Healthpeak Properties (DOC) 10-Q 2008 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
	For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from              to

Commission file number 1-08895

HCP, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	33-0091377
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 300
Long Beach, CA 90806
(Address of principal executive offices)

(562) 733-5100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days  YES  x   NO  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer      x	Accelerated Filer  o
Non-accelerated Filer  o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
YES  o  NO  x

As of October 29, 2008, there were 252,652,540 shares of the registrant’s $1.00 par value common stock outstanding.

HCP, Inc.

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	32
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	44
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	46
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	46
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	46
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46
Item 6.	Exhibits	48
Signatures		55

2

HCP, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Real estate:
Buildings and improvements	$	7,733,690		$	7,521,415
Development costs and construction in progress	249,837			372,527
Land	1,563,167			1,569,956
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	781,903			621,379
Net real estate	8,764,791			8,842,519
Net investment in direct financing leases	647,429			640,052
Loans receivable, net	1,068,240			1,065,485
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures	275,593			248,894
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $17,860 and $23,109, respectively	30,011			44,892
Cash and cash equivalents	117,052			96,269
Restricted cash	37,310			36,427
Intangible assets, net	552,906			623,073
Real estate held for sale, net	5,301			408,028
Other assets, net	532,771			516,133
Total assets	$	12,031,404		$	12,521,772
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Bank line of credit	$	—		$	951,700
Bridge loan	520,000			1,350,000
Senior unsecured notes	3,522,689			3,819,950
Mortgage debt	1,804,069			1,277,291
Mortgage debt on assets held for sale	978			3,470
Other debt	102,602			108,496
Intangible liabilities, net	249,965			278,143
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	224,680			233,752
Deferred revenue	64,841			55,990
Total liabilities	6,489,824			8,078,792
Minority interests:
Joint venture partners	17,430			33,436
Non-managing member unitholders	230,811			305,835
Total minority interests	248,241			339,271
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 11,820,000 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $25.00 per share	285,173			285,173
Common stock, $1.00 par value: 750,000,000 shares authorized; 251,925,869 and 216,818,780 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	251,926			216,819
Additional paid-in capital	4,835,014			3,724,739
Cumulative dividends in excess of earnings	(49,893		)	(120,920		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(28,881		)	(2,102		)
Total stockholders’ equity	5,293,339			4,103,709
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	12,031,404		$	12,521,772

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

HCP, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Revenues:
Rental and related revenues	$	233,632		$	205,585		$	657,484		$	554,031
Tenant recoveries	20,240			17,560			61,855			42,909
Income from direct financing leases	14,543			18,832			43,646			49,037
Investment management fee income	1,523			1,602			4,448			12,062
Total revenues	269,938			243,579			767,433			658,039
Costs and expenses:
Depreciation and amortization	77,659			70,418			233,920			184,132
Operating	49,846			49,914			146,506			127,457
General and administrative	17,541			16,499			56,913			53,894
Impairments	3,710			—			13,425			—
Total costs and expenses	148,756			136,831			450,764			365,483
Other income (expense):
Gain on sale of real estate interest	—			—			—			10,141
Interest and other income, net	62,312			21,538			128,378			54,724
Interest expense	(83,249		)	(103,707		)	(265,054		)	(254,434		)
Total other income (expense)	(20,937		)	(82,169		)	(136,676		)	(189,569		)
Income before income taxes, equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures and minority interests’ share in earnings	100,245			24,579			179,993			102,987
Income taxes	(866		)	318			(4,385		)	860
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures	1,227			1,242			3,736			3,758
Minority interests’ share in earnings	(5,803		)	(6,018		)	(17,055		)	(17,992		)
Income from continuing operations	94,803			20,121			162,289			89,613
Discontinued operations:
Income before gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes	3,198			15,874			18,025			56,838
Gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes	27,416			286,153			227,810			392,269
Total discontinued operations	30,614			302,027			245,835			449,107
Net income	125,417			322,148			408,124			538,720
Preferred stock dividends	(5,282		)	(5,282		)	(15,848		)	(15,848		)
Net income applicable to common shares	$	120,135		$	316,866		$	392,276		$	522,872
Basic earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	0.07		$	0.63		$	0.36
Discontinued operations	0.12			1.47			1.06			2.19
Net income applicable to common shares	$	0.49		$	1.54		$	1.69		$	2.55
Diluted earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	0.37		$	0.07		$	0.63		$	0.36
Discontinued operations	0.12			1.46			1.05			2.17
Net income applicable to common shares	$	0.49		$	1.53		$	1.68		$	2.53
Weighted average shares used to calculate earnings per common share:
Basic	244,572			206,186			232,199			205,322
Diluted	245,906			207,070			233,391			206,672
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.455		$	0.445		$	1.365		$	1.335

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

HCP, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008
Preferred Stock, $1.00 Par Value:
Shares, beginning and ending	11,820
Amounts, beginning and ending	$	285,173
Common Stock, Shares:
Shares at beginning of period	216,819
Issuance of common stock, net	34,484
Exercise of stock options	623
Shares at end of period	251,926
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value:
Balance at beginning of period	$	216,819
Issuance of common stock, net	34,484
Exercise of stock options	623
Balance at end of period	$	251,926
Additional Paid-In Capital:
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,724,739
Issuance of common stock, net	1,088,556
Exercise of stock options	11,082
Amortization of deferred compensation	10,637
Balance at end of period	$	4,835,014
Cumulative Dividends in Excess of Earnings:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(120,920	)
Net income	408,124
Preferred dividends	(15,848		)
Common dividend ($1.365 per share)	(321,249		)
Balance at end of period	$	(49,893	)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(2,102	)
Change in net unrealized gains and losses on securities:
Unrealized losses	(32,836		)
Less reclassification adjustment realized in net income	2,746
Change in net unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges:
Unrealized gains	124
Less reclassification adjustment realized in net income	2,777
Changes in Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan obligation	76
Foreign currency translation adjustment	334
Balance at end of period	$	(28,881	)
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net income	$	408,124
Other comprehensive loss	(26,779		)
Total comprehensive income	$	381,345

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

HCP, Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	408,124		$	538,720
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate, in-place lease and other intangibles:
Continuing operations	233,920			184,132
Discontinued operations	5,832			17,748
Amortization of below market lease intangibles, net	(6,020		)	(3,185		)
Stock-based compensation	10,637			8,516
Amortization of debt issuance costs	9,226			15,274
Recovery of loan losses	—			(386		)
Straight-line rents	(28,645		)	(39,467		)
Interest accretion	(20,134		)	(6,428		)
Deferred rental revenue	16,227			8,937
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures	(3,736		)	(3,758		)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	3,736			3,148
Minority interests’ share in earnings	17,055			17,992
Gain on sales of real estate and real estate interest	(227,810		)	(402,410		)
Marketable securities losses (gains), net	2,746			(4,874		)
Derivative losses, net	1,803			—
Impairments	13,425			—
Changes in:
Accounts receivable	14,881			(2,626		)
Other assets	(6,660		)	(18,384		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	10,776			(3,128		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	455,383			309,821
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash used in acquisitions and development of real estate	(132,436		)	(339,692		)
Lease commissions and tenant and capital improvements	(44,734		)	(27,029		)
Proceeds from sales of real estate, net	629,404			854,505
Cash used in SEUSA acquisition, net of cash acquired	—			(2,977,564		)
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures	(2,620		)	(2,619		)
Distributions in excess of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures	8,727			476,992
Purchase of marketable securities	(26,101		)	(26,647		)
Proceeds from the sale of marketable securities	10,700			53,514
Proceeds from sales of interests in unconsolidated joint ventures	2,855			—
Principal repayments on loans receivable	14,590			101,340
Investment in loans receivable	(2,863		)	(18,615		)
Increase in restricted cash	(883		)	(28,461		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	456,639			(1,934,276		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net repayments under bank line of credit	(951,700		)	(624,500		)
Repayments of bridge and term loans	(830,000		)	(504,593		)
Borrowings under bridge loan	—			2,750,000
Repayments of mortgage debt	(63,740		)	(82,482		)
Issuance of mortgage debt	579,078			143,421
Repayments of senior unsecured notes	(300,000		)	(20,000		)
Issuance of senior unsecured notes	—			500,000
Settlement of cash flow hedges	(9,658		)	—
Debt issuance costs	(10,068		)	(18,659		)
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and exercise of options	1,060,236			300,591
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock	(337,097		)	(291,787		)
Distributions to minority interests	(28,290		)	(17,088		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(891,239		)	2,134,903
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	20,783			510,448
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	96,269			58,405
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	117,052		$	568,853

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

HCP, Inc.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(1)Business

HCP, Inc. is a Maryland corporation that is organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) which, together with its consolidated entities (collectively, “HCP” or the “Company”), invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. The Company acquires, develops, leases, manages and disposes of healthcare real estate and provides mortgage and specialty financing to healthcare providers.

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Use of Estimates

Management is required to make estimates and assumptions in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HCP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures that it controls, through voting rights or other means. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company applies Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised (“FIN 46R”), for arrangements with variable interest entities. FIN 46R provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A variable interest entity is broadly defined as an entity where either (i) the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest, or (ii) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates investments in VIEs when the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE at either the creation of the variable interest entity or upon the occurrence of a qualifying reconsideration event. Qualifying reconsideration events include the modification of contractual arrangements and the disposal of all or a portion of an interest held by the primary beneficiary.

At September 30, 2008, the Company had 81 properties with a carrying value of $1.5 billion leased to a total of nine tenants that have been identified as VIEs (“VIE tenants”) and a loan with a carrying value of $78 million to a borrower that has been identified as a VIE. The Company acquired these leases and loan on October 5, 2006 in its merger with CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (“CRP”). CRP determined it was not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and the Company is required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acquisition relative to their primary beneficiary assessments, provided the Company does not believe CRP’s accounting to be in error. The Company believes that its accounting for the VIEs is the appropriate accounting in accordance with GAAP. On December 21, 2007, the Company made an investment of approximately $900 million in mezzanine loans where each mezzanine borrower has been identified as a VIE. The Company has also determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs.

7

The Company applies Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 04-5, Investor’s Accounting for an Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor is the Sole General Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“EITF 04-5”), to investments in joint ventures. EITF 04-5 provides guidance on the type of rights held by the limited partner(s) that preclude consolidation in circumstances in which the sole general partner would otherwise consolidate the limited partnership in accordance with GAAP. The assessment of limited partners’ rights and their impact on the presumption of control of the limited partnership by the sole general partner should be made when an investor becomes the sole general partner and should be reassessed if (i) there is a change to the terms or in the exercisability of the rights of the limited partners, (ii) the sole general partner increases or decreases its ownership of limited partnership interests, or (iii) there is an increase or decrease in the number of outstanding limited partnership interests. EITF 04-5 also applies to managing member interests in limited liability companies.

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

Investments in entities which the Company does not consolidate but for which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are reported under the equity method. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s share of the investee’s earnings or losses are included in the Company’s operating results.

The initial carrying value of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is based on the amount paid to purchase the joint venture interest or the carrying value of the assets prior to the sale of interests in the joint venture. To the extent that the Company’s cost basis is different from the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is generally amortized over the life of the related assets and liabilities and included in the Company’s share of equity in earnings of the joint venture. The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment based upon a comparison of the fair value of the equity method investment to its carrying value. When the Company determines a decline in the fair value of the equity method investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary, an impairment is recorded. The Company recognizes gains on the sale of interests in joint ventures to the extent the economic substance of the transaction is a sale in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 78-9, Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate (“SFAS No. 66”).

Revenue Recognition

Rental income from tenants is recognized in accordance with GAAP, including SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”). The Company begins recognizing rental revenue when collectability is reasonably assured and the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. For assets acquired subject to leases the Company recognizes revenue upon acquisition of the asset provided the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased asset. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, the Company determines whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or the Company. When the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:

·whether the lease stipulates how and on what a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;

·whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;

·whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general purpose in nature; and

·whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease.

For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue exceeding amounts contractually due from tenants. Such cumulative excess amounts are included in other assets and were $101 million and $76 million, net of allowances, at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. If the Company determines that collectability of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, the Company limits future recognition to amounts contractually owed, and, where appropriate, the Company establishes an allowance for estimated losses.

8

The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, include lease termination fees of $18 million from a tenant in connection with the early termination of three leases on July 30, 2008 in its life science segment. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, include income of $9 million and $15 million, respectively, resulting from the Company’s change in estimate relating to the collectability of straight-line rents due from Summerville Senior Living, Inc. (“Summerville”) and Emeritus Corporation (“Emeritus”), of which $6 million is included in discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. On September 4, 2007, Emeritus acquired Summerville and provided the Company with additional security under its leases with Summerville.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants and operators on an ongoing basis. This evaluation considers industry and economic conditions, property performance, credit enhancements and other factors. For straight-line rent amounts, the Company’s assessment is based on amounts recoverable over the term of the lease. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had an allowance of $43 million and $36 million, respectively, included in other assets, as a result of the Company’s determination that collectability is not reasonably assured for certain straight-line rent amounts.

Certain leases provide for additional rents contingent upon a percentage of the facility’s revenue in excess of specified base amounts or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized when actual results reported by the tenant, or estimates of tenant results, exceed the base amount or other thresholds. Such revenue is recognized in accordance with SAB 104, which requires that income is recognized only after the contingency has been removed (when the related thresholds are achieved), which may result in the recognition of rental revenue in periods subsequent to when such payments are received.

Tenant recoveries related to reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented in accordance with EITF Issue 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent (“EITF 99-19”). EITF 99-19 requires that these reimbursements be recorded gross, as the Company is generally the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in selecting the supplier and bears the credit risk.

The Company uses the direct finance method of accounting to record income from direct financing leases (“DFLs”). For leases accounted for as DFLs, future minimum lease payments are recorded as a receivable. The difference between the future minimum lease payments and the estimated residual values less the cost of the properties is recorded as unearned income. Unearned income is deferred and amortized to income over the lease terms to provide a constant yield. Investments in DFLs are presented net of unamortized unearned income.

The Company receives management fees from its investments in certain joint venture entities for various services provided as the managing member of the entities. Management fees are recorded as revenue when management services have been performed.

The Company recognizes gains on sales of properties in accordance with SFAS No. 66 upon the closing of the transaction with the purchaser. Gains on properties sold are recognized using the full accrual method when the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured, the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale, the initial investment from the buyer is sufficient and other profit recognition criteria have been satisfied. Gains on sales of properties may be deferred in whole or in part until the requirements for gain recognition under SFAS No. 66 have been met.

Real Estate

Real estate, consisting of land, buildings and improvements, is recorded at cost. The Company allocates the cost of the acquisition, including the assumption of liabilities, to the acquired tangible assets and identifiable intangibles based on their estimated fair values in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.

The Company assesses fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including historical operating results, known and anticipated trends, and market and economic conditions. The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it was vacant.

9

The Company records acquired “above and below” market leases at fair value using discount rates which reflect the risks associated with the leases acquired. The amount recorded is based on the present value of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above market leases and the initial term plus the extended term for any leases with bargain renewal options. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, the Company considers leasing commissions, legal and other related costs.

The Company capitalizes direct construction and development costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development or construction of a real estate project. In accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost, and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, construction and development costs are capitalized while substantive activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. The Company considers a construction project as substantially complete and held available for occupancy upon the completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from cessation of major construction activity. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use, or after development activities have stopped, are expensed as incurred. Costs previously capitalized related to abandoned acquisitions or developments are charged to earnings. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

The Company computes depreciation on properties using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Depreciation is discontinued when a property is identified as held for sale. Building and improvements are depreciated over useful lives ranging up to 45 years. Above and below market lease intangibles are amortized primarily to revenue over the remaining noncancellable lease terms and bargain renewal periods, if any. Other in-place lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining noncancellable lease term and bargain renewal periods, if any.

Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans receivable are classified as held-for-investment based on management’s intent and ability to hold the loans for the foreseeable future or to maturity. Loans held-for-investment are carried at amortized cost, reduced by a valuation allowance for estimated credit losses. The Company recognizes interest income on loans, including the amortization of discounts and premiums, using the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis. Premiums and discounts are recognized as yield adjustments over the life of the related loans. Loans are transferred from held-for-investment to held-for-sale when management’s intent is to no longer hold the loans for the foreseeable future. Loans held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Allowances are established for loans based upon an estimate of probable losses for the individual loans deemed to be impaired. Impairment is indicated when it is deemed probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due on a timely basis in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The allowance is based upon the Company’s assessment and belief of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record; the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors; and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. These estimates consider all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s contractual effective rate, the fair value of collateral, general economic conditions and trends, historical and industry loss experience, and other relevant factors.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

The Company assesses the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”). If the sum of the expected future net undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset, an impairment loss will be recognized by adjusting the asset’s carrying amount to its estimated fair value.

Goodwill is tested at least annually applying the following two-step approach in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The first step of the test is a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit containing goodwill to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then the second step of the test is needed to measure the amount of potential goodwill impairment. The second step requires the fair value of the reporting unit to be allocated to all the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination at the date of the impairment test. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of assets and liabilities is the implied value of goodwill and is used to determine the amount of impairment.

10

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Certain long-lived assets are classified as held-for-sale in accordance with SFAS No. 144. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their fair value less cost to sell and are no longer depreciated. Discontinued operations is defined in SFAS No. 144 as a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held for sale if, (i) the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction, and (ii) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense is recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, as revised (“SFAS No. 123R”). On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application transition method which provides for only current and future period stock-based awards to be measured and recognized at fair value.

SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based awards granted on or after January 1, 2006 to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Compensation expense for awards with graded vesting is generally recognized ratably over the period from the date of grant to the date when the award is no longer contingent on the employee providing additional services. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company applied SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, for stock-based awards granted prior to January 1, 2006.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily consists of amounts held by mortgage lenders to provide for (i) future real estate tax expenditures, tenant improvements and capital improvements, and (ii) security deposits and net proceeds from property sales that were executed as tax-deferred dispositions.

Derivatives

During its normal course of business, the Company uses certain types of derivative instruments for the purpose of managing interest rate risk. To qualify for hedge accounting, derivative instruments used for risk management purposes must effectively reduce the risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. In addition, at inception of a qualifying hedging relationship, the underlying transaction or transactions, must be, and are expected to remain, probable of occurring in accordance with the Company’s related assertions.

The Company applies SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133”). SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and hedging activities. It requires the recognition of all derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives required to be bifurcated, as assets or liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges or that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as hedging instruments in qualifying hedging relationships, the change in fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) whereas the change in fair value of the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes designating all derivatives that are part of a hedging relationship to specific forecasted transactions or recognized obligations in the balance sheet. The Company also assesses and documents, both at the hedging instrument’s inception and on a quarterly basis

11

thereafter, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows associated with the respective hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective as a hedge, or that it is probable the underlying forecasted transaction will not occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively and reclassifies amounts recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings.

Income Taxes

In 1985, HCP, Inc. elected REIT status and believes it has always operated so as to continue to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Accordingly, HCP, Inc. will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that it continues to qualify as a REIT and distributions to stockholders equal or exceed its taxable income. On July 27, 2007, the Company formed HCP Life Science REIT, a consolidated subsidiary, which elected REIT status for the year ended December 31, 2007. HCP, Inc., along with its consolidated REIT subsidiary, are each subject to the REIT qualification requirements under Sections 856 to 860 of the Code. If either REIT fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates and may be ineligible to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent tax years.

HCP, Inc. and HCP Life Science REIT are subject to state and local income taxes in some jurisdictions, and in certain circumstances each REIT may also be subject to federal excise taxes on undistributed income. In addition, certain activities the Company undertakes must be conducted by entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). TRSs are subject to both federal and state income taxes.

Marketable Securities

The Company classifies its marketable equity and debt securities as available-for-sale in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined based on the specific identification method. When the Company determines declines in fair value of marketable securities are other-than-temporary, a realized loss is recognized in earnings.

Capital Raising Issuance Costs

Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of both common and preferred shares are recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. Debt issuance costs are deferred and included in other assets and amortized to interest expense based on the effective interest method over the remaining term of the related debt.

Segment Reporting

The Company reports its consolidated financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“SFAS No. 131”). The Company’s segments are based on the Company’s method of internal reporting which classifies its operations by healthcare sector. The Company’s business includes five segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life science, (iii) medical office, (iv) hospital and (v) skilled nursing.

Prior to the Slough Estates USA Inc. (“SEUSA”) acquisition on August 1, 2007, the Company operated through two reportable segments—triple-net leased and medical office buildings. As a result of the Company’s acquisition of SEUSA, the Company added a significant portfolio of real estate assets under different leasing and property management structures and made corresponding organizational changes. The Company believes the change to its reportable segments is appropriate and consistent with how its chief operating decision maker reviews the Company’s operating results. In addition, in accordance with SFAS No. 131, all prior period segment information has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Minority Interests and Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments

As of September 30, 2008, there were 5.6 million non-managing member units outstanding in six limited liability companies of which the Company is the managing member: (i) HCPI/Tennessee, LLC; (ii) HCPI/Utah, LLC; (iii) HCPI/Utah II, LLC; (iv) HCP DR California, LLC; (v) HCP DR Alabama, LLC; and (vi) HCP DR MCD, LLC. The Company consolidates these entities since it exercises control and carries the minority interests at cost. The non-managing member LLC Units (“DownREIT units”) are exchangeable for an amount of cash approximating the then-current market value of shares of the Company’s common stock or, at the Company’s option, shares of the Company’s common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). Upon exchange of DownREIT units for the

12

Company’s common stock, the carrying amount of the DownREIT units is reclassified to stockholders’ equity. In April 2008, as a result of the non-managing member converting its remaining HCPI/Indiana, LLC DownREIT units, HCPI/Indiana, LLC became a wholly-owned subsidiary. At September 30, 2008, the carrying and market values of the 5.6 million DownREIT units were $230.8 million and $323.0 million, respectively.

Life Care Bonds Payable

Two of the Company’s continuing care retirement communities (“CCRCs”) issue non-interest bearing life care bonds payable to certain residents of the CCRCs. Generally, the bonds are refundable to the resident or to the resident’s estate upon termination or cancellation of the CCRC agreement. An additional senior housing facility owned by the Company collects non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits that are refundable to the resident or the resident’s estate upon the earlier of the re-letting of the unit or after two years of vacancy. Proceeds from the issuance of new bonds are used to retire existing bonds, and since the maturity of the obligations for the three facilities is not determinable, no interest is imputed. These amounts are included in other debt in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value Measurement

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company implemented the requirements of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (‘‘SFAS No. 157’’), for its financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 refines the definition of fair value, expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements and establishes specific requirements as well as guidelines for a consistent framework to measure fair value. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants. Further, SFAS No. 157 requires the Company to maximize the use of observable market inputs, minimize the use of unobservable market inputs and disclose in the form of an outlined hierarchy the details of such fair value measurements.

SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to a fair value measurement are considered to be observable or unobservable in a marketplace. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. These inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

·Level 1 – quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

·Level 2 – quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

·Level 3 – fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

The Company measures fair value using a set of standardized procedures that are outlined herein for all financial assets and liabilities which are required to be measured at fair value. When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third party source to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1. In some instances where a market price is available, but in an inactive or over-the-counter market where significant fluctuations in pricing can occur, the Company consistently applies the dealer (market maker) pricing estimate and classifies the financial asset or liability in Level 2.

If quoted market prices or inputs are not available, fair value measurements are based upon valuation models that utilize current market or independently sourced market inputs, such as interest rates, option volatilities, credit spreads, etc. Items valued using such internally-generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As a result, a financial asset or liability could be classified in either Level 2 or 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable. Internal fair value models and techniques used by the Company include discounted cash flow and Black Scholes valuation models.

Based on the guidelines of SFAS No. 157, the Company has amended its techniques used in measuring the fair value of derivative and other financial asset and liability positions. These enhancements include the impact of the Company’s or counterparty’s credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value as well as the election of the mid-market pricing expedient outlined in the standard. The implementation of these enhancements and the adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

13

On February 12, 2008, the FASB postponed the implementation of SFAS No. 157 related to non-financial assets and liabilities until fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. As a result, the Company has not applied the above fair value procedures to its goodwill and long-lived asset impairment analyses during the current period. The Company believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations upon implementation for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (‘‘SFAS No. 159’’). SFAS No. 159 permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS No. 159 was effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year after November 15, 2007, and subsequent reporting periods thereafter. Currently the Company has not adopted the guidelines of SFAS No. 159 and continues to evaluate whether or not it will in future periods based on industry participant elections and financial reporting consistency with its peers.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, as revised (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed (including intangibles), and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. SFAS No. 141R also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 141R on January 1, 2009 will require the Company to prospectively expense all transaction costs for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or subsequent to that date. Early adoption and retroactive application of SFAS No. 141R to fiscal years preceding the effective date is not permitted. The implementation of this standard on January 1, 2009 could materially impact the Company’s future financial results to the extent that it acquires significant amounts of real estate, as related acquisition costs will be expensed as incurred rather than the Company’s current practice of capitalizing such costs and amortizing them over the estimated useful life of the assets acquired.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB 51 (“SFAS No. 160”), which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity. Purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement and, upon a gain or loss of control, the interest purchased or sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009 and applies prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements, which apply retrospectively. To the extent that the Company purchases or disposes of interests in entities or real estate partnerships that cause a change in control in periods subsequent to adoption, the impact on its financial position or results of operations could be material, as these interests will be recognized at fair value with gains and losses recorded to earnings.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 establishes, among other things, the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Financial Accounting Standard 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. In developing assumptions about renewal or extension, FSP FAS 142-3 requires an entity to consider its own historical experience (or, if no experience, market participant assumptions) adjusted for relevant entity-specific factors in paragraph 11 of SFAS No. 142. FSP FAS 142-3 expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 142 and is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009, with early adoption prohibited. The guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements shall be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 on January 1, 2009 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

14

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method as described in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Under the guidance in FSP EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. All prior-period earnings per share data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively. Early application is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on January 1, 2009 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Assets sold or held for sale and associated liabilities have been reclassified on the balance sheets and operating results reclassified from continuing to discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144 (see Note 5). “Tenant recoveries” have been reclassified from “rental and related revenues.” “Income taxes” have been reclassified from “general and administrative” expenses. In addition, in accordance with SFAS No. 131, all prior period segment information has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

(3)Mergers and Acquisitions

Slough Estates USA Inc.

On August 1, 2007, the Company closed its acquisition of SEUSA for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $3.0 billion. SEUSA’s life science portfolio is concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area and San Diego County.

The calculation of total consideration follows (in thousands):

Payment of aggregate cash consideration	$	2,978,911
Estimated acquisition costs, net of cash acquired	3,800
Purchase price, net of assumed liabilities	2,982,711
Fair value of liabilities assumed, including debt	220,133
Purchase price	$	3,202,844

Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of SEUSA were recorded at their relative fair values as of the date of the acquisition. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company revised its initial purchase price allocation of its acquired interest in SEUSA, which resulted in the Company reallocating $51 million among buildings and improvements, development costs and construction in progress, land, intangible assets and investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures from its preliminary allocation at December 31, 2007. The changes from the Company’s initial purchase price allocation did not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.

15

The following table summarizes the revised fair values of the SEUSA assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date of August 1, 2007 (in thousands):

Assets acquired
Buildings and improvements	$	1,664,156
Development costs and construction in progress	254,626
Land	827,041
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures	68,300
Intangible assets	351,500
Other assets	37,221
Total assets acquired	$	3,202,844
Liabilities assumed
Mortgages payable and other debt	$	33,553
Intangible liabilities	147,700
Other liabilities	38,880
Total liabilities assumed	220,133
Net assets acquired	$	2,982,711

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of SEUSA, the Company obtained, from a syndicate of banks, a financing commitment for a $3.0 billion bridge loan under which $2.75 billion was borrowed at closing.

The assets, liabilities and results of operations of SEUSA are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Pro Forma Results of Operations

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assume that the acquisition of SEUSA was completed on January 1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2007		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Revenues	$	265,215	$	771,590
Net income	307,361		449,945
Basic earnings per common share	1.47		2.11
Diluted earnings per common share	1.46		2.10

(4)Acquisitions of Real Estate Properties

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company acquired a senior housing facility for $11 million, purchased a joint venture interest valued at $29 million and funded an aggregate of $126 million for construction, tenant and capital improvement projects primarily in the life science and medical office segments.

A summary of acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding SEUSA (Note 3), follows (in thousands):

	Consideration								Assets Acquired
Acquisitions(1)	Cash Paid		Real Estate		Debt Assumed		DownREIT Units(2)		Real Estate		Net Intangibles
Medical office	$	166,982	$	—	$	—	$	93,887	$	247,996	$	12,873
Hospital	120,562		35,205		—		84,719		235,084		5,402
Life science	35,777		—		12,215		2,092		48,237		1,847
Senior housing	15,956		340		5,148		—		20,772		672
	$	339,277	$	35,545	$	17,363	$	180,698	$	552,089	$	20,794

(1)Includes transaction costs, if any.

(2)Non-managing member LLC units.

16

(5)Dispositions of Real Estate, Real Estate Interests and Discontinued Operations

Dispositions of Real Estate

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold three hospitals for approximately $116 million and recognized a gain on sales of real estate of $27 million. The hospitals sold included the hospital located in Tarzana, California, which was sold for $89 million resulting in a gain on sales of real estate of $18 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company sold 42 senior housing facilities for approximately $504 million and recognized a gain on sales of real estate of $286 million.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold 47 properties for approximately $629 million and recognized a gain on sales of real estate of $228 million. The Company’s sales of properties were made from the following segments: (i) 68% hospital, (ii) 15% skilled nursing, (iii) 14% medical office and (iv) 3% senior housing.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company sold 89 properties for approximately $896 million and recognized a gain on sales of real estate of $392 million. The Company’s sales of properties were made from the following segments: (i) 70% skilled nursing, (ii) 26% senior housing and (iii) 4% medical office.

Dispositions of Real Estate Interests

On January 5, 2007, the Company formed a senior housing joint venture (“HCP Ventures II”), which included 25 properties valued at $1.1 billion, which were encumbered by a $686 million secured debt facility. The Company received approximately $280 million in proceeds, including a one-time acquisition fee of $5.4 million, which is included in investment management fee income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. No gain or loss was recognized for the sale of a 65% interest in this joint venture.

On April 30, 2007, the Company formed a medical office joint venture, HCP Ventures IV, LLC (“HCP Ventures IV”), which included 55 properties valued at approximately $585 million. Upon the disposition of an 80% interest in this venture, the Company received $196 million and recognized a gain of $10.1 million. These proceeds included a one-time acquisition fee of $3 million, which was recognized in investment management fee income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Properties Held for Sale

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company held for sale seven and 54 properties with carrying amounts of $5 million and $408 million, respectively.

Results from Discontinued Operations

The following table summarizes income from discontinued operations and gain on sales of real estate included in discontinued operations (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Rental and related revenues	$	3,826	$	23,185	$	28,011	$	86,049
Other revenues	—		19		18		3,066
	3,826		23,204		28,029		89,115
Depreciation and amortization expenses	47		3,886		5,832		17,748
Operating expenses	197		2,862		3,294		6,800
Other costs and expenses	384		582		878		7,729
Income before gain on sales of real estate, net of income taxes	$	3,198	$	15,874	$	18,025	$	56,838
Gain on sales of real estate	$	27,416	$	286,153	$	227,810	$	392,269
Number of properties held for sale	7		62		7		62
Number of properties sold	3		42		47		89
Number of properties included in discontinued operations	10		104		54		151

17

(6)Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The components of net investment in DFLs consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

	September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007
Minimum lease payments receivable	$	1,384,798		$	1,414,116
Estimated residual values	468,769			468,769
Less unearned income	(1,206,138		)	(1,242,833		)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	647,429		$	640,052
Properties subject to direct financing leases	30			30

The DFLs were acquired in the Company’s merger with CRP. CRP determined that these leases were DFLs, and the Company is required to carry forward CRP’s accounting conclusions after the acquisition date relative to their assessment of these leases, provided that the Company does not believe CRP’s accounting to be in error. The Company believes that its accounting for the leases is the appropriate accounting in accordance with GAAP. Certain leases contain provisions that allow the tenants to elect to purchase the properties during or at the end of the lease terms for the aggregate initial investment amount plus adjustments, if any, as defined in the lease agreements. Certain leases also permit the Company to require the tenants to purchase the properties at the end of the lease terms. Lease payments due to the Company relating to three land-only DFLs, along with the land, with a carrying value of $59.5 million at September 30, 2008 are subordinate to and serve as collateral for first mortgage construction loans entered into by the tenants to fund development costs related to the properties.

(7)Loans Receivable

The following table summarizes the Company’s loans receivable balance (in thousands):

	September 30, 2008								December 31, 2007
	Real Estate Secured		Other			Total			Real Estate Secured		Other			Total
HCR ManorCare mezzanine	$	—	$	1,000,000		$	1,000,000		$	—	$	1,000,000		$	1,000,000
Joint venture partners	—		7,053			7,053			—		7,055			7,055
Other	68,343		75,983		(1)	144,326			69,126		86,285			155,411
Unamortized discounts, fees and costs	—		(82,898		)(2)	(82,898		)	—		(96,740		)	(96,740		)
Loan loss allowance	—		(241		)	(241		)	—		(241		)	(241		)
	$	68,343	$	999,897		$	1,068,240		$	69,126	$	996,359		$	1,065,485

(1)Consists primarily of the Company’s loan to an affiliate of the Cirrus Group, LLC.

(2)Consists primarily of discounts related to the Company’s HCR ManorCare mezzanine loans.

The Company provided an affiliate of the Cirrus Group, LLC with an interest only, senior secured term loan. The loan provides for a maturity date of December 31, 2008, with a one-year extension at the option of the borrower, under which amounts were borrowed to finance the acquisition, development, syndication and operation of new and existing surgical partnerships. This loan accrues interest at a rate of 14.0%, of which 9.5% is payable monthly and the balance of 4.5% is deferred until maturity. The loan is subject to equity contribution requirements and borrower financial covenants and is collateralized by assets of the borrower (comprised primarily of interests in partnerships operating surgical facilities in premises leased from a Cirrus affiliate, HCP Ventures IV or the Company) and is guaranteed up to $34.6 million through a combination of (i) a personal guarantee of up to $9.0 million by a principal of Cirrus, and (ii) a guarantee of the balance by other principals of Cirrus under arrangements for recourse limited only to their interests in certain entities owning real estate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the borrower made principal payments aggregating $11.8 million reducing the carrying value of this loan to $78 million at September 30, 2008.

On December 21, 2007, the Company made an investment in mezzanine loans having an aggregate face value of $1.0 billion, for approximately $900 million, as part of the financing for The Carlyle Group’s $6.3 billion purchase of Manor Care, Inc. (“HCR ManorCare”). These loans bear interest on their face amounts at a floating rate of one-month LIBOR plus 4.0%, mature in January 2013 and are pre-payable at any time subject to a yield maintenance fee during the first twelve months. These loans are mandatorily pre-payable in January 2012 unless the borrower satisfies certain financial conditions. The loans are secured by an indirect pledge of the equity ownership in 339 HCR ManorCare facilities located in 30 states and are subordinate to other debt of approximately $3.6 billion at closing. At September 30, 2008, the carrying value of this loan was $914 million.

18

(8)Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company owns interests in the following entities which are accounted for under the equity method at September 30, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

Entity(1)	Properties	Investment(2)		Ownership%
HCP Ventures II	25 senior housing facilities	$	141,384	35
HCP Ventures III, LLC	13 medical office buildings	12,159		30
	50 MOBs, 4 life science facilities
HCP Ventures IV, LLC	and 4 hospitals	46,417		20
HCP Life Science(3)	4 life science facilities	68,017		50 - 63
Suburban Properties, LLC	1 medical office building	4,402		67
Advances to unconsolidated joint ventures, net		3,214
		$	275,593
Edgewood Assisted Living Center, LLC(4)(5)	1 senior housing facility	$	(480)	45
Seminole Shores Living Center, LLC(4)(5)	1 senior housing facility	(945)		50
		$	(1,425)

(1)	These joint ventures are not consolidated because the Company does not control, through voting rights or other means, the entities. See Note 2 regarding the Company’s policy on consolidation.
(2)	Represents the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the unconsolidated joint venture. See Note 2 regarding the Company’s policy for accounting for joint venture interests.
(3)	Includes three unconsolidated joint ventures between the Company and an institutional capital partner for which the Company is the managing member. HCP Life Science includes the following partnerships: (i) Torrey Pines Science Center LP (50%); (ii) Britannia Biotech Gateway LP (55%); and (iii) LASDK LP (63%). The unconsolidated joint ventures were acquired as part of its purchase of Slough Estates USA Inc. on August 1, 2007.
(4)	As of September 30, 2008, the Company has guaranteed in the aggregate $4 million of a total of $8 million of notes payable for these two joint ventures. No liability has been recorded related to these guarantees as of September 30, 2008.
(5)	Negative investment amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
	Summarized combined financial information for the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures follows (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007(7)
Real estate, net	$	1,712,009	$	1,752,289
Other assets, net	199,860		195,816
Total assets	$	1,911,869	$	1,948,105
Notes payable	$	1,176,105	$	1,192,270
Accounts payable	49,108		45,427
Other partners’ capital	496,108		511,149
HCP’s capital(6)	190,548		199,259
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	1,911,869	$	1,948,105

	Three Months Ended September 30,(7)				Nine Months Ended September 30,(7)
	2008		2007(8)		2008		2007(8)
Total revenues	$	46,522	$	44,380	$	138,938	$	129,412
Net income	1,615		1,634		5,408		10,100
HCP’s equity income	1,227		1,242		3,736		3,758
Fees earned by HCP	1,523		1,602		4,448		12,062
Distributions received, net	4,208		2,388		12,463		480,140

(6)	Aggregate basis difference of the Company’s investments in these joint ventures of $80 million, as of September 30, 2008, is primarily attributable to real estate and lease related intangible assets.
(7)	Includes the financial information of Arborwood Living Center, LLC and Greenleaf Living Centers, LLC, which were sold on April 3, 2008 and June 12, 2008, respectively.
(8)	Includes the results of operations from HCP Ventures IV, LLC, whose subsidiaries were wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries of the Company prior to April 30, 2007.

19

(9)Intangibles

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, intangible lease assets, comprised of lease-up intangibles, above market tenant lease intangibles, below market ground lease intangibles and intangible assets related to non-compete agreements, were $711 million and $725 million, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the accumulated amortization of intangible assets was $158 million and $102 million, respectively.

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, below market lease intangibles and above market ground lease intangibles were $305 million and $311 million, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the accumulated amortization of intangible liabilities was $55 million and $33 million, respectively.

(10) Other Assets

The Company’s other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

	September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007
Marketable debt securities	$	274,550	$	289,163
Marketable equity securities	9,362		13,933
Goodwill	51,746		51,746
Straight-line rent assets, net	101,084		76,188
Deferred debt issuance costs, net	22,905		16,787
Other	73,124		68,316
Total other assets	$	532,771	$	516,133

The cost or amortized cost, estimated fair value and gross unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities follows (in thousands):

					Gross Unrealized
	Cost(1)		Fair Value		Gains		Losses
September 30, 2008:
Debt securities	$	291,101	$	274,550	$	—	$	(16,551	)
Equity securities	8,679		9,362		871		(188		)
Total investments	$	299,780	$	283,912	$	871	$	(16,739	)
December 31, 2007:
Debt securities	$	275,000	$	289,163	$	14,663	$	(500	)
Equity securities	13,874		13,933		300		(241		)
Total investments	$	288,874	$	303,096	$	14,963	$	(741	)

(1)Represents the original cost basis of the marketable securities reduced by other-than-temporary impairments recorded through earnings, if any.

Marketable securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2008 are not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired as the Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value. The Company’s marketable debt securities accrue interest ranging from 9.625% to 9.25%, and mature between November 2016 and May 2017.

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company purchased $26 million of senior secured notes with an aggregate par value of $27 million that accrue interest at 9.625% and mature on November 15, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company sold marketable debt securities with a cost basis of $10 million and $45 million, which resulted in gains of approximately $0.7 million and $3.9 million, respectively, and were recognized in interest and other income, net. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company realized gains from the sale of various marketable equity securities totaling $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, which were included in interest and other income, net. The Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment of $3.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 on marketable equity securities with a carrying value of $8.1 million at September 30, 2008.

20

(11) Debt

Bank Line of Credit, Bridge Loan and Term Loan

The Company’s revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks provided for an aggregate $1.5 billion of borrowing capacity at September 30, 2008. This revolving line of credit facility accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.325% to 1.00%, depending upon the Company’s debt ratings. The Company pays a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment ranging from 0.10% to 0.25%, depending upon its debt ratings. Based on the Company’s debt ratings on September 30, 2008, the margin on the revolving line of credit facility was 0.55% and the facility fee was 0.15%. The Company’s revolving line of credit facility matures on August 1, 2011.

At September 30, 2008, the outstanding balance of the Company’s bridge loan was $520 million. The bridge loan had an initial maturity date of July 31, 2008 that has been extended to January 31, 2009 through the exercise of an extension option. The Company has an additional 6-month extension option, subject to debt compliance and extension fees, which could be used to extend the maturity date to July 31, 2009 from January 31, 2009. This bridge loan accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.425% to 1.25%, depending upon the Company’s debt ratings (weighted average effective interest rate of 3.38% at September 30, 2008). Based on the Company’s debt ratings on September 30, 2008, the margin on the bridge loan facility was 0.70%.

The Company’s revolving line of credit facility and bridge loan contain certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements, including cross-default provisions to other indebtedness. A portion of these financial covenants become more restrictive through the period ending March 31, 2009. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreement (i) limit the ratio of Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%, (ii) limit the ratio of Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 65%, (iii) require a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.75 times, and (iv) require a formula-determined Minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of $4.2 billion at September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with each of these restrictions and requirements of the credit revolving credit facility and bridge loan.

On October 24, 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million unsecured term loan, which matures on August 1, 2011. The term loan accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.825% to 2.375% depending upon the Company’s debt ratings. Based on the Company’s debt ratings on October 24, 2008, the margin on the term loan is 2.00%. The Company received net proceeds of $197 million, which were used to repay a portion of its outstanding indebtedness under the bridge loan facility. The term loan contains certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements, similar to those included in the revolving line of credit and bridge loan.

Senior Unsecured Notes

At September 30, 2008, the Company had $3.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes outstanding. Interest rates on the notes ranged from 3.72% to 7.07% at September 30, 2008. The weighted average effective interest rate on the senior unsecured notes at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, was 6.25% and 6.18%, respectively. Discounts and premiums are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

In September 2008, the Company repaid $300 million of maturing senior unsecured notes which accrued interest based on the three-month LIBOR plus 0.45%. The notes were repaid with funds available under the Company’s revolving line of credit facility.

The senior unsecured notes contain certain covenants including limitations on debt and other customary terms. At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

Mortgage Debt

At September 30, 2008, the Company had $1.8 billion in mortgage debt secured by 227 healthcare facilities with a carrying amount of $3.6 billion. Interest rates on the mortgage notes ranged from 2.21% to 8.63% with a weighted average effective rate of 6.02% at September 30, 2008.

21

In May 2008, the Company placed $259 million of seven-year mortgage financing on 21 of its senior housing assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a fixed interest rate of 5.83%. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under the revolving line of credit facility and bridge loan.

In September 2008, the Company placed mortgage financing on our senior housing assets through Fannie Mae aggregating $319 million, which was comprised of $140 million of five-year mortgage financing on four assets and $179 million of eight-year financing on 12 assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 6.39%. The Company received net proceeds aggregating $312 million, which were used to repay the outstanding indebtedness under its revolving line of credit facility.

Secured debt generally requires monthly principal and interest payments. Some of the loans are also cross-collateralized by multiple properties. The secured debt is collateralized by deeds of trust or mortgages on certain properties and is generally non-recourse. Mortgage debt encumbering properties typically restricts title transfer of the respective properties subject to the terms of the mortgage, prohibits additional liens, restricts prepayment, requires payment of real estate taxes, requires maintenance of the properties in good condition, requires maintenance of insurance on the properties and includes requirements to obtain lender consent to enter into and terminate material tenant leases.

Other Debt

At September 30, 2008, the Company had $102.6 million of non-interest bearing Life Care Bonds at two of its CCRCs and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at another of its senior housing facilities, all of which were payable to certain residents of the facilities (collectively “Life Care Bonds”). At September 30, 2008, $41.0 million of the Life Care Bonds were refundable to the residents upon the resident moving out or to their estate upon death, and $61.6 million of the Life Care Bonds were refundable after the units are successfully remarketed to new residents.

Debt Maturities

 The following table summarizes our stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments, excluding debt premiums and discounts, at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

Year	Bank Line of Credit		Bridge Loan(1)		Senior Notes		Mortgage Debt		Other Debt		Total
2008 (3 months)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43,073	$	102,602	$	145,675
2009	—		320,000		—		274,169		—		594,169
2010	—		—		206,421		298,453		—		504,874
2011	—		200,000		300,000		137,310		—		637,310
2012	—		—		250,000		108,625		—		358,625
Thereafter	—		—		2,787,000		937,904		—		3,724,904
	$	—	$	520,000	$	3,543,421	$	1,799,534	$	102,602	$	5,965,557

(1)On October 24, 2008, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million term loan. The above table reflects the reclassification of the portion of the bridge loan that was repaid with proceeds from the term loan, which matures on August 1, 2011.

(12) Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings.  From time to time, the Company is a party to legal proceedings, lawsuits and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Regardless of their merits, these matters may force the Company to expend significant financial resources. Except as described in this Note 12, the Company is not aware of any other legal proceedings or claims that it believes may have, individually or taken together, a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. The Company’s policy is to accrue legal expenses as they are incurred.

On May 3, 2007, Ventas, Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, asserting claims of tortious interference with contract and tortious interference with prospective business advantage. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company interfered with Ventas’ purchase agreement with Sunrise Senior Living Real Estate Investment Trust (“Sunrise REIT”); that the Company interfered with Ventas’ prospective business advantage in connection with the Sunrise REIT transaction; and that the Company’s actions caused Ventas to suffer damages, including the payment of over $100 million in additional consideration to acquire the Sunrise REIT assets. Ventas is seeking monetary relief, including compensatory and punitive damages, against the Company.

22

The Company believes that Ventas’ claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against Ventas’ lawsuit. On April 8, 2008, the Company filed a motion for leave to assert counterclaims against Ventas as part of the above litigation. The Company’s counterclaims allege, among other things, that Sunrise REIT fraudulently induced the Company to participate in a flawed and unfair auction process, and that absent such misconduct, the Company would have succeeded in acquiring Sunrise REIT. The Company seeks to recover compensatory and punitive damages. The proposed counterclaims further allege that Ventas, in acquiring Sunrise REIT, assumed the liability of Sunrise REIT. On July 25, 2008, the Court granted the Company’s motion over Ventas’ opposition, allowing HCP to file its counterclaims. The Court has set a trial date of August 18, 2009. The Company intends to pursue such claims vigorously; however, there can be no assurances that it will prevail on any of the claims or the amount of any recovery that may be awarded. The Company expects that defending its interests and pursuing its own claims in the foregoing matters will require it to expend significant funds. The Company is unable to estimate the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary gain, loss or financial impact with respect to these matters as of September 30, 2008.

In April 2007, the Company and Health Care Property Partners, a joint venture between the Company and an affiliate of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, served Tenet and certain Tenet subsidiaries with notices of default with respect to its hospital in Tarzana, California, and two other hospitals that are leased by such affiliates from the Company and Health Care Property Partners (“HCPP”). Subsequent to the delivery of such notices, the Company exercised its right to terminate the leases to Tenet of four other hospitals owned by the Company, invoking cross­default provisions under such leases. In May 2007 and September 2007, certain subsidiaries of Tenet filed complaints against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles and initiated arbitration proceedings with respect to the seven hospitals owned by the Company and HCPP, in each case asserting various causes of action generally relating to the notices of default and the lease terminations. In October 2007, HCPP responded to the claims by Tenet’s subsidiaries in the arbitration proceedings, and the Company filed a counterclaim against Tenet and the plaintiffs in the California state court action. On June 30, 2008, the parties executed a definitive settlement agreement relating to the disputes that are the subject of the litigation and arbitration proceedings described above. On September 19, 2008, the parties closed the transactions contemplated by the settlement agreement, effecting, among other things: the sale of a hospital in Tarzana, California, by the Company to a Tenet affiliate; the extension of the terms of three other hospitals leased by the Company to affiliates of Tenet; and the acquisition by the Company of Tenet’s 23% interest in HCPP. All claims pending in the Superior Court of the State of California were formally dismissed on September 26, 2008, and the claims in the arbitration proceedings were formally dismissed on October 1, 2008.

The Company recognized $29 million of income from the settlement of the above disputes, which was included in interest and other income, net and a gain on sales of real estate for the sale of the hospital in Tarzana, California, of $18 million.

The fair value of consideration exchanged and related income recognized as a result of the Company’s settlement with Tenet follows (in thousands):

Consideration received
Cash proceeds for hospital in Tarzana, California and other settlement	$	105,760
Fair value of Tenet’s 23% interest in HCPP	29,137
Total consideration received	$	134,897
Consideration given
Fair value of hospital in Tarzana, California	$	88,900
Cash paid for Tenet’s interest in HCPP	17,379
Total consideration given	$	106,279
Settlement income	$	28,618

The gain on the sale of the Company’s hospital in Tarzana, California to Tenet consisted of the following (in thousands):

Fair value of hospital, net of costs	$	88,609
Carrying value of hospital sold	(70,590		)
Gain on sale of real estate	$	18,019

Development Commitments.  As of September 30, 2008, the Company was committed under the terms of contracts to complete the construction of properties undergoing development at a remaining aggregate cost of approximately $27 million.

23

Concentration of Credit Risk.  Concentration of credit risk arises when a number of operators, tenants or obligors related to the Company’s investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions.

On December 21, 2007, the Company made an investment in mezzanine loans to HCR ManorCare with an aggregate face value of $1.0 billion, for approximately $900 million. At September 30, 2008, these loans represented approximately 77% of our skilled nursing segment assets and 7% of our total segment assets.

At September 30, 2008, the Company had 81 of its senior housing facilities leased to nine tenants that have been identified as VIEs (“VIE Tenants”). These VIE Tenants are thinly capitalized entities that rely on the cash flow generated from the senior housing facilities to pay operating expenses, including rent obligations under their leases. The 81 senior housing facilities leased to the VIE Tenants are operated by Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. (“Sunrise”). Sunrise is publicly traded and is subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is required to file periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q with the SEC.

To mitigate credit risk of certain senior housing leases, leases are combined into portfolios that contain cross-default terms, so that if a tenant of any of the properties in a portfolio defaults on its obligations under its lease, the Company may pursue its remedies under the lease with respect to any of the properties in the portfolio. Certain portfolios also contain terms whereby the net operating profits of the properties are combined for the purpose of securing the funding of rental payments due under each lease.

DownREIT Partnerships.  In connection with the formation of certain DownREIT partnerships, partners generally contributed appreciated real estate to the DownREIT in exchange for DownREIT units. These contributions are generally tax-free, so that the pre-contribution gain related to the property is not taxed to the contributing partner. However, if the contributed property is later sold by the partnership, the pre-contribution gain that exists at the date of sale is specially allocated and taxed to the contributing partners. In many of the DownREITs, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with those partners who contributed appreciated property into the partnership. Under these indemnification agreements, if any of the appreciated real estate contributed by the partners is sold by the partnership in a taxable transaction within a specified number of years after the property was contributed, HCP will reimburse the affected partners for the federal and state income taxes associated with the pre-contribution gain that is specially allocated to the affected partner under the Code (“make-whole payments”). These make-whole payments include a tax gross-up provision.

Credit Enhancement Guarantee.  Certain of the Company’s senior housing facilities serve as collateral for $137 million of debt (maturing May 1, 2025) that is owed by a previous owner of the facilities. The Company’s obligation under such indebtedness is guaranteed by the debtor who has an investment grade credit rating. These senior housing facilities are classified as DFLs and have a carrying value of $351 million at September 30, 2008.

Environmental Costs.  The Company monitors its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company carries environmental insurance and believes that the policy terms, conditions, limitations and deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage and current industry practice.

General Uninsured Losses.  The Company obtains various types of insurance to mitigate the impact of property, business interruption, liability, flood, windstorm, earthquake, environmental and terrorism related losses. The Company attempts to obtain appropriate policy terms, conditions, limits and deductibles considering the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage and current industry practice. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses, such as those due to acts of war or other events that may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. In addition, the Company has a large number of properties that are exposed to earthquake, flood and windstorm and the insurance for such losses carries high deductibles. Should an uninsured loss occur at a property, the Company’s assets may become impaired and the Company may not be able to operate its business at the property for an extended period of time.

24

(13) Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The following table lists the Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock cash dividends made by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

Declaration Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share		Dividend Payable Date
January 28	March 14	$	0.45313	March 31
April 24	June 16	$	0.45313	June 30
July 31	September 15	$	0.45313	September 30

The following table lists the Series F cumulative redeemable preferred stock cash dividends made by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

Declaration Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share		Dividend Payable Date
January 28	March 14	$	0.44375	March 31
April 24	June 16	$	0.44375	June 30
July 31	September 15	$	0.44375	September 30

On October 30, 2008, the Company announced that its Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45313 per share on its Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock and $0.44375 per share on its Series F cumulative redeemable preferred stock. These dividends will be paid on December 31, 2008 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 15, 2008.

Common Stock

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued 397,000 and 1.1 million shares of common stock, respectively, under its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”). The Company also issued 623,000 and 328,000 shares upon exercise of stock options, and 2.0 million and 157,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of DownREIT units during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued 144,000 and 273,000 shares of restricted stock, respectively, under the Company’s 2006 Performance Incentive Plan. The Company also issued 131,000 and 110,000 shares upon the vesting of performance restricted stock units during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In connection with HCP’s addition to the S&P 500 Index on March 28, 2008, the Company issued 12.5 million shares of its common stock on April 2, 2008. In a separate transaction, the Company issued 4.5 million shares to a REIT-dedicated institutional investor on April 2, 2008. The net proceeds received from these two offerings in the aggregate were approximately $560 million, which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under the Company’s revolving line of credit facility.

On August 11, 2008, the Company issued 14.95 million shares of its common and received net proceeds of approximately $481 million, which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under the Company’s bridge loan.

The following table lists the common stock cash dividends made by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

Declaration Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share		Dividend Payable Date
January 28	February 7	$	0.455	February 21
April 24	May 5	$	0.455	May 19
July 31	August 11	$	0.455	August 21

25

On October 30, 2008, the Company announced that its Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.455 per share. The common stock cash dividend will be paid on November 21, 2008 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 10, 2008.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2008			2007
	(in thousands)
AOCI—unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net	$	(15,868	)	$	14,222
AOCI—unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net	(11,342		)	(14,243		)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan minimum liability	(2,037		)	(2,113		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	366			32
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss	$	(28,881	)	$	(2,102	)

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table provides a reconciliation of comprehensive income (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net income	$	125,417		$	322,148		$	408,124		$	538,720
Other comprehensive loss	(20,683		)	(6,600		)	(26,779		)	(10,007		)
Total comprehensive income	$	104,734		$	315,548		$	381,345		$	528,713

Substantially all of other comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 related to the fair value of the Company’s marketable debt securities. See also discussions of marketable debt securities in Note 10.

(14) Segment Disclosures

The Company evaluates its business and makes resource allocations based on its five business segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life science, (iii) medical office, (iv) hospital, and (v) skilled nursing. Under the senior housing, life science, hospital and skilled nursing segments, the Company invests primarily in single operator or tenant properties through acquisition and development of real estate, secured financing and marketable debt securities of operators in these sectors. Under the medical office segment, the Company invests through acquisition and secured financing in medical office buildings that are primarily leased under gross or modified gross leases, generally to multiple tenants, and which generally require a greater level of property management. The acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007 resulted in a change to the Company’s reportable segments. Prior to the SEUSA acquisition, the Company operated through two reportable segments—triple-net leased and medical office buildings. The senior housing, life science, hospital and skilled nursing segments were previously aggregated under the Company’s triple-net leased segment. SEUSA’s results are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of the Company’s acquisition on August 1, 2007. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described under Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (see Note 2). There were no intersegment sales or transfers during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. The Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating income from continuing operations (“NOI”) of the combined properties in each segment.

Non-segment assets consist primarily of real estate held for sale and corporate assets including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, net and deferred financing costs. Interest expense, depreciation and amortization and non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining the Company’s performance measure. See Note 12 for other information regarding concentrations of credit risk.

26

Summary information for the reportable segments follows (in thousands):

For the three months ended September 30, 2008:

Segments	Rental and Related Revenues		Tenant Recoveries		Income From DFLs		Investment Management Fees		Total Revenues		NOI(1)		Interest and Other Income, net
Senior housing	$	71,154	$	—	$	14,543	$	867	$	86,564	$	82,167	$	311
Life science	65,997		7,513		—		1		73,511		63,761		—
Medical office	65,713		12,315		—		655		78,683		42,301		—
Hospital	21,607		412		—		—		22,019		21,179		11,074
Skilled nursing	9,161		—		—		—		9,161		9,161		20,811
Total segments	233,632		20,240		14,453		1,523		269,938		218,569		32,196
Non-segment	—		—		—		—		—		—		30,116
Total	$	233,632	$	20,240	$	14,543	$	1,523	$	269,938	$	218,569	$	62,312

For the three months ended September 30, 2007:

Segments	Rental and Related Revenues		Tenant Recoveries		Income From DFLs		Investment Management Fees		Total Revenues		NOI(1)		Interest and Other Income, net
Senior housing	$	79,315	$	—	$	18,832	$	806	$	98,953	$	94,759	$	467
Life science	28,720		7,070		—		—		35,790		25,727		—
Medical office	67,173		10,490		—		796		78,459		42,042		—
Hospital	21,537		—		—		—		21,537		20,695		10,321
Skilled nursing	8,840		—		—		—		8,840		8,840		439
Total segments	205,585		17,560		18,832		1,602		243,579		192,063		11,227
Non-segment	—		—		—		—		—		—		10,311
Total	$	205,585	$	17,560	$	18,832	$	1,602	$	243,579	$	192,063	$	21,538

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

Segments	Rental and Related Revenues		Tenant Recoveries		Income From DFLs		Investment Management Fees		Total Revenues		NOI(1)		Interest and Other Income, net
Senior housing	$	212,451	$	—	$	43,646	$	2,457	$	258,554	$	245,754	$	914
Life science	155,527		25,180		—		3		180,710		149,293		—
Medical office	197,108		35,310		—		1,988		234,406		130,450		—
Hospital	65,429		1,365		—		—		66,794		64,013		33,344
Skilled nursing	26,969		—		—		—		26,969		26,969		64,797
Total segments	657,484		61,855		43,646		4,448		767,433		616,479		99,055
Non-segment	—		—		—		—		—		—		29,323
Total	$	657,484	$	61,855	$	43,646	$	4,448	$	767,433	$	616,479	$	128,378

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007:

Segments	Rental and Related Revenues		Tenant Recoveries		Income From DFLs		Investment Management Fees		Total Revenues		NOI(1)		Interest and Other Income, net
Senior housing	$	216,600	$	—	$	49,037	$	7,770	$	273,407	$	254,940	$	1,166
Life science	37,494		8,429		—		—		45,923		33,410		—
Medical office	210,091		34,394		—		4,292		248,777		141,197		—
Hospital	63,663		86		—		—		63,749		62,790		30,999
Skilled nursing	26,183		—		—		—		26,183		26,183		1,318
Total segments	554,031		42,909		49,037		12,062		658,039		518,520		33,483
Non-segment	—		—		—		—		—		—		21,241
Total	$	554,031	$	42,909	$	49,037	$	12,062	$	658,039	$	518,520	$	54,724

27

(1)Net Operating Income from Continuing Operations (“NOI”) is a non-GAAP supplemental financial measure used to evaluate the operating performance of real estate. The Company defines NOI as rental revenues, including tenant recoveries and income from direct financing leases, less property-level operating expenses. NOI excludes investment management fee income, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments, gain on sale of real estate interest, interest and other income, net, interest expense, income taxes, equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures, minority interests’ share in earnings and discontinued operations. The Company believes NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of the Company’s real estate at the property level on an unleveraged basis. The Company uses NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and assess property-level performance. The Company believes that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to NOI. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of operating performance to net income as defined by GAAP since it does not reflect the aforementioned excluded items. Further, the Company’s definition of NOI may not be comparable to the definition used by other real estate investment trusts, as those companies may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.

The following is a reconciliation from NOI to reported net income, the most direct comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net operating income from continuing operations	$	218,569		$	192,063		$	616,479		$	518,520
Investment management fee income	1,523			1,602			4,448			12,062
Depreciation and amortization	(77,659		)	(70,418		)	(233,920		)	(184,132		)
General and administrative	(17,541		)	(16,499		)	(56,913		)	(53,894		)
Impairments	(3,710		)	—			(13,425		)	—
Gain on sale of real estate interest	—			—			—			10,141
Interest and other income, net	62,312			21,538			128,378			54,724
Interest expense	(83,249		)	(103,707		)	(265,054		)	(254,434		)
Income taxes	(866		)	318			(4,385		)	860
Equity income from unconsolidated joint ventures	1,227			1,242			3,736			3,758
Minority interests’ share in earnings	(5,803		)	(6,018		)	(17,055		)	(17,992		)
Total discontinued operations	30,614			302,027			245,835			449,107
Net income	$	125,417		$	322,148		$	408,124		$	538,720

The Company’s total assets by segment were:

	September 30,			December 31,
Segments	2008			2007
Senior housing	$	4,457,543		$	4,440,832
Life science	3,523,923			3,461,101
Medical office	2,287,131			2,254,924
Hospital	1,111,182			1,126,152
Skilled nursing	1,187,394			1,163,157
Gross segment assets	12,567,173			12,446,166
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(884,937		)	(689,983		)
Net segment assets	11,682,236			11,756,183
Real estate held for sale, net	5,301			408,028
Non-segment assets	343,867			357,561
Total assets	$	12,031,404		$	12,521,772

Segment assets include an allocation of the carrying value of goodwill. At September 30, 2008, goodwill is allocated as follows: (i) senior housing—$30.5 million, (ii) life science—$1.4 million, (iii) medical office—$11.4 million, (iv) hospital—$5.1 million, and (v) skilled nursing—$3.3 million.

(15) Derivative Instruments

The Company uses derivative instruments as hedges to mitigate interest rate fluctuations on specific forecasted transactions and recognized obligations. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

The primary risks associated with derivative instruments are market and credit risk. Market risk is defined as the potential for loss in value of the derivative instruments due to adverse changes in market prices (interest rates). Utilizing derivative instruments allows the Company to effectively manage the risk of increasing interest rates with respect to the potential effects these fluctuations could have on future earnings and cash flows.

28

Credit risk is the risk that one of the parties to a derivative contract fails to perform or meet their financial obligation. The Company does not obtain collateral associated with its derivative instruments, but monitors the credit standing of its counterparties, primarily global institutional banks, on a regular basis. Should a counterparty fail to perform, the Company would incur a financial loss to the extent that the associated derivative contract was in an asset position. At September 30, 2008, the Company does not anticipate non-performance by counterparties to its outstanding derivative contracts.

In July 2005, the Company entered into three interest rate swap contracts that are designated as hedging the variability of expected cash flows related to floating rate debt assumed in connection with the acquisition of a real estate portfolio. The cash flow hedges have a notional amount of $45.6 million and mature in July 2020. The aggregate fair value of the derivative contracts is a $0.7 million liability and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. At September 30, 2008, no amounts of ineffectiveness for the derivative contracts were recorded.

During October and November 2007, the Company entered into two forward-starting interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts aggregating $900 million. The interest rate swap contracts are designated in qualifying, cash flow hedging relationships, to hedge the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate component of interest payments on forecasted, unsecured, fixed-rate debt expected to be issued during the current fiscal year. As of September 30, 2008, the Company terminated these hedges per the cash settlement provisions of the derivative contracts. The termination of the $500 million notional contract resulted in a payment of $14.8 million and the termination of the $400 million notional contract resulted in a cash receipt of $5.2 million. Upon settlement of these derivative contracts, the Company revised its best estimate of the hedged forecasted transactions, and as a result an ineffectiveness charge of $2.4 million was recognized in interest and other income, net in the consolidated statements of income. At September 30, 2008, the Company expects that the hedged forecasted transactions remain probable of occurring in accordance with its designated assertions.

(16) Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
	(in thousands)
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest	$	280,103		$	234,051
Taxes paid	4,266			958
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Capitalized interest	22,479			4,024
Increase (decrease) in accrued construction costs	(10,604		)	18,868
Real estate exchanged in real estate acquisitions	—			35,205
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Mortgages assumed with real estate acquisitions	4,892			5,357
Issuance of restricted stock	144			273
Vesting of restricted stock units	131			110
Cancellation of restricted stock	108			34
Conversion of non-managing member units into common stock	74,509			3,702
Non-managing member units issued in connection with acquisitions	—			180,698
Unrealized losses, net on available for sale securities and derivatives designated as cash flow hedges	32,836			6,241

See also discussions of the SEUSA acquisition and HCP Ventures II and HCP Ventures IV, in Notes 3 and 8, respectively.

(17) Earnings Per Common Share

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by including the effect of dilutive securities. Options to purchase approximately 0.5 million and 0.6 million shares of common stock that had an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included because they are not dilutive. Additionally, 8.0 million shares issuable upon conversion of 5.6 million DownREIT units during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 10.1 million shares issuable upon conversion of 7.6 million non-managing member units during the three months ended September 30, 2007 were not included since they are anti-dilutive.

29

The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share and share amounts):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator
Income from continuing operations	$	94,803		$	20,121		$	162,289		$	89,613
Preferred stock dividends	(5,282		)	(5,282		)	(15,848		)	(15,848		)
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shares	89,521			14,839			146,441			73,765
Discontinued operations	30,614			302,027			245,835			449,107
Net income applicable to common shares for basic and diluted earnings per share	$	120,135		$	316,866		$	392,276		$	522,872
Denominator
Basic weighted average common shares	244,572			206,186			232,199			205,322
Dilutive stock options and restricted stock	1,334			884			1,192			1,350
Diluted weighted average common shares	245,906			207,070			233,391			206,672
Basic earnings per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	0.37		$	0.07		$	0.63		$	0.36
Discontinued operations	0.12			1.47			1.06			2.19
Net income applicable to common shares	$	0.49		$	1.54		$	1.69		$	2.55
Diluted earnings per common share
Income from continuing operations	$	0.37		$	0.07		$	0.63		$	0.36
Discontinued operations	0.12			1.46			1.05			2.17
Net income applicable to common shares	$	0.49		$	1.53		$	1.68		$	2.53

(18) Fair Value Measurements

The following tables illustrate the Company’s fair value measurements of its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The second table includes the associated unrealized and realized gains and losses, as well as purchases, sales, issuances, settlements (net) or transfers for financial instruments classified as Level 3 instruments in the fair value hierarchy. Realized gains and losses are recorded in interest and other income, net on the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

The following is a summary of fair value measurements at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

Financial Instrument	Fair Value			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Marketable equity securities	$	9,362		$	9,362	$	—		$	—
Marketable debt securities	274,550			257,550		17,000			—
Interest rate swaps(1)	(716		)	—		(716		)	—
Warrants(1)	3,143			—		—			3,143
Total	$	286,339		$	266,912	$	16,284		$	3,143

(1)Interest rate swaps and common stock warrants are valued using observable and unobservable market assumptions, as well as standardized derivative pricing models.

30

The following is a reconciliation of fair value measurements classified as Level 3 at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

	Warrants
December 31, 2007	$	2,560
Total gains or losses (realized and unrealized):
Included in earnings	583
Included in other comprehensive income	—
Purchases, issuances, and settlements	—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3	—
September 30, 2008	$	3,143

(19) Impairments

During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized an impairment of $3.7 million related to intangible assets associated with the early termination of three leases in the life science segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a result of anticipated dispositions, four properties in the senior housing segment and one hospital were determined to be impaired resulting in impairments of $9.7 million. No properties or intangible assets were determined to be impaired in 2007.

31

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Language Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical factual statements are “forward-looking statements.” We intend to have our forward-looking statements covered by the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with those provisions. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding our and our officers’ intent, belief or expectations as identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “forecast,” “plan,” “estimate,” “could,” “would,” “should” and other comparable and derivative terms or the negatives thereof. In addition, we, through our officers, from time to time, make forward-looking oral and written public statements concerning our expected future operations, strategies, securities offerings, growth and investment opportunities, dispositions, capital structure changes, budgets and other developments. Readers are cautioned that, while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith belief and reasonable assumptions based upon current information, we can give no assurance that our expectations or forecasts will be attained. Therefore, readers should be mindful that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that they are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. As more fully set forth under “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements include:

(a)	Changes in federal, state or local laws and regulations, including those affecting the healthcare industry that affect our costs of compliance or increase the costs, or otherwise affect the operations of our operators, tenants and borrowers;
(b)	Changes in the reimbursement available to our tenants and borrowers by governmental or private payors, including changes in Medicare and Medicaid payment levels and the availability and cost of third party insurance coverage;
(c)	Competition for tenants and borrowers, including with respect to new leases and mortgages and the renewal or rollover of existing leases;
(d)	Availability of suitable properties to acquire at favorable prices and the competition for the acquisition and financing of those properties;
(e)	The ability of our operators, tenants and borrowers to conduct their respective businesses in a manner sufficient to maintain or increase their revenues and to generate sufficient income to make rent and loan payments to us;
(f)	The financial weakness of some operators and tenants, including potential bankruptcies and downturns in their businesses, which results in uncertainties regarding our ability to continue to realize the full benefit of such operators’ and/or tenants’ leases;
(g)	Changes in national, regional and local economic conditions, including changes in interest rates and the availability and cost of capital;
(h)	The risk that we will not be able to sell or lease properties that are currently vacant, at all or at competitive rates;
(i)	The financial, legal and regulatory difficulties of significant operators of our properties, including Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. and Tenet Healthcare Corporation;
(j)	The risk that we may not be able to integrate acquired businesses successfully or achieve the operating efficiencies and other benefits of acquisitions within expected time-frames or at all, or within expected cost projections;
(k)	The ability to obtain financing necessary to consummate acquisitions or on favorable terms; and
(l)	The potential impact of existing and future litigation matters, including related developments.

32

Except as required by law, we undertake no, and hereby disclaim any, obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, changed circumstances or otherwise.

The information set forth in this Item 2 is intended to provide readers with an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations. We will discuss and provide our analysis in the following order:

·Executive Summary

·2008 Transaction Overview

·Other Events

·Dividends

·Critical Accounting Policies

·Results of Operations

·Liquidity and Capital Resources

·Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

·Contractual Obligations

·Inflation

·Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Executive Summary

We are a Maryland corporation organized to qualify as a REIT that, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, invests primarily in real estate serving the healthcare industry in the United States. We acquire, develop, lease, dispose and manage healthcare real estate and provide mortgage and specialty financing to healthcare providers. At September 30, 2008, our real estate portfolio, excluding assets held for sale but including mortgage loans and properties owned by joint ventures, consisted of interests in 704 facilities.

Our business strategy is based on three principles: (i) opportunistic investing; (ii) portfolio diversification; and (iii) conservative financing. We actively redeploy capital from investments with lower return potential into assets with higher return potential and recycle capital from shorter-term to longer-term investments. We make investments where the expected risk-adjusted return exceeds our cost of capital and strive to leverage our operator, tenant and other business relationships.

Our strategy contemplates acquiring and developing properties on terms that are favorable to us. We attempt to structure transactions that are tax-advantaged and mitigate risks in our underwriting process. Generally, we prefer larger, more complex private transactions that leverage our management team’s experience and our infrastructure.

We follow a disciplined approach to enhancing the value of our existing portfolio, including the ongoing evaluation of the potential disposition of properties that no longer fit our strategy. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we sold 47 properties for $629 million. At September 30, 2008, we had seven properties with a carrying amount of $5 million classified as held for sale.

We primarily generate revenue by leasing healthcare properties under long-term leases. Most of our rents and other earned income from leases are received under triple-net leases or leases that provide for substantial recovery of operating expenses; however, some of our medical office buildings (“MOBs”) and life science leases are structured as gross or modified gross leases. Accordingly, for such MOBs and life science facilities we incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities and insurance. Our growth depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels; (ii) maximize tenant recoveries given underlying lease structures; and (iii) control operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific, market specific, general economic and other conditions.

33

Recently, there has been a slowdown in the economy, a decline in the availability of financing from the capital markets, and a widening of credit spreads which has, or may in the future, adversely affect the businesses of our tenants, operators and borrowers to varying degrees. Such conditions may impact their ability to meet their obligations to us and, in certain cases, could lead to restructurings, disruptions, or bankruptcies of our tenants, operators and/or borrowers. These market conditions could also adversely affect the amount of revenue we report, require us to increase our allowances for losses, result in impairment charges and valuation allowances that decrease our net income and equity, and reduce our cash flows from operations. In addition, these conditions or events could impair our credit rating and our ability to raise additional capital, require us to seek alternative operators or tenants, and finance or refinance debt secured by properties they operate or where they are tenants.

Access to external capital on favorable terms is critical to the success of our strategy. Generally, we attempt to match the long-term duration of most of our investments with long-term fixed-rate financing. At September 30, 2008, 12% of our consolidated debt is at variable interest rates, which includes $520 million for the outstanding balance of the bridge loan. We intend to maintain an investment grade rating on our senior debt securities and manage various capital ratios and amounts within appropriate parameters.

Access to capital markets impacts our cost of capital and ability to refinance maturing indebtedness, as well as to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities or secured debt. Thus far during 2008 we have raised $1 billion of equity capital, $643 million from asset dispositions, $578 million from the placement of FNMA secured debt and $200 million in the bank term loan market this year through October 24, 2008. As of October 31, 2008, we had a credit rating of Baa3 (stable) from Moody’s, BBB (stable) from S&P and BBB (stable) from Fitch on our senior unsecured debt securities, and Ba1 (stable) from Moody’s, BB+ (stable) from S&P and BBB- (stable) from Fitch on our preferred securities. Recently there has been a decline in the availability of financing from the capital markets and widening credit spreads. Our ability to continue to access capital could be impacted by various factors including general market conditions and the continuing slowdown in the economy, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, and any changes to these ratings, the market price of our capital stock, the performance of our portfolio, tenants, borrowers and operators, including any restructurings, disruptions or bankruptcies of our tenants, borrowers and operators, the perception of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, any unwillingness on the part of lenders to make loans to us and any deterioration in the financial position of lenders that might make them unable to meet their obligations to us.

2008 Transaction Overview

Investment Transactions

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we sold three hospitals valued at $116 million and made investments aggregating $89 million through the purchase of debt securities and a joint venture interest, and funding of construction and other capital projects.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, two of our life science facilities located in South San Francisco were placed into service representing 147,000 square feet.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we sold assets valued at $643 million, which included the sale of 47 properties for approximately $629 million and other investments for $14 million. Our sales of properties and other investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were made from the following segments: (i) 68% hospital, (ii) 15% skilled nursing, (iii) 14% medical office and (iv) 3% senior housing.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we made investments aggregating $192 million through the acquisition of a senior housing facility, the purchase of marketable debt securities and a joint venture interest, and the funding of construction and other capital projects.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, three of our life science facilities located in South San Francisco were placed into service representing 229,000 square feet.

Financing Transactions

In connection with HCP’s addition to the S&P 500 Index on March 28, 2008, we issued 12.5 million shares of our common stock on April 2, 2008. In a separate transaction, we issued 4.5 million shares to a REIT-dedicated institutional investor on April 2, 2008. The net proceeds received from these two offerings in the aggregate were approximately $560 million, which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility.

In May 2008, we placed $259 million of seven-year mortgage financing on 21 of our senior housing assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a fixed interest rate of 5.83%. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility and bridge loan.

In June 2008, we settled two forward-starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $900 million and recognized an ineffectiveness charge of $2.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share of common stock, in interest and other income, net.

On August 11, 2008, we issued 14.95 million shares of our common stock. We received net proceeds of $481 million, which were used to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under our bridge loan facility.

34

In September 2008, we placed mortgage financing on senior housing assets through Fannie Mae aggregating $319 million, which was comprised of $140 million of five-year mortgage financing on four assets and $179 million of eight-year financing on 12 assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 6.39%. We received net proceeds aggregating $312 million, which were used to repay our outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility.

On October 24, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million unsecured term loan. The term loan accrues interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.00%, based on our current debt ratings, and matures in August 2011. The net proceeds of $197 million received by us from the term loan were used to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under our bridge loan facility, reducing the outstanding balance to $320 million.

Other Events

On July 30, 2008, we received and recognized lease termination fees of $18 million from a tenant in connection with the early termination of three leases representing 149,000 square feet in our life science segment. Upon termination of the leases, we recognized an impairment of $4 million related to intangible assets associated with these leases.

On September 19, 2008, we completed the restructuring of our hospital portfolio leased to Tenet and settled various disputes. The settlement provided for, among other things, the sale of our hospital in Tarzana, California, valued at $89 million, the purchase of Tenet’s minority interest in a joint venture valued at $29 million and the extension of the terms of three other hospitals leased by us to Tenet. As a result of the sale of our hospital in Tarzana, California and the settlement of our legal disputes with Tenet, we recognized income of $47 million.

Dividends

On October 30, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors declared a quarterly common stock cash dividend of $0.455 per share. The dividend will be paid on November 21, 2008 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 10, 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. We base estimates on our experience and on various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions or other matters had been different, it is possible that different accounting would have been applied, resulting in a different presentation of our financial statements. For a description of the risks associated with our critical accounting policies, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business” as included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007. For a description of our critical accounting policies, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” as included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007. From time to time, we re-evaluate our estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current estimates and assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Results of Operations

We evaluate our business and allocate resources among our five business segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life science, (iii) medical office, (iv) hospital, and (v) skilled nursing. Under the senior housing, life science, hospital and skilled nursing segments, we invest primarily in single operator or tenant properties through the acquisition and development of real estate, secured financing, mezzanine financing and investment in marketable debt securities of operators in these sectors. Under the medical office segment, we invest through acquisition that are leased under gross or modified gross leases, generally to multiple tenants, and which generally require a greater level of property management. The acquisition of Slough Estates USA Inc. (“SEUSA”) on August 1, 2007 resulted in a change to our reportable segments. Prior to the SEUSA acquisition, we operated through two reportable segments—triple-net leased and medical office buildings. The senior housing, life science, hospital and skilled nursing segments were previously aggregated under our triple-net leased segment. SEUSA’s results are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition of August 1, 2007. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

35

We completed our acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007 and SEUSA’s results of operations are reflected in our consolidated financial statements from that date. We expect increases in revenues, expenses and interest income from a full year of results from our SEUSA acquisition and mezzanine loan investments. In addition, we expect that the 14.95 million common shares we issued on August 11, 2008 will have a dilutive effect on per share amounts in future periods.

Our financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are summarized as follows:

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007

Rental and related revenues.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
Segments	2008		2007		$			%
	(dollars in thousands)
Senior housing	$	71,154	$	79,315	$	(8,161	)	(10	)%
Life science	65,997		28,720		37,277			130
Medical office	65,713		67,173		(1,460		)	(2	)
Hospital	21,607		21,537		70			—
Skilled nursing	9,161		8,840		321			4
Total	$	233,632	$	205,585	$	28,047		14	%

·Senior housing.  The results for the three months ended September 30, 2007 included income of $9.1 million resulting from our change in estimate relating to the collectability of straight-lined rents due from Summerville Senior Living, Inc. (“Summerville”) and Emeritus Corporation (“Emeritus”). On September 4, 2007, Emeritus acquired Summerville and provided us with additional security under its leases with Summerville. No changes in estimates related to the collectability of straight-lined rents were made during the three months ended September 30, 2008.

Included in senior housing rental and related revenues are facility-level operating revenues for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. From time to time, tenants default on their leases, which causes us to take possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in senior housing rental and related revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The rental and related revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 for these facilities were $3.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

·Life science.  Life science rental and related revenues increased primarily as a result of our acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007. Included in life science rental and related revenues are lease termination fees of $18 million from a tenant in connection with the early termination of three leases on July 30, 2008.

Tenant recoveries.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
Segments	2008		2007		$		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Life science	$	7,513	$	7,070	$	443	6	%
Medical office	12,315		10,490		1,825		17
Hospital	412		—		412		NM	(1)
Total	$	20,240	$	17,560	$	2,680	15	%

(1)   Percentage change not meaningful.

The increase in tenant recoveries for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to the additive effect of our acquisitions during 2008 and 2007 and higher operating expenses in 2008.

36

Income from direct financing leases.  Income from direct financing leases decreased $4.3 million to $14.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to two direct financing lease tenants exercising their purchase options during 2007. No purchase options were exercised during 2008.

Investment management fee income.  Investment management fee income decreased by $0.1 million to $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the one-time acquisition fee of $0.2 million earned in September 2007 related to HCP Ventures IV’s acquisition of a property for $35.5 million. No acquisition fees were earned for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $7.2 million to $77.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to our acquisition of SEUSA.

General and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million to $17.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Included in general and administrative expenses are merger and integration-related expenses associated with the SEUSA acquisition of $60,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.7 million associated with the CNL Retirement Properties, Inc., CNL Retirement Corp. and SEUSA mergers for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Excluding the merger and integration-related expenses, the increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased compensation related expenses and professional and legal fees.

The information set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

Impairments.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized impairments of $3.7 million related to intangible assets associated with the early termination of three leases. No intangible assets were determined to be impaired during the three months ended September 30, 2007.

Interest and other income, net.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, interest and other income, net increased $40.8 million, to $62.3 million. This increase was primarily related to $28.6 million of income related to the settlement of litigation with Tenet and an increase in interest income of $20.4 million from our HCR ManorCare mezzanine loan investment made in December 2007. The increase was partially offset by $4.0 million of lower interest earned on cash balances in 2008 and a $3.5 million prepayment penalty earned on a loan in 2007. For a more detailed description of our mezzanine loan investment and marketable securities, see Note 7 and Note 10, respectively, of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest expense.  Interest expense decreased $20.5 million to $83.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to (i) $22.1 million from the decrease in outstanding indebtedness under our bridge loan and line of credit facilities, (ii) a charge of $6.2 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our previous revolving line of credit facility that was terminated during the three months ended September 30, 2007, (iii) $2.5 million decrease resulting from the repayment of $300 million senior unsecured floating rate notes in September 2008 and (iv) a $1.7 million increase in the amount of capitalized interest relating to the increase in assets under development. The combined decrease in interest expense was partially offset by an increase of $10.1 million of interest expense from the issuance of $600 million of senior unsecured notes in October 2007.

37

The table below sets forth information with respect to our debt, excluding premiums and discounts (dollars in thousands):

	As of September 30,
	2008			2007
Balance:
Fixed rate	$	5,223,688		$	4,109,207
Variable rate	741,869			3,270,542
Total	$	5,965,557		$	7,379,749
Percent of total debt:
Fixed rate	88		%	56		%
Variable rate	12			44
Total	100		%	100		%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period:
Fixed rate	6.27		%	6.10		%
Variable rate	3.54			6.21
Total weighted average rate	5.93		%	6.15		%

Minority interests’ share in earnings.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, minority interests’ share in earnings decreased $0.2 million to $5.8 million. This decrease is primarily due to the conversions of 1.9 million of our non-managing member LLC Units (“DownREIT units”) into common stock during 2008. In addition, we expect that our purchase of Tenet’s minority interest in Health Care Property Partners (“HCPP”) will decrease minority interests’ share in earnings in future periods. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on HCPP.

Income taxes.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, income taxes increased $1.2 million to $0.9 million. This increase is primarily due to higher levels of income from our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Discontinued operations.  The decrease of $271.4 million in income from discontinued operations to $30.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily due to a decrease in gains on real estate dispositions of $258.7 million, and operating income from discontinued operations of $12.7 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we sold three properties for $116 million, as compared to 42 properties for $504 million in the year ago period. Discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included 10 properties compared to 104 properties for the three months ended September 30, 2007.

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007

Rental and related revenues.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
Segments	2008		2007		$			%
	(dollars in thousands)
Senior housing	$	212,451	$	216,600	$	(4,149	)	(2	)%
Life science	155,527		37,494		118,033			NM	(1)
Medical office	197,108		210,091		(12,983		)	(6	)
Hospital	65,429		63,663		1,766			3
Skilled nursing	26,969		26,183		786			3
Total	$	657,484	$	554,031	$	103,453		19	%

(1)   Percentage change not meaningful.

·Senior housing. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, included income of $9.1 million resulting from our change in estimate relating to the collectability of straight-lined rents due from Summerville and Emeritus. Senior housing rental and related revenues increased $5.0 million related to rent escalations and resets and $1.6 million due to the additive effect of our acquisitions during 2008 and 2007. No changes in estimates related to the collectability of straight-lined rents were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

38

Included in senior housing rental and related revenues were facility-level operating revenues for five senior housing properties that were previously leased on a triple-net basis. From time to time, tenants default on their leases, which causes us to take possession of the operations of the facility. We contract with third-party managers to manage these properties until a replacement tenant can be identified or the property can be sold. The operating revenues and expenses for these properties are included in senior housing rental and related revenues and operating expenses, respectively. The rental and related revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 for these facilities were $9.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively.

·Life science. Life science rental and related revenues increased primarily as a result of our acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007. Included in life science rental and related revenues are lease termination fees of $18 million from a tenant in connection with the early termination of three leases on July 30, 2008.

·Medical office. Medical office rental and related revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 includes $17.9 million from assets that are no longer consolidated and are now in our HCP Ventures IV, LLC joint venture (“HCP Ventures IV”). The decrease in medical office rental and related revenues resulting from HCP Ventures IV was partially offset by the additive effect of our MOB acquisitions during 2007.

Tenant recoveries.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
Segments	2008		2007		$		%
	(dollars in thousands)
Life science	$	25,180	$	8,429	$	16,751	NM	(1)
Medical office	35,310		34,394		916		3	%
Hospital	1,365		86		1,279		NM	(1)
Total	$	61,855	$	42,909	$	18,946	44	%

(1)   Percentage change not meaningful.

The increase in tenant recoveries for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily as a result of our acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007, the additive effect of our acquisitions during 2007 and higher operating expenses in 2008, partially offset by the assets that are no longer consolidated and are now in HCP Ventures IV.

Income from direct financing leases.  Income from direct financing leases decreased $5.4 million to $43.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to two direct financing lease tenants exercising their purchase options on our leased assets during 2007. No purchase options were exercised during 2008.

Investment management fee income.  Investment management fee income decreased by $7.6 million to $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in investment management fee income was primarily due to the acquisition fees earned related to our HCP Ventures II joint venture of $5.4 million on January 5, 2007 and HCP Ventures IV of $3.0 million on April 30, 2007. No acquisition fees were earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $49.8 million to $233.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily related to our SEUSA acquisition. The increase in depreciation and amortization from our other acquisitions in 2007 was partially offset by the 2007 results from the assets contributed to HCP Ventures IV.

39

Operating expenses.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
Segments	2008		2007		$			%
	(dollars in thousands)
Senior housing	$	10,343	$	10,697	$	(354	)	(3	)%
Life science	31,414		12,513		18,901			NM	(1)
Medical office	101,968		103,288		(1,320		)	(1	)
Hospital	2,781		959		1,822			NM	(1)
Total	$	146,506	$	127,457	$	19,049		15	%

(1)Percentage change not meaningful.

Operating expenses are predominantly related to MOB and life science properties where we incur the expenses and recover a portion of those expenses from the tenants. The presentation of expenses as operating or general and administrative is based on the underlying nature of the expense. Periodically, we review the classification of expenses between categories and make revisions based on changes in the underlying nature of the expense.

The increase in operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily as a result of our acquisition of SEUSA on August 1, 2007, the additive effect of our acquisitions during 2007 and higher operating expenses in 2008, partially offset by the assets that are no longer consolidated and are now in HCP Ventures IV.

General and administrative expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased $3.0 million to $56.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Included in general and administrative expenses are merger and integration-related expenses associated with the SEUSA acquisition of $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $9.1 million associated with the CNL Retirement Properties, Inc., CNL Retirement Corp. and SEUSA mergers for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Excluding the merger and integration-related expenses, the increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase of $15.3 million related to compensation related expenses and professional and legal fees, partially offset by a decrease of $3.2 million related to write-offs of costs related to acquisitions not consummated and franchise taxes.

The information set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

Impairments.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized impairments of $9.7 million related to five properties and $3.7 million related to intangible assets associated with the early termination of three leases. No properties or intangible assets were determined to be impaired during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Gain on sale of real estate interest.  On April 30, 2007, we sold an 80% interest in HCP Ventures IV, which resulted in a gain of $10.1 million. No similar transactions occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Interest and other income, net.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, interest and other income, net increased $73.7 million to $128.4 million. This increase was primarily related to $63.5 million of interest income from our HCR ManorCare mezzanine loan investment made in December 2007 and $28.6 million related to the settlement of litigation with Tenet, which was partially offset by (i) $4.8 million of lower interest earned on cash balances in 2008; (ii) a $3.5 million prepayment penalty earned on a loan in 2007; (iii) an other-than-temporary impairment of $3.5 million incurred in 2008; and (iv) a decrease in gains from the sale of marketable debt securities of $3.0 million. For a more detailed description of our mezzanine loan investment, see Note 7 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest expense.  Interest expense increased $10.6 million to $265.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to $31.8 million of interest expense from the issuance of $1.1 billion of senior unsecured notes during 2007, $10.4 million from the increase in the average outstanding balance under our bridge loan and line of credit facilities and a hedging ineffectiveness charge of $2.4 million on a forward-starting interest rate swap contract that was settled on June 30, 2008. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by (i) an increase of $18.5 million of capitalized interest related to an increase in assets under development in our life science segment, (ii) a charge of $6.2 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan fees associated with our previous revolving line of credit facility that was terminated in 2007 and (iii) $5 million resulting from the repayment of $300 million senior unsecured floating rate notes in September 2008.

40

Income taxes.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income taxes increased $5.2 million to $4.4 million. This increase is primarily due to higher levels of income from our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Minority interests’ share in earnings.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, minority interests’ share in earnings decreased $0.9 million to $17.1 million. This decrease is primarily due to the conversions of 1.9 million of our minority interest DownREIT units into common stock during 2008. In addition, we expect that our purchase of Tenet’s minority interest in HCPP will decrease minority interests’ share in earnings in future periods. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on HCPP.

Discontinued operations.  The decrease of $203.3 million in income from discontinued operations to $245.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $449.1 million for the comparable period in the prior year is primarily due to a decrease in gains on real estate dispositions of $164.5 million and operating income from discontinued operations of $38.8 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we sold 47 properties for $629 million, as compared to 89 properties for $896 million in the year ago period. Discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included 54 properties compared to 151 properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Included in discontinued operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $6 million of rental income we recognized, resulting from a change in estimate related to the collectability of straight-line rental income from Emeritus. No changes in estimates related to the collectability of straight-lined rents were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks had unused borrowing availability at September 30, 2008 of approximately $1.5 billion.  Our principal liquidity needs are to: (i) fund normal operating expenses, (ii) repay the $320 million remaining on the bridge loan, (iii) meet other debt service requirements, including $317 million of our mortgage debt maturing in the remainder of 2008 and in 2009, (iv) fund capital expenditures, including tenant improvements and leasing costs, (v) fund acquisition and development activities, and (vi) make minimum distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Code. We believe these needs will be satisfied using cash flows generated by operations, provided by financing activities, sales of assets and/or contributions of assets to joint ventures during the next twelve months.

Access to capital markets impacts our cost of capital and ability to refinance maturing indebtedness, as well as to fund future acquisitions and development through the issuance of additional securities or secured debt. Thus far during 2008 we have raised $1 billion of equity capital, $643 million from asset dispositions, $578 million from the placement of FNMA secured debt and $200 million in the bank term loan market this year through October 24, 2008. As of October 31, 2008, we had a credit rating of Baa3 (stable) from Moody’s, BBB (stable) from S&P and BBB (stable) from Fitch on our senior unsecured debt securities, and Ba1 (stable) from Moody’s, BB+ (stable) from S&P and BBB- (stable) from Fitch on our preferred securities. Recently there has been a decline in the availability of financing from the capital markets and widening credit spreads. Our ability to continue to access capital could be impacted by various factors including general market conditions and the continuing slowdown in the economy, interest rates, credit ratings on our securities, and any changes to these ratings, the market price of our capital stock, the performance of our portfolio, tenants, borrowers and operators, including any restructurings, disruptions or bankruptcies of our tenants, borrowers and operators, the perception of our potential future earnings and cash distributions, any unwillingness on the part of lenders to make loans to us and any deterioration in the financial position of lenders that might make them unable to meet their obligations to us.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $455.4 million and $309.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows from operations reflect increased revenues, partially offset by higher costs and expenses, and fluctuations in receivables, payables, accruals and deferred revenue. Our cash flows from operations are dependent upon the occupancy level of multi-tenant buildings, rental rates on leases, our tenants’ performance on their lease and loan obligations, the level of operating expenses and other factors.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $456.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and principally reflects the proceeds of $629.4 million received from the sales of facilities and $132.4 million used to fund acquisitions and development of real estate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we used $44.7 million and $27.0 million, respectively, to fund lease commissions and tenant and capital improvements.

Net cash used in financing activities was $891.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and included: (i) net repayments of $951.7 million of borrowings under our line of credit facility, (ii) repayments of $830.0 million of borrowings under our bridge loan, (iii) repayment of $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes, (iv) repayment of mortgage debt aggregating $63.7 million, and (v) payments of common and preferred dividends aggregating $337.1 million. The amount of cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $1.1 billion from the issuance of common

41

stock and $579.1 million from the placement of mortgage debt. In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our stockholders. Accordingly, we intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders of our common and preferred stock.

At September 30, 2008, we held approximately $16.9 million in deposits and $26.1 million in irrevocable letters of credit from commercial banks securing tenants’ lease obligations and borrowers’ loan obligations. We may draw upon the letters of credit or depository accounts if there are defaults under the related leases or loans. Amounts available under letters of credit could change based upon facility operating conditions and other factors, and such changes may be material.

Debt

Bank line of credit, bridge loan and term loan. Our revolving line of credit with a syndicate of banks provided for an aggregate $1.5 billion of borrowing capacity at September 30, 2008. This revolving line of credit facility accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.325% to 1.00%, depending upon our debt ratings. We pay a facility fee on the entire revolving commitment ranging from 0.10% to 0.25%, depending upon our debt ratings. Based on our debt ratings on September 30, 2008, the margin on the revolving line of credit facility was 0.55% and the facility fee was 0.15%. Our revolving line of credit facility matures on August 1, 2011.

At September 30, 2008, the outstanding balance of our bridge loan was $520 million. The bridge loan had an initial maturity date of July 31, 2008 that has been extended to January 31, 2009 through the exercise of an extension option. We have an additional 6-month extension option, subject to debt compliance and extension fees, which could be used to extend the maturity date to July 31, 2009 from January 31, 2009. This bridge loan accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 0.425% to 1.25%, depending upon our debt ratings (weighted average effective interest rate of 3.38% at September 30, 2008). Based on our debt ratings on September 30, 2008, the margin on the bridge loan facility was 0.70%.

Our revolving line of credit facility and bridge loan contain certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements, including cross-default provisions to other indebtedness. A portion of these financial covenants become more restrictive through the period ending March 31, 2009. Among other things, these covenants, using terms defined in the agreement (i) limit the ratio of Consolidated Total Indebtedness to Consolidated Total Asset Value to 60%, (ii) limit the ratio of Unsecured Debt to Consolidated Unencumbered Asset Value to 65%, (iii) require a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.75 times, and (iv) require a formula-determined Minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of $4.2 billion at September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with each of these restrictions and requirements of our credit revolving credit facility and bridge loan.

On October 24, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million unsecured term loan, which matures on August 1, 2011. The term loan accrues interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.825% to 2.375% depending upon our debt ratings. Based on our debt rating on October 24, 2008, the margin on the term loan is 2.00%. We received net proceeds of $197 million, which were used to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under our bridge loan facility. The term loan contains certain financial restrictions and other customary requirements, similar to those included in our revolving line of credit and bridge loan.

Senior unsecured notes.  At September 30, 2008, we had $3.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes outstanding. Interest rates on the notes ranged from 3.72% to 7.07% with a weighted average rate of 6.25% at September 30, 2008. Discounts and premiums are amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

Mortgage debt.  At September 30, 2008, we had $1.8 billion in mortgage debt secured by 227 healthcare facilities with a carrying amount of $3.6 billion. Interest rates on the mortgage notes ranged from 2.21% to 8.63% with a weighted average rate of 6.02% at September 30, 2008.

In May 2008, we placed $259 million of seven-year mortgage financing on 21 of our senior housing assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a fixed interest rate of 5.83%. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility and bridge loan.

42

In September 2008, we placed mortgage financing on our senior housing assets through Fannie Mae aggregating $319 million, which was comprised of $140 million of five-year mortgage financing on four assets and $179 million of eight-year financing on 12 assets. The assets are cross-collateralized and the debt has a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 6.39%. We received net proceeds aggregating $312 million, which were used to repay our outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility.

Other debt.  At September 30, 2008, we had $102.6 million of non-interest bearing Life Care Bonds at two of our CCRCs and non-interest bearing occupancy fee deposits at another of our senior housing facilities, all of which were payable to certain residents of the facilities (collectively “Life Care Bonds”). At September 30, 2008, $41.0 million of the Life Care Bonds were refundable to the residents upon the resident moving out or to their estate upon death, and $61.6 million of the Life Care Bonds were refundable after the units are successfully remarketed to new residents.

Derivative Instruments.  During October and November 2007, we entered into two forward-starting interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts aggregating $900 million. In June 2008, we terminated these hedges per the cash settlement provisions of the derivative contracts. The termination of the $500 million notional contract resulted in a payment of $14.8 million and the termination of the $400 million notional contract resulted in a cash receipt of $5.2 million. We also have three interest rate swap contracts outstanding at September 30, 2008 which are hedging the fluctuations in interest payments on variable rate secured debt. On September 30, 2008, these interest rate swap contracts had an aggregate notional and fair value of $45.6 million and a $0.7 million liability, respectively. For a more detailed description of our derivative financial instruments, see Note 15 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Debt Maturities

The following table summarizes our stated debt maturities and scheduled principal repayments, excluding debt premiums and discounts, at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

Year	Bank Line of Credit		Bridge Loan(1)		Senior Notes		Mortgage Debt		Other Debt		Total
2008 (3 months)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43,073	$	102,602	$	145,675
2009	—		320,000		—		274,169		—		594,169
2010	—		—		206,421		298,453		—		504,874
2011	—		200,000		300,000		137,310		—		637,310
2012	—		—		250,000		108,625		—		358,625
Thereafter	—		—		2,787,000		937,904		—		3,724,904
	$	—	$	520,000	$	3,543,421	$	1,799,534	$	102,602	$	5,965,557

(1)On October 24, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million term loan. The above table reflects the reclassification of the portion of the bridge loan that was repaid with proceeds from the term loan, which matures on August 1, 2011.

Equity

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we issued approximately 397,000 shares of our common stock under our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, at an average price per share of $32.04, for aggregate proceeds of $12.8 million. We also received $11.7 million in proceeds from stock option exercises. At September 30, 2008, stockholders’ equity totaled $5.3 billion and our equity securities had a market value of $10.3 billion.

On April 2, 2008, we issued 17 million shares of our common stock and used the net proceeds received of approximately $560 million to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under our revolving line of credit facility.

On August 11, 2008, we issued 14.95 million shares of our common stock. We received approximately $481 million of net proceeds, which were used to repay a portion of our outstanding indebtedness under our bridge loan facility.

At September 30, 2008, there were a total of 5.6 million DownREIT units outstanding in six limited liability companies in which we are the managing member: (i) HCPI/Tennessee, LLC; (ii) HCPI/Utah, LLC; (iii) HCPI/Utah II, LLC; (iv) HCP DR California, LLC; (v) HCP DR Alabama, LLC; and (vi) HCP DR MCD, LLC. The DownREIT units are redeemable for an amount of cash approximating the then-existing market value of shares of our common stock or, at our option, shares of our common stock (subject to certain adjustments, such as stock splits and reclassifications). In April 2008, as a result of the non-managing member converting its remaining HCPI/Indiana, LLC DownREIT units, HCPI/Indiana, LLC became a wholly-owned subsidiary.

43

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We own interests in certain unconsolidated joint ventures, including HCP Ventures II, HCP Ventures III, LLC and HCP Ventures IV, as described under Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Except in limited circumstances, our risk of loss is limited to our investment in the joint venture and any outstanding loans receivable. In addition, we have certain properties which serve as collateral for debt that is owed by a previous owner of certain of our facilities, as described under Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Our risk of loss for these certain properties is limited to the outstanding debt balance plus penalties, if any. We have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements that we expect would materially affect our liquidity and capital resources except those described below under “Contractual Obligations.”

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our material contractual payment obligations and commitments at September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

	Total		Less than One Year		2009-2010		2011-2012		More than Five Years
Senior unsecured notes and mortgage debt	$	5,342,955	$	43,073	$	779,043	$	795,935	$	3,724,904
Development commitments(1)	26,725		3,370		23,355		—		—
Bridge loan(2)	520,000		—		320,000		200,000		—
Ground and other operating leases	180,598		928		7,161		7,023		165,486
Other debt	102,602		102,602		—		—		—
Interest	1,930,060		86,124		617,381		506,260		720,295
Total	$	8,102,940	$	236,097	$	1,746,940	$	1,509,218	$	4,610,685

(1)Represents construction and other commitments for developments in progress.

(2)On October 24, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $200 million term loan. The above table reflects the reclassification of the portion of the bridge loan that was repaid with proceeds from the term loan, which matures on August 1, 2011.

Inflation

Our leases often provide for either fixed increases in base rents or indexed escalators, based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures, and/or additional rent based on increases in the tenants’ operating revenues. Substantially all of our MOB leases require the tenant to pay a share of property operating costs such as real estate taxes, insurance and utilities. Substantially all of our senior housing, life science, skilled nursing and hospital leases require the operator or tenant to pay all of the property operating costs or reimburse us for all such costs. We believe that inflationary increases in expenses will be offset, in part, by the operator or tenant expense reimbursements and contractual rent increases described above.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk.  At September 30, 2008, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on approximately: (i) $520 million of variable rate bridge financing, (ii) $197 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable and (iii) $25 million of variable rate senior unsecured notes, which was partially offset by $1.0 billion of variable rate mezzanine loans receivable. Of the $197 million of variable rate mortgage notes payable outstanding, $46 million has been hedged utilizing interest rate swap contracts. Of our consolidated debt of $6.0 billion at September 30, 2008, excluding the $46 million of variable rate secured debt where the rates have been swapped to a fixed rate, approximately 12% is at variable interest rates.

Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future earnings or cash flows on our fixed rate debt, fixed rate loans receivable or marketable debt securities unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. Conversely, movements in interest rates on variable rate debt

44

and loans receivable would change our future earnings and cash flows, but not significantly affect the fair value of those instruments. Assuming a one percentage point increase in the interest rates related to the variable-rate debt and variable-rate loans, and assuming no change in the outstanding balances as of September 30, 2008, interest expense, net of interest income, for 2008 would decrease by approximately $2.6 million, or $0.01 per common share on a diluted basis.

We use derivative instruments during our normal course of business to manage interest rate risk. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information in this regard.

For the nine month period ending September 30, 2008, we had three interest rate swap contracts outstanding which are designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships. In June 2008, the interest rate swap contracts have an aggregate notional amount and fair value of $45.6 million and a $0.7 million liability, respectively. The derivative contracts mature in July 2020 and are currently recognized in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

To illustrate the effect of movements in the interest rate markets, we performed a market sensitivity analysis on the noted hedging instruments. To do so, we applied various basis point spreads to the underlying interest rates in order to determine the effect on the instruments’ fair value. The following table summarizes the analysis performed (dollars in thousands):

		Effects of Change in Interest Rates
Date Entered	Maturity Date	50 Basis Points		–50 Basis Points			100 Basis Points		–100 Basis Points
July 13, 2005	July 15, 2020	$	1,938	$	(2,444	)	$	4,129	$	(4,635	)

During October and November 2007, we entered into two forward-starting interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts aggregating $900 million. The interest rate swap contracts were designated in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate component of interest payments on forecasted unsecured, fixed-rate debt expected to be issued during the current fiscal year. As of September 30, 2008, we terminated these hedges per the cash settlement provisions of the derivative contracts. The termination of the $500 million notional contract resulted in a payment of $14.8 million and the termination of the $400 million notional contract resulted in a cash receipt of $5.2 million. At September 30, 2008, we expect that the hedged forecasted transactions remain probable of occurring in accordance with the designated assertions.

We assess and document, both at the hedging instrument’s inception and on a quarterly basis thereafter, to determine whether the derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows associated with their underlying hedged items. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be highly effective as a hedge, or that it is probable the underlying forecasted transaction will not occur, we will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively and reclassify amounts recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings. It is possible that the amounts we may recognize in earnings at a future date could be significant to our results of operations.

Market Risk.  We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity and debt markets. Strain on the capital markets, an unfavorable credit environment, and current market conditions can affect the fair value of our equity and debt investments as well as influence our borrowing costs. These investments in marketable debt and equity securities are classified as available for sale. Gains and losses on these securities are recognized in income when realized and other-than-temporary impairment may be periodically recorded when identified. The initial indicator of impairment for marketable equity securities is a sustained decline in market price below the cost basis recorded for that investment. We consider a variety of factors, such as: the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; the issuer’s financial condition, capital strength and near-term prospects; any recent events specific to that issuer and economic conditions of its industry; and our investment horizon in relation to an anticipated near-term recovery in the stock or bond price, if any. At September 30, 2008, the fair value of marketable equity securities was $9.4 million and cost basis, or the new basis for those securities where a recognized loss was recorded as a result of an other-than-temporary impairment, was $8.7 million. At September 30, 2008, the fair value of marketable debt securities was $274.6 million, with a cost basis of $291.1 million. We believe that we have the intent and ability to hold our marketable equity securities that have unrealized losses for a period of time sufficient to allow the anticipated recovery in market value. However, we may determine in future periods, based on the market price of the investments and other factors, that such unrealized losses are other-than-temporary and recognize the losses in earnings, which could be significant to our results of operations.

45

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. Our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

The information set forth under the heading “Legal Proceedings” of Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

The legal proceeding disclosed in the previous Quarterly Report relating to the Company’s litigation with Tenet Healthcare Corporation (filed on May 8, 2007 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles) was settled on September 19, 2008. The settlement provided for, among other things, the sale of a hospital in Tarzana, California, the purchase of Tenet’s interest in a joint venture and the extension of the terms of three other hospitals leased by the Company to Tenet. All claims pending in the Superior Court of the State of California were formally dismissed on September 26, 2008, and the claims in the arbitration proceedings were formally dismissed on October 1, 2008.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007. Please refer to those filings for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

None.

(b)

None.

46

(c)

The table below sets forth information with respect to purchases of our common stock made by us or on our behalf or by any “affiliated purchaser,” as such term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, during the quarter ended September 30, 2008.

Period Covered	Total Number Of Shares Purchased(1)	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number Of Shares (Or Units) Purchased As Part Of Publicly Announced Plans Or Programs	Maximum Number (Or Approximate Dollar Value) Of Shares (Or Units) That May Yet Be Purchased Under The Plans Or Programs
July 1-31, 2008	573	$	35.38	—	—
August 1-31, 2008	9,159	35.89		—	—
September 1-30, 2008	328	34.28		—	—
Total	10,060	$	35.80	—	—

(1)Represents restricted shares withheld under our Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and our 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Incentive Plans”), to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting of restricted shares. Our Incentive Plans provide that the value of the shares withheld shall be the closing price of our common stock on the date the relevant transaction occurs.

47

Item 6.  Exhibits

2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 1, 2006, by and among HCP, Ocean Acquisition 1, Inc. and CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed May 4, 2006.)
2.2	Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2007, by and between HCP and SEGRO plc (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed June 6, 2007).
3.1	Articles of Restatement of HCP (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895), filed October 30, 2007).
3.2	Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 25, 2006).
3.2.1	Amendment No. 1 to Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of HCP (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.2.1 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895), filed October 30, 2007).
4.1	Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A (Registration No. 333-86654), filed May 21, 2002).
4.2	Form of Fixed Rate Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-27671), filed March 20, 1989).
4.3	Form of Floating Rate Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-27671), filed March 20, 1989).
4.4	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1998, by and between HCP and James D. Bremner (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1998). This Exhibit is identical in all material respects to two other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCP, were James P. Revel and Michael F. Wiley.
4.5	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 20, 1999, by and between HCP and Boyer Castle Dale Medical Clinic, L.L.C. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1998). This Exhibit is identical in all material respects to 13 other documents except the parties thereto. The parties to these other documents, other than HCP, were Boyer Centerville Clinic Company, L.C., Boyer Elko, L.C., Boyer Desert Springs, L.C., Boyer Grantsville Medical, L.C., Boyer-Ogden Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer Ogden Medical Associates No. 2, LTD., Boyer Salt Lake Industrial Clinic Associates, LTD., Boyer-St. Mark’s Medical Associates, LTD., Boyer McKay-Dee Associates, LTD., Boyer St. Mark’s Medical Associates #2, LTD., Boyer Iomega, L.C., Boyer Springville, L.C., and Boyer Primary Care Clinic Associates, LTD. #2.
4.6	Indenture, dated as of January 15, 1997, by and between American Health Properties, Inc. (a company that merged with and into HCP) and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to American Health Properties, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 21, 1997).
4.7	First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 1999, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
4.8	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2001, by and among HCP, Boyer Old Mill II, L.C., Boyer- Research Park Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VII, L.C., Chimney Ridge, L.C., Boyer-Foothill Associates, LTD., Boyer Research Park Associates VI, L.C., Boyer Stansbury II, L.C., Boyer Rancho Vistoso, L.C., Boyer-Alta View Associates, LTD., Boyer Kaysville Associates, L.C., Boyer Tatum Highlands Dental Clinic, L.C., Amarillo Bell Associates, Boyer Evanston, L.C., Boyer Denver Medical, L.C., Boyer Northwest Medical Center Two, L.C., and Boyer Caldwell Medical, L.C. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K405 (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2001).

48

4.9	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.5% Senior Notes due February 15, 2006” (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 21, 1996).
4.10	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “67/8% Mandatory Par Put Remarketed Securities due June 8, 2015” (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed July 21, 1998).
4.11	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.45% Senior Notes due June 25, 2012” (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed June 25, 2002).
4.12	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.00% Senior Notes due March 1, 2015” (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 28, 2003).
4.13	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, establishing a series of securities entitled “55/8% Senior Notes due May 1, 2017” (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed April 27, 2005).
4.14	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2003, by and among HCP, Charles Crews, Charles A. Elcan, Thomas W. Hulme, Thomas M. Klaritch, R. Wayne Price, Glenn T. Preston, Janet Reynolds, Angela M. Playle, James A. Croy, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Erica Ann Klaritch, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Adam Joseph Klaritch, John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Thomas Michael Klaritch, Jr. and John Klaritch as Trustee of the 2002 Trust F/B/O Nicholas James Klaritch (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003).
4.15	Amended and Restated Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan, dated as of October 23, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to HCP’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-10939), dated December 5, 2003).
4.16	Specimen of Stock Certificate representing the 7.25% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of HCP’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A12B (File No. 1-08895), filed on September 12, 2003).
4.17	Specimen of Stock Certificate representing the 7.1% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of HCP’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A12B (File No. 1-08895), filed on December 2, 2003).
4.18	Form of Fixed Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed November 20, 2003).
4.19	Form of Floating Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed November 20, 2003).
4.20	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 22, 2005, by and among HCP, William P. Gallaher, Trustee for the William P. & Cynthia J. Gallaher Trust, Dwayne J. Clark, Patrick R. Gallaher, Trustee for the Patrick R. & Cynthia M. Gallaher Trust, Jeffrey D. Civian, Trustee for the Jeffrey D. Civian Trust dated August 8, 1986, Jeffrey Meyer, Steven L. Gallaher, Richard Coombs, Larry L. Wasem, Joseph H. Ward, Jr., Trustee for the Joseph H. Ward, Jr. and Pamela K. Ward Trust, Borue H. O’Brien, William R. Mabry, Charles N. Elsbree,

49

	Trustee for the Charles N. Elsbree Jr. Living Trust dated February 14, 2002, Gary A. Robinson, Thomas H. Persons, Trustee for the Persons Family Revocable Trust under trust dated February 15, 2005, Glen Hammel, Marilyn E. Montero, Joseph G. Lin, Trustee for the Lin Revocable Living Trust, Ned B. Stein, John Gladstein, Trustee for the John & Andrea Gladstein Family Trust dated February 11, 2003, John Gladstein, Trustee for the John & Andrea Gladstein Family Trust dated February 11, 2003, Francis Connelly, Trustee for the The Francis J & Shannon A Connelly Trust, Al Coppin, Trustee for the Al Coppin Trust, Stephen B. McCullagh, Trustee for the Stephen B. & Pamela McCullagh Trust dated October 22, 2001, and Larry L. Wasem—SEP IRA (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
4.21	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York, as trustee, setting forth the terms of HCP’s Fixed Rate Medium-Term Notes and Floating Rate Medium-Term Notes (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.22	Form of Fixed Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.23	Form of Floating Rate Global Medium-Term Note (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 17, 2006).
4.24	Form of Floating Rate Notes Due 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 19, 2006).
4.25	Form of 5.95% Notes Due 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 19, 2006).
4.26	Form of 6.30% Notes Due 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed September 19, 2006).
4.27	Form of 5.65% Senior Notes Due 2013 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed December 4, 2006).
4.28	Form of 6.00% Senior Notes Due 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 22, 2007).
4.29	Officers’ Certificate (including Form of 6.70% Senior Notes Due 2018 as Annex A thereto), dated October 15, 2007, pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1993, by and between HCP and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee to The Bank of New York, establishing a series of securities entitled “6.70% Senior Notes due 2018” (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 4.29 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895), filed October 30, 2007).
4.30	Acknowledgment and Consent, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and among Zions First National Bank, KC Gardner Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah, LLC, Gardner Property Holdings, L.C. and HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).
4.31	Acknowledgment and Consent, dated as of May 11, 2007, by and among Zions First National Bank, KC Gardner Company, L.C., HCPI/Utah II, LLC, Gardner Property Holdings, L.C. and HCP (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.30 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007).
10.1	Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 30, 1985, to Partnership Agreement of Health Care Property Partners, a California general partnership, the general partners of which consist of HCP and certain affiliates of Tenet (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1985).
10.2	Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to HCP’s Proxy Statement filed March 21, 1997).*

50

10.2.1	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).*
10.2.2	Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Directors Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of January 4, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1999).*
10.3	Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix B to HCP’s Proxy Statement filed March 21, 1997).*
10.3.1	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, effective as of November 3, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).*
10.4	2000 Stock Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to HCP’s Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08895) for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 7, 2003).*
10.4.1	First Amendment to Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (effective as of May 7, 2003) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed February 3, 2005).*
10.5	Second Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Plan (effective as of October 25, 2007) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
10.6	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Indiana, LLC, dated as of November 20, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1998).
10.7	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah, LLC, dated as of January 20, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 1998).
10.8	Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, by and between HCP Medical Office Buildings II, LLC and Texas HCP Medical Office Buildings, L.P., for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).
10.9	Cross-Collateralization, Cross-Contribution and Cross-Default Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2000, by and between HCP Medical Office Buildings I, LLC and Meadowdome, LLC, for the benefit of First Union National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).
10.10	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah II, LLC, dated as of August 17, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K405 (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.10.1	Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Utah II, LLC, dated as of October 30, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K405 (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.11	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2008, by and between HCP and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*

51

10.12	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of October 2, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003).
10.12.1	Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of September 29, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
10.12.2	Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, dated as of October 29, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2004).
10.12.3	Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC and New Member Joinder Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2005, by and among HCP, HCPI/Tennessee, LLC and A. Daniel Weyland (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).
10.12.4	Amendment No. 4 to Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of HCPI/Tennessee, LLC, effective as of January 1, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.13	Intentionally omitted.
10.14	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for employees and consultants, effective as of May 7, 2003, relating to HCP’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.15	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for directors, effective as of May 7, 2003, relating to HCP’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.16	Amended and Restated Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of May 7, 2003 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2003).*
10.17	Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.18	Form of CEO Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with three-year cliff vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.19	Form of employee Performance Restricted Stock Unit Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
10.20	CEO Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, relating to HCP’s Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005).*
10.21	Form of directors and officers Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).*
10.22	Form of employee Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with five-year installment vesting (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).*
10.23	Form of non-employee director Restricted Stock Award Agreement with five-year installment vesting, (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).*

52

10.24	Form of Non-Employee Directors Stock-For-Fees Program (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed August 2, 2006).*
10.25	Amended and Restated Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated April 24, 2008, by and between HCP and James F. Flaherty III (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).*
10.26	$2,750,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2007, by and among HCP, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed August 6, 2007).
10.27	$1,500,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2007, by and among HCP, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed August 6, 2007).
10.28	Change in Control Severance Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to HCP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 1-08895), filed October 30, 2007).*
10.29	2006 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to HCP’s Proxy Statement (File No. 1-08895) for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 11, 2006).*
10.30	Form of Mezzanine Loan Agreement defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.31	Form of Intercreditor Agreement defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.32	Form of Cash Management Agreement defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.33	Form of Pledge and Security Agreement defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.34	Form of Promissory Note defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.35	Form of Guaranty Agreement defining HCP’s rights and obligations in connection with its Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.36	Form of Assignment and Assumption Agreement entered into in connection with HCP’s Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.37	Form of Omnibus Assignment entered into in connection with HCP’s Manor Care investment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to HCP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended (filed No. 1-08895) for the year ended December 31, 2007).
10.38	Executive Bonus Program (incorporated herein by reference to HCP’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-08895), filed January 31, 2008.
31.1	Certification by James F. Flaherty III, HCP’s Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

53

31.2	Certification by Mark A. Wallace, HCP’s Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
32.1	Certification by James F. Flaherty III, HCP’s Chief Executive Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification by Mark A. Wallace, HCP’s Principal Financial Officer, Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
100.INS	XBRL Instance Document.**
100.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.**
100.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.**
100.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.**
100.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.**
100.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.**

*Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.

**Attached as Exhibit 100 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 401 of Regulation S-T that the financial information contained in the XBRL documents is unaudited and unreviewed and these are not the official publicly filed financial statements of the Company. The purpose of submitting these XBRL formatted documents is to test the related format and technology and, as a result, investors should continue to rely on the official filed version of the furnished documents and not rely on this information in making investment decisions.

In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 100, shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

54

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 4, 2008	HCP, Inc.
	(Registrant)
	/s/ Mark A. Wallace
	Mark A. Wallace
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	(Principal Financial Officer)
	/s/ George P. Doyle
	George P. Doyle
	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

55