SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
_______________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-30083
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA | 95-3927330 | |||
(STATE OF INCORPORATION) | (I.R.S. EMPLOYER ID NO.) |
3990-B HERITAGE OAK COURT, SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063
(805) 583-7744
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of Each Class: | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: | |||
| Common Stock | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $24,478,000.
The total shares of common stock without par value outstanding at September 13, 2007 is 12,253,117.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2008 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
INDEX
PART I | ||
| Item 1. | 3 | |
| 13 | ||
| Item 1A. | 14 | |
| Item 1B. | 21 | |
| Item 2. | 22 | |
| Item 3. | 22 | |
| Item 4. | 22 | |
PART II | ||
| Item 5. | 22 | |
| Item 6. | 23 | |
| Item 7. | 24 | |
| Item 7A. | 29 | |
| Item 8. | 30 | |
| Item 9. | 48 | |
| Item 9A. | 48 | |
| Item 9B. | 48 | |
PART III | ||
| Item 10. | 49 | |
| Item 11. | 49 | |
| Item 12. | 49 | |
| Item 13. | 49 | |
| Item 14. | 49 | |
PART IV | ||
| Item 15. | 50 | |
| 51 | ||
| 52 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements inherently are subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which we cannot predict or quantify. Our actual results may differ materially from the results projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “ITEM 1A — Risk Factors,” and in “ITEM 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” You generally can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “seeks,” or “continues,” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Forward looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any such statements. Forward looking statements contained within this document represent a good-faith assessment of Qualstar’s future performance for which management believes there is a reasonable basis. Qualstar disclaims any obligation to update the forward looking statements contained herein, except as may be required by law.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data primarily in network computing environments. Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges and robotics to move the cartridges from their storage locations to the tape drives under software control. Our tape libraries provide data storage solutions for organizations requiring backup, recovery and archival storage of critical data. Our products are compatible with commonly used operating systems, including UNIX, Windows, and Linux. Our tape libraries are also compatible with a wide range of storage management software packages, such as those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/Legato, Tivoli, Symantec, CommVault and BakBone Software. We currently offer tape libraries for two popular tape drive technologies, LTO and AIT. We have discontinued sales of libraries with Super AIT and DLT tape drives due to declining demand for those tape drive technologies.
We sell our tape libraries worldwide, primarily to value added resellers and original equipment manufacturers. These customers typically integrate our tape libraries with software from third party vendors and related hardware such as servers and network components to provide complete storage solutions, which are then sold to end users. We configure our libraries based on each customer’s individual requirements, with a normal delivery time of one to five working days. This rapid fulfillment of customer orders allows our resellers to minimize their inventory levels and allows us to compete effectively with distribution channels used by our competitors.
Qualstar was incorporated in California in 1984. In 1995, we entered the tape automation market with a series of tape libraries incorporating 8mm tape drives. Since that time, we have introduced a succession of tape library models designed to work with the leading automation-capable tape drive technologies. Automated tape libraries and related products, such as tape drives and tape media, represented approximately 66.6% of revenues for fiscal 2007, approximately 66.2% of revenues for fiscal 2006, and approximately 75.1% of revenues for fiscal 2005. Sales of power supplies, services and other products accounted for the balance of our revenues.
In July 2002, we purchased the assets of N2Power, Incorporated, a supplier of ultrasmall high efficiency open-frame switching power supplies. Power supplies provided by N2Power are utilized within some of our tape library products as well as sold to original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturers for incorporation into their products. N2Power products are sold under the N2Power brand name as well as under a private label brand name through independent sales representatives and distributors. Revenues from N2Power products totaled approximately 14.6% of revenues for fiscal 2007, 11.9% of revenues for fiscal 2006 and 5.0% of revenues for fiscal 2005.
Our power supplies are used to convert common alternating current (AC) line voltages found in buildings and to direct current (DC) voltages that are needed internally to operate most electronic equipment. Since purchasing N2Power we have continued to develop and market additional models and model families to broaden the product line and increase potential business prospects.
DATA STORAGE INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Storing, managing and protecting data has become critical to the operation of many enterprises and governments as the world economy becomes increasingly information dependent. The data storage industry is growing in response to the increase in the amount of data that is generated and that must be preserved. The amount of data has been increasing due to the growth in the number of computers, the number, size and complexity of computer networks and software applications, and the emergence of new applications such as image processing, internet services, medical image storage, video and motion picture image storage, and other multi-media applications. In addition, businesses continue to generate increasing amounts of traditional business information with respect to their products, customers and financial data. This increase in the amount of data that is generated stimulates increases in the demand for data storage and the management of this data.
FACTORS DRIVING GROWTH IN DATA STORAGE
| • | Increased demand from Internet businesses. The growth in the Internet has created businesses that depend on the creation, access to and archival storage of data. We believe this demand will continue to grow as individuals and businesses increase their reliance on the Internet for communications, commerce and data retrieval. |
| • | Growth in new types of data. New types of data are also fueling the growth in data storage. For example, graphics, audio, video, medical and security images, and multi-media uses such as video on demand, require far greater storage capacity than text and financial data. |
| • | Recognition of the critical importance ofdata. Corporate databases contain useful information about customer records, order patterns and other factors that can be analyzed and transformed into a valuable asset and a competitive advantage. The ability to efficiently store, manage and protect this information is important to the value and success of many businesses. The usefulness of past and present data is further enhanced by sophisticated data mining software applications that can access and analyze large databases. |
| • | Growing awareness of the need for disasterprotection. Companies are recognizing that without their data they may not survive. Natural disasters, as well as overt and covert actions targeted at individual companies or classes of users, can destroy data and entire data centers, threatening a company’s very existence. Systematic replication and secure off-site storage of corporate data is recognized as the best defense against catastrophic data loss. Tape libraries are a key technology in most corporate data disaster protection plans. |
| • | Compliance with new regulatory requirements for recordsretention. Many businesses now must deal with new regulatory requirements from various governmental agencies that require businesses to retain data for longer periods of time. The regulations that have received the most visibility include HIPAA requirements covering medical records; Sarbanes-Oxley, which addresses corporate governance; and Rule 17a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, regarding recordkeeping requirements for the securities industry. These regulations and others are projected to increase demand for long-term storage capacity over the next few years. |
| • | Growth in network computing applications anddata. The use of computer networks has shifted critical information and applications to network servers to allow more people to gain access to stored data as well as to create new data. As the speed of network computing has increased, numerous new applications have become feasible such as computer fax and e-mail, all of which generate progressively more data. Organizations are increasingly aware of the need to protect this data, as networks become a mission-critical element of many operations. |
| • | Decrease in the costs of storing data. The costs of data storage have decreased with advances in technology and improved manufacturing processes. We expect these costs to continue to decrease. The decrease in the cost of data storage encourages the storage of more data and makes it more cost effective to simply add more storage capacity than to remove old data, which in the past may have been purged periodically. |
ADVANCES IN DATA STORAGE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
The growth in data is contributing to an evolution in traditional storage solutions. New technologies are designed to provide high-speed connectivity for data-intensive applications across multiple operating systems. These new methods of storage and data management technologies include the following:
| • | Fibre Channel. Fibre Channel is an interface technology based on industry standards for the connection of storage devices to networks. Interface is the term used to describe the electronics, cabling and software used to facilitate communications between devices. With Fibre Channel, users are better able to share stored information with other storage devices and servers over longer distances, with faster data transfer speeds, thereby increasing the importance of storage area networks. |
| • | Storage Area Networks. Storage Area Network, or SAN, architecture applies the inherent benefits of a networked approach to data storage applications, which allows data to move efficiently and reliably between multiple storage devices and servers. The benefits of SAN architecture also include increasing the expandability of existing storage solutions and providing a higher level of connectivity than exists with traditional technologies. Additionally, SANs are able to provide these benefits across multiple operating systems. |
| • | Advanced storage management software. This software automatically migrates infrequently accessed data to the lower cost storage medium such as a tape library. A user’s request for this data at some later date will recall the data automatically from the tape library. This process reduces the overall storage cost by using the least expensive storage medium to store data that is not expected to be needed on a frequent basis. Advances in storage management software have increased the ability of businesses to more cost-effectively store, manage and retrieve data, which in turn allows businesses to operate more efficiently. |
| • | Network Attached Storage. Current storage devices are dependent on a file server for all commands and control. Network attached storage devices give storage devices file server functionality, which allow users to plug a storage device directly into a network without requiring a separate file server. This allows users to maintain, or even enhance, system performance while saving on both time and cost. |
TYPES OF DATA STORAGE
Current non-volatile storage solutions are based primarily on two technologies: magnetic disk and magnetic tape. These technologies represent a compromise among a variety of competing factors including capacity, cost, speed, portability and data reliability. Magnetic tapes are removable, which allows them to be transported easily to an off-site location for security or protection from physical harm. Magnetic disks provide quicker access to stored data and generally are used when speed is important. Less frequently used data is often migrated from magnetic disks to tape storage. Tape libraries provide an online solution, where less frequently used data files are stored on tape at substantially lower cost compared to disk while still providing automated access.
TAPE LIBRARIES AND APPLICATIONS
Tape libraries automate the tape loading process, eliminate errors induced by human operators, and enhance security compared to tapes that must be retrieved and loaded manually. Tape libraries can also be operated from remote locations around the clock, thus, eliminating the need for an operator. Automated tape libraries are a key component in a company’s overall storage solution and data protection strategy.
Tape drives and tape media are the two key components of tape libraries. The costs of tape drives and tape media have declined with advances in technology, and we expect this trend to continue. As prices decline, new applications for automated storage become justified, further increasing the number of applications that can benefit from the use of tape libraries. We believe that continued technological improvements in tape drives and tape media will continue to reduce overall storage costs in the future.
Current and emerging applications for tape libraries include:
| • | Automated backup. Backup is the creation of a duplicate copy of current data for the purpose of recovering the data in the event the original is lost or damaged. An automated tape library, in conjunction with storage management software, can backup network data at any time without human intervention. A library with multiple tape drives can backup data using all of its drives simultaneously, thus significantly speeding up the recording process. Backup tapes can be removed from the library and stored in an off-site location for protection against a loss of the primary site. |
| • | Archiving. Archiving is the storage of data for historical purposes. When information is stored on tape, automated tape libraries, under application control, can catalog tapes for future retrieval and prevent unauthorized removal or corruption of data by using password or key lock protection. Archival tapes provide a historic record for use in fraud detection, audit, legal and other processes. Tape libraries are also used for archiving due to benefits offered by the tape medium, such as long-term data integrity, resistance to environmental contamination, ease of relocation and low cost. |
| • | Image management. Storage-intensive applications such as satellite mapping and medical image management systems are turning to tape libraries because of the cost advantage over traditional storage methods. X-ray images or MRI results, for instance, must frequently be kept on file for years. Storing a digitized image in a tape library costs considerably less than storing a film copy, and can be retrieved years later with the click of a mouse. |
DISTRIBUTION OF TAPE LIBRARY PRODUCTS
The requirements for storage solutions vary depending on the size of an enterprise, the type of data generated and the amount of data to be stored. With the increased dependence on stored data, most organizations, regardless of their size, have a heightened need for storage solutions that integrate devices such as tape drives, tape libraries and storage management software. Those organizations with sufficient in-house information technology resources can rely on their internal infrastructure and expertise to design, purchase and implement their own storage solutions. These organizations may elect to purchase equipment from distributors or directly from the original equipment manufacturers. Many organizations, however, do not have sufficient in-house resources but have the same need for data storage solutions. These organizations often look to value added resellers to design, supply and install their storage solutions.
Value added resellers develop and install storage solutions for enterprises that face complex storage needs but lack the in-house capability of designing and implementing the proper solution or have chosen to outsource these functions. Typically, the value added reseller will select among a variety of different hardware technologies and software options, as well as provide installation and other services, to deliver a complete storage solution for the end user. Value added resellers require rapid turnaround of orders, custom configuration of tape libraries, drop shipment to their customer’s site, software, and marketing and technical support.
Original equipment manufacturers generally resell products made by others under their own brand name and typically assume responsibility for product sales, service and support. Original equipment manufacturers enable manufacturers, such as Qualstar, to reach end users not served by other channels and to serve select vertical markets where specific original equipment manufacturers have exceptional strength. Original equipment manufacturers require special services such as product configuration control, extensive qualification testing, custom colors and private labeling.
OUR TAPE LIBRARY SOLUTIONS
We offer storage solutions that respond to the growing data management challenges facing businesses today, while addressing the unique needs of value added resellers and original equipment manufacturers.
We believe that high reliability is important to the end users of our products due to the critical nature of the data that is being stored, shorter time periods available for the back-up operations, and the operation of backup systems during hours when personnel may not be available to respond to problems. To address these concerns, we emphasize quality and reliability in the design, manufacturing and testing of our products which reduces the potential for product failures and results in products that require little maintenance.
The technology utilized in automated tape libraries is continuously evolving due to advances in data recording methods, component cost reductions, advances in semiconductor and microprocessor technologies, and a general trend toward miniaturization in the electronics industry. This changing technology requires that we continuously develop and market new products to prevent our product lines from becoming obsolete.
Our tape libraries are compatible with over 45 third-party storage management software packages, including those supplied by Computer Associates, EMC/Legato, Tivoli, Symantec, CommVault and BakBone Software. Storage management software enables network administrators to allocate the use of storage technologies among user groups or tasks, to manage data from a central location, and to retrieve, transfer and backup data between multiple workstations. We believe that storage management software is a crucial component of any automated storage installation, and lack of compatibility is a significant barrier to entry for new tape library competitors. To ensure compatibility, our engineers work with independent software vendors during the product development cycles. We do not have contracts with any independent software vendors, nor do we need access to their software code to design our products. We maintain relationships with them by making tape libraries available so they can qualify their software to work with our tape libraries and by evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape libraries. We also support our relationships with them by keeping them informed about current and anticipated changes to our products and by referring business to them when value added resellers or end users inquire about storage management software sources.
STRATEGY
Our goal is to enhance our position as a supplier of automated tape libraries and to maintain or increase our market share in each of the product categories in which we compete. To achieve this goal, we intend to:
| • | Focus our development efforts on higher margin product categories. Early in Fiscal 2007 we began shipments of a newly-developed library system referred to as the XLS family of products. The XLS expands the breadth of our product line into the enterprise computing environment where tape capacities may range into the thousands of tapes. We intend to continue to build on this product category with future product releases and enhancements in order to pursue this market segment where the potential margins are higher than we have traditionally enjoyed. |
| • | Focus on value added reseller channels. We sell our products primarily through selected value added resellers who have a strong market presence, have demonstrated the ability to work directly with end users, and who maintain relationships with major vendors of storage management software. Because we market our products primarily through this channel, we have implemented a variety of programs to support and enhance our relationships with our reseller partners. These programs are designed to benefit the reseller and increase the likelihood of selling our products. We intend to maintain our marketing presence in support of this channel. We conduct business with our value added resellers on an individual purchase order basis and no long-term purchase commitments are involved. |
| • | Maintain and strengthen original equipment manufacturerrelationships. We sell our products to several companies under private label or original equipment manufacturer relationships. Original equipment manufacturer sales enable us to reach some end users not served by our value added resellers. The same product characteristics that make our tape libraries attractive to value added resellers also are important to original equipment manufacturers. We conduct business with our original equipment manufacturer customers on an individual purchase order basis and no long-term purchase commitments are involved. |
Our strategy for the power supply business is to selectively pursue market opportunities where we can command a premium price for high-efficiency products rather than becoming a commodity supplier. As electronic devices continue to shrink in size, many designers are forced to consider our high-density, high-efficiency approach.
We believe that our experience, efficiency and control over the development and manufacture of new products are key factors in the successful execution of our strategy. We design our tape libraries with a high percentage of common parts, use quality components and minimize the number of moving parts. We utilize proprietary techniques in the design, production and testing of our libraries in order to simplify the manufacturing process and reduce our costs. We manufacture all of our products at a single facility and we control our inventory closely to provide rapid delivery to our customers. These steps allow us to design and bring to market new products in response to changing technology.
PRODUCTS
Tape Libraries
We offer a number of tape library families, each capable of incorporating one or more tape drive technologies, as summarized in the following table:
Product Family | Tape Drive Technology | Range of Tape Cartridges | Maximum Capacity in Terabytes(1) | ||||
| TLS-4000 | Sony AIT | 12 to 600 | 240 | ||||
| TLS-8000 | LTO | 11 to 264 | 211 | ||||
| RLS-4000 | Sony AIT | 22 to 70 | 28 | ||||
| RLS-8000 | LTO | 12 to 44 | 35 | ||||
| XLS Series | LTO | 295-2805 | (2) | 2,244 | (2) | ||
____________
| (1) | A Terabyte is one million megabytes, or one thousand gigabytes. The table shows native capacity and excludes gains from data compression, which can increase capacity by more than 100%. |
| (2) | 2,805 tapes and 2,244 terabytes reflect the product configuration at its initial release stage. Planned future releases of internal firmware will allow expansion to as high as 6,265 tapes and 5,012 terabytes using LTO tape technology. |
Our tape library families include a number of models that differ in storage capacity, price and features. Our libraries are installed in network computing environments ranging from small departmental networks to enterprise-wide networks supporting hundreds of users. We believe that selling products for multiple tape drive technologies insulates us somewhat from the dynamics of the marketplace as various tape standards compete for market share. This helps our products appeal to the broadest possible range of end user market segments. This wide range of products makes us a one-stop supplier for our value added reseller and original equipment manufacturer customers, enabling them to meet most end user requirements for a specific tape format or data capacity.
Tape libraries generally contain two or more tape drives and from ten to thousands of tapes. We design our tape libraries for continuous, unattended operation. Multiple tape drives allow simultaneous access to different data files by different users on the network, and increase the rate at which data can move on to, out of, or within the network. A library with multiple tape drives can back up data using multiple drives simultaneously, significantly speeding up the recording process. In some of our libraries, tape cartridges are stored in removable magazines, allowing for easy bulk removal of the tapes. Our libraries also offer features such as barcode readers to scan cartridge labels and an input/output port for importing and exporting tapes under system control. Several of our library models are expandable in the field by increasing the number of tape storage positions. This feature provides the end user with the ability to increase data capacity as storage needs grow.
We continue to develop and release new libraries to expand our product offerings to meet the changing demands of the marketplace. In addition, we continue to enhance and improve our existing products to maintain our competitive position.
Some of our tape libraries incorporate a number of specialized features that we believe improve reliability, serviceability and performance, including:
| • | Rapid tape drive replacement. We design our libraries so that a tape drive can be replaced quickly without special tools. This feature minimizes the off-line time required when a tape drive must be replaced, and frequently avoids the high cost and delays of a service call. |
| • | Fibre Channel connectivity. We offer a Fibre Channel option on many of our models for connection to Storage Area Networks and other high performance applications. |
| • | Closed-loop servo control. Our tape libraries use digital closed-loop servo control for robotic motion to provide precise tape handling. This yields motion that is smooth, repeatable and highly reliable. |
| • | Brushless motors. Motors are a key component in any robotic system. We use only brushless electric motors in our tape libraries. Brushless motors provide longer life and less electrical noise compared to conventional brush-type motors. We build many of our own motors in order to obtain optimum performance and reliability. |
| • | Remote management. Many larger companies with global back-up requirements or disaster management programs require tape libraries that can be located off-site in various regions, but that must be administered from a single location. With our remote library manager, customers can put libraries anywhere in the world and manage them from a single administrative hub using a standard web browser. |
Our RLS Series of tape libraries are designed to fit efficiently in equipment racks and provide back-up capacity in only five standard units, or a total of 8.75 inches of rack space. In addition, some models in the RLS series are designed to support dual-redundant power supplies and hot-swappable tape drives.
Our XLS family of tape libraries is designed to be expandable from 300 to over 6000 tapes and is focused on the needs of large enterprises. The XLS product is feature rich and is intended to provide the customer with a highly reliable and high efficiency solution. Initial customer shipments commenced in July 2006.
Power Supplies
In addition to tape libraries, we design and sell ultrasmall, open frame, high efficiency switching power supplies. These power supplies are used to convert AC line voltage to DC for use in a wide variety of electronic equipment such as telecommunications equipment, servers, routers, switches, wireless systems and gaming devices.
Our power supplies are sold under the N2 Power brand. We have specialized in units that are less than 1¾ inches high and that are optimized for high efficiency operation. The high efficiency allows the units to be operated in confined spaces without heating up the surrounding equipment. These products are manufactured for us in China and sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEM) and contract manufacturers as well as to distributors.
We believe that as worldwide energy concerns and energy costs rise, our high efficiency approach will become more important. Additionally, these power supplies are utilized within some of our tape library products. We have developed a line of power supply products that deliver up to twice the power in half the space of competitive products. Manufacturers of servers, routers, switches, telecom gear, and other process-based equipment continuously pursue smaller, more powerful, and more efficient power sources for their equipment to remain competitive.
Each power supply undergoes a complete functional test and a multi hour burn-in to insure that every unit meets our stringent quality requirements. We believe our high power factor design reduces loads on both generating stations and air-cooling systems.
Other Products
We also sell ancillary products related to our tape libraries, such as tape media, tape magazines, cables, bar code labels and fiber channel adapters.
SALES AND MARKETING
Sales
We sell our tape library products primarily through value added resellers. Our sales force will initiate contact with value added resellers who are candidates to sell our tape libraries. We strive to develop relationships with resellers who have expertise in storage management applications, established relationships with end users and the experience to understand and satisfy their customers’ needs.
We believe that by selling directly to value added resellers, we have an advantage over competitors who will often sell directly to end users, thereby competing with their resellers. Some of the advantages of our strategy include the following:
| • | Higher profit margins. Focusing on this channel, we achieve economies that result in higher profit margins to be shared by both the reseller and us. |
| • | Custom configurations. We offer custom configurations of our products, such as special paint, private branding and non-standard options, on very short notice. |
| • | Channel conflicts avoided. We refer substantially all end user inquiries to our reseller partners. Frequently, our sales force will make end user visits with resellers to help close a pending sale. |
| • | Credit. We extend credit terms to resellers who meet our credit requirements. |
| • | Rapid delivery. We generally ship a product within one to five working days of confirming an order, rivaling the delivery time of competitors that use distributors to bring products to market. |
Although we sell our tape libraries primarily to value added resellers, we believe that original equipment manufacturers are an important element of our business. The sales cycle for original equipment manufacturers generally encompasses six months to one year and may involve extensive product and system qualification testing, evaluation, integration and verification. Original equipment manufacturers typically assume responsibility for product sales, service and support.
Our international sales are currently directed from our corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. All of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Revenues from customers outside of North America were approximately $5.0 million, or 24.4% of revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately $5.7 million, or 26.1% of revenues in fiscal 2006, and approximately $6.9 million, or 27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005.
Our sales are spread across a broad customer base. Revenues from Qualstar’s two largest customers combined were approximately 11.9%, 13.4%, and 13.9% for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue.
Marketing
We support our sales efforts with a broad array of marketing programs designed to generate brand awareness, attract and retain qualified value added resellers and inform end users about the advantages of our products. We provide our resellers with a full range of marketing materials, including product specifications, sales literature, software connectivity information and product application notes.
We train our resellers to sell our products and to answer customers’ questions. We advertise in key publications and participate in trade shows. We display our products under the Qualstar brand name at some trade shows and participate in other trade shows in partnership with our principal suppliers and resellers. We support our marketing and customer support with a website that features comprehensive marketing and product information. We conduct sales and technical training classes for our resellers. We also conduct various promotional activities for resellers such as cooperative advertising.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT
We believe that strong customer service and technical support is an essential aspect of our business. Our customer service and technical support efforts consist of the following components:
| • | Technical support. Our technical support personnel are available twenty-four hours per day, Monday through Friday. Technical support personnel are available to all customers at no charge by telephone and e-mail to answer questions and solve problems relating to our products. Our technical support personnel are trained in all aspects of our products. Our support staff is located at our headquarters in Simi Valley, California. We sell service contracts for on-site service of our tape libraries installed within the United States and Canada, which are fulfilled by IBM Corporation and on-site service contracts sold in Europe are fulfilled by Eastman Kodak S.A. Commercial Imaging Group. |
• | Installation services. Our technical support personnel provide assistance to our resellers by traveling to the end user’s location to assist the reseller or end user with setup and installation on many of our larger library systems, such as the XLS series of products. |
| • | Sales engineering. Our engineers provide pre-sales support to our resellers, and post-sales support if necessary. Engineers typically become involved in more complex problem-solving situations involving interactions between our products, third-party software, network server hardware and the network operating systems. Engineers work with resellers and end users over the telephone and at an end user site as required. |
| • | Training. We offer a product maintenance training program for end users, value added resellers, original equipment manufacturers, customer service and technical support personnel. We conduct training classes at our headquarters. |
| • | Warranty. We provide a three year warranty on our TLS and RLS tape libraries and a one year warranty on our XLS tape libraries. Some TLS and all RLS models have three year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of components, or if necessary, complete libraries. All other TLS models have a one-year advance replacement warranty with the second and third year being return-to-factory for service at no charge. XLS libraries sold in North America have a one year onsite service warranty and XLS libraries sold outside of North America have one year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of components, or if necessary, complete libraries. Customers may purchase extended advance replacement service coverage and on-site service if they are located in the United States, Canada and most countries within Europe. |
MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLIERS
We manufacture all of our tape libraries at our facility in Simi Valley, California. We operate our manufacturing on one daily eight-hour shift. However, if required, we have the ability to add a second or third shift to increase our capacity.
To respond rapidly to orders, we build our tape libraries to a semi-finished state, perform full testing and then place the tape libraries in a holding area until an order is received. Once an order is confirmed, we remove the unit from the holding area, install tape drives and configure the unit to meet the specific requirements of the order, retest and then ship.
The manufacturing cycle to bring our libraries to a semi-finished state is approximately five working days for our TLS and RLS libraries and approximately 30 working days for our XLS libraries. We believe that this process represents an effective way to control our inventory levels while maintaining the ability to fill specific orders in short lead times. We coordinate inventory planning and management with suppliers and customers to match our production to market demand. Once we confirm an order, we generally ship the product within one to five working days. We believe this response time is among the fastest in the industry and gives us a competitive edge. Because we fill the majority of our orders as they are received, our backlog generally is small and is not indicative of future revenues.
We carefully select our suppliers based on their ability to provide quality parts that meet our specifications and volume requirements. Inventory planning and management is coordinated closely with suppliers to match our production needs. Many of the components assembled into our libraries are off-the-shelf parts, which reduces the risk of part shortages and allows us to maintain inventory of these parts at a minimum. A number of our component parts are not available off the shelf, but are designed to our specifications.
Tape drives and tape media are available only from a limited number of suppliers, some of which are sole-source providers. Some of our suppliers compete with us by selling their own tape libraries. Any disruption in supplies of tape drives or tape media could delay shipments of our products.
COMPETITION
The market for automated tape libraries is intensely competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving standards. Because we offer a broad range of libraries for different tape drive technologies, we tend to have a large number of competitors that differ depending on the particular format and performance level. Our principal competitors in this market segment include Sun MicroSystems, Quantum Corporation, Overland Storage, Inc., and SpectraLogic Corporation.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources, better name recognition, larger research and development staffs, and more capabilities in manufacturing, marketing and distributing products than we do. Our competitors may develop new technologies and products that are more effective than our products. We are not ISO-9000 certified, unlike some of our competitors, which may limit some customers’ ability to purchase our products.
As competitors introduce products in a particular tape drive technology, the increased competition normally results in price erosion and a reduction in gross margins for all competitors. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against either current or potential competitors or that competition will not cause a reduction in our revenues or profit margins. We believe that our ability to compete depends on a number of factors, including the success and timing of new product developments by us and by our competitors, compatibility of our products with a broad range of computing systems, product performance, reliability, price, marketing and sales execution and customer support. Specifically, we believe that the principal competitive factors in the selection of a tape library include:
| • | reliability of the robotic assembly that handles the tape cartridges; |
| • | initial purchase price; |
| • | storage capacity; |
| • | speed of data transfer; |
| • | compatibility with existing operating systems and storage management software; |
| • | after-sale expandability of a tape library to meet increasing storage requirements; |
| • | expected product life, cost of maintenance and total cost of ownership; and |
| • | physical configuration and power requirements of the library. |
We believe our tape libraries compete favorably overall with respect to many of these factors.
Our power supply products compete in a number of markets focused on the needs of OEM and contract manufacturers. We have concentrated on supplying units that provide above average electrical efficiency as well as high space efficiency as measured in watts per cubic inch.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our research and development team consists of engineers and technicians who have data storage and related industry experience. We have developed over 40 separate tape library models for eleven different tape formats over the last twelve years.
Our research and development efforts rely on the integration of multiple engineering disciplines to generate products that meet market needs in a competitive and timely fashion. Successful development of automated tape libraries requires the integration of mechanical design, electronic design packaging, and firmware design into a single product. Product success also relies on the engineering group’s thorough knowledge of each of the different tape drive technologies.
We frequently develop new products in response to the availability of a new tape drive technology. As tape drive manufacturers compete in the marketplace, they continually invest in research and development to gain performance leadership either by offering increasingly enhanced versions of their current tape drive products or by introducing an entirely new tape drive technology. We benefit from these industry developments by utilizing the new technology in our products. Our engineers work closely with the tape drive manufacturers through the drive development cycle to assure that reliable tape library and tape drive combinations are brought to market.
The design architecture of our tape libraries makes use of common parts across most product families, allowing us to develop and introduce new products quickly. If a new tape drive is an advanced version of one already incorporated in one or more of our products, our time and dollar investment to incorporate the new drive can be relatively small, with the primary focus being on verification testing. When the form factors differ, the time and investment requirements can grow and may require development of a new product family altogether.
We also develop new products as we identify emerging market needs. Our sales, marketing, product development and engineering groups identify products to fulfill customer and marketplace needs. Our research and development group concentrates on leveraging previous engineering investments into new products. For example, our firmware is based on successive generations of the operating system developed for our first library. We also use common parts in our different library series and leverage our electro-mechanical and electronic hardware technology from previous products into next generation designs. In some cases, entire subassemblies are transferable, leveraging not only engineering time but also materials purchasing, inventory stocking and manufacturing efforts.
We continue to develop new models and new power supply families in response to input from our customers. The product development cycle involves circuit design, printed circuit board layouts, prototype testing, safety agency and compliance testing and test equipment development.
Our research and development expenses were approximately $3.1 million in fiscal 2007, approximately $3.1 million in fiscal 2006, and approximately $3.8 million in fiscal 2005.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We rely on copyright protection of our firmware, as well as patent protection for some of our designs and products. We also rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws to protect our proprietary rights. However, we do not believe our intellectual property provides significant protection from competition. We believe that, because of the rapid pace of technological change in the tape storage industry, patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection are less significant than factors such as the knowledge, ability and experience of our personnel and timely new product introductions.
We enter into Employee Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreements with our engineers along with all employees and consultants to protect our technology and designs. However, we do not believe that such protection can preclude competitors from developing substantially equivalent products.
EMPLOYEES
As of August 31, 2007, we had 87 employees, including 35 in operations and manufacturing, 20 in research and development, 6 in customer service and technical support, 14 in sales and marketing, and 12 in administration and finance. We also employ a small number of temporary employees and consultants as needed. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreement or other similar agreement. We believe that we have a good relationship with our employees.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive Officers
Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the board of directors. The executive officers of Qualstar as of September 14, 2007 are:
Name | Age | Position |
| William J. Gervais | 64 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
| Richard A. Nelson | 64 | Vice President of Engineering, Secretary and Director |
| Andrew A. Farina | 61 | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| David L. Griffith | 50 | Vice President of Operations |
| Robert K. Covey | 60 | Vice President of Marketing |
| Robert C. King | 63 | Vice President of Sales |
Background
William J. Gervais is a founder of Qualstar and has been our President and a director since our inception in 1984, and was elected Chief Executive Officer in January 2000. From 1984 until January 2000, Mr. Gervais also served as our Chief Financial Officer. From 1981 until 1984, Mr. Gervais was President of Northridge Design Associates, Inc., an engineering consulting firm. Mr. Gervais was a co-founder, and served as Engineering Manager from 1976 until 1981, of Micropolis Corporation. Mr. Gervais earned a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 1967.
Richard A. Nelson is a founder of Qualstar and has been our Vice President of Engineering, Secretary and a director since our inception in 1984. From 1974 to 1984, Mr. Nelson was self employed as an engineering consultant specializing in microprocessor technology. Mr. Nelson earned a B.S. in Electronic Engineering from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 1966.
Andrew A. Farina joined Qualstar as Chief Financial Officer in November 2006. From September 1996 to December 2005, Mr. Farina was the Chief Financial Officer of 99¢ Only Stores. From March 1993 thru September 1996, Mr. Farina was Vice President of Finance of Crown BBK, Inc., a food brokerage business. From June 1991 to March 1993, Mr. Farina held the position of Vice President of Finance for Benchmark Corporation. From 1976 through February 1991, Mr. Farina held various positions, starting as divisional Controller and advancing to President at Sirena, Inc., a division of Sara Lee. Mr. Farina earned a B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Nevada in 1969 and obtained his CPA certification in the State of California in 1974. Mr. Farina received his MBA from California State Polytechnic University in 1982.
David L. Griffith, our Vice President of Operations, joined the company in October of 2001. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Griffith served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Stardrive Solutions Inc., a software solutions provider for the broadcast automation industry. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Griffith was the Corporate Vice President of Business Development at Tandberg Data ASA where he was responsible for the development of worldwide business plans and corporate expansion activities. From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Griffith was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tandberg Data, Inc. located in Simi Valley, California. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Griffith was the Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Tandberg Data, Inc. From 1987 to 1990, Mr. Griffith acted as Marketing Manager and Program Manager for the Memory Products Group of Siemens Information Systems. Mr. Griffith received a degree in Mechanical Engineering from California State Polytechnic University in 1980.
Robert K. Covey has been our Vice President of Marketing since 1994. From 1986 to 1993 Mr. Covey was regional manager of ATG Cygnet, an optical disk library firm. From 1982 to 1985, Mr. Covey served as national sales manager at Micropolis Corporation, a former disk drive manufacturer. Mr. Covey attended Butler University and Bentley College from 1965 to 1968.
Robert C. King was appointed our Vice President of Sales in June 2005. From 1999 until it was acquired by JDS Uniphase in 2004, Mr. King was Vice President, Sales for E2O Communications, a manufacturer of optical transceivers. From 1995 to 1998 Mr. King was Vice President, Sales and Marketing for Advanced Photonix. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. King served as Vice President, Sales and Marketing for Performance Materials Corporation. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. King served as Vice President, Market and Business Development for PCO, a subsidiary of Corning Incorporated. Mr. King holds a B.S.M.E. degree from Ohio University in Athens, Ohio.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, as described at page 3 of this report under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.” We believe that the risks described below are the most important factors which may cause our actual future results of operations to differ materially from the results projected in the forward-looking statements.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable to our business in general are described below. Specific risks applicable to our tape library and power supply operating segments are described in the following subsections of Item 1A.
We have a limited number of executives. The loss of any single executive or thefailure to hire and integrate capable new executives could harm our business.
The success of our business is tied closely to the managerial, engineering and business acumen of our existing executives. William J. Gervais, our President, has been largely responsible for the development of most of our tape libraries, has overseen our operations and growth, and established and maintained our strategic relationships. We expect that he will continue these efforts for the foreseeable future. Our future success will also depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate key executives and other key personnel, many of whom have been instrumental in developing new technologies and strategic plans. We may not be able to retain our existing personnel or attract additional qualified personnel in the future. However, our current dependence on a limited number of executives and other key personnel, for whom replacements may be difficult to find, entails a risk that we may not be able to supervise and manage our ongoing operations.
Our lack of significant order backlog makes it difficult to forecast future revenuesand operating results.
We normally ship products within a few days after orders are received. Consequently, we do not have significant order backlog and a large portion of our revenues in each quarter result from orders we received during that quarter. Because backlog can be an important indicator of future revenues, our lack of backlog makes it more difficult to forecast our future revenues. Since our operating expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, unexpected fluctuations in revenues could negatively impact our quarterly operating results.
Our research and development spending may not yield results that justify the costsincurred.
In recent fiscal years we have spent substantial amounts for research and development. Our products and markets are technologically advanced and rapidly evolving, and we cannot be assured that these efforts will successfully provide us with new or upgraded products that will be competitive. If these programs are not successful, our investment in research and development will not yield corresponding benefits to us.
Our customers have the right to return our products in certain circumstances. Anexcessive number of returns may reduce our revenues.
Our customers have 30 days from the date of purchase to return products that do not conform to an end user’s requirements. Distributors have additional return privileges that extend well beyond 30 days. We may otherwise allow product returns if we think that doing so maximizes the effectiveness of our sales channels and promotes our reputation for quality and service. Although we estimate and reserve for potential returns in our reported financial results, actual returns could exceed our estimates. If the number of returns exceeds our estimates, our financial results could be adversely impacted for the periods during which returns are made.
We may spend money pursuing sales that do not occur when anticipated or at all.
Original equipment manufacturer customers typically conduct significant evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance procedures before they begin to market and sell new products. This evaluation process is lengthy and may range from six months to one year or more. This process is complex and may require significant sales, marketing, engineering and management resources on our part. The process becomes more complex as we simultaneously qualify our products with multiple customers or pursue large orders with a single customer. As a result, we may expend resources to develop customer relationships before we recognize any revenue from these relationships, if at all.
We sell a significant portion of our products to customers located outside the UnitedStates. Currency fluctuations and increased costs associated with internationalsales could make our products unaffordable in foreign markets, which would reduce ourrevenue or profitability.
Revenues from shipments to customers outside of North America accounted for approximately 24.4% of revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately 26.1% of revenues in fiscal 2006, and approximately 27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005. We believe that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenues. Our international sales subject us to a number of risks, including:
| • | political and economic instability may reduce demand for our products or our ability to market our products in foreign countries; |
| • | although we denominate our international sales in U.S. dollars, currency fluctuations could make our products unaffordable to foreign purchasers or more expensive compared to those of foreign manufacturers; |
| • | restrictions on the export or import of technology may reduce or eliminate our ability to sell in certain markets; |
| • | greater difficulty of administering business overseas may increase the costs of foreign sales and support; |
| • | foreign governments may impose tariffs, quotas and taxes on our products; |
| • | longer payment cycles typically associated with international sales and potential difficulties in collecting accounts receivable may reduce the profitability of foreign sales; and |
| • | our current determination not to seek ISO-9000 certification, a widely accepted method of establishing and certifying the quality of a manufacturer’s operations, may reduce sales. |
These risks may increase our costs of doing business internationally and reduce our revenues or profitability.
A failure to develop and maintain proprietary technology may negatively affect ourbusiness.
We rely on copyright protection of electronic circuits and our firmware, as well as patent protection for some of our designs and products. We also rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret, and other intellectual property laws and various contract rights to protect our proprietary rights. However, we do not believe our intellectual property rights provide significant protection from competition. As a consequence, these rights may not preclude competitors from developing products that are substantially equivalent or superior to our products. In addition, many aspects of our products are not subject to intellectual property protection and therefore can be reproduced by our competitors.
Intellectual property infringement claims brought against us could be time consumingand expensive to defend.
In recent years, there has been an increasing amount of litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights. Qualstar is not currently directly involved in any intellectual property litigation or proceedings. However, in April 2004 we settled litigation that Raytheon Company had filed alleging that Qualstar and eight other named defendants infringed on a patent owned by Raytheon Company entitled “Mass Data Storage Library.” In the future, we may become subject to other claims or inquiries regarding our alleged unauthorized use of a third party’s intellectual property. An adverse outcome in litigation could force us to do one or more of the following:
| • | stop selling, incorporating or using our products or services that use the challenged intellectual property; |
| • | subject us to significant liabilities to third parties; |
| • | obtain from the owners of the infringed intellectual property right a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or |
| • | redesign those products or services that use the infringed technology, which redesign may be either economically or technologically infeasible. |
Whether or not an intellectual property litigation claim is valid, the cost of responding to it, in terms of legal fees and expenses and the diversion of management resources, could harm our business.
Our warranty reserves may not adequately cover our warranty obligations.
We have established reserves for the estimated liability associated with our product warranties. However, we could experience unforeseen circumstances where these or future reserves may not adequately cover our warranty obligations.
Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate unexpectedly from quarter toquarter, which may cause our stock price to decline.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the past, and are likely to vary significantly in the future due to several factors, including:
| • | general economic conditions affecting spending for information technology; |
| • | increased competition and pricing pressures; |
| • | reductions in the size, delays in the timing, or cancellation of significant customer orders; |
| • | shifts in product or distribution channel mix; |
| • | the timing of the introduction or enhancement of products by us, our original equipment manufacturer customers or our competitors; |
| • | expansions or reductions in our relationships with value added reseller and original equipment manufacturer customers; |
| • | financial difficulties affecting our value added reseller or original equipment manufacturer customers that render them unable to pay amounts owed to us; |
| • | market acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products; |
| • | new product developments by storage device manufacturers, such as disk drives, that could render our products less cost effective or less competitive; |
| • | the rate of growth in the data storage market and the various segments within it; |
| • | timing and levels of our operating expenses; and |
| • | availability of key components and performance of key suppliers. |
We believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results may not necessarily be reliable indicators of our future performance. It is likely that in some future period our operating results will not meet your expectations or those of public market analysts.
Any unanticipated change in revenues or operating results is likely to cause our stock price to fluctuate since such changes reflect new information available to investors and analysts. New information may cause investors and analysts to revalue our stock and this, in the aggregate, may cause fluctuations in our stock price.
Our officers and directors could implement corporate actions that are not in the bestinterests of our shareholders as a whole.
Our executive officers and directors own beneficially, in the aggregate, approximately 43% of our outstanding common stock as of June 30, 2007. As a result, these shareholders will be able to exercise significant control over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, which could delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us. The interests of our officers and directors, when acting in their capacity as shareholders, may lead them to:
| • | vote for the election of directors who agree with the incumbent officers’ or directors’ preferred corporate policy; or |
| • | oppose or support significant corporate transactions when these transactions further their interests as incumbent officers or directors, even if these interests diverge from their interests as shareholders per se and thus from the interests of other shareholders. |
Some provisions of our charter documents may make takeover attempts difficult, whichcould depress the price of our stock and inhibit your ability to receive a premiumprice for your shares.
Our board of directors has the authority, without any action by the shareholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights and preferences of such shares. In addition, our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that eliminate cumulative voting in the election of directors and require shareholders to give advance notice if they wish to nominate directors or submit proposals for shareholder approval. These provisions may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, may discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over its market price and may adversely affect the market price, and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends and therefore you will only be able torecover your investment in our common stock, if at all, by selling the shares of thestock that you own.
We historically have pursued a policy of reinvesting our earnings in research and development, expanding our value added reseller and original equipment manufacturer relationships, and expanding our manufacturing capabilities. Consequently, we have never paid dividends on our shares of capital stock. We currently intend to continue this policy for the foreseeable future to strengthen our financial and competitive position in the markets in which we operate.
Trading in our stock has been limited and our stock price has been volatile.Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares.
There has been very little trading in shares of our stock and some days it does not trade at all. This, as well as the factors listed below, has caused the price of our stock to be volatile. Consequently, it may be difficult to sell your shares of our stock at the price you paid for them or at a price equal to that quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market. Factors that may cause our stock price to fluctuate in the future include:
| • | quarterly variations in operating results, especially if they differ from our previously announced forecasts or forecasts made by analysts; |
| • | our announcements of anticipated future revenues or operating results; |
| • | announcements concerning us, our competitors, our customers, or our industry; |
| • | the introduction of new technology or products by us or our competitors; |
| • | comments regarding us and the data storage market made by industry analysts or on Internet bulletin boards; |
| • | changes in earnings estimates by analysts or changes in accounting policies; |
| • | changes in product pricing policies by us or our competitors; and |
| • | changes in general economic conditions. |
In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume volatility in recent years. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many smaller public companies for reasons frequently unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the specific companies. These market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR TAPE LIBRARY BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable specifically to our tape library operating segment are described below.
Our principal competitors devote greater financial resources to developing, marketingand selling automated tape libraries. Consequently, we may be unable to maintain orincrease our market share.
We face significant competition in developing and selling automated tape libraries. Rapid and ongoing changes in technology and product standards could quickly render our products less competitive, or even obsolete. We have significantly fewer financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and other resources than many of our competitors and these limited resources may harm our business in many ways. For example, in the past several years our competitors have:
| • | acquired other tape library companies; |
| • | increased the geographic scope of their market; |
| • | offered a wider range of tape library products; and |
| • | developed and acquired proprietary software and disk based products that operate in conjunction with their products and the products of their competitors. |
In the future, our competitors may leverage their greater resources to:
| • | develop, manufacture and market products that are less expensive or technologically superior to our products; |
| • | attend more trade shows and spend more on advertising and marketing; |
| • | reach a wider array of potential customers through a broader range of distribution channels; |
| • | respond more quickly to new or changing technologies, customer requirements and standards; or |
| • | reduce prices in order to preserve or gain market share. |
We believe competitive pressures are likely to continue. We cannot guarantee that our resources will be sufficient to address this competition or that we will manage costs and adopt strategies capable of effectively utilizing our resources. If we are unable to respond to competitive pressures successfully, our prices and profit margins may fall and our market share may decrease.
Our suppliers could reduce shipments of tape drives and tape media. If this occurs,we would be forced to curtail production, our revenues could fall and our marketshare could decline.
Automated tape libraries and related products, such as tape drives and tape media, represented approximately 66.6% of our revenues for fiscal 2007, approximately 66.2% of our revenues for fiscal 2006 and approximately 75.1% of our revenues for fiscal 2005. We depend on a limited number of third-party manufacturers to supply us with the tape drives and tape media that we incorporate into our automated tape libraries. Some tape drive manufacturers, including Sony Corporation and IBM Corporation, compete with us by also manufacturing tape libraries. There can be no assurance that other tape drive manufacturers will not also begin to manufacture libraries.
Historically, some of these suppliers have been unable to meet demand for their products and have allocated their limited supply among customers. If suppliers limit our supply of tape drives or tape media, we may be forced to delay or cancel shipments of our tape libraries. The major supplier risks we face include the following:
| • | Sony Electronics, Inc. is our sole-source supplier of AIT drives and media. In the past, Sony has allocated some of their products and may allocate them again in the future. In fiscal 2007 we derived approximately $6.6 million or 32.2% of our revenues, in fiscal 2006 we derived approximately $7.9 million, or 36.4%, of our revenues, and in fiscal 2005 we derived approximately $12.0 million, or 47.8% of revenues from the sale of libraries, tape drives and tape media based on Sony AIT and Super AIT technologies. If Sony reduces its sales to us or raises its prices, we could lose revenues and our margins could decline. |
| • | The LTO standard was developed by an industry consortium consisting of IBM, Hewlett Packard and Quantum Corporation. LTO competes with AIT. All three drive suppliers also sell automated tape libraries that utilize LTO tape drives and compete with our products. Therefore, even if we receive adequate allocation, it may be at a price that renders our products uncompetitive. |
Our other suppliers have in the past been, and may in the future be, unable to meet our demand, including our needs for timely delivery, adequate quantity and high quality. We do not have long-term supply contracts with any of our significant suppliers. The partial or complete loss of any of our suppliers could result in lost revenue, added costs and production delays or could otherwise harm our business and customer relationships.
Our revenues could decline if we fail to execute our distribution strategysuccessfully.
We distribute and sell our automated tape libraries primarily through value added resellers and original equipment manufacturers, and intend to continue this strategy for the foreseeable future. Value added resellers integrate our tape libraries with products of other manufacturers and sell the combined products to their own customers. Original equipment manufacturers combine our tape libraries with their own products and sell the combined product under their own brand. We currently devote, and intend to continue to devote, significant resources to develop and maintain these relationships. A failure to initiate, manage and expand our relationships with value added resellers or original equipment manufacturers could limit our ability to grow or sustain our current level of revenues.
Our focus on the distribution of our products through value added resellers poses the following risks:
| • | we may reach fewer customers because we depend on value added resellers to market to end users and these value added resellers may fail to market effectively or fail to devote sufficient or effective sales, marketing and technical support to the sales of our products; |
| • | we may lose sales because many of our value added resellers sell products that compete with our products. These value added resellers may reduce their marketing efforts for our products in favor of products manufactured by our competitors; |
| • | our costs may increase as value added resellers generally require a higher level of customer support than do original equipment manufacturers; and |
| • | as the market for tape libraries matures, we expect that tape libraries designed for small and medium size businesses will not require the level of sales, marketing and technical support traditionally provided by value added resellers and, consequently, tape libraries for these customers will be increasingly sold through distribution channels rather than through value added resellers. |
We depend upon our original equipment manufacturer customers’ ability to develop new products, applications and product enhancements that incorporate our products in a timely, cost-effective and customer-friendly manner. We cannot guarantee that our original equipment manufacturer customers will meet these challenges effectively. Original equipment manufacturers typically conduct substantial and lengthy evaluation programs before certifying a new product for inclusion in their product line. We may be required to devote significant financial and human resources to these evaluation programs with no assurance that our products will ever be selected. In addition, even if selected by the original equipment manufacturer, there generally is no requirement that the original equipment manufacturer purchase any particular amount of product from us or that it refrain from purchasing competing products.
We do not have any exclusive agreements with our value added resellers or original equipment manufacturers, who purchase our products on an individual purchase order basis. If we lose important value added resellers or original equipment manufacturer customers, if they reduce their focus on our products or if we are unable to obtain additional value added reseller or original equipment manufacturer customers, our business could suffer.
We rely on tape technology for a substantial part of our revenues. Our business willbe harmed if demand for storage solutions using tape technology declines or fails todevelop as we expect.
We derive a high percentage of our revenues from products that incorporate some form of tape technology. We expect to derive a high percentage of our revenues from these products for the foreseeable future. As a result, we will continue to be subject to the risk of a decrease in revenues if demand for these products declines or if rising prices make it more difficult to obtain them. If products incorporating other technologies gain comparable or superior market acceptance and competitive price advantage, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely and materially affected unless we successfully develop and market products incorporating the new technology.
If we fail to develop and introduce new products on a timely and cost-effectivebasis, or if our products do not contain the features required by the marketplace, wewill eventually lose market share and sales to more innovative competitors.
The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. The future success of Qualstar will depend on our ability to anticipate changes in technology, to develop new and enhanced products on a timely and cost-effective basis, and to introduce, manufacture and achieve market acceptance of these new and enhanced products. In particular, our success will depend on the market acceptance of our new XLS family of automated tape libraries. Our RLS and TLS families of tape libraries are facing increasing competition from products manufactured by our competitors and may face competition from other types of storage devices that may be developed in the future.
Development schedules for high technology products are inherently subject to uncertainty and there can be no assurance we will be able to meet our product development schedules or that our development costs will be within budgeted amounts. If the products or product enhancements developed are not deliverable due to technical problems, quality issues or component shortages, or if such products or product enhancements are not accepted by the marketplace or are unreliable, then our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.
The introduction of new storage technologies or the adoption of an industry standard different than our current product standards could render our existing products obsolete.
We depend upon independent software vendors to provide storage management software that makesour tape libraries functional.
The utility of an automated tape library depends upon the storage management software, which supports the library and integrates it into the user’s computing environment to provide a complete storage solution. We do not develop and have no control over the development of this storage management software. Instead we rely on third party independent software vendors to develop and support this software. Accordingly, the continued development and future growth of the market for our products will depend partly upon the success of software vendors to meet the overall data storage and management needs of tape library purchasers and our ability to maintain relationships with these firms. Although we do not have contracts with any third party independent software vendors, we maintain relationships with them by:
| • | supplying tape libraries so they can qualify their software to work with our tape libraries; |
| • | evaluating their software for compatibility with our tape libraries; |
| • | keeping them informed as to current and contemplated changes to our products; and |
| • | referring business to them when value added resellers or end users inquire about software sources. |
We may have to expend significant amounts of time and money defending or settlingproduct liability claims arising from failures of our tape libraries.
Because our tape library customers use our products to store and backup their important data, we face potential liability if our products fail to perform. Although we maintain general liability insurance, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or that exceeds our insurance coverage could reduce our profitability or cause us to discontinue operations.
Undetected flaws could increase our costs, reduce our revenues and divert resourcesfrom our core business needs.
Our tape libraries are complex. Despite our efforts to revise and update our manufacturing and test processes to address engineering and component changes, we may not be able to control and eliminate manufacturing flaws adequately. These flaws may include undetected software or hardware defects associated with:
| • | a newly introduced product; |
| • | a new version of an existing product; or |
| • | a product that has been integrated into a network storage solution with the products of other vendors. |
The variety of contexts in which errors may arise may make it difficult to identify the source of a problem. These problems may:
| • | cause us to incur significant warranty, repair and replacement costs; |
| • | divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts; |
| • | cause significant customer relations problems; or |
| • | damage our reputation. |
To address these risks, we frequently revise and update manufacturing and test procedures to address engineering and component changes to our products. If we fail to adequately monitor, develop and implement appropriate test and manufacturing processes we could experience a rate of product failure that results in substantial shipment delays, repair or replacement costs or damage to our reputation. Product flaws may also consume our limited engineering resources and interrupt our development efforts. Significant product failures would increase our costs and result in the loss of future sales and be harmful to our business.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR POWER SUPPLY BUSINESS
The principal risks applicable specifically to our power supply operating segment are described below.
We primarily depend on a single contract manufacturer for the majority of our power supplies.Loss of this supplier could harm our business.
The primary supplier of our N2 Power power supplies is located in China. If this manufacturer should be unable to deliver products to us on a timely basis or at all, our power supply business could be adversely affected. Though we have five years of favorable experience with this supplier, there can be no assurance that circumstances might not change and compel this supplier to curtail or terminate deliveries to us.
Price erosion may have a material adverse effect on our margins and profitability.
The majority of the power supply manufactures that we compete with have substantially more resources and more models available than we do. Additionally the power supply business is generally characterized by intense competition. There can be no assurances that a competitor will not choose to use its resources to underprice our products in the market, thereby adversely affecting our sales or margins.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our headquarters, located in Simi Valley, California, consists of a single building containing approximately 57,000 square feet housing our manufacturing, sales and marketing, finance and administration and approximately half of our engineering. Our lease on this facility expires in February 2011. Rent on this facility is $39,000 per month, with step-ups ranging from $2,400 to $2,800 per month every two years.
We also lease approximately 4,300 square feet of office space in Boulder, Colorado, that houses our Advanced Development Group. The lease of the Boulder, Colorado facility expires in May 2009. We closed our sales office in Surrey, United Kingdom in May 2007.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At this time, we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us that we expect will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain, however. We cannot assure you that we will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Qualstar’s common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Stock Market (NASDAQ Symbol — QBAK). The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock as reported by NASDAQ, during the periods indicated:
Period | Date Range | High | Low | ||||||
Fiscal 2007: | |||||||||
| First Quarter | July 1 — September, 30, 2006 | $ | 3.51 | $ | 2.60 | ||||
| Second Quarter | October 1 — December 31, 2006 | $ | 3.81 | $ | 2.76 | ||||
| Third Quarter | January 1 — March 31, 2007 | $ | 3.57 | $ | 2.86 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | April 1 — June 30, 2007 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 2.84 | ||||
Fiscal 2006: | |||||||||
| First Quarter | July 1 — September, 30, 2005 | $ | 4.51 | $ | 3.55 | ||||
| Second Quarter | October 1 — December 31, 2005 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 3.21 | ||||
| Third Quarter | January 1 — March 31, 2006 | $ | 4.50 | $ | 3.30 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter | April 1 — June 30, 2006 | $ | 4.20 | $ | 3.00 | ||||
There were approximately 43 owners of record of Qualstar’s common stock as of September 13, 2007.
Qualstar has declared no cash dividends during the periods reported. Qualstar does not currently anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but intends to retain any future earnings for reinvestment in its business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon Qualstar’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, terms of any debt instruments then in effect and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant at the time.
ADDITIONAL EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides additional information regarding Qualstar’s equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2007:
Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 585,000 | $ | 4.07 | 217,175 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Totals | 585,000 | $ | 4.07 | 217,175 | ||||||||
____________
| (1) | Includes shares subject to stock options granted under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, and shares available for additional option grants under that plan, as of June 30, 2007. |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data is qualified in its entirety by and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this 10-K. Our historical financial results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, expect per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Income Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues | $ | 20,612 | $ | 21,731 | $ | 25,144 | $ | 31,530 | $ | 33,557 | ||||||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 14,092 | 14,856 | 16,529 | 19,575 | 21,171 | |||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | 6,520 | 6,875 | 8,615 | 11,955 | 12,386 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 3,136 | 3,083 | 3,750 | 4,268 | 3,994 | |||||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 3,110 | 3,213 | 3,350 | 3,607 | 3,834 | |||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 3,168 | 3,629 | 3,955 | 5,420 | 4,428 | |||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 9,414 | 9,925 | 11,055 | 13,295 | 12,256 | |||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | (2,894 | ) | (3,050 | ) | (2,440 | ) | (1,340 | ) | 130 | |||||||||||
| Investment income | 1,477 | 1,269 | 858 | 624 | 693 | |||||||||||||||
| Impairment loss for other-than-temporary decline in investments | — | — | — | (160 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (1,417 | ) | (1,781 | ) | (1,582 | ) | (876 | ) | 823 | |||||||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 30 | (89 | ) | 65 | (145 | ) | 274 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (1,447 | ) | $ | (1,692 | ) | $ | (1,647 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 549 | ||||||
| Earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
| Diluted | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ||||||
| Shares used to compute earnings (loss) per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | 12,577 | 12,579 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | 12,577 | 12,666 | |||||||||||||||
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | �� | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,697 | $ | 6,845 | $ | 12,210 | $ | 6,401 | $ | 6,236 | ||||||||||
| Marketable securities | 25,568 | 26,822 | 21,854 | 29,376 | 29,857 | |||||||||||||||
| Working capital | 25,152 | *29,012 | *25,121 | 46,534 | 47,191 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 44,063 | 45,399 | 47,223 | 51,647 | 52,096 | |||||||||||||||
| Total debt | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity | 41,841 | 42,858 | 44,653 | 48,064 | 48,868 | |||||||||||||||
____________
| * | In fiscal 2006 and 2005, certain marketable securities were reclassified to long-term assets. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop, manufacture and sell automated magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data primarily in network computing environments. We currently offer tape libraries for two popular tape drive technologies, LTO and AIT. We have discontinued sales of libraries with Super AIT and ALT tape drives due to declining demand for those tape drive technologies.
Many enterprises now routinely manage very large databases, in addition to storing information on local desktop computers. This, coupled with the growth in the amount of data from new sources and applications, is increasing the need for managing and storing data efficiently. Anticipating the increased demand for tape libraries, we have developed tape libraries spanning a broad range of tape formats, prices, capacity and performance. We expect our products to continue to evolve in the future in response to emerging tape technologies and changing customer preferences.
We have developed a network of value added resellers who specialize in delivering complete storage solutions to end users. End users of our products range from small businesses requiring simple automated backup solutions to large organizations needing complex storage management solutions. We also sell our products to original equipment manufacturers who bundle our products with their own and sell them as part of a complete system or solution. We assist our customers with marketing, sales and technical support.
Our international sales efforts are currently directed from our corporate offices in Simi Valley, California. All of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Revenues from sales outside North America were approximately $5.0 million, or 24.4% of revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately $5.7 million, or 26.1% of revenues in fiscal 2006, and approximately $6.9 million, or 27.3% of revenues in fiscal 2005.
We also design, develop and sell ultra-small high-efficiency open-frame switching power supplies for original equipment manufacturers of telecommunications equipment, servers, routers, switches, RAIDs, and other equipment. Our power supplies are sold under the N2Power brand name through independent sales representatives and a private distributor. The primary customers are original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturers.
Net revenues include revenues from the sale of tape libraries, library tape drives, tape cartridges, ancillary products, and power supplies. Ancillary revenues include service, repair, and on-site service agreements net of the cost of any third party service contracts. Automated tape libraries and related products, such as tape drives and tape media, represented approximately 66.6% of revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately 66.2% of revenues in fiscal 2006, and approximately 75.1% of revenues in fiscal 2005. Sales of power supplies represented approximately 14.6% of revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately 11.9% of revenues in fiscal 2006, and approximately 5.0% of revenues in fiscal 2005. Sales of ancillary products and services accounted for the balance of our revenues.
Gross margins depend on several factors, including the cost of manufacturing, product mix, customer demand and the level of competition. Larger tape libraries provide higher gross margins than do smaller tape libraries primarily because the competition is less intense in this market segment.
Research and development activities include the design and development of new products, as well as enhancements to existing products.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to customer promotional offers, sales returns, bad debts, inventories, warranty costs, investments, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon shipment of product to our customers, less estimated returns, for which provision is made at the time of sale. Title and risk of loss transfer to the customer when the product leaves our dock in Simi Valley, California, or another shipping location designated by us. In general, these customers are allowed to return the product, free of penalty, within thirty days of shipment, if the product does not meet the end user’s requirements.
We record an allowance for estimated sales returns based on past experience and current knowledge of our customer base. Our experience has been such that only a very small percentage of products are returned. Should our experience change, however, we may require additional allowances for sales returns.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on an assessment of the collectibility of specific accounts and the overall condition of accounts receivable. In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we analyze specific trade receivables, historical bad debts, customer credits, customer credit-worthiness and changes in customers’ payment terms and patterns. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make additional payments, then we may need to make additional allowances. Likewise, if we determine that we could realize more of our receivables in the future than previously estimated, we would adjust the allowance to increase income in the period we made this determination.
Inventory Valuation
We record inventories at the lower of cost or market value. We assess the value of our inventories periodically based upon numerous factors including expected product or material demand, current market conditions, technological obsolescence, current cost and net realizable value. If necessary, we write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence, potential shrinkage, or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If technology changes more rapidly than expected, or market conditions become less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Warranty Obligations
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, including active monitoring and evaluation of product failure rates, material usage and estimation of service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. However, should actual product failure rates, material usage, or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. Historically our warranty costs have not been significant.
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value of the award at the date of grant and recognize compensation expense over the vesting period. The inputs we use for the model require the use of judgment, estimates and assumptions regarding the expected volatility of the stock, the expected term the average employee will hold the option prior to the date of exercise, and the amount of share-based awards that are expected to be forfeited. Changes in these inputs and assumptions could occur and actual results could differ from these estimates, and our results of operations could be materially impacted.
Accounting for Income Taxes
We estimate our tax liability based on current tax laws in the statutory jurisdictions in which we operate. These estimates include judgments about deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes, as well as about the realization of deferred tax assets.
We maintain a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of realizing the benefits of net deferred tax assets in future years. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for such a valuation allowance. In the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, the valuation allowance would be decreased accordingly.
We may periodically undergo examinations by the federal and state regulatory authorities and the Internal Revenue Service. We may be assessed additional taxes and or penalties contingent on the outcome of these examinations. Our previous examinations have not resulted in any unfavorable or significant assessments.
Our California tax returns for fiscal years 2001 through 2003 were audited by the California Franchise Tax Board. In July 2007, we accepted the Franchise Tax Board’s proposal to resolve these tax audits, which resulted in a $77,000 reduction in the amount of tax refund we had expected related to research and development tax credits. We previously had booked a reserve of $55,000 related to this expected refund.
The Company has net operating losses, capital losses, research and development credit and other carryforwards for tax purposes of $2.4 million at June 30, 2007 and $1.9 million at June 30, 2006 expiring between fiscal years 2009 and 2025, except for the state research and development credit, which has no limit on the carryforward period.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table reflects, as a percentage of net revenues, statements of operations data for the periods indicated:
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 68.4 | 68.4 | 65.7 | |||||||||
| Gross margin | 31.6 | 31.6 | 34.3 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | 15.2 | 14.2 | 14.9 | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 15.1 | 14.8 | 13.4 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 15.4 | 16.7 | 15.7 | |||||||||
| Loss from operations | (14.1 | ) | (14.1 | ) | (9.7 | ) | ||||||
| Investment income | 7.2 | 5.8 | 3.4 | |||||||||
| Loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes | (6.9 | ) | (8.3 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 0.1 | (0.4 | ) | 0.3 | ||||||||
| Net loss | (7.0 | )% | (7.9 | )% | (6.6 | )% | ||||||
We have two operating segments for financial disclosure purposes: tape libraries and power supplies, as discussed in Footnote 10. The following table summarizes our revenue by major product line and by operating segment:
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Tape Library revenues: | ||||||||||||
| TLS | 35.9 | % | 42.6 | % | 51.7 | % | ||||||
| RLS | 8.6 | % | 12.2 | % | 13.1 | % | ||||||
| XLS | 8.5 | % | — | — | ||||||||
| 53.0 | % | 54.8 | % | 64.8 | % | |||||||
| Other library revenues: | ||||||||||||
| Service | 14.2 | % | 14.5 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||
| Media | 13.6 | % | 11.4 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||
| Upgrades, Spares | 4.6 | % | 7.4 | % | 9.3 | % | ||||||
| Total library revenues | 85.4 | % | 88.1 | % | 94.9 | % | ||||||
| Power Supply revenues | 14.6 | % | 11.9 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||
| 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net Revenues. Net revenues were $20.6 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $21.7 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $1.1 million, or 5.1% is attributed to lower sales of our tape library products in the TLS and RLS product lines, in conjunction with lower service and miscellaneous revenue, partially offset by revenue from our new enterprise-level XLS tape library product line and increased media and power supply revenue. We commenced sales of our new XLS product line in fiscal 2007, and sales of these libraries accounted for 8.5% of total revenue in fiscal 2007.
Tape Library Segment
Revenues attributed to our tape library segment were $17.6 million, or 85.4% of revenues in fiscal 2007, as compared to $19.1 million, or 88.1% of revenues in fiscal 2006. We anticipate sales of our new enterprise-level XLS product line to capture a larger percent of our tape library revenues in fiscal 2008. However, we expect sales of our TLS and RLS tape library product lines to decline in fiscal 2008.
Power Supply Segment
Revenues attributed to our power supply segment were 3.0 million, or 14.6% of revenues, in fiscal 2007 as compared to $2.6 million, or 11.9% of revenues in fiscal 2006. This increase was due to increased sales to OEMs and distributors of an expanded power supply product line. We expect continued growth as a percentage of sales in our power supply revenues during fiscal 2008.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $6.5 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $6.9 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.4 million, or 5.2%, is comparable as a percent of sales, resulting in comparable gross profit percentages in fiscal years 2007 and 2006 of 31.6%.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $3.1 million in fiscal 2007, comparable with $3.1 million in fiscal 2006.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $3.1 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $3.2 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.1 million, or 3.1%, is attributed primarily to a decrease in marketing salaries and the closing of our sales office in the United Kingdom, offset by increased advertising and promotion expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $3.2 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $3.6 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.4 million, or 11.1%, is due to lower compensation related expenses, legal and audit fees, and insurance expense, offset in part by higher bad debt expense.
Investment Income. Investment income was $1.5 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $1.3 million in fiscal 2006. The increase of $0.2 million, or 16.4% is due to reinvestment of our lower yielding maturities into higher yielding investments and due to higher interest rates in fiscal 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes was $30,000 in fiscal 2007 as compared to a benefit for income taxes of $89,000 in fiscal 2006. The benefit in fiscal 2006 is due to the reversal of a reserve established in fiscal 2005 against research and development credits that were refunded in fiscal 2006.
Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased from $25.1 million in fiscal 2005 to $21.7 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $3.4 million, or 13.5% is attributed to declining unit sales of our tape library products in the TLS and RLS product lines, incorporating AIT, SAIT, DLT, and LTO tape technology, in conjunction with lower average unit selling prices, partially offset by increased service and power supply revenue. Power supply revenue has doubled year over year while service revenue increased by approximately 19%.
Revenues from tape libraries and drives decreased to $11.9 million, or 54.8% of revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2006, from $16.3 million, or 64.8% of revenues, in the year ended June 30, 2005.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased from $8.6 million in fiscal 2005 to $6.9 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $1.7 million, or 20.2%, is primarily due to lower revenues resulting in lower absorption of manufacturing overhead expenses, additional inventory reserves and lower average selling prices.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased from $3.8 million in fiscal 2005 to $3.1 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.7 million, or 17.8%, is due primarily to lower salaries associated with a decrease in headcount, as our XLS product line transitioned from the development phase to the design verification phase, lower prototype material costs and lower consulting fees.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from $3.4 million in fiscal 2005 to $3.2 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.2 million, or 4.1%, can be attributed primarily to a decrease in promotion and travel related expenses.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased from $4.0 million in fiscal 2005 to $3.6 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of approximately $0.4 million, or 8.2%, is due to lower legal and bad debt expenses.
Investment Income. Investment income increased to $1.3 million in fiscal 2006 from $0.9 million in fiscal 2005. The increase of $0.4 million, or 48% is due to higher average short-term security balances combined with higher short-term yields available during the rising interest rate environment during fiscal 2006.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes decreased from $0.1 million in fiscal 2005 to a benefit for income taxes of $0.1 million in fiscal 2006. The decrease of $0.2 million is due to the reversal of a reserve established in fiscal 2005 against research and development credits that were refunded in fiscal 2006.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash used by operating activities was $0.7 million in fiscal 2007 and $19,000 in fiscal 2006 and cash provided by operating activities was $0.2 million in fiscal 2005. Cash used by operating activities in fiscal 2007 relates primarily to our net loss for the year adjusted for non-cash items, an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities, partially offset by a decrease in inventories. In fiscal 2006, the near breakeven in operating cash resulted from the receipt of research and development credit refunds and a decrease in accounts receivable, offset by a net loss for the year. In fiscal 2005, operating cash was primarily provided by refunds of fiscal 2002 federal and state income taxes paid and a decrease in accounts receivable, offset partially by decreases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.
Cash provided by investing activities was $1.5 million in fiscal 2007, cash used in investing activities was $5.3 million in fiscal 2006 and cash provided by investing activities was $7.3 million in fiscal 2005. Cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2007 relates primarily to proceeds from the sale of marketable securities, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities. Cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2006 related primarily to the purchase of marketable securities and equipment partially offset by sales of marketable securities. Cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2005 related primarily to sales of marketable securities partially offset by purchases of marketable securities and equipment.
Cash used in financing activities of $1.7 million for fiscal 2005 related primarily to repurchasing shares of our common stock.
As of June 30, 2007, we had $7.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and $25.6 million in marketable securities. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and funds available from the sale of our marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next 12 months. We may utilize cash to invest in businesses, products or technologies that we believe are strategic. We regularly evaluate other companies and technologies for possible investment by us. In addition, we have made and may in the future make investments in companies with whom we have identified potential synergies. However, we have no present commitments or agreements with respect to any material acquisition of other businesses or technologies.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following is a summary of our future payments due under contractual obligations as of June 30, 2007:
Year Ended June 30 | Operating Leases | Purchase Obligations | Total | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| 2008 | $ | 603 | $ | 1,543 | $ | 2,146 | ||||||
| 2009 | 620 | — | 620 | |||||||||
| 2010 | 588 | — | 588 | |||||||||
| 2011 | 307 | — | 307 | |||||||||
| 2012 | — | — | — | |||||||||
| $ | 2,118 | $ | 1,543 | $ | 3,661 | |||||||
Purchase obligations in the table above represent the value of open purchase orders as of June 30, 2007. We believe that some of these obligations could be canceled for payment of a nominal penalty or no penalty; however, the amount of open purchase orders that could be canceled under such terms is difficult to quantify.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We develop products in the United States and sell them worldwide. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. As all sales are currently made in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in shorter duration securities. We have no outstanding debt nor do we utilize derivative financial instruments. Therefore, no quantitative tabular disclosures are required.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Page | |
| (1) Consolidated Financial Statements | |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 31 |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets | 32 |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations | 33 |
| Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity | 34 |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 35 |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 36 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Qualstar Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Qualstar Corporation as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Qualstar Corporation at June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, Qualstar Corporation changed its method of accounting for share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (revised 2004) on July 1, 2005.
| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
Los Angeles, California
September 21, 2007
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 7,697 | $ | 6,845 | ||||
| Marketable securities, short-term | 9,574 | 14,040 | ||||||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $170 at June 30, 2007 and $118 at June 30, 2006 | 3,462 | 2,700 | ||||||
| Inventories | 5,928 | 7,298 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 576 | 511 | ||||||
| Prepaid income taxes | 137 | 159 | ||||||
| Total current assets | 27,374 | 31,553 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 601 | 924 | ||||||
| Marketable securities, long-term | 15,994 | 12,782 | ||||||
| Other assets | 94 | 140 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 44,063 | $ | 45,399 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 654 | $ | 783 | ||||
| Accrued payroll and related liabilities | 455 | 466 | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | 1,113 | 1,292 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities | 2,222 | 2,541 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000 shares authorized; no shares issued | — | — | ||||||
| Common stock, no par value; 50,000 shares authorized, 12,253 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively | 18,593 | 18,503 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (55 | ) | (395 | ) | ||||
| Retained earnings | 23,303 | 24,750 | ||||||
| Total shareholders’ equity | 41,841 | 42,858 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 44,063 | $ | 45,399 | ||||
See accompanying notes
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Net revenues | $ | 20,612 | $ | 21,731 | $ | 25,144 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 14,092 | 14,856 | 16,529 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 6,520 | 6,875 | 8,615 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||
| Research and development | 3,136 | 3,083 | 3,750 | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 3,110 | 3,213 | 3,350 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 3,168 | 3,629 | 3,955 | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 9,414 | 9,925 | 11,055 | |||||||||
| Loss from operations | (2,894 | ) | (3,050 | ) | (2,440 | ) | ||||||
| Investment income | 1,477 | 1,269 | 858 | |||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (1,417 | ) | (1,781 | ) | (1,582 | ) | ||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 30 | (89 | ) | 65 | ||||||||
| Net Loss | $ | (1,447 | ) | $ | (1,692 | ) | $ | (1,647 | ) | |||
| Loss per share: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||
| Diluted | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||
| Shares used to compute loss per share: | ||||||||||||
| Basic | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | |||||||||
| Diluted | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes | Other Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | From | Income | Retained | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Director | (Loss) | Earnings | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2004 | 12,596 | $ | 20,121 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (101 | ) | $ | 28,089 | $ | 48,064 | |||||||||||
| Exercise of stock options | 16 | 76 | — | — | — | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Retirement of shares pursuant to stock repurchase | (359 | ) | (1,827 | ) | — | — | — | (1,827 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Principal and interest payments on directors’ notes | — | — | 45 | — | — | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (1,647 | ) | (1,647 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments | — | — | — | (58 | ) | — | (58 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (1,705 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2005 | 12,253 | $ | 18,370 | $ | — | $ | (159 | ) | $ | 26,442 | $ | 44,653 | ||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation | — | 133 | — | — | — | 133 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (1,692 | ) | (1,692 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments | — | — | — | (236 | ) | — | (236 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (1,928 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2006 | 12,253 | $ | 18,503 | $ | — | $ | (395 | ) | $ | 24,750 | $ | 42,858 | ||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation | — | 90 | — | — | — | 90 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | — | — | — | — | (1,447 | ) | (1,447 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments | — | — | — | 340 | — | 340 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | (1,107 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2007 | 12,253 | $ | 18,593 | $ | — | $ | (55 | ) | $ | 23,303 | $ | 41,841 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,447 | ) | $ | (1,692 | ) | $ | (1,647 | ) | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 421 | 454 | 463 | |||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | — | — | 436 | |||||||||
| Provision for (recovery of) bad debts and returns, net | 88 | (31 | ) | 38 | ||||||||
| Stock based compensation | 90 | 133 | — | |||||||||
| Loss (gain) on sale of securities | 50 | — | (11 | ) | ||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable | (850 | ) | 863 | 1,058 | ||||||||
| Inventories | 1,370 | (141 | ) | 261 | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (67 | ) | (57 | ) | 29 | |||||||
| Prepaid income taxes and income taxes payable | 22 | 481 | 432 | |||||||||
| Accounts payable | (129 | ) | 20 | (408 | ) | |||||||
| Accrued payroll and related liabilities | (11 | ) | (30 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
| Other accrued liabilities | (179 | ) | (19 | ) | (443 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (642 | ) | (19 | ) | 204 | |||||||
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
| Purchases of equipment | (50 | ) | (142 | ) | (164 | ) | ||||||
| Purchases of marketable securities | (17,041 | ) | (13,204 | ) | (22,277 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities | 18,585 | 8,000 | 29,752 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 1,494 | (5,346 | ) | 7,311 | ||||||||
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||||
| Principal and interest payments on directors’ notes | — | — | 45 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | — | — | 76 | |||||||||
| Repurchase of common stock | — | — | (1,827 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash used in financing activities | — | — | (1,706 | ) | ||||||||
| NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 852 | (5,365 | ) | 5,809 | ||||||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | 6,845 | 12,210 | 6,401 | |||||||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | $ | 7,697 | $ | 6,845 | $ | 12,210 | ||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES: | ||||||||||||
| Income taxes paid | $ | 7 | $ | 2 | $ | 5 | ||||||
See accompanying notes
QUALSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Accounting Policies
Business
Qualstar Corporation (“Qualstar”) was incorporated in California in 1984 to develop and manufacture IBM compatible 9-track reel-to-reel tape drives for the personal computer and workstation marketplaces. Since 1995, Qualstar has focused its efforts on designing, developing, manufacturing and selling automated magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data primarily in the network computing environment. Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges and robotics to move the tape cartridges from their storage locations to the tape drives under software control. Qualstar’s libraries provide storage solutions for organizations requiring backup, recovery, and archival storage of critical electronic information. Qualstar’s tape libraries are compatible with commonly used operating systems, including UNIX, Windows and Linux and a wide range of storage management software. Qualstar currently offers tape libraries for LTO and AIT tape drive technologies.
In July 2002, Qualstar purchased the assets of N2Power, Incorporated, a supplier of ultra small high efficiency open frame switching power supplies. Power supplies are sold with the N2Power brand name as well as under a private label brand name to original equipment manufacturers.
Accounting Principles
The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Qualstar and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
Estimates and Assumptions
Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Examples include estimates of loss contingencies, product life cycles and inventory obsolescence, bad debts, sales returns, stock-based compensation forfeiture rates; the potential outcome of future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns; and determining when investment impairments are other-than-temporary. Actual results and outcomes may differ from management’s estimates and assumptions.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured (less estimated returns, for which provisions are made at the time of sale) in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 104, Revenue Recognition. The provision for estimated returns is made based on known claims and estimates of additional returns based on historical data. Revenues from technical support services and other services are recognized at the time the services are performed. Revenues from service contracts entered into with third party service providers are recognized at the time of sale, net of costs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Qualstar classifies as cash equivalents only cash and those investments that are highly liquid, interest earning investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consist primarily of high-quality U.S. corporate securities and U.S. federal government debt securities. Our marketable securities portfolio consists of short-term securities with original maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase and remaining maturities of less than one year and longer term securities with original maturities of greater than one year and less than five years. Marketable securities are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market value using the specific identification method; unrealized gains and losses are reflected in other comprehensive income until realized; realized gains and losses are included in earnings when the underlying securities are sold and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold. A $50,000 loss from the sale of marketable securities was recorded in fiscal year 2007. No significant gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities were recorded in fiscal year 2006. All of Qualstar’s marketable securities were classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Concentration of Credit Risk, Other Concentration Risks and Significant Customers
Qualstar sells its products primarily through a variety of market channels including original equipment manufacturers (OEM) and value added resellers (VAR) located worldwide. Ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition are performed by Qualstar, and generally, collateral is not required. Potential uncollectible accounts have been provided for in the financial statements.
Sales outside of North America represented approximately 24.4% of net revenues in fiscal 2007, approximately 26.1% of net revenues in fiscal 2006 and approximately 27.3% of net revenues in fiscal 2005. Revenues from Qualstar’s two largest customers combined were approximately 11.9%, 13.4%, and 13.9% for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. At June 30, 2007 and 2006, the two largest customer’s accounts receivable, net of specific allowances, totaled approximately 24.1% and 20.8% of net accounts receivable, respectively.
Suppliers
Sales and costs of goods sold related to tape library products purchased from one supplier totaled approximately 32.2% and 30.6% in fiscal 2007, 36.4% and 34.1%in fiscal 2006, and 47.8% and 41.0% in fiscal 2005, respectively, of total sales and cost of goods sold.
The primary supplier of our N2 Power power supplies is located in China. If this manufacturer should be unable to deliver products to us in a timely basis or at all, our power supply business could be adversely affected. Though we have five years of favorable experience with this supplier, there can be no assurance that circumstances might not change and compel this supplier to curtail or terminate deliveries to us.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience, and other currently available evidence. Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Charged to Costs and Expenses | Charged to Other Accounts | Deductions(1) | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2007 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 88,000 | $ | — | $ | (17,000 | ) | $ | 121,000 | |||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2006 | $ | 248,000 | $ | (31,000 | ) | $ | — | $ | (167,000 | ) | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||
| Year Ended June 30, 2005 | $ | 217,000 | $ | 38,000 | $ | — | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 248,000 | |||||||||
____________
| (1) | Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out basis) or market. Cost includes materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead related to the purchase and production of inventories. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand, future purchase commitments with our suppliers, and the estimated utility of our inventory. If our review indicates a reduction in utility below carrying value, we reduce our inventory to a new cost basis.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. Estimated useful lives are as follows:
| Machinery and equipment | 5-7 years |
| Furniture and fixtures | 5-7 years |
| Computer equipment | 3-5 years |
Expenditures for normal maintenance and repair are charged to expense as incurred, and improvements are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement of property or equipment, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gain or loss is included in the results of operations.
Long-Lived Assets
Qualstar reviews the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of any asset may not be recoverable, in accordance with The Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than the carrying amount. If an impairment is indicated, the amount of the loss to be recorded is based upon an estimate of the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset. Fair value is based upon discounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition and other valuation methods. There were no impairment losses of long-lived assets recognized during the periods presented.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Qualstar records all charges for outbound shipping and handling as revenue. All inbound shipping and fulfillment costs are classified as costs of goods sold.
Warranty Obligations
Qualstar provides a three year warranty on its TLS and RLS tape libraries and a one year warranty on its XLS tape libraries. Some TLS and all RLS models have three year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of components, or if necessary, complete libraries. All other TLS models have a one-year advance replacement warranty with the second and third year being return-to-factory for service at no charge. XLS libraries sold in North America have a one year onsite service warranty and XLS libraries sold outside of North America have one year advance replacement warranty coverage that provides for replacement of components, or if necessary, complete libraries. A provision for costs related to warranty expense is recorded when revenue is recognized, which is estimated based on historical warranty costs incurred. Customers may purchase extended advance replacement service coverage and on-site service if they are located in the United States, Canada and most countries within Europe.
The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others,” which clarifies the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” relating to a guarantor’s accounting for and disclosures for certain guarantees. FIN 45 requires enhanced disclosures, among other things, for certain guarantees, including warranty accruals. Qualstar does not issue third party guarantees, as defined, and therefore only the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 apply.
Activity in the liability for product warranty for the periods presented were as follows (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 173 | $ | 133 | ||||
| Cost of warranty claims | (58 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
| Accruals for product warranties | 59 | 85 | ||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 174 | $ | 173 | ||||
Research and Development
All research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. These costs consist primarily of engineering salaries, benefits, outside consultant fees, purchased parts and supplies directly involved in the design and development of new products, and facilities and other internal costs.
Advertising
Advertising and promotion expenses include costs associated with direct and indirect marketing, trade shows and public relations. Qualstar expenses all costs of advertising and promotion as incurred. Advertising and promotion expenses for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $604,000, $407,000 and $520,000, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of these financial instruments.
Change in Accounting Principle and Share-Based Compensation
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), share-based payment, using the modified prospective application transition method effective July 1, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for share-based payment awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option grants as of the measurement date. The cost is recognized over the requisite service period ( the vesting period) for the estimated number of stock options ultimately expected to vest. The Company recognized $90,000 and $133,000 as stock based compensation expense in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts are similar to the amounts reported historically in the Company’s footnotes under the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS 123.
In accordance with SFAS 123, the Company previously measured employee stock option related compensation expense using the minimum value method for grants prior to the Company’s initial public offering and the Black-Scholes method afterward for determining the weighted average fair value of options granted. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, had employee stock option related compensation expense been determined based on the Black-Scholes method, the Company’s net loss and loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Fiscal Year | ||||
June 30, 2005 | ||||
| Net loss as reported | $ | (1,647 | ) | |
| Stock-based employee compensation cost included in reported net loss | — | |||
| Pro forma stock-based employee compensation cost under SFAS 123 | (118 | ) | ||
| Pro forma net loss | $ | (1,765 | ) | |
| Loss per share: | ||||
| Basic — as reported | $ | (0.13 | ) | |
| Basic — pro forma | $ | (0.14 | ) | |
| Diluted — as reported | $ | (0.13 | ) | |
| Diluted — pro forma | $ | (0.14 | ) | |
In computing the pro forma compensation expense under SFAS 123, a weighted-average fair value of $1.27 for the 2005 stock option grants was estimated at the date of grant using the minimum value option pricing model before Qualstar’s initial public offering and the Black-Scholes model afterward with the following assumptions:
2005 | ||||
| Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | ||
| Risk-free interest rate | 3.8 | % | ||
| Expected life of options | 4 years | |||
| Volatility | 36.9 | % | ||
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method in accordance with SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credits and loss carryforwards. Current income tax expense or benefit represents the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or refundable for the current year. A valuation allowance is established when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is accounted for according to SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (SFAS 130). Comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on debt and equity securities classified as available-for-sale and included as a component of shareholders’ equity.
Loss per Share
Qualstar calculates earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic earnings per share has been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share has been computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average common shares outstanding plus dilutive securities or other contracts to issue common stock as if these securities were exercised or converted to common stock.
The following table sets forth the calculation for basic and diluted loss per share for the periods indicated:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Loss: | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,447 | ) | $ | (1,692 | ) | $ | (1,647 | ) | |||
| Shares: | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares for basic loss per share | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | |||||||||
| Stock options | — | — | — | |||||||||
| Weighted average shares for diluted loss per share | 12,253 | 12,253 | 12,398 | |||||||||
Shares issuable under stock options of 585,000, 557,000 and 455,000 for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share because the effect would be antidilutive.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Note 2 – Marketable Securities
The following table summarizes marketable securities by security type at June 30, 2007, and June 30, 2006, respectively (in thousands):
June 30, 2007 | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies | $ | 15,357 | $ | — | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 15,316 | |||||||
| Government Sponsored Enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations | 4,570 | — | (11 | ) | 4,559 | |||||||||||
| Commercial Paper | 1,287 | — | — | 1,287 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 3,904 | — | (4 | ) | 3,900 | |||||||||||
| Municipal bonds | 505 | 1 | — | 506 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 25,623 | $ | 1 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 25,568 | |||||||
June 30, 2006 | Amortized Cost | Unrealized Gain | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies | $ | 16,318 | $ | — | $ | (229 | ) | $ | 16,089 | |||||||
| Government Sponsored Enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations | 3,519 | — | (108 | ) | 3,411 | |||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 7,380 | — | (58 | ) | 7,322 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 27,217 | $ | — | $ | (395 | ) | $ | 26,822 | |||||||
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2007, and June 30, 2006, respectively.
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2007 | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,668 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 14,668 | $ | (41 | ) | ||||||||||
| Government Sponsored Enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations | — | — | 3,552 | (11 | ) | 3552 | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | — | — | 2,071 | (4 | ) | 2,071 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,291 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 20,291 | $ | (56 | ) | ||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2006 | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies | $ | 4,599 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 11,490 | $ | (211 | ) | $ | 16,089 | $ | (229 | ) | |||||||||
| Government Sponsored Enterprise collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,757 | (9 | ) | 1,654 | (99 | ) | 3,411 | (108 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 3,340 | (6 | ) | 3,982 | (52 | ) | 7,322 | (58 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 9,696 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | 17,126 | $ | (362 | ) | $ | 26,822 | $ | (395 | ) | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in U.S. Treasury obligations and direct obligations of U.S. Government agencies were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007.
Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are identified as GSEs. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in GSE collateralized mortgage obligations were caused by interest rate increases. The cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by the GSE. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007.
Corporate Bonds. The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in corporate bonds were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007.
The following tables summarize the contractual maturities of the Company’s fixed maturity securities (in thousands):
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
| Less than 90 days | $ | — | $ | 1,557 | ||||
| Less than one year | 9,574 | 12,483 | ||||||
| Due in one to five years | 15,994 | 12,782 | ||||||
| $ | 25,568 | $ | 26,822 | |||||
Note 3 – Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
| Raw materials, net | $ | 5,234 | $ | 6,473 | ||||
| Finished goods | 694 | 825 | ||||||
| $ | 5,928 | $ | 7,298 | |||||
Note 4 – Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment are as follows:
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | $ | 546 | $ | 546 | ||||
| Furniture and fixtures | 984 | 1,006 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment | 2,456 | 2,416 | ||||||
| 3,986 | 3,968 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,385 | ) | (3,044 | ) | ||||
| $ | 601 | $ | 924 | |||||
Note 5 – Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of the following:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | — | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (156 | ) | ||||
| State | 30 | (3 | ) | (215 | ) | |||||||
30 | (89 | ) | (371 | ) | ||||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||||||
| Federal | — | — | 342 | |||||||||
| State | — | — | 94 | |||||||||
— | — | 436 | ||||||||||
| $ | 30 | $ | (89 | ) | $ | 65 | ||||||
The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to Qualstar’s effective income tax rate:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Statutory federal income tax benefit | (34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | (34.0 | )% | ||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | (4.0 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (3.7 | ) | ||||||
| Non-taxable investment income | 0.0 | 0.0 | (3.4 | ) | ||||||||
| Research and development credits | (14.0 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (15.5 | ) | ||||||
| Valuation allowance | 53.8 | 36.7 | 60.9 | |||||||||
| Other | 0.3 | 2.1 | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||
| 2.1 | % | (5.1 | )% | 4.1 | % | |||||||
The tax effect of temporary differences resulted in deferred income tax assets (liabilities) as follows:
June 30, | ||||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 1,358 | $ | 1,030 | ||||
| Capital loss and other credit carryforwards | 445 | 444 | ||||||
| Research and development credit carryforwards | 635 | 437 | ||||||
| Allowance for bad debts and returns | 65 | 45 | ||||||
| Inventory reserves | 320 | 279 | ||||||
| Capitalized inventory costs | 34 | 30 | ||||||
| Marketable securities | 21 | 151 | ||||||
| Other accruals | 502 | 455 | ||||||
| Total gross deferred tax assets | 3,380 | 2,871 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and other | (107 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
| Total gross deferred tax liabilities | (107 | ) | (215 | ) | ||||
| Valuation allowance | (3,273 | ) | (2,656 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
The Company placed a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 based on the Company’s assessment regarding the realizability of such assets in future years. The Company has net operating losses, capital losses, research and development credit and other carryforwards for tax purposes of $2.4 million at June 30, 2007 and $1.9 million at June 30, 2006 expiring between fiscal years 2009 and 2025, except for the state research and development credit, which has no limit on the carryforward period.
Note 6 – Preferred Stock
Qualstar’s capital structure allows for the Board of Directors to authorize 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has authority to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of these shares of preferred stock without any future vote or action by the shareholders. At June 30, 2007 and 2006, there were no outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Note 7 – Shared Based Stock Option Plans
The Company has one share-based compensation plan as described below. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded share-based compensation associated with outstanding stock option grants of approximately $90,000, $133,000 and $0, respectively. No income tax benefit was recognized in the income statement for share-based arrangements in any period presented.
Qualstar adopted a stock option plan (1998 Stock Incentive Plan) under which incentive and nonqualified stock options could be granted for an aggregate of no more than 1,215,000 shares of common stock. Under the terms of the plan, options could be issued at an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant. If an incentive stock option is granted to an individual owning more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all stock, the exercise price of the option may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. These option awards typically vest based on 4 years of continuous service at a rate of 25% per year and terminate as specified in each option agreement, but terminate no later than ten years after the date of grant.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination in determining forfeiture rates and evaluates separate groups of employees by functional area that have similar historical exercise behavior. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the vesting term of the award, historical employee exercise behavior, expected volatility of the Company’s stock and an employee’s average length of service. The risk-free interest rate used in this model correlates to a U.S. constant rate Treasury security with a contractual life that approximates the expected term of the option award. Weighted-average numbers have been used below as indicated.
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
| Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | 4.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||
| Expected life of options | 5 years | 4 years | 4 years | |||||||||
| Volatility | 35.4 | % | 30.8 | % | 36.9 | % | ||||||
The following table summarizes all stock option activity (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Options | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2006 | 557 | $ | 4.36 | |||||||||||||
| Granted | 128 | 2.93 | ||||||||||||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Forfeited or expired | (100 | ) | 4.23 | |||||||||||||
| Outstanding at June 30, 2007 | 585 | $ | 4.07 | 7.25 | $ | 86 | ||||||||||
| Exercisable at June 30, 2007 | 299 | $ | 4.93 | 3.20 | $ | 21 | ||||||||||
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1.13, $0.96, and $1.27, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal year 2005 was $11,000.
At June 30, 2007, there was $293,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation awards granted under the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years. The total fair value of shares vested for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $78,000, $156,000 and $188,000, respectively.
Note 8 – Purchase of N2 Power
On July 11, 2002, Qualstar acquired the assets and intellectual properties of N2Power, Incorporated, a privately held company which designed and produced small and efficient open-frame switching power supplies. The consideration for this acquisition amounted to $250,000 plus acquisition expenses of $38,000. The purchase price was primarily allocated to a patent, in the amount of $240,000, which is being amortized over 5 years. At June 30, 2007, accumulated amortization of the patent was $240,000. Amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $48,000 in each year. The patent is fully amortized as of June 30, 2007.
Note 9 – Commitments
Qualstar’s lease agreement for its facility located in Simi Valley, California, expires in February of 2011. The annual rent for the lease is $468,000, with step-ups ranging from $28,000 to $34,000 every two years. The Company provides for rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Qualstar’s lease agreement for its facility located in Boulder, Colorado, expires in May of 2009. The annual rent for the lease is $47,000, with a nominal step-up of approximately 3% annually. The Company provides for rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Future minimum lease payments under these leases are as follows:
Year Ending June 30, | Minimum Lease Payment (in thousands) | |||
| 2008 | $ | 603 | ||
| 2009 | 620 | |||
| 2010 | 588 | |||
| 2011 | 307 | |||
| 2012 and thereafter | — | |||
| $ | 2,118 | |||
Rent expense (including equipment rental) for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005, was $665,000, $670,000, and $671,000, respectively.
Note 10 – Segment Information
Based on the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS No. 131)” and the manner in which the Chief Operating Decision Maker analyzes the business, Qualstar has determined that it has two separate operating segments.
Segment revenue, loss before income taxes and total assets were as follows:
Year Ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Revenue | (in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Tape Libraries: | ||||||||||||
| Product | $ | 14,676 | $ | 16,008 | $ | 21,231 | ||||||
| Service | 2,929 | 3,144 | 2,638 | |||||||||
| Total Tape Libraries | 17,605 | 19,152 | 23,869 | |||||||||
| Power Supplies | 3,007 | 2,579 | 1,275 | |||||||||
| Consolidated Revenue | $ | 20,612 | $ | 21,731 | $ | 25,144 | ||||||
Year Ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Loss before Taxes | (in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Tape Libraries | $ | (1,310 | ) | $ | (1,434 | ) | $ | (1,427 | ) | |||
| Power Supplies | (107 | ) | (347 | ) | (155 | ) | ||||||
| Consolidated Loss before Income Taxes | $ | (1,417 | ) | $ | (1,781 | ) | $ | (1,582 | ) | |||
Year Ended June 30 | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Total Assets | (in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Tape Libraries | $ | 43,228 | $ | 44,312 | $ | 46,317 | ||||||
| Power Supplies | 835 | 1,087 | 906 | |||||||||
| Consolidated Assets | $ | 44,063 | $ | 45,399 | $ | 47,223 | ||||||
SFAS No. 131, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. This standard requires segmentation based on our internal organization and reporting of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. Our two segments are Tape Libraries and Power Supplies. The two segments discussed in this analysis are presented the way we internally managed and monitored performance in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005. Our financial reporting systems present various data for management to operate the business, including internal profit and loss statements prepared on a basis consistent with U.S. GAAP. For the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 amounts do not reflect allocations for certain internal resources, pension expense, legal expense, accounting fees, and other items. However, this represented the measurement data used by the chief operating decision maker in evaluating performance. The tape library business has dominated our operations, thus, our operations and reporting have been set up to accommodate a single segment and attribute all revenues and expenses to the tape library side, with the power supply business being an ancillary part of overall operations. As the power supply segment grew in fiscal 2006 to represent greater than 10% of combined revenues, a framework for internal resource allocations for labor, including direct, indirect and overhead was implemented in fiscal 2006.
The types of products and services provided by each segment are summarized below:
Tape Libraries — The Company designs, develops, manufactures and sells automated magnetic tape libraries used to store, retrieve and manage electronic data primarily in network computing environments. Tape libraries consist of cartridge tape drives, tape cartridges and robotics to move the cartridges from their storage locations to the tape drives under software control. Our tape libraries provide data storage solutions for organizations requiring backup, recovery and archival storage of critical data.
Power Supplies — The Company designs, develops, and sells ultra small, open frame, high efficiency switching power supplies. These power supplies are used to convert AC line voltage to DC for use in a wide variety of electronic equipment such as telecommunications equipment, machine tools, routers, switches, wireless systems and gaming devices.
Certain assets are tracked separately by the power supplies segment, and all others are recorded in the tape library segment for internal reporting presentations. Cash is not segregated between the two segments, but retained by the library segment.
Geographic Information
Information regarding revenues attributable to the Qualstar’s primary geographic operating regions is as follows:
Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||
| North America | $ | 15,582 | $ | 16,051 | $ | 18,281 | ||||||
| Europe | 3,196 | 3,467 | 4,933 | |||||||||
| Asia Pacific | 1,330 | 1,610 | 1,264 | |||||||||
| Other | 504 | 603 | 666 | |||||||||
| $ | 20,612 | $ | 21,731 | $ | 25,144 | |||||||
The geographic classification of revenues is based upon the location to which the product is shipped. Qualstar does not have any significant long-lived assets outside of the United States.
Note 11 – Legal Proceedings
The Company is from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. At this time, management is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against the Company that we expect will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or operating results. Legal claims are inherently uncertain, however. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be adversely affected in the future by legal proceedings.
Note 12 – Benefit Plans
Qualstar has a voluntary deferred compensation plan (the Plan) qualifying for treatment under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). All employees are eligible to participate in the Plan following three months of service of employment and may contribute up to 100% of their compensation on a pre-tax basis, not to exceed the annual IRS maximum. Qualstar, at the discretion of management, may make matching contributions in an amount equal to 25% of the first 6% of compensation contributed by eligible participants. Qualstar’s contributions under the Plan totaled $43,000, $59,000, and $67,000 for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005 respectively.
Note 13 – Related Party Transactions
Qualstar’s outside counsel is a member of its board of directors. During the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005 Qualstar paid $69,000, $94,000, and $105,000, respectively to the law firm in which the director is a shareholder for general business purposes.
Note 14 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition and measurement threshold for tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return and relates to the uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006, thus, we expect to adopt it in our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In 2007, we adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Current Year Misstatements.” SAB 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using both a balance sheet (iron curtain) and an income statement (rollover) approach to evaluate whether either approach results in an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition adjustment. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have an impact on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. We expect to adopt SFAS 157 in our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS 159 gives us the irrevocable option to carry many financial assets and liabilities at fair values, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. We expect to adopt SFAS 159 in our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
Note 15 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2007: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | 5,786 | $ | 4,884 | $ | 5,283 | $ | 4,659 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 2,246 | 1,338 | 1,634 | 1,302 | ||||||||||||
| Net Income (loss) | $ | 245 | $ | (667 | ) | $ | (446 | ) | $ | (579 | ) | |||||
| Net loss per share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Diluted | 0.02 | (0.06 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.05 | ) | |||||||||
Fiscal 2006: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | $ | 4,888 | $ | 5,052 | $ | 5,689 | $ | 6,102 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 1,603 | 1,446 | 1,922 | 1,904 | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (694 | ) | $ | (598 | ) | $ | (189 | ) | $ | (211 | ) | ||||
| Net loss per share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
| Diluted | (0.06 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Qualstar’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2007, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We did not make any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of Form 10-K (except information as to Qualstar’s executive officers, which is included under Part I, Item 1 of this Report) will be included in Qualstar’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of its fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, and is hereby incorporated by reference to such Proxy Statement.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
A list of our executive officers and biographical information appears in Part I, Item 1 of this report. Information about our Directors may be found under the caption “Election of Directors” of our Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”). That information is incorporated herein by reference.
Additional information in response to this item is incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement to be filed within 120 days after our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference to our proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference to our proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference to our proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference to our proxy statement to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The financial statements are set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits:
Exhibit No. | Description | |
3.1(1) | Restated Articles of Incorporation. | |
3.2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | |
| 10.1(1)* | 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. | |
| 10.2(1) | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | |
| 10.3(2) | Lease agreement between Strategic Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated September 20, 2000. | |
| 14.1(3) | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | |
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of Qualstar Corporation | |
| 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
| 31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| 32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
____________
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to Qualstar’s registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-96009), declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstar’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstar’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. |
| * | Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| QUALSTAR CORPORATION | ||
| Date: September 26, 2007 | By: | /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS |
| William J. Gervais, | ||
Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
| /s/ WILLIAM J. GERVAIS | Chief Executive Officer, | |||
| William J. Gervais | President and Director | |||
| (principal executive officer) | ||||
| /s/ RICHARD A. NELSON | Vice President, Engineering | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Richard A. Nelson | Secretary and Director | |||
| /s/ CARL W. GROMADA | Director | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Carl W. Gromada | ||||
| /s/ STANLEY W. CORKER | Director | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Stanley W. Corker | ||||
| /s/ ROBERT E. RICH | Director | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Robert E. Rich | ||||
| /s/ ROBERT A. MEYER | Director | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Robert A. Meyer | ||||
| /s/ ANDREW A. FARINA | Vice-President and CFO | September 26, 2007 | ||
| Andrew A. Farina | (principal financial officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
3.1(1) | Restated Articles of Incorporation. | |
3.2(1) | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | |
| 10.1(1)* | 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. | |
| 10.2(1) | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | |
| 10.3(2) | Lease agreement between Strategic Performance Fund-II, Inc. and Qualstar Corporation, dated September 20, 2000. | |
| 14.1(3) | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | |
| Subsidiaries of Qualstar Corporation | ||
| Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | ||
| Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
| Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
____________
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibits to Qualstar’s registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission File No. 333-96009), declared effective by the Commission on June 22, 2000. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstar’s Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to the designated exhibit to Qualstar’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. |
| * | Each of these exhibits constitutes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report. |
52