Sales for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 5% and 13%, respectively, over the comparable periods in the prior fiscal year.
Bookings for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 5% over the comparable periods in the prior fiscal year.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 5% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The increase was due to higher volume of product shipped as a result of strong demand from all of the markets the Company serves. Demand was particularly strong in the wireless infrastructure, military and fiber optic markets.
Bookings for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were $25,938, compared to $24,643 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The improvement in bookings was due primarily to increased orders from the wireless infrastructure, military, medical electronics and fiber optic markets. The backlog of unfilled orders at March 31, 2007 was $19,187, compared to $18,290 at March 31, 2006 and $18,941 at June 30, 2006. Typically, a majority of the Company’s backlog will be shipped by the end of the next fiscal quarter.
Gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 33% of net sales, compared to 38% of net sales for the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. Gross margins decreased due to higher than normal scrapping of finished goods and work-in-process inventory. The Company periodically scraps inventory based upon the mix of inventory relative to near-term trends in bookings. In the most recent quarter, the Company scrapped an additional approximately $878 of inventory that likely would have been scrapped over the next several quarters. This had a negative impact on gross margins for the quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 decreased 2% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The decrease was primarily the result of lower depreciation expense and decreased bonuses, partially offset by increased commission expense and increased professional fees.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 46% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of increased product and process development activity.
Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased $64 from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year as a result of higher earnings on excess cash invested.
The effective income tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately 31% and 38%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of deductions permitted to manufacturers by Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code and decreased state tax due to state tax law changes.
As a result of the foregoing, net income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $1,865, or $0.21 per common share and $0.20 per common share assuming dilution, compared to net income of $2,089, or $0.24 per common share and $0.23 per common share assuming dilution, for the comparable period in the prior fiscal year.
13
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared with Nine Months Ended March 31, 2006
Net sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 13% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The increase was due to higher volume of product shipped as a result of improving economic conditions in the markets the Company serves, increased market share and expanding acceptance of the Company’s newer products in the market. The volume improvement was broad-based across all of the Company’s markets and products.
Bookings for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 were $67,823, compared to $64,244 for the nine months ended March 31, 2006. The improvement in bookings was due primarily to increased orders from customers in the wireless infrastructure, medical equipment and fiber optic markets.
Gross margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was 37% of net sales, compared to 34% of net sales for the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The gross margin improved due to higher sales volume and efficiencies associated with operating at higher production levels and due to expenses incurred in the prior year associated with the attempted conversion of certain functions to a different computer system.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 3% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year. The increase was primarily the result of increased commission expense related to the increased sales levels, increased administrative staff costs, bonuses, increased severance expense and increased professional fees (relating to audit and tax services), partially offset by decreased depreciation and decreased training costs.
Research and development expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 13% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of increased product and process development activity.
Interest expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased 13% from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year as a result of higher average borrowings outstanding during the period. Over the past 12 months, the Company has borrowed under its equipment line of credit to expand its capacity and upgrade capabilities. Additionally, in September of the prior fiscal year, the Company’s Swedish subsidiary borrowed approximately $1.5 million in order to repatriate earnings.
Interest income for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $76 from the comparable period in the prior fiscal year as a result of higher earnings on cash invested during the period.
The effective income tax rates for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were approximately 32% and 37%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of deductions permitted to manufacturers by Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code and decreased state tax due to state tax law changes.
14
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
As a result of the foregoing, net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was $6,197, or $0.70 per common share and $0.68 per common share assuming dilution, compared to net income of $3,327, or $0.39 per common share and $0.38 per common share assuming dilution, for the comparable period in the prior fiscal year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
| | March 31, 2007 | | June 30, 2006 | |
Cash and Investments | | $ | 8,360 | | $ | 8,324 | |
Working Capital | | $ | 56,475 | | $ | 46,649 | |
Year to Date: | | | | | | | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | $ | 2,182 | | $ | 5,668 | |
Capital Expenditures | | $ | 3,712 | | $ | 8,309 | |
Depreciation and Amortization | | $ | 4,658 | | $ | 6,207 | |
| | | | | | | |
Current Ratio | | | 6.1:1 | | | 4.8:1 | |
Quick Ratio | | | 1.8:1 | | | 1.7:1 | |
The Company’s financial position at March 31, 2007 remains strong as evidenced by working capital of $56,475 and current and quick ratios of 6.1 to 1 and 1.8 to 1, respectively.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments increased by $36 from June 30, 2006, as a result of positive operating cash flows and proceeds from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by capital expenditures and repayments of long term debt. Accounts receivable decreased by $737 from June 30, 2006, primarily as a result of decreased sales in the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Inventories increased by $6,758 from June 30, 2006, primarily as a result of increased precious metal purchases and higher production levels to support current and future demand. Deferred income tax assets increased $77 primarily due to timing differences between tax and book inventory. Other current assets increased by $2,249 from June 30, 2006, primarily due to estimated tax payments offsetting the provision for current year taxable income.
15
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
The current portion of long-term debt increased by $114 from June 30, 2006, due to additional debt coming due within one year. Accounts payable decreased by $221 from June 30, 2006, due to the timing of purchases of precious metal and dielectric powders. Accrued expenses increased by $135 from June 30, 2006, due to the timing of payments of various accrued expenses. Deferred income tax liabilities increased $360 from June 30, 2006, primarily due to timing differences between tax and book depreciation.
In April 2004, the Company entered into a $4,000 credit facility with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) for the purchase of equipment. In May 2005, the credit facility was increased to $6,000. Borrowings under the line bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either a fixed rate of 3.47% above the five year Treasury Bond yield or a floating rate of 3.65% above LIBOR. Borrowings under the line are secured by the equipment purchased thereunder. Each separate borrowing under the line is a fully amortizing term loan with a maturity of five years from the date the funds are drawn down. The line of credit has been extended several times and currently will expire on August 16, 2007, subject to an additional six month extension upon review by GECC. GECC has the option to securitize these loans with a third party. Loans securitized with a third party increase the available line of credit to the Company. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had $4,213 of borrowings outstanding under this facility at fixed interest rates ranging from 7.15% to 7.93%, and $6,000 of additional borrowing availability.
In December 2004, the Company entered into a credit facility with Commerce Bank, N.A. Under the terms of this facility, the Company may request advances from time to time up to an aggregate of $5,000. Any advance made bears interest at the Prime Rate as reported in the Wall Street Journal. Borrowings under the facility are secured by a lien on the Company’s accounts receivable. The facility has been extended several times and currently will expire on November 30, 2007. The facility is subject to certain financial covenants, including minimum tangible net worth and liability percentage ratios. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility.
In September 2005, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary in Sweden obtained a series of five term loans aggregating 12,000 Swedish Krona (“SEK”) (approximately $1,500) from Svenska Handelsbanken, AB (“Handelsbanken”). The loans are unsecured and bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.56% to 4.59%. The five loans are each for a principal amount of 2,400 SEK and are fully amortizing. The loans mature in one to five years with the first having matured on September 30, 2006 and one other maturing on each succeeding September 30th through 2010. In connection with, and as an inducement to Handelsbanken to make the loans, the Company entered into a Guaranty and Agreement with Handelsbanken whereby the Company has agreed to guarantee the payment of all its Swedish subsidiary’s obligations under the loans.
The Company leases an administrative office, manufacturing and research and development complex located in Jacksonville, Florida (the “Jacksonville Facility”) from a partnership controlled by the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and principal stockholder under a capital lease. At March 31, 2007, the Jacksonville Facility had an aggregate cost of $5,104 and a net book value of $1,301. The lease is for a period of 30 years, was capitalized using an interest rate of 10.5% and expires on September 30, 2010. The lease currently provides for base rent of approximately $812 per annum. The lease further provides for annual increases in base rent for years beginning after May 1, 1999, based on the increase in the Consumer Price Index since May 1, 1998 applied to base rent. The lease also provides for increases to the base rent in connection with any new construction at the Jacksonville Facility. Under the lease, upon any new construction being placed into use, the base rent is subject to increase to the fair market rental of the Jacksonville Facility, including the new construction.
16
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 totaled $3,712, including expenditures for machinery and equipment and leasehold improvements. The Company intends to use cash on hand, cash generated through operations and the line of credit with GECC to finance budgeted capital expenditures of approximately $1,600 for the remainder of fiscal year 2007, primarily for equipment acquisitions and building renovations.
Aggregate contractual obligations as of March 31, 2007 mature as follows:
| | Payments Due by Period | |
Contractual Obligations | | Total | | Less than 1 Year | | 1- 3 years | | 3- 5 Years | | After 5 years | |
Bank Debt | | $ | 6,465 | | $ | 1,884 | | $ | 3,528 | | $ | 1,053 | | $ | — | |
Capital Lease Obligations | | | 2,843 | | | 812 | | | 1,625 | | | 406 | | | — | |
Operating Leases | | | 318 | | | 290 | | | 28 | | | — | | | — | |
Purchase Obligations | | | 3,579 | | | 3,579 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Total Contractual Obligations | | $ | 13,205 | | $ | 6,565 | | $ | 5,181 | | $ | 1,459 | | $ | — | |
The Company routinely enters into binding and non-binding purchase obligations in the ordinary course of business, primarily covering anticipated purchases of inventory and equipment. The terms of these commitments generally do not extend beyond one year.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued disclosure guidance for “critical accounting policies.” The SEC defines “critical accounting policies” as those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to its consolidated financial statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 The Company believes that the following accounting policies require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments:
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and a customer’s current creditworthiness, as determined by its review of the customer’s current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains an allowance for estimated credit losses based upon its historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. While such credit losses have historically been within the Company’s expectations and the allowances established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that it has in the past. Should the financial position of its customers deteriorate resulting in an impairment of their ability to pay amounts due, the Company’s revised estimate of such losses and any actual losses in excess of previous estimates may negatively impact its operating results.
17
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
Sales Returns and Allowances
In the ordinary course of business, the Company accepts returns of products sold for various reasons and grants sales allowances to customers. While the Company engages in extensive product quality control programs and processes, its level of sales returns is affected by, among other things, the quality of its manufacturing processes. The Company maintains an allowance for sales returns and allowances based upon historical returns and allowances granted. While such returns and allowances have historically been within the Company’s expectations, actual return and allowance rates in the future may differ from current estimates, which could negatively impact the Company’s operating results.
Inventory Valuation
The Company values inventory at the lower of aggregate cost (first-in, first-out) or market. When the cost of inventory is determined by management to be in excess of its market value, such inventory is written down to its estimated net realizable value. This requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions about several factors (e.g., future sales quantities and selling prices, and percentage complete and failure rates for work in process) based upon historical experience and its projections for future periods. Changes in factors such as the level of order bookings, the product mix of order bookings and the Company’s manufacturing processes could have a material impact on the Company’s assessment of the net realizable value of inventory in the future.
Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets
The Company regularly evaluates its ability to recover the reported amount of its deferred income taxes considering several factors, including its estimate of the likelihood of the Company generating sufficient taxable income in future years during the period over which temporary differences reverse. Presently, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets based primarily on its history of and projections for taxable income in the future. In the event that actual results differ from its estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, the Company may need to establish a valuation allowance against a portion or all of its deferred tax assets, which could materially impact its financial position or results of operations in future periods.
Valuation of Long-lived Assets
The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets whenever the Company determines that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Its assessment is primarily based upon its estimate of future cash flows associated with these assets. The Company believes that the carrying amount of its long-lived assets is recoverable. However, should its operating results deteriorate, or anticipated new product launches not occur or not attain the commercial acceptance that the Company anticipates, the Company may determine that some portion of its long-lived assets are impaired. Such determination could result in non-cash charges to income that could materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations for that period.
18
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
Accounting Standards Issued Not Yet Adopted
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), to address the noncomparability in reporting tax assets and liabilities resulting from a lack of specific guidance in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”) on the uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. Specifically, FIN No. 48 prescribes (a) a consistent recognition threshold, and (b) a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and provides related guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN No. 48 will apply to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company will adopt FIN No. 48 effective July 1, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of FIN No. 48 on its financial position and consolidated results of operations.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 108”), which addresses how the effects of prior-year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current-year financial statements. SAB No. 108 will require registrants to quantify misstatements using both the balance sheet and income statement approaches and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. When the effect of initial adoption is determined to be material, SAB No. 108 allows registrants to record that effect as a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning-of-year retained earnings. The requirements are effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The Company will adopt SAB No. 108 effective June 30, 2007. The Company is in the process of assessing the effect of SAB No. 108 on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company’s market risk exposure at March 31, 2007 is consistent with the types of market risk and amount of exposures presented in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, including foreign currency exchange rate, commodity price, security price and interest rate risks.
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In response to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”), the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President - Finance carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, these officers concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal controls that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
19
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1. through 5. | Not Applicable |
Exhibit No. | | | Description |
10.15(i) | | | Letter extending the Consulting Agreement with Northport System, Inc. until December 31, 2007. |
31.1 | - | | Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
31.2 | - | | Section 302 Certification of Principal Accounting Officer. |
32.1 | - | | Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
32.2 | - | | Section 906 Certification of Principal Accounting Officer. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP.
(Company)
DATE: May 11, 2007
| | BY: | /S/ Victor Insetta
|
| | | Victor Insetta President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | |
DATE: May 11, 2007
| | BY: | /S/ Andrew R. Perz
|
| | | Andrew R. Perz Vice President, Finance (Principal Accounting Officer) |
21