Parker Drilling (PKDC) 10-Q 2012 Q1 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-7573

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	73-0618660
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5 Greenway Plaza, Suite 100, Houston, Texas	77046
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(281) 406-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of May 1, 2012, there were 117,610,161 common shares outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Part I. Financial Information		3
Item 1. Financial Statements		3
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets March 31, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011		3
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		4
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011		5
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements		6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		27
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		36
Part II. Other Information		37
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		37
Item 1A. Risk Factors		37
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		37
Item 6. Exhibits		38
Signatures		39
Exhibit 4.1
Exhibit 10.1
Exhibit 10.2
Exhibit 10.3
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2

PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,996		$	97,869
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $1,724 and $1,544 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		191,206			183,923
Rig materials and supplies		25,413			29,947
Deferred costs		4,989			3,249
Deferred income taxes		5,823			6,650
Other tax assets		34,063			25,358
Assets held for sale		5,315			5,315
Other current assets		8,641			15,302
Total current assets		344,446			367,613
Property, plant and equipment less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $993,410 and $970,276 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		750,804			719,809
Deferred income taxes		106,018			108,311
Other noncurrent assets		24,685			20,513
Total assets	$	1,225,953		$	1,216,246
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	147,249		$	145,723
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		119,799			135,250
Accrued income taxes		5,184			4,837
Total current liabilities		272,232			285,810
Long-term debt		331,000			337,000
Other long-term liabilities		30,087			33,452
Long-term deferred tax liability		18,250			15,934
Contingencies (Note 11)		—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		19,584			19,508
Capital in excess of par value		640,974			637,042
Accumulated deficit		(85,552	)		(111,944	)
Total controlling interest stockholders’ equity		575,006			544,606
Noncontrolling interest		(622	)		(556	)
Total equity		574,384			544,050
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,225,953		$	1,216,246

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands Except Per Share and Weighted Average Shares Outstanding)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Revenues	$	176,569		$	156,179
Expenses:
Operating expenses		94,932			107,376
Depreciation and amortization		27,619			27,599
		122,551			134,975
Total operating gross margin		54,018			21,204
General and administration expense		(5,497	)		(6,806	)
Gain on disposition of assets, net		492			1,004
Total operating income		49,013			15,402
Other income and (expense):
Interest expense		(8,037	)		(5,861	)
Interest income		26			47
Change in fair value of derivative positions		(49	)		—
Other		16			11
Total other expense		(8,044	)		(5,803	)
Income before income taxes		40,969			9,599
Income tax expense:
Current tax expense		9,631			4,018
Deferred tax expense		5,012			821
Total income tax expense		14,643			4,839
Net income		26,326			4,760
Less: Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		(66	)		(67	)
Net income attributable to controlling interest	$	26,392		$	4,827
Basic earnings per share:	$	0.23		$	0.04
Diluted earnings per share:	$	0.22		$	0.04
Number of common shares used in computing earnings per share:
Basic		116,848,516			115,119,277
Diluted		118,404,491			116,322,199

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

4

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	26,326		$	4,760
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		27,619			27,599
Gain on disposition of assets		(492	)		(1,004	)
Deferred income tax expense		5,012			821
Expenses not requiring cash		6,999			4,453
Change in accounts receivable		(6,280	)		(9,747	)
Change in other assets		(3,419	)		37,379
Change in liabilities		(20,000	)		(23,504	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		35,765			40,757
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(59,433	)		(50,664	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		736			1,561
Proceeds from insurance settlements		—			250
Net cash used in investing activities		(58,697	)		(48,853	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of term loan		(6,000	)		(3,000	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		—			135
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation		59			1,125
Net cash used in financing activities		(5,941	)		(1,740	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		(28,873	)		(9,836	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		97,869			51,431
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	68,996		$	41,595
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	1,929		$	1,933
Income taxes paid	$	17,009		$	1,389

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

5

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. General

In the opinion of the management of Parker Drilling Company (Parker Drilling), the accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normally recurring nature which are necessary for a fair presentation of: (1) the financial position as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, (2) the results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and (3) cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be realized for the year ending December 31, 2012. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Nature of Operations — Parker Drilling, together with its subsidiaries (the Company), is a provider of contract drilling and drilling-related services. Our rental tools subsidiary specializes in oil and gas drilling rental tools, providing high-quality, reliable equipment, such as drill pipe, heavy-weight drill pipe, tubing, high-torque connections, blowout preventers (BOPs) and drill collars used for drilling, workover and production applications.

Our business, both internationally and within North America, provides extensive experience and expertise in drilling geologically difficult wells and in managing the logistical and technological challenges of operating in remote, harsh and ecologically sensitive areas. Additionally, our international drilling business includes other project management services, such as labor, maintenance, and logistics for operators who own their own drilling rigs, but choose Parker Drilling to operate the rigs for them. At March 31, 2012, our combined U.S. and international marketable rig fleet consisted of 15 barge drilling rigs and 25 land rigs located in the United States, Latin America, and certain Eastern Hemisphere regions. Our Technical Services business includes engineering and related project services during the concept development, pre-FEED (Front End Engineering and Design), and FEED phases of our customer owned drilling facility projects. As these projects mature, we strive to continue providing the same services during the Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Installation (EPCI) phase.

Segment Reporting— As of December 31, 2011, we re-aligned our reporting segments to be consistent with recent changes to our drilling organization. We have six distinct operating segments:

• Rental Tools

• U.S. Barge Drilling

• U.S. Drilling

• International Drilling

• Technical Services

• Construction Contract

As of December 31, 2011, we expanded our segments by one, adding a U.S. Drilling segment, represented primarily by our two Arctic Alaska Drilling Units (AADU) rigs in Alaska. Our U.S. Barge Drilling segment, previously referred to as the U.S. Drilling segment, represents our U.S. Gulf of Mexico barge business and remained unchanged. We aligned our international operations more closely with the management structure. Our previous three international geographic regions (Americas, CIS/AME, and Asia Pacific) are now two – Latin America and Eastern Hemisphere. Each region includes all drilling-related operations, whether conducted using a Parker-owned rig or a customer-owned rig pursuant to an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contract. Our technical services activities, which primarily include our engagement in engineering support initiatives, pre-FEED, FEED and EPCI projects that have the potential to evolve into future O&M opportunities, are now reported as an individual segment. Our Rental Tools and Construction Contract segments remain unchanged. Amounts presented throughout this document for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 have been revised to conform to current period presentation.

6

Consolidation — The consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of Parker Drilling and subsidiaries in which we exercise control or have a controlling financial interest, including entities, if any, in which the Company is allocated a majority of the entity’s losses or returns, regardless of ownership percentage. If a subsidiary of Parker Drilling has a 50 percent interest in an entity but Parker Drilling’s interest in the subsidiary or the entity does not meet the consolidation criteria described above, then that interest is accounted for under the equity method.

Reclassifications — Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material effect on our consolidated condensed statements of operations, consolidated condensed balance sheets or consolidated condensed statements of cash flows.

Reimbursable Costs — The Company recognizes reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenues and accounts for out-of-pocket expenses as direct operating costs. Such amounts totaled $7.7 million, and $14.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and 2011, respectively.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and our revenue and expenses during the periods reported. Estimates are typically used when accounting for certain significant items, such as legal or contractual liability accruals, mobilization and deferred mobilization, revenue and cost accounting for projects that follow the percentage of completion method, self-insured medical/dental plans, and other items requiring the use of estimates. Estimates are based on a number of variables which may include third party valuations, historical experience, where applicable, and assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved with estimates, actual results may differ from management estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk — Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade receivables with a variety of national and international oil and gas companies. We generally do not require collateral on our trade receivables.

At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had deposits in domestic banks in excess of federally insured limits of approximately $11.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively. In addition, we had deposits in foreign banks, which were not insured at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, of $33.3 million and $38.4 million, respectively.

Our customer base consists primarily of major, independent, national and international oil and gas companies and integrated service providers. We depend on a limited number of customers. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, no single customer contributed 10 percent or more to our year to date consolidated revenues. All of our segments depend on one or a limited number of key customers, the loss of any one or more which could have a material adverse effect on the segment.

Construction Contract — For the periods reported, our construction contract business included only the Liberty drilling rig construction project for BP. In November 2010, our customer, BP, informed us that it was suspending construction on the project to review the rig’s engineering and design, including its safety systems. The Liberty rig construction contract was a fixed fee and reimbursable contract accounted for on a percentage of completion basis. As of December 31, 2011, we had recognized $335.5 million in revenues and $11.7 million of margin on the contract.

The Liberty rig construction contract expired on February 8, 2011 prior to completion of the rig. Before expiration of the construction contract, BP identified several areas of concern relating to design, construction and invoicing for which it asked us to provide explanations and documentation, and we have done so. Although we provided BP with the requested information, we do not know when or how these issues will be resolved with our client.

7

After expiration of the construction contract, the Company and BP continued activities to preserve and maintain the rig under the “pre-operations” phase of our contract, which was entered into in August 2009 and expired on July 1, 2011. A new consulting services agreement was reached between the Company and BP effective July 1, 2011. Under the consulting services agreement, the Company assisted BP with technical support in a review of the rig’s design, the creation of a new statement of requirements for the rig, and the transition of documentation and materials to BP. All work under the consulting agreement has been completed and we are engaged with BP on construction contract close-out resolution.

Capitalized Interest — Interest from external borrowings is capitalized on major projects until the assets are ready for their intended use. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the underlying asset and is amortized over the useful lives of the assets in the same manner as the underlying assets. Capitalized interest costs reduce net interest expense in the consolidated condensed statements of operations. During the three-months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we capitalized interest costs primarily related to the construction of the two new AADU rigs of $2.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively.

2. Asset Impairment

During the fourth quarter of 2011, in accordance with the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets subsections of ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, we recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of $170.0 million related to our AADU rigs due to the extended construction and commissioning schedule and related costs. The AADU rigs are reported as part of the U.S. Drilling segment.

3. Earnings per share (EPS)

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per-Share Amount
Basic EPS	$	26,392,000		116,848,516	$	0.23
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock				1,555,975		(0.01	)
Diluted EPS:	$	26,392,000		118,404,491	$	0.22
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per-Share Amount
Basic EPS	$	4,827,000		115,119,277	$	0.04
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock				1,202,922		—
Diluted EPS:	$	4,827,000		116,322,199	$	0.04

8

4. Reportable Segments

We report our business activities in six business segments: (1) Rental Tools, (2) U.S. Barge Drilling, (3) U.S. Drilling, (4) International Drilling, (5) Technical Services, and (6) Construction Contract. We eliminate inter-segment revenue and expenses. The following table represents the results of operations by reportable segment:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
Operations by Reportable Industry Segment	2012			2011
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Revenues:
Rental Tools	$	66,284		$	52,319
U.S. Barge Drilling		27,835			15,920
U.S. Drilling(2)		—			—
International Drilling		78,750			69,936
Technical Services		3,700			8,366
Construction Contract		—			9,638
Total revenues		176,569			156,179
Operating income:
Rental Tools(1)		33,602			24,095
U.S. Barge Drilling(1)		7,157			(2,680	)
U.S. Drilling(1)		(1,547	)		(341	)
International Drilling(1)		14,559			(694	)
Technical Services(1)		247			1,567
Construction Contract(1)		—			(743	)
Total operating income		54,018			21,204
General and administrative expense		(5,497	)		(6,806	)
Gain on disposition of assets, net		492			1,004
Total operating income		49,013			15,402
Interest expense		(8,037	)		(5,86l	)
Interest income		26			47
Changes in fair value of derivative positions		(49	)		—
Other		16			11
Income before income taxes	$	40,969		$	9,599

(1) Operating income is calculated as revenues less direct operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization expense.

(2) As of March 31, 2012, this segment had not begun generating revenue.

5. Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale of $5.3 million as of March 31, 2012 was comprised of the net book value of three land rigs and related inventory. We have received a down payment on these assets and associated inventories and consummation of the sales is targeted for 2012. The three rigs are part of our Eastern Hemisphere fleet, and prior to being classified as assets held for sale, were included in the international drilling segment. We expect the carrying amount of the assets, less costs to sell, will be fully recoverable through sale of the assets.

9

6. Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company applies the accounting guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. At March 31, 2012, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $15.7 million (which includes $8.6 million of benefits which would favorably impact our effective tax rate upon recognition). As of March 31, 2011, we had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $16.2 million primarily related to foreign operations. In addition, the Company recognizes interest and penalties that could be applied to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had approximately $8.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties that could be applied to uncertain tax positions.

7. Income Tax Benefit/Expense

Income tax expense was $14.6 million for the first quarter of 2012, as compared to income tax expense of $4.8 million for the first quarter of 2011. The increase in current quarter tax expense is driven primarily by higher pre-tax earnings of $41.0 million for the first quarter of 2012 as compared to $9.6 million for the first quarter of 2011.

8. Long-Term Debt

Our 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes (2.125% Notes) are scheduled to mature in July 2012. As a result, the $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2.125% Notes is classified as a current obligation on our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2012. Subsequent to quarter end, we issued an additional $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of our existing 9.125% Senior Notes (9.125% Notes) at a price of 104.0% of par, resulting in gross proceeds of $130.0 million. Net proceeds from the offering will be utilized to repurchase the 2.125% Notes pursuant to a tender offer commenced on April 11, 2012 or to repay any non-tendered 2.125% Notes at their stated maturity, July 15, 2012. The tender offer price is $1,003.27 for each $1,000 principal amount of 2.125% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The following table illustrates the Company’s current debt portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
	(Dollars in Thousands)
9.125% Senior Notes, due April 2018	$	300,000	$	300,000
2.125% Convertible Senior Notes, due July 2012		123,249		121,723
Term Note		55,000		61,000
Revolving Credit Facility		—		—
Total debt		478,249		482,723
Less current portion		147,249		145,723
Total long-term debt	$	331,000	$	337,000

9.125% Senior Notes, due April 2018

On March 22, 2010, we issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% Senior Notes due 2018 (9.125% Notes) pursuant to an Indenture between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (Trustee). The 9.125% Notes were issued at par with interest payable on April 1 and

10

October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2010. Net proceeds from the 9.125% Notes offering were primarily used to redeem the $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 9.625% Senior Notes due 2013 and to repay $42.0 million of borrowings under our Revolver. As noted above, we issued and sold an additional $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% Notes in April 2012.

The 9.125% Notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness. The 9.125% Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by substantially all of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries other than immaterial subsidiaries and subsidiaries generating revenue primarily outside the United States.

At any time prior to April 1, 2013, we may redeem up to 35 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the 9.125% Notes at a redemption price of 109.125 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds of certain equity offerings by us. On and after April 1, 2014, we may redeem all or a part of the 9.125% Notes upon appropriate notice, at a redemption price of 104.563 percent of the principal amount, and at redemption prices decreasing each year thereafter to par. If we experience certain changes in control, we must offer to repurchase the 9.125% Notes at 101.0 percent of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.

The Indenture restricts our ability and the ability of certain subsidiaries to: (i) sell assets; (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; (iii) make investments; (iv) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; (v) create or incur liens; (vi) enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (vii) incur dividend or other payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries; (viii) merge or consolidate with other entities; (ix) enter into transactions with affiliates; and (x) engage in certain business activities. Additionally, the Indenture contains certain restrictive covenants designating certain events as Events of Default. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.

2.125% Convertible Senior Notes, due July 2012

On July 5, 2007, we issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes (2.125% Notes) due July 2012. As of March 31, 2012, the 2.125% Notes are classified as current debt in our consolidated condensed balance sheet.

The significant terms of the 2.125% Notes are as follows:

• 2.125% Notes Conversion Feature — The initial conversion price for holders to convert their 2.125% Notes into shares is at a common stock share price equivalent of $13.85 (72.2217 shares of common stock per $1,000 note value). Conversion rate adjustments occur for any issuances of stock, warrants, rights or options (except for stock purchase plans or dividend re-investments) or any other transfer of benefit to substantially all stockholders, or as a result of a tender or exchange offer. We may, under advice of our Board of Directors, increase the conversion rate at our sole discretion for a period of at least 20 days.

• 2.125% Notes Settlement Feature — Upon tender of the 2.125% Notes for conversion, we can either settle entirely in shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, solely at our option. Our intent is to satisfy our conversion obligation for our 2.125% Notes in cash, rather than in common stock, for at least the aggregate principal amount of the 2.125% Notes. This reduces the resulting potential earnings dilution to only include any possible conversion premium, which would be the difference between the average price of our shares and the conversion price per share of common stock.

• Contingent Conversion Feature — Holders may only convert the 2.125% Notes when either sales price or trading price conditions are met, on or after the 2.125% Notes’ due date or upon certain accounting changes or certain corporate transactions (fundamental changes) involving stock distributions. Make-whole provisions are only included in the accounting and fundamental change conversions such that holders do not lose value as a result of the changes.

11

• Settlement Feature — Upon conversion, we will pay either cash or provide shares of our common stock if any, based on a daily conversion rate multiplied by a volume weighted average price of our common stock during a specified period following the conversion date. Conversions can be settled in cash or shares, solely at our discretion.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, none of the conditions allowing holders of the 2.125% Notes to convert had been met. However, as of April 15, 2012, holders may surrender convertible notes for conversion at any time until the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the maturity date.

Concurrently with the issuance of the 2.125% Notes, we purchased a convertible note hedge (note hedge) and sold warrants in private transactions with counterparties that were different than the ultimate holders of the 2.125% Notes. The note hedge included purchasing free-standing call options and selling free-standing warrants, both exercisable in our common shares. The note hedge allows us to receive shares of our common stock from the counterparties to the transaction equal to the amount of common stock related to the excess conversion value that we would issue and/or pay to the holders of the 2.125% Notes upon conversion.

The terms of the call options mirror the 2.125% Notes’ major terms whereby the call option strike price is the same as the initial conversion price as are the number of shares callable, $13.85 per share and 9,027,713 shares, respectively. This feature prevents dilution of our outstanding shares. The warrants allow us to sell 9,027,713 common shares at a strike price of $18.29 per share. The conversion price of the 2.125% Notes remains at $13.85 per share, and the existence of the call options and warrants serve to guard against dilution at share prices less than $18.29 per share, since we would be able to satisfy our obligations and deliver shares upon conversion of the 2.125% Notes with shares that are obtained by exercising the call options.

We paid a premium of approximately $31.5 million for the call options, and received proceeds for a premium of approximately $20.3 million for the sale of the warrants. This reduced the net cost of the note hedge to $11.2 million. The expiration date of the note hedge is the earlier of the last day on which the 2.125% Notes remain outstanding or the maturity date of the 2.125% Notes.

The 2.125% Notes are classified as a liability in our consolidated condensed balance sheets. Because we have the choice of settling the call options and the warrants in cash or shares of our common stock and these contracts meet all of the applicable criteria for equity classification, the cost of the call options and proceeds from the sale of the warrants are classified in stockholders’ equity in the consolidated condensed balance sheets. In addition, because both of these contracts are classified in stockholders’ equity and are indexed solely to our common stock, they are not accounted for as derivatives.

Debt issuance costs related to the 2.125% Notes of approximately $3.6 million are being amortized over the five year term of the 2.125% Notes using the effective interest method. As of March 31, 2012, the unamortized debt issuance costs were $0.2 million. Holders may surrender convertible notes for conversion at any time on or after April 15, 2012 until the close of business on the second business day immediately preceding the maturity date. Proceeds from the transaction of $110.2 million were used to redeem our outstanding senior floating rate notes, to pay the net cost of hedge and warrant transactions, and for general corporate purposes. As noted above, on April 11, 2012 we commenced a tender offer to purchase any and all of the 2.125% Notes.

Credit Agreement:

On May 15, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) consisting of a senior secured $80.0 million revolving credit facility (Revolver) and senior secured term loan facility (Term Loan) of up to $50.0 million. The Credit Agreement provides that, subject to certain conditions, including the approval of the Administrative Agent and the lenders’ acceptance (or additional lenders being joined as new lenders), the amount of the Term Loan or Revolver could be increased by an additional $50.0 million, so long as after giving effect to such increase, the Aggregate Commitments shall not be in excess of $180.0 million. On April 1, 2011, the Company exercised the additional $50.0 million accordion feature and entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement that increased the Aggregate Commitment under the

12

Credit Agreement to $159.0 million, and borrowed an additional $50.0 million in a Term Loan. When the facility was increased, all other terms of the Credit Agreement remained the same, including covenants and Applicable Rates (as defined in the Credit Agreement).

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries, each of which has executed guaranty agreements. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants with which we were in compliance as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Credit Agreement terminates on May 14, 2013.

Revolver:

Our Revolver is available for general corporate purposes and to support letters of credit. Interest on Revolver loans accrues at a Base Rate plus an Applicable Rate or LIBOR plus an Applicable Rate. The Applicable Rate varies from a rate per annum ranging from 2.75 percent to 3.25 percent for LIBOR rate loans and 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent for base rate loans, determined by reference to the consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Revolving loans are available subject to a borrowing base calculation based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, certain specified barge drilling rigs and rental equipment of the Company and its subsidiary guarantors. There were no revolving loans outstanding at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011. Letters of credit outstanding totaled $2.7 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Term Loan:

The Term Loan originated at $50.0 million and required quarterly principal payments of $3.0 million. Interest on the Term Loan accrues at either a Base Rate plus 2.25 percent or LIBOR plus 3.25 percent. On April 1, 2011, the company expanded its Term Loan Facility by $50.0 million. Funding was provided by certain current lenders and Barclays Bank PLC, which joined as a lender under the Credit Agreement. We used the proceeds from the additional Term Loan to repay the $25.0 million outstanding on the Revolver, purchase additional rental tool inventory, and for general corporate purposes. The additional Term Loan amortizes $3.0 million per quarter beginning June 30, 2011. Upon the completion of the transaction, total borrowings under the Term Loan Facility were $79.0 million. Amortization on the Term Loans is $6.0 million per quarter. The outstanding balance on the Term Loan at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $55.0 million and $61.0 million, respectively.

9. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company entered into two variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements as a strategy to manage the floating rate risk on the Term Loan borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The two agreements fix the interest rate on a notional amount of $73.0 million of borrowings at 3.878% for the period beginning June 27, 2011 and terminating May 14, 2013. The notional amount of the swap agreements will decrease correspondingly with amortization of the Term Loan. We do not apply hedge accounting to the agreements and, accordingly, the Company reports the mark-to-market change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps in earnings. For the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized in earnings a nominal loss relating to these accounts.

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Certain of our assets and liabilities are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. For purposes of recording fair value adjustments for certain financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, and determining fair value disclosures, we estimate fair value at a price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market for the asset or liability.

13

The fair value measurement and disclosure requirements of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 820,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (ASC 820) requires inputs that we categorize using a three-level hierarchy, from highest to lowest level of observable inputs, as follows:

• Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets

• Level 2 — Direct or indirect observable inputs, including quoted prices or other market data, for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or identical assets or liabilities in less active markets

• Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that require significant judgment for which there is little or no market data.

When multiple input levels are required for a valuation, we categorize the entire fair value measurement according to the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement even though we may have also utilized significant inputs that are more readily observable.

The amounts reported in our consolidated condensed balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value. Fair values and related carrying values of our debt instruments are as follows:

	March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Long-term Debt
9.125% Notes	$	300,000	$	319,500	$	300,000	$	315,000
2.125% Notes		125,000		124,535		125,000		123,204
Total	$	425,000	$	444,035	$	425,000	$	438,204

The carrying amount of our interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated fair value, measured using Level 2 inputs. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the carrying amount of our interest rate swap agreements was $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, recorded in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated condensed balance sheets.

As discussed in Note 2, in accordance with the Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets subsections of ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of $170.0 million related to the AADU rigs in order to record them at their fair value of $169.5 million. The fair value of the AADU rigs was based on expected future cash flows using Level 3 inputs discounted at a 10 percent rate of interest.

Market conditions could cause an instrument to be reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2, or Level 2 to Level 3. There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy or any changes in the valuation techniques used during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

11. Contingencies

Asbestos-Related Claims

We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits that are incidental to our operations in which the claimants seek an unspecified amount of monetary damages for personal injury, including injuries purportedly resulting from exposure to asbestos on drilling rigs and associated facilities. At March 31, 2012, there were approximately 15 of these lawsuits in which we are one of many defendants. These lawsuits have been filed in the United States in the State of Mississippi.

14

The subsidiaries named in these asbestos-related lawsuits intend to defend themselves vigorously and, based on the information available to us at this time, we do not expect the outcome to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these lawsuits. No amounts were accrued at March 31, 2012.

Gulfco Site

In 2003, we received an information request under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) designating Parker Drilling Offshore Corporation, a subsidiary of Parker Drilling, as a potentially responsible party with respect to the Gulfco Marine Maintenance, Inc. Superfund Site in Freeport, Texas (EPA No. TX 055144539). The subsidiary responded to this request and in January 2008 received an administrative order to participate in an investigation of the site and a study of the remediation needs and alternatives. The EPA alleges that the subsidiary is a successor to a party who owned the Gulfco site during the time when chemical releases took place there. In December 2010, we entered into an agreement with two other potentially responsible parties, pursuant to which we agreed to pay 20 percent of past and future costs to study and remediate the site. The EPA recently issued notice letters to several other parties who may also participate in funding the site remediation costs. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had made certain participating payments and had accrued $0.7 million for our portion of certain unreimbursed past costs and the estimated future cost of remediation.

Customs Agent and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Investigation

As previously disclosed, we received requests from the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in July 2007 and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in January 2008 relating to our utilization of the services of a customs agent. The DOJ and the SEC are conducting parallel investigations into possible violations of U.S. law by us, including the FCPA. In particular, the DOJ and the SEC are investigating certain of our operations relating to countries in which we currently operate or formerly operated, including Kazakhstan and Nigeria. We are fully cooperating with the DOJ and SEC investigations and conducted an internal investigation into potential customs and other issues in Kazakhstan and Nigeria. The internal investigation has identified issues relating to potential non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including the FCPA, with respect to operations in Kazakhstan and Nigeria. At this point, we are unable to predict the duration, scope or result of the DOJ or the SEC investigation or whether either agency will commence any legal action. We are currently in continuing discussions with the DOJ and SEC regarding a potential settlement of this matter, but no agreement has been reached with either agency. We cannot predict or estimate whether or when a resolution with each will occur, or the terms, conditions, or other parameters of any such resolution (including the size of any monetary penalties or disgorgement). Therefore, we have not made any accrual in our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2012, with respect to the investigations.

The DOJ and the SEC have a broad range of civil and criminal sanctions under the FCPA and other laws and regulations, which they may seek to impose against corporations and individuals in appropriate circumstances including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, disgorgement, fines, penalties and modifications to business practices and compliance programs. These authorities have entered into agreements with, and obtained a range of sanctions against, several public corporations and individuals arising from allegations of improper payments and deficiencies in books and records and internal controls, whereby civil and criminal penalties were imposed. Recent civil and criminal settlements have included multi-million dollar fines, deferred prosecution agreements, guilty pleas, and other sanctions, including the requirement that the relevant corporation retain a monitor to oversee its compliance with the FCPA. In addition, corporations may have to end or modify existing business relationships. Any of these remedial measures, if applicable to us, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

15

We have taken certain steps to enhance our anti-bribery compliance efforts, including retaining a full-time Chief Compliance Officer who reports to the Chief Executive Officer and Audit Committee; adopting revised FCPA policies, procedures, and controls; increasing training and testing requirements; strengthening contractual provisions for our service providers that interface with foreign government officials; improving due diligence and continuing oversight procedures for the review and selection of such service providers; and implementing a compliance awareness improvement initiative that includes issuance of periodic anti-bribery compliance alerts.

Demand Letter and Derivative Litigation

In April 2010, we received a demand letter from a law firm representing Ernest Maresca. The letter states that Mr. Maresca is one of our stockholders and that he believes that certain of our current and former officers and directors violated their fiduciary duties related to the issues described above under “Customs Agent and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Investigation.” The letter requests that our Board of Directors take action against the individuals in question. In response to this letter, the Board formed a special committee to evaluate the issues raised by the letter and determine a course of action for the Company. On August 25, 2010, Mr. Maresca filed a derivative action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against our current directors, select officers, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit, like the demand letter, alleged that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company related to the issues described above under “Customs Agent and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Investigation.” The lawsuit sought damages in an unspecified amount, along with various other forms of relief and an award of attorney fees, other costs, and expenses to the plaintiff. The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff in December 2010.

On June 3, 2010, Mohamed Kassamali, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a derivative action in the state court of Harris County, Texas against our current directors and the Company as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company related to the issues described above under “Customs Agent and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Investigation.” On June 22, 2010, the Fuchs Family Trust, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a substantially similar lawsuit in the state court of Harris County, Texas. On June 23, 2010, Kenneth Flacks, a purported stockholder of the Company, also filed a substantially similar lawsuit in the state court of Harris County, Texas. The lawsuits seek damages related to the alleged breaches of duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement and waste of corporate assets. The damages sought include both compensatory and exemplary damages in an unspecified amount, along with various other forms of relief and an award of attorney fees, other costs, and expenses to the plaintiffs. All defendants have retained counsel, and on October 15, 2010, the three cases pending in the state court of Harris County, Texas were consolidated under the Kassamali case number and restyled as In re Parker Drilling Derivative Litigation. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended petition on April 7, 2011. On May 23, 2011, defendants filed special exceptions to that petition, which were fully briefed as of August 8, 2011. On December 9, 2011, the Court granted a 90-day deferral of the action. A hearing on the special exceptions is anticipated in May 2012.

On August 31, 2010, Douglas Freuler, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a derivative action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against our current directors, select officers, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit was substantially similar to those filed in the state court of Harris County, Texas, and alleges breach of fiduciary duties to the Company related to the issues described above under “Customs Agent and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Investigation,” as well as abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment. The damages sought included both compensatory and exemplary damages in an unspecified amount, along with various other forms of relief and an award of attorney fees, other costs, and expenses to the plaintiffs. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint were granted on June 30, 2011, and plaintiff was given thirty days to replead. Mr. Freuler filed his second amended complaint on July 20, 2011. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint were granted on March 14, 2012. On April 12, 2012, Mr. Freuler filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

16

Economic Sanctions Compliance

We are subject to laws and regulations restricting our international operations, including activities involving restricted countries, organizations, entities and persons that have been identified as unlawful actors or that are subject to U.S. economic sanctions. Pursuant to an internal review, we have identified certain shipments of equipment and supplies that were routed through Iran as well as other activities, including drilling activities, which may have violated applicable U.S. laws and regulations. We have reviewed these shipments, transactions and drilling activities to determine whether the timing, nature and extent of such activities or other conduct may have given rise to violations of these laws and regulations, and we voluntarily disclosed the results of our review to the U.S. government. At this point, we are unable to predict whether the government will initiate an investigation or any proceedings against us or the ultimate outcome that may result from our voluntary disclosure. If U.S. enforcement authorities determine that we were not in compliance with export restrictions, U.S. economic sanctions or other laws and regulations that apply to our international operations, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties and other remedial measures, which could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Kazakhstan Ministry of Finance Tax Audit

On August 14, 2009, the Kazakhstan Branch (PKD Kazakhstan) of Parker Drilling’s subsidiary, Parker Drilling Company International Limited (PDCIL), received an Act of Tax Audit from the Ministry of Finance of Kazakhstan (MinFin) for the period January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2007. PKD Kazakhstan was assessed additional taxes in the amount of KZT 1.45 billion (approximately USD $9.7 million) and associated interest in the amount of KZT 700 million (approximately USD $4.7 million). The amounts assessed relate to corporate income taxes and interest in connection with the disallowance of the head office’s management and administrative expenses, loan interest and state duties, as well as Value Added Taxes (VAT) and interest in connection with VAT offset on debts classified as doubtful by MinFin, and for property taxes and interest in connection with Barge Rig 257 as a result of MinFin applying a lower rate of depreciation.

On September 25, 2009, PKD Kazakhstan appealed the Act of Tax Audit with MinFin on the basis that PKD Kazakhstan was exercising its rights provided by the Convention between the Governments of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the United States of America on the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Income and Capital, as well as improper application of Kazakhstan Tax Code provisions.

On January 13, 2010, PKD Kazakhstan received a response from MinFin to the appeal filed September 25, 2009. MinFin agreed with PKD Kazakhstan to remove the assessment related to property taxes and interest in connection with Barge Rig 257 which reduced the overall assessment by KZT 741 million (approximately USD $5.0 million).

On March 1, 2010, PKD Kazakhstan filed a claim against the Tax Department, in the Special Inter-district Economic Court of Atyrau Oblast, seeking to invalidate the revised Tax Notification. On May 5, 2010, the court elected not to issue a ruling on the merits of the case on the basis of an alleged lack of standing. PKD Kazakhstan adjusted and re-filed its claim in June 2010.

On August 17, 2010, the Special Inter-district Economic Court of Atyrau Oblast rendered a decision rejecting PKD Kazakhstan’s re-filed claim. PKD Kazakhstan filed on September 17, 2010 an appeal to the Atyrau Oblast Court. That appeal was heard by a single judge on October 27, 2010, at the conclusion of which the court announced its decision to let the lower court decision stand without amendment or cancellation.

17

On November 18, 2010, PKD Kazakhstan filed an appeal to a three-judge panel of the Atyrau Oblast Court. On December 9, 2010, the court announced its decision to uphold the lower court decision and allow the revised Tax Notification to stand. As a result of the decision on December 9, 2010, PKD Kazakhstan had an obligation to pay the residual assessment. The amount due related to the tax assessment and applicable interest was approximately $11.3 million, plus an administrative penalty of approximately $3.2 million arising from the same alleged underpayment of taxes. PKD Kazakhstan paid these amounts in full prior to December 31, 2010 to avoid enforcement actions and additional interest while we pursue further challenges.

PKD Kazakhstan continues to believe that it properly exercised its rights provided by the Convention and that MinFin improperly applied certain provisions of the Kazakhstan Tax Code. PKD Kazakhstan submitted a discretionary appeal to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and on October 13, 2011 the Supreme Court verbally announced its decision to not accept and consider the merits of the appeal. PKD Kazakhstan is considering its remaining available options for relief under Kazakhstan law and the Convention and anticipates taking this matter through the U.S. Competent Authority process, which may take months or years to resolve.

12. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income — FASB ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, as amended by FASB ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, revises FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to require that a registrant report comprehensive income in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The ASUs eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income (OCI) as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. Public entities are required to comply with the new reporting requirements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 and interim periods within those years. Calendar year-end companies must adopt the requirements for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or disclosures.

Fair value measurements — Effective January 1, 2012, we adopted the accounting standards update that changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Some of the amendments included in this update are intended to clarify the applications of existing fair value measurement requirements. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Our adoption did not have a material effect on the disclosures contained in our notes to the consolidated financial statements.

13. Parent, Guarantor, Non-Guarantor Unaudited Consolidating Condensed Financial Statements

Set forth on the following pages are the consolidating condensed financial statements of Parker Drilling. The Company’s 9.125% Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the restricted subsidiaries of Parker Drilling. There are currently no restrictions on the ability of the restricted subsidiaries to transfer

18

funds to Parker Drilling in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. Parker Drilling is a holding company with no operations, other than through its subsidiaries. Separate financial statements for each guarantor company are not provided as the company complies with the exception to Rule 3-10(a)(1) of Regulation S-X, set forth in sub-paragraph (f) of such rule. All guarantor subsidiaries are owned 100 percent by the parent company, all guarantees are full and unconditional and all guarantees are joint and several.

We are providing consolidating condensed financial information of the parent, Parker Drilling, the guarantor subsidiaries, and the non-guarantor subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The consolidating condensed financial statements present investments in both consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting.

19

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2012
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	34,861		$	948		$	33,187		$	—		$	68,996
Accounts and notes receivable, net		289,607			98,059			300,437			(496,897	)		191,206
Rig materials and supplies		—			(467	)		25,880			—			25,413
Deferred costs		—			—			4,989			—			4,989
Deferred income taxes		—			4,705			633			485			5,823
Other tax assets		68,326			(35,722	)		1,766			(307	)		34,063
Assets held for sale		—			—			5,315			—			5,315
Other current assets		788			325			7,528			—			8,641
Total current assets		393,582			67,848			379,735			(496,719	)		344,446
Property, plant and equipment, net		79			514,919			235,806			—			750,804
Investment in subsidiaries and intercompany advances		758,264			(236,275	)		1,364,952			(1,886,941	)		—
Other noncurrent assets		43,682			67,371			19,285			365			130,703
Total assets	$	1,195,607		$	413,863		$	1,999,778		$	(2,383,295	)	$	1,225,953
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	147,249		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	147,249
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		67,128			73,391			190,441			(211,161	)		119,799
Accrued income taxes		(702	)		1,684			4,557			(355	)		5,184
Total current liabilities		213,675			75,075			194,998			(211,516	)		272,232
Long-term debt		331,000			—			—			—			331,000
Other long-term liabilities		8,284			6,066			15,737			—			30,087
Long-term deferred tax liability		5,059			26,318			(14,021	)		894			18,250
Intercompany payables		62,583			43,657			111,619			(217,859	)		—
Contingencies		—			—			—			—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		19,584			18,049			43,003			(61,052	)		19,584
Capital in excess of par value		640,974			733,119			1,444,091			(2,177,210	)		640,974
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(85,552	)		(488,421	)		204,973			283,448			(85,552	)
Total controlling interest stockholders’ equity		575,006			262,747			1,692,067			(1,954,814	)		575,006
Noncontrolling interest		—			—			(622	)		—			(622	)
Total Equity		575,006			262,747			1,691,445			(1,954,814	)		574,384
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,195,607		$	413,863		$	1,999,778		$	(2,383,295	)	$	1,225,953

20

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	55,670		$	4,212		$	37,987		$	—		$	97,869
Accounts and notes receivable, net		289,512			94,748			285,326			(485,663	)		183,923
Rig materials and supplies		—			762			29,185			—			29,947
Deferred costs		—			—			3,249			—			3,249
Deferred income taxes		—			5,311			853			486			6,650
Other tax assets		47,834			(25,218	)		2,742			—			25,358
Assets held for sale		—			—			5,315			—			5,315
Other current assets		788			6,381			8,133			—			15,302
Total current assets		393,804			86,196			372,790			(485,177	)		367,613
Property, plant and equipment, net		79			474,942			244,787			1			719,809
Investment in subsidiaries and intercompany advances		720,214			(212,883	)		1,347,719			(1,855,050	)		—
Other noncurrent assets		44,962			66,660			16,839			363			128,824
Total assets	$	1,159,059		$	414,915		$	1,982,135		$	(2,339,863	)	$	1,216,246
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	145,723		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	145,723
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		60,120			94,056			181,010			(199,936	)		135,250
Accrued income taxes		(205	)		921			4,121			—			4,837
Total current liabilities		205,638			94,977			185,131			(199,936	)		285,810
Long-term debt		337,000			—			—			—			337,000
Other long-term liabilities		8,081			9,474			15,897			—			33,452
Long-term deferred tax liability		1,151			25,232			(11,296	)		847			15,934
Intercompany payables		62,583			43,657			111,619			(217,859	)		—
Contingencies		—			—			—			—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		19,508			18,049			43,003			(61,052	)		19,508
Capital in excess of par value		637,042			733,120			1,444,091			(2,177,211	)		637,042
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(111,944	)		(509,594	)		194,246			315,348			(111,944	)
Total controlling interest stockholders’ equity		544,606			241,575			1,681,340			(1,922,915	)		544,606
Noncontrolling interest		—			—			(556	)		—			(556	)
Total Equity		544,606			241,575			1,680,784			(1,922,915	)		544,050
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,159,059		$	414,915		$	1,982,135		$	(2,339,863	)	$	1,216,246

21

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months ended March 31, 2012
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
Total revenues	$	—			99,157		$	103,025		$	(25,613	)	$	176,569
Operating expenses		—			43,559			76,986			(25,613	)		94,932
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,595			12,024			—			27,619
Total operating gross margin		—			40,003			14,015			—			54,018
General and administration expense(1)		(45	)		(5,374	)		(78	)		—			(5,497	)
Gain on disposition of assets, net		—			418			74			—			492
Total operating income (loss)		(45	)		35,047			14,011			—			49,013
Other income and (expense):
Interest expense		(9,001	)		(36	)		(1,949	)		2,949			(8,037	)
Interest income		95			178			2,702			(2,949	)		26
Changes in fair value of derivative positions		(49	)		—			—			—			(49	)
Other		—			13			3			—			16
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries		31,900			—			—			(31,900	)		—
Total other income and (expense)		22,945			155			756			(31,900	)		(8,044	)
Income (benefit) before income taxes		22,900			35,202			14,767			(31,900	)		40,969
Income tax expense (benefit):
Current		(8,110	)		11,479			6,262			—			9,631
Deferred		4,618			2,550			(2,156	)		—			5,012
Total income tax expense (benefit)		(3,492	)		14,029			4,106			—			14,643
Net income (loss)		26,392			21,173			10,661			(31,900	)		26,326
Less: Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			(66	)		—			(66	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	26,392		$	21,173		$	10,727		$	(31,900	)	$	26,392

(1) General and administration expenses for field operations are included in operating expenses.

22

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months ended March 31, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
Total revenues	$	—		$	87,405		$	108,091		$	(39,317	)	$	156,179
Operating expenses		—			50,402			96,291			(39,317	)		107,376
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,210			12,389			—			27,599
Total operating gross margin		—			21,793			(589	)		—			21,204
General and administration expense(1)		(45	)		(6,699	)		(62	)		—			(6,806	)
Gain on disposition of assets, net		—			810			194			—			1,004
Total operating income (loss)		(45	)		15,904			(457	)		—			15,402
Other income and (expense):
Interest expense		(6,852	)		(8,910	)		(1,728	)		11,629			(5,861	)
Interest income		8,970			190			2,516			(11,629	)		47
Other		—			—			11			—			11
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries		3,965			—			—			(3,965	)		—
Total other income and (expense)		6,083			(8,720	)		799			(3,965	)		(5,803	)
Income (benefit) before income taxes		6,038			7,184			342			(3,965	)		9,599
Income tax expense (benefit):
Current		(65	)		222			3,861			—			4,018
Deferred		1,276			151			(606	)		—			821
Total income tax expense		1,211			373			3,255			—			4,839
Net income (loss)		4,827			6,811			(2,913	)		(3,965	)		4,760
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		—			—			(67	)		—			(67	)
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest	$	4,827		$	6,811		$	(2,846	)	$	(3,965	)	$	4,827

(1) All field operations general and administration expenses are included in operating expenses.

23

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Year Ended March 31, 2012
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:	$	26,392		$	21,173		$	10,661		$	(31,900	)	$	26,326
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,595			12,024			—			27,619
Gain on disposition of assets		—			(418	)		(74	)		—			(492	)
Deferred income tax expense		4,618			2,550			(2,156	)		—			5,012
Expenses not requiring cash		6,839			191			(31	)		—			6,999
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries		(31,900	)		—			—			31,900			—
Change in accounts receivable		(95	)		(2,326	)		(3,859	)		—			(6,280	)
Change in other assets		(20,726	)		16,618			689			—			(3,419	)
Change in liabilities		6,154			(24,103	)		(2,051	)		—			(20,000	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(8,718	)		29,280			15,203			—			35,765
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			(56,611	)		(2,822	)		—			(59,433	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		—			697			39			—			736
Net cash (used in) investing activities		—			(55,914	)		(2,783	)		—			(58,697	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Pay down on term note		(6,000	)		—			—			—			(6,000	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		59			—			—			—			59
Intercompany advances, net		(6,150	)		23,370			(17,220	)		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(12,091	)		23,370			(17,220	)		—			(5,941	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(20,809	)		(3,264	)		(4,800	)		—			(28,873	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		55,670			4,212			37,987			—			97,869
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	34,861		$	948		$	33,187		$	—		$	68,996

24

PARKER DRILLING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31, 2011
	Parent			Guarantor			Non-Guarantor			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	4,827		$	6,811		$	(2,913	)	$	(3,965	)	$	4,760
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,210			12,389			—			27,599
Gain on disposition of assets		—			(810	)		(194	)		—			(1,004	)
Deferred income tax expense		1,276			151			(606	)		—			821
Expenses not requiring cash		4,507			—			(54	)		—			4,453
Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries		(3,965	)		—			—			3,965			—
Change in accounts receivable		6,968			24,315			(41,030	)		—			(9,747	)
Change in other assets		326			39,374			(2,321	)		—			37,379
Change in liabilities		3,372			(66,599	)		39,723			—			(23,504	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		17,311			18,452			4,994			—			40,757
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		—			(47,233	)		(3,431	)		—			(50,664	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		—			1,360			201			—			1,561
Proceeds from insurance settlements					250									250
Net cash used in investing activities		—			(45,623	)		(3,230	)		—			(48,853	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Paydown on term note		(3,000	)		—			—			—			(3,000	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		135			—			—			—			135
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		1,125			—			—			—			1,125
Intercompany advances, net		(6,201	)		22,638			(16,437	)		—			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(7,941	)		22,638			(16,437	)		—			(1,740	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		9,370			(4,533	)		(14,673	)		—			(9,836	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		13,835			2,317			35,279			—			51,431
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	23,205		$	(2,216	)	$	20,606		$	—		$	41,595

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

25

14. Subsequent Event

Pursuant to an Offering Memorandum dated April 11, 2012, we issued an additional $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of our existing 9.125% Notes. The notes were priced at 104.0% of par, resulting in gross proceeds of $130.0 million and a yield to maturity of 8.256%. The offering closed on April 25, 2012.

Also on April 11, 2012, the Company commenced an any and all cash tender offer for its $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 2.125% Notes. The tender offer will expire at midnight, Eastern Standard time, on May 8, 2012, unless extended or earlier terminated by the Company. Holders of 2.125% Notes who validly tender will receive $1,003.27 for each $1,000 principal amount of 2.125% Notes purchased in the tender offer, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the settlement date.

On April 9, 2012, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of May 15, 2008 among the Company, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America N.A., as administrative agent. Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the Credit Agreement was amended to clarify the definition of permitted refinancing indebtedness under the Credit Agreement which allowed for the transactions described above to commence.

26

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

DISCLOSURE NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 10-Q contains statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act). All statements contained in this Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements for purposes of these provisions, including any statements regarding:

• stability of prices and demand for oil and natural gas;

• levels of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities;

• demand for contract drilling and drilling-related services and demand for rental tools;

• our future operating results and profitability;

• our future rig utilization, dayrates and rental tools activity;

• entering into new, or extending existing, drilling contracts and our expectations concerning when our rigs will commence operations under such contracts;

• growth through acquisitions of companies or assets;

• organic growth of our operations;

• construction or upgrades of rigs and expectations regarding when these rigs will commence operations;

• capital expenditures for acquisition of rigs, construction of new rigs or major upgrades to existing rigs;

• scheduled delivery, commissioning and subsequent operation of our AADU rigs under the terms of our agreement with BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.;

• entering into joint venture agreements;

• our future liquidity;

• availability and sources of funds to refinance our debt and expectations of when debt will be reduced;

• the outcome of pending or future legal proceedings, investigations, tax assessments and other claims;

• the availability of insurance coverage for pending or future claims;

• the enforceability of contractual indemnification in relation to pending or future claims; and

• compliance with covenants under our debt agreements.

In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “may,” “should,” “will” and “would” or similar words. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by our management in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors they believe are relevant. Although our management believes that their assumptions are reasonable based on information currently available, those assumptions are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. The following factors, as well as those factors set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and any other cautionary language included in this Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements:

27

• worldwide economic and business conditions that adversely affect market conditions and/or the cost of doing business including Euro country failures and downgrades;

• our inability to access the credit or bond markets;

• U.S. credit market volatility resulting from the U.S. national debt and potential further downgrades of the U.S. credit rating;

• the U.S. economy and the demand for natural gas;

• low U.S. natural gas prices could adversely affect U.S. drilling and our barge rig and rental tools businesses;

• worldwide demand for oil;

• fluctuations in the market prices of oil and natural gas;

• imposition of unanticipated trade restrictions;

• unanticipated operating hazards and uninsured risks;

• political instability, terrorism or war;

• governmental regulations, including changes in accounting rules or tax laws that may impact our ability to remit funds to the U.S., that adversely affect the cost of doing business;

• changes in the tax laws that would allow double taxation on foreign sourced income;

• the outcome of our investigation and the parallel investigations by the SEC and DOJ into possible violations of U.S. law, including the FCPA;

• adverse environmental events;

• adverse weather conditions;

• global health concerns;

• changes in the concentration of customer and supplier relationships;

• ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for their operations;

• unexpected cost increases for new construction and upgrade and refurbishment projects;

• delays in obtaining components for capital projects and in ongoing operational maintenance and equipment certifications;

• shortages of skilled labor;

• unanticipated cancellation of contracts by customers or operators;

• breakdown of equipment;

• other operational problems including delays in start-up or commissioning of rigs;

• changes in competition;

• the effect of litigation and contingencies; and

• other similar factors, some of which are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our other reports and filings with the SEC.

Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Before you decide to invest in our securities, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

28

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Overview

Our first quarter results demonstrate the strength and durability of our business strategy and our success in adapting to the effects of diverging trends in oil and natural gas prices in North America and uneven growth in international E&P spending. Our Rental Tools segment continued to grow, serving the increased need for premium drill pipe in shale plays. The U.S. Barge Drilling segment’s performance reflects increased drilling activity in the shallow waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Our International Drilling segment benefited from an increase in rig fleet average utilization and a higher average dayrate for our rigs, and an increase in the number of O&M projects. Our Technical Services segment’s results reflect the net impact of one project being completed and progression on others.

Outlook

Our current business activity and observed trends in our markets are expected to support continued strength in our business. Drilling for oil and liquids –rich gas targets continues to expand in the U.S., both on land and in the coastal waters of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. In addition, the U.S. land drilling market continues to grow footage drilled, a prime indicator of demand for drill pipe and other rental tools. The worldwide E&P industry’s increased spending to develop oil and natural gas resources is expected to lead to more international drilling activity, including an expanded reach into challenging environments that require safe and efficient operations and more fit-for-purpose drilling solutions. We believe these trends and our balanced and diversified operations position us to continue to deliver solid results from our operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

Revenues of $176.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased $20.4 million over the comparable 2011 period. Operating gross margin increased over 150% to $54.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 as compared with $21.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. We recorded net income attributable to controlling interest of $26.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared with $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

29

The following is an analysis of our operating results for the comparable quarters:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012					2011
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Revenues:
Rental Tools	$	66,284		37	%	$	52,319		34	%
U.S. Barge Drilling		27,835		16	%		15,920		10	%
U.S. Drilling		—		0	%		—		0	%
International Drilling		78,750		45	%		69,936		45	%
Technical Services		3,700		2	%		8,366		5	%
Construction Contract		—		0	%		9,638		6	%
Total revenues		176,569		100	%		156,179		100	%
Operating gross margin:
Rental Tools gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization		44,654		67	%		34,182		65	%
U.S. Barge Drilling gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization		10,695		38	%		1,817		11	%
U.S. Drilling gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization		(466	)				(213	)
International Drilling gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization		26,507		34	%		12,193		17	%
Technical Services gross margin		247		7	%		1,567		19	%
Construction Contract gross margin		—		0	%		(743	)	–8	%
Total operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization		81,637		46	%		48,803		31	%
Depreciation and amortization		(27,619	)				(27,599	)
Total operating gross margin		54,018					21,204
General and administrative expense		(5,497	)				(6,806	)
Gain on disposition of assets, net		492					1,004
Total operating income	$	49,013				$	15,402

30

Segment operating gross margins excluding depreciation and amortization, are computed as revenues less direct operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, where applicable; segment operating gross margin percentages are computed as operating gross margin as a percent of revenues. The operating gross margin amounts and operating gross margin percentages should not be used as a substitute for those amounts reported under U.S. GAAP. However, we monitor our business segments based on several criteria, including operating gross margin. Management believes that this information is useful to our investors because it more accurately reflects cash generated by segment. Such operating gross margin amounts are reconciled to our most comparable U.S. GAAP measure as follows:

	Rental Tools		U.S. Barge Drilling			U.S. Drilling			International Drilling			Technical Services(2)		Construction Contract(2)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012	(Dollars in Thousands)
Operating gross margin(1)	$	33,602	$	7,157		$	(1,547	)		14,559		$	247	$	—
Depreciation and amortization		11,052		3,538			1,081			11,948			—		—
Operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization	$	44,654	$	10,695		$	(466	)	$	26,507		$	247		—
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Operating gross margin(1)	$	24,095	$	(2,680	)	$	(341	)	$	(694	)	$	1,567	$	(743	)
Depreciation and amortization		10,087		4,497			128			12,887			—		—
Operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization	$	34,182	$	1,817		$	(213	)	$	12,193		$	1,567	$	(743	)

(1) Operating gross margin is calculated as revenues less direct operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization expense.

(2) The Technical Services segment and the Construction Contract segment do not incur depreciation and amortization.

Rental Tools

Rental Tools segment revenues increased $14.0 million, or 26.7%, to $66.3 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $52.3 million for the first quarter of 2011. The increase was driven primarily by growth in demand for rental tools and pricing. The growing use of lateral drilling and longer well-bores to exploit both shale deposits and conventional oil and gas reservoirs in the U.S. continues to contribute to greater market demand for our rental tools.

Rental Tools segment operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization, increased by $10.5 million, or 30.6%, in the current quarter compared with the first quarter of 2011, primarily due to increased revenues and product positioning which allows for improved cost leverage.

U.S. Barge Drilling

U.S. Barge Drilling segment revenues increased $11.9 million, or 74.8%, to $27.8 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $15.9 million for the first quarter of 2011. The increase in revenues was primarily due to increased utilization and higher average dayrates for the U.S. barge rig fleet.

The U.S. Barge Drilling segment’s operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization, increased by $8.9 million to $10.7 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2011. The approximate five-fold increase in operating gross margin is due to an increase in both utilization and average dayrates for the barge rig fleet.

31

U.S. Drilling

As of March 31, 2012, the U.S. Drilling segment had not begun generating revenue. Operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization, was a loss of $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and includes expenditures associated with re-entering the Alaskan market. The start-up costs include salaries and employee hiring-related expenditures, training and rental of facilities in Alaska to support our operations.

International Drilling

International Drilling segment revenues increased $8.8 million, or 12.6%, to $78.8 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $69.9 million for the first quarter of 2011. The higher revenues are primarily due to an increase in drilling revenue generated by the operation of rigs that we own partially offset by a decline in revenues from O&M contracts.

Revenues related to Parker-owned rigs increased $14.8 million, or 35.1%, to $56.9 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $42.1 million the first quarter of 2011 due to increases in revenue in both the Latin America and Eastern Hemisphere regions. Revenues in the Latin America region increased primarily due to increased utilization. Two rigs that had been idle for some or all of the 2011 first quarter were active in the 2012 first quarter. Revenues in the Eastern Hemisphere region increased primarily as a result of increased utilization, higher dayrates and increased amortization of revenue related to customer-funded reimbursable rig upgrades.

O&M revenues declined $6.0 million, or 21.5%, for the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. The decrease in revenues from our O&M contracts was primarily due to a decrease in reimbursable revenues related to a drilling rig relocation project which commenced during the first quarter of 2011 and was completed prior to December 31, 2011. The decrease in revenues was partially offset by an increase in revenue related to an O&M contract that was on stand-by rate during the first quarter of 2012 compared to minimal revenue in the 2011 first quarter related to a shipyard refurbishment project. O&M projects included approximately $4.4 million and $11.0 million of reimbursable costs for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which added to revenues but had little impact on operating margins.

International Drilling operating gross margin excluding depreciation and amortization, was $26.5 million during the first quarter of 2012, an increase of $14.3 million, or 117.4%, compared with $12.2 million for the first quarter of 2011. The increase in operating gross margin for the first quarter of 2012 was primarily due to higher dayrates and increased utilization and the inclusion in the 2011 first quarter of $1.1 million of expense related to a non-cash charge to write-off certain VAT assets in the Eastern Hemisphere region and $1.9 million of expense related to equity tax assessments in Latin America.

Technical Services

Technical Services segment revenues decreased $4.7 million, or 55.8%, to $3.7 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $8.4 million for the first quarter of 2011. This decrease was primarily due to expiration at the end of the second quarter of 2011 of the “pre-operations” phase of the Liberty rig O&M contract and transition of the Berkut platform project (previously described as the “Arkutun Dagi” project) from its engineering phase to a less revenue-intensive construction oversight and assistance phase. The decline in revenues was partially offset by revenues from two front-end engineering projects that are in the early development stages.

Operating gross margin for this segment decreased to $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2011. The decrease is primarily the result of decreased operating gross margins on the Berkut platform project offset by increased margins on the two front-end engineering projects. The Technical Services segment does not incur depreciation and amortization.

32

Construction Contract

This segment includes only the Liberty extended-reach drilling rig construction project for use in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Construction Contract segment revenues were zero for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared with $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This segment reported zero and $0.7 million operating gross margin for the first quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The operating gross margin generated during the first quarter of 2011 was due to preliminary close-out of the Liberty project and recognition of final percentage of completion revenues. The construction contract segment does not incur depreciation and amortization.

The Liberty rig construction contract was a fixed fee and reimbursable contract accounted for on a percentage of completion basis. As of December 31, 2011, we had recognized $335.5 million in project-to-date revenues. We have recognized $11.7 million of margin on the contract.

In November 2010, BP informed us that it was suspending construction on the project to review the rig’s engineering and design, including its safety systems. The Liberty rig construction contract expired on February 8, 2011 prior to completion of the rig. Before expiration of the construction contract, BP identified several areas of concern relating to design, construction and invoicing for which it asked us to provide explanations and documentation, and we have done so. Although we provided BP with the requested information, we do not know when or how these issues will be resolved with our client.

After expiration of the construction contract, the Company and BP continued activities to preserve and maintain the rig under the “pre-operations” phase of an O&M contract, which was entered into in August 2009 and expired on July 1, 2011. A new consulting services agreement was reached between the Company and BP effective July 1, 2011. Under the consulting services agreement, we assisted BP in a review of the rig’s design, the creation of a new statement of requirements for the rig, and the transition of documentation and materials to BP. All work under the consulting agreement has been completed and we are engaged with BP on construction contract close-out resolution.

Other Financial Data

Gains on asset dispositions for the first quarter of 2012 and 2011 were $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and were primarily the result of asset sales during each period. We periodically sell equipment deemed to be excess or not currently required for operations.

Interest expense increased $2.2 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011. This was due to a $2.1 million decrease in interest capitalized on major projects, primarily resulting from a reduction in the value of the AADUs following an impairment charge recorded during the fourth quarter of 2011. Interest income was not significant during each quarter.

General and administration expense decreased $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2012 compared with the first quarter of 2011 due primarily to a decrease in legal and professional fees associated with the SEC and DOJ investigations (see further discussion in Note 11 in the Notes to Company financial statements) in addition to a decrease in salaries and wages.

Income tax expense was $14.6 million for the first quarter of 2012, compared with $4.8 million for the first quarter of 2011. The increase in current quarter tax expense is driven primarily by higher pre-tax earnings of $41.0 million for the first quarter of 2012 as compared to $9.6 million for the first quarter of 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We periodically evaluate our liability requirements, capital needs and availability of resources in view of inventory levels, expansion plans, debt service requirements and other operational cash needs. To meet our short and long term liquidity requirements, including payment of operating expenses and repaying debt, we rely primarily on cash from operations. However, we have recently, as well as in the past, sought to raise

33

additional capital. We expect that, for the foreseeable future, cash generated from operations will be sufficient to provide us the ability to fund our operations, provide the working capital necessary to support our strategy and fund planned capital expenditures.

Our 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes (2.125% Notes) are scheduled to mature in July 2012. As a result, the $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2.125% Notes is classified as a current obligation on our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2012. Pursuant to an Offering Memorandum dated April 11, 2012, subsequent to quarter end, we issued an additional $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of our existing 9.125% Notes at a price of 104.0% of par, resulting in gross proceeds of $130.0 million. Net proceeds from the offering will be utilized to repurchase the 2.125% Notes pursuant to a tender offer commenced on April 11, 2012 or to repay any non-tendered 2.125% Notes at their stated maturity, July 15, 2012. The tender offer price is $1,003.27 for each $1,000 principal amount of 2.125% Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Cash Flows

As of March 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $69.0 million, a decrease of $28.9 million from December 31, 2011. The primary uses of cash for the three month period ended March 31, 2012 were $59.4 million for capital expenditures and a $6.0 million payment on our Term Loan. Major capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2012 included $26.9 million on the construction of two new rigs for work in Alaska and $25.1 million for tubular and other rental tools for our Rental Tools segment. The primary source of cash for the first quarter of 2012 was $35.8 million from operating activities.

As of March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $41.6 million, an increase of $9.8 million from December 31, 2010. The primary source of cash for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 as reflected on the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows was $40.8 million from operating activities. The primary use of cash was $50.7 million for capital expenditures and a $3.0 million payment on our Term Loan. Major capital expenditures for the year-to-date period included $26.1 million on the construction of two new rigs for work in Alaska and $15.8 million for tubulars and other rental tools for our Rental Tools segment.

Financing Activity

On May 15, 2008, we entered into the Credit Agreement with a five-year senior secured $80.0 million Revolver and a Term Loan of up to $50.0 million. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries, except for domestic subsidiaries owned by foreign subsidiaries and certain immaterial subsidiaries, each of which has executed a guaranty. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, such as minimum ratios for consolidated leverage, consolidated interest coverage and consolidated senior secured leverage, with which we were in compliance at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes and to fund reimbursement obligations under letters of credit the banks issue on our behalf pursuant to this facility. Loans are available under the Revolver subject to a borrowing base calculation based on a percentage of eligible accounts receivable, certain specified barge drilling rigs and eligible rental equipment of the Company and its subsidiary guarantors.

On April 1, 2011, we exercised the accordion feature under the Credit Agreement and entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement that increased the aggregate current commitment under the Credit Agreement to $159.0 million, and borrowed an additional $50.0 million under a Term Loan. Funding was provided by certain current lenders and Barclays Bank PLC, which joined as a lender under the Credit Agreement. Use of proceeds included repayment of the $25.0 million outstanding on the Revolver, purchases of additional rental tool inventory and general corporate purposes. The additional Term Loan began amortizing at $3.0 million per quarter beginning June 30, 2011, raising the quarterly amortization to $6.0 million. Upon the completion of the transaction, total borrowings under the Term Loan were $79.0 million and there were no borrowings under the Revolver.

34

On March 22, 2010, we issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% Notes. The 9.125% Notes were issued at par with interest payable on April 1 and October 1, beginning October 1, 2010. We used the proceeds from the 9.125% Notes offering to redeem $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 9.625% Notes, to repay $42.0 million of borrowings under our Revolver and for general corporate purposes.

As of March 31, 2012, there was $55.0 million outstanding on the Term Loan, $2.7 million in letters of credit outstanding, and no amounts outstanding on the Company’s revolving credit facility.

We had total long-term debt, including current portion, of $478.2 million as of March 31, 2012, which consisted of:

• $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes due July 15, 2012, less an associated $1.8 million in unamortized debt discount, all of which is classified as short term.

• $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% Notes, due April 1, 2018; and

• $55.0 million drawn against our 2008 credit facility, including no borrowings under our Revolver and $55.0 million under our Term Loan, $24.0 million of which is classified as current.

As noted above, in April 2012 we issued an additional $125 million of 9.125% Notes, the proceeds of which will be used to repurchase the 2.125% Notes.

As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $146.3 million of liquidity which consisted of $69.0 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and $77.3 million of availability under our Revolving Credit Facility.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our future contractual cash obligations as of March 31, 2012:

	Total		Less than 1 Year		Years 1-3		Years 3-5		More than 5 Years
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Contractual cash obligations:
Long-term debt – principal (1)	$	480,000	$	149,000	$	31,000	$	—	$	300,000
Long-term debt – interest (1)		167,138		29,958		55,055		54,750		27,375
Operating leases (2)		29,580		9,496		6,845		4,572		8,667
Purchase commitments (3)		14,644		14,644		—		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	691,362	$	203,098	$	92,900	$	59,322	$	336,042
Commercial commitments:
Long-term debt – standby
Revolving credit facility	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Standby letters of credit(4)		2,661		2,661		—		—		—
Total commercial commitments	$	2,661	$	2,661	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1) Long-term debt includes the principal and interest cash obligations of the 9.125% Notes, the 2.125% Notes, and the Term Loan. The remaining unamortized discount of $1.8 million on the 2.125% Notes is not included in the contractual cash obligations schedule.

(2) Operating leases consist of lease agreements in excess of one year for office space, equipment, vehicles and personal property.

(3) Purchase commitments outstanding as of March 31, 2012 are primarily related to rig upgrade projects and new rig construction.

(4) We have an $80.0 million revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2012, we had no borrowings under the Revolver and $2.7 million of availability has been used to support letters of credit that have been issued, resulting in $77.3 million of availability. The revolving credit facility expires May 14, 2013.

35

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any unconsolidated special-purpose entities, off-balance sheet financing arrangements or guarantees of third-party financial obligations. We have no energy or commodity contracts.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no material change in the market risk faced by us from that reported in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 6, 2012. For more information on market risk, see Part II, Item 7A in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures — We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. We performed evaluations under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012. Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting— There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

36

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 11, “Contingencies,” in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference into this item.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The Company currently has no active share repurchase programs. Periodically, the Company purchases shares on the open market to meet our employer matching requirements under our Stock Bonus Plan. Additionally, when restricted stock awarded by the Company becomes taxable compensation to personnel, shares may be withheld to satisfy the associated withholding tax liabilities. Information on our purchases of equity securities by means of such share withholdings is provided in the table below:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchase		Average Price Paid Per Share
January 1-31, 2012		—	$	0.00
February 1-29, 2012		—	$	0.00
March 1-31, 2012		106,958	$	6.24
Total		106,958	$	6.24

37

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits: The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:

Exhibit Number		DESCRIPTION
4.1	—	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2012, among Parker Drilling Company, the Guarantors named therein, and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2012).
10.1	—	Separation Agreement and Release dated as of March 5, 2012 between Parker Drilling Company and David C. Mannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2012).
10.2	—	Second Amendment dated as of March 5, 2012 to First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Parker Drilling Company and Robert L. Parker Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2012).
10.3	—	Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2012, among Parker Drilling Company, as Borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank of America N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 11, 2012.)
31.1	—	Robert L. Parker, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
31.2	—	W. Kirk Brassfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d- 14(a) Certification.
32.1	—	Robert L. Parker, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Section 1350 Certification.
32.2	—	W. Kirk Brassfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Section 1350 Certification.

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
Date: May 4, 2012	By:	/s/ Robert L. Parker, Jr.
		Robert L. Parker, Jr.
		Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
	By:	/s/ W. Kirk Brassfield
		W. Kirk Brassfield
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

39

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number		DESCRIPTION
4.1	—	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2012, among Parker Drilling Company, the Guarantors named therein, and the Initial Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2012).
10.1	—	Separation Agreement and Release dated as of March 5, 2012 between Parker Drilling Company and David C. Mannon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2012).
10.2	—	Second Amendment dated as of March 5, 2012 to First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Parker Drilling Company and Robert L. Parker Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2012).
10.3	—	Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2012, among Parker Drilling Company, as Borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, as Guarantors, the Lenders party thereto, and Bank of America N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 11, 2012.)
31.1	—	Robert L. Parker, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
31.2	—	W. Kirk Brassfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Rule 13a-14(a)/15d- 14(a) Certification.
32.1	—	Robert L. Parker, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Section 1350 Certification.
32.2	—	W. Kirk Brassfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Section 1350 Certification.