EDAC Technologies (EDAC) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

OMB APPROVAL
OMB Number:	3235-0059
Expires:	January 31, 2008
Estimated average burden hours per response	14

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant   o

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   o

Check the appropriate box:

o   Preliminary Proxy Statement

o  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x   Definitive Proxy Statement

o   Definitive Additional Materials

o   Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

      Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x   No fee required.

o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

      1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

      2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

      3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

      4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

      5) Total fee paid:

      o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

      o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

      1) Amount Previously Paid:

      2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

      3) Filing Party:

      4) Date Filed:

SEC 1913 (02-02) Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
1806 NEW BRITAIN AVENUE
FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06032
(860) 677-2603

Notice of 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Wednesday, June 6, 2007

     The 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of EDAC Technologies Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the offices of the Company at 1790 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, on Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. local time, to consider and act upon the following matters:

     1. To elect five directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

     2. To ratify the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2007;

     3. To consider and vote upon one shareholder proposal, (if properly presented); and

     4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Glenn L. Purple

Glenn L. Purple, Secretary

Farmington, Connecticut
April 27, 2007

     Shareholders of record at the close of business on April 19, 2007 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

     Your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope in order to ensure representation of your shares at the meeting. No postage need be affixed if the proxy card is mailed in the United States.

     A copy of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders and a Proxy Statement also accompany this Notice.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
1806 NEW BRITAIN AVENUE
FARMINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06032

Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
to be held on Wednesday, June 6, 2007

SOLICITATION AND VOTING

     This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of EDAC Technologies Corporation (“EDAC” or the “Company”) of proxies, in the accompanying form, to be used at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at the offices of the Company, 1790 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, on Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. local time, and any adjournments thereof.

     The Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006 is being mailed to shareholders, along with these proxy materials, on or about April 27, 2007.

     At the close of business on April 19, 2007, the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were 4,583,103 shares of common stock, par value $.0025 per share (“Common Stock”), outstanding and entitled to vote, constituting all of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share.

     The holders of a majority of the number of shares of Common Stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy (including shares that abstain or otherwise do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for shareholder approval) will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

     Assuming a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the election of directors, meaning the five directors receiving the most votes will be elected. All other matters which are properly brought before the meeting will be approved upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented and voting on the matter. Shares that abstain from voting as to a particular matter, and shares held in “street name” by a broker or nominee that indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote as to a particular matter, will not be voted in favor of such matter, and also will not be counted as shares voting on such matter. Accordingly, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the voting on a matter that requires the affirmative vote of a certain percentage of the votes cast or the shares voting on that matter.

     Although not required by law, the Company is seeking shareholder approval to ratify the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the 2007 fiscal year. If shareholders do not ratify such appointment, the Company may reevaluate its appointment.

     All shares of Common Stock represented by properly executed proxies that are received in time for the Annual Meeting and which have not been revoked will be voted in accordance

with the instructions indicated in such proxies. If no such instructions are indicated, such shares of Common Stock will be voted “FOR” each nominee for election to the Board of Directors, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP as independent auditors of the Company and “AGAINST” the shareholder proposal regarding majority voting for the election of directors. In addition, the persons designated in such proxies will have the discretion to vote on matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting. If the Company proposes to adjourn the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote all shares of Common Stock for which they have authority in favor of such adjournment.

     The grant of a proxy on the enclosed proxy card does not preclude a shareholder from voting in person at the Annual Meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise by delivering to the Secretary of the Company, prior to the Annual Meeting, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date and time than the proxy, delivering to the Secretary of the Company a duly executed proxy bearing a later date and time than the revoked proxy, or attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute the revocation of a proxy.

Voting questions

What am I voting on?

There are three proposals scheduled to be voted on at the meeting:

• The election of 5 directors;

• The ratification of the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors for 2007; and

• If properly presented, the shareholder proposal regarding majority voting for the election of directors.

Who is entitled to vote?

You are entitled to vote or direct the voting of your EDAC Common Stock at the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder at the end of the day on April 19, 2007, the record date. You may own EDAC Common Stock either (1) directly in your name as ashareholder of record or (2) indirectly through a broker, bank or other nominee as abeneficial owner. Ashareholder of record is a person or entity that holds shares on the record date which are registered in such shareholder’s name on the records of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, EDAC’s stock transfer agent. Abeneficial owner is a person or entity that holds shares on the record date through a broker, bank or other nominee.Beneficial owners are generally entitled to provide voting instructions to theshareholder of record of those shares.

How can shareholders vote?

Shareholders of record can vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting or can vote by proxy. We send proxy cards to allshareholders of recordto enable them to direct the voting of their shares. Brokers, banks and nominees typically offer telephonic or electronic means by whichbeneficial ownerscan submit voting instructions, in addition to the traditionally mailed voting

2

instruction cards. You are welcome to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, however, if you are abeneficial owner, you will need to contact the broker, bank or other nominee through which you indirectly own the shares, to obtain a “legal proxy” to permit you to vote by written ballot at the Annual Meeting.

How does the Board of Directors recommend shareholders vote on the matters to be considered at the meeting?

The Board recommends a vote:

FOReach of its nominees for election as director,
FORthe appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP as Independent Auditors,
AGAINSTthe shareholder proposal regarding majority voting for the election of directors.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card.

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy Statement.

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the persons named in your proxy card, if you are a shareholder of record, will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

     The Company’s By-Laws provide for at least five and no more than nine directors to be elected at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each director holds office until the next succeeding Annual Meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected. In accordance with the By-Laws, the Board of Directors has set the number of directors at five. Proxies may not be voted for more than five directors. The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect each of Joseph Lebel, Dominick A. Pagano, Stephen J. Raffay, Ross C. Towne and Daniel C. Tracy as directors, unless authority to vote for the election of the nominees is withheld by marking the proxy to that effect. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company. Each of the nominees has indicated his willingness to serve, if elected, but if any of such persons should be unable or unwilling to stand for election, proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors.

3

			Director		Principal
Name	Age		Since		Occupation
Joseph Lebel (1)		77		2005	Retired Quality Control Manager for the Company
Dominick A. Pagano (2)		63		2001	President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and President and Chief Executive Officer of Dapco Industries, Inc. (a manufacturer of ultrasonic inspection equipment for the steel and railroad industries)
Stephen J. Raffay (3)		79		2000	Retired Vice-Chairman, Emhart Corporation (a manufacturer of various machinery and consumer products)
Ross C. Towne (4)		63		2002	Owner of Management Partners Inc. (a management consulting firm)
Daniel C. Tracy (5)		66		1999	Chairman of the Board of the Company and Business Consultant

(1)	Mr. Lebel was the Quality Control Manager for the Company from 1961 until he retired in 1995. He was a director of the Company from 2001 to 2002.
(2)	Mr. Pagano became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in August 2002 and also serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Dapco Industries, Inc., a company that he founded in 1972. Mr. Pagano served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of American Environmental Technologies, Inc. from 1988 until 1999. Mr. Pagano has been a director of the Company since July 2001, but he did not serve as a director from April 2002 to October 2002.
(3)	Mr. Raffay served as a senior executive and as a director of Emhart Corporation until his retirement as Vice Chairman in 1987. Since then he has done consulting work and has served as a director of a number of companies.
(4)	Mr. Towne has owned Management Partners, Inc., a management consulting firm specializing in business planning, organizational restructuring and operational audits, since 1990. He served as President and Chief Financial Officer of The Washington Source, Inc. from 2000 to 2004.
(5)	Mr. Tracy was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from 1963 until his retirement in 1998, serving since 1975 as a partner.

     The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR all of the nominees for director.

4

Board and Committee Meetings and Related Matters

     The Company has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors.

     The Audit Committee, composed of Messrs. Raffay, Towne and Tracy, held four meetings during 2006. The Audit Committee meets annually to consider the report and recommendation of the Company’s independent auditors and is available for additional meetings upon request of such auditors. The Audit Committee’s functions also include the engagement and retention of such auditors, adoption of accounting methods and procedures, public disclosures required for compliance with securities laws and other matters relating to the Company’s financial accounting and reporting. For additional information regarding the Audit Committee, see the “Report of the Audit Committee” below.

     Since April 10, 2006, the Compensation Committee has been composed of Messrs. Lebel, Raffay, Towne and Tracy. Messrs. John Moses and William B. Bayne Jr., former directors of the Company, had served on the Compensation Committee until they resigned in March 2006. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during 2006. The Compensation Committee sets the compensation for the executive officers of the Company and establishes compensation policies for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. The Compensation Committee is primarily responsible for the administration of the Company’s stock option plans, under which option grants may be made to employees, officers, directors and consultants. The Compensation Committee convened five times (including one teleconference meeting) in fiscal year 2006 with all members of the committee present during each of the meetings. In addition, the committee held numerous teleconference calls, with all members participating, to deliberate matters considered essential to the execution of the committee’s responsibilities.

     During 2006, the Governance and Nominating Committee was composed of Messrs. Lebel, Raffay, Towne and Tracy. The Governance and Nominating Committee held one meeting during 2006.

     The Board of Directors held thirteen meetings during 2006, of which four were telephonic. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and each Committee on which he served.

     By letter dated March 9, 2006, John Moses resigned from the Board of Directors. In his letter of resignation, Mr. Moses indicated that his resignation was because his fellow Board members have repeatedly refused to address Mr. Moses’ request to hire a full-time chief executive officer, and his request to change the manner in which directors are elected from plurality voting to majority voting. The Company believes that some of Mr. Moses’ allegations are without merit. However, the Company has reviewed and continues to review the issues raised by Mr. Moses as discussed in the Board of Directors’ Statement of Opposition to Mr. Moses’ shareholder proposal set forth below in this Proxy Statement.

     The Board of Directors has determined that the following members of the Board are independent directors, as such term is defined in Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15): Joseph Lebel, Stephen J. Raffay, Ross C. Towne and Daniel C. Tracy.

5

Director Nominations

     The Governance and Nominating Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Lebel, Raffay, Towne and Tracy. All of the committee members are independent directors. The duties and responsibilities of the Governance and Nominating Committee are set forth in a written Nominating Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted on March 9, 2004. A copy of the charter is available on EDAC’s website:www.edactechnologies.com. Nominations of candidates for election as directors may be made by the Governance and Nominating Committee or by shareholders. The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders.

     The general criteria that the Governance and Nominating Committee uses to select nominees are: such individual’s reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards; their demonstrated business acumen, experience and ability to exercise sound judgments in matters that relate to the current and long-term objectives of the Company; their willingness and ability to contribute positively to the decision-making process of the Company; their commitment to understand the Company and its industry and to regularly attend and participate in meetings of the Board and its committees; their ability to understand the sometimes conflicting interests of the various constituencies of the Company, which include shareholders, employees, customers, governmental units, creditors and the general public, and to act in the interests of all shareholders; and no nominee should have, or appear to have, a conflict of interest that would impair the nominee’s ability to represent the interests of all the Company’s shareholders and to fulfill the responsibilities of a director.

     A shareholder may nominate one or more persons for election as a director at a meeting of shareholders only if such shareholder has given timely notice in proper written form of his or her intent to make such nomination or nominations. To be timely, such shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed to and received by the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 60th calendar day prior to the date of such meeting or (ii) the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of such meeting. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of a meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice described above. To be in proper form, a shareholder’s notice to the Secretary shall set forth:

• the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination, the name and address of the person or persons to be nominated;

• a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting, that the shareholder will continue to be a holder of record of stock of the Company as of the date of such meeting and, if applicable, that the shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice;

6

• if applicable, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the shareholder;

• such other information regarding each nominee to be proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and

• the consent of each nominee to serve as director of the Company if so elected.

     The Chairman of the meeting shall refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting

     Although the Company does not have a formal policy with respect to director attendance at annual meetings, the Company strongly encourages directors to attend the annual meeting. All of our directors attended last year’s annual meeting, and we expect that all of our directors will attend this year’s annual meeting.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

     The Board will give appropriate attention to written communications on issues that are submitted by shareholders and other interested parties. Absent unusual circumstances, the Chairman of the Board of Directors will, with the assistance of the Company’s outside legal counsel, (1) be primarily responsible for monitoring communications from shareholders and other interested parties and (2) provide copies or summaries of such communications to the other directors as he considers appropriate.

     Shareholders and other interested parties who wish to send communications to the Board should address such communications to Daniel C. Tracy, Chairman of the Board, EDAC Technologies Corporation, 1806 New Britain Ave., Farmington, CT 06032.

Fees of Independent Auditors

     The following is a summary of the fees billed by the Company’s principal accountant for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Fee Category	Fiscal 2006 fees		Fiscal 2005 fees
Audit Fees	$	82,900	$	80,000
Audit-related fees		—		—
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		27,070		15,000
Total Fees	$	109,970	$	95,000

7

     Audit Fees.Services consist of the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

     Audit-Related Fees.Services consist of that which are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit Fees.” No such fees were incurred during the past two years.

     Tax Fees.Services consist of tax return preparation and tax advice for federal and state taxes. Services for 2006 and 2005 were provided by accountants other than the Company’s principal accountant.

     All Other Fees.Services consist of audits of the Company’s employee benefit plans and $12,070 for consulting work regarding potential acquisition work in 2006.

     The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company considered that the provision of the services and the payment of the fees described above are compatible with maintaining the independence of Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP.

     The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services, audit related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by case basis.

     The Audit Committee approved all services and fees billed by the Company’s principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Report of the Audit Committee

     The Audit Committee is composed of three members of the Company’s Board of Directors, namely Messrs. Raffay, Towne and Tracy. Because the Company’s Common Stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, the Company is not subject to the listing requirements of any securities exchange or The Nasdaq Stock Market regarding the composition of the Company’s Audit Committee. However, each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) for the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. The Board has identified Mr. Daniel Tracy as the “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in a written Audit Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted on March 14, 2001, and amended on March 3, 2003 and March 8, 2004. A copy of the charter is available on EDAC’s website:www.edactechnologies.com.

     The Audit Committee has:

• reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, with the Company’s management and with the Company’s independent auditors;

8

• discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Accounting Standards No. 61, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as currently in effect; and

• received and discussed with the Company’s independent auditors the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and discussed with the independent auditors the matters disclosed in the letter and their independence from the Company.

     Based on such review and discussions with management and the independent auditors, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, for filing with the Commission.

AUDIT COMMITTEE:

Stephen J. Raffay, Chairman
Ross C. Towne
Daniel C. Tracy

Compensation of Directors

     In 2006, the Company paid directors of the Company a retainer of $3,125 each fiscal quarter and $1,500 for each non-telephonic Board of Directors or committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Board of Directors was paid an additional retainer of $1,250 each fiscal quarter and an additional $500 per non-telephonic meeting attended. Each director who serves as Chairman of a committee was paid an additional $500 for each non-telephonic meeting chaired by such director. Effective March 7, 2006, in addition to the fees described above, each director who participates in a telephonic Board of Directors or committee meeting at which a substantive resolution is considered will be paid $500. On that date, the Board of Directors also authorized a one-time payment of $2,500 to each director in recognition of the numerous telephonic meetings held in 2006 and during 2005 (16 in total). During 2006, one further telephonic meeting of the Compensation Committee was held on April 20, 2006, at which time the members of the Compensation Committee were each paid $500 and the chair of the Compensation Committee was paid an additional $500 for such meeting.

     Each new director of the Company is granted a stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock on the day of such director’s initial election to the Board of Directors. The exercise price of such options is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.

9

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the compensation of the Company’s directors for the fiscal year 2006:

	Fees Earned or		Option
	paid in Cash		Awards		Total
Name	($)(3)		($)(4) (5)		($)
William B. Bayne, Jr. (1)		7,125		—		7,125
Joseph Lebel		33,500		—		33,500
John Moses (2)		7,125		—		7,125
Stephen Raffay		41,500		—		41,500
Ross Towne		41,500		—		41,500
Daniel Tracy		49,000		8,400		58,400

(1)	Mr. Bayne served as a director until his resignation on March 14, 2006.
(2)	Mr. Moses served as a director until his resignation on March 9, 2006.
(3)	Includes the one-time payment on March 13, 2006 of $2,500, as referenced above under “Compensation of Directors”.
(4)	Amounts reflect expense recognized by the Company for accounting purposes calculated in accordance with FAS123R with respect to stock options. The assumptions made in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note C Common Stock and Stock Options to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Exhibit 13 to EDAC’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Under FAS 123R, this stock option was amortized over its 2 month vesting period.
(5)	The aggregate number of option awards outstanding at December 30, 2006 by director were: Mr. Lebel 10,000; Mr. Raffay 10,000; Mr. Towne 10,000 and Mr. Tracy 25,000.

Executive Officers

     The following table sets forth the name, age and current positions and offices of each executive officer of the Company:

Name	Age		Office
Dominick A. Pagano		63	President and Chief Executive Officer
Luciano M. Melluzzo		43	Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Glenn L. Purple		51	Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

     Mr. Pagano became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in August 2002 and also serves as President of Dapco Industries, Inc. He has served as President of Dapco Industries since he founded that company in 1972.

10

     Mr. Melluzzo joined the Company in November 2003 as Engineering Manager for the Company’s Spindle and Design operations. He was promoted in December 2004 to General Manager and in November 2005 was appointed Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company and since May 1999, Mr. Melluzzo served as the Manager of Sales and Marketing of Quality Engineering Services,a manufacturing and design company, unaffiliated with the Company, specializing in molds, tool design, fixture and gage fabrication and special machinery.

     Mr. Purple joined the Company in February 1982 as Controller. He served as Controller until November 2002, when he was appointed Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company. Mr. Purple also served as Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from 1989 through 1996.

     Officers are elected annually by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Design and Objectives:

The Compensation Committee is responsible for the design and administration of the Company’s executive and management compensation programs. The programs consist of: (i) base compensation in the form of a base salary plus typical employee fringe benefits, (ii) short-term incentives in the form of cash bonuses and (iii) long-term incentives in the form of stock options. These incentive programs are designed to align executive compensation with shareholder value. The overall goals of the compensation programs are to:

• Ensure that the Company is able to attract, retain and motivate outstanding employees;

• Ensure that pay levels remain competitive

• Encourage business development consistent with the business cycle of the Company;

• Promote the achievement of financial objectives specified by the Company;

• Recognize and reward employees for the Company’s performance and the achievement of individual goals and objectives.

Elements of Compensation:

     The Compensation Committee believes that each element of the compensation programs is essential to the achievement of short-term and long-term objectives of the Company. The following is a discussion of each of those elements.

     Base Compensation:

     Base compensation is a critical element of executive compensation because it provides executives with a consistent base level of income. During fiscal year 2007, base annual salaries for our executive officers were set at levels that the Compensation Committee believes, based on input from an external human resources consulting firm, are competitive with a relevant peer group of companies. We intend to evaluate our executive officers’ base annual salaries each year relative to local competitive situations for similar companies in the same or similar industries in

11

order to continue to attract and retain qualified executive officers. In addition to compensation market data, the Compensation Committee also considers individual executives’ position scope and accountability, experience level and overall performance when determining base salary. To the extent they are eligible, executive officers of the Company are also able to participate in all benefit programs that the Company makes available to its employees, including, but not limited to, health and dental insurance.

     Short-Term Incentives:

     Executive officers can also earn short-term incentives in the form of an annual cash bonus based on the Company’s achievement of predetermined objective financial and other criteria established annually by the Compensation Committee. The Company’s short-term incentives are designed to produce compensation that the Compensation Committee believes is fair and competitive for executive officers when compared against a relevant peer group of companies. Short-term incentives are a key component of the total compensation offering and are designed to reward executives for achieving annual financial and other performance goals. We have used cash as the payment form to enhance the total cash opportunity for our executives which we believe strengthens our ability to attract and retain talented leaders.

     The target incentive bonuses for the executive officers of the Company have been established as a percentage of their base salary. The specific financial objectives established by the Compensation Committee to determine bonus compensation for fiscal year 2007 are based on the Company’s sales and operating income, and the achievement of certain personal performance objectives, as detailed in the chart below:

				Financial Objectives for Target Incentive
				Bonus
				(total 100%)
							Company			Individual
	Target Incentive Bonus			Company			Operating			Performance
Position	(Percentage of Base Salary)			Sales			Income			Objectives
Chief Executive Officer		50	%		20	%		60	%		20	%
Chief Operating Officer		40	%		20	%		60	%		20	%
Chief Financial Officer		30	%		10	%		70	%		20	%

     In connection with determining the annual bonuses for the executives, each element of the compensation programs is considered individually. For example, if corporate sales objectives and individual performance objectives are achieved, but corporate operating income falls short of the target objectives, then only a portion of the target incentive compensation would be awarded to the executive officer.

     Long-Term Incentives:

     Long-term incentives are awarded to executives in the form of stock options at the periodic and subjective discretion of the Compensation Committee, and as approved by the Board of Directors. The Company believes the awarding of such incentives will retain

12

experienced and capable executive management focused on the longer term benefit of the shareholders. In particular, equity-based awards are intended to motivate our executive officers to improve the long-term performance of our common stock, and we therefore believe that equity-based compensation helps create a vital long-term partnership between our executive officers and shareholders.

     There is no direct or indirect relationship as to the allocation of short-term and long-term compensation programs of the Company. The awarding of short-term and long-term incentives and compensation to the Chief Executive Officer is based primarily on the audited financial results of the Company. Short-term and long-term awards granted to other executive officers are based primarily on unaudited financial results and achievement of personal goals and objectives.

     Incentives are based primarily on historical results; therefore, the Compensation Committee has determined that there is no need to implement a plan to adjust or recover incentives previously granted executive officers. To the extent the incentive programs focus on future events, the value of long-term incentives (stock options) will be reflected in the market value of such options.

Overview of the Activities of the Compensation Committee:

     During 2006 the Board of Directors authorized the Compensation Committee to engage the services of Overton Consulting, Inc., a compensation consulting firm, to review and evaluate the various compensation programs of the Company’s management and proposed employment agreements of the Company’s Executive Officers. The scope of the resulting review included cash compensation plans and short-term and long-term incentive programs of the Board of Directors, executive officers and division managers of the Company.

     As a result of the review and evaluation, certain salaries were adjusted to bring them within the competitive level of similar positions within the local market. Furthermore, in 2007 the Company entered into employment agreements with Mr. Purple and Mr. Melluzzo, and an amended employment agreement with Mr. Pagano, in order to (i) align the employment terms of these three Executive Officers with the fiscal year of the Company, (ii) incorporate terms and conditions commensurate with the local market and industry and companies of a similar size and (iii) provide competitive compensation with similar positions in the local market. These employment agreements are further described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Employment Agreements”. The Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement provides for (among other things), compensation equivalent to his annual compensation (including typical employee fringe benefits) in the event of a change of control which is defined in the agreement as previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     Also, short-term individual incentive programs were tied directly to the financial performance of the Company and/or divisional budget objectives and the achievement of specific individual goals.

     In fiscal year 2006, a cash bonus of $90,000 was granted to the Chief Executive Officer in recognition of achievements since 2002, which include among other things, balance sheet restructuring, growth in sales and profitability, debt restructuring, product and customer diversification, improvement in shareholder value and development of executive and divisional management. Adjustment of the base salary of the Chief Executive Officer was deferred

13

pending completion of audited financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2006. The base salary of the Chief Executive Office was subsequently increased in fiscal year 2007 retroactive to the commencement of fiscal year 2007.

     In addition, the Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, the granting of a total of 54,500 stock options to the three executive officers and four divisional managers. The options were priced as of the close of business on December 5, 2006 (the date of approval of the grants), vest ratably over a period of three years and are exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant.

     The compensation review and evaluation conducted by a compensation consulting firm and referred to above, included a recommendation for modifications to increase the long-term compensation of the Board of Directors and reevaluate the total compensation of the Board of Directors annually or bi-annually based on local compensation considerations and the overall financial performance of the company. After due consideration by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors, no action was taken on this recommendation.

     The Compensation Committee convened five times (including one teleconference meeting) in fiscal year 2006 with all members of the committee present during each of the meetings. In addition, the committee held numerous teleconference calls, with all members participating, to deliberate matters considered essential to the execution of the committee’s responsibilities. The executive officers of the Company do not play a role in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation. The Compensation Committee does not have a charter.

Compensation Committee Report

     The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the management of the Company. Based on this review and discussion, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
Ross C. Towne, Chairman
Joseph P. Lebel
Stephen J. Raffay
Daniel C. Tracy

14

Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Information

     The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and other executive officer of the Company who served during 2006 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

Summary Compensation Table

									Change in
									Pension Value
									and
									Nonqualified		All
									Deferred		Other
							Option		Compensation		Compen-
Name and Principal			Salary		Bonus		Awards		Earnings		sation		Total
Position	Year		($)		($)		($)(1)		($) (2)		($) (3)		($)
Dominick A. Pagano President and Chief Executive Officer		2006		180,000		20,000		813		—		27,000		227,813
Luciano M. Melluzzo Vice President and Chief Operating Officer		2006		160,000		14,420		12,870		—		—		187,290
Glenn L. Purple Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		2006		132,356		33,453		7,487		269		—		173,565

(1)	Amounts reflect expense recognized by EDAC for accounting purposes calculated in accordance with FAS123R with respect to stock options. The assumptions made in the valuation of these awards are set forth in Note C Common Stock and Stock Options to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Exhibit 13 to EDAC’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Under FAS 123R, the stock options are amortized over their 36 month vesting period.
(2)	Amount represents the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the Company’s defined benefit plan. The amount for Mr. Melluzzo was negative $81 and therefore excluded from the above table. This plan was frozen with respect to all future benefits as of April 1, 1993.
(3)	Other compensation for Mr. Pagano represents director retainers and board meeting fees.

Option Grants

     The following table provides certain information regarding stock options granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2006.

15

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

		All Other
		Option		Exercise
		Awards:		or Base		Grant Date
		Number of		Price of		Fair Value
		Securities		Option		Of Stock
		Underlying		Awards		and Option
Name	Date	Options		($/sh) (1)		Awards (2)
Dominick A. Pagano	12/5/06		25,000		2.90	$	33,750
Luciano M. Melluzzo	12/5/06		10,000		2.90	$	13,500
Glenn L. Purple	12/5/06		7,500		2.90	$	10,125

(1)	Consists of stock options with an exercise price equal to the closing price of EDAC common stock on the date of grant and a ten year term. Options are exercisable 1/3 after 1 year, 2/3 after 2 years and are fully exercisable after 3 years.
(2)	Reflects grant date fair value of stock options calculated in accordance with FAS 123R.

Fiscal Year-End Option Values

     The following table provides certain information regarding options held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 30, 2006.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

	Option Awards
					Equity
					Incentive
					Plan
					Awards:
					Number of
	Number of		Number of		Securities
	Securities		Securities		Underlying
	Underlying		Underlying		Unexercised
	Unexercised		Unexercised		Unearned		Option		Option
	Options (#)		Options (#)		Options		Exercise		Expiration
Name	Exerciseable		Unexerciseable		(#)		Price($)		Date
Dominick A. Pagano		—		25,000		25,000		2.90		12/04/16
		140,000		—		—		0.60		8/12/12
Luciano M. Melluzzo		—		10,000		10,000		2.90		12/04/16
				20,000		20,000		3.70		12/30/15
		1,667		833		833		1.67		12/6/14
		5,000		—		—		1.10		12/7/13
Glenn L. Purple		—		7,500		7,500		2.90		12/04/16
		—		10,000		10,000		3.70		12/30/15
		3,333		1,667		1,667		1.67		12/6/14
		2,500		—		—		1.10		1/5/14

16

	Option Awards
					Equity
					Incentive
					Plan
					Awards:
					Number of
	Number of		Number of		Securities
	Securities		Securities		Underlying
	Underlying		Underlying		Unexercised
	Unexercised		Unexercised		Unearned		Option		Option
	Options (#)		Options (#)		Options		Exercise		Expiration
Name	Exerciseable		Unexerciseable		(#)		Price($)		Date
Glenn L. Purple (con’t)		5,000		—		—		0.51		12/2/12
		5,000		—		—		1.3125		2/4/11
		3,000		—		—		0.97		6/12/10

Pension Plan

				Number of		Present Value of
				Years		Accumulated
				Credited Service		Benefits (2)
Name	Plan Name			#		$
Luciano M. Melluzzo		(1	)		8		6,425
Glenn L. Purple		(1	)		11		31,175

(1)	Plan name is EDAC Technologies Corporation Gros-Ite Division Employees’ Pension Plan.
(2)	The Present Value of Accumulated Benefits is calculated using a discount rate of 6%. Reference Note E to the Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 28 through 30 of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders.

The plan provides for benefits based on years of service and compensation during the last five years of employment prior to April 1, 1993. The normal retirement benefit payable monthly at age 65 is calculated as one-twelfth of the sum of 1.5% of final average compensation less .45% of the offset allowance multiplied by the years of credited service to a maximum of 30 years. The offset allowance is the lesser of $10,000 per year or the final average compensation. Final average compensation used in the formula includes an employee’s salary, or if paid hourly, his hourly rate of pay multiplied by 2,080. In March 1993, the Board of Directors approved a curtailment to the plan which resulted in the freezing of all future benefits under the plan as of April 1, 1993.

Employment Agreements

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement – between the Company and Dominick A. Pagano.

     On February 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with its current President and Chief Executive Officer, Dominick A.

17

Pagano, which replaced his employment agreement dated as of February 13, 2005. Under the new agreement, the initial term commences on the first day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year and continues until the last day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year, and automatically extends for successive periods of 12 months (equal to the Company’s next fiscal year period) unless either party gives the other 90 days advance written notice to the contrary. Mr. Pagano’s initial annual base salary is $190,000, subject to adjustment thereafter. To the extent he is eligible, Mr. Pagano is entitled to participate in all bonus and benefit programs that the Company establishes and makes available to its employees. Under the new agreement, the Company may terminate Mr. Pagano’s employment for cause (as defined in the agreement), or upon not less than 90 days’ prior written notice to Mr. Pagano. Mr. Pagano may terminate his employment with the Company for “good reason” or upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company.

     The new agreement provides that if Mr. Pagano’s employment terminates because of death or disability, or if the Company terminates Mr. Pagano’s employment for cause or Mr. Pagano terminates his employment (without “good reason”) upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company, Mr. Pagano is entitled to the compensation, bonus and benefits otherwise payable to him under the agreement through the last day of his actual employment by the Company.

     While Mr. Pagano is employed by the Company, and if the Company terminates his employment for cause, for a period of one year following such termination, Mr. Pagano cannot directly or indirectly: (a) engage in any business or enterprise (whether as owner, partner, officer, director, employee, consultant, investor, lender or otherwise, except as the holder of not more than 1% of the outstanding stock of a publicly-held company) that is competitive with the Company’s business as conducted as of the termination date, including but not limited to any business or enterprise that develops, manufactures, markets, or sells any product or service that competes with any product or service developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, or planned to be developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, by the Company or any of its subsidiaries while Mr. Pagano was employed by the Company; or (b) either alone or in association with others (i) solicit, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Pagano to solicit, any employee of the Company to leave the employ of the Company, or (ii) solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Pagano to solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, any person who was employed by the Company at any time during the twelve-month period preceding the date of termination of Mr. Pagano’s employment with the Company.

     If the Company terminates Mr. Pagano’s employment for any reason other than cause, or if Mr. Pagano terminates his employment for “good reason”, Mr. Pagano is entitled to receive the following for the 12 month period following the date of his termination: (i) Mr. Pagano’s salary as in effect on the date of his termination and the amount of the annual bonus paid to him for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination (payable in annualized monthly installments), (ii) any incentive compensation earned by Mr. Pagano through the date of his termination (payable to him at the customary time), and (iii) the other fringe benefits that were provided to Mr. Pagano while employed by the Company including health and dental insurance, to the extent such benefits can be provided by the Company to non-employees, or to the extent such benefits cannot be provided to non-employees, then the cash equivalent thereof. The payment of these amounts is contingent upon Mr. Pagano executing a release.

18

     Mr. Pagano can terminate his employment for “good reason” if any of the following occurs during the term of his employment, (i) a material reduction in Mr. Pagano’s authority, duties or compensation without the prior written consent of Mr. Pagano, (ii) a material breach by the Company of the terms of the agreement, which breach, if capable of being remedied, (A) the Company has not taken appropriate action to remedy within 10 business days following written notice from Mr. Pagano to the Company notifying it of such breach, and (B) is not remedied by the Company within 30 days following such written notice, (iii) the relocation of Mr. Pagano’s place of work more than 30 miles from the Company’s current facilities in Farmington, Connecticut, or (iv) a “change of control” of the Company.

     Under the new agreement, a “change of control” means: (i) the acquisition by an individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership of any capital stock of the Company if, after such acquisition, such Person beneficially owns (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) 40% or more of the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the Company or the combined voting power of the then-outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; (ii) such time as the Continuing Directors (as defined below) do not constitute two-thirds of the Board (or, if applicable, the Board of Directors of a successor corporation to the Company), where the term “Continuing Director” means at any date a member of the Board (A) who was a member of the Board on the date of the execution of the new agreement or (B) who was nominated or elected subsequent to such date by at least two-thirds of the directors who were Continuing Directors at the time of such nomination or election or whose election to the Board was recommended or endorsed by at least two-thirds of the directors who were Continuing Directors at the time of such nomination or election; provided, however, that there is excluded from clause (B) any individual whose initial assumption of office occurred as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents, by or on behalf of a person other than the Board; or (iii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization or statutory share exchange involving the Company or a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, unless the owners of the capital stock of the Company before such transaction continue to own more than 50% of the capital stock of the acquiring or succeeding entity in substantially the same proportions immediately following such a transaction.

Employment Agreement – between the Company and Glenn L. Purple.

     On February 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with its current Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary, Glenn L. Purple. Under the agreement, the initial term commences on the first day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year and continues until the last day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year, and automatically extends for successive periods of 12 months (equal to the Company’s next fiscal year period) unless either party gives the other 90 days advance written notice to the contrary. Mr. Purple’s initial annual base salary is $141,000 subject to adjustment thereafter. To the extent he is eligible, Mr. Purple is entitled to participate in all bonus and benefit programs that the Company establishes and makes available to its employees. Under the agreement, the Company may terminate Mr. Purple’s employment for cause (as defined in the agreement), or upon not less than 90 days’ prior written notice to Mr. Purple. Mr. Purple may terminate his employment with the Company for “good reason” or upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company.

19

     The agreement provides that if Mr. Purple’s employment terminates because of death or disability, or if the Company terminates Mr. Purple’s employment for cause or Mr. Purple terminates his employment (without “good reason”) upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company, Mr. Purple is entitled to the compensation, bonus and benefits otherwise payable to him under the agreement through the last day of his actual employment by the Company.

     While Mr. Purple is employed by the Company, and if the Company terminates his employment for cause, for a period of one year following such termination, Mr. Purple cannot directly or indirectly: (a) engage in any business or enterprise (whether as owner, partner, officer, director, employee, consultant, investor, lender or otherwise, except as the holder of not more than 1% of the outstanding stock of a publicly-held company) that is competitive with the Company’s business as conducted as of the termination date, including but not limited to any business or enterprise that develops, manufactures, markets, or sells any product or service that competes with any product or service developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, or planned to be developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, by the Company or any of its subsidiaries while Mr. Purple was employed by the Company; or (b) either alone or in association with others (i) solicit, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Purple to solicit, any employee of the Company to leave the employ of the Company, or (ii) solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Purple to solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, any person who was employed by the Company at any time during the twelve-month period preceding the date of termination of Mr. Purple’s employment with the Company.

     If the Company terminates Mr. Purple’s employment for any reason other than cause, or if Mr. Purple terminates his employment for “good reason”, Mr. Purple is entitled to receive the following for the 12 month period following the date of his termination: (i) Mr. Purple’s salary as in effect on the date of his termination and the amount of the annual bonus paid to him for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination (payable in annualized monthly installments), (ii) any incentive compensation earned by Mr. Purple through the date of his termination (payable to him at the customary time), and (iii) the other fringe benefits that were provided to Mr. Purple while employed by the Company including health and dental insurance, to the extent such benefits can be provided by the Company to non-employees, or to the extent such benefits cannot be provided to non-employees, then the cash equivalent thereof. The payment of these amounts is contingent upon Mr. Purple executing a release.

     Mr. Purple can terminate his employment for “good reason” if any of the following occurs during the term of his employment, (i) a material reduction in Mr. Purple’s authority, duties or compensation without the prior written consent of Mr. Purple, (ii) a material breach by the Company of the terms of the agreement, which breach, if capable of being remedied, (A) the Company has not taken appropriate action to remedy within 10 business days following written notice from Mr. Purple to the Company notifying it of such breach, and (B) is not remedied by the Company within 30 days following such written notice, or (iii) the relocation of Mr. Purple’s place of work more than 30 miles from the Company’s current facilities in Farmington, Connecticut.

20

Employment Agreement – between the Company and Luciano M. Melluzzo.

     On February 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with its current Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Luciano M. Melluzzo. Under the agreement, the initial term commences on the first day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year and continues until the last day of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year, and automatically extends for successive periods of 12 months (equal to the Company’s next fiscal year period) unless either party gives the other 90 days advance written notice to the contrary. Mr. Melluzzo’s initial annual base salary is $170,000, subject to adjustment thereafter. To the extent he is eligible, Mr. Melluzzo is entitled to participate in all bonus and benefit programs that the Company establishes and makes available to its employees. Under the agreement, the Company may terminate Mr. Melluzzo’s employment for cause (as defined in the agreement), or upon not less than 90 days’ prior written notice to Mr. Melluzzo. Mr. Melluzzo may terminate his employment with the Company for “good reason” or upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company.

     The agreement provides that if Mr. Melluzzo’s employment terminates because of death or disability, or if the Company terminates Mr. Melluzzo’s employment for cause or Mr. Melluzzo terminates his employment (without “good reason”) upon 90 days’ advance written notice to the Company, Mr. Melluzzo is entitled to the compensation, bonus and benefits otherwise payable to him under the agreement through the last day of his actual employment by the Company.

     While Mr. Melluzzo is employed by the Company, and if the Company terminates his employment for cause, for a period of one year following such termination, Mr. Melluzzo cannot directly or indirectly: (a) engage in any business or enterprise (whether as owner, partner, officer, director, employee, consultant, investor, lender or otherwise, except as the holder of not more than 1% of the outstanding stock of a publicly-held company) that is competitive with the Company’s business as conducted as of the termination date, including but not limited to any business or enterprise that develops, manufactures, markets, or sells any product or service that competes with any product or service developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, or planned to be developed, manufactured, marketed, sold or provided, by the Company or any of its subsidiaries while Mr. Melluzzo was employed by the Company; or (b) either alone or in association with others (i) solicit, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Melluzzo to solicit, any employee of the Company to leave the employ of the Company, or (ii) solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, or permit any organization directly or indirectly controlled by Mr. Melluzzo to solicit for employment, hire or engage as an independent contractor, any person who was employed by the Company at any time during the twelve-month period preceding the date of termination of Mr. Melluzzo’s employment with the Company.

     If the Company terminates Mr. Melluzzo’s employment for any reason other than cause, or if Mr. Melluzzo terminates his employment for “good reason”, Mr. Melluzzo is entitled to receive the following for the 12 month period following the date of his termination: (i) Mr. Melluzzo’s salary as in effect on the date of his termination and the amount of the annual bonus paid to him for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of termination (payable in annualized monthly installments), (ii) any incentive compensation earned by Mr. Melluzzo through the date of his termination (payable to him at the customary time), and (iii) the other fringe benefits that were provided to Mr. Melluzzo while employed by the Company including health and dental insurance, to the extent such benefits can be provided by the Company to non-

21

employees, or to the extent such benefits cannot be provided to non-employees, then the cash equivalent thereof. The payment of these amounts is contingent upon Mr. Melluzzo executing a release.

     Mr. Melluzzo can terminate his employment for “good reason” if any of the following occurs during the term of his employment, (i) a material reduction in Mr. Melluzzo’s authority, duties or compensation without the prior written consent of Mr. Melluzzo, (ii) a material breach by the Company of the terms of the agreement, which breach, if capable of being remedied, (A) the Company has not taken appropriate action to remedy within 10 business days following written notice from Mr. Melluzzo to the Company notifying it of such breach, and (B) is not remedied by the Company within 30 days following such written notice, or (iii) the relocation of Mr. Melluzzo’s place of work more than 30 miles from the Company’s current facilities in Farmington, Connecticut.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

     The Board of Directors reviews on a case-by-case basis any direct or indirect transactions between the Company and its executive officers, directors or stockholders holding 5% or more of its voting securities, and any other transactions required to be disclosed as related person transactions by Item 404 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. The Board of Directors has adopted a written Related Person Transaction Policy for the review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons. Pursuant to this policy, all related person transactions or series of similar transactions required to be disclosed by the SEC rules are prohibited unless approved or ratified by the Board of Directors. In general, the Board of Directors will consider all relevant facts and circumstances when reviewing any potential related person transaction, including, for example, the commercial reasonableness of its terms; the benefit to the Company; the opportunity costs of alternate transactions; and the materiality and character of the related person’s interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person.

     If the potential transaction were to involve a Board member, he or she must be available to answer questions, but would neither participate in any discussion or vote to either approve or disapprove the transaction.

     The Board will not approve or ratify a related person transaction unless it shall have determined that, upon consideration of all relevant information, the transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. If the Board determines not to approve or ratify a related person transaction (whether such transaction is being reviewed for the first time or has previously been approved and is being reviewed), the transaction will not be entered into or continued, as the Board shall direct.

     The Company has advised its directors and executive officers that they are required to promptly notify the Corporate Secretary of the Company of any proposed related person transaction in which such director or executive officer may be directly or indirectly involved as soon he or she becomes aware of a possible transaction. The Corporate Secretary of the Company is responsible for taking all reasonable steps to ensure that all related person transactions be presented to the Board of Directors for review and discussion, and if appropriate, pre-approval or ratification by the Board of Directors.

22

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

     The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors. During the fiscal year ended December 30, 2006, the following board members served on the Compensation Committee: William B. Bayne, Joseph P. Lebel, John Moses, Stephen J. Raffay, Ross Towne and Daniel Tracy. No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during fiscal year 2006 an officer or employee of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, or formerly an officer of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, nor has any member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

PROPOSAL NO. 2 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the 2007 fiscal year. Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP has served as the Company’s independent auditors since August 2003. Although this appointment is not required to be submitted to a vote of shareholders, the Company believes it appropriate as a matter of policy to request that the shareholders ratify the appointment. The Board of Directors recommends that all shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP as the Company’s independent auditors. If shareholder ratification is not received, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors may reconsider the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP.

     It is expected that a representative of Carlin, Charron & Rosen LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

     The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock as of March 31, 2007 by (i) each director, nominee for director and Named Executive Officer, (ii) each person or entity known by the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group.

     The Company has determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the Commission. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons included in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, except to the extent authority is shared with spouses under applicable law. Shares of Common Stock subject to options that are either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2007 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the option holder for the purpose of computing the

23

percentage ownership of the option holder. However, these shares are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

	Number of Shares		Percent
Name	Beneficially Owned		of Class
William B. Bayne, Jr. (1)		153,070		3.4
Joseph P. Lebel (2)		140,557		3.1
Luciano M. Melluzzo (3)		14,375		*
John Moses (4)		403,760		8.9
Dominick A. Pagano (5)		351,768		7.5
Glenn L. Purple (6)		51,138		1.1
Stephen J. Raffay (7)		18,000		*
Ross C. Towne (8)		77,090		1.7
Daniel C. Tracy (9)		132,468		2.9
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (7 persons) (10)		785,396		16.5

*	Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
(1)	Mr. Bayne’s address is 1806 South Arlington Ridge Road, Arlington, Virginia 22202. Mr. Bayne resigned as a director on March 14, 2006.
(2)	Includes 10,000 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Lebel.
(3)	Includes 13,334 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Melluzzo. Mr. Melluzzo is Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and is not a director.
(4)	Mr. Moses’ address is 3616 North Albemarle Street, Arlington, Virginia, 22207. Mr. Moses resigned as a director on March 9, 2006.
(5)	Includes 140,000 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Pagano. Mr. Pagano’s address is 1806 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06032.
(6)	Includes 22,167 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Purple. Mr. Purple is Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and is not a director.
(7)	Includes 10,000 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Raffay.
(8)	Includes 10,000 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Towne.
(9)	Includes 25,000 shares subject to stock options held by Mr. Tracy.
(10)	Includes 230,501 shares subject to stock options held by all directors and executive officers as a group.

     The above beneficial ownership information is based upon information furnished by the specified persons and is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. It is

24

not necessarily to be construed as an admission of beneficial ownership for other purposes and may include shares as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

     Any shareholder who desires to submit a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy for the Company’s 2008 Annual Meeting must submit the proposal in writing to Glenn L. Purple, Secretary, EDAC Technologies Corporation, 1806 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, no later than December 28, 2007.

     The Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws require a shareholder to give advance notice of any proposal, including the nomination of candidates for the Board of Directors, that the shareholder wishes to bring before a meeting of shareholders of the Company. In general, for a proposal to be brought before a meeting of shareholders by a shareholder, written notice of the shareholder proposal must be delivered to, or mailed to and received by, the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company, not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 60^th calendar day prior to the date of such meeting or (ii) the 10^th calendar day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of such meeting. The written notice of a shareholder proposal must contain all of the information required by the Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws. Notices of intention to present proposals at the 2008 Annual Meeting should be addressed to Glenn L. Purple, Secretary, EDAC Technologies Corporation, 1806 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06032.

PROPOSAL NO. 3 – SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING MAJORITY VOTING FOR ELECTING DIRECTORS

     On or about December 20, 2006, the Company received the following shareholder proposal from John W. Moses of 3616 N. Albemarle St., Arlington, VA 22207, the then owner of 477,000 shares. In accordance with the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement (collectively, the “Moses Shareholder Proposal”) in this proxy statement verbatim as they were submitted to us. Following the Moses Shareholder Proposal is the response of the Company’s Board of Directors. While the Moses Shareholder Proposal recommends that you vote FOR this proposal, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal for the reasons set forth below in the Board of Directors’ Statement of Opposition. The text of the Moses Shareholder Proposal is as follow:

     “RESOLVED: That the stockholders of EDAC Technologies Corporation (“Company”) hereby request that the Board of Directors initiate the appropriate process to amend the Company’s certificate of incorporation to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of stockholders.

     SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Our Company is incorporated in Wisconsin. Among other issues, Wisconsin corporate law addresses the issue of the level of voting support necessary for a specific action, such as the election of corporate directors. Wisconsin law provides that unless a company’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise, a plurality of all the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is sufficient to elect a director.

25

     Our Company presently uses the plurality vote standard to elect directors. This proposal requests that the Board initiate a change in the Company’s director election vote standard to provide that nominees for the board of directors must receive a majority of the vote cast in order to be elected or re-elected to the Board.

     We believe that a majority vote standard in director elections would give shareholders a meaningful role in the director election process. Under the Company’s current standard, a nominee in a director election can be elected with as little as a single affirmative vote, even if a substantial majority of the votes cast are “withheld” from that nominee. The majority vote standard would require that a director receive a majority of the vote cast in order to be elected to the Board.

     The majority vote proposal received high levels of interest recently, winning majority support at Advanced Micro Devices, Freeport McMoRan, Marathon Oil, Marsh and McClennan, Office Depot, Raytheon, and others. Leading proxy advisory firms recommended voting in favor of the proposal. We contend that changing the legal standard to a majority vote is a superior solution that merits shareholder support.

     Our proposal is not intended to limit the judgment of the Board in crafting the requested governance change. For instance, the Board should address the status of incumbent director nominees who fail to receive a majority vote under a majority vote standard and whether a plurality vote standard may be appropriate in director elections when the number of director nominees exceeds the available board seats.

     We urge your support for this important director election reform.”

The Company’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the Moses Shareholder Proposal.

     THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION:The Company’s directors, like those of many public corporations, are elected by a plurality of votes cast at the annual meeting. The Board of Directors believes that the present system of electing directors best serves the interests of all shareholders.

     The Board strongly disagrees with the proponent’s assertion that the implementation of a majority vote standard is necessary to give shareholders a meaningful role in the director election process. The Company already has in place a process by which shareholders may recommend candidates for election, as described in this Proxy Statement under the heading, “Director Nominations”. Furthermore, the Company has already established a robust corporate governance process designed to identify and propose director nominees who will serve the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Governance and Nominating Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors, evaluates and recommends director nominees for election. In order to be considered, nominees must meet specified criteria designed to ensure that our Board members are highly qualified and reflect a diversity of experience and viewpoints. The Company’s shareholders have a history of electing strong and independent Boards, not only by a plurality, but also in fact by a substantial majority of the votes cast.

     The Board believes that the proponent’s characterization of the plurality voting process — in particular the suggestion that a director may be elected by receiving only a single affirmative vote — is highly theoretical and not supported by historic results. Over the past five

26

years at each annual meeting, every director nominee has received the affirmative vote of more 63% of the shares voting at each meeting. Adopting the proposal to depart from the Company’s plurality voting requirement would have had no effect on the outcome of our election process during the past five years.

     Even if the proposal were adopted and at a future election enough shareholder votes were withheld to prevent a director from receiving a majority vote, the Board believes that the best interest of the Company’s shareholders would not be served. For example, if withheld votes aggregated just over 50% of the votes cast, a director receiving just under a majority of the votes cast would not be elected. Similarly, if there were more candidates nominated than the number of open board seats, the shareholder votes could be spread in such a way that no nominee receives a majority of the votes cast. In either case, the nominee director preferred by the shareholders would not be elected and the result is less desirable than the current system of electing directors by a plurality vote.

     The plurality voting standard for the election of directors is used widely by publicly traded companies. It is the default standard under Wisconsin law and is known and understood by shareholders. The Board of Directors believes that the plurality standard provides a reliable mechanism for electing an independent Board of Directors that is committed to delivering long-term shareholder value.

     The Board of Directors continues to follow the discussions and studies regarding majority election of directors, and continues to consider whether a change to this standard would be in the best interests of the shareholders. At the present time, the Board of Directors believes that it would not be prudent to change its director election process until more is known about the benefits and risks of alternative approaches to director elections, and a generally accepted framework for majority voting is agreed. Until such time, the Board believes it generally is in the best interest of shareholders to continue to follow its current process, which is the most widely used and tested industry practice for electing directors.

     For the foregoing reasons, the Board believes that requiring a majority vote for the election of directors is not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.The Company’s Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST the Moses Shareholder Proposal.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

     Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the Commission initial reports of beneficial ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of the Company’s equity securities on Forms 4 or 5. The rules promulgated by the Commission under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act require those persons to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed with the Commission pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely upon a review of such forms actually furnished to the Company, and written representations of certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers that no forms were required to be filed, the Company believes that during fiscal year 2006, all directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders of the Company have filed with the

27

Commission on a timely basis all reports required to be filed under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

OTHER MATTERS

     The Board of Directors does not know of any other matters which may be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, including any adjournment or adjournments thereof, it is intended that proxies received in response to this solicitation will be voted on such matters in the discretion of the person or persons named in the accompanying proxy form.

     All costs of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitations by mail, the Company’s directors, officers and employees, without additional remuneration, may solicit proxies by telephone, telegraph and personal interviews, and the Company reserves the right to retain outside agencies for the purpose of soliciting proxies. Brokers, custodians and fiduciaries will be requested to forward proxy soliciting material to the owners of stock held in their names, and, as required by law, the Company will reimburse them for their out-of-pocket expenses in this regard.

     The Board of Directors hopes that shareholders will attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend, you are urged to complete, date and return the enclosed proxy in the accompanying envelope. Prompt response will greatly facilitate arrangements for the meeting and your cooperation will be appreciated.

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Glenn L. Purple

Glenn L. Purple, Secretary

Farmington, Connecticut
April 27, 2007

28

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

June 6, 2007

Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.

¯  Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.  ¯

n  20530030000000000000  4                                               060607

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE: “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2 AND “AGAINST” PROPOSAL 3. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HEREx
							FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:					2.	To ratify the appointment of Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 29, 2007.	o	o	o
		NOMINEES:
o	FOR ALL NOMINEES	O	Joseph Lebel			THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL NO. 2
		O	Dominick A. Pagano				FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
o	WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES	O O	Stephen J. Raffay Ross C. Towne		3.	To vote upon a shareholder proposal, if properly presented, regarding majority voting for the election of directors of the Company.	o	o	o
		O	Daniel C. Tracy
o	FOR ALL EXCEPT (See Instructions below)
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR ALL NOMINEES” FOR    DIRECTOR.						THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “AGAINST” PROPOSAL NO. 3
					PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here:l
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.				o

Signature of Shareholder    Date:    Signature of Shareholder    Date:  

     Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

n

n

o             n

EDAC TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS - JUNE 6, 2007
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

      The undersigned appoints each of Glenn L. Purple and Edward J. Samorajczyk, Jr., and each of them, as proxies (with full power of substitution) of the undersigned to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of EDAC Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) to be held on June 6, 2007 at 9:30 a.m., local time, at the offices of the Company, 1790 New Britain Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut and any adjournment thereof, and to vote the shares of common stock of the Company held by the undersigned on April 19, 2007, as specified on the reverse side and on any other matters that may properly come before said meeting, or any adjournment thereof.

This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR the election of all nominees, FOR Proposal 2, and AGAINST Proposal 3.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)

n

14475  n