Fresh Start Accounting [Text Block] | Fresh Start Accounting We adopted Fresh Start Accounting on the Effective Date in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy. As referenced below, our reorganization value of $ 334.0 million , immediately prior to emergence was substantially less than our post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Furthermore and in connection with our reorganization, we experienced a change in control as the outstanding common and preferred shares of the Predecessor were canceled and substantially all of the New Common Stock was issued to the Predecessor’s creditors, primarily former holders of our Senior Notes. Accordingly, the holders of the Predecessor’s common and preferred shares effectively received no shares of the Successor. The adoption of Fresh Start Accounting results in a new reporting entity, the Successor, for financial reporting purposes. The presentation is analogous to that of a new business entity such that the Successor is presented with no beginning retained earnings or deficit on the Effective Date. Reorganization Value Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Successor’s total assets prior to the consideration of liabilities and is intended to approximate the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets immediately after a restructuring. The reorganization value, which was derived from the Successor’s enterprise value, was allocated to our individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Enterprise value represents the estimated fair value of an entity’s long term debt and shareholders’ equity. The Successor’s enterprise value, as approved by the Bankruptcy Court in support of the Plan, was estimated to be within a range of $ 218 million to $ 382 million with a mid-point value of $ 300 million . Based on the estimates and assumptions utilized in our Fresh Start Accounting process, we estimated the Successor’s enterprise value to be approximately $ 266.2 million after the consideration of cash and cash equivalents on hand at the Effective Date. The following table reconciles the enterprise value, net of cash and cash equivalents, to the estimated fair value of our Successor common stock as of the Effective Date: Enterprise value $ 234,831 Plus: Cash and cash equivalents 31,414 Less: Fair value of debt (75,350 ) Fair value of Successor common stock $ 190,895 Shares outstanding as of September 12, 2016 14,992,018 Per share value $ 12.73 The following table reconciles the enterprise value to the reorganization value of our Successor assets as of the Effective Date: Enterprise value $ 234,831 Plus: Cash and cash equivalents 31,414 Plus: Current liabilities 54,171 Plus: Noncurrent liabilities excluding long-term debt 13,558 Reorganization value $ 333,974 Valuation Process Our valuation analysis was prepared with the assistance of an independent third-party consultant utilizing reserve information prepared by our independent reserve engineers, internal development plans and schedules, other internal financial information and projections and the application of standard valuation techniques including risked net asset value analysis and comparable public company metrics. Our principal assets include the Successor’s oil and gas properties. We determined the fair value of our oil and gas properties based on the discounted cash flows expected to be generated from these assets. Our analyses were based on market conditions and reserves in place as confirmed by our independent petroleum engineers. The proved reserves were segregated into various geographic regions, including sub-regions within the Eagle Ford where a substantial portion of our assets are located, for which separate risk factors were determined based on geological characteristics. Due to the limited drilling plans that we had in place, proved undeveloped locations were risked accordingly. Future cash flows were estimated by using NYMEX forward prices for West Texas Intermediate crude oil and Henry Hub natural gas with inflation adjustments applied to periods beyond a five-year horizon. These prices were adjusted for differentials realized by us for location and product quality. Gathering and transportation costs were estimated based on agreements that we have in place and development and operating costs were based on our most recent experience and adjusted for inflation in future years. The risk-adjusted after-tax cash flows were discounted at a rate of 13.5 %. This rate was determined from a weighted-average cost of capital computation which utilized a blended expected cost of debt and expected returns on equity for similar industry participants. Plugging and abandonment costs were also identified and measured in this process in order to determine the fair value of the Successor’s AROs attributable to our proved developed reserves on the Effective Date. Based on this valuation process, we determined fair values of $ 121.9 million for our proved reserves and $ 2.7 million for the related AROs. With respect to the valuation of our undeveloped acreage, we segregated our current lease holdings in the Eagle Ford into prospect regions in which we have significant developed acreage and those in which we have not yet initiated any significant drilling activity. For those prospects within previously developed regions, we applied a multiple based on recent transactions involving acreage deemed comparable to our acreage for each targeted formation. Based on this valuation process, we determined a fair value of $ 92.5 million for our undeveloped acreage within previously developed regions of the Eagle Ford. For those lease holdings in other areas of the Eagle Ford, we disregarded those prospects for which lease expirations were to occur during 2016 as well as those for which future drilling was considered uneconomical at then current commodity prices. A reduced multiple was then applied to this adjusted undeveloped acreage consistent with recent transactions for acreage deemed comparable to our acreage resulting in a fair value of $ 8.3 million . We attributed no value to our limited undeveloped lease holdings in all areas other than the Eagle Ford. Our remaining equipment and other fixed assets were valued at $ 26.7 million primarily using a cost approach that incorporated depreciation and obsolescence to the extent applicable on an asset-by-asset basis. The most significant of these assets is our water facility in South Texas which is integral to our regional operations. Accordingly, this asset, for which we determined a fair value of $ 23.4 million , is included in our full cost pool for purposes of determining our DD&A attributable to our oil and gas production. Certain assets, particularly personal property including office equipment and vehicles, among others, were valued based on market data for comparable assets to the extent such information was available. The remaining reorganization value is attributable to certain natural gas imbalance receivables, cash and cash equivalents, working capital assets including accounts receivable, prepaid items, current derivative assets and debt issuance costs. Our natural gas imbalance receivables, which are fully attributable to our Mid-Continent operations in the Granite Wash, were valued using NYMEX spot prices for Henry Hub natural gas adjusted for basis differentials for transportation. Our accounts receivable, including amounts receivable from our joint venture partners, were subjected to analysis on an individual basis and reserved to the extent we believe was appropriate. Collectively, these remaining assets, including our current derivative assets which are marked-to-market on a monthly basis, are stated at their fair values on the Effective Date. The reorganization value also includes $ 3.0 million of issuance costs attributable to the Credit Facility under which we initially borrowed $ 75.4 million . This amount has been capitalized in accordance with GAAP as it represents costs attributable to the access to credit over the term of the Credit Facility. Our liabilities on the Effective Date include the aforementioned borrowings under the Credit Facility, working capital liabilities including accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a reserve for certain litigation matters, pension and health care obligations attributable to certain retirees, AROs, and derivative liabilities. As the Credit Facility is current and is a variable-rate financial instrument, it is stated at its fair value. Our working capital liabilities and litigation reserve are ordinary course obligations and their carrying amounts approximate their fair values. We revalued our retiree obligations based on data from our independent actuaries and they have been stated at their fair values. The AROs were valued in connection with the valuation process attributable to our oil and gas reserves as discussed above. Finally, our derivative liabilities have also been stated at their fair value as they are marked-to-market on a monthly basis. Successor Balance Sheet The following table reflects the reorganization and application of Fresh Start Accounting adjustments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 12, 2016: Reorganization Fresh Start Predecessor Adjustments Adjustments Successor Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 48,718 $ (17,304 ) (1 ) $ — $ 31,414 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts 35,606 4,292 (2 ) — 39,898 Derivative assets 397 — — 397 Other current assets 3,966 (832 ) (3 ) — 3,134 Total current assets 88,687 (13,844 ) — 74,843 Property and equipment, net 309,261 — (55,751 ) (12 ) 253,510 Other assets 6,902 (1,281 ) (4 ) — 5,621 Total assets $ 404,850 $ (15,125 ) $ (55,751 ) $ 333,974 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 77,151 $ (21,166 ) (5 ) $ (3,455 ) (13 ) $ 52,530 Derivative liabilities 1,641 — — 1,641 Current maturities of long-term debt 113,653 (113,653 ) (6 ) — — Total current liabilities 192,445 (134,819 ) (3,455 ) 54,171 Other liabilities 84,953 100 (5 ) (80,615 ) (14 ) 4,438 Derivative liabilities 9,120 — — 9,120 Long-term debt — 75,350 (7 ) — 75,350 Liabilities subject to compromise 1,154,163 (1,154,163 ) (8 ) — — Shareholders’ equity (deficit) Preferred stock (Predecessor) 1,880 (1,880 ) (9 ) — — Common stock (Predecessor) 697 (697 ) (9 ) — — Paid-in capital (Predecessor) 1,213,797 (1,213,797 ) (9 ) — — Deferred compensation obligation (Predecessor) 3,440 (3,440 ) (9 ) — — Accumulated other comprehensive income (Predecessor) 383 (383 ) (9 ) — — Treasury stock (Predecessor) (3,574 ) 3,574 (9 ) — — Common stock (Successor) — 150 (10 ) — 150 Paid-in capital (Successor) — 190,745 (10 ) — 190,745 Accumulated deficit (2,252,454 ) 2,224,135 (11 ) 28,319 (15 ) — Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) (1,035,831 ) 1,198,407 28,319 190,895 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit) $ 404,850 $ (15,125 ) $ (55,751 ) $ 333,974 Reorganization Adjustments 1. Represents the net cash payments that occurred on the Effective Date: Sources: Proceeds from the Credit Facility $ 75,350 Proceeds from the Rights Offering, net of issuance costs 49,943 Total sources $ 125,293 Uses: Repayment of RBL $ 113,653 Accrued interest payable on RBL 1,374 DIP Facility fees 12 Debt issue costs of the Credit Facility 3,011 Funding of professional fee escrow account 14,575 RBL lender professional fees and expenses 455 Ad Hoc Committee and indenture trustee professional fees and expenses 6,782 Payment of certain allowed claims and settlements 2,735 Total uses 142,597 $ (17,304 ) 2. Represents the reclassification of SERP assets to a current receivable from other noncurrent assets upon the cancellation of the underlying plan and the reversion of the assets to the Successor. 3. Represents the write-off of certain prepaid directors and officers tail insurance. 4. Represents the capitalization of debt issuance costs attributable to the Credit Facility, net of the reclassification of SERP assets as discussed in item (2) above. 5. Represents the payment of professional fees on behalf of the RBL Lenders, the Ad Hoc Committee and the UCC, indenture trustee fees and expenses, interest payable on the RBL as well as certain allowed claims and settlements net of the establishment of reserves and the reinstatement of certain other obligations. 6. Represents the repayment of the RBL in cash in full. 7. Represents the initial borrowings under the Credit Facility. 8. Liabilities subject to compromise were settled as follows in accordance with the Plan: Liabilities subject to compromise prior to the Effective Date: Senior Notes $ 1,075,000 Interest on Senior Notes 47,213 Firm transportation obligation 11,077 Compensation – related 9,733 Deferred compensation 4,676 Trade accounts payable 1,487 Litigation claims 1,092 Other accrued liabilities 3,885 $ 1,154,163 Amounts settled in cash, reinstated or otherwise reserved at emergence (3,915 ) Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise $ 1,150,248 9. Represents the cancellation of our Predecessor preferred and common stock and related components of our Predecessor shareholders’ deficit. 10. Represents the issuance of 14,992,018 shares of New Common Stock with a fair value of $ 12.73 per share. 11. Represents the cumulative impact of the reorganization adjustments described above: Gain on settlement of of liabilities subject to compromise $ 1,150,248 Fair value of equity allocated to: Unsecured creditors on the Effective Date 174,477 Unsecured creditors pending resolution on the Effective Date 10,396 Backstop Parties in the form of a Commitment Premium 6,022 190,895 Cancellation of Predecessor shareholders’ deficit 882,992 Net impact to Predecessor accumulated deficit $ 2,224,135 Fresh Start Adjustments 12. Represents the Fresh Start Accounting valuation adjustments applied to our oil and gas properties and other equipment. 13. Represents the accelerated recognition of the current portion of previously deferred gains on sales of assets attributable to the accounting presentation required by GAAP under the Predecessor. 14. Represents the recognition of Fresh Start Accounting adjustments to: (i) our AROs attributable to the revalued oil and gas properties and (ii) our retiree obligations based on actuarial measurements, as well as the accelerated recognition of the noncurrent portion of previously deferred gains on sales of assets attributable to the accounting presentation required by GAAP under the Predecessor. 15. Represents the cumulative impact of the Fresh Start Accounting adjustments discussed above. Reorganization Items. As described above in Note 2, our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period ended September 12, 2016 include “Reorganization items, net,” which reflects gains recognized on the settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and costs and other expenses associated with the bankruptcy proceedings, principally professional fees, and the costs associated with the DIP Facility. These post-petition costs for professional fees, as well as administrative fees charged by the U.S. Trustee, have been reported in “Reorganization items, net” in our Consolidated Statement of Operations as described above. Similar costs that were incurred during the pre-petition periods have been reported in “General and administrative” expenses. The following table summarizes the components included in “Reorganization items, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period presented: January 1 Through September 12, 2016 Gains on the settlement of liabilities subject to compromise $ 1,150,248 Fresh start accounting adjustments 28,319 Legal and professional fees and expenses (29,976 ) Settlements attributable to contract amendments (2,550 ) DIP Facility costs and commitment fees (170 ) Write-off of prepaid directors and officers insurance (832 ) Other reorganization items (46 ) $ 1,144,993 Fresh Start Accounting We adopted Fresh Start Accounting on the Effective Date in connection with our emergence from bankruptcy. As referenced below, our reorganization value of $ 334.0 million , immediately prior to emergence was substantially less than our post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. Furthermore and in connection with our reorganization, we experienced a change in control as the outstanding common and preferred shares of the Predecessor were canceled and substantially all of the New Common Stock was issued to the Predecessor’s creditors, primarily former holders of our Senior Notes. Accordingly, the holders of the Predecessor’s common and preferred shares effectively received no shares of the Successor. The adoption of Fresh Start Accounting results in a new reporting entity, the Successor, for financial reporting purposes. The presentation is analogous to that of a new business entity such that the Successor is presented with no beginning retained earnings or deficit on the Effective Date. Reorganization Value Reorganization value represents the fair value of the Successor’s total assets prior to the consideration of liabilities and is intended to approximate the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets immediately after a restructuring. The reorganization value, which was derived from the Successor’s enterprise value, was allocated to our individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Enterprise value represents the estimated fair value of an entity’s long term debt and shareholders’ equity. The Successor’s enterprise value, as approved by the Bankruptcy Court in support of the Plan, was estimated to be within a range of $ 218 million to $ 382 million with a mid-point value of $ 300 million . Based on the estimates and assumptions utilized in our Fresh Start Accounting process, we estimated the Successor’s enterprise value to be approximately $ 266.2 million after the consideration of cash and cash equivalents on hand at the Effective Date. The following table reconciles the enterprise value, net of cash and cash equivalents, to the estimated fair value of our Successor common stock as of the Effective Date: Enterprise value $ 234,831 Plus: Cash and cash equivalents 31,414 Less: Fair value of debt (75,350 ) Fair value of Successor common stock $ 190,895 Shares outstanding as of September 12, 2016 14,992,018 Per share value $ 12.73 The following table reconciles the enterprise value to the reorganization value of our Successor assets as of the Effective Date: Enterprise value $ 234,831 Plus: Cash and cash equivalents 31,414 Plus: Current liabilities 54,171 Plus: Noncurrent liabilities excluding long-term debt 13,558 Reorganization value $ 333,974 Valuation Process Our valuation analysis was prepared with the assistance of an independent third-party consultant utilizing reserve information prepared by our independent reserve engineers, internal development plans and schedules, other internal financial information and projections and the application of standard valuation techniques including risked net asset value analysis and comparable public company metrics. Our principal assets include the Successor’s oil and gas properties. We determined the fair value of our oil and gas properties based on the discounted cash flows expected to be generated from these assets. Our analyses were based on market conditions and reserves in place as confirmed by our independent petroleum engineers. The proved reserves were segregated into various geographic regions, including sub-regions within the Eagle Ford where a substantial portion of our assets are located, for which separate risk factors were determined based on geological characteristics. Due to the limited drilling plans that we had in place, proved undeveloped locations were risked accordingly. Future cash flows were estimated by using NYMEX forward prices for West Texas Intermediate crude oil and Henry Hub natural gas with inflation adjustments applied to periods beyond a five-year horizon. These prices were adjusted for differentials realized by us for location and product quality. Gathering and transportation costs were estimated based on agreements that we have in place and development and operating costs were based on our most recent experience and adjusted for inflation in future years. The risk-adjusted after-tax cash flows were discounted at a rate of 13.5 %. This rate was determined from a weighted-average cost of capital computation which utilized a blended expected cost of debt and expected returns on equity for similar industry participants. Plugging and abandonment costs were also identified and measured in this process in order to determine the fair value of the Successor’s AROs attributable to our proved developed reserves on the Effective Date. Based on this valuation process, we determined fair values of $ 121.9 million for our proved reserves and $ 2.7 million for the related AROs. With respect to the valuation of our undeveloped acreage, we segregated our current lease holdings in the Eagle Ford into prospect regions in which we have significant developed acreage and those in which we have not yet initiated any significant drilling activity. For those prospects within previously developed regions, we applied a multiple based on recent transactions involving acreage deemed comparable to our acreage for each targeted formation. Based on this valuation process, we determined a fair value of $ 92.5 million for our undeveloped acreage within previously developed regions of the Eagle Ford. For those lease holdings in other areas of the Eagle Ford, we disregarded those prospects for which lease expirations were to occur during 2016 as well as those for which future drilling was considered uneconomical at then current commodity prices. A reduced multiple was then applied to this adjusted undeveloped acreage consistent with recent transactions for acreage deemed comparable to our acreage resulting in a fair value of $ 8.3 million . We attributed no value to our limited undeveloped lease holdings in all areas other than the Eagle Ford. Our remaining equipment and other fixed assets were valued at $ 26.7 million primarily using a cost approach that incorporated depreciation and obsolescence to the extent applicable on an asset-by-asset basis. The most significant of these assets is our water facility in South Texas which is integral to our regional operations. Accordingly, this asset, for which we determined a fair value of $ 23.4 million , is included in our full cost pool for purposes of determining our DD&A attributable to our oil and gas production. Certain assets, particularly personal property including office equipment and vehicles, among others, were valued based on market data for comparable assets to the extent such information was available. The remaining reorganization value is attributable to certain natural gas imbalance receivables, cash and cash equivalents, working capital assets including accounts receivable, prepaid items, current derivative assets and debt issuance costs. Our natural gas imbalance receivables, which are fully attributable to our Mid-Continent operations in the Granite Wash, were valued using NYMEX spot prices for Henry Hub natural gas adjusted for basis differentials for transportation. Our accounts receivable, including amounts receivable from our joint venture partners, were subjected to analysis on an individual basis and reserved to the extent we believe was appropriate. Collectively, these remaining assets, including our current derivative assets which are marked-to-market on a monthly basis, are stated at their fair values on the Effective Date. The reorganization value also includes $ 3.0 million of issuance costs attributable to the Credit Facility under which we initially borrowed $ 75.4 million . This amount has been capitalized in accordance with GAAP as it represents costs attributable to the access to credit over the term of the Credit Facility. Our liabilities on the Effective Date include the aforementioned borrowings under the Credit Facility, working capital liabilities including accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a reserve for certain litigation matters, pension and health care obligations attributable to certain retirees, AROs, and derivative liabilities. As the Credit Facility is current and is a variable-rate financial instrument, it is stated at its fair value. Our working capital liabilities and litigation reserve are ordinary course obligations and their carrying amounts approximate their fair values. We revalued our retiree obligations based on data from our independent actuaries and they have been stated at their fair values. The AROs were valued in connection with the valuation process attributable to our oil and gas reserves as discussed above. Finally, our derivative liabilities have also been stated at their fair value as they are marked-to-market on a monthly basis. |