The following provides certain information for the portfolio managers of the Adviser who have responsibility for the daily management of some Funds. In addition, Wellington Management, Paradigm Capital Management and Vontobel have provided information below regarding their portfolio managers.
Each of the FIMCO portfolio managers manages at least one First Investors mutual fund other than the Fund or Funds that are covered by this SAI. In many cases, these other First Investors Funds are managed similarly to the Funds that are shown in this SAI, except to the extent required by differences in cash flow, investment policy, or law. Mr. Miska participates in the day-to-day management of First Investors’ profit sharing plan and FIMCO’s own investment account. Mr. Wagner also participates in the day-to-day management of First Investors’ profit sharing plan, the general account of our life insurance company affiliate and FIMCO’s own investment account. Portions of these non-fund accounts may be managed similarly to one or more of the Funds covered by this SAI.
The side-by-side management of two or more First Investors Funds or non-fund accounts presents a variety of potential conflicts of interest. For example, the portfolio manager may purchase or sell securities for one portfolio and not another portfolio, and the performance of securities purchased for one portfolio may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other portfolios. A FIMCO portfolio manager may also want to buy the same security for two Funds that he manages or a Fund and a non-fund account. In some cases, there may not be sufficient amounts of the security available (for example, in the case of a hot initial public offering (“IPO”) or new bond offering) to cover the needs of all of the accounts managed by a FIMCO portfolio manager or the buying activity of the accounts could affect the market value of the security. Similar potential conflicts could arise when two or more Fund or non-fund accounts managed by the same portfolio manager or managers want to sell the same security at the same time. Finally, a portfolio manager may want to sell a security that is held by a Fund or non-fund account and at the same time buy the same security for another one of his accounts. This could occur even if the accounts were managed similarly because, for example, the two accounts have different cash flows.
FIMCO has adopted a variety of policies and procedures to address these potential conflicts of interest and to ensure that each Fund and non-fund account is treated fairly. For example, FIMCO has adopted policies for bunching and allocating trades when two or more Funds or non-fund accounts wish to buy or sell the same security at the same time. These policies prescribe the procedures for placing orders in such circumstances, determining allocations in the event that such orders cannot be fully executed, and determining the price to be paid or received by each account in the event that orders are executed in stages. FIMCO has also adopted special policies that address investments in IPOs and new bond offerings, the side-by-side management of Funds and the non-fund accounts, and internal crosses between FIMCO-managed accounts that are effected under Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company Act. FIMCO’s Investment Compliance Manager also conducts reviews of trading activity to ensure that these policies and procedures are being followed and that the accounts are being managed fairly. FIMCO has also adopted a Code of Ethics restricting the personal securities trading and conduct of portfolio managers of the Funds.
Individual portfolio managers at Wellington Management manage multiple accounts for multiple clients. These accounts may include mutual funds, separate accounts (assets managed on behalf of institutions, such as pension funds, insurance companies, foundations, or separately managed account programs sponsored by financial intermediaries), bank common trust accounts, and hedge funds. The Focused Equity Fund’s portfolio manager (“Fund Manager”), who is listed in the prospectus and is primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Focused Equity Fund (“Fund”), generally manages accounts in several different investment styles. These accounts may have investment objectives, strategies, time horizons, tax considerations and risk profiles that differ from those of the Fund. The Fund Manager makes investment decisions for each account, including the Fund, based on the investment objectives, policies, practices, benchmarks, cash flows, tax and other relevant investment considerations applicable to that account. Consequently, the Fund Manager may purchase or sell securities, including IPOs, for one account and not another account, and the performance of securities purchased for one account may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other accounts. Alternatively, these accounts may be managed in a similar fashion to the Fund and thus the accounts may have similar, and in some cases nearly identical, objectives, strategies and/or holdings to that of the Fund.
The Fund Manager or other portfolio managers at Wellington Management may place transactions on behalf of other accounts that are directly or indirectly contrary to investment decisions made on behalf of the Fund, or make investment decisions that are similar to those made for the Fund, both of which have the potential to adversely impact the Fund depending on market conditions. For example, the Fund Manager may purchase a security in one account while appropriately selling that same security in another account. Similarly, the Fund Manager may purchase the same security for the Fund and one or more other accounts at or about the same time, and in those instances, the other accounts will have access to their respective holdings prior to the public disclosure of the Fund’s holdings. In addition, some of these accounts have fee structures, including performance fees, which are or have the potential to be higher, in some cases significantly higher, than the fees paid by the Fund to Wellington Management. Because incentive payments paid by Wellington Management to the Fund Manager are tied to revenues earned by Wellington Management, and, where noted, to the performance achieved by the Fund Manager in each account, the incentives associated with any given account may be significantly higher or lower than those associated with other accounts managed by the Fund Manager. Finally, the Fund Manager may hold shares or investments in the other pooled investment vehicles and/or other accounts identified above.
Wellington Management’s goal is to meet its fiduciary obligation to treat all clients fairly and provide high quality investment services to all of its clients. Wellington Management has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures, which it believes address the conflicts associated with managing multiple accounts for multiple clients. In addition, Wellington Management monitors a variety of areas, including compliance with primary account guidelines, the allocation of IPOs, and compliance with the firm’s Code of Ethics, and places additional investment restrictions on portfolio managers who manage hedge funds and certain other accounts. Furthermore, senior investment and business personnel at Wellington Management periodically review the performance of Wellington Management’s portfolio managers. Although Wellington Management does not track the time a portfolio manager spends on a single account, Wellington Management does periodically assess whether a portfolio manager has adequate time and resources to effectively manage the portfolio manager’s various client mandates.
Paradigm Capital Management’s portfolio manager also manages one other First Investors mutual fund other than the Fund covered by this SAI, other mutual funds, and multiple institutional accounts. The other First Investors mutual fund is managed similarly to the Fund that is covered by this SAI, except to the extent required by differences in cash flow, investment policy or law. The side-by-side management of First Investors Funds and the other accounts presents a variety of potential conflicts of interest. For example, the portfolio manager may purchase or sell securities for one portfolio and not another portfolio, and the performance of securities purchased for one portfolio may vary from the performance of securities purchased for other portfolios. The portfolio manager may also want to buy the same security for the two Funds that he manages or a Fund and a non-fund account. In some cases, there may not be sufficient amounts of the securities available to cover the needs of all the accounts managed by Paradigm Capital Management.
Paradigm Capital Management’s goal is to treat all clients fairly and provide high quality investment services. Paradigm Capital Management has adopted and implemented policies and procedures, including brokerage and trade allocation policies and procedures, that it believes address the conflicts associated with managing multiple accounts. Paradigm Capital Management utilizes a pro-rata allocation methodology for the purchase and sale of securities common to more than one portfolio. An exception to the pro-rata allocation methodology can be made for tax considerations and specific client mandates, including directed brokerage specifications.
Vontobel’s portfolio manager is responsible for the day-to-day management of one other First Investors mutual fund other than the Fund covered by this SAI, other mutual funds, multiple pooled vehicles, and institutional account(s). The portfolio manager has a team of analysts that conduct screening of companies that must meet Vontobel’s strict investment criteria. This screening process yields an investment universe from which each portfolio that Vontobel manages is built. The side-by-side management of First Investors Funds and other accounts presents a variety of potential conflicts of interest. For example, the portfolio manager may purchase or sell securities for one portfolio and not another portfolio. The performance of securities within one portfolio may differ from the performance of securities in another portfolio. In some cases, there may not be a sufficient amount of securities available to fulfill the complete allocation of said securities amongst all client accounts.
It is the goal of Vontobel, as a fiduciary, to treat all clients in a fair and equitable manner. Vontobel has designed policies and procedures, including policies and procedures for brokerage and trade allocation. Vontobel believes that the policies and procedures it has implemented are reasonably designed to detect and remedy the types of conflicts associated with managing multiple portfolios.
Each FIMCO portfolio manager of each Fund covered by this SAI receives a salary and also a potential bonus (except no bonus is paid for managing the Special Bond, Target Maturity 2007, Target Maturity 2010 and Target Maturity 2015 Funds) if the Fund’s performance ranks in the top 50% of the funds within the selected Lipper Peer Group, (i.e., above the median) on a pre-tax basis as of the end of the calendar year. For this purpose, each Life Series Fund’s performance is adjusted to reflect the expenses of the retail version of the same or similarly managed Fund, which is also managed by the same portfolio manager. The rate of the bonus (in basis points) depends upon the Fund’s performance ranking within the top 50% of the funds in the peer group. The amount of the bonus is computed by multiplying the applicable bonus rate by the average net management fee received by FIMCO for managing the Fund during the year. In the case of a Fund that has more than one portfolio manager, the bonus is shared. In addition to the bonuses that they may receive on the Funds that they manage, the Directors of Equity and Fixed Income are also entitled to receive a percentage of any bonus that is earned by a portfolio manager who reports to them. All bonuses (including those earned by the Directors of Equities and Fixed Income) are paid as follows. One-third of the bonus is paid within the first quarter of the following year. The remaining amount is invested in the retail version of the Fund and then paid in two installments over the next two years. The portfolio manager must remain continuously employed by FIMCO to be eligible to receive each installment of the bonus. The portfolio manager is also entitled to participate on the same basis as other employees in the profit sharing and deferred bonus plans that are offered by FIMCO’s parent company. The amount that is contributed to these plans is determined in the sole discretion of the parent company based upon the overall profitability of FIMCO and its affiliates from all lines of business. The profitability of FIMCO is an important factor in determining the amount of this contribution.
The following chart shows each Fund’s Lipper Peer Group for purposes of determining each portfolio manager’s potential bonus for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Mr. Wagner is also primarily responsible for managing the fixed income investments in the company’s own profit sharing plan, the investment accounts of FIMCO and its life insurance company affiliate (collectively, “the company’s proprietary accounts”). Mr. Miska is primarily responsible for managing the equity investments in the company’s profit sharing plan and the investment accounts of FIMCO. Mr. Wagner and Mr. Miska do not receive any compensation (apart from their normal FIMCO salary and entitlement to participate on the same basis as other employees in the company’s profit sharing and deferred bonus plans) for managing the investments of the company’s proprietary accounts. Nor do they receive any form of bonus for assisting in the management of the company’s proprietary accounts. Although Messrs. Wagner and Miska do not receive any compensation or bonus for managing the company’s proprietary accounts, as discussed above, they are participants in the company’s profit sharing and deferred bonus plans. Moreover, the company’s proprietary accounts invest in assets that are eligible investments for the Funds that Messrs. Wagner and Miska manage or oversee in their capacities as Directors of Fixed Income and Equities. Thus, in theory, they could have an economic incentive to favor the company’s proprietary accounts over the Funds in determining which investments to buy, sell or hold. FIMCO monitors trading in the company’s proprietary accounts to address such potential conflicts.
Wellington Management is paid a fee based on the assets under management as set forth in the Subadvisory Agreement between Wellington Management and FIMCO with respect to the Focused Equity Fund. Wellington Management pays its Fund Manager out of its total revenues and other resources, including fees earned, as determined under the Subadvisory Agreement.
Wellington Management’s compensation structure is designed to attract and retain high caliber portfolio managers necessary to deliver high quality investment management services to its clients. Wellington Management’s compensation of the Fund Manager includes a base salary and incentive components. The base salary for Mr. Megargel, Fund Manager, is determined by the Managing Partners of the firm. A partner’s base salary is generally a fixed amount that may change as a result of an annual review. The Fund Manager is eligible to receive an incentive payment based on the revenues earned by Wellington Management from the relevant Fund managed by the Fund Manager and generally each other portfolio managed by such Fund Manager. Each equity portfolio manager’s incentive payment relating to the relevant fund is linked to the gross pre-tax performance of the portion of the fund managed by the portfolio manager compared to the benchmark index and/or peer group identified below over one and three year periods, with an emphasis on three year results. Wellington Management applies similar incentive compensation structures (although the benchmarks or peer groups, time periods and rates may differ) to other portfolios managed by the Fund Manager, including portfolios with performance fees. Portfolio-based incentives across all portfolios managed by a portfolio manager can, and typically do, represent a significant portion of a portfolio manager’s overall compensation; incentive compensation varies significantly by individual and can vary significantly from year to year. The Fund Manager may also be eligible for bonus payments based on their overall contribution to Wellington Management’s business operations. Senior management at Wellington Management may reward individuals as it deems appropriate based on factors other than portfolio performance. As a partner of Wellington Management, Mr. Megargel is eligible to participate in a partner-funded tax-qualified retirement plan, the contributions to which are made pursuant to an actuarial formula.
Mr. Walthausen’s compensation, which is paid by Paradigm, for managing the Discovery Fund, other investment companies, and institutional accounts is all at risk and is generally comprised of two components. The first component is based on a fixed percentage of the fees earned for the assets he manages. The second component, which is principally for institutional accounts, is performance based and Mr. Walthausen becomes eligible for an additional percentage of the fees earned on the assets he manages if his three-year average pre-tax performance exceeds the Russell 2000 Index for the same period and in part, by applying various subjective factors, including business development activities and marketing initiatives.
Mr. Walthausen also participates in Paradigm Capital Management’s Phantom Stock Plan. Under the Phantom Stock Plan, each share increases in value as revenues grow.
The portfolio manager’s compensation, which is paid by Vontobel, consists of two components. The first component is a base salary, which is fixed. The second component of compensation is a percentage share in the advisory fee revenue that the assets under management in the portfolio manager’s strategy generate.
Part II of this SAI describes the brokerage allocation policies of the First Investors Funds. Set forth below are tables containing information concerning the commissions paid by the Funds for the prior three fiscal years as well as any investments that they have made in their regular broker-dealers (or their parent companies) during the past fiscal year. In addition, the amounts listed below under “Commissions Paid for Research Services” and “Transactions for Which Commissions Paid for Research Services” include only commissions paid for third-party research. The Funds also direct commissions to full service broker-dealers that offer proprietary research on a “bundled” basis. The amounts paid to full service broker-dealers are included below under “Total Commissions Paid” but are not reflected in the other two columns.
Information concerning tax laws applicable to the Funds is set forth in Part II of this SAI.
As of April 3, 2007, First Investors Life Insurance Company owned of record or beneficially owned 100% of the outstanding shares of each Fund.
The Funds incorporate by reference the financial statements and reports of an independent registered public accounting firm contained in the annual reports to shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
The investment strategies used by each Fund, including strategies to invest in particular types of securities or financial instruments, are listed below. The investment strategies that each Fund currently uses or currently anticipates using are noted by a check (ü) mark. The investment strategies that each Fund does not currently anticipate using are noted by a dash (─) mark. Each Fund reserves the right to alter its investment strategies or to use other strategies to the extent permitted by its investment policies and applicable regulatory requirements. The investment policies of each Fund are set forth in its prospectus and Appendix B of this SAI. The investment strategies listed below, and their associated risks, are described in Part II of this SAI.
The following is a list of the investment policies of each Fund other than those policies that are set forth in the Fund’s prospectus. Each Fund’s investment policies are designed to set limits on or prohibit the Fund from engaging in specified investment strategies. For a description of the investment strategies that each Fund actually uses or currently contemplates using, you should review the prospectus for the Fund and Appendix A of this SAI.
Each Fund also has adopted the investment policies that are set forth below. Unless identified as non-fundamental, these investment policies are fundamental policies, which may not be changed without the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, as defined by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). As defined by the 1940 Act, a “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund” means the affirmative vote of the lesser of (1) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund or (2) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding shares are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy.
Each Fund’s investment objective is a non-fundamental policy of the Fund. Non-fundamental policies may be changed by the Board of Trustees (“Board”) without shareholder approval. Except with respect to borrowing, or as otherwise expressly provided, changes in the value of a Fund’s assets will not cause a violation of the Fund’s investment policies.
Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief.
Issue senior securities, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief.
Make loans, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief.
Except for the Cash Management Fund and except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief, with respect to 75% of the Fund’s total assets, purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, and securities of other investment companies) if, as a result, (a) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer, or (b) the Fund would hold more that 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer.
The Cash Management Fund may not purchase the securities of any issuer, if as a result, the Fund would not comply with any applicable diversification requirements for a money market fund under the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder, as such may be amended from time to time.
Except for any Fund that is “concentrated” in an industry or group of industries within the meaning of the 1940 Act, purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities) if, as a result, more than 25% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the securities of companies whose principal business activities are in the same industry.
Purchase or sell real estate, except that, to the extent permitted by applicable law, each Fund may (a) invest in securities or other instruments directly or indirectly secured by real estate, and (b) invest in securities or other instruments issued by issuers that invest in real estate.
Purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments issued by persons that purchase or sell commodities or commodities contracts; but this shall not prevent a Fund from purchasing, selling and entering into financial futures contracts (including futures contracts on indices of securities, interest rates and currencies), and options on financial futures contracts (including futures contracts on indices of securities, interest rates and currencies), warrants, swaps, forward contracts, foreign currency spot and forward contracts or other derivative instruments that are not related to physical commodities.
Underwrite securities issued by others, except to the extent that a Fund may be considered an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”) in the disposition of restricted securities or in connection with investment in other investment companies.
The High Yield Fund, Special Bond Fund and Investment Grade Fund have adopted the following non-fundamental investment restriction, which may be changed without prior shareholder approval:
1. The High Yield Fund, Special Bond Fund and Investment Grade Fund may invest in credit-linked securities, provided that no more than 10% of the Fund’s net assets are invested in credit-linked securities.
Statement of Additional Information Part II
dated May 1, 2007
Part II of this SAI describes policies and practices that apply to each of the Funds in the First Investors Family of Funds, except as otherwise indicated. The First Investors Family of Funds (or “First Investors Funds”) consists of 4 registered investment companies: First Investors Equity Funds, First Investors Income Funds, First Investors Tax Exempt Funds and First Investors Life Series Funds. The term “Fund” as used herein includes each individual series of each series investment company, except as otherwise indicated. The Shareholder Manual is not applicable to First Investors Life Series Funds.
PART II - TABLE OF CONTENTS
| |
DESCRIPTIONS OF INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS | 2 |
I. DEBT SECURITIES | 2 |
II. EQUITY SECURITIES | 7 |
III. FOREIGN SECURITIES EXPOSURE | 8 |
IV. RESTRICTED AND ILLIQUID SECURITIES | 10 |
V. WHEN ISSUED SECURITIES | 10 |
VI. STANDBY COMMITMENTS | 10 |
VII. FUTURES AND OPTIONS | 11 |
VIII. DERIVATIVES | 14 |
IX. REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS | 16 |
X. TEMPORARY BORROWING | 16 |
XI. TEMPORARY DEFENSIVE INVESTMENTS | 16 |
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES | 17 |
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER | 18 |
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS | 18 |
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF THE FUNDS | 24 |
UNDERWRITER AND DEALERS | 24 |
DISTRIBUTION PLANS | 25 |
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE | 26 |
ALLOCATION OF PORTFOLIO BROKERAGE | 28 |
CREDIT RATINGS INFORMATION | 29 |
GENERAL INFORMATION | 33 |
APPENDIX A - TAXES | A-1 |
DESCRIPTIONS OF INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AND RISKS
The following are descriptions of investment strategies that are used by one or more of the Funds within the First Investors Family of Funds, as well as the risks of those strategies. To determine which strategies are used by a particular First Investors Fund, you must review the prospectus and Appendices A and B (Appendices A, B, and C for the Tax Exempt Funds) of Part I of the SAI with respect to such Fund. The prospectus will identify the principal investment strategies of the Fund and the principal risks of those strategies. Appendix A (Appendix A and B for the Tax Exempt Funds) contains schedules listing the investment strategies that may be used by each Fund covered by the SAI. Appendix B (Appendix C for the Tax Exempt Funds) describes the investment policies that may limit or restrict the Fund’s ability to use certain investment strategies. The references below to “Funds” or a “Fund” refer to those Funds that are authorized to invest in the described securities.
I.
Debt Securities
The Funds may invest in all of the debt securities described below. The market value of most debt securities is influenced by changes in the level of interest rates. Generally, as interest rates rise, the market value of a debt security decreases. Conversely, as interest rates fall, the market value of a debt security increases. This is referred to as interest rate risk. Factors which could result in a rise in interest rates, and a decrease in the market value of a debt security, include an increase in inflation or inflation expectations, an increase in the rate of U.S. economic growth, an expansion in the Federal budget deficit and an increase in the price of commodities such as oil.
The market value of most debt securities is influenced by the credit risks associated with such security. Credit risk is the risk that an issuer may not be able to pay principal and interest when due. The debt securities that are purchased by the Funds may be rated investment grade, may be rated below investment grade or may be unrated. Debt obligations rated Baa or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or BBB or higher by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) are considered investment grade. Bonds that are rated lower than Baa or BBB are considered below investment grade and are referred to as “High Yield Securities.” In general, the lower the credit rating for a debt security, the higher the credit risk. As discussed below, High Yield Securities are speculative and generally involve a higher risk of loss of principal and income than higher-rated debt securities. Even debt obligations that are rated Baa by Moody’s or BBB by S&P have speculative characteristics.
A. Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Investments. The Funds may invest in commercial paper (which are short-term promissory notes issued by corporations), commercial bank obligations (such as certificates of deposit and bankers acceptances), and short-term obligations issued by the U.S. government, its agencies, or instrumentalities. Commercial paper is generally sold without registration pursuant to exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933, such as Section 3(a)(3) or 4(2). The commercial paper purchased by the Funds may be liquid or illiquid. See “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for risks associated with investing in restricted and illiquid securities. The commercial paper purchased by the Funds may be rated or unrated. The commercial paper purchased by the Funds may also take the form of short term promissory notes that are backed by assets, such as credit card and other receivables. See “Other Asset-Backed Securities.”
B. Corporate Bonds and Notes. The Funds may invest in bonds and notes issued by corporations and other similar entities. Corporate bonds and notes generally have maturities of between one and thirty years. In general, the longer the maturity of a bond, the greater the interest rate risk. The corporate bonds and notes that may be purchased by the Funds may be convertible into equity securities, which may also include hybrid securities. See “Convertible Debt Securities.” The Funds may also invest in debt securities that are accompanied by warrants or rights that are convertible into the issuer’s equity securities. The Funds may sell or retain such warrants or rights.
C. Convertible Debt Securities. The Funds may invest in convertible debt securities and/or hybrid securities. A convertible debt security is generally a debt obligation that may be converted into the stock of the same or different issuer. The value of a convertible bond may be dependent in part on the value of the issuer’s equity securities.
D. Hybrid Securities. Hybrid securities generally combine both debt and equity characteristics. The most common example is a convertible bond that has features of any ordinary bond, but is influenced by the price movements of the stock into which it is convertible. Hybrid securities can include a variety of features that allow them to exhibit changing proportions of debt and equity characteristics. As a result, it may be difficult to classify them as either debt or equity.
E. High Yield Securities. The Funds may invest in high yield, high risk securities also known as junk bonds (“High Yield Securities”), including securities of companies that are in default or undergoing bankruptcy or reorganization (“Distressed Securities”). High yield securities include bonds that are rated below Baa by Moody’s or below BBB by S&P as well as unrated bonds that are determined by the Funds to be of equivalent quality.
Debt obligations, including convertible debt securities, rated lower than Baa by Moody’s or BBB by S&P, are speculative and generally involve a higher risk of loss of principal and income than higher-rated debt securities. The prices of High Yield Securities tend to be more sensitive to adverse economic changes or individual corporate developments than those of higher quality bonds. Periods of economic uncertainty and changes generally result in increased volatility in the market prices and yields of High Yield Securities. A significant economic downturn or a substantial period of rising interest rates could severely affect the market for High Yield Securities. In these circumstances, issuers of High Yield Securities might have greater difficulty in making principal and interest payments, meeting projected business goals, and obtaining additional financing. Thus, there could be a higher incidence of default. This would affect the value of such securities. Further, if the issuer of a security owned by a Fund defaults, that Fund might incur additional expenses to seek recovery.
The Funds could also incur a loss by investing in a High Yield Security due to an inaccurate evaluation of its credit risk. There may be less information available about issuers of High Yield Securities than is available concerning issuers of higher quality debt. Moreover, the credit ratings issued by credit rating services may not fully reflect the true risks of an investment. For example, credit ratings typically evaluate the safety of principal and interest payments, not market value risk, of High Yield Securities. Also, credit rating agencies may fail to change on a timely basis a credit rating to reflect changes in economic or company conditions that affect a security’s market value.
The market for High Yield Securities generally is thinner and less active than that for higher quality bonds, which may limit a Fund’s ability to sell such securities at reasonable prices in response to changes in the economy or the financial markets. High Yield Securities are typically traded among a small number of broker-dealers. Purchasers of High Yield Securities tend to be institutions, rather than individuals, which is a factor that further limits the secondary market. A less active and thinner market for High Yield Securities than that available for higher quality securities may result in more difficulty in executing trades at favorable prices, particularly during unsettled market conditions.
The ability of a Fund to value or sell High Yield Securities will be adversely affected to the extent that such securities are thinly traded or illiquid. During such periods, there may be less reliable objective information available and thus the task of valuing High Yield Securities becomes more difficult, with judgment playing a greater role. Further, adverse publicity about the economy or a particular issuer may adversely affect the public’s perception of the value, and thus liquidity, of a High Yield Security, whether or not such perceptions are based on a fundamental analysis.
If an issuer of a High Yield Security containing a redemption or call provision exercises either provision in a declining interest rate market, a Fund would have to replace the security, which could result in a decreased return for shareholders. Conversely, if a Fund experiences unexpected net redemptions in a rising interest rate market, it might be forced to sell certain securities, regardless of investment merit. This could result in decreasing the assets to which Fund expenses could be allocated and in a reduced rate of return for that Fund.
A High Yield Security may itself be convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities, or may carry with it the right to acquire equity securities evidenced by warrants attached to the security or acquired as part of a unit with the security. To the extent permitted by a Fund’s investment policies, securities received upon conversion or exercise of warrants and securities remaining upon the break-up of units or detachment of warrants may be retained to permit orderly disposition, to establish a long-term holding period for Federal income tax purposes, or to seek capital appreciation.
F. Income Deposit Securities (“IDSs”). An IDS represents two separate securities, a share of common stock and a debt security issued by the same company, that are combined into one unit that trades like a stock on an exchange. Generally, the holder of an IDS has the right to separate the IDS into the share of common stock and the note represented thereby within a designated number of days following the closing of an offering or upon the occurrence of a change of control.
IDSs are subject to the same risks as the underlying securities that make up an IDS. There may be a thinner and less active market for IDSs than that available for higher quality securities. An issuer’s indebtedness could restrict its ability to pay interest and principal on the notes, pay dividends on the stock, and impact financing options and liquidity positions.
G. Syndicated Bank Loans. A Fund may invest in syndicated bank loans. An investment in a syndicated bank loan does not violate a Fund’s fundamental investment policy against making loans because syndicated bank loans are sold to institutional investors and trade like other debt instruments. Syndicated bank loan participations are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental or other borrower to another party. They may represent amounts owed to lenders or lending syndicates to suppliers of goods or services, or to other parties. A Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with the purchasing participations, a Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the loan, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and a Fund may not directly benefit from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, a Fund will be subject to credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation. In the event of the insolvency of the lender selling a participation, a Fund may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any set-off between the lender and the borrower.
Investments in syndicated bank loans present the possibility that a Fund could be held liable as co-lender under emerging legal theories of lender liability. In addition, if the loan is foreclosed, a Fund could be part owner of any collateral and could bear the costs and liabilities of owning and disposing of the collateral. The Fund anticipates that syndicated bank loans could be sold only to a limited number of institutional investors. In addition, some syndicated bank loans may not be rated by major rating agencies and may not be protected by the securities laws.
Investments in syndicated bank loans involve risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the borrower. Syndicated bank loans may not be readily marketable and may be subject to restrictions on resale.
H. Mortgage-Backed Securities. The Funds may invest in mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage pass-through securities. These securities represent interests in pools of mortgage loans. The payments of principal and interest on the underlying loans pass through to investors. Although the underlying mortgage loans are for specified periods of time, such as fifteen to thirty years, the borrowers can, and typically do, repay them sooner. Thus, the security holders may receive prepayments of principal, in addition to the principal, which is part of the regular monthly payments.
There are three types of interest rate related risks associated with mortgage-backed securities. The first is interest rate risk. The values of mortgage-backed securities will generally fluctuate inversely with interest rates. The second is prepayment risk. This is the risk that borrowers will repay their mortgages earlier than anticipated. A borrower is more likely to prepay a mortgage that bears a relatively high rate of interest. Thus, in times of declining interest rates, some higher yielding mortgages might be repaid resulting in larger cash payments to the Fund, and the Fund will be forced to accept lower interest rates when that cash is used to purchase additional securities. The third is extension risk. When interest rates rise, prepayments often drop, which should extend the average maturity of the mortgage-backed security. This makes mortgage-backed securities more sensitive to interest rate changes.
Mortgage-backed securities may also be subject to credit risk. Payment of principal and interest on most mortgage pass-through securities (but not the market value of the securities themselves) may be guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies whose obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government (in the case of securities guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association) or may be guaranteed by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government whose obligations are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”)). See “U.S. Government Securities.” Mortgage pass-through securities may also be issued by non-governmental issuers (such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers and other secondary market issuers). Some of these mortgage pass-through securities may be supported by various forms of insurance or guarantees.
I. Other Asset-Backed Securities. The Funds may invest in other forms of asset-backed securities i.e., in addition to asset-based commercial paper and mortgage-backed securities. These securities, issued by trusts and special purpose corporations, are backed by a pool of assets, such as credit card receivables, automobile loans, airplane leases, equipment leases, and other forms of receivables. These securities present certain risks in addition to those normally associated with debt securities. For instance, these securities may not have the benefit of any security interest in any collateral that could ensure payment of the receivable. For example, credit card receivables are generally unsecured. The obligors may also be entitled to the protection of a number of state and federal credit laws. Moreover, even if there are perfected security interests in the underlying collateral, there is the possibility that recoveries on repossessed collateral may not be sufficient to support payments on these securities.
To lessen the effect of failures by obligors on underlying assets to make payments, asset-backed securities may contain elements of credit support which fall into two categories: (i) liquidity protection and (ii) protection against losses resulting from ultimate default by an obligor on the underlying assets. Liquidity protection refers to the provision of advances, to ensure that the receipt of payments on the underlying pool occurs in a timely fashion. Protection against losses resulting from ultimate default ensures payment through insurance policies or letters of credit obtained by the issuer or sponsor from third parties. The degree of credit support provided for each issue is generally based on historical information respecting the level of credit risk associated with the underlying assets. Delinquency or loss in excess of that anticipated or failure of the credit support could adversely affect the return on an investment in such a security. Credit supports, if any, do not protect against fluctuation in the market values of asset-backed securities. Moreover, a credit support depends upon the financial ability of its issuer to honor the support.
J. Municipal Securities. Municipal securities are debt obligations issued by or on behalf of states, territories and possessions of the United States (such as Puerto Rico), the District of Columbia and their political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities. The two principal classifications of municipal securities are “general obligation” and “revenue” securities. General obligation securities are secured by the issuer's pledge of its full faith and credit for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue securities generally are payable only from revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities or, in some cases, from the proceeds of a tax or other specific revenue source. The yields on municipal securities depend on, among other things, general bond market conditions, conditions of the municipal securities market, the size of a particular offering, the maturity of the obligation and the rating of the issuer.
Generally, the values of municipal securities vary inversely to changes in interest rates. Municipal securities are also subject to credit risk, which is the risk that the obligor may not be able to repay the debt when due or in the case of a revenue security that the source of the revenue may not be sufficient. National, regional or state-wide economic developments may adversely affect the market value of municipal securities held by a Fund or the ability of particular obligors to make timely payments of debt service on those obligations. There is also the risk that some or all of the interest income that a Fund receives from municipal securities might become taxable or be determined to be taxable by the Internal Revenue Service, applicable state tax authorities, or a judicial body. Future court decisions or legislative actions may also affect the ability of the issuer of a municipal security to repay its obligations.
K. U.S. Government Securities. The Funds may invest in U.S. Government Securities. U.S. Government Securities include: (1) U.S. Treasury obligations (which differ only in their interest rates and maturities), (2) obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities that are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government (such as securities issued by the FHA, GNMA, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Export-Import Bank, the General Services Administration and the Maritime Administration and certain securities issued by the FHA and the Small Business Administration) and (3) securities that are guaranteed by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government but are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government (such as the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the Federal Home Loan Banks). These U.S. Government-sponsored entities, although chartered or sponsored by Congress, are not funded by Congressional appropriations and are not guaranteed nor insured by the U.S. Government. They are supported only by the credit of the issuing agency, instrumentality or corporation. The range of maturities of U.S. Government Securities is usually three months to thirty years. In general, the U.S. Government Securities tend to carry more interest rate risk than corporate bonds with similar maturities.
The Funds may also invest in separated or divided U.S. Government Securities. These instruments represent a single interest, or principal, payment on a U.S. Government Security that has been separated from all the other interest payments as well as the security itself. When the Fund purchases such an instrument, it purchases the right to receive a single payment of a set sum at a known date in the future. The interest rate on such an instrument is determined by the price the Fund pays for the instrument when it purchases the instrument at a discount under what the instrument entitles the Fund to receive when the instrument matures. The amount of the discount the Fund will receive will depend upon the length of time to maturity of the separated U.S. Government Security and prevailing market interest rates when the separated U.S. Government Security is purchased. Separated U.S. Government Securities can be considered zero coupon investments because no payment is made to the Fund until maturity. The market values of these securities are much more susceptible to change in market interest rates than income-producing securities. See “Zero Coupon and Pay-In-Kind Securities.” These securities are purchased with original issue discount and such discount is includable as gross income to a Fund shareholder over the life of the security.
The Funds may also purchase certificates, not issued by the U.S. Treasury, which evidence ownership of future interest, principal or interest and principal payments on obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury. The actual U.S. Treasury securities will be held by a custodian on behalf of the certificate holder. These certificates are purchased with original issue discount and are subject to greater fluctuations in market value, based upon changes in market interest rates, than income-producing securities.
L. Variable Rate and Floating Rate Securities. The Funds may invest in variable rate and floating rate securities. Issuers of such notes include corporations, banks, broker-dealers, finance companies and issuers of municipal securities. Variable rate notes include master demand notes that are obligations permitting the holder to invest fluctuating amounts, which may change daily without penalty, pursuant to direct arrangements between the Fund, as lender, and the borrower. The interest rates on these notes fluctuate from time to time. The issuer of such obligations normally has a corresponding right, after a given period, to prepay in its discretion the outstanding principal amount of the obligations plus accrued interest upon a specified number of days’ notice to the holders of such obligations.
The interest rate on a floating rate obligation is based on a known lending rate, such as a bank’s prime rate, and is adjusted automatically each time such rate is adjusted. The interest rate on a variable rate obligation is adjusted automatically at specified intervals. Frequently, such obligations are secured by letters of credit or other credit support arrangements provided by banks. Because these obligations are direct lending arrangements between the lender and borrower, there may be no established secondary market for these obligations and they may be illiquid. See “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for the risks of illiquid securities. Where these obligations are not secured by letters of credit or other credit support arrangements, the right of a Fund to redeem is dependent on the ability of the borrower to pay principal and interest on demand. Such obligations frequently are not rated by credit rating agencies. The Funds will invest in obligations that are unrated only if they determine that, at the time of investment, the obligations are of comparable quality to the other obligations in which the Fund may invest. The Fund will consider on an ongoing basis the creditworthiness of the issuers of the floating and variable rate obligations in the Fund’s portfolio.
M. Zero Coupon and Pay-In-Kind Securities. The Funds may invest in zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities. Zero coupon securities are debt obligations that do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or a specified date when the securities begin paying current interest. They are issued and traded at a discount from their face amount or par value, which discount varies depending on the time remaining until cash payments begin, prevailing interest rates, liquidity of the security and the perceived credit quality of the issuer. Pay-in-kind securities are those that pay “interest” through the issuance of additional securities. The market prices of zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities generally are more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest periodically and in cash and are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than do other types of debt securities having similar maturities and credit quality. Original issue discount earned on zero coupon securities, and the “interest” received on pay-in-kind securities, each year must be accounted for by a Fund that holds such securities for purposes of determining the amount it must distribute that year to continue to qualify for tax treatment as a regulated investment company. Thus, a Fund may be required to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of cash it actually receives. These distributions must be made from a Fund’s cash assets or, if necessary, from the proceeds of sales of portfolio securities. A Fund will not be able to purchase additional income-producing securities with cash used to make such distributions, and its current income ultimately could be reduced as a result.
II.
Equity Securities
A. Common Stocks, Preferred Stocks, and Warrants. The Funds may invest in equity securities, including common stocks, preferred stocks, rights, warrants that are convertible into common stocks as well as options to buy or sell stocks (“equity securities”). Equity securities are subject to market risk. This means that they may decline in value over short or even extended periods not only because of company-specific developments, but also due to an economic downturn, a change in interest rates, or a change in investor sentiment. Stock markets tend to run in cycles with periods when prices generally go up, known as “bull” markets, and periods when stock prices generally go down, referred to as “bear” markets. The risks of investing in equity securities can be magnified when a Fund invests in them by means of options. For the special risks associated with options, see “Section VII. Futures and Options”. The Funds may invest in equity securities of foreign companies directly or through depository receipts. Investments in the stocks of foreign companies involve additional risks, including risks arising from currency fluctuations, government regulation, unfavorable political or legal developments, differences in financial reporting standards, and less stringent regulation of foreign securities markets. See “Section III. Foreign Securities Exposure” for the additional information on the associated strategies and risks. The Funds may also invest in common stocks or other equity securities issued by newer and less seasoned companies with small to medium market capitalizations. Securities issued by such companies present greater risks than securities which are issued by larger, more established companies.
B. Shares of Other Investment Companies. The Funds may invest in the shares of other investment companies, including Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”) that are registered as investment companies. Investments in the shares of other investment companies or ETFs carry all of the same risks that are associated with direct investments in the securities that are owned by such companies. See “Shares of Exchange Traded Funds.” Investments in the shares of other investment companies or ETFs also expose a Fund to additional expenses. A Fund that invests in an investment company or an ETF will bear a proportionate share of the fees, including investment advisory and administrative fees, that are paid by such investment company or ETF.
C. Shares of Exchange-Traded Funds. ETFs essentially are baskets of stocks that are listed on an exchange and trade like individual stocks. ETFs typically seek to replicate selected indices. The value of an ETF is usually determined by demand for the underlying securities themselves. Although the value of an ETF is related to the ETF’s underlying portfolio assets, shares of ETFs (like shares of closed-end investment companies) can trade at a discount to net asset value. In addition, a failure to maintain the exchange listing of an ETF’s shares and substantial market or other disturbances could adversely affect the value of such securities.
ETFs may or may not be registered as investment companies depending upon how they are organized. ETFs that are organized as unit investment trusts are registered under the 1940 Act as investment companies. Examples of such ETFs include iShares (formerly called World Equity Benchmark Shares or WEBS) and Standard & Poor’s Depository Receipts (“SPDRs”). ETFs that are organized as grantor trusts, such as Holding Company Depository Receipts (“HOLDRs”), generally are not required to register as investment companies under the 1940 Act. Investments in ETFs, whether or not registered or not registered as investment companies, expose the Funds to additional fees.
D. Real Estate Investment Trusts. The Funds may invest in shares of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). Equity REITS invest in income-producing real estate. They produce income from rental and lease payments as well as occasional sales of property. Mortgage REITs make construction, development, and long-term mortgage loans. They produce income from repayment of the loans and sales of the loan obligations. REITs may invest in both real estate and real estate loans.
Unlike most corporations, REITs do not have to pay federal income tax if they meet certain Internal Revenue Code requirements. To qualify, a REIT must (1) distribute to its shareholders for each taxable year at least 90% of the sum of its “real estate investment trust taxable income” and certain other income and (2) must derive at least 75% of its gross income from rent from, interest on mortgages, and on sales of real property. REITs generally offer investors greater liquidity and diversification than direct ownership of real estate, as well as greater income potential than an investment in common stocks.
REITs are subject to real estate industry risk. In general, real estate values can be affected by a variety of factors, including supply and demand for properties, the economic health of the country as well as different regions, and the strength of specific industries that rent properties. Ultimately, an individual REIT’s performance depends on the types and locations for the properties it owns and on how well the REIT manages its properties. For instance, rental income could decline because of extended vacancies, increased competition from nearby properties, tenants’ failures to pay rent, or incompetent management. Property values could decrease because of overbuilding in the area, environmental liabilities, uninsured damages caused by natural disasters, a general decline in the neighborhood, losses due to casualty or condemnation, increases in property taxes, or changes in zoning laws. Loss of federal tax status as a REIT may also affect an individual REIT’s performance.
REITs are also subject to interest rate risk. REIT stock prices overall will decline over short or even long periods because of rising interest rates. In general, during periods of high interest rate risks, REITs may lose some of their appeal for investors who may be able to obtain higher yields from other income-producing investments. Higher interest rates also mean that financing for real estate purchases and improvements may be more costly and difficult to obtain.
REITs tend to be small or medium-size companies. Because small and mid-cap stocks are typically less liquid than large-cap stocks, REIT stocks may sometimes experience greater share-price fluctuation than the stocks of larger companies. See “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for the risks of illiquid securities.
E. Income Deposit Securities (“IDSs”). For a discussion of IDSs, see “Section I. Debt Securities – E. Income Deposit Securities.”
III.
Foreign Securities Exposure
The Funds may invest in securities issued by foreign companies or governmental authorities either directly or through depository receipts or exchange traded funds (“ETFs”) (generally “foreign securities”). Investing in foreign securities involves more risk than investing in U.S. securities. Changes in the value of foreign currencies can significantly affect the value of a foreign security held by a Fund, irrespective of developments relating to the issuer. In addition, the values of foreign securities may be affected by changes in exchange control regulations and fluctuations in the relative rates of exchange between the currencies of different nations, as well as by economic and political developments. Other risks involved in investing in foreign securities include the following: there may be less publicly available information about foreign companies comparable to the reports and ratings that are published about companies in the United States; foreign companies are not generally subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those applicable to U.S. companies; some foreign stock markets have substantially less volume than U.S. markets, and securities of some foreign companies are less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies; there may be less government supervision and regulation of foreign stock exchanges, brokers and listed companies than exist in the United States; and there may be the possibility of expropriation or confiscatory taxation, political or social instability or diplomatic developments which could affect assets of a Fund held in foreign countries. Investments in foreign government debt obligations also involve special risks. The issuer of the debt may be unable or unwilling to pay interest or repay principal when due in accordance with the terms of such debt, and a Fund may have limited legal resources in the event of default. Political conditions, especially a sovereign entity’s willingness to meet the terms of its debt obligations, are of considerable significance.
A. Depository Receipts. The Funds may invest in securities issued by foreign companies through American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) or Global Depository Receipts (“GDRs”). ADRs typically are issued by a U.S. bank or trust company and evidence ownership of the underlying securities of foreign issuers. Generally, ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and are designed for use in the U.S. securities markets. Thus, these securities are not denominated in the same currency as the underlying securities into which they may be converted. ADRs are not considered by the Funds to be foreign securities for purpose of any investment restrictions on investments in foreign securities. ADRs are, however, subject to many of the risks inherent in investing in foreign securities, including but not limited to currency fluctuations, political instability, government regulation, unfavorable political or legal developments, and differences in financial reporting standards. ADRs may be purchased through “sponsored” or “unsponsored” facilities. A sponsored facility is established jointly by the issuer of the underlying security and a depository, whereas a depository may establish an unsponsored facility without participation by the issuer of the depository security. Holders of unsponsored depository receipts generally bear all the costs of such facilities and the depository of an unsponsored facility frequently is under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications received from the issuer of the deposited security or to pass through voting rights to the holders of such receipts of the deposited securities.
GDRs are issued globally and evidence a similar ownership arrangement to ADRs. Generally, GDRs are not denominated in U.S. dollars and are designed for trading in non-U.S. securities markets. Unlike ADRs, GDRs are typically denominated in foreign currencies. They may not, however, be denominated in the same currency as the underlying securities into which they may be converted. As with ADRs, the issuers of the securities underlying unsponsored GDRs are not obligated to disclose material information in the U.S. and, therefore, there may be less information available regarding such issuers and there may not be a correlation between such information and the market value of the GDRs. GDRs also involve the risks of other investments in foreign securities. For purposes of any investment restrictions on investments in foreign securities, GDRs are considered to be foreign securities.
B. Foreign Securities Traded in the United States. The Funds may invest directly in foreign equity or debt securities that are traded in the United States. Such securities are generally denominated in United States dollars. They also may be issued originally in the United States. For example, some foreign companies raise capital by selling dollar-denominated bonds to institutional investors in the United States (“Yankee Bonds”). Such bonds have all of the risks associated with foreign securities traded in foreign markets, except for the risks of foreign securities markets. There may be a thin trading market for foreign securities that are traded in the United States, and in some cases such securities may be illiquid, since such securities may be restricted and traded principally among institutional investors. See “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for the risks of illiquid securities. To the extent that dollar-denominated foreign stocks and bonds are traded in the United States securities markets, the Funds do not consider them to be foreign securities for purposes of investment policies restricting investments on such securities.
C. Foreign Securities Traded in Foreign Markets. The Funds may invest in foreign securities that are traded in foreign securities markets. In addition to the general risks of foreign investments discussed above, securities that are traded in foreign markets present special risks, including higher brokerage costs, potentially thinner trading markets, extended settlement periods and the risks of holding securities with foreign subcustodians and securities depositories. When the Funds are investing in securities that are denominated in foreign currencies, they may also sell securities denominated in foreign currencies and retain the proceeds in those foreign currencies to use at a future date (to purchase other securities denominated in those currencies) or buy foreign currencies outright to purchase securities denominated in those foreign currencies at a future date. The Funds may also engage in foreign currency futures contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency exchange contracts and options thereon. See “Futures and Options” in section VII for a description of such investments. The Funds may also invest some or all of their excess cash in deposit accounts with foreign banks.
The Funds may invest in participatory notes. Participatory notes (commonly known as P-notes) are derivative instruments used by foreign funds and investors to take positions in Indian securities. Participatory notes are generally issued by the associates of India-based foreign brokerages and domestic institutional brokerages. Participatory notes represent interests in securities listed on the Indian bourses and, thus, present similar risks to investing directly in such securities. Participatory notes also expose investors to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the entity issuing the note may not be able to honor its financial commitments.
D. Foreign Securities Traded in Emerging Markets. The Funds may invest in the securities of issuers in less developed foreign countries including countries whose economies or securities markets are not yet highly developed. There are special risks associated with investing in emerging markets in addition to those described above in “Foreign Securities Traded in Foreign Markets.” These special risks include, among others, greater political uncertainties, an economy's dependence on revenues from particular commodities or on international aid or development assistance, currency transfer restrictions, a limited number of potential buyers for such securities and delays and disruptions in securities settlement procedures.
E. Foreign Currency. In addition to the instruments described in the Futures and Options section below, a Fund also may invest in foreign currency, foreign currency futures, and foreign currency options. Unlike forward foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign currency futures contracts and options on such contracts are standardized as to amount and delivery period and are traded on boards of trade and commodities exchanges. It is anticipated that such contracts may provide greater liquidity and lower costs than forward currency exchange contracts.
A Fund may purchase eurodollar instruments, which are U.S. dollar-denominated futures contracts or options thereon which are linked to the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”), although foreign currency-denominated instruments are available from time to time. Eurodollar futures contracts enable purchasers to obtain a fixed rate for the lending of funds and sellers to obtain a fixed rate for borrowings. A Fund might use Eurodollar futures contracts and options thereon to hedge against changes in LIBOR, to which many interest rate swaps and fixed-income instruments are linked.
IV.
Restricted and Illiquid Securities
The Funds may invest in restricted and illiquid securities. Restricted securities are securities that are subject to legal restrictions on resale, such as securities that have been issued in private transactions without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”). Restricted securities that have been sold without registration in private transactions generally can be resold only to other qualified institutional buyers under exemptions from registration under the 1993 Act, such as Rule 144A, or in subsequent registered offerings. The Funds may register restricted securities for resale. The registration of securities for resale involves costs and the Funds generally must rely on the issuers to provide accurate financial and other information in the registration statement and other regulatory filings for such securities.
Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business at approximately the prices at which they are valued. The Funds consider restricted securities to be illiquid unless their adviser or subadviser determines that such securities are liquid under policies and procedures that have been approved by the Board of Trustees of the Funds. The Funds also consider repurchase agreements with maturities in excess of seven days and OTC options and their underlying collateral to be illiquid securities.
It may be difficult or impossible for the Funds to resell restricted or illiquid securities. As a result, the Funds could suffer losses by investing in such securities. It may also be difficult to value such securities. The Funds could also incur costs (such as registration fees) to resell restricted securities.
V.
When-Issued Securities
The Funds may invest in securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis at the time the purchase is made. A Fund generally would not pay for such securities or start earning interest on them until they are issued or received. However, when a Fund purchases debt obligations on a when-issued basis, it assumes the risks of ownership, including the risk of price fluctuation, at the time of purchase, not at the time of receipt. Failure of the issuer to deliver a security purchased by a Fund on a when-issued basis may result in such Fund incurring a loss or missing an opportunity to make an alternative investment. When a Fund enters into a commitment to purchase securities on a when-issued basis, it establishes a separate account on its books and records or with its custodian consisting of cash or liquid high-grade debt securities equal to the amount of the Fund’s commitment, which are valued at their fair market value. If on any day the market value of this segregated account falls below the value of the Fund’s commitment, the Fund will be required to deposit additional cash or qualified securities into the account until the value of the account is equal to the value of the Fund’s commitment. When the securities to be purchased are issued, the Fund will pay for the securities from available cash, the sale of securities in the segregated account, sales of other securities and, if necessary, from the sale of the when-issued securities themselves although this is not ordinarily expected. Securities purchased on a when-issued basis are subject to the risk that yields available in the market, when delivery takes place, may be higher than the rate to be received on the securities a Fund is committed to purchase. Sale of securities in the segregated account or sale of the when-issued securities may cause the realization of a capital gain or loss.
VI.
Standby Commitments
The Funds may acquire standby commitments from banks with respect to securities held by the Funds. Under a standby commitment, a bank agrees to buy a particular security from a Fund at a specified price at the fund’s option. A standby commitment is similar to a put option for a particular security in a Fund’s portfolio. Standby commitments acquired by a Fund are not added to the computation of that Fund’s net asset value. Standby commitments are subject to certain risk, including the issuer’s ability to pay for a security when a Fund decides to sell the security for which it is issued and the lack of familiarity with standby commitments in the marketplace. A Fund’s ability to exercise their rights under a standby commitment is unconditional, without any limitation whatsoever, and non-transferable. The Fund, however, is permitted to sell a security covered by a standby commitment at any time and to any person.
A Fund may pay a consideration to a bank for the issuance of a standby commitment if necessary and advisable. Such a consideration may take the form of either a payment in cash, or the payment of a higher price for security covered by such a commitment. The effect of the payment of such consideration is to reduce the yield to maturity for the security so covered. Standby commitments acquired by a Fund are not added to the computation of a Fund’s net asset value and are valued at zero. When a Fund pays a consideration for the issuance of a standby commitment, the cost is treated as unrealized depreciation for the time it is held by the Fund. The dollar-weighted average maturity calculation for a Fund is not affected by standby commitments.
VII.
Futures and Options
The Funds may use financial futures, options or forward currency contracts as part of their investment strategies. The Funds may use stock index futures contracts and options thereon in anticipation of a significant market or market sector advance. The purchase of a stock index futures contract affords a hedge against not participating in such advance at a time when a Fund is not fully invested. Such purchase of a futures contract would serve as a temporary substitute for the purchase of individual stocks, which may then be purchased in an orderly fashion. Further, stock index futures contracts and call options thereon may be purchased to maintain a desired percentage of a Fund invested in stocks in the event of a large cash flow into the Fund, or to generate additional income from cash held by the Fund. Stock index futures and options thereon may also be used to adjust country exposure.
The Funds may also use forward currency contracts to hedge cash positions during the settlement of transactions involving individual foreign securities and in between such transactions. For example, when a Fund enters into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security denominated in a foreign currency, or when a Fund anticipates the receipt in a foreign currency of dividend or interest payments on a security that it holds, a Fund may desire to “lock-in” the U.S. dollar price of the security or the U.S. dollar equivalent of such payment, as the case may be, by entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale, for a fixed amount of U.S. dollars or foreign currency, of the amount of foreign currency involved in the underlying transaction. A Fund will thereby be able to protect itself against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the currency exchange rates.
The Funds may also use foreign currency futures transactions and options. Through the purchase and sale of such contracts, the Funds may be able to achieve many of the same objectives attainable through the use of forward currency contracts, but more effectively and possibly at a lower cost. Unlike forward foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign currency futures contracts and options on such contracts are standardized as to amount and delivery period and are traded on boards of trade and commodities exchanges. It is anticipated that such contracts may provide greater liquidity and lower costs than forward currency exchange contracts.
The Funds may purchase eurodollar instruments, which are U.S. dollar-denominated futures contracts or options thereon which are linked to the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”), although foreign currency-denominated instruments are available from time to time. Eurodollar futures contracts enable purchasers to obtain a fixed rate for the lending of funds and sellers to obtain a fixed rate for borrowings. The Funds might use Eurodollar futures contracts and options thereon to hedge against changes in LIBOR, to which many interest rate swaps and fixed-income instruments are linked.
The Funds may also purchase options to buy individual securities when they believe that the prices of the securities will increase or write (sell) covered call options on individual securities when they do not believe that the prices of these securities will increase. When a Fund buys an option to purchase an individual security, it is generally anticipating that the price of the underlying security will increase before the option expires. In the event that this does not occur, the option could expire worthless and the Fund could lose the entire amount that it had paid for the option. When a Fund writes a covered call option, the Fund is generally attempting to increase the income it receives by holding the underlying security. However, it also limits its opportunity to profit from any increase in the market value of the underlying security above the exercise price of the option.
Additional information concerning the use of these instruments is discussed below. A Fund might not employ any of the strategies described below for a variety of reasons including the fact that a particular futures or options strategy may be too costly to benefit the Fund. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any strategy will succeed. Use of these instruments is subject to the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the several options and futures exchanges upon which options and futures contracts are traded and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”). In addition, a Fund's ability to use these instruments may be limited by tax considerations. The Funds have claimed an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act and, therefore, the Funds are not subject to registration or regulation as a pool operator.
To the extent that a Fund participates in the options or futures markets, it will incur investment risks and transaction costs to which it would not be subject absent the use of these strategies. The use of these strategies involves certain special risks, including: (1) dependence on the Adviser's or Subadviser’s, as applicable, ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and securities prices; (2) imperfect correlation between the price of options, futures contracts and options thereon and movements in the prices of the securities being hedged; (3) the fact that skills needed to use these strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio securities; (4) the leverage (if any) that is created by investing in the option or futures contract; and (5) the possible absence of a liquid secondary market for any particular instrument at any time. If the Adviser's or a Subadviser’s, as applicable, prediction of movements in the direction of the securities and interest rate markets is inaccurate, the adverse consequences to that Fund may leave it in a worse position than if such strategies were not used.
No price is paid upon entering into futures contracts. Instead, upon entering into a futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit with their custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker through which the transaction is effected an amount of cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid, high-grade debt instruments generally equal to 3%-5% or less of the contract value. This amount is known as “initial margin.”
When writing a call or put option on a futures contract, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Initial margin on futures contracts is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking to market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures transactions, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligation to or from a clearing organization. A Fund is also obligated to make initial and variation margin payments when it writes options on futures contracts.
Buyers and sellers of futures positions and options thereon can enter into offsetting closing transactions, by selling or purchasing, respectively, a futures position or options position with the same terms as the position or option purchased or sold. Positions in futures contracts and options thereon may be closed only on an exchange or board of trade providing a secondary market for such futures or options.
Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may establish daily limits on the amount that the price of a futures contract or related option may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular contract, no trades may be made that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movements during a particular trading day and therefore does not limit potential losses because prices could move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading and thereby prevent prompt liquidation of unfavorable positions. In such event, it may not be possible for a Fund to close a position and, in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would have to make daily cash payments of variation margin (except in the case of purchased options). However, in the event futures contracts have been used to hedge portfolio securities, such securities generally will not be sold until the contracts can be terminated. In such circumstances, an increase in the price of the securities, if any, may partially or completely offset losses on the futures contract. However, there is no guarantee that the price of the securities will, in fact, correlate with the price movements in the contracts and thus provide an offset to losses on the contracts.
Successful use by a Fund of futures contracts and related options will in part depend upon the Adviser’s or Subadviser’s, as applicable, ability to predict movements in the direction of the overall securities, currency and interest rate markets, which requires different skills and techniques than predicting changes in the prices of individual securities. There is, in addition, the risk that the movements in the price of the futures contract or related option will not correlate with the movements in prices of the underlying instruments or currencies. In addition, if a Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell assets from its portfolio to meet daily variation margin requirements. Any such sale of assets may or may not be made at prices that reflect the rising market. Consequently, a Fund may need to sell assets at a time when such sales are disadvantageous to the Fund. If the price of the futures contract or related option moves more than the price of the underlying instruments or currencies, a Fund will experience either a loss or a gain on the futures contract or related option that may or may not be completely offset by movement in the price of the instruments or currencies that are the subject of the hedge.
In addition to the possibility that there may be an imperfect correlation, or no correlation at all, between price movements in the futures or related option position and the securities or currencies being hedged, movements in the prices of futures contracts and related options may not correlate perfectly with movements in the prices of the hedged securities or currencies because of price distortions in the futures market. As a result, a correct forecast of general market trends may not result in successful hedging through the use of futures contracts and related options over the short term.
Positions in futures contracts and related options may be closed out only on the exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market for such futures contracts or related options. Although a Fund may intend to purchase or sell futures contracts and related options only on the exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be a liquid secondary market for such futures and related options, there is no assurance that such a market will exist for any particular contract or option at any particular time. In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures or option position and, in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make variation margin payments.
Options on futures contracts have a limited life. The ability to establish and close out options on futures will be subject to the maintenance of liquid secondary markets on the relevant exchanges or boards of trade.
Purchasers of options on futures contracts pay a premium in cash at the time of purchase. This amount and the transaction costs are all that is at risk. Sellers of options on a futures contract, however, must post initial margin and are subject to additional margin calls that could be substantial in the event of adverse price movements. In addition, although the maximum amount at risk when a Fund purchases an option is the premium paid for the option and the transaction costs, there may be circumstances when the purchase of an option on a futures contract would result in a loss to a Fund when the use of a futures contract would not, such as when there is no movement in the level of the underlying stock index or the value of securities or currencies being hedged.
A Fund’s activities in the futures and related options markets may result in a higher portfolio turnover rate and additional transaction costs in the form of added brokerage commissions; however, a Fund also may save on commissions by using futures and related options as a hedge rather than buying or selling individual securities or currencies in anticipation or as a result of market movements.
Buyers and sellers of foreign currency futures contracts are subject to the same risks that apply to the use of futures generally. Further, settlement of a foreign currency futures contract may occur within the country issuing the underlying currency. In that case, a Fund must accept or make delivery of the underlying foreign currency in accordance with any U.S. or foreign restrictions or regulations regarding the maintenance of foreign banking arrangements by U.S. residents, and may be required to pay any fees, taxes or charges associated with such delivery that are assessed in the issuing country.
A Fund may not write options or purchase or sell futures or forward contracts unless it owns either (1) an offsetting (“covered”) position in securities, or other options or futures or forward contracts or (2) cash and liquid securities with a value sufficient at all times to cover its potential obligations. A Fund must comply with guidelines established by the SEC with respect to coverage of such instruments by mutual funds and, if required, will set aside cash and liquid securities in a segregated account with its custodian in the prescribed amount. Securities or other options, futures or forward contract positions used for cover and securities held in a segregated account cannot be sold or closed out while the strategy is outstanding unless they are replaced with similar assets. As a result, there is a possibility that the use of cover or segregation involving a large percentage of a Fund's assets could impede portfolio management and decrease a Fund's liquidity.
A Fund may effectively terminate its right or obligation under an option by entering into a closing transaction. If a Fund wishes to terminate its obligation under a call option it has written, a Fund may purchase a call option of the same series (that is, a call option identical in its terms to the call option previously written); this is known as a closing purchase transaction. Conversely, in order to terminate its right under a call or put option it has purchased, a Fund may write an option of the same series, as the option held; this is known as a closing sale transaction. Closing transactions essentially permit a Fund to realize profits or limit losses on its options positions prior to the exercise or expiration of the option.
The value of an option position will reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, currency or index, the time remaining until expiration, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, currency or index and general market conditions. For this reason, the successful use of options depends upon the Adviser's or the Subadviser’s ability to forecast the direction of price fluctuations in the underlying securities or, in the case of index options, fluctuations in the market sector represented by the index selected.
Unless an option purchased by a Fund is exercised or unless a closing transaction is affected with respect to that position, a loss will be realized in the amount of the premium paid and any transaction costs.
A position in an exchange-listed option may be closed out only on an exchange that provides a secondary market for identical options. The ability to establish and close out positions on the exchanges is subject to the maintenance of a liquid secondary market. There can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular option at any particular time. Closing transactions may be affected with respect to options traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets (currently the primary markets for options on debt securities) only by negotiating directly with the other party to the option contract or in a secondary market for the option if such market exists. There can be no assurance that a Fund will be able to liquidate an OTC option at a favorable price at any time prior to expiration. In the event of insolvency of the opposite party, a Fund may be unable to liquidate an OTC option.
Accordingly, it may not be possible to effect closing transactions with respect to certain options, with the result that a Fund would have to exercise those options that it has purchased in order to realize any profit. With respect to options written by a Fund, the inability to enter into a closing transaction may result in material losses to it. For example, because a Fund must maintain a covered position or segregate assets with respect to any call option it writes, a Fund may not sell the underlying assets used to cover an option during the period it is obligated under the option unless it substitutes other acceptable securities. This requirement may impair a Fund's ability to sell a portfolio security or make an investment at a time when such a sale or investment might be advantageous.
Index options are settled exclusively in cash. If a Fund purchases an option on an index, the option is settled based on the closing value of the index on the exercise date. Thus, a holder of an index option who exercises it before the closing index value for that day is available runs the risk that the level of the underlying index may subsequently change. For example, in the case of a call option, if such a change causes the closing index value to fall below the exercise price of the option on the index, the exercising holder will be required to pay the difference between the closing index value and the exercise price of the option.
A Fund's activities in the options markets may result in a higher portfolio turnover rate and additional brokerage costs; however, a Fund also may save on commissions by using options as a hedge rather than buying or selling individual securities in anticipation or as a result of market movements.
The precise matching of the forward currency contract amounts and the value of the securities involved will not generally be possible because the future value of such securities in foreign currencies will change as a consequence of market movements in the value of those securities between the date the forward contract is entered into and the date it matures. Accordingly, it may be necessary for a Fund to purchase additional foreign currency on the spot (i.e., cash) market and bear the expense of such purchase if the market value of the security is less than the amount of foreign currency the Fund is obligated to deliver and if a decision is made to sell the security and make delivery of the foreign currency. Conversely, it may be necessary to sell on the spot market some of the foreign currency received upon the sale of the portfolio security if its market value exceeds the amount of foreign currency the Fund is obligated to deliver. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain. Forward currency contracts involve the risk that anticipated currency movements will not be accurately predicted, causing a Fund to sustain losses on these contracts and transactions costs.
At or before the maturity date of a forward contract requiring a Fund to sell a currency, the Fund may either sell a portfolio security and use the sale proceeds to make delivery of the currency or retain the security and offset its contractual obligation to deliver the currency by purchasing a second contract pursuant to which the Fund will obtain, on the same maturity date, the same amount of the currency that it is obligated to deliver. Similarly, a Fund may close out a forward contract requiring it to purchase a specified currency by entering into a second contract entitling it to sell the same amount of the same currency on the maturity date of the first contract. A Fund would realize a gain or loss as a result of entering into an offsetting forward currency contract under either circumstance to the extent the exchange rate or rates between the currencies involved moved between the execution dates of the first contract and the offsetting contract. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to enter into new or offsetting forward currency contracts. Forward currency contracts also involve a risk that the other party to the contract may fail to deliver currency or pay for currency when due, which could result in substantial losses to a Fund. The cost to a Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currencies involved, the length of the contract period and the market conditions then prevailing. Because forward currency contracts are usually entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are involved.
VIII.
Derivatives
The Funds may invest in derivatives, including credit-linked securities, inverse floaters and interest rate swaps. Derivative securities are instruments that derive their value from other financial instruments, securities, or indices.
A. Credit-Linked Securities. Credit-linked securities are securities whose performance is linked to the performance of a designated basket or index of high yield securities. Credit-linked securities are typically issued by a trust or a similar entity, which invests in a designated basket of high yield securities or in swap agreements or securities lending agreements that are based upon a designated basket or index of high yield securities. Investments in credit-linked securities can be an efficient means of managing the cash position of a Fund.
The risks associated with investing in credit-linked securities include the following:
1.
Market Risk. The values of credit-linked securities will generally rise or fall in response to the changes in the market values of the designated basket or index of high yield securities.
2.
Credit Risk and Interest Rate Risk. The credit risk and interest rate risk associated with an investment in a credit-linked security are generally equivalent to the credit risk and interest rate risk associated with direct investments in the actual securities in the underlying designated basket or index of high yield securities.
3.
Counter-Party Risk. This is the risk that the counter-party to a swap or securities lending agreement will be unable to honor its commitments under the agreement.
4.
Liquidity Risk. Credit-linked securities are typically not registered for public trading under the Securities Act of 1933 and are therefore considered restricted securities. At times, it may be difficult to sell credit-linked securities due to the lack of an available trading market. See, Section IV “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for the risks of illiquid securities.
5.
Basis Risk. This is the risk that the performance of credit-linked securities may not correspond with the performance of the underlying designated basket or index of high yield securities.
For these reasons, there is no guarantee that the strategy of investing in credit-linked securities will be successful and a Fund could lose money by investing in them.
B. Inverse Floaters. Inverse floaters are securities on which the rate of interest varies inversely with interest rates on other securities or the value of an index. For example, an inverse floating rate security may pay interest at a rate that increases as a specified interest rate index decreases but decreases as that index increases. The secondary market for inverse floaters may be limited and they may be illiquid. See “Restricted and Illiquid Securities” for the risks of illiquid securities. The market values of such securities generally are more volatile than the market values of ordinary fixed rate obligations. The interest rates on inverse floaters may be significantly reduced, even to zero, if interest rates rise.
C. Interest Rate Swaps. Interest rate swap transactions are agreements between two parties to exchange interest payments on a designated amount of two different securities for a designated period of time. For example, two parties may agree to exchange interest payments on variable and fixed rate instruments. The Funds may enter into interest rate swap transactions to preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or a portion of its bond portfolio.
The Funds will usually enter into swaps on a net basis, i.e., the two payment streams will be netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or on dates specified in the investment. A Fund’s obligations under a swap agreement will be accrued on a daily basis (offset against any amounts owing to the Fund), and appropriate Fund assets having an aggregate net asset value at least equal to the accrued but unpaid net amounts owed to a swap counter-party will be generally maintained in a segregated account. A Fund also will establish and maintain such segregated accounts with respect to its total obligations under any swaps that are not entered into on a net basis. Because segregated accounts will be established with respect to such transactions, the Funds do not treat swap transactions as constituting senior securities. Accordingly, the Funds will not treat them as being subject to the Funds’ borrowing restrictions.
The Funds will enter into interest rate swap transactions only with banks and recognized securities dealers or their respective affiliates believed to present minimal credit risk in accordance with guidelines established by each Fund's Board. Swaps do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is limited to the net amount of payments the Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to a swap defaults, the Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund contractually is entitled to receive. If there is a default by the counter-party, the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.
The swap market has grown significantly in recent years with a large number of banks and investment banking firms acting both as principals and as agents utilizing standardized swap documentation. As a result, the swap market has become relatively liquid. Certain swap transactions involve more recent innovations for which standardized documentation has not yet been fully developed and, accordingly, they are less liquid than traditional swap transactions.
The use of swaps is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. If a Fund were incorrect in its forecasts of interest rates, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if this investment technique were not used.
IX.
Repurchase Agreements
The Funds may invest in repurchase agreements. A repurchase agreement is essentially a short-term collateralized loan. The lender (a Fund) agrees to purchase a security from a borrower (typically a broker-dealer) at a specified price. The borrower simultaneously agrees to repurchase that same security at a higher price on a future date. The difference between the purchase price and the repurchase price effectively constitutes the payment of interest. In a standard repurchase agreement, the securities, which serve as collateral, are transferred to a Fund’s custodian bank. In a “tri-party” repurchase agreement, these securities would be held by a different bank for the benefit of the Fund as buyer and the broker-dealer as seller. In a “quad-party” repurchase agreement, the Fund’s custodian bank also is made a party to the agreement. Each Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System or securities dealers who are members of a national securities exchange or are market makers in government securities. The period of these repurchase agreements will usually be short, from overnight to one week. The securities, which are subject to repurchase agreements, however, may have long maturities. Each Fund will always receive, as collateral, securities whose market value, including accrued interest, will at all times be at least equal to 100% of the dollar amount invested by the Fund in each agreement, and the Fund will make payment for such securities only upon physical delivery or evidence of book entry transfer to the account of the custodian. If the seller defaults, a Fund might incur a loss if the value of the collateral securing the repurchase agreement declines, and might incur disposition costs in connection with liquidating the collateral. In addition, if bankruptcy or similar proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security, realization upon the collateral by a Fund may be delayed or limited.
X.
Temporary Borrowing
The Funds may borrow for temporary or emergency purposes to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any applicable exemptive relief. Borrowing increases the risks of investing by increasing leverage and accentuating potential losses.
XI.
Temporary Defensive Investments
From time to time, the Funds may take temporary defensive positions in reaction to unusual market conditions, anticipated redemptions, or other events. At such times, the Funds may invest large portions of their portfolios in cash (including foreign currency) or cash equivalents such as commercial paper and short-term debt instruments. For a description of commercial paper and other short-debt instruments, see “Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Investments.” When the Funds are taking temporary defensive positions, they may not achieve their investment objectives and they could suffer losses. For information concerning the risks of investing in commercial paper, other short-term debt instruments, and foreign currency, see “Debt Securities”, “Commercial Paper and Other Short-Term Investments”, and “Foreign Securities Exposure.”
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS INFORMATION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
In accordance with SEC regulatory requirements, each First Investors Fund files a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC on a quarterly basis on Forms N-CSR and N-Q. These forms are publicly available on the SEC's Internet website (http://www.sec.gov). Each Fund will also provide a copy of its latest Form N-CSR to the public free of charge upon request. Each Fund (except for a money market fund) also includes a schedule of its portfolio holdings in its annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders, which are available free of charge to the public upon request. Each Fund also publishes its top ten holdings on the First Investors website (http://www.firstinvestors.com) on a quarterly basis with a 30 day lag.
Until portfolio holdings information for First Investors Funds is made public in Form N-CSR, in Form N-Q, in a shareholder report, or on the First Investors website, it is considered to be confidential. Such information may only be disclosed to persons who have a legitimate business reason to have the information and who are subject to a duty to keep the information confidential (including a duty not to trade on such information). Neither the Funds, FIMCO, any subadviser of the Funds, nor any other person receives compensation in connection with disclosure of information about portfolio securities.
Non-public portfolio holdings information may not be provided to any actual or prospective shareholder of the Funds, any institutional investor, or any broker-dealer or financial intermediary who seeks such information for purposes of determining whether to invest in the Funds. This is not considered a legitimate business need for the information. If such persons request portfolio holdings information, they may only be provided with information that is disclosed in the latest annual or semi-annual report, in Forms N-CSR and N-Q filed with the SEC, and on the First Investors website.
Non-public portfolio holdings information may be provided to the following categories of persons based upon the fact that they have a legitimate business need for such information and are subject to a duty of confidentiality:
(a)
Investment advisers, sub-advisers, and sub-adviser candidates for the Funds (and their access persons);
(b)
Custodians and sub-custodians of the Funds;
(c)
Auditors of the Funds;
(d)
Legal counsel for the Funds;
(e)
Legal counsel to the independent trustees of the Funds;
(f)
Ratings or ranking agencies;
(g)
Parties who provide insurance for municipal securities purchased by the Funds;
(h)
Companies that provide analytical services to the Funds and their investment adviser;
(i)
Companies that provide pricing, operational, trade notification, settlement and valuation services to the Funds, their Adviser and/or their subadvisers;
(j)
Proxy voting services employed by the Funds;
(k)
Broker-dealers who provide execution or research services for the Funds (including identifying potential buyers and sellers for securities that are held by the Funds);
(l)
Broker-dealers who provide quotations that are used in pricing when a pricing service is unable to provide a price or it is determined to be unreliable; and
(m)
Companies that provide other services that are deemed to be beneficial to the Funds.
The Funds have ongoing arrangements to provide portfolio holdings information to the following: custodians and sub-custodians of the Funds (Bank of New York, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and their foreign sub-custodians); the independent registered public accounting firm of the Funds (Tait, Weller & Baker); ratings or ranking agencies and companies that provide analytical services to the Funds and their investment adviser (Lipper, FactSet Research Systems, Inc., Investment Technology Group, Inc., and Bloomberg); parties who provide insurance for municipal securities purchased by the Funds (Ambac, MBIA, FSA and FGIC); pricing service employed by Funds (FT Interactive Data Corp.); proxy voting services employed by the Funds (Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., Automatic Data Processing, Inc., and Glass Lewis & Co.); and companies that provide operational, trade notification, settlement, pricing and valuation services (State Street Investment Manager Solutions).
The following categories of persons are authorized to disclose portfolio holdings information to persons who have a legitimate business reason to receive non-public information – executive officers of the Funds, the portfolio managers, traders, analysts, other portfolio department personnel, such as portfolio assistants and administrative assistants, portfolio accountants, senior executives, and legal and compliance officers of the Funds’ adviser or subadvisers.
FIMCO employs the following policies on behalf of the Funds with respect to portfolio holdings information. It requires employees who have access to non-public portfolio holdings information as part of their regular functions to treat such information as confidential, prohibits them from trading for their own accounts based upon such information to the extent that such trading would violate the law, and prohibits them from selectively disclosing such information to any person who does not have a legitimate business need for such information that is consistent with the interests of the Funds. FIMCO permits such employees to disclose a non-public list of portfolio holdings to a broker-dealer that provides services to the Funds subject to the following conditions: (a) the list must be at least 30 days old; (b) it must not specify the number of shares or units held, the dollar value, or the percentage of assets represented by the securities; and (c) it must be accompanied by a statement that the information is being provided solely to assist the broker-dealer to provide research and execution services for the Funds and may not be used for trading in the Funds’ shares by the broker-dealer or its clients.
The subadvisers for certain First Investors Funds, Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management”), Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. (“Paradigm Capital Management”) and Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. (formerly named Vontobel USA, Inc.) (“Vontobel”), use policies that comply with the policies of First Investors Funds. Generally, Wellington Management’s policies prohibit disclosing the portfolio holdings of any Fund to any person unless such disclosure has been approved by the Fund or such a disclosure is reasonably necessary for Wellington Management to provide investment advice to its clients. Paradigm Capital Management’s policies require authorization prior to any disclosure of portfolio holdings to any outside vendor or service provider other than a broker-dealer that provides it with research and execution services. Paradigm Capital Management’s policies also recognize that it is appropriate to release portfolio information upon request from regulatory agencies or if compelled by law to do so. Vontobel, aside from its disclosure of portfolio holdings information to broker-dealers that provide research and execution services to the Funds, will not disclose portfolio holdings information to third parties until such information is made public by the Funds.
The Investment Compliance Manager of the Funds’ investment adviser monitors for compliance with the foregoing policies with respect to Access Persons of the Funds and the Adviser. Any violations of these policies are reported to the Board of Trustees of the Funds on a quarterly basis. The policies of the Funds’ sub-advisers are monitored by its compliance staff, and any violations are required to be reported to the Chief Compliance Officer of FIMCO and the Funds, and the Board of Trustees of the Funds.
PORTFOLIO TURNOVER
Portfolio securities may be sold from time to time without regard to the length of time they have been held when, in the opinion of the Adviser or Subadviser (as applicable), investment considerations warrant such action. Portfolio turnover rate is calculated by dividing (1) the lesser of purchases or sales of portfolio securities for the fiscal year by (2) the monthly average of the value of portfolio securities owned during the fiscal year. A 100% turnover rate would occur if all the securities in a Fund's portfolio, with the exception of securities whose maturities at the time of acquisition were one year or less, were sold and either repurchased or replaced within one year. A high rate of portfolio turnover (100% or more) generally leads to higher transaction costs and may result in a greater number of taxable transactions.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUNDS
Investment advisory services to each Fund are provided by FIMCO, pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”). FIMCO is a wholly owned subsidiary of First Investors Consolidated Corporation (“FICC”), and its address is 95 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005. FICC and its consolidated subsidiaries engage in a variety of businesses, ranging from investment management to brokerage services, insurance and banking.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, FIMCO is responsible for supervising and managing each Fund’s investments, determining each Fund’s portfolio transactions and supervising all aspects of each Fund's operations, subject to review by the Trustees. The Advisory Agreement also provides that FIMCO shall provide the Funds with certain executive, administrative and clerical personnel, office facilities and supplies, conduct the business and details of the operation of each Fund and assume certain expenses thereof, other than obligations or liabilities of the Funds.
The Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, with respect to a Fund, without penalty by the Trustees or by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Fund, or by FIMCO, in each instance on not less than 60 days' written notice, and shall automatically terminate in the event of its assignment (as defined in the 1940 Act). The Advisory Agreement also provides that it will continue in effect, with respect to a Fund, for a period of over two years only if such continuance is approved annually either by the Trustees or by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Fund, and, in either case, by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees voting in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.
Under the Advisory Agreement, each Fund is obligated to pay the Adviser an annual fee, paid monthly, as set forth in Part I of its SAI. Each Fund bears all expenses of its operations other than those assumed by the Adviser or its Underwriter under the terms of its Advisory or Underwriting Agreements. Fund expenses include, but are not limited to: the advisory fee; Rule 12b-1 fees; shareholder servicing fees and expenses; custodian fees and expenses; legal and auditing fees; registration fees and expenses; expenses of communicating to existing shareholders, including preparing, printing and mailing prospectuses and shareholder reports to such shareholders; and proxy and shareholder meeting expenses.
FIMCO has an Investment Committee composed of the Chairman and General Counsel of FIMCO, the Investment Compliance Manager, and the portfolio managers of each of the Funds. The Investment Committee meets periodically to review the performance of each of the Funds, the investment strategies that are being used to manage the Funds and recent additions and deletions from the portfolios of the Funds.
FICC owns all of the voting common stock of the Adviser and all of the outstanding stock of First Investors Corporation and the Funds’ transfer agent. Kathryn S. Head and members of her family control FICC and, therefore, control the Adviser.
Wellington Management serves as the investment subadviser to the Global, All-Cap Growth, Focused Equity Funds and Life Series Focused Equity Fund pursuant to a subadvisory agreement (“Subadvisory Agreement”). Under the Subadvisory Agreement, Wellington Management is responsible for managing each Fund’s investments, subject to the oversight of FIMCO and the Board. FIMCO is responsible for paying Wellington Management a subadvisory fee with respect to each Fund, as set forth in Part I of the SAI for the Fund. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that it will continue for a period of more than two years from the date of execution only so long as such continuance is approved annually by either the Board or a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund and, in either case, by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees voting in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Subadvisory Agreement also provides that it will terminate automatically if assigned or upon termination of the Advisory Agreement, and that it may be terminated at any time without penalty by the Board or a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund or by the subadviser upon not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that Wellington Management will not be liable for any error of judgment or for any loss suffered by the Fund in connection with the matters to which the Subadvisory Agreement relates, except a loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation or from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties.
Paradigm Capital Management serves as the investment subadviser to the Special Situations and Life Series Discovery Funds pursuant to a subadvisory agreement (“Subadvisory Agreement”). Under the Subadvisory Agreement, Paradigm Capital Management is responsible for managing each Fund’s investments, subject to the oversight of FIMCO and the Board. FIMCO is responsible for paying Paradigm Capital Management a subadvisory fee with respect to each Fund, as set forth in Part I of the SAI for the Fund. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that it will continue for a period of more than two years from the date of execution only so long as such continuance is approved annually by either the Board or a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund and, in either case, by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees voting in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Subadvisory Agreement also provides that it will terminate automatically if assigned or upon the termination of the Advisory Agreement, and that it may be terminated at any time without penalty by the Board or a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund or by the subadviser upon not more that 60 days’ nor less that 30 days’ written notice. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that Paradigm Capital Management will not be liable for any error of judgment or for any loss suffered by the Fund in connection with the matters to which the Subadvisory Agreement relates, except a loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation or from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations or duties.
Vontobel serves as the investment subadviser to the International and Life Series International Funds pursuant to a subadvisory agreement (“Subadvisory Agreement”). Under the Subadvisory Agreement, Vontobel is responsible for managing each Fund’s investments, subject to the oversight of FIMCO and the Board. FIMCO is responsible for paying Vontobel a subadvisory fee with respect to each Fund as set forth in Part I of the SAI for the Fund. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that it will continue for a period of more than two years from the date of execution only so long as such continuance is approved annually by either the Board or a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund and, in either case, by a vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees voting in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Subadvisory Agreement also provides that it will terminate automatically if assigned or upon the termination of the Advisory Agreement, and that it may be terminated at any time without penalty by the Board or a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund or by the subadviser upon not more that 60 days’ nor less that 30 days’ written notice. The Subadvisory Agreement provides that Vontobel will not be liable for any error of judgment or for any loss suffered by the Fund in connection with the matters to which the Subadvisory Agreement relates, except a loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation or from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations or duties.
In accordance with the requirements of Rule 204A-1 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 17j-1 of the 1940 Act, the First Investors Funds, FIMCO, and their principal underwriter, First Investors Corporation (“FIC”) have adopted a Code of Ethics (“Code”) to protect the Funds and other advisory clients of FIMCO (“Other Advisory Clients”) from actual and potential conflicts of interest which may arise from the Personal Securities Transactions and other conduct of access persons (“Access Persons”).
Under the Code, all Access Persons are expected to not only comply with the federal securities laws and the Code but also to follow the highest fiduciary and ethical standards in all business and personal dealings which could in any way affect the Funds or Other Advisory Clients. The guiding principles for all Access Persons are to place the interests of the Funds and Other Advisory Clients first at all times, to avoid placing themselves in any position in which there is any actual or apparent conflict of interest with the interests of the Funds or Other Advisory Clients, and to refrain from taking any inappropriate advantage of their positions of trust and responsibility.
Subject to certain exemptions, all Access Persons, except the disinterested Trustees of the Funds, are subject to a number of restrictions on their personal trading activities. Among other things, Access Persons (a) must report to FIMCO upon hire, and annually thereafter, all holdings of covered securities and reportable securities, as defined in the Code; (b) must have all non-exempt trades in covered securities pre-cleared; (c) are generally prohibited from trading covered securities while any of the Funds are buying or selling or actively considering buying or selling the same covered securities; (d) are prohibited from retaining profits from short-term trading in covered securities; (e) must provide duplicate account statements and confirmations to a compliance officer; and (f) are prohibited from purchasing covered securities in limited offerings, including initial public offerings and private placements, unless a compliance officer determines that there are no actual or apparent conflicts between the interest of the Access Persons and the Funds.
Wellington Management, which serves as subadviser to certain First Investors Funds, has similarly adopted a Code of Ethics that governs the personal securities trading and conduct of its portfolio managers and other access persons of its clients. Among other things, Wellington Management’s code of ethics requires its access persons to file reports concerning their personal securities holdings and transactions, including holdings of, and transactions in, mutual funds for which Wellington Management serves as subadviser; it requires access persons to preclear “covered transactions” prior to execution; and, it imposes “black out restrictions” on buying or selling securities that are being bought or sold by Wellington Management clients.
Paradigm Capital Management, which serves as subadviser to certain First Investors Funds, has similarly adopted a Code of Ethics that governs the personal securities trading and conduct of its portfolio managers and other access persons of its clients. Among other things, Paradigm Capital Management’s code of ethics requires access persons to receive approval of a compliance officer prior to executing non-exempt personal securities transactions in “Named Securities”, which are securities currently recommended by Paradigm Capital Management for purchase or sale or are under consideration for purchase or sale; and it requires its access persons to report their personal securities holdings and transactions, including holdings of, and transactions in, mutual funds for which Paradigm Capital Management serves as subadviser.
Vontobel, which serves as a subadviser to certain First Investor Funds, also has similarly adopted a Code of Ethics that governs the personal securities trading and conduct of its portfolio managers and other access persons of its clients. Personnel subject to the code may purchase and sell securities for their personal accounts, including securities that may be purchased, sold or held by the Fund for which Vontobel serves as subadviser, subject to certain restrictions and conditions. Generally, personal securities transactions are subject to preclearance procedures, reporting requirements and holding period rules. The code also restricts personal securities transactions in private placements, initial public offerings and securities in which the Funds, for which Vontobel serves as subadviser, have a pending order.
The Funds have adopted policies and procedures for determining how proxies relating to portfolio securities should be voted, including procedures for addressing potential conflicts of interest that may be presented between the interests of the Funds and their shareholders and the interests of their investment adviser, principal underwriter, and other affiliated persons.
With respect to the Funds that are managed by FIMCO, the Board of Trustees of the Funds have approved the use of FIMCO’s proxy voting policies and procedures with respect to proxies relating to portfolio securities held by such Funds. FIMCO’s proxy voting policies and procedures include guidelines for voting on particular types of issues. These guidelines reflect the belief that proxies should be voted in a manner that serves the best economic interests of the Funds. When the guidelines do not cover a specific issue, or to vote in accordance with such guidelines would be contrary to the best economic interests of the Funds, FIMCO shall use its best judgment in voting proxies on behalf of the Funds.
The following are FIMCO’s proxy voting guidelines.
Directors, Auditors and Other Business
| |
· Election of Directors | With Management |
| |
· Appointment/Selection of Auditors | With Management |
Corporate Governance
| |
· Executive Compensation | With Management. Executive compensation is generally considered when deciding whether to invest in a company. If the Adviser believes that management’s position on an executive compensation proposal is contrary to shareholder interests, it will generally sell its investment in the issuer. |
· Classified Boards | Against |
· Golden Parachutes | Against |
· Super Majority Provision | Against |
· Combination of Several Anti-Takeover Proposals and an Anti-Greenmail Proposal (without the opportunity to vote separately on each issue) | Against |
| |
· Require Majority of Independent Directors | Reviewed on a Case-by-Case Basis |
| |
· Limit Special Meeting | Against |
· Unequal Voting Rights | Against |
· Cumulative Voting | With Management |
· Blank Check Preferred Stock | Against |
· Increase in Authorized Common Stock | Reviewed on a Case-by-Case Basis to Determine if it is Intended as an Anti-takeover Provision |
· Merger, Acquisition, Reorganization, or Reincorporation | Reviewed on a Case-by-Case Basis |
· Social Responsibility Issues | With Management |
The following are FIMCO’s policies and procedures for identifying and resolving conflicts of interest that may arise in connection with voting of proxies.
Neither FIMCO nor any of its affiliates engage in investment banking, administration or management of corporate retirement plans, or other activities that may create a potential conflict of interest between the interests of the Funds and FIMCO and its affiliates regarding a proxy vote. Nevertheless, if a proxy proposal were to create a conflict of interest between the interests of a Fund and those of FIMCO or its affiliates, the conflict of interest would have to be reported to FIMCO’s General Counsel. The General Counsel would then provide guidance concerning the resolution of the conflict of interest and would report the conflict of interest to the Board of Trustees of the Funds at its next formal meeting.
With respect to the Funds that are managed by Wellington Management in its capacity as subadviser, the Board of Trustees of the Funds have approved the use of Wellington Management’s proxy voting policies and procedures with respect to proxies relating to portfolio securities held by such Funds. Wellington Management votes proxies in what it believes are the best economic interests of its clients and in accordance with its Proxy Policies and Procedures. Wellington Management’s Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the review and oversight of the firm’s Global Proxy Policies and Procedures. The Corporate Governance Group within Wellington Management’s Corporate Operations Department is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the proxy voting process. Although Wellington Management may utilize the services of various external resources in analyzing proxy issues and has established its own Proxy Guidelines setting forth general guidelines for voting proxies, Wellington Management personnel analyze all proxies and vote proxies based on their assessment of the merits of each proposal. Each Fund’s portfolio manager has the authority to determine the final vote for securities held in the Fund, unless the portfolio manager is determined to have a material conflict of interest related to that proxy vote.
Wellington Management maintains procedures designed to identify and address material conflicts of interest in voting proxies. Its Corporate Governance Committee sets standards for identifying materials conflicts based on client, vendor and lender relationships. Proxy votes for which Wellington Management identifies a material conflict are reviewed by designated members of its Corporate Governance Committee or by the entire committee in some cases to resolve the conflict and direct the vote.
With respect to the Funds that are managed by Paradigm Capital Management in its capacity as subadviser, the Board of Trustees of the Funds has approved the use of Paradigm Capital Management’s proxy voting policies and procedures with respect to proxies relating to portfolio securities held by such Funds. Paradigm Capital Management votes proxies consistent with the best interests of the client, including long-term and short-term economic interests. Paradigm Capital Management’s Chief Compliance Officer is responsible for the review and oversight of the firm’s proxy voting policies and procedures. The portfolio managers are responsible for the day-to-day administration of the proxy voting process. Paradigm Capital Management has subscribed to an unaffiliated third-party corporate governance research service to assist it in analyzing proxies. The portfolio managers have the authority to determine the final vote for securities held in Funds for which they serve as the designated manager, unless such party is determined to have a material conflict of interest related to that proxy vote.
Paradigm Capital Management maintains procedures designed to identify and address material conflicts of interest in voting proxies. The Chief Compliance Officer sets standards for identifying material conflicts. Proxy votes for which Paradigm Capital Management identifies a material conflict are reviewed by the Chief Compliance Officer and the portfolio manager to resolve the conflict and direct the vote. If a resolution cannot be made by the Chief Compliance Officer and the portfolio manager, a third party may be asked to resolve the situation.
With respect to the Funds that are managed by Vontobel in its capacity as subadviser, the Board of Trustees has approved the use of Vontobel’s proxy voting policies and procedures with respect to proxies relating to portfolio securities held by the Fund. Vontobel votes proxies consistent with the best interests of the client. Vontobel has subscribed to an unaffiliated third-party corporate governance research service to assist it in analyzing proxies. In most cases, Vontobel votes in strict accordance with the recommendations of the unaffiliated third-party corporate governance research service, but reserves the right to change that vote when a majority of the portfolio managers disagree with a recommendation or the firm is otherwise advised by the client in writing.
Vontobel maintains procedures designed to identify and address material conflicts of interest in voting proxies. Whenever the Proxy Voting Group at Vontobel detects an actual or potential material conflict between the interests of a client, on the one hand, and the firm’s interests or the interests of a person affiliated with the firm on the other, the Proxy Voting Group will review the conflict. If a potential conflict has been identified, then Vontobel will provide the client with sufficient information regarding the potential conflict and obtain the client’s consent prior to voting, or vote securities in accordance with its proxy voting policies discussed above.
FIMCO, Wellington Management, Paradigm Capital Management and Vontobel may be unable to vote or may determine not to vote a proxy on behalf of a Fund due to securities lending, share blocking and re-registration requirements, lack of adequate information, untimely receipt of proxy materials, immaterial impact of the vote, and/or excessive costs.
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available for free, upon request, by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available (1) without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026 and (2) on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF THE FUNDS
There is one common Board of the Funds within the First Investors Family of Funds. The Board plays an important supervisory role with respect to oversight of the management of the Funds. Among other things, the Board is responsible for the annual approval of investment advisory contracts, evaluation of portfolio performance, and the oversight of decisions that have been made by the Adviser and subadvisers, as applicable, pursuant to delegated authority. There are three standing committees of the Board, the “Nominating and Compensation Committee”, the “Audit Committee”, and the “Investment Committee”. The Nominating and Compensation and Audit Committees are comprised solely of the Independent Trustees. The Investment Committee is compromised of three Independent Trustees and one Interested Trustee. (Independent Trustees are also referred to as Disinterested Trustees.) The Nominating and Compensation Committee elects from its members a chairperson who serves for a three-year term and until a successor is elected. The Audit and Investment Committees may designate one member to serve as the Chairperson of the Committee.
The Nominating and Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, selecting and nominating persons to serve as Independent Trustees on the Board, evaluating candidates’ qualifications, reviewing the composition of the Board to determine whether it may be appropriate to add other Independent Trustees, and reviewing trustee compensation. The Nominating and Compensation Committee was established in November 2004. During the last fiscal year, the Nominating and Compensation Committee met one time to discuss nominating and compensation related matters.
When the Board has, or expects to have, a vacancy, the Nominating and Compensation Committee receives and reviews information on candidates qualified to be recommended to the full Board as nominees for election as Trustees, including any recommendations by shareholders. The Nominating and Compensation Committee will review shareholder recommendations for nominations to fill vacancies on the Board if such recommendations are submitted in writing and addressed to the Nominating and Compensation Committee at the Funds’ offices c/o First Investors Management Company, Inc., 95 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.
The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, overseeing the Funds’ accounting, financial reporting, and internal controls, approving the selection, retention, or termination of auditors, evaluating the independence of auditors, pre-approving any audit and non-audit services provided to the Funds and certain non-audit services provided to the Funds’ investment adviser or any of its affiliates, meeting with the auditors to discuss the audit plan, audit results, and any matters of concern that may be raised by the auditors, receiving reports from Fund management regarding the design or operation of the Funds’ internal controls, investigating improprieties or suspected improprieties in the Funds’ accounting or financial reporting, and reporting its activities to the full Board on a regular basis. The Audit Committee met three times during the last fiscal year.
The Investment Committee is responsible for, among other things, reviewing the investment performance data and related reports provided to the Board, reviewing the investment performance benchmarks and peer groups used in reports delivered to the Board, reviewing fee structures, expense ratios, fee waivers, and expense cap reimbursements, and reviewing the performance of the Funds individually and in the aggregate. The Investment Committee was established in November 2006 and met one time during the last fiscal year.
UNDERWRITER AND DEALERS
Each Fund, except First Investors Life Series Funds, has entered into an underwriting agreement (“Underwriting Agreement”) with First Investors Corporation (“Underwriter” or “FIC”) that requires the Underwriter to use its best efforts to sell shares of the Funds. The Underwriting Agreement was unanimously approved by each Fund’s Board and the Independent Trustees. The Underwriting Agreement provides that it will continue in effect from year to year, with respect to a Fund, only so long as such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the Board or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of such Fund, and in either case by the vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees, voting in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. The Underwriting Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment.
The following table lists the current sales charge with respect to Class A shares of each Fund, except Cash Management Fund and Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund, as well as the amount of the sales charge that is reallowed to dealers selling the shares:
| | | |
| Sales Charge as % of Offering Price Net Amount Invested | Concession to Dealers as a % of Offering Price |
Amount of Investment |
Less than $100,000 | 5.75% | 6.10% | 4.72% |
$100,000 but under $250,000 | 4.50 | 4.71 | 3.69 |
$250,000 but under $500,000 | 3.50 | 3.63 | 2.87 |
$500,000 but under $1,000,000 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 2.05 |
$1,000,000 or more | 0 | 0 | * |
* There is no sales charge on transactions of $1 million or more, purchases that qualify for Rights of Accumulation of $1 million, purchases made pursuant to a Letter of Intent of $1 million and purchases by group retirement plans pursuant to sales charge waiver privileges as described in the First Investors Shareholder Manual. The Underwriter will pay from its own resources an imputed dealer concession equal to 0.90% of the amount invested to dealers on such purchases. If such shares are redeemed within 24 months of purchase, a CDSC of 1.00% will be deducted from the redemption proceeds. The CDSC will generally be applied in the same manner as the CDSC on Class B shares, as described in First Investors’ Shareholder Manual.
DISTRIBUTION PLANS
Each Fund, except the First Investors Life Series Funds, has adopted one or more Distribution Plans in accordance with Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Each Fund, except for the Cash Management Fund and the Tax Exempt Money Market Fund, has adopted Distribution Plans for both their Class A and Class B shares (“Class A Plan” and “Class B Plan” or “Plans”). The Cash Management Fund and Tax Exempt Money Market Fund have adopted only one plan, which is for their Class B shares. Under the Class A Plan, each Fund compensates the Underwriter for certain expenses incurred in the distribution of that Fund’s shares and the servicing or maintenance of existing Fund shareholder accounts at an annualized rate of up to 0.30% of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to its Class A shares. Under the Class B Plan, each Fund compensates the Underwriter at an annualized rate of 1.00% of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to its Class B shares.
Each Plan was unanimously approved by the applicable Fund’s Board and the Independent Trustees. Each Plan will continue in effect from year to year as long as its continuance is approved annually by either the applicable Fund’s Board or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the relevant class of shares of such Fund. In either case, to continue, each Plan must be approved by the vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees of the applicable Fund. Each Fund’s Board reviews quarterly and annually a written report provided by the Treasurer of the amounts expended under the applicable Plan and the purposes for which such expenditures were made.
Each Plan can be terminated at any time by a vote of a majority of the applicable Fund’s Independent Trustees or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the relevant class of shares of such Fund. Any change to any Plan that would materially increase the costs to that class of shares of a Fund may not be instituted without the approval of the outstanding voting securities of that class of shares of such Fund as well as any class of shares that converts into that class. Such changes also require approval by a majority of the applicable Fund’s Independent Trustees.
In adopting each Plan, the Board of each Fund considered all relevant information and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that each Plan will benefit each Fund and their class of shareholders. The Boards believe that amounts spent pursuant to each Plan have assisted each Fund in providing ongoing servicing to shareholders, in competing with other providers of financial services and in promoting sales, thereby increasing the net assets of each Fund.
In reporting amounts expended under the Plans to the Trustees, in the event that the expenses are not related solely to one class, the expenses are allocated as follows: the expenses that are allocated to service are allocated based solely on average net assets and the expenses that are allocated to distribution are allocated pursuant to a methodology that takes into account the costs with respect to each class.
DETERMINATION OF NET ASSET VALUE
All Funds Except Cash Management Fund, Life Series Cash Management Fund and Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund.
In calculating its net asset value (“NAV”), each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, the Life Series Cash Management Fund, and the Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund, generally values its assets on the basis of market quotations, last sale prices, or estimates of value furnished by a pricing service. If such information is not available for a security held by the Fund, is determined to be unreliable, or (to the Adviser’s knowledge) does not reflect a significant event occurring after the close of the market on which the security principally trades (but before the close of trading on the NYSE), the security will be valued at its fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by a Fund’s Board. Foreign securities are priced based upon their market values as of the close of the foreign markets in which they principally trade. The Fund also relies on a pricing service in circumstances where the U.S. securities markets exceed a pre-determined threshold to value foreign securities held in the Fund’s portfolio. The pricing service, its methodology or the threshold may change from time to time. In the event that a Fund holds any insured municipal bond which is in default in the payment of principal or interest, the defaulted bond may be valued based upon the value of a comparable bond which is insured and not in default. Debt obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost.
Consistent with SEC regulations, changes in holdings of portfolio securities are generally reflected in the NAV calculation on the first business day following the trade (i.e., T + 1). Therefore, when a Fund purchases or sells a security during the day, any change in the value of the security that occurs that day is not reflected in the Fund’s NAV. “When-issued securities” are also reflected in the NAV of a Fund on a T + 1 basis. Such investments are valued thereafter at the mean between the most recent bid and asked prices obtained from recognized dealers in such securities or by the pricing services. For valuation purposes, quotations of foreign securities in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange equivalents in effect as of the close of the London Stock Exchange.
Cash Management Fund, Life Series Cash Management Fund and Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund.
Each of these Funds values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. To use amortized cost to value its portfolio securities, a Fund must adhere to certain conditions under that Rule relating to the Fund’s investments, some of which are discussed in each Fund’s Prospectus. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and value at maturity is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value. In the event that a large number of redemptions take place at a time when interest rates have increased, the Fund might have to sell portfolio securities prior to maturity and at a price that might not be desirable.
Each Fund’s Board has established procedures for the purpose of maintaining a constant net asset value of $1.00 per share, which include a review of the extent of any deviation of net asset value per share, based on available market quotations, from the $1.00 amortized cost per share. Should that deviation exceed ½ of 1% for the Fund, the Board will promptly consider whether any action should be initiated to eliminate or reduce material dilution or other unfair results to shareholders. Such action may include selling portfolio securities prior to maturity, reducing or withholding dividends and utilizing a net asset value per share as determined by using available market quotations. The Fund maintains a dollar weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days or less and does not purchase any instrument with a remaining maturity greater than 397 days, limits portfolio investments, including repurchase agreements, to those U.S. dollar-denominated instruments that are of high quality and that the Trustees determine present minimal credit risks as advised by the Adviser, and complies with certain reporting and record keeping procedures. There is no assurance that a constant net asset value per share will be maintained. In the event amortized cost ceases to represent fair value per share, the Board will take appropriate action.
Emergency Pricing Procedures For All Funds.
Each Fund’s Board may suspend the determination of a Fund’s net asset value per share for the whole or any part of any period (1) during which trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) is restricted as determined by the SEC or the NYSE is closed for other than weekend and holiday closings, (2) during which an emergency, as defined by rules of the SEC in respect to the U.S. market, exists as a result of which disposal by a Fund of securities owned by it is not reasonably practicable for the Fund fairly to determine the value of its net assets, or (3) for such other period as the SEC has by order permitted.
In the event that the Funds must halt operations during any day that they would normally be required to price under Rule 22c-1 under the 1940 Act due to an emergency (“Emergency Closed Day”), the Funds will apply the following procedures:
1.
The Funds will make every reasonable effort to segregate orders received on the Emergency Closed Day and give them the price that they would have received but for the closing. The Emergency Closed Day price will be calculated as soon as practicable after operations have resumed and will be applied equally to sales, redemptions and repurchases that were in fact received in the mail or otherwise on the Emergency Closed Day.
2.
For purposes of paragraph 1, an order will be deemed to have been received by the Funds on an Emergency Closed Day, even if neither the Funds nor the Transfer Agent is able to perform the mechanical processing of pricing on that day, under the following circumstances:
(a)
In the case of a mail order, the order will be considered received by a Fund when the postal service has delivered it to FIC’s Edison, New Jersey offices prior to the close of regular trading on the NYSE; and
(b)
In the case of a wire order, including a Fund/SERV order, the order will be considered received when it is received in good form by a FIC branch office or an authorized dealer prior to the close of regular trading on the NYSE.
3.
If the Funds are unable to segregate orders received on the Emergency Closed Day from those received on the next day the Funds are open for business, the Funds may give all orders the next price calculated after operations resume.
4.
On business days in which the NYSE is not open for regular trading, the Funds may determine not to price their portfolio securities if such prices would lead to a distortion of the NAV, for the Funds and their shareholders.
ALLOCATION OF PORTFOLIO BROKERAGE
The Adviser and subadvisers (in the case of Funds that have subadvisers) have authority to select the brokers and dealers that are used to effect portfolio transactions for the Funds. Portfolio transactions are generally structured as agency transactions or principal transactions. In agency transactions, the Funds generally pay brokerage commissions. In principal transactions, the Funds may pay a dealer commission, mark-up, or selling concession. In the case of a riskless principal transaction, the Funds may pay a “commission” if the confirmation statement explicitly states the amount of the transaction that is considered to represent a commission. The Funds may also purchase certain fixed income securities directly from an issuer without paying commissions or discounts.
In selecting broker-dealers to execute portfolio transactions and assessing the reasonableness of their commissions, the Adviser and subadvisers consider, among other things, a broker-dealer’s expertise, reputation, reliability, and performance in executing transactions, and the value of any research that it makes available. A Fund may pay more than the lowest available commission (as that term is defined by the SEC) in return for brokerage and research services provided to the Adviser or, for Funds that employ a subadviser, to either the Adviser or subadviser. Additionally, when directed by the Board of the Funds, the Adviser or subadviser, as applicable, may use brokerage commissions to acquire services that do not qualify in whole or in part as research or brokerage services. They may also, with approval of the Board, use dealer concessions available in fixed-priced underwritings to pay for research and other services.
The research acquired by the Adviser or a subadviser with Fund commissions includes so-called proprietary research and third-party research. Proprietary research is research that is generated by a full-service brokerage firm and offered to the firm’s clients on a “bundled” basis along with execution services. In other words, there is no separately stated charge for the research. Third-party research is research that is prepared by an independent third party and provided by a brokerage firm. In a third-party research arrangement, the cost of the research is generally stated both in dollars and in terms of a soft-to-hard dollar ratio. The client acquiring the research generally pays for the research by directing a specified amount of commission business to the broker-dealer that provides it. The broker-dealer in turn pays the third party that provides the research.
The type of research services acquired with Fund commissions include: (a) market data, such as stock quotes, last sale prices, trading volumes, and other information as to the market for and availability of securities for purchase or sale; (b) research reports containing statistical or factual information or opinions pertaining to the economy, particular industries or sectors, particular issuers, or the creditworthiness of issuers; (c) meetings with executives of issuers or analysts; and (d) data concerning Fund performance and fees. The Adviser generally uses each research service acquired with commissions to service all the Funds in the First Investors Family of Funds, rather than the particular Fund or Funds whose commissions may pay for a research service. In other words, a Fund’s brokerage may be used to pay for a research service that is used in managing another Fund within the First Investors Family of Funds. The subadvisers may likewise use research obtained with commissions to service their other clients.
The Board of the Funds has approved an arrangement whereby the Adviser acquires two mixed-use services with commissions, Lipper’s Directors’ Analytical Data and iMoneyNet. These services are used by the Adviser both for research purposes and to analyze and report to the Fund’s Board a Fund’s performance and fees relative to other comparable funds. The Adviser currently allocates 50% of the cost of these arrangements to administration in the Funds’ expenses. The portion of the cost of each of these mixed-use services that is attributable to administration is treated as a Fund expense for purposes of computing the expense ratios that are included in the prospectuses.
The Adviser or subadviser may combine transaction orders placed on behalf of a Fund with orders placed with other clients for the purpose of negotiating brokerage commissions or obtaining a more favorable transaction price. The securities purchased or sold in such bunched orders must be allocated in accordance with written procedures approved by the Board of the Funds. The Adviser does not place portfolio orders with an affiliated broker or allocate brokerage commission business to any broker-dealer in recognition of distributing Fund shares. Moreover, no broker-dealer affiliated with FIMCO, Wellington Management or Vontobel participates in commissions generated by portfolio orders placed on behalf of any Fund. A broker-dealer affiliate of Paradigm Capital Management, CL King & Associates, has been authorized by the Board of the Funds to execute portfolio transactions on behalf of the Special Situations and Life Series Discovery Funds in accordance with procedures adopted by the Funds pursuant to Rule 17e-1 of the 1940 Act.
CREDIT RATINGS INFORMATION
Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) Long-Term Credit Ratings.
S&P issues the following credit ratings to long-term bonds, including but not limited to corporate bonds, municipal bonds, and government bonds. The ratings are based on current information furnished by the issuer or obtained by S&P from other sources it considers reliable. S&P does not perform any audit in connection with any rating and may, on occasion, rely on unaudited financial information. The ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information, or based on other circumstances.
The ratings are based, in varying degrees, on the following considerations:
-
Likelihood of default capacity and willingness of the obligor as to the timely payment of interest and repayment of principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation;
-
Nature of and provisions of the obligation; and
-
Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors’ rights.
AAA Debt rated “AAA” has the highest rating assigned by S&P. Capacity to pay interest and repay principal is extremely strong.
AA Debt rated “AA” has a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal and differs from the higher rated issues only in small degree.
A Debt rated “A” has a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal although it is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories.
BBB Debt rated “BBB” is regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas it normally exhibits adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal for debt in this category than in higher rated categories.
BB, B, CCC, CC, C Debt rated “BB,” “B,” “CCC,” “CC” and “C” is regarded, on balance, as predominantly speculative with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal. “BB” indicates the least degree of speculation and “C” the highest. While such debt will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions.
BB Debt rated “BB” has less near-term vulnerability to default than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to inadequate capacity to meet timely interest and principal payments.
B Debt rated “B” has a greater vulnerability to default but currently has the capacity to meet interest payments and principal repayments. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay principal.
CCC Debt rated “CCC” has a currently identifiable vulnerability to default and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet timely payment of interest and repayment of principal. In the event of adverse business, financial or economic conditions, it is not likely to have the capacity to pay interest and repay principal.
CC The rating “CC” typically is applied to debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied “CCC” rating.
C The rating “C” typically is applied to debt subordinated to senior debt which is assigned an actual or implied “CCC-” debt rating. The “C” rating may be used to cover a situation where a bankruptcy petition has been filed, but debt service payments are continued.
D Debt rated “D” is in payment default. The “D” rating category is used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless S&P believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The “D” rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition if debt service payments are jeopardized.
Plus (+) or Minus (-): The ratings from “AA” to “CCC” may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major categories.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) Long-Term Credit Ratings.
Moody’s issues the following credit ratings to long-term bonds and preferred stock.
Aaa Bonds which are rated “Aaa” are judged to be of the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as “gilt edged.” Interest payments are protected by a large or exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While the various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair the fundamentally strong position of such issues.
Aa Bonds which are rated “Aa” are judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the Aaa group they comprise what are generally known as high-grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large as in Aaa securities, fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risk appear somewhat greater than the Aaa securities.
A Bonds which are rated “A” possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered as upper-medium-grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment some time in the future.
Baa Bonds which are rated “Baa” are considered as medium-grade obligations (i.e., they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured). Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present, but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great length of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have speculative characteristics as well.
Ba Bonds, which are rated “Ba”, are judged to have speculative elements; their future cannot be considered as well assured. Often the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate, and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times over the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this class.
B Bonds, which are rated “B” generally, lack characteristics of the desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small.
CAA Bonds, which are rated “CAA”, are of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest.
Ca Bonds which are rated “Ca” represent obligations which are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings.
C Bonds which are rated “C” are the lowest rated class of bonds, and issues so rated can be regarded as having extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing.
Moody’s applies numerical modifiers, 1, 2 and 3 in each generic rating classification from Aa through B in its corporate bond rating system. The modifier 1 indicates that the security ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates that the issue ranks in the lower end of its generic rating category.
S&P Credit Ratings for Commercial Paper.
An S&P’s commercial paper rating is a current opinion of the likelihood of timely payment of debt having an original maturity of no more than 365 days. Ratings are graded into several categories, ranging from ‘A’ for the highest-quality obligations to ‘D’ for the lowest. These categories are as follows:
A-1 This designation indicates that the degree of safety regarding timely payment is strong. Those issues determined to possess extremely strong safety characteristics are denoted with a plus sign (+) designation.
A-2 Capacity for timely payment on issues with this designation is satisfactory. However, the relative degree of safety is not as high as for issues designated ‘A-1.’
A-3 Issues carrying this designation have an adequate capacity for timely payment. They are, however, more vulnerable to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances than obligations carrying the higher designations.
B Issues rated ‘B’ are regarded as having only speculative capacity for timely payment.
C This rating is assigned to short-term debt obligations with a doubtful capacity for payment.
D Debt rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category is used when interest payments of principal payments are not made on the date due, even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless Standard & Poor’s believes such payments will be made during such grace period.
Moody’s Short-Term Credit Ratings.
Moody’s short-term debt ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to repay punctually senior debt obligations which have an original maturity not exceeding one year. Obligations relying upon support mechanisms such as letters-of-credit and bonds of indemnity are excluded unless explicitly rated.
Prime 1 Issuers rated Prime-1 (or supporting institutions) have a superior ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations. Prime-1 repayment ability will often be evidenced by many of the following characteristics:
·
Leading market positions in well-established industries.
·
High rates of return on funds employed.
·
Conservative capitalization structure with moderate reliance on debt and ample asset protection.
·
Broad margins in earning coverage of fixed financial charges and high internal cash generation.
·
Well-established access to a range of financial markets and assured sources of alternate liquidity.
Prime 2 Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay senior short-term debt obligations. This will normally be evidenced by many of the characteristics cited above, but to a lesser degree. Earnings trends and coverage ratios, while sound, may be more subject to variation than is the case for Prime-2 securities. Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more affected by external conditions. Ample alternative liquidity is maintained.
Prime 3 Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability for repayment of senior short-term obligations. The effect of industry characteristics and market compositions may be more pronounced. Variability in earnings and profitability may result in changes in the level of debt-protection measurements and may require relatively high financial leverage. Adequate alternate liquidity is maintained.
Not Prime Issuers rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
S&P’s Ratings Services Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings.
S&P issues the following credit ratings for short-term debt issues. These ratings reflect the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to notes. Notes due in 3 years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes maturing beyond 3 years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. The following criteria will be used in making that assessment.
- Amortization schedule (the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities the more likely it will be treated as a note).
- Source of Payment (the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note).
Note rating symbols are as follows:
SP-1 Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation.
SP-2 Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.
SP-3 Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.
Moody’s Short-Term Municipal Debt Credit Ratings.
In municipal debt issuance, there are three rating categories for short-term obligations that are considered investment grade. These ratings are designated as Moody’s Investment Grade (MIG) and are divided into three levels – MIG 1 through MIG 3.
In addition, those short-term obligations that are of speculative quality are designated SG, or speculative grade.
In the case of variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs), a two-component rating is assigned. The first element represents Moody’s evaluation of the degree of risk associated with scheduled principal and interest payments. The second element represents Moody’s evaluation of the degree of risk associated with the demand feature, using the MIG rating scale.
The short-term rating assigned to the demand feature of VRDOs is designated as VMIG. When either the long- or short-term aspect of a VRDO is not rated, that piece is designated NR, e.g., Aaa/NR or NR/VMIG 1.
MIG ratings expire at note maturity. By contrast, VMIG rating expirations will be a function of each issue’s specific structural or credit features.
MIG 1/VMIG 1 This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
MIG 2/VMIG 2 This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protections are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.
MIG 3/VMIG 3 This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.
SG This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Custodian. The Bank of New York, One Wall Street, New York, NY 10286, is custodian of the securities and cash of each Fund, except for First Investors Global and International Funds and First Investors Life Series International Fund, and employs foreign sub-custodians and foreign securities depositories to provide custody of foreign assets. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., 40 Water Street, Boston, MA 02109, is custodian of the securities and cash of the First Investors Global and International Funds and First Investors Life Series International Fund and employs foreign subcustodians and foreign securities depositories to provide custody of their foreign assets.
Audits and Reports. The accounts of the Funds are audited twice a year by Tait, Weller & Baker, an independent registered public accounting firm, 1818 Market Street, Suite 2400, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2108. Shareholders of each Fund receive semi-annual and annual reports, including audited financial statements, and a list of securities owned.
Legal Counsel. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, 1601 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006, serves as counsel to the Funds.
Transfer Agent. Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), Raritan Plaza 1, Edison, NJ 08837, an affiliate of FIMCO and FIC, acts as transfer agent for the Funds and as redemption agent for regular redemptions. ADM provides services to account holders that includes, but is not limited to, opening and closing non-retirement and retirement accounts, transacting purchases, redemptions and exchanges, issuing checks, issuing tax statements, issuing account statements and maintaining records for the Funds. ADM receives fees from the Funds that are based upon a combination of account maintenance and a per transaction basis in accordance with a fee schedule that is approved by the Board of the Funds. In addition, the Funds reimburse ADM for its out-of-pocket costs including, but not limited to, the costs of postage, forms, envelopes, telephone lines and other similar items. The Transfer Agent's telephone number is 1-800-423-4026.
Retirement Accounts. First Investors Federal Savings Bank (“FIFSB”) acts as custodian on certain retirement accounts that are opened through ADM (such as IRA and 403(b) accounts). FIFSB charges an annual custodial fee for each type of retirement account it services irrespective of the number of Funds that are held in the retirement account. These custodial fees are currently being paid by the Funds but the Funds reserve the right to discontinue paying this fee at any time on 45 days’ written notice to account holders. FIFSB reserves the right to increase or modify the custodial fee on prior written notice.
Shareholder and Trustee Liability. Each First Investors Fund is organized as a Delaware statutory trust. The Declaration of Trust of each Fund contains an express disclaimer of shareholder liability for acts or obligations of the Trust. Further, any note, bond, contract or other written obligation of the Trust or Fund may contain a disclaimer that the obligation may be only enforced against the assets of the Trust or Fund, but the omission of such disclaimer will not operate to bind or create personal liability for any shareholder or Trustee.
Each Declaration of Trust also provides for indemnification out of the property of the Fund of any shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of the Fund. Each Declaration of Trust also provides that the Trust shall, upon request, assume the defense of any claim made against any shareholder for any act or obligation of the Fund and satisfy any judgment thereon. Thus, the risk of a shareholder's incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which the Fund itself would be unable to meet its obligations. The Adviser believes that, in view of the above, the risk of personal liability to shareholders is immaterial and extremely remote. Each Fund’s Declaration of Trust further provides that the Trustees will not be liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law, but nothing in the Declaration of Trust protects a Trustee against any liability to which he or she would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office. Each Fund may have an obligation to indemnify Trustees and officers with respect to litigation.