UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-04119
T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund, Inc. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: May 31, 2019
High Yield Fund | May 31, 2019 |
PRHYX | Investor Class |
PAHIX | Advisor Class |
PRHIX | I Class |
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by SEC regulations, paper copies of the T. Rowe Price funds’ annual and semiannual shareholder reports will no longer be mailed, unless you specifically request them. Instead, shareholder reports will be made available on the funds’ website (troweprice.com/prospectus), and you will be notified by mail with a website link to access the reports each time a report is posted to the site.
If you already elected to receive reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and need not take any action. At any time, shareholders who invest directly in T. Rowe Price funds may generally elect to receive reports or other communications electronically by enrolling attroweprice.com/paperlessor, if you are a retirement plan sponsor or invest in the funds through a financial intermediary (such as an investment advisor, broker-dealer, insurance company, or bank), by contacting your representative or your financial intermediary.
You may elect to continue receiving paper copies of future shareholder reports free of charge. To do so, if you invest directly with T. Rowe Price, please call T. Rowe Price as follows: IRA, nonretirement account holders, and institutional investors,1-800-225-5132; small business retirement accounts,1-800-492-7670. If you are a retirement plan sponsor or invest in the T. Rowe Price funds through a financial intermediary, please contact your representative or financial intermediary or follow additional instructions if included with this document. Your election to receive paper copies of reports will apply to all funds held in your account with your financial intermediary or, if you invest directly in the T. Rowe Price funds, with T. Rowe Price. Your election can be changed at any time in the future.
T. ROWE PRICE HIGH YIELD FUND |
HIGHLIGHTS
■ | The High Yield Fund posted a gain during our reporting period, outperforming its benchmark, the Credit Suisse High Yield Index, and its Lipper peer group average. |
■ | The combination of our higher-quality credit focus and underweight allocation to the energy industry was a top contributor to returns over the past year. |
■ | We are moving toward a more defensive positioning, but our analysts continue to find idiosyncratic situations that we believe have the potential to generate meaningful gains. |
■ | The macro environment currently has a significant influence on investor sentiment, and a degree of uncertainty is likely to persist. |
Log in to your account attroweprice.comfor more information.
*Certain mutual fund accounts that are assessed an annual account service fee can also save money by switching to e-delivery.
CIO Market Commentary
Dear Shareholder
Markets were extremely volatile in your fund’s fiscal year ended May 31, 2019, although well-diversified portfolios emerged with modest gains. Evidence of a slowdown in the global economy hampered equities but boosted bond returns by pushing down long-term interest rates.
The period started on a generally bright note. The U.S. economy shifted back into a higher gear in 2018, expanding at its fastest pace (2.9%) in three years due in part to stimulus from the December 2017 tax cuts and increased federal spending. Consumer confidence gauges rose as the unemployment rate fell, taking both to favorable levels not seen in two decades. Corporate earnings were particularly strong, with profits for the largest companies expanding by roughly 20% in 2018, thanks to the lower corporate tax rate and healthy revenues.
The continuing expansion encouraged the Federal Reserve to stay on its path of monetary tightening, with policymakers raising the federal funds rate once each quarter in 2018. Markets initially proved resilient to the hikes, but early signs of economic weakness led to worries that the Fed might be moving too quickly. The pace of home sales and new construction slowed in late 2018 as rising mortgage rates and a lack of entry-level homes weighed on affordability. Business investment also appeared to weaken, and gauges of manufacturing activity declined.
The Fed’s hikes eventually began to put pressure on markets. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told an interviewer on October 3 that interest rates were still “a long way” from a neutral level that would neither stimulate nor restrain the economy. Stocks sold off over the following days, and the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note reached 3.25%, its highest level since 2011. (Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.)
Growth signals worsened into the end of the year, bringing bond yields back down but weighing further on equities. The partial government shutdown that began in late December and lasted through much of January delivered another blow. The holiday sales season did not meet expectations, and measures of consumer confidence dropped sharply. The major equity benchmarks entered or neared bear market territory, defined as a decline of at least 20% from their recent highs.
The Fed responded to the slowdown and market turmoil with a “dovish pivot,” sending bond and stock prices sharply higher in early 2019. Powell and other Fed officials made assurances that they would respond to any pronounced slowdown with all the tools at their disposal and signaled that future rate hikes were in “pause” mode. Indeed, markets soon began pricing in a likelihood that the Fed’s next move would be to cut rates. Long-term bond yields tumbled dramatically, and the yield on the 10-year note ended May at 2.14%, well below its year-ago level of 2.83%.
The Fed also had to account for the impact of the trade tensions between the U.S. and China. Hopes that an all-out trade war might be averted helped lift the markets in the first four months of 2019, particularly after President Donald Trump stated that the two sides were “getting very close” to a deal. These hopes were dashed in early May, however, after the White House declared that negotiations had fallen through and then subsequently raised the tariff rate on many Chinese goods to 25% from 10%. The tit-for-tat tariff battle also seemed to be metastasizing into a “technological cold war,” with each country taking steps to limit the other’s access to critical components and raw materials.
The future course of U.S.-China trade relations is a central question facing investors. Unfortunately, I suspect that neither side is in the mood for compromise, with President Trump feeling the need to remain resolute before the 2020 election and Chinese officials equally eager to deny him a victory, and potentially willing to wait to negotiate with his successor.
One way we’ll monitor these developments is through weekly and monthly meetings of our investment teams, where our managers, analysts, economists, and legislative specialists share observations and insights. While further turbulence in the markets seems likely, I’m confident that our uniquely collaborative approach will continue to serve our shareholders well.
Thank you for your continued confidence in T. Rowe Price.
Sincerely,
Robert Sharps
Group Chief Investment Officer
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
The fundseeks high current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation.
FUND COMMENTARY
How did the fund perform in the past 12 months?
The HighYieldFundreturned5.39% in the 12months endedMay 31, 2019, outperforming its benchmark, the Credit Suisse HighYield Index, andits Lipper peer group average. (Returns forAdvisor and IClass shares variedslightly, reflecting theirdifferent fee structures.Past performance cannot guarantee future results.)
What factors influenced the fund’s performance?
We experiencedthreedistinct cycles in the past 12months.After financialmarkets benefitedfroma relatively sanguine environment fromthe beginning of our fiscal year through September 2018, significantvolatility took holdthat weighedon the performance of risk assets in the fourth quarter. Then the Federal Reserve’s pivot froman outlook that calledformultiple rate hikes in 2019 to no rate hikes significantly improvedsentiment in the high yieldasset class in the earlymonths of this year.
The fund’s global footprint is an important consideration when evaluating our results over the past year.In terms of regional exposure, the fund’s allocations to the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, emergingmarkets were the top contributors to relative results, while our European holdings were a performancedrag. European high yieldsignificantly underperformedother regionsduring the first half of 2018 andthen came under pressure in the fourth quarter amidgrowing Brexit anxiety. Despite the recovery in 2019, the portfolio’s European holdings laggedthe performance of the benchmark’s allocation to the region formost of the period.
Floating rate bank loans—our largest off-index allocation—helped dampen portfolio volatility, especiallyduring the fourth quarter. The loan asset class has historically performedwell relative to other fixedincome segmentsduring periods of rising interest rates.Although bank loans tradedlower inNovember andDecember as themarket adjustedto a new Federal Reserve narrative andreducedits expectations for further rate hikes, leveragedloans postedgains in 2018 comparedwith high yield marketdeclines.
The fund’s exposure to currency forwardcontracts also contributedto absolute performanceduring our reporting period. We use currency forwards to hedge any non-U.S.dollar-denominatedbondexposure and do not place active currency bets. Overall, we aimto have the value addsourcedfromcredit selection.
Energy is the largest industry in the high yield market. The combination of our higher-quality credit focus andunderweight allocation to the energy industry was a top contributor to returns over the past year. The portfolio’s subsector exposure includes an overweight tomidstreamcredits, an underweight to services, anda focus on high-quality exploration andproduction (E&P) companies. Energy was the only index segment to post a loss in the 12-month period, whereas ourdefensive positioning enabledthe portfolio to generate amodest positive return in the industry.
In the health care segment,AvantorandBausch Healthwere notable relative performance contributors.Avantor, a leading provider of product andservice solutions to laboratory andproduction companies, has become one of our highest-conviction holdings.Its acquisition ofVWR has createdsynergies, andits end markets are improving.Avantor’s recently completedinitial public offering was supportive for the credit as a large portion of the proceeds will be usedto paydowndebt.Additionally, the nature ofAvantor’s businessmeans that its products have applications across a broadsegment of the health care sector, andthe company is not subject to government regulation. (Please refer to the portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings andthe amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Bausch Health is a global company thatdevelops,manufactures, and markets a broadrange of pharmaceutical,medicaldevice, andover-the-counter products.Although it carries significantdebt on its balance sheet,management has beenmaking progress on reducing leverage.Additionally, we believe that the company’s fundamentals are improving as Bausch has a highly stable, growing business in contact lenses andophthalmology. The company is also not exposedto the situations—such as litigation relatedto the opioidcrisis—that are currently weighing on the performance of some areas of the health care sector.
While energy was the top sector-level contributor to results over the past year, several energy names were among the portfolio’s notabledetractors, although we were able tominimize the performancedrag relative to the benchmark. Weakness in the oil andgas segments largely reflects a slowing economy as well as concerns that a protractedU.S.-China trade conflict couldhave negative long-termimplications for globaldemand.
One area of particular stress in the energy industry is the natural gas space, where horizontaldrilling andfracking have createdthe potential for an enormous amount of new supply to enter themarket. Over the past year, thisdynamic weighedon the performance of portfolio holdings including private natural gas E&P companyVine Oil & GasandGulfport Energy, one of the nation’s largest natural gas producers.
How is the fund positioned?
We aremoving towardamoredefensive positioning, as there is currently less relative value in themarket than early in the year.Nevertheless, our analysts continue to findidiosyncratic situations, such asAvantor, that we believe have the potential to generatemeaningful gains.
As part of ourdefensive strategy, we establisheda small position in five-year TreasuriesduringApril. Thiswas intendedto be somewhat of an insurance policy in the event that potential negative outcomes—such as trade negotiationsdissolving—came to pass. This hedge contributedto the portfolio’s performance in May when escalating tradedisputes increasedthe attractiveness of safe-haven governmentdebt.
We have increasedthe portfolio’s exposure to utilities, which, in our view, is one of themost attractive and defensive industries in a slowing economy. Specifically, we addedamodest allocation to the investment-grade utility space in California, andthree of the portfolio’s convertible preferredpositions are utilities.In addition to attractive coupons, these securities fromAmerican Electric Power,NextEra Energy, andSempra Energyprovide upside potential if the equities performwell.
Investing at the short endof thematurity spectrumhas become another important aspect of ourdefensive positioning, andwe have been buying bonds thatmature within five years whenever possible. We believe this increases the probability of a positive outcome because capitalmarkets shouldremain open to refinancing these bonds.
What is portfolio management’s outlook?
Themacro environment currently has a significant influence on investor sentiment. Slowing economic growth, the Fed’s interest rate strategy, trade tensions, andthe upcoming U.S. presidential election have createda cloudof uncertainty that is likely to persist—particularly if the Fedremains on hold.Investors are eagerly anticipating an “insurance” rate cut that wouldsupport the performance of financialmarkets, but thismay not occur.Nevertheless, the current environment is broadly supportive for fixedincome strategies, as coupon payments provide a reliable income source that enhances the appeal of bonds amidturbulentmarket conditions.
The high yieldasset class continues todemonstrate its resilience.After posting a loss in 2018, the high yield market began this year with its strongest quarterly performance since 2009. Steady economic growth, albeit at a slower pace, creates a healthy environment for below investment-grade companies. Limitednew supply andrecent inflows to the asset class have createdfavorable technical conditions, andwe expectdefault activity to remain low in the next 12months.Although the economy is slowing, barring a precipitous furtherdeceleration, the pace of growth shouldbe sufficient to support issuers’ fundamentals andsustain credit quality trends.
The views expressed reflect the opinions of T. Rowe Price as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic, or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
RISKS OF BOND INVESTING
Bonds are subject to interest rate risk, thedecline in bondprices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, andcredit risk, the chance that any fundholding couldhave its credit ratingdowngradedor that a bondissuer willdefault (fail tomake timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the fund’s income level andshare price. High yieldcorporate bonds couldhave greater pricedeclines than funds that invest primarily in high-quality bonds. Companies issuing high yieldbonds are not as strong financially as those with higher credit ratings, so the bonds are usually consideredto be speculative investments. Bank loansmay at times becomedifficult to value andhighly illiquid;they are subject to credit risk such as nonpayment of principal or interest, andrisks of bankruptcy andinsolvency.
Investing in the securities of non-U.S. issuers involves special risks not typically associatedwith investing in U.S. issuers. Foreign securities tendto bemore volatile andless liquidthan investments in U.S. securities and may lose value because of adverse local, political, social, or economicdevelopments overseas, ordue to changes in the exchange rates between foreign currencies andthe U.S.dollar.In addition, foreign investments are subject to settlement practices andregulatory andfinancial reporting standards thatdiffer fromthose of the U.S. These risks are heightenedfor the fund’s investments in emergingmarkets, which aremore susceptible to governmental interference, less efficient tradingmarkets, andthe imposition of local taxes or restrictions on gaining access to sales proceeds for foreign investors.
GROWTH OF $10,000
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which include a broad-based market index and may also include a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN
EXPENSE RATIO
FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Please note that the fund has three share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, the Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee, and I Class shares are available to institutionally oriented clients and impose no 12b-1 or administrative fee payment. Each share class is presented separately in the table.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Note:T. Rowe Price charges an annual account service fee of $20, generally for accounts with less than $10,000. The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $50,000 or more; accounts electing to receive electronic delivery of account statements, transaction confirmations, prospectuses, and shareholder reports; or accounts of an investor who is a T. Rowe Price Personal Services or Enhanced Personal Services client (enrollment in these programs generally requires T. Rowe Price assets of at least $250,000). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
QUARTER-END RETURNS
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
T. Rowe Price HighYieldFund,Inc. (the corporation) is registeredunder theInvestment CompanyAct of 1940 (the 1940Act). The HighYieldFund(the fund) is adiversified, open-end management investment company establishedby the corporation. The fundseeks high current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation. The fundhas three classes of shares:the HighYieldFund(Investor Class), the HighYieldFund–Advisor Class (Advisor Class), andthe HighYieldFund–IClass (IClass).Advisor Class shares are soldonly through unaffiliatedbrokers andother unaffiliatedfinancial intermediaries.IClass shares require a$1 million initial investmentminimum, although theminimumgenerally is waivedfor retirement plans, financial intermediaries, andcertain other accounts. TheAdvisor Class operates under a Board-approvedRule 12b-1 plan pursuant to which the class compensates financial intermediaries fordistribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services;theInvestor and IClassesdo not pay Rule 12b-1 fees. Each class has exclusive voting rights onmatters relatedsolely to that class;separate voting rights onmatters that relate to all classes;and, in all other respects, the same rights andobligations as the other classes.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of PreparationThe fundis an investment company andfollows accounting andreporting guidance in the FinancialAccounting Standards Board(FASB)Accounting Standards CodificationTopic 946(ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were preparedin accordance with accounting principles generally acceptedin the UnitedStates ofAmerica (GAAP), including, but not limitedto,ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimatesmade bymanagement. Management believes that estimates andvaluations are appropriate;however, actual resultsmaydiffer fromthose estimates, andthe valuations reflectedin the accompanying financial statementsmaydiffer fromthe value ultimately realizedupon sale ormaturity. Certain prior year amounts in the accompanying financial statements andfinancial highlights have been restatedto conformto current year presentation.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and DistributionsInvestment transactions are accountedfor on the tradedate basis.Income andexpenses are recordedon the accrual basis. Realizedgains andlosses are reportedon the identifiedcost basis. Premiums and discounts ondebt securities are amortizedfor financial reporting purposes. Paydown gains andlosses are recordedas an adjustment to interest income.Income tax-relatedinterest andpenalties, if incurred, are recordedas income tax expense.Dividends receivedfrom mutual fundinvestments are reflectedasdividendincome;capital gaindistributions are reflectedas realizedgain/loss. Dividendincome andcapital gaindistributions are recordedon the ex-dividend date. Distributions to shareholders are recordedon the ex-dividend date.Incomedistributions aredeclaredby each classdaily andpaid monthly.Acapital gaindistributionmay also bedeclaredandpaidby the fundannually.
Currency TranslationAssets, including investments, andliabilitiesdenominatedin foreign currencies are translatedinto U.S.dollar values eachday at the prevailing exchange rate, using themean of the bidandaskedprices of such currencies against U.S.dollars as quotedby amajor bank. Purchases andsales of securities, income, andexpenses are translatedinto U.S.dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the respectivedate of such transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realizedandunrealizedsecurity gains andlosses is not bifurcatedfromthe portion attributable to changes inmarket prices.
Class AccountingShareholder servicing, prospectus, andshareholder report expenses incurredby each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to all classes andinvestment income are allocatedto the classes basedupon the relativedaily net assets of each class’s settledshares;realizedandunrealizedgains andlosses are allocatedbasedupon the relativedaily net assets of each class’s outstanding shares. TheAdvisor Class pays Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the class’s averagedaily net assets.
Redemption FeesPrior toApril 1, 2019, a 2% fee was assessedon redemptions of fundshares heldfor 90days or less todeter short-termtrading andto protect the interests of long-termshareholders. Redemption fees were withheldfromproceeds that shareholders receivedfromthe sale or exchange of fundshares. The fees were paidto the fundandwere recordedas an increase to paid-in capital. The feesmay have causedthe redemption price per share todiffer fromthe net asset value per share.
New Accounting GuidanceIn March 2017, the FASB issuedamendedguidance to shorten the amortization periodfor certain callabledebt securities heldat a premium. The guidance is effective for fiscal years andinterimperiods beginning after December 15, 2018.Adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.
IndemnificationIn the normal course of business, the fund may provide indemnification in connection with its officers and directors, service providers, and/or private company investments. The fund’smaximumexposure under these arrangements is unknown;however, the risk ofmaterial loss is currently consideredto be remote.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The fund’s financial instruments are valuedandeach class’s net asset value (NAV) per share is computedat the close of theNewYork Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, eachday theNYSE is open for business. However, theNAVper sharemay be calculatedat a time other than the normal close of theNYSE if trading on theNYSE is restricted, if theNYSE closes earlier, or asmay be permittedby the SEC.
Fair ValueThe fund’s financial instruments are reportedat fair value, which GAAPdefines as the price that wouldbe receivedto sell an asset or paidto transfer a liability in an orderly transaction betweenmarket participants at themeasurementdate. The T. Rowe PriceValuation Committee (theValuation Committee) is an internal committee that has beendelegatedcertain responsibilities by the fund’s Boardof Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately pricedat fair value in accordance with GAAP andthe 1940Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, theValuation Committeedevelops andoversees pricing-relatedpolicies andprocedures andapproves all fair valuedeterminations. Specifically, theValuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, andpersons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions;oversees the selection, services, andperformance of pricing vendors;oversees valuation-relatedbusiness continuity practices;andprovides guidance on internal controls andvaluation-related matters. TheValuation Committee reports to the Boardandhas representation fromlegal, portfoliomanagement andtrading, operations, riskmanagement, andthe fund’s treasurer.
Various valuation techniques andinputs are usedtodetermine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs usedtomeasure fair value:
Level 1–quotedprices (unadjusted) in activemarkets for identical financial instruments that the fundcan access at the reportingdate
Level 2–inputs other than Level 1 quotedprices that are observable, eitherdirectly or indirectly (including, but not limitedto, quotedprices for similar financial instruments in activemarkets, quotedprices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactivemarkets, interest rates andyieldcurves, impliedvolatilities, andcredit spreads)
Level 3–unobservable inputs
Observable inputs aredevelopedusingmarketdata, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, andreflect the assumptions thatmarket participants woulduse to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for whichmarketdata are not available andaredevelopedusing the best information available about the assumptions thatmarket participants woulduse to price the financialinstrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques tomaximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Whenmultiple inputs are usedtoderive fair value, the financial instrument is assignedto the level within the fair value hierarchy basedon the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument.Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associatedwith financial instruments at that level but rather thedegree of judgment usedindetermining those values.
Valuation TechniquesDebt securities generally are tradedin the over-the-counter (OTC)market andare valuedat prices furnishedbydealers whomakemarkets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yieldor price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon,maturity, andtype, as well as prices quotedbydealers whomakemarkets in such securities. Generally,debt securities are categorizedin Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy;however, to the extent the valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the securities wouldbe categorizedin Level 3.
Equity securities listedor regularly tradedon a securities exchange or in the OTCmarket are valuedat the last quotedsale price or, for certainmarkets, the official closing price at the time the valuations aremade. OTC Bulletin Boardsecurities are valuedat themean of the closing bidandaskedprices.Asecurity that is listedor tradedonmore than one exchange is valuedat the quotation on the exchangedeterminedto be the primarymarket for such security. Listedsecurities not tradedon a particularday are valuedat themean of the closing bidandaskedprices fordomestic securities andthe last quotedsale or closing price for international securities.
For valuation purposes, the last quotedprices of non-U.S. equity securitiesmay be adjustedto reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of theNYSE.If the fund determines thatdevelopments between the close of a foreignmarket andthe close of theNYSE will, affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fundwill adjust the previous quotedprices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of theNYSE.Indeciding whether it is necessary to adjust quotedprices to reflect fair value, the fundreviews a variety of factors, includingdevelopments in foreignmarkets, the performance of U.S. securitiesmarkets, andthe performance of instruments trading in U.S.markets that represent foreign securities andbaskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreignmarket is closedbut the fundis open. The funduses outside pricing services to provide it with quotedprices andinformation to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fundcannot predict how often it will use quotedprices andhow often it willdetermine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value.As ameans of evaluating its security valuation process, the fundroutinely compares quotedprices, the nextday’s opening prices in the samemarkets, andadjustedprices.
Actively tradedequity securities listedon adomestic exchange generally are categorizedin Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorizedin Level 2 of the fair value hierarchydespite the availability of quotedprices because, asdescribedabove, the fundevaluates and determines whether those quotedprices reflect fair value at the close of theNYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Boardsecurities, certain preferredsecurities, andequity securities tradedin inactivemarkets generally are categorizedin Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments inmutual funds are valuedat themutual fund’s closingNAVper share on theday of valuation andare categorizedin Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Forwardcurrency exchange contracts are valuedusing the prevailing forwardexchange rate andare categorizedin Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are valuedat prices furnishedby an independent pricing service or independent swapdealers andgenerally are categorizedin Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy;however, if unobservable inputs are significant to the valuation, the swap wouldbe categorizedin Level 3.Assets andliabilities other than financial instruments, including short-termreceivables andpayables, are carriedat cost, or estimatedrealizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly tradedfinancial instruments andthose for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or aredeemednot to reflect fair value are statedat fair value asdeterminedin goodfaith by theValuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricingdetermination is to arrive at a price that couldreasonably be expectedfroma current sale. Financial instruments fair valuedby theValuation Committee are primarily private placements, restrictedsecurities, warrants, rights, andother securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, theValuation Committee regularlymakes goodfaith judgments to establish andadjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur andcircumstances warrant. For instance, indetermining the fair value of troubledor thinly traded debt instruments, theValuation Committee considers a variety of factors, whichmay include, but are not limitedto, the issuer’s business prospects, its financial standing andperformance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, strategic events affecting the company,market liquidity for the issuer, andgeneral economic conditions andevents.In consultation with the investment andpricing teams, theValuation Committee willdetermine an appropriate valuation technique basedon available information, whichmay include both observable andunobservable inputs. TheValuation Committee typically will affordgreatest weight to actual prices in arm’s length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions betweenmarket participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, andprices aredeemedrepresentative of fair value. However, theValuation Committeemay also consider other valuationmethods such as adiscount or premiumfrom market value of a similar, freelytradedsecurity of the same issuer; discountedcash flows;yieldtomaturity;or some combination. Fair valuedeterminations are reviewedon a regular basis andupdatedas information becomes available, including actual purchase andsale transactions of the issue. Because any fair valuedetermination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is adegree of subjectivity inherent in such pricingdecisions, andfair value pricesdeterminedby theValuation Committee could differ fromthose of othermarket participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valuedsecuritiesmay be categorizedin Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation InputsThe following table summarizes the fund’s financial instruments, basedon the inputs usedtodetermine their fair values on May 31, 2019 (for furtherdetail by category, please refer to the accompanying Portfolio ofInvestments):
Following is a reconciliation of the fund’s Level 3 holdings for the year endedMay 31, 2019. Gain (loss) reflects both realizedandchange in unrealizedgain/loss on Level 3 holdingsduring the period, if any, andis includedon the accompanying Statement of Operations. The change in unrealizedgain/loss on Level 3 instruments heldat May 31, 2019, totaled $(610,000) for the year endedMay 31, 2019. During the year, transfers into Level 3 resultedfroma lack of observablemarketdata for the security andtransfers out of Level 3 were because observablemarketdata became available for the security.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the year endedMay 31, 2019, the fundinvestedinderivative instruments.Asdefinedby GAAP, aderivative is a financial instrument whose value isderivedfroman underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable;it requires little or no initial investment andpermits or requires net settlement. The fundinvests inderivatives only if the expectedrisks andrewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, andoverall risk profile, asdescribedin its prospectus andStatement ofAdditionalInformation. The fund may usederivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge againstdeclines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency andat a lower cost than is possible throughdirect investment, to enhance return, or to adjust portfolioduration andcredit exposure. The risks associatedwith the use ofderivatives aredifferent from, andpotentiallymuch greater than, the risks associatedwith investingdirectly in theinstruments on which thederivatives are based. The fundat all timesmaintains sufficient cash reserves, liquidassets, or other SEC-permittedasset types to cover its settlement obligations under openderivative contracts.
The fundvalues itsderivatives at fair value andrecognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations.Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even forderivatives employedas economic hedges. Generally, the fundaccounts for itsderivatives on a gross basis.Itdoes not offset the fair value ofderivative liabilities against the fair value ofderivative assets on its financial statements, nordoes it offset the fair value ofderivative instruments against the right to reclaimor obligation to return collateral. The following table summarizes the fair value of the fund’sderivative instruments heldas of May 31, 2019, andthe relatedlocation on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities, presentedby primary underlying risk exposure:
Additionally, the amount of gains andlosses onderivative instruments recognizedin fundearningsduring the year endedMay 31, 2019, andthe relatedlocation on the accompanying Statement of Operations is summarizedin the following table by primary underlying risk exposure:
Counterparty Risk and CollateralThe fundinvests inderivatives in variousmarkets, which expose it todiffering levels of counterparty risk. Counterparty risk on exchange-tradedandcentrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-tradedoptions, andcentrally clearedswaps, isminimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterpartydefaults. For futures andcentrally clearedswaps, the fundis requiredtodeposit collateral in an amount specifiedby the clearinghouse andthe clearing firm(margin requirement), andthemargin requirementmust bemaintainedover the life of the contract. Each clearinghouse andclearing firm, in its solediscretion,may adjust themargin requirements applicable to the fund.
Derivatives, such as bilateral swaps, forwardcurrency exchange contracts, andOTC options that are transactedandsettledirectly with a counterparty (bilateralderivatives)may expose the fundto greater counterparty risk. Tomitigate this risk, the fundhasenteredintomaster netting arrangements (MNAs) with certain counterparties that permit net settlement under specifiedconditions and, for certain counterparties, also require the exchange of collateral to covermark-to-market exposure. MNAsmay be in the formofInternational Swaps andDerivativesAssociationmaster agreements (ISDAs) or foreign exchange letter agreements (FXletters).
MNAs provide the ability to offset amounts the fundowes a counterparty against amounts the counterparty owes the fund(net settlement). BothISDAs andFXletters generally allow termination of transactions andnet settlement upon the occurrence of contractually specifiedevents, such as failure to pay or bankruptcy.In addition,ISDAs specify other events, the occurrence of which wouldallow one of the parties to terminate. For example, adowngrade in credit rating of a counterparty below a specifiedrating wouldallow the fundto terminate, while adecline in the fund’s net assets ofmore than a specifiedpercentage wouldallow the counterparty to terminate. Upon termination, all transactions with that counterparty wouldbe liquidatedanda net termination amount settled.ISDAs include collateral agreements whereas FXlettersdo not. Collateral requirements aredetermined daily basedon the net aggregate unrealizedgain or loss on all bilateralderivatives with a counterparty, subject tominimumtransfer amounts that typically range from $100,000 to$250,000.Any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is typically transferredthe same businessday.
Collateralmay be in the formof cash ordebt securities issuedby the U.S. government or relatedagencies. Cash postedby the fundis reflectedas cashdeposits in the accompanying financial statements andgenerally is restrictedfromwithdrawal by the fund;securities postedby the fundare so notedin the accompanying Portfolio ofInvestments;both remain in the fund’s assets. Collateral pledgedby counterparties is not includedin the fund’s assets because the fund does not obtain effective control over those assets. For bilateralderivatives, collateral postedor receivedby the fundis heldin a segregatedaccount at the fund’s custodian. While typically not soldin the samemanner as equity or fixedincome securities, exchange-tradedor centrally cleared derivativesmay be closedout only on the exchange or clearinghouse where the contracts were traded, andOTC andbilateralderivativesmay be unwoundwith counterparties or transactions assignedto other counterparties to allow the fundto exit the transaction. This ability is subject to the liquidity of underlying positions.As of May 31, 2019, securities valuedat$2,574,000 hadbeen postedby the fundto counterparties for bilateralderivatives.As of May 31, 2019, collateral pledgedby counterparties to the fundfor bilateralderivatives consistedof$2,930,000 cash andsecurities valuedat$666,000.As of May 31, 2019, securities valuedat$1,128,000 hadbeen postedby the fundfor exchange-tradedand/or centrally cleared derivatives.
Forward Currency Exchange ContractsThe fundis subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives.It uses forwardcurrency exchange contracts (forwards) primarily to protect its non-U.S.dollar-denominatedsecurities fromadverse currencymovements.Aforwardinvolves an obligation to purchase or sell a fixedamount of a specific currency on a futuredate at a price set at the time of the contract.Although certain forwardsmay be settledby exchanging only the net gain or loss on the contract,most forwards are settledwith the exchange of the underlying currencies in accordance with the specifiedterms. Forwards are valuedat the unrealizedgain or loss on the contract, which reflects the net amount the fundeither is entitledto receive or obligatedtodeliver, asmeasuredby thedifference between the forwardexchange rates at thedate of entry into the contract andthe forwardrates at the reportingdate.Appreciatedforwards are reflectedas assets and depreciatedforwards are reflectedas liabilities on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities. Risks relatedto the use of forwards include the possible failure of counterparties tomeet the terms of the agreements;that anticipatedcurrencymovements will not occur, thereby reducing the fund’s total return;andthe potential for losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year endedMay 31, 2019, the volume of the fund’s activity in forwards, basedon underlying notional amounts, was generally between 1% and3% of net assets.
OptionsThe fundis subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives anduses options to helpmanage such risk. The fund may use options tomanage exposure to security prices, interest rates, foreign currencies, andcredit quality;as an efficientmeans of adjusting exposure to all or a part of a targetmarket;to enhance income;as a cashmanagement tool;or to adjust credit exposure. Options are includedin net assets at fair value, options purchasedare includedinInvestments in Securities, andOptions written are separately reflectedas a liability on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities. Premiums on unexercised, expiredoptions are recordedas realizedgains or losses;premiums on exercisedoptions are recordedas an adjustment to the proceeds fromthe sale or cost of the purchase. Thedifference between the premiumandthe amount receivedor paidin a closing transaction is also treatedas realizedgain or loss.In return for a premiumpaid, options on swaps give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to enter a specifiedswap contract on predefinedterms. The exercise price of an option on a creditdefault swap is statedin terms of a specifiedspreadthat represents the cost of credit protection on the reference asset, including both the upfront premiumto open the position andfuture periodic payments. The exercise price of an interest rate swap is statedin terms of a fixedinterestrate;generally, there is no upfront payment to open the position. Risks relatedto the use of options include possible illiquidity of the optionsmarkets;trading restrictions imposedby an exchange or counterparty; movements in the underlying asset values andcredit ratings;andfor options written, potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year endedMay 31, 2019, the volume of the fund’s activity in options, basedon underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and5% of net assets.
SwapsThe fundis subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives anduses swap contracts to helpmanage such risk. The fund may use swaps in an effort tomanage both long andshort exposure to changes in interest rates, inflation rates, andcredit quality;to adjust overall exposure to certainmarkets;to enhance total return or protect the value of portfolio securities;to serve as a cashmanagement tool;or to adjust portfolioduration andcredit exposure. Swap agreements can be settledeitherdirectly with the counterparty (bilateral swap) or through a central clearinghouse (centrally clearedswap). Fluctuations in the fair value of a contract are reflectedin unrealizedgain or loss andare reclassifiedto realizedgain or loss upon contract termination or cash settlement.Net periodic receipts or payments requiredby a contract increase ordecrease, respectively, the value of the contract until the contractual paymentdate, at which time such amounts are reclassifiedfromunrealizedto realizedgain or loss. For bilateral swaps, cash payments aremade or receivedby the fundon a periodic basis in accordance with contract terms;unrealizedgain on contracts andpremiums paidare reflectedas assets andunrealizedloss on contracts andpremiums receivedare reflectedas liabilities on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities. For bilateral swaps, premiums paidor receivedare amortizedover the life of the swap andare recognizedas realizedgain or loss in the Statement of Operations. For centrally clearedswaps, payments aremade or receivedby the fundeachday to settle thedaily fluctuation in the value of the contract (variationmargin).Accordingly, the value of a centrally clearedswap includedin net assets is the unsettledvariationmargin;net variationmargin receivable is reflectedas an asset andnet variationmargin payable is reflectedas a liability on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities.
Creditdefault swaps are agreements where one party (the protection buyer) agrees tomake periodic payments to another party (the protection seller) in exchange for protection against specifiedcredit events, such as certaindefaults andbankruptcies relatedto an underlying credit instrument, or issuer or index of such instruments. Upon occurrence of a specifiedcredit event, the protection seller is requiredto pay the buyer thedifference between the notional amount of the swap andthe value of the underlying credit, either in the formof a net cash settlement or by paying the gross notional amount andacceptingdelivery of the relevant underlying credit. For creditdefault swaps where the underlying credit is an index, a specifiedcredit eventmay affect all or individualunderlying securities includedin the index andwill be settledbasedupon the relative weighting of the affectedunderlying security(ies) within the index. Generally, the payment risk for the seller of protection is inversely relatedto the currentmarket price or credit rating of the underlying credit or themarket value of the contract relative to the notional amount, which are indicators of themarkets’ valuation of credit quality.As of May 31, 2019, the notional amount of protection soldby the fundtotaled $32,968,000 (0.4% of net assets), which reflects themaximumpotential amount the fundcouldbe requiredto pay under such contracts. Risks relatedto the use of creditdefault swaps include the possible inability of the fundto accurately assess the current andfuture creditworthiness of underlying issuers, the possible failure of a counterparty to performin accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that couldadversely affect the fund’s swap investments, andpotential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment.
During the year endedMay 31, 2019, the volume of the fund’s activity in swaps, basedon underlying notional amounts, was generally between 2% and5% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fundengages in the following practices tomanage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, andrisk factors of the fundaredescribed more fully in the fund’s prospectus andStatement ofAdditionalInformation.
Noninvestment-Grade DebtAt May 31, 2019, approximately 89% of the fund’s net assets were invested, eitherdirectly or through its investment in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in noninvestment-gradedebt including “high yield” or “junk” bonds or leveragedloans.Noninvestment-gradedebt issuers aremore likely to suffer an adverse change in financial condition that wouldresult in the inability tomeet a financial obligation. The noninvestment-gradedebtmarketmay experience sudden andsharp price swingsdue to a variety of factors, including changes in economic forecasts, stockmarket activity, large sustainedsales bymajor investors, a high-profiledefault, or a change inmarket sentiment. These eventsmaydecrease the ability of issuers tomake principal andinterest payments andadversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities.Accordingly, securities issuedby such companies carry a higher risk ofdefault andshouldbe consideredspeculative.
Restricted SecuritiesThe fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable pricemay bedifficult and may involve substantialdelays andadditional costs.
Bank LoansThe fund may invest in bank loans, which represent an interest in amounts owedby a borrower to a syndicate of lenders. Bank loans are generally noninvestment grade andoften involve borrowers whose financial condition is highly leveraged. Bank loansmay be in the formof either assignments or participations.Aloan assignment transfers all legal, beneficial, andeconomic rights to the buyer, andtransfer typically requires consent of both the borrower andagent.In contrast, a loan participation generally entitles the buyer to receive the cash flows fromprincipal, interest, andany fee payments on a portion of a loan;however, the seller continues to holdlegal title to that portion of the loan.As a result, the buyer of a loan participation generally has nodirect recourse against the borrower andis exposedto credit risk of both the borrower andseller of the participation. Bank loans often have extendedsettlement periods, generallymay be repaidat any time at the option of the borrower, and may require additional principal to be fundedat the borrowers’discretion at a laterdate (e.g. unfundedcommitments andrevolvingdebt instruments). Until settlement, the fund maintains liquidassets sufficient to settle its unfundedloan commitments. The fundreflects both the fundedportion of a bank loan as well as its unfundedcommitment in the Portfolio ofInvestments. However, if a credit agreement provides no initial funding of a tranche andfunding of the full commitment at a futuredate(s) is at the borrower’sdiscretion andconsidereduncertain, a loan is reflectedin the Portfolio ofInvestments only if, andonly to the extent that, the fundhas actually settleda funding commitment.At May 31, 2019, the fund’s total unfundedcommitments not includedin the Portfolio ofInvestments were$57,190,000.
OtherPurchases andsales of portfolio securities other than short-termsecurities aggregated $4,630,198,000 and $4,040,138,000, respectively, for the year endedMay 31, 2019.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is requiredsince the fundintends to continue to qualify as a regulatedinvestment company under Subchapter M of theInternal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income andgains. Distributionsdeterminedin accordance with federal income tax regulationsmaydiffer in amount or character fromnet investment income andrealizedgains for financial reporting purposes.
The fundfiles U.S. federal, state, andlocal tax returns as required. The fund’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the taxreturn but which can be extendedto six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporatedno uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.
Financial reporting records are adjustedfor permanent book/taxdifferences to reflect tax character but are not adjustedfor temporarydifferences. The permanent book/tax adjustments have no impact on results of operations or net assets andrelate primarily to a tax practice that treats a portion of the proceeds fromeach redemption of capital shares as adistribution of taxable net investment income or realizedcapital gain and differences between book/tax amortization policies. For the year endedMay 31, 2019, the following reclassification was recorded:
Distributionsduring the years endedMay 31, 2019 andMay 31, 2018, totaled $414,364,000 and $482,687,000, respectively, andwere characterizedas ordinary income for tax purposes.At May 31, 2019, the tax-basis cost of investments, includingderivatives, andcomponents of net assets were as follows:
The fundintends to retain realizedgains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards.Net realizedcapital lossesmay be carriedforwardindefinitely to offset future realizedcapital gains.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fundismanagedby T. Rowe PriceAssociates,Inc. (PriceAssociates), a wholly ownedsubsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group,Inc. (Price Group). The investmentmanagement agreement between the fundandPriceAssociates provides for an annual investmentmanagement fee, which is computed daily andpaid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fundfee, equal to 0.30% of the fund’s averagedaily net assets, anda group fee. The group fee rate is calculatedbasedon the combinednet assets of certainmutual funds sponsoredby PriceAssociates (the group) appliedto a graduatedfee schedule, with rates ranging from0.48% for the first$1 billion of assets to 0.265% for assets in excess of$650 billion. The fund’s group fee isdeterminedby applying the group fee rate to the fund’s averagedaily net assets.At May 31, 2019, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.29%.
TheIClass is subject to an operating expense limitation (IClass Limit) pursuant to which PriceAssociates is contractually requiredto pay all operating expenses of theIClass, excludingmanagement fees;interest;expenses relatedto borrowings, taxes, andbrokerage;andother non-recurring expenses permittedby the investmentmanagement agreement, to the extent such operating expenses, on an annualizedbasis, exceedtheIClass Limit. This agreement will continue through the limitationdate indicatedin the table below, and may be renewed, revised, or revokedonly with approval of the fund’s Board. TheIClass is requiredto repay PriceAssociates for expenses previously paidto the extent the class’s net assets grow or expensesdecline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the class’s operating expenses (after the repayment is taken into account) to exceedthe lesser of:(1) theIClass Limit in place at the time such amounts were paid;or (2) the currentIClass Limit. However, no repayment will bemademore than three years after thedate of a payment or waiver.
In addition, the fundhas enteredinto service agreements with PriceAssociates andtwo wholly ownedsubsidiaries of PriceAssociates, each an affiliate of the fund(collectively, Price). PriceAssociates provides certain accounting andadministrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services,Inc. provides shareholder andadministrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services,Inc. provides subaccounting andrecordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts investedin theInvestor Class. For the year endedMay 31, 2019, expenses incurredpursuant to these service agreements were$68,000 for PriceAssociates; $1,432,000 for T. Rowe Price Services,Inc.;and $166,000 forT. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services,Inc.All amountsdue to and due fromPrice, exclusive of investmentmanagement fees payable, are presentednet on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities.
Additionally, the fundis one of severalmutual funds in which certain college savings plansmanagedby PriceAssociatesmay invest.As approvedby the fund’s Boardof Directors, shareholder servicing costs associatedwith each college savings plan are borne by the fundin proportion to the averagedaily value of its shares ownedby the college savings plan. For the year endedMay 31, 2019, the fundwas charged $27,000 for shareholder servicing costs relatedto the college savings plans, of which$22,000 was for services providedby Price.All amountsdue to and due fromPrice, exclusive of investmentmanagement fees payable, are presentednet on the Statement ofAssets andLiabilities.At May 31, 2019, less than 1% of the outstanding shares of theInvestor Class were heldby college savings plans.
The fundis also one of severalmutual funds sponsoredby PriceAssociates (underlying Price Funds) in which the T. Rowe Price SpectrumFunds (SpectrumFunds) andT. Rowe Price Retirement Funds (Retirement Funds)may invest.None of the SpectrumFunds or Retirement Funds invest in the underlying Price Funds for the purpose of exercisingmanagement or control. Pursuant to special servicing agreements, expenses associatedwith the operation of the SpectrumFunds andRetirement Funds are borne by each underlying Price Fundto the extent of estimatedsavings to it andin proportion to the averagedaily value of its shares ownedby the SpectrumFunds andRetirement Funds. Expenses allocatedunder these special servicing agreements are reflectedas shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the year endedMay 31, 2019, the fundwas allocated $1,121,000 of SpectrumFunds’ expenses and $1,936,000 of Retirement Funds’ expenses. Of these amounts,$1,404,000 relatedto services providedby Price.All amountsdue to and due fromPrice, exclusive of investmentmanagement fees payable, are presentednet on the accompanying Statement ofAssets andLiabilities.At May 31, 2019, approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of theInvestor Class were heldby the SpectrumFunds andRetirement Funds.
In addition, othermutual funds, trusts, andother accountsmanagedby PriceAssociates or its affiliates (collectively, Price Funds andaccounts)may invest in the fundandare not subject to the special servicing agreementsdisclosedabove.No Price fundor accountmay invest for the purpose of exercisingmanagement or control over the fund.At May 31, 2019, approximately 29% of theIClass’s outstanding shares were heldby Price Funds andaccounts.
The fund may invest its cash reserves in certain open-end management investment companiesmanagedby PriceAssociates andconsideredaffiliates of the fund:the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fundor the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, organizedasmoneymarket funds, or the T. Rowe Price Short-TermFund, a short-termbondfund(collectively, the Price Reserve Funds). The Price Reserve Funds are offeredas short-terminvestment options tomutual funds, trusts, andother accountsmanagedby PriceAssociates or its affiliates andare not available fordirect purchase bymembers of the public. Cash collateral fromsecurities lending is investedin the T. Rowe Price Short-TermFund. The Price Reserve Funds pay no investmentmanagement fees.
The fund may also invest in certain other T. Rowe Price funds (Price Funds) as ameans of gaining efficient andcost-effective exposure to certainmarkets. The fund does not invest for the purpose of exercisingmanagement or control;however, investments by the fund may represent a significant portion of an underlying Price Fund’s net assets. Each underlying Price Fundis an open-end management investment companymanagedby PriceAssociates andis consideredan affiliate of the fund. To ensure that the fund does not incurduplicatemanagement fees (paidby the underlying Price Fund(s) andthe fund), PriceAssociates has agreedto permanently waive a portion of itsmanagement fee chargedto the fundin an amount sufficient to fully offset that portion ofmanagement fees paidby each underlying Price Fundrelatedto the fund’s investment therein.Annualmanagement fee rates andamounts waivedrelatedto investments in the underlying Price Fund(s) for the year endedMay 31, 2019, are as follows:
Totalmanagement fee waivedwas allocatedratably in the amounts of$113,000,$6,000 and $36,000 for theInvestor Class,Advisor Class and IClass, respectively, for the year endedMay 31, 2019.
The fund may participate in securities purchase andsale transactions with other funds or accounts advisedby PriceAssociates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adoptedby the fund’s BoardandSecurities andExchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase andsale cross trades be effectedat the independent currentmarket price of the security. During the year endedMay 31, 2019, the fundhadno purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advisedby PriceAssociates.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors of T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund, Inc. and
Shareholders of T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have auditedthe accompanying statement of assets andliabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of T. Rowe Price HighYieldFund,Inc. (one of the funds constituting T. Rowe Price HighYieldFund,Inc., hereafter referredto as the “Fund”) as of May 31, 2019, the relatedstatement of operations for the year endedMay 31, 2019, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the periodendedMay 31, 2019, including the relatednotes, andthe financial highlights for each of the periods indicatedtherein (collectively referredto as the “financial statements”).In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of the Fundas of May 31, 2019, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the periodendedMay 31, 2019 andthe financial highlights for each of the periods indicatedtherein, in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the UnitedStates ofAmerica.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’smanagement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Fund’s financial statements basedon our audits. We are a public accounting firmregisteredwith the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board(UnitedStates) (PCAOB) andare requiredto be independent with respect to the Fundin accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws andthe applicable rules andregulations of the Securities andExchange Commission andthe PCAOB.
We conductedour audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan andperformthe audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free ofmaterialmisstatement, whetherdue to error or fraud.
Our audits includedperforming procedures to assess the risks ofmaterialmisstatement of the financial statements, whetherdue to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respondto those risks. Such procedures includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also includedevaluating the accounting principles usedandsignificant estimatesmade bymanagement, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures includedconfirmation of securities ownedas of May 31, 2019 by correspondence with the custodians, transfer agent andbrokers;when replies were not receivedfrombrokers, we performedother auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
July 19, 2019
We have servedas the auditor of one ormore investment companies in the T. Rowe Price group of investment companies since 1973.
TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) FOR THE TAX YEAR ENDED 5/31/19
We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.
The fund’s distributions to shareholders included $7,359,000 from short-term capital gains.
For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $9,209,000 of the fund’s income represents qualified dividend income subject to long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 20%.
For corporate shareholders, $8,848,000 of the fund’s income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.
INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Policies.” Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SEC’s website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Records.” Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
Effective for reporting periods on or after March 1, 2019, the fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Prior to March 1, 2019, the fund filed a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Forms N-PORT and N-Q are available electronically on the SEC’s website (sec.gov).
APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Each year, the fund’s Board of Directors (Board) considers the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor), on behalf of the fund. In that regard, at an in-person meeting held on March 11–12, 2019 (Meeting), the Board, including a majority of the fund’s independent directors, approved the continuation of the fund’s Advisory Contract. At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of the Advisor and the approval of the Advisory Contract. The independent directors were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Contract by independent legal counsel from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, the Advisor was guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the independent directors. In considering and approving the Advisory Contract, the Board considered the information it believed was relevant, including, but not limited to, the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting, but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with the Advisor about various topics. The Board meets regularly and, at each of its meetings, covers an extensive agenda of topics and materials and considers factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the T. Rowe Price funds’ advisory contracts, including performance and the services and support provided to the funds and their shareholders.
Services Provided by the Advisor
The Board considered the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor. These services included, but were not limited to, directing the fund’s investments in accordance with its investment program and the overall management of the fund’s portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as financial, investment operations, and administrative services; compliance; maintaining the fund’s records and registrations; and shareholder communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the Advisor’s senior management team and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund, as well as the Advisor’s compliance record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Advisor.
Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board took into account discussions with the Advisor and reports that it receives throughout the year relating to fund performance. In connection with the Meeting, the Board reviewed the fund’s net annualized total returns for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and 10-year periods as of September 30, 2018, and compared these returns with the performance of a peer group of funds with similar investment programs and a wide variety of other previously agreed-upon comparable performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Broadridge, which is an independent provider of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Board’s ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including any research received under “soft dollar” agreements and commission-sharing arrangements with broker-dealers.The Board considered that the Advisor may receive some benefit from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to which research is received from broker-dealers that execute the fund’s portfolio transactions. The Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Advisor from managing the T. Rowe Price funds. The Board also reviewed estimates of the profits realized from managing the fund in particular, and the Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the fund.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. Under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays a fee to the Advisor for investment management services composed of two components—a group fee rate based on the combined average net assets of most of the T. Rowe Price funds (including the fund) that declines at certain asset levels and an individual fund fee rate based on the fund’s average daily net assets—and the fund pays its own expenses of operations. The Board concluded that the advisory fee structure for the fund continued to provide for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale with the fund’s investors.
Fees and Expenses
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in management fees and expenses. Among other things, the Board reviewed data for peer groups that were compiled by Broadridge, which compared: (i) contractual management fees, total expenses, actual management fees, and nonmanagement expenses of the Investor Class of the fund with a group of competitor funds selected by Broadridge (Investor Class Expense Group); (ii) total expenses and actual management fees of the Advisor Class of the fund with a group of competitor funds selected by Broadridge (Advisor Class Expense Group); and (iii) total expenses, actual management fees, and nonmanagement expenses of the Investor Class of the fund with a broader set of funds within the Lipper investment classification (Expense Universe). The Board considered the fund’s contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate (which reflects the management fees actually received from the fund by the Advisor after any applicable waivers, reductions, or reimbursements), operating expenses, and total expenses (which reflect the net total expense ratio of the fund after any waivers, reductions, or reimbursements) in comparison with the information for the Broadridge peer groups. Broadridge generally constructed the peer groups by seeking the most comparable funds based on similar investmentclassifications and objectives, expense structure, asset size, and operating components and attributes and ranked funds into quintiles, with the first quintile representing the funds with the lowest relative expenses and the fifth quintile representing the funds with the highest relative expenses. The information provided to the Board indicated that the fund’s contractual management fee ranked in the second quintile (Investor Class Expense Group), the fund’s actual management fee rate ranked in the third quintile (Investor Class Expense Group) and fourth quintile (Advisor Class Expense Group and Expense Universe), and the fund’s total expenses ranked in the second quintile (Investor Class Expense Group and Expense Universe) and first quintile (Advisor Class Expense Group).
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisor’s responsibilities and services provided to subadvisory and other institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the Advisor’s mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than its institutional account business and considered various relevant factors, such as the broader scope of operations and oversight, more extensive shareholder communication infrastructure, greater asset flows, heightened business risks, and differences in applicable laws and regulations associated with the Advisor’s proprietary mutual fund business. In assessing the reasonableness of the fund’s management fee rate, the Board considered the differences in the nature of the services required for the Advisor to manage its mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a subadvisor to another institution’s mutual fund or for an institutional account and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract
As noted, the Board approved the continuation of the Advisory Contract. No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the continuation of the Advisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for services thereunder).
ABOUT THE FUND’S DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Your fund is overseen by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting or potentially affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and business and regulatory affairs. The Board elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Board’s members are independent of the Boards of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; “inside” or “interested” directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS(a) | ||
Name (Year of Birth) Year Elected [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen] | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
Teresa Bryce Bazemore (1959) 2018 [188] | President, Radian Guaranty (2008 to 2017); Chief Executive Officer, Bazemore Consulting LLC (2018 to present); Director, Chimera Investment Corporation (2017 to present); Director, Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (2017 to present) | |
Ronald J. Daniels (1959) 2018 [188] | President, The Johns Hopkins University(b) and Professor, Political Science Department, The Johns Hopkins University (2009 to present); Director, Lyndhurst Holdings (2015 to present) | |
Bruce W. Duncan (1951) 2013 [188] | Chief Executive Officer and Director (January 2009 to December 2016), Chairman of the Board (January 2016 to present), and President (January 2009 to September 2016), First Industrial Realty Trust, an owner and operator of industrial properties; Chairman of the Board (2005 to September 2016) and Director (1999 to September 2016), Starwood Hotels & Resorts, a hotel and leisure company; Member, Investment Company Institute Board of Governors (2017 to present); Member, Independent Directors Council Governing Board (2017 to present); Senior Advisor, KKR (November 2018 to present); Director, Boston Properties (May 2016 to present); Director, Marriott International, Inc. (September 2016 to present) | |
Robert J. Gerrard, Jr. (1952) 2013 [188] | Advisory Board Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies, a collaborative working to improve opportunities for young African Americans (1997 to 2016); Chairman of the Board, all funds (July 2018 to present) | |
Paul F. McBride (1956) 2013 [188] | Advisory Board Member, Vizzia Technologies (2015 to present); Board Member, Dunbar Armored (2012 to 2018) | |
Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D. (1963) 2013 [188] | Dean, Woodrow Wilson School (2012 to present); Professor and Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC, a nonprofit education and social policy research organization (2011 to present); Member, National Academy of Education (2010 to present); Research Associate of Labor Studies Program at the National Bureau of Economic Research (2011 to 2015); Board Member, National Bureau of Economic Research (2011 to present); Chair of Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economic Profession of the American Economic Association (2012 to 2018); Vice President (2015 to 2016), Board Member, American Economic Association (2018 to present) | |
John G. Schreiber (1946) 1992 [188] | Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder, Partner, and Cochairman of the Investment Committee, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (1992 to 2015); Director, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, a real estate finance company (2012 to 2016); Director and Chairman of the Board, Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (2013 to present); Director, Hilton Worldwide (2007 to present); Director, Hudson Pacific Properties (2014 to 2016); Director, Invitation Homes (2014 to 2017); Director, JMB Realty Corporation (1980 to present) | |
Mark R. Tercek(c) (1957) 2009 [0] | President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 to present) | |
(a)All information about the independent directors was current as of February 19, 2019, unless otherwise indicated, except for the number of portfolios overseen, which is current as of the date of this report. | ||
(b)William J. Stromberg, president and chief executive officer of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., the parent company of the Price Funds’ investment advisor, has served on the Board of Trustees of Johns Hopkins University since 2014 and is a member of the Johns Hopkins University Board’s Compensation Committee. | ||
(c)Effective February 15, 2019, Mr. Tercek resigned from his role as independent director of the Price Funds. |
INSIDE DIRECTORS | ||
Name (Year of Birth) Year Elected* [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen] | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
David Oestreicher (1967) 2018 [188] | Chief Legal Officer, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Hong Kong (Price Hong Kong), and T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Japan and T. Rowe Price Singapore (Price Singapore); Principal Executive Officer and Executive Vice President, all funds | |
Robert W. Sharps, CFA, CPA** (1971) 2019 [188] | Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. | ||
**Mr. Sharps replaced Edward A. Wiese as director of the domestic fixed income Price Funds effective January 1, 2019. |
OFFICERS | ||
Name (Year of Birth) Position Held With High Yield Fund | Principal Occupation(s) | |
Jason A. Bauer (1979) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Darrell N. Braman (1963) Vice President and Secretary | Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. | |
Michael F. Connelly, CFA (1977) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Michael Della Vedova (1969) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Carson R. Dickson, CFA, CPA (1976) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Stephen M. Finamore, CFA (1976) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Justin T. Gerbereux, CFA (1975) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
John R. Gilner (1961) Chief Compliance Officer | Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. | |
Gary J. Greb (1961) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Trust Company | |
Paul J. Krug, CPA (1964) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Paul M. Massaro, CFA (1975) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Catherine D. Mathews (1963) Treasurer and Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Andrew C. McCormick (1960) President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
John W. Ratzesberger (1975) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Shannon H. Rauser (1987) Assistant Secretary | Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price | |
Rodney M. Rayburn, CFA (1970) President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Brian A. Rubin, CPA (1974) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Michael J. Trivino (1981) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Mark J. Vaselkiv (1958) Executive Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Megan Warren (1968) Vice President | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; formerly, Executive Director, JPMorgan Chase (to 2017) | |
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at least 5 years. |
Item 1. (b) Notice pursuant to Rule 30e-3.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Bruce W. Duncan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Duncan is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to, or on behalf of, the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:
Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.
(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $2,684,000 and $1,874,000, respectively.
(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price High Yield Fund, Inc.
By | /s/ David Oestreicher | |||||
David Oestreicher | ||||||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
Date | July 19, 2019 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ David Oestreicher | |||||
David Oestreicher | ||||||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
Date | July 19, 2019 | |||||
By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |||||
Catherine D. Mathews | ||||||
Principal Financial Officer | ||||||
Date | July 19, 2019 |