Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ' |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SJW Corp., its wholly owned subsidiaries, and two variable interest entities in which two SJW Corp. subsidiaries are the primary beneficiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. |
SJW Corp.'s principal subsidiary, San Jose Water Company, is a regulated California water utility providing water service to approximately one million people in the greater metropolitan San Jose area. San Jose Water Company's accounting policies comply with the applicable uniform system of accounts prescribed by the CPUC and conform to generally accepted accounting principles for rate-regulated public utilities. Approximately 90% of San Jose Water Company's revenues are derived from the sale of water to residential and business customers. |
SJWTX, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of SJW Corp., is incorporated in the State of Texas and is doing business as Canyon Lake Water Service Company (“CLWSC”). CLWSC is a public utility in the business of providing water service to approximately 36,000 people. CLWSC's service area comprises more than 240 square miles in western Comal County and southern Blanco County in the growing region between San Antonio and Austin, Texas. SJWTX, Inc. has a 25% interest in Acequia Water Supply Corporation. Acequia has been determined to be a variable interest entity within the scope of ASC Topic 810 with SJWTX, Inc. as the primary beneficiary. As a result, Acequia has been consolidated with SJWTX, Inc. |
SJW Land Company owns commercial properties, several undeveloped real estate properties, and warehouse properties in the states of California, Arizona, Texas and Tennessee and holds a 70% limited partnership interest in 444 West Santa Clara Street, L.P. 444 West Santa Clara Street, L.P. has been determined to be a variable interest entity within the scope of ASC Topic 810 with SJW Land Company as the primary beneficiary. As a result, 444 West Santa Clara Street L.P. has been consolidated with SJW Land Company (see Note 9). |
Texas Water Alliance Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of SJW Corp., is undertaking activities that are necessary to develop a water supply project in Texas. In connection with the project, TWA applied for groundwater production and transportation permits to meet the future water needs in the Canyon Lake Water Service Company's service area and to the central Texas hill country communities and utilities adjacent to this area. In January of 2013, TWA's permits were approved unanimously by the groundwater district in Gonzales County. |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Utility Plant |
The cost of additions, replacements and betterments to utility plant is capitalized. The amount of interest capitalized in 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $905, $913 and $699, respectively. Construction in progress was $30,846 and $24,298 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
The major components of depreciable plant and equipment as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Equipment | $ | 226,557 | | | 214,670 | |
|
Transmission and distribution | 967,031 | | | 892,957 | |
|
Office buildings and other structures | 60,998 | | | 58,593 | |
|
Total depreciable plant and equipment | $ | 1,254,586 | | | 1,166,220 | |
|
|
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated service lives of the assets, ranging from 5 to 75 years. The estimated service lives of depreciable plant and equipment are as follows: |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Useful Lives | | | | | |
Equipment | 5 to 35 years | | | | | |
Transmission and distribution plant | 35 to 75 years | | | | | |
Office buildings and other structures | 7 to 50 years | | | | | |
|
For the years 2013, 2012 and 2011, depreciation expense as a percent of the beginning of the year balance of depreciable plant was approximately 3.4%, 3.5% and 3.5%, respectively. A portion of depreciation expense is allocated to administrative and general expense. For the years 2013, 2012 and 2011, the amounts allocated to administrative and general expense were $1,556, $1,531 and $1,516, respectively. Depreciation expense for utility plant for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $32,616, $31,005 and $29,141, respectively. The cost of utility plant retired, including retirement costs (less salvage), is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. |
Utility Plant Intangible Assets |
All intangible assets are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the legal or estimated economic life of the asset, ranging from 5 to 70 years (see Note 6). |
Real Estate Investments |
Real estate investments are recorded at cost and consist primarily of land and buildings. Net gains and losses from the sale of real estate investments are recorded as a component of other (expense) income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Nonutility property in Water Utility Services is also classified in real estate investments and not separately disclosed on the balance sheet based on the immateriality of the amount. Nonutility property is property that is neither used nor useful in providing water utility services to customers and is excluded from the rate base for rate-setting purposes. San Jose Water Company recognizes gain/loss on disposition of nonutility property in accordance with CPUC Code Section 790, whereby the net proceeds are reinvested back into property that is useful in providing water utility services to customers. There is no depreciation associated with nonutility property as it is all land. The major components of real estate investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Land | $ | 18,892 | | | 18,892 | |
|
Buildings and improvements | 59,256 | | | 55,011 | |
|
Intangibles | 329 | | | 329 | |
|
Total real estate investment | $ | 78,477 | | | 74,232 | |
|
|
Depreciation on real estate investments is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 5 to 39 years. |
|
On February 1, 2013, SJW Land Company sold its warehouse building located in Windsor, Connecticut for $9,200. The Company recognized a pre-tax gain on the sale of real estate investment of $1,063, after selling expenses of $369. The following represents the major components of the Connecticut warehouse building recorded in long-lived assets held-for-sale on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012. |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| 31-Dec-12 | | | |
Land | $ | 1,200 | | | | |
| | |
Buildings and improvements | 8,684 | | | | |
| | |
Subtotal | 9,884 | | | | |
| | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | 2,116 | | | | |
| | |
Total | $ | 7,768 | | | | |
| | |
Gross land, buildings and improvements of $77,082 and $72,838 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, represent assets that are leased or available for lease. Land, building and improvements as of December 31, 2012 excludes the Connecticut warehouse building as it has been reclassified as held-for-sale. The following schedule shows the future minimum rental payments to be received from third parties under operating leases that have remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2013: |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | |
Year ending December 31: | Rental Revenue | | | |
2014 | $ | 5,497 | | | | |
| | |
2015 | 5,616 | | | | |
| | |
2016 | 5,786 | | | | |
| | |
2017 | 5,883 | | | | |
| | |
2018 | 5,061 | | | | |
| | |
Thereafter | 31,817 | | | | |
| | |
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
In accordance with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 360—“Property, Plant and Equipment,” the long-lived assets of SJW Corp. are reviewed for impairment when changes in circumstances or events require adjustments to the carrying values of the assets. When such changes in circumstances or events occur, the Company assesses recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows. To the extent an impairment exists, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to operations in the period in which the impairment is identified. Long-lived assets consist primarily of utility plant in service, real estate investments, intangible assets, and regulatory assets. In addition, the Company tests unamortized intangible assets, which primarily relate to water rights, at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that this asset may be impaired. The Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. In assessing the qualitative factors, the Company considers the impact of these key factors: change in industry and competitive environment, financial performance, and other relevant Company-specific events. If the Company determines that as a result of the qualitative assessment it is more likely than not (> 50% likelihood) that the fair value is less than carrying amount, then a quantitative test is performed. No impairments occurred during 2013 or 2012. |
Financial Instruments |
The following instruments are not measured at fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets but require disclosure of fair values: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The estimated fair value of such instruments approximates their carrying value as reported on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of such financial instruments are determined using the income approach based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The fair value of these instruments would be categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents, which would be categorized as Level 1. The fair value of long-term debt is discussed in Note 4, pension plan assets in Note 10 and investment in California Water Service Group in Note 13. |
Investment in California Water Service Group |
SJW Corp.'s investment in California Water Service Group is accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 320—“Investments—Debt and Equity Securities,” as an available-for-sale marketable security. The investment is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at its quoted market price with the change in unrealized gain or loss reported, net of tax, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (see Note 13). |
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities |
Generally accepted accounting principles for water utilities include the recognition of regulatory assets and liabilities as permitted by ASC Topic 980. In accordance with ASC Topic 980, Water Utility Services, to the extent applicable, records deferred costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that these costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from when the costs and credits are incurred. Accounting for such costs and credits is based on management's judgment and prior historical ratemaking practices, and it occurs when management determines that it is probable that these costs and credits will be recognized in the future revenue of Water Utility Services through the ratemaking process. The regulatory assets and liabilities recorded by Water Utility Services, in particular, San Jose Water Company, primarily relate to the recognition of deferred income taxes for ratemaking versus tax accounting purposes, balancing and memorandum accounts, postretirement pension benefits, medical costs, accrued benefits for vacation and asset retirement obligations that have not been passed through in rates. The Company adjusts the related asset and liabilities for these items through its regulatory asset and liability accounts at year-end, except for certain postretirement benefit costs and balancing and memorandum accounts which are adjusted monthly. The Company expects to recover regulatory assets related to plant depreciation income tax temporary differences over the average lives of the plant assets of between 5 to 75 years. |
Rate-regulated enterprises are required to charge a regulatory asset to earnings if and when that asset no longer meets the criteria for being recorded as a regulatory asset. San Jose Water Company continually evaluates the recoverability of regulatory assets by assessing whether the amortization of the balance over the remaining life can be recovered through expected and undiscounted future cash flows. |
Regulatory liabilities reflect balancing and memorandum accounts, temporary differences provided at higher than the current tax rate for utility plant which will flow through to future ratepayers, and unamortized investment tax credits. |
Regulatory assets and liabilities are comprised of the following as of December 31: |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Regulatory assets: | | | |
|
Income tax temporary differences, net | $ | 8,220 | | | 8,146 | |
|
Postretirement pensions and other medical benefits | 62,949 | | | 113,633 | |
|
Pension balancing account | 9,734 | | | 6,671 | |
|
Water rate assistance program balancing account | 2,590 | | | 776 | |
|
Other | 4,725 | | | 5,151 | |
|
Total regulatory assets | $ | 88,218 | | | 134,377 | |
|
Regulatory liabilities: | | | |
|
Cost of capital memorandum account | $ | 2,297 | | | 2,295 | |
|
Water supply balancing accounts | 2,378 | | | 1,594 | |
|
Total regulatory liabilities | $ | 4,675 | | | 3,889 | |
|
Net regulatory assets included in Consolidated Balance Sheets | $ | 83,543 | | | 130,488 | |
|
|
Regulatory Rate Filings |
On January 3, 2012, San Jose Water Company filed a general rate case application requesting rate increases of $47,400, or 21.51% in 2013, $13,000, or 4.87% in 2014 and $34,800, or 12.59% in 2015. This general rate case filing also includes: (1) recovery of the under-collected balance of $2,599 in the balancing account, (2) disbursement of the over-collected balance of $650 accrued in various memorandum accounts and (3) implementation of a full revenue decoupling Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism (“WRAM”) and associated Modified Cost Balancing Account (“MCBA”). The WRAM de-couples San Jose Water Company's revenue requirement from ratepayer usage. Under the WRAM, San Jose Water Company would recover the full quantity revenue amounts authorized by the CPUC by using advice letter filings for any unbilled quantity revenue amounts or refunds for over-collection, regardless of customer usage volumes. A MCBA similarly provides for recovery/refund for changes in water supply mix from amounts authorized by the CPUC. A general rate case is scheduled to be a year-long proceeding before the CPUC that involves a discovery phase led by the CPUC's Division of Ratepayer Advocates and customer intervenors that are assigned party status, settlement meetings, as well as possible evidentiary hearings. Parties to the proceeding filed opening briefs on July 20, 2012 and reply briefs on August 7, 2012. On September 26, 2012, San Jose Water Company filed a motion for interim rate relief so that if a decision was not reached by the end of 2012, San Jose Water Company would be allowed to adopt interim rates, effective January 1, 2013, until a decision is adopted. To date, a decision has not been adopted and interim rates are currently in effect. Interim rates were set equal to fiscal year-end 2012 rates. Differences between interim rates and approved rates are tracked in a memorandum account and will be submitted for recovery or refund. A decision on this application is expected in the second quarter of 2014. |
On October 3, 2013, CLWSC filed a rate case with the TCEQ. The filing contained a requested rate increase of 23.1%, or $2,400. With the exception of customers served within the City of Bulverde, the new rates became effective on December 2, 2013. Prior to approval by the TCEQ, such rates are subject to adjustment and refund. The Company has recognized the increase in accordance with ASC Topic 980 which provides that a regulated entity is permitted to bill requested rate increases before the regulator has ruled on the request. If information becomes available that indicates it is probable that any of the 23.1% rate increase will need to be refunded and the amount of refund can be reasonably estimated, a loss contingency shall be accrued. CLWSC has determined at this time that it is not probable that any of the rate increase will need to be refunded. Customers have 150 days from filing to protest the application. Management does not anticipate that the final TCEQ decision will materially affect the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
|
Income Taxes |
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the effect of temporary differences between financial and tax reporting. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current tax rates in effect. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period that includes the enactment date. |
To the extent permitted by the CPUC, investment tax credits resulting from utility plant additions are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related property. |
Advances for Construction and Contributions in Aid of Construction |
In California, advances for construction received after 1981 are refunded ratably over 40 years. Estimated refunds for the next five years and thereafter are shown below: |
|
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| Estimated Refunds | | | |
2014 | $ | 2,402 | | | | |
| | |
2015 | 2,403 | | | | |
| | |
2016 | 2,402 | | | | |
| | |
2017 | 2,402 | | | | |
| | |
2018 | 2,402 | | | | |
| | |
Thereafter | 58,032 | | | | |
| | |
|
Contributions in aid of construction represent funds received from developers that are not refundable under applicable regulations. Depreciation applicable to utility plant constructed with these contributions is charged to contributions in aid of construction. |
Customer advances and contributions in aid of construction received subsequent to 1986 and prior to June 12, 1996 generally must be included in federal taxable income. Taxes paid relating to advances and contributions are recorded as deferred tax assets for financial reporting purposes and are amortized over 40 years for advances, and over the tax depreciable life of the related asset for contributions. Receipts subsequent to June 12, 1996 are generally exempt from federal taxable income, unless specifically prescribed under treasury regulations. |
Advances and contributions received subsequent to 1991 and prior to 1997 are included in California state taxable income. |
Asset Retirement Obligation |
SJW Corp.'s asset retirement obligation is recorded as a liability included in other non-current liabilities. It reflects principally the retirement costs of wells and other anticipated clean-up costs, which by law, must be remediated upon retirement. Retirement costs have historically been recovered through rates at the time of retirement. As a result, the liability is offset by a regulatory asset. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the asset retirement obligation is as follows: |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013 | | 2012 |
Retirement obligation | $ | 4,612 | | | 4,650 | |
|
Discount rate | 6 | % | | 6 | % |
Present value, recorded as a liability | 1,733 | | | 1,807 | |
|
Deferred tax | 1,192 | | | 1,242 | |
|
Regulatory asset | $ | 2,925 | | | 3,049 | |
|
|
Revenue |
SJW Corp. recognizes its regulated and nonregulated revenue when services have been rendered, in accordance with ASC Topic 605. |
Metered revenue of Water Utility Services includes billing to customers based on meter readings plus an estimate of water used between the customers' last meter reading and the end of the accounting period. Water Utility Services read the majority of its customers' meters on a bi-monthly basis and records its revenue based on its meter reading results. Unbilled revenue from the last meter reading date to the end of the accounting period is estimated based on the most recent usage patterns, production records and the effective tariff rates. Actual results could differ from those estimates, which may result in an adjustment to the operating revenue in the period which the revision to Water Utility Services' estimates is determined. San Jose Water Company also recognizes balancing and memorandum accounts in its revenue when it is probable that future recovery of previously incurred costs or future refunds that are to be credited to customers will occur through the ratemaking process. |
Revenues also include a surcharge collected from regulated customers that is paid to the CPUC. This surcharge is recorded both in operating revenues and administrative and general expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the surcharge was $3,741, $3,862 and $3,272, respectively. |
Revenue from San Jose Water Company's nonregulated utility operations, maintenance agreements or antenna leases are recognized when services have been rendered. Nonregulated operating revenue in 2013, 2012 and 2011 includes $5,882, $5,523 and $4,935, respectively, from the operation of the City of Cupertino municipal water system. Revenue from SJW Land Company properties is recognized ratably over the term of the leases. |
Balancing and Memorandum Accounts |
For California, the CPUC has established a balancing account mechanism for the purpose of tracking the under-collection or over-collection associated with expense changes and the revenue authorized by the CPUC to offset those expense changes. The Company also maintains memorandum accounts to track revenue impacts due to catastrophic events, unforeseen water quality expenses related to new federal and state water quality standards, energy efficiency, cost of capital, any revenue requirement impact of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, and other approved activities or as directed by the CPUC. As of December 31, 2013, the total balance in San Jose Water Company's balancing and memorandum accounts, including interest, was a net under-collection of $8,167. |
Balancing and memorandum accounts are recognized in revenue by San Jose Water Company when it is probable that future recovery of previously incurred costs or future refunds that are to be credited to customers will occur through the ratemaking process. In assessing the probability criteria for balancing and memorandum accounts between general rate cases, the Company considers evidence that may exist prior to CPUC authorization that would satisfy ASC Topic 980, subtopic 340-25 recognition criteria. Such evidence may include regulatory rules and decisions, past practices, and other facts and circumstances that would indicate that recovery or refund is probable. When such evidence provides sufficient support for balance recognition, the balances are recorded in the Company's financial statements. |
The Company met the recognition requirements for certain of its balancing and memorandum accounts and certain amounts subject to balancing and memorandum accounts and recorded revenue and regulatory assets totaling $5,019 and $2,604 during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. All balancing and memorandum-type accounts not included for recovery or refund in the current general rate case will be reviewed by the CPUC in San Jose Water Company's next general rate case or at the time an individual account reaches a threshold of 2% of authorized revenue, whichever occurs first. |
On August 27, 2010, SJWTX, Inc. filed a rate case with the TCEQ. The filing contained a request for an immediate increase in revenue of 38% and a total increase of 71%. The new rates (38%) became effective on October 27, 2010. On August 21, 2013, the TCEQ issued a decision in SJWTX, Inc.'s rate case that authorized a 33% increase in revenue requirement. Since the rates authorized by the TCEQ are less than the interim rates, this resulted in a customer refund of approximately $982 for rate over-collections during the period of interim rates. This amount has been recorded as a regulatory liability and reduction of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2013. |
Share-Based Payment |
SJW Corp. utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions, to compute the fair value of options at the grant date, and the basis for the share-based compensation for financial reporting purposes. In addition, SJW Corp. estimates forfeitures for share-based awards that are not expected to vest. |
SJW Corp. utilizes the Monte Carlo valuation model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions, to compute the fair value of market performance-vesting restricted stock units. |
The compensation cost charged to income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. |
Maintenance Expense |
Planned major maintenance projects are charged to expense as incurred. |
Earnings per Share |
Basic earnings per share is calculated using income available to common shareholders, divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The two-class method in computing basic earnings per share is not used because the number of participating securities as defined in FASB ASC Topic 260—“Earnings Per Share” is not significant. (The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security.) Diluted earnings per share is calculated using income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock including both shares outstanding and shares potentially issuable in connection with stock options, deferred restricted common stock awards under SJW Corp.'s Long-Term Incentive Plan and shares potentially issuable under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Restricted common stock units and stock options of 3,071, 6,557 and 4,243 as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. |