The Company's investment portfolio increased by $33.2 million or 26.2% to $160.0 million between December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2005, the Company's available-for-sale portfolio had an unrealized gain, net of taxes, of $1.5 million. Between June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2005, the Company's investment portfolio increased by $18.7 million or 13.3%. This growth was the result of the FNB acquisition.
On a pro-forma basis, the Company's investment portfolio increased by $6.0 million or 3.9% during the first six months of 2005. Year-over-year, the investment portfolio declined by $12.0 million or 7.0% on a pro-forma basis, the result of the decline in investments on the FNB balance sheet was to fund loan growth.
Loans grew by $240.0 million or 50.2% during the first six months of 2005. The growth in commercial loans was $138.0 million or 87.4% and municipal loans increased $9.7 million or 70.6%. The residential mortgage portfolio increased by $65.3 million or 30.4%, and home equity lines of credit grew $18.9 million or 29.1% year-to-date. The majority of this growth was due to the FNB acquisition. Between June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2005, the loan portfolio increased $274.9 million or 62.0%, as a result of strong customer demand and the FNB acquisition
On a pro-forma basis, the loan portfolio increased by $53.9 million or 8.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Year-over-year, the loan portfolio increased by $97.2 million or 15.6% on a pro-forma basis, the result of strong loan growth seen by the Company in both the Mid-Coast and Down East Maine regions.
The allowance for loan losses represents the amount available for credit losses inherent in the Company's loan portfolio. Loans are charged off when they are deemed uncollectible, after giving consideration to factors such as the customer's financial condition, underlying collateral and guarantees, as well as general and industry economic conditions.
Adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is determined using a consistent, systematic methodology, which analyzes the risk inherent in the loan portfolio. In addition to evaluating the collectibility of specific loans when determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, Management also takes into consideration other factors such as changes in the mix and size of the loan portfolio, historic loss experience, the amount of delinquencies and loans adversely classified, and economic trends. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is assessed by an allocation process whereby specific loss allocations are made against certain adversely classified loans, and general loss allocations are made against segments of the loan portfolio which have similar attributes. The Company’s historical loss experience, industry trends, and the impact of the local and regional economy on the Company’s borrowers, were considered by Management in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by provisions charged against current earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectibility of the loan principal is unlikely. Recoveries on loans previously charged off are credited to the allowance. While Management uses available information to assess possible losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on increases in non-performing loans, changes in economic conditions, growth in loan portfolios, or for other reasons. Any future additions to the allowance would be recognized in the period in which they were determined to be necessary. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. Such agencies may require the Company to record additions to the allowance based on judgments different from those of Management.
Credit quality of the commercial portfolios is quantified by a corporate credit rating system designed to parallel regulatory criteria and categories of loan risk. Individual loan officers monitor their loans to ensure appropriate rating assignments are made on a timely basis. Risk ratings and quality of the commercial loan portfolio are also assessed on a regular basis by an independent loan review consulting firm. An ongoing portfolio trend analyses and individual credit reviews to evaluate loan risk and compliance with corporate lending policies are also performed. The level of allowance allocable to each group of risk-rated loans is then determined by applying a loss factor that estimates the amount of probable loss in each category. The assigned loss factor for each risk rating is based upon Management’s assessment of historical loss data, portfolio characteristics, economic trends, overall market conditions and past experience.
Consumer loans, which include residential mortgages, home equity loans/lines, and direct/indirect loans, are generally evaluated as a group based on product type and on the basis of delinquency data and other credit data available due to the large number of such loans and the relatively small size of individual credits. Allocations for these loan categories are principally determined by applying loss factors that represent Management’s estimate of inherent losses. In each category, inherent losses are estimated based upon Management’s assessment of historical loss data, portfolio characteristics, economic trends, overall market conditions and past experience. In addition, certain loans in these categories may be individually risk-rated if considered necessary by Management.
The other method used to allocate the allowance for loan losses entails the assignment of reserve amounts to individual loans on the basis of loan impairment. Certain loans are evaluated individually and are judged to be impaired when Management believes it is probable that the Company will not collect all of the contractual interest and principal payments as scheduled in the loan agreement. Under this method, loans are selected for evaluation based on internal risk ratings or non-accrual status. A specific reserve is allocated to an individual loan when that loan has been deemed impaired and when the amount of a probable loss is estimable on the basis of its collateral value, the present value of anticipated future cash flows, or its net realizable value. At June 30, 2005, impaired loans with specific reserves totaled $1,588,000 million (all of these loans were on non-accrual status) and the amount of such reserves were $385,000 million.
All of these analyses are reviewed and discussed by the Directors' Loan Committee, and recommendations from these processes provide Management and the Board of Directors with independent information on loan portfolio condition. As a result of these analyses, the Company has concluded that the level of the allowance for loan losses was adequate as of June 30, 2005. As of that date, the balance of $6,518,000 was 0.91% of total loans, compared to 0.99% at December 31, 2004 and 1.03% at June 30, 2004. Loans considered to be impaired according to SFAS 114/118 totaled $3,208,000 at June 30, 2005, compared to $1,601,000 at December 31, 2004. The portion of the allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans at June 30, 2005, was $385,000 compared to $228,000 at December 31, 2004.
On a pro-forma basis, the allowance for loan losses decreased by $201,000 or 3.0% in the first six months of 2005. This was the result of limited additional provision to the allowance due to the analysis of credit quality in the loan portfolio and the level of loan chargeoffs during the period.
Deposits
During the first six months of 2005, deposits increased by $302.4 million or 81.8% over December 31, 2004. Core deposits (demand, NOW, savings and money market accounts) increased by $147.7 million or 62.0% in the first six months of 2005. During the same period, certificates of deposit increased $154.2 million or 115.9%. Between June 30, 2004, and June 30, 2005, deposits grew by 73.9%, or $285.7 million. Demand deposits grew $28.9 million, NOW accounts $50.2 million, savings $46.7 million, and money market accounts $32.2 million, while certificates of deposit increased $127.7 million. The majority of the growth, both year-to-date and year-over-year, was due to the FNB acquisition and in certificates of deposit, primarily from wholesale and brokered sources..
On a pro-forma basis, deposits grew by $112.8 million or 20.2% during the first six months of 2005. This growth was in certificate of deposits, primarily from wholesale and brokered sources.
Borrowed Funds
The Company's funding includes borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, the Federal Reserve System, and repurchase agreements, enabling it to grow its balance sheet and, in turn, grow its revenues. They may also be used to carry out interest rate risk management stategies, and are increased to replace or supplement other sources of funding, including core deposits and certificates of deposit. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, borrowed funds decreased by $29.5 million or 14.2% from December 31, 2004. Between June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2005, borrowed funds increased $4.1 million or 2.3%. These enabled the Company to meet its funding needs for asset growth at a reasonable cost.
On a pro-forma basis, borrowed funds decreased by $50.5 million or 22.1% during the first six months of 2005. This was the result of growth in wholesale and brokered sources, as noted above. Year-over-year, borrowed funds decreased $20.3 million or 10.3%.
Page 19
Shareholders' Equity
Shareholders' equity as of June 30, 2005 was $100.6 million, compared to $52.8 million as of December 31, 2004. The Company's strong earnings performance in the first six months of 2005, net of dividends paid, added to shareholders' equity, in addition to the significant increase from the FNB acquisition. The net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, presented in accordance with SFAS 115, decreased by $0.5 million from December 31, 2004, as a result of a recent rise in interest rates and by maturing securities replaced at lower yields.
On April 27, 2004, the Company's Board of Directors declared a three-for-one split of the Company's common stock payable in the form of a 200% stock dividend to shareholders of record on May 12, 2004, with a payment date of June 1, 2004. All share and per share data included in the consolidated financial statements and elsewhere in this report have been restated to reflect the stock split.
In 2005, a cash dividend of 13.0 cents per share was declared in the second quarter compared to 11.0 cents in the second quarter of 2004. The dividend payout ratio was 40.63% in the second quarter of 2005 compared to 39.29% in the second quarter of 2004.
In determining future dividend payout levels, the Board of Directors carefully analyzes capital requirements and earnings retention, as set forth in the Company's Dividend Policy. The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends to its shareholders depends on receipt of dividends from its subsidiary, the Bank. The subsidiary may pay dividends to its parent out of so much of its net profits as the Bank's directors deem appropriate, subject to the limitation that the total of all dividends declared by the Bank in any calendar year may not exceed the total of its net profits of that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years. The amount available for dividends in 2005 is this year's net income plus $9.7 million.
Regulatory leverage capital ratios for the Company were 7.93% and 8.03% at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The Company had a tier one risk-based capital ratio of 10.98% and tier two risk-based capital ratio of 11.99% at June 30, 2005, compared to 11.62% and 12.71%, respectively, at December 31, 2004. These are comfortably above the standards to be rated "well-capitalized" by regulatory authorities -- qualifying the Company for lower deposit-insurance premiums.
On January 20, 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock or approximately 2.5% of the outstanding shares. The Company expects such repurchases to be effected from time to time, in the open market, in private transactions or otherwise, during a period of up to 24 months. The amount and timing of shares to be purchased will be subject to market conditions and will be based on several factors, including the price of the Company's stock and the level of stock issuances under the Company's employee stock plans. No assurance can be given as to the specific timing of the share repurchases or as to whether and to what extent the share repurchase will be consummated.
As of June 30, 2005, the Company had repurchased 121,966 shares under the new repurchase plan at an average price of $16.86.
Non-Performing Assets
At June 30, 2005, loans on non-accrual status totaled $3.2 million, which compares to non-accrual loans of $1.6 million as of December 31, 2004. In addition to loans on non-accrual status at June 30, 2005, loans past due 90 days or more and accruing (calculated on a constant 30-day month basis) totaled $547,000 which compares to $281,000 as of December 31, 2004. The Company continues to accrue interest on these loans because it believes collection of the interest is reasonably assured. The majority of the increase in non-performing assets in the second quarter of 2005 was the result of the FNB acquisition.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
No material off-balance sheet risk exists that requires a separate liability presentation.
Sale of Loans
No recourse obligations have been incurred in connection with the sale of loans.
Page 20
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth the contractual obligations of the Company as of June 30, 2005:
In thousands of dollars | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
Borrowed funds | $177,729 | $111,013 | $25,000 | $29,000 | $12,716 |
Operating leases | 828 | 203 | 361 | 181 | 83 |
Certificates of deposit | 287,275 | 229,043 | 43,620 | 14,491 | 121 |
Total | $465,832 | $340,259 | $68,981 | $43,672 | $12,920 |
Commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit | $150,168 | $150,168 | $- | $- | $- |
Liquidity Management
As of June 30, 2005 the Bank had primary sources of liquidity of $97.7 million and an additional $23.3 million of secondary sources. It is Management's opinion this is adequate. In its Asset/Liability policy, the Bank has guidelines for liquidity. The Company is not aware of any recommendations by the regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on the Company's liquidity, capital resources or results of operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain disclosures in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain certain forward-looking statements (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). In preparing these disclosures, Management must make assumptions, including, but not limited to, the level of future interest rates, prepayments on loans and investment securities, required levels of capital, needs for liquidity, and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. These forward-looking statements may be subject to significant known and unknown risks uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, those matters referred to in the preceding sentence.
Although First National Lincoln Corporation believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by the Company which attempt to advise interested parties of the facts which affect the Company's business.
Page 21
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market-Risk Management
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates. First National Lincoln Corporation's market risk is composed primarily of interest rate risk. The Bank's Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position of the Company and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. All guidelines and policies established by ALCO have been approved by the Board of Directors.
Asset/Liability Management
The primary goal of asset/liability management is to maximize net interest income within the interest rate risk limits set by ALCO. Interest rate risk is monitored through the use of two complementary measures: static gap analysis and earnings simulation modeling. While each measurement has limitations, taken together they represent a reasonably comprehensive view of the magnitude of interest rate risk in the Company, the level of risk through time, and the amount of exposure to changes in certain interest rate relationships.
Static gap analysis measures the amount of repricing risk embedded in the balance sheet at a point in time. It does so by comparing the differences in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. A gap is defined as the difference between the principal amount of assets and liabilities which reprice within a specified time period. The Bank's cumulative one-year gap, at June 30, 2005, was -3.67% of total assets. ALCO's policy limit for the one-year gap is plus or minus 20% of total assets. Core deposits with non-contractual maturities are presented based upon historical patterns of balance attrition and pricing behavior which are reviewed at least annually.
The gap repricing distributions include principal cash flows from residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities in the time frames in which they are expected to be received. Mortgage prepayments are estimated by applying industry median projections of prepayment speeds to portfolio segments based on coupon range and loan age.
A summary of the Bank's static gap, as of June 30, 2005 is presented in the following table:
| 0-90 | 90-365 | 1-5 | 5+ |
In thousands of dollars | Days | Days | Years | Years |
Investment securities at amortized cost | $19,555 | $27,645 | $75,689 | $36,695 |
Loans held for sale | - | - | - | - |
Loans | 294,427 | 114,031 | 253,694 | 56,305 |
Other interest-earning assets | - | - | - | 8,078 |
Non-rate-sensitive assets | 71 | 213 | 1,134 | 42,223 |
Total assets | 314,053 | 141,889 | 330,517 | 143,301 |
Interest-bearing deposits | 250,377 | 96,882 | 58,297 | 210,394 |
Borrowed funds | 128,656 | 7,026 | 14,109 | 27,658 |
Non-rate-sensitive liabilities and equity | 1,281 | 3,843 | 20,496 | 110,741 |
Total liabilities and equity | 380,314 | 107,751 | 92,902 | 348,793 |
Period gap | $(66,261) | $34,138 | $237,615 | $(205,492) |
Percent of total assets | -7.13% | 3.67% | 25.56% | -22.10% |
Cumulative gap | (66,261) | (32,123) | 205,492 | - |
Percent of total assets | -7.13% | -3.45% | 22.10% | 0.00% |
The earnings simulation model forecasts capture the impact of changing interest rates on one-year and two-year net interest income. The modeling process calculates changes in interest income received and interest expense paid on all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected on the Company's balance sheet. None of the assets used in the simulation are held for trading purposes. The modeling is done for a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in the absolute level of interest rates as well as basis risk, as represented by changes in the shape of the yield curve and changes in interest rate relationships. Management evaluates the effects on income of alternative interest rate scenarios
Page 22
against earnings in a stable interest rate environment. This analysis is also most useful in determining the short-run earnings exposures to changes in customer behavior involving loan payments and deposit additions and withdrawals.
The Bank's most recent simulation model projects net interest income would increase by approximately 1.97% of stable-rate net interest income if short-term rates affected by Federal Open Market Committee actions fall gradually by two percentage points over the next year, and decrease by approximately 4.91% if rates rise gradually by two percentage points. Both scenarios are well within ALCO's policy limit of a decrease in net interest income of no more than 10.0% given a 2.0% move in interest rates, up or down. Management believes this reflects a reasonable interest rate risk position. In year two, and assuming no additional movement in rates, the model forecasts that net interest income would be higher than that earned in a stable rate environment by 4.95% in a falling-rate scenario and decrease by 7.19% in a rising rate scenario when compared to the year-one base scenario.
A summary of the Bank's interest rate risk simulation modeling, as of June 30, 2005 is presented in the following table:
Changes in Net Interest Income | 2005 |
Year 1
Projected change if rates decrease by 2.0% | +1.97% |
Projected change if rates increase by 2.0% | -4.91% |
| | |
Year 2
Projected change if rates decrease by 1.0% | +4.95% |
Projected change if rates increase by 2.0% | -7.19% |
| | |
This dynamic simulation model includes assumptions about how the balance sheet is likely to evolve through time and in different interest rate environments. Loans and deposits are projected to maintain stable balances. All maturities, calls and prepayments in the securities portfolio are assumed to be reinvested in similar assets. Mortgage loan prepayment assumptions are developed from industry median estimates of prepayment speeds for portfolios with similar coupon ranges and seasoning. Non-contractual deposit volatility and pricing are assumed to follow historical patterns. The sensitivities of key assumptions are analyzed annually and reviewed by ALCO.
The information for static gap and changes in net interest income presented in this section pertains to the Bank only and does not include goodwill and a small volume of assets and liabilities owned by the Company and included in its consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2005. This sensitivity analysis does not represent a Company forecast and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results. These hypothetical estimates are based upon numerous assumptions including, among others, the nature and timing of interest rate levels, yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, and reinvestment/ replacement of asset and liability cash flows. While assumptions are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, the Company cannot make any assurances as to the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.
Interest Rate Risk Management
A variety of financial instruments can be used to manage interest rate sensitivity. These may include investment securities, interest rate swaps, and interest rate caps and floors. Frequently called interest rate derivatives, interest rate swaps, caps and floors have characteristics similar to securities but possess the advantages of customization of the risk-reward profile of the instrument, minimization of balance sheet leverage and improvement of liquidity. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was not using any derivative instruments for interest rate risk management.
The Company engages an independent consultant to periodically review its interest rate risk position, as well as the effectiveness of simulation modeling and reasonableness of assumptions used. As of June 30, 2005, there were no significant differences between the views of the independent consultant and Management regarding the Company's interest rate risk exposure. Management expects interest rates will continue to rise in 2005 and believes that the current level of interest rate risk is acceptable.
Page 23
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of June 30, 2005, the end of the quarter covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company and its management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Company’s management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company reviews its disclosure controls and procedures, which may include its internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company’s systems evolve with its business.
Page 24
Part II – Other Information
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
The Company was not involved in any legal proceedings requiring disclosure under Item 103 of Regulation S-K during the reporting period.
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company issues shares to the Bank's 401k Investment and Savings Plan pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), contained in Section 3(a)(11) thereof and Rule 147 promulgated thereunder. During the first six months of 2005, 21,970 shares were issued pursuant to this Plan, as presented in the following table:
Month | Shares |
January | 6,088 |
February | 1,514 |
March | 560 |
April | 1,417 |
May | 11,292 |
June | 1,099 |
| 21,970 |
Item 3 – Default Upon Senior Securities
None.
Page 25
Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of First National Lincoln Corporation, the one-bank holding company of The First, N.A., was held at The Samoset Resort, 220 Warrenton Street, Rockport, Maine 04856, on Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, for the following purposes:
• To ratify the Board of Directors’ vote to fix the number of directors at ten. |
• To elect as directors of the Company the six (6) nominees listed in the Proxy Statement dated March 25, 2005, as noted. |
• To ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker as independent auditors of the Company for 2005. |
• To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
Only shareholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2005 (the “Voting Record Date”) were entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Voting Record Date, there were 9,874,710 shares of Common Stock of the Company, $0.01 par value per share, issued and outstanding, and the Company had no other class of equity securities outstanding. Each share of Common Stock was entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting on all matters properly presented thereat.
The results of voting at the meeting are summarized in the following table:
| For | Against | Abstain | Total Votes |
Article # 1 Fixed # of Directors | 8,919,396 | 60,150 | 41,464 | 9,021,010 |
Article # 2 Director Election | | | | |
Tony C. McKim | 8,938,657 | 53,942 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
Mark N. Rosborough | 8,967,874 | 24,725 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
Katherine M. Boyd | 8,972,466 | 20,133 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
Carl S. Poole, Jr. | 8,975,077 | 17,522 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
David B. Soule, Jr. | 8,973,466 | 19,133 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
Bruce B. Tindal | 8,975,077 | 17,522 | 28,411 | 9,021,010 |
Article # 3 Independent Auditor | 9,004,372 | 8,903 | 7,735 | 9,021,010 |
Item 5 – Other Information
Page 26
Item 6 – Exhibits
Exhibit 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger With FNB Bankshares Dated August 25, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Form 8-K dated August 25, 2004, filed under item 1.01 on August 27, 2004.
Exhibit 3.1 Conformed Copy of the Registrants Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on October 7, 2004.
Exhibit 3.2 Conformed Copy of the Registrant's Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on October 7, 2004.
Exhibit 10.1(a) FNB Bankshares' Stock Option Plan. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 5.03 on October 7, 2004.
Exhibit 10.1(b) Specimen FNB Bankshares Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement entered into with Messrs. Rosborough, McKim, Wrobel, Dalrymple and Lay, whose FNB Bankshares options have been converted into options to purchase 5,287, 34,086, 15,275, 11,750 and 21,150 shares of the Registrant's stock, respectively, all at $3.80 per share, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(b) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.2(a) Specimen Employment Continuity Agreement entered into with Messrs. McKim, Wroble, Dalrymple and Lay, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.2(b) Specimen Amendment to Employment Continuity Agreement entered into with Messrs. McKim, Wrobel, Dalrymple and Lay, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.3(a) Specimen Split Dollar Agreement entered into with Messrs. McKim, Wrobel, Dalrymple and Lay. For Mr. McKim, the amount of the death benefit is $250,000; for Messrs. Lay, Dalrymple and Wrobel, the death benefit is $150,000. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 10.3(b) Specimen Amendment to Split Dollar Agreement entered into with Messrs. McKim, Wrobel, Dalrymple and Lay, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Company’s Form 8-K filed under item 1.01 on January 14, 2005.
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Persuant to Rule 13A-14(A) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Persuant to Rule 13A-14(A) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Persuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Persuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Persuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Persuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Page 27
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST NATIONAL LINCOLN CORPORATION
/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault
Daniel R. Daigneault
President & Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2005
/s/ F. Stephen Ward
F. Stephen Ward
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 9, 2005
Page 28