UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.
OR
¨ | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8895
HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | | 33-0091377 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 900
Newport Beach, California 92660
(Address of principal executive offices)
(949) 221-0600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨
As of November 11, 2002, there were 59,010,094 shares of $1.00 par value common stock outstanding.
HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| | | | PAGE NO.
|
Item 1. | | Financial Statements: | | |
|
| | | | 2 |
|
| | | | 3 |
|
| | | | 4 |
|
| | | | 5 |
|
Item 2. | | | | 15 |
|
Item 4. | | | | 28 |
|
| | PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | | |
|
Item 5. | | | | 29 |
|
Item 6. | | | | 29 |
|
| | 33 |
1
Health Care Property Investors, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands)
| | September 30, 2002
| | | December 31, 2001
| |
| | (Unaudited) | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Investments: | | | | | | | | |
Buildings and Improvements | | $ | 2,467,950 | | | $ | 2,267,030 | |
Accumulated Depreciation | | | (404,808 | ) | | | (339,971 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 2,063,142 | | | | 1,927,059 | |
Construction in Progress | | | 22,031 | | | | 11,616 | |
Land | | | 266,357 | | | | 255,881 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 2,351,530 | | | | 2,194,556 | |
Loans Receivable | | | 277,163 | | | | 176,286 | |
Investments in and Advances to Partnerships | | | 32,887 | | | | 21,750 | |
Accounts Receivable | | | 19,238 | | | | 20,940 | |
Other Assets | | | 10,569 | | | | 9,213 | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | | | 11,714 | | | | 8,408 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total Assets | | $ | 2,703,101 | | | $ | 2,431,153 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | | | |
Bank Notes Payable | | $ | 213,500 | | | $ | 108,500 | |
Senior Notes Payable | | | 896,465 | | | | 764,230 | |
Mortgage Notes Payable | | | 178,538 | | | | 185,022 | |
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Deferred Income | | | 64,639 | | | | 56,709 | |
Minority Interests in Partnerships | | | 13,210 | | | | 13,767 | |
Minority Interests in Convertible Operating Partnership Units | | | 55,965 | | | | 56,201 | |
Stockholders’ Equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stock | | | 274,487 | | | | 274,487 | |
Common Stock | | | 58,778 | | | | 56,387 | |
Additional Paid-In Capital | | | 1,184,532 | | | | 1,100,743 | |
Other Equity | | | (9,929 | ) | | | (7,948 | ) |
Cumulative Net Income | | | 991,090 | | | | 883,084 | |
Cumulative Dividends | | | (1,218,174 | ) | | | (1,060,029 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity | | | 1,280,784 | | | | 1,246,724 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | | $ | 2,703,101 | | | $ | 2,431,153 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
2
Health Care Property Investors, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | Three Months Ended September 30,
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| |
| | 2002
| | | 2001
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental Income, Triple Net Properties | | $ | 62,972 | | | $ | 57,453 | | | $ | 177,867 | | | $ | 167,145 | |
Rental Income, Managed Properties | | | 24,363 | | | | 20,499 | | | | 68,684 | | | | 59,906 | |
Interest and Other Income | | | 5,337 | | | | 5,433 | | | | 15,901 | | | | 16,096 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 92,672 | | | | 83,385 | | | | 262,452 | | | | 243,147 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Expense | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Expense | | | 20,361 | | | | 18,871 | | | | 56,116 | | | | 59,420 | |
Real Estate Depreciation | | | 19,385 | | | | 17,471 | | | | 55,870 | | | | 51,560 | |
Managed Properties Operating Expenses | | | 8,619 | | | | 7,386 | | | | 23,504 | | | | 21,687 | |
General and Administrative Expenses | | | 4,253 | | | | 3,221 | | | | 12,813 | | | | 9,986 | |
Impairment Losses Related to Depreciable Property | | | — | | | | 5,190 | | | | — | | | | 7,360 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 52,618 | | | | 52,139 | | | | 148,303 | | | | 150,013 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Income From Operations | | | 40,054 | | | | 31,246 | | | | 114,149 | | | | 93,134 | |
Minority Interests | | | (2,049 | ) | | | (1,689 | ) | | | (6,278 | ) | | | (4,624 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Income Before Discontinued Operations | | | 38,005 | | | | 29,557 | | | | 107,871 | | | | 88,510 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income From Discontinued Operations | | | (284 | ) | | | 259 | | | | 1,219 | | | | 2,472 | |
Loss on Real Estate Dispositions | | | (479 | ) | | | (5,743 | ) | | | (1,084 | ) | | | (5,985 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | (763 | ) | | | (5,484 | ) | | | 135 | | | | (3,513 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Income | | | 37,242 | | | | 24,073 | | | | 108,006 | | | | 84,997 | |
Dividends to Preferred Stockholders | | | (6,225 | ) | | | (6,225 | ) | | | (18,675 | ) | | | (18,675 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 31,017 | | | $ | 17,848 | | | $ | 89,331 | | | $ | 66,322 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 1.56 | | | $ | 1.25 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 0.53 | | | $ | 0.32 | | | $ | 1.54 | | | $ | 1.24 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Basic | | | 58,204 | | | | 55,360 | | | | 57,425 | | | | 53,178 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted | | | 58,416 | | | | 55,624 | | | | 57,823 | | | | 53,391 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
3
Health Care Property Investors, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
| | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| |
| | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net Income | | $ | 108,006 | | | $ | 84,997 | |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to | | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate Depreciation | | | 56,254 | | | | 52,422 | |
Non Cash Charges | | | 3,910 | | | | 3,174 | |
Joint Venture Adjustments | | | 229 | | | | 12 | |
Impairment Losses Related to Depreciable Property | | | 1,707 | | | | 13,640 | |
Gain on Sale of Real Estate Properties | | | (623 | ) | | | (295 | ) |
Changes in: | | | | | | | | |
Operating Assets | | | 2,142 | | | | (957 | ) |
Operating Liabilities | | | 2,296 | | | | (1,517 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities | | | 173,921 | | | | 151,476 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of Real Estate | | | (229,396 | ) | | | (140,945 | ) |
Proceeds from the Sale of Real Estate Properties, Net | | | 20,580 | | | | 27,120 | |
Investment in Loan Receivable | | | (112,750 | ) | | | — | |
Other Investments and Loans | | | (738 | ) | | | (1,508 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | | (322,304 | ) | | | (115,333 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net Change in Bank Notes Payable | | | 105,000 | | | | (92,200 | ) |
Repayment of Senior Notes Payable | | | (116,000 | ) | | | (1,000 | ) |
Issuance of Senior Notes | | | 247,630 | | | | — | |
Cash Proceeds from Issuing Common Stock | | | 77,615 | | | | 150,202 | |
Final and Periodic Payments on Mortgages | | | (6,484 | ) | | | (3,868 | ) |
Dividends Paid | | | (158,145 | ) | | | (139,856 | ) |
Other Financing Activities | | | 2,073 | | | | 1,792 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities | | | 151,689 | | | | (84,930 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) In Cash And Cash Equivalents | | | 3,306 | | | | (48,787 | ) |
Cash And Cash Equivalents, Beginning Of Period | | | 8,408 | | | | 58,623 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents, End Of Period | | | 11,714 | | | | 9,836 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Capitalized Interest | | | 1,167 | | | | 50 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
4
HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2002
(Unaudited)
(1) | | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
We, the management of Health Care Property Investors, Inc., believe that the unaudited financial information contained in this report reflects all adjustments that are necessary to state fairly the financial position, the results of operations, and the cash flows of the Company. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the Company or HCPI means Health Care Property Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries and joint ventures. We both recommend and presume that users of this interim financial information read or have read or have access to the audited financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the preceding fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. Therefore, notes to the financial statements and other disclosures that would repeat the disclosures contained in our most recent annual report to security holders have been omitted. This interim financial information does not necessarily represent a full year’s operations for various reasons, including acquisitions and dispositions, changes in rents and interest rates, and the timing of debt and equity financings.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is recorded in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 101), as amended. SAB 101 requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These four criteria include persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectibility. If the collectibility of revenue is determined incorrectly, the amount and timing of our reported revenue could be significantly affected.
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts:
Rental revenue from our tenants is our principal source of revenue. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants on an on-going basis. Based on these reviews, we have established provisions and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the possible inability of our tenants to make required rent payments. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded during each period and is recorded against rental revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. The total amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts, which represents the cumulative allowances less write-offs of uncollectible rent, is recorded against tenant and other receivables on our consolidated balance sheets. If we incorrectly estimate the required allowances for doubtful accounts, our financial condition and results of operations could be significantly affected.
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Assets:
We compute depreciation on our properties using the straight-line method based on an estimated useful life ranging up to 45 years. A significant portion of the acquisition cost of each property is allocated to building (usually approximately 90%). The allocation of the acquisition cost to building and the determination of the useful life of a property are based on appraisals commissioned from independent real estate appraisal firms. If we do not allocate appropriately to the building or incorrectly estimate the useful life of our properties, the computation of depreciation will not appropriately reflect the allocation of our capital expenditures over future periods.
5
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
We periodically review long-lived assets (primarily real estate, investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and notes receivable) for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of the fair value of the investment involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on analysis of the future operating results or projected rents for each long-lived asset. Our ability to accurately predict future cash flows may impact the determination of fair value.
If a decline in the fair market value of a long-lived asset occurs, we may be required to make a determination as to whether the decline in fair value is other than temporary. Our assessment as to the nature of a decline in fair value is primarily based on estimates of expectations of future rents or future operating results, and our intent to hold the long-lived asset. If an investment is considered impaired and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, a write-down is recognized.
Discontinued Operations:
We have reclassified certain facilities’ operations as Discontinued Operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (Statement 144) which was issued in August 2001. Statement 144 established accounting and reporting standards requiring that long-lived assets to be disposed of be reported as Discontinued Operations if management has committed to a plan to sell the asset under usual and customary terms within one year of establishing the plan to sell. See Note 3 for the impact of Statement 144 on previously reported periods.
Stock Options:
As of January 1, 2002, we commenced recognizing compensation expense in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (Statement 123). The implementation of Statement 123 is prospective and therefore 2001 operating results have not been impacted. We use the Black Scholes model for calculating stock option expense. This model requires us to make certain estimates including stock volatility, discount rate and the termination discount factor. If we incorrectly estimate these variables, our results of operations could be affected.
Derivatives and Hedging:
Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (Statement 133) established accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Additionally, changes in the derivative’s fair value are recognized as comprehensive income if specific hedge accounting criteria are met. If these criteria are not met, changes in the fair value are to be included in earnings. See Note 5 for the impact of agreements requiring the application of Statement 133.
Reclassifications:
We have made reclassifications, where necessary, for comparative financial statement presentations.
6
(2) | | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS |
As of September 30, 2002, our portfolio of properties, including equity investments, consisted of 442 facilities located in 42 states. These facilities are comprised of 183 long-term care facilities, 88 assisted living facilities, 85 medical office buildings, 35 physician group practice clinics, 21 acute care hospitals, 14 retirement living communities, nine freestanding rehabilitation facilities and seven health care laboratory and biotech research facilities. Our gross undepreciated investment in these properties, which includes joint ventures, was approximately $3,063,684,000 at September 30, 2002.
Acquisitions:
During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we acquired 22 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $206,000,000. These properties have an average annual lease rate of 10.7%. The properties consist of 11 long-term care facilities, five assisted living facilities, two retirement living communities, three medical office buildings and one health care laboratory and biotech research facility.
On September 30, 2002 we completed a $125,000,000 investment in subsidiaries of American Retirement Corporation. The investment is comprised of a $112,750,000 five year loan and a 9.8% equity interest in each of seven limited liability companies for $12,250,000. Collectively, the limited liability companies own and lease nine retirement living communities. These nine facilities are subject to mortgages totaling $170,000,000 with an average interest rate of 7.6% and various maturity dates.
The $112,750,000 five year loan has a stated interest rate of 19.5% per annum. The loan requires cash payments of 9% of the original principal amount increasing annually by 55 basis points until April 2004. The principal balance and all unpaid accrued interest will be payable upon the maturity of the loan, which is prepayable after three years.
The loan was made to a subsidiary of American Retirement Corporation that holds a 90.2% ownership interest in each of the seven limited liability companies referenced above. These facilities have been operating profitably and have a current occupancy level of 94%. These retirement communities are leased to, and operated by, other operating subsidiaries of American Retirement.
The loan is collateralized by the 90.2% ownership interests. In the event of nonpayment on the loan, these ownership interests would be transferable to us.
The nine retirement living communities owned by the seven limited liability companies collateralize $170,000,000 of first mortgages with fixed and variable interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 9.5% and maturity dates ranging from January 2004 to June 2025. Additionally, the nine retirement living communities are leased to subsidiaries of American Retirement Corporation under a 15 year Master Lease with two ten year renewal options. The initial lease rate is 10.5% on a $295,000,000 asset base with increases based upon performance of the underlying operating facilities and changes in the consumer price index.
Construction:
During the third quarter of 2002, rent commenced at 10.15% on a $12,300,000 health care laboratory and biotech research facility construction project. Also, construction continued on a $28,000,000 acute care hospital and medical office building in Idaho Falls of which $21,262,000 has been incurred to date.
7
Dispositions:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121 “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of,” we wrote down one land parcel to be sold to fair value less costs to sell. The resulting $400,000 loss is included in Gain/(Loss) on Real Estate Dispositions. The net loss on real estate dispositions for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $1,084,000, which includes total write-downs of $1,707,000 on four properties offset by a net gain of $623,000 on the sale of seven facilities.
(3) | | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Statement 144 requires that the operating results generated on long-lived assets to be disposed of be reclassified as Discontinued Operations. The reclassification has no impact on Net Income, FFO or per share amounts.
When we have committed to a plan to sell the asset under usual and customary terms within one year of establishing the plan to sell, the financial results for all periods presented are reclassified as Discontinued Operations. The following illustrates the net reclassification impact of Statement 144 on previously issued financial statements as a result of classifying facilities as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of 2002.
Increase/(Decrease) in Income From Operations from amounts previously stated:
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2001
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001
| |
Rental Income, Triple Net Properties | | $ | (472 | ) | | $ | (2,940 | ) |
Rental Income, Managed Properties | | | (275 | ) | | | (857 | ) |
Interest and Other Income | | | (5 | ) | | | (9 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | (752 | ) | | | (3,806 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Interest Expense | | | — | | | | — | |
Real Estate Depreciation | | | 6,561 | | | | 7,142 | |
Managed Properties Operating Expenses | | | 212 | | | | 472 | |
General and Administrative Expenses | | | — | | | | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 6,773 | | | | 7,614 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations | | $ | (6,021 | ) | | $ | (3,808 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
At September 30, 2002, we had 11 facilities classified as Discontinued Operations. Included in Discontinued Operations is an operating loss from these 11 facilities of $284,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and operating income of $259,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Included in Discontinued Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, is operating income of $1,219,000 and $2,472,000, respectively. Of these 11 facilities, six have been sold and five with a net book value of $6,224,000 had not yet been sold as of September 30, 2002.
At September 30, 2002, we had approximately 650 leases in the Managed Portfolio and approximately 97 health care operators.
8
Major Operators:
Listed below are our major operators, which represent three percent or more of our annualized revenue, the annualized revenue in properties operated by those operators, and the percentage of total annualized revenue from these operators as of September 30, 2002. Annualized revenue is the expected rental income from leased properties, interest income from mortgage properties and net operating income (NOI) on Managed Portfolio properties over the next twelve months. Amounts incorporate expected sales, mortgage payoffs, lease renewals or rent resets based on our best estimates. All of the companies listed below (with the exception of Centennial Healthcare Corp.) are publicly traded companies and are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and accordingly file periodic financial statements on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
| | Annualized Revenue
| | Percentage
| |
| | (Dollar amounts in thousands) | |
Tenet Healthcare Corporation (THC) | | $ | 57,065 | | 16.9 | % |
American Retirement Corp. (ACR) | | | 20,942 | | 6.2 | % |
HealthSouth Corporation (HRC) | | | 17,010 | | 5.0 | % |
Emeritus Corporation (ESC) | | | 16,557 | | 4.9 | % |
Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (KIND) | | | 16,398 | | 4.8 | % |
HCA Inc. (HCA) | | | 15,206 | | 4.5 | % |
Beverly Enterprises (BEV) | | | 11,991 | | 3.5 | % |
Centennial Healthcare Corp. | | | 10,635 | | 3.1 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | $ | 165,804 | | 48.9 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Managed Property Operations:
As of September 30, 2002, we have 99 owned properties comprised of 66 medical office buildings (“MOBs”), seven healthcare laboratory and biotech research facilities and 26 physician group practice clinics with triple net, gross and modified gross leases with multiple tenants that are managed by independent property management companies on our behalf (“Managed Portfolio”). These facilities are consolidated because they are either fully or majority owned and controlled by the Company or our subsidiaries. Rents and operating income attributable to these properties are included in Rental Income, Managed Properties in our financial statements. Expenses related to the operation of these facilities are recorded as Operating Expenses, Managed Properties.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we paid off $116,000,000 of maturing long-term debt with an average interest rate of 7.25%.
Derivatives and Hedging:
During 1999, we entered into a $25,000,000 swap contract through which the variable interest rate on a senior note was fixed until its February 2004 maturity. We have reflected the change in the fair market value of this instrument of $313,000 as of September 30, 2002 as an accumulated comprehensive loss, which is recorded under Other Equity. If the note is held to maturity as planned, the unrealized loss will not be incurred.
9
(6) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Accounts receivable consists of the following:
| | September 30, 2002
| | | December 31, 2001
| |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Rent and Interest Receivable | | $ | 25,610 | | | $ | 25,900 | |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | | | (6,372 | ) | | | (4,960 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable, Net | | $ | 19,238 | | | $ | 20,940 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
(7) STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The following table provides a summary of the activity for the Stockholders’ Equity account for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (amounts in thousands):
| | Preferred Stock
| | Common Stock
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares
| | Amount
| | Number of Shares
| | Par Value Amount
| | Additional Paid-In Capital
| | Cumulative Net Income
| | Cumulative Dividends
| | | Other Equity
| | | Total Stockholders’ Equity
| |
Balances, December 31, 2001 | | 11,722 | | $ | 274,487 | | 56,387 | | $ | 56,387 | | $ | 1,100,743 | | $ | 883,084 | | $ | (1,060,029 | ) | | $ | (7,948 | ) | | $ | 1,246,724 | |
Stock Options Exercised | | | | | | | 635 | | | 635 | | | 23,001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 23,636 | |
Stock Grants Issued | | | | | | | 96 | | | 96 | | | 3,433 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,529 | |
Stock Options Granted (See Note 1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | 231 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 231 | |
Common Stock Issued | | | | | | | 1,660 | | | 1,660 | | | 57,124 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 58,784 | |
Net Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 108,006 | | | | | | | | | | | 108,006 | |
Dividends Paid—Preferred Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (18,675 | ) | | | | | | | (18,675 | ) |
Dividends Paid—Common Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (139,470 | ) | | | | | | | (139,470 | ) |
Deferred Compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (1,838 | ) | | | (1,838 | ) |
Notes receivable From Officers and Directors (see Note 5) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 170 | | | | 170 | |
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (313 | ) | | | (313 | ) |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Balances, September 30, 2002 | | 11,722 | | $ | 274,487 | | 58,778 | | $ | 58,778 | | $ | 1,184,532 | | $ | 991,090 | | $ | (1,218,174 | ) | | $ | (9,929 | ) | | $ | 1,280,784 | |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Other Equity:
Other equity consists of the following:
| | September 30, 2002
| | December 31, 2001
|
| | (Amounts in thousands) |
Unamortized Balance on Deferred Compensation | | $ | 6,217 | | $ | 4,379 |
Notes Receivable From Officers and Directors for Purchase of Common Stock | | | 2,259 | | | 2,429 |
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss (See Note 5) | | | 1,453 | | | 1,140 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total Other Equity | | $ | 9,929 | | $ | 7,948 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss is a reduction to net income in calculating comprehensive income. Comprehensive income is the change in equity from non-owner sources. Our comprehensive income reflects the change in the fair market value of our interest rate swap (see Note 5).
10
Comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 was $107,693,000 and $84,997,000, respectively.
Stock Options Granted:
As of January 1, 2002, we commenced recognizing compensation expense in accordance with Statement 123. Stock option expense represents the amount of amortized compensation costs related to 2002 stock options awarded to employees. The charge of $231,000 has been included in General and Administrative Expense. Previously, we had accounted for all stock options under Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25 (APB 25), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” which is permitted under Statement 123. Had compensation expense for stock options been determined with rules set out in Statement 123 since the effective date, our Net Income and Basic Earnings Per Common Share would have been lower by approximately $351,000 and $0.006 per basic share and $478,000 and $0.009 per basic share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(8) OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS
As of September 30, 2002, there were a total of 1,607,967 non-managing member units outstanding in three limited liability companies of which we are the managing member: HCPI/Utah, LLC, HCPI/Utah II, LLC and HCPI/Indiana, LLC. These non-managing member units are convertible into our common stock on a one-for-one basis. During the third quarter of 2002, we issued 93,486 non-managing member units as part of the acquisition of one medical office building and one health care laboratory and biotech research facility. In addition, during the quarter 124,487 non-managing member units were converted into the same number of common shares.
(9) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
We compute earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing Net Income applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated including the effect of dilutive securities. Options to purchase shares of common stock that have an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the common stock during the period are not included because they are not dilutive.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002
|
| | Income
| | Shares
| | Per Share Amount
| | Income
| | Shares
| | Per Share Amount
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 31,017 | | 58,204 | | $ | 0.53 | | $ | 89,331 | | 57,425 | | $ | 1.56 |
Dilutive Options | | | — | | 212 | | | | | | — | | 398 | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 31,017 | | 58,416 | | $ | 0.53 | | $ | 89,331 | | 57,823 | | $ | 1.54 |
| |
|
| |
| | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
11
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2001
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001
|
| | Income
| | Shares
| | Per Share Amount
| | Income
| | Shares
| | Per Share Amount
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 17,848 | | 55,360 | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 66,322 | | 53,178 | | $ | 1.25 |
Dilutive Options | | | — | | 264 | | | | | | — | | 213 | | | |
| |
|
| |
| | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 17,848 | | 55,624 | | $ | 0.32 | | $ | 66,322 | | 53,391 | | $ | 1.24 |
| |
|
| |
| | | | |
|
| |
| | | |
(10) FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
We are required to report information about operations on the bases that we use internally to measure performance under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.”
We believe that Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is the most important supplemental measure of operating performance for a real estate investment trust. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a real estate investment trust that use historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. The term FFO was designed by the real estate investment trust industry to address this problem.
We adopted the definition of FFO prescribed by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO is defined as Net Income applicable to common shares (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, and extraordinary items, plus real estate depreciation and real estate related amortization, discontinued operations, impairment losses related to depreciable property and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis.
FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income. FFO, as we define it, may not be comparable to similarly entitled items reported by other real estate investment trusts that do not define it exactly as the NAREIT definition.
12
Below are summaries of the calculation of our FFO (all amounts in thousands):
| | Three Months Ended September 30,
| | Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
| | 2002
| | | 2001
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
Net Income Applicable to Common Shares | | $ | 31,017 | | | $ | 17,848 | | $ | 89,331 | | $ | 66,322 |
Real Estate Depreciation | | | 19,385 | | | | 17,471 | | | 55,870 | | | 51,560 |
Impairment Losses Related to Depreciable Property | | | — | | | | 5,190 | | | — | | | 7,360 |
Loss and Depreciation on Real Estate Dispositions | | | 479 | | | | 6,024 | | | 1,468 | | | 6,847 |
Joint Venture Adjustments | | | (43 | ) | | | 19 | | | 229 | | | 12 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Funds From Operations | | $ | 50,838 | | | $ | 46,552 | | $ | 146,898 | | $ | 132,101 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(11) COMMITMENTS
We have committed to acquire five medical office buildings for $22,000,000. We have committed to fund additional development of facilities on existing properties of approximately $11,000,000, and are committed to fund $36,500,000 for construction of new health care facilities. We expect that a significant portion of these commitments will be funded; however, experience suggests that some committed transactions may not close for various reasons including unsatisfied closing conditions, competitive financing sources, final negotiation differences or the operator’s inability to obtain required internal or governmental approvals.
(12) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 11, 2002, we closed on a new three-year revolving line of credit totaling $490,000,000.
On October 29, 2002, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per common share payable on November 20, 2002 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 8, 2002.
The Board of Directors also declared a cash dividend of $0.492188 per share on our series A cumulative preferred stock, $0.54375 per share on our series B cumulative preferred stock and $0.5375 per share on our series C cumulative preferred stock depositary shares. These dividends will be paid on December 31, 2002 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 16, 2002.
(13) DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The carrying amount for Cash and Cash Equivalents approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. Fair values for Mortgage Loans Receivable and Senior Notes and Mortgage Notes Payable are based on the estimates of management and on rates currently prevailing for comparable loans and instruments of comparable maturities, and are as follows:
13
| | September 30, 2002
| | December 31, 2001
|
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
| | Carrying Amount
| | Fair Value
|
| | (Amounts in thousands) |
Mortgage Loans Receivable | | $ | 142,873 | | $ | 145,357 | | $ | 148,075 | | $ | 143,319 |
Senior Notes and Mortgage Notes Payable | | $ | 1,075,003 | | $ | 1,163,749 | | $ | 949,252 | | $ | 975,617 |
(14) NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 145 “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (Statement 145), effective with fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. These rescinded Statements primarily relate to the extinguishment of debt and lease accounting. In June 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” effective with fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2002 with early application encouraged. In October 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 147 “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” which is an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9 (effective for acquisitions on or after October 1, 2002). The effect of these three pronouncements on our financial statements is not expected to be material.
14
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
Health Care Property Investors, Inc., including our wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliated joint ventures (HCPI), generally acquires health care facilities and leases them on a long-term basis to health care providers. We also lease medical office space to providers and physicians on a shorter term basis. On a more limited basis, we provide mortgage financing on health care facilities. As of September 30, 2002, our portfolio of properties, including equity investments, consisted of 442 facilities located in 42 states. These facilities are comprised of 183 long-term care facilities, 88 assisted living facilities, 85 medical office buildings, 35 physician group practice clinics, 21 acute care hospitals, 14 retirement living communities, nine freestanding rehabilitation facilities and seven health care laboratory and biotech research facilities and. Our gross undepreciated investment in these properties, which includes joint ventures, was approximately $3.07 billion at September 30, 2002.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we acquired 22 properties for an aggregate purchase price of $206,000,000. These properties have an average annual lease rate of 10.7%. The properties consist of 11 long-term care facilities, five assisted living facilities, two retirement living communities, three medical office buildings and one health care laboratory and biotech research facility.
In addition, on September 30, 2002, we completed a $125,000,000 investment in subsidiaries of American Retirement Corporation. The investment is comprised of a $112,750,000 five year loan and a 9.8% equity interest in each of seven limited liability companies for $12,250,000. Collectively, the limited liability companies own and lease nine retirement living communities. The investment of $125,000,000 has an initial pay rate of 9% with a required payment at maturity to bring our return to 19.5%.
We financed the acquisitions primarily through the proceeds from the issuance of new debt and equity, from asset sales and the use of our line of credit.
As of September 30, 2002, we had written commitments to acquire or construct an additional $58,000,000 of health care real estate. During the third quarter of 2002, rent commenced at 10.15% on a $12,300,000 health care laboratory and biotech research facility construction project. Also, construction continued on a $28,000,000 acute care hospital and medical office building of which $21,262,000 has been incurred to date.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recorded in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 101), as amended. SAB 101 requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These criteria are persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectibility. If the collectibility of revenue is determined incorrectly, the amount and timing of our reported revenue could be significantly affected.
15
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Rental revenue from our tenants is our principal source of revenue. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants on an on-going basis. Based on these reviews, we have established provisions and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the possible inability of our tenants to make required rent payments to us. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded during each period and is recorded against rental revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. The allowance for doubtful accounts, which represents the cumulative allowances less write-offs of uncollectible rent, is recorded against tenant and other receivables on our consolidated balance sheets. If we incorrectly estimate the required allowances for doubtful accounts, our financial condition and results of operations could be significantly affected.
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Assets
We compute depreciation on our properties using the straight-line method based on an estimated useful life ranging up to 45 years. A significant portion of the acquisition cost of each property is allocated to building (usually approximately 90%). The allocation of the acquisition cost to building and the determination of the useful life of a property are based on appraisals commissioned from independent real estate appraisal firms. If we do not allocate appropriately to the building or incorrectly estimate the useful life of our properties, the computation of depreciation will not appropriately reflect the allocation of our capital expenditures over future periods.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically review long-lived assets (primarily real estate, investments in unconsolidated joint ventures entities and notes receivable) for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The determination of the fair value of the investment involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on analysis of the future operating results and resulting cash flows of each long-lived asset. Our ability to accurately predict future cash flows may impact the determination of fair value.
If a decline in the fair market value of a long-lived asset occurs, we may be required to make a determination as to whether the decline in fair value is other than temporary. Our assessment as to the nature of a decline in fair value is primarily based on estimates of expectations of future rents or future operating results, and our intent to hold the long-lived asset. If an investment is considered impaired and the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, a write-down is recognized.
Stock Options
As of January 1, 2002, we commenced recognizing compensation expense in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (Statement 123). The implementation of Statement 123 is prospective and therefore 2001 operating results have not been impacted. We use the Black Scholes model for calculating stock option expense. This model requires us to make certain estimates including stock volatility, discount rate and the termination discount factor. If we incorrectly estimate these variables, our results of operations could be affected.
16
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Income applicable to common shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 totaled $31,017,000 and $89,331,000 or $0.53 and $1.54 per diluted share of common stock on revenue of $92,672,000 and $262,452,000, respectively. This compares with Net Income applicable to common shares of $17,848,000 and $66,322,000 or $0.32 and $1.24 per diluted share of common stock on revenue of $83,385,000 and $243,147,000 respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001.
Net Income applicable to common shares for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 includes a $479,000 (or $0.008 per diluted share of common stock) net loss on real estate dispositions and a $5,743,000 (or $0.10 per diluted share of common stock) net loss on real estate dispositions, respectively. Net Income applicable to common shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 includes a $1,084,000 (or $0.02 per diluted share of common stock) and a $5,985,000 (or $0.11 per diluted common share) net loss on real estate dispositions, respectively. Also included in Net Income applicable to common shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 is a write-down to fair market value less costs to sell of $400,000 (or $0.007 per diluted share of common stock) of one property to be sold and $1,707,000 (or $0.03 per diluted share of common stock) of four properties to be sold, respectively. Included in Net Income applicable to common shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 is a write-down to fair market value less costs to sell of $6,280,000 (or $0.11 per diluted share of common stock) of six facilities to be sold. Also included in Net Income applicable to common shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 is an impairment loss of $5,190,000 (or $0.09 per diluted share of common stock) of five facilities and $7,360,000 (or $0.14 per diluted share of common stock) of seven facilities, respectively.
Additionally, included in Net Income applicable to common shares for 2002 and 2001 is the effect of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”) “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” which delays the recognition of approximately $4,000,000 of cash receipts paid by tenants for additional rents from the first quarter to subsequent quarters each year.
Rental Income attributable to Triple Net Leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $5,519,000 and $10,722,000 to $62,972,000 and $177,867,000, respectively, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increases are primarily the result of the positive impact of acquisitions made during 2001 and the first three quarters of 2002 and positive rent growth, offset by rent reductions on certain properties (see discussion elsewhere in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and dispositions made during 2001 and the first three quarters of 2002.
Rental Income attributable to Managed Properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $3,864,000 and $8,778,000 to $24,363,000 and $68,684,000, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. There was a related increase in Managed Properties Operating Expenses in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 of $1,233,000 and $1,817,000 to $8,619,000 and $23,504,000, respectively compared to the same periods of 2001. Net operating income on Managed Properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $2,631,000 and $6,961,000, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. These increases were generated primarily from 2001 and 2002 acquisition activity and a net $1,300,000 lease termination fee related to the early vacancies of four single tenant physician clinics.
Interest and Other Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $96,000 and $195,000 to $5,337,000 and $15,901,000, respectively, as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily as a result of the $6,720,000 pay off of two loans early in 2002.
17
Interest Expense for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $1,490,000 and decreased $3,304,000 to $20,361,000 and $56,116,000, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase for the three month period is primarily the result of the $250,000,000 debt issuance in the second quarter of 2002. The decrease for the nine month period is primarily the result of lower interest rates on short-term bank loans as well as the refinancing at lower rates of maturing senior debt. The $1,032,000 and $2,827,000 increase in General and Administrative Expenses for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, is primarily the result of costs related to troubled operators. Real Estate Depreciation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $1,914,000 and $4,310,000 to $19,385,000 and $55,870,000, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2001. These increases resulted from depreciation on the properties acquired during the last six months of 2001 and the first nine months of 2002.
We believe that Funds From Operations (FFO) is the most important supplemental measure of operating performance for a real estate investment trust. (See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.) FFO for the three months ended September 30, 2002 increased $4,286,000 to $50,838,000 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily due to the positive impact of our acquisitions made during 2001 and the first nine months of 2002 offset by dispositions made during 2001 and 2002.
FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to Net Income. FFO, as we define it, may not be comparable to similarly entitled items reported by other real estate investment trusts that do not use the NAREIT definition.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed investments through the sale of common and preferred stock, issuance of medium-term and long-term debt, issuance of units in Down-REITs, assumption of mortgage debt, the mortgaging of certain of our properties, use of short-term bank lines and use of internally generated cash flows. We have also raised cash through the disposition of assets in 2000, 2001 and 2002. Management believes that our liquidity and sources of capital are adequate to finance our operations for the foreseeable future, including through December 31, 2002. Future investments in additional facilities will be dependent on the availability of cost-effective sources of capital.
At September 30, 2002, stockholders’ equity totaled $1,280,784,000 and our equity securities had a market value of $2,869,097,000. Total debt presently represents 31% and 50% of our total market and book capitalization, respectively. Our senior debt is rated BBB+/BBB+/Baa2 by Standard & Poor’s, Fitch and Moody’s, respectively, and has been rated medium investment grade continuously since 1986, when we first received a bond rating. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, earnings covered fixed charges and preferred stock dividends at a ratio of 2.23 to 1.00 and FFO (before interest expense) covered Interest Expense at a ratio of 3.5 to 1.00.
Tabulated below is our debt maturity table by year and in the aggregate.
| | | | |
2002 (October—December) | | $ | 1,000,000 | |
2003 | | | 43,000,000 | |
2004 | | | 106,000,000 | |
2005 | | | 460,000,000 | (1) |
2006 | | | 143,000,000 | |
Thereafter | | | 536,000,000 | |
| |
|
|
|
| | $ | 1,289,000,000 | |
| |
|
|
|
18
(1) Includes $213,000,000 related to our revolving line of credit.
On June 25, 2002, we issued $250,000,000 of 6.45% coupon (6.74% effective rate after including related costs) Senior Notes due 2012. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually in June and December.
During the first nine months of 2002, we paid off $116,000,000 of maturing long-term debt with an average interest rate of 7.25%. These payments were initially financed with funds available under our revolving lines of credit.
Revolving Lines of Credit
We recently closed on a new three-year revolving line of credit totaling $490,000,000. Borrowings under the lines of credit averaged $89,000,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, at a rate of 2.53%. The average bank interest rate on borrowings of $56,000,000 was 4.06% for the third quarter of 2001.
Secured Debt
At September 30, 2002, we had a total of $178,538,000 in Mortgage Notes Payable secured by 35 health care facilities with a net book value of approximately $310,667,000. Interest rates on the Mortgage Notes ranged from 3.2% to 10.63% with an average rate of 8.0%.
As part of the investment in American Retirement Corporation (see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), we have a 9.8% equity interest in each of seven limited liability companies which together own nine retirement living communities. The nine retirement living communities owned by the seven limited liability companies collateralize $170,000,000 of first mortgages with fixed and variable interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 9.5% and maturity dates ranging from January 2004 to June 2025.
Equity
During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we raised $59,114,000 under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan at an average price per share of $39.38.
As of September 30, 2002, there were a total of 1,607,967 non-managing member units outstanding in three limited liability companies of which we are the managing member: HCPI/Utah, LLC, HCPI/Utah II, LLC and HCPI/Indiana, LLC. These non-managing member units are convertible into our common stock on a one-for-one basis. During the third quarter of 2002, we issued 93,486 non-managing member units as part of the acquisition of one medical office building and one health care laboratory and biotech research facility. In addition, during the third quarter of 2002, 124,487 non-managing member units were converted into the same number of common shares.
Shelf Registrations
On April 19, 2002, we filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the registration of $975,000,000 of debt and equity securities that may be issued from time to time. As of October 2002, we have $725,000,000 available for future issuances of debt and equity securities.
19
Letters of Credit
At September 30, 2002, we held approximately $8,928,000 in depository accounts and $50,356,000 in irrevocable letters of credit from commercial banks to secure a number of lessees’ lease obligations and borrowers’ loan obligations. We may draw upon the letters of credit or depository accounts if there are any defaults under the leases or loans. Amounts available under letters of credit could change based upon facility operating conditions and other factors and such changes may be material.
Facility Rollovers
As of September 30, 2002, we had 14 facilities that are subject to lease expirations and mortgage maturities during the remainder of 2002. These facilities currently represent approximately 0.1% of annualized revenue. For the year ending December 31, 2003, we have ten facilities, representing approximately 1.1% of annualized revenue, subject to lease expirations and mortgage maturities.
Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures
On September 30, 2002 we completed a $125,000,000 investment in subsidiaries of American Retirement Corporation. The investment is comprised of a $112,750,000 five year loan and a 9.8% equity interest in each of seven limited liability companies for $12,250,000. Collectively, the limited liability companies own and lease nine retirement living communities (see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Also, we have an 80% interest in five joint ventures that lease six long-term care facilities and a 45%-50% interest in four joint ventures that each operate an assisted living facility. Since the other members in these joint ventures have significant voting rights relative to acquisition, sale and refinancing of assets, we account for these investments using the equity method of accounting.
Combined summarized unaudited financial information of the joint ventures follows:
| | September 30, 2002
| | December 31, 2001
| |
| | (Amounts in thousands) | |
Total Assets | | $ | 332,321 | | $ | 38,461 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Total Liabilities | | $ | 186,174 | | $ | 39,008 | |
Total Partners’ Capital | | | 146,147 | | | (547 | ) |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| | $ | 332,321 | | $ | 38,461 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| | Nine Months Ended September 30,
| |
| | 2002
| | 2001
| |
Rental and Interest Income | | $ | 3,492 | | $ | 3,180 | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $ | 144 | | $ | (605 | ) |
Company’s Equity in Joint Venture Operations | | $ | 82 | | $ | 23 | |
Distributions to HCPI | | $ | 788 | | $ | 583 | |
20
As of September 30, 2002, we have guaranteed approximately $6.8 million on notes payable obligations for four of these joint ventures.
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION
Acute Care and Rehabilitation Hospitals
As of September 30, 2002, we derived 24% of our annualized revenue, or $80,000,000, from 21 acute care hospitals. The acute care hospital sector continues to post strong financial performance and publicly traded companies within this sector show strong earnings trends. The operating performance of our acute care hospitals ranks in the top quartile of hospitals in the nation.
Tenet Healthcare Corporation, one of the nation’s largest health care providers, is our largest lessee and leases eight acute care hospitals representing 16.7% of our annualized revenue. The net operating income for the past 12 months for these hospitals covers rent payments at an above average rate for the sector. On November 6, 2002, Tenet announced that it had received an audit request from the Department of Health and Human Services to determine whether certain Medicare outlier payments to Tenet hospitals were paid in accordance with Medicare laws and regulations. Further, Tenet announced on November 7, 2002 that it has restructured executive management. On November 11, 2002, Moody’s Investors Service revised the outlook of Tenet to negative while maintaining its credit rating at Baa3 and Standard and Poors Rating Service downgraded Tenet’s credit rating from BBB to BBB-. At this time, we do not believe that the foregoing developments relating to Tenet will have an adverse impact on Tenet’s ability to make payments to us under our lease agreements.
As of September 30, 2002, we derived 4.7% of our annualized revenue, or $16,000,000, from nine in-patient rehabilitation hospitals leased to HealthSouth Corporation. HealthSouth Corporation recently announced a significantly lower outlook for income as a result of reductions in Medicare reimbursement related to outpatient therapies. After adjusting for reductions in income at our nine rehabilitation hospitals, we believe that seven facilities aggregating 3.6% of our annualized revenue will not require rent reductions, and two facilities aggregating 1.1% of our annualized revenue may require modest rent reductions at lease expiration in 2004 and 2007.
We acquired one hospital as part of the American Health Properties’ acquisition, located in West Valley City near Salt Lake City, UT, that had above-market rent. This facility has consistently performed well. Recently, we concluded an agreement to renew the lease from 2003 through 2017 at a rate commensurate with market conditions, which will result in an annual reduction in rent of approximately $2,000,000 as of July 2002. The agreement requires funding up to $12,000,000 for capital additions for the facility over the next three years without an increase in rent, resulting in an overall reduction in earnings of $2,800,000 per year when the capital additions are complete.
Long-Term Care and Assisted Living Operators
Twenty-six percent of our revenue as of September 30, 2002, is derived from the long-term care sector. We have observed an improvement in occupancies and operations at many of our long-term care facilities in the past two years. However, access to affordable liability insurance, a nursing shortage, and adequacy of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, continue to present significant challenges for the long-term care industry. Although some states have improved Medicaid reimbursement, the economic slowdown has placed pressure on many state budgets, which could slow rate increases planned for 2002 and 2003. Laws supporting certain Medicare reimbursements expired October 1, 2002. This has resulted in an approximate 10% reduction in average Medicare payments. Congress may pass legislation in the next several months restoring some of this reduction. We believe that already low margins in the long-term care sector will narrow further beginning October 1, 2002.
As of September 30, 2002, we derived 13% of our annualized revenue from the assisted living industry. This sector has been challenged by overbuilding, slow fill-up, rising insurance costs and higher operating costs associated with increased acuity of residents. Development of new assisted living facilities has slowed significantly, and occupancy rates and bottom line performance are improving, albeit slower than operators had forecasted. Recently, several operators have expanded their portfolios via acquisitions of existing assisted living facilities, indicating a positive signal for the industry. Some operators have now produced positive operating cash flows for their portfolios and others are approaching this milestone.
21
Managed Medical Office And Clinic Portfolio
Our 4,507,000 square foot managed medical office building, health care laboratory and biotech research facility and physician group practice clinic portfolio produced approximately 18% of our annualized revenue as of September 30, 2002. Occupancy for this portfolio decreased from 91% to 89% due to early vacancies of four single tenant physician clinic facilities totaling 90,000 square feet.
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW:
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per bed and per square foot data)
| | Long-Term Care Facilities
| | | Acute Care Hospitals
| | | Medical Office Building
| | | Assisted Living Facilities
| | | Retirement Living Communities
| | | Rehabilitation Hospitals
| | | Physician Group Practice Clinics
| | | Healthcare Laboratory and Biotech Research
| | | Portfolio Total
| | | Percent age of Portfolio Total
| | | Managed Portfolio (3)
| |
Annualized Revenue by State(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
California | | $ | 5,744 | | | $ | 29,113 | | | $ | 11,312 | | | $ | 5,346 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,459 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 55,974 | | | 16.5 | % | | | | |
Texas | | | 4,282 | | | | 6,970 | | | | 10,761 | | | | 11,537 | | | | 5,451 | | | | 1,753 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 40,754 | | | 12.0 | % | | | | |
Indiana | | | 19,706 | | | | — | | | | 6,824 | | | | 1,504 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 28,034 | | | 8.3 | % | | | | |
Florida | | | 5,335 | | | | 7,562 | | | | 1,595 | | | | 2,517 | | | | 6,287 | | | | 2,250 | | | | 2,442 | | | | — | | | | 27,988 | | | 8.3 | % | | | | |
Utah | | | 514 | | | | 6,248 | | | | 11,734 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,325 | | | | 24,821 | | | 7.3 | % | | | | |
North Carolina | | | 4,515 | | | | 7,805 | | | | — | | | | 1,433 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 533 | | | | — | | | | 14,286 | | | 4.2 | % | | | | |
Tennessee | | | 10,991 | | | | — | | | | 1,310 | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,377 | | | | — | | | | 13,683 | | | 4.0 | % | | | | |
Other (35 States) | | | 38,136 | | | | 22,283 | | | | 24,446 | | | | 22,706 | | | | 10,277 | | | | 11,954 | | | | 3,130 | | | | — | | | | 132,932 | | | 39.4 | % | | | | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Grand Total (42 States) | | $ | 89,223 | | | $ | 79,981 | | | $ | 67,982 | | | $ | 45,048 | | | $ | 22,015 | | | $ | 15,957 | | | $ | 11,941 | | | $ | 6,325 | | | $ | 338,472 | | | 100.0 | % | | $ | 60,070 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage of Total Revenue | | | 26.4 | % | | | 23.6 | % | | | 20.1 | % | | | 13.3 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 1.9 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | | 17.7 | % |
Investment(2) | | $ | 701,784 | | | $ | 675,929 | | | $ | 710,127 | | | $ | 439,182 | | | $ | 216,349 | | | $ | 113,977 | | | $ | 143,212 | | | $ | 63,124 | | | $ | 3,063,684 | | | | | | $ | 666,462 | |
Return on Investments(4) | | | 12.7 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 10.3 | % | | | 10.2 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 8.3 | % | | | 10.0 | % | | | 11.1 | % | | | | | | 9.0 | % |
Number of Properties | | | 183 | | | | 21 | | | | 85 | | | | 88 | | | | 14 | | | | 9 | | | | 35 | | | | 7 | | | | 442 | | | | | | | 99 | |
Vacant Properties | | | 3 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5 | | | | — | | | | 8 | | | | | | | — | |
Number of Beds/Units | | | 22,354 | | | | 2,785 | | | | — | | | | 7,024 | | | | 4,237 | | | | 685 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 37,085 | | | | | | | — | |
Number of Square Feet | | | 6,860,000 | | | | 2,939,000 | | | | 4,891,000 | | | | 4,919,000 | | | | 5,215,000 | | | | 708,000 | | | | 986,000 | | | | 468,000 | | | | 26,986,000 | | | | | | | 4,507,000 | |
Investment per Bed/Unit(4) | | $ | 31 | | | $ | 237 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 63 | | | $ | 51 | | | $ | 166 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | | $ | — | |
Investment per Square Foot(4) | | $ | 102 | | | $ | 233 | | | $ | 145 | | | $ | 89 | | | $ | 42 | | | $ | 161 | | | $ | 145 | | | $ | 135 | | | | | | | | | | $ | 148 | |
Occupancy Data-Current Quarter(5) | | | 81 | % | | | 58 | % | | | — | | | | 79 | % | | | 90 | % | | | 76 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | 89 | % |
Occupancy Data-Prior Quarter(5) | | | 81 | % | | | 58 | % | | | — | | | | 79 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 76 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | 91 | % |
Cash Flow Coverage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Before Management Fees | | | 1.8 | | | | 4.6 | | | | — | | | | 1.1 | | | | 1.6 | | | | 3.9 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.7 | | | | | | | | |
After Management Fees | | | 1.4 | | | | 4.2 | | | | — | | | | 0.9 | | | | 1.3 | | | | 3.7 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2.4 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | | Annualized rental income, interest income, and net operating income (NOI) on managed portfolio on total investments above. Annualized amounts do not reflect the impact of the reclassification of discontinued operations in accordance with Statement 144. |
(2) | | Includes partnership and limited liability company investments and incorporates all partners’ and members’ assets and construction commitments as well as our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures. Construction in process and related land purchases total $22,031. |
(3) | | Includes managed Medical Office Buildings, Physician Group Practice Clinics, and Healthcare Laboratory and Biotech Research included in the preceding totals. |
(4) | | Excludes facilities under construction. |
(5) | | Excludes facilities under construction, newly completed facilities under start up, vacant facilities and facilities where the data is not available or not meaningful. |
22
PORTFOLIO BY OPERATOR / TENANT:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Operator/Tenant (1)
| | Revenue (2)
| | Percentage
| |
Tenet Healthcare | | $ | 57,065 | | 16.9 | % |
American Retirement Corp. | | | 20,942 | | 6.2 | % |
HealthSouth Corporation | | | 17,010 | | 5.0 | % |
Emeritus Corporation | | | 16,557 | | 4.9 | % |
Kindred Healthcare, Inc. | | | 16,398 | | 4.8 | % |
HCA Inc. | | | 15,206 | | 4.5 | % |
Beverly Enterprises | | | 11,991 | | 3.5 | % |
Centennial Healthcare | | | 10,635 | | 3.1 | % |
Not-For-Profit Investment Grade Tenants | | | 6,231 | | 1.8 | % |
Other Publicly Traded Operators or Guarantors (15 Operators) | | | 39,597 | | 11.7 | % |
Other Non Public Operators and Tenants | | | 126,840 | | 37.6 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Grand Total | | $ | 338,472 | | 100.0 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
OPERATORS / PROPERTIES AT RISK(3):
Operator
| | Annual Rental Income to HCPI
| |
Centennial Healthcare | | $ | 10,635 | |
Sun Healthcare Group | | | 2,441 | |
Integrated Health Services | | | 1,720 | |
Beverly Enterprises | | | 1,180 | |
Other Non Public Operators and Tenants | | | 756 | |
| |
|
|
|
| | $ | 16,732 | |
| |
|
|
|
Percent of Revenue | | | 4.9 | % |
| |
|
|
|
Near Term Potential Future Rent Reduction From the Above Operators | | $ | 2,000 | |
| |
|
|
|
Percent of Revenue | | | 0.6 | % |
| |
|
|
|
(1) | | At September 30, 2002, the Company had approximately 97 health care operators and approximately 650 leases in the managed portfolio. |
(2) | | Annualized rental income, interest income, and net operating income (NOI) on managed portfolio on total investments above. Annualized amounts do not reflect the impact of the reclassification of discontinued operations in accordance with Statement 144. |
(3) | | Updated from October 22, 2002 earnings press release to reflect most current available information. |
23
RENEWAL INFORMATION:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
| | Lease Expirations and Mortgage Maturities
| |
Year
| | Annualized Revenue (1) (2)
| | Percentage
| |
2002 | | $ | 82 | | 0.1 | % |
2003 | | | 3,838 | | 1.1 | % |
2004(3) | | | 59,671 | | 17.6 | % |
2005(3) | | | 26,836 | | 7.9 | % |
2006 | | | 16,218 | | 4.8 | % |
Thereafter | | | 231,827 | | 68.5 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Grand Total | | $ | 338,472 | | 100.0 | % |
| |
|
| |
|
|
SAME STORE GROWTH:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Rent Growth on Comparable Facilities for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 vs. September 30, 2001
| | | | |
Triple Net Properties: | | | | |
Number of Facilities | | | 267 | |
Revenue Increase | | $ | 94 | |
| | | | |
Managed Properties: | | | | |
Number of Facilities | | | 83 | |
Occupancy Percentage at September 30, 2002 | | | 87 | % |
Occupancy Percentage Change from September 30, 2001 | | | (4 | %) |
Net Operating Income Increase | | $ | 2,238 | |
(1) Annualized Revenue is the expected rental income from leased properties, interest income from mortgage properties and net operating income (NOI) on Managed Portfolio properties over the next twelve months. Amounts incorporate expected sales, mortgage payoffs, lease renewals or rent resets based on the Company’s best estimates. Annualized amounts do not reflect the impact of the reclassification of discontinued operations in accordance with Statement 144.
(2) This column includes the revenue impact by year and the total annualized rental and interest income associated with the properties subject to lease expiration, lessees’ renewal option and/or purchase options and mortgage maturities.
(3) $43,819 and $10,383 for 2004 and 2005, respectively, of this revenue relates to eight hospitals leased to Tenet.
24
LEASE UP STATISTICS ON NEW ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Occupancy
| | Facilities
| | Average Months in Operation
| | Annualized Rents
| | Percent of Annualized Revenue
|
0% - 50% | | 1 | | 31.0 | | $890 | | 0.26% |
50% - 70% | | 2 | | 32.0 | | 1,200 | | 0.35% |
70% - 90% | | 5 | | 44.4 | | 2,535 | | 0.75% |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | 1.36% |
| | | | | | | |
|
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002
|
Acquisitions | | $ | 156,000 | | $ | 331,000 |
Construction in Progress(1) | | $ | 6,831 | | $ | 21,296 |
Rentable Square footage Acquired(2) | | | 4,526 | | | 5,927 |
RETAINED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS:
| | Current Quarter
| | | Prior Quarter
| |
Retained Funds From Operations | | $ | 3,052 | | | $ | 5,771 | |
Inception-to-Date of Funds From Operations Retained | | $ | 180,461 | | | $ | 177,409 | |
Dividends Paid Percentage Since Inception | | | 86.1 | % | | | 86.83 | % |
(1) | | Includes $8,654 related to a facility that was transferred out of construction in progress as rent commenced in August. |
(2) | | Excludes facilities under construction. |
CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Quarterly Report that are not historical factual statements are “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements include, among other things, statements regarding our intent, belief or expectations and can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should” and other comparable terms or the negative thereof. In addition, we, through our senior management, from time to time make forward looking oral and written public statements concerning our expected future operations and other developments. Readers are cautioned that, while forward looking statements reflect our good faith belief and best judgment based upon current information, they are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the expectations contained in the forward looking statements as a result of various factors. In addition to other factors set forth in this Quarterly Report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, readers should consider the following:
25
| (a) | | Legislative, regulatory, or other changes in the health care industry at the local, state or federal level which increase the costs of or otherwise affect the operations of our lessees; |
| (b) | | Changes in the reimbursement available to our lessees and mortgagors by governmental or private payors, including changes in Medicare and Medicaid payment levels and the availability and cost of third party insurance coverage; |
| (c) | | Competition for lessees and mortgagors, including with respect to new leases and mortgages and the renewal or rollover of existing leases; |
| (d) | | Availability of suitable health care facilities to acquire at a favorable cost of capital and the competition for such acquisition and financing of health care facilities; |
| (e) | | The ability of our lessees and mortgagors to operate our properties in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase revenues and to generate sufficient income to make rent and loan payments; |
| (f) | | The financial weakness of operators in the long-term care and assisted living sectors, including the bankruptcies of certain of our tenants, which results in uncertainties in our ability to continue to realize the full benefit of such operators’ leases; |
| (g) | | Changes in national or regional economic conditions, including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital for the Company; and |
| (h) | | The risk that we will not be able to sell or lease facilities that are currently vacant. |
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our investments are financed by the sale of common stock, long-term debt, internally generated cash flows and short-term bank debt.
We generally have fixed base rent on our leases; in addition, there can be additional rent based on a percentage of increased revenue over specified base period revenue of the properties and/or increases based on inflation indices or other factors. Financing costs are comprised of dividends on preferred and common stock, fixed interest on long-term debt and short-term interest on bank debt.
On a more limited basis, we have provided mortgage loans to operators of health care facilities in the normal course of business. All of the mortgage loans receivable have fixed interest rates or interest rates with periodic fixed increases. Therefore, the mortgage loans receivable are all considered to be fixed rate loans, and the current interest rate (the lowest rate) is used in the computation of market risk provided in the following table if material.
We may assume existing mortgage notes payable as part of an acquisition transaction. Currently we have two mortgage notes payable with variable interest rates and the remaining mortgage notes payable have fixed interest rates or interest rates with fixed periodic increases. Our Senior Notes are at fixed rates with one exception for a $25,000,000 variable rate senior note for which management has fixed the interest rate by means of a swap contract. The variable rate loans are at interest rates below the current prime rate of 4.75%, and fluctuations are tied to the prime rate or to a rate currently below the prime rate.
At September 30, 2002, we are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates only on $4,290,000 of variable rate mortgage notes payable and $213,500,000 of variable rate bank debt out of our portfolio of real estate of $3,064,000,000.
Fluctuation in the interest rate environment will not affect our future earnings and cash flows on our fixed rate debt until that debt matures and must be replaced or refinanced. Interest rate changes will affect the fair value of the fixed rate instruments. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate
26
debt would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not affect the fair value on those instruments. Assuming a one percentage point increase in the interest rate related to the variable rate debt including the mortgage notes payable and the bank lines of credit, and assuming no change in the outstanding balance as of year end, interest expense for 2002 would increase by approximately $2,178,000.
The principal amount and the average interest rates for the mortgage loans receivable and debt categorized by the final maturity dates is presented in the following table. The fair value estimates for the mortgage loans receivable are based on the estimates of management and on rates currently prevailing for comparable loans. The fair market value estimates for debt securities are based on discounting future cash flows utilizing current rates offered to us for debt of the same type and remaining maturity.
| | Maturity
| | | |
| | 2002
| | | 2003
| | | 2004
| | | 2005
| | | 2006
| | | Thereafter
| | | Total
| | | FairValue
|
| | (Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Loans Receivable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 40,837 | | | $ | 102,036 | | | $ | 142,873 | | | $ | 145,357 |
Weighted Average Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.75 | % | | | 10.59 | % | | | 10.35 | % | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Variable Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Bank Notes Payable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 213,500 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 213,500 | | | $ | 213,500 |
Weighted Average Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.32 | % | | | | | | | | | | | 3.32 | % | | | |
|
Mortgage Notes Payable | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 4,290 | | | | | | | $ | 4,290 | | | $ | 4,290 |
Weighted Average Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.25 | % | | | | | | | 3.25 | % | | | |
|
Fixed Rate Debt: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Notes Payable | | | | | | $ | 31,000 | | | $ | 92,000 | | | $ | 231,000 | | | $ | 135,000 | | | $ | 407,465 | | | $ | 896,465 | | | $ | 963,841 |
Weighted Average Interest Rate | | | | | | | 7.09 | % | | | 7.78 | % | | | 6.87 | % | | | 6.73 | % | | | 7.21 | % | | | 7.11 | % | | | |
|
Mortgage Notes Payable | | $ | 345 | | | $ | 8,318 | | | $ | 9,632 | | | $ | 13,795 | | | | | | | $ | 142,158 | | | $ | 174,248 | | | $ | 195,618 |
Weighted Average Interest Rate | | | 9.00 | % | | | 8.52 | % | | | 7.59 | % | | | 8.76 | % | | | | | | | 8.10 | % | | | 8.14 | % | | | |
We do not believe that the future market rate risks related to the above securities will have a material impact on us or the results of our future operations. Readers are cautioned that most of the statements contained in the “Disclosures about Market Risk” paragraphs are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures under the heading “Cautionary Language Regarding Forward Looking Statements” previously set forth.
NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our implementation of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
In April 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 145 “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (Statement 145), effective with fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. These Statements primarily relate to the extinguishment of debt and lease accounting. In June 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” effective with fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2002 with early application encouraged. In October 2002, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 147 “Acquisition of Certain Financial Institutions” which is an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9 (effective for acquisitions on or after October 1, 2002). The effect of these pronouncements on our financial statements is not expected to be material.
27
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to the date we completed our evaluation.
28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On October 7, 2002, James F. Flaherty III was elected by our Board of Directors to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer and was also elected as a Director. We currently expect that Mr. Flaherty will become our Chief Executive Officer at or about the time of our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2003. Kenneth B. Roath, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is expected to remain Chairman following the 2003 stockholders meeting.
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (Update Pending)
a) Exhibits:
3.1 | | Articles of Restatement of HCPI (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3.1 of HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001). |
|
3.2 | | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCPI (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3.2 of HCPI’s quarterly report on form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1999). |
|
3.3 | | Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCPI (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
3.4 | | Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCPI (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 of HCPI’s registration statement on form S-3 filed August 30, 2002, registration number 333-99063). |
|
3.5 | | Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCPI. |
|
4.1 | | Rights agreement, dated as of July 27, 2000, between Health Care Property Investors, Inc. and the Bank of New York which includes the form of Certificate of Designations of the Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Health Care Property Investors, Inc. as Exhibit A, the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit C (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 of Health Care Property Investors, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 28, 2000). |
|
4.2 | | Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, between HCPI and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, with respect to the Series C and D Medium Term Notes, the Senior Notes due 2006 and the Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities due 2015 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCPI’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated September 9, 1993). |
|
4.3 | | Indenture, dated as of April 1, 1989, between HCPI and The Bank of New York for Debt Securities (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCPI’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated March 20, 1989). |
|
4.4 | | Form of Fixed Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to HCPI’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated March 20, 1989). |
|
4.5 | | Form of Floating Rate Note (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.3 to HCPI’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated March 20, 1989). |
|
4.6 | | Registration Rights Agreement dated November 20, 1998 between HCPI and James D. Bremner (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.8 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). This exhibit is identical in all material respects to two other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCPI, were James P. Revel and Michael F. Wiley. |
|
4.7 | | Registration Rights Agreement dated January 20, 1999 between HCPI and Boyer Castle Dale Medical Clinic, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.9 to |
29
| | HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). This exhibit is identical in all material respects to 13 other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCPI, were Boyer Centerville Clinic Company, L.C., Boyer Elko, L.C., Boyer Desert Springs, L.C., Boyer Grantsville Medical, L.C., Boyer-Ogden Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer Ogden Medical Associates No. 2, LTD., Boyer Salt Lake Industrial Clinic Associates, LTD., Boyer-St. Mark’s Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer McKay-Dee Associates, LTD., Boyer St. Mark’s Medical Associates #2, LTD., Boyer Iomega, L.C., Boyer Springville, L.C., and—Boyer Primary Care Clinic Associates, LTD. #2. |
|
4.8 | | Form of Deposit Agreement (including form of Depositary Receipt with respect to the Depositary Shares, each representing one-one hundredth of a share of our 8.60% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series C) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.8 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2001) dated as of March 1, 2001 by and among HCPI, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. and the holders from time to time of the Depositary Shares described therein. |
|
4.9 | | Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1997, between American Health Properties, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 4.1 to American Health Properties, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K (file no. 001-09381), dated January 21, 1997). |
|
4.10 | | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, between HCPI and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated by reference to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999). |
|
4.11 | | Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, dated November 9, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to HCPI’s registration statement on Form S-3 dated November 13, 2000, registration number 333-49796). |
|
4.12 | | Registration Rights Agreement dated August 17, 2001 between HCPI, Boyer Old Mill II, L.C., Boyer-Research Park Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VII, L.C., Chimney Ridge, L.C., Boyer-Foothill Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VI, L.C., Boyer Stansbury II, L.C., Boyer Rancho Vistoso, L.C., Boyer-Alta View Associates, LTD., Boyer Kaysville Associates, L.C., Boyer Tatum Highlands Dental Clinic, L.C., Amarillo Bell Associates, Boyer Evanston, L.C., Boyer Denver Medical, L.C., Boyer Northwest Medical Center Two, L.C., and Boyer Caldwell Medical, L.C. (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.12 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
4.13 | | Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of June 12, 2002 by and among Merrill Lynch Private Finance Inc., The Boyer Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah, LLC, the unitholders of HCPI/Utah, LLC. and HCPI (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.13 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002). |
|
4.14 | | Acknowledgment and Consent dated as of June 12, 2002 by and among Merrill Lynch Private Finance Inc., The Boyer Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah II, LLC, the unitholders of HCPI/Utah II, LLC. and HCPI (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002). |
|
10.1 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 30, 1985, to Partnership Agreement of Health Care Property Partners, a California general partnership, the general partners of which consist of HCPI and certain affiliates of Tenet (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1985). |
30
10.2 | | HCPI Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.43 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997).* |
|
10.3 | | HCPI Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.44 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1997).* |
|
10.4 | | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).* |
|
10.5 | | Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).* |
|
10.6 | | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).* |
|
10.7 | | HCPI 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of March 23, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).* |
|
10.8 | | HCPI Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.45 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1997).* |
|
10.9 | | Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999).* |
|
10.10 | | Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.17 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).* |
|
10.11 | | Employment Agreement dated October 13, 2000 between HCPI and Kenneth B. Roath (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).* |
|
10.12 | | Various letter agreements, each dated as of October 16, 2000, among HCPI and certain key employees of the Company (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.12 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).* |
|
10.13 | | HCPI Amended and Restated Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).* |
|
10.14 | | Stock Transfer Agency Agreement between HCPI and The Bank of New York dated as of July 1, 1996 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.40 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1996). |
|
10.15 | | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated November 20, 1998 of HCPI/Indiana, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998). |
|
10.16 | | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated January 20, 1999of HCPI/Utah, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998). |
|
10.17 | | Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 1999, among HCPI, each of the banks identified on the signature pages hereof, The Bank of New York, as agent for the banks and as issuing bank, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells |
31
| | Fargo Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, with BNY Capital Markets, Inc., as lead arranger and Book Manager (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999). |
|
10.18 | | 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 1999 among HCPI, each of the banks identified on the signature pages hereof, The Bank of New York, as agent for the banks, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, with BNY Capital Markets, Inc., as lead arranger and book manager (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to HCPI’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1999). |
|
10.19 | | Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, by HCP Medical Office Buildings II, LLC, and Texas HCP Medical Office Buildings, L.P., for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000). |
|
10.20 | | Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2000, by HCP Medical Office Buildings I, LLC, and Meadowdome, LLC, for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000). |
|
10.21 | | Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated August 17, 2001of HCPI/Utah II, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
10.22 | | First Amendment to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement dated October 30, 2001of HCPI/Utah II, LLC (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
10.23 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 29, 2001, to the 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 1999 among HCPI, each of the banks identified on the signature pages thereto, The Bank of New York, as agent for the banks, and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as co-documentation agents, with BNY Capital Markets, Inc., as lead arranger and book manager (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to HCPI’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
10.24 | | Employment Agreement dated October 8, 2002 between HCPI and James F. Flaherty III.* |
|
10.25 | | Amendment to Employment Agreement dated October 8, 2002 between HCPI and Kenneth B. Roath.* |
|
10.26 | | Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2002, among HCPI, each of the banks identified on the signature pages hereof, The Bank of New York, as agent for the banks and as issuing bank, Bank of America, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as syndicating agents, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agent, with Credit Suisse First Boston, Deutche Bank A.G. and Fleet National Bank as managing agents, and BNY Capital Markets, Inc., as lead arranger and book runner. |
| * | | Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement. |
b) Reports on Form 8-K:
| (i) | | Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2002, regarding HCPI’s Regulation FD Disclosure. |
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 14, 2002 | | | | HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC. (REGISTRANT) |
|
| | | | | | | | /s/ James G. Reynolds
|
| | | | | | | | James G. Reynolds Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
| | | | | | | | /s/ Devasis Ghose
|
| | | | | | | | Devasis Ghose Senior Vice President-Finance and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
33
Certification Form
Section 302 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Kenneth B. Roath,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Health Care Property Investors, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
|
/s/ KENNETH B. ROATH
|
Kenneth B. Roath Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
1
Certification Form
Section 302 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James G. Reynolds, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Health Care Property Investors, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
|
/s/ JAMES G. REYNOLDS
|
James G. Reynolds Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
2