UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: October 1, 2004
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 001-14543
_________________
LABOR READY, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 91-1287341 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
1015 A Street, Tacoma, Washington (Address of principal executive offices) | 98402 (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (253) 383-9101 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock without par value | The New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of class
None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last ninety days. Yesý Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yesý Noo
As of November 4, 2004, there were 41,979,929 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference: None.
LABOR READY, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
LABOR READY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands
ASSETS
(Unaudited)
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURRENT ASSETS: | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 95,464 | $ | 83,112 | ||||||||
Marketable securities | 15,948 | 25,257 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 20,875 | 7,796 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable pledged under securitization agreement | 99,106 | 75,840 | ||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (4,393 | ) | (4,016 | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other | 13,292 | 10,779 | ||||||||||
Income tax receivable | -- | 940 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 12,730 | 5,096 | ||||||||||
Total current assets | 253,022 | 204,804 | ||||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: | ||||||||||||
Buildings and land | 15,888 | 15,707 | ||||||||||
Computers and software | 31,518 | 30,474 | ||||||||||
Cash dispensing machines | 15,030 | 15,075 | ||||||||||
Furniture and equipment | 2,607 | 1,858 | ||||||||||
65,043 | 63,114 | |||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 38,157 | 34,625 | ||||||||||
Property and equipment, net | 26,886 | 28,489 | ||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS: | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash and other assets | 125,267 | 110,802 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 11,941 | 15,616 | ||||||||||
Other assets | 24,373 | 14,006 | ||||||||||
Total other assets | 161,581 | 140,424 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 441,489 | $ | 373,717 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
LABOR READY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In Thousands (Except Par Values)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 20,330 | $ | 17,302 | ||||||||
Accrued wages and benefits | 18,163 | 14,897 | ||||||||||
Income tax payable | 5,203 | -- | ||||||||||
Current portion of workers' compensation claims reserve | 43,558 | 36,170 | ||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 2,054 | 2,461 | ||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 89,308 | 70,830 | ||||||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 71,550 | 72,760 | ||||||||||
Workers' compensation claims reserve, less current portion | 92,302 | 75,988 | ||||||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 163,852 | 148,748 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 253,160 | 219,578 | ||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | ||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.131 par value, 20,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||||||
No shares issued and outstanding | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||||||
41,957 and 41,102 shares issued and outstanding | 60,808 | 53,441 | ||||||||||
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment | 2,505 | 2,058 | ||||||||||
Cumulative unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities | (26 | ) | 28 | |||||||||
Retained earnings | 125,042 | 98,612 | ||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 188,329 | 154,139 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 441,489 | $ | 373,717 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
LABOR READY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||||||
Revenue from services | $ | 296,134 | $ | 254,497 | $ | 772,102 | $ | 642,461 | ||||||
Cost of services | 204,766 | 177,943 | 540,248 | 450,036 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 91,368 | 76,554 | 231,854 | 192,425 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 62,635 | 57,261 | 179,391 | 163,848 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,200 | 2,137 | 6,539 | 6,252 | ||||||||||
Income from operations | 26,533 | 17,156 | 45,924 | 22,325 | ||||||||||
Interest and other expense, net | (772 | ) | (1,202 | ) | (2,037 | ) | (3,284 | ) | ||||||
Income before tax expense | 25,761 | 15,954 | 43,887 | 19,041 | ||||||||||
Income tax | 10,189 | 5,605 | 17,457 | 6,686 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 15,572 | $ | 10,349 | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | ||||||
Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||
Basic | 41,900 | 40,335 | 41,538 | 40,263 | ||||||||||
Diluted | 52,583 | 51,035 | 52,190 | 50,610 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
LABOR READY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In Thousands
(Unaudited)
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 15,572 | $ | 10,349 | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | 286 | 123 | 447 | 1,239 | ||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities | (2 | ) | (28 | ) | (54 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income | 284 | 95 | 393 | 1,230 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 15,856 | $ | 10,444 | $ | 26,823 | $ | 13,585 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
LABOR READY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In Thousands
(Unaudited)
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | |||||||||||
provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7,120 | 6,939 | |||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 6,214 | 6,193 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (3,959 | ) | (3,522 | ) | |||||||
Other operating activities | 1,922 | 770 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (42,182 | ) | (40,143 | ) | |||||||
Workers' compensation claims reserve | 23,702 | 10,508 | |||||||||
Other assets | (4,249 | ) | 607 | ||||||||
Other current liabilities | 13,422 | 11,535 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 28,420 | 5,242 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (3,616 | ) | (4,378 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of marketable securities | (13,483 | ) | (30,873 | ) | |||||||
Maturities of marketable securities | 22,738 | 22,844 | |||||||||
Purchase of Spartan Staffing | (9,890 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Increase in other assets | (196 | ) | (167 | ) | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and other assets | (14,465 | ) | 1,477 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 10 | -- | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (18,902 | ) | (11,097 | ) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of stock through options and employee | |||||||||||
benefit plans | 5,305 | 2,407 | |||||||||
Payments on debt | (2,012 | ) | (1,751 | ) | |||||||
Payments for offering costs | -- | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Checks issued against future deposits | (870 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | -- | (4,957 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 2,423 | (4,315 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash | 411 | 1,120 | |||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 12,352 | (9,050 | ) | ||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | 83,112 | 69,255 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 95,464 | $ | 60,205 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statement
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1: ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures usually found in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2004. Certain classifications of Other assets and Long-term Workers’ compensation claims reserves have been revised in the consolidated financial statements at January 2, 2004 to conform to the October 1, 2004 presentation. These revisions had no effect on the operating results of either period. Operating results for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004.
On March 12, 2003, the Board of Directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from December 31 to a 52/53-week fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to December 31. This change was effective for fiscal year 2003, which ended on January 2, 2004. In fiscal years consisting of 53 weeks, the final quarter will consist of 14 weeks while in 52-week years all quarters will consist of 13 weeks. All references in these financial statements to the “2003 fiscal year end,” “2003 year end” or “end of 2003” are to the fiscal year ended January 2, 2004.
Fiscal Year 2004 | Fiscal Year 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ending Date | # of Days | Ending Date | # of Days | ||||||
1st Quarter | April 2, 2004 | 91 | March 28, 2003 | 87 | |||||
2nd Quarter | July 2, 2004 | 91 | June 27, 2003 | 91 | |||||
3rd Quarter | October 1, 2004 | 91 | September 26, 2003 | 91 | |||||
4th Quarter | December 31, 2004 | 91 | January 2, 2004 | 98 |
On April 5, 2004, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of Spartan Staffing, Inc., a privately held Florida corporation. The results of operations of Spartan Staffing are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since the date of purchase. The Company’s year to date operating results would not be significantly different had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the year. The total cost of the assets purchased was $9.9 million, which included $6.3 million of goodwill. The Company obtained an independent valuation of the trade names, trademarks, non-compete agreements, and customer relationships purchased and internally determined the fair value of the other assets and liabilities. The purchase price has been calculated as follows (in thousands):
Cash consideration | $ | 9,580 | |||
Acquisition fees | 310 | ||||
Total cost of assets purchased | $ | 9,890 | |||
The total cost of assets purchased has been allocated as follows (in thousands):
Current assets | $ | 58 | |||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 700 | ||||
Amortizable (definite-lived) intangible assets | 2,600 | ||||
Non-amortizable (indefinite-lived) intangible assets | 500 | ||||
Goodwill | 6,319 | ||||
Capital leases assumed | (287 | ) | |||
$ | 9,890 | ||||
8
Intangible assets
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we test goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from services is recognized at the time the service is performed. A portion of our income is derived from cash dispensing machine (“CDM”) fees, which are immaterial for all periods presented. Sales coupons or other incentives are recognized in the period the related revenue is earned.
Stock-based compensation
We follow Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations to account for stock options and employee stock purchase plans. Since the exercise price of our employee stock options is not less than the market price of the underlying stock at the date of grant, under APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation cost is recognized. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, issued in December 2002, requires us to provide pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share as if compensation cost for our stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS 148.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS 148, our net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amount):
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 | Thirteen Weeks Ended September 26, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Income | ||||||||
As Reported | $ | 15,572 | $ | 10,349 | ||||
Stock-based employee compensation costs, net of tax | $ | 415 | $ | 9 | ||||
Pro Forma | $ | 15,157 | $ | 10,340 | ||||
Net Income Per Share - As Reported | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.26 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
Net Income Per Share - Pro Forma | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.26 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.22 |
9
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended September 26, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Income | ||||||||
As Reported | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | ||||
Stock-based employee compensation costs, net of tax | $ | 1,122 | $ | 667 | ||||
Pro Forma | $ | 25,308 | $ | 11,688 | ||||
Net Income Per Share - As Reported | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.29 | ||||
Net Income Per Share - Pro Forma | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.29 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.28 |
NOTE 2: MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Management determines the appropriate classification, pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, of our investments in debt and equity securities (“Marketable Securities”) at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such determination at each balance sheet date. Marketable Securities consist of revenue bonds and other municipal obligations. The aggregate carrying value of our Marketable Securities was $15.9 million at October 1, 2004 and $25.3 million at January 2, 2004. At October 1, 2004, those securities were classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value as reported by the Company’s investment brokers, with the unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. There were no material unrealized holding gains or losses at October 1, 2004. The specific identification method is used for computing realized gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities. For the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004, there were no sales of available-for-sale securities.
NOTE 3: RESTRICTED CASH AND OTHER ASSETS
We have cash deposits and other restricted assets with independent financial institutions predominately for the purpose of securing our obligations in connection with our workers’ compensation program and for cross collateralization of our Accounts Receivable Facility. These assets may be released as workers’ compensation claims are paid or when letters of credit are released or can be supported by eligible accounts receivable.
The following is a summary of restricted cash and other assets as of October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 (in millions):
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workers’ Compensation Related | |||||||||
Workers’ Assurance Program cash-backed instruments* | $ | 105.1 | $ | 77.6 | |||||
Secured instruments | 9.7 | 9.0 | |||||||
Available for future commitments in Workers’ Assurance Program | 3.5 | 2.2 | |||||||
Subtotal | 118.3 | 88.8 | |||||||
Accounts Receivable Facility | 7.0 | 22.0 | |||||||
Total Restricted Cash and Other Assets | $ | 125.3 | $ | 110.8 | |||||
10
* We have agreements with certain financial institutions through our wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary, Workers’ Assurance of Hawaii, Inc. (our “Workers’ Assurance Program”), that allow us to restrict cash for the purpose of providing cash-backed instruments for our workers’ compensation collateral. These instruments include cash-backed letters of credit, cash held in trusts that we control, and cash deposits held by our insurance carriers.
As a result of our policy renewal, we expect to restrict an additional $33.8 million of cash for use as collateral by the end of 2004. Of that total, $4.8 million was restricted and deposited with our insurance carrier subsequent to the quarter ended October 1, 2004. An additional $4.8 million will be deposited with our insurance carrier by the end of the year and the balance of $24.2 million will be restricted by year end, and will be deposited with our insurance carrier during 2005.
Subsequent to quarter end, we received a collateral reduction of $9.5 million of cash-backed commitments from a prior insurance carrier which reduced our restricted cash.
NOTE 4: RECEIVABLES FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES
For workers’ compensation claims originating in the majority of states (which we refer to as self-insured states), we have purchased insurance policies from independent, third-party carriers, which cover any claims for a particular event above a deductible amount, on a “per occurance” basis. Over the years the deductible has ranged from $250,000 to its current level of $2.0 million.
Our workers’ compensation reserves include not only estimated expenses for claims within our deductible layer but also estimated expenses related to claims above our deductible limits (“excess claims”). We record a receivable for the insurance coverage on excess claims. We discount this receivable to its estimated net present value using a discount rate based on the methodology used to discount the related loss liability as described in Note 7. When appropriate, based on our best estimate, we record a valuation allowance against the insurance receivable to reflect amounts that may not be realized.
Three of the insurance companies with which we formerly did business are currently in liquidation or financial distress and have failed to pay a number of excess claims. We have presented these excess claims to the guarantee funds of the states in which the claims originated. Certain of these excess claims have been rejected by the state guarantee funds due to statutory eligibility limitations. Although we believe it is probable that we will receive payments on the majority of our excess claims, we have concluded that recovery is unlikely on a portion of these claims. As a result, we have recorded a valuation allowance against the insurance receivables at October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 in the amount of $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 are discounted receivables from insurance companies, net of related valuation allowance, of $12.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
11
NOTE 5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table presents the Company’s purchased intangible assets, which are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands):
October 1, 2004 | Amortization Period | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amortizable (definite-lived) intangible assets: | ||||||
Trade name/trademarks | $ | 400 | 2.5 years | |||
Customer relationships | 1,300 | 2.5 years | ||||
Non-compete agreements | 900 | 2.0 years | ||||
2,600 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization | 565 | |||||
Total amortized (definite-lived) intangible assets, net | $ | 2,035 | ||||
Non-amortizable (indefinite-lived) intangible assets: | ||||||
Trade name/trademarks | 500 | |||||
Goodwill | 6,319 | |||||
Total non-amortizable (indefinite-lived) intangible assets | $ | 6,819 | ||||
The Company obtained all of its intangible assets as a result of the purchase of Spartan Staffing described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Amortization expense for the thirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 was $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
NOTE 6: LONG-TERM DEBT
Convertible Subordinated Notes — During 2002, the Company issued 6.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due June 2007 (the “Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $70.0 million. Interest is payable on the Notes on June 15 and December 15 of each year. Holders may convert the Notes into shares of Company common stock at any time prior to the maturity date at a conversion price of $7.26 per share (equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 137.741 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes), subject to certain adjustments. The Notes are unsecured subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future debt that would constitute senior debt under the indenture, including letters of credit and surety bonds. On or after June 20, 2005, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes for cash at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest if the market value of our common stock equals or exceeds 125% of the conversion price ($9.08) for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30 trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the date we mail notice of our intent to redeem the Notes. Our notice to redeem some or all of the Notes must be mailed at least 30 days prior to but not more than 60 days prior to the redemption date.
12
Capital Leases – The following is a summary of property held under capital leases:
(Amounts in Thousands) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | ||||||||
Computers and software | $ | 1,612 | $ | 1,669 | |||||
Furniture and equipment | 276 | -- | |||||||
Cash dispensing machines | 11,974 | 14,320 | |||||||
13,862 | 15,989 | ||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 9,741 | 10,066 | |||||||
$ | 4,121 | $ | 5,923 | ||||||
Minimum future lease payments under capital leases as of October 1, 2004 for each of the next five years and in the aggregate are (in thousands):
2004 | $ | 766 | |||||
2005 | 1,676 | ||||||
2006 | 722 | ||||||
2007 | 421 | ||||||
2008 | 201 | ||||||
2009 | 4 | ||||||
Thereafter | -- | ||||||
Total minimum lease payments | 3,790 | ||||||
Less amounts representing interest and taxes | 186 | ||||||
Present value of net minimum lease payments | 3,604 | ||||||
Less current maturities | 2,054 | ||||||
Long-term portion | $ | 1,550 | |||||
Interest rates on capitalized leases range from 0.0% to 9.12% and are payable over 9 to 84 months.
NOTE 7: WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RESERVES
We provide workers’ compensation insurance to our temporary and regular employees. For workers’ compensation claims originating in the majority of states (which we refer to as self-insured states), we have purchased insurance policies from independent, third-party carriers, which cover any claims for a particular event above a $2.0 million deductible, on a “per occurrence” basis. This results in our being substantially self-insured. While we have primary responsibility for all claims, we have obtained insurance coverage to reimburse us for all losses and expenses beyond the deductible limits (“excess claims”) as discussed in Note 4.
Our workers’ compensation reserve includes not only estimated expenses for claims within our deductible layer but also estimated expenses related to excess claims. The amount of the reserve is established using management judgement and expectations, as well as actuarial estimates of the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not reported. Adjustments to the claims reserve are charged or credited to expense in the periods in which they occur. Included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 are discounted workers’ compensation claims reserve in the amounts of $135.9 million and $112.2 million, respectively.
13
Our workers’ compensation reserve is discounted to its estimated net present value primarily using a discount rate based on average returns on “risk-free” Treasury instruments, which is evaluated on a quarterly basis. At October 1, 2004, our reserves are generally discounted at rates between 3.8% and 5.0%.
Our insurance policies must be renewed annually. At the beginning of the quarter we renewed our coverage with American International Group, Inc. (AIG) for occurences in the period from July 2004 through June 2005.
For workers’ compensation claims originating in Washington, Ohio, West Virginia, North Dakota, Wyoming, Canada and Puerto Rico (the “monopolistic jurisdictions”) we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums and obtain full coverage under government-administered programs. Accordingly, because we are not the primary obligor, our financial statements do not reflect the liability for workers’ compensation claims in these monopolistic jurisdictions. For work related claims originating in the United Kingdom which exceed amounts covered by governmental medical insurance programs, we have purchased an employers’ liability insurance policy that carries a 25 million British Pound limit in total.
Workers’ compensation expense is recorded as part of our cost of services and consists of the following components: self-insurance reserves net of changes in discount, monopolistic jurisdictions premium, insurance premium and estimates of excess claims from loss years covered by insurance companies now in liquidation. Workers’ compensation expense totaling $20.9 million and $19.0 million was recorded for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively. Workers’ compensation expense totaling $58.0 million and $48.1 million was recorded for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively.
NOTE 8: NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing adjusted net income by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares include the dilutive effects of outstanding options and the conversion features of the Notes, except where their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The anti-dilutive shares not considered as part of our calculation are as follows:
(Amounts in Thousands) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | ||||||
Stock Options | 161 | 610 | 161 | 891 | |||||
Convertible Notes | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Anti-dilutive shares associated with our options relate to those options whose grant price is higher than the average market value of our stock during the period presented. We have anti-dilutive shares associated with our convertible Notes when net income per share would have been higher had the Notes been converted to equity (the “if-converted” calculation). The Notes are anti-dilutive in quarters when our net income per share is $.08 or lower. The number of additional shares associated with the Notes is equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Notes, $70.0 million, divided by the stated conversion price of $7.26, or 9,642 shares.
14
Diluted net income and common shares were calculated as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 15,572 | $ | 10,349 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Interest on Notes | 1,106 | 1,106 | ||||||
Amortization of costs for Notes issuance | 149 | 162 | ||||||
Tax effect | (496 | ) | (445 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments | 759 | 823 | ||||||
Adjusted net income | $ | 16,331 | $ | 11,172 | ||||
Common Shares and Potential Common Shares | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic | ||||||||
net income per common share | 41,900 | 40,335 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||
Stock options | 1,041 | 1,058 | ||||||
Convertible Notes | 9,642 | 9,642 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares and potential | ||||||||
common shares used in diluted net income per | ||||||||
common share | 52,583 | 51,035 | ||||||
15
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | ||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||
Interest on Notes | 3,318 | 3,269 | ||||||
Amortization of costs for Notes issuance | 447 | 460 | ||||||
Tax effect | (1,498 | ) | (1,309 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments | 2,267 | 2,420 | ||||||
Adjusted net income | $ | 28,697 | $ | 14,775 | ||||
Common Shares and Potential Common Shares | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(In Thousands) | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares used in basic | ||||||||
net income per common share | 41,538 | 40,263 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||
Stock options | 1,010 | 705 | ||||||
Convertible Notes | 9,642 | 9,642 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares and potential | ||||||||
common shares used in diluted net income per | ||||||||
common share | 52,190 | 50,610 | ||||||
NOTE 9: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Accounts Receivable Facility
In March 2001, we entered into a letter of credit facility and accounts receivable securitization facility (collectively the “Accounts Receivable Facility”) with certain unaffiliated financial institutions that expires in February 2006. The Accounts Receivable Facility provides loan advances and letters of credit through the sale of substantially all of our eligible domestic accounts receivable to a wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary, Labor Ready Funding Corporation. The Accounts Receivable Facility includes a corporate guarantee by us and requires that we comply with certain financial covenants. Among other things, these covenants require us to maintain certain liquidity, net income and net worth levels and a certain ratio of net income to fixed expenses. Subject to certain availability requirements, the Accounts Receivable Facility allows us to borrow a maximum of $80 million, all of which may be used to obtain letters of credit. The amounts we may borrow (our borrowing capacity) under this agreement are largely a function of the levels of our accounts receivable from time to time, supplemented by pledged and restricted cash. We currently use this facility to issue letters of credit but if we were to take a loan against this borrowing capacity, interest would be charged at 2.5% above the Prime Rate. We are currently in compliance with all covenants related to the Accounts Receivable Facility.
16
At October 1, 2004 we had a total available borrowing capacity of $80.0 million under the Accounts Receivable Facility comprised of $73.7 million of accounts receivable and $6.3 million of restricted cash. The $73.7 million represents the eligible portion of our total $99.1 million of securitized accounts receivable and the $6.3 million represents the eligible portion of the $7.0 million of restricted cash cross collateralizing the Accounts Receivable Facility. Of that borrowing capacity available at October 1, 2004, we had $73.1 million of letters of credit issued against it leaving us with $6.9 million available for future borrowings.
We are required by our insurance carriers and certain state workers’ compensation programs to collateralize a portion of our workers’ compensation obligation with irrevocable letters of credit, cash-backed instruments, or surety bonds. The letters of credit bear fluctuating annual fees, which were approximately 1.0% of the principal amount of the letters of credit outstanding as of October 1, 2004. The surety bonds bear annual fees based on a percentage of the bond, which is determined by each independent surety carrier but does not exceed 2% of the bond amount.
At October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 we had provided our insurance carriers and certain states with commitments in the form and amounts outlined below (in millions):
Workers' Compensation Commitments as of: | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | ||||||||
Accounts Receivable Facility letters of credit | $ | 72.7 | $ | 73.2 | |||||
Workers’ Assurance Program cash-backed instruments | 104.6 | 77.6 | |||||||
Secured instruments | 9.5 | 9.0 | |||||||
Unsecured surety bonds | 6.0 | 5.9 | |||||||
Total Collateral Commitments | $ | 192.8 | $ | 165.7 | |||||
As a result of our policy renewal, we expect to restrict an additional $33.8 million of cash for use as collateral by the end of 2004. Of that total, $4.8 million was restricted and deposited with our insurance carrier subsequent to the quarter ended October 1, 2004. An additional $4.8 million will be deposited with our insurance carrier by the end of the year and the balance of $24.2 million will be restricted by year end, and will be deposited with our insurance carrier during 2005.
Subsequent to quarter end, we received a collateral reduction of $9.5 million of cash-backed commitments from a prior insurance carrier which reduced our restricted cash.
Revolving Credit Facility
In January 2002, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). As of October 1, 2004 the available borrowing amount was $8.8 million with interest at the fluctuating rate per annum of .75% below the Prime Rate or 1.85% above the London Inter-Bank Rate, at the option of the Company. The available borrowing amount under this facility will be reduced by $125,000 each quarter through February 2006 at which time the facility expires. The Revolving Credit Facility bears fees of 0.35% of the unused amount, and is secured by a first deed of trust on our corporate headquarters building. The Revolving Credit Facility contains a cross-default provision with respect to our Accounts Receivable Facility, which obligates us, among other things, to maintain certain liquidity, net income and net worth levels and a certain ratio of net income to fixed expenses. We currently do not have any borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility and are in compliance with all covenants.
17
Legal Contingencies and Developments
From time to time we are the subject of compliance audits by federal, state and local authorities relating to a variety of regulations including wage and hour laws, taxes, workers’ compensation, immigration and safety. From time to time we are also subject to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our operations. A summary of our most significant pending litigation is set forth below. It is not possible at this time for us to determine fully the effect of all legal proceedings on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity; however, to the extent possible, where legal liabilities can be estimated and are considered probable, we have recorded a liability. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we have established reserves for these contingent legal and regulatory liabilities in the amount of $6.4 million at October 1, 2004 and $3.9 million at January 2, 2004. We believe that none of the currently pending legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows beyond amounts that have been accrued in the financial statements, although we can make no assurances in this regard.
On February 14, 2001, Armando Ramirez, Phyllis Stennis, Earl Levels and Maurice Johnson filed an action in California State Court, Alameda County, alleging violation of federal and state wage and hour laws for failing to pay temporary employees for all hours worked. The plaintiffs are present or former temporary employees for us and sought unquantified damages, injunctive relief and certification of a class of workers. On July 12, 2002, the court certified classes of plaintiffs in connection with claims relating to waiting time, travel time and equipment charges for the period of February 1998 to present. On November 19, 2003, the court granted our motion for partial summary judgment, ruling that time spent by temporary employees waiting for job assignments is not compensable. Thereafter the parties entered into an agreement to settle all remaining claims, and the settlement received final approval by the court on August 2, 2004.
On July 29, 2002, Marisol Balanderan and 55 other plaintiffs filed an action against us and one of our customers in California State Court, Los Angeles County. The plaintiffs are temporary employees and job applicants who seek unquantified compensatory and punitive damages based on allegations that they were subjected to discrimination in dispatch to jobs on the basis of their female gender, throughout a period from September 2001 through January 2002. They also seek certification of a class of similarly situated temporary employees.
On February 6, 2003, Scott Romer and Shawna Clark, both former Labor Ready employees, filed an action against us in California State Court, Los Angeles County. The plaintiffs allege that they were wrongfully exempted from overtime pay during their employment. They seek unquantified compensatory damages and certification of a class of similarly situated employees. On January 6, 2004, Patricia Huntley and Brandon McCall filed a complaint in intervention and have been included as plaintiffs in this lawsuit.
On July 16, 2003, Alecia Recio, Elizabeth Esquivel, Debbie Owen and Barry Selbts, each a current or former Labor Ready employee, jointly filed an action in United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging failure to pay overtime under state and federal law and seeking unspecified damages and certification of a class of similarly situated employees. On September 23, 2003, the court dismissed the case for improper venue. On October 1, 2003, Recio re-filed her case in California State Court, Los Angeles County, seeking similar relief on behalf of Labor Ready employees employed in the State of California. On October 21, 2003, Owen re-filed her case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, seeking similar relief on behalf of Labor Ready employees employed in all states except California. The Owen case has been stayed pending resolution of the Huntley/McCall case described above. On December 30, 2003, Patricia Huntley filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington seeking similar relief on behalf of Labor Ready employees employed in all states except California, and consolidated her claims with those of Owen.
On May 10, 2004, Lester Mason filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging that we violated state law in connection with fees charged for our cash dispensing machines and transportation of our temporary employees. The plaintiff sought damages of $1,000 per transaction and certification of a class of similarly situated Florida employees. The court dismissed the action without prejudice in July 2004. On August 5, 2004, Alexander Wright and Walter McLamore filed a similar action in the Florida Circuit Court for Broward County.
18
NOTE 10: SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||
(Amounts in Thousands) | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 2,971 | $ | 3,014 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 13,403 | $ | 8,503 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||
Assets acquired with capital lease obligations | $ | 348 | $ | 494 | ||||
Capital leases assumed with the purchase of Spartan Staffing | $ | 287 | $ | -- | ||||
Contribution of common stock to 401(k) plan | $ | 219 | $ | 285 | ||||
Stock bonus | $ | 146 | $ | -- | ||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities | $ | (54 | ) | $ | (9 | ) |
NOTE 11: EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
We have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) to provide substantially all regular employees who have completed six months of service and meet certain limited qualifications, relative to weekly total hours and calendar months worked, an opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions. The ESPP permits payroll deductions up to 10% of eligible after-tax compensation. Participant account balances are used to purchase shares of common stock at the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of shares on either the first day or the last day of each month. The ESPP expires on June 30, 2006. 1.9 million shares of common stock have been reserved for purchase under the ESPP, of which 1.2 million shares have been issued and 0.7 million shares remain available for future issuance. During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004, participants purchased 49,000 shares in the ESPP for cash proceeds of $0.6 million. During the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003, participants purchased 79,000 shares in the ESPP for cash proceeds of $0.4 million.
NOTE 12: STOCK OPTION PLANS
We have stock option plans for directors, officers and employees, which provide for non-qualified and incentive stock options. The majority of our options vest evenly over a four-year period from the date of grant and expire if not exercised within five years from the date of grant.
19
The fair value of option grants is estimated on the date of grant utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2004: risk-free interest rates of 3.0% based on an expected life of options of 4.2 years, a volatility expectation of 79% and a 0% dividend yield.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods indicated below (in thousands, except exercise price):
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 | Thirteen Weeks Ended September 26, 2003 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares | (1) Price | Shares | (1) Price | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 3,773 | $ | 6.67 | 5,018 | $ | 6.33 | |||||||||
Granted | 25 | $ | 13.53 | 68 | $ | 8.24 | |||||||||
Exercised | (66 | ) | $ | 6.14 | (254 | ) | $ | 4.85 | |||||||
Canceled | (112 | ) | $ | 12.17 | (219 | ) | $ | 7.93 | |||||||
Outstanding at the end of the period | 3,620 | $ | 7.08 | 4,613 | $ | 6.36 | |||||||||
Exercisable at the end of the period | 1,241 | $ | 5.32 | 1,915 | $ | 7.78 | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options | |||||||||||||||
granted during the period | $ | 7.63 | $ | 2.50 | |||||||||||
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended September 26, 2003 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shares | (1) Price | Shares | (1) Price | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period | 4,529 | $ | 7.16 | 5,397 | $ | 6.52 | |||||||||
Granted | 456 | $ | 12.72 | 325 | $ | 6.62 | |||||||||
Exercised | (778 | ) | $ | 6.10 | (443 | ) | $ | 4.49 | |||||||
Canceled | (587 | ) | $ | 13.41 | (666 | ) | $ | 8.98 | |||||||
Outstanding at the end of the period | 3,620 | $ | 7.08 | 4,613 | $ | 6.36 | |||||||||
Exercisable at the end of the period | 1,241 | $ | 5.32 | 1,915 | $ | 7.78 | |||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options | |||||||||||||||
granted during the period | $ | 7.68 | $ | 2.61 | |||||||||||
______________________________________
(1) Weighted average exercise price.
As of October 1, 2004, 1,244 shares of common stock were available for future grants under our stock option plans.
20
Information relating to stock options outstanding and exercisable at October 1, 2004 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Outstanding Options | Exercisable Options | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range of Exercise Prices | Shares | Weighted Remaining Life | Weighted Average Price | Shares | Weighted Average Price | |||||
$ 3.05 - $ 3.80 | 922 | 1.58 | $ | 3.45 | 545 | $ | 3.45 | |||
$ 3.81 - $ 6.00 | 934 | 2.33 | $ | 5.24 | 378 | $ | 5.09 | |||
$ 6.01 - $ 14.00 | 1,749 | 3.81 | $ | 9.91 | 318 | $ | 8.80 | |||
$ 14.01 - $ 14.41 | 15 | 4.73 | $ | 14.32 | -- | $ | -- | |||
$ 3.05 - $ 14.41 | 3,620 | 2.86 | $ | 7.08 | 1,241 | $ | 5.32 | |||
NOTE 13: NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on the remaining portions of Issue No. 03-01,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (“EITF 03-01”), effective for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2004. The consensus clarifies the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments in debt and equity securities, in particular investments within the scope of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and investments accounted for under the cost method. EITF 03-01 also provides new disclosure requirements for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity investments. In September 2004, the FASB issued a final FASB Staff Position, FSP Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-01-1 that delays the effective date for the measurement and recognition guidance of EITF 03-01. The adoption of this EITF is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
During March 2004, the FASB issued an exposure draft of a new standard entitledShare Based Payment, which would amend SFAS 123 and Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 95,Statement of Cash Flows. The new accounting standard, as proposed, would require the expensing of stock options issued by the Company in the financial statements using a fair-value-based method and would be effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005. See Note 1 “Stock-Based Compensation” for pro forma disclosures regarding the effect on net income and income per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of the SFAS No. 123. Depending on the method adopted by the Company to calculate stock-based compensation expense upon the adoption of Share Based Payment, the pro forma disclosure in Note 1 may not be indicative of the stock-based compensation expense to be recognized in periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
21
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our expectations for future events and future financial performance. Generally, the words “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Factors which could affect our financial results are described in Item 3, Item 7 and Item 7A of Part 1 of our Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2004 and in the “Risk Factors” included in this Form 10-Q. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We assume no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.
Executive Overview
Labor Ready is an international provider of temporary workers for manual labor jobs. Our customers are primarily in the transportation, warehousing, hospitality, landscaping, construction, light manufacturing, retail, wholesale, sanitation and printing industries. During 2003, we served over 275,000 customers and we put nearly 600,000 people to work through our dispatch offices in all 50 of the United States, in Puerto Rico, in five provinces of Canada and in the United Kingdom.
Our quarter was highlighted by a 16.4% increase in revenue to $296.1 million compared to revenue of $254.5 million for the third quarter of 2003. This revenue growth resulted in net income for the quarter of $15.6 million or $0.31 per share, as compared to net income of $10.3 million or $0.22 per share for the third quarter of 2003. Sales from branches open one year or longer grew approximately 7.1% over a year earlier. We have completed our planned 2004 branch openings. However, additional branch openings and closures may be appropriate as we continue to seek opportunities to expand.
The first three quarters of our year were highlighted by a 20.2% increase in revenue to $772.1 million compared to revenue of $642.5 million for the same period in 2003. This revenue growth resulted in net income for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 of $26.4 million or $0.55 per share, compared to net income of $12.4 million or $0.29 per share for the same period last year. On a comparable billing day/constant currency basis, revenue for the first three quarters of 2004 increased 16.7% over the first three quarters of 2003. The Company benefited from four more billing days for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to the same period last year, representing approximately $0.03 of net income per share. Sales from branches one year or older grew approximately 11.0% over a year earlier. We opened 32 new branches during the first three quarters of 2004, 27 of which were in the United States and five in the United Kingdom and we added 27 additional branches through the purchase of Spartan Staffing.
The strong growth in demand we began to see at the end of 2003 continued into the third quarter of 2004, across most industries and regions of our operations. As small and medium-sized businesses staff for renewed growth, they are relying on contingent labor to manage costs. As the economy improves, we believe demand for a flexible work force will continue to grow.
On April 5, 2004 we completed the acquisition of Spartan Staffing, which added an additional 27 branch locations. The purchase of Spartan Staffing has allowed us to expand our market share and is consistent with our commitment to serve the on-demand staffing needs of small and medium-sized businesses. The impact of this acquisition on the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 was accretive to our earnings per share and is expected to be accretive for the rest of 2004. Additionally, we anticipate the Spartan Staffing operations will have margins from income from operations similar to Labor Ready’s existing business, before the additional amortization of intangible assets related to the purchase.
22
Results of Operations
Thirteen Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended September 26, 2003
The following table compares the operating results for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 and September 26, 2003 (in thousands):
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | Percent Change | |||||||||
Revenue from services | $ | 296,134 | $ | 254,497 | 16 | .4 | |||||
Cost of services | 204,766 | 177,943 | 15 | .1 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 62,635 | 57,261 | 9 | .4 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,200 | 2,137 | 2 | .9 | |||||||
Interest and other expense, net | (772 | ) | (1,202 | ) | (35 | .8) | |||||
Income before tax benefit | 25,761 | 15,954 | 61 | .5 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 15,572 | $ | 10,349 | 50 | .5 |
Dispatch Offices and Revenue from Services. The number of offices increased to 820 at October 1, 2004 from 788 locations at September 26, 2003. This represents a net increase of 32 dispatch offices. Revenue for third quarter increased 16.4% compared to the same quarter a year ago. The change in revenue was made up of the following five components: (a) a 7.1% increase in same store revenue, defined as those branches opened one year or longer, (b) a 6.0% increase due to branches acquired in the Spartan Staffing purchase, (c) a (1.2%) decline in revenue related to closed branches, (d) a 1.8% increase in revenue from new branches and (e) a 2.7% benefit from foreign currency translation and the shifting of our quarter later in the year as a result of our transition to a 52/53-week fiscal year.
Cost of Services and Gross Margin. Cost of services decreased to 69.2% of revenue for the quarter ended October 1, 2004 compared to 69.9% for the quarter ended September 26, 2003. Labor costs increased by 1.7% quarter over quarter while our average billing rate increased by 3.1% over the same period. As a result, our gross margins increased to 30.9% for the quarter ended October 1, 2004 compared to 30.1% for the quarter ended September 26, 2003.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses as a percent of revenue were 21.2% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to 22.5% for the thirteen weeks ended September 26, 2003, as the company-wide concerted effort to control costs and increase average branch revenue continues.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased slightly to $2.2 million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 from $2.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 26, 2003.
Interest and Other Expense, Net. We recorded interest and other expense, net of interest income, of ($0.8) million for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to ($1.2) million for the thirteen weeks ended September 26, 2003. The change is attributable to an increase in interest income as short-term interest rates rise on our growing cash balances.
Taxes On Income. Our effective tax rate was 39.6% for the thirteen weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to 35.1% for the thirteen weeks ended September 26, 2003. The increase during 2004 as compared to 2003 is largely attributable to fewer federal Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work tax credits relative to higher income before taxes and an increase in our state effective tax rate. The principal difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and our effective income tax rate results from state income taxes, federal tax credits, certain non-deductible expenses and the valuation allowance discussed below.
We have a net deferred tax asset of approximately $24.7 million at October 1, 2004 resulting primarily from workers’ compensation reserves and allowance for doubtful accounts. We have assessed our past earnings history and trends, projected sales, expiration dates of loss carry forwards, and our ability to implement tax planning strategies which are designed to accelerate or increase taxable income. Based on the results of this analysis and the uncertainty of the realization of certain tax planning measures, we have established a valuation allowance against certain carry forward benefits in the amount of $6.3 million at October 1, 2004 and $3.7 million at September 26, 2003.
23
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended October 1, 2004 Compared to Thirty-nine Weeks Ended September 26, 2003
The following table compares the operating results for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 and September 26, 2003 (in thousands):
Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | Percent Change | |||||||||
Revenue from services | $ | 772,102 | $ | 642,461 | 20 | .2 | |||||
Cost of services | 540,248 | 450,036 | 20 | .0 | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 179,391 | 163,848 | 9 | .5 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 6,539 | 6,252 | 4 | .6 | |||||||
Interest and other expense, net | (2,037 | ) | (3,284 | ) | (38 | .0) | |||||
Income before tax benefit | 43,887 | 19,041 | 130 | .5 | |||||||
Net income | $ | 26,430 | $ | 12,355 | 113 | .9 |
Dispatch Offices and Revenue from Services. The number of offices increased to 820 at October 1, 2004 from 788 locations at September 26, 2003. This represents a net increase of 32 dispatch offices. Revenue for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 increased 20.2% compared to the same period a year ago. The change in revenue was made up of the following five components: (a) an 11.0% increase in same store revenue, defined as those branches opened one year or longer, (b) a 4.8% increase due to branches acquired in the Spartan Staffing purchase, (c) a (0.8%) decline in revenue related to closed branches, (d) a 1.8% increase in revenue from new branches and (e) a 3.4% benefit from foreign currency translation and additional sales days due to our transition to a 52/53-week fiscal year.
Cost of Services and Gross Margin. Cost of services remained constant at 70.0% of revenue for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 and for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003. Labor costs increased by 1.6% year over year while our average billing rate has increased by 2.5% over the same period. As a result, our gross margins remained constant at 30.0% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 and for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses as a percent of revenue were 23.2% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to 25.5% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003, as the company-wide concerted effort to control costs and increase average branch revenue continues.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased slightly to $6.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 from $6.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003.
Interest and Other Expense, Net. We recorded interest and other expense, net of interest income, of ($2.0) million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to ($3.3) million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003. The change is attributable to an increase in other income as a result of a legal settlement and an increase in interest income as short-term interest rates rise on our growing cash balances.
Taxes On Income. Our effective tax rate was 39.8% for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to 35.1% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003. The increase during 2004 as compared to 2003 is largely attributable to fewer federal Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work tax credits relative to higher income before taxes and the effects associated with profitable operations in Canada. The principal difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and our effective income tax rate results from state income taxes, federal tax credits, certain non-deductible expenses and the valuation allowance discussed below.
We have a net deferred tax asset of approximately $24.7 million at October 1, 2004 resulting primarily from workers’ compensation reserves and allowance for doubtful accounts. We have assessed our past earnings history and trends, projected sales, expiration dates of loss carry forwards, and our ability to implement tax planning strategies which are designed to accelerate or increase taxable income. Based on the results of this analysis and the uncertainty of the realization of certain tax planning measures, we have established a valuation allowance against certain carry forward benefits in the amount of $6.3 million at October 1, 2004 and $3.7 million at September 26, 2003.
24
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to workers’ compensation claims, bad debts, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Workers’ Compensation Reserves. We maintain reserves for workers’ compensation claims, including the excess claims portion above our deductible, using management judgement and expecations, as well as actuarial estimates of the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not reported. This reserve, which reflects potential liabilities to be paid in future periods based on estimated payment patterns, is discounted to its estimated net present value primarily using returns on “risk-free” Treasury instruments with maturities comparable to the average life of our workers’ compensation claims. At October 1, 2004, our reserves are generally discounted at rates between 3.8% and 5.0%. We evaluate the reserve regularly throughout the year and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of such claims and related expenses exceeds the amounts estimated, additional reserves may be required.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We evaluate this allowance regularly throughout the year and make adjustments as needed. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Reserves for Contingent Legal and Regulatory Liabilities. We have established reserves for contingent legal and regulatory liabilities. We record a liability when our management judges that it is probable that a legal claim will result in an adverse outcome and the amount of liability can be estimated. We evaluate this reserve regularly throughout the year and make adjustments as needed. If the actual outcome of these matters is different than expected, an adjustment would be charged or credited to expense in the period the outcome occurs or the period in which the estimate changes.
Income Taxes and Related Valuation Allowance. We account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. As required under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 109,“Accounting for Income Taxes”, these expected future tax consequences are measured based on provisions of tax law as currently enacted; the effects of future changes in tax laws are not anticipated. Future tax law changes, such as a change in the corporate tax rate, could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. When appropriate, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to offset future tax benefits that may not be realized. In determining whether a valuation allowance is appropriate, we consider whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, based in part upon management’s judgments regarding future events. Based on that analysis, we have determined that a valuation allowance is appropriate for the portion of our foreign net operating losses that may not be utilized within the permitted carry forward periods as of October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 due to the uncertainty of the realization of certain tax planning measures.
25
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow Summary (This summary should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Form 10-Q)
Cash Flows from Operations
Net cash provided by operating activities was $28.4 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2004 compared to $5.2 million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 26, 2003. The increase in cash flows from operations in 2004 compared to 2003 is largely due to significant growth in our net income and our workers’ compensation claims reserve. Our workers’ compensation claims reserve growth is the result of increased payroll as well as an increased loss estimate on that payroll. Those positive impacts were partially offset by increased funding of our accounts receivable as sales have increased.
We typically pay our temporary workers on a daily basis, bill our customers weekly and, on average, collect monthly. Consequently, from time to time we may experience negative cash flow from operations.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The change in cash used in investing activities for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 compared to the thirty-nine weeks ended September 26, 2003 is due mostly to changes in restricted cash and other assets and the purchase of Spartan Staffing. Our restricted cash and other assets are used primarily to collateralize our workers’ compensation program and our Accounts Receivable Facility. We increased our restricted cash and other assets by $14.5 million during the first three quarters of 2004 compared to a decrease in these accounts of $1.5 million during the first three quarters of 2003. This fluctuation is due to periodic shifts in the form and mix of collateral making up our total workers’ compensation commitments. At October 1, 2004, we had $192.8 million of total collateral commitments compared to $152.8 million at September 26, 2003.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The change in cash from financing activities was $2.4 million for the thirty-nine week period ended October 1, 2004 compared to ($4.3) million for the thirty-nine week period ended September 26, 2003. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2004 is the result of increased activity in the exercise of stock options by our employees. Net cash used in financing activities for 2003 was primarily the result of common stock repurchases of approximately 800,000 shares in the amount of $5.0 million made during the first half of 2003. The Board of Directors has authorized repurchases of up to an additional 1.4 million shares.
Capital Resources
In March 2001, we entered into a letter of credit facility and an accounts receivable securitization facility (collectively the “Accounts Receivable Facility”) with certain unaffiliated financial institutions that expires in February of 2006. The Accounts Receivable Facility provides loan advances and letters of credit through the sale of substantially all of our eligible domestic accounts receivable to a wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary, Labor Ready Funding Corporation. The Accounts Receivable Facility includes a corporate guarantee by us and requires that we comply with certain financial covenants. Among other things, these covenants require us to maintain certain liquidity, net income and net worth levels and a certain ratio of net income to fixed expenses. Subject to certain availability requirements, the Accounts Receivable Facility allows us to borrow a maximum of $80 million, all of which may be used to obtain letters of credit. The amounts we may borrow (our borrowing capacity) under this facility are largely a function of the levels of our accounts receivable from time to time, supplemented by pledged and restricted cash. We currently use this facility to issue letters of credit but if we were to take a loan against this borrowing capacity, interest would be charged at 2.5% above the Prime Rate. We are currently in compliance with all covenants related to the Accounts Receivable Facility.
We have agreements with certain financial institutions through our wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary, Workers’ Assurance of Hawaii, Inc. (our “Workers’ Assurance Program”), that allow us to restrict cash for the purpose of providing cash-backed instruments for our workers’ compensation collateral. These instruments include cash-backed letters of credit, cash held in trusts that we control, and cash deposits held by our insurance carriers. At October 1, 2004 we had restricted cash in our Workers’ Assurance Program totaling $108.6 million. Of this cash, $105.1 million was committed to insurance carriers leaving $3.5 million available for future needs. We will be able to restrict up to an additional $33.8 million during the balance of the 2004 through the use of this program, $4.8 million of which we posted subsequent to the quarter ended October 1, 2004.
26
In January 2002, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). As of October 1, 2004, the available borrowing amount was $8.8 million with interest at the fluctuating rate per annum of .75% below the Prime Rate or 1.85% above the London Inter-Bank Rate, at the option of the Company. The available borrowing amount under this facility will be reduced by $125,000 each quarter through February 2006 at which time the facility expires. The Revolving Credit Facility bears fees of 0.35% of the unused amount, and is secured by a first deed of trust on our corporate headquarters building. The Revolving Credit Facility contains a cross-default provision with respect to our Accounts Receivable Facility, which obligates us, among other things, to maintain certain liquidity, net income and net worth levels and a certain ratio of net income to fixed expenses. We currently do not have any borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility and are in compliance with all covenants.
During 2002, the Company issued 6.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the “Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $70.0 million. Interest is payable on the Notes on June 15 and December 15 of each year. Holders may convert the Notes into shares of Company common stock at any time prior to the maturity date at a conversion price of $7.26 per share (equivalent to an initial conversion rate of approximately 137.741 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes), subject to certain adjustments. The Notes are unsecured subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future debt that would constitute senior debt under the indenture, including letters of credit and surety bonds. On or after June 20, 2005, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest if the market value of our common stock equals or exceeds 125% of the conversion price ($9.08) for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30 trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the date we mail notice of our intent to redeem the Notes. Our notice to redeem some or all of the Notes must be mailed at least 30 days prior to but not more than 60 days prior to the redemption date.
We believe that cash provided from operations and our capital resources will be adequate to meet our cash requirements over the next twelve months.
Workers’ Compensation Collateral and Claims Reserves
As described in Notes 4 and 7, we provide workers’ compensation insurance to our temporary and regular employees. For workers’ compensation claims originating in the majority of states (which we refer to as self-insured states), we have purchased insurance policies from independent, third-party carriers, which cover any claims for a particular event above a deductible amount on a “per occurrence” basis. Our current deductible amount is $2.0 million. This results in our being substantially self-insured. While we are responsible for all claims, all losses and expenses beyond the deductible amount (“excess claims”) would be reimbursable by the insurance carrier.
Our insurance policies must be renewed annually. At the beginning of the quarter we renewed our coverage with American International Group, Inc. (AIG) for occurences in the period from July 2004 through June 2005.
We are required by our insurance carriers and certain state workers’ compensation programs to collateralize a portion of our workers’ compensation obligation with irrevocable letters of credit, cash-backed instruments, other secured instruments, or surety bonds. Our insurance carriers annually assess the amount of collateral they will require from us relative to our workers’ compensation obligation for which they are responsible. Such amounts can increase or decrease independent of our assessments and reserves. At October 1, 2004 and January 2, 2004 we had provided our insurance carriers and certain states with commitments in the form and amounts outlined below (in millions):
Workers' Compensation Commitments as of: | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | ||||||||
Accounts Receivable Facility letters of credit | $ | 72.7 | $ | 73.2 | |||||
Workers’ Assurance Program cash-backed instruments | 104.6 | 77.6 | |||||||
Secured instruments | 9.5 | 9.0 | |||||||
Unsecured surety bonds | 6.0 | 5.9 | |||||||
Total Collateral Commitments | $ | 192.8 | $ | 165.7 | |||||
27
Our total collateral commitments exceed our workers’ compensation reserve due to several factors including the following which are quantified below: (a) our claims reserves are discounted to net present value and our collateral commitments are based on the gross, undiscounted reserve, (b) a delay in the release of collateral related to claims that have been previously paid and, therefore, are no longer reflected in the reserve, (c) collateral posted with current provider ahead of obligation incurred and (d) the obligation to post excess collateral for claims not yet paid based on requirements specific to the insurance carrier.
The following table provides a reconciliation of our collateral commitments to our workers’ compensation reserve balance as of the period end dates presented (in millions):
October 1, 2004 | January 2, 2004 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ending workers’ compensation reserve: | $ | 135.9 | $ | 112.2 | |||||
a) Discount on reserves | 28.1 | 23.6 | |||||||
b) Unreleased collateral posted on claims that have been paid | 34.6 | 24.4 | |||||||
c) Collateral posted with current provider ahead of obligation incurred | 4.6 | 11.1 | |||||||
d) Excess collateral on claims not yet paid | 3.4 | 6.2 | |||||||
e) Reserves for claims above our deductible (“excess claims”) | (13.8 | ) | (11.8 | ) | |||||
Total Collateral Commitments | $ | 192.8 | $ | 165.7 | |||||
As a result of our policy renewal, we expect to restrict an additional $33.8 million of cash for use as collateral by the end of 2004. Of that total, $4.8 million was restricted and deposited with our insurance carrier subsequent to the quarter ended October 1, 2004. An additional $4.8 million will be deposited with our insurance carrier by the end of the year and the balance of $24.2 million will be restricted by year end, and will be deposited with our insurance carrier during 2005.
Subsequent to quarter end, we received a collateral reduction of $9.5 million of cash-backed commitments from a prior insurance carrier which increased our cash and reduced our restricted cash.
The Accounts Receivable Facility letters of credit bear fluctuating annual fees, which were approximately 1.0% of the principal amount of the letters of credit outstanding as of October 1, 2004. Our surety bonds are issued by independent insurance companies on our behalf and bear annual fees based on a percentage of the bond, which is determined by each independent surety carrier, but does not exceed 2.0% of the bond amount. The terms of these bonds are subject to annual review and renewal and the bonds can be canceled by the sureties with as little as 60 days notice.
Our Worker’s Assurance Program cash-backed instruments include cash-backed letters of credit, cash held in trusts that we control, and cash deposits held by our insurance carriers. The letters of credit bear fluctuating annual fees, which were approximately 0.35% of the principal amount of the letters of credit as of October 1, 2004.
Generally, our workers’ compensation reserve for estimated claims increases as temporary labor services are provided and decreases as payments are made on these claims. Although the estimated claims are expensed as incurred, the claim payments are made over an average period of five years. Collateral for our workers’ compensation program is posted with various state workers’ compensation programs and insurance carriers based upon their assessments of our potential liabilities. Due to the timing difference between the recognition of expense and claim payments as described above, we generally anticipate that both our reserves and our collateral obligations will continue to grow.
28
The following table provides an analysis of changes in our workers’ compensation claims reserves (in thousands). Changes in reserve estimates are reflected in the income statement for the period when the changes in estimates are made.
(Amounts in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||
October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | October 1, 2004 | September 26, 2003 | |||||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 126,958 | $ | 103,097 | $ | 112,158 | $ | 97,253 | ||||||
Self-Insurance reserve expense | ||||||||||||||
Expenses related to current year (net of discount) | 19,318 | 16,177 | 48,852 | 38,444 | ||||||||||
Expenses related to prior years | (3,439 | ) | (3,273 | ) | (3,829 | ) | (2,859 | ) | ||||||
Total | 15,879 | 12,904 | 45,023 | 35,585 | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior year discount | 1,215 | 1,508 | 2,858 | 3,569 | ||||||||||
Payments | ||||||||||||||
Payments related to current year claims | (3,545 | ) | (2,814 | ) | (5,368 | ) | (4,521 | ) | ||||||
Payments related to claims from prior years | (5,647 | ) | (6,213 | ) | (20,871 | ) | (24,681 | ) | ||||||
Total | (9,192 | ) | (9,027 | ) | (26,239 | ) | (29,202 | ) | ||||||
Change in excess claims reserve | 1,000 | (721 | ) | 2,060 | 556 | |||||||||
Ending balance | 135,860 | 107,761 | 135,860 | 107,761 | ||||||||||
Less current portion | 43,558 | 35,434 | 43,558 | 35,434 | ||||||||||
Long-term portion | $ | 92,302 | $ | 72,327 | $ | 92,302 | $ | 72,327 | ||||||
Our workers’ compensation reserve is established using estimates of the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, as well as those that have been incurred but not reported. Throughout the year, management regularly reviews and evaluates the adequacy of reserves for prior periods, and establishes rates for future accruals. Adjustments to prior period reserves are charged or credited to expense in the periods in which the estimate changes. Our claims reserves are discounted to their estimated net present value primarily using returns on “risk-free” Treasury instruments with maturities comparable to the average life of our workers’ compensation claims. At October 1, 2004, our reserves are generally discounted at rates between 3.8% and 5.0%.
Factors we consider in establishing and adjusting these reserves include, among other things, (a) the estimates provided by our independent actuaries, (b) our mix of business by state and by type of work performed, (c) industry and nationwide trends in benefit costs, (d) appropriate discount rates and estimated payment patterns, (e) future savings related to claims management and other cost containment measures. Factors that have caused our estimated losses for prior years to change include, among other things, (i) inflation of medical and indemnity costs at a rate higher than originally anticipated, (ii) regulatory and legislative developments that have increased benefits and settlement requirements in several states, and (iii) a different mix of business than previously anticipated.
29
Other
Included in cash and cash equivalents as of October 1, 2004 is cash held within dispatch office CDMs for payment of temporary payrolls in the amount of approximately $16.1 million compared to $15.8 million at January 2, 2004.
Our capital expenditures were $4.0 million and $4.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004 and September 26, 2003, respectively. We anticipate that our capital expenditures will be approximately $1.0 million for the balance of 2004.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We have various contractual obligations that are recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Certain contractual obligations, such as operating lease obligations, are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements, but are required to be disclosed. There were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in our contractual obligations during the thirty-nine-week period ended October 1, 2004.
The following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations as of October 1, 2004:
Payments Due By Period (in thousands) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations | Total | 2004 | 2005 through 2006 | 2007 through 2008 | 2009 and later | ||||||
Long-term debt (a) | $70,000 | $ -- | $ -- | $70,000 | $ -- | ||||||
Interest on long-term debt (a) | 13,380 | 2,187 | 8,750 | 2,443 | -- | ||||||
Capital lease obligations (b) | 3,790 | 766 | 2,398 | 622 | 4 | ||||||
Operating leases (c) | 6,253 | 781 | 3,780 | 1,125 | 567 | ||||||
Purchase obligations (d) | 2,933 | 1,419 | 1,514 | -- | -- | ||||||
Other long-term obligations (e) | 1,806 | 940 | 866 | -- | -- | ||||||
Other cash obligations (f) | 33,816 | 9,662 | 24,154 | -- | -- | ||||||
Total Contractual Cash Obligations | $131,978 | $15,755 | $41,462 | $74,190 | $571 | ||||||
(a) | Convertible Subordinated Notes further described in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in Item I of Part I of this Form 10-Q |
(b) | Primarily payments on leases of the Cash Dispensing Machines, which include interest and tax amounts. |
(c) | Excludes all payments related to leases cancelable within ninety days. |
(d) | Binding purchase orders for goods or services outstanding at October 1, 2004. |
(e) | Voice and data service contracts. |
(f) | Collateral posting obligations related to workers' compensation policy year ended June 30, 2005. |
30
The following table provides a summary, by period of expiration, of commercial commitments and other commitment capacity available to us as of October 1, 2004:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period (in thousands) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Commercial Commitments | Total | 2004 | 2005 through 2006 | 2007 through 2008 | 2009 and later | ||||||
Accounts Receivable Facility (g) | $ 80,000 | -- | $80,000 | -- | -- | ||||||
Line of credit (h) | 8,750 | 125 | 8,625 | -- | -- | ||||||
Secured instruments (g) | 9,484 | 9,484 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||
Unsecured surety bonds | 7,500 | 7,500 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||
Total Commercial Commitments | $ 105,734 | $17,109 | $88,625 | -- | -- | ||||||
Other Commitment Capacity | |||||||||||
Workers’ Assurance Program (i) | 108,579 | ||||||||||
Total Commercial Commitments and | |||||||||||
other Collateral Capacity | 214,313 | ||||||||||
Total Collateral Commitments | |||||||||||
Outstanding as of October 1, 2004 | (192,800) | ||||||||||
Available Commitment Capacity | $ 21,513 | ||||||||||
(g) | See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q. |
(h) | No balance outstanding. See description of Revolving Credit Facility in Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q |
(i) | See description in Capital Resources in Item 2 of Part I of this Form 10-Q. |
As a result of our policy renewal, we expect to restrict an additional $33.8 million of cash for use as collateral by the end of 2004. Of that total, $4.8 million was restricted and deposited with our insurance carrier subsequent to the quarter ended October 1, 2004. An additional $4.8 million will be deposited with our insurance carrier by the end of the year and the balance of $24.2 million will be restricted by year end, and will be deposited with our insurance carrier during 2005.
Subsequent to quarter end, we received a collateral reduction of $9.5 million of cash-backed commitments from a prior insurance carrier which increased our cash and reduced our restricted cash.
31
Risk Factors: Issues and Uncertainties
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. The following risk factors, issues and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating our future prospects. In particular, keep these risk factors in mind when you read “forward-looking” statements elsewhere in this report. Forward-looking statements relate to our expectations for future events and time periods. Generally, the words “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Any of the following risks could harm our business, operating results or financial condition and could result in a complete loss of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we currently think are immaterial may also harm our business and financial condition in the future.
Competition for customers in our industry is intense, and if we are not able to effectively compete, our financial results could be harmed and the price of our securities could decline.
The short-term, light industrial niche of the temporary services industry is highly competitive, with limited barriers to entry. Several very large full-service and specialized temporary labor companies, as well as small local operations, compete with us in the staffing industry. Competition in some markets is intense, particularly for provision of light industrial personnel, and these competitive forces limit our ability to raise prices to our customers. For example, competitive forces have historically limited our ability to raise our prices to immediately and fully offset increased costs of doing business, including increased labor costs, costs for workers’ compensation and state unemployment insurance. As a result of these forces, we have in the past faced pressure on our operating margins. Pressure on our margins remains intense, and we cannot assure you that it will not continue. If we are not able to effectively compete in our targeted markets, our operating margins and other financial results will be harmed and the price of our securities could decline.
If we are not able to obtain insurance on commercially reasonable terms, our financial condition or results of operations could suffer.
We are required to pay workers’ compensation benefits for our temporary and regular employees. The insurance markets have undergone dramatic changes in recent periods and several insurers are experiencing financial difficulties. These changes have resulted in significantly increased insurance costs and higher deductibles, including those applicable to our workers’ compensation insurance coverages. Under our workers’ compensation insurance program, we maintain “per occurrence” insurance, which covers any claims for a particular event above a $2.0 million deductible, and we do not maintain an aggregate stop-loss limit other than on a per-occurrence basis. While we have secured coverage with American International Group, Inc. (AIG) for occurences in the period from July 2004 through June 2005, our insurance policies must be renewed annually, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully renew such policies for any period after June 2005. In the event we are not able to obtain workers’ compensation insurance on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to operate our business would be significantly impacted and our financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
We maintain employment practice liability insurance (EPLI) for certain types of claims that may arise out of the course of employment. We currently maintain a policy with a $2.5 million deductible with a maximum aggregate coverage of $10.0 million per claim and per policy year which is applicable to the coverage period of July 2004 through June 2005. The EPLI market has experienced increasing losses in recent periods creating increases in insurance premiums, increases in deductible limits, and decreases in overall coverage. In the event we are unable to retain EPLI coverage on commercially reasonable terms, our financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
We expect that the amount of collateral that we are required to post to support our workers’ compensation obligations will increase, which will reduce the capital we have available to grow and support our operations.
We are required to maintain commitments such as irrevocable letters of credit, cash-backed instruments, or surety bonds to secure repayment to our insurance companies (or in some instances, the state) of the deductible portion of all open workers’ compensation claims. We pledge cash or other assets in order to secure these commitments. We sometimes face difficulties in recovering our collateral from insurers, particularly when those insurers are in financial distress, and we cannot guarantee that our collateral for past claims will be released in a timely manner as we pay down claims. As a result, we expect that the amount of collateral required to secure our commitments to our insurance carriers will continue to increase. We believe that our current sources of liquidity will satisfy our immediate needs for these obligations; however, our currently available sources of collateral for these commitments are limited and we could be required to seek additional sources of capital in the future. These additional sources of financing may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. Even if they are available, these financings could result in dilution of earnings to our existing shareholders.
32
Our reserves for workers’ compensation claims, allowance for doubtful accounts, and other liabilities may be inadequate, and we may incur additional charges if the actual costs of these claims exceed the amounts estimated.
We maintain a reserve for workers’ compensation claims using actuarial estimates of the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not reported. This reserve, which reflects potential liabilities that span several years, is discounted to its net present value using a discount rate selected by management pursuant to our accounting policy. We evaluate the accrual rates for our reserves regularly throughout the year and make adjustments as needed. If the actual cost of such claims and related expenses exceed the amounts estimated, or if the discount rate represents an inflated estimate of our return on capital over time, actual losses for these claims may exceed reserves and/or additional reserves may be required. We also establish an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. We have also established reserves for contingent legal and regulatory liabilities, based on management's estimates and judgments of the scope and likelihood of these liabilities. We cannot assure you that our reserves are adequate. If the actual outcome of these matters is less favorable than expected, an adjustment would be charged to expense in the period in which the outcome occurs or the period in which our estimate changes.
Some insurance companies with which we have previously done business are in financial distress. If our insurers do not fulfill their obligations, we could experience significant losses.
Prior to our current policy with AIG, we purchased annual insurance policies in connection with our workers’ compensation obligations from three primary carriers. Kemper Insurance Company (Kemper) provided coverage for occurrences commencing in 2001 through June 30, 2003. Prior to 2001, Legion Insurance Company (Legion) and Reliance Insurance Company (Reliance) provided coverage to us. Legion and Reliance are currently in liquidation and Kemper is in financial distress. All three carriers have failed to pay a number of covered claims that exceed our deductible limits (“excess claims”). We have presented these excess claims to the guarantee funds of the states in which the claims originated. Certain of these excess claims have been rejected by the state guarantee funds due to statutory eligibility limitations. As a result, we have concluded it is likely that we will be unable to obtain reimbursement for at least a portion of these excess claims. To the extent we experience additional claims that exceed our deductible limits and our insurers do not satisfy their coverage obligations, we may continue to be forced to satisfy some or all of those claims directly; this in turn could harm our financial condition or results of operations.
We may be exposed to employment-related claims and costs that could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are in the business of employing people and placing them in the workplaces of other businesses. As a result, we are subject to a large number of federal and state regulations relating to employment. This creates a risk of potential claims of discrimination and harassment, violations of health and safety and wage and hour laws, criminal activity and other claims. From time to time we are subject to audit by various state and governmental authorities to determine our compliance with a variety of these regulations. We have in the past been found, and may in the future be found, to have violated regulations or other regulatory requirements applicable to our operations. We may, from time to time, incur fines and other losses or negative publicity with respect to any such violation. In addition, some or all of these claims may give rise to litigation, which could be time-consuming for our management team, costly and could harm our business. We currently maintain insurance for certain types of employer liability with coverage above a $2.5 million deductible per occurrence with a maximum aggregate coverage of $10.0 million per claim. We cannot assure you that we will not experience these problems in the future or that our insurance will be sufficient in amount or scope to cover any of these types of liabilities or that we will be able to continue to secure insurance coverage for such events on terms that we find commercially reasonable.
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from operations in a limited number of markets. Recessions in these markets have harmed and could continue to harm our operations.
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from our operations in a limited number of states. Revenue generated from operations in California, Texas and Florida, in the aggregate, accounted for approximately 34.7% and 34.9% of our overall revenue in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The California economy was particularly hard-hit by the most recent economic recession. California is our largest market and economic weakness in this region or our other key markets could harm our business.
33
Any significant economic downturn could result in our clients using fewer temporary employees, which could harm our business or cause the price of our securities to decline.
During 2001 and 2002 and to some extent in 2003, the slowdown in the U.S. economy significantly impacted the light industrial labor markets and reduced our revenue. Because demand for personnel services and recruitment services is sensitive to changes in the level of economic activity, our business may suffer during economic downturns. As economic activity slows down, companies tend to reduce their use of temporary employees and recruitment services before undertaking layoffs of their regular employees, resulting in decreased demand for our personnel. As a result, any significant economic downturn could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations, or cause the price of our securities to decline.
Establishment and expansion of our international operations will burden our resources and may fail to generate a substantial increase in revenue.
As of October 1, 2004, we had 47 dispatch offices in the United Kingdom and 36 in Canada. Establishing, maintaining and expanding our international operations expose us to a number of risks and expenses, including:
• substantially increased costs of operations;
• temporary diversion of existing management resources;
• establishment of an efficient and self-reliant local infrastructure;
• ability to deal effectively with local labor organizations and trade unions;
• ability to attract, hire and train qualified local sales and administrative personnel;
• compliance with additional local regulatory requirements;
• fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies;
• longer payment cycles;
• expansion of our information and control systems to manage expanded global operations; and
• the additional expense and risks inherent in operations in geographically and culturally diverse locations.
We cannot assure you that we will effectively deal with the challenges of expanding our foreign operations and our attempts to do so could harm our financial performance or results of operations.
We are continually subject to the risk of new regulation, which could harm our business.
Over the past three years, a number of bills were introduced in Congress and various state legislatures which, if enacted, would impose conditions which could harm our business. This proposed legislation, much of which is backed by labor unions, has included provisions such as a requirement that our temporary employees receive the same pay and benefits as our customers’ regular employees, prohibition on fees charged in connection with our CDMs and a requirement that our customers provide workers’ compensation insurance for our temporary employees. We take a very active role and incur expense in opposing proposed legislation adverse to our business and in informing policy makers as to the social and economic benefits of our business. However, we cannot guarantee that any of these bills will not be enacted, in which event demand for our service may suffer.
Organized labor has been particularly active in sponsoring legislation in the State of California, our largest market. Adverse legislation in California or our other large markets could significantly increase our costs of doing business or decrease the value of our services to our customers. Either result could harm our results of operations.
The cost of compliance with government regulations is significant and could harm our operating results.
We incur significant costs to comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations relating to employment, including occupational safety and health provisions, wage and hour requirements (including minimum wages), workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance. We cannot assure you that we will be able to increase fees charged to our customers to offset increased costs relating to these laws and regulations. If we incur additional costs to comply with these regulations and we are not able to increase the rates we charge our customers to fully cover any such increase, our margins and operating results will be harmed.
Our operations expose us to the risk of litigation, which we try to manage but could lead to significant potential liability.
From time to time we are party to litigation in the ordinary course of our business. The claimants in several current proceeding are seeking to aggregate claims as a class action. The costs of defense and the risk of loss in connection with class action suits are greater than in standard commercial litigation. We cannot assure you that such litigation will not disrupt our business or impact our financial results, due to the costs of defending against such litigation, any judgments that may be awarded against us and the loss of significant management time devoted to such litigation.
34
Our business depends extensively on recruiting and retaining qualified dispatch office managers. If we are not able to attract a sufficient number of qualified dispatch office managers, our future growth and financial performance may suffer.
We rely heavily on the performance and productivity of our dispatch office managers, who manage the operation of the dispatch offices, including recruitment and daily dispatch of temporary employees, marketing and providing quality customer service. We have historically experienced a high degree of turnover among our branch managers. As a result, we must continue to recruit a sufficient number of managers to staff new offices and to replace managers lost through attrition or termination. Our future growth and financial performance depend on our ability to hire, train and retain qualified managers from a limited pool of qualified candidates who frequently have no prior experience in the temporary employment industry.
Our credit facilities require that we meet certain levels of financial performance. In the event we fail either to meet these requirements or have them waived, we may be subject to penalties and we could be forced to seek additional financing.
Our credit facilities contain strict financial covenants. Among other things, these covenants require us to maintain certain net income and net worth levels and a certain ratio of net income to fixed expenses. In the past we have negotiated amendments to these covenants to ensure our continued compliance with their restrictions. We cannot assure you that our lender would consent to such amendments on commercially reasonable terms in the future if we once again required such relief. In the event that we do not comply with the covenants and the lender does not consent to such non-compliance, we will be in default of our agreement, which could subject us to penalty rates of interest and accelerate the maturity of the outstanding balances. Moreover, the indenture governing our Notes and a number of our smaller loan arrangements contain cross-default provisions, which accelerate our indebtedness under these arrangements in the event we default under our credit facilities. Accordingly, in the event of a default under our credit facilities, we could be required to seek additional sources of capital to satisfy our liquidity needs. These additional sources of financing may not be available on commercially reasonable terms. Even if they are available, these financings could result in dilution to our existing shareholders.
Future acquisitions or acquisition efforts may not be successful, which may limit our growth or adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
As part of our business strategy, we may pursue acquisitions of other temporary staffing businesses. Unsuccessful acquisition efforts may result in significant additional expenses that would not otherwise be incurred. Following an acquisition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to integrate the operations of the acquired business without significant difficulties, including unanticipated costs, difficulty in retaining customers, failure to retain key employees and the diversion of management attention. In addition, we may not realize the revenues and cost savings that we expect to achieve or that would justify the acquisition investment, and we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate. These circumstances could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
We have significant working capital requirements.
We require significant working capital in order to operate our business. We have historically experienced periods of negative cash flow from operations and investment activities, especially during seasonal peaks in revenue experienced in the third and fourth quarter of the year. We invest significant cash into the opening and operations of new dispatch offices until they begin to generate revenue sufficient to cover their operating costs. We also pay our temporary personnel on a daily basis and bill our customers on a weekly basis. As a result, we must maintain cash reserves to pay our temporary personnel prior to receiving payment from our customers. In addition, we are required to pledge amounts to secure letters of credit that collateralize certain of our workers’ compensation obligations, and these amounts may increase in future periods. Any such increase in pledged amounts would decrease amounts available for working capital purposes. As a result of these factors, if our available cash balances and borrowing base under our existing credit facilities do not grow commensurate with the growth in our working capital requirements, we would explore alternative sources of financing to satisfy our liquidity needs, including the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. Any such issuances could result in dilution to existing shareholders.
Our information and computer processing systems are critical to the operations of our business and any failure could cause significant problems.
Our management information systems, located at our headquarters, are essential for data exchange and operational communications with dispatch offices throughout the country. Any interruption, impairment or loss of data integrity or malfunction of these systems could severely hamper our business and could require that we commit significant additional capital and management resources to rectify the problem.
35
The loss of any of our key personnel could harm our business.
Our future financial performance will depend to a significant extent on our ability to motivate and retain key management personnel. Competition for qualified management personnel is intense and in the event we experience further turnover in our senior management positions, we cannot assure you that we will be able to recruit suitable replacements. We must also successfully integrate all new management and other key positions within our organization in order to achieve our operating objectives. Even if we are successful, turnover in key management positions will temporarily harm our financial performance and results of operations as new management becomes familiar with our business. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our executive officers.
Our business would suffer if we could not attract enough temporary employees.
We compete with other temporary personnel companies to meet our customer needs and we must continually attract reliable temporary employees to fill positions. We have in the past experienced short-term worker shortages and we may continue to experience such shortages in the future. If we are unable to find temporary employees to fulfill the needs of our customers over a long period of time, we could lose customers and our business could suffer.
Determinations that we have misclassified the jobs performed by our temporary employees for workers’ compensation insurance purposes, even if the misclassifications are inadvertent, could result in us owing penalties to government regulators and/or having to record additional expense.
In five states, Canada and Puerto Rico, we pay workers’ compensation insurance premiums directly to the government in amounts based in part on the classification of jobs performed by our employees. From time to time, we are subject to audits by various state regulators regarding our classifications of jobs performed by our employees. The classification of jobs performed by our employees is one of many factors taken into account by our actuaries in helping us determine the adequacy of our financial reserves for our workers’ compensation exposure. If it is determined that we have materially misclassified a significant number of our employees, we could be required to increase our financial reserves for our workers’ compensation liability, which could harm our results of operations and could cause the price of our securities to decline.
Labor unions have attempted to harm our business.
Various labor unions and activist groups have attempted to disrupt our business. For example, these groups have backed legislation designed to adversely impact our business, coordinated legal actions directed at our activities and engaged in a public relations campaign to discredit members of our management team and influence our customers. We cannot assure you that these activities will not harm our business or the price of our securities.
We cannot obtain representations from Arthur Andersen LLP relating to our historical financial statements for the year ending on December 31, 2001 and prior years.
Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) served as our independent auditor from 1997 until May 3, 2002, when our board of directors dismissed Andersen due to events that had cast doubt on Andersen’s future. As a result of our termination of Andersen, we retained the accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm. Andersen can no longer provide us with representations relating to our historical financial statements for the year ended on December 31, 2001 and prior years. We cannot predict the impact of Andersen’s failure to make the required representations. Furthermore, relief that may be available to investors under the federal securities laws against auditing firms may not be available as a practical matter against Andersen.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates, and to a minor extent, foreign currency exchange rates, each of which could adversely affect the value of our investments. We do not currently use derivative financial instruments. At October 1, 2004, our purchased investments included in cash and cash equivalents had maturities of less than 90 days. Therefore, an increase in interest rates immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels at October 1, 2004 would not have a material effect upon our cash and cash equivalent balances, operating results or cash flows.
At October 1, 2004, our marketable securities consisted of revenue bonds and other municipal obligations. Therefore, an increase in interest rates immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels at October 1, 2004 would not have a material effect upon our marketable securities balances, operating results or cash flows.
We have a minor amount of assets and liabilities denominated in certain foreign currencies related to our international operations. We have not hedged our translation risk on these currencies and we have the ability to hold our foreign-currency denominated assets indefinitely and do not expect that a sudden or significant change in foreign exchange rates will have a material impact on future net income or cash flows.
36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and our CFO concluded that, as of October 1, 2004, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements found in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q.
Item 2. Changes in Securities; Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On December 11, 2002, our Board of Directors approved a resolution granting management the authority to repurchase up to 2.0 million shares of the Company's common stock. As of October 1, 2004, approximately 600,000 shares of common stock have been repurchased pursuant to this resolution, leaving 1.4 million shares available for future repurchase. There were no repurchases of Company stock during the thirty-nine weeks ended October 1, 2004.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended October 1, 2004.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits | |||
31.1 | Certification of Joseph P. Sambataro, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Labor Ready, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.2 | Certification of Steven C. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer of Labor Ready, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.1 | Certification of Joseph P. Sambataro, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Labor Ready, Inc. and Steven C. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer of Labor Ready, Inc., Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LABOR READY, INC. | |
/s/ Joseph P. Sambataro, Jr. 11/15/04 Signature Date By: Joseph P. Sambataro, Jr., Director, Chief Executive Officer and President | |
/s/ Steven C. Cooper 11/15/04 Signature Date By: Steven C. Cooper, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President |
38