Healthpeak Properties (DOC) 10-K 2012 FY Annual report

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)
ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                        to
Commission file number 1-08895

HCP, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	33-0091377
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 300 Long Beach, California	90806 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code(562) 733-5100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock	New York Stock Exchange

          Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes ý  No o

          Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes o  No ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant; (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) Smaller reporting company o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes o No ý

          State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $18.8 billion.

          As of February 4, 2013 there were 453,379,156 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

          Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant's 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders have been incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

		Page Number
PART I
Item 1.	Business		3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		13
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		26
Item 2.	Properties		26
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		32
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		32
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		33
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		35
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		67
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		69
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures		69
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		69
Item 9B.	Other Information		72
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		72
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		72
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		72
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		73
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		73
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules		73

2

PART I

All references in this report to "HCP," the "Company," "we," "us" or "our" mean HCP, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless the context suggests otherwise, references to "HCP, Inc." mean the parent company without its subsidiaries.

ITEM 1.    Business

Business Overview

        HCP, an S&P 500 company, invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. We are a Maryland corporation organized in 1985 to qualify as a self-administered real estate investment trust ("REIT"). We are headquartered in Long Beach, California, with offices in Nashville, Tennessee and San Francisco, California. We acquire, develop, lease, manage and dispose of healthcare real estate, and provide financing to healthcare providers. Our portfolio is comprised of investments in the following five healthcare segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) post-acute/skilled nursing, (iii) life science, (iv) medical office and (v) hospital. We make investments within our healthcare segments using the following five investment products: (i) properties under lease, (ii) debt investments, (iii) developments and redevelopments, (iv) investment management and (v) investments in senior housing operations utilizing the structure permitted by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which is commonly referred to as "RIDEA."

        The delivery of healthcare services requires real estate and, as a result, tenants and operators depend on real estate, in part, to maintain and grow their businesses. We believe that the healthcare real estate market provides investment opportunities due to the following:

•

Compelling demographics driving the demand for healthcare services;

•

Specialized nature of healthcare real estate investing; and

•

Ongoing consolidation of a fragmented healthcare real estate sector.

        Our website address iswww.hcpi.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish them to, the United States ("U.S.") Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

Healthcare Industry

        Healthcare is the single largest industry in the U.S. based on Gross Domestic Product ("GDP"). According to the National Health Expenditures report by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS"): (i) national health expenditures are projected to grow 3.8% in 2013 and 7.4% in 2014; (ii) the average compounded annual growth rate for national health expenditures, over the projection period of 2015 through 2021, is anticipated to be 6.2%; and (iii) the healthcare industry is projected to represent 17.8% of U.S. GDP in 2013.

        Senior citizens are the largest consumers of healthcare services. According to CMS, on a per capita basis, the 75-year and older segment of the population spends 76% more on healthcare than the 65 to 74-year-old segment and over 200% more than the population average.

3

U.S. Population Over 65 Years Old

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, the Statistical Abstract of the United States.

Business Strategy

        Our primary goal is to increase shareholder value through profitable growth, which allows us to maintain or increase dividends per share to our shareholders. Our investment strategy to achieve this goal is based on three principles: (i) opportunistic investing, (ii) portfolio diversification and (iii) conservative financing.

Opportunistic Investing

        We make investment decisions that are expected to drive profitable growth and create shareholder value. We attempt to position ourselves to create and take advantage of situations to meet our goals and investment criteria.

Portfolio Diversification

        We believe in maintaining a portfolio of healthcare investments diversified by segment, geography, operator, tenant and investment product. We monitor, but do not limit, our investments based on the percentage of our total assets that may be invested in any one property type, investment product, geographic location, the number of properties which we may lease to a single operator or tenant, or loans we may make to a single borrower. With investments in multiple segments and investment products, we can focus on opportunities with the most attractive risk/reward profile for the portfolio as a whole. We may structure transactions as master leases, require operator or tenant insurance and indemnifications, obtain credit enhancements in the form of guarantees, letters of credit or security deposits, and take other measures to mitigate risk.

Conservative Financing

        We believe a conservative balance sheet is important to our ability to execute our opportunistic investing approach. We strive to maintain a conservative balance sheet by actively managing our debt-to-equity levels and maintaining multiple sources of liquidity, such as our revolving line of credit facility, access to capital markets and secured debt lenders, relationships with current and prospective institutional joint venture partners, and our ability to divest of assets. Our debt obligations are primarily fixed rate with staggered maturities, which reduces the impact of rising interest rates on our operations.

        We finance our investments based on our evaluation of available sources of funding. For short-term purposes, we may utilize our revolving line of credit facility or arrange for other short-term borrowings from banks or other sources. We arrange for longer-term financing through offerings of

4

equity and debt securities, placement of mortgage debt and capital from other institutional lenders and equity investors.

        We specifically incorporate by reference into this section the information set forth in Item 7, "2012 Transaction Overview," included elsewhere in this report.

Competition

        Investing in real estate serving the healthcare industry is highly competitive. We face competition from other REITs, investment companies, pension funds, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, healthcare operators, lenders, developers and other institutional investors, some of whom may have greater resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition makes it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our objectives. Our ability to compete may also be impacted by national and local economic trends, availability of investment alternatives, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, existing laws and regulations, new legislation and population trends.

        Income from our facilities is dependent on the ability of our operators and tenants to compete with other companies on a number of different levels, including: the quality of care provided, reputation, the physical appearance of a facility, price and range of services offered, alternatives for healthcare delivery, the supply of competing properties, physicians, staff, referral sources, location, the size and demographics of the population in surrounding areas, and the financial condition of our tenants and operators. Private, federal and state payment programs as well as the effect of laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the profitability of our tenants and operators. For a discussion of the risks associated with competitive conditions affecting our business, see "Risk Factors" in Item 1A.

Healthcare Segments

        Senior housing.    At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 441 senior housing facilities, 21 of which are in a RIDEA structure. Excluding RIDEA properties, all of our senior housing facilities are leased to single tenants under triple-net lease structures. Senior housing facilities include assisted living facilities ("ALFs"), independent living facilities ("ILFs") and continuing care retirement communities ("CCRCs"), which cater to different segments of the elderly population based upon their personal needs. Services provided by our operators or tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for by the residents directly or through private insurance and are less reliant on government reimbursement programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. Our senior housing property types are further described below:

•

Assisted Living Facilities.  ALFs are licensed care facilities that provide personal care services, support and housing for those who need help with activities of daily living ("ADL"), such as bathing, eating and dressing, yet require limited medical care. The programs and services may include transportation, social activities, exercise and fitness programs, beauty or barber shop access, hobby and craft activities, community excursions, meals in a dining room setting and other activities sought by residents. These facilities are often in apartment-like buildings with private residences ranging from single rooms to large apartments. Certain ALFs may offer higher levels of personal assistance for residents requiring memory care as a result of Alzheimer's disease or other forms of dementia. Levels of personal assistance are based in part on local regulations. At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 363 ALFs.

•

Independent Living Facilities.  ILFs are designed to meet the needs of seniors who choose to live in an environment surrounded by their peers with services such as housekeeping, meals and activities. These residents generally do not need assistance with ADL. However, in some of our

5

facilities, residents have the option to contract for these services. At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 64 ILFs.

•

Continuing Care Retirement Communities.  CCRCs provide housing and health-related services under long-term contracts. This alternative is appealing to residents as it eliminates the need for relocating when health and medical needs change, thus allowing residents to "age in place." Some CCRCs require a substantial entry or buy-in fee and most also charge monthly maintenance fees in exchange for a living unit, meals and some health services. CCRCs typically require the individual to be in relatively good health and independent upon entry. At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 14 CCRCs.

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired 129 senior housing communities for $1.7 billion, from a joint venture between Emeritus Corporation and Blackstone Real Estate Partners VI, an affiliate of Blackstone (the "Blackstone JV"). Located in 29 states, the portfolio encompasses 10,077 units representing a diversified care mix of 61% assisted living, 25% independent living, 13% memory care and 1% skilled nursing. Emeritus continues to operate the communities pursuant to a new triple-net, master lease for the 129 properties guaranteed by Emeritus. For a more detailed description of the acquisition see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Our senior housing segment accounted for approximately 33%, 30% and 30% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our senior housing operator concentration for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Operators	Percentage of Segment Revenues		Percentage of Total Revenues
HCR ManorCare, Inc. ("HCR ManorCare")(1)		11		30
Emeritus Corporation ("Emeritus")(2)		23		8
Sunrise Senior Living Inc. ("Sunrise")(3)		15		5
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. ("Brookdale")(4)		14		5

(1)

Percentage of total revenues includes revenues earned from both our senior housing and post-acute/skilled nursing facilities leased to HCR ManorCare.

(2)

Percentage of total revenues from Emeritus includes partial results for Blackstone JV acquisition. Assuming that full-year results were included for this acquisition in our 2012 revenues, the percentage of segment revenues and total revenues would be 36% and 12%, respectively.

(3)

Certain of our properties are leased to tenants who have entered into management contracts with Sunrise to operate the respective property on their behalf. To determine our concentration of revenues generated from properties operated by Sunrise, we aggregate revenue from these tenants with revenue generated from the two properties that are leased directly to Sunrise.

(4)

Brookdale percentages do not include $143 million of senior housing revenues, related to 21 senior housing facilities that Brookdale operates on our behalf under a RIDEA structure. Assuming that these revenues were attributable to Brookdale, the percentage of combined segment and total revenues associated Brookdale would be 36% and 12% respectively.

        Post-acute/skilled nursing.    At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 312 post-acute/skilled nursing facilities ("SNFs"). SNFs offer restorative, rehabilitative and custodial nursing care for people not requiring the more extensive and sophisticated treatment available at hospitals. Ancillary revenues and revenues from sub-acute care services are derived from providing services to residents beyond room and board and include occupational, physical, speech, respiratory and intravenous therapy, wound care, oncology treatment, brain injury care and orthopedic therapy as well as sales of pharmaceutical products and other services. Certain SNFs provide some of the foregoing services on an out-patient basis. Post-acute/skilled nursing services provided by our operators and tenants in these facilities are primarily paid for either by private sources or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. All of our SNFs are leased to single tenants under triple-net lease structures.

6

        Our post-acute/skilled nursing segment accounted for approximately 29%, 29% and 13% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our post-acute/skilled nursing operator/tenant concentration for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Operators/Tenants and Borrowers	Percentage of Segment Revenues		Percentage of Total Revenues
HCR ManorCare(1)		90		30

(1)

Percentage of total revenues includes revenues earned from both senior housing and post-acute/skilled nursing facilities leased to HCR ManorCare.

        Life science.    At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 113 life science properties, including four facilities owned by our Investment Management Platform. These properties contain laboratory and office space primarily for biotechnology, medical device and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other organizations involved in the life science industry. While these properties contain similar characteristics to commercial office buildings, they generally contain more advanced electrical, mechanical, and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning ("HVAC") systems. The facilities generally have specialty equipment including emergency generators, fume hoods, lab bench tops and related amenities. In many instances, life science tenants make significant investments to improve their leased space, in addition to landlord improvements, to accommodate biology, chemistry or medical device research initiatives. Life science properties are primarily configured in business park or campus settings and include multiple buildings. The business park and campus settings allow us the opportunity to provide flexible, contiguous/adjacent expansion to accommodate the growth of existing tenants. Our properties are located in well-established geographical markets known for scientific research, including San Francisco, San Diego and Salt Lake City. At December 31, 2012, 96% of our life science leases (based on leased square feet) were under triple-net structures.

        Our life science segment accounted for approximately 15%, 17% and 22% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our life science tenant concentration for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Tenants	Percentage of Segment Revenues		Percentage of Total Revenues
Genentech, Inc.		19		3
Amgen, Inc.		18		3

        Medical office.    At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 273 medical office buildings ("MOBs"), including 66 facilities owned by our Investment Management Platform. These facilities typically contain physicians' offices and examination rooms, and may also include pharmacies, hospital ancillary service space and outpatient services such as diagnostic centers, rehabilitation clinics and day-surgery operating rooms. While these facilities are similar to commercial office buildings, they require additional plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems to accommodate multiple exam rooms that may require sinks in every room, and special equipment such as x-ray machines. In addition, MOBs are often built to accommodate higher structural loads for certain equipment and may contain "vaults" or other specialized construction. Our MOBs are typically multi-tenant properties leased to healthcare providers (hospitals and physician practices), with approximately 77% of our MOBs, based on square feet, located on hospital campuses and 94% are affiliated with hospital systems. At December 31, 2012, 47% of our medical office leases (based on leased square feet) were under triple-net structures.

7

        Our medical office segment accounted for approximately 18%, 19% and 25% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2012, HCA, Inc. ("HCA"), as our tenant, contributed 14% of our medical office segment revenues.

        Our Investment Management Platform represents the following unconsolidated joint ventures: (i) HCP Ventures III, LLC, and HCP Ventures IV, LLC, which consists of MOB portfolios, and (ii) the HCP Life Science ventures. For a more detailed description of these unconsolidated joint ventures, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Hospital.    At December 31, 2012, we had interests in 21 hospitals, including four facilities owned by our Investment Management Platform. Services provided by our operators and tenants in these facilities are paid for by private sources, third-party payors (e.g., insurance and Health Maintenance Organizations or "HMOs"), or through the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our hospital property types include acute care, long-term acute care, specialty and rehabilitation hospitals. Our hospitals are generally leased to single tenants or operators under triple-net lease structures.

        Our hospital segment accounted for approximately 5%, 5% and 10% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our hospital operator/tenant concentration for the year ended December 31, 2012:

Operators/Tenants and Borrowers	Percentage of Segment Revenues		Percentage of Total Revenues
HCA(1)		29		4
Tenet Healthcare Corporation		27		1

(1)

Percentage of total revenues from HCA includes revenues earned from both our medical office and hospital segments.

Investment Products

        Properties under lease.    We primarily generate revenue by leasing properties under long-term leases. Most of our rents and other earned income from leases are received under triple-net leases or leases that provide for a substantial recovery of operating expenses. However, some of our MOBs and life science facility rents are structured under gross or modified gross leases. Accordingly, for such gross or modified gross leases, we incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities and insurance.

        Our ability to grow income from properties under lease depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels, (ii) maximize tenant recoveries and (iii) control non-recoverable operating expenses. Most of our leases include contractual annual base rent escalation clauses that are either predetermined fixed increases and/or are a function of an inflation index.

        Debt investments.    Our mezzanine loans are generally secured by a pledge of ownership interests of an entity or entities, which directly or indirectly own properties, and are subordinate to more senior debt, including mortgages and more senior mezzanine loans. Borrowers of our interests in mortgage and construction loans are typically healthcare providers and healthcare real estate generally secures these loans.

        Developments and redevelopments.    We generally commit to development projects that are at least 50% pre-leased or when we believe that market conditions will support speculative construction. We work closely with our local real estate service providers, including brokerage, property management, project management and construction management companies to assist us in evaluating development proposals and completing developments. Our development and redevelopment investments are primarily in our life science and medical office segments. Redevelopments are properties that require

8

significant capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquisition cost or existing basis) to update, achieve stabilization or to change the primary use of the properties.

        Investment management.    We co-invest in real estate properties with institutional investors through joint ventures structured as partnerships or limited liability companies. We target institutional investors with long-term investment horizons who seek to benefit from our expertise in healthcare real estate. Predominantly, we retain noncontrolling interests in the joint ventures ranging from 20% to 30% and serve as the managing member. These ventures generally allow us to earn acquisition and asset management fees, and have the potential for promoted interests or incentive distributions based on performance of the joint venture.

        Operating properties ("RIDEA").    We may enter into contracts with healthcare operators to manage communities that are placed in a structure permitted by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (commonly referred to as "RIDEA"). Under the provisions of RIDEA, a REIT may lease "qualified healthcare properties" on an arm's length basis to a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an "eligible independent contractor." We view RIDEA as a structure primarily to be used on properties that present attractive valuation entry points and to drive growth by: (i) transitioning the asset to a new operator that can bring scale, operating efficiencies, and/or ancillary services; or (ii) investing capital to reposition the asset.

Portfolio Summary

        At December 31, 2012, we managed $21.3 billion of investments in our Owned Portfolio and Investment Management Platform. At December 31, 2012, we also owned $540 million of assets under development, including redevelopment, and land held for future development.

Owned Portfolio

        As of December 31, 2012, our leases and operating properties and debt investments in our Owned Portfolio consisted of the following (square feet and dollars in thousands):

											Year Ended December 31, 2012
				Investment(3)
	Number of Properties(1)								Total Investment				Interest Income(5)
Segment			Capacity(2)	Properties(1)		Debt					NOI(4)
Senior housing		441	45,669 Units	$	7,543,163	$	123,642		$	7,666,805	$	531,419	$	3,503
Post-acute/skilled		312	41,538 Beds		5,669,469		328,905			5,998,374		538,856		19,993
Life science		109	7,002 Sq. ft.		3,362,298		—			3,362,298		236,491		—
Medical office		207	14,274 Sq. ft.		2,613,254		—			2,613,254		202,547		—
Hospital		17	2,410 Beds		650,937		46,292	(6)		697,229		80,980		1,040
Total		1,086		$	19,839,121	$	498,839		$	20,337,960	$	1,590,293	$	24,536

(1)

Represents 1,065 properties under lease with an investment value of $19.1 billion and 21 operating properties under a RIDEA structure with an investment value of $759 million.

(2)

Senior housing facilities are measured in units (e.g., studio, one or two bedroom units). Life science facilities and medical office buildings are measured in square feet. SNFs and hospitals are measured in licensed bed count.

(3)

Property investments represent: (i) the carrying amount of real estate and intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization; and (ii) the carrying amount of direct financing leases. Debt investment represents the carrying amount of mezzanine, mortgage and other secured loan investments.

(4)

Net Operating Income from Continuing Operations ("NOI") is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate properties. For the reconciliation of NOI to net income for 2012, refer to Note 14 in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

9

(5)

Interest income represents interest earned from our debt investments.

(6)

Includes a senior secured loan to Delphis Operations, L.P. ("Delphis") that was placed on non-accrual status effective January 1, 2011 with a carrying value of $31 million at December 31, 2012. For a more detailed description of the senior secured loan to Delphis, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our business segments.

Developments and Redevelopments

        At December 31, 2012, in addition to our investments in properties under lease and debt investments, we have an aggregate investment of $540 million in assets under development, including redevelopment, and land held for future development, primarily in our life science and medical office segments.

Investment Management Platform

        As of December 31, 2012, our Investment Management Platform consisted of the following properties under lease (square feet and dollars in thousands):

Segment	Number of Properties		Capacity(1)	HCP's Ownership Interest	Joint Venture Investment(2)		Total Revenues		Total Operating Expenses
Medical office(3)		66	3,389 Sq. ft.	20 - 30%	$	729,831	$	72,421	$	30,870
Life science		4	278 Sq. ft.	50 - 63%		144,489		10,881		1,513
Hospital		4	149 Beds	20%		81,383		4,001		963
Total		74			$	955,703	$	87,303	$	33,346

(1)

Life science facilities and medical office buildings are measured in square feet.

(2)

Represents the joint ventures' carrying amount of real estate and intangibles, after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization.

(3)

During 2010, one MOB was placed into redevelopment; its statistics are not included in the medical office information.

Employees of HCP

        At December 31, 2012, we had 149 full-time employees, none of whom are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement

Overview

        Our tenants and operators are typically subject to extensive and complex federal, state and local healthcare laws and regulations relating to fraud and abuse practices, government reimbursement, licensure and certificate of need and similar laws governing the operation of healthcare facilities, and we expect that the healthcare industry, in general, will continue to face increased regulation and pressure in the areas of fraud, waste and abuse, cost control, healthcare management and provision of services, among others. These regulations are wide-ranging and can subject our tenants and operators to civil, criminal and administrative sanctions. Affected tenants and operators may find it increasingly difficult to comply with this complex and evolving regulatory environment because of a relative lack of guidance in many areas as certain of our healthcare properties are subject to oversight from several government agencies and the laws may vary from one jurisdiction to another. Changes in laws and regulations and reimbursement enforcement activity and regulatory non-compliance by our tenants and

10

operators can all have a significant effect on their operations and financial condition, which in turn may adversely impact us, as detailed below and set forth under "Risk Factors" in Item 1A.

        Based on information primarily provided by our tenants and operators, excluding our medical office segment, at December 31, 2012 we estimate that approximately 18% and 14% of the annualized base rental payments received from our tenants and operators were dependent on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, respectively.

        The following is a discussion of certain laws and regulations generally applicable to our operators, and in certain cases, to us.

Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

        There are various extremely complex federal and state laws and regulations governing healthcare providers' relationships and arrangements and prohibiting fraudulent and abusive practices by such providers. These laws include (i) federal and state false claims acts, which, among other things, prohibit providers from filing false claims or making false statements to receive payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs, (ii) federal and state anti-kickback and fee-splitting statutes, including the Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback statute, which prohibit the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce referrals or recommendations of healthcare items or services, (iii) federal and state physician self-referral laws (commonly referred to as the "Stark Law"), which generally prohibit referrals by physicians to entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, (iv) the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law, which prohibits, among other things, the knowing presentation of a false or fraudulent claim for certain healthcare services and (v) federal and state privacy laws, including the privacy and security rules contained in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which provide for the privacy and security of personal health information. Violations of healthcare fraud and abuse laws carry civil, criminal and administrative sanctions, including punitive sanctions, monetary penalties, imprisonment, denial of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and potential exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare programs. These laws are enforced by a variety of federal, state and local agencies and can also be enforced by private litigants through, among other things, federal and state false claims acts, which allow private litigants to bringqui tam or "whistleblower" actions. Many of our operators and tenants are subject to these laws, and some of them may in the future become the subject of governmental enforcement actions if they fail to comply with applicable laws.

Reimbursement

        Sources of revenue for many of our tenants and operators include, among other sources, governmental healthcare programs, such as the federal Medicare program and state Medicaid programs, and non-governmental payors, such as insurance carriers and HMOs. As federal and state governments focus on healthcare reform initiatives, and as the federal government and many states face significant budget deficits, efforts to reduce costs by these payors will likely continue, which may result in reduced or slower growth in reimbursement for certain services provided by some of our tenants and operators.

Healthcare Licensure and Certificate of Need

        Certain healthcare facilities in our portfolio are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. In addition, various licenses and permits are required to dispense narcotics, operate pharmacies, handle radioactive materials and operate equipment. Many states require certain healthcare providers to obtain a certificate of need, which requires prior approval for the construction, expansion and closure of certain healthcare facilities. The

11

approval process related to state certificate of need laws may impact some of our tenants' and operators' abilities to expand or change their businesses.

Life Science Facilities

        While certain of our life science tenants include some well-established companies, other such tenants are less established and, in some cases, may not yet have a product approved by the Food and Drug Administration or other regulatory authorities for commercial sale. Creating a new pharmaceutical product or medical device requires substantial investments of time and money, in part, because of the extensive regulation of the healthcare industry; it also entails considerable risk of failure in demonstrating that the product is safe and effective and in gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance.

Senior Housing Entrance Fee Communities

        Certain of the senior housing facilities mortgaged to or owned by us are operated as entrance fee communities. Generally, an entrance fee is an upfront fee or consideration paid by a resident, a portion of which may be refundable, in exchange for some form of long-term benefit. Some of the entrance fee communities are subject to significant state regulatory oversight, including, for example, oversight of each facility's financial condition, establishment and monitoring of reserve requirements and other financial restrictions, the right of residents to cancel their contracts within a specified period of time, lien rights in favor of the residents, restrictions on change of ownership and similar matters.

Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA")

        Our properties must comply with the ADA and any similar state or local laws to the extent that such properties are "public accommodations" as defined in those statutes. The ADA may require removal of barriers to access by persons with disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where such removal is readily achievable. To date, we have not received any notices of noncompliance with the ADA that have caused us to incur substantial capital expenditures to address ADA concerns. Should barriers to access by persons with disabilities be discovered at any of our properties, we may be directly or indirectly responsible for additional costs that may be required to make facilities ADA-compliant. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable accommodations pursuant to the ADA is an ongoing one, and we continue to assess our properties and make modifications as appropriate in this respect.

Environmental Matters

        A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect healthcare facility operations. These complex federal and state statutes, and their enforcement, involve a myriad of regulations, many of which involve strict liability on the part of the potential offender. Some of these federal and state statutes may directly impact us. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender, such as us, may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner's or secured lender's liability therefore could exceed or impair the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, could reduce our revenues. For a description of the risks associated with environmental matters, see "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this report.

12

ITEM 1A.    Risk Factors

The section below discusses the most significant risk factors that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        As set forth below, we believe that the risks facing our company generally fall into the following categories:

•

Risks related to our business; and

•

Risks related to tax matters, including REIT-related risks.

Risks Related to Our Business

Volatility or disruption in the financial markets may impair our ability to raise capital, obtain new financing or refinance existing obligations and fund real estate and development activities.

        The global financial markets recently have experienced pervasive and fundamental disruptions. While these conditions have stabilized since the first quarter of 2009 and the capital markets generally have shown signs of improvement, the sustainability of an economic recovery is uncertain and additional levels of market disruption and volatility could materially adversely impact our ability to raise capital, obtain new financing or refinance our existing obligations as they mature and fund real estate and development activities.

        Market volatility could also lead to significant uncertainty in the valuation of our investments and those of our joint ventures, that may result in a substantial decrease in the value of our properties and those of our joint ventures. As a result, we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of such investments and the associated goodwill, if any, which may require us to recognize impairment charges in earnings.

We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs and limitations on our access to such capital could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to meet commitments as they become due or make future investments necessary to grow our business.

        We may not be able to fund all future capital needs from cash retained from operations. If we are unable to obtain enough internal capital, we may need to rely on external sources of capital (including debt and equity financing) to fulfill our capital requirements. If we cannot access these external sources of capital, we may not be able to make the investments needed to grow our business and to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature. Our access to capital depends upon a number of factors, some of which we have little or no control over, including but not limited to:

•

general availability of credit and market conditions, including rising interest rates and increased borrowing cost;

•

the market price of the shares of our equity securities and the credit ratings of our debt and preferred securities;

•

the market's perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions;

•

our degree of financial leverage and operational flexibility;

•

the financial integrity of our lenders, which might impair their ability to meet their commitments to us or their willingness to make additional loans to us, and our inability to replace the financing commitment of any such lender on favorable terms, or at all;

•

the stability in the market value of our properties;

13

•

the financial performance and general market perception of our operators, tenants and borrowers;

•

changes in the credit ratings on U.S. government debt securities or default or delay in payment by the United States of its obligations; and

•

issues facing the healthcare industry, including, but not limited to, healthcare reform and changes in government reimbursement policies.

        If our access to capital is limited by these factors or other factors, it could have a material adverse impact on our ability to fund operations, refinance our debt obligations, fund dividend payments, acquire properties and development activities.

Adverse changes in our credit ratings could impair our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, and negatively impact the market price of our securities, including our common stock.

        The credit ratings of our senior unsecured debt are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount and type of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financings we may obtain. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings and in the event that our current credit ratings deteriorate, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and it may be more difficult or expensive to obtain additional financing or refinance existing obligations and commitments. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings would trigger additional costs or other potentially negative consequences under our current and future credit facilities and debt instruments.

Our level of indebtedness may increase and materially adversely affect our future operations.

        Our outstanding indebtedness as of December 31, 2012 was approximately $8.7 billion. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, including in connection with the development or acquisition of assets, which may be substantial. Any significant additional indebtedness could negatively affect the credit ratings of our debt and require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to interest and principal payments due on our indebtedness. Greater demands on our cash resources may reduce funds available to us to pay dividends, conduct development activities, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, or carry out other aspects of our business strategy. Increased indebtedness can also limit our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions, make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions and create competitive disadvantages for us compared to other companies with relatively lower debt levels. Increased future debt service obligations may limit our operational flexibility, including our ability to finance or refinance our properties, contribute properties to joint ventures or sell properties as needed.

Covenants related to our indebtedness limit our operational flexibility and breaches of these covenants could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        Our unsecured credit facilities, unsecured debt securities and secured debt and other indebtedness that we may incur in the future, require or will require us to comply with a number of customary financial and other covenants, such as maintaining certain levels of debt service coverage and leverage ratio, tangible net worth requirements and maintaining REIT status. Our continued ability to incur additional debt and to conduct business in general is subject to compliance with these financial and other covenants, which limit our operational flexibility. For example, mortgages on our properties contain customary covenants such as those that limit or restrict our ability, without the consent of the lender, to further encumber or sell the applicable properties, or to replace the applicable tenant or operator. Breaches of certain covenants may result in defaults under the mortgages on our properties

14

and cross-defaults under certain of our other indebtedness, even if we satisfy our payment obligations to the respective obligee. Additionally, defaults under the leases or operating agreements related to mortgaged properties, including defaults associated with the bankruptcy of the applicable tenant or operator, may result in a default under the underlying mortgage and cross-defaults under certain of our other indebtedness. Covenants that limit our operational flexibility as well as defaults under our debt instruments could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

An increase in interest rates could increase interest cost on new debt, and could materially adversely impact our ability to refinance existing debt, sell assets and limit our acquisition, investment and development activities.

        If interest rates increase, so could our interest costs for any new debt. This increased cost could make the financing of any acquisition and development activity more costly. Rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures, or cause us to pay higher interest rates upon refinancing and increase interest expense on refinanced indebtedness. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amount third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to reposition our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

We depend on a limited number of operators and tenants that account for a large percentage of our revenues.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately 48% of our revenues were generated by our leasing or financial arrangements with the following four companies: HCR ManorCare (30%); Emeritus (8%); Sunrise (5%); and Brookdale (5%). The failure, inability or unwillingness of these operators or tenants to meet their obligations to us could materially reduce our cash flow as well as our results of operations, which could in turn reduce the amount of dividends we pay, cause our stock price to decline and have other material adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        In addition, any failure by these operators or tenants to effectively conduct their operations or to maintain and improve our properties could adversely affect their business reputation and their ability to attract and retain patients and residents in our properties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. These operators and tenants generally have also agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses, and we cannot provide any assurance that they will have sufficient assets, income, access to financing and insurance coverage to enable it to satisfy its indemnification obligations.

Economic and other conditions that negatively affect geographic areas to which a greater percentage of our revenue is attributed could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately 44% of our revenue was derived from properties located in California (22%), Texas (12%) and Florida (10%). As a result, we are subject to increased exposure to adverse conditions affecting these regions, including downturns in the local economies or changes in local real estate conditions, increased competition or decreased demand, and changes in state-specific legislation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of one or more of our major operators or tenants may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

        We lease our properties directly to operators in most cases, and in certain other cases, we lease to third-party tenants who enter into long-term management agreements with operators to manage the

15

properties. Although our leases, financing arrangements and other agreements with our tenants and operators generally provide us the right under specified circumstances to terminate a lease, evict an operator or tenant, or demand immediate repayment of certain obligations to us, the bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization that may render certain of these remedies unenforceable, or at the least, delay our ability to pursue such remedies. For example, we cannot evict a tenant or operator solely because of its bankruptcy filing. A debtor has the right to assume, or to assume and assign to a third party, or to reject its unexpired contracts in a bankruptcy proceeding. If a debtor were to reject its leases with us, our claim against the debtor for unpaid and future rents would be limited by the statutory cap set forth in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which may be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease. In addition, the inability of our tenants or operators to make payments or comply with certain other lease obligations may affect our compliance with certain covenants contained in our debt securities, credit facilities and the mortgages on the properties leased or managed by such tenants and operators. In addition, under certain conditions, defaults under the underlying mortgages may result in cross-default under our other indebtedness. Although we believe that we would be able to secure amendments under the applicable agreements in those circumstances, the bankruptcy of an applicable operator or tenant may potentially result in less favorable borrowing terms than currently available, delays in the availability of funding or other material adverse consequences. In addition, many of our facilities are leased to healthcare providers who provide long-term custodial care to the elderly; evicting such operators for failure to pay rent while the facility is occupied may be a difficult and slow process and may not be successful.

Our operators and tenants may not procure the necessary insurance to adequately insure against losses.

        Our leases generally require our tenants and operators to secure and maintain comprehensive liability and property insurance that covers us, as well as the tenants and operators. Some types of losses may not be adequately insured by our tenants and operators. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could incur liability or lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property. We continually review the insurance maintained by our tenants and operators and believe the coverage provided to be customary for similarly situated companies in our industry. However, we cannot assure you that material uninsured losses, or losses in excess of insurance proceeds, will not occur in the future.

Our operators and tenants are faced with litigation and may experience rising liability and insurance costs.

        In some states, advocacy groups have been created to monitor the quality of care at healthcare facilities and these groups have brought litigation against the operators and tenants of such facilities. Also, in several instances, private litigation by patients has succeeded in winning large damage awards for alleged abuses. The effect of this litigation and other potential litigation may materially increase the costs incurred by our operators and tenants for monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance. In addition, their cost of liability and medical malpractice insurance can be significant and may increase so long as the present healthcare litigation environment continues. Cost increases could cause our operators to be unable to make their lease or mortgage payments or fail to purchase the appropriate liability and malpractice insurance, potentially decreasing our revenues and increasing our collection and litigation costs. In addition, as a result of our ownership of healthcare facilities, we may be named as a defendant in lawsuits allegedly arising from the actions of our operators or tenants, for which claims such operators and tenants have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against, but which may require unanticipated expenditures on our part.

16

Operators and tenants that fail to comply with the requirements of, or changes to, governmental reimbursement programs such as Medicare or Medicaid, may cease to operate or be unable to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us.

        Certain of our operators and tenants are affected by an extremely complex set of federal, state and local laws and regulations that are subject to frequent and substantial changes (sometimes applied retroactively) resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. See "Item 1—Business—Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement" above. For example, to the extent that any of our operators or tenants receive a significant portion of their revenues from governmental payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, such revenues may be subject to:

•

statutory and regulatory changes;

•

retroactive rate adjustments;

•

recovery of program overpayments or set-offs;

•

administrative rulings;

•

policy interpretations;

•

payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries or carriers;

•

government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities); and

•

interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits at such property.

        In recent years, governmental payors have frozen or reduced payments to healthcare providers due to budgetary pressures. Healthcare reimbursement will likely continue to be of significant importance to federal and state authorities. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or the effect that any future legislative reforms may have on our operators' and tenants' costs of doing business and on the amount of reimbursement by government and other third-party payors. The failure of any of our operators or tenants to comply with these laws, requirements and regulations could materially adversely affect their ability to meet their financial and contractual obligations to us.

Legislation to address the federal government's projected operating deficit could have a material adverse effect on our operators' liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

        Congress may consider legislation to address the fiscal condition of the United States that may include entitlement reform, tax reform, reductions in domestic discretionary spending, budget sequestration of certain non-defense discretionary federal programs, and an increase in the national debt limit that could have a material adverse effect on our operators' liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. In particular, Congress may consider legislation affecting the funding of entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Plans that may result in reductions in funding and reimbursements to providers; tax reform that may impact corporate and individual tax rates and retirement plans; and an increase in the federal debt limit that may have an impact on credit markets. Additionally, the Administration may implement proposals under current law or legislation that may be approved by Congress that could modify the delivery of services and benefits under Medicare, Medicaid or Medicare Advantage Plans. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our operators' liquidity, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect their ability to satisfy their obligations to us and could have a material adverse effect on us.

17

Operators and tenants that fail to comply with federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations may cease to operate or be unable to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us.

        Certain of our operators and tenants are subject to extensive federal, state, local and industry-related licensure, certification and inspection laws, regulations and standards. Our operators' or tenants' failure to comply with any of these laws, regulations or standards could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state healthcare programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. For example, certain of our properties may require a license, registration and/or certificate of need to operate. Failure of any operator or tenant to obtain a license, registration or certificate of need, or loss of a required license, registration or certificate of need, would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by such operator or tenant. Additionally, failure of our operators and tenants to generally comply with applicable laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on facilities owned by or mortgaged to us, and therefore may materially adversely impact us. See "Item 1—Business—Government Regulation, Licensing and Enforcement—Healthcare Licensure and Certificate of Need" above.

Increased competition, as well as an inability to grow revenues as originally forecast, have resulted and may further result in lower net revenues for some of our operators and tenants and may affect their ability to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us.

        The healthcare industry is highly competitive and can become more competitive in the future. The occupancy levels at, and rental income from, our facilities is dependent on our ability and the ability of our operators and tenants to maintain and increase such levels and income and to compete with entities that have substantial capital resources. These entities compete with other operators and tenants on a number of different levels, including the quality of care provided, reputation, the physical appearance of a facility, price, the range of services offered, family preference, alternatives for healthcare delivery, the supply of competing properties, physicians, staff, referral sources, location and the size and demographics of the population in the surrounding area. Private, federal and state payment programs and the effect of laws and regulations may also have a significant influence on the profitability of the properties and their tenants. Our operators and tenants also compete with numerous other companies providing similar healthcare services or alternatives such as home health agencies, life care at home, community-based service programs, retirement communities and convalescent centers. Such competition, which has intensified due to overbuilding in some segments in which we invest, has caused the occupancy rate of newly constructed buildings to slow and the monthly rate that many newly built and previously existing facilities were able to obtain for their services to decrease. We cannot be certain that the operators and tenants of all of our facilities will be able to achieve occupancy and rate levels that will enable them to meet all of their obligations to us. Further, many competing companies may have resources and attributes that are superior to those of our operators and tenants. Thus, our operators and tenants may encounter increased competition in the future that could limit their ability to maintain or attract residents or expand their businesses which could materially adversely affect their ability to meet their financial and other contractual obligations to us, potentially decreasing our revenues, impairing our assets, and increasing our collection and dispute costs.

Our tenants in the life science industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty.

        Life science tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing pharmaceutical products, are subject to certain unique risks, as follows:

•

some of our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research, development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such activities, a tenant's business may be adversely affected or fail;

18

•

the research, development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants' products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals which may be costly or difficult to obtain;

•

even after a life science tenant gains regulatory approval and market acceptance, the product may still present significant regulatory and liability risks, including, among others, the possible later discovery of safety concerns, competition from new products, and ultimately the expiration of patent protection for the product;

•

our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by healthcare reform and the reimbursement policies of government or private healthcare payors; and

•

our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws.

        We cannot assure you that our life science tenants will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants' businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty making payments to us, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may be unable to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our real estate-related loans, and even if we are successful in our foreclosure efforts, we may be unable to successfully operate, occupy or reposition the underlying real estate, which may adversely affect our ability to recover our investments.

        If an operator or tenant defaults under one of our mortgages or mezzanine loans, we may have to foreclose on the loan or protect our interest by acquiring title to the collateral and thereafter making substantial improvements or repairs in order to maximize the property's investment potential. In some cases, as noted above, the collateral consists of the equity interests in an entity that directly or indirectly owns the applicable real property or interests in operating facilities and, accordingly, we may not have full recourse to assets of that entity. Operators, tenants or borrowers may contest enforcement of foreclosure or other remedies, seek bankruptcy protection against our exercise of enforcement or other remedies and/or bring claims for lender liability in response to actions to enforce mortgage obligations. Foreclosure-related costs, high loan-to-value ratios or declines in the value of the facility may prevent us from realizing an amount equal to our mortgage or mezzanine loan upon foreclosure, and we may be required to record valuation allowance for such losses. Even if we are able to successfully foreclose on the collateral securing our real estate-related loans, we may inherit properties for which we may be unable to expeditiously seek tenants or operators, if at all, which would adversely affect our ability to fully recover our investment.

Required regulatory approvals can delay or prohibit transfers of our healthcare facilities.

        Transfers of healthcare facilities to successor tenants or operators may be subject to regulatory approvals or ratifications, including, but not limited to, change of ownership approvals under certificate of need laws and Medicare and Medicaid provider arrangements that are not required for transfers of other types of commercial operations and other types of real estate. The replacement of any tenant or operator could be delayed by the regulatory approval process of any federal, state or local government agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. If we are unable to find a suitable replacement tenant or operator upon favorable terms, or at all, we may take possession of a facility, which might expose us to successor liability or require us to indemnify subsequent operators to whom we might transfer the operating rights and licenses, all of which may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

19

Competition may make it difficult to identify and purchase, or develop, suitable healthcare facilities, to grow our investment portfolio.

        We face significant competition from other REITs, investment companies, private equity and hedge fund investors, sovereign funds, healthcare operators, lenders, developers and other institutional investors, some of whom may have greater resources and lower costs of capital than we do. Increased competition makes it more challenging for us to identify and successfully capitalize on opportunities that meet our business goals and could improve the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell, thereby impeding our investment, acquisition and development activities. If we cannot capitalize on our development pipeline, identify and purchase a sufficient quantity of healthcare facilities at favorable prices or if we are unable to finance acquisitions on commercially favorable terms, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make certain of our healthcare properties suitable for other operators and tenants.

        Healthcare facilities are typically highly customized and may not be easily adapted to non-healthcare-related uses. The improvements generally required to conform a property to healthcare use, such as upgrading electrical, gas and plumbing infrastructure, are costly and at times tenant-specific. A new or replacement operator or tenant may require different features in a property, depending on that operator's or tenant's particular operations. If a current operator or tenant is unable to pay rent and vacates a property, we may incur substantial expenditures to modify a property before we are able to secure another operator or tenant. Also, if the property needs to be renovated to accommodate multiple operators or tenants, we may incur substantial expenditures before we are able to re-lease the space. These expenditures or renovations may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

20

We face additional risks associated with property development that can render a project less profitable or not profitable at all and, under certain circumstances, prevent completion of development activities once undertaken.

        Large-scale, ground-up development of healthcare properties presents additional risks for us, including risks that:

•

a development opportunity may be abandoned after expending significant resources resulting in the loss of deposits or failure to recover expenses already incurred;

•

the development and construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates due to increased interest rates and higher materials, transportation, labor, leasing or other costs, which could make the completion of the development project less profitable;

•

construction and/or permanent financing may not be available on favorable terms or at all;

•

the project may not be completed on schedule, which can result in increases in construction costs and debt service expenses as a result of a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including natural disasters, labor conditions, material shortages, regulatory hurdles, civil unrest and acts of war; and

•

occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not meet expected levels and could be insufficient to make the property profitable.

        These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our use of joint ventures may limit our flexibility with jointly owned investments.

        We have and may continue in the future to develop and/or acquire properties in joint ventures with other persons or entities when circumstances warrant the use of these structures. Our participation in joint ventures is subject to risks that may not be present with other methods of ownership, including:

•

we could experience an impasse on certain decisions because we do not have sole decision-making authority, which could require us to expend additional resources on resolving such impasses or potential disputes, including litigation or arbitration;

•

our joint venture partners could have investment goals that are not consistent with our investment objectives, including the timing, terms and strategies for any investments;

•

our ability to transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party may be restricted;

•

our joint venture partners might become bankrupt, fail to fund their share of required capital contributions or fail to fulfill their obligations as a joint venture partner, which may require us to infuse our own capital into the venture on behalf of the partner despite other competing uses for such capital; and

•

our joint venture partners may have competing interests in our markets that could create conflict of interest issues.

From time to time, we acquire other companies and if we are unable to successfully integrate these operations, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

        Acquisitions require the integration of companies that have previously operated independently. Successful integration of the operations of these companies depends primarily on our ability to consolidate operations, systems, procedures, properties and personnel and to eliminate redundancies and costs. We may encounter difficulties in these integrations. Potential difficulties associated with

21

acquisitions include the loss of key employees, the disruption of our ongoing business or that of the acquired entity, possible inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies and the assumption of unexpected liabilities, including:

•

liabilities relating to the clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions;

•

unasserted claims of vendors or other persons dealing with the seller;

•

liabilities, claims and litigation, whether or not incurred in the ordinary course of business, relating to periods prior to our acquisition;

•

claims for indemnification by general partners, directors, officers and others indemnified by the seller; and

•

liabilities for taxes relating to periods prior to our acquisition.

        In addition, the acquired companies and their properties may fail to perform as expected, including in respect of estimated cost savings. Inaccurate assumptions regarding future rental or occupancy rates could result in overly optimistic estimates of future revenues. Similarly, we may underestimate future operating expenses or the costs necessary to bring properties up to standards established for their intended use. If we have difficulties with any of these areas, or if we later discover additional liabilities or experience unforeseen costs relating to our acquired companies, we might not achieve the economic benefits we expect from our acquisitions, and this may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

From time to time we have made, and in the future we may seek to make, one or more material acquisitions, which may involve the expenditure of significant funds.

        We regularly review potential transactions in order to maximize shareholder value and believe that currently there are available a number of acquisition opportunities that would be complementary to our business, given the recent industry consolidation trend. In connection with our review of such transactions, we regularly engage in discussions with potential acquisition candidates, some of which are material. Any future acquisitions could require the issuance of securities, the incurrence of debt, assumption of contingent liabilities or incurrence of significant expenditures, any of which could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the financing required for such acquisitions may not be available on commercially favorable terms or at all.

Loss of our key personnel could temporarily disrupt our operations and adversely affect us.

        We are dependent on the efforts of our executive officers, and competition for these individuals is intense. Although our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief investment officer and general counsel have employment agreements with us, we cannot assure you that they will remain employed with us. The loss or limited availability of the services of any of our executive officers, or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could, at least temporarily, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and be negatively perceived in the capital markets.

Unfavorable resolution of litigation matters and disputes, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

        From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims. We may also be named as defendants in lawsuits allegedly arising out of our actions or the actions of our operators and tenants in which such operators and tenants have agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless from and against various claims, litigation and liabilities arising in connection with their respective businesses. An unfavorable resolution of litigation may have a material adverse effect on our

22

business, results of operations and financial condition. Regardless of its outcome, litigation may result in substantial costs and expenses and significantly divert the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to prevail in, or achieve a favorable settlement of, litigation. In addition, litigation, government proceedings or environmental matters could lead to increased costs or interruption of our normal business operations.

We may experience uninsured or underinsured losses, which could result in a significant loss of the capital we have invested in a property, decrease anticipated future revenues or cause us to incur unanticipated expense.

        We maintain comprehensive insurance coverage on our properties with terms, conditions, limits and deductibles that we believe are adequate and appropriate given the relative risk and costs of such coverage, and we continually review the insurance maintained by us. However, a large number of our properties are located in areas exposed to earthquake, windstorm, flood and other natural disasters and may be subject to other losses. In particular, our life science portfolio is concentrated in areas known to be subject to earthquake activity. While we purchase insurance for earthquake, windstorm, flood and other natural disasters that we believe is adequate in light of current industry practice and analysis prepared by outside consultants, there is no assurance that such insurance will fully cover such losses. These losses can decrease our anticipated revenues from a property and result in the loss of all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property. The insurance market for such exposures can be very volatile and we may be unable to purchase the limits and terms we desire on a commercially reasonable basis in the future. In addition, there are certain exposures where insurance is not purchased as we do not believe it is economically feasible to do so or where there is no viable insurance market.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with our real estate related investments may materially impair the value of those investments.

        Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, as a current or previous owner of real estate, we may be required to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum released at a property, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and cleanup costs incurred by the third parties in connection with the contamination. In addition, some environmental laws create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages and the costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Although we (i) currently carry environmental insurance on our properties in an amount and subject to deductibles that we believe are commercially reasonable, and (ii) generally require our operators and tenants to undertake to indemnify us for environmental liabilities they cause, such liabilities could exceed the amount of our insurance, the financial ability of the tenant or operator to indemnify us or the value of the contaminated property. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may materially adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. As the owner of a site, we may also be held liable under common law to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the site. Although we are generally indemnified by the current operators or tenants of our properties for contamination caused by them, these indemnities may not adequately cover all environmental costs. We may also experience environmental liabilities arising from conditions not known to us.

The impact of the comprehensive healthcare regulation enacted in 2010 on us and operators and tenants cannot accurately be predicted.

        Legislative proposals are introduced or proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures each year that would affect major changes in the healthcare system, either nationally or at the state level.

23

Notably, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, along with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "Affordable Care Act"). The passage of the Affordable Care Act has resulted in comprehensive reform legislation that is expected to expand healthcare coverage to millions of currently uninsured people beginning in 2014 and provide for significant changes to the U.S. healthcare system over the next ten years. To help fund this expansion, the Affordable Care Act outlines certain reductions in Medicare reimbursements for various healthcare providers, including long-term acute care hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, as well as certain other changes to Medicare payment methodologies. This comprehensive healthcare legislation provides for extensive future rulemaking by regulatory authorities, and also may be altered or amended. We cannot accurately predict whether any pending legislative proposals will be adopted or, if adopted, what effect, if any, these proposals would have on our operators and tenants and, thus, our business. Similarly, while we can anticipate that some of the rulemaking that will be promulgated by regulatory authorities will affect our operators and tenants and the manner in which they are reimbursed by the federal healthcare programs, we cannot accurately predict today the impact of those regulations on our operators and tenants and thus on our business.

        The Supreme Court's decision upholding the constitutionality of the individual mandate while striking down the provisions linking federal funding of state Medicaid programs with a federally mandated expansion of those programs has not reduced the uncertain impact that the law will have on healthcare delivery systems over the next decade. We can expect that the federal authorities will continue to implement the law, but, because of the Court's mixed ruling, the implementation will take longer than originally expected, with a commensurate increase in the period of uncertainty regarding the law's full long term financial impact on the delivery of and payment for healthcare.

Risk Related to Tax, including REIT-Related risks

Loss of our tax status as a REIT would substantially reduce our available funds and would have material adverse consequences for us and the value of our common stock.

        Qualification as a REIT involves the application of numerous highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, as well as the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. We intend to continue to operate in a manner that enables us to qualify as a REIT. However, our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon our ability to meet, through actual annual operating results, asset diversification, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership, the various qualification tests imposed under the Code. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must make distributions to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could change the tax laws or interpretations of the tax laws regarding qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification, in a manner that is materially adverse to our stockholders. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we have operated or will continue to operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT.

        If we lose our REIT status, we will face serious tax consequences that will substantially reduce the funds available to make payments of principal and interest on the debt securities we issue and to make distributions to stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT:

•

we will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income;

•

we will be subject to corporate-level income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;

24

•

we could be subject to increased state and local income taxes; and

•

unless we are entitled to relief under relevant statutory provisions, we will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we fail to qualify as a REIT.

        As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital and could materially adversely affect the value of our common stock.

We could have potential deferred and contingent tax liabilities from corporate acquisitions that could limit, delay or impede future sales of our properties.

        If, during the ten-year period beginning on the date we acquire certain companies, we recognize gain on the disposition of any property acquired, then, to the extent of the excess of (i) the fair market value of such property as of the acquisition date over (ii) our adjusted income tax basis in such property as of that date, we will be required to pay a corporate-level federal income tax on this gain at the highest regular corporate rate. There can be no assurance that these triggering dispositions will not occur, and these requirements could limit, delay or impede future sales of our properties.

        In addition, the IRS may assert liabilities against us for corporate income taxes for taxable years prior to the time that we acquire certain companies, in which case we will owe these taxes plus interest and penalties, if any.

There are uncertainties relating to the calculation of non-REIT tax earnings and profits ("E&P") in certain acquisitions, which may require us to distribute E&P.

        In order to remain qualified as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our stockholders all of the accumulated non-REIT E&P of certain companies that we acquire, prior to the close of the first taxable year in which the acquisition occurs. Failure to make such E&P distributions would result in our disqualification as a REIT. The determination of the amount to be distributed in such E&P distributions is a complex factual and legal determination. We may have less than complete information at the time we undertake our analysis, or we may interpret the applicable law differently from the IRS. We currently believe that we have satisfied the requirements relating to such E&P distributions. There are, however, substantial uncertainties relating to the determination of E&P, including the possibility that the IRS could successfully assert that the taxable income of the companies acquired should be increased, which would increase our non-REIT E&P. Moreover, an audit of the acquired company following our acquisition could result in an increase in accumulated non-REIT E&P, which could require us to pay an additional taxable distribution to our then-existing stockholders, if we qualify under rules for curing this type of default, or could result in our disqualification as a REIT.

        Thus, we might fail to satisfy the requirement that we distribute all of our non-REIT E&P by the close of the first taxable year in which the acquisition occurs. Moreover, although there are procedures available to cure a failure to distribute all of our E&P, we cannot now determine whether we will be able to take advantage of these procedures or the economic impact on us of doing so.

Our charter contains ownership limits with respect to our common stock and other classes of capital stock.

        Our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our common stock and preferred stock that are intended to assist us in preserving our qualification as a REIT. Under our charter, subject to certain exceptions, no person or entity may own, actually or constructively, more than 9.8% (by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of our common stock or any class or series of our preferred stock.

25

        Additionally, our charter has a 9.9% ownership limitation on the direct or indirect ownership of our voting shares, which may include common stock or other classes of capital stock. Our Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from either ownership limit. The ownership limits may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

We are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter relating to business combinations.

        The Maryland Business Combination Act provides that unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not engage in business combinations, including a merger, consolidation, share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification of equity securities with an "interested stockholder" or an affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of a Maryland corporation. Unless our Board of Directors takes action to exempt us, generally or with respect to certain transactions, from this statute in the future, the Maryland Business Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations between us and other persons.

        In addition to the restrictions on business combinations contained in the Maryland Business Combination Act, our charter also contains restrictions on business combinations. Our charter requires that, except in certain circumstances, "business combinations," including a merger or consolidation, and certain asset transfers and issuances of securities, with a "related person," including a beneficial owner of 10% or more of our outstanding voting stock, be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 90% of our outstanding voting stock.

        The restrictions on business combinations provided under Maryland law and contained in our charter may delay, defer or prevent a change of control or other transaction even if such transaction involves a premium price for our common stock or our stockholders believe that such transaction is otherwise in their best interests.

ITEM 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments

        None.

ITEM 2.    Properties

        We are organized to invest in income-producing healthcare-related facilities. In evaluating potential investments, we consider a multitude of factors, including:

•

Location, construction quality, age, condition and design of the property;

•

Geographic area, proximity to other healthcare facilities, type of property and demographic profile;

•

Whether the expected risk-adjusted return exceeds our cost of capital;

•

Whether the rent or operating income provides a competitive market return to our investors;

•

Duration, rental rates, operator and tenant quality and other attributes of in-place leases, including master lease structures;

•

Current and anticipated cash flow and its adequacy to meet our operational needs;

•

Availability of security such as letters of credit, security deposits and guarantees;

•

Potential for capital appreciation;

26

•

Expertise and reputation of the operator or tenant;

•

Occupancy and demand for similar healthcare facilities in the same or nearby communities;

•

The mix of revenues generated at healthcare facilities between privately-paid and government reimbursed;

•

Availability of qualified operators or property managers and whether we can manage the property;

•

Potential alternative uses of the facilities;

•

The regulatory and reimbursement environment in which the properties operate;

•

Tax laws related to REITs;

•

Prospects for liquidity through financing or refinancing; and

•

Our access to and cost of capital.

        The following summarizes our property and direct financing lease ("DFL") investments as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 (square feet and dollars in thousands).

Facility Location	Number of Facilities		Capacity(1)		Gross Asset Value(2)		Rental Revenues(3)		Operating Expenses
Senior housing—real estate:				(Units)
Texas		40		6,380	$	776,522	$	84,795	$	22,197
California		36		4,026		694,429		72,675		10,333
Florida		34		4,676		640,196		89,339		30,747
Oregon		27		2,180		322,705		4,695		44
Illinois		14		1,768		316,304		44,849		17,130
Virginia		11		1,403		285,046		20,868		58
Washington		20		1,433		235,802		11,159		1
Colorado		7		1,070		211,732		17,584		—
New Jersey		8		803		176,773		12,818		32
Georgia		19		1,107		160,997		4,162		90
Other (31 States)		132		12,738		1,882,362		142,919		13,778
		348		37,584		5,702,868		505,863		94,410
Senior housing—DFLs(4):
Maryland		13		1,113		248,606		20,527		—
New Jersey		8		679		186,896		15,214		104
Illinois		10		944		173,889		14,751		—
Florida		14		1,203		157,434		13,072		63
Pennsylvania		10		805		142,846		12,119		—
Ohio		11		980		138,588		11,349		30
Other (12 States)		27		2,361		409,493		33,186		55
		93		8,085		1,457,752		120,218		252
Total senior housing		441		45,669	$	7,160,620	$	626,081	$	94,662

27

Facility Location	Number of Facilities		Capacity(1)		Gross Asset Value(2)		Rental Revenues(3)		Operating Expenses
Post-acute/skilled nursing—real estate:				(Beds)
Virginia		9		934	$	58,376	$	6,853	$	—
Indiana		8		892		46,972		7,903		—
Ohio		8		1,047		43,023		7,727		20
Nevada		2		267		13,837		2,778		—
Colorado		2		240		13,800		1,673		—
Other (10 States)		15		1,727		54,409		10,453		(97	)
		44		5,107		230,417		37,387		(77	)
Post-acute/skilled nursing—DFLs(4):
Pennsylvania		43		6,981		1,206,920		114,510		—
Illinois		26		3,472		700,148		64,133		—
Ohio		44		5,237		638,718		59,666		133
Michigan		27		3,345		577,342		52,093		—
Florida		27		3,557		543,556		50,503		10
Other (24 States)		101		13,839		1,756,957		160,950		320
		268		36,431		5,423,641		501,855		463
Total post-acute/skilled nursing		312		41,538	$	5,654,058	$	539,242	$	386
Life science:				(Sq. Ft.)
California		98		6,256	$	3,031,260	$	273,704	$	51,115
Utah		10		669		114,480		15,479		2,008
North Carolina		1		77		6,023		481		50
Total life science		109		7,002	$	3,151,763	$	289,664	$	53,173
Medical office:				(Sq. Ft.)
Texas		47		4,265	$	666,522	$	98,018	$	44,420
Utah		28		1,292		191,608		21,437		5,997
California		14		788		191,240		26,473		13,330
Colorado		16		1,080		186,376		26,860		10,728
Tennessee		17		1,486		158,156		27,342		10,752
Washington		6		651		154,137		29,110		10,550
Other (21 States and Mexico)		79		4,712		817,991		105,571		36,487
Total medical office		207		14,274	$	2,366,030	$	334,811	$	132,264
Hospital:				(Beds)
Texas		4		959	$	213,506	$	29,806	$	3,511
California		2		185		123,556		16,683		6
Georgia		2		274		77,948		11,644		5
North Carolina		1		355		72,500		7,815		16
Florida		1		199		62,450		7,790		—
Other (6 States)		7		438		81,895		10,755		(25	)
Total hospital		17		2,410	$	631,855	$	84,493	$	3,513
Total properties		1,086			$	18,964,326	$	1,874,291	$	283,998

(1)

Senior housing facilities are measured in units (e.g. studio, one or two bedroom apartments). Life science facilities and MOBs are measured in square feet. SNFs and hospitals are measured in licensed bed count.

(2)

Represents gross real estate and the carrying value of DFLs. Gross real estate represents the carrying amount of real estate after adding back accumulated depreciation and amortization.

(3)

Rental revenues represent the combined amount of rental and related revenues, tenant recoveries, resident fees and services and income from direct financing leases.

(4)

Represents leased properties that are classified as DFLs.

28

        The following table summarizes occupancy and average annual rent trends for our owned portfolio for the years ended December 31, (square feet in thousands):

	2012			2011			2010			2009			2008
Senior housing(1):
Average annual rent per unit(2)	$	13,059		$	12,887		$	12,656		$	11,918		$	12,530
Average capacity (units)(3)		37,089			33,911			24,453			24,209			24,143
Post-acute/skilled nursing(1):
Average annual rent per bed(2)	$	11,624		$	11,140		$	6,885		$	6,817		$	6,537
Average capacity (beds)(3)		39,856			30,565			5,063			5,041			5,043
Life science:
Average occupancy percentage		90	%		90	%		89	%		91	%		87	%
Average annual rent per square foot(2)	$	45		$	44		$	44		$	43		$	37
Average occupied square feet(3)		6,250			6,076			5,740			5,554			5,362
Medical office:
Average occupancy percentage		91	%		91	%		91	%		91	%		90	%
Average annual rent per square foot(2)	$	27		$	26		$	26		$	26		$	25
Average occupied square feet(3)		12,295			11,865			11,583			11,577			11,719
Hospital(1):
Average annual rent per bed(2)	$	34,236		$	33,499		$	32,710		$	29,825		$	33,357
Average capacity (beds)(3)		2,410			2,410			2,399			2,376			2,392

(1)

Senior housing includes average units of 5,008 and 1,672 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are in a RIDEA structure in which resident occupancy impacts our annual revenue. The average resident occupancy for these units was 86% and 88% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. All other senior housing, post-acute/skilled nursing and hospital facilities are generally leased to single tenants under triple-net lease structures for each of the periods reported, for which these facilities were or approximately 100% leased.

(2)

Average annual rent per unit/square feet is presented as a ratio of revenues comprised of rental and related revenues, tenant recoveries and income from direct financing leases divided by the average capacity or average occupied square feet of the facilities and annualized for mergers and acquisitions for the year in which they occurred. Average annual rent for leased properties (including DFLs) exclude termination fees and non-cash revenue adjustments (i.e., straight-line rents, amortization of above and below market lease intangibles and DFL interest accretion). Average annual rent for operating properties operated under a RIDEA structure is calculated based on NOI divided by the average capacity of the facilities.

(3)

Capacity for senior housing facilities is measured in units (e.g., studio, one or two bedroom units). Capacity for post-acute/skilled nursing and hospitals is measured in licensed bed count. Capacity for life science facilities and MOBs is measured in square feet. Average capacity for senior housing, post-acute/skilled nursing and hospitals is as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and one quarter in arrears from the periods presented.

29

Development Properties

        The following table sets forth the properties owned by us in our life science, medical office and hospital segments as of December 31, 2012 that are currently under development or redevelopment (dollars in thousands):

Name of Project	Location	Estimated/ Actual Completion Date(1)		Total Investment To Date(2)		Estimated Total Investment
Life science:
2019 Stierlin Ct	Mountain View, CA		1Q 2013	$	17,860	$	21,298
Durham Research Lab	Durham, NC		3Q 2013		13,068		25,851
Carmichael(3)	Durham, NC		3Q 2013		3,737		16,397
1030 Massachusetts Avenue	Cambridge, MA		2Q 2014		35,833		39,992
Ridgeview	Poway, CA		2Q 2014		11,430		22,937
Medical office:
Westpark Plaza(4)	Plano, TX		2Q 2013		10,537		13,585
Innovation Drive	San Diego, CA		4Q 2013		29,327		33,689
Alaska(4)	Anchorage, AK		4Q 2013		8,553		11,763
Folsom	Sacramento, CA		2Q 2014		33,360		39,251
Hospital:
Fresno(5)	Fresno, CA		1Q 2013		14,708		21,324
				$	178,413	$	246,087

(1)

For development projects, management's estimate of the date the core and shell structure improvements are expected to be completed. For redevelopment projects, management's estimate of the time in which major construction activity in relation to the scope of the project has been substantially completed. There are no assurances that any of these projects will be completed on schedule or within estimated amounts.

(2)

Investment-to-date of $178 million includes the following: (i) $81 million in development costs and construction in progress, (ii) $71 million of buildings and (iii) $26 million of land. Development costs and construction in progress of $237 million presented on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2012, includes the following: (i) $81 million of costs for development projects in process noted above; (ii) $102 million of costs for land held for development; and (iii) $54 million for tenant and other facility related improvement projects in process.

(3)

Represents approximately 33% of the Carmichael facility in redevelopment. The balance of the facility remains in operations.

(4)

Represents approximately 70% and 50% of the Westpark Plaza and Alaska MOBs, respectively. The balance of the MOBs were placed in service during 2012.

(5)

Represents approximately 25% of the Fresno hospital placed in redevelopment in March 2011. The balance of the hospital remains in operations.

30

Tenant Lease Expirations

        The following table shows tenant lease expirations, including those related to direct financing leases ("DFLs"), for the next 10 years and thereafter at our leased properties, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options, see "Tenant Purchase Options" section of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on leases subject to purchase options (dollars in thousands):

			Expiration Year
Segment	Total		2013(1)		2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter
Senior housing(2):
Properties		420		—		5		1		15		11		47		10		35		16		3		277
Base rent(3)	$	525,368	$	—	$	5,091	$	209	$	23,003	$	19,106	$	89,796	$	14,486	$	55,314	$	17,724	$	2,938	$	297,701
% of segment base rent		100		—		1		—		4		4		17		3		10		3		1		57
Post-acute/skilled:
Properties		312		—		9		1		1		9		2		12		5		—		4		269
Base rent(3)	$	466,770	$	—	$	7,197	$	450	$	320	$	8,607	$	1,111	$	10,403	$	5,352	$	—	$	3,086	$	430,244
% of segment base rent		100		—		2		—		—		2		—		2		1		—		1		92
Life science:
Square feet		6,392		410		355		691		259		819		601		121		936		557		280		1,363
Base rent(3)	$	232,608	$	10,174	$	10,696	$	23,452	$	6,812	$	27,494	$	25,768	$	4,147	$	42,291	$	31,619	$	8,391	$	41,764
% of segment base rent		100		4		5		10		3		12		11		2		18		13		4		18
Medical office:
Square feet		13,131		2,385		1,783		1,589		1,309		1,568		1,187		851		895		394		538		632
Base rent(3)	$	287,621	$	50,131	$	40,661	$	35,744	$	27,261	$	34,789	$	24,057	$	18,450	$	20,837	$	9,472	$	12,151	$	14,068
% of segment base rent		100		18		14		13		10		12		8		6		7		3		4		5
Hospital:
Properties		17		1		3		—		—		2		—		5		—		1		1		4
Base rent(3)	$	67,699	$	2,611	$	16,018	$	—	$	—	$	4,776	$	—	$	7,113	$	—	$	825	$	3,575	$	32,781
% of segment base rent		100		4		24		—		—		7		—		11		—		1		5		48
Total:
Base rent(3)	$	1,580,066	$	62,916	$	79,663	$	59,855	$	57,396	$	94,772	$	140,732	$	54,599	$	123,794	$	59,640	$	30,141	$	816,558
% of total base rent		100		4		5		4		4		6		9		3		8		4		2		51

(1)

Includes month-to-month leases.

(2)

Excludes 21 facilities with annualized NOI of $49.6 million operated under a RIDEA structure.

(3)

The most recent month's (or subsequent month's if acquired in the most recent month) base rent including additional rent floors, cash income from direct financing leases annualized for 12 months. Base rent does not include tenant recoveries, additional rents in excess of floors and non-cash revenue adjustments (i.e., straight-line rents, amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, DFL interest accretion and deferred revenues).

31

        The following is a graphical presentation of our total tenant lease expirations (as presented above) for the next 10 years and thereafter at our leased properties, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options (dollars in millions):

Total Lease Expirations Graph

        We specifically incorporate by reference into this section the information set forth in Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, included in this report.

ITEM 3.    Legal Proceedings

        We are involved from time-to-time in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including, but not limited to commercial disputes, environmental matters, and litigation in connection with transactions including acquisitions and divestitures. We believe that such existing legal proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position or our results of operations. We record a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

        See litigation matter under the heading "Legal Proceedings" of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding legal proceedings, which information is incorporated by reference in this Item 3.

ITEM 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures

        None.

32

PART II

ITEM 5.    Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Set forth below for the fiscal quarters indicated are the reported high and low sales prices per share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.

	2012				2011				2010
	High		Low		High		Low		High		Low
First Quarter	$	42.75	$	38.72	$	38.29	$	35.81	$	34.37	$	26.70
Second Quarter		44.15		37.81		40.75		35.00		34.50		28.53
Third Quarter		47.75		43.59		38.23		28.76		38.05		31.08
Fourth Quarter		46.15		43.31		41.98		32.66		37.65		31.87

        At February 1, 2013, we had approximately 11,298 stockholders of record and there were approximately 188,236 beneficial holders of our common stock.

        It has been our policy to declare quarterly dividends to the common stockholders so as to comply with applicable provisions of the Code governing REITs. The cash dividends per share paid on common stock are set forth below:

	2012		2011		2010
First Quarter	$	0.50	$	0.48	$	0.465
Second Quarter		0.50		0.48		0.465
Third Quarter		0.50		0.48		0.465
Fourth Quarter		0.50		0.48		0.465
Total	$	2.00	$	1.92	$	1.86

        On January 25, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.525 per share. The common stock dividend will be paid on February 19, 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 4, 2013.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

        On December 11, 2012, we issued 194,374 shares of our common stock upon the redemption of 194,374 non-managing member units of our subsidiary, HCP DR Alabama, LLC ("HCP Alabama"), to a non-managing member of HCP Alabama. On December 18, 2012, we issued 540 shares of our common stock upon the redemption of 270 non-managing member units of our subsidiary, HCPI/Utah II, LLC ("Utah II"), to four transferees of a non-managing member of Utah II. In each case, the shares of our common stock were issued in a private placement to an accredited investor pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We did not receive any cash proceeds from the issuance of shares of our common stock upon redemption of the non-managing member units of HCP Alabama or Utah II, although we did acquire non-managing member units of each subsidiary in exchange for the shares of common stock we issued upon redemption of the units.

33

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of our common stock made by or on our behalf during the quarter ended December 31, 2012.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period Covered	Total Number Of Shares Purchased(1)		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number Of Shares Purchased As Part Of Publicly Announced Plans Or Programs		Maximum Number (Or Approximate Dollar Value) Of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Plans Or Programs
November 1-30, 2012		233	$	44.01		—		—
December 1-31, 2012		165,038		45.16		—		—
Total		165,271		45.16		—		—

(1)

Represents restricted shares withheld under our 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (the "2006 Incentive Plan"), to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting of restricted shares. Our 2006 Incentive Plan provides that the value of the shares withheld shall be the closing price of our common stock on the date the relevant transaction occurs.

Stock Price Performance Graph

        The graph below compares the cumulative total return of HCP, the S&P 500 Index and the Equity REIT Index of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT"), from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2012. Total return assumes quarterly reinvestment of dividends before consideration of income taxes.

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

AMONG S&P 500, EQUITY REITS AND HCP, Inc.

RATE OF RETURN TREND COMPARISON

JANUARY 1, 2008–DECEMBER 31, 2012

(JANUARY 1, 2008 = 100)

Stock Price Performance Graph Total Return

Assumes $100 invested January 1, 2008 in HCP, S&P 500 Index and NAREIT Equity REIT Index.

34

ITEM 6.    Selected Financial Data

        Set forth below is our selected financial data as of and for each of the years in the five year period ended December 31, 2012.

	Year Ended December 31,(1)(2)
	2012		2011(3)		2010		2009(3)		2008
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Income statement data:
Total revenues	$	1,900,722	$	1,712,096	$	1,240,206	$	1,133,618	$	1,123,977
Income from continuing operations		812,884		547,338		315,346		97,732		223,019
Net income applicable to common shares		812,289		515,302		307,498		109,069		425,368
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares:
Basic earnings per common share		1.83		1.28		0.91		0.22		0.75
Diluted earnings per common share		1.83		1.28		0.91		0.22		0.75
Net income applicable to common shares:
Basic earnings per common share		1.90		1.29		1.01		0.40		1.79
Diluted earnings per common share		1.90		1.29		1.00		0.40		1.79
Balance sheet data:
Total assets		19,915,555		17,408,475		13,331,923		12,209,735		11,849,826
Debt obligations(4)		8,693,820		7,722,619		4,646,345		5,656,143		5,937,456
Total equity		10,753,777		9,220,622		8,146,047		5,958,609		5,407,840
Other data:
Dividends paid		865,306		787,689		590,735		517,072		457,643
Dividends paid per common share		2.00		1.92		1.86		1.84		1.82

(1)

Reclassification, presentation and certain computational changes have been made for the results of properties sold or held-for-sale reclassified to discontinued operations.

(2)

The following are acquisitions that had a meaningful impact on our financial position and results of operations in the years in which they closed and thereafter:

•

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired 129 senior housing communities from the Blackstone JV.

•

On June 28, 2012, we made an investment in senior unsecured notes as part of Terra Firma's acquisition of Four Seasons Health Care.

•

On April 7, 2011, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of the real estate assets of HCR ManorCare, which includes the settlement of our HCR ManorCare debt investments discussed below.

•

On January 14, 2011, we acquired our partner's 65% interest in HCP Ventures II, a joint venture that owned 25 senior housing facilities, becoming the sole owner of the portfolio.

•

On August 3, 2009, we purchased a participation in the first mortgage debt of HCR ManorCare.

(3)

On November 9, 2011, we entered into an agreement with Ventas, Inc. ("Ventas") to settle all remaining claims relating to Ventas's litigation against HCP arising out of Ventas's 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living REIT. We paid $125 million to Ventas, which was recorded as litigation settlement expense for the year ended December 31, 2011. On September 4, 2009, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Ventas in an action brought against us. The jury awarded Ventas approximately $102 million in compensatory damages, which we recorded as a litigation provision expense during the year ended December 31, 2009.

(4)

Includes bank line of credit, bridge and term loans, senior unsecured notes, mortgage and other secured debt, and other debt.

35

ITEM 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

        Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical factual statements are "forward-looking statements." We intend to have our forward-looking statements covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with those provisions. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding our and our officers' intent, belief or expectations as identified by the use of words such as "may," "will," "project," "expect," "believe," "intend," "anticipate," "seek," "forecast," "plan," "estimate," "could," "would," "should" and other comparable and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. In addition, we, through our officers, from time to time, make forward-looking oral and written public statements concerning our expected future operations, strategies, securities offerings, growth and investment opportunities, dispositions, capital structure changes, budgets and other developments. Readers are cautioned that, while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith belief and reasonable assumptions based upon current information, we can give no assurance that our expectations or forecasts will be attained. Therefore, readers should be mindful that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. As more fully set forth in Part I, Item 1A., "Risk Factors" in this report, factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements include:

(a)

Changes in global, national and local economic conditions, including a prolonged period of weak economic growth;



(b)

Continued volatility in the capital markets, including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital;



(c)

Our ability to manage our indebtedness level and changes in the terms of such indebtedness;



(d)

The effect on healthcare providers of the automatic spending cuts enacted by Congress ("Sequestration") on entitlement programs, including Medicare, will, unless modified, result in future reductions in reimbursements.



(e)

The ability of our operators, tenants and borrowers to conduct their respective businesses in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase their revenues and to generate sufficient income to make rent and loan payments to us and our ability to recover investments made, if applicable, in their operations;



(f)

The financial weakness of some operators and tenants, including potential bankruptcies and downturns in their businesses, which results in uncertainties regarding our ability to continue to realize the full benefit of such operators' and/or tenants' leases;



(g)

Changes in federal, state or local laws and regulations, including those affecting the healthcare industry that affect our costs of compliance or increase the costs, or otherwise affect the operations of our operators, tenants and borrowers;



(h)

The potential impact of future litigation matters, including the possibility of larger than expected litigation costs, adverse results and related developments;



(i)

Competition for tenants and borrowers, including with respect to new leases and mortgages and the renewal or rollover of existing leases;



(j)

Our ability to negotiate the same or better terms with new tenants or operators if existing leases are not renewed or we exercise our right to replace an existing operator or tenant upon default;

36

(k)

Availability of suitable properties to acquire at favorable prices and the competition for the acquisition and financing of those properties;



(l)

The financial, legal, regulatory and reputational difficulties of significant operators of our properties;



(m)

The risk that we may not be able to achieve the benefits of investments within expected time-frames or at all, or within expected cost projections;



(n)

The ability to obtain financing necessary to consummate acquisitions on favorable terms;



(o)

The risks associated with our investments in joint ventures and unconsolidated entities, including our lack of sole decision making authority and our reliance on our joint venture partners' financial condition and continued cooperation; and



(p)

Changes in the credit ratings on U.S. government debt securities or default or delay in payment by the United States of its obligations.

        Except as required by law, we undertake no, and hereby disclaim any, obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, changed circumstances or otherwise.

        The information set forth in this Item 7 is intended to provide readers with an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. We will discuss and provide our analysis in the following order:

•

Executive Summary

•

2012 Transaction Overview

•

Dividends

•

Critical Accounting Policies

•

Results of Operations

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources

•

Non-GAAP Financial Measure—Funds from Operations

•

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

•

Contractual Obligations

•

Inflation

•

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Executive Summary

        We are a self-administered REIT that, together with our unconsolidated joint ventures, invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the U.S. We acquire, develop, lease, manage and dispose of healthcare real estate and provide financing to healthcare providers. At December 31, 2012, our portfolio of investments, including properties owned by our Investment Management Platform, consisted of interests in 1,160 facilities.

        Our business strategy is based on three principles: (i) opportunistic investing, (ii) portfolio diversification, and (iii) conservative financing. We actively redeploy capital from investments with lower return potential or shorter investment horizons into assets representing longer term investments with attractive risk adjusted return potential. We make investments where the expected risk-adjusted

37

return exceeds our cost of capital and strive to capitalize on our operator, tenant and other business relationships to grow our business.

        Our strategy contemplates acquiring and developing properties on terms that are favorable to us. Generally, we prefer larger, more complex private transactions that leverage our management team's experience and our infrastructure. We follow a disciplined approach to enhancing the value of our existing portfolio, including ongoing evaluation of potential disposition of properties that no longer fit our strategy.

        We primarily generate revenue by leasing healthcare properties under long-term leases with fixed and/or inflation indexed escalators. Most of our rents and other earned income from leases are received under triple-net leases or leases that provide for substantial recovery of operating expenses; however, some of our medical office and life science leases are structured as gross or modified gross leases. Operating expenses are generally related to MOB and life science leased properties and senior housing properties managed on our behalf ("RIDEA properties"). Accordingly, for such MOBs, life science facilities and RIDEA properties, we incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities, employee costs for resident care and insurance. Our growth for these assets depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels; (ii) maximize tenant recoveries given underlying lease structures; and (iii) control operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions. At December 31, 2012, the contractual maturities in our portfolio of leased assets were 13% through 2015 (measured in dollars of expiring base rents).

        Access to capital markets impacts our cost of capital and ability to refinance maturing indebtedness, as well as to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities or secured debt. Access to external capital on favorable terms is critical to the success of our strategy.

2012 Transaction Overview

Investment Transactions

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, we completed $2.6 billion of investments as follows:

$1.7 Billion Senior Housing Portfolio Acquisition and $52 Million Secured Financing

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired 129 senior housing communities for $1.7 billion, from a joint venture between Emeritus and the Blackstone JV. Located in 29 states, the portfolio encompasses 10,077 units representing a diversified care mix of 61% assisted living, 25% independent living, 13% memory care and 1% skilled nursing. Based on current operating performance, the 129 communities consist of 95 that are stabilized and 34 that are currently in lease—up. The transaction closed in two stages: (i) 127 senior housing facilities on October 31, 2012 for $1.68 billion representing 9,842 units; and (ii) two senior housing facilities on December 4, 2012 for $24 million representing 235 units.

        Emeritus continues to operate the communities pursuant to a new triple-net, master lease for the 129 properties (the "Master Lease") guaranteed by Emeritus. The Master Lease provides aggregate contractual rent in the first year of $103.6 million. The contractual rent will increase annually by the greater of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") or 3.7% on average over the initial five years, and thereafter by the greater of CPI or 3.0% for the remaining initial lease term. At the beginning of the sixth lease year, rent on the 34 lease-up properties will increase to the greater of the percentage increase in CPI or fair market, subject to a floor of 103% and a cap of 130% of the prior year's rent.

38

        The leased properties are grouped into three pools that share comparable characteristics and these leased pools have initial terms of 14 to 16 years. Emeritus has two extension options, which, if exercised, will provide for lease terms of 30 to 35 years. We are still evaluating the acquisition of up to four additional communities related to this transaction.

        Concurrent with the acquisition, Emeritus purchased nine communities from the Blackstone JV, for which we have provided secured debt financing of $52 million with a four-year term. The loan is secured by the underlying real estate and is prepayable at Emeritus' option. The interest rate on the loan mirrors the 6.1% lease yield, including the annual increases through maturity.

$853 Million of Additional Investment Transactions

        On August 7, 2012, we completed the acquisition of eight on-campus MOBs for $80 million from Scottsdale Healthcare. Located in Scottsdale, Arizona, the portfolio represents 398,000 square feet with an occupancy of 89% at closing.

        Between July and October 2012, we acquired 12 MOBs from The Boyer Company valued at $188 million, including DownREIT units and debt valued at $43 million and $60 million, respectively; the MOBs are primarily located on the campuses of HCA, Iasis Healthcare and Community Health Systems and comprise 758,000 square feet with an occupancy of 88% at closing. The transaction closed in three stages: (i) six MOBs on July 31, 2012 for $77 million representing 327,000 square feet; (ii) four MOBs on August 15, 2012 for $49 million representing 199,000 square feet and; (iii) two MOBs on October 19, 2012 for $62 million representing 232,000 square feet.

        On July 31, 2012, we closed a mezzanine loan facility to lend up to $205 million to Tandem Health Care ("Tandem"), an affiliate of Formation Capital, as part of the recapitalization of a post-acute/skilled nursing portfolio. We funded $100 million (the "First Tranche") at closing and have a commitment to fund an additional $105 million (the "Second Tranche") between February 2013 and August 2013. The Second Tranche will be used to repay debt senior to our loan. At closing, the loan was subordinate to $400 million in senior mortgage debt and $137 million in senior mezzanine debt. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12% and 14% per annum for the First and Second Tranches, respectively. Including fees received at closing, the loan has a blended yield to maturity of approximately 13% assuming both tranches are funded. The facility has a total term of up to 63 months from the initial closing and is prepayable at the borrower's option.

        On June 28, 2012, we made an investment in senior unsecured notes with an aggregate par value of £138.5 million at a discount for £136.8 million, as part of the financing for Terra Firma's £825 million acquisition of Four Seasons Health Care ("Four Seasons"), the largest elderly and specialist care provider in the United Kingdom with 445 care homes and 61 specialist care centers. The notes mature in June 2020 and are non-callable until June 2016. The notes bear interest on their par value at a fixed rate of 12.25% per annum, with an original discount resulting in a yield to maturity of 12.5%. Terra Firma, a leading European private equity firm, provided £345 million in equity financing, resulting in a loan-to-capitalization of 62% for the Four Seasons notes. The £136.8 million for this investment is match funded by an equivalent GBP denominated unsecured term loan discussed below.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, we made other investments of $270 million as follows: (i) acquisition of a MOB for $13 million; (ii) acquisition of a life science facility for $8 million; (iii) acquisition of a senior housing facility for $4 million; (iv) acquisition of a parcel of land adjacent to one of our hospitals for $3 million; and (v) funding of development and other capital projects of $242 million, primarily in our life science, senior housing and medical office segments.

39

Other Transactions

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold two senior housing facilities for $111 million, a parcel of land in our life science segment for $18 million, a skilled nursing facility for $15 million and a MOB for $7 million.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, we expanded our tenant relationship with General Atomics in Poway, CA to a total of 396,000 square feet, consisting of the following: (i) a lease extension of 281,000 square feet through June 2024, and (ii) a new 10-year lease (expected to commence mid-2014) for a 115,000 square feet build-to-suit development. As part of this transaction, General Atomics purchased a 19-acre land parcel from us for $18 million; in connection with the agreement to sell the land parcel, we incurred a $7.9 million impairment charge.

Financings

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, we raised $3.5 billion of capital in the equity and credit markets as follows:

        In connection with funding the $1.7 billion Senior Housing Portfolio acquisition, we completed the following capital market transactions:

•

On November 19, 2012, we issued $800 million of 2.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2020. The notes were priced at 99.729% of the principal amount with an effective yield to maturity of 2.667%. Net proceeds from this offering were $793 million.

•

On October 19, 2012, we completed a public offering of 22 million shares of common stock and received net proceeds of $979 million.

        On July 30, 2012, in connection with our Four Seasons senior unsecured notes investment, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a £137 million four-year unsecured term loan (the "Term Loan") that accrues interest at a rate of GBP London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 1.20%, based on our current debt ratings. Concurrent with the closing of the Term Loan, we entered into a four-year interest rate swap agreement that fixes the rate of the Term Loan at 1.81%, subject to adjustments based on our credit ratings. The Term Loan contains a one-year committed extension option and similar covenants to those in our unsecured revolving line of credit facility.

        On July 23, 2012, we issued $300 million of 3.15% senior unsecured notes due in 2022. The notes were priced at 98.888% of the principal amount with an effective yield to maturity of 3.28%. Net proceeds from this offering were $294 million.

        In June 2012, we completed a $376 million offering of 8.97 million shares of common stock at $41.88 per share with the proceeds used primarily to repay $250 million of 6.45% senior unsecured notes at maturity on June 25, 2012.

        On March 27, 2012, we completed an amendment to our existing $1.5 billion unsecured revolving line of credit facility. We improved the pricing and extended the maturity of the facility one additional year to March 2016. Based on our current credit ratings, the amended facility bears interest annually at one-month LIBOR plus 1.075% and has a facility fee of 0.175%, which in the aggregate represents a 55 basis point reduction to our funded interest cost.

        On March 22, 2012, we announced the redemption of the 4.0 million shares of 7.25% Series E and 7.82 million shares of 7.10% Series F preferred stock at a price of $25.00 per share, or $295.5 million in aggregate, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends to April 23, 2012 (the redemption date). As a result of the redemption, we incurred a charge of $10.4 million related to the original issuance costs of the

40

preferred stock (this charge is presented as an additional preferred stock dividend in our consolidated statements of income).

        On March 22, 2012, we priced a $359 million offering of 9.0 million shares of common stock at $39.93 per share with the proceeds used primarily to redeem all outstanding shares of our preferred stock.

        On January 23, 2012, we issued $450 million of 3.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2019; net proceeds from the offering were $444 million.

Dividends

        Quarterly dividends paid during 2012 aggregated $2.00 per share, which represents a 4.2% increase from 2011. On January 25, 2013, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.525 per share, which represents a 5% increase. The common stock dividend will be paid on February 19, 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 4, 2013. Based on the first quarter's dividend, the annualized rate of distribution for 2013 is $2.10, compared with $2.00 in 2012.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires our management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base estimates on the best information available to us at the time, our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in a different presentation of our consolidated financial statements. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. For a more detailed discussion of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Below is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HCP, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiaries and joint ventures that we control, through voting rights or other means. We consolidate investments in variable interest entities ("VIEs") when we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE at: (i) the inception of the variable interest entity, (ii) as a result of a change in circumstance identified during our continuous review of our VIE relationships or (iii) upon the occurrence of a qualifying reconsideration event.

        We make judgments with respect to our level of influence or control of an entity and whether we are (or are not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors includes, but is not limited to, our ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, our form of ownership interest, our representation on the entity's governing body, the size and seniority of our investment, our ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions, replace the manager and/or liquidate the entity, if applicable. Our ability to correctly assess our influence or control over an entity when determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE

41

affects the presentation of these entities in our consolidated financial statements. If we perform a primary beneficiary analysis at a date other than at inception of the variable interest entity, our assumptions may be different and may result in the identification of a different primary beneficiary.

        If we determine that we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, our consolidated financial statements would include the operating results of the VIE (either tenant or borrower) rather than the results of the variable interest in the VIE. We would depend on the VIE to provide us timely financial information and rely on the internal control of the VIE to provide accurate financial information. If the VIE has deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting, or does not provide us with timely financial information, this may adversely impact the quality and/or timing of our financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting.

Revenue Recognition

        We recognize rental revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectibility is reasonably assured and the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. For assets acquired subject to leases, we recognize revenue upon acquisition of the asset provided the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, we determine whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or us. When we are the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. The determination of ownership of the tenant improvements is subject to significant judgment. If our assessment of the owner of the tenant improvements for accounting purposes were to change, the timing and amount of our revenue recognized would be impacted.

        Certain leases provide for additional rents contingent upon a percentage of the facility's revenue in excess of specified base amounts or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized when actual results reported by the tenant, or estimates of tenant results, exceed the base amount or other thresholds. The recognition of additional rents requires us to make estimates of amounts owed and to a certain extent are dependent on the accuracy of the facility results reported to us. Our estimates may differ from actual results, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

        We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants and operators on an ongoing basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For straight-line rent amounts, our assessment is based on income recoverable over the term of the lease. We exercise judgment in establishing allowances and consider payment history and current credit status in developing these estimates. These estimates may differ from actual results, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

        Loans receivable are classified as held-for-investment based on management's intent and ability to hold the loans for the foreseeable future or to maturity. We recognize interest income on loans, including the amortization of discounts and premiums, using the interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis when collectibility of the future payments is reasonably assured. Premiums, discounts and related costs are recognized as yield adjustments over the life of the related loans.

        We use the direct finance method of accounting to record income from DFLs. For leases accounted for as DFLs, future minimum lease payments are recorded as a receivable. The difference between the future minimum lease payments and the estimated residual values less the cost of the

42

properties is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms to provide a constant yield when collectibility of the lease payments is reasonably assured. Investments in DFLs are presented net of unamortized unearned income. The determination of estimated useful lives and residual values are subject to significant judgment. If our assessments for accounting purposes were to change, the timing and amount of our revenue recognized would be impacted.

        Loans and DFLs are placed on non-accrual status at such time as management determines that collectibility of contractual amounts is not reasonably assured. While on non-accrual status, loans or DFLs are either accounted for on a cash basis, in which income is recognized only upon receipt of cash, or on a cost-recovery basis, in which all cash receipts reduce the carrying value of the loan or DFL, based on management's judgment of collectibility.

        Allowances are established for loans and DFLs based upon a probable loss estimate for individual loans and DFLs deemed to be impaired. Loans and DFLs are impaired when it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due on a timely basis in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan or lease. Determining the adequacy of the allowance is complex and requires significant judgment by us about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The allowance is based upon our assessment of the borrower's or lessee's overall financial condition, resources and payment record; the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors; and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. These estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's or DFL's effective interest rate, the fair value of collateral, general economic conditions and trends, historical and industry loss experience, and other relevant factors. While our assumptions are based in part upon historical data, our estimates may differ from actual results, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate

        We make estimates as part of our allocation of the purchase price of acquisitions to the various components of the acquisition based upon the relative fair value of each component. The most significant components of our allocations are typically the allocation of fair value to the buildings as-if-vacant, land and in-place leases. In the case of the fair value of buildings and the allocation of value to land and other intangibles, our estimates of the values of these components will affect the amount of depreciation and amortization we record over the estimated useful life of the property acquired or the remaining lease term. In the case of the value of in-place leases, we make our best estimates based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Our assumptions affect the amount of future revenue that we will recognize over the remaining lease term for the acquired in-place leases.

        A variety of costs are incurred in the development and leasing of properties. After determination is made to capitalize a cost, it is allocated to the specific component of a project that is benefited. Determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease involves a degree of judgment. The costs of land and buildings under development include specifically identifiable costs. The capitalized costs include pre-construction costs essential to the development of the property, development costs, construction costs, interest costs, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during the period of development. We consider a construction project as substantially completed and held available for occupancy and cease capitalization of costs upon the completion of the related tenant improvements.

43

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

        We assess the carrying value of our real estate assets and related intangibles ("real estate assets"), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of real estate assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset or asset group to the respective estimated future undiscounted cash flows. In order to review our real estate assets for recoverability, we consider market conditions, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party appraisals, where considered necessary. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the real estate asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the real estate asset.

        Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. If it is determined, based on certain qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we apply the two-step approach. Certain qualitative factors assessed by us include current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets and the overall financial and operating performance of HCP. If we qualitatively determine that it is more likely than not the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount the two-step approach is necessary.

        If the fair value of a reporting unit containing goodwill is less than its carrying value, then the second step of the test is needed to measure the amount of potential goodwill impairment. The second step requires the fair value of a reporting unit to be allocated to all the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. We estimate the current fair value of the assets and liabilities in the reporting unit through various valuation techniques, including applying capitalization rates to segment net operating income, quoted market values and third-party appraisals, as necessary. The fair value of the reporting unit may also include an allocation of an enterprise value premium that we estimate a third party would be willing to pay for the company.

        The determination of the fair value of real estate assets and goodwill involves significant judgment. This judgment is based on our analysis and estimates of fair value of real estate assets and reporting units, and the future operating results and resulting cash flows of each real estate asset whose carrying amount may not be recoverable. Our ability to accurately predict future operating results and cash flows and estimate and allocate fair values impacts the timing and recognition of impairments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

        Investments in entities which we do not consolidate but have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are reported under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the investee's earnings or losses is included in our consolidated results of operations.

        The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is based on the amount paid to purchase the joint venture interest or the carrying value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the joint venture. We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the fair value of the equity method investment to our carrying value. If we determine a decline in the fair value of our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture is below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded. The determination of the fair value and as to whether a deficiency in fair value is "other-than-temporary" of investments in unconsolidated joint

44

ventures involves significant judgment. Our estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at market rates, general economic conditions and trends, severity and duration of the fair value deficiency, and other relevant factors. Capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads utilized in our valuation models are based upon rates that we believe to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments. While we believe our assumptions are reasonable, changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on our financial results.

Income Taxes

        As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to evaluate our compliance with REIT requirements. Our determinations are based on interpretation of tax laws, and our conclusions may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments to income tax expense may be required as a result of: (i) audits conducted by federal, state and local tax authorities, (ii) our ability to qualify as a REIT, (iii) the potential for built-in-gain recognized related to prior-tax-free acquisitions of C corporations, and (iv) changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within the income tax provision.

Results of Operations

        We evaluate our business and allocate resources among our five business segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) post-acute/skilled nursing, (iii) life science, (iv) medical office and (v) hospital. Under the senior housing, life science, post-acute/skilled nursing and hospital segments, we invest or co-invest primarily in single operator or tenant properties, through the acquisition and development of real estate, management of operations and by debt issued by operators in these sectors. Under the medical office segment, we invest or co-invest through the acquisition and development of MOBs that are leased under gross, modified gross or triple-net leases, generally to multiple tenants, and which generally require a greater level of property management. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

        We use net operating income ("NOI") and adjusted NOI to assess and compare property level performance, including our same property portfolio ("SPP"), and to make decisions about resource allocations. We believe these measures provide investors relevant and useful information because they reflect only income and operating expense items that are incurred at the property level and present them on an unleveraged basis. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income as defined by GAAP since NOI excludes certain components from net income. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other REITs, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment information and the relevant reconciliations from net income to NOI and adjusted NOI.

        Operating expenses are generally related to MOB and life science leased properties and senior housing properties managed on our behalf (RIDEA properties). We generally recover all or a portion of MOB and life science expenses from the tenants (tenant recoveries). The presentation of expenses as operating or general and administrative is based on the underlying nature of the expense. Periodically, we review the classification of expenses between categories and make revisions based on changes in the underlying nature of the expenses.

        Our evaluation of results of operations by each business segment includes an analysis of our SPP and our total property portfolio. SPP information allows us to evaluate the performance of our leased property portfolio under a consistent population by eliminating changes in the composition of our portfolio of properties. We identify our SPP as stabilized properties that remained in operations and

45

were consistently reported as leased properties or RIDEA properties for the duration of the year-over-year comparison periods presented. Accordingly, it takes a stabilized property a minimum of 12 months in operations under a consistent reporting structure to be included in our SPP. Newly acquired operating assets are generally considered stabilized at the earlier of lease-up (typically when the tenant(s) controls the physical use of at least 80% of the space) or 12 months from the acquisition date. Newly completed developments, including redevelopments, are considered stabilized at the earlier of lease-up or 24 months from the date the property is placed in service. SPP NOI excludes certain non-property specific operating expenses that are allocated to each operating segment on a consolidated basis.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2012 to the Year Ended December 31, 2011

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired 129 senior housing communities from the Blackstone JV (see additional information in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The transaction closed in two stages: (i) 127 senior housing facilities on October 31, 2012; and (ii) two senior housing facilities on December 4, 2012. The results of operations from the acquisitions are reflected in our consolidated financial statements from those respective dates.

        On April 7, 2011, we completed our acquisition of substantially all of HCR ManorCare's real estate assets; additionally, we purchased a noncontrolling equity interest in the operations of HCR ManorCare. On January 14, 2011, we acquired our partner's 65% interest in HCP Ventures II that resulted in the consolidation of HCP Ventures II. On September 1, 2011, we entered into management contracts with Brookdale with respect to 21 senior living communities (these 21 communities were acquired in January 2011 as part of our purchase of HCP Ventures II). These 21 communities are now in a RIDEA structure are managed by Brookdale, the respective resident level revenues and related operating expenses are reported in our consolidated financial statements. See additional information regarding the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, HCP Ventures II purchase and the Brookdale RIDEA transaction in Notes 3, 8 and 12, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The results of operations from our HCR ManorCare, HCP Ventures II and 21 properties managed under a RIDEA structure are reflected in our financial statements from those respective dates.

Segment NOI and Adjusted NOI

        The tables below provide selected operating information for our SPP and total property portfolio for each of our five business segments. Our consolidated SPP consists of 565 properties representing properties acquired or placed in service and stabilized on or prior to January 1, 2011 and that remained in operations under a consistent reporting structure through December 31, 2012. Our consolidated total property portfolio represents 1,086 and 932 properties at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and excludes properties classified as discontinued operations.

46

Senior Housing

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands except per unit data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Rental revenues(1)	$	380,413		$	378,553		$	1,860		$	482,336		$	470,592		$	11,744
Resident fees and services		1,054			3,542			(2,488	)		143,745			50,619			93,126
Total revenues	$	381,467		$	382,095		$	(628	)	$	626,081		$	521,211		$	104,870
Operating expenses		(613	)		(1,052	)		439			(94,662	)		(34,538	)		(60,124	)
NOI	$	380,854		$	381,043		$	(189	)	$	531,419		$	486,673		$	44,746
Straight-line rents		(24,740	)		(34,579	)		9,839			(30,415	)		(34,911	)		4,496
DFL accretion		(6,863	)		(9,052	)		2,189			(18,812	)		(17,918	)		(894	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(1,569	)		(1,569	)		—			(1,320	)		(1,466	)		146
Lease termination fees		—			—			—			—			1,350			(1,350	)
Adjusted NOI	$	347,682		$	335,843		$	11,839		$	480,872		$	433,728		$	47,144
Adjusted NOI % change								3.5	%
Property count(2)		221			221						441			312
Average capacity (units)(3)		25,081			25,056						37,089			33,911
Average annual rent per unit(4)	$	13,887		$	13,446					$	13,059		$	12,887

(1)

Represents rental and related revenues and income from DFLs.

(2)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2011, we removed two senior housing properties from SPP that were sold or classified as held for sale.

(3)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented.

(4)

Average annual rent per unit for operating properties under a RIDEA structure is based on NOI.

        SPP Adjusted NOI.    SPP adjusted NOI improved primarily as a result of annual rent escalations and an increase in rental revenues from properties that were previously transitioned from Sunrise to other operators, partially offset by a decrease in additional rents.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Including the impact of our SPP, our total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily increased as a result of 66 senior housing leased properties classified as DFLs that were acquired on April 7, 2011 from HCR ManorCare and 127 senior housing communities acquired on October 31, 2012 and two senior housing communities acquired on December 4, 2012 from the Blackstone JV (see Notes 3, 4 and 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, the Blackstone JV acquisition and Net Investments in DFLs, respectively).

        Additionally, HCP Ventures II was consolidated on January 14, 2011 (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), resulting in us recognizing rental and related revenues for the 25 leased properties commencing on that date. On September 1, 2011, for 21 of these 25 properties, we entered into management contracts in a structure permitted by RIDEA (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), resulting in the termination of the properties' leases. For these 21 properties that are now in a RIDEA structure, the resident-level revenues and related operating expenses are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning on that date.

47

Post-Acute/Skilled Nursing

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands, except per bed data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Rental revenues(1)	$	37,387		$	36,745		$	642		$	539,242		$	397,554		$	141,688
Operating expenses		75			(180	)		255			(386	)		(585	)		199
NOI	$	37,462		$	36,565		$	897		$	538,856		$	396,969		$	141,887
Straight-line rents		(547	)		(967	)		420			(547	)		(968	)		421
DFL accretion		—			—			—			(75,428	)		(56,089	)		(19,339	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		—			—			—			46			34			12
Adjusted NOI	$	36,915		$	35,598		$	1,317		$	462,927		$	339,946		$	122,981
Adjusted NOI % change								3.7	%
Property count(2)		44			44						312			312
Average capacity (beds)(3)		5,031			5,061						39,856			30,565
Average annual rent per bed	$	7,323		$	7,069					$	11,624		$	11,140

(1)

Represents rental and related revenues and income from DFLs.

(2)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2011, we removed a post-acute/skilled nursing property from SPP that was sold or classified as held for sale.

(3)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented.

        SPP NOI and Adjusted NOI.    SPP NOI and adjusted NOI increased year-over-year primarily as a result of rent escalations.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Including the impact of our SPP, our total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily increased as a result of 268 post-acute/skilled nursing leased properties classified as DFLs that were acquired on April 7, 2011 from HCR ManorCare (see Notes 3 and 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the HCR ManorCare Acquisition and Net Investments in DFLs, respectively, and discussion regarding our share in the earnings of our 9.4% interest in HCR ManorCare below under the caption "Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures").

48

Life Science

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars and square feet in thousands, except per sq. ft. data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	243,469		$	244,401		$	(932	)	$	246,811		$	245,942		$	869
Tenant recoveries		42,164			41,882			282			42,853			42,209			644
Total revenues	$	285,633		$	286,283		$	(650	)	$	289,664		$	288,151		$	1,513
Operating expenses		(47,913	)		(49,123	)		1,210			(53,173	)		(52,796	)		(377	)
NOI	$	237,720		$	237,160		$	560		$	236,491		$	235,355		$	1,136
Straight-line rents		(8,590	)		(14,685	)		6,095			(9,730	)		(14,971	)		5,241
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		462			(1,066	)		1,528			411			(1,123	)		1,534
Lease termination fees		(175	)		(7,011	)		6,836			(175	)		(7,011	)		6,836
Adjusted NOI	$	229,417		$	214,398		$	15,019		$	226,997		$	212,250		$	14,747
Adjusted NOI % change								7.0	%
Property count		101			101						109			104
Average occupancy		91.4	%		90.5	%					89.6	%		89.6	%
Average occupied square feet		6,108			6,050						6,250			6,076
Average annual rent per occupied sq. ft.	$	45		$	44					$	45		$	44

        SPP and Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    NOI increased primarily as a result of lease expansions and extensions and a decline in non-reimbursable operating expenses, partially offset by a decline in lease termination fees. Adjusted NOI increased primarily as a result of a $4 million rent payment in connection with a February 2012 amendment to a lease, annual rent escalations, lease expansions and extensions, and a decline in non-reimbursable operating expenses.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, 978,000 square feet of new and renewal leases commenced at an average annual base rent of $21.71 per square foot compared to 776,000 square feet of expiring and terminated leases with an average annual base rent of $24.23 per square foot. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we acquired 77,000 square feet with an average annual base rent of $9.79 per square foot.

49

Medical Office

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars and square feet in thousands, except per sq. ft. data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	271,002		$	265,851		$	5,151		$	285,331		$	272,362		$	12,969
Tenant recoveries		45,509			46,186			(677	)		49,480			47,753			1,727
Total revenues	$	316,511		$	312,037		$	4,474		$	334,811		$	320,115		$	14,696
Operating expenses		(119,447	)		(118,894	)		(553	)		(132,264	)		(127,902	)		(4,362	)
NOI	$	197,064		$	193,143		$	3,921		$	202,547		$	192,213		$	10,334
Straight-line rents		(4,069	)		(5,473	)		1,404			(5,121	)		(5,691	)		570
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		358			384			(26	)		457			(130	)		587
Lease termination fees		(314	)		—			(314	)		(314	)		(212	)		(102	)
Adjusted NOI	$	193,039		$	188,054		$	4,985		$	197,569		$	186,180		$	11,389
Adjusted NOI % change								2.7	%
Property count(1)		183			183						207			187
Average occupancy		91.4	%		90.9	%					91.1	%		90.9	%
Average occupied square feet		11,642			11,556						12,295			11,865
Average annual rent per occupied sq. ft.	$	27		$	26					$	27		$	26

(1)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2011, we removed (i) a MOB that was sold or classified as held for sale; and (ii) three MOBs that were placed into redevelopment in 2012, which no longer meet our criteria for SPP as of the date they were placed into redevelopment.

        SPP NOI and Adjusted NOI.    SPP NOI and adjusted NOI increased year-over-year primarily as a result of rent escalations and an increase in medical office occupancy.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Including the impact of our SPP, our total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI increased primarily as a result of the additive effect of our MOB acquisitions during 2012.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, 2.2 million square feet of new and renewal leases commenced at an average annual base rent of $21.94 per square foot compared to 2.1 million square feet of expiring and terminated leases with an average annual base rent of $22.43 per square foot. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we acquired 1.1 million square feet with an average annual base rent of $22.19 per square foot.

50

Hospital

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands, except per bed data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	79,110		$	77,676		$	1,434		$	82,167		$	80,832		$	1,335
Tenant recoveries		2,327			2,297			30			2,326			2,296			30
Total revenues	$	81,437		$	79,973		$	1,464		$	84,493		$	83,128		$	1,365
Operating expenses		(3,506	)		(4,328	)		822			(3,513	)		(4,330	)		817
NOI	$	77,931		$	75,645		$	2,286		$	80,980		$	78,798		$	2,182
Straight-line rents		(534	)		(904	)		370			(1,114	)		(1,525	)		411
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(771	)		(771	)		—			(871	)		(871	)		—
Adjusted NOI	$	76,626		$	73,970		$	2,656		$	78,995		$	76,402		$	2,593
Adjusted NOI % change								3.6	%
Property count		16			16						17			17
Average capacity (beds)(1)		2,379			2,379						2,410			2,410
Average annual rent per bed	$	33,683		$	32,912					$	34,236		$	33,499

(1)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented. Certain operators in our hospital portfolio are not required under their respective leases to provide operational data.

        SPP and Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    NOI and adjusted NOI increased for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of rent escalations and the new leases that commenced in 2012 for two of our hospitals.

Other Income and Expense Items

        Interest income.    Interest income decreased $75 million to $25 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily the result of the following: (i) a decrease of $54 million in income earned from and due to the settlement of our HCR ManorCare debt investments in 2011 and (ii) a decrease of $43 million in income earned from and as a result of prepayment premiums and unamortized discounts recognized in April 2011 upon the early repayment of our loans to Genesis HealthCare. The decreases in interest income were partially offset by $19 million of interest earned from our loan and senior unsecured notes investments in 2012 (see Notes 7 and 10, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).

        Interest expense.    For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest expense increased $734,000 to $417 million. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $13 million resulting from our senior unsecured notes offerings, net of related maturities of certain senior unsecured notes during 2011 and 2012. The increase was offset by the $11 million write-off of unamortized loan fees related to a terminated bridge loan commitment in 2011 and a decrease resulting from the payoff of certain mortgage debt during 2011.

        Our exposure to expense fluctuations related to our variable rate indebtedness is substantially mitigated by our interest rate swap contracts. For a more detailed discussion of our interest rate risk, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 7A.

51

        The table below sets forth information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts (dollars in thousands):

	As of December 31,(1)
	2012			2011
Balance:
Fixed rate	$	8,606,075		$	7,166,349
Variable rate		40,385			502,919
Total	$	8,646,460		$	7,669,268
Percent of total debt:
Fixed rate		99.5	%		93.4	%
Variable rate		0.5			6.6
Total		100	%		100	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
Fixed rate		5.23	%		5.83	%
Variable rate		1.49	%		2.19	%
Total weighted average rate		5.22	%		5.59	%

(1)

Excludes $82 million and $88 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of other debt that represents non-interest bearing life care bonds and occupancy fee deposits at certain of our senior housing facilities, which have no scheduled maturities. At December 31, 2012, $86 million of variable-rate mortgages and £137 million ($223 million) term loan are presented as fixed-rate debt as the interest payments under such debt have been swapped (pay fixed and receive float). At December 31, 2011, $88 million of variable-rate mortgages are presented as fixed-rate debt as the interest payments under such debt have been swapped (pay fixed and receive float); the interest rates for swapped debt are presented at the swapped rates.

        Depreciation and amortization expense.    Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $8 million to $358 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily the result of additive effects of our acquisitions during 2011 and 2012.

        General and administrative expenses.    General and administrative expenses decreased $17 million to $79 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily due to an insurance recovery of $7 million during 2012 for previously incurred legal expenses and a decrease of $8 million in acquisition costs incurred during 2012 compared to similar costs incurred during 2011.

        Litigation settlement and provision.    On November 9, 2011, we entered into an agreement with Ventas to settle all remaining claims relating to Ventas's litigation against us arising out of Ventas's 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living REIT. As part of the settlement, we paid $125 million to Ventas, which resulted in a charge for the same amount (see the information set forth under the heading "Legal Proceedings" of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). No similar charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012.

        Impairments (recoveries).    During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized an impairment of $8 million as a result of the disposition of a life science land parcel (see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized an impairment of $15 million related to a senior secured term loan as a result of concluding that the carrying value of the loan was in excess of the fair value of the related collateral supporting the loan (see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).

        Other income, net.    For the year ended December 31, 2012, other income, net decreased $10 million to $3 million. The decrease was primarily the result of a gain of $8 million resulting from our acquisition of our partner's 65% interest in and consolidation of HCP Ventures II in January 2011

52

(see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) and $6 million received in connection with a litigation settlement in June 2011 that represents proceeds owed to us from a prior sale of assets. No similar gain upon consolidation was recognized or settlements were received during the year ended December 31, 2012. The decreases were partially offset by a $5 million charge during the year ended December 31, 2011 for an other-than-temporary impairment of marketable equity securities.

        Income taxes.    For the year ended December 31, 2012, income taxes decreased $3 million to a benefit of $2 million. The decrease in income taxes was primarily due to the tax benefit resulting from declines in taxable income of our TRS entities during the year ended December 31, 2012.

        Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures.    Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures is primarily the result of our 9.4% equity interest in HCR ManorCare. The October 2011 CMS reduction of skilled nursing reimbursements under Resource Utilization Group-Version 4 ("RUGs-IV"), together with changes in requirements for the delivery of group therapy services, reduced HCR ManorCare's revenues and increased its therapy costs in 2012. HCR ManorCare partially mitigated these adverse impacts through a cost reduction program. Further, HCR ManorCare experienced increased exposure to general and professional liability claims resulting in higher charges in 2012, which, together with the circumstances discussed above, reduced our share in the earnings from our equity interest in HCR ManorCare.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased $8 million to $54 million. This increase primarily was the result of the full-year share of earnings from our interest in HCR ManorCare, Inc. compared to a partial-year in 2011 (see Notes 3 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). The Company's share of earnings from HCR ManorCare (equity income) increases for the corresponding reduction of related lease expense recognized at the HCR ManorCare level.

        Discontinued operations.    Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $34 million, compared to $7 million for the comparable period in 2011. The increase is primarily due to an increase in gains on real estate dispositions of $28 million, partially offset by a decline in operating income from discontinued operations of $2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we sold real estate investments for $151 million, compared to $19 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2011 to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Segment NOI and Adjusted NOI

        The tables below provide selected operating information for our SPP and total property portfolio for each of our five business segments. Our consolidated SPP consists of 550 properties representing properties acquired or placed in service and stabilized on or prior to January 1, 2010 and that remained in operations under a consistent reporting structure through December 31, 2011. Our consolidated total property portfolio represents 932 and 566 properties at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and excludes properties classified as discontinued operations.

53

Senior Housing

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands except per unit data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Rental revenues(1)	$	364,029		$	329,926		$	34,103		$	470,592		$	337,220		$	133,372
Resident fees and services		3,542			32,596			(29,054	)		50,619			32,596			18,023
Total revenues	$	367,571		$	362,522		$	5,049		$	521,211		$	369,816		$	151,395
Operating expenses		(991	)		(26,474	)		25,483			(34,538	)		(28,773	)		(5,765	)
NOI	$	366,580		$	336,048		$	30,532		$	486,673		$	341,043		$	145,630
Straight-line rents		(32,612	)		(20,416	)		(12,196	)		(34,911	)		(21,746	)		(13,165	)
DFL accretion		(9,052	)		(10,641	)		1,589			(17,918	)		(10,641	)		(7,277	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(1,569	)		(1,974	)		405			(1,466	)		(1,974	)		508
Lease termination fees		—			—			—			1,350			—			1,350
Adjusted NOI	$	323,347		$	303,017		$	20,330		$	433,728		$	306,682		$	127,046
Adjusted NOI % change								6.7	%
Property count(2)		214			214						312			221
Average capacity (units)(3)		24,246			24,219						33,911			24,453
Average annual rent per unit(4)	$	13,377		$	13,605					$	12,887		$	12,656

(1)

Represents rental and related revenues and income from DFLs.

(2)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2010, we removed five senior housing properties from SPP that were sold or classified as held for sale.

(3)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented.

(4)

Average annual rent per unit for operating properties under a RIDEA structure is based on NOI.

        SPP NOI and Adjusted NOI.    SPP NOI increased primarily as a result of rent escalations related to new leases or leases not subject to straight-line rents. SPP NOI includes a decline in resident fees and services and operating expenses as a result of the consolidation of 27 properties in four variable interest entities from August 31, 2010 to November 1, 2010 (see Notes 12 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statement s for additional information regarding these VIEs). SPP adjusted NOI improved primarily as a result of annual rent escalations and an increase in rental revenues from properties transitioned from Sunrise to other operators.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Including the impact of our SPP, our total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI for the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily increased as a result of 66 senior housing leased properties classified as DFLs that were acquired on April 7, 2011 from HCR ManorCare.

        Additionally, HCP Ventures II was consolidated on January 14, 2011 (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), resulting in us recognizing rental and related revenues for the 25 leased properties commencing on that date. On September 1, 2011, for 21 of these 25 properties, we entered into management contracts in a structure permitted by RIDEA (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), resulting in the termination of the properties' leases. For these 21 properties that are now in a RIDEA structure, the

54

resident-level revenues and related operating expenses are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning on that date.

Post-Acute/Skilled Nursing

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands, except per bed data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Rental revenues(1)	$	36,745		$	36,023		$	722		$	397,554		$	36,023		$	361,531
Operating expenses		(180	)		(135	)		(45	)		(585	)		(176	)		(409	)
NOI	$	36,565		$	35,888		$	677		$	396,969		$	35,847		$	361,122
Straight-line rents		(967	)		(1,162	)		195			(968	)		(1,162	)		194
DFL accretion		—			—			—			(56,089	)		—			(56,089	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		—			—			—			34			—			34
Adjusted NOI	$	35,598		$	34,726		$	872		$	339,946		$	34,685		$	305,261
Adjusted NOI % change								2.5	%
Property count(2)		44			44						312			44
Average capacity (beds)(3)		5,061			5,063						30,565			5,063
Average annual rent per bed	$	7,069		$	6,885					$	11,140		$	6,885

(1)

Represents rental and related revenues and income from DFLs.

(2)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2010, we removed a post-acute/skilled nursing property from SPP that was sold or classified as held for sale.

(3)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Our total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI for the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily increased as a result of 268 post-acute/skilled nursing leased properties classified as DFLs that were acquired on April 7, 2011 from HCR ManorCare.

55

Life Science

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars and square feet in thousands, except per sq. ft. data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	236,996		$	235,675		$	1,321		$	245,942		$	237,160		$	8,782
Tenant recoveries		39,671			39,375			296			42,209			39,602			2,607
Total revenues	$	276,667		$	275,050		$	1,617		$	288,151		$	276,762		$	11,389
Operating expenses		(45,570	)		(45,613	)		43			(52,796	)		(48,492	)		(4,304	)
NOI	$	231,097		$	229,437		$	1,660		$	235,355		$	228,270		$	7,085
Straight-line rents		(14,430	)		(15,395	)		965			(14,971	)		(15,673	)		702
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(1,053	)		(394	)		(659	)		(1,123	)		(392	)		(731	)
Lease termination fees		(7,011	)		(7,267	)		256			(7,011	)		(7,267	)		256
Adjusted NOI	$	208,603		$	206,381		$	2,222		$	212,250		$	204,938		$	7,312
Adjusted NOI % change								1.1	%
Property count		95			95						104			98
Average occupancy		92.2	%		90.0	%					89.6	%		89.0	%
Average occupied square feet		5,825			5,687						6,076			5,740
Average annual rent per occupied sq. ft.	$	44		$	44					$	44		$	44

        SPP NOI and Adjusted NOI.    SPP NOI increased primarily as a result of annual rent escalations on leases not subject to straight-line rents. SPP adjusted NOI primarily increased as a result of annual rent escalations, partially offset by a decline due to deferred rent payments in 2010 that did not reoccur in 2011.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    Including the impact from our SPP, our total portfolio NOI increased primarily as a result of the additive effect of our life science acquisitions during 2010 and 2011.

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, 949,000 square feet of new and renewal leases commenced at an average annual base rent of $24.32 per square foot compared to 852,000 square feet of expiring and terminated leases with an average annual base rent of $24.62 per square foot. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired 140,000 square feet with an average annual base rent of $33.30 per square foot.

56

Medical Office

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars and square feet in thousands, except per sq. ft. data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	263,743		$	260,083		$	3,660		$	272,362		$	262,276		$	10,086
Tenant recoveries		45,191			46,631			(1,440	)		47,753			47,009			744
Total revenues	$	308,934		$	306,714		$	2,220		$	320,115		$	309,285		$	10,830
Operating expenses		(118,909	)		(121,576	)		2,667			(127,902	)		(127,887	)		(15	)
NOI	$	190,025		$	185,138		$	4,887		$	192,213		$	181,398		$	10,815
Straight-line rents		(5,065	)		(3,162	)		(1,903	)		(5,691	)		(3,159	)		(2,532	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(130	)		(2,179	)		2,049			(130	)		(2,187	)		2,057
Lease termination fees		—			(3	)		3			(212	)		(398	)		186
Adjusted NOI	$	184,830		$	179,794		$	5,036		$	186,180		$	175,654		$	10,526
Adjusted NOI % change								2.8	%
Property count(1)		181			181						187			186
Average occupancy		90.7	%		90.6	%					90.9	%		90.6	%
Average occupied square feet		11,483			11,467						11,865			11,583
Average annual rent per occupied sq. ft.	$	26		$	26					$	26		$	26

(1)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2010, we removed a MOB that was sold or classified as held for sale.

        SPP Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    SPP NOI and adjusted NOI increased year-over-year primarily as a result of rent escalations and an increase in medical office occupancy.

        Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    In addition to the impact from SPP, total portfolio NOI and adjusted NOI increased year-over-year as a result of the additive effect of our MOB acquisitions during 2010 and 2011.

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, 1.9 million square feet of new and renewal leases commenced at an average annual base rent of $22.01 per square foot compared to 1.8 million square feet of expiring and terminated leases with an average annual base rent of $22.92 per square foot. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we acquired 132,000 square feet with an average annual base rent of $18.74 per square foot.

57

Hospital

        Results are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands, except per bed data):

	SPP									Total Portfolio
	2011			2010			Change			2011			2010			Change
Rental and related revenues	$	77,676		$	77,613		$	63		$	80,832		$	81,091		$	(259	)
Tenant recoveries		2,297			2,400			(103	)		2,296			2,400			(104	)
Total revenues	$	79,973		$	80,013		$	(40	)	$	83,128		$	83,491		$	(363	)
Operating expenses		(4,328	)		(4,831	)		503			(4,330	)		(4,830	)		500
NOI	$	75,645		$	75,182		$	463		$	78,798		$	78,661		$	137
Straight-line rents		(904	)		(3,683	)		2,779			(1,525	)		(4,148	)		2,623
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(771	)		(771	)		—			(871	)		(871	)		—
Adjusted NOI	$	73,970		$	70,728		$	3,242		$	76,402		$	73,642		$	2,760
Adjusted NOI % change								4.6	%
Property count(1)		16			16						17			17
Average capacity (beds)(2)		2,379			2,368						2,410			2,399
Average annual rent per bed	$	32,912		$	31,908					$	33,499		$	32,710

(1)

From our past presentation of SPP for the year ended December 31, 2010, we removed a hospital that was placed into redevelopment in 2011, which no longer meets our criteria for SPP as of the date placed into redevelopment.

(2)

Represents average capacity as reported by the respective tenants or operators for the twelve month period and a quarter in arrears from the periods presented. Certain operators in our hospital portfolio are not required under their respective leases to provide operational data.

        SPP and Total Portfolio NOI and Adjusted NOI.    NOI increased for the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily as a result of rent escalations. Adjusted NOI increased primarily as a result of rent escalations and the expiration of rent abatements on our Irvine hospital.

Other Income and Expense Items

        Interest income.    For the year ended December 31, 2011, interest income decreased $60 million to $100 million as a result of decreases of income earned from and due to the settlement of our HCR ManorCare debt investments in 2011 of $58 million, a decrease of $12 million due to interest earned from marketable debt securities that were sold in 2010 and a decline of $12 million of interest earned from our Delphis loan as it was placed on non-accrual status in 2011; these decreases were partially offset by an increase of $35 million in interest earned and prepayment premiums and unamortized discounts recognized in April 2011 upon the early repayment of our loans to Genesis HealthCare. For a more detailed description of our loan investments and marketable debt securities, see Notes 7 and 10, respectively, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Investment management fee income.    Investment management fee income decreased $3 million to $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily as a result of acquiring our partner's 65% interest in HCP Ventures II on January 14, 2011, which resulted in the termination of the partnerships' related management contracts.

        Interest expense.    For the year ended December 31, 2011, interest expense increased $131 million to $416 million. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to a $111 million increase from our $2.4 billion senior unsecured notes offering in January 2011 as a result of prefunding activities from our

58

HCR ManorCare Acquisition, the $11 million write-off of unamortized loan fees related to an expired bridge loan commitment and the consolidation of HCP Ventures II on January 14, 2011 that included the consolidation of $635 million of mortgage debt, which increases were partially offset by the impact of repayments of mortgage debt related to contractual maturities and senior unsecured notes during 2010 and 2011 and lower interest rates during 2011 as compared to 2010.

        Our exposure to expense fluctuations related to our variable rate indebtedness is substantially mitigated by our interest rate swap contracts. For a more detailed discussion of our interest rate risk, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 7A.

        The table below sets forth information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts (dollars in thousands):

	As of December 31,(1)
	2011			2010
Balance:
Fixed rate	$	7,166,349		$	4,260,027
Variable rate		502,919			306,290
Total	$	7,669,268		$	4,566,317
Percent of total debt:
Fixed rate		93	%		93	%
Variable rate		7			7
Total		100	%		100	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
Fixed rate		5.83	%		6.35	%
Variable rate		2.19	%		4.03	%
Total weighted average rate		5.59	%		6.19	%

(1)

December 31, 2011 and 2010 excludes $88 million and $92 million, respectively, of other debt that represents non-interest bearing life care bonds and occupancy fee deposits at certain of our senior housing facilities, which have no scheduled maturities. At December 31, 2011, $88 million of variable-rate mortgages are presented as fixed-rate debt as the interest payments under such debt have been swapped (pay fixed and receive float). At December 31, 2010, $250 million of fixed-rate senior unsecured notes are presented as variable-rate debt as the interest payments under such debt has been swapped (pay float and receive fixed) and $60 million of variable-rate mortgages are presented as fixed-rate debt as the interest payments under such debt have been swapped (pay fixed and receive float); the interest rates for swapped debt are presented at the swapped rates.

        Depreciation and amortization expense.    Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $43 million to $350 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily related to: (i) a $37 million increase as a result of the consolidation of HCP Ventures II on January 14, 2011 and (ii) a $12 million increase from the additive effect of our other property acquisitions during 2010 and 2011.

        General and administrative expenses.    General and administrative expenses increased $13 million to $96 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in general and administrative expenses was a result of increases in acquisition costs, primarily attributable to our HCR ManorCare Acquisition and compensation related expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in legal fees associated with litigation matters (see the information set forth under the heading "Legal Proceedings" of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Litigation settlement and provision.    On November 9, 2011, we entered into an agreement with Ventas to settle all remaining claims relating to Ventas's litigation against us arising out of Ventas's 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living REIT. As part of the settlement, we paid $125 million to

59

Ventas, which resulted in a charge for the same amount (see the information set forth under the heading "Legal Proceedings" of Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). No similar charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2010.

        Impairments (recoveries).    During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized an impairment of $15 million related to our Delphis senior secured term loan as a result of concluding that the carrying value of this loan was in excess of the fair value of the related collateral supporting this loan (see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

        During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized aggregate income of $12 million, which represents impairment recoveries of portions of impairment charges recognized in 2009 of investments related to Erickson Retirement Communities and its affiliate entities ("Erickson"). Erickson was the tenant at three of our senior housing CCRC DFLs and the borrower of a senior construction loan in which we had a participation interest (see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Other income, net.    For the year ended December 31, 2011, other income, net decreased $3 million to $13 million. The year ended December 31, 2011, included the net impact of the following: (i) a gain of $8 million resulting from our January 2011 acquisition of our partner's 65% interest in and consolidation of HCP Ventures II, (ii) income of $6 million in connection with a litigation settlement in June 2011 for proceeds owed to the Company from a sale of assets, and (iii) a charge of $5 million for an other-than-temporary impairment of marketable equity securities. The year ended December 31, 2010 included gains on marketable securities of $15 million.

        Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures.    During the year ended December 31, 2011, equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased $42 million to $47 million. This increase was primarily a result of equity income from our 9.4% interest in HCR ManorCare (see Notes 3 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), partially offset by the impact of our consolidation of HCP Ventures II on January 14, 2011, which was previously accounted for as an equity method investment.

        Impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.    During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized impairments of $72 million related to our 35% interest in HCP Ventures II, an unconsolidated joint venture that owned 25 senior housing properties previously leased by Horizon Bay (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). No similar impairments were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2011.

        Discontinued operations.    Income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $7 million, compared to $29 million for the comparable period in 2010. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in gains on real estate dispositions of $17 million and a decline in operating income from discontinued operations of $5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we sold properties for $19 million, compared to $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund recurring operating expenses, (ii) meet debt service requirements, including $550 million of senior unsecured notes and $292 million of mortgage debt principal payments and maturities in 2013, (iii) fund capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing costs, (iv) fund acquisition and development activities, and (v) make dividend distributions. We anticipate that cash flow from continuing operations over the next 12 months will be adequate to fund our business operations, debt service payments, recurring capital expenditures and cash dividends to shareholders. Capital requirements relating to maturing indebtedness, acquisitions and development activities may require funding from borrowings and/or equity and debt offerings.

60

        Access to capital markets impacts our cost of capital and ability to refinance maturing indebtedness, as well as our ability to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities or secured debt. Credit ratings impact our ability to access capital and directly impact our cost of capital as well. For example, as noted below, our revolving line of credit facility accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin that depends upon our debt ratings. We also pay a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment that depends upon our debt ratings. As of February 11, 2013, we had a credit rating of BBB+ from Fitch, Baa1 from Moody's and BBB+ from S&P on our senior unsecured debt securities.

        Net cash provided by operating activities was $1 billion and $724 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in operating cash flows is primarily the result of the following: (i) the additive impact of our acquisitions in 2011 and 2012, (ii) assets placed in service in 2011 and 2012 and (iii) rent escalations and resets in 2011 and 2012, which increases were partially offset by increased debt interest payments. Our cash flows from operations are dependent upon the occupancy level of multi-tenant buildings, rental rates on leases, our tenants' performance on their lease obligations, the level of operating expenses and other factors.

        The following are significant investing and financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012:

•

acquired $1.9 billion of real estate, including the $1.7 billion Blackstone JV acquisition;

•

purchased $215 million (£137 million) of senior unsecured notes and funded $219 million of loans;

•

raised $3.5 billion of debt and equity capital to fund, among other things, the aforementioned investments, repay debt totaling $860 million and redeem preferred securities for $296 million; and

•

paid dividends on common and preferred stock of $865 million, which are generally funded by cash provided by our operating activities.

Debt

        Bank line of credit and Term Loan.    On March 27, 2012, we executed an amendment to our existing $1.5 billion unsecured revolving line of credit facility (the "Facility"). This amendment reduces the cost of the Facility (lower borrowing rate and facility fee) and extends the Facility's maturity by one additional year to March 2016. The Facility contains a one-year extension option. Borrowings under this Facility accrue interest at LIBOR plus a margin that depends upon our debt ratings. We pay a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment that depends on our debt ratings. Based on our debt ratings at February 11, 2013, the margin on the Facility was 1.075%, and the facility fee was 0.175%. The Facility also includes a feature that will allow us to increase the borrowing capacity by an aggregate amount of up to $500 million, subject to securing additional commitments from existing lenders or new lending institutions.

        On July 30, 2012, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a £137 million ($223 million at December 31, 2012) four-year unsecured Term Loan (the "Term Loan") that accrues interest at a rate of GBP LIBOR plus 1.20%, based on our current debt ratings. Concurrent with the closing of the Term Loan, we entered into a four-year interest rate swap agreement that fixed the rate of the Term Loan at 1.81%, subject to adjustments based on our credit ratings. The Term Loan contains a one-year committed extension option.

        Our Facility and Term Loan contain certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreements (i) limit the ratio of Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%, (ii) limit the ratio

61

of Secured Debt to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 30%, (iii) limit the ratio of Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 60%, (iv) require a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.5 times and (v) require a formula-determined Minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of $9.2 billion at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with each of these restrictions and requirements of the Facility and Term Loan.

        Our Facility also contains cross-default provisions to other indebtedness of ours, including in some instances, certain mortgages on our properties. Certain mortgages contain default provisions relating to defaults under the leases or operating agreements on the applicable properties by our operators or tenants, including default provisions relating to the bankruptcy filings of such operator or tenant. Although we believe that we would be able to secure amendments under the applicable agreements if a default as described above occurs, such a default may result in significantly less favorable borrowing terms than currently available, material delays in the availability of funding or other material adverse consequences.

        Senior unsecured notes.    At December 31, 2012, we had senior unsecured notes outstanding with an aggregate principal balance of $6.7 billion. Interest rates on the notes ranged from 1.21% to 7.07% with a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.10% and a weighted average maturity of six years at December 31, 2012. The senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants including limitations on debt, maintenance of unencumbered assets, cross-acceleration provisions and other customary terms. At December 31, 2012, we believe we were in compliance with these covenants.

        Mortgage debt.    At December 31, 2012, we had $1.7 billion in aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding that is secured by 135 healthcare facilities (including redevelopment properties) with a carrying value of $2.1 billion. Interest rates on the mortgage debt ranged from 1.54% to 8.69% with a weighted average effective interest rate of 6.13% and a weighted average maturity of four years at December 31, 2012.

        Mortgage debt generally requires monthly principal and interest payments, is collateralized by certain properties and is generally non-recourse. Mortgage debt typically restricts transfer of the encumbered properties, prohibits additional liens, restricts prepayment, requires payment of real estate taxes, requires maintenance of the assets in good condition, requires maintenance of insurance on the assets and includes conditions to obtain lender consent to enter into and terminate material leases. Some of the mortgage debt is also cross-collateralized by multiple properties and may require tenants or operators to maintain compliance with the applicable leases or operating agreements of such real estate assets.

        Other debt.    At December 31, 2012, we had $82 million of non-interest bearing life care bonds at two of our continuing care retirement communities and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at two of our senior housing facilities, all of which were payable to certain residents of the facilities (collectively, "Life Care Bonds"). The Life Care Bonds are refundable to the residents upon the termination of the contract or upon the successful resale of the unit.

62

Debt Maturities

        The following table summarizes our stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Year	Term Loan(1)		Senior Unsecured Notes			Mortgage			Total(2)
2013	$	—	$	550,000		$	291,747		$	841,747
2014		—		487,000			179,695			666,695
2015		—		400,000			308,048			708,048
2016		222,694		900,000			291,338			1,414,032
2017		—		750,000			550,052			1,300,052
Thereafter		—		3,650,000			65,886			3,715,886
		222,694		6,737,000			1,686,766			8,646,460
(Discounts) and premiums, net		—		(24,376	)		(10,222	)		(34,598	)
	$	222,694	$	6,712,624		$	1,676,544		$	8,611,862

(1)

Represents £137 million translated into U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2012.

(2)

Excludes $82 million of other debt that represents Life Care Bonds that have no scheduled maturities.

        Derivative Financial Instruments.    We use derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of interest rate and foreign exchange fluctuations on specific forecasted transactions as well as recognized financial obligations or assets. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

        The following table summarizes our outstanding interest rate and foreign exchange swap contracts as of December 31, 2012 (dollars and GBP in thousands):

Date Entered	Maturity Date		Hedge Designation	Fixed Rate/Buy Amount			Floating/Exchange Rate Index	Notional/Sell Amount		Fair Value
July 2005		July 2020	Cash Flow		3.82	%	BMA Swap Index	$	45,600	$	(8,666	)
November 2008		October 2016	Cash Flow		5.95	%	1 Month LIBOR+1.50%		27,000		(3,878	)
July 2009		July 2013	Cash Flow		6.13	%	1 Month LIBOR+3.65%		13,700		(155	)
July 2012		June 2016	Cash Flow		1.81	%	1 Month GBP LIBOR+1.20%		£137,000		89
July 2012		June 2016	Cash Flow	$	79,600		Buy USD/Sell GBP		£  50,700		(2,641	)

        For a more detailed description of our derivative financial instruments, see Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in Item 7A.

Equity

        At December 31, 2012, we had 453 million shares of common stock outstanding. At December 31, 2012, equity totaled $10.8 billion, and our equity securities had a market value of $20.7 billion.

        As of December 31, 2012, there were a total of four million DownREIT units outstanding in four limited liability companies in which we are the managing member. The DownREIT units are exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of shares of our common stock or, at our option, shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications).

63

Shelf Registration

        We have a prospectus that we filed with the SEC as part of a registration statement on Form S-3ASR, using a shelf registration process which expires in July 2015. Under the "shelf" process, we may sell any combination of the securities in one or more offerings. The securities described in the prospectus include common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, debt securities and warrants.

        The prospectus only provides a general description of the securities we may offer. The prospectus may not be used to sell securities unless accompanied by a prospectus supplement or a free writing prospectus. Each time we sell securities under the shelf registration, we will provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of the securities being offered and of the offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information contained in the prospectus.

        We may offer and sell the securities pursuant to the prospectus through underwriters, dealers or agents or directly to purchasers, on a continuous or delayed basis. The securities may also be resold by selling security holders. The prospectus supplement for each offering will describe in detail the plan of distribution for that offering and will set forth the names of any underwriters, dealers or agents involved in the offering and any applicable fees, commissions or discount arrangements. We intend to use the net proceeds from the sales of the securities as set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement, and unless otherwise set forth in a therein, we will not receive any proceeds if the securities are sold by a selling security holder.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure—Funds From Operations ("FFO")

        We believe FFO applicable to common shares, diluted FFO applicable to common shares, and basic and diluted FFO per common share are important supplemental non-GAAP measures of operating performance for a REIT. Because the historical cost accounting convention used for real estate assets utilizes straight-line depreciation (except on land), such accounting presentation implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen and fallen with market conditions, presentations of operating results for a REIT that uses historical cost accounting for depreciation could be less informative. The term FFO was designed by the REIT industry to address this issue.

        FFO is defined as net income applicable to common shares (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from acquisition and dispositions of depreciable real estate or related interests, impairments of, or related to, depreciable real estate, plus real estate and DFL depreciation and amortization, with adjustments for joint ventures. Adjustments for joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to net income. We compute FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts' ("NAREIT") definition; however, other REITs may report FFO differently or have a different interpretation of the current NAREIT definition from us. In addition, we present FFO before the impact of litigation settlement charges, preferred stock redemption charges, impairments (recoveries) of non-depreciable assets and merger-related items (defined below) ("FFO as adjusted"). Management believes FFO as adjusted is a useful alternative measurement. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of FFO and should not be used as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP).

        Details of certain items that affect comparability are discussed underResults of Operations above. The following is a reconciliation from net income applicable to common shares, the most direct

64

comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, to FFO and FFO as adjusted (in thousands, except per share data):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Net income applicable to common shares	$	812,289		$	515,302		$	307,498
Depreciation and amortization of real estate, in-place lease and other intangibles:
Continuing operations		358,245			349,922			306,934
Discontinued operations		8,267			7,473			6,513
DFL depreciation		12,756			8,840			—
Gain on sales of real estate		(31,454	)		(3,107	)		(19,925	)
Gain upon consolidation of joint venture		—			(7,769	)		—
Impairments of interests in unconsolidated joint venture		—			—			71,693
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures		(54,455	)		(46,750	)		(4,770	)
FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures		64,933			56,887			25,288
Noncontrolling interests' and participating securities' share in earnings		17,547			18,062			15,767
Noncontrolling interests' and participating securities' share in FFO		(21,620	)		(20,953	)		(18,361	)
FFO applicable to common shares	$	1,166,508		$	877,907		$	690,637
Distributions on dilutive convertible units		13,028			6,916			11,847
Diluted FFO applicable to common shares	$	1,179,536		$	884,823		$	702,484
Diluted FFO per common share	$	2.72		$	2.19		$	2.25
Weighted average shares used to calculate diluted FFO per common share		434,328			403,864			312,797
Diluted earnings per common share	$	1.90		$	1.29		$	1.00
Depreciation and amortization of real estate, in-place lease and other intangibles		0.85			0.89			1.02
DFL depreciation		0.03			0.02			—
Gain on sales of real estate and upon consolidation of joint venture		(0.07	)		(0.03	)		(0.06	)
Impairments of interests in unconsolidated joint ventures		—			—			0.23
Joint venture and participating securities FFO adjustments		0.01			0.02			0.06
Diluted FFO per common share	$	2.72		$	2.19		$	2.25
Impact of adjustments to FFO:
Preferred stock redemption charge(1)	$	10,432		$	—		$	—
Litigation settlement and provision charges(2)		—			125,000			—
Other impairments (recoveries)(3)		7,878			15,400			(11,900	)
Merger-related items(4)		5,642			26,596			4,339
	$	23,952		$	166,996		$	(7,561	)

65

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
FFO as adjusted applicable to common shares	$	1,190,460	$	1,044,903	$	683,076
Distributions on dilutive convertible units		12,957		11,646		12,089
Diluted FFO as adjusted	$	1,203,417	$	1,056,549	$	695,165
Diluted FFO as adjusted per common share	$	2.78	$	2.69	$	2.23
Weighted average shares used to calculate diluted FFO as adjusted per common share(5)		433,607		393,237		311,285

(1)

In connection with the redemption of our preferred stock, during the year ended December 31, 2012, we incurred a redemption charge of $10.4 million related to the original issuance costs.

(2)

The litigation settlement charge during the year ended December 31, 2011 relates to the Ventas settlement.

(3)

The following impairments, net of recoveries had an impact on FFO:

•

The impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2012 relates to the sale of a land parcel in our life science segment.

•

The impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2011 relates to our senior secured loan to Delphis.

•

Recoveries for the year ended December 31, 2010 relate to portions of previous impairment charges related to investments in three direct financing leases (non-depreciable due to lessee purchase option) and a participation interest in a senior construction loan related to Erickson.

(4)

The year ended December 31, 2012 merger-related items of $0.02 per share attributable to the Senior Housing Portfolio acquisition include direct transaction costs and the impact of the negative carry of prefunding the transaction with the $1.0 billion, or 22 million shares, common stock offering completed on October 19, 2012 on the calculation of weighted average shares. Proceeds from this offering were used to fund the Senior Housing Portfolio Acquisition. Merger-related items for the year ended December 31, 2011 are attributable to our HCR ManorCare Acquisition (incurred from January 1st through April 6th 2011), which include the following: (i) $26.8 million of direct transaction costs, (ii) $23.9 million of interest expense associated with the $2.4 billion senior unsecured notes issued on January 24, 2011, proceeds from which were obtained to prefund the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, partially offset by (iii) $24.1 million of income related to gains upon the reinvestment of the our debt investment in HCR ManorCare and other miscellaneous items. Merger-related items for 2010 primarily include professional fees associated with our HCR ManorCare Acquisition.

(5)

Our weighted average shares used to calculate diluted FFO as adjusted eliminate the impact of 46 million shares of common stock from our December 2010 offering and 30 million shares from our March 2011 common stock offering (excludes 4.5 million shares sold to the underwriters upon exercise of their option to purchase additional shares), which issuances increased our weighted average shares by 12.9 million and 1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Proceeds from these offerings were used to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the HCR ManorCare Acquisition.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        We own interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures as described under Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in the joint venture and any outstanding loans receivable. In addition, we have certain properties which serve as collateral for debt that is owed by a previous owner of certain of our facilities, as described under Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our risk of loss for these certain properties is limited to the outstanding debt balance plus penalties, if any. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described below underContractual Obligations.

66

Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes our material contractual payment obligations and commitments at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

	Total(1)		Less than One Year		2014-2015		2016-2017		More than Five Years
Term loan(2)	$	222,694	$	—	$	—	$	222,694	$	—
Senior unsecured notes		6,737,000		550,000		887,000		1,650,000		3,650,000
Mortgage debt		1,686,766		291,747		487,743		841,390		65,886
Construction loan commitments(3)		50,216		35,926		14,290		—		—
Development commitments(4)		13,514		13,079		435		—		—
Ground and other operating leases		224,574		7,734		13,491		10,025		193,324
Interest(5)		2,554,191		424,618		717,441		526,560		885,572
Total	$	11,488,955	$	1,323,104	$	2,120,400	$	3,250,669	$	4,794,782

(1)

Excludes $82 million of other debt that represents Life Care Bonds that have no scheduled maturities.

(2)

Represents £137 million translated into U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2012.

(3)

Represents commitments to finance development projects and related working capital financings.

(4)

Represents construction and other commitments for developments in progress.

(5)

Interest on variable-rate debt is calculated using rates in effect at December 31, 2012.

Inflation

        Our leases often provide for either fixed increases in base rents or indexed escalators, based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures, and/or additional rent based on increases in the tenants' operating revenues. Most of our MOB leases require the tenant to pay a share of property operating costs such as real estate taxes, insurance and utilities. Substantially all of our senior housing, life science, post-acute/skilled nursing and hospital leases require the operator or tenant to pay all of the property operating costs or reimburse us for all such costs. We believe that inflationary increases in expenses will be offset, in part, by the operator or tenant expense reimbursements and contractual rent increases described above.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of new accounting standards. There were no accounting pronouncements that were issued, but not yet adopted by us, that we believe will materially impact our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

        We use derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to mitigate interest rate and foreign currency risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

        To illustrate the effect of movements in the interest rate and foreign currency markets, we performed a market sensitivity analysis on our hedging instruments. We applied various basis point spreads to the underlying interest rate curves and foreign currency exchange rates of the derivative portfolio in order to determine the instruments' change in fair value. Assuming a one percentage point change in the underlying interest rate curve and foreign currency exchange rates, the estimated change

67

in fair value of each of the underlying derivative instruments would not exceed $8 million. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional analysis details.

        Interest Rate Risk.    At December 31, 2012, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on properties with a gross value of $83 million that are subject to leases where the payments fluctuate with changes in LIBOR (excludes $223 million of variable-rate senior unsecured notes that have been hedged through interest-rate swap contracts). Our exposure to income fluctuations related to our variable-rate investments is partially offset by: (i) $25 million of variable-rate senior unsecured notes and (ii) $15 million of variable-rate mortgage debt payable (excludes $86 million of variable-rate mortgage notes that have been hedged through interest-rate swap contracts). Additionally, our exposure to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates excludes our GBP denominated $223 million (£137 million) variable-rate Term Loan that has been hedged through interest-rate swap contracts.

        Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt and assets unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. Conversely, changes in interest rates on variable rate debt and investments would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a one percentage point increase in the interest rate related to the variable-rate investments and variable-rate debt, and assuming no other changes in the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2012, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $0.3 million, or less than $0.01 per common share on a diluted basis.

        Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk.    At December 31, 2012, our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates relates to forecasted interest receipts from our GBP denominated senior unsecured notes (see additional discussion of the Four Seasons Health Care Senior Unsecured Notes in Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements). Our foreign currency exchange exposure is mitigated by the forecasted interest and principal payments from our GBP denominated unsecured Term Loan (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information) and a foreign currency swap contract for approximately 85% of the forecasted interest receipts from our senior unsecured notes through the non-call period which ends on June 15, 2016.

        Market Risk.    We have investments in marketable debt securities classified as held-to-maturity, because we have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost and adjusted for the amortization of premiums and discounts through maturity. We consider a variety of factors in evaluating an other-than-temporary decline in value, such as: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than our current adjusted carrying value; the issuer's financial condition, capital strength and near-term prospects; any recent events specific to that issuer and economic conditions of its industry; and our investment horizon in relationship to an anticipated near-term recovery in the market value, if any. At December 31, 2012, the fair value and adjusted carrying value of marketable debt securities were $234 million and $223 million, respectively.

        We have investments in marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale. Gains and losses on these securities are recognized in income when realized, and losses are recognized when an other-than-temporary decline in value is identified. An initial indicator of an other-than-temporary decline in value for marketable equity securities is based on the severity of the decline in market value below the cost basis for an extended period of time. We consider a variety of factors in evaluating an other-than-temporary decline in value, such as: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than our current cost basis; the issuer's financial condition, capital strength and near-term prospects; any recent events specific to that issuer and economic conditions of its industry; and our investment horizon in relationship to an anticipated near-term recovery in the market value, if

68

any. At December 31, 2012, the fair value and adjusted cost basis of marketable equity securities were $25 million and $17 million, respectively.

        The principal amount and the average interest rates for our loans receivable and debt categorized by maturity dates is presented in the table below. The fair value for our senior unsecured notes payable is based on prevailing market prices. The fair value estimates for loans receivable and mortgage debt payable are based on discounting future cash flows utilizing current rates for loans and debt of the same type and remaining maturity.

	Maturity
	2013			2014			2015			2016			2017			Thereafter			Total			Fair Value
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Loans receivable (USD)	$	38,633	(1)	$	—		$	15,640		$	111,900		$	111,742		$	—		$	277,915		$	279,850
Weighted average interest rate		13.48	%		—	%		8.00	%		7.25	%		11.61	%		—	%		9.91	%
Debt securities held-for-sale (GBP)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	222,809		$	—		$	—		$	222,809		$	234,137
Weighted average interest rate		—	%		—	%		—	%		12.25	%		—	%		—	%		12.25	%
Liabilities(2):
Variable-rate debt:
Term loan (GBP)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	222,694		$	—		$	—		$	222,694		$	222,694
Weighted average interest rate		—	%		—	%		—	%		2.00	%		—	%		—	%		2.00	%
Senior unsecured notes payable (USD)	$	—		$	25,000		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	25,000		$	24,982
Weighted average interest rate		—	%		1.27	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		1.27	%
Mortgage debt payable (USD)	$	6,430		$	455		$	8,500		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15,385		$	14,205
Weighted average interest rate		2.01	%		—	%		1.75	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		1.85	%
Fixed-rate debt:
Senior unsecured notes payable (USD)	$	550,000		$	462,000		$	400,000		$	900,000		$	750,000		$	3,650,000		$	6,712,000		$	7,407,031
Weighted average interest rate		5.80	%		3.32	%		6.64	%		5.07	%		6.04	%		4.89	%		5.11	%
Mortgage debt payable (USD)	$	285,317		$	179,240		$	299,548		$	291,338		$	550,052		$	65,887		$	1,671,382		$	1,756,949
Weighted average interest rate		6.25	%		5.78	%		6.17	%		6.88	%		6.04	%		5.26	%		6.17	%
Interest rate derivatives assets (liabilities):
Variable-rate debt:
Variable to fixed	$	(155	)	$	—		$	—		$	(3,878	)	$	—		$	(8,666	)	$	(12,699	)	$	(12,699	)
Weighted average pay rate		6.13	%		—	%		—	%		5.95	%		—	%		3.82	%		4.50	%
Weighted average receive rate		3.86	%		—	%		—	%		2.67	%		—	%		1.21	%		1.69	%
Variable to fixed (GBP)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	89		$	—		$	—		$	89		$	89
Weighted average pay rate		—	%		—	%		—	%		1.81	%		—	%		—	%		1.81	%
Weighted average receive rate		—	%		—	%		—	%		1.82	%		—	%		—	%		1.82	%

(1)

Effective January 1, 2011, a senior secured loan to Delphis was placed on non-accrual status. For additional information regarding the senior secured loan to Delphis see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)

Excludes $82 million of other debt that represents non-interest bearing Life Care Bonds and occupancy fee deposits at certain of our senior housing facilities, which have no scheduled maturities.

ITEM 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.

ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

        None.

ITEM 9A.    Controls and Procedures

        Disclosure Controls and Procedures.    We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our

69

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

        Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

        As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of December 31, 2012, at the reasonable assurance level.

        Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.    There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2012 to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

        Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.    Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.

        The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

70

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of HCP, Inc.
Long Beach, California

        We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of HCP, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, of the Company and our report dated February 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
February 12, 2013

71

ITEM 9B.    Other Information

        None.

PART III

ITEM 10.    Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

        Our executive officers were as follows on February 1, 2013:

Name	Age	Position
James F. Flaherty III	55	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Jonathan M. Bergschneider	38	Executive Vice President—Life Science Estates
Paul F. Gallagher	52	Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
Edward J. Henning	59	Executive Vice President
Thomas D. Kirby	66	Executive Vice President—Acquisitions and Valuations
Thomas M. Klaritch	55	Executive Vice President—Medical Office Properties
James W. Mercer	68	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Timothy M. Schoen	45	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Susan M. Tate	52	Executive Vice President—Post-Acute and Hospitals
Kendall K. Young	52	Executive Vice President—Senior Housing

        We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and all senior financial officers, including our principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller. A current copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.hcpi.com. In addition, waivers from, and amendments to, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our directors and executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, will be timely posted in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.hcpi.com.

        We hereby incorporate by reference the information appearing under the captions "Directors and Executive Officers," "Board of Directors and Corporate Governance" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2013.

ITEM 11.    Executive Compensation

        We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2013.

ITEM 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

        We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the captions "Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders, Directors and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2013.

72

ITEM 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

        We hereby incorporate by reference the information under the captions "Certain Transactions" and "Board of Directors and Corporate Governance" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2013.

ITEM 14.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services

        We hereby incorporate by reference under the caption "Audit and Non-Audit Fees" in the Registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to its 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 25, 2013.

PART IV

ITEM 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules (2012)

(a)(1)	Financial Statements:
	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP
	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2012 and 2011
	Consolidated Statements of Income—for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity—for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(a)(2)	Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
	Note: All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is presented in the financial statements and the related notes or because the schedules are not applicable.
(a)(3)	Exhibits:

2.1	Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2010, by and among HCP, Inc., HCP 2010 REIT LLC, HCR ManorCare, Inc., HCR Properties, LLC and HCR Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed December 14, 2010).
2.1.1	Amendment to Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2011, by and among HCP, Inc., HCP 2010 REIT LLC, HCR ManorCare MergeCo, Inc., HCR ManorCare, LLC, HCR Properties, LLC and HCR Healthcare,  LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed April 13, 2011).†
2.2	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and among BRE/SW Portfolio LLC, those owner entities listed on Schedule 1 thereto, HCP, Inc. and Emeritus Corporation.**
3.1	Articles of Restatement of HCP (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-182824, filed July 24, 2012).

73

3.2	Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 25, 2006).
3.2.1	Amendment No. 1 to Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.2.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).
3.2.2	Amendment No. 2 to Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).
3.2.3	Amendment No. 3 to Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed March 10, 2011).
4.1	Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP's Registration Statement on Form S-3/A (Registration No. 333-86654), filed May 21, 2002).
4.1.1	First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 24, 2011, to the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 24, 2011).
4.2	Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1997, by and between American Health Properties, Inc. (a company that merged with and into HCP) and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to American Health Properties, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 21, 1997).
4.2.1	First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, to the Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1997, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
4.3	Form of Fixed Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed November 20, 2003).
4.4	Form of Floating Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed November 20, 2003).
4.5	Form of Fixed Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.6	Form of Floating Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.7	Officers' Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled "6.00% Senior Notes due March 1, 2015" (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 28, 2003).

74

4.8	Officers' Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled "55/8% Senior Notes due May 1, 2017" (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed April 27, 2005).
4.9	Officers' Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee, setting forth the terms of HCP's Fixed Rate Medium-Term Notes and Floating Rate Medium-Term Notes (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.10	Form of 5.95% Notes Due 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 19, 2006).
4.11	Form of 6.30% Notes Due 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 19, 2006).
4.12	Form of 5.65% Senior Notes Due 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed December 4, 2006).
4.13	Form of 6.00% Senior Notes Due 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 22, 2007).
4.14	Officers' Certificate (including Form of 6.70% Senior Notes Due 2018 as Annex A thereto), dated October 15, 2007, pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee to The Bank of New York, establishing a series of securities entitled "6.70% Senior Notes due 2018" (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.29 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895), filed October 30, 2007).
4.15	Form of 2.700% Senior Notes due 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 24, 2011).
4.16	Form of 3.750% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 24, 2011).
4.17	Form of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 24, 2011).
4.18	Form of 6.750% Senior Notes due 2041 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 24, 2011).
4.19	Form of 3.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 23, 2012).
10.1	Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to HCP's Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08895), filed March 21, 1997).*
10.1.1	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).*
10.1.2	Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1999).*

75

10.2	Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B to HCP's Proxy Statement (File No. 1 08895), filed March 21, 1997).*
10.2.1	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).*
10.3	Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to HCP's Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08895) for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 7, 2003).*
10.3.1	First Amendment to Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (effective as of May 7, 2003) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 3, 2005).*
10.3.2	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Employees and Consultants, effective as of May 7, 2003, relating to HCP's Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.3.3	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Directors, effective as of May 7, 2003, relating to HCP's Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.3.4	CEO Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, relating to HCP's Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).*
10.4	Second Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).*
10.5	Amended and Restated Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.6	2006 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Annex 2 to HCP's Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08895) for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 23, 2009).*
10.6.1	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009).*
10.6.2	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three-year cliff vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009).*]
10.6.3	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009).*

76

10.6.4	Form of Director 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Director Stock Unit Award Agreement with four-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).
10.6.5	HCP, Inc. Terms and Conditions Applicable to Restricted Stock Unit Awards Granted Under the 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011).*
10.6.6	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).*
10.6.7	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.6.8	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three-year cliff vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.6.9	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five- year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (Filed No. 1-08895), for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
10.6.10	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).*
10.6.11	Form of Non-Employee Director 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement with five- year installment vesting, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).*
10.6.12	Form of Non-Employee Directors 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Stock-For-Fees Program (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed August 2, 2006).*
10.6.13	Amended and Restated Stock Unit Award Agreement Granted Under 2006 Performance Incentive Plan, dated April 24, 2008, by and between HCP and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.6.14	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*
10.6.15	Form of CEO 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*
10.6.16	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*

77

10.6.17	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*
10.6.18	Form of Employee 2006 Performance Incentive Plan Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).*
10.7	Change in Control Severance Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).*
10.8	Executive Bonus Program (incorporated herein by reference to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 31, 2008.*
10.9	Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, amended as of July 25, 2012 (incorporated by reference to HCP's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-182824), dated July 24, 2012 and as supplemented on July 25, 2012.
10.10	Form of directors and officers Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
10.11	Letter Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2009, by and between HCP and Scott A. Anderson (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009).*
10.12	Letter Agreement, dated July 7, 2010, by and between HCP and Kendall Young. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).*
10.13	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2008, by and between HCP and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.14	Employment Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2012, by and between HCP and Paul F. Gallagher (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File 1-08895), filed February 1, 2012).*
10.15	Employment Agreement, dated as of January 26, 2012, by and between HCP and Timothy M. Schoen (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File 1-08895), filed February 1, 2012).*
10.16	Employment Agreement, dated October 25, 2012, by and between HCP, Inc. and James W. Mercer (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).*
10.17	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah, LLC, dated as of January 20, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1998).
10.18	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah II, LLC, dated as of August 17, 2001, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed November 9, 2012).
10.19	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of October 2, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003).

78

10.19.1	Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of September 29, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
10.19.2	Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of October 29, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2004).
10.19.3	Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC and New Member Joinder Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2005, by and among HCP, HCPI/Tennessee, LLC and A. Daniel Weyland (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
10.19.4	Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, effective as of January 1, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 1-08895), for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.20	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HC PDR MCD, LLC, dated as of February 9, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed April 20, 2012).
10.21	Stockholders Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2010, among HCP, Inc., HCR ManorCare, Inc. and certain stockholders of HCR ManorCare, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed December 14, 2010).
10.22	Form of Mezzanine Loan Agreement defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.23	Form of Intercreditor Agreement defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.24	Form of Cash Management Agreement defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.25	Form of Pledge and Security Agreement defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.26	Form of Promissory Note defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 1-08895), for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.27	Form of Guaranty Agreement defining HCP's rights and obligations in connection with its HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 1-08895), for the year ended December 31, 2007).

79

10.28	Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement entered into in connection with HCP's Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (File No. 1-08895), for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.29	Form of Omnibus Assignment entered into in connection with HCP's HCR ManorCare investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
10.30	Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, by and between HCP Medical Office Buildings II, LLC and Texas HCP Medical Office Buildings, L.P., for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).
10.31	Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2000, by and between HCP Medical Office Buildings I, LLC and Meadowdome, LLC, for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).
10.32	Credit Agreement, dated March 11, 2011, by and among the Company, as borrower, the lenders referred to therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed March 15, 2011).
10.32.1	Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated March 27, 2012, by and among the Company, as borrower, the lenders referred to therein and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed March 29, 2012).
10.33	Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2011, by and between the parties set forth on Exhibit A-1, Exhibit A-2, Exhibit A-3 and Exhibit A-4 attached thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed July 12, 2011).†
10.33.1	First Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2011, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.59.1 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2011).
10.33.2	Second Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2011, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.59.2 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2011).
10.33.3	Third Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2012, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.59.3 to HCP's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2011).
10.33.4	Fourth Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2012, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012).

80

10.33.5	Fifth Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2012, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
10.33.6	Sixth Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2012, by and among the parties signatory thereto and HCR III Healthcare, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
10.40	Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and between HCPI Trust, HCP Senior Housing Properties Trust, HCP SH ELP1 Properties, LLC, HCP SH ELP2 Properties, LLC, HCP SH ELP3 Properties, LLC, HCP SH Lassen House, LLC, HCP SH Mountain Laurel, LLC, HCP SH Mountain View, LLC, HCP SH Oakridge, LLC, HCP SH River Valley Landing, LLC and HCP SH Sellwood Landing, LLC, as lessor, and Emeritus Corporation, as lessee.**†
10.40.1	First Amendment to Master Lease and Security Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2012, by and between HCPI Trust, HCP Senior Housing Properties Trust, HCP SH ELP1 Properties, LLC, HCP SH ELP2 Properties,  LLC, HCP SH ELP3 Properties, LLC, HCP SH Lassen House, LLC, HCP SH Mountain Laurel, LLC, HCP SH Mountain View, LLC, HCP SH Oakridge, LLC, HCP SH River Valley Landing, LLC and HCP SH Sellwood Landing, LLC, as lessor, and Emeritus Corporation, as lessee.**†
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP.
31.1	Certification by James F. Flaherty III, HCP's Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2	Certification by Timothy M. Schoen, HCP's Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
32.1	Certification by James F. Flaherty III, HCP's Principal Executive Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification by Timothy M. Schoen, HCP's Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.**
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.**
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.**
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.**
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.**
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.**

*

Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement

**

Furnished herewith.

†

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment with the SEC.

81

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 12, 2013

HCP, Inc. (Registrant)

/s/ JAMES F. FLAHERTY III
James F. Flaherty III,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ JAMES F. FLAHERTY III James F. Flaherty III	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	February 12, 2013
/s/ TIMOTHY M. SCHOEN Timothy M. Schoen	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	February 12, 2013
/s/ SCOTT A. ANDERSON Scott A. Anderson	Senior Vice President — Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)	February 12, 2013
/s/ CHRISTINE N. GARVEY Christine N. Garvey	Director	February 12, 2013
/s/ DAVID B. HENRY David B. Henry	Director	February 12, 2013
/s/ LAURALEE E. MARTIN Lauralee E. Martin	Director	February 12, 2013
/s/ MICHAEL D. MCKEE Michael D. McKee	Director	February 12, 2013

82

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ PETER L. RHEIN Peter L. Rhein	Director	February 12, 2013
/s/ KENNETH B. ROATH Kenneth B. Roath	Director	February 12, 2013
/s/ JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN Joseph P. Sullivan	Director	February 12, 2013

83

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Equity	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts	F-59
Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation	F-60

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of HCP, Inc.
Long Beach, California

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HCP, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HCP, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

        As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of presentation for comprehensive income due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 12, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
February 12, 2013

F-2

HCP, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	December 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Real estate:
Buildings and improvements	$	10,537,484		$	8,816,551
Development costs and construction in progress		236,864			190,590
Land		1,850,397			1,722,948
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,739,718	)		(1,449,579	)
Net real estate		10,885,027			9,280,510
Net investment in direct financing leases		6,881,393			6,727,777
Loans receivable, net		276,030			110,253
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures		212,213			224,052
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,668 and $1,341, respectively		34,150			26,681
Cash and cash equivalents		247,673			33,506
Restricted cash		37,848			41,553
Intangible assets, net		552,701			372,390
Assets held for sale, net		—			106,295
Other assets, net		788,520			485,458
Total assets(1)	$	19,915,555		$	17,408,475
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Bank line of credit	$	—		$	454,000
Term loan		222,694			—
Senior unsecured notes		6,712,624			5,416,063
Mortgage debt		1,676,544			1,715,039
Mortgage debt and intangible liabilities on assets held for sale, net		—			55,897
Other debt		81,958			87,985
Intangible liabilities, net		105,909			117,777
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		293,994			275,478
Deferred revenue		68,055			65,614
Total liabilities(2)		9,161,778			8,187,853
Commitments and contingencies
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: aggregate liquidation preference of $295.5 million as of December 31, 2011		—			285,173
Common stock, $1.00 par value: 750,000,000 shares authorized; 453,191,321 and 408,629,444 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		453,191			408,629
Additional paid-in capital		11,180,066			9,383,536
Cumulative dividends in excess of earnings		(1,067,367	)		(1,024,274	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(14,653	)		(19,582	)
Total stockholders' equity		10,551,237			9,033,482
Joint venture partners		14,752			16,971
Non-managing member unitholders		187,788			170,169
Total noncontrolling interests		202,540			187,140
Total equity		10,753,777			9,220,622
Total liabilities and equity	$	19,915,555		$	17,408,475

(1)

The Company's consolidated total assets at December 31, 2012, include assets of certain variable interest entities ("VIEs") that can only be used to settle the liabilities of those VIEs as follows: accounts receivable, net, $1.7 million; cash and cash equivalents, $9.6 million; and other assets, net, $1.8 million. See Note 21 for additional details.

(2)

The Company's consolidated total liabilities at December 31, 2012, include liabilities of certain VIEs for which the VIE creditors do not have recourse to HCP, Inc. as follows: other debt, $0.2 million; accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $14.4 million; and deferred revenue, $1.7 million. See Note 21 for additional details.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

HCP, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Revenues:
Rental and related revenues	$	1,013,815		$	1,002,578		$	904,332
Tenant recoveries		94,658			92,258			89,011
Resident fees and services		143,745			50,619			32,596
Income from direct financing leases		622,073			464,704			49,438
Interest income		24,536			99,864			160,163
Investment management fee income		1,895			2,073			4,666
Total revenues		1,900,722			1,712,096			1,240,206
Costs and expenses:
Interest expense		417,130			416,396			285,508
Depreciation and amortization		358,245			349,922			306,934
Operating		283,998			220,151			210,158
General and administrative		79,454			96,121			83,019
Litigation settlement and provision		—			125,000			—
Impairments (recoveries)		7,878			15,400			(11,900	)
Total costs and expenses		1,146,705			1,222,990			873,719
Other income, net		2,776			12,732			16,194
Income before income taxes and equity income from and impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		756,793			501,838			382,681
Income taxes		1,636			(1,250	)		(412	)
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures		54,455			46,750			4,770
Impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		—			—			(71,693	)
Income from continuing operations		812,884			547,338			315,346
Discontinued operations:
Income before gain on sales of real estate		2,504			4,049			9,124
Gain on sales of real estate		31,454			3,107			19,925
Total discontinued operations		33,958			7,156			29,049
Net income		846,842			554,494			344,395
Noncontrolling interests' share in earnings		(14,302	)		(15,603	)		(13,686	)
Net income attributable to HCP, Inc.		832,540			538,891			330,709
Preferred stock dividends		(17,006	)		(21,130	)		(21,130	)
Participating securities' share in earnings		(3,245	)		(2,459	)		(2,081	)
Net income applicable to common shares	$	812,289		$	515,302		$	307,498
Basic earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	1.83		$	1.28		$	0.91
Discontinued operations		0.07			0.01			0.10
Net income applicable to common shares	$	1.90		$	1.29		$	1.01
Diluted earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	1.83		$	1.28		$	0.91
Discontinued operations		0.07			0.01			0.09
Net income applicable to common shares	$	1.90		$	1.29		$	1.00
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:
Basic		427,047			398,446			305,574
Diluted		428,316			400,218			306,900

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-4

HCP, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Net income	$	846,842		$	554,494		$	344,395
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized gains (losses)		7,776			(5,396	)		937
Reclassification adjustment realized in net income		—			5,396			(12,742	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
Unrealized losses		(3,127	)		(4,367	)		(996	)
Reclassification adjustment realized in net income		387			(1,033	)		1,453
Change in Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan obligation		(356	)		(495	)		43
Foreign currency translation adjustment		249			(450	)		202
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		4,929			(6,345	)		(11,103	)
Total comprehensive income		851,771			548,149			333,292
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(14,302	)		(15,603	)		(13,686	)
Total comprehensive income attributable to HCP, Inc.	$	837,469		$	532,546		$	319,606

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

HCP, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Preferred Stock						Common Stock									Cumulative Dividends In Excess Of Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
													Additional Paid-In Capital									Total Stockholders' Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount
January 1, 2010		11,820		$	285,173			293,548		$	293,548		$	5,719,400		$	(515,450	)	$	(2,134	)	$	5,780,537		$	178,072		$	5,958,609
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			330,709			—			330,709			13,686			344,395
Other comprehensive losses		—			—			—			—			—			—			(11,103	)		(11,103	)		—			(11,103	)
Issuance of common stock, net		—			—			77,278			77,278			2,353,967			—			—			2,431,245			(6,135	)		2,425,110
Repurchase of common stock		—			—			(154	)		(154	)		(4,373	)		—			—			(4,527	)		—			(4,527	)
Exercise of stock options		—			—			253			253			6,064			—			—			6,317			—			6,317
Amortization of deferred compensation		—			—			—			—			14,924			—			—			14,924			—			14,924
Preferred dividends		—			—			—			—			—			(21,130	)		—			(21,130	)		—			(21,130	)
Common dividends ($1.86 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(569,605	)		—			(569,605	)		—			(569,605	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(16,049	)		(16,049	)
Noncontrolling interests in acquisitions		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			10,002			10,002
Issuance of noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			8,395			8,395
Other		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			709			709
December 31, 2010		11,820			285,173			370,925			370,925			8,089,982			(775,476	)		(13,237	)		7,957,367			188,680			8,146,047
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			538,891			—			538,891			15,603			554,494
Other comprehensive losses		—			—			—			—			—			—			(6,345	)		(6,345	)		—			(6,345	)
Issuance of common stock, net		—			—			36,683			36,683			1,268,781			—			—			1,305,464			(3,456	)		1,302,008
Repurchase of common stock		—			—			(136	)		(136	)		(4,855	)		—			—			(4,991	)		—			(4,991	)
Exercise of stock options		—			—			1,157			1,157			29,639			—			—			30,796			—			30,796
Amortization of deferred compensation		—			—			—			—			20,034			—			—			20,034			—			20,034
Preferred dividends		—			—			—			—			—			(21,130	)		—			(21,130	)		—			(21,130	)
Common dividends ($1.92 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(766,559	)		—			(766,559	)		—			(766,559	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(15,156	)		(15,156	)
Noncontrolling interests in acquisitions		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			1,500			1,500
Issuance of noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			14,028			14,028
Purchase of noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			(20,045	)		—			—			(20,045	)		(14,059	)		(34,104	)
December 31, 2011		11,820		$	285,173			408,629			408,629			9,383,536			(1,024,274	)		(19,582	)		9,033,482			187,140			9,220,622
Net income		—			—			—			—			—			832,540			—			832,540			14,302			846,842
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			4,929			4,929			—			4,929
Preferred stock redemption		(11,820	)		(285,173	)		—			—			—			(10,327	)		—			(295,500	)		—			(295,500	)
Issuance of common stock, net		—			—			42,468			42,468			1,739,357			—			—			1,781,825			(25,029	)		1,756,796
Repurchase of common stock		—			—			(361	)		(361	)		(15,271	)		—			—			(15,632	)		—			(15,632	)
Exercise of stock options		—			—			2,455			2,455			49,167			—			—			51,622			—			51,622
Amortization of deferred compensation		—			—			—			—			23,277			—			—			23,277			—			23,277
Preferred dividends		—			—			—			—			—			(6,679	)		—			(6,679	)		—			(6,679	)
Common dividends ($2.00 per share)		—			—			—			—			—			(858,627	)		—			(858,627	)		—			(858,627	)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(15,631	)		(15,631	)
Noncontrolling interests in acquisitions		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			42,734			42,734
Issuance of noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			1,584			1,584
Purchase of noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,560	)		(2,560	)
December 31, 2012		—		$	—			453,191		$	453,191		$	11,180,066		$	(1,067,367	)	$	(14,653	)	$	10,551,237		$	202,540		$	10,753,777

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

HCP, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	846,842		$	554,494		$	344,395
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate, in-place lease and other intangibles:
Continuing operations		358,245			349,922			306,934
Discontinued operations		8,267			7,473			6,513
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(2,232	)		(4,510	)		(6,378	)
Amortization of deferred compensation		23,277			20,034			14,924
Amortization of deferred financing costs, net		16,501			25,769			9,856
Straight-line rents		(47,311	)		(59,173	)		(47,243	)
Loan and direct financing lease interest accretion		(95,444	)		(93,003	)		(69,645	)
Deferred rental revenues		(1,655	)		(2,319	)		(3,984	)
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures		(54,455	)		(46,750	)		(4,770	)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures		3,384			3,273			5,373
Gain upon consolidation of joint venture		—			(7,769	)		—
Marketable securities (gains) losses, net		—			5,396			(14,597	)
Gain upon settlement of loans receivable		—			(22,812	)		—
Gain on sales of real estate		(31,454	)		(3,107	)		(19,925	)
Derivative (gains) losses, net		43			(1,226	)		1,302
Impairments, net of recoveries		7,878			15,400			59,793
Changes in:
Accounts receivable, net		(7,469	)		2,590			9,222
Other assets		(3,814	)		27,582			(6,341	)
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities		14,267			(47,103	)		(4,931	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,034,870			724,161			580,498
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash used in the senior housing portfolio acquisition		(1,701,410	)		—			—
Other acquisitions		(186,478	)		(113,324	)		(212,005	)
Cash used in the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, net of cash acquired		—			(4,026,556	)		—
Cash used in the HCP Ventures II purchase, net of cash acquired		—			(135,550	)		—
Development of real estate		(133,596	)		(85,061	)		(92,842	)
Leasing costs and tenant and capital improvements		(61,440	)		(52,903	)		(97,930	)
Proceeds from sales of real estate, net		150,943			19,183			32,284
Purchase of an interest in and contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures		—			(95,000	)		(6,565	)
Distributions in excess of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures		2,915			2,408			4,365
Purchases of marketable securities		(214,859	)		(22,449	)		—
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		—			—			179,215
Principal repayments on loans receivable and direct financing leases		45,046			303,941			63,953
Investments in loans receivable and direct financing leases, net		(218,978	)		(369,939	)		(298,085	)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash		3,705			(5,234	)		(3,319	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,314,152	)		(4,580,484	)		(430,929	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings (repayments) under bank line of credit		(454,000	)		454,000			—
Borrowings under term loan		214,789			—			—
Repayments of term loan		—			—			(200,000	)
Issuance of senior unsecured notes		1,550,000			2,400,000			—
Repayments and repurchases of senior unsecured notes		(250,000	)		(292,265	)		(206,422	)
Repayments of mortgage and other secured debt		(155,565	)		(169,783	)		(636,096	)
Deferred financing costs		(27,565	)		(43,716	)		(11,850	)
Preferred stock redemption		(295,500	)		—			—
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and exercise of options		1,792,786			1,327,813			2,426,900
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock		(865,306	)		(787,689	)		(590,735	)
Issuance of noncontrolling interests		1,584			14,028			8,395
Purchase of noncontrolling interests		(2,143	)		(34,104	)		—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(15,631	)		(15,156	)		(15,319	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,493,449			2,853,128			774,873
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		214,167			(1,003,195	)		924,442
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		33,506			1,036,701			112,259
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	247,673		$	33,506		$	1,036,701

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-7

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)   Business

        HCP, Inc., an S&P 500 company, is a Maryland corporation that is organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") which, together with its consolidated entities (collectively, "HCP" or the "Company"), invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. The Company acquires, develops, leases, manages and disposes of healthcare real estate and provides financing to healthcare providers.

(2)   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

        Management is required to make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from management's estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HCP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures or variable interest entities that it controls through voting rights or other means. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.

        The Company is required to continually evaluate its VIE relationships and consolidate these entities when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of their operations. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without additional subordinated financial support.

        A variable interest holder is considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors includes, but is not limited to, the Company's ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, its form of ownership interest, its representation on the VIE's governing body, the size and seniority of its investment, its ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions and its ability to replace the manager of and/or liquidate the entity.

        For its investments in joint ventures, the Company evaluates the type of ownership rights held by the limited partner(s) that may preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership. The assessment of limited partners' rights and their impact on the presumption of control over a limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership in the limited partnership interests, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. The Company similarly evaluates the rights of managing members of limited liability companies.

F-8

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

        The Company recognizes rental revenue when the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, the Company determines whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or the Company. When the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance that is funded by the Company is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to, the following criteria:

•

whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;

•

whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;

•

whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general-purpose in nature; and

•

whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease term.

        Certain leases provide for additional rents contingent upon a percentage of the facility's revenue in excess of specified base amounts or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized when actual results reported by the tenant, or estimates of tenant results, exceed the base amount or other thresholds, and only after the contingency has been removed (when the related thresholds are achieved). This may result in the recognition of rental revenue in periods subsequent to when such payments are received.

        Tenant recoveries related to the reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor and, with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the associated credit risk.

        For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectibility is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue amounts which differ from those that are contractually due from tenants. If the Company determines that collectibility of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, the Company limits future recognition to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, establishes an allowance for estimated losses.

        Resident fee revenue is recorded when services are rendered and includes resident room and care charges, community fees and other resident charges. Residency agreements are generally for a term of 30 days to one year, with resident fees billed monthly. Revenue for certain care related services is recognized as services are provided and is billed monthly in arrears.

        The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on an ongoing basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For straight-line rent amounts, the Company's assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease.

F-9

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The Company uses the direct finance method of accounting to record income from direct financing leases ("DFLs"). For leases accounted for as DFLs, the future minimum lease payments are recorded as a receivable. Unearned income represents the net investment in the DFL, less the sum of minimum lease payments receivable and the estimated residual values of the leased properties. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms to provide a constant yield when collectibility of the lease payments is reasonably assured. Investments in DFLs are presented net of unamortized and unearned income.

        Loans receivable are classified as held-for-investment based on management's intent and ability to hold the loans for the foreseeable future or to maturity. Loans held-for-investment are carried at amortized cost and are reduced by a valuation allowance for estimated credit losses as necessary. The Company recognizes interest income on loans, including the amortization of discounts and premiums, using the interest method. The interest method is applied on a loan-by-loan basis when collectibility of the future payments is reasonably assured. Premiums and discounts are recognized as yield adjustments over the life of the related loans. Loans are transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale when management's intent is to no longer hold the loans for the foreseeable future. Loans held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

        The Company receives management fees from its investments in certain joint venture entities for various services it provides as the managing member. Management fees are recorded as revenue when management services have been performed. Intercompany profit for management fees is eliminated.

        The Company recognizes gain on sales of real estate upon the closing of a transaction with the purchaser. Gains on properties sold are recognized using the full accrual method when the collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, the Company is not obligated to perform additional activities that may be considered significant, the initial investment from the buyer is sufficient and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gain on sales of real estate may be deferred in whole or in part until the requirements for gain recognition have been met.

        Allowances are established for loans and DFLs based upon an estimate of probable losses for the individual loans and DFLs deemed to be impaired. Loans and DFLs are impaired when it is deemed probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan or lease. An allowance is based upon the Company's assessment of the borrower's or lessee's overall financial condition; economic resources and payment record; the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors; and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. These estimates consider all available evidence including the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's or DFL's effective interest rate, fair value of collateral, general economic conditions and trends, historical and industry loss experience, and other relevant factors, as appropriate.

        Loans and DFLs are placed on non-accrual status when management determines that the collectibility of contractual amounts is not reasonably assured. While on non-accrual status, loans or DFLs are either accounted for on a cash basis, in which income is recognized only upon receipt of cash, or on a cost-recovery basis, in which all cash receipts reduce the carrying value of the loan or DFL, based on the Company's expectation of future collectibility.

Real Estate

        The Company's real estate assets, consisting of land, buildings and improvements are recorded at their then fair value at the time of consolidation. The assumed liabilities, acquired tangible assets and identifiable intangibles are also recorded at their then fair value. The Company assesses fair value based on cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available

F-10

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, as well as market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property is based on the value of the property as if it is vacant.

        The Company records acquired "above and below market" leases at their fair value using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired. The amount recorded is based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management's estimate of fair market lease rates for each in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the extended term for any leases with bargain renewal options. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on the Company's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each property and the respective tenant's lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes estimates of lost rents at estimated market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which are dependent on local market conditions and expected trends. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, the Company considers leasing commissions, legal and other related costs.

        The Company capitalizes direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate asset. The Company capitalizes construction and development costs while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. The Company considers a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the completion of company owned tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of significant construction activity. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have ceased, are expensed as incurred. For redevelopment of existing operating properties, the Company capitalizes costs based on the net carrying value of the existing property under redevelopment plus the cost for the construction and improvement incurred in connection with the redevelopment. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The Company considers costs incurred in conjunction with re-leasing properties, including tenant improvements and lease commissions, to represent the acquisition of productive assets and, accordingly, such costs are reflected as investing activities in the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows.

        The Company computes depreciation on properties using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful life. Depreciation is discontinued when a property is identified as held-for-sale. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over useful lives ranging up to 50 years. Above and below market lease intangibles are amortized primarily to revenue over the remaining noncancellable lease terms and bargain renewal periods, if any. In-place lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining noncancellable lease term and bargain renewal periods, if any.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

        The Company assesses the carrying value of real estate assets and related intangibles ("real estate assets"), whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The Company tests its real estate assets for impairment by comparing the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows to the carrying value of the real estate asset or asset group. If the carrying value exceeds the expected future undiscounted cash flows,

F-11

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

an impairment loss will be recognized by adjusting the carrying value of the real estate asset or asset group to its fair value.

        Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. If it is determined, based on certain qualitative factors, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the Company applies the second step of the two-step approach. Potential impairment indicators and qualitative factors include a significant decline in real estate valuations, restructuring plans, current macroeconomic conditions, state of the equity and capital markets or a significant decline in the value of the Company's market capitalization. The second step of the two-step approach requires the fair value of a reporting unit to be allocated to all the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if it had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment. The Company selected the fourth quarter of each fiscal year to perform its annual impairment test.

Assets Held-for-Sale and Discontinued Operations

        Certain long-lived assets are classified as held-for-sale and are reported at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value less costs to sell and are no longer depreciated. Discontinued operations is a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held-for-sale and, (i) the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction, and (ii) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

        Investments in entities which the Company does not consolidate but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are reported under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company's share of the investee's earnings or losses are included in the Company's consolidated results of operations.

        The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is based on the amount paid to purchase the joint venture interest or the fair value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the joint venture. To the extent that the Company's cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the lives of the related assets and liabilities, and such amortization is included in the Company's share of equity in earnings of the joint venture. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When the Company determines a decline in the fair value of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded. The Company recognizes gains on the sale of interests in joint ventures to the extent the economic substance of the transaction is a sale.

        The Company's fair values for its equity method investments are based on discounted cash flow models that include all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period and, where applicable, any estimated debt premiums or discounts. Capitalization rates, discount rates and credit spreads utilized in these models are based upon assumptions that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

F-12

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Share-Based Compensation

        Compensation expense for share-based awards granted to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized in the consolidated statements of income based on their grant date fair market value. Compensation expense for awards with graded vesting schedules is generally recognized ratably over the period from the grant date to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional services.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

        Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and short-term investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted Cash

        Restricted cash primarily consists of amounts held by mortgage lenders to provide for (i) real estate tax expenditures, tenant improvements and capital expenditures, and (ii) security deposits and net proceeds from property sales that were executed as tax-deferred dispositions.

Derivatives

        During its normal course of business, the Company uses certain types of derivative instruments for the purpose of managing interest rate and currency risk. To qualify for hedge accounting, derivative instruments used for risk management purposes must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. In addition, at inception of a qualifying cash flow hedging relationship, the underlying transaction or transactions, must be, and are expected to remain, probable of occurring in accordance with the Company's related assertions.

        The Company recognizes all derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated, as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the criteria of hedge accounting are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), whereas the change in fair value of the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated in qualifying fair value hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives offsets the change in fair value of the hedged item, whereas the change in fair value of the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings.

        The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes designating all derivatives that are part of a hedging relationship to specific forecasted transactions as well as recognized obligations or assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company also assesses and documents, both at inception of the hedging relationship and on a quarterly basis thereafter, whether the derivatives that are designated in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting the designated risks associated with the respective hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective as a hedge, or that it is probable the underlying forecasted transaction will not occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively and records the appropriate adjustment to earnings based on the current fair value of the derivative.

F-13

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Income Taxes

        HCP, Inc. elected REIT status and believes it has always operated so as to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Accordingly, HCP, Inc. will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that it continues to qualify as a REIT and makes distributions to stockholders equal to or in excess of its taxable income. In addition, the Company has formed several consolidated subsidiaries, which have elected REIT status. HCP, Inc. and its consolidated REIT subsidiaries are each subject to the REIT qualification requirements under Sections 856 to 860 of the Code. If any REIT fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates and may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years.

        HCP, Inc. and its consolidated REIT subsidiaries are subject to state and local income taxes in some jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances each REIT may also be subject to federal excise taxes on undistributed income. In addition, certain activities that the Company undertakes may be conducted by entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRSs"). TRSs are subject to both federal and state income taxes. The Company recognizes tax penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits as additional income tax expense. Interest relating to unrecognized tax benefits is recognized as interest expense.

Marketable Securities

        The Company classifies its marketable equity securities as available-for-sale. These securities are carried at their fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in stockholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined based on the specific identification method. When the Company determines declines in fair value of marketable securities are other-than-temporary, a loss is recognized in earnings.

        The Company classifies its marketable debt securities as held-to-maturity, because the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost and adjusted for the amortization of premiums and discounts through maturity.

Capital Raising Issuance Costs

        Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of common shares are recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of preferred shares are recorded as a reduction of the preferred stock amount. Debt issuance costs are deferred, included in other assets and amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt utilizing the interest method.

Segment Reporting

        The Company's segments are based on its internal method of reporting which classifies operations by healthcare sector. The Company's business operations include five segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) post-acute/skilled nursing, (iii) life science, (iv) medical office and (v) hospital.

Noncontrolling Interests

        The Company reports arrangements with noncontrolling interests as a component of equity separate from the parent's equity. The Company accounts for purchases or sales of equity interests that

F-14

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

do not result in a change in control as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is included in consolidated net income on the face of the consolidated statements of income and, upon a gain or loss of control, the interest purchased or sold, as well as any interest retained, is recorded at its fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings.

        The Company consolidates non-managing member limited liability companies ("DownREITs") because it exercises control, and noncontrolling interests in these entities are carried at cost. The non-managing member LLC Units ("DownREIT units") are exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of shares of the Company's common stock or, at the Company's option, shares of the Company's common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). Upon exchange of DownREIT units for the Company's common stock, the carrying amount of the DownREIT units is reclassified to stockholders' equity.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

        Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are translated into U.S. dollars use exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies that are translated into U.S. dollars use average rates of exchange in effect during the related period. Gains or losses resulting from translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders' equity on the consolidated balance sheets. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. The effects of transaction gains or losses are included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of income.

Preferred Stock Redemptions

        The Company recognizes the excess of the redemption value of cumulative redeemable preferred stock redeemed over its carrying amount as a charge to earnings.

Life Care Bonds Payable

        Certain of the Company's continuing care retirement communities ("CCRCs") issue non-interest bearing life care bonds payable to certain residents of the CCRCs. Generally, the bonds are refundable to the resident or to the resident's estate upon termination or cancellation of the CCRC agreement or upon the successful resale of the unit. Proceeds from the issuance of new bonds are used to retire existing bonds, and since the maturity of the obligations for the facilities is not determinable, no interest is imputed. These amounts are included in other debt in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value Measurement

        The Company measures and discloses the fair value of nonfinancial and financial assets and liabilities utilizing a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or unobservable in a marketplace. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. These inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

•

Level 1—quoted prices foridentical instruments in active markets;

F-15

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

•

Level 2—quoted prices forsimilar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

•

Level 3—fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

        The Company measures fair value using a set of standardized procedures that are outlined herein for all assets and liabilities which are required to be measured at fair value. When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third party source to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. In some instances where a market price is available, but the instrument is in an inactive or over-the-counter market, the Company consistently applies the dealer (market maker) pricing estimate and classifies the asset or liability in Level 2.

        If quoted market prices or inputs are not available, fair value measurements are based upon valuation models that utilize current market or independently sourced market inputs, such as interest rates, option volatilities, credit spreads and/or market capitalization rates. Items valued using such internally-generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a result, the asset or liability could be classified in either Level 2 or Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable. Internal fair value models and techniques used by the Company include discounted cash flow and Black-Scholes valuation models. The Company also considers its counterparty's and own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at their fair value. The Company has elected the mid-market pricing expedient when determining fair value.

Earnings per Share

        Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company accounts for unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities, which are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by including the effect of dilutive and preferred securities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2013-02"). The amendments in this update require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income by the net income line item. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-02 on January 1, 2013 to have an impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02,Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment ("ASU 2012-02"). The amendments in this update provide an entity with the option to make a qualitative assessment about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired to determine whether it should perform a quantitative impairment test. The adoption of ASU 2012-02 on January 1, 2013 did not have an impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

F-16

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-01,Continuing Care Retirement Communities—Refundable Advance Fees ("ASU 2012-01"). This update clarifies the situations in which recognition of deferred revenue for refundable advance fees is appropriate. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2012-01 on January 1, 2013 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2011-05"). The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income and the total of comprehensive income. In December 2011, the FASB deferred portions of this update in its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 (see discussion above). The Company has elected the two-statement approach and the required financial statements are presented herein.

        In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04,Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs ("ASU 2011-04"). The amendments in this update result in additional fair value measurement and disclosure requirements within U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments update the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

        Certain amounts in the Company's consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Assets sold or held-for-sale and associated liabilities have been reclassified on the consolidated balance sheets and operating results reclassified from continuing to discontinued operations.

(3)   HCR ManorCare Acquisition

        On April 7, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the real estate assets of HCR ManorCare, Inc. ("HCR ManorCare"), for a purchase price of $6.0 billion (the "HCR ManorCare Acquisition"). The purchase price consisted of the following: (i) $4 billion in cash consideration; and (ii) $2 billion representing the fair value of the Company's HCR ManorCare debt investments that were settled as part of this acquisition. Through this transaction, the Company acquired 334 HCR ManorCare post-acute, skilled nursing and assisted living facilities. The facilities are located in 30 states, with the highest concentrations in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Illinois and Michigan. A wholly-owned subsidiary of HCR ManorCare operates the assets pursuant to a long-term triple-net master lease agreement supported by a guaranty from HCR ManorCare. Additionally, the Company exercised its option to purchase an ownership interest of HCR ManorCare for $95 million that represented a 9.9% equity interest at closing.

F-17

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The HCR ManorCare Acquisition total purchase price is as follows (in thousands):

	April 7, 2011
Payment of aggregate cash consideration, net of cash acquired	$	3,801,624
HCP's loan investments in HCR ManorCare's debt settled at fair value(1)		1,990,406
Assumed HCR ManorCare accrued liabilities at fair value(2)		224,932
Total purchase consideration	$	6,016,962
Legal, accounting and other fees and costs(3)	$	26,839

(1)

The Company recognized a gain of approximately $23 million, included in interest income, which represents the fair value of the Company's existing mezzanine and mortgage loan investments in HCR ManorCare in excess of its carrying value on the acquisition date.

(2)

In August 2011, the Company paid or refunded these amounts to certain taxing authorities or the seller. These August 2011 cash payments are included in the "cash used in the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, net of cash acquired" that is presented in the 2011 consolidated statement of cash flows under investing activities.

(3)

Represents estimated fees and costs of $15.5 million and $11.3 million that were expensed and included in general and administrative expense and interest expense, respectively. These charges are directly attributable to the transaction and represent non-recurring costs.

        The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date of April 7, 2011 (in thousands):

Assets acquired
Net investments in direct financing leases	$	6,002,074
Cash and cash equivalents		6,996
Intangible assets		14,888
Total assets acquired		6,023,958
Total liabilities assumed		224,932
Net assets acquired	$	5,799,026

        In connection with the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, the Company entered into a credit agreement for a 365-day bridge loan facility (from funding to maturity) in an aggregate amount of up to $3.3 billion. In March 2011, the Company terminated this bridge loan facility in accordance with its terms; consequently, the Company incurred a charge of $11.3 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan fees associated with this bridge loan commitment that is included in interest expense.

        The assets and liabilities of the Company's investments related to HCR ManorCare and the related results of operations are included in the consolidated financial statements from the April 7, 2011 acquisition date. From the acquisition date to December 31, 2011, the Company recognized income of $412 million related to its HCR ManorCare DFLs and $45 million related to its share in earnings from its 9.4% equity method investment in HCR ManorCare.

Pro Forma Results of Operations

        The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, including the Company's ownership interest in the operations of HCR

F-18

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

ManorCare, was completed as of January 1 for each of the periods presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Revenues	$	1,807,355	$	1,690,899
Net income		659,514		745,119
Net income applicable to HCP, Inc.		643,911		731,433
Basic earnings per common share	$	1.53	$	1.86
Diluted earnings per common share		1.52		1.85

(4)   Other Real Estate Property Investments

$1.7 Billion Senior Housing Portfolio Acquisition

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company acquired 129 senior housing communities for $1.7 billion, from a joint venture between Emeritus Corporation ("Emeritus") and Blackstone Real Estate Partners VI, an affiliate of Blackstone (the "Blackstone JV"). Located in 29 states, the portfolio encompasses 10,077 units representing a diversified care mix of 61% assisted living, 25% independent living, 13% memory care and 1% skilled nursing. Based on operating performance at closing, the 129 communities consist of 95 that are stabilized and 34 that were in lease-up. The transaction closed in two stages: (i) 127 senior housing facilities on October 31, 2012 for $1.68 billion representing 9,842 units; and (ii) two senior housing facilities on December 4, 2012 for $24 million representing 235 units. The Company paid $1.7 billion in cash consideration to acquire: (i) real estate with a fair value of $1.5 billion, (ii) intangible assets with a fair value of $170 million and assumed intangible liabilities with a fair value of $4 million. As of December 31, 2012, the purchase price allocation is preliminary, and the final purchase price allocation will be determined pending the receipt of information necessary to complete the valuation of certain assets and liabilities, which may result in a change from the initial estimate.

        Emeritus operates the communities pursuant to a new triple-net, master lease for the 129 properties (the "Master Lease") guaranteed by Emeritus. The Master Lease provides aggregate contractual rent in the first year of $103.6 million. The contractual rent will increase annually by the greater of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") or 3.7% on average over the initial five years, and thereafter by the greater of CPI or 3.0% for the remaining initial lease term. At the beginning of the sixth lease year, rent on the 34 lease-up properties will increase to the greater of the percentage increase in CPI or fair market, subject to a floor of 103% and a cap of 130% of the prior year's rent. From the acquisition dates to December 31, 2012, the Company recognized income of $22 million related to its acquisitions of the 129 senior housing communities.

        The leased properties are grouped into three pools that share comparable characteristics and these leased pools have initial terms of 14 to 16 years. Emeritus has two extension options, which, if exercised, will provide for lease terms of 30 to 35 years.

        Concurrent with the acquisition, Emeritus purchased nine communities from the Blackstone JV, for which the Company provided secured debt financing of $52 million with a four-year term. The loan is secured by the underlying real estate and is prepayable at Emeritus' option. The interest rate on the loan was initially 6.1% and will gradually increase during its four year term to 6.8%.

F-19

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Pro Forma Results of Operations

        The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the acquisition of 129 senior housing communities from the Blackstone JV were completed as of January 1 for each of the periods presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Revenues	$	1,987,055	$	1,815,696	$	1,343,806
Net income		870,802		584,361		374,262
Net income applicable to HCP, Inc.		856,500		568,758		360,576
Basic earnings per common share	$	1.88	$	1.30	$	1.03
Diluted earnings per common share		1.88		1.29		1.03

Other Real Estate Acquisitions

        A summary of other acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2012 follows (in thousands):

	Consideration							Assets Acquired
Acquisitions	Cash Paid		Debt and Other Liabilities Assumed		Noncontrolling Interest			Real Estate		Net Intangibles
Senior housing	$	3,860	$	—	$	—		$	3,541	$	319
Life science		7,964		—		86			7,580		470
Medical office		171,654		60,597		42,648	(1)		207,561		67,338
Hospital		3,000		—		—			3,000		—
	$	186,478	$	60,597	$	42,734		$	221,682	$	68,127

(1)

Represents non-managing member limited liability company units.

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred an aggregate of $183 million for construction, tenant and other capital improvement projects, primarily in the senior housing, life science and medical office segments.

        A summary of acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2011 follows (in thousands):

	Consideration						Assets Acquired
Acquisitions	Cash Paid		Debt Assumed		Noncontrolling Interest		Real Estate		Net Intangibles
Life science	$	84,087	$	57,869	$	—	$	133,210	$	8,746
Medical office		29,743		—		1,500		26,191		5,052
	$	113,830	$	57,869	$	1,500	$	159,401	$	13,798

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred an aggregate of $127 million for construction, tenant and other capital improvement projects, primarily in the life science and medical office segments. During the year ended December 31, 2011, two of the Company's life science facilities located in South San Francisco were placed in service representing 88,000 square feet.

F-20

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(5)   Dispositions of Real Estate and Discontinued Operations

Dispositions of Real Estate and Land

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company sold the following: (i) two senior housing facilities for $111 million, (ii) a skilled nursing facility for $15 million, (iii) a medical office building for $7 million and (iv) a parcel of land in the life science segment for $18 million. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company sold three senior housing facilities for $19 million.

Results from Discontinued Operations

        The following table summarizes operating income from discontinued operations and gain on sales of real estate included in discontinued operations (dollars in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
Rental and related revenues	$	13,025	$	14,877	$	19,293
Depreciation and amortization expenses		8,267		7,473		6,513
Operating expenses		22		22		263
Other expense, net		2,232		3,333		3,393
Income before gain on sales of real estate	$	2,504	$	4,049	$	9,124
Gain on sales of real estate	$	31,454	$	3,107	$	19,925
Number of properties held-for-sale		—		4		7
Number of properties sold		4		3		14
Number of properties included in discontinued operations		4		7		21

(6)   Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

        The components of net investment in DFLs consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	December 31,
	2012			2011
Minimum lease payments receivable(1)	$	25,217,520		$	25,744,161
Estimated residual values		4,010,514			4,010,514
Less unearned income		(22,346,641	)		(23,026,898	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	6,881,393		$	6,727,777
Properties subject to direct financing leases		361			361

(1)

The minimum lease payments receivable are primarily attributable to HCR ManorCare ($24 billion). The triple-net lease with HCR ManorCare provides for annual rent of $472.5 million in the first year and $489 million beginning April 1, 2012. The rent increases by 3.5% per year over the next four years and by 3% for the remaining portion of the initial lease term. The properties are grouped into four pools, and HCR ManorCare has a one-time extension option for each pool with rent increased for the first year of the extension option to the greater of fair market rent or a 3% increase over the rent for the prior year. Including the extension options, which the Company determined to be bargain renewal options, the four leased pools had total initial available terms ranging from 23 to 35 years.

F-21

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        On April 7, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of 334 HCR ManorCare properties subject to a single master lease that the Company classified as a DFL. See discussion of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition in Note 3.

        Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements. Certain leases also permit the Company to require the tenants to purchase the properties at the end of the lease terms.

        Lease payments previously due to the Company relating to three land-only DFLs, along with the land, were subordinate to and served as collateral for first mortgage construction loans entered into by Erickson Retirement Communities and its affiliate entities ("Erickson") to fund development costs related to the properties. On October 19, 2009, Erickson filed for bankruptcy protection, which included a plan of reorganization. In December 2009, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to reduce the carrying value of these assets to a nominal amount. In February 2010, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Erickson which was subsequently approved by the bankruptcy court. In April 2010, the reorganization was completed, which resulted in the Company (i) retaining deposits held by the Company with balances of $5 million and (ii) receiving an additional $9.6 million. As a result, the Company recognized aggregate income of $11.9 million in impairment recoveries in 2010, which represented the reversal of a portion of the allowances established pursuant to the previous December 2009 impairment charges of $63.1 million related to its investments in the three DFLs and participation interest in the senior construction loan.

        Future minimum lease payments contractually due under direct financing leases at December 31, 2012, were as follows (in thousands):

Year	Amount
2013	$	551,139
2014		563,994
2015		583,418
2016		603,513
2017		622,198
Thereafter		22,293,258
	$	25,217,520

F-22

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(7)   Loans Receivable

        The following table summarizes the Company's loans receivable (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2012								2011
	Real Estate Secured		Other Secured			Total			Real Estate Secured			Other Secured			Total
Mezzanine	$	—	$	145,150		$	145,150		$	—		$	90,148		$	90,148
Other		147,264		—			147,264			35,643			—			35,643
Unamortized discounts, fees and costs		—		(2,974	)		(2,974	)		(1,040	)		(1,088	)		(2,128	)
Allowance for loan losses		—		(13,410	)		(13,410	)		—			(13,410	)		(13,410	)
	$	147,264	$	128,766		$	276,030		$	34,603		$	75,650		$	110,253

Real Estate Secured Loans

        Following is a summary of loans receivable secured by real estate at December 31, 2012:

Final Maturity Date	Number of Loans			Payment Terms	Principal Amount		Carrying Amount
					(in thousands)
2013		1		monthly payments of $99,200, accrues interest at 11.5% and secured by three skilled nursing facilities in Michigan	$	8,492	$	7,982
2015		1		monthly interest-only payments beginning in 2013, accrues interest at 8.00% and secured by a hospital in Louisiana		15,640		15,640
2016		4	(1)	aggregate monthly interest-only payments of $400,700, accrues interest at 8.25% and secured by four senior housing facilities located in Tennessee, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Texas		57,350		59,900
2016		1		monthly payments of $273,000, accrues interest at 6.1%, and secured by nine senior housing facilities located in Alabama, Arizona, Minnesota, Maryland, Texas and Wisconsin		52,000		52,000
2017		2	(1)	monthly interest-only payments of $71,742, accrues interest at 8.25%, and secured by two senior housing facilities in New Jersey and Pennsylvania		11,404		11,742
		9			$	144,886	$	147,264

(1)

Represents commitments to fund an aggregate of $119 million for six senior housing development projects.

        At December 31, 2012, future contractual principal payments to be received on loans receivable secured by real estate are $8 million in 2013, $16 million in 2015, $112 million in 2016 and $11 million in 2017. The Company recognized $6 million in interest income related to loans secured by real estate. At December 31, 2012, the Company accrued $3 million of interest receivables related to real estate secured loans.

F-23

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Other Secured Loans

        Tandem Health Care Loan.    On July 31, 2012, the Company closed a mezzanine loan facility to lend up to $205 million to Tandem Health Care ("Tandem"), an affiliate of Formation Capital, as part of the recapitalization of a post-acute/skilled nursing portfolio. The Company funded $100 million (the "First Tranche") at closing and has a commitment to fund an additional $105 million (the "Second Tranche") between February 2013 and August 2013. The Second Tranche will be used to repay debt senior to the Company's loan. At closing, the loan was subordinate to $400 million in senior mortgage debt and $137 million in senior mezzanine debt. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12% and 14% per annum for the First and Second Tranche, respectively. The facility has a total term of up to 63 months from the initial closing, is prepayable at the borrower's option and is secured by real estate partnership interests.

        Delphis Operations, L.P. Loan.    The Company holds a secured term loan made to Delphis Operations, L.P. ("Delphis" or the "Borrower") that is collateralized by all of the assets of the Borrower. The Borrower's collateral is comprised primarily of interests in partnerships operating surgical facilities, some of which are on the premises of properties owned by the Company or HCP Ventures IV, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture of the Company. In December 2009, the Company determined that the loan was impaired. Further, in January 2011 the Company placed the loan on cost-recovery status, whereby accrual of interest income was suspended and any payments received from the Borrower are applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.

        As part of a March 2012 agreement (the "2012 Agreement") between Delphis, certain past and current principals of Delphis and the Cirrus Group, LLC (the "Guarantors"), and the Company, the Company agreed, among other things, to allow the distribution of $1.5 million to certain of the Guarantors from funds generated from sales of assets that were pledged as additional collateral for this loan. Further, the Company, as part of the 2012 Agreement, agreed to provide financial incentives to the Borrower regarding the liquidation of the primary collateral assets for this loan.

        Pursuant to the aforementioned 2012 Agreement, the Company received the remaining cash ($4.8 million, after reducing this amount by $0.5 million for related legal expenses) and other consideration ($2.1 million) of $6.9 million from the Guarantors. In addition, during 2012 the Company received $38.1 million in net proceeds from the sales of two of the primary collateral assets, which proceeds, together with the cash payments and other consideration, have been applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying value of the loan was $30.7 million and $75.7 million, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Company believes the fair value of the collateral supporting this loan is in excess of its carrying value. During the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company received cash payments of $43 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

F-24

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        A reconciliation of the Company's allowance for the losses related to the Company's senior secured loan to Delphis follows (in thousands):

	Amount
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	3,397
Additions(1)		10,013
Balance at December 31, 2011		13,410
Additions		—
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	13,410

(1)

In September 2011 the Company recognized a total provision for losses of $15.4 million related to its Delphis loan that is discussed above; $10.0 million of this provision reduced the carrying value of the loan and the remaining $5.4 million provision reduced the carrying value of the related accrued interest receivable (accrued interest on loans is presented in other assets; see Note 10 for additional information).

        HCR ManorCare Loans.    In December 2007, the Company made a $900 million investment (at a discount of $100 million) in HCR ManorCare mezzanine loans, which paid interest at a floating rate of one-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 4.0%. Also, in August 2009 and January 2011, the Company purchased $720 million (at a discount of $130 million) and $360 million, respectively, in participations in HCR ManorCare first mortgage debt, which paid interest at LIBOR plus 1.25%.

        On April 7, 2011, upon closing of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition, the Company's $2.0 billion of loans to HCR ManorCare were settled, which resulted in additional interest income of $23 million, which represents the excess of the loans' fair values above their carrying values at the acquisition date. See Note 3 for additional discussion related to the HCR ManorCare Acquisition.

        Genesis HealthCare Loans.    In September and October 2010, the Company purchased participations in a senior loan and mezzanine note of Genesis HealthCare ("Genesis") with par values of $278 million (at a discount of $28 million) and $50 million (at a discount of $10 million), respectively. The Genesis senior loan paid interest at LIBOR (subject to a floor of 1.5%, increasing to 2.5% by maturity) plus a spread of 4.75%, increasing to 5.75% by maturity. The senior loan was secured by all of Genesis' assets. The mezzanine note paid interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 7.50%. In addition to the coupon interest payments, the mezzanine note required the payment of a termination fee, of which the Company's share prior to the early repayment of this loan was $2.3 million.

        On April 1, 2011, the Company received $330.4 million from the early repayment of its loans to Genesis, and recognized additional interest income of $34.8 million, which represents the related unamortized discounts and termination fee.

(8)   Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

HCP Ventures II

        On January 14, 2011, the Company acquired its partner's 65% interest in HCP Ventures II, a joint venture that owned 25 senior housing facilities, becoming the sole owner of the portfolio.

F-25

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The HCP Ventures II consideration is as follows (in thousands):

	January 14, 2011
Cash paid for HCP Ventures II's partnership interest	$	135,550
Fair value of HCP's 35% interest in HCP Ventures II (carrying value of $65,223 at closing)(1)		72,992
Total consideration	$	208,542
Estimated fees and costs
Legal, accounting, and other fees and costs(2)	$	150
Debt assumption fees(3)		500
Total	$	650

(1)

At closing, the Company recognized a gain of approximately $8 million, included in other income, net, which represents the fair value of the Company's 35% interest in HCP Ventures II in excess of its carrying value as of the acquisition date.

(2)

Represents estimated fees and costs that were expensed and included in general and administrative expenses. These charges are directly attributable to the transaction and represent non-recurring costs.

(3)

Represents debt assumption fees that were capitalized as deferred debt costs.

        In accordance with the accounting guidance applicable to acquisitions of the partner's ownership interests that result in consolidation of previously unconsolidated entities, the Company recorded all of the assets and liabilities of HCP Ventures II at their fair value as of the January 14, 2011 acquisition date. In determining the fair values, relevant market data and valuation techniques were utilized and included, but were not limited to, market data comparables for capitalization and discount rates, credit spreads and property specific cash flows assumptions. The capitalization and discount rates as well as credit spread assumptions utilized in the Company's valuation model were based on information that it believes to be within a reasonable range of current market data.

        The following table summarizes the fair values of the HCP Ventures II assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of January 14, 2011 (in thousands):

Assets acquired
Buildings and improvements	$	683,633
Land		79,580
Cash		2,585
Restricted cash		1,861
Intangible assets		78,293
Total assets acquired	$	845,952
Liabilities assumed
Mortgage debt	$	635,182
Other liabilities		2,228
Total liabilities assumed		637,410
Net assets acquired	$	208,542

        The related assets, liabilities and results of operations of HCP Ventures II are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition, January 14, 2011.

F-26

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Summary of Unconsolidated Joint Venture Information

        The Company owns interests in the following entities that are accounted for under the equity method at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Entity(1)	Properties/Segment	Investment(2)			Ownership%
HCR ManorCare	post-acute/skilled nursing operations	$	90,559			9.4(3)
HCP Ventures III, LLC	13 medical office		7,510			30
HCP Ventures IV, LLC	54 medical office and 4 hospital		32,249			20
HCP Life Science(4)	4 life science		67,785			50-63
Horizon Bay Hyde Park, LLC	1 senior housing		6,769			72
Suburban Properties, LLC	1 medical office		7,134			67
Advances to unconsolidated joint ventures, net			207
		$	212,213
Edgewood Assisted Living Center, LLC	1 senior housing	$	(417	)		45
Seminole Shores Living Center, LLC	1 senior housing		(674	)		50
		$	(1,091	)

(1)

These entities are not consolidated because the Company does not control, through voting rights or other means, the joint ventures. See Note 2 regarding the Company's accounting policies related to principles of consolidation.

(2)

Represents the carrying value of the Company's investment in the unconsolidated joint venture. See Note 2 regarding the Company's accounting policy for joint venture interests.

(3)

Presented after adjusting the Company's 9.9% ownership rate for the dilution of certain of HCR ManorCare's employee equity awards. See discussion of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition in Note 3.

(4)

Includes three unconsolidated joint ventures between the Company and an institutional capital partner for which the Company is the managing member. HCP Life Science includes the following partnerships: (i) Torrey Pines Science Center, LP (50%); (ii) Britannia Biotech Gateway, LP (55%); and (iii) LASDK, LP (63%).

F-27

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        Summarized combined financial information for the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2012		2011
Real estate, net	$	3,731,740	$	3,806,187
Goodwill and other assets, net		5,734,318		5,797,690
Total assets	$	9,466,058	$	9,603,877
Capital lease obligations and mortgage debt	$	6,875,932	$	6,871,743
Accounts payable		971,095		1,083,581
Other partners' capital		1,435,885		1,465,536
HCP's capital(1)		183,146		183,017
Total liabilities and partners' capital	$	9,466,058	$	9,603,877

(1)

The combined basis difference of the Company's investments in these joint ventures of $28 million, as of December 31, 2012, is primarily attributable to real estate, capital lease obligations, deferred tax assets, goodwill and lease-related net intangibles.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011(1)(2)			2010(1)
Total revenues	$	4,260,319		$	4,388,376		$	172,972
Net loss(3)(4)		(15,865	)		(827,306	)		(54,237	)
HCP's share in earnings(3)(4)(5)		54,455			46,750			4,770
HCP's impairment of its investment in HCP Ventures II(4)		—			—			(71,693	)
Fees earned by HCP		1,895			2,073			4,666
Distributions received by HCP		6,299			5,681			9,738

(1)

Includes the financial information of HCP Ventures II, up to the date in which it was consolidated on January 14, 2011.

(2)

Beginning April 7, 2011, includes the financial information of HCR ManorCare, in which the Company acquired an interest for $95 million that represented a 9.9% equity interest at closing.

(3)

The combined net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011, includes impairments, net of the related tax benefit, of $865 million related to HCR ManorCare's goodwill and intangible assets. The impairments at the operating entity were the result of reduced cash flows primarily caused by the reimbursement reductions for the Medicare skilled nursing facility Prospective Payment System announced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) effective October 1, 2011. These reimbursement reductions were previously considered in the Company's underwriting assumptions for its initial investments in the operations of HCR ManorCare; therefore, the goodwill that was impaired was not part of the Company's basis in its investment. As such, HCR ManorCare's impairments during the year ended December 31, 2011 did not have an impact on the Company's share of earnings from or its investment in HCR ManorCare.

(4)

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010, includes an impairment of $54.5 million related to straight-line rent assets of HCP Ventures II (the "Ventures"). Concurrently, during the year ended December 31, 2010 HCP recognized a $71.7 million impairment of its investment in the Ventures that was primarily attributable to a reduction in the fair value of the Ventures' real estate assets and included the Company's share of the impact of the Ventures' impairment of its straight-line rent assets. Therefore, HCP's share in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2010 related to the impact of the Ventures' impairment of its straight-line rent assets was not included in equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures on the consolidated statements of income.

(5)

The Company's joint venture interest in HCR ManorCare is accounted for using the equity method and results in an ongoing reduction of DFL income, proportional to HCP's ownership in HCR ManorCare. The Company recorded a

F-28

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

reduction in DFL income of $59.4 million and $42.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Further, the Company's share of earnings from HCR ManorCare (equity income) increases for the corresponding reduction of related lease expense recognized at the HCR ManorCare level.

(9)   Intangibles

        The Company's intangible lease assets were (in thousands):

	December 31,
Intangible lease assets	2012			2011
Lease-up intangibles	$	581,742		$	385,148
Above market tenant lease intangibles		153,141			145,374
Below market ground lease intangibles		58,939			41,015
Gross intangible lease assets		793,822			571,537
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(241,121	)		(199,147	)
Net intangible lease assets	$	552,701		$	372,390

        The increase in intangible assets in 2012 from 2011 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of 129 senior housing communities from the Blackstone JV, comprised primarily of lease-up intangibles with an average amortization period of 15 years. The remaining weighted average amortization period of intangible assets was 12 years and 11 years at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

        The Company's intangible lease liabilities were (in thousands):

	December 31,
Intangible lease liabilities	2012			2011
Below market lease intangibles	$	192,733		$	206,460
Above market ground lease intangibles		6,091			1,779
Gross intangible lease liabilities		198,824			208,239
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(92,915	)		(90,462	)
Net intangible lease liabilities	$	105,909		$	117,777

        The remaining weighted average amortization period of unfavorable market lease intangibles was approximately eight years at both December 31, 2012 and 2011.

        For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, rental income includes additional revenues of $4.0 million, $6.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, from the amortization of net below market lease intangibles. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, operating expenses include additional expense of $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, from the amortization of net above market ground lease intangibles. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, depreciation and amortization expense includes additional expense of $43.7 million, $44.8 million and $45.7 million, respectively, from the amortization of lease-up and non-compete agreement intangibles.

F-29

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        Estimated aggregate amortization of intangible assets and liabilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter follows (in thousands):

	Intangible Assets		Intangible Liabilities
2013	$	72,684	$	16,772
2014		67,943		16,261
2015		64,078		15,696
2016		59,674		15,150
2017		52,452		12,787
Thereafter		235,870		29,243
	$	552,701	$	105,909

(10) Other Assets

        The Company's other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2012		2011
Straight-line rent assets, net of allowance of $33,521 and $34,457, respectively	$	306,294	$	266,620
Marketable debt securities(1)		222,809		—
Leasing costs, net		93,763		92,288
Deferred financing costs, net		45,490		35,649
Goodwill		50,346		50,346
Marketable equity securities		24,829		17,053
Other(2)(3)		44,989		23,502
Total other assets	$	788,520	$	485,458

(1)

Represents £137.9 million of Four Seasons senior unsecured notes translated into U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2012 (see below for additional information).

(2)

Includes a $5.4 million allowance for losses related to accrued interest receivable on the Delphis loan. At both December 31, 2012 and 2011, the carrying value of interest accrued related to the Delphis loan was zero. See Note 7 for additional information about the Delphis loan and the related impairment.

(3)

At December 31, 2012, includes aggregate loan receivables of $10 million from HCP Ventures IV, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture (see Note 8 for additional information) with an interest rate of 12% and various maturities from March 2013 to December 2013. The loans are secured by the counterparty's 80% partnership interest in the joint venture.

        In June 2011, the Company purchased approximately $22.4 million of marketable equity securities that are classified as available-for-sale. At December 31, 2011, the Company incurred a $5.4 million impairment for these securities as it concluded the decrease in value of such securities below their carrying value was other-than-temporary. At December 31, 2012, the marketable equity securities had a fair value and adjusted cost basis of $24.8 million and $17.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the fair value and adjusted cost basis of the marketable equity securities were both $17.1 million.

F-30

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Four Seasons Health Care Senior Unsecured Notes

        On June 28, 2012, the Company purchased senior unsecured notes with an aggregate par value of £138.5 million at a discount for £136.8 million ($214.9 million). The notes are issued by Elli Investments Limited, a subsidiary of Terra Firma, a European private equity firm, as part of its financing for the acquisition of Four Seasons Health Care, an elderly and specialist care provider in the United Kingdom. The notes mature in June 2020 and are non-callable through June 2016. The notes bear interest on their par value at a fixed rate of 12.25% per annum, with an original issue discount resulting in a yield to maturity of 12.5%. This investment was financed by a GBP denominated unsecured term loan that is discussed in Note 11. These senior unsecured notes are accounted for as marketable debt securities and classified as held-to-maturity.

(11) Debt

Bank Line of Credit and Term Loan

        On March 27, 2012, the Company executed an amendment to its existing $1.5 billion unsecured revolving line of credit facility (the "Facility"). This amendment reduces the cost of the Facility (lower borrowing rate and facility fee) and extends the Facility's maturity by one additional year to March 2016. The Facility contains a one-year extension option. Borrowings under this Facility accrue interest at LIBOR plus a margin that depends on the Company's debt ratings. The Company pays a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment that depends upon its debt ratings. Based on the Company's debt ratings at December 31, 2012, the margin on the Facility was 1.075%, and the facility fee was 0.175%. The Facility also includes a feature that will allow the Company to increase the Facility by an aggregate amount of up to $500 million, subject to securing additional commitments from existing lenders or new lending institutions. At December 31, 2012, the Company had no balance outstanding under this Facility.

        On July 30, 2012, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a £137 million ($223 million at December 31, 2012) four-year unsecured term loan (the "Term Loan") that accrues interest at a rate of GBP LIBOR plus 1.20%, based on the Company's current debt ratings. Concurrent with the closing of the Term Loan, the Company entered into a four-year interest rate swap contract that fixes the interest rate of the Term Loan at 1.81%, subject to adjustments based on the Company's debt ratings. The Term Loan contains a one-year committed extension option.

        The Facility and Term Loan contain certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements, including cross-default provisions to other indebtedness. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreements (i) limit the ratio of Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%, (ii) limit the ratio of Secured Debt to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 30%, (iii) limit the ratio of Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 60%, (iv) require a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.5 times and (v) require a formula-determined Minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of $9.2 billion at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with each of these restrictions and requirements of the Facility and Term Loan.

Senior Unsecured Notes

        At December 31, 2012, the Company had senior unsecured notes outstanding with an aggregate principal balance of $6.7 billion. At December 31, 2012, interest rates on the notes ranged from 1.21% to 7.07% with a weighted average effective rate of 5.10% and a weighted average maturity of six years. Discounts and premiums are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related senior

F-31

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants including limitations on debt, cross-acceleration provisions and other customary terms. As of December 31, 2012, the Company believes it was in compliance with these covenants.

        On November 19, 2012, the Company issued $800 million of 2.625% senior unsecured notes due in 2020. The notes were priced at 99.729% of the principal amount with an effective yield to maturity of 2.667%. Net proceeds from this offering were $793 million.

        On July 23, 2012, the Company issued $300 million of 3.15% senior unsecured notes due in 2022. The notes were priced at 98.888% of the principal amount with an effective yield to maturity of 3.28%; net proceeds from the offering were $294 million.

        On June 25, 2012, the Company repaid $250 million of maturing senior unsecured notes, which accrued interest at a rate of 6.45%. The senior unsecured notes were repaid with proceeds from the Company's June 2012 common stock offering.

        On January 23, 2012, the Company issued $450 million of 3.75% senior unsecured notes due in 2019. The notes were priced at 99.523% of the principal amount with an effective yield to maturity of 3.83%; net proceeds from the offering were $444 million.

        On September 15, 2011, the Company repaid $292 million of maturing senior unsecured notes, which accrued interest at a rate of 4.82%. The senior unsecured notes were repaid with funds available under the Facility.

        On January 24, 2011, the Company issued $2.4 billion of senior unsecured notes as follows: (i) $400 million of 2.70% notes due 2014; (ii) $500 million of 3.75% notes due 2016; (iii) $1.2 billion of 5.375% notes due 2021; and (iv) $300 million of 6.75% notes due 2041. The notes had an initial weighted average maturity of 10.3 years and a weighted average yield of 4.83%; net proceeds from the offering were $2.37 billion.

        The following is a summary of senior unsecured notes outstanding by maturity date at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Maturity	Principal Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
2013	$	550,000			5.80	%
2014		487,000			3.15
2015		400,000			6.64
2016		900,000			5.07
2017		750,000			6.04
2018		600,000			6.83
2019		450,000			3.96
2020		800,000			2.79
2021		1,200,000			5.53
2022		300,000			3.39
2041		300,000			6.89
		6,737,000
Discounts, net		(24,376	)
	$	6,712,624

F-32

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Mortgage Debt

        At December 31, 2012, the Company had $1.7 billion in aggregate principal amount of mortgage debt outstanding that is secured by 135 healthcare facilities (including redevelopment properties) that had a carrying value of $2.1 billion. At December 31, 2012, interest rates on the mortgage debt range from 1.54% to 8.69% with a weighted average effective interest rate of 6.13% and a weighted average maturity of four years.

        The following is a summary of mortgage debt outstanding by maturity date at December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Maturity	Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
2013	$	291,747			6.15	%
2014		179,695			5.78
2015		308,048			6.03
2016		291,338			6.88
2017		550,052			6.04
Thereafter		65,886			5.26
		1,686,766
Discounts, net		(10,222	)
	$	1,676,544

        Mortgage debt generally requires monthly principal and interest payments, is collateralized by real estate assets and is generally non-recourse. Mortgage debt typically restricts transfer of the encumbered assets, prohibits additional liens, restricts prepayment, requires payment of real estate taxes, requires maintenance of the assets in good condition, requires maintenance of insurance on the assets and includes conditions to obtain lender consent to enter into or terminate material leases. Some of the mortgage debt is also cross-collateralized by multiple assets and may require tenants or operators to maintain compliance with the applicable leases or operating agreements of such real estate assets.

Other Debt

        At December 31, 2012, the Company had $82 million of non-interest bearing life care bonds at two of its CCRCs and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at two of its senior housing facilities, all of which were payable to certain residents of the facilities (collectively, "Life Care Bonds"). The Life Care Bonds are refundable to the residents upon the termination of the contract or upon the successful resale of the unit.

F-33

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Debt Maturities

        The following table summarizes the Company's stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

Year	Term Loan(1)		Senior Unsecured Notes			Mortgage Debt			Total(2)
2013	$	—	$	550,000		$	291,747		$	841,747
2014		—		487,000			179,695			666,695
2015		—		400,000			308,048			708,048
2016		222,694		900,000			291,338			1,414,032
2017		—		750,000			550,052			1,300,052
Thereafter		—		3,650,000			65,886			3,715,886
		222,694		6,737,000			1,686,766			8,646,460
(Discounts) and premiums, net		—		(24,376	)		(10,222	)		(34,598	)
	$	222,694	$	6,712,624		$	1,676,544		$	8,611,862

(1)

Represents £137 million translated into U.S. dollars as of December 31, 2012.

(2)

Excludes $82 million of other debt that represents non-interest bearing Life Care Bonds and occupancy fee deposits at certain of the Company's senior housing facilities, which have no scheduled maturities.

(12) Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

        From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of the Company's business. Except as described in this Note 12, the Company is not aware of any other legal proceedings or claims that it believes may have, individually or taken together, a material adverse effect on the Company's business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company's policy is to accrue legal expenses as they are incurred.

        On May 3, 2007, Ventas, Inc. ("Ventas") filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky alleging, among other things, that the Company interfered with Ventas's prospective business advantage in connection with Ventas's 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living Real Estate Investment Trust ("Sunrise REIT"). Ventas sought compensatory damages in excess of $300 million plus punitive damages. Prior to the jury deliberations, the District Court dismissed, among other rulings, Ventas's claim for punitive damages. On September 4, 2009, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Ventas in the amount of approximately $102 million. The Company recognized $102 million as a provision for litigation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009. Both Ventas and the Company appealed various rulings of the District Court and the jury verdict to the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On May 17, 2011, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the District Court erred by not submitting Ventas's claim for punitive damages to the jury, and affirmed the District Court's judgment in all other respects. On August 23, 2011, the Company paid Ventas $102 million resulting from the jury verdict. On November 9, 2011, the Company and Ventas settled all claims relating to the litigation and the Company paid $125 million to Ventas in addition to the $102 million paid in August 2011.

F-34

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        On June 29, 2009, several of the Company's subsidiaries, together with three of its tenants, filed complaints in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the "Court of Chancery") against Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. and three of its subsidiaries ("Sunrise"). One of the complaints, which related to four of the 64 communities subject to the dispute, was removed on July 24, 2009 to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (the "Virginia District Court"). On April 30, 2010, the Virginia District Court dismissed all claims before it, and each party filed a notice of appeal regarding the decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

        On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into agreements with Sunrise in which: (i) the Company acquired the right to terminate management contracts on 27 of the 75 senior housing communities owned by the Company (these 27 communities were leased to tenants that had entered into management contracts with Sunrise); (ii) Sunrise agreed to limit certain fees and charges associated with the in-place management contracts of the remaining 48 communities, where such limitations were consistent with the parties' budgetary rights and obligations under existing agreements; (iii) the Company agreed to fund certain capital expenditures at the remaining 48 communities, and (iv) both parties dismissed all of the previous litigation proceedings that were filed against each other. The Company agreed to pay Sunrise $50 million for the right to terminate the management contracts of the 27 communities; after taking into account the rights to approximately $9 million of working capital that the Company received in conjunction with acquiring these termination rights, the net cost to acquire the termination rights was $41 million. The Company had marketed for lease the 27 communities to a limited group of operators, and prior to August 31, 2010, had received a favorable bid and an executed non-binding term sheet from Emeritus Corporation ("Emeritus"). On October 18, 2010, the Company executed two triple-net master leases with Emeritus for the 27 communities on terms consistent with a non-binding term sheet agreed to by the Company and Emeritus in August 2010, including fixed lease terms of 15 years and two 10 year extension options. Shortly thereafter, on October 31, 2010, the Company exercised its rights under the existing lease contracts to terminate the leases with the tenants that had entered into the management contracts with Sunrise for a payment of $2 million. The term of the new Emeritus leases commenced on November 1, 2010, immediately after such termination.

        The Company capitalized the $41 million cost for the above termination rights as an initial direct leasing cost of the new leases as it determined that: (i) acquiring the right to terminate Sunrise's long-term management contracts was essential to enable the Company to lease such communities to another operator; and (ii) prior to August 31, 2010, the leasing transaction with Emeritus was reasonably assured. The initial direct leasing costs will be amortized over the initial 15-year term of the new leases with Emeritus. Further, the Company concluded that no amount of the $50 million paid to Sunrise should be allocated to the dismissed litigation or to the existing leases on the 48 remaining communities, because the Company believed that: (i) as ruled by the Virginia District Court, Sunrise's counterclaims lacked merit and had no value, and the claims remaining in the Chancery Court arose from similar facts and were expected to be decided on the basis of similar law; (ii) Sunrise's agreement to limit certain fees on the remaining 48 communities, and the Company's agreement to fund certain capital expenditures at the communities, were each consistent with the Company's and Sunrise's obligations, respectively under the existing agreements; and (iii) the incremental value gained by the reasonably assured future rents from Emeritus and the acquired working capital exceeded the payment to Sunrise.

F-35

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Concentration of Credit Risk

        Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of operators, tenants or obligors related to the Company's investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company regularly monitors various segments of its portfolio to assess potential concentrations of risks. The Company does not have significant foreign operations.

        The following table provides information regarding the Company's concentration with respect to certain operators; the information provided is presented for the gross assets and revenues that are associated with certain operators as percentages of the respective segment's and total Company's gross assets and revenues:

Segment Concentrations:

	Percentage of Senior Housing Gross Assets				Percentage of Senior Housing Revenues
	December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
Operators	2012		2011		2012		2011		2010
HCR ManorCare(1)		11		14		11		10		—
Brookdale(2)		11		14		14		22		11
Emeritus(3)		35		19		23		24		14
Sunrise(3)(4)		17		22		15		19		21

	Percentage of Post-Acute/ Skilled Nursing Gross Assets				Percentage of Post-Acute/ Skilled Nursing Revenues
	December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
Operators	2012		2011		2012		2011		2010
HCR ManorCare(1)		89		94		90		84		30

Total Company Concentrations:

	Percentage of Total Company Gross Assets				Percentage of Total Company Revenues
	December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
Operators	2012		2011		2012		2011		2010
HCR ManorCare(1)		31		35		30		27		9
Brookdale(2)		4		5		5		7		5
Emeritus(3)		13		6		8		7		6
Sunrise(3)(4)		7		7		5		6		9

(1)

On April 7, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of HCR ManorCare's real estate assets, which included the settlement of the Company's HCR ManorCare debt investments, see Notes 3 and 7 for additional information.

(2)

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, Brookdale Senior Living ("Brookdale") percentages do not include $692 and $683 million, respectively, of senior housing assets related to 21 senior housing facilities that Brookdale operates (beginning September 1, 2011) on the Company's behalf under a RIDEA structure. Assuming that these assets were attributable to Brookdale, the percentage of combined segment and total assets attributable to Brookdale would be 20% and 8%, respectively, as of December 31, 2012, and 26% and 9%, respectively, as of December 31, 2011. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, Brookdale percentages do not include $143 million and $47 million, respectively, of senior

F-36

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

housing revenues, related to 21 senior housing facilities that Brookdale operates on the Company's behalf under a RIDEA structure. Assuming that these revenues were attributable to Brookdale, the percentage of combined segment and total revenues attributable to Brookdale would be 36% and 12%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 31% and 10%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

(3)

27 properties formerly operated by Sunrise were transitioned to Emeritus effective November 1, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Sunrise percentages exclude $33 million of revenues for 27 properties due to the consolidation of four VIEs from August 31 2010 to November 1, 2010. Assuming that these revenues were attributable to Sunrise, the percentage of segment and total revenues for Sunrise would be 28% and 12%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Percentage of total revenues from Emeritus for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes partial results for Blackstone JV acquisition. Assuming that full-year results were included for this acquisition in the Company's 2012 revenues, the percentage of segment revenues and total revenues would be 36% and 12%, respectively.

(4)

Certain of the Company's properties are leased to tenants who have entered into management contracts with Sunrise to operate the respective property on their behalf. The Company's concentration of gross assets includes properties directly leased to Sunrise and properties that are managed by Sunrise on behalf of third party tenants.

        On September 1, 2011, the Company completed a strategic venture with Brookdale that includes the operation of 37 HCP-owned senior living communities previously leased to or operated by Horizon Bay Retirement Living ("Horizon Bay"). As part of this transaction, Brookdale acquired Horizon Bay and: (i) assumed an existing triple-net lease for nine HCP communities; (ii) entered into a new triple-net lease related to four HCP communities; (iii) assumed Horizon Bay's management of three HCP communities, one of which was recently developed by HCP; and (iv) entered into management contracts and a joint venture agreement for a 10% interest in the real estate and operations for 21 of the Company's communities that are in a RIDEA structure. In connection with these transactions, the Company purchased approximately one million shares of Brookdale's common stock in June 2011 (see Note 10 for additional information regarding these marketable equity securities).

        Under the provisions of RIDEA, a REIT may lease "qualified health care properties" on an arm's length basis to a TRS if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an "eligible independent contractor." The year ended December 31, 2012 includes $143 million and $91 million in revenues and operating expenses, respectively, as a result of reflecting the facility-level results for the 21 RIDEA facilities operated by Brookdale beginning September 1, 2011. The year ended December 31, 2011 includes $47 million and $30 million in revenues and operating expenses, respectively, as a result of reflecting the facility-level results for the 21 RIDEA facilities.

        The year ended December 31, 2010 includes increases of $29 million and $26 million in revenues and operating expenses, respectively, as a result of reflecting the facility-level results for 27 facilities leased to four VIE tenants operated by Sunrise that were consolidated, for the period from August 31, 2010 to November 1, 2010, as a result of the termination rights the Company acquired from the settlement agreement discussed above. See Note 21 for additional information regarding VIEs.

        To mitigate credit risk of leasing properties to certain senior housing and post-acute/skilled nursing operators, leases with operators are often combined into portfolios that contain cross-default terms, so that if a tenant of any of the properties in a portfolio defaults on its obligations under its lease, the Company may pursue its remedies under the lease with respect to any of the properties in the portfolio. Certain portfolios also contain terms whereby the net operating profits of the properties are combined for the purpose of securing the funding of rental payments due under each lease.

        At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company's gross real estate assets in the state of California, excluding assets held-for-sale, represented approximately 20% and 23% of the Company's total assets, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company's revenues derived from properties

F-37

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

located in the states of California, Texas and Florida represented approximately 22%, 12% and 10% of the Company's total revenues, respectively.

DownREIT LLCs

        In connection with the formation of certain DownREIT limited liability companies ("LLCs"), members may contribute appreciated real estate to a DownREIT LLC in exchange for DownREIT units. These contributions are generally tax-deferred, so that the pre-contribution gain related to the property is not taxed to the member. However, if a contributed property is later sold by the DownREIT LLC, the unamortized pre-contribution gain that exists at the date of sale is specifically allocated and taxed to the contributing members. In many of the DownREITs, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with those members who contributed appreciated property into the DownREIT LLC. Under these indemnification agreements, if any of the appreciated real estate contributed by the members is sold by the DownREIT LLC in a taxable transaction within a specified number of years, the Company will reimburse the affected members for the federal and state income taxes associated with the pre-contribution gain that is specially allocated to the affected member under the Code ("make-whole payments"). These make-whole payments include a tax gross-up provision. These indemnification agreements have expiration terms that range through 2033.

Credit Enhancement Guarantee

        Certain of the Company's senior housing facilities serve as collateral for $117 million of debt (maturing May 1, 2025) that is owed by a previous owner of the facilities. This indebtedness is guaranteed by the previous owner who has an investment grade credit rating. These senior housing facilities, which are classified as DFLs, had a carrying value of $374 million as of December 31, 2012.

Environmental Costs

        The Company monitors its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company carries environmental insurance and believes that the policy terms, conditions, limitations and deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage and current industry practice.

General Uninsured Losses

        The Company obtains various types of insurance to mitigate the impact of property, business interruption, liability, flood, windstorm, earthquake, environmental and terrorism related losses. The Company attempts to obtain appropriate policy terms, conditions, limits and deductibles considering the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage and current industry practice. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses, such as those due to acts of war or other events that may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. In addition, the Company has a large number of properties that are exposed to earthquake, flood and windstorm occurrences for which the related insurances carry high deductibles.

Tenant Purchase Options

        Certain leases contain purchase options whereby the tenant may elect to acquire the underlying real estate. Annualized lease payments (base rent only) to be received from these leases, including

F-38

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

DFLs, subject to purchase options, in the year that the purchase options are exercisable, are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year	Annualized Base Rent(1)		Number of Properties
2013	$	42,700		23
2014		36,666		15
2015		16,702		15
2016		38,933		18
2017		1,685		2
Thereafter		96,859		58
	$	233,545		131

(1)

Represents the most recent month's base rent including additional rent floors and cash income from direct financing leases annualized for 12 months. Base rent does not include tenant recoveries, additional rents in excess of floors and non-cash revenue adjustments (i.e., straight-line rents, amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, DFL interest accretion and deferred revenues).

Rental Expense

        The Company's rental expense attributable to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $7 million, $6 million and $6 million, respectively. These rental expense amounts include ground rent and other leases. Ground leases generally require fixed annual rent payments and may also include escalation clauses and renewal options. These leases have terms that are up to 99 years, excluding extension options. Future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable ground and other operating leases as of December 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands):

Year	Amount
2013	$	7,734
2014		7,119
2015		6,372
2016		5,228
2017		4,797
Thereafter		193,324
	$	224,574

(13) Equity

Preferred Stock

        On April 23, 2012, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock consisting of 4,000,000 shares of its 7.25% Series E preferred stock and the 7,820,000 shares of its 7.10% Series F preferred stock. The shares of Series E and Series F preferred stock were redeemed at a price of $25 per share, or $295.5 million in aggregate, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. As a result of the redemption, which was announced on March 22, 2012, the Company incurred a charge of $10.4 million related to the original issuance costs of the preferred stock (this charge is

F-39

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

presented as an additional preferred stock dividend in the Company's consolidated statements of income).

        Distributions with respect to the Company's preferred stock can be characterized for federal income tax purposes as taxable ordinary dividends, capital gain dividends, nondividend distributions or a combination thereof. Following is the characterization of the Company's annual preferred stock dividends per share:

	Series E						Series F
	December 31,						December 31,
	2012(1)		2011		2010		2012(1)		2011		2010
	(unaudited)
Ordinary dividends	$	0.4383	$	1.4335	$	1.6695	$	0.4292	$	1.4038	$	1.6350
Capital gain dividends		0.0148		0.3790		0.1430		0.0145		0.3712		0.1400
	$	0.4531	$	1.8125	$	1.8125	$	0.4437	$	1.7750	$	1.7750

(1)

As discussed above, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding preferred stock on April 23, 2012.

Common Stock

        Distributions with respect to the Company's common stock can be characterized for federal income tax purposes as taxable ordinary dividends, capital gain dividends, nondividend distributions or a combination thereof. Following is the characterization of the Company's annual common stock dividends per share:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
	(unaudited)
Ordinary dividends	$	1.4618	$	0.9259	$	1.0935
Capital gain dividends		0.0495		0.2448		0.0937
Nondividend distributions		0.4887		0.7493		0.6728
	$	2.0000	$	1.9200	$	1.8600

        On January 25, 2013, the Company announced that its Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.525 per share. The common stock cash dividend will be paid on February 19, 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 4, 2013.

        On October 19, 2012, we completed a public offering of 22 million shares of common stock and received net proceeds of $979 million, which were primarily used to acquire the 129 senior housing communities from the Blackstone JV.

        In June 2012, the Company completed a $376 million offering of 8.97 million shares of common stock at a price of $41.88 per share, which were primarily used to repay $250 million of maturing senior unsecured notes, which accrued interest at a rate of 6.45%.

        In March 2012, the Company completed a $359 million offering of 9.0 million shares of common stock at a price of $39.93 per share, which were primarily used to redeem all outstanding shares of the Company's preferred stock.

F-40

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        In March 2011, the Company completed a $1.273 billion public offering of 34.5 million shares of common stock at a price of $36.90 per share. The Company received total net proceeds of $1.235 billion, which were primarily used to finance part of the aggregate purchase price of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition. The following is a summary of the Company's other issuances of common stock:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011
	(shares in thousands)
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan		1,064		1,910
Conversion of DownREIT units		736		80
Exercise of stock options		2,455		1,157
Vesting of restricted stock units(1)		707		228

(1)

Issued under the Company's 2006 Performance Incentive Plan.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

        The following is a summary of the Company's accumulated other comprehensive loss (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2012			2011
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities	$	7,776		$	—
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net		(18,452	)		(15,712	)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan minimum liability		(3,150	)		(2,794	)
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment		(827	)		(1,076	)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(14,653	)	$	(19,582	)

Noncontrolling Interests

        At December 31, 2012, there were four million non-managing member units (six million shares of HCP common stock are issuable upon conversion) outstanding in four DownREIT LLCs, in all of which the Company is the managing member. At December 31, 2012, the carrying and market values of the four million DownREIT units were $188 million and $275 million, respectively.

(14) Segment Disclosures

        The Company evaluates its business and makes resource allocations based on its five business segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) post-acute/skilled nursing, (iii) life science, (iv) medical office and (v) hospital. Under the senior housing, post-acute/skilled nursing, life science and hospital segments, the Company invests or co-invests primarily in single operator or tenant properties, through the acquisition and development of real estate, management of operations (RIDEA) and by debt issued by operators in these sectors. Under the medical office segment, the Company invests or co-invests through the acquisition and development of medical office buildings ("MOBs") that are leased under gross, modified gross or triple-net leases, generally to multiple tenants, and which generally require a greater level of property management. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described under Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 2). There were no intersegment

F-41

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

sales or transfers during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating income from continuing operations ("NOI"), adjusted NOI and interest income of the combined investments in each segment.

        Non-segment assets consist primarily of corporate assets including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, net, marketable equity securities, deferred financing costs and, if any, real estate held-for-sale. Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining the Company's performance measure. See Note 12 for other information regarding concentrations of credit risk.

        Summary information for the reportable segments follows (in thousands):

        For the year ended December 31, 2012:

Segments	Rental Revenues(1)		Resident Fees and Services		Interest Income		Investment Management Fee Income		Total Revenues		NOI(2)		Adjusted NOI(2) (Cash NOI)
Senior housing	$	482,336	$	143,745	$	3,503	$	—	$	629,584	$	531,419	$	480,872
Post-acute/skilled nursing		539,242		—		19,993		—		559,235		538,856		462,927
Life science		289,664		—		—		4		289,668		236,491		226,997
Medical office		334,811		—		—		1,891		336,702		202,547		197,569
Hospital		84,493		—		1,040		—		85,533		80,980		78,995
Total	$	1,730,546	$	143,745	$	24,536	$	1,895	$	1,900,722	$	1,590,293	$	1,447,360

        For the year ended December 31, 2011:

Segments	Rental Revenues(1)		Resident Fees and Services		Interest Income		Investment Management Fee Income		Total Revenues		NOI(2)		Adjusted NOI(2) (Cash NOI)
Senior housing	$	470,592	$	50,619	$	178	$	70	$	521,459	$	486,673	$	433,728
Post-acute/skilled nursing		397,554		—		98,450		—		496,004		396,969		339,946
Life science		288,151		—		—		4		288,155		235,355		212,250
Medical office		320,115		—		—		1,999		322,114		192,213		186,180
Hospital		83,128		—		1,236		—		84,364		78,798		76,402
Total	$	1,559,540	$	50,619	$	99,864	$	2,073	$	1,712,096	$	1,390,008	$	1,248,506

        For the year ended December 31, 2010:

Segments	Rental Revenues(1)		Resident Fees and Services		Interest Income		Investment Management Fee Income		Total Revenues		NOI(2)		Adjusted NOI(2) (Cash NOI)
Senior housing	$	337,220	$	32,596	$	364	$	2,300	$	372,480	$	341,043	$	306,682
Post-acute/skilled nursing		36,023		—		121,703		—		157,726		35,847		34,685
Life science		276,762		—		—		4		276,766		228,270		204,938
Medical office		309,285		—		—		2,362		311,647		181,398		175,654
Hospital		83,491		—		38,096		—		121,587		78,661		73,642
Total	$	1,042,781	$	32,596	$	160,163	$	4,666	$	1,240,206	$	865,219	$	795,601

(1)

Represents rental and related revenues, tenant recoveries, and income from DFLs.

F-42

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(2)

NOI is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate. The Company defines NOI as rental and related revenues, including tenant recoveries, resident fees and services, and income from direct financing leases, less property level operating expenses. NOI excludes interest income, investment management fee income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, litigation settlement, impairments, impairment recoveries, other income, net, income taxes, equity income from and impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and discontinued operations. The Company believes NOI provides relevant and useful information because it reflects only income and operating expense items that are incurred at the property level and presents them on an unleveraged basis. Adjusted NOI is calculated as NOI after eliminating the effects of straight-line rents, DFL accretion, amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, and lease termination fees. Adjusted NOI is sometimes referred to as "cash NOI." The Company uses NOI and adjusted NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess and compare property level performance. The Company believes that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income as defined by GAAP because it does not reflect the aforementioned excluded items. Further, the Company's definition of NOI may not be comparable to the definition used by other REITs, as those companies may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.

        The following is a reconciliation from reported net income to NOI and adjusted NOI (in thousands):

	Years ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Net income	$	846,842		$	554,494		$	344,395
Interest income		(24,536	)		(99,864	)		(160,163	)
Investment management fee income		(1,895	)		(2,073	)		(4,666	)
Interest expense		417,130			416,396			285,508
Depreciation and amortization		358,245			349,922			306,934
General and administrative		79,454			96,121			83,019
Litigation settlement and provision		—			125,000			—
Impairments (recoveries)		7,878			15,400			(11,900	)
Other income, net		(2,776	)		(12,732	)		(16,194	)
Income taxes		(1,636	)		1,250			412
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures		(54,455	)		(46,750	)		(4,770	)
Impairments of investment in unconsolidated joint venture		—			—			71,693
Total discontinued operations		(33,958	)		(7,156	)		(29,049	)
NOI		1,590,293			1,390,008			865,219
Straight-line rents		(47,311	)		(59,173	)		(47,243	)
DFL accretion		(94,240	)		(74,007	)		(10,641	)
Amortization of above and below market lease intangibles, net		(2,232	)		(4,510	)		(6,378	)
Lease termination fees		(636	)		(5,873	)		(7,665	)
NOI adjustments related to discontinued operations		1,486			2,061			2,309
Adjusted NOI	$	1,447,360		$	1,248,506		$	795,601

F-43

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The Company's total assets by segment were (in thousands):

	December 31,
Segments	2012			2011			2010
Senior housing	$	7,658,612		$	5,785,441		$	4,196,456
Post-acute/skilled nursing		6,080,826			5,644,472			2,133,640
Life science		3,932,397			3,886,851			3,709,528
Medical office		2,661,394			2,336,302			2,299,311
Hospital		724,999			757,618			770,038
Gross segment assets		21,058,228			18,410,684			13,108,973
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,978,597	)		(1,646,736	)		(1,386,850	)
Net segment assets		19,079,631			16,763,948			11,722,123
Assets held-for-sale, net		—			106,295			147,538
Other non-segment assets		835,924			538,232			1,462,262
Total assets	$	19,915,555		$	17,408,475		$	13,331,923

        At December 31, 2012, goodwill of $50.3 million is allocated as follows: (i) senior housing—$30.5 million, (ii) medical office—$11.4 million, (iii) post-acute/skilled nursing—$3.3 million and (iv) hospital—$5.1 million. The Company completed the required annual impairment test during the three months ended December 31, 2012; no impairment was recognized based on the results of this impairment test.

(15) Future Minimum Rents

        Future minimum lease payments to be received, excluding operating expense reimbursements, from tenants under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

Year	Amount
2013	$	1,043,473
2014		1,004,409
2015		963,872
2016		926,289
2017		852,670
Thereafter		4,182,607
	$	8,973,320

(16) Compensation Plans

Stock Based Compensation

        On May 11, 2006, the Company's stockholders approved the 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (the "2006 Incentive Plan"). The 2006 Incentive Plan provides for the granting of stock-based compensation, including stock options, restricted stock and performance restricted stock units to officers, employees and directors in connection with their employment with or services provided to the Company. On April 23, 2009, the Company's stockholders amended the 2006 Incentive Plan. As a result of the amendment, the maximum number of shares reserved for awards under the 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended, is 23.2 million shares. The maximum number of shares available for future awards under the

F-44

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2006 Incentive Plan is 6.8 million shares at December 31, 2012, of which approximately 4.5 million shares may be issued as restricted stock and performance restricted stock units.

Stock Options

        Stock options are granted with an exercise price per share equal to the closing market price of the company's common stock on the grant date. Stock options generally vest ratably over a four- to five-year period and have a 10-year contractual term. Vesting of certain options may accelerate, as provided in the 2006 Incentive Plan or in the applicable award agreement, upon retirement, a change in control or other specified events. Upon the exercise of options, the participant is required to pay the exercise price of the options being exercised and the related tax withholding obligation. Participants have the ability to elect to have the Company withhold the number of shares to be delivered upon exercise of stock options to pay the related exercise price and tax withholding obligation. The value of the shares withheld is dependent upon the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date that the relevant transaction occurs.

        A summary of the stock option activity in 2012 is presented in the following table (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Shares Under Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012		6,524		$	28.76		6.1	$	84,169
Granted		455			41.64
Exercised		(3,838	)		28.33
Forfeited		(14	)		26.40
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012		3,127			31.16		6.9		43,774
Exercisable as of December 31, 2012		539			32.09		6.0		7,041

        The following table summarizes additional information concerning outstanding and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2012 (shares in thousands):

					Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Currently Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price	Shares Under Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price				Shares Under Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$23.34 - $25.52		910	$	23.34		6.1		54	$	23.34
27.11 -  28.35		739		28.28		6.8		210		28.12
31.95 -  41.64		1,478		37.41		7.4		275		36.84
		3,127		31.16		6.9		539		32.09

F-45

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The following table summarizes additional information concerning unvested stock options at December 31, 2012 (shares in thousands):

	Shares Under Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2012		3,285		$	3.77
Granted		455			6.34
Vested		(1,138	)		3.59
Forfeited		(14	)		3.67
Unvested at December 31, 2012		2,588			4.30

        The weighted average fair value per share at the date of grant for options awarded during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $6.34, $5.97 and $5.17, respectively. The total vesting date intrinsic value (at vesting) of shares under options vested during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $18.0 million, $15.8 million and $10.7 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of vested shares under options at December 31, 2012 was $7.0 million.

        Proceeds received from options exercised under the 2006 Incentive Plan for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $51.6 million, $30.8 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value (at exercise) of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $51.0 million, $13.4 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

        The fair value of the stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions described below. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees and turnover rates. For stock options granted in 2012, 2011 and 2010, the expected volatility was based on the average of the Company's: (i) historical volatility of the adjusted closing prices of its common stock for a period equal to the stock option's expected life, ending on the grant date, calculated on a weekly basis and (ii) the implied volatility of traded options on its common stock for a period equal to 30 days ending on the grant date. For stock options granted prior to 2010, the expected volatility was based on the Company's historical volatility of the adjusted closing prices of its common stock for a period equal to the stock option's expected life, ending on the grant date and calculated on a weekly basis. The following table summarizes the Company's stock option valuation assumptions used with respect to stock options awarded in 2012, 2011 and 2010:

	2012			2011			2010
Risk-free rate		1.09	%		2.58	%		2.77	%
Expected life (in years)		5.9			6.5			6.3
Expected volatility		32.7	%		31.8	%		35.0	%
Expected dividend yield		5.9	%		6.1	%		6.2	%

Restricted Stock and Performance Restricted Stock Units

        Under the 2006 Incentive Plan, restricted stock and performance restricted stock units generally have a contractual life or vest over a three- to five-year period. The vesting of certain restricted shares

F-46

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

and units may accelerate, as provided in the 2006 Incentive Plan or in the applicable award agreement, upon retirement, a change in control or other specified events. When vested, each performance restricted stock unit is convertible into one share of common stock. The restricted stock and performance restricted stock units are valued on the grant date based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on that date. Generally, the Company recognizes the fair value of the awards over the applicable vesting period as compensation expense. Upon any exercise or payment of restricted shares or units, the participant is required to pay the related tax withholding obligation. Participants generally have the flexibility to elect to have the Company reduce the number of shares to be delivered to pay the related tax withholding obligation. The value of the shares withheld is dependent on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on the date that the relevant transaction occurs. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company withheld 361,000, 136,000 and 154,000 shares, respectively, to offset tax withholding obligations with respect to the restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards.

        The following table summarizes additional information concerning restricted stock and restricted stock units at December 31, 2012 (units and shares in thousands):

	Restricted Stock Units			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Restricted Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at January 1, 2012		1,478		$	32.59		339		$	27.75
Granted		456			41.67		—			N/A
Vested		(707	)		33.03		(186	)		27.55
Forfeited		(7	)		38.29		(8	)		26.72
Unvested at December 31, 2012		1,220			35.16		145			27.24

        At December 31, 2012, the weighted average remaining vesting period of restricted stock units and restricted stock was three years. The total fair values (at vesting) of restricted stock and restricted stock units which vested for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $38.6 million, $14.4 million and $12.5 million, respectively.

        As the Company pays dividends on its outstanding common stock, holders of restricted stock awards are generally entitled to any dividends on the underlying restricted shares, and holders of restricted stock units generally have the right to a cash payment equal to the dividends that would be paid on a number of shares of Company common stock equal to the number of outstanding units subject to the award.

        On August 14, 2006, the Company granted 219,000 restricted stock units to the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The restricted stock units vest over a period of 10 years beginning in 2012, subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances as provided in the applicable award agreement and the Company's employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer. Each vested unit will be convertible, upon payment of the award, into one share of common stock. Additionally, as the Company pays dividends on its outstanding common stock, the original award will be credited with additional restricted stock units as dividend equivalents (in lieu of receiving a cash payment). Generally, the dividend equivalent restricted stock units will be subject to the same vesting and other conditions as applied to the grant. At December 31, 2012, the total number of restricted stock units under this arrangement was approximately 317,000.

F-47

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        In 2012, the Company implemented a clawback policy that is retroactive to prior years pursuant to which its Board of Directors or Compensation Committee shall, in such circumstances as it determines to be appropriate, require reimbursement or cancellation of all or a portion of any short or long-term cash or equity incentive awards or payments to an officer (or former officer, as the case may be) of the Company where: (1) the amount of, or number of shares included in, any such payment or award was determined based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of an accounting restatement due to noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws; and (2) a lesser payment or award of cash or shares would have been made to the individual based upon the restated financial results; and (3) the payment or award of cash or shares was received by the individual prior to or during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing of the financial results that were subsequently restated.

        Total share-based compensation expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $23.3 million, $20.2 million and $15.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $41.6 million of deferred compensation cost associated with future employee services, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company's incentive plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.

Employee Benefit Plan

        The Company maintains a 401(k) and profit sharing plan that allows for eligible participants to defer compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. The Company provides a matching contribution of up to 4% of each participant's eligible compensation. During 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company's matching contributions were approximately $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

(17) Impairments

        During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company executed an expansion of its tenant relationship with General Atomics in Poway, CA, to a total of 396,000 square feet, consisting of the following: (i) a lease extension of 281,000 square feet through June 2024, (ii) a new 10—year lease for a 115,000 square feet building to be developed and (iii) the purchase of a 19 acre land parcel from the Company for $19 million. As a result of the land sale the Company recognized an impairment charge of $7.9 million, which reduced the carrying value of the Company's investment from $27 million to the $19 million sales price. The fair value of the Company's land parcel was based on the sales price from its disposition in conjunction with this transaction. The sales price of the land parcel was considered to be a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy.

        During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company concluded that its senior secured term loan to Delphis was impaired and established a provision for losses (impairment) of $15.4 million. The impairment resulted from the Company's conclusion that the carrying value of its loan was in excess of the fair value of the loan's underlying collateral assets. This provision for losses reduced the carrying value of its investment from $91.1 million to its fair value of $75.7 million. The fair value of the Company's loan investment was based on a discounted cash flow valuation model and inputs considered to be a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. Inputs to this valuation model include real estate capitalization rates, discount rates, earnings multiples, industry growth rates and operating margins, some of which influence the Company's expectation of future cash flows from the loan and, accordingly, the fair value of its investment.

F-48

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        On October 12, 2010, the Company concluded that its 35% interest in HCP Ventures II, which owns 25 senior housing properties leased by Horizon Bay Communities or certain of its affiliates (collectively "Horizon Bay"), was impaired. The impairment resulted from the recent and projected deterioration of the operating performance of the properties leased by Horizon Bay from HCP Ventures II. During the year ended December 31, 2010 the Company recognized an impairment of $71.7 million related to its investment in HCP Ventures II, which reduced the carrying value of its investment from $136.8 million to its fair value of $65.1 million. The fair value of the Company's investment in HCP Ventures II was based on a discounted cash flow valuation model that is considered to be a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. Inputs to this valuation model include real estate capitalization rates, discount rates, industry growth rates and operating margins, some of which influence the Company's expectation of future cash flows from HCP Ventures II and, accordingly, the fair value of its investment.

(18) Income Taxes

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $1.6 million, as compared to income tax expense of $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company's income tax expense from discontinued operations was insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. The Company's deferred income tax expense and its balance in deferred tax assets and liabilities were insignificant as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

        The Company files numerous U.S. federal, state and local income and franchise tax returns. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local tax examinations by taxing authorities for years prior to 2008.

        At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the tax basis of the Company's net assets is less than the reported amounts by $7.6 billion and $7.4 billion, respectively. The difference between the reported amounts and the tax basis is primarily related to the Slough Estates USA, Inc. ("SEUSA") and HCR ManorCare acquisitions, which occurred in 2007 and 2011, respectively. Both SEUSA and HCR ManorCare were corporations subject to federal and state income taxes. As a result of these acquisitions, the Company succeeded to the tax attributes of SEUSA and HCR ManorCare, including the tax basis in the acquired companies' assets and liabilities. The Company generally will be subject to a corporate-level tax on any taxable disposition of SEUSA's pre-acquisition assets that occur within ten years after its August 1, 2007 acquisition, and any taxable disposition of HCR ManorCare's pre-acquisition assets that occur within ten years after its April 7, 2011 acquisition.

        The corporate-level tax associated with the disposition of assets acquired in connection with the SEUSA and HCR ManorCare acquisitions would be assessed only to the extent of the built-in gain that existed on the date of each acquisition, based on the fair market value of the assets on August 1, 2007, with respect to SEUSA, and April 7, 2011, with respect to HCR ManorCare. The Company does not expect to dispose of any assets included in either acquisition that would result in the imposition of a material tax liability. As a result, the Company has not recorded a deferred tax liability associated with this corporate-level tax. Gains from asset dispositions occurring more than 10 years after either acquisition will not be subject to this corporate-level tax. However, from time to time, the Company may dispose of SEUSA or HCR ManorCare assets before the applicable 10-year periods if it is able to effect a tax deferred exchange.

        In connection with the SEUSA and HCR ManorCare acquisitions, the Company assumed unrecognized tax benefits of $8 million and $2 million, respectively. During 2011, the Company had a

F-49

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

net decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of $4.9 million. The decrease was caused by the reversal of the remaining $6.9 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to the SEUSA acquisition caused by SEUSA's settlement of federal and state tax audits for all years for which unrecognized tax benefits had been accrued, net of a $2.0 million increase in unrecognized tax benefits assumed in connection with the HCR ManorCare acquisition. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the entire $2.0 million balance in unrecognized tax benefits was related to HCP's acquisition of HCR ManorCare.

        A reconciliation of the Company's beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits follows (in thousands):

	Amount
Balance at January 1, 2010	$	7,975
Reductions based on prior years' tax positions		(1,085	)
Additions based on 2010 tax positions		—
Balance at December 31, 2010		6,890
Additions based on prior years' tax positions		1,783
Reductions based on prior years' tax positions		(6,890	)
Additions based on 2011 tax positions		194
Balance at December 31, 2011		1,977
Reductions based on prior years' tax positions		—
Additions based on 2012 tax positions		—
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	1,977

        The Company anticipates that the balance in unrecognized tax benefits will decrease over the next 12 months by approximately $891,000 due to a lapse in the statute of limitations.

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an insignificant increase to interest expense associated with the unrecognized tax benefits. Due to the reversal of the remaining balance of the SEUSA unrecognized tax benefits during 2011, the related $1.3 million of interest expense was also reversed. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded net reductions to interest expense of $1.1 million and net increases to interest expense of $0.2 million, respectively, associated with the unrecognized tax benefits.

        The Company has agreements with the sellers of SEUSA and HCR ManorCare whereby any increases in taxes and associated interest and penalties related to years prior to each of these acquisitions will be the responsibility of the sellers. Similarly, any pre-acquisition tax refunds and associated interest income will be refunded to the sellers.

        There would be no effect on the Company's tax rate if the unrecognized tax benefits were to be recognized.

F-50

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(19) Earnings Per Common Share

        The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Numerator
Income from continuing operations	$	812,884		$	547,338		$	315,346
Noncontrolling interests' share in continuing operations		(12,411	)		(15,484	)		(13,563	)
Income from continuing operations applicable to HCP, Inc.		800,473			531,854			301,783
Preferred stock dividends		(17,006	)		(21,130	)		(21,130	)
Participating securities' share in continuing operations		(3,245	)		(2,459	)		(2,081	)
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares		780,222			508,265			278,572
Discontinued operations		33,958			7,156			29,049
Noncontrolling interests' share in discontinued operations		(1,891	)		(119	)		(123	)
Net income applicable to common shares	$	812,289		$	515,302		$	307,498
Denominator
Basic weighted average common shares		427,047			398,446			305,574
Dilutive potential common shares		1,269			1,772			1,326
Diluted weighted average common shares		428,316			400,218			306,900
Basic earnings per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	1.83		$	1.28		$	0.91
Discontinued operations		0.07			0.01			0.10
Net income applicable to common stockholders	$	1.90		$	1.29		$	1.01
Diluted earnings per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	1.83		$	1.28		$	0.91
Discontinued operations		0.07			0.01			0.09
Net income applicable to common shares	$	1.90		$	1.29		$	1.00

        Restricted stock and certain of the Company's performance restricted stock units are considered participating securities, because dividend payments are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest, which require the use of the two-class method when computing basic and diluted earnings per share.

        Options to purchase approximately 0.6 million, 1.1 million and 1.9 million shares of common stock that had an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the common stock during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were not included because they are anti-dilutive. Additionally, six million shares issuable upon conversion of four million DownREIT units during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were not included because they are anti-dilutive.

F-51

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(20) Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest	$	389,753	$	348,455		$	282,750
Income taxes paid		1,790		1,710			1,765
Capitalized interest		23,360		26,402			21,664
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Loan received upon real estate disposition		—		—			21,519
Accrued construction costs		14,157		11,525			3,558
Settlement of loans receivable as consideration for the HCR ManorCare Acquisition		—		1,990,406			—
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Restricted stock issued		—		—			224
Vesting of restricted stock units		707		228			276
Cancellation of restricted stock		8		35			52
Conversion of non-managing member units into common stock		24,988		3,456			6,135
Noncontrolling interests issued in connection with acquisitions		42,734		1,500			9,267
Mortgages included in the consolidation of HCP Ventures II		—		635,182			—
Mortgages and other liabilities assumed with real estate acquisitions		60,597		57,869			30,299
Unrealized gains (losses), net on available for sale securities and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges		4,649		(9,763	)		(59	)

        See additional information regarding supplemental non-cash financing activities related to of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition in Notes 3 and 7, the HCP Ventures II purchase in Note 8 and preferred stock redemption in Note 13.

(21) Variable Interest Entities

Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities

        At December 31, 2012, the Company leased 48 properties to a total of seven VIE tenants and had an additional investment in a loan to a VIE borrower. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs. The carrying value and classification of the related assets, liabilities and maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company's involvement with these VIEs are presented below at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

VIE Type	Maximum Loss Exposure(1)		Asset/Liability Type	Carrying Amount
VIE tenants—operating leases	$	297,497	Lease intangibles, net and straight-line rent receivables	$	15,061
VIE tenants—DFLs		1,121,708	Net investment in DFLs		598,819
Loan—senior secured		30,652	Loans receivable, net		30,652

(1)

The Company's maximum loss exposure related to the VIE tenants represents the future minimum lease payments over the remaining term of the respective leases, which may be mitigated by re-leasing the properties to new tenants. The Company's maximum loss exposure related to its loan to the VIE represents its current aggregate carrying amount. See Note 12 for additional information on the VIE tenants.

F-52

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        As of December 31, 2012, the Company has not provided, and is not required to provide, financial support through a liquidity arrangement or otherwise, to its unconsolidated VIEs, including circumstances in which it could be exposed to further losses (e.g., cash shortfalls).

        The Company holds an interest-only, senior secured term loan made to a borrower (Delphis Operations, L.P.) that has been identified as a VIE (see Note 7 for additional information on the Delphis loan). The Company does not consolidate the VIE because it does not have the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. The loan is collateralized by all of the assets of the borrower (comprised primarily of interests in partnerships that operate surgical facilities, some of which are on the premises of properties owned by the Company or HCP Ventures IV, LLC) and is supported in part by limited guarantees made by certain former and current principals of the borrower. Recourse under certain of these guarantees is limited to the guarantors' respective ownership interests in certain entities owning real estate that are pledged to secure such guarantees.

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities

        In September 2011, the Company formed a partnership in which it has a 90% ownership interest and a leasing relationship with an entity that operates 21 properties in a RIDEA structure ("RIDEA Entity"). The Company consolidated this entity as a result of the rights it acquired through the joint venture agreement with Brookdale (see Note 12 for additional information on the RIDEA structure). In the fourth quarter of 2012, upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event, it was determined that this RIDEA Entity is a VIE and that the Company is the primary beneficiary; therefore, the Company continues to consolidate this entity. The assets and liabilities of this RIDEA Entity substantially consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities generated from its operating activities. The assets generated by the operating activities of the RIDEA Entity may be used to settle its contractual obligations, which include lease obligations to the Company. The Company is entitled to its ownership share of the RIDEA Entity's assets; however, it does not guarantee its liabilities (or contractual obligations) and is not liable to its general creditors.

        During 2010, the Company had leasing relationships with a total of four VIE tenants, related to 27 properties, whose operations were not consolidated by the Company prior to August 31, 2010 because it did not have the ability to control the activities (i.e., recurring operating activities) that most significantly impact the VIEs' economic performance. On August 31, 2010, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Sunrise, whereby it determined that it had acquired the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs' economic performance. As a result, the Company consolidated the four VIEs for the period from August 31, 2010 (the date of the settlement agreement with Sunrise) to November 1, 2010 (the date these 27 properties were transitioned and leased to Emeritus). See Note 12 for additional information regarding the VIE tenants.

        See Notes 7 and 12 for additional description of the nature, purpose and activities of the Company's VIEs and interests therein.

(22) Fair Value Measurements

        The following table illustrates the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets. Recognized gains and losses are recorded in other income, net on the Company's consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels within the fair value hierarchy.

F-53

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

        The financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands):

Financial assets and liabilities	Fair Value			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Marketable equity securities	$	24,829		$	24,829	$	—		$	—
Interest-rate swap asset(1)		89			—		89			—
Interest-rate swap liabilities(1)		(12,699	)		—		(12,699	)		—
Currency swap liabilities(1)		(2,641	)		—		(2,641	)		—
Warrants(1)		670			—		—			670
	$	10,248		$	24,829	$	(15,251	)	$	670

(1)

Interest rate and currency swaps as well as common stock warrant fair values are determined based on observable and unobservable market assumptions utilizing standardized derivative pricing models.

(23) Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. The fair values of loans receivable, bank line of credit, term loan, mortgage debt and other debt are based on rates currently prevailing for similar instruments with similar maturities. The fair values of the marketable debt securities, interest-rate and currency swap contracts as well as common stock warrants were determined based on observable and unobservable market assumptions using standardized pricing models. The fair values of the senior unsecured notes and marketable equity securities are determined utilizing market quotes.

        The table below summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's financial instruments:

	December 31,
	2012				2011
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Loans receivable, net(2)	$	276,030	$	279,850	$	110,253	$	111,073
Marketable debt securities(3)		222,809		234,137		—		—
Marketable equity securities(1)		24,829		24,829		17,053		17,053
Warrants(3)		670		670		1,334		1,334
Bank line of credit(2)		—		—		454,000		454,000
Term loan(2)		222,694		222,694		—		—
Senior unsecured notes(1)		6,712,624		7,432,012		5,416,063		5,819,304
Mortgage debt(2)		1,676,544		1,771,155		1,764,571		1,870,070
Other debt(2)		81,958		81,958		87,985		87,985
Interest-rate swap asset(2)		89		89		—		—
Interest-rate swap liability(2)		12,699		12,699		12,123		12,123
Currency swap liabilities(2)		2,641		2,641		—		—

(1)

Level 1: Fair value calculated based on quoted prices in active markets.

(2)

Level 2: Fair value based on quoted prices for similar or identical instruments in active or inactive markets, respectively, or calculated utilizing model-derived valuations in which significant inputs or value drivers are observable in active markets.

F-54

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(3)

Level 3: Fair value determined based on significant unobservable market inputs using standardized derivative pricing models.

(24) Derivative Financial Instruments

        The following table summarizes the Company's outstanding interest-rate swap contracts as of December 31, 2012 (dollars and GBP in thousands):

Date Entered	Maturity Date	Hedge Designation	Fixed Rate/Buy Amount			Floating/Exchange Rate Index	Notional/Sell Amount		Fair Value(1)
July 2005(2)	July 2020	Cash Flow		3.82	%	BMA Swap Index	$	45,600	$	(8,666	)
November 2008(3)	October 2016	Cash Flow		5.95	%	1 Month LIBOR+1.50%		27,000		(3,878	)
July 2009(4)	July 2013	Cash Flow		6.13	%	1 Month LIBOR+3.65%		13,700		(155	)
July 2012(4)	June 2016	Cash Flow		1.81	%	1 Month GBP LIBOR+1.20%		£137,000		89
July 2012(5)	June 2016	Cash Flow	$	79,600		Buy USD/Sell GBP		£  50,700		(2,641	)

(1)

Interest-rate and foreign currency swap assets are recorded in other assets, net and interest-rate and foreign currency swap liabilities are recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

(2)

Represents three interest-rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $45.6 million which hedge fluctuations in interest payments on variable-rate secured debt due to overall changes in hedged cash flows.

(3)

Acquired in conjunction with mortgage debt assumed related to real estate acquired on December 28, 2010. Hedges fluctuations in interest payments on variable-rate secured debt due to fluctuations in the underlying benchmark interest rate.

(4)

Hedges fluctuations in interest payments on variable-rate secured and unsecured debt due to fluctuations in the underlying benchmark interest rate.

(5)

Currency swap contract (buy USD/sell GBP) hedges the foreign currency exchange risk related to a portion of the Company's forecasted interest receipts on GBP denominated senior unsecured notes. Represents seven foreign exchange contracts to sell £7.2 million at a rate of $1.5695 on various dates between June 2013 and June 2016.

        The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations on specific forecasted transactions as well as recognized financial obligations or assets. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

        The primary risks associated with derivative instruments are market and credit risk. Market risk is defined as the potential for loss in value of a derivative instrument due to adverse changes in market prices. Utilizing derivative instruments allows the Company to manage the risk of fluctuations in interest and foreign currency rates related to the potential impact these changes could have on future earnings, forecasted cash flows and the fair value of recognized obligations.

        Credit risk is the risk that one of the parties to a derivative contract fails to perform or meet their financial obligation. The Company does not obtain collateral associated with its derivative contracts, but monitors the credit standing of its counterparties on a regular basis. Should a counterparty fail to perform, the Company would incur a financial loss to the extent that the associated derivative contract was in an asset position. At December 31, 2012, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties to its outstanding derivative contracts.

        During October and November 2007, the Company entered into two forward- starting interest-rate swap contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $900 million and settled the contracts during the three months ended June 30, 2008. The settlement value, less the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships, was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income to be reclassified into interest expense over the forecasted term of the underlying unsecured fixed-rate debt. The interest-rate swap contracts were designated in qualifying, cash flow hedging relationships, to hedge the Company's

F-55

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

exposure to fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate component of interest payments on forecasted, unsecured, fixed-rate debt that were expected to be issued in 2012 and 2013. During 2010, the Company revised its estimated issuance date for the underlying unsecured, fixed-rate debt. As a result, the Company recognized a $1.0 million charge in other income, net, during the year ended December 31, 2010, related to the interest payments that were no longer probable of occurring.

        In August 2009, the Company entered into an interest-rate swap contract (pay float and receive fixed), that was designated as hedging fluctuations in interest receipts related to its participation in the variable-rate first mortgage debt of HCR ManorCare. At March 31, 2011 the Company determined, based on the anticipated closing of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition during April 2011, that the underlying hedged transactions (underlying mortgage debt interest receipts) were not probable of occurring. As a result, the Company reclassified $1 million of unrealized gains related to this interest-rate swap contract into other income, net. Concurrent with closing the HCR ManorCare Acquisition (for additional details see Note 3), the Company settled the interest-rate swap contract for proceeds of $1 million.

        On July 27, 2012, the Company entered into a foreign currency swap contracts to hedge the foreign currency exchange risk related to a portion of the forecasted interest receipts from its GBP denominated senior unsecured notes (see additional discussion of the Four Seasons Health Care Senior Unsecured Notes in Note 10). The cash flow hedge has a fixed USD/GBP exchange rate of 1.5695 (buy $11.4 million and sell £7.2 million semi-annually) for a portion of its forecasted semi-annual cash receipts denominated in GBP. The foreign currency swap contracts mature through June 2016 (the end of the non-call period of the senior unsecured notes). The fair value of the contracts at December 31, 2012 was a liability of $2.6 million and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2012, there was no ineffective portion related to this hedge.

        On July 27, 2012, the Company entered into an interest-rate swap contract that is designated as hedging the interest payments on its GBP denominated Term Loan due to fluctuations in the underlying benchmark interest rate (see additional discussions of the Term Loan in Note 11). The cash flow hedge has a notional amount of £137 million and expires in June 2016 (the maturity of the Term Loan). The fair value of the contract at December 31, 2012 was an asset of $89,000 and is included in other assets, net. During the year ended December 31, 2012, there was no ineffective portion related to this hedge.

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company earned lower interest income of $209,000 and recognized additional interest expense of $3.3 million, resulting from its cash flow and fair value hedging relationships. At December 31, 2012, the Company expects that the hedged forecasted transactions for each of the outstanding qualifying cash flow hedging relationships remain probable of occurring and as a result no gains or losses recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss are expected to be reclassified to earnings.

        To illustrate the effect of movements in the interest rate and foreign currency markets, the Company performed a market sensitivity analysis on its outstanding hedging instruments. The Company applied various basis point spreads to the underlying interest rate curves and foreign currency exchange

F-56

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

rates of the derivative portfolio in order to determine the instruments' change in fair value. The following table summarizes the results of the analysis performed (dollars in thousands):

		Effects of Change in Interest and Foreign Currency Rates
Date Entered	Maturity Date	+50 Basis Points			-50 Basis Points			+100 Basis Points			-100 Basis Points
July 2005	July 2020	$	1,675		$	(1,578	)	$	3,301		$	(3,204	)
November 2008	October 2016		516			(468	)		1,008			961
July 2009	July 2013		33			(36	)		67			(70	)
July 2012	June 2016		3,906			(3,694	)		7,706			(7,494	)
July 2012	June 2016		(588	)		237			(1,000	)		649

(25) Transactions with Related Parties

        Mr. Klaritch, an executive vice president of the Company, was previously a senior executive and limited liability company member of MedCap Properties, LLC, which was acquired in October 2003 by HCP and a joint venture of which HCP was the managing member. As part of that transaction, MedCap Properties, LLC contributed certain property interests to a newly-formed entity, HCPI/Tennessee LLC, in exchange for DownREIT units. In connection with the transactions, Mr. Klaritch received 113,431 non-managing member units in HCPI/Tennessee, LLC in a distribution of his interest in MedCap Properties, LLC. Each DownREIT unit is redeemable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of two shares of HCP's common stock or, at HCP's option, two shares of HCP's common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications). During the year ended December 31, 2012, Mr. Klaritch and his affiliates exchanged their remaining approximately 45,000 HCPI/Tennessee, LLC DownREIT units for approximately 90,000 shares of the Company's common stock.

(26) Selected Quarterly Financial Data

        Selected quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts). Results of operations for properties sold or to be sold have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented:

	Three Months Ended During 2012
	March 31		June 30			September 30		December 31
	(in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
Total revenues	$	455,827	$	461,251		$	475,157	$	508,487
Income before income taxes and equity income from and impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		179,808		190,016			183,897		203,072
Total discontinued operations		2,371		(597	)		1,153		31,031
Net income		196,564		204,975			199,043		246,260
Net income applicable to HCP, Inc.		193,380		202,024			196,108		241,028
Dividends paid per common share		0.50		0.50			0.50		0.50
Basic earnings per common share		0.43		0.48			0.46		0.54
Diluted earnings per common share		0.43		0.48			0.45		0.53

F-57

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

	Three Months Ended During 2011
	March 31		June 30		September 30		December 31
	(in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)
Total revenues	$	327,960	$	484,941	$	440,914	$	458,281
Income before income taxes and equity income from and impairments of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures		71,602		217,897		157,464		54,875
Total discontinued operations		1,621		1,653		962		2,920
Net income		73,984		234,252		175,471		70,787
Net income applicable to HCP, Inc.		70,093		228,759		172,195		67,844
Dividends paid per common share		0.48		0.48		0.48		0.48
Basic earnings per common share		0.17		0.55		0.41		0.15
Diluted earnings per common share		0.17		0.55		0.41		0.15

        The above selected quarterly financial data includes the following significant transactions:

•

On January 14, 2011, the Company acquired its partner's 65% interest in HCP Ventures II, a joint venture that owned 25 senior housing facilities, becoming the sole owner of the portfolio. The impact of the Company's consolidation of HCP Ventures II is included in the results beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

•

On April 7, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the real estate assets of HCR ManorCare. The impact of the HCR ManorCare Acquisition is included in the results beginning in the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

•

On September 1, 2011, the Company completed a strategic venture with Brookdale that includes the operation of 37 HCP-owned senior living communities previously leased to or operated by Horizon Bay. The impact of reflecting the facility-level results for the 21 RIDEA facilities operated by Brookdale is included in the results beginning in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

•

On November 9, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Ventas to settle all remaining claims relating to Ventas's litigation against HCP arising out of Ventas's 2007 acquisition of Sunrise Senior Living REIT. The Company paid $125 million to Ventas and incurred a charge during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 for such amount.

•

The Company redeemed all outstanding preferred stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

•

The Company completed the acquisition of the 129 senior housing portfolio during the quarter ended December 31, 2012.

F-58

HCP, Inc.

Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

December 31, 2012


(In thousands)

Allowance Accounts(1)			Additions				Deductions
Year Ended December 31,	Balance at Beginning of Year		Amounts Charged Against Operations, net		Acquired Properties		Uncollectible Accounts Written-off			Disposed Properties			Balance at End of Year
2012	$	49,209	$	3,724	$	—	$	(960	)	$	(3,374	)	$	48,599
2011		43,740		13,316		2		(4,673	)		(3,176	)		49,209
2010		129,505		8,519		—		(93,858	)		(426	)		43,740

(1)

Includes allowance for doubtful accounts, straight-line rent reserves, and allowances for loan and direct financing lease losses.

F-59

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
Senior housing
1107	Huntsville	AL	$	—	$	307	$	5,813	$	—	$	307	$	5,453	$	5,760	$	(852	)		2006		40
1154	Little Rock	AR		—		1,922		14,140		445		2,046		13,967		16,013		(2,203	)		2006		39
0786	Douglas	AZ		—		110		703		—		110		703		813		(265	)		2005		35
2087	Prescott	AZ		—		1,803		8,134		—		1,803		8,134		9,937		(51	)		2012		45
1974	Sun City	AZ		33,024		2,640		33,223		236		2,640		33,458		36,098		(2,563	)		2011		30
0518	Tucson	AZ		31,983		2,350		24,037		—		2,350		24,037		26,387		(7,411	)		2002		30
1238	Beverly Hills	CA		—		9,872		32,590		2,123		9,872		33,988		43,860		(5,442	)		2006		40
1149	Camarillo	CA		—		5,798		19,427		575		5,822		19,202		25,024		(2,927	)		2006		40
1006	Carlsbad	CA		—		7,897		14,255		363		7,897		13,827		21,724		(2,169	)		2006		40
0883	Carmichael	CA		—		4,270		13,846		—		4,270		13,236		17,506		(2,013	)		2006		40
0851	Citrus Heights	CA		—		1,180		8,367		—		1,180		8,037		9,217		(1,762	)		2006		29
2092	Clearlake	CA		—		354		4,799		—		354		4,799		5,153		(25	)		2012		45
0790	Concord	CA		25,000		6,010		39,601		—		6,010		38,301		44,311		(7,085	)		2005		40
2181	Corona	CA		2		2,719		10,051		—		2,719		10,051		12,770		(27	)		2012		45
0787	Dana Point	CA		—		1,960		15,946		—		1,960		15,466		17,426		(2,867	)		2005		39
1152	Elk Grove	CA		—		2,235		6,339		262		2,235		6,448		8,683		(973	)		2006		40
0798	Escondido	CA		14,340		5,090		24,253		—		5,090		23,353		28,443		(4,330	)		2005		40
2054	Fortuna	CA		—		1,248		2,865		—		1,248		2,865		4,113		(18	)		2012		50
2079	Fortuna	CA		—		1,346		11,856		—		1,346		11,856		13,202		(57	)		2012		45
0791	Fremont	CA		9,059		2,360		11,672		—		2,360		11,192		13,552		(2,075	)		2005		40
1965	Fresno	CA		22,909		1,730		31,918		1,424		1,730		33,342		35,072		(2,402	)		2011		30
0788	Granada Hills	CA		—		2,200		18,257		—		2,200		17,637		19,837		(3,270	)		2005		39
1156	Hemet	CA		—		1,270		5,966		214		1,271		5,933		7,204		(906	)		2006		40
0856	Irvine	CA		—		8,220		14,104		—		8,220		13,564		21,784		(1,934	)		2006		45
0227	Lodi	CA		8,880		732		5,453		—		732		5,453		6,185		(2,228	)		1997		35
0226	Murietta	CA		5,967		435		5,729		—		435		5,729		6,164		(2,274	)		1997		35
1165	Northridge	CA		—		6,718		26,309		549		6,752		26,015		32,767		(4,001	)		2006		40
1561	Orangevale	CA		—		2,160		8,522		1,000		2,160		9,522		11,682		(1,906	)		2008		40
1168	Palm Springs	CA		—		1,005		5,183		396		1,005		5,217		6,222		(770	)		2006		40
0789	Pleasant Hill	CA		6,270		2,480		21,333		—		2,480		20,633		23,113		(3,826	)		2005		40
1166	Rancho Mirage	CA		—		1,798		24,053		475		1,812		23,600		25,412		(3,628	)		2006		40
2065	Roseville	CA		—		692		21,662		—		692		21,662		22,354		(94	)		2012		45
1008	San Diego	CA		—		6,384		32,072		222		6,384		31,191		37,575		(4,901	)		2006		40
1007	San Dimas	CA		—		5,628		31,374		208		5,630		30,786		36,416		(4,835	)		2006		40
1009	San Juan Capistrano	CA		—		5,983		9,614		189		5,983		9,516		15,499		(1,507	)		2006		40
1167	Santa Rosa	CA		—		3,582		21,113		665		3,627		20,964		24,591		(3,196	)		2006		40
0793	South San Francisco	CA		10,449		3,000		16,586		—		3,000		16,056		19,056		(2,970	)		2005		40
1966	Sun City	CA		17,343		2,650		22,709		857		2,650		23,567		26,217		(1,938	)		2011		30
0792	Ventura	CA		9,873		2,030		17,379		—		2,030		16,749		18,779		(3,106	)		2005		40
1155	Yorba Linda	CA		—		4,968		19,290		308		5,030		18,740		23,770		(2,896	)		2006		40
2055	Yreka	CA		—		565		9,184		—		565		9,184		9,749		(49	)		2012		45
1232	Colorado Springs	CO		—		1,910		24,479		400		1,910		23,915		25,825		(3,689	)		2006		40
0512	Denver	CO		49,164		2,810		36,021		1,885		2,810		37,906		40,716		(11,177	)		2002		30
1233	Denver	CO		—		2,511		30,641		342		2,528		30,163		32,691		(4,696	)		2006		40
2146	Denver	CO		—		875		5,693		—		875		5,693		6,568		(33	)		2012		45
1000	Greenwood Village	CO		—		3,367		43,610		—		3,367		42,814		46,181		(6,037	)		2006		40
1234	Lakewood	CO		—		3,012		31,913		321		3,012		31,437		34,449		(4,870	)		2006		40
2091	Montrose	CO		—		1,378		23,924		—		1,378		23,924		25,302		(105	)		2012		50
2085	Glastonbury	CT		—		3,743		9,766		—		3,743		9,766		13,509		(55	)		2012		45
2144	Glastonbury	CT		—		2,258		15,446		—		2,258		15,446		17,704		(78	)		2012		45
0730	Torrington	CT		12,460		166		11,001		—		166		10,591		10,757		(2,030	)		2005		40
1010	Woodbridge	CT		—		2,352		9,929		224		2,363		9,680		12,043		(1,540	)		2006		40
0538	Altamonte Springs	FL		—		1,530		7,956		—		1,530		7,136		8,666		(1,783	)		2002		40
0861	Apopka	FL		5,816		920		4,816		—		920		4,716		5,636		(842	)		2006		35
0852	Boca Raton	FL		—		4,730		17,532		2,605		4,730		19,727		24,457		(3,982	)		2006		30
1001	Boca Raton	FL		11,523		2,415		17,923		—		2,415		17,561		19,976		(2,476	)		2006		40
0544	Boynton Beach	FL		7,950		1,270		4,773		—		1,270		4,773		6,043		(1,173	)		2003		40
1963	Boynton Beach	FL		34,037		2,550		31,521		37		2,550		31,558		34,108		(2,444	)		2011		30
1964	Boynton Beach	FL		4,765		570		5,649		359		570		6,008		6,578		(591	)		2011		30
0539	Clearwater	FL		—		2,250		2,627		—		2,250		2,627		4,877		(656	)		2002		40
0746	Clearwater	FL		17,557		3,856		12,176		—		3,856		11,321		15,177		(3,079	)		2005		40
0862	Clermont	FL		8,236		440		6,518		—		440		6,418		6,858		(1,146	)		2006		35
1002	Coconut Creek	FL		13,779		2,461		16,006		—		2,461		15,620		18,081		(2,203	)		2006		40
0492	Delray Beach	FL		11,316		850		6,637		—		850		6,637		7,487		(1,459	)		2002		43
0850	Gainesville	FL		15,941		1,020		13,490		—		1,020		13,090		14,110		(2,154	)		2006		40

F-60

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
1095	Gainesville	FL		—		1,221		12,226		—		1,221		12,001		13,222		(1,875	)		2006		40
0490	Jacksonville	FL		43,756		3,250		25,936		1,539		3,250		27,475		30,725		(7,966	)		2002		35
1096	Jacksonville	FL		—		1,587		15,616		—		1,587		15,298		16,885		(2,390	)		2006		40
0855	Lantana	FL		—		3,520		26,452		—		3,520		25,652		29,172		(5,487	)		2006		30
1968	Largo	FL		59,700		2,920		64,989		840		2,920		65,829		68,749		(5,108	)		2011		30
0731	Ocoee	FL		16,331		2,096		9,322		—		2,096		8,801		10,897		(1,687	)		2005		40
0859	Oviedo	FL		8,491		670		8,071		—		670		7,971		8,641		(1,423	)		2006		35
1970	Palm Beach Gardens	FL		32,875		4,820		26,572		5,471		4,820		32,043		36,863		(2,283	)		2011		30
1017	Palm Harbor	FL		—		1,462		16,774		500		1,462		16,888		18,350		(2,669	)		2006		40
0190	Pinellas Park	FL		3,927		480		3,911		—		480		3,911		4,391		(1,872	)		1996		35
0732	Port Orange	FL		15,242		2,340		9,898		—		2,340		9,377		11,717		(1,797	)		2005		40
1971	Sarasota	FL		27,525		3,050		29,516		393		3,050		29,908		32,958		(2,256	)		2011		30
0802	St. Augustine	FL		14,626		830		11,627		—		830		11,227		12,057		(2,352	)		2005		35
0692	Sun City Center	FL		9,746		510		6,120		—		510		5,865		6,375		(1,424	)		2004		35
0698	Sun City Center	FL		—		3,466		70,810		—		3,466		69,750		73,216		(16,891	)		2004		34
1097	Tallahassee	FL		—		1,331		19,039		—		1,331		18,695		20,026		(2,921	)		2006		40
0224	Tampa	FL		—		600		5,566		686		696		6,155		6,851		(1,910	)		1997		45
0849	Tampa	FL		12,036		800		11,340		—		800		10,940		11,740		(1,800	)		2006		40
1257	Vero Beach	FL		—		2,035		34,993		201		2,035		33,634		35,669		(5,252	)		2006		40
1605	Vero Beach	FL		—		700		16,234		—		700		16,234		16,934		(1,185	)		2010		35
1976	West Palm Beach	FL		—		390		2,241		73		390		2,315		2,705		(206	)		2011		30
1098	Alpharetta	GA		—		793		8,761		342		793		8,817		9,610		(1,387	)		2006		40
1099	Atlanta	GA		—		687		5,507		370		687		5,477		6,164		(869	)		2006		40
1169	Atlanta	GA		—		2,665		5,911		455		2,669		6,092		8,761		(894	)		2006		40
2108	Buford	GA		—		706		3,460		—		706		3,460		4,166		(20	)		2012		45
2109	Buford	GA		—		1,217		2,461		—		1,217		2,461		3,678		(16	)		2012		45
2123	Buford	GA		—		1,987		6,561		—		1,987		6,561		8,548		(38	)		2012		45
2053	Canton	GA		—		613		17,676		—		613		17,676		18,289		(72	)		2012		50
2155	Commerce	GA		—		537		8,428		—		537		8,428		8,965		(43	)		2012		45
2165	Hartwell	GA		—		212		6,493		—		212		6,493		6,705		(30	)		2012		45
2066	Lawrenceville	GA		—		774		2,476		—		774		2,476		3,250		(19	)		2012		45
1241	Lilburn	GA		—		907		17,340		7		907		16,791		17,698		(2,625	)		2006		40
2167	Lithia Springs	GA		—		1,031		6,954		—		1,031		6,954		7,985		(40	)		2012		40
2105	Macon	GA		—		547		11,157		—		547		11,157		11,704		(47	)		2012		45
1112	Marietta	GA		—		894		6,944		440		904		7,108		8,012		(1,118	)		2006		40
2156	Marietta	GA		—		987		4,818		—		987		4,818		5,805		(28	)		2012		45
2086	Newnan	GA		—		1,424		4,005		—		1,424		4,005		5,429		(29	)		2012		45
2147	Stone Mountain	GA		—		400		3,046		—		400		3,046		3,446		(17	)		2012		45
2118	Woodstock	GA		—		764		7,334		—		764		7,334		8,098		(36	)		2012		45
2157	Woodstock	GA		—		1,926		12,757		—		1,926		12,757		14,683		(62	)		2012		45
1088	Davenport	IA		—		511		8,039		—		511		7,868		8,379		(1,229	)		2006		40
1093	Marion	IA		—		502		6,865		—		502		6,713		7,215		(1,049	)		2006		40
2166	Sioux City	IA		—		197		8,078		—		197		8,078		8,275		(43	)		2012		45
1091	Bloomington	IL		—		798		13,091		—		798		12,832		13,630		(2,005	)		2006		40
1587	Burr Ridge	IL		—		2,640		23,902		912		2,704		24,749		27,453		(2,934	)		2010		25
1089	Champaign	IL		—		101		4,207		1,592		279		5,463		5,742		(710	)		2006		40
1157	Hoffman Estates	IL		—		1,701		12,037		244		1,704		11,695		13,399		(1,826	)		2006		40
1090	Macomb	IL		—		81		6,062		—		81		5,905		5,986		(923	)		2006		40
1143	Mt. Vernon	IL		—		296		15,935		3,562		512		18,949		19,461		(2,654	)		2006		40
1969	Niles	IL		31,508		3,790		32,912		926		3,790		33,838		37,628		(2,668	)		2011		30
1005	Oak Park	IL		25,989		3,476		35,259		—		3,476		34,713		38,189		(4,895	)		2006		40
1961	Olympia Fields	IL		35,605		4,120		29,400		410		4,120		29,810		33,930		(2,328	)		2011		30
1162	Orland Park	IL		—		2,623		23,154		224		2,623		22,748		25,371		(3,529	)		2006		40
1092	Peoria	IL		—		404		10,050		—		404		9,840		10,244		(1,538	)		2006		40
1588	Prospect Heights	IL		—		2,680		20,299		953		2,725		21,208		23,933		(2,576	)		2010		25
1952	Vernon Hills	IL		52,252		4,900		45,854		336		4,900		46,190		51,090		(3,492	)		2011		30
1237	Wilmette	IL		—		1,100		9,373		—		1,100		9,149		10,249		(1,430	)		2006		40
0379	Evansville	IN		—		500		9,302		—		500		7,762		8,262		(2,256	)		1999		45
1144	Indianapolis	IN		—		1,197		7,718		—		1,197		7,486		8,683		(1,170	)		2006		40
1145	Indianapolis	IN		—		1,144		8,261		7,371		1,144		15,399		16,543		(1,997	)		2006		40
0457	Jasper	IN		—		165		5,952		359		165		6,311		6,476		(2,081	)		2001		35
2047	Kokomo	IN		—		296		3,245		—		296		3,245		3,541		(93	)		2012		30
1146	West Lafayette	IN		—		813		10,876		—		813		10,626		11,439		(1,660	)		2006		40
1170	Edgewood	KY		—		1,868		4,934		339		1,916		4,796		6,712		(713	)		2006		40
0697	Lexington	KY		8,010		2,093		16,917		—		2,093		16,299		18,392		(4,615	)		2004		30
1105	Louisville	KY		—		1,499		26,252		240		1,513		25,868		27,381		(4,061	)		2006		40

F-61

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
2115	Murray	KY		—		480		7,208		—		480		7,208		7,688		(40	)		2012		45
2135	Paducah	KY		—		621		16,768		—		621		16,768		17,389		(68	)		2012		50
1013	Danvers	MA		—		4,616		30,692		243		4,621		30,344		34,965		(4,772	)		2006		40
1151	Dartmouth	MA		—		3,145		6,880		516		3,176		7,117		10,293		(1,049	)		2006		40
1012	Dedham	MA		—		3,930		21,340		267		3,930		21,032		24,962		(3,297	)		2006		40
1158	Plymouth	MA		—		2,434		9,027		441		2,438		8,987		11,425		(1,348	)		2006		40
1153	Baltimore	MD		—		1,684		18,889		380		1,695		18,835		20,530		(2,895	)		2006		40
1249	Frederick	MD		—		609		9,158		89		609		9,003		9,612		(1,415	)		2006		40
1011	Pikesville	MD		—		1,416		8,854		288		1,416		8,681		10,097		(1,404	)		2006		40
0281	Westminster	MD		15,295		768		5,251		—		768		4,853		5,621		(1,444	)		1998		45
0546	Cape Elizabeth	ME		—		630		3,524		93		630		3,617		4,247		(885	)		2003		40
0545	Saco	ME		—		80		2,363		155		80		2,518		2,598		(612	)		2003		40
1258	Auburn Hills	MI		—		2,281		10,692		—		2,281		10,692		12,973		(1,671	)		2006		40
1248	Farmington Hills	MI		—		1,013		12,119		294		1,013		12,070		13,083		(1,910	)		2006		40
0696	Holland	MI		41,447		787		51,410		—		787		50,172		50,959		(14,243	)		2004		29
1094	Portage	MI		—		100		5,700		4,617		100		9,950		10,050		(1,408	)		2006		40
0472	Sterling Heights	MI		—		920		7,326		—		920		7,326		8,246		(2,372	)		2001		35
1259	Sterling Heights	MI		—		1,593		11,500		—		1,593		11,181		12,774		(1,747	)		2006		40
2143	Champlin	MN		—		1,576		26,725		—		1,576		26,725		28,301		(111	)		2012		50
1235	Des Peres	MO		—		4,361		20,664		—		4,361		20,046		24,407		(3,132	)		2006		40
1236	Richmond Heights	MO		—		1,744		24,232		—		1,744		23,548		25,292		(3,679	)		2006		40
0853	St. Louis	MO		—		2,500		20,343		—		2,500		19,853		22,353		(4,357	)		2006		30
2081	St. Peters	MO		—		1,377		31,508		—		1,377		31,508		32,885		(154	)		2012		45
2074	Oxford	MS		—		2,003		14,140		—		2,003		14,140		16,143		(65	)		2012		45
0842	Great Falls	MT		—		500		5,683		—		500		5,423		5,923		(926	)		2006		40
2163	Great Falls	MT		—		252		9,908		—		252		9,908		10,160		(44	)		2012		45
0878	Charlotte	NC		—		710		9,559		—		710		9,159		9,869		(1,393	)		2006		40
1584	Charlotte	NC		—		2,052		6,529		—		2,052		6,529		8,581		(637	)		2010		40
1119	Concord	NC		—		601		7,615		166		612		7,546		8,158		(1,195	)		2006		40
2126	Mooresville	NC		—		1,866		38,289		—		1,866		38,289		40,155		(151	)		2012		50
1254	Raleigh	NC		—		1,191		11,532		54		1,191		11,300		12,491		(1,774	)		2006		40
2127	Minot	ND		—		685		16,047		—		685		16,047		16,732		(74	)		2012		45
2080	Kearney	NE		—		463		22,977		—		463		22,977		23,440		(103	)		2012		45
2169	Lexington	NE		—		474		8,405		—		474		8,405		8,879		(52	)		2012		40
2168	Mc Cook	NE		—		1,024		13,789		—		1,024		13,789		14,813		(85	)		2012		40
2129	Seward	NE		—		792		18,276		—		792		18,276		19,068		(97	)		2012		40
2119	Wayne	NE		—		675		14,283		—		675		14,283		14,958		(69	)		2012		45
1599	Cherry Hill	NJ		—		2,420		11,042		1,000		2,420		12,042		14,462		(1,399	)		2010		25
1239	Cresskill	NJ		—		4,684		53,927		43		4,684		52,984		57,668		(8,280	)		2006		40
0734	Hillsborough	NJ		15,778		1,042		10,042		—		1,042		9,576		10,618		(1,835	)		2005		40
1242	Madison	NJ		—		3,157		19,909		35		3,157		19,358		22,515		(3,028	)		2006		40
0733	Manahawkin	NJ		13,766		921		9,927		—		921		9,461		10,382		(1,813	)		2005		40
1014	Paramus	NJ		—		4,280		31,684		207		4,280		31,191		35,471		(4,899	)		2006		40
1231	Saddle River	NJ		—		1,784		15,625		164		1,784		15,345		17,129		(2,399	)		2006		40
0245	Voorhees Township	NJ		8,541		900		7,629		—		900		7,629		8,529		(2,299	)		1998		45
0213	Albuquerque	NM		—		767		9,324		—		767		8,825		9,592		(3,059	)		1996		45
2120	Albuquerque	NM		—		2,129		8,144		—		2,129		8,144		10,273		(43	)		2012		45
2161	Rio Rancho	NM		—		1,154		13,726		—		1,154		13,726		14,880		(74	)		2012		40
2121	Roswell	NM		—		1,265		6,391		—		1,265		6,391		7,656		(42	)		2012		45
2150	Roswell	NM		—		1,148		8,303		—		1,148		8,303		9,451		(53	)		2012		45
0796	Las Vegas	NV		—		1,960		5,816		—		1,960		5,426		7,386		(1,006	)		2005		40
2110	Las Vegas	NV		—		667		14,469		—		667		14,469		15,136		(79	)		2012		45
1252	Brooklyn	NY		—		8,117		23,627		532		8,117		23,582		31,699		(3,797	)		2006		40
1256	Brooklyn	NY		—		5,215		39,052		82		5,215		38,283		43,498		(5,991	)		2006		40
2177	Clifton Park	NY		—		2,257		11,470		—		2,257		11,470		13,727		(55	)		2012		50
2176	Greece	NY		—		666		9,569		—		666		9,569		10,235		(49	)		2012		45
2178	Greece	NY		—		601		7,362		—		601		7,362		7,963		(38	)		2012		45
2174	Orchard Park	NY		—		726		17,735		—		726		17,735		18,461		(95	)		2012		45
2175	Orchard Park	NY		—		478		11,961		—		478		11,961		12,439		(59	)		2012		45
0473	Cincinnati	OH		—		600		4,428		—		600		4,428		5,028		(1,434	)		2001		35
0841	Columbus	OH		6,480		970		7,806		1,023		970		8,438		9,408		(1,395	)		2006		40
0857	Fairborn	OH		6,651		810		8,311		—		810		8,011		8,821		(1,468	)		2006		36
1147	Fairborn	OH		—		298		10,704		3,068		298		13,541		13,839		(1,980	)		2006		40
1386	Marietta	OH		—		1,069		11,435		—		1,069		11,230		12,299		(1,545	)		2007		40
1253	Poland	OH		—		695		10,444		7		695		10,113		10,808		(1,582	)		2006		40
1159	Willoughby	OH		—		1,177		9,982		295		1,194		9,855		11,049		(1,505	)		2006		40

F-62

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
2158	Broken Arrow	OK		—		1,115		18,852		—		1,115		18,852		19,967		(82	)		2012		45
2122	Muskogee	OK		—		412		2,815		—		412		2,815		3,227		(19	)		2012		45
1171	Oklahoma City	OK		—		801		4,904		265		811		4,776		5,587		(718	)		2006		40
2082	Oklahoma City	OK		—		1,696		3,591		—		1,696		3,591		5,287		(23	)		2012		45
2083	Oklahoma City	OK		—		2,116		28,007		—		2,116		28,007		30,123		(125	)		2012		45
2070	Tahlequah	OK		—		256		5,648		—		256		5,648		5,904		(29	)		2012		45
1160	Tulsa	OK		—		1,115		11,028		282		1,129		10,607		11,736		(1,624	)		2006		40
2130	Ashland	OR		—		—		19,303		—		—		19,303		19,303		(90	)		2012		45
2103	Eagle Point	OR		—		609		12,117		—		609		12,117		12,726		(55	)		2012		45
2098	Eugene	OR		—		1,082		18,858		—		1,082		18,858		19,940		(76	)		2012		50
2104	Eugene	OR		—		653		13,568		—		653		13,568		14,221		(61	)		2012		45
2136	Grants Pass	OR		—		553		3,144		—		553		3,144		3,697		(19	)		2012		50
2137	Grants Pass	OR		—		1,064		16,124		—		1,064		16,124		17,188		(67	)		2012		50
2138	Grants Pass	OR		—		654		2,896		—		654		2,896		3,550		(26	)		2012		50
2145	Grants Pass	OR		—		561		13,444		—		561		13,444		14,005		(59	)		2012		45
2139	Gresham	OR		—		533		6,335		—		533		6,335		6,868		(29	)		2012		50
2140	Lebanon	OR		—		505		12,571		—		505		12,571		13,076		(58	)		2012		50
2152	McMinnville	OR		—		3,203		24,909		—		3,203		24,909		28,112		(184	)		2012		45
2159	McMinnville	OR		—		1,374		6,118		—		1,374		6,118		7,492		(38	)		2012		45
2090	Monmouth	OR		—		679		1,089		—		679		1,089		1,768		(10	)		2012		50
2106	Monmouth	OR		—		603		8,538		—		603		8,538		9,141		(43	)		2012		45
2089	Newberg	OR		—		1,889		16,855		—		1,889		16,855		18,744		(74	)		2012		50
2133	Portland	OR		—		1,615		12,030		—		1,615		12,030		13,645		(50	)		2012		50
2151	Portland	OR		—		1,890		9,256		—		1,890		9,256		11,146		(51	)		2012		45
2171	Portland	OR		—		—		16,087		—		—		16,087		16,087		(64	)		2012		50
2050	Redmond	OR		—		1,229		21,921		—		1,229		21,921		23,150		(87	)		2012		50
2084	Roseburg	OR		—		912		12,220		—		912		12,220		13,132		(62	)		2012		45
2134	Scappoose	OR		—		489		1,122		—		489		1,122		1,611		(8	)		2012		50
2153	Scappoose	OR		—		971		7,116		—		971		7,116		8,087		(41	)		2012		45
2051	Springfield	OR		—		1,124		22,515		—		1,124		22,515		23,639		(95	)		2012		50
2057	Springfield	OR		—		527		6,035		—		527		6,035		6,562		(32	)		2012		45
2056	Stayton	OR		—		130		487		—		130		487		617		(5	)		2012		45
2058	Stayton	OR		—		253		8,621		—		253		8,621		8,874		(43	)		2012		45
2088	Tualatin	OR		—		—		6,326		—		—		6,326		6,326		(42	)		2012		45
1163	Haverford	PA		—		16,461		108,816		2,628		16,461		109,832		126,293		(17,166	)		2006		40
2063	Selinsgrove	PA		—		529		9,111		—		529		9,111		9,640		(51	)		2012		45
1967	Cumberland	RI		—		2,630		19,050		171		2,630		19,221		21,851		(1,500	)		2011		30
1959	East Providence	RI		18,060		1,890		13,989		301		1,890		14,290		16,180		(1,118	)		2011		30
1960	Greenwich	RI		9,890		450		11,845		761		450		12,606		13,056		(986	)		2011		30
1972	Smithfield	RI		—		1,250		17,816		48		1,250		17,864		19,114		(1,465	)		2011		30
1973	South Kingstown	RI		—		1,390		12,551		16		1,390		12,567		13,957		(999	)		2011		30
1975	Tiverton	RI		—		3,240		25,735		35		3,240		25,770		29,010		(1,984	)		2011		30
1962	Warwick	RI		17,671		1,050		17,389		696		1,050		18,082		19,132		(1,459	)		2011		30
1104	Aiken	SC		—		357		14,832		151		363		14,471		14,834		(2,282	)		2006		40
1100	Charleston	SC		—		885		14,124		292		896		14,075		14,971		(2,216	)		2006		40
1109	Columbia	SC		—		408		7,527		131		412		7,458		7,870		(1,179	)		2006		40
2154	Florence	SC		—		379		3,928		—		379		3,928		4,307		(25	)		2012		45
0306	Georgetown	SC		—		239		3,008		—		239		3,008		3,247		(903	)		1998		45
0879	Greenville	SC		—		1,090		12,558		—		1,090		12,058		13,148		(1,834	)		2006		40
1172	Greenville	SC		—		993		16,314		437		1,006		15,838		16,844		(2,430	)		2006		40
2059	Greenville	SC		—		679		3,297		—		679		3,297		3,976		(23	)		2012		45
2099	Hilton Head Island	SC		—		1,346		5,767		—		1,346		5,767		7,113		(35	)		2012		45
2111	Hilton Head Island	SC		—		1,651		1,329		—		1,651		1,329		2,980		(12	)		2012		45
2112	Hilton Head Island	SC		—		993		1,862		—		993		1,862		2,855		(14	)		2012		45
0305	Lancaster	SC		—		84		2,982		—		84		2,982		3,066		(811	)		1998		45
0880	Myrtle Beach	SC		—		900		10,913		—		900		10,513		11,413		(1,599	)		2006		40
0312	Rock Hill	SC		—		203		2,671		—		203		2,671		2,874		(782	)		1998		45
1113	Rock Hill	SC		—		695		4,119		322		795		4,126		4,921		(697	)		2006		40
2076	Rock Hill	SC		—		919		14,741		—		919		14,741		15,660		(72	)		2012		45
2093	Rock Hill	SC		—		644		4,140		—		644		4,140		4,784		(23	)		2012		45
0313	Sumter	SC		—		196		2,623		—		196		2,623		2,819		(788	)		1998		45
2067	West Columbia	SC		—		373		2,509		—		373		2,509		2,882		(18	)		2012		45
2132	Cordova	TN		—		2,167		5,829		—		2,167		5,829		7,996		(17	)		2012		45
2060	Franklin	TN		—		1,905		27,907		—		1,905		27,907		29,812		(125	)		2012		45
2100	Hendersonville	TN		—		1,486		2,276		—		1,486		2,276		3,762		(20	)		2012		45
2073	Kingsport	TN		—		1,113		8,625		—		1,113		8,625		9,738		(43	)		2012		45

F-63

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
2071	Memphis	TN		—		978		10,124		—		978		10,124		11,102		(44	)		2012		45
1003	Nashville	TN		11,131		812		16,983		562		812		16,797		17,609		(2,289	)		2006		40
2094	Nashville	TN		—		1,106		14,774		—		1,106		14,774		15,880		(65	)		2012		45
0860	Oak Ridge	TN		8,515		500		4,741		—		500		4,641		5,141		(829	)		2006		35
0843	Abilene	TX		1,813		300		2,830		—		300		2,710		3,010		(446	)		2006		39
2107	Amarillo	TX		—		1,315		26,838		—		1,315		26,838		28,153		(118	)		2012		45
1004	Arlington	TX		14,243		2,002		19,110		—		2,002		18,729		20,731		(2,641	)		2006		40
1116	Arlington	TX		—		2,494		12,192		249		2,540		11,873		14,413		(1,875	)		2006		40
0511	Austin	TX		—		2,960		41,645		—		2,960		41,645		44,605		(12,840	)		2002		30
1589	Austin	TX		—		2,860		17,358		497		2,973		17,742		20,715		(2,287	)		2010		25
0202	Beaumont	TX		—		145		10,404		—		145		10,020		10,165		(3,547	)		1996		45
2075	Bedford	TX		—		1,204		26,845		—		1,204		26,845		28,049		(118	)		2012		45
0844	Burleson	TX		4,140		1,050		5,242		—		1,050		4,902		5,952		(807	)		2006		40
0848	Cedar Hill	TX		8,743		1,070		11,554		—		1,070		11,104		12,174		(1,827	)		2006		40
1325	Cedar Hill	TX		—		440		7,494		—		440		7,494		7,934		(1,522	)		2007		40
2164	Dallas	TX		—		2,993		8,113		—		2,993		8,113		11,106		(43	)		2012		45
0513	Fort Worth	TX		—		2,830		50,832		—		2,830		50,832		53,662		(15,673	)		2002		30
0506	Friendswood	TX		22,714		400		7,354		—		400		7,354		7,754		(1,716	)		2002		45
0217	Houston	TX		11,517		835		7,195		—		835		7,195		8,030		(2,380	)		1997		45
0491	Houston	TX		—		2,470		21,710		750		2,470		22,460		24,930		(6,936	)		2002		35
1106	Houston	TX		—		1,008		15,333		183		1,020		15,098		16,118		(2,373	)		2006		40
1111	Houston	TX		—		1,877		25,372		247		1,961		24,491		26,452		(3,853	)		2006		40
1955	Houston	TX		59,350		9,820		50,079		1,673		9,820		51,752		61,572		(4,332	)		2011		30
1956	Houston	TX		11,334		4,450		9,272		1,151		4,450		10,422		14,872		(1,897	)		2011		30
1957	Houston	TX		38,976		8,170		37,285		794		8,170		38,080		46,250		(3,034	)		2011		30
1958	Houston	TX		35,888		2,910		37,443		876		2,910		38,321		41,231		(3,074	)		2011		30
2068	Houston	TX		—		985		18,824		—		985		18,824		19,809		(84	)		2012		45
0820	Irving	TX		10,721		710		9,949		—		710		9,359		10,069		(1,872	)		2005		35
2149	Kerrville	TX		—		836		34,031		—		836		34,031		34,867		(157	)		2012		45
2124	Lubbock	TX		—		1,143		4,656		—		1,143		4,656		5,799		(28	)		2012		45
0845	North Richland Hills	TX		3,026		520		5,117		—		520		4,807		5,327		(791	)		2006		40
0846	North Richland Hills	TX		6,631		870		9,259		—		870		8,819		9,689		(1,659	)		2006		35
2113	North Richland Hills	TX		—		743		11,503		—		743		11,503		12,246		(51	)		2012		45
1102	Plano	TX		—		494		12,518		145		505		12,247		12,752		(1,925	)		2006		40
2064	Plano	TX		—		590		6,930		—		590		6,930		7,520		(36	)		2012		45
2162	Portland	TX		—		1,233		14,001		—		1,233		14,001		15,234		(72	)		2012		45
0494	San Antonio	TX		7,813		730		3,961		—		730		3,961		4,691		(946	)		2002		45
1590	San Antonio	TX		—		2,860		17,030		282		2,880		17,292		20,172		(2,236	)		2010		25
2116	Sherman	TX		—		563		3,138		—		563		3,138		3,701		(19	)		2012		45
1954	Sugar Land	TX		38,384		3,420		36,846		896		3,420		37,742		41,162		(2,904	)		2011		30
1103	The Woodlands	TX		—		802		17,358		228		869		17,071		17,940		(2,689	)		2006		40
0195	Victoria	TX		12,645		175		4,290		3,101		175		7,018		7,193		(1,848	)		1995		43
0847	Waxahachie	TX		2,079		390		3,879		—		390		3,659		4,049		(602	)		2006		40
1953	Webster	TX		36,675		4,780		30,854		793		4,780		31,646		36,426		(2,503	)		2011		30
2069	Cedar City	UT		—		437		8,706		—		437		8,706		9,143		(40	)		2012		45
1161	Salt Lake City	UT		—		2,621		22,072		287		2,654		21,371		24,025		(3,317	)		2006		40
2101	St. George	UT		—		683		9,435		—		683		9,435		10,118		(45	)		2012		45
1015	Arlington	VA		—		4,320		19,567		455		4,320		19,445		23,765		(3,102	)		2006		40
1244	Arlington	VA		—		3,833		7,076		92		3,833		6,931		10,764		(1,083	)		2006		40
1245	Arlington	VA		—		7,278		37,407		226		7,278		36,748		44,026		(5,772	)		2006		40
0881	Chesapeake	VA		—		1,090		12,444		—		1,090		11,944		13,034		(1,817	)		2006		40
1247	Falls Church	VA		—		2,228		8,887		108		2,228		8,780		11,008		(1,390	)		2006		40
1164	Fort Belvoir	VA		—		11,594		99,528		6,332		11,594		103,862		115,456		(16,653	)		2006		40
1250	Leesburg	VA		—		607		3,236		66		607		3,157		3,764		(1,869	)		2006		35
1016	Richmond	VA		—		2,110		11,469		281		2,110		11,324		13,434		(1,785	)		2006		40
1246	Sterling	VA		—		2,360		22,932		250		2,360		22,668		25,028		(3,573	)		2006		40
2077	Sterling	VA		—		1,046		15,788		—		1,046		15,788		16,834		(68	)		2012		45
0225	Woodbridge	VA		—		950		6,983		—		950		6,983		7,933		(2,211	)		1997		45
1173	Bellevue	WA		—		3,734		16,171		210		3,737		15,813		19,550		(2,447	)		2006		40
2095	College Place	WA		—		758		8,051		—		758		8,051		8,809		(43	)		2012		45
1240	Edmonds	WA		—		1,418		16,502		35		1,418		16,066		17,484		(2,514	)		2006		40
2172	Ellensburg	WA		—		1,291		5,167		—		1,291		5,167		6,458		(37	)		2012		40
2160	Kenmore	WA		—		3,284		16,641		—		3,284		16,641		19,925		(73	)		2012		45
0797	Kirkland	WA		—		1,000		13,403		—		1,000		13,043		14,043		(2,419	)		2005		40
1174	Lynnwood	WA		—		1,203		7,415		326		1,203		7,741		8,944		(1,167	)		2006		40
1251	Mercer Island	WA		—		4,209		8,123		296		4,209		8,214		12,423		(1,335	)		2006		40

F-64

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
2141	Moses Lake	WA		—		603		4,243		—		603		4,243		4,846		(31	)		2012		50
2096	Poulsbo	WA		—		3,529		16,340		—		3,529		16,340		19,869		(80	)		2012		45
2102	Richland	WA		—		375		4,941		—		375		4,941		5,316		(23	)		2012		45
0794	Shoreline	WA		9,178		1,590		10,671		—		1,590		10,261		11,851		(1,903	)		2005		40
0795	Shoreline	WA		—		4,030		26,421		—		4,030		25,651		29,681		(4,678	)		2005		39
1175	Snohomish	WA		—		1,541		10,228		195		1,541		10,164		11,705		(1,563	)		2006		40
2097	Spokane	WA		—		1,310		4,956		—		1,310		4,956		6,266		(33	)		2012		45
2061	Vancouver	WA		—		973		4,096		—		973		4,096		5,069		(25	)		2012		45
2062	Vancouver	WA		—		1,498		9,997		—		1,498		9,997		11,495		(46	)		2012		45
2052	Yakima	WA		—		557		5,897		—		557		5,897		6,454		(29	)		2012		50
2078	Yakima	WA		—		265		5,756		—		265		5,756		6,021		(25	)		2012		45
2114	Yakima	WA		—		1,187		8,406		—		1,187		8,406		9,593		(46	)		2012		45
2072	Appleton	WI		—		246		12,517		—		246		12,517		12,763		(57	)		2012		45
2170	Madison	WI		—		834		10,050		—		834		10,050		10,884		(52	)		2012		40
2117	Bridgeport	WV		—		4,008		14,603		—		4,008		14,603		18,611		(90	)		2012		45
2125	Bridgeport	WV		—		4,093		3,368		—		4,093		3,368		7,461		(32	)		2012		45
2142	Cody	WY		—		558		10,076		—		558		10,076		10,634		(40	)		2012		50
2148	Sheridan	WY		—		915		12,047		—		915		12,047		12,962		(58	)		2012		45
			$	1,294,357	$	619,716	$	5,074,654	$	87,650	$	621,354	$	5,081,517	$	5,702,871	$	(605,972	)
Life Science
1482	Brisbane	CA		—		50,989		1,789		36,920		50,989		38,708		89,697		—			2007		**
1481	Carlsbad	CA		—		30,300		—		7,705		30,300		7,705		38,005		—			2007		**
1522	Carlsbad	CA		—		23,475		—		2,792		23,475		2,792		26,267		—			2007		**
1401	Hayward	CA		—		900		7,100		913		900		8,013		8,913		(976	)		2007		40
1402	Hayward	CA		—		1,500		6,400		3,458		1,500		9,857		11,357		(1,343	)		2007		40
1403	Hayward	CA		—		1,900		7,100		263		1,900		7,363		9,263		(1,189	)		2007		40
1404	Hayward	CA		—		2,200		17,200		12		2,200		17,212		19,412		(2,331	)		2007		40
1405	Hayward	CA		—		1,000		3,200		7,478		1,000		10,678		11,678		(2,154	)		2007		40
1549	Hayward	CA		—		1,006		4,259		1,534		1,006		5,793		6,799		(1,285	)		2007		29
1550	Hayward	CA		—		677		2,761		54		677		2,814		3,491		(526	)		2007		29
1551	Hayward	CA		—		661		1,995		2,322		661		4,317		4,978		(381	)		2007		29
1552	Hayward	CA		—		1,187		7,139		594		1,187		7,733		8,920		(1,633	)		2007		29
1553	Hayward	CA		—		1,189		9,465		95		1,189		9,560		10,749		(1,795	)		2007		29
1554	Hayward	CA		—		1,246		5,179		1,822		1,246		7,001		8,247		(1,516	)		2007		29
1555	Hayward	CA		—		1,521		13,546		121		1,521		13,667		15,188		(2,567	)		2007		29
1556	Hayward	CA		—		1,212		5,120		2,699		1,212		7,819		9,031		(1,467	)		2007		29
1424	La Jolla	CA		—		9,600		25,283		7,397		9,648		31,703		41,351		(4,213	)		2007		40
1425	La Jolla	CA		—		6,200		19,883		99		6,276		19,906		26,182		(2,724	)		2007		40
1426	La Jolla	CA		—		7,200		12,412		3,084		7,291		15,404		22,695		(3,552	)		2007		27
1427	La Jolla	CA		—		8,700		16,983		671		8,746		17,608		26,354		(3,387	)		2007		30
1947	La Jolla	CA		12,222		2,581		10,534		20		2,581		10,554		13,135		(703	)		2011		30
1949	La Jolla	CA		8,068		2,686		11,045		527		2,686		11,572		14,258		(747	)		2011		30
1488	Mountain View	CA		—		7,300		25,410		1,360		7,559		26,506		34,065		(3,577	)		2007		40
1489	Mountain View	CA		—		6,500		22,800		1,866		6,500		24,666		31,166		(3,206	)		2007		40
1490	Mountain View	CA		—		4,800		9,500		442		4,800		9,942		14,742		(1,400	)		2007		40
1491	Mountain View	CA		—		4,200		8,400		1,249		4,209		9,640		13,849		(1,833	)		2007		40
1492	Mountain View	CA		—		3,600		9,700		730		3,600		10,430		14,030		(2,041	)		2007		40
1493	Mountain View	CA		—		7,500		16,300		1,904		7,500		17,603		25,103		(2,316	)		2007		40
1494	Mountain View	CA		—		9,800		24,000		203		9,800		24,203		34,003		(3,297	)		2007		40
1495	Mountain View	CA		—		6,900		17,800		3,245		6,900		21,046		27,946		(2,514	)		2007		40
1496	Mountain View	CA		—		7,000		17,000		6,364		7,000		23,364		30,364		(5,078	)		2007		40
1497	Mountain View	CA		—		14,100		31,002		10,111		14,100		41,113		55,213		(8,786	)		2007		40
1498	Mountain View	CA		—		7,100		25,800		8,101		7,100		33,901		41,001		(7,304	)		2007		40
2017	Mountain View	CA		—		—		—		17,860		—		17,860		17,860		—			—		*
1470	Poway	CA		—		5,826		12,200		5,727		5,826		17,927		23,753		(4,536	)		2007		40
1471	Poway	CA		—		5,978		14,200		4,253		5,978		18,453		24,431		(3,835	)		2007		40
1472	Poway	CA		—		25,800		2,405		4,989		25,800		7,394		33,194		—			2007		**
1477	Poway	CA		—		29,943		2,475		17,568		29,943		20,042		49,985		—			2007		**
1478	Poway	CA		—		6,700		14,400		6,145		6,700		20,545		27,245		(5,495	)		2007		40
1499	Redwood City	CA		—		3,400		5,500		1,285		3,407		6,777		10,184		(1,464	)		2007		40
1500	Redwood City	CA		—		2,500		4,100		1,188		2,506		5,282		7,788		(1,069	)		2007		40
1501	Redwood City	CA		—		3,600		4,600		819		3,607		5,412		9,019		(884	)		2007		30
1502	Redwood City	CA		—		3,100		5,100		804		3,107		5,650		8,757		(965	)		2007		31
1503	Redwood City	CA		—		4,800		17,300		3,183		4,818		20,466		25,284		(2,621	)		2007		31
1504	Redwood City	CA		—		5,400		15,500		856		5,418		16,338		21,756		(2,173	)		2007		31

F-65

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

												Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																		Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements					Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
1505	Redwood City	CA		—		3,000		3,500		955			3,006		4,449		7,455		(851	)		2007		40
1506	Redwood City	CA		—		6,000		14,300		3,020			6,018		17,302		23,320		(2,605	)		2007		40
1507	Redwood City	CA		—		1,900		12,800		6,811			1,912		19,599		21,511		(1,286	)		2007		39
1508	Redwood City	CA		—		2,700		11,300		6,498			2,712		17,787		20,499		(1,160	)		2007		39
1509	Redwood City	CA		—		2,700		10,900		4,695			2,712		15,583		18,295		(1,590	)		2007		40
1510	Redwood City	CA		—		2,200		12,000		5,116			2,212		17,105		19,317		(2,308	)		2007		38
1511	Redwood City	CA		—		2,600		9,300		1,474			2,612		10,763		13,375		(1,711	)		2007		26
1512	Redwood City	CA		—		3,300		18,000		123			3,300		18,123		21,423		(2,448	)		2007		40
1513	Redwood City	CA		—		3,300		17,900		123			3,300		18,023		21,323		(2,434	)		2007		40
0679	San Diego	CA		—		7,872		34,617		17,163			7,872		51,781		59,653		(11,907	)		2002		39
0837	San Diego	CA		—		4,630		2,029		8,645			4,630		10,673		15,303		(1,366	)		2006		31
0838	San Diego	CA		—		2,040		902		4,942			2,040		5,844		7,884		(360	)		2006		40
0839	San Diego	CA		—		3,940		3,184		4,459			3,940		6,847		10,787		(2,679	)		2006		40
0840	San Diego	CA		—		5,690		4,579		673			5,690		5,252		10,942		(1,155	)		2006		40
1418	San Diego	CA		—		11,700		31,243		6,430			11,700		37,672		49,372		(5,503	)		2007		40
1420	San Diego	CA		—		6,524		—		3,497			6,524		3,497		10,021		—			2007		**
1421	San Diego	CA		—		7,000		33,779		—			7,000		33,779		40,779		(4,574	)		2007		40
1422	San Diego	CA		—		14,800		7,600		3,178			14,800		10,778		25,578		(1,625	)		2007		30
1423	San Diego	CA		—		8,400		33,144		—			8,400		33,144		41,544		(4,488	)		2007		40
1514	San Diego	CA		—		5,200		—		—			5,200		—		5,200		—			2007		**
1558	San Diego	CA		—		7,740		22,654		1,088			7,778		23,703		31,481		(3,097	)		2007		38
1948	San Diego	CA		25,230		5,879		25,305		325			5,879		25,631		31,510		(1,689	)		2011		30
1950	San Diego	CA		1,098		884		2,796		—			884		2,796		3,680		(186	)		2011		30
1407	South San Francisco	CA		1,741		28,600		48,700		4,961			28,600		53,662		82,262		(8,876	)		2007		35
1408	South San Francisco	CA		813		9,000		17,800		1,004			9,000		18,804		27,804		(2,410	)		2007		40
1409	South San Francisco	CA		1,737		18,000		38,043		421			18,000		38,464		56,464		(5,174	)		2007		40
1410	South San Francisco	CA		—		4,900		18,100		150			4,900		18,250		23,150		(2,454	)		2007		40
1411	South San Francisco	CA		—		8,000		27,700		86			8,000		27,786		35,786		(3,758	)		2007		40
1412	South San Francisco	CA		1,084		10,100		22,521		238			10,100		22,759		32,859		(3,054	)		2007		40
1413	South San Francisco	CA		—		8,000		28,299		252			8,000		28,550		36,550		(3,843	)		2007		40
1414	South San Francisco	CA		—		3,700		20,800		212			3,700		21,012		24,712		(2,820	)		2007		40
1430	South San Francisco	CA		1,118		10,700		23,621		212			10,700		23,832		34,532		(3,233	)		2007		40
1431	South San Francisco	CA		—		7,000		15,500		157			7,000		15,657		22,657		(2,106	)		2007		40
1435	South San Francisco	CA		—		13,800		42,500		32,764			13,800		75,264		89,064		(6,907	)		2007		40
1436	South San Francisco	CA		—		14,500		45,300		34,087			14,500		79,387		93,887		(7,229	)		2007		40
1437	South San Francisco	CA		—		9,400		24,800		16,980			9,400		41,781		51,181		(3,127	)		2007		40
1439	South San Francisco	CA		—		11,900		68,848		70			11,900		68,918		80,818		(9,325	)		2007		40
1440	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,000		57,954		—			10,000		57,954		67,954		(7,848	)		2007		40
1441	South San Francisco	CA		—		9,300		43,549		—			9,300		43,549		52,849		(5,897	)		2007		40
1442	South San Francisco	CA		—		11,000		47,289		81			11,000		47,370		58,370		(6,427	)		2007		40
1443	South San Francisco	CA		—		13,200		60,932		1,158			13,200		62,090		75,290		(7,737	)		2007		40
1444	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,500		33,776		337			10,500		34,112		44,612		(4,602	)		2007		40
1445	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,600		34,083		—			10,600		34,083		44,683		(4,615	)		2007		40
1448	South San Francisco	CA		—		14,100		71,344		52			14,100		71,396		85,496		(9,667	)		2007		40
1449	South San Francisco	CA		—		12,800		63,600		472			12,800		64,072		76,872		(8,723	)		2007		40
1450	South San Francisco	CA		—		11,200		79,222		20			11,200		79,242		90,442		(10,730	)		2007		40
1451	South San Francisco	CA		—		7,200		50,856		66			7,200		50,922		58,122		(6,894	)		2007		40
1452	South San Francisco	CA		—		14,400		101,362		(115	)		14,400		101,247		115,647		(13,699	)		2007		40
1454	South San Francisco	CA		—		11,100		47,738		9,369			11,100		57,108		68,208		(8,748	)		2007		40
1455	South San Francisco	CA		—		9,700		41,937		5,835			10,261		47,211		57,472		(6,906	)		2007		40
1456	South San Francisco	CA		—		6,300		22,900		8,196			6,300		31,096		37,396		(4,858	)		2007		40
1458	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,900		20,900		4,094			10,909		24,788		35,697		(5,567	)		2007		40
1459	South San Francisco	CA		—		3,600		100		183			3,600		283		3,883		(94	)		2007		5
1460	South San Francisco	CA		—		2,300		100		92			2,300		192		2,492		(100	)		2007		5
1461	South San Francisco	CA		—		3,900		200		171			3,900		371		4,271		(200	)		2007		5
1462	South San Francisco	CA		—		7,117		600		5,020			7,117		5,272		12,389		(674	)		2007		40
1463	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,381		2,300		16,370			10,381		18,670		29,051		(1,094	)		2007		40
1464	South San Francisco	CA		—		7,403		700		7,287			7,403		7,987		15,390		(522	)		2007		40
1468	South San Francisco	CA		—		10,100		24,013		2,796			10,100		26,809		36,909		(5,478	)		2007		40
1480	South San Francisco	CA		—		32,210		3,110		11,185			32,210		14,295		46,505		—			2007		**
1559	South San Francisco	CA		—		5,666		5,773		188			5,695		5,863		11,558		(5,892	)		2007		5
1560	South San Francisco	CA		—		1,204		1,293		15			1,210		1,287		2,497		(1,293	)		2007		5
1982	South San Francisco	CA		—		64,900		—		9,586			64,900		9,586		74,486		—			2011		**
1604	Cambridge	MA		—		8,389		10,630		16,944			8,389		27,574		35,963		(1	)		2010		*
2011	Durham	NC		9,044		447		6,152		3,411			448		9,564		10,012		—			2011		*
2029	Durham	NC		—		1,920		5,661		2,180			1,920		7,841		9,761		(126	)		2012		20

F-66

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
0461	Salt Lake City	UT		—		500		8,548		—		500		8,548		9,048		(2,908	)		2001		33
0462	Salt Lake City	UT		—		890		15,623		—		890		15,624		16,514		(4,678	)		2001		38
0463	Salt Lake City	UT		—		190		9,875		—		190		9,875		10,065		(2,540	)		2001		43
0464	Salt Lake City	UT		—		630		6,921		62		630		6,984		7,614		(2,143	)		2001		38
0465	Salt Lake City	UT		—		125		6,368		67		125		6,435		6,560		(1,640	)		2001		43
0466	Salt Lake City	UT		—		—		14,614		7		—		14,621		14,621		(3,235	)		2001		43
0507	Salt Lake City	UT		—		280		4,345		226		280		4,571		4,851		(1,022	)		2002		43
0537	Salt Lake City	UT		—		—		6,517		—		—		6,517		6,517		(1,532	)		2002		35
0799	Salt Lake City	UT		—		—		14,600		90		—		14,690		14,690		(2,140	)		2005		40
1593	Salt Lake City	UT		—		—		23,998		—		—		23,998		23,998		(1,757	)		2010		33
			$	62,155	$	935,828	$	2,197,732	$	457,086	$	937,148	$	2,650,293	$	3,587,441	$	(370,208	)
Medical office
0638	Anchorage	AK		6,237		1,456		10,650		5,447		1,456		16,046		17,502		(1,726	)		2000		*
0520	Chandler	AZ		—		3,669		13,503		1,836		3,669		15,095		18,764		(3,287	)		2002		40
2040	Mesa	AZ		—		—		17,314		1		—		17,314		17,314		(176	)		2012		45
0468	Oro Valley	AZ		—		1,050		6,774		892		1,050		7,090		8,140		(1,691	)		2001		43
0356	Phoenix	AZ		—		780		3,199		992		780		3,465		4,245		(1,338	)		1999		32
0470	Phoenix	AZ		—		280		877		42		280		918		1,198		(236	)		2001		43
1066	Scottsdale	AZ		—		5,115		14,064		2,015		4,791		16,396		21,187		(3,037	)		2006		40
2021	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		12,312		5		—		12,317		12,317		(249	)		2012		25
2022	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		9,179		10		—		9,190		9,190		(210	)		2012		25
2023	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		6,398		14		—		6,412		6,412		(116	)		2012		25
2024	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		9,522		—		—		9,522		9,522		(165	)		2012		25
2025	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		4,102		36		—		4,138		4,138		(92	)		2012		25
2026	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		3,655		—		—		3,655		3,655		(63	)		2012		25
2027	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		7,168		—		—		7,168		7,168		(129	)		2012		25
2028	Scottsdale	AZ		—		—		6,659		—		—		6,659		6,659		(115	)		2012		25
0453	Tucson	AZ		—		215		6,318		940		291		6,982		7,273		(2,248	)		2000		35
0556	Tucson	AZ		—		215		3,940		605		215		4,214		4,429		(855	)		2003		43
1041	Brentwood	CA		—		—		30,864		1,450		25		32,092		32,117		(5,190	)		2006		40
1200	Encino	CA		—		6,151		10,438		2,304		6,453		12,385		18,838		(2,663	)		2006		33
0436	Murietta	CA		—		400		9,266		1,649		520		10,234		10,754		(3,907	)		1999		33
0239	Poway	CA		—		2,700		10,839		2,070		2,783		11,690		14,473		(4,866	)		1997		35
0318	Sacramento	CA		—		2,860		21,850		8,784		2,860		29,864		32,724		(6,105	)		1998		*
0234	San Diego	CA		—		2,848		5,879		1,289		3,009		5,356		8,365		(2,605	)		1997		21
0235	San Diego	CA		—		2,863		8,913		2,874		3,068		9,949		13,017		(4,855	)		1997		21
0236	San Diego	CA		—		4,619		19,370		3,521		4,711		17,660		22,371		(8,308	)		1997		21
0421	San Diego	CA		—		2,910		17,362		9,055		2,910		26,417		29,327		(4,547	)		1999		*
0564	San Jose	CA		2,764		1,935		1,728		1,569		1,935		3,178		5,113		(1,116	)		2003		37
0565	San Jose	CA		6,436		1,460		7,672		495		1,460		8,161		9,621		(2,120	)		2003		37
0659	San Jose	CA		—		1,718		3,124		385		1,718		3,432		5,150		(661	)		2000		34
1209	Sherman Oaks	CA		—		7,472		10,075		2,425		7,741		12,221		19,962		(3,641	)		2006		22
0439	Valencia	CA		—		2,300		6,967		1,174		2,309		7,036		9,345		(2,805	)		1999		35
1211	Valencia	CA		—		1,344		7,507		503		1,383		7,972		9,355		(1,370	)		2006		40
0440	West Hills	CA		—		2,100		11,595		1,799		2,156		10,603		12,759		(4,067	)		1999		32
0728	Aurora	CO		—		—		8,764		899		—		9,663		9,663		(2,896	)		2005		39
1196	Aurora	CO		—		210		12,362		1,118		210		13,445		13,655		(2,346	)		2006		40
1197	Aurora	CO		—		200		8,414		845		200		9,259		9,459		(1,904	)		2006		33
0882	Colorado Springs	CO		—		—		12,933		4,903		—		17,837		17,837		(3,995	)		2007		40
0814	Conifer	CO		—		—		1,485		35		13		1,508		1,521		(276	)		2005		40
1199	Denver	CO		—		493		7,897		539		558		8,372		8,930		(1,613	)		2006		33
0808	Englewood	CO		—		—		8,616		3,701		—		12,192		12,192		(2,489	)		2005		35
0809	Englewood	CO		—		—		8,449		2,131		—		10,294		10,294		(2,427	)		2005		35
0810	Englewood	CO		—		—		8,040		4,337		—		12,378		12,378		(2,895	)		2005		35
0811	Englewood	CO		—		—		8,472		1,800		—		10,229		10,229		(2,388	)		2005		35
0812	Littleton	CO		—		—		4,562		1,348		79		5,728		5,807		(1,363	)		2005		35
0813	Littleton	CO		—		—		4,926		1,202		5		6,078		6,083		(1,309	)		2005		38
0570	Lone Tree	CO		—		—		—		18,659		—		18,531		18,531		(4,152	)		2003		39
0666	Lone Tree	CO		14,103		—		23,274		823		—		24,086		24,086		(4,248	)		2000		37
1076	Parker	CO		—		—		13,388		106		8		13,477		13,485		(2,308	)		2006		40
0510	Thornton	CO		—		236		10,206		1,800		244		11,974		12,218		(2,980	)		2002		43
0433	Atlantis	FL		—		—		5,651		495		33		5,796		5,829		(2,408	)		1999		35
0434	Atlantis	FL		—		—		2,027		177		5		2,199		2,204		(851	)		1999		34
0435	Atlantis	FL		—		—		2,000		427		—		2,328		2,328		(922	)		1999		32
0602	Atlantis	FL		—		455		2,231		336		455		2,377		2,832		(486	)		2000		34

F-67

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
0604	Englewood	FL		—		170		1,134		240		198		1,330		1,528		(312	)		2000		34
0609	Kissimmee	FL		—		788		174		211		815		335		1,150		(108	)		2000		34
0610	Kissimmee	FL		—		481		347		304		486		646		1,132		(150	)		2000		34
0671	Kissimmee	FL		—		—		7,574		1,595		—		8,601		8,601		(1,690	)		2000		36
0603	Lake Worth	FL		—		1,507		2,894		1,807		1,507		4,570		6,077		(681	)		2000		34
0612	Margate	FL		—		1,553		6,898		560		1,553		7,441		8,994		(1,376	)		2000		34
0613	Miami	FL		8,538		4,392		11,841		2,464		4,392		14,137		18,529		(3,074	)		2000		34
1067	Milton	FL		—		—		8,566		217		—		8,775		8,775		(1,392	)		2006		40
0563	Orlando	FL		—		2,144		5,136		3,142		2,288		8,018		10,306		(2,603	)		2003		37
0833	Pace	FL		—		—		10,309		2,548		—		12,534		12,534		(3,127	)		2006		44
0834	Pensacola	FL		—		—		11,166		478		—		11,644		11,644		(1,836	)		2006		45
0614	Plantation	FL		787		969		3,241		824		1,011		4,014		5,025		(988	)		2000		34
0673	Plantation	FL		4,943		1,091		7,176		472		1,091		7,524		8,615		(1,407	)		2002		36
0701	St. Petersburg	FL		—		—		10,141		3,654		—		13,651		13,651		(2,769	)		2004		38
1210	Tampa	FL		—		1,967		6,602		3,612		2,067		9,894		11,961		(2,874	)		2006		25
1058	McCaysville	GA		—		—		3,231		18		—		3,249		3,249		(513	)		2006		40
1065	Marion	IL		—		99		11,484		98		100		11,581		11,681		(1,931	)		2006		40
1057	Newburgh	IN		—		—		14,019		1,234		—		15,247		15,247		(2,342	)		2006		40
2039	Kansas City	KS		1,895		440		2,173		2		440		2,173		2,613		(28	)		2012		35
2043	Overland Park	KS		—		—		7,668		3		—		7,668		7,668		(91	)		2012		40
0483	Wichita	KS		—		530		3,341		374		530		3,716		4,246		(951	)		2001		45
1064	Lexington	KY		—		—		12,726		859		—		13,583		13,583		(2,476	)		2006		40
0735	Louisville	KY		—		936		8,426		2,758		936		11,077		12,013		(7,101	)		2005		11
0737	Louisville	KY		—		835		27,627		2,386		835		29,610		30,445		(6,638	)		2005		37
0738	Louisville	KY		4,959		780		8,582		3,309		808		11,782		12,590		(4,955	)		2005		18
0739	Louisville	KY		8,015		826		13,814		1,531		826		14,855		15,681		(3,452	)		2005		38
0740	Louisville	KY		8,679		2,983		13,171		3,237		2,983		16,235		19,218		(4,266	)		2005		30
1944	Louisville	KY		—		788		2,414		—		788		2,414		3,202		(193	)		2010		25
1945	Louisville	KY		24,937		3,255		28,644		—		3,255		28,644		31,899		(1,910	)		2010		30
1946	Louisville	KY		—		430		6,125		—		430		6,125		6,555		(408	)		2010		30
1324	Haverhill	MA		—		800		8,537		1,388		828		9,896		10,724		(1,851	)		2007		40
1213	Ellicott City	MD		—		1,115		3,206		1,439		1,115		4,645		5,760		(1,003	)		2006		34
0361	GlenBurnie	MD		—		670		5,085		—		670		5,085		5,755		(1,985	)		1999		35
1052	Towson	MD		—		—		14,233		3,588		—		15,777		15,777		(3,467	)		2006		40
0240	Minneapolis	MN		—		117		13,213		1,394		117		14,458		14,575		(6,071	)		1997		32
0300	Minneapolis	MN		1,370		160		10,131		2,461		160		12,195		12,355		(4,896	)		1997		35
2032	Independence	MO		33,387		—		48,025		4		—		48,025		48,025		(194	)		2012		45
1078	Flowood	MS		—		—		8,413		689		—		9,075		9,075		(1,553	)		2006		40
1059	Jackson	MS		—		—		8,869		37		—		8,905		8,905		(1,391	)		2006		40
1060	Jackson	MS		6,005		—		7,187		2,160		—		9,347		9,347		(1,696	)		2006		40
1068	Omaha	NE		13,661		—		16,243		400		17		16,615		16,632		(2,714	)		2006		40
0729	Albuquerque	NM		—		—		5,380		182		—		5,563		5,563		(1,109	)		2005		39
0348	Elko	NV		—		55		2,637		12		55		2,649		2,704		(1,050	)		1999		35
0571	Las Vegas	NV		—		—		—		18,002		—		17,459		17,459		(4,115	)		2003		40
0660	Las Vegas	NV		3,487		1,121		4,363		3,244		1,253		7,423		8,676		(2,396	)		2000		34
0661	Las Vegas	NV		3,635		2,125		4,829		3,284		2,225		7,798		10,023		(1,767	)		2000		34
0662	Las Vegas	NV		6,953		3,480		12,305		3,055		3,480		15,099		18,579		(3,689	)		2000		34
0663	Las Vegas	NV		1,004		1,717		3,597		1,985		1,717		5,562		7,279		(1,716	)		2000		34
0664	Las Vegas	NV		2,046		1,172		1,550		316		1,172		1,651		2,823		(1,649	)		2000		*
0691	Las Vegas	NV		—		3,244		18,339		1,574		3,273		19,764		23,037		(6,395	)		2004		30
2037	Mesquite	NV		3,280		—		5,559		5		—		5,559		5,559		(64	)		2012		40
1285	Cleveland	OH		—		823		2,726		660		853		2,671		3,524		(546	)		2006		40
0400	Harrison	OH		—		—		4,561		300		—		4,861		4,861		(1,776	)		1999		35
1054	Durant	OK		—		619		9,256		1,152		651		10,368		11,019		(1,609	)		2006		40
0817	Owasso	OK		—		—		6,582		594		—		7,176		7,176		(2,168	)		2005		40
0404	Roseburg	OR		—		—		5,707		—		—		5,707		5,707		(2,074	)		1999		35
0252	Clarksville	TN		—		765		4,184		—		765		4,184		4,949		(1,762	)		1998		35
0624	Hendersonville	TN		—		256		1,530		661		256		2,070		2,326		(588	)		2000		34
0559	Hermitage	TN		—		830		5,036		5,011		830		9,826		10,656		(2,613	)		2003		35
0561	Hermitage	TN		—		596		9,698		2,284		596		11,548		12,144		(3,123	)		2003		37
0562	Hermitage	TN		—		317		6,528		1,749		317		8,021		8,338		(2,218	)		2003		37
0154	Knoxville	TN		—		700		4,559		3,462		700		8,022		8,722		(2,162	)		1994		19
0409	Murfreesboro	TN		—		900		12,706		—		900		12,706		13,606		(5,767	)		1999		35
0625	Nashville	TN		9,089		955		14,289		1,475		955		15,518		16,473		(3,335	)		2000		34
0626	Nashville	TN		3,742		2,050		5,211		2,239		2,055		7,383		9,438		(1,543	)		2000		34
0627	Nashville	TN		530		1,007		181		554		1,007		715		1,722		(163	)		2000		34

F-68

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
0628	Nashville	TN		5,298		2,980		7,164		1,331		2,980		8,440		11,420		(1,674	)		2000		34
0630	Nashville	TN		535		515		848		233		528		1,067		1,595		(219	)		2000		34
0631	Nashville	TN		—		266		1,305		789		266		1,991		2,257		(430	)		2000		34
0632	Nashville	TN		—		827		7,642		2,429		827		9,976		10,803		(2,213	)		2000		34
0633	Nashville	TN		9,567		5,425		12,577		3,185		5,425		15,729		21,154		(3,390	)		2000		34
0634	Nashville	TN		8,747		3,818		15,185		2,854		3,818		17,692		21,510		(4,081	)		2000		34
0636	Nashville	TN		436		583		450		—		583		450		1,033		(82	)		2000		34
0573	Arlington	TX		8,532		769		12,355		1,871		769		14,160		14,929		(2,954	)		2003		34
0576	Conroe	TX		2,787		324		4,842		1,588		324		6,326		6,650		(1,787	)		2000		34
0577	Conroe	TX		5,125		397		7,966		1,247		397		8,884		9,281		(1,789	)		2000		34
0578	Conroe	TX		5,355		388		7,975		1,474		388		9,328		9,716		(1,377	)		2000		*
0579	Conroe	TX		1,751		188		3,618		660		188		4,261		4,449		(779	)		2000		34
0581	Corpus Christi	TX		—		717		8,181		2,041		717		10,178		10,895		(2,758	)		2000		34
0600	Corpus Christi	TX		—		328		3,210		2,019		328		5,029		5,357		(1,277	)		2000		34
0601	Corpus Christi	TX		—		313		1,771		624		313		2,382		2,695		(651	)		2000		34
0582	Dallas	TX		5,268		1,664		6,785		2,056		1,693		8,692		10,385		(2,024	)		2000		34
1314	Dallas	TX		—		15,230		162,971		5,238		15,239		167,873		183,112		(29,471	)		2006		35
0583	Fort Worth	TX		2,906		898		4,866		1,231		898		6,041		6,939		(1,415	)		2000		34
0805	Fort Worth	TX		—		—		2,481		726		2		3,158		3,160		(963	)		2005		25
0806	Fort Worth	TX		—		—		6,070		35		5		6,024		6,029		(1,123	)		2005		40
1061	Granbury	TX		—		—		6,863		80		—		6,943		6,943		(1,115	)		2006		40
0430	Houston	TX		—		1,927		33,140		1,979		2,063		34,830		36,893		(13,129	)		1999		35
0446	Houston	TX		—		2,200		19,585		5,566		2,209		22,623		24,832		(12,966	)		1999		17
0586	Houston	TX		—		1,033		3,165		840		1,033		3,881		4,914		(930	)		2000		34
0589	Houston	TX		9,688		1,676		12,602		2,743		1,706		15,124		16,830		(3,510	)		2000		34
0670	Houston	TX		—		257		2,884		1,028		297		3,847		4,144		(807	)		2000		35
0702	Houston	TX		—		—		7,414		1,115		7		8,501		8,508		(1,891	)		2004		36
1044	Houston	TX		—		—		4,838		3,186		—		7,940		7,940		(1,802	)		2006		40
0590	Irving	TX		5,510		828		6,160		1,563		828		7,665		8,493		(1,544	)		2000		34
0700	Irving	TX		—		—		8,550		2,905		—		11,452		11,452		(2,601	)		2004		34
1202	Irving	TX		—		1,604		16,107		589		1,604		16,696		18,300		(2,699	)		2006		40
1207	Irving	TX		—		1,955		12,793		859		1,986		13,621		15,607		(2,051	)		2006		40
1062	Lancaster	TX		—		162		3,830		301		162		4,097		4,259		(760	)		2006		39
0591	Lewisville	TX		5,147		561		8,043		703		561		8,720		9,281		(1,620	)		2000		34
0144	Longview	TX		—		102		7,998		386		102		8,384		8,486		(3,488	)		1992		45
0143	Lufkin	TX		—		338		2,383		40		338		2,423		2,761		(988	)		1992		45
0568	McKinney	TX		—		541		6,217		629		541		6,433		6,974		(1,690	)		2003		36
0569	McKinney	TX		—		—		636		7,604		—		7,603		7,603		(1,695	)		2003		40
0596	Nassau Bay	TX		5,383		812		8,883		1,614		812		10,350		11,162		(1,825	)		2000		37
1079	North Richland Hills	TX		—		—		8,942		390		—		9,199		9,199		(1,528	)		2006		40
2048	North Richland Hills	TX		—		1,385		10,213		—		1,385		10,213		11,598		(142	)		2012		30
0142	Pampa	TX		—		84		3,242		569		84		3,811		3,895		(1,629	)		1992		45
1048	Pearland	TX		—		—		4,014		4,002		—		7,953		7,953		(1,685	)		2006		40
0447	Plano	TX		—		1,700		7,810		4,598		1,704		11,946		13,650		(3,467	)		1999		*
0597	Plano	TX		7,569		1,210		9,588		1,760		1,210		11,255		12,465		(2,491	)		2000		34
0672	Plano	TX		9,607		1,389		12,768		1,167		1,389		13,575		14,964		(2,752	)		2002		36
1284	Plano	TX		—		2,049		18,793		1,082		2,087		19,050		21,137		(5,122	)		2006		40
1286	Plano	TX		—		3,300		—		—		3,300		—		3,300		—			2006		**
0815	San Antonio	TX		—		—		9,193		773		12		9,924		9,936		(2,282	)		2006		35
0816	San Antonio	TX		4,473		—		8,699		1,035		—		9,696		9,696		(2,140	)		2006		35
1591	San Antonio	TX		—		—		7,309		288		12		7,585		7,597		(635	)		2010		30
1977	San Antonio	TX		—		—		26,191		610		—		26,799		26,799		(1,797	)		2011		30
0598	Sugarland	TX		3,815		1,078		5,158		1,456		1,084		6,472		7,556		(1,395	)		2000		34
1081	Texarkana	TX		—		1,117		7,423		566		1,177		7,929		9,106		(1,291	)		2006		40
0599	Texas City	TX		6,237		—		9,519		157		—		9,676		9,676		(1,666	)		2000		37
0152	Victoria	TX		—		125		8,977		—		125		8,977		9,102		(3,605	)		1994		45
1592	Bountiful	UT		5,154		999		7,426		55		999		7,481		8,480		(607	)		2010		30
0169	Bountiful	UT		—		276		5,237		561		330		5,743		6,073		(2,161	)		1995		45
0346	Castle Dale	UT		—		50		1,818		63		50		1,881		1,931		(757	)		1998		35
0347	Centerville	UT		—		300		1,288		191		300		1,479		1,779		(623	)		1999		35
2035	Draper	UT		5,810		—		10,803		79		—		10,876		10,876		(110	)		2012		45
0350	Grantsville	UT		—		50		429		39		50		468		518		(209	)		1999		35
0469	Kaysville	UT		—		530		4,493		146		530		4,639		5,169		(1,160	)		2001		43
0456	Layton	UT		—		371		7,073		377		389		7,359		7,748		(2,517	)		2001		35
2042	Layton	UT		—		—		10,275		7		—		10,275		10,275		(107	)		2012		45
0359	Ogden	UT		—		180		1,695		121		180		1,764		1,944		(715	)		1999		35

F-69

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
1283	Ogden	UT		—		106		4,464		524		106		4,528		4,634		(719	)		2006		40
0357	Orem	UT		—		337		8,744		1,184		306		9,191		9,497		(4,044	)		1999		35
0371	Providence	UT		—		240		3,876		202		256		3,802		4,058		(1,474	)		1999		35
0353	Salt Lake City	UT		—		190		779		61		201		830		1,031		(342	)		1999		35
0354	Salt Lake City	UT		—		220		10,732		1,342		220		11,872		12,092		(4,563	)		1999		35
0355	Salt Lake City	UT		—		180		14,792		1,215		180		15,901		16,081		(6,251	)		1999		35
0467	Salt Lake City	UT		—		3,000		7,541		649		3,109		8,036		11,145		(2,410	)		2001		38
0566	Salt Lake City	UT		—		509		4,044		834		509		4,710		5,219		(1,264	)		2003		37
2041	Salt Lake City	UT		—		—		12,326		9		—		12,326		12,326		(125	)		2012		45
2033	Sandy	UT		3,170		867		3,513		8		867		3,513		4,380		(79	)		2012		20
0358	Springville	UT		—		85		1,493		188		85		1,682		1,767		(673	)		1999		35
0482	Stansbury	UT		—		450		3,201		346		450		3,484		3,934		(904	)		2001		45
0351	Washington Terrace	UT		—		—		4,573		1,946		—		6,167		6,167		(2,178	)		1999		35
0352	Washington Terrace	UT		—		—		2,692		439		—		2,801		2,801		(1,077	)		1999		35
2034	West Jordan	UT		7,958		—		12,021		10		—		12,021		12,021		(121	)		2012		45
2036	West Jordan	UT		1,509		—		1,383		11		—		1,383		1,383		(13	)		2012		20
0495	West Valley City	UT		—		410		8,266		1,002		410		9,268		9,678		(2,922	)		2002		35
0349	West Valley City	UT		—		1,070		17,463		76		1,036		17,566		18,602		(6,955	)		1999		35
1208	Fairfax	VA		—		8,396		16,710		2,848		8,408		19,545		27,953		(4,437	)		2006		28
0572	Reston	VA		—		—		11,902		44		—		11,875		11,875		(2,832	)		2003		43
0448	Renton	WA		—		—		18,724		1,523		—		19,580		19,580		(7,276	)		1999		35
0781	Seattle	WA		—		—		52,703		3,206		—		53,162		53,162		(11,795	)		2004		39
0782	Seattle	WA		—		—		24,382		3,634		21		27,188		27,209		(6,521	)		2004		36
0783	Seattle	WA		—		—		5,625		969		—		6,547		6,547		(4,806	)		2004		10
0785	Seattle	WA		—		—		7,293		1,341		—		7,875		7,875		(2,125	)		2004		33
1385	Seattle	WA		—		—		38,925		848		—		39,763		39,763		(7,329	)		2007		30
2038	Evanston	WY		2,213		—		4,601		12		—		4,601		4,601		(52	)		2012		40
0884	Coyoacan	DF		—		415		3,739		255		338		4,066		4,404		(736	)		2006		40
			$	320,032	$	192,906	$	1,989,115	$	313,338	$	195,525	$	2,255,103	$	2,450,628	$	(506,859	)
Post—acute/skilled nursing
0012	Livermore	CA		—		610		1,711		1,125		610		2,835		3,445		(2,788	)		1985		25
0315	Perris	CA		—		336		3,021		—		336		3,021		3,357		(1,552	)		1998		25
0002	Fort Collins	CO		—		499		1,913		1,454		499		3,114		3,613		(3,114	)		1985		25
0018	Morrison	CO		—		1,429		5,464		4,019		1,429		8,757		10,186		(8,565	)		1985		24
0280	Statesboro	GA		—		168		1,508		—		168		1,509		1,677		(798	)		1992		25
0297	Rexburg	ID		—		200		5,310		—		200		5,060		5,260		(2,097	)		1998		35
0378	Anderson	IN		—		500		4,724		1,734		500		6,057		6,557		(2,033	)		1999		35
0384	Angola	IN		—		130		2,900		2,798		130		5,698		5,828		(1,100	)		1999		35
0385	Fort Wayne	IN		—		200		4,150		2,667		200		6,817		7,017		(1,928	)		1999		38
0386	Fort Wayne	IN		—		140		3,760		—		140		3,760		3,900		(1,414	)		1999		35
0387	Huntington	IN		—		30		2,970		338		30		3,308		3,338		(1,159	)		1999		35
0373	Kokomo	IN		—		250		4,622		1,294		250		5,653		5,903		(1,462	)		1999		45
0454	New Albany	IN		—		230		6,595		—		230		6,595		6,825		(2,214	)		2001		35
0484	Tell City	IN		—		95		6,208		1,299		95		7,509		7,604		(1,802	)		2001		45
0688	Cynthiana	KY		—		192		4,875		—		192		4,875		5,067		(961	)		2004		40
0071	Mayfield	KY		—		218		2,797		—		218		2,792		3,010		(1,835	)		1986		40
0298	Franklin	LA		—		405		3,424		—		405		3,424		3,829		(1,780	)		1998		25
0299	Morgan City	LA		—		203		2,050		—		203		2,050		2,253		(1,065	)		1998		25
0017	Westborough	MA		—		858		2,975		2,894		858		5,866		6,724		(4,578	)		1985		30
0388	Las Vegas	NV		—		1,300		3,950		1,487		1,300		5,437		6,737		(1,486	)		1999		35
0389	Las Vegas	NV		—		1,300		5,800		—		1,300		5,800		7,100		(2,182	)		1999		35
0390	Fairborn	OH		—		250		4,850		—		250		4,850		5,100		(1,825	)		1999		35
0391	Georgetown	OH		—		130		4,970		—		130		4,970		5,100		(1,870	)		1999		35
0063	Marion	OH		—		218		2,971		—		218		2,966		3,184		(2,521	)		1986		30
0038	Newark	OH		—		400		8,588		—		400		8,577		8,977		(6,254	)		1986		35
0392	Port Clinton	OH		—		370		3,630		—		370		3,630		4,000		(1,366	)		1999		35
0393	Springfield	OH		—		250		3,950		2,113		250		6,063		6,313		(1,697	)		1999		35
0394	Toledo	OH		—		120		5,130		—		120		5,130		5,250		(1,930	)		1999		35
0395	Versailles	OH		—		120		4,980		—		120		4,980		5,100		(1,873	)		1999		35
0695	Carthage	TN		—		129		2,406		—		129		2,225		2,354		(535	)		2004		35
0054	Loudon	TN		—		26		3,879		—		26		3,873		3,899		(2,872	)		1986		35
0047	Maryville	TN		—		160		1,472		—		160		1,468		1,628		(862	)		1986		45
0048	Maryville	TN		—		307		4,376		—		307		4,369		4,676		(2,489	)		1986		45
0285	Fort Worth	TX		—		243		2,036		269		243		2,305		2,548		(1,212	)		1998		25
0296	Ogden	UT		—		250		4,685		—		250		4,435		4,685		(1,817	)		1998		35

F-70

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

											Gross Amount at Which Carried As of December 31, 2012
					Initial Cost to Company																	Life on Which Depreciation in Latest Income Statement is Computed
									Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition
City		State	Encumbrances at December 31, 2012		Land		Buildings and Improvements				Land		Buildings and Improvements		Total(1)		Accumulated Depreciation			Year Acquired/ Constructed
0681	Fishersville	VA		—		751		7,734		—		751		7,220		7,971		(1,570	)		2004		40
0682	Floyd	VA		—		309		2,263		—		309		1,893		2,202		(654	)		2004		25
0689	Independence	VA		—		206		8,366		—		206		7,810		8,016		(1,676	)		2004		40
0683	Newport News	VA		—		535		6,192		—		535		5,719		6,254		(1,243	)		2004		40
0684	Roanoke	VA		—		586		7,159		—		586		6,696		7,282		(1,454	)		2004		40
0685	Staunton	VA		—		422		8,681		—		422		8,136		8,558		(1,766	)		2004		40
0686	Williamsburg	VA		—		699		4,886		—		699		4,464		5,163		(971	)		2004		40
0690	Windsor	VA		—		319		7,543		—		319		7,018		7,337		(1,506	)		2004		40
0687	Woodstock	VA		—		603		5,395		9		605		4,987		5,592		(1,086	)		2004		40
			$	—	$	16,696	$	196,869	$	23,500	$	16,698	$	213,721	$	230,419	$	(86,962	)
Hospital
0126	Sherwood	AR		—		709		9,604		—		709		9,587		10,296		(4,693	)		1990		45
0113	Glendale	AZ		—		1,565		7,050		—		1,565		7,050		8,615		(3,543	)		1988		45
1038	Fresno	CA		—		3,652		29,113		16,699		3,652		45,813		49,465		(10,320	)		2006		40
0423	Irvine	CA		—		18,000		70,800		—		18,000		70,800		88,800		(26,641	)		1999		35
0127	Colorado Springs	CO		—		690		8,338		—		690		8,338		9,028		(4,058	)		1989		45
0425	Palm Beach Garden	FL		—		4,200		58,250		—		4,200		58,250		62,450		(21,915	)		1999		35
0887	Atlanta	GA		—		4,300		13,690		—		4,300		11,890		16,190		(3,468	)		2007		40
0426	Roswell	GA		—		6,900		55,300		—		6,900		54,859		61,759		(20,687	)		1999		35
0112	Overland Park	KS		—		2,316		10,681		—		2,316		10,680		12,996		(5,558	)		1989		45
1383	Baton Rouge	LA		—		690		8,545		86		690		8,502		9,192		(1,557	)		2007		40
0877	Slidell	LA		—		1,490		22,034		—		1,490		20,934		22,424		(3,227	)		2006		40
2031	Slidell	LA		—		3,000		—		643		3,000		643		3,643		—			2012		**
0429	Hickory	NC		—		2,600		69,900		—		2,600		69,900		72,500		(26,296	)		1999		35
0886	Dallas	TX		—		1,820		8,508		26		1,820		7,454		9,274		(1,087	)		2007		40
1319	Dallas	TX		—		18,840		138,235		1,097		18,840		139,332		158,172		(22,658	)		2007		35
1384	Plano	TX		—		6,290		22,686		3,920		6,290		26,606		32,896		(4,346	)		2007		25
0084	San Antonio	TX		—		1,990		11,184		—		1,990		11,174		13,164		(6,104	)		1987		45
0885	Greenfield	WI		—		620		9,542		—		620		8,722		9,342		(1,270	)		2006		40
			$	—	$	79,672	$	553,460	$	22,471	$	79,672	$	570,534	$	650,206	$	(167,428	)
Total continuing operations properties			$	1,676,544	$	1,844,818	$	10,011,830	$	904,045	$	1,850,397	$	10,771,168	$	12,621,565	$	(1,737,429	)
Corporate and other assets				—		—		2,729		4,014		—		3,180		3,180		(2,289	)
Total			$	1,676,544	$	1,844,818	$	10,014,559	$	908,059	$	1,850,397	$	10,774,348	$	12,624,745	$	(1,739,718	)

*

Property is in development or taken out of service and placed in redevelopment and not yet placed in service.

**

Represents land parcels held for development which are not depreciated.

†

A portion of the property has been taken out of service and placed in redevelopment.

(1)

At December 31, 2012, the tax basis of the Company's net real estate assets is less than the reported amounts by approximately $1.6 billion.

F-71

HCP, Inc.

Schedule III: Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Continued)

December 31, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)

        (b)   A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 follows (in thousands):

	Year ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
Real estate:
Balances at beginning of year	$	10,730,089		$	9,756,927		$	9,416,188
Acquisition of real estate and development and improvements		1,941,091			1,049,723			377,354
Disposition of real estate		(148,752	)		(21,737	)		(61,139	)
Impairments		(7,878	)		—			—
Balances associated with changes in reporting presentation(1)		110,195			(54,824	)		24,524
Balances at end of year	$	12,624,745		$	10,730,089		$	9,756,927
Accumulated depreciation:
Balances at beginning of year	$	1,449,579		$	1,226,122		$	1,015,263
Depreciation expense		302,332			294,480			254,799
Disposition of real estate		(32,942	)		(5,705	)		(27,123	)
Balances associated with changes in reporting presentation(1)		20,749			(65,318	)		(16,817	)
Balances at end of year	$	1,739,718		$	1,449,579		$	1,226,122

(1)

The balances associated with changes in reporting presentation represent real estate and accumulated depreciation related to properties placed into discontinued operations as of December 31, 2012.

F-72