted upon at the meeting. The executive offices of the Company are located at 777 106^th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, Washington 98004. This proxy statement and proxy form were sent to stockholders on or about March 16,  2021.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Voting Rights

Stockholders eligible to vote at the meeting are those identified as owners at the close of business on the record date, March 2, 2021. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each of the items presented at the meeting. At the close of business on March 2, 2021, the Company had 347,134,971 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Stockholders may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. Execution of a proxy does not affect the right of a stockholder to attend the meeting. The Board recommends that stockholders exercise their right to vote by promptly completing and returning the proxy form either by mail, telephone or the internet.

Voting by Proxy

Mark C. Pigott and Mark A. Schulz are designated proxy holders to vote shares on behalf of stockholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting. The proxy holders are authorized to:

• vote shares as instructed by the stockholders who have properly completed and returned the proxy form;

• vote shares as recommended by the Board when stockholders have executed and returned the proxy form, but have given no instructions; and

• vote shares at their discretion on any matter not identified in the proxy form that is properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

The Trustee for the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (the “SIP”) votes shares held in the SIP according to each member’s instructions on the proxy form. If no voting instructions are received, the Trustee will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares for which it has received timely voting instructions, as provided in the SIP.

Proxy Voting Procedures

The proxy form allows registered stockholders to vote in one of three ways:

Mail.    Stockholders may complete, sign, date and return the proxy form in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided.

Telephone.    Stockholders may call the toll-free number listed on the proxy form and follow the voting instructions given.

Internet.    Stockholders may access the internet address listed on the proxy form and follow the voting instructions given.

1

Telephone and internet voting procedures authenticate each stockholder by using a control number. The voting procedures will confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Stockholders who vote by telephone or internet should not return the proxy form.

Stockholders who hold shares through a broker or agent should follow the voting instructions received from that broker or agent.

Revoking Proxy Voting Instructions.    A proxy may be revoked by a later-dated proxy or by written notice to the Secretary of the Company at any time before it is voted. Stockholders who hold shares through a broker should contact the broker or other agent if they wish to change their vote after executing the proxy.

Online Availability of Annual Meeting Materials

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Stockholder Meeting to be held at 10:30 a.m. on April 27, 2021, at the PACCAR Parts Distribution Center in Renton, Washington, or virtually, if required. The 2021 proxy statement and the 2020 Annual Report to stockholders are available on the Company’s website at www.paccar.com/2021annualmeeting.

Stockholders who hold shares in a bank or brokerage account who previously elected to receive the annual meeting materials electronically and now wish to change their election and receive paper copies may contact their bank or broker to change their election.

Stockholders who receive annual meeting materials electronically will receive a notice when the proxy materials become available with instructions on how to access them over the internet.

Multiple Stockholders Sharing the Same Address

Registered stockholders at a shared address who would like to discontinue receipt of multiple copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the future should write to EQ Shareowner Services, Attn: Householding, P.O. Box 64854, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854. Street name stockholders at a shared address who would like to discontinue receipt of multiple copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the future should contact their bank or broker.

Some street name stockholders elected to receive one copy of the 2020 Annual Report and 2021 Proxy Statement at a shared address prior to the 2021 Annual Meeting. If those stockholders wish to change that election, they may do so by contacting their bank, broker or PACCAR at 425.468.7495 or P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009.

Vote Required and Method of Counting Votes

The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by duly authorized proxy, of a majority of all the stock issued and outstanding and having voting power shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions are counted as shares present at the meeting.

Item 1: Election of Directors

In an uncontested director election, each director nominee shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director’s election exceeds 50 percent of the number of votes cast with respect to that director’s election. Votes cast include votes “against” but exclude “abstentions” and “broker nonvotes” with respect to that director’s election. Pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, an incumbent director that is not elected by a majority vote will tender his or her

2

resignation subject to acceptance by the Board. The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting. Proxies signed, dated and returned unmarked will be voted FOR all of the nominees. Please note that brokers and custodians may not vote on the election of directors in the absence of specific client instruction. Those who hold shares in such accounts are encouraged to provide voting instructions to the broker or custodian.

If any nominee is unable to act as director because of an unexpected occurrence, the proxy holders may vote the proxies for another person or the Board of Directors may reduce the number of directors to be elected.

Item 2: Stockholder Proposal

Proxies signed, dated and returned unmarked will be voted AGAINST Item 2.

To be approved, Item 2 must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the item.

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following persons are known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2020 (amounts shown are rounded to whole shares):

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned			Percent   of Class
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055		23,875,808	(a)		6.9
Capital World Investors 33 South Hope Street, 55th Fl Los Angeles, CA 90071		22,638,476	(b)		6.5
The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355		26,878,987	(c)		7.8

(a) BlackRock, Inc. and its subsidiaries reported on Schedule 13G filed January 29, 2021 that BlackRock has sole voting power over 20,513,541 shares and sole dispositive power over 23,875,808 shares.

(b) Capital World Investors reported on Schedule 13G filed February 16, 2021 that it has sole voting power over 22,638,476 shares and sole dispositive power over 22,638,476 shares.

(c) The Vanguard Group reported on Schedule 13G filed February 10, 2021 that it has shared voting power over 556,017 shares; sole dispositive power over 25,357,822 shares and shared dispositive power over 1,521,165 shares.

3

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following list includes all shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by each Company director and Named Executive Officer, and by Company directors and executive officers as a group as of March 2, 2021 (amounts shown are rounded to whole share amounts).

Name	Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class
Michael T. Barkley		80,164(a)	*
Dame Alison J. Carnwath		35,744(b)	*
Franklin L. Feder		8,284(b)	*
R. Preston Feight		110,178(a)	*
Beth E. Ford		29,465(b)	*
Kirk S. Hachigian		36,621(b)	*
Roderick C. McGeary		23,558(b)	*
John M. Pigott		2,310,723(b)(c)	*
Mark C. Pigott		3,942,195(d)	1.14
T. Kyle Quinn		60,488(a)	*
Harrie C. Schippers		128,587(a)	*
Mark A. Schulz		23,383(b)	*
Darrin C. Siver		62,286(a)	*
Gregory M. E. Spierkel		37,690(b)	*
Charles R. Williamson (retired April 26, 2021)		85,330(b)	*
Total of all directors and executive officers as a group (19 individuals)		7,110,002	2.05

*Does not exceed one percent.

(a) Includes shares allocated in the SIP for which the participant has sole voting and investment power as follows: R. P. Feight 9,218; H. C. Schippers 1,305; M. T. Barkley 21,350; T. K. Quinn 7,765; D. C. Siver 13,389. Also includes restricted shares for which the participant has voting power as follows: R. P. Feight 23,915. Also includes restricted stock units without voting rights to be settled in shares of common stock as follows: R. P. Feight 4,892; H.C. Schippers 19,575; M. T. Barkley 6,702; T. K. Quinn 6,715; D. C. Siver 7,023. Also includes options to purchase shares exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2021 as follows: R. P. Feight 50,402; H. C. Schippers 63,846; M. T. Barkley 23,696; D. C. Siver 12,778. Also includes deferred cash awards accrued as stock units without voting rights under the Deferred Compensation Plan that are settled in shares of common stock: M. T. Barkley 1,058; T. K. Quinn 17,288; and D. C. Siver 2,338.

(b) Includes shares in the Restricted Stock and Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “RSDC Plan”) over which the participant has sole voting but no investment power. Also includes deferred stock units without voting rights to be settled in shares of common stock as follows: A. J. Carnwath 6,511; F. L. Feder 8,284; B. E. Ford 29,465; K. S. Hachigian 36,621; R. C. McGeary 23,558; J. M. Pigott 34,126; M. A. Schulz 14,412; G. M. E. Spierkel 37,690; C. R. Williamson 51,997.

(c) Includes shares held in the name of a spouse and/or children to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed.

(d) Includes 96,580 shares allocated in the SIP for which he has sole voting and investment power. Also includes options to purchase 328,416 shares exercisable within 60 days of March 2, 2021, and deferred cash awards accrued as 212,982 stock units without voting rights under the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Long-Term Incentive Plan that are settled in shares of common stock. Includes shares held in the name of a spouse and/or children to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed.

4

EXPENSES FOR SOLICITATION

Expenses for solicitation of proxies will be paid by the Company. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, solicitation may be made by directors, officers and employees of the Company through electronic, telephone or personal solicitation, which will be made without additional compensation. The Company has retained D. F. King & Co., Inc. to aid in the solicitation of stockholders for a fee of approximately $9,500 plus reimbursement of expenses. The Company will request banks and brokers to solicit proxies from their customers and will reimburse those banks and brokers reasonable out-of-pocket costs for this solicitation.

ITEM 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Eleven directors are to be elected at the meeting. The persons named below have been designated by the Board as nominees for election as directors for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2022. Ten of the nominees are currently serving as directors of the Company and Ganesh Ramaswamy is a new nominee. Chuck Williamson will retire from the Board effective April 26, 2021. The Company is grateful to Chuck for his fifteen years of outstanding leadership on the Board. He was the lead director for six years and chaired several Board committees.

BOARD NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS

(TERMS EXPIRE AT THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING)

MARK C. PIGOTT, age 67, is Executive Chairman of the Company and has held that position since April 2014. Mr. Pigott was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from January 1997-April 2014, Vice Chairman from January 1995-December 1996, Executive Vice President from December 1993-January 1995, Senior Vice President from January 1990-December 1993, and Vice President from October 1988-December 1989. He served as a director of Franklin Resources Inc., an investment management company, from 2011-2021. He is the brother of John M. Pigott, a director of the Company. He has served as a director of the Company since 1994. Mr. Pigott has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including engineering and business degrees from Stanford University, thorough knowledge of the global commercial vehicle industry and an outstanding record of profitable growth generated through 42 years with the Company. PACCAR has benefited from an excellent record of industry-leading stockholder returns generated under his leadership.

DAME ALISON J. CARNWATH, age 68, has been a senior adviser to Evercore Partners, an independent corporate finance advisory firm (formerly known as Lexicon Partners) since 2005, and chair of the advisory board at Living Bridge Equity Partners, LLP, a private equity firm (formerly known as ISIS Equity Partners, LLP) since 1999, both based in the United Kingdom. She has served as a director of Coller Capital Ltd. since 2015, a United Kingdom-based company. She has been a member of the supervisory board and chair of the audit committee of BASF, a leading chemical company based in Germany, since 2014, and she has served as a director of Zurich Insurance Group since 2012. She previously served as chair of Land Securities plc, the United Kingdom’s largest property company listed on the London Stock Exchange (2008-2018); as non-executive chair of MF Global Holdings Ltd. (2008-2010); and as a non-executive director of BP p.l.c. (2018-January 2021) and the Man Group plc (2001-2013), both based in the United Kingdom. She has served as a director of the Company since 2005. Dame Alison has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including certification as a chartered accountant, service as chair (1999-2004) and chief executive (2001) of the Vitec Group plc, a British supplier to the broadcast industry, and 33 years’ experience in international finance and investment banking including three years as a managing director of Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette (1997-2000).

5

FRANKLIN L. FEDER, age 69, served as chief executive officer, Alcoa Latin America & Caribbean of Alcoa Inc., a global producer of bauxite, alumina and aluminum, from 2004-2014. He previously served as vice president and director of corporate development of Alcoa Inc. from 1999-2004, chief financial officer of Alcoa Latin America from 1994-1999 and director corporate planning from 1990-1994. He was also managing partner of Technomic Consultores from 1978-1988, and a partner at Booz, Allen & Hamilton from 1989-1990. He has served as a director of Minerals Technologies Inc. since 2017. He has also served as a director of Companhia Brasileira de Aluminio and AES Tiete Energia since 2016, Prumo Logistica S.A. since 2019 and FS Bioenergia since 2021, all Brasil-based companies. He previously served as a director of Intercement from 2017-2020, a director of Loma Negra Corporation from 2018-2020, a director of Unigel from 2016-2018, a director of Grupo Dahma from 2015-2016, and a director of Alexander Proudfoot from 2014-2016. He has served as a director of the Company since 2018. Mr. Feder has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including an M.B.A. from IMD in Lausanne, Switzerland and a B.A. from the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Sao Paulo, Brasil.

R. PRESTON FEIGHT, age 53, is Chief Executive Officer of the Company and has held that position since July 2019. Mr. Feight served as Executive Vice President of the Company from September 2018-June 2019, PACCAR Vice President and President of DAF Trucks from April 2016-August 2018, General Manager of Kenworth Truck Company and Vice President of PACCAR from January 2015-March 2016, Kenworth Assistant General Manager for Marketing and Sales from April 2012-December 2014, Kenworth Chief Engineer from August 2008-March 2012. Previously he worked as an engineer at Ford for six years and as an engineer at Allied Signal for two years. He has served as a director of the Company since 2019. Mr. Feight has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northern Arizona University, an M.S. in engineering management from the University of Colorado and thorough knowledge of the global commercial vehicle industry gained through 23 years with the Company.

BETH E. FORD, age 57, is president and chief executive officer at Land O’Lakes, a member-owned agricultural production and dairy cooperative and has held that position since July 2018. She previously served as Land O’Lakes’ chief operating officer, business units, from 2017-2018, group executive vice president and chief operating officer from 2015-2017 and as executive vice president and chief supply chain and operations officer from 2012-2015. Ms. Ford served as executive vice president and head of supply chain at International Flavor and Fragrances (2008-2011). Ms. Ford also served as a director of Clearwater Paper Corporation (2013-2018). She is on the Dean’s Advisory Committee for the College of Business at Iowa State University and the Columbia University Business School – Deming Center Board of Advisors. She has served as a director of the Company since 2015. Ms. Ford has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including an M.B.A. from Columbia University Business School and a B.B.A. from Iowa State University. Ms. Ford has a background in agribusiness, chemicals, consumer package goods, publishing and oil and gas gained through 34 years in operating and senior leadership positions with global companies including International Flavor and Fragrances, PepsiCo, Hachette Book Group, Scholastic Corporation and Mobil Corporation.

KIRK S. HACHIGIAN, age 61, served as non-executive chairman of JELD-WEN Holding, Inc., a global manufacturer of windows and doors from 2016-2019; and as JELD-WEN’s chairman and chief executive officer from 2014-2016. He served as chairman and chief executive officer of Cooper Industries plc, a global manufacturer of electrical products, from 2005 to 2012. Prior to joining Cooper in 2001, Mr. Hachigian was an executive with General Electric Company for eight years, including assignments in Mexico and Asia. He has served as lead director for Allegion plc and director of NextEra Energy Inc. since 2013 and as a director of Cabinetworks Group since 2020. He has served as a director of the Company since 2008. Mr. Hachigian has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from University of California at Berkeley and an M.B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

6

RODERICK C. MCGEARY, age 70, served in consulting and audit roles with KPMG LLP from 1972-2000 culminating in the position as co-vice chairman of consulting (1997-1999). He has served as a director of Raymond James Financial, Inc. since September 2015. He was chairman of BearingPoint Inc., formerly KPMG Consulting, LLC, a management and technology consulting firm, from 2004-2009 and was its interim chief executive officer from 2004-2005. He has served as a director of Cisco Systems since 2003. He has served as a director of the Company since 2012. Mr. McGeary has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including a B.S. degree in accounting from Lehigh University, strong experience as a certified public accountant and extensive experience in management and technology consulting.

JOHN M. PIGOTT, age 57, is a partner in Beta Business Ventures, LLC, a private investment company concentrating in natural resources, and was a partner in the predecessor company Beta Capital Group, LLC since 2003. He is the brother of Mark C. Pigott, a director of the Company. He has served as a director of the Company since 2009. Mr. Pigott has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including an engineering degree from Stanford, an M.B.A. from UCLA and a background in manufacturing gained through 12 years with the Company including five years as a senior manager of Company truck operations in the United Kingdom and in the United States. He is a substantial long-term stockholder in the Company.

GANESH RAMASWAMY, age 52, is Vice President and President, Global Services, for Johnson Controls International, a global provider of building technologies and solutions. He joined Johnson Controls International in December 2019. From 2015 to 2019, Mr. Ramaswamy served in executive leadership roles at Danaher Corporation, a diversified manufacturer of life sciences, diagnostics, and industrial products and services. His roles at Danaher included Group Executive, Marking & Coding; President, Videojet Technologies; and Senior Vice President, High Growth markets for Beckman Coulter Diagnostics. From 2011 to 2015, Mr. Ramaswamy served in various executive roles at Pentax Medical, a provider of endoscopic imaging devices and solutions, including as President of Pentax Medical from 2013 to 2015. Earlier in his career, Mr. Ramaswamy served in roles of increasing responsibility with the General Electric Company in product development, quality management, service operations, and general management. Mr. Ramaswamy brings a broad range of experiences from diverse industries in the areas of global business management, technology-based innovation, commercial strategies in emerging markets, and business systems. Mr. Ramaswamy has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, an M.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, an M.S. in mechanical engineering from Auburn University, and a B.Tech. in mechanical engineering from the University of Kerala.

MARK A. SCHULZ, age 68, is currently president and chief executive officer of M. A. Schulz and Associates, a management consulting firm, and a founding partner in Fontinalis Partners, LLC, a transportation technology strategic investment firm. He served as president of international operations at Ford Motor Company from 2005 until his retirement in 2007 and in a variety of executive roles during 35 years with Ford, including running Ford’s Mazda, Jaguar, Land Rover and Aston Martin affiliates and setting up manufacturing and distribution operations in South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. He served as a director of Dana Incorporated (2008-2018), as a director of YRC Worldwide, Inc. (2007-2009) and as a director of the National Committee of United States-China Relations and the United States-China Business Council. He has served as a director of the Company since 2012 and as lead director since January 2020. Mr. Schulz has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including engineering degrees from Valparaiso University and the University of Michigan, an M.B.A. from the University of Detroit, an M.S. in management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and over 35 years of management experience in the automotive industry worldwide.

7

GREGORY M. E. SPIERKEL, age 64, served as chief executive officer of Ingram Micro Inc., a worldwide distributor of technology products, from 2005-2012. He previously served as president from March 2004-April 2005. During his 14-year tenure with that company he held other senior positions including executive vice president. He has served as a director of MGM Resorts International since 2013 and as a director of Schneider Electric (Paris) since 2014. He has served as a director of the Company since 2008. Mr. Spierkel has the attributes and qualifications listed in the Company guidelines for board membership including an M.B.A. from Georgetown University and 32 years of management experience around the world including seven years as chief executive of Ingram Micro.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES.

BOARD GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors has determined that the following persons served as independent directors in 2020 as defined by Nasdaq Rule 5605(a)(2): Dame Alison J. Carnwath, Franklin L. Feder, Beth E. Ford, Kirk S. Hachigian, Roderick C. McGeary, Mark A. Schulz, Gregory M. E. Spierkel and Charles R. Williamson.

The Board of Directors maintains a corporate governance section on the Company’s website, which includes key information about its governance practices. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, its Board committee charters and its Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are located at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors. The Corporate Governance Guidelines prohibit the Company’s directors and executive officers from hedging or pledging their ownership of PACCAR stock. Employees, other than executive officers, are generally permitted to engage in transactions designed to hedge or offset market risk.

The Company’s leadership structure includes an Executive Chairman, a Chief Executive Officer and an independent lead director who serves for a three-year term. M. A. Schulz currently serves as lead director. This leadership structure, in which the roles of the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are separate, together with an experienced and engaged lead director and independent key committees, is appropriate for the Company at this time because it effectively allocates authority, responsibility and oversight between management, the Executive Chairman and the independent members of the Board.

The Company has policies to ensure a strong and independent board. The Board regularly meets in executive session without management. The lead director presides over the executive sessions of the Board’s independent directors. Seventy-three percent of the Company’s eleven current directors are independent as defined under Nasdaq rules.

The Board oversees risk through management presentations at Board meetings and through its Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. The Audit Committee charter provides that the Committee shall discuss with management the Company’s risk exposures, including cybersecurity risk, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. As part of this process, the Committee receives periodic reports from the Company’s internal auditor and from its general counsel and the Committee reports to the full Board at least four times a year. The Compensation Committee oversees risk arising from the Company’s compensation programs and annually reviews how those programs manage and mitigate risk. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees potential environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and monitors legal developments and trends.

8

Stockholders may contact the Board of Directors by writing to: The Board of Directors, PACCAR Inc, 11^th Floor, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009, or by e-mailing PACCAR.Board@paccar.com. The Corporate Secretary will receive, process and acknowledge receipt of all written stockholder communications. Suggestions or concerns involving accounting, internal controls or auditing matters will be directed to the Audit Committee chairman. Concerns regarding other matters will be directed to the individual director or committee named in the correspondence. If no identification is made, the matter will be directed to the Executive Committee of the Board.

The Board of Directors met five times during 2020. Each member attended at least 75 percent of the combined total of meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the Board on which each served. All Company directors are expected to attend each annual stockholder meeting. All directors attended the annual stockholder meeting in April 2020.

The Board has four standing committees. The members of each committee in 2020 are listed below with the chair of each committee listed first:

Audit     Committee	Compensation       Committee	Executive     Committee	Nominating and Governance     Committee
R. C. McGeary A. J. Carnwath F. L. Feder G. M. E. Spierkel	G. M. E. Spierkel B. E. Ford K. S. Hachigian M. A. Schulz	M. C. Pigott J. M. Pigott M. A. Schulz	M. A. Schulz A. J. Carnwath R. C. McGeary C. R. Williamson

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has responsibility for the selection, evaluation and compensation of the independent auditors and approval of all services they provide. The Committee annually assesses the independent public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence, performance and whether there should be a rotation of the Company’s independent accounting firm. The Committee and its chairperson are involved in the selection of the audit firm’s lead engagement partner. The Committee reviews the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements, monitors the integrity and effectiveness of the audit process and reviews the corporate compliance programs. It monitors the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting and oversees the internal audit function.

The Company has a rigorous and thorough cybersecurity protocol. The Company’s information security risk council updates the Audit Committee throughout the year and also prepares reports for the Board of Directors.

The Audit Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors/audit-committee-charter. All four members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and financial literacy requirements of the SEC and Nasdaq rules. The Board of Directors designated all four members of the Audit Committee as financial experts. The Committee met six times in 2020.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and approving salaries and other compensation matters for executive officers. It administers the Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Committee establishes base salaries and annual and long-term performance goals for executive officers. It considers the opinion of the CEO when determining compensation for the executives that report to him. It also evaluates the CEO’s performance annually in executive session. It approves the attainment of annual and long-term goals by the executive officers.

9

The Committee has authority to employ a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of the compensation of the Company’s CEO and other executive officers. In 2020, the Committee retained Mercer, a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh and McLennan Companies, to provide a market analysis of the compensation of the executive officers. Mercer analyzed data from the Peer Companies (defined in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section below) and industry surveys and reported its results to the Committee. Mercer was paid $84,650 for this project. Mercer and its affiliates were also retained by the Company to provide insurance brokerage and human resources consulting services, and were paid $228,972 in the aggregate for these additional services. The Committee did not review or approve the other services provided by Mercer and its affiliates for the Company, as those services were approved by management in the normal course of business. The Committee conducted an independence assessment and no conflict of interest was identified.

The Compensation Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors/compensation-committee-charter. All four members of the Compensation Committee meet the director independence requirements of the SEC and Nasdaq rules and the “nonemployee director” requirements of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee met five times in 2020.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating director candidates and selecting nominees for approval by the independent members of the Board of Directors. It also makes recommendations to the Board on corporate governance matters including director compensation.

The Committee has established written criteria for the selection of new directors, which are available at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors/guidelines-for-board-membership . The criteria state that a diversity of perspectives, skills and business experience relevant to the Company’s global operations should be represented on the Board. The Committee recognizes the importance of having a diversity of gender, heritage and backgrounds to ensure that a variety of opinions and perspectives are represented on the Board. Initial lists of director candidates include qualified racially/ethnically and gender diverse candidates. To be a qualified director candidate, a person must have achieved significant success in business, education or public service, must not have a conflict of interest and must be committed to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders. In addition, the candidate must have the following attributes:

• the highest ethical and moral standards and integrity;

• the intelligence, education and experience to make a meaningful contribution to board deliberations;

• the commitment, time and diligence to effectively discharge board responsibilities;

• mature judgment, objectivity, practicality and a willingness to ask difficult questions; and

• the commitment to work together as an effective group member to deliberate and reach consensus for the betterment of the stockholders and the long-term viability of the Company.

The Committee considers the names of director candidates submitted by management and members of the Board of Directors. It also considers recommendations by stockholders submitted in writing to: Chairman, Nominating and Governance Committee, PACCAR Inc, 11^th Floor, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, WA 98009. Nominations by stockholders must include information set forth in the Company’s Bylaws. The Committee engages the services of a private search firm from time to time to assist in identifying and screening director candidates. The Committee evaluates qualified director candidates and selects nominees for approval by the members of the Board of Directors.

The Company’s Bylaws provide for proxy access by eligible stockholders. Stockholder nominations require compliance with Article III, Section 7 of the Bylaws.

10

The Nominating and Governance Committee charter describes the Committee’s responsibilities. It is posted at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors/nominating-and-governance-committee . Each of the four Committee members meets the independence requirements of the Nasdaq rules. The Committee met four times in 2020.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee acts on routine Board matters when the Board is not in session. The Committee took action two times in 2020.

Board Composition and Diversity

PACCAR’s Board of Directors is committed to a broad range of experience and expertise that will build on the Company’s 115-year record of success. The composition of the Board reflects different genders, ethnicities, and geographic and cultural backgrounds that enhance the Board’s understanding of our employees, customers, dealers and other stakeholders.

11

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The following table provides information on compensation for non-employee directors who served during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020:

Summary Compensation

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (a) ($)		Stock Awards (b) ($)		All Other Compensation (c)($)		Total (d)($)
A. J. Carnwath		145,000		150,035		5,000		300,035
F. L. Feder		125,000		150,035		5,000		280,035
B. E. Ford		135,000		150,035		5,000		290,035
K. S. Hachigian		135,000		150,035		5,000		290,035
R. C. McGeary		160,000		150,035		5,000		315,035
J. M. Pigott		115,000		150,035		5,000		270,035
M. A. Schulz		171,250		150,035		10,000		331,285
G. M. E. Spierkel		160,000		150,035		5,000		315,035
C. R. Williamson		138,750		150,035		5,000		293,785

(a) Fees for non-employee directors include the 2020 annual retainer of $110,000, paid quarterly, and committee meeting fees of $5,000 per meeting. In addition, an annual $25,000 retainer is payable quarterly to the lead director, and an annual $15,000 retainer is payable quarterly to the chairs of the audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees. If newly elected or retired during the calendar year, the non-employee director receives a prorated retainer. A single meeting attendance fee is paid when more than one committee meeting is held on the same day. B. E. Ford and C. R. Williamson elected to defer retainer and meeting fees into stock units pursuant to the terms of the RSDC Plan described in the narrative below.

(b) The grant date fair value of the restricted stock award granted on January 2, 2020 to non-employee directors was $150,035, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note R, Stock Compensation Plans, to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. On December 31, 2020, non-employee directors held unvested shares of restricted stock as follows: Dame A. J. Carnwath 2,055; M. A. Schulz 2,055; C. R. Williamson 6,535. In lieu of restricted stock, some non-employee directors held unvested restricted stock units including additional deferred stock units credited as a result of dividend equivalents earned with respect to the restricted stock units as follows: A. J. Carnwath 4,681; F. L. Feder 6,434; B. E. Ford 27,056; K. S. Hachigian 34,455; R. C. McGeary 21,537; J. M. Pigott 31,987; M. A. Schulz 12,493; G. M. E. Spierkel 35,511; C. R. Williamson 51,093.

(c) Directors may participate in the Company’s matching gift program on the same basis as U.S. salaried employees. Under the program, the PACCAR Foundation matches donations participants make to eligible educational institutions up to a maximum annual donation of $5,000 per participant. In 2020, the PACCAR Foundation matched gifts of $5,000 each made by M. A. Schulz and C. R. Williamson to educational institutions. In addition, the PACCAR Foundation made donations of $5,000 each to charitable organizations selected by Dame A. J. Carnwath, F. L. Feder, B. E. Ford, K. S. Hachigian, R. C. McGeary, J. M. Pigott, M. A. Schulz and G. M. E. Spierkel.

(d) B. E. Ford and C. R. Williamson deferred some or all of their cash compensation earned in 2020 into stock units. None of the deferred compensation earned a rate of interest that exceeded 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Perquisites were less than the $10,000 reporting threshold.

12

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

In addition to the cash compensation described in footnote (a) above, on the first business day of the year, each non-employee director received $150,000 in restricted stock or restricted stock units under the RSDC Plan. The number of shares or units received is determined by dividing $150,000 by the closing price of a share of Company stock on the first business day of the year and rounding up to the nearest whole share. Non-employee directors newly elected during the calendar year receive a prorated award to reflect the number of calendar quarters the director will serve in the year of election. Restricted shares vest three years after the date of grant or upon retirement, death or disability. Directors receive dividends and voting rights on all shares during the vesting period. If non-employee directors elect to receive a credit to the stock unit account in lieu of a grant of restricted stock, the account is credited with the number of shares otherwise applicable to the grant of restricted stock and subject to the same vesting conditions as discussed below.

Non-employee directors may elect to defer all or a part of their cash retainer and fees to an income account or to a stock unit account under the RSDC Plan. The income account accrues interest at a rate equal to the simple combined average of the monthly Aa Industrial Bond yield averages for the immediately preceding quarter and is compounded quarterly. Stock unit accounts are credited with the number of shares of Company common stock that could have been purchased at the closing price on the date the cash compensation is payable. Thereafter, dividends earned are treated as if they were reinvested at the closing price of Company stock on the date the dividend is payable. Those electing stock units have no voting rights in the stock. The balances in a director’s deferred accounts are paid out at or after retirement or termination in accordance with the director’s deferred account election. The balance in the stock unit account is distributed in shares of the Company’s common stock. The aggregate number of deferred stock units accumulated in the deferral account of participating non-employee directors is reflected in footnote (b) to the Stock Ownership Table on page 4.

The Company provides transportation or reimburses non-employee directors for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their services. It also pays or reimburses directors for expenses incurred to participate in continuing education programs related to their service as a PACCAR director.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Non-Employee Directors

All non-employee directors are expected to hold at least five times their annual cash retainer in Company stock and/or deferred stock units while serving as a director. Directors have five years from date of appointment to attain this ownership threshold. All non-employee directors with five or more years of service have the required stockholding as of January 1, 2021.

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Under its Charter, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving related-person transactions as set forth in Item 404 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K. The Committee will consider whether such transactions are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Company has written procedures designed to bring such transactions to the attention of management. Management is responsible for presenting related-person transactions to the Audit Committee for review and approval.

13

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (“CD&A”)

Executive Summary of Company Performance and Compensation Practices

In 2020, the Company reported net sales and revenues of $18.73 billion and net income of $1.30 billion. The Company has achieved 82 consecutive years of net income, paid annual dividends every year since 1941 and delivered an average annual total return to stockholders over the past 20 years of 15.2 percent versus 7.5 percent for the S&P 500 Index.

2020 Financial Results and Business Highlights:

• Consolidated net sales and revenues of $18.73 billion

• Net income of $1.30 billion

• 6.9% after-tax return on revenues

• PACCAR Parts revenue of $3.91 billion

• PACCAR Parts pre-tax income of $799.3 million

• Financial Services assets of $15.80 billion

• Financial Services new business volume of $5.02 billion

• Financial Services pre-tax income of $233.1 million

• Cash provided by operations of $2.99 billion

• Dividends declared of $687.1 million

• Medium-term note issuances of $1.99 billion

• PACCAR invested $843.4 million in capital projects and research and development

• Record year-end stockholders’ equity of $10.42 billion

• Delivered 133,300 vehicles worldwide

Key Compensation and Governance Practices

The Company emphasizes pay for performance and equity-based incentive programs designed to compensate executives for generating outstanding performance for stockholders.

• Incentive-based pay (“Pay for Performance”) represents approximately 67 percent of the Named Executive Officers’ target total compensation.

• Net income is the key metric in the annual incentive compensation program.

• The key metrics for long-term incentive cash awards are the three-year change in net income, return on sales and return on capital compared with Peer Companies.

• Executive officer stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements align executives’ long-term goals with that of stockholders.

• There are no employment contracts, excise tax gross ups or significant perquisites for executive officers.

• The Company does not discount, backdate, reprice or grant equity awards retroactively and prohibits the buy-out of underwater options.

14

• The Company prohibits the hedging or pledging of Company stock or purchasing stock on margin for directors and executive officers.

• The Company may claw back executive officer incentive compensation where a financial restatement is caused by fraud and the incentive compensation was based on financial results impacted by the restatement.

Compensation Program Objectives and Structure

PACCAR’s compensation programs are directed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), composed exclusively of independent directors. The programs are designed to attract and retain high-quality executives, link incentives to the Company’s performance and align the interests of management with those of stockholders. These programs offer compensation that is competitive with companies that operate in the same industries globally. PACCAR’s goal is to achieve superior performance measured against its industry peers. The Company has delivered 82 consecutive years of net income, paid annual dividends every year since 1941 and delivered excellent stockholder returns. The Company delivered an average annual total return to stockholders over the past 20 years of 15.2 percent versus 7.5 percent for the S&P 500 Index. The compensation framework has these components:

Short-term performance compensation:

• Salary. The fixed amount of compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities.

• Annual incentive cash compensation. Annual cash awards that focus on the attainment of Company profit targets and individual business unit goals.

Long-term performance compensation:

• An equity- and cash-based Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) that focuses on long-term growth in stockholder value, including three-year performance versus industry peers as measured by net income change, return on sales and return on capital. The equity-based compensation consists of stock options and restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs).

The Committee believes that this combination of salary, cash incentives and equity-based compensation provides appropriate incentives for executives to deliver superior short- and long-term business performance and stockholder returns.

The Named Executive Officers and all U.S. salaried employees participate in the Company’s retirement programs. The Named Executive Officers also participate in the Company’s unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan described on page 29, which provides a retirement benefit to those employees affected by the maximum benefit limitations permitted for qualified plans by the Internal Revenue Code and other qualified plan benefit limitations.

The Company does not provide any other significant perquisites or executive benefits to its Named Executive Officers.

Stockholder Approval for the Company’s Executive Compensation Programs

In 2020, stockholders voted on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers (known as a “say on pay” vote), with 96 percent of the shares voting to approve the Company’s compensation practices. The Committee believes the stockholder vote affirms the Company’s conservative approach to executive compensation. In 2017, an advisory vote was taken on the frequency of review of our executive compensation program. A majority of the shares that voted on this proposal approved a three-year period for review of the executive compensation program.

15

Executive Compensation Criteria

The Committee considers a number of important factors when reviewing and determining executive compensation, including job responsibilities, Company performance, business unit performance, individual performance and compensation for executives among peer organizations. The Committee also considers the opinion of the Chief Executive Officer when determining compensation for the executives that report to him.

Industry Compensation Comparison Groups.    The Committee periodically utilizes information from published compensation surveys as well as compensation data from Peer Companies to determine if compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers is competitive with the market. The Committee believes that comparative compensation information should be used in its deliberations. It does not specify a “target” compensation level for any given executive but rather a range of target compensation. The Committee has discretion to determine the nature and extent to which it will use comparative compensation data.

Role of Compensation Consultants.    The Committee periodically retains a compensation consultant to assess the competitiveness of the Company’s compensation programs. In 2020, the Committee retained Mercer, a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh and McLennan Companies, to evaluate the executive base salaries and total compensation structure, which were previously reviewed in 2018. Mercer compiled compensation data from the Company’s Peer Companies, as well as from a Mercer study concerning executive compensation in the United States and a Willis Towers Watson survey. Mercer provided the Committee with aggregated data obtained from the surveyed companies. The review found that the Company’s salary structure midpoints were on average seven percent below the market median. Mercer reported its findings to the Committee and proposed a revised salary structure with midpoints increased ten percent to slightly above the market median. The Committee adopted the proposed executive salary structure effective January 1, 2021. The Mercer report also supported an adjustment to the base salary target percentages for the restricted stock and stock option portion of the LTIP for certain Named Executive Officers. The new target percentages, which are shown on page 24, were adopted by the Compensation Committee effective January 1, 2021.

Peer Companies.    As part of its analysis of comparative data, the Committee includes compensation data from Peer Companies. In particular, the Company measures its financial performance against Peer Companies when evaluating achievement of the cash portion of the LTIP Company performance goal. The Committee reviews the composition of the Peer Companies annually to ensure the companies are appropriate for comparative purposes. The Peer Companies are listed below. The Peer Group Index is listed on page 35. Commencing with the 2021-2023 LTIP cycle, TRATON will replace Navistar International Corporation as a Peer Company.

Company Name	FY 2020 Revenue (in $ billions)
PACCAR Inc		18.7
AGCO Corporation		9.2
Caterpillar Inc.		41.7
CNH Industrial N.V.		26.0
Cummins Inc.		19.8
Dana Incorporated		7.1
Deere & Company		35.5
Eaton Corporation		17.9
Meritor Inc.		3.0
Navistar International Corporation		7.5
Oshkosh Corporation		6.9
AB Volvo		36.6

16

Elements of Total Compensation

The Company’s executive compensation program is comprised of base salaries, annual incentive cash and long-term incentives consisting of cash, stock options and restricted stock/RSUs.

Compensation Element	Designed To Reward	Relationship To The Objectives
Base Salary	•  Experience, knowledge of the industry, duties and scope of responsibility	•  Provides a level of cash compensation to attract and retain talented executives to the Company who can continue to improve the Company’s overall performance
Short-Term Incentive Compensation	•  Success in achieving annual objectives	•  Motivates executives to achieve specific Company-wide and business unit objectives •  Provides competitive compensation to attract and retain talented executives
Long-Term Incentive Compensation	•  Continued excellence and attainment of objectives over time •  Success in long-term growth and development	•  Motivates executives to achieve long-term business unit and Company-wide objectives •  Aligns the executives’ interests with long-term stockholder interests in order to increase overall stockholder value •  Provides competitive compensation to attract and retain talented executives

Compensation Mix.    The Company’s executive compensation program structure includes a balance of salary and annual and long-term incentives, including Company equity. For 2020, the Committee approved target allocations as displayed below for R. P. Feight, the Company’s CEO, and the other Named Executive Officers. The Company believes these allocations promote its objectives of profitable growth and superior long-term results, which benefit stockholders.

Base Salary.    Base salary provides a level of compensation that is competitive with industry Peer Companies to attract and retain high-caliber executives. The midpoints of the base salary ranges are set at approximately the market median of the 2018 Mercer report with the minimum salary at 70 percent of the midpoint and the maximum salary at 130 percent of the midpoint. An executive officer’s actual salary relative to this salary range reflects his or her responsibility, experience, tenure with the Company and individual performance.

17

The Committee reviews base salaries every 12 to 24 months and may or may not approve changes. Consistent with this practice, the Committee reviewed the salary of each Named Executive Officer in 2020. The Committee considered performance, the addition of new responsibilities and the midpoint of the base salary range. The Chief Executive Officer suggested salary revisions for the other Named Executive Officers. The Committee approved salary percentage increases in 2020 as follows: H. C. Schippers, 5.9 percent; D. C. Siver, 9.1 percent. The Committee believes these increases align the Named Executive Officers with the salaries of the median of the industry Peer Group reflecting current market trends and the responsibilities of the Named Executive Officers. The Committee believes that the base salary of each Named Executive Officer is appropriate based on scope of responsibility, experience, tenure with the Company, individual performance and competitive pay practices.

Annual Incentive Cash Compensation (“IC”).    This program provides yearly cash incentives for the Named Executive Officers to achieve annual Company profit and business unit goals. Subject to the funding maximums established by the Committee that are described below under the heading “IC Funding Limit”, the Committee sets annual performance goals and a threshold, target and maximum award for each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of base salary. 2020 awards are measured on a sliding scale as follows:

% of Goal Achieved	<70%	70%	85%	100%	115%	130%	140% and above
% of Target Paid	0%	40%	70%	100%	130%	160%	200%

A hallmark of the annual cash incentive program has been a consistent and rigorous focus on achieving the Company’s annual net income goal. The Committee has chosen net income, not EBITDA or operating profit, as the chief financial metric for this program because it is the primary indicator of corporate performance to stockholders. When setting incentive compensation goals for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee believes that corporate performance is an appropriate measure of individual performance. Accordingly, the majority of the 2020 annual incentive compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and a substantial portion of the annual incentive compensation for each of the Named Executive Officers is based upon Company net income performance. The net income goal is proposed by Company management and approved by the Board and the Committee before or within the first 90 days of each year. The target level represents an amount of net income that the Committee determines is attainable with excellent performance under expected economic conditions. The remaining goals for the Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers are based upon individual business unit or leadership criteria determined by the Committee for the Chief Executive Officer and by the Chief Executive Officer for the other Named Executive Officers. The Committee assesses annual goal achievement and approves awards for the Named Executive Officers.

For 2020, the Company’s net income target was $1.90 billion with a minimum incentive compensation threshold of $1.60 billion and a maximum incentive compensation threshold of $2.30 billion. Actual net income achieved was $1.30 billion. The Committee evaluated the negative profit impact of COVID-19, which resulted in the closing of all production facilities worldwide for five weeks beginning in March 2020. The Committee approved payments based on 70 percent attainment (40 percent of target payouts) for the PACCAR net income goal. The Committee approved an overall payment for R. P. Feight of 62.5 percent of target, based on 70 percent achievement of the Company profit goal and 115 percent for his leadership in achieving the Company’s strategic initiatives in his role as Chief Executive Officer. The Committee approved an overall payment for H. C. Schippers of 67 percent of target, including 70 percent achievement of the business unit profit goal and 115 percent achievement for his leadership of Company growth initiatives. The Committee approved an overall payment for M. T. Barkley of 85 percent of target, including 107.5 percent for his leadership of Company growth initiatives. The Committee approved an overall payment for T. K. Quinn of 89.5 percent of target, including 108.1 percent achievement for his leadership of Company growth and technology initiatives. The Committee approved an overall payment for D. C. Siver of 62.4 percent of target, including 77.4 percent achievement of the business unit profit goals and 100 percent achievement for his leadership of Company growth initiatives. The Committee exercised discretion to reduce each Named Executive Officer’s maximum funding amount described

18

below under the heading “IC Funding Limit” in determining payout as described above. The following table outlines the 2020 goals and incentive awards for each of the current Named Executive Officers:

Name and Principal Position	Performance Measure	Target Award as a % of Base Salary	Performance Measure as a % of Target	Award Achieved as a % of Target
R. P. Feight Chief Executive Officer	Company Profit Goal Business Leadership	125	75 25	62.5
H. C. Schippers President & Chief Financial Officer	Company Profit Goal Business Unit Profit Business Leadership	95	40 30 30	67.0
M. T. Barkley Senior Vice President & Controller	Company Profit Goal Business Leadership	70	40 60	85.0
T. K. Quinn Vice President & Chief Technology Officer	Company Profit Goal Business Leadership	70	35 65	89.5
D. C. Siver Senior Vice President	Company Profit Goal Business Unit Profit Business Leadership	70	40 30 30	62.4

IC Funding Limit.    IC Awards for the Named Executive Officers are subject to the terms of the Senior Executive Yearly Incentive Compensation Plan (the “IC Plan”) approved by the stockholders. The maximum amount that may be paid to any eligible participant in any year under the IC Plan is $4,500,000. Pursuant to the IC Plan, the Committee established a yearly funding plan limit for 2020 IC awards equal to a percentage of the Company’s net income (the “Annual Pool”) and assigned a percentage of the Annual Pool to each Named Executive Officer. The 2020 funding limit equaled three percent of the Company’s net income and the corresponding maximum share of such pool for the current Chief Executive Officer and the next four most highly compensated executive officers was 39.7%, 21.4%, 19.0%, 10.2% and 9.7%, respectively. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) any award otherwise payable to the Named Executive Officers under each officer’s funding maximum based on the achievement of the IC Plan goals, an assessment of individual performance and other factors within the discretion of the Committee. The Committee exercised such discretion in determining the IC awards for 2020 performance.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation (“LTIP”).    The Company’s long-term incentive program is based on a multi-year performance period and provides annual grants of stock options and cash incentive awards. The program also includes restricted stock and RSUs, which are awarded to certain executives based on the attainment of an annual performance goal and vest over three years. The LTIP aligns the interests of executives with those of stockholders to focus on long-term growth in stockholder value. The 2020 target for each element of the long-term compensation program for each Named Executive Officer is calculated as a percentage of base salary as indicated in the table below:

Name	Long-Term           Cash			Stock     Options			Restricted         Stock
R. P. Feight		180	%		490	%		200	%
H. C. Schippers		110	%		400	%		120	%
M. T. Barkley		80	%		190	%		65	%
T. K. Quinn		80	%		190	%		65	%
D. C. Siver		80	%		190	%		65	%

19

Long-term incentive compensation cash award.    This program focuses on long-term growth in stockholder value by providing an incentive for superior Company performance that is measured against Peer Companies’ performance over a three-year period. Company performance is measured by the three-year change in net income, return on sales and return on capital (weighted equally) as compared to the Peer Companies (“Company Performance Goal”). Named Executive Officers and all executive officers are eligible for a long-term incentive cash award based upon three-year performance goals approved by the Committee with a new performance period beginning every calendar year. Subject to the funding maximums established by the Committee that are described below under the heading “LTIP Funding Limit”, the Committee approved the following goals for the 2020-2022 cycle:

Name	Financial Performance and Individual Performance Measures for LTIP 2020-2022 Cycle	Performance Measure as a % of Target
R. P. Feight	Company Performance Goal Business Leadership	75 25
H. C. Schippers	Company Performance Goal Business Unit Profit Business Leadership	50 30 20
M. T. Barkley	Company Performance Goal Company Profit Business Leadership	40 30 30
T. K. Quinn	Company Performance Goal Company Profit Business Leadership	40 20 40
D. C. Siver	Company Performance Goal Business Unit Profit Business Leadership	50 25 25

The Committee believes that the three-year change in net income, return on sales and return on capital are excellent indicators of the Company’s performance against the Peer Companies. The target amount will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks above at least half of the Peer Companies. The maximum cash award amount will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks above all of the Peer Companies. No award will be earned if the Company’s financial performance ranks in the bottom 25 percent of the Peer Companies. The Company has used this rigorous comparison goal for over 15 years. During that period the Company ranked above 50 percent of the Peer Companies in 12 of the last 15 years, demonstrating excellent performance against the Peer Companies and providing superior returns to stockholders.

The remaining portion of the award for the Chief Executive Officer and the Named Executive Officers is based upon individual business unit and leadership goals determined by the Committee for the Chief Executive Officer, and by the Chief Executive Officer for the other Named Executive Officers, measured over a three-year performance cycle. The Committee assesses goal achievement for the prior three-year period in April following completion of the applicable cycle and approves awards for the Named Executive Officers at such time. Long-term incentive cash awards are measured on a sliding scale as indicated below:

% of Goal Achieved	<75%	75%	100%	125%	150% and above
% of Target Paid	0%	50%	100%	150%	200%

In April 2020, the Committee determined cash awards for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019. For the 2017-2019 LTIP cycle, the Company ranked first among the twelve Peer Companies and the Committee approved a payout of 200 percent of target on the Company Performance Goal for each Named Executive Officer.

20

All Named Executive Officers in the 2017-2019 LTIP cycle had goals in addition to the Company Performance Goal. The award for R. P. Feight was based 35 percent on business unit profit at DAF and Leyland and 25 percent on business unit leadership. The Committee determined that R. P. Feight exceeded each goal and approved an overall payout of 168.7 percent of target. The award for H. C. Schippers was based 25 percent on business unit profit at DAF, Leyland and PACCAR Parts and 25 percent on business unit leadership. The Committee determined that H. C. Schippers exceeded each goal and approved an overall payout of 178.3 percent of target. The award for M. T. Barkley was based 60 percent on business unit leadership. The Committee determined that M. T. Barkley exceeded each goal and approved an overall payout of 164 percent of target. The award for T. K. Quinn was based 50 percent on business unit profit at Peterbilt and 25 percent on business unit leadership. The Committee determined that T. K. Quinn exceeded each goal and approved an overall payout of 180 percent of target. The award for D. C. Siver was based 30 percent on business unit profit at Peterbilt and 35 percent on business unit leadership. The Committee determined that D. C. Siver exceeded each goal and approved an overall payout of 172 percent of target. The Committee exercised discretion to reduce each Named Executive Officer’s maximum funding amount described below under the heading “LTIP Funding Limit” in determining payout as described above. The long-term cash awards for the 2018-2020 LTIP cycle have not been determined as of the date of this proxy statement because Peer Group comparison data was not available.

LTIP Funding Limit.    The maximum cash portion amount that may be paid to any eligible participant in any year under the LTIP program is $7,000,000. The LTIP awards for the Named Executive Officers are subject to the conditions of payment set forth in the Long-Term Incentive Plan. Pursuant to the LTIP, the Committee established a funding limit for the 2020-2022 LTIP performance cycle equal to one percent of the Company’s cumulative net income and the maximum share of such pool assigned to the current Chief Executive Officer and the next four most highly compensated executive officers was 45.4%, 19.7%, 16.8%, 9.3% and 8.8%, respectively. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) any award otherwise payable to the Named Executive Officers under each officer’s funding maximum based on the achievement of the LTIP goals, an assessment of individual performance and other factors within the discretion of the Committee.

Stock options.    The Committee includes stock options in its compensation program because stock options link the interests of executives directly with stockholders’ interests through increased individual stock ownership. Stock options are granted by the Committee once each year on a predetermined date after the fourth-quarter earnings release and are not repriced, backdated or purchased by the Company. The number of options is determined by multiplying the executive’s base salary on the grant date by a target award percentage and dividing by the average closing price of the Company’s stock on the first five trading days of the year. The exercise price of stock options is the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Options become exercisable at the end of a three-year vesting period and expire ten years after the date of grant. A participant who elects to retire at age 62 with 15 years of service, but before age 65, has ten years from date of grant to exercise vested options and a prorated number of stock options which are not otherwise exercisable at the time of retirement will become immediately exercisable, and may thereafter be exercised by the participant at any time within ten years after the date of grant. A participant who retires at or after age 65 has the full term to exercise options and unvested options will continue to vest. Vesting may be accelerated in the event of a change in control.

The Committee granted stock options on February 4, 2020 in accordance with the target award percentages listed on page 19. All stock options granted in 2020 vest and become exercisable on January 1, 2023, and remain exercisable until February 4, 2030 unless the participant’s employment terminates earlier for reasons other than retirement, or the participant is demoted to an ineligible position.

Annual restricted stock program.    Performance-based restricted stock and RSUs are included in the program because they link the interests of executives directly with stockholders’ interests through increased individual stock ownership and add a performance goal that is tied to the success of the Company’s business. The Committee sets a Company performance goal on or before the first 90 days of the year, and restricted stock

21

or RSU grants are made in the following year if the Committee determines that the performance goal is achieved. The number of restricted shares or RSUs is determined by multiplying the executive’s base salary by the target award percentage and dividing by the average closing price of the Company’s stock on the first five trading days of the year. The restricted stock or RSUs vest 25 percent on the first day of the month following the grant and an additional 25 percent on each succeeding first of January. Unvested awards are forfeited upon termination unless termination is by reason of death, disability or retirement. All awards vest immediately upon a change in control. Each Named Executive Officer has the same rights as all other stockholders to vote the shares and receive cash dividends. Named Executive Officers may elect to receive RSUs instead of restricted stock on the above terms, except that RSUs do not have voting rights.

The performance goal for 2020 was five percent after-tax return on revenue. The goal was determined based on the average return on revenues of heavy- and medium-duty truck manufacturers in Europe and North America. Return on revenue is defined as net income divided by total revenues.

On February 2, 2021, the Committee determined that the 2020 performance goal was achieved and approved the grant of restricted stock or RSUs consistent with the target award percentages listed on page 19. The restricted stock or RSUs granted on February 2, 2021 for 2020 performance are included in footnote (b) on page 26.

Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer

The Committee applies the same compensation philosophy, policies and comparative data analysis to the Chief Executive Officer as it applies to the other Named Executive Officers. The Chief Executive Officer is the only officer with overall responsibility for all corporate functions and, as a result, has a greater percentage of his total compensation based on the overall financial performance of the Company. Under his leadership in 2020, the Company achieved good annual revenues and net income, while prioritizing employees’ health and safety during a global pandemic.

Deferral of Annual and Long-Term Performance Awards

The Committee administers a Deferred Compensation Plan described on page 30, which allows eligible employees to defer cash incentive awards into an income account or a stock unit account. Both accounts are unfunded and unsecured. This program provides tax and retirement planning benefits to participants and market-based returns on amounts deferred. Certain deferrals are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Payouts from the income account are made in cash either in a lump sum or in a maximum of 15 annual installments in accordance with the executive’s payment election. Stock unit accounts are paid out in Company stock either in a one-time distribution or in a maximum of 15 annual installments in accordance with the executive’s payment election. Participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan is voluntary.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company’s executive officers are required to meet stock ownership guidelines that reflect alignment of senior executives’ long-term goals with that of the Company stockholders. The minimum number of shares of company stock and deferred stock units expected to be held by each category of executive officer is as follows: the Chief Executive Officer — five times base salary; other Named Executive Officers — three times base salary; and other executive officers — one times base salary. Company executive officers have three years from the first January after the executive first holds the qualifying position to attain the stock ownership target. The Committee reviews compliance with the guidelines each year. Executives who are not in compliance with the ownership threshold must retain all vested restricted stock and at least 50% of after-tax shares acquired through the exercise of stock options until the applicable stock ownership threshold is met. As of January 1, 2021, all executive officers either had achieved the stock ownership threshold or were within the time allowed to meet it.

22

Effect of Post-Termination Events

The Company has no written employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer or with any Named Executive Officer. Executive compensation programs provide full benefits only if a Named Executive Officer remains with the Company until normal retirement at age 65. In general, upon a termination without cause a Named Executive Officer retains vested benefits but receives no enhancements or severance. In a termination for cause, the executive forfeits all benefits except those provided under a qualified pension plan. Long-term cash incentives are prorated upon retirement at age 62, with 15 years of service, or death and are awarded at the maximum level upon a change in control. The annual restricted stock grants become fully vested at retirement, death or a change in control. The Company believes that the benefits described in this section help it attract and retain its executive officers by providing financial security in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment or a change in control of the Company. The fact that the Company provides these benefits does not materially affect other decisions that the Company makes regarding compensation. The Company maintains a separation pay plan for all U.S. salaried employees that provides a single payment of up to six months of base salary in the event of job elimination in a business restructuring or reduction in the workforce. The Named Executive Officers are eligible for the benefit on the same terms as any other eligible U.S. salaried employee.

Effect of Tax Treatment

While the Compensation Committee considers the deductibility of compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Compensation Committee believes that it is in the best interests of our stockholders to structure a program that is considered to be the most effective in attracting, motivating and retaining key executives.

Compensation Forfeiture

In the event the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in misconduct detrimental to the Company, including fraudulent conduct which results in a material inaccuracy in the Company’s financial statements, the officer may be terminated for cause and all unpaid compensation forfeited. Cause is defined to include: an act of embezzlement, fraud or theft; the deliberate disregard of the rules of the Company or a subsidiary; any unauthorized disclosure of any secret or confidential information of the Company or a subsidiary; any conduct which constitutes unfair competition with the Company or a subsidiary; or inducing any customer of the Company or a subsidiary to breach any contracts with the Company or a subsidiary. The provisions do not allow for recoupment of base salary which has been previously paid.

In the event the Board determines that an executive officer has engaged in fraud that has caused or substantially contributed to material restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Board in its discretion may recover from the officer or former officer any incentive compensation award which was based in whole or in part on financial results that were subject to a material restatement.

23

Changes Approved For 2021

The Committee approved a revised salary structure and an increase in the target percentages of base salary for the stock option and restricted stock portion of the LTIP for the Chief Executive Officer and Named Executive Officers based on the results of the Mercer market study conducted in 2020. The changes are indicated in the following tables.

	Percent of Base Salary
Officer	2020 Stock Options			2021 Stock Options
R. P. Feight		490	%		600	%
H. C. Schippers		400	%		400	%
M. T. Barkley		190	%		200	%
T. K. Quinn		190	%		200	%
D. C. Siver		190	%		200	%
	Percent of Base Salary
Officer	2020 Restricted Stock			2021 Restricted Stock
R. P. Feight		200	%		250	%
H. C. Schippers		120	%		120	%
M. T. Barkley		65	%		80	%
T. K. Quinn		65	%		80	%
D. C. Siver		65	%		80	%

Conclusion

The Company’s compensation programs are designed and administered in a manner consistent with its conservative executive compensation philosophy and guiding principles. The programs emphasize the retention of key executives and appropriate rewards for excellent results. The Committee monitors these programs in recognition of the dynamic marketplace in which the Company competes for talent. The Company will continue to emphasize pay-for-performance and equity-based incentive programs that compensate executives for results that are consistent with generating outstanding performance for its stockholders.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis Section (“CD&A”) for 2020 with management. Based on the Committee’s review and its discussions with management, the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

G. M. E. Spierkel, Chairman

B. E. Ford

K. S. Hachigian

M. A. Schulz

24

2020 Summary Compensation

The following table provides information on compensation for the Named Executive Officers for the last three fiscal years that ended December 31, 2020:

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Stock Awards (Restricted Stock/ RSUs) ($) (a)		Option Awards ($) (b)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (c)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (d)		All Other Compensation ($) (e)		Total ($)
R. P. Feight		2020		1,200,000		2,640,000		748,524		937,500		2,764,444		19,250		8,309,718
Chief Executive Officer		2019		940,385		770,000		336,744		2,004,665		2,248,599		81,660		6,382,053
		2018		539,615		272,250		93,674		945,067		383,065		731,336		2,965,007
H. C. Schippers		2020		856,731		1,122,000		432,827		546,329		1,346,693		14,250		4,318,830
President & Chief		2019		832,308		1,056,000		452,764		2,214,999		1,147,267		32,087		5,735,425
Financial Officer		2018		798,077		880,000		310,028		1,564,262		627,436		13,750		4,193,553
M. T. Barkley		2020		520,000		371,800		125,786		309,400		892,293		14,250		2,233,529
Senior Vice President & Controller		2019		492,942		346,775		130,392		1,065,669		947,110		14,000		2,996,888
T. K. Quinn		2020		525,000		375,375		126,988		328,913		1,235,595		14,250		2,606,121
Senior Vice President & Chief Technology Officer
D. C. Siver		2020		556,731		393,250		133,040		243,880		1,298,537		14,250		2,639,688
Senior Vice President		2019		532,308		357,500		134,423		1,169,548		1,173,791		14,000		3,381,570

(a) Represents dollar-denominated restricted equity rights awarded in 2020 under the LTIP and settled in restricted stock or RSUs in February 2021 following achievement of an annual performance goal. The amounts shown are calculated by applying the applicable target award percentage to the individual’s maximum potential base salary. Amounts shown for 2019 and 2018 have been restated to conform to the current year disclosure methodology.

(b) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted under the LTIP on February 4, 2020, February 6, 2019 and February 7, 2018, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional accounting information, including the Company’s Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model assumptions, refer to Note R in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for 2020, 2019 and 2018.

(c) Amounts for 2020 represent the awards earned under the IC Plan in 2020 that are determined and paid in 2021. Cash awards earned under the LTIP for the 2018-2020 cycle will not be determined until late April 2021. Amounts for 2019 and 2018 include IC and LTIP cash awards.

(d) Represents the aggregate change in value during 2020 of benefits accrued under the Company’s qualified defined-benefit retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan (R. P. Feight $2,764,444; H. C. Schippers $617,068; M. T. Barkley $890,078; T. K. Quinn $1,235,595; D. C. Siver $1,297,308); H. C. Schippers change in value of benefits accrued under the DAF defined benefit plan and his transition agreement, $150,498 and $579,127, respectively; and the interest earned under the Deferred Compensation Plan in excess of 120 percent of the applicable federal long-term rate as prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (M. T. Barkley $2,215; D. C. Siver $1,229). Company retirement benefits are described in the accompanying Pension Benefits disclosure.

(e) Represents Company matching contributions to the SIP (401(k) plan) of $14,250 for each Named Executive Officer for 2020, $14,000 for 2019 and $13,750 for 2018. In 2020, amounts also include a gift of $5,000 made by the PACCAR Foundation to a charitable organization selected by R. P. Feight. In 2019, amounts also include (i) tax equalization for reimbursement of income taxes paid in the Netherlands in excess of U.S. tax equivalents for R. P. Feight $62,660; (ii) reimbursement of moving expenses for H. C. Schippers $18,087; and (iii) a gift of $5,000 made by the PACCAR Foundation to a charitable organization selected by R. P. Feight. In 2018, the amount for R. P. Feight includes tax equalization for reimbursement of income taxes and moving expenses $717,586. Aggregate perquisites were less than $10,000 for all Named Executive Officers.

25

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during 2020:

Name	Grant Date		Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (a)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards				All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
			Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
R. P. Feight
Restricted Equity Rights (b)		2/4/2020								2,400,000		2,640,000
Stock Options (c)		2/4/2020												74,706		76.18		748,524
LTIP Cash (c)				147,273		2,160,000		4,320,000
Annual Incentive Cash (d)				150,000		1,500,000		3,000,000
H. C. Schippers
Restricted Equity Rights (b)		2/4/2020								1,020,000		1,122,000
Stock Options (c)		2/4/2020												43,198		76.18		432,827
LTIP Cash (c)				42,500		935,000		1,870,000
Annual Incentive Cash (d)				48,925		815,416		1,630,832
M. T. Barkley
Restricted Equity Rights (b)		2/4/2020								338,000		371,800
Stock Options (c)		2/4/2020												12,554		76.18		125,786
LTIP Cash (c)				15,127		416,000		832,000
Annual Incentive Cash (d)				43,680		364,000		728,000
T. K. Quinn
Restricted Equity Rights (b)		2/4/2020								341,250		375,375
Stock Options (c)		2/4/2020												12,674		76.18		126,988
LTIP Cash (c)				15,273		420,000		840,000
Annual Incentive Cash (d)				44,100		367,500		735,000
D. C. Siver
Restricted Equity Rights (b)		2/4/2020								357,500		393,250
Stock Options (c)		2/4/2020												13,278		76.18		133,040
LTIP Cash (c)				20,000		440,000		880,000
Annual Incentive Cash (d)				23,450		390,833		781,666

(a) See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for how these amounts are determined.

(b) Represents dollar-denominated rights that are settled in restricted stock/RSUs under the LTIP described on page 19 following satisfaction of an annual performance goal. The restricted equity rights were settled on February 2, 2021 based on the average closing price of the Company’s stock on the first five trading days of 2021, as follows: R. P. Feight 30,332; H. C. Schippers 12,892; M. T. Barkley 4,272; T. K. Quinn 4,314; D. C. Siver 4,482. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock/RSUs, calculated using the closing price of Company stock on February 2, 2021 of $91.89, is as follows: R. P. Feight $2,787,207; H. C. Schippers $1,184,646; M. T. Barkley $392,554; T. K. Quinn $396,413; D. C. Siver $411,851.

(c) Represents stock options granted or cash awards made under the LTIP.

(d) Represents awards under the Company’s IC Plan described on page 18.

26

2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows all outstanding stock option and restricted stock or RSU awards held by the Named Executive Officers on December 31, 2020:

			Option Awards(a)								Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Vesting Date		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(b)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(c)
R. P. Feight		5,414		0		43.24		1/1/2015		2/2/2022		832		71,785
		6,794		0		47.81		1/1/2016		2/6/2023		2,332		201,205
		5,352		0		59.15		1/1/2017		2/7/2024		7,338		633,123
		7,046		0		62.46		1/1/2018		2/4/2025
		12,474		0		50.00		1/1/2019		2/4/2026
		9,958		0		67.63		1/1/2020		2/7/2027
		0		8,778		68.69		1/1/2021		2/7/2028
		0		40,768		65.56		1/1/2022		2/6/2029
		0		74,706		76.18		1/1/2023		2/4/2030
H. C. Schippers		7,848		0		59.15		1/1/2017		2/7/2024		2,330		201,032
		8,654		0		62.46		1/1/2018		2/4/2025		6,852		591,191
		11,568		0		50.00		1/1/2019		2/4/2026		9,720		838,642
		24,572		0		67.63		1/1/2020		2/7/2027
		0		29,052		68.69		1/1/2021		2/7/2028
		0		54,814		65.56		1/1/2022		2/6/2029
		0		43,198		76.18		1/1/2023		2/4/2030
M. T. Barkley		10,000		0		50.00		1/1/2019		2/4/2026		973		83,950
		12,324		0		67.63		1/1/2020		2/7/2027		2,700		232,956
		0		11,372		68.69		1/1/2021		2/7/2028		3,222		277,994
		0		15,786		65.56		1/1/2022		2/6/2029
		0		12,554		76.18		1/1/2023		2/4/2030
T. K. Quinn		12,760		0		67.63		1/1/2020		2/7/2027		1,005		86,711
		0		11,756		68.69		1/1/2021		2/7/2028		2,644		228,124
		0		15,460		65.56		1/1/2022		2/6/2029		3,237		279,288
		0		12,674		76.18		1/1/2023		2/4/2030
D. C. Siver		0		12,778		68.69		1/1/2021		2/7/2028		1,093		94,304
		0		16,274		65.56		1/1/2022		2/6/2029		2,784		240,204
		0		13,278		76.18		1/1/2023		2/4/2030		3,406		293,870

(a) Represents stock options granted under the LTIP that vest in full on the third January 1 following the grant date. The vesting date may be accelerated if a change in control occurs. Options expire ten years from the date of grant unless employment is terminated earlier.

(b) Represents restricted stock/RSUs granted in settlement of restricted equity rights under the LTIP, which vest in four equal tranches commencing on March 1 following the grant date and then on January 1 of each year.

(c) The amount shown represents the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2020 of $86.28.

27

2020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table shows all stock options exercised and restricted stock awards or RSUs that vested during 2020 for the Named Executive Officers and the value realized upon exercise or vesting:

	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of   Shares Acquired   on Exercise (#)		Value Realized     on Exercise     ($) (a)		Number of Shares     Acquired on     Vesting (#)		Value Realized     on Vesting     ($) (b)
R. P. Feight		0		0		5,367		394,689
H. C. Schippers		14,424		492,394		9,842		738,974
M. T. Barkley		36,894		1,130,064		4,451		338,971
T. K. Quinn		43,768		1,276,865		4,498		342,628
D. C. Siver		31,138		694,135		4,544		345,571

(a) The dollar amounts shown are determined by multiplying the number of shares of the Company’s common stock by the difference between the per-share market price of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise and the exercise price of the options.

(b) The dollar amounts are determined by multiplying the number of restricted shares or RSUs that vested by the per-share closing price of the Company’s common stock on the vesting date.

2020 Pension Benefits

The following table shows the present value of the retirement benefit payable to the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020:

Name	Plan Name	Number of   Years Credited Service (#)		Present Value of   Accumulated   Benefit ($)		Payments   During Last   Fiscal Year ($)
R. P. Feight	Retirement Plan		22		1,169,706		0
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		22		5,892,000		0
H. C. Schippers	Retirement Plan (DAF)		30		632,030		0
	Retirement Plan (US)		4		312,019		0
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		4		1,594,074		0
	Transition Agreement		4		1,633,778		0
M. T. Barkley	Retirement Plan		29		1,825,103		0
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		29		4,624,107		0
T. K. Quinn	Retirement Plan		15		991,621		0
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		15		2,624,120		0
D. C. Siver	Retirement Plan		27		1,446,701		0
	Supplemental Retirement Plan		27		3,964,304		0

The Company’s U.S. qualified noncontributory retirement plan has been in effect since 1947. The Named Executive Officers participate in this plan on the same basis as other U.S. salaried employees. Employees are eligible to become a member in the plan after completion of 12 months of employment with at least 1,000 hours of service. The plan provides benefits based on years of service and salary. Participants are vested in their retirement benefits after five years of service.

The benefit for each year of service, up to a maximum of 35 years, is equal to one percent of the highest average salary plus 0.5 percent of highest average salary in excess of the Social-Security-covered compensation level. Highest average salary is defined as the average of the highest 60 consecutive months of an employee’s

28

cash compensation, which includes base salary and annual incentive cash compensation, but it excludes compensation under the LTIP. The benefits are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. Benefits from the plan are paid as a monthly single-life annuity or, if married, actuarially-equivalent 50 percent, 75 percent or 100 percent joint and survivor annuity options are also available. Survivor benefits based on the 50 percent joint and survivor option will be paid to an eligible spouse if the employee is a vested member in the plan and dies before retirement.

The Company’s unfunded U.S. Supplemental Retirement Plan (“SRP”) provides a retirement benefit to those affected by the maximum benefit limitations permitted for qualified plans by the Internal Revenue Code and to those deferring incentive compensation bonuses. The benefit is equal to the amount of normal pension benefit reduction resulting from the application of maximum benefit and salary limitations and the exclusion of deferred incentive compensation bonuses from the retirement plan benefit formula. Benefits from the plan are paid as a lifetime monthly annuity or a single lump-sum distribution at the executive’s election and the benefits will be paid at the later of: (1) termination of employment or (2) the date the participant attains age 55. If the participant dies before the supplemental benefit commencement date, the participant’s surviving spouse will be eligible to receive a survivor pension for the amount by which the total survivor pension benefit exceeds the surviving spouse’s retirement plan benefit. Executives terminated for cause, as defined in the Plan, forfeit all SRP benefits.

Normal retirement age under both plans is 65, and participants may retire early between ages 55 and 65 if they have 15 years of service. For retirement at ages 55 through 61 with 15 years of service, pension benefits are reduced four percent per year from age 65. For retirement at or after age 62 with 15 years of service, there is no reduction in retirement benefits. As of December 31, 2020, M. T. Barkley is eligible for a normal retirement benefit and H. C. Schippers and T. K. Quinn are eligible for a reduced early retirement benefit.

H. C. Schippers’ transition agreement provides that if he works for PACCAR in the United States for at least five years, then an additional year of credited service will be added to his nonqualified retirement benefit for each fully completed year of service.

H. C. Schippers participated in the Company’s pension program in the Netherlands on the same basis as other DAF Eindhoven employees. DAF participates in the Metal and Electrical Engineering Industry Pension Fund (the “Fund”), a multi-employer defined benefit plan covering employees of the country’s metal industry. The benefit is based on a percentage of the career average salary up to the annually indexed salary maximum multiplied by years of service up to age 68 per January 1, 2020. In 2020, the percentage of salary was 1.875 percent and the yearly indexed maximum salary was €78,348. Survivor benefits include a pension up to 70 percent of the participant’s benefit. Participants contribute 50 percent of the premiums and are vested from date of hire. Normal retirement benefits begin at age 68 and participants may retire early at or after age 55 with reduced benefits.

The Pension Benefits table shows the present value of the accrued retirement benefits for the Named Executive Officers under the Company’s retirement plan and Supplemental Retirement Plan based on highest average salary and service as of December 31, 2020 and the present value of H. C. Schippers’ accrued benefits under the Fund and his transition agreement. Present value calculations for each Named Executive Officer under age 62 assumed that each remains employed until age 62, if eligible for unreduced benefits, or age 65 if not. Additional assumptions include the use of FTSE Discount Pension Curve as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 to discount future payouts (equivalent to a discount rate of 2.45 percent and 3.15 percent, respectively, for the Plan in aggregate). The mortality assumptions use the RP-2012 White Collar Male Mortality Table projected generationally with projection scale MP-2020 (MP-2019 for 2019).

29

2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table provides information about the deferred compensation accounts of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2020. Amounts deferred reflect cash awards payable in prior years but voluntarily deferred by the executive.

Name	Executive   Contribution in   2020 ($)		Aggregate   Earnings in   2020 ($)		Aggregate       Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate     Balance as of     12/31/2020 (a)($)
R. P. Feight		0		0		0		0
H. C. Schippers		0		0		0		0
M. T. Barkley		0		18,479		0		376,468
T. K. Quinn		440,865		202,806		0		1,330,456
D. C. Siver		0		28,724		0		358,276

(a) To the extent required to be reported, all cash awards were reported as compensation to the Named Executive Officer in the Summary Compensation Table for previous years.

The Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan provides all eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, an opportunity to voluntarily defer all or part of the cash awards earned and payable under the LTIP and the IC Plan. The Company makes no contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan. Accounts are credited with interest or dividend equivalents as described below.

A portion of the amount in the 2020 Aggregate Earnings column is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Named Executive Officers as follows: M. T. Barkley $2,215; D. C. Siver $1,229. Certain of the Named Executive Officers have elected to defer into an income account, a stock unit account or any combination of each. Deferral elections were made in the year before the award was payable. Cash awards were credited to the income account on the date the award was payable and interest is compounded monthly on the account balance based on the simple combined average of the daily Aa Industrial Bond yield average for the immediately preceding month. The Named Executive Officer may elect to be paid out the balance in the income account in a lump sum or in up to 15 substantially equal annual installments. Cash awards credited to the stock unit account are treated as if they had been invested in the Company’s common stock on the date the cash award is payable. Dividend equivalents are credited to the stock unit account and treated as if they had been invested in the Company’s common stock on the date the dividend is paid to stockholders. A Named Executive Officer’s stock unit account is paid out in Company stock either in a one-time distribution or in a maximum of 15 annual installments, at the election of the Named Executive Officer. Payment of a Named Executive Officers income account and stock unit account will be made or commence to be made in the first January following the Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment, unless the Named Executive Officer elects to have payment occur or commence on an earlier date, except that payment on account of termination of employment to a participant who is a specified employee for purposes of Section 409A on the Internal Revenue Code will not be made prior to the first day of the month following the six-month anniversary of termination of employment. If the Named Executive Officer dies before his or her interest under the Deferred Compensation Plan has been distributed, his or her interest will be distributed to his or her beneficiary. A Named Executive Officer will forfeit his or her entire interest under the Deferred Compensation Plan if he or she is terminated by the Company for cause or if the Named Executive Officer refuses to provide advice or counsel to the Company or any of its subsidiaries after the Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The Named Executive Officers do not have severance or change in control agreements with the Company. The information below describes certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans if each

30

Named Executive Officer’s employment terminated or a change in control occurred on December 31, 2020. These payments do not include deferred compensation balances and the present value of accumulated Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits reported in the “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” and “Pension Benefits” tables.

	R. P. Feight ($)		H. C. Schippers ($)		M. T. Barkley ($)		T. K. Quinn ($)		D. C. Siver ($)
Termination for Cause		0		0		0		0		0
Termination Without Cause		0		0		0		0		0
Retirement
Annual Incentive Plan		N/A		546,329		309,400		328,913		N/A
Stock Options		N/A		N/A		653,915		N/A		N/A
Long-Term Cash Award		N/A		880,000		356,000		368,000		N/A
Restricted Stock		N/A		1,630,865		594,901		594,124		N/A
Total		N/A		3,057,194		1,914,216		1,291,037		N/A
Death
Annual Incentive Plan		937,500		546,329		309,400		328,913		243,880
Long-Term Cash Award		1,455,000		1,778,333		753,333		761,333		813,333
Restricted Stock		906,113		1,630,865		594,901		594,124		628,377
Total		3,298,613		3,955,527		1,657,634		1,684,370		1,685,590
Change in control
Annual Incentive Plan		3,000,000		1,630,832		728,000		735,000		781,666
Long-Term Cash Award		2,910,000		3,556,667		1,506,667		1,522,667		1,626,667
Restricted Stock		906,113		1,630,865		594,901		594,124		628,377
Total		6,816,113		6,818,364		2,829,568		2,851,791		3,036,710

Termination for Cause.    If a Named Executive Officer had been terminated for “cause,” as defined in the Company’s LTIP Administrative Guidelines, all unpaid cash incentives under the IC Plan and the LTIP, stock options (vested and unvested), restricted stock, deferred compensation balances and accrued Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits would have been immediately forfeited.

Resignation or Termination Without Cause.    If a Named Executive Officer had resigned or been terminated without cause, all unpaid incentives under the IC Plan and the LTIP, unvested stock options and restricted stock would have been immediately forfeited. Vested stock options would remain exercisable for one month from the date of termination.

Deferred compensation balances, as described in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table, would be paid in a lump sum or in installments according to the payment election filed by the Named Executive Officer. The Named Executive Officer may elect to have such payments made or commence in any January that is at least 12 months from the date of such payment election, but no later than the first January following the year in which the executive attains age 70-1/2.

Accrued Supplemental Retirement Plan (“SRP”) benefits described under the Pension Benefits Table would be paid in a form previously elected by the Named Executive Officer. R. P. Feight would receive a single lump-sum cash payment. H. C. Schippers, M. T. Barkley, T. K. Quinn and D. C. Siver would receive monthly annuities payable for life. If termination occurred on December 31, 2020, these payments would be made or would commence in accordance with the terms of the SRP on July 1, 2021 for each Named Executive Officer.

Retirement.    M. T. Barkley was eligible for normal retirement benefits and H. C. Schippers and T. K. Quinn were eligible for early retirement benefits. R. P. Feight and D. C. Siver were not eligible for early retirement benefits. Deferred compensation balances and accumulated SRP benefits would have been payable for the Named Executive Officers as described above under “Resignation or Termination Without Cause”. Annual incentive compensation earned in 2020 would have been paid in the first quarter of 2021 and long-term incentive

31

cash awards earned under the 2018-2020 performance cycle would be paid by May 2021 based on actual performance against goals. The long-term performance awards in the table reflect target awards. LTIP cash awards for incomplete cycles are prorated for retirement after age 62, with 15 or more years of service. For the one officer over age 65 (M. T. Barkley), unvested stock options would continue to vest on their original vesting schedule and, along with vested stock options, be exercisable prior to their original expiration date. The stock options value in the table reflects the difference between the closing market price on December 31, 2020 and the exercise price multiplied by the number of unvested stock options. All outstanding restricted stock/RSUs for the Named Executive Officers who were (i) over age 62 or (ii) over age 55 with at least 15 years of service would vest in full upon retirement. The amount listed for restricted stock/RSUs in the table reflects vesting of all unvested restricted stock/RSUs for those eligible for normal or early retirement at the closing market price on December 31, 2020. The closing market price on December 31, 2020 was $86.28 per share.

Death.    In the event of the death of a Named Executive Officer on December 31, 2020, beneficiaries of the Named Executive Officer would have been entitled to receive all of the benefits that would have been paid to a Named Executive Officer who had retired on that date as described above, with the following exceptions:

• Long-term incentive cash awards earned under the 2019-2021 LTIP performance cycle and the 2020-2022 LTIP performance cycle would have been paid on a prorated basis (2/3 and 1/3, respectively) following completion of the cycle, based on actual performance against goals.

• All outstanding restricted stock/RSUs would vest immediately.

Change in control.    Benefits payable in the event of a change in control on December 31, 2020 are the same as benefits payable in the event of death on the same date (as described above) with the following exceptions:

• Named Executive Officers employed on December 31, 2020 would have been entitled to a maximum IC award for 2020 (200 percent of target), a maximum long-term incentive cash award under the 2018-2020 performance cycle of the LTIP and a maximum prorated award under the 2019-2021 and the 2020-2022 performance cycles based on the number of full or partial months completed in the performance cycle. The maximum payment amounts are shown in the table above and would have been paid in a lump sum immediately following the change in control.

• All outstanding restricted stock/RSUs would vest immediately.

Deferred compensation balances would have been paid as a single lump sum in cash from the “income account” and whole shares of the Company’s common stock from the “stock account” immediately following the change in control.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the discretionary authority to provide the following benefits in the event of a change in control:

• Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options. The value of unvested options that could have been immediately vested upon a change in control on December 31, 2020 was: R. P. Feight $1,753,649; H. C. Schippers $2,083,071; M. T. Barkley $653,915 ; T. K. Quinn $655,127; D. C. Siver $696,070.

• The Supplemental Retirement Plan benefits that would have been paid had the plan been terminated following a change in control on December 31, 2020 are less than the amounts shown in the 2020 Pension Benefits Table on page 28 by the following amounts: R. P. Feight $360,193; H. C. Schippers $217,168; M. T. Barkley $490,999; T. K. Quinn $390,906; D. C. Siver $350,057. Under his transition agreement, H. C. Schippers could be entitled to $12,638 more than the amount shown in the 2020 Pension Benefits Table.

32

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

PACCAR identified its median employee using the employee population on October 1, 2020, and used total cash compensation as the appropriate “consistently applied compensation measure” in order to determine the median paid employee. Total cash compensation paid to each employee for the period from January 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020 was reviewed for all global employees. PACCAR believes total cash compensation reasonably reflects annual compensation. The identified median employee’s total annual compensation will be compared to the CEO’s total annual compensation, both as calculated in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. The CEO’s cash award earned for the 2018-2020 LTIP cycle will not be determined until April 26, 2021. The CEO pay ratio for 2020 will be disclosed in the Form 8-K when the LTIP payment is made. The CEO pay ratio for 2019 was 94 to 1.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has furnished the following report:

The Audit Committee is comprised of four members, each of whom meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of SEC and Nasdaq rules. It adopted a written charter outlining its responsibilities that was approved by the Board of Directors. A current copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is posted at www.paccar.com/about-us/board-of-directors/audit-committee-charter. The Board of Directors designated all Audit Committee members as Audit Committee financial experts.

Among the Committee’s responsibilities are the selection and evaluation of the independent auditors and the review of the financial statements. The Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year with management. In addition, the Committee discussed all matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board with the independent auditors Ernst & Young LLP. The Committee received from Ernst & Young LLP the written disclosures and letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with them their independence. Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited financial statements and its discussions with management and the independent auditors, the Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, and be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

R. C. McGeary, Chairman

A. J. Carnwath

F. L. Feder

G. M. E. Spierkel

33

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Ernst & Young LLP performed the audit of the Company’s financial statements for 2020 and has been selected to perform this function for 2021. Partners from the Seattle office of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make statements if they desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee approved the engagement of the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has also adopted policies and procedures for preapproving all audit and non-audit work performed by Ernst & Young LLP. The audit services engagement terms and fees and any changes to them require Audit Committee preapproval. The Committee has also preapproved the use of Ernst & Young LLP for specific categories of non-audit, audit-related and tax services up to a specific annual limit. Any proposed services exceeding preapproved limits require specific Audit Committee preapproval. Ernst & Young LLP has served as the Company’s independent auditor since 1945. The Company’s complete preapproval policy was attached to the Company’s 2004 proxy statement as Appendix E, available upon request.

The services provided for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are as follows:

	(in millions)
	2020		2019
Audit	$	8.42	$	7.99
Audit-Related		.30		.35
Tax		.11		.13
All Other		.00		.00
Total	$	8.83	$	8.47

Audit Fees.   In the year ended December 31, 2020, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, charged the Company $8.42 million for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Fees.   In the year ended December 31, 2020, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company $.30 million for audit-related professional services. These services included employee benefit plan (pension and 401(k)) audits and other assurance services not directly related to the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Tax.   In the year ended December 31, 2020, the independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, billed the Company $.11 million for tax services, which included fees for tax return preparation for the Company, consulting on audits and inquiries by taxing authorities and the effects that the tax law changes and present and future transactions may have on the Company’s tax liabilities.

All Other Fees.   In the year ended December 31, 2020, Ernst & Young LLP was not engaged to perform professional services other than those authorized above.

34

STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock, to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Composite 500 Stock Index and the cumulative total return of the industry peer group of companies identified below (the “Peer Group Index”) for the last five fiscal years ended December 31, 2020. Standard & Poor’s has calculated a return for each company in the Peer Group Index weighted according to its respective capitalization at the beginning of each period with dividends reinvested on a monthly basis. Management believes that the identified companies and methodology used in the graph for the Peer Group Index provides a better comparison than other indices available. The Peer Group Index consists of AGCO Corporation, Caterpillar Inc., CNH Industrial N.V., Cummins Inc., Dana Incorporated, Deere & Company, Eaton Corporation, Meritor Inc., Navistar International Corporation, Oshkosh Corporation and AB Volvo. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested December 31, 2015, in the Company’s common stock and in the stated indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.

	2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020
PACCAR Inc		100		138.38		158.89		134.55		195.16		218.07
S&P 500 Index		100		111.96		136.40		130.42		171.49		203.04
Peer Group Index		100		142.24		214.65		177.39		227.93		302.22

35

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL

The Company has been advised that one stockholder intends to present a proposal at the Annual Meeting. The Company will furnish the name, address and number of shares held by the proponent upon receipt of a request for such information to the Secretary.

In accordance with the proxy regulations, the following is the complete text of the proposal exactly as submitted. The stockholder proposal includes some assertions the Company believes are incorrect. The Company has not addressed these inaccuracies. The Company accepts no responsibility for the proposal.

ITEM 2: STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SUPERMAJORITY VOTE PROVISIONS

Proposal 2 – Simple Majority Vote

RESOLVED, Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws.

This proposal will complete the process begun by management in 2018. PACCAR shareholders gave 99% support to the 2018 management proposal to eliminate a supermajority voting requirement.

Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance. Supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively related to company performance according to “What Matters in Corporate Governance” by Lucien Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to block initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by a status quo management.

This proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman Sachs and FirstEnergy. These votes would have been higher than 74% to 88% if more shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice. The proponents of these proposals included Ray T. Chevedden and William Steiner.

Completion of the adoption of simple majority vote can be one fowward thinking step to make the corporate governance of PCAR more competitive and unlock shareholder value.

Please vote yes:

Simple Majority Vote – Proposal 2

36

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSE

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSES THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST ITEM 2 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

PACCAR is committed to corporate governance policies and practices that enhance stockholder returns. Its conservative policies ensure that the Company is governed in accordance with the highest standards of integrity and in the best interest of its stockholders. After careful consideration, the Board of Directors believes that the current supermajority voting requirements are reasonable and appropriate for the most significant matters that affect the Company.

The Company’s excellent governance practices and strong financial performance have delivered outstanding long-term results to stockholders.

The Company is one of only 38 companies in the S&P 500 Index that has an S&P credit rating of A+ or better. The Company’s governance structure positions the Company for profitable long-term growth, which benefits its stockholders. The Company has delivered an average annual return to stockholders of 15.2 percent versus 7.5 percent for the S&P 500 for the past 20 years ending December 31, 2020.

Stockholders can approve items, such as the following, by a simple majority vote.

Under Delaware law and the Company’s governance documents, a simple majority vote applies to many matters submitted for stockholder approval. For example, a simple majority vote applies to the election of directors; advisory votes on executive compensation (“Say on Pay”); frequency of Say on Pay votes; and approval of equity incentive plans for directors and officers.

The Company’s supermajority voting provisions reflect the critical items that protect PACCAR stockholders against the actions of short-term investors such as hedge funds or corporate activists. Supermajority voting provisions ensure that a broad consensus of stockholders agree on the most significant corporate changes.

The Company’s two-thirds supermajority vote provisions are designed to protect all PACCAR stockholders against coercive takeover tactics by requiring that a broad consensus of stockholders agree on significant corporate matters.

The current voting provisions encourage persons or firms making unsolicited takeover bids to negotiate with the Board to ensure that the interests of all the Company’s stockholders are considered. In addition, the supermajority provisions allow the Board to consider alternative proposals that maximize the value of the Company for all stockholders.

The Certificate of Incorporation provides that holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock must approve the following actions.

• amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation;

• the sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Company’s property and assets;

• the Company’s merger or consolidation with another entity;

• dissolution of the Company; and

• approval of a stockholder action to replace, alter or repeal the bylaws.

37

Supermajority voting requirements have been adopted by other leading companies.

Publicly-traded S&P 500 companies that have supermajority voting provisions include Eaton, Alphabet, Abbott Laboratories, Expeditors International, General Electric, International Paper Company, Starbucks and others. These companies recognize the benefits that result from this positive governance structure. The Board of Directors believes that the current two-thirds voting requirement is reasonable and appropriate to maximize value for all stockholders.

PACCAR has an excellent record in stockholder returns, governance and stockholder rights.

The proponent provides no reason why PACCAR’s excellent long-term performance would be enhanced by eliminating its supermajority vote provisions.

The Board regularly reviews developments in corporate governance and thoughtfully evaluates which practices serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. PACCAR’s stockholder rights and corporate governance practices include:

• Annual election of directors

• Majority voting for directors

• Proxy access right

• Board membership guidelines to promote diversity

• Separate Chairman and CEO roles

• Lead independent director

• Fully independent Board committees

• Stockholder right to call a special meeting

• Stock ownership policy for directors and executive officers

The Company’s commitment to sound corporate governance principles and long-term stockholder value has delivered the following achievements.

• In 2020, the Company’s directors were elected by an average of 97 percent of votes cast.

• The Company is a leader in environmental innovation. PACCAR will commence production of zero emission battery-electric vehicles in 2021.

• PACCAR has earned an environmental best practices score of “A” or “A-” for six consecutive years from CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project). PACCAR’s score of “A-” in 2020 places it in the top 15% of over 9,500 companies reporting. PACCAR’s CDP scores reflect the robust approach that the company has implemented to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF vehicles and from its global facilities.

• The Company communicates regularly with many of its large stockholders. PACCAR met with approximately 80 of its institutional stockholders in 2020.

The supermajority voting provisions are in the best interest of PACCAR stockholders because they enhance company stability, improve long-term strategic planning and ensure that more stockholders are represented in important deliberations.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company benefits from the existing supermajority vote requirement because it enhances corporate stability and enables the Board to pursue long-term corporate strategies for the benefit of all stockholders. Major steps such as the sale, merger or dissolution of the Company should have the support of a supermajority of the stockholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST ITEM 2.

38

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 2022

A stockholder proposal must be addressed to the Corporate Secretary and received at the principal executive offices of the Company, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009, by the close of business on November 16, 2021, to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. A stockholder nomination by an eligible stockholder for one or more director candidates for the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders may be included in the proxy if the Company receives information and notice of the nomination in compliance with Art. III, Section 7 of the Company’s Bylaws no later than November 16, 2021, and no earlier than October 17, 2021.

For business to be brought before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders by a stockholder, other than those proposals or nominees included in the proxy materials, the Company’s Bylaws (Art. III, Section 5 and Section 6) provide that notice of such business, including director nominations, must be received at the Company’s principal executive offices not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting. The notice must include the information stated in the Bylaws. A copy of the pertinent Bylaw provision is available upon request to the Corporate Secretary, PACCAR Inc, P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, Washington 98009.

OTHER BUSINESS

The Company knows of no other business likely to be brought before the meeting.

We will furnish to any stockholder upon request, without charge, a copy of any information that has been incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

I. E. Song

Secretary

March 16, 2021

39

Directions to PACCAR Parts Distribution Center

PACCAR PARTS DISTRIBUTION CENTER

405 Houser Way North

Renton, WA 98057

425.254.4200

Driving Directions	Parking
From I-405 southbound	Attendants at the entrance gate will provide directions to available parking.
•  Take Exit 5.
•  Turn right at end of ramp.
•  Merge into left lane and turn left onto Garden Ave. N.
•  Turn left onto North 8th Street.
•  Follow signs to Shareholder Event parking.
From I-405 northbound
•  Take Exit 5.
•  Turn left at end of ramp.
•  Go through traffic light and down the hill.
•  Merge into left lane and turn left onto Garden Ave. N.
•  Turn left onto North 8th Street.
•  Follow signs to Shareholder Event parking.

PACCAR Inc Shareowner Services P.O. Box 64945 St. Paul, MN 55164-0945 Address change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below: TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE, SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD. The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR” all the Director Nominees listed in Item 1. 1. Election of director nominees to serve for a one-year term FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 01. Mark C. Pigott 07. Roderick C. McGeary 02. Dame Alison J. Carnwath 08. John M. Pigott 03. Franklin L. Feder 09. Ganesh Ramaswamy Please fold here – Do not separate 04. R. Preston Feight 10. Mark A. Schulz 05. Beth E. Ford 11. Gregory M. E. Spierkel 06. Kirk S. Hachigian The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “AGAINST” Item 2. 2. Stockholder proposal regarding supermajority voting For Against Abstain provisions if properly presented at the meeting IMPORTANT: THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND AGAINST ITEM 2, AND IN THEIR DISCRETION UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. Date Signature(s) in Box Please sign exactly as name(s) appears in type. Joint owners should each sign. When acting as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full title. If a corporation or partnership, please sign full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

PACCAR Inc ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:30 a.m. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 10:30 a.m. The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available on the Company’s website at www.paccar.com/2021annualmeeting. PACCAR Inc 777—106th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 proxy This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on April 27, 2021. The shares of Common Stock you hold of record on March 2, 2021 will be voted as you specify on the reverse side. If the proxy is signed, dated and returned but no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” all the Director Nominees listed in Item 1 and “AGAINST” Item 2. By signing and dating the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Mark C. Pigott and Mark A. Schulz, with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and to vote in their discretion on any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments. This proxy card constitutes voting instructions to the Trustee of the PACCAR Inc Savings Investment Plan (SIP) to vote the interest of the undersigned in the shares of Common Stock of PACCAR held by the Trustee in the SIP. The shares will be voted by the Trustee in accordance with the voting instructions indicated on the reverse. If no voting instructions are timely received, the Trustee will vote the shares in direct proportion to the shares with respect to which it has received timely voting instructions, as provided in the SIP. This proxy card also constitutes voting instructions to the record holder of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) to vote the interest of the undersigned in the shares of Common Stock of PACCAR held in the ESPP. Vote by Internet, Phone or Mail 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week Your internet or phone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. : ( * INTERNET/MOBILE PHONE MAIL www.proxypush.com/PCAR 1-866-883-3382 Mark, sign and date your proxy Use the internet to vote your proxy. Use a touch-tone phone to card and return it in the vote your proxy. postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote your proxy by internet or by phone, you do NOT need to mail back this proxy card.