In April 2004, PREIT created a five-person Office of the Chairman, consisting of Ronald Rubin, Jonathan B. Weller, George F. Rubin, Edward A. Glickman and Joseph F. Coradino, intended to enable PREIT to maximize the talent and experience of its management team to further support PREIT’s growth initiatives. Upon the execution of new employment agreements or, in Mr. Glickman’s case, an amendment to his existing employment agreement, Ronald Rubin continued as PREIT’s chairman and chief executive officer, Jonathan B. Weller and George F. Rubin became vice chairmen, Edward A. Glickman became president and chief operating officer, and Joseph F. Coradino became president of PREIT Services, LLC and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc., as well as remaining PREIT’s Executive Vice President — Retail. On February 28, 2006, Mr. Weller entered into a separation agreement with PREIT, which is described below under “— Separation Agreement with Jonathan B. Weller.”
Ronald Rubin’s employment agreement with PREIT was effective as of January 1, 2004 for an initial term through December 31, 2006, and extending year-to-year thereafter unless either party gives at least 120 days advance written notice that the term will not be extended. Under the agreement, Mr. Rubin serves as chairman and chief executive officer of PREIT. Mr. Rubin’s salary may be increased each year at the discretion of PREIT’s compensation committee. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Rubin is eligible each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs. PREIT is also obligated to contribute $100,000 per year to a supplemental retirement plan that will accrue interest at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts in the supplemental retirement plan are payable to Mr. Rubin within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. Under the agreement, the board of trustees of PREIT is obligated to nominate Mr. Rubin as candidate for election to the board of trustees at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which his term as a trustee is scheduled to expire, so long as Mr. Rubin’s employment has not been terminated and a non-renewal notice has not been given to Mr. Rubin pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
George F. Rubin’s employment agreement with PREIT was effective as of January 1, 2004 for an initial term through December 31, 2006, and extending year-to-year thereafter unless either party gives at least 120 days advance written notice that the term will not be extended. Under the agreement, Mr. Rubin serves as vice chairman of PREIT. Mr. Rubin’s salary may be increased each year at the discretion of PREIT’s compensation committee. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Rubin is eligible each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs. PREIT is also obligated to contribute $35,000 per year to a supplemental retirement plan that will accrue interest at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts in the supplemental retirement plan are payable to Mr. Rubin within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason. Under the agreement, the board of trustees of PREIT is obligated to nominate Mr. Rubin as candidate for election to the board of trustees at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which his term as a trustee is scheduled to expire, so long as Mr. Rubin’s employment has not been terminated and a non-renewal notice has not been given to Mr. Rubin pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
Edward A. Glickman entered into an employment agreement with PREIT on November 10, 2000, and entered into an amendment to his employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2004. The employment agreement, as amended, provides that Mr. Glickman is to serve as president and chief operating officer of PREIT. The term of the employment agreement was made retroactively effective to January 1, 1999 and extended until September 30, 2002, whereupon it automatically renewed for an additional two-year period, which it will continue to do every other September 30 unless and until either party gives notice of termination at least one year prior to the end of the then current term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Glickman is entitled to a salary increase of $25,000 per year (or a greater amount as determined by the board of trustees) on the first day of each January during the term. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Glickman is eligible each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs. PREIT is also obligated to contribute $25,000 per year to a supplemental retirement plan that will accrue interest at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts in the supplemental retirement plan are payable to Mr. Glickman within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason.
Joseph F. Coradino’s employment agreement with PREIT was effective as of January 1, 2004 for an initial term through December 31, 2006, and extending year-to-year thereafter unless either party gives at least 120 days advance written notice that the term will not be extended. Under the agreement, Mr. Coradino serves as
Back to Contents
Executive Vice President — Retail of PREIT. He has also been appointed as the president of PREIT Services, LLC and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. Mr. Coradino’s salary may be increased each year at the discretion of PREIT’s compensation committee. In accordance with the agreement, Mr. Coradino is eligible each year to participate in PREIT’s cash and equity incentive programs. PREIT is obligated to contribute $35,000 per year to a supplemental retirement plan that will accrue interest at the rate of 10% per year, compounded annually. The amounts in the supplemental retirement plan are payable to Mr. Coradino within 60 days of the termination of his employment for any reason.
The employment agreements described above contain provisions addressing the consequences of a termination of each executive’s employment. With respect to each executive other than Mr. Glickman, if PREIT terminates the executive’s employment without specified cause, or if the executive terminates his employment for specified good reason (including the delivery by PREIT of notice that the term of the agreement will not be renewed or, in the case of Ronald Rubin or George F. Rubin, the failure of the board of trustees to nominate the executive for election to the board of trustees upon the expiration of the executive’s then-current term as a trustee), the executive is entitled to a lump-sum severance payment equal to three times the sum of the executive’s then current salary plus the executive’s average bonuses for the last three years. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the phrase “average bonuses for the last three years” means the average percentage of the executive’s salary represented by his annual bonus paid in each of the prior three years, multiplied by his then current salary. In the same circumstances, Mr. Glickman is entitled to three times the sum of his then current salary plus the average of his annual bonus over the last three years. Additionally, Mr. Glickman is entitled to terminate his employment for good reason within specified time periods if Ronald Rubin ceases to be PREIT’s chief executive officer for any reason or if Mr. Glickman is not offered a new three-year employment agreement following a change of control of PREIT providing for the same title and responsibilities and the same or greater compensation and benefits as in effect immediately before the change of control.
If the employment of an executive (other than Ronald Rubin or Mr. Glickman) is terminated as a result of death or disability during the term of his employment agreement, the executive or his estate is entitled to continue to receive his then-current salary (offset, in the case of disability, by payments under disability insurance policies paid for by PREIT) for the longer of the remainder of the term or one year. If Ronald Rubin’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Rubin or his estate is entitled to continue to receive his then-current salary (offset, in the case of disability, by payments under disability insurance policies paid for by PREIT) for the longer of the remainder of the term or three years. If Mr. Glickman’s employment is terminated as a result of his death during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Glickman’s estate is entitled to receive a single payment equal to six months of his then-current salary. If Mr. Glickman’s employment is terminated as a result of his disability during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Glickman is entitled to continue to receive his then-current salary (offset by payments under disability insurance policies) for two years. Each executive, or his estate, would also receive a prorated portion of any bonus payable with respect to established performance goals that PREIT achieves in the year of the executive’s disability or death.
Additionally, the employment agreements provide that, if PREIT terminates the employment of any of the executives without cause, if the executive terminates his employment for good reason, or if the executive’s employment is terminated as a result of death or disability, then, in each case, the executive’s options immediately become vested and the executive is (and, in some cases, his dependents are) entitled to continuing medical benefits for a specified period of time. If PREIT terminates the employment of any of the executives without cause or if the executive terminates his employment for good reason, the executive’s restricted shares immediately become vested.
The employment agreements also provide that, in the event any payments to such executives result in the imposition on them of an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, PREIT will pay to such executive an additional amount equal to the amount of the excise tax or, in Mr. Glickman’s case, one half of the excise tax.
Separation Agreement with Jonathan B. Weller
In connection with the formation of the Office of the Chairman, Jonathan B. Weller entered into an employment agreement with PREIT effective as of January 1, 2004 for an initial term through December 31,
17
Back to Contents
2006. On March 1, 2006, PREIT announced the retirement of Mr. Weller, effective April 15, 2006. In connection with Mr. Weller’s retirement, on February 28, 2006, PREIT entered into a separation of employment agreement with Mr. Weller. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Weller’s employment agreement expired and he retired from PREIT’s board of trustees, each effective as of March 8, 2006, the date on which the separation agreement became irrevocable. Mr. Weller remained employed as PREIT’s vice chairman through April 15, 2006 pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement, which generally provided that Mr. Weller would receive the same base compensation and health, medical and other benefits that he received under the employment agreement. The separation agreement contains mutual releases, as well as confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-disparagement provisions. Pursuant to the separation agreement, Mr. Weller received an aggregate payment of approximately $4.2 million in cash and common shares, including the vesting of 39,477 restricted common shares. Mr. Weller’s currently outstanding options to acquire common shares will remain exercisable for 180 days after April 15, 2006, or until they would otherwise expire, whichever comes first, and he will remain eligible to receive performance shares under PREIT’s 2005-2008 outperformance program. Following Mr. Weller’s retirement as vice chairman of PREIT, PREIT and Mr. Weller entered into a consulting agreement under which Mr. Weller will serve as an independent consultant with respect to PREIT’s human resources and related activities. The term of the agreement is one year, it is terminable on 30 days notice and Mr. Weller will receive $10,000 per month for his services.
Stock Options
The following table presents information as to the exercise of options to purchase common shares of PREIT and the fiscal year-end value of unexercised options for all of the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table. None of the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table were granted options during 2005.
Aggregate Option Exercises in 2005
and December 31, 2005 Option Values
| | Shares | | | | Number of Unexercised | | Value of Unexercised | |
| | Acquired | | | | Options at | | In-the-Money Options at | |
| | On | | Value | | December 31, 2005
| | December 31, 2005(1)
| |
Name | | Exercise | | Realized | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | | Exercisable | | Unexercisable | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald Rubin | | | — | | | — | | | 150,000 | | | — | | $ | 1,792,500 | | | — | |
Jonathan B. Weller | | | 5,000 | | $ | 80,875 | | | 15,605 | | | — | | $ | 227,989 | | | — | |
Edward A. Glickman | | | 14,260 | | $ | 320,280 | | | 120,000 | | | — | | $ | 2,191,000 | | | — | |
George F. Rubin | | | 50,000 | | $ | 1,115,250 | | | 25,000 | | | — | | $ | 298,750 | | | — | |
Joseph F. Coradino | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | In-the-money options are those where the fair market value of the underlying securities exceeds the exercise price of the option. The dollar values of the options are calculated by determining the difference between the exercise price of the options and the closing price of PREIT’s common shares on December 30, 2005, which was $37.36 per share. |
Equity Compensation Plans
The following table summarizes PREIT’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:
Plan category | | Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (1) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders | | | 389,954 | (2) | $ | 23.68 | | | 1,980,468 | (3) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | | | 41,300 | (4) | $ | 23.85 | | | 167,132 | (5) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | | 431,254 | | $ | 23.70 | | | 2,147,600 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
18
Back to Contents
(1) | Does not include shares reflected in the column entitled “Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights.” |
| |
(2) | Does not include 446,013 restricted shares awarded under PREIT’s 1999 and 2003 Equity Incentive Plans that were outstanding and unvested at December 31, 2005. |
| |
(3) | Includes 1,910,967 shares available for awards under PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2005. The 2003 plan was adopted by PREIT’s board of trustees and shareholders in 2003 and authorized PREIT to issue up to 2,500,000 shares in connection with awards of restricted shares, options, share appreciation rights, performance shares, contract shares, bonus shares and dividend equivalent rights. PREIT may make awards under the 2003 plan to its non-employee trustees, officers and other key employees. The compensation committee of PREIT’s board of trustees administers the 2003 Plan. Also includes 69,501 shares available for issuance under PREIT’s qualified employee share purchase plan as of December 31, 2005. |
| |
(4) | Does not include 14,001 restricted shares awarded under PREIT’s Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Trustees that were outstanding and unvested at December 31, 2005. The Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Trustees was adopted in 2002 and authorized PREIT to issue to its trustees who are not employees of PREIT or any of its affiliates up to 50,000 restricted shares. The plan provides for the automatic grant of 1,000 shares to each non-employee trustee on January 31 of each year. As of December 31, 2005, 26,000 restricted shares had been granted under the plan. The restricted shares vest in three approximately equal annual installments so long as the recipient remains a trustee of PREIT. The plan is administered by the compensation committee of PREIT’s board of trustees. |
| |
(5) | Includes 24,000 shares available for issuance under PREIT’s Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Trustees and 143,132 shares available for issuance under PREIT’s non-qualified employee share purchase plan. |
Long Term Incentive Plan Awards
On January 28, 2005, the compensation committee of the board of trustees approved the PREIT 2005-2008 Outperformance Program for certain of PREIT’s officers. The compensation committee approved the Outperformance Program pursuant to PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by PREIT’s shareholders in November 2003.
Under the Outperformance Program, if PREIT’s total return to shareholders over the measurement period specified in the Outperformance Program exceeds the thresholds established by the compensation committee and set forth in the Outperformance Program, PREIT will award shares to the eligible participants. The aggregate number of shares to be awarded is determined based on the degree to which PREIT exceeds the total return thresholds. Each participant in the Outperformance Program is entitled to receive a portion of the aggregate number of shares based on a percentage allocation specified in the Outperformance Program. The table below shows the applicable measurement period and percentage allocation for each of the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table:
Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards — Awards in Last Fiscal Year
Name | | Performance or other period until maturation or payout | | Percentage Allocation | | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Ronald Rubin | | | 1/1/2005-12/31/2008 | | | 19.7 | % | |
Jonathan B. Weller(1) | | | 1/1/2005-12/31/2008 | | | 12.2 | % | |
Edward A. Glickman | | | 1/1/2005-12/31/2008 | | | 12.2 | % | |
George F. Rubin | | | 1/1/2005-12/31/2008 | | | 12.2 | % | |
Joseph F. Coradino | | | 1/1/2005-12/31/2008 | | | 12.2 | % | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) | As discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, pursuant to his separation agreement with PREIT, Mr. Weller remains eligible to receive shares under the Outperformance Program, although he is no longer employed by PREIT. |
19
Back to Contents
The Outperformance Program is based on a measurement period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2008 or, if earlier, the date (or, in the case of a business combination, the effectiveness) of a change in control of PREIT (as defined in the participant’s employment agreement with PREIT or, if the participant does not have an employment agreement, as defined in PREIT’s 2003 Equity Plan). Total return to shareholders is a measure of the return to shareholders of a REIT, consisting of dividends on a common share during a specified measurement period (which are deemed to be reinvested in shares when paid) plus (or minus) the increase (or decrease) in the market value of a common share from the beginning to the end of the measurement period.
If, for the measurement period, the total return to shareholders of PREIT exceeds the greater of a dollar amount equal to (a) a 12% compound annual return rate, or (b) 115% of the total return (expressed as a percentage) of the Morgan Stanley REIT Index (subsequently renamed the MSCI US REIT Index) (“Threshold One”), then PREIT will deliver to each participant a number of shares equal to the aggregate number of shares in the bonus pool multiplied by such participant’s percentage interest in the pool. The number of shares available in the bonus pool to be awarded under the Outperformance Program will be (i) the sum of (a) the dollar amount equal to 4.5% multiplied by the amount by which the total return to shareholders exceeds Threshold One (but is less than or equal to an amount equal to a 16% compound annual return rate (“Threshold Two”)), multiplied by the weighted average number of outstanding shares and operating partnership units (owned by persons other than PREIT) during the measurement period, plus (b) the dollar amount, if any, equal to 6.5% multiplied by the amount by which the total return to shareholders exceeds Threshold Two, multiplied by the weighted average number of outstanding shares and operating partnership units (owned by persons other than PREIT) during the measurement period divided by (ii) the value of one share on the last day of the measurement period (using a 20 day average, except in the event of a change in control). If the total return to shareholders does not exceed Threshold One, then PREIT will not award any shares. In addition, the number of shares available to be awarded under the Outperformance Program may not have a fair market value (calculated as defined above) that exceeds one percent of the fair market value (calculated as described above) of the shares outstanding plus the shares issuable upon redemption of operating partnership units outstanding (owned by persons other than PREIT), each determined as of the last day of the measurement period.
In order to receive an award under the Outperformance Program, a participant must be employed by PREIT on the last day of the measurement period, except that if a participant employed under an employment agreement on January 28, 2005 dies, terminates employment due to disability, terminates employment for good reason, or is terminated without cause (in each case, as defined in the participant’s employment agreement with PREIT), the participant or the participant’s beneficiaries will be eligible to receive the award. The compensation committee may allow a participant without an employment agreement to receive an award under the Outperformance Program upon the termination of the participant’s employment to the extent and in a manner that it deems appropriate. The compensation committee also has the general authority under PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (with certain exceptions) to amend an award under the Outperformance Program. If PREIT awards shares under the Outperformance Program, PREIT will deliver the shares on or about February 15, 2009 or, if there is a change in control, within 30 days after the last day of the measurement period. Except if there is a change in control, participants may elect (on or before June 30, 2008) to defer delivery of all or a portion of the shares to be awarded until separation from service, a specified date chosen by the participant, or the earlier of separation from service or a specified date. Participants who elect to defer delivery of their shares will have dividend equivalents credited on their deferred shares which will be reinvested in notional shares (on which dividend equivalents will also be credited and so reinvested). A participant who has elected to defer delivery of his or her shares may elect to receive the shares prior to the scheduled delivery date in the event of an unforeseeable emergency.
Transactions with Management
On April 28, 2003, New Castle Associates acquired Cherry Hill Mall from The Rouse Company in exchange for New Castle Associates’ interest in Christiana Mall, cash and the assumption by New Castle Associates of mortgage debt on Cherry Hill Mall. One of the partners of New Castle Associates, which was both the sole general partner and a limited partner of New Castle Associates, is Pan American Associates, which is controlled by Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin. Also on April 28, 2003, PREIT acquired 49% of the aggregate partnership interests in New Castle Associates from partners of New Castle Associates other than Pan American Associates,
20
Back to Contents
in exchange for an aggregate of 585,422 common units of limited partnership interest of PREIT Associates, L.P., and subsequently increased its aggregate ownership interest in New Castle Associates to approximately 73%. PREIT also obtained an option to acquire the remaining interests in New Castle Associates, including that of Pan American Associates, in exchange for an aggregate of 609,317 additional common units, which it exercised in May 2004. As a result, PREIT now owns 100% of New Castle Associates.
PREIT has agreed to provide tax protection related to its acquisition of New Castle Associates to the prior owners of New Castle Associates for a period of eight years following the closing of the transaction between New Castle Associates and The Rouse Company. Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin are beneficiaries of this tax protection agreement.
In November 2003, PREIT merged with Crown American Realty Trust (“Crown”). In accordance with the merger agreement between PREIT and Crown, PREIT expanded the size of its board of trustees by two in December 2003 and elected Messrs. Pasquerilla and Mazziotti, who were members of Crown’s board at the time of the merger, to fill the vacancies created by the expansion. Messrs. Pasquerilla and Mazziotti continue to serve on PREIT’s board of trustees. At the time of the merger, Mr. Pasquerilla was also Crown’s chairman and chief executive officer.
In connection with the merger, PREIT Associates, L.P. acquired substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Crown American Properties, L.P. (“CAP”) other than an 11% interest in the capital and 1% interest in the profits of two partnerships that owned 14 shopping malls. CAP’s retained interest in the two partnerships (the “Retained Interest”) entitles CAP to a quarterly cumulative preferred distribution of $184,300 and is subject to a put-call arrangement between CAP and PREIT Associates, L.P. pursuant to which PREIT Associates, L.P. has the right to require CAP to contribute the Retained Interest to PREIT Associates, L.P. following the 36th month after the closing of the merger and CAP has the right to contribute the Retained Interest to PREIT Associates, L.P. following the 40th month after the closing of the merger, in each case in exchange for 341,297 common units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. Holders of common units generally receive distributions at the approximate times, and in the same amounts, as PREIT pays dividends to its shareholders. Common units may be redeemed by their holders for an amount per unit equal to the average closing price of a PREIT common share on the 10 trading days immediately before the date notice of redemption is received by PREIT in its capacity as general partner of PREIT Associates, L.P. PREIT has the right to acquire any common units tendered for redemption for cash or PREIT shares, on the basis of one share for each common unit, subject to adjustments for share splits and other capital changes. After the merger, CAP became, and is today, wholly-owned by entities controlled by Mr. Pasquerilla.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement, CAP transferred Pasquerilla Plaza in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, where Crown formerly maintained its executive offices, to Crown Investments Trust (“CIT”) in exchange for 14 unimproved parcels of property adjacent to three of Crown’s malls and approximately $1.25 million in cash. PREIT entered into a lease with CIT with respect to certain space in Pasquerilla Plaza for use in connection with PREIT’s post-closing transition activities, which has now terminated. Rental payments on this lease in 2005 totaled $11,000. PREIT also contracted with an entity controlled by Mr. Pasquerilla to provide information technology support and tax services to PREIT at Pasquerilla Plaza during the transition period, which is complete. Payments for these support services in 2005 totaled $81,000. Following the conclusion of the transition period, an entity controlled by Mr. Pasquerilla exercised its option to obtain from PREIT much of the information technology equipment through assumption of the remaining lease payments for the equipment, meeting the buyout terms of leases and through direct purchase from PREIT for $389,000.
Also in connection with the execution of the merger agreement, Mr. Pasquerilla and certain entities with which he is affiliated (the “Pasquerilla Group”) entered into an indemnification agreement with PREIT, dated as of May 13, 2003, whereby the Pasquerilla Group agreed to indemnify PREIT for certain liabilities that PREIT might have incurred as a result of various transactions among the Pasquerilla Group, on the one hand, and Crown and CAP, on the other hand. PREIT is no longer entitled to indemnification under the agreement. The indemnification agreement continues to provide participation rights for PREIT in any net proceeds in excess of a specified amount that are received by the Pasquerilla Group upon the sale of Pasquerilla Plaza within three years from the date of consummation of the merger.
21
Back to Contents
PREIT also entered into a tax protection agreement with the members of the Pasquerilla Group in connection with the merger. Under this tax protection agreement, PREIT agreed not to dispose of certain protected properties acquired in the merger in a taxable transaction until the earlier of November 20, 2011 or the date on which the Pasquerilla Group collectively owns less than 25% of the aggregate of the shares and units that they acquired in the merger. If PREIT violates the tax protection agreement during the first five years of the protection period, it would owe as damages the sum of the hypothetical tax owed by the Pasquerilla Group, plus an amount intended to make the Pasquerilla Group whole for taxes that may be due upon receipt of those damages. From the end of the first five years through the end of the tax protection period, damages are intended to compensate the affected parties for interest expense incurred on amounts borrowed to pay the taxes incurred on the prohibited sale. If PREIT were to sell properties in violation of the tax protection agreement, the amounts that PREIT would be required to pay to the Pasquerilla Group could be substantial.
The members of the Pasquerilla Group entered into several additional agreements with PREIT in connection with the closing of the merger. These agreements include (1) a shareholder agreement, under which the Pasquerilla Group agreed that, for a period of five years and nine months following the closing of the merger, if any of them transfer the PREIT common shares received by the Pasquerilla Group in connection with the merger or the related transactions other than in accordance with the terms of the shareholder agreement, they will forfeit a portion of their rights under the tax protection agreement or, in certain circumstances, Mr. Pasquerilla can elect to resign from PREIT’s board of trustees in lieu of forfeiting a portion of the rights under the tax protection agreement; (2) a registration rights agreement, under which PREIT granted to the Pasquerilla Group certain registration rights in respect of the PREIT common shares and the PREIT common shares underlying units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. received by the Pasquerilla Group in connection with the merger and the related transactions; (3) a standstill agreement, under which the Pasquerilla Group agreed to certain restrictions on their ability to acquire additional securities of PREIT or otherwise seek, alone or together with others, to acquire control of the board of trustees of PREIT, which restrictions will remain in place until the later of the eighth anniversary of the closing of the merger or such time as Mr. Pasquerilla no longer serves as a trustee of PREIT; (4) a non-competition agreement, under which the Pasquerilla Group agreed that, for a period of eight years following the closing of the merger, they will not engage in certain activities that would be competitive with PREIT, solicit PREIT’s employees or induce PREIT’s business contacts to curtail or terminate their business relationship with PREIT; and (5) an intellectual property license agreement, under which certain members of the Pasquerilla Group granted a non-exclusive, non-assignable, non-transferable, non-sublicenseable, royalty-free license for PREIT and its affiliates to use certain intellectual property and domain names associated with the Crown name and logo.
Cumberland Mall Transaction
On October 8, 2004, PREIT signed an agreement to purchase 100% of the partnership interests in Cumberland Mall Associates, a New Jersey limited partnership that owned the Cumberland Mall in Vineland, New Jersey. On February 1, 2005, PREIT completed this purchase and the purchase of a vacant 1.7 acre parcel adjacent to the mall. PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. had provided management and leasing services to Cumberland Mall since 1997 for Cumberland Mall Associates. Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin controlled and had a substantial ownership interest in Cumberland Mall Associates and the entity that owned the adjacent undeveloped parcel.
The total price paid for the mall and the adjacent undeveloped parcel was approximately $59.5 million, including the assumption of approximately $47.7 million in mortgage debt. PREIT paid the approximately $0.9 million purchase price of the adjacent parcel in cash. After certain closing adjustments, the portion of the purchase price for the mall remaining after assumption of the mortgage debt was approximately $11.0 million, which was paid using common units issued by PREIT Associates, L.P. that were valued based on the average of the closing price of PREIT’s common shares on the ten consecutive trading days immediately before the closing date of the transaction.
A committee of non-management trustees was formed to evaluate the transactions on behalf of PREIT. The committee obtained an independent appraisal and found the purchase price to be fair to PREIT. The committee also approved the reduction of the fee payable by Cumberland Mall Associates to PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. under the existing management agreement upon the sale of the mall from 3% of the purchase price to 1% of the purchase price. PREIT’s board of trustees also approved the transaction.
22
Back to Contents
PREIT has agreed to provide tax protection related to its acquisition of Cumberland Mall Associates to the prior owners of Cumberland Mall Associates for a period of eight years following the closing. Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin are beneficiaries of this tax protection agreement.
On December 22, 2005, PREIT entered into an agreement (the “Unit Purchase Agreement”) to purchase 339,300 common units of limited partnership interest in PREIT Associates, L.P. from CAP for cash in an aggregate amount of approximately $12,342,000. The terms of the Unit Purchase Agreement were negotiated between PREIT and CAP and determined without reference to the provisions of the PREIT Associates, L.P. partnership agreement. In addition, CAP and its affiliates, including Mr. Pasquerilla, agreed to a standard lockup from selling or transferring securities of PREIT and PREIT Associates, L.P. for a period of approximately 135 days. The end date of the lock up coincides with the end of the customary blackout period applicable to PREIT’s trustees and officers following the announcement of PREIT’s financial results for the first quarter of 2006. The transaction was approved by PREIT’s board of trustees.
PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. currently provides management, leasing and development services to 11 properties owned by partnerships and other entities in which certain officers or trustees of PREIT and PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. have indirect ownership interests. In addition, the mother of Stephen B. Cohen, a trustee of PREIT, has an interest in two additional properties for which PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. provides management, leasing and development services. Total revenues earned by PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. for such services were $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, $0.2 million was due from these partnerships, $0.1 million of which was collected subsequent to December 31, 2005.
PREIT-RUBIN, Inc. holds a note receivable from an entity in which Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin have an interest with a balance of $0.1 million that is due in installments through 2010 and bears an interest rate of 10% per annum.
PREIT leases its principal executive offices from Bellevue Associates, an entity in which certain PREIT officers/trustees have an interest. The lease has a term of 10 years, and it commenced November 1, 2004. PREIT has the option to renew the lease for up to two additional five year periods at the then-current fair market rate calculated in accordance with the terms of the lease. PREIT has the right on one occasion at any time during the seventh lease year to terminate the lease upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. PREIT rents approximately 68,100 square feet under the lease. Base rent is $1.4 million per year during the first five years of the lease and $1.5 million per year during the second five years. PREIT paid rent of approximately $1.5 million in 2005 under the lease, which includes base rent and other amounts paid in 2005 pursuant to the terms of the lease. Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin, collectively with members of their immediate families, own approximately a 50% interest in the Landlord.
PREIT uses an airplane in which Ronald Rubin owns a fractional interest. PREIT paid $0.2 million in 2005 for flight time used by employees on PREIT-related business.
Ronald Rubin and George F. Rubin are brothers. Two of George F. Rubin’s sons, Daniel Rubin and Timothy Rubin, are employed by subsidiaries of PREIT. Daniel Rubin’s annual salary in 2005 was approximately $110,000 and in 2006 is $112,200. Timothy Rubin’s annual salary in 2005 was $200,000 and in 2006 is $210,000. In addition, Daniel Rubin received 2,000 restricted shares in 2005 valued at $81,500 and his bonus for 2005 was $15,758 and Timothy Rubin received 4,000 restricted shares in 2005 valued at approximately $163,000 and his bonus for 2005 was $223,401.
Board Matters
PREIT has a standing compensation committee, a standing audit committee and a standing nominating and governance committee. PREIT’s by-laws authorize the establishment of a standing executive committee to consist of three members. PREIT’s board of trustees has not yet appointed any members to the executive committee. When duly constituted, the executive committee will be authorized to exercise all of the powers and authority of the board of trustees between meetings of the board of trustees, except for matters that are expressly reserved by PREIT’s bylaws to the full board of trustees or to another committee of the board of trustees.
23
Back to Contents
The compensation committee, which is comprised of Rosemarie B. Greco, Chair, Lee H. Javitch, Leonard I. Korman, and Ira M. Lubert, met four times during 2005. The principal duties of the compensation committee are to review and approve goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of PREIT’s chief executive officer and other executive officers, to set compensation accordingly and in light of existing agreements, to make recommendations to PREIT’s board of trustees regarding incentive compensation and equity-based plans, and to administer these plans.
The audit committee, which is comprised of John J. Roberts, Chair, Stephen B. Cohen, Lee H. Javitch, and Donald F. Mazziotti, met six times during 2005. The principal duties of the audit committee are to oversee PREIT’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of PREIT’s financial statements, to select and retain independent auditors, to review with management and the independent auditors PREIT’s annual financial statements and related footnotes, to review PREIT’s internal audit activities, to review with the independent auditors the planned scope and results of the annual audit and their reports and recommendations, and to review with the independent auditors matters relating to PREIT’s system of internal controls. PREIT’s audit committee is governed by an amended and restated charter approved and adopted by PREIT on April 14, 2004.
The nominating and governance committee, which is comprised of Ira M. Lubert, Chair, Rosemarie B. Greco, Leonard I. Korman, and John J. Roberts, met three times during 2005. The principal duties of the nominating and governance committee are to identify individuals qualified to become trustees of PREIT, recommend trustee nominees and trustee committee appointments to the board, develop and recommend a set of governance principles applicable to PREIT and oversee the evaluation of the performance of PREIT’s board of trustees and management with respect to matters other than compensation.
The nominating and governance committee chooses candidates for the office of trustee without regard to sex, race, religion, or national origin, and its charter specifies the following minimum qualifications, qualities, and skills that a committee-recommended nominee must possess: the highest character and integrity; sufficient experience to enable a meaningful contribution to PREIT and its board of trustees; and sufficient time available to devote to PREIT’s affairs and to carry out the responsibilities of a trustee. The nominating and governance committee does not solicit recommendations from shareholders regarding trustee nominee candidates, but will consider any such recommendation received in writing and accompanied by sufficient information to enable the nominating and governance committee to asses the candidates’ qualifications, along with confirmation of the candidates’ consent to serve as a trustee if elected. Such recommendations should be sent care of Bruce Goldman, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, The Bellevue, 200 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102. Any recommendation received from shareholders after January 1 of any year will not be considered until the following year. In addition to considering candidates recommended by shareholders, the committee considers potential candidates recommended by PREIT’s current trustees and officers, and is authorized to utilize independent search firms to assist in identifying candidates. The committee screens all candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation, but only shareholder recommendations are subject to the January 1 deadline for submission for consideration in any given year. In each case, the committee determines whether a recommended candidate meets PREIT’s minimum qualifications and possesses the qualities and skills for trustees and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate.
In addition to PREIT’s board and committee meetings, the non-management members of PREIT’s board meet separately at regularly scheduled meetings. The presiding member of these meetings rotates at each meeting. In addition to the regularly scheduled meetings of the non-management members of PREIT’s board of trustees, PREIT’s independent trustees meet separately at least once per year.
Any interested party wishing to communicate with PREIT’s board of trustees, the non-management trustees, or any individual PREIT trustee on a confidential basis may do so in writing addressed, as applicable, to the board, the non-management trustees, or the individual trustee and sent care of Bruce Goldman, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, The Bellevue, 200 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102. PREIT’s General Counsel will review any such communication and will deliver all such communications to the addressee.
The board of trustees met five times in 2005. All of the trustees attended at least 75% of board and applicable committee meetings in 2005 except Ira M. Lubert, who attended three out of five board meetings. The
24
Back to Contents
board’s policy is that trustees are expected to attend PREIT’s annual meeting of shareholders. Last year, all of the trustees other than Mark E. Pasquerilla attended the annual meeting.
Each trustee who is not an officer of PREIT received an annual retainer for 2005 of $25,000, plus $1,500 per board of trustees or committee meeting in which the trustee participated. On February 23, 2006, the board of trustees, upon recommendation of the nominating and governance committee, increased the annual retainer to $30,000 per year. In addition, the chairpersons of PREIT’s audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and governance committee each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. Non-employee trustees also receive 1,000 restricted shares on January 31 of each year under the Restricted Share Plan for Non-Employee Trustees which vest over three years, and each receives a grant of 5,000 options upon first becoming a trustee that vests over four years.
Corporate Governance
PREIT’s corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics for non-employee trustees, code of business conduct and ethics for officers and employees, and the governing charters for the audit, nominating and governance, and compensation committees of PREIT’s board of trustees are available free of charge on PREIT’s website at www.preit.com, as well as in print to any shareholder upon request. PREIT’s board of trustees and the nominating and governance committee of PREIT’s board regularly review corporate governance developments and modify these guidelines, codes, and charters as warranted. Any modifications are reflected on PREIT’s website.
Over half of the members of PREIT’s board of trustees are independent trustees. For a trustee to be considered independent, PREIT’s board must determine that the trustee does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with PREIT. PREIT’s board has established guidelines to assist it in determining trustee independence. These guidelines conform to the independence requirements contained in the New York Stock Exchange listing rules. In addition, PREIT’s board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in making determinations of independence. The guidelines and the categorical standards that PREIT’s board of trustees uses to determine whether a trustee is independent specify that:
| 1. | Other than in his or her capacity as a trustee or shareholder of the Company, no independent trustee shall have a material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, officer or other affiliate of an organization (including a charitable organization) that has a material relationship with the Company). For this purpose, a trustee shall be presumed not to have a material relationship with the Company if he or she is not and, within the past two years, has not been an executive officer of, or the direct or indirect owner of more than 10% of the equity interest in, any business or professional entity: |
| | | |
| | • | that within the last two years has made or received, or going forward proposes to make or receive, payments to or from the Company or any of its subsidiaries for property or services in excess of 5% of (i) the Company’s consolidated gross revenues for its last full fiscal year, or (ii) the other entity’s consolidated gross revenues for its last full fiscal year; or |
| | | |
| | • | to which the Company or any of its affiliates is indebted in an aggregate amount exceeding 5% of the Company’s total consolidated assets as of the end of the Company’s last full fiscal year. |
| | |
| 2. | No independent trustee shall have been employed by the Company, and no immediate family member of an independent trustee shall have been an executive officer of the Company, within the past three years. |
| | |
| 3. | No independent trustee shall have received more than $100,000 in direct annual compensation from the Company within the past three years, other than trustee and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service). |
| | |
| 4. | No independent trustee shall have been affiliated with or employed by a present or former auditor of the Company within the last three years. |
| | |
| 5. | Within the last three years, no independent trustee shall have been an employee of another company if an executive officer of the Company then served on the compensation committee of such other company. |
25
Back to Contents
| 6. | Within the last three years, no independent trustee shall have served as an executive officer or employee of a company that made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeded the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
| | |
| 7. | No immediate family members of an independent trustee shall fit within the categories prohibited by any of the foregoing (other than with respect to the prohibition on employment by the Company, which addresses immediate family members directly), and no independent trustee may have any relationships with the Company that are substantially similar to any of the categories prohibited by the foregoing. |
| | |
| 8. | Independent trustees shall satisfy any other independence criteria required by applicable law or regulation or established by the board of trustees. |
The board has determined that the following eight members of PREIT’s thirteen member board of trustees satisfy the New York Stock Exchange’s independence requirements and PREIT’s guidelines: Stephen B. Cohen, M. Walter D’Alessio, Rosemarie B. Greco, Lee H. Javitch, Leonard I. Korman, Ira M. Lubert, Donald F. Mazziotti and John J. Roberts.
All members of the compensation committee, audit committee, and nominating and governance committee of PREIT’s board of trustees must be, and are, independent trustees. Members of the audit committee must also, and do, satisfy additional Securities and Exchange Commission independence requirements, which provide that they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from PREIT or any of its subsidiaries other than compensation for serving on PREIT’s board or on committees of PREIT’s board.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires PREIT’s executive officers and trustees and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of PREIT’s equity securities (collectively, the “reporting persons”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to furnish PREIT with copies of these reports. Based on PREIT’s review of the copies of the reports it has received, and written representations received from certain reporting persons with respect to the filing of reports on Forms 3, 4, and 5, PREIT believes that all filings required to be made by the reporting persons since the beginning of 2005 were made on a timely basis except for the following: one filing by Joseph F. Coradino reporting the sale of 600 shares and one filing by Joseph F. Coradino reporting the sale of 700 shares.
| Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
No member of the compensation committee is or was during 2005 an employee, or is or ever has been an officer, of PREIT or its subsidiaries. No executive officer of PREIT served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another company, one of whose executive officers serves as a member of PREIT’s board of trustees or compensation committee.
26
Back to Contents
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
Compensation Principles and Objectives
PREIT’s compensation committee is composed of four independent, non-employee trustees. As stated in its charter, the principal purpose of the committee is to discharge the responsibility of the board of trustees relating to executive compensation. The committee is assisted in performing its work by an independent compensation consultant selected and engaged by the committee, as well as by PREIT’s senior vice president of human resources, legal counsel and, where appropriate, senior management. The compensation terms established by the committee are designed to reward performance by PREIT’s executives at all levels.
The objectives of the committee’s compensation principles are to provide compensation to PREIT’s executives that (i) is appropriate for the executives based on their contributions to PREIT and is competitive with compensation provided by comparable companies, (ii) retains and attracts key executives, (iii) motivates executives to focus on both short-term and long-term goals aligned with the interests of PREIT’s shareholders and (iv) instills a commitment to the success of PREIT through an increased equity ownership interest in PREIT. In regard to the latter objective, PREIT has adopted share ownership and retention guidelines. The guidelines establish minimum equity ownership requirements for executives at or above the level of executive vice president, ranging from an equity value of two to five times the executive’s base salary. Equity ownership for purposes of the guidelines includes equity owned by the immediate family of the executive, ownership of limited partnership interests in PREIT Associates, L.P. and the after-tax value of currently exercisable options. The guidelines also require at least 50% of the after-tax value of restricted shares to be retained by the executive for at least one year following vesting.
For the portion of compensation based upon performance, the criteria involve both performance by PREIT, as measured by commonly accepted metrics in the REIT industry, as well as by individual performance. The portion of compensation based on industry metrics increases significantly with the executive’s level of responsibility within PREIT. This reflects the view of the committee that the most senior officers have the greatest opportunity to influence PREIT’s financial performance and that, therefore, their compensation should reflect PREIT’s financial performance. In the case of less senior officers, a more significant percentage of the performance portion of their compensation is dependent upon the achievement of individual or group goals.
The performance metric used in PREIT’s annual cash bonus plan is currently funds from operations (“FFO”) per diluted share for the relevant fiscal year. FFO is a commonly used measure of periodic financial performance in the REIT industry. The principal metric used in connection with equity awards is total return to shareholders (“TRS”), measured for PREIT’s equity compensation programs over periods of one to four years.
The committee believes that awards based on FFO and TRS align the interests of senior management closely with the interests of PREIT’s shareholders over both the short and longer terms. Moreover, taking annual equity awards and longer term equity awards into account, a substantial portion of the compensation of senior executives will be received in the form of common shares upon the achievement of the TRS targets established by the committee. The focus on equity-based compensation as the principal component of the compensation of senior executives further aligns the interests of management and shareholders.
Elements of Compensation
In addition to considering individual and company performance, the committee reviews compensation survey data of a select group of real estate investment trusts and other companies comparable in size to PREIT. The committee considers the survey information to be a significant factor in decisions concerning levels and components of executive compensation.
Base Salary. The committee reviews and establishes the base salary of each senior officer annually, subject to the terms of the executive’s employment agreement. The base salary is intended to be competitive with comparable companies and to reflect the contributions of the executive to PREIT.
Annual Cash Bonus. Annual cash bonuses to senior officers are based on the extent to which PREIT’s financial performance achieves fiscal year goals set by the committee and the executive’s individual performance for the fiscal year. The financial performance targets for the relevant year are expressed in terms of FFO per
27
Back to Contents
diluted share. The portion of the annual cash bonus that is dependent upon achieving the targeted levels of FFO increases with the level of responsibility of the executive. In the case of the members of the Office of the Chairman, 80% of the bonus is currently based upon the achievement of FFO targets. In the case of senior vice presidents and vice presidents, the individual performance goals are generally measured against key performance indicators. The committee has adopted a requirement that FFO per diluted share must attain a specified minimum level as a condition to the payment of any bonuses based upon individual performance.
Equity Awards. Equity awards are granted by the committee under PREIT’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and are made in the form of (i) annual restricted share grants, (ii) restricted share unit (RSU) awards granted for the first time in 2006 and (iii) performance shares under the 2005-2008 Outperformance Program adopted in 2005.
(1) Restricted share awards are granted annually to senior vice presidents and vice presidents and vest in most cases in equal installments over a five year period based upon continued service to PREIT. In the case of executives at or above the level of executive vice president, the annual restricted share awards granted in 2005 and earlier years were divided into two portions. One-half of the restricted share award vests in equal installments over five years, and the balance of the restricted share award may vest in whole or in part over five years conditioned upon the achievement of annual TRS targets established at the time of the award. Dividends are paid by PREIT on each unvested restricted share. The performance portion of the restricted share awards for the senior officers was replaced in 2006 by RSUs, which differ in several respects from performance based restricted shares and are described below.
(2) The committee approved the grant of RSUs for the first time in connection with the 2006 equity awards to executives holding the office of executive vice president or higher. As in prior years, one-half of the annual equity awards granted to these officers in 2006 are restricted shares which vest in equal installments, in most cases over a five year period, based upon continued service to PREIT. The balance of the 2006 equity awards are in the form of RSUs. Each RSU represents a right to receive one common share as discussed below. Dividends on common shares are deemed to be applied on the payment date to the purchase of additional RSUs at the current market price. The conversion of the RSUs into PREIT shares depends upon the attainment of TRS at specified levels relative to the constituent companies in a leading REIT index for the three year measurement period commencing January 1, 2006 and ending December 31, 2008. TRS is a measure of the return to shareholders of a REIT, consisting of dividends on a common share during a specified measurement period (which are deemed to be reinvested in shares when paid) plus (or minus) the increase (or decrease) in the market value of a common share from the beginning to the end of the measurement period.
(3) The Outperformance Program is designed to result in the creation of a bonus pool based upon the degree to which the TRS of PREIT exceeds both a minimum percentage established by the committee and the TRS of a leading REIT index during the four years commencing January 1, 2005 and ending December 31, 2008. Officers at the level of senior vice president and higher share in the bonus pool in proportions increasing with the seniority of the executive. The amounts earned under the Outperformance Program are payable in shares of PREIT.
CEO Compensation
Mr. Rubin’s compensation consists of the same components as other senior officers and is governed by the compensation principles previously described. This includes the principle that the majority of his target compensation should be in the form of equity and should be determined by PREIT’s financial performance as described above. The components of Mr. Rubin’s 2005 compensation were:
Base Salary. Mr. Rubin’s base salary for 2005 was $520,000, which was approximately 4% above his 2004 salary. In setting his base salary, the committee considered the performance of PREIT for 2004 and projected performance for 2005, survey data for comparable companies, the level of raises granted to other senior executives of PREIT and the amount of the base salary relative to the other components of his compensation package.
Annual Cash Bonus. Mr. Rubin’s cash bonus for 2005 was $158,080, or 30.4% of Mr. Rubin’s base salary for the year. PREIT’s FFO per share for 2005 was the principal factor in determining the percentage of base salary paid as a bonus.
28
Back to Contents
Restricted Shares. Mr. Rubin was awarded 26,954 restricted shares in 2005, valued at $1,100,000 when granted. One-half of the restricted shares vest in equal installments over five years based upon continued service. The other half of the award vests in equal installments over five years conditioned upon achieving TRS targets during each of the years established by the committee. If TRS exceeds the target for any year, the excess may be carried back or forward to years in which TRS is less than the target. Vesting of the restricted shares is accelerated upon the termination by (i) PREIT of Mr. Rubin’s employment for reasons other than cause, as defined under Mr. Rubin’s employment agreement, or (ii) Mr. Rubin for good reason, as defined in his employment agreement. The size of the award relative to Mr. Rubin’s base salary of $520,000 reflects a decision by the committee to emphasize the use of equity and performance-based compensation in the compensation package of the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Rubin received dividends in the amount of $123,630 from PREIT in 2005 on unvested restricted shares awarded in 2005 and prior years.
The committee adopted the Outperformance Program in 2005 and awarded Mr. Rubin 19.7% of the performance shares under the Outperformance Program. The value of the performance shares will be determined by PREIT’s TRS during the four years ending December 31, 2008 as previously described. Payments under the Program are made in shares of PREIT. Mr. Rubin will retain his right to receive performance shares under the Outperformance Program in the event of the termination of his employment by (i) PREIT for reasons other than cause, (ii) Mr. Rubin for good reason or (iii) death or disability.
Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of compensation paid to PREIT’s chief executive officer and its four other most highly compensated executive officers as of the close of PREIT’s tax year. To qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m), compensation, including base salary, annual bonuses, and compensation attributable to restricted stock vesting and nonqualified benefits, in excess of $1,000,000 per year paid to each of these executive officers generally must be “performance-based” compensation as determined under Section 162(m). To be performance-based compensation, the material terms of the performance goal(s) under which the compensation is to be paid must be disclosed to and approved by shareholders before the compensation is paid. Although the committee’s intention is, to the greatest extent reasonable, to structure compensation so that it satisfies the “performance based” compensation requirements under Section 162(m), the committee will balance the costs and burdens involved in doing so against the value to PREIT and its shareholders of the tax benefits to be obtained by PREIT in doing so. Accordingly, the committee reserves the right to design programs that recognize a full range of performance criteria important to PREIT’s success, even where the compensation paid under such programs may not be fully deductible as a result of Section 162(m).
| | | SUBMITTED BY THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Rosemarie B. Greco, Chair Lee H. Javitch Leonard I. Korman Ira M. Lubert | |
29
Back to Contents
Performance Graph
The graph below sets forth PREIT’s cumulative shareholder return with the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Index, the NAREIT Equity Index and the Russell 2000 Index. Equity real estate investment trusts are defined as those which derive more than 75% of their income from equity investments in real estate assets. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in each of the four was $100 for the period December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2005 and that all dividends were reinvested.

30
Back to Contents
Audit Committee Report
PREIT’s audit committee is governed by an amended and restated charter approved and adopted by PREIT on April 14, 2004. PREIT’s board of trustees has determined that all of the members of the audit committee are independent based on the New York Stock Exchange listing rules and PREIT’s own independence guidelines. Each member of the committee also meets the SEC’s additional independence requirements for audit committee members. In addition, PREIT’s board of trustees has determined that John J. Roberts is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules.
PREIT’s management has primary responsibility for PREIT’s financial statements. KPMG LLP, PREIT’s registered independent auditor for 2005, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of PREIT’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. Before PREIT’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 was filed with the SEC, the audit committee reviewed and discussed with management and KPMG LLP the audited financial statements of PREIT for the year ended December 31, 2005, which included the consolidated balance sheets of PREIT as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and the notes thereto. In connection with this review, the audit committee, among other things:
| • | made inquiries of PREIT’s internal auditor and KPMG LLP with respect to the reliability and integrity of PREIT’s accounting policies and financial reporting practices; and |
| | |
| • | reviewed with KPMG LLP its views on the quality of PREIT’s implementation of accounting principles, disclosure practices and use of accounting estimates in preparing the financial statements. |
The audit committee discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Communications with Audit Committees), as amended by SAS 90 (Audit Committee Communications), which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of PREIT’s financial statements. The audit committee received written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, which relates to the accountants’ independence from PREIT and its related entities, and has discussed with KPMG its independence from PREIT.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to PREIT’s board of trustees that PREIT’s audited financial statements be included in PREIT’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
| | | SUBMITTED BY THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
John J. Roberts, Chair Stephen B. Cohen Lee H. Javitch Donald F. Mazziotti | |
31
Back to Contents
Additional Information Regarding Our Independent Public Auditors
In addition to retaining KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) to audit PREIT’s consolidated financial statements for 2005, PREIT retained KPMG, as well as other accounting firms, to provide other auditing and advisory services in 2005. PREIT understands the need for KPMG to maintain objectivity and independence in its audit of PREIT’s financial statements. To minimize relationships that could appear to impair the objectivity of KPMG, PREIT’s audit committee is required to pre-approve all non-audit work performed by KPMG.
The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG in 2005 and 2004 for these various services were:
Type of Fees | | 2005 | | 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees | | $ | 768,875 | | $ | 875,520 | |
Audit-Related Fees | | | 149,500 | | | 155,528 | |
Tax Fees | | | 324,450 | | | 578,000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total | | $ | 1,242,825 | | $ | 1,609,048 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the table above, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees PREIT paid KPMG for professional services for the audit of PREIT’s consolidated financial statements included in PREIT’s Forms 10-K, review of financial statements included in PREIT’s Forms 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with the review of SEC registration statements and other filings, comfort letters and consents; “audit-related fees” are fees for audits and reviews of partnership financial statements to satisfy lender or partnership agreement requirements; and “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance and other tax consultation related to transactions consummated by PREIT during 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
In accordance with the SEC’s auditor independence rules, the audit committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to us by our independent auditor. The audit committee has delegated pre-approval authority between meetings of the audit committee to the chair of the audit committee. The fees listed in the table above were properly pre-approved. The audit committee or its chair considered the nature of the non-audit services provided by KPMG and determined that those services were compatible with the provision of independent audit services by KPMG.
Principal Security Holders
The following table shows information concerning beneficial ownership of PREIT’s shares by the only persons known by PREIT as being the beneficial owner of more than 5% of PREIT’s common shares based on PREIT’s review of publicly available filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission by such persons:
Title of Class | | Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership as of Date of Applicable SEC Filing | | Percent of Outstanding Shares as of April 7, 2006 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares of Beneficial Interest | | | Barclays Global Investors, NA. | | | 3,773,577 | | | 10.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Includes shares beneficially owned by Barclays Global Investors, NA., Barclays Global Fund Advisors, Barclays Global Investors, Ltd, and Barclays Global Investors Japan Trust and Banking Company Limited. |
Incorporation by Reference
The information contained in this proxy statement under the headings “Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation,” “Performance Graph,” and “Audit Committee Report” is not “soliciting material,” nor is it “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that PREIT specifically incorporates such information by reference in a filing.
32
Back to Contents
Shareholders’ Proposals
Under SEC rules, certain shareholder proposals may be included in PREIT’s proxy statement. Any shareholder desiring to have such a proposal included in PREIT’s proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held in 2007 must deliver a proposal in full compliance with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to PREIT’s executive offices by December 22, 2006. Where a shareholder does not seek inclusion of a proposal in the proxy material and submits a proposal outside of the process described in Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the proposal must have been received by March 7, 2007, or it will be deemed “untimely” for purposes of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act and, therefore, the proxies will have the right to exercise discretionary authority with respect to such proposal. PREIT has not received any such proposal to be submitted from the floor at the upcoming meeting.
| | | By Order of the Board of Trustees
 Bruce Goldman Secretary | |
April 21, 2006
33
 | VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. |
| |
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST THE BELLEVUE 200 S. BROAD STREET PHILADELPHIA PA, 19102
| ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust in mailing proxy materials, you may consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years. |
| |
| VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. |
| |
| VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, c/o ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
| |
| You are urged to sign and return this Proxy so that you may be sure that these shares will be voted. |
| |
| If you vote your proxy by Internet or telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. |
| |
| You may view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at www.preit.com |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: PREIT1 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED BELOW AND FOR PROPOSAL 2. | | | | | | | | |
Vote on Trustees | | | | | | For All | | Withhold All | | For All Except | | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark "For All Except" and write the nominee's name on the line below. |
1. ELECTION OF TRUSTEES: |
NOMINEES: | 01) | Stephen B. Cohen (Class B Trustee) | 04)
| Leonard I. Korman (Class B Trustee)
| | | | | | | | ___________ |
| 02) | Joseph F. Coradino (Class A Trustee) | 05) | Donald F. Mazziotti (Class B Trustee)
| | | | | | | | |
| 03) | M. Walter D'Alessio (Class B Trustee) | 06) | Ronald Rubin (Class B Trustee)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vote on Proposal | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | For | | Against | | Abstain |
2. RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2006:
| | | | | | | |  |
|
3. IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Please sign exactly as your name appears on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If the signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES - Sign below. This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed. | | Yes | No | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. |  |  | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household. |  |  | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
 | |  |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date | | Signature (Joint Owners) Date |

Annual Meeting of Shareholders
PENNSYLVANIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
June 1, 2006
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Trustees
The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints George F. Rubin, Edward A. Glickman and Lee Javitch, and each and any of them, as proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote and act with respect to all shares of beneficial interest of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust held of record by the undersigned at the close of business on April 7, 2006 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, June 1, 2006 and at any adjournment thereof.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, NO POSTAGE REQUIRED.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY, DULY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS INSTRUCTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF INSTRUCTIONS ARE NOT GIVEN, THEY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL NO. 1 AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR 2006.
(continued on reverse side)