UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý |
| Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities |
For the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005
OR
o |
| Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities |
for the transition period from to
Commission File No. 1-3381
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania |
| 23-0962915 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
| (I.R.S. Employer ID number) |
|
|
|
3111 W. Allegheny Ave. Philadelphia, PA |
| 19132 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip code) |
215-430-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of August 26, 2005 there were 54,103,567 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
UNAUDITED
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| Jan. 29, 2005* |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 41,670 |
| $ | 82,758 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
| 35,093 |
| 30,994 |
| ||
Merchandise inventories |
| 634,352 |
| 602,760 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
| 34,250 |
| 45,349 |
| ||
Other |
| 77,893 |
| 96,065 |
| ||
Assets held for disposal |
| — |
| 665 |
| ||
Total Current Assets |
| 823,258 |
| 858,591 |
| ||
Property and Equipment-at cost: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land |
| 259,239 |
| 261,985 |
| ||
Buildings and improvements |
| 913,324 |
| 916,099 |
| ||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 644,224 |
| 633,098 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
| 20,712 |
| 40,426 |
| ||
|
| 1,837,499 |
| 1,851,608 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| 890,859 |
| 906,577 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and Equipment - Net |
| 946,640 |
| 945,031 |
| ||
Other |
| 66,663 |
| 63,401 |
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 1,836,561 |
| $ | 1,867,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 333,303 |
| $ | 310,981 |
|
Trade payable program liability |
| 12,071 |
| — |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
| 263,610 |
| 306,671 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 18,383 |
| 19,406 |
| ||
Current maturities of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
| 144,461 |
| 40,882 |
| ||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 771,828 |
| 677,940 |
| ||
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases, less current maturities |
| 215,534 |
| 352,682 |
| ||
Convertible long-term debt |
| 119,000 |
| 119,000 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 52,172 |
| 37,977 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 27,333 |
| 25,968 |
| ||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders’ Equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Stock, par value $1 per share: |
| 68,557 |
| 68,557 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 286,617 |
| 284,966 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
| 525,703 |
| 536,780 |
| ||
Common stock subscriptions receivable |
| (39 | ) | (167 | ) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (3,524 | ) | (4,852 | ) | ||
|
| 877,314 |
| 885,284 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Less cost of shares in treasury - 10,981,577 shares and 11,305,130 shares |
| 167,356 |
| 172,564 |
| ||
Less cost of shares in benefits trust - 2,195,270 shares |
| 59,264 |
| 59,264 |
| ||
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| 650,694 |
| 653,456 |
| ||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders��� Equity |
| $ | 1,836,561 |
| $ | 1,867,023 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
* Taken from the audited financial statements as of January 29, 2005 as filed on Form 10-K.
3
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
UNAUDITED
|
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||||
|
| Amount |
| Amount |
| Amount |
| Amount |
| ||||
Merchandise Sales |
| $ | 480,608 |
| $ | 488,716 |
| $ | 944,456 |
| $ | 949,597 |
|
Service Revenue |
| 96,810 |
| 104,710 |
| 197,188 |
| 209,962 |
| ||||
Total Revenues |
| 577,418 |
| 593,426 |
| 1,141,644 |
| 1,159,559 |
| ||||
Costs of Merchandise Sales |
| 347,725 |
| 347,249 |
| 689,416 |
| 672,623 |
| ||||
Costs of Service Revenue |
| 86,834 |
| 80,701 |
| 170,748 |
| 159,252 |
| ||||
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 434,559 |
| 427,950 |
| 860,164 |
| 831,875 |
| ||||
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 132,883 |
| 141,467 |
| 255,040 |
| 276,974 |
| ||||
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 9,976 |
| 24,009 |
| 26,440 |
| 50,710 |
| ||||
Total Gross Profit |
| 142,859 |
| 165,476 |
| 281,480 |
| 327,684 |
| ||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 133,200 |
| 136,694 |
| 268,462 |
| 266,256 |
| ||||
Operating Profit |
| 9,659 |
| 28,782 |
| 13,018 |
| 61,428 |
| ||||
Non-operating Income |
| 483 |
| 470 |
| 2,221 |
| 1,062 |
| ||||
Interest Expense |
| 9,234 |
| 7,800 |
| 18,149 |
| 17,098 |
| ||||
Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| 908 |
| 21,452 |
| (2,910 | ) | 45,392 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
| 76 |
| 7,937 |
| (1,356 | ) | 16,795 |
| ||||
Net Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
| 832 |
| 13,515 |
| (1,554 | ) | 28,597 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 210 |
| (852 | ) | (178 | ) | (1,383 | ) | ||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
| 1,042 |
| 12,663 |
| (1,732 | ) | 27,214 |
| ||||
Retained Earnings, beginning of period |
| 529,177 |
| 541,203 |
| 536,780 |
| 531,933 |
| ||||
Cash Dividends |
| (3,758 | ) | (3,915 | ) | (7,320 | ) | (7,813 | ) | ||||
Effect of Stock Options |
| (717 | ) | (818 | ) | (1,974 | ) | (2,201 | ) | ||||
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
| (41 | ) | — |
| (51 | ) | — |
| ||||
Retained Earnings, end of period |
| $ | 525,703 |
| $ | 549,133 |
| $ | 525,703 |
| $ | 549,133 |
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 0.01 |
| $ | 0.23 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.51 |
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.01 |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| (0.03 | ) | ||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.22 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.48 |
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
| $ | 0.01 |
| $ | 0.22 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.47 |
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.01 |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| (0.02 | ) | ||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.21 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
Cash Dividends Per Share |
| $ | 0.0675 |
| $ | 0.0675 |
| $ | 0.1350 |
| $ | 0.1350 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollar amounts in thousands)
UNAUDITED
Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (loss) earnings |
| $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | 27,214 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
| (178 | ) | (1,383 | ) | ||
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations |
| (1,554 | ) | 28,597 |
| ||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Earnings From Continuing Operations to Net Cash Provided by Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 38,655 |
| 37,767 |
| ||
Accretion of asset disposal obligation |
| 56 |
| 71 |
| ||
Stock compensation expense |
| 1,403 |
| 847 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| (239 | ) | 20,553 |
| ||
(Gain) loss from sales of assets |
| (3,606 | ) | 360 |
| ||
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Decrease in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other |
| 24,421 |
| 3,711 |
| ||
Increase in merchandise inventories |
| (31,592 | ) | (42,889 | ) | ||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
| 22,322 |
| (3,493 | ) | ||
Decrease in accrued expenses |
| (45,090 | ) | (22,554 | ) | ||
Increase (decrease) in other long-term liabilities |
| 14,195 |
| (898 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
| 18,971 |
| 22,072 |
| ||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| (704 | ) | (1,728 | ) | ||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
| 18,267 |
| 20,344 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
| (42,463 | ) | (28,830 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sales of assets |
| 1,262 |
| 1,453 |
| ||
Proceeds from sales of assets held for disposal |
| 6,913 |
| — |
| ||
Net cash used in continuing operations |
| (34,288 | ) | (27,377 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| 931 |
| 10,532 |
| ||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (33,357 | ) | (16,845 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net borrowings under line of credit agreements |
| 6,815 |
| 137 |
| ||
Net borrowings (payments) on trade payable program liability |
| 12,071 |
| (7,216 | ) | ||
Reduction of long-term debt |
| (40,452 | ) | (84,425 | ) | ||
Other |
| (53 | ) | 3,283 |
| ||
Dividends paid |
| (7,320 | ) | (7,813 | ) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
| — |
| 108,854 |
| ||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
| 2,451 |
| 6,049 |
| ||
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan |
| 490 |
| 541 |
| ||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities |
| (25,998 | ) | 19,410 |
| ||
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash |
| (41,088 | ) | 22,909 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 82,758 |
| 60,984 |
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 41,670 |
| $ | 83,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for interest |
| $ | 17,017 |
| $ | 17,000 |
|
Cash received from income tax refunds |
| $ | 9,682 |
| $ | 5,483 |
|
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accrued purchases of property and equipment |
| $ | 2,148 |
| $ | — |
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Equipment Capital Leases |
| $ | 124 |
| $ | 1,413 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated balance sheet as of July 30, 2005, the consolidated statements of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2005 and July 31,2004 have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at July 30, 2005 and for all periods presented have been made.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005. The results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
NOTE 2. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. For all stock options, no stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net earnings, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company began to issue restricted stock unit awards to certain employees. The recorded expense for these awards under the intrinsic method was $615,000 ($384,000 net of tax) and $1,403,000 ($877,000 net of tax) for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005, respectively, and $149,000 ($94,000 net of tax) and $847,000 ($534,000 net of tax) for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004, respectively. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation:
(dollar amounts in thousands, |
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| |||||||||
except per share amounts) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| |||||
Net earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As reported |
| $ | 1,042 |
| $ | 12,663 |
| $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | 27,214 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Less: | Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value-based method, net of tax |
| (473 | ) | (674 | ) | (856 | ) | (1,536 | ) | ||||
Pro forma |
| $ | 569 |
| $ | 11,989 |
| $ | (2,588 | ) | $ | 25,678 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As reported |
| $ | .02 |
| $ | .22 |
| $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .48 |
| |
Pro forma |
| $ | .01 |
| $ | .21 |
| $ | (.05 | ) | $ | .46 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
As reported |
| $ | .02 |
| $ | .21 |
| $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .45 |
| |
Pro forma |
| $ | .01 |
| $ | .20 |
| $ | (.05 | ) | $ | .43 |
| |
6
The fair value of each option granted during the periods ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||
Dividend yield |
| 1.77% |
|
| 1.67% |
|
|
Expected volatility |
| 46% |
|
| 41% |
|
|
Risk-free interest rate range: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
high |
| 4.4% |
|
| 4.7% |
|
|
low |
| 3.5% |
|
| 2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ranges of expected lives in years |
| 3-8 |
|
| 3-8 |
|
|
NOTE 3. New Accounting Standards
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections-a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in nondiscretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 154 as applicable beginning in fiscal 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation Number (FIN) 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”, an interpretation of SFAS 143 (Asset Retirement Obligations). FIN 47 addresses diverse accounting practices that have developed with regard to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity should have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The provision is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company has not determined the impact that the adoption of FIN 47 will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) or SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supercedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and subsequently issued stock option related guidance. This statement establishes standards for the accounting of transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services, primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods and services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models. If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.
The Company was initially required to apply SFAS No. 123R to all awards granted, modified or settled as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. However, on April 14, 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a press release that postpones the application of SFAS No. 123R to no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. For the Company, this is the fiscal year beginning January 29, 2006.
7
The statement also requires the Company to use either the modified-prospective method or modified retrospective method in its transition. Under the modified-prospective method, the Company must recognize compensation cost for all awards granted subsequent to adopting the standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards outstanding upon adoption. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company must restate its previously issued financial statements to recognize the amounts it previously calculated and reported on a pro-forma basis, as if the prior standard had been adopted. Under both methods, the statement permits the use of either the straight-line or an accelerated method to amortize the cost as an expense for awards with graded vesting. The standard permits and encourages early adoption.
The Company has commenced its analysis of the impact of SFAS No. 123R, but has not yet decided: (1) whether to elect early adoption, (2) the early adoption date, if elected, (3) the use of the modified-prospective or modified retrospective method and (4) the election to use straight-line or an accelerated method. Accordingly, the Company has not determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. SFAS No. 153 amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provision is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s current financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “ Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 ‘Inventory Pricing’.” The standard requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. The provision is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 4. Merchandise Inventories
Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each fiscal year based on inventory and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs. If the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of costing inventory had been used by the Company, inventory would have been $633,962,000 and $588,301,000 as of July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005, respectively.
The Company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels, the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions. The Company believes that the risk of obsolescence is minimal as excess inventory has historically been returned to the Company’s vendors for credit. The Company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when the selling price is lower than recorded costs. The reserves are revised, if necessary, on a quarterly basis for adequacy. The Company’s reserves against inventory for these matters were $13,184,000 and $12,676,000 at July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005, respectively.
NOTE 5. Accrued Expenses
The Company’s accrued expenses as of July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005 were as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| Jan. 29, 2005 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Casualty and medical risk insurance |
| $ | 150,302 |
| $ | 164,065 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
| 41,608 |
| 45,899 |
| ||
Other |
| 71,700 |
| 96,707 |
| ||
Total |
| $ | 263,610 |
| $ | 306,671 |
|
8
NOTE 6. Other Current Assets
The Company’s other current assets as of July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005 were as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| Jan. 29, 2005 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reinsurance premiums receivable |
| $ | 70,212 |
| $ | 80,397 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
| 7,586 |
| 15,404 |
| ||
Other |
| 95 |
| 264 |
| ||
Total |
| $ | 77,893 |
| $ | 96,065 |
|
NOTE 7. Restructuring
Building upon the Profit Enhancement Plan launched in October 2000, the Company conducted a comprehensive review of its operations including individual store performance, the entire management infrastructure and its merchandise and service offerings. On July 31, 2003, the Company announced several initiatives aimed at realigning its business and continuing to improve upon the Company’s profitability. These actions, including the disposal and sublease of the closed properties, were substantially completed by January 31, 2004 with costs of approximately $65,986,000. The Company is accounting for these initiatives in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” and SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
Reserve Summary
The following chart details the reserve balances through July 30, 2005. The reserve includes remaining rent on leases net of sublease income and other contractual obligations associated with leased properties.
(dollar amounts |
| Lease |
| Contractual |
|
|
| |||
in thousands) |
| Expenses |
| Obligations |
| Total |
| |||
Reserve balance at Jan. 29, 2005 |
| $ | 1,755 |
| $ | 141 |
| $ | 1,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Provision for present value of liabilities |
| 67 |
| — |
| 67 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Changes in assumptions about future sublease income and lease termination |
| 155 |
| 33 |
| 188 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash payments |
| (310 | ) | (88 | ) | (398 | ) | |||
Reserve balance at July 30, 2005 |
| $ | 1,667 |
| $ | 86 |
| $ | 1,753 |
|
9
NOTE 8. Store Closures and Sales
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, our discontinued operations continues to reflect the ongoing costs for the stores remaining from the 33 stores closed on July 31, 2003 as part of our corporate restructuring (see Note 7). Below is a summary of these stores’ costs for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004:
|
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| ||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||||
Total Revenues |
| $ | — |
| $ | (1 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Total Gross Earnings (Loss) |
| 291 |
| (1,438 | ) | (304 | ) | (2,243 | ) | ||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 3 |
| (88 | ) | 29 |
| (48 | ) | ||||
Gain (Loss) from Discontinued Operations Before Income Taxes |
| 288 |
| (1,351 | ) | (333 | ) | (2,195 | ) | ||||
Gain (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| $ | 210 |
| $ | (852 | ) | $ | (178 | ) | $ | (1,383 | ) |
Sales of Stores in Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company sold a closed store for proceeds of $931,000 resulting in a pre-tax gain of $341,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company sold assets held for disposal for proceeds of $3,652,000 resulting in a loss of $157,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company sold assets held for disposal for proceeds of $6,879,000 resulting in a gain of $172,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
Other Store Sales and Transfers
During the second quarter of 2005 the Company sold a closed store classified as an asset held for disposal for proceeds of $6,912,000 resulting in a pre-tax gain of $5,176,000, which was recorded in costs of merchandise sales on the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2005 the Company sold a closed store classified as an asset held for use for proceeds of $659,000 resulting in a pre-tax loss of $502,000, which was recorded in costs of merchandise sales on the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company reclassified a store in assets held for disposal at April 29, 2005 to assets held for use in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144, as the Company concluded that the sale of the store was no longer expected to occur within one year. This store is valued at its fair value at the date of the subsequent decision to transfer it, which was lower than its carrying amount before it was classified as held for sale adjusted for depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as held and used. The results of operations of this store are not material for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and therefore have not been reclassified into continuing operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE 9. Pension and Savings Plan
Pension expense includes the following:
|
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| ||||||||
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31,2004 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Service cost |
| $ | 91 |
| $ | 111 |
| $ | 182 |
| $ | 219 |
|
Interest Cost |
| 753 |
| 745 |
| 1,506 |
| 1,451 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
| (587 | ) | (574 | ) | (1,174 | ) | (1,149 | ) | ||||
Amortization of transition obligation |
| 41 |
| 41 |
| 82 |
| 82 |
| ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
| 91 |
| 91 |
| 182 |
| 182 |
| ||||
Amortization of net loss |
| 545 |
| 422 |
| 1,090 |
| 866 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
| $ | 934 |
| $ | 836 |
| $ | 1,868 |
| $ | 1,651 |
|
10
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 that it expected to contribute $1,090,000 to its pension plan in fiscal 2005. As of July 30, 2005, $1,288,000 of contributions have been made, due to significant payments made to two former employees. The Company now anticipates the total contributions for fiscal 2005 to be approximately $1,440,000.
The Company has 401(k) savings plans which cover all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age with one or more years of service. The Company contributes the lesser of 50% of the first 6% of a participant’s contributions or 3% of the participant’s compensation. The Company’s savings plans’ contribution expense was $953,000 and $780,000 for the thirteen weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and $1,794,000 and $1,807,000 for the twenty-six weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.
On January 31, 2004, the Company amended and restated its Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (SERP). This amendment converted the defined benefit plan to a defined contribution plan for certain unvested participants and all future participants. All vested participants will continue to accrue benefits according to the previous defined benefit formula. The Company’s contribution expense for the defined contribution portion of the plan was $218,000 and $212,000 and $436,000 and $429,000 for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.
NOTE 10. Advertising Expense
The Company expenses the production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place. Gross advertising expense was $23,201,000 and $22,517,000, and $46,419,000 and $37,893,000, for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. No advertising costs were recorded as assets as of July 30, 2005 or January 29, 2005.
The Company receives funds from vendors in the normal course of business for a variety of reasons, including cooperative advertising. Contracts for cooperative advertising typically have a duration of one year. There were 153 and 150 vendors participating in such contracts for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. The Company’s level of advertising expense would not be impacted in the absence of these contracts.
Certain cooperative advertising reimbursements are netted against specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred in connection with the selling of the vendor’s product. Cooperative advertising reimbursements of $10,593,000 and $14,885,000 for the thirteen weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and $19,419,000 and $24,960,000 for the twenty-six weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, were recorded as a reduction of advertising expense with the net amount included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. Any excess reimbursements over these costs are characterized as a reduction of inventory and are recognized as a reduction of cost of sales as the inventories are sold, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 02-16. The amount of excess reimbursements recognized as a reduction of costs of sales were $10,570,000 and $7,356,000 for the thirteen weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and $21,002,000 and $16,705,000 for the twenty-six weeks ending July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. The balance of excess reimbursements remaining in inventory was immaterial at July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005.
11
NOTE 11. Net Earnings Per Share
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
UNAUDITED
|
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| |||||||||
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| |||||
(a) | Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
| $ | 832 |
| $ | 13,515 |
| $ | (1,554 | ) | $ | 28,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Adjustment for interest on convertible senior notes, net of income tax effect |
| — |
| 1,001 |
| — |
| 2,003 |
| ||||
(b) | Adjusted net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
| $ | 832 |
| $ | 14,516 |
| $ | (1,554 | ) | $ | 30,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
(c) | Average number of common shares outstanding during period |
| 55,683 |
| 57,875 |
| 55,597 |
| 56,410 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Common shares assumed issued upon conversion of convertible senior notes |
| — |
| 6,697 |
| — |
| 6,697 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Common shares assumed issued upon exercise of dilutive stock options, net of assumed repurchase, at the average market price |
| 449 |
| 1,749 |
| — |
| 1,847 |
| ||||
(d) | Average number of common shares assumed outstanding during period |
| 56,132 |
| 66,321 |
| 55,597 |
| 64,954 |
| ||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Net Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operation (a/c) |
| $ | 0.01 |
| $ | 0.23 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.51 |
|
| Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.01 |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| (0.03 | ) | ||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.22 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.48 |
| |
Diluted Earnings (Loss)Per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Net Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations (b/d) |
| $ | 0.01 |
| $ | 0.22 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.01 |
| (0.01 | ) | — |
| (0.02 | ) | ||||
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
| $ | 0.02 |
| $ | 0.21 |
| $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.45 |
|
During the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2005, the diluted loss per common share calculation was the same as the basic loss per common share calculation, as all potentially dilutive securities were anti-dilutive due to the Company’s reported net loss.
Adjustments for the convertible senior notes were anti-dilutive during the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005 and therefore excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005.
At July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 there were outstanding 4,785,000 and 6,363,000 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively. Certain stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the periods then ended. The total numbers of such shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation are 3,135,000 and 935,000 for the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and 944,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004.
12
NOTE 12. Warranty Reserve
The Company provides warranties for both its merchandise sales and service labor. Warranties for merchandise are generally covered by its vendors, with the Company covering any costs above the vendor’s stipulated allowance. Service labor warranties are covered in full by the Company on a limited lifetime basis. The Company establishes its warranty reserves based on historical data of warranty transactions.
Components of the reserve for warranty costs for the twenty-six week period ended July 30, 2005 are as follows:
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
| |
Beginning balance at January 29, 2005 |
| $ | 1,324 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Additions related to current period sales |
| 7,051 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Warranty costs incurred in current period |
| (7,042 | ) | |
Ending Balance at July 30, 2005 |
| $ | 1,333 |
|
NOTE 13. Debt and Financing Arrangements
Upon maturity on June 1, 2005, the Company retired the remaining $40,444,000 aggregate principal amount of its 7% Senior Notes with cash from operations and its existing line of credit. In December 2004, the Company repurchased, through a tender offer, $59,556 of these notes. In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company reclassified the $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of these notes then outstanding to current liabilities on the balance sheet.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2005 the Company reclassified $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.92% Term Enhanced ReMarketable Securities (TERMS) to current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The TERMS’ initial maturity date is July 7, 2006, unless the underwriter exercises its option to remarket the TERMS through a maturity date of July 7, 2016. If the underwriter exercises such option, the Company has the right to redeem the TERMS prior to such remarketing. The redemption price is based upon the then present value of the remaining payments on the TERMS through July 17, 2016, at 5.45%, discounted at the 10 year Treasury rate.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005 the Company reclassified, to current liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet, $43,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.88% Medium-Term Notes with a stated maturity date of March 6, 2006.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company entered into a vendor financing program with an availability of $20,000,000. Under this program, the Company’s factor makes accelerated and discounted payments to its vendors and the Company, in turn, makes its regularly scheduled full vendor payments to the factor. As of July 30, 2005, the Company had an outstanding balance of $12,071,000 under these arrangements, classified as trade payable program liability in the consolidated balance sheet.
In October 2001, the Company entered into a contractual commitment to purchase media advertising services with equal annual purchase requirements totaling $39,773,000 over four years. The remaining minimum purchase requirement for 2005 (the final year of this commitment) is approximately $3,572,000, which the Company expects to meet.
13
NOTE 14. Supplemental Guarantor Information
On December 14, 2004, the Company issued $200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 15, 2014, and on May 21, 2002, the Company issued $150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due June 1, 2007. Both issuances are unsecured and jointly and severally guaranteed by the Company’s wholly-owned direct and indirect operating subsidiaries, The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. and Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack of Puerto Rico, Inc. PBY Corporation was added as a subsidiary guarantor of both issuances on January 6, 2005.
The following are consolidating balance sheets of the Company as of July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005 and the related consolidating statements of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004 and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004. The consolidating statements of operations and cash flows for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004 have been reclassified to show PBY Corporation as a subsidiary guarantor for comparative purposes.
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(dollar amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
July 30, 2005 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 12,655 |
| $ | 9,319 |
| $ | 19,696 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 41,670 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
| 17,770 |
| 17,323 |
| — |
| — |
| 35,093 |
| |||||
Merchandise inventories |
| 222,177 |
| 412,175 |
| — |
| — |
| 634,352 |
| |||||
Prepaid expenses |
| 27,650 |
| 14,717 |
| 9,552 |
| (17,669 | ) | 34,250 |
| |||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
| 4,484 |
| (28,438 | ) | 5,571 |
| 18,383 |
| — |
| |||||
Other |
| 12,543 |
| 12,107 |
| 53,243 |
| — |
| 77,893 |
| |||||
Total Current Assets |
| 297,279 |
| 437,203 |
| 88,062 |
| 714 |
| 823,258 |
| |||||
Property and Equipment - at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Land |
| 86,766 |
| 172,473 |
| — |
| — |
| 259,239 |
| |||||
Buildings and improvements |
| 314,219 |
| 599,105 |
| — |
| — |
| 913,324 |
| |||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 273,221 |
| 371,003 |
| — |
| — |
| 644,224 |
| |||||
Construction in progress |
| 20,462 |
| 250 |
| — |
| — |
| 20,712 |
| |||||
|
| 694,668 |
| 1,142,831 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,837,499 |
| |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| 356,510 |
| 534,349 |
| — |
| — |
| 890,859 |
| |||||
Property and Equipment - Net |
| 338,158 |
| 608,482 |
| — |
| — |
| 946,640 |
| |||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
| 1,517,842 |
| 1,262,127 |
| — |
| (2,779,969 | ) | — |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Intercompany receivable |
| — |
| 776,723 |
| 83,315 |
| (860,038 | ) | — |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Other |
| 62,526 |
| 3,644 |
| — |
| 493 |
| 66,663 |
| |||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 2,215,805 |
| $ | 3,088,179 |
| $ | 171,377 |
| $ | (3,638,800 | ) | $ | 1,836,561 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 333,294 |
| $ | 9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 333,303 |
|
Trade payable program liability |
| 12,071 |
| — |
| — |
|
|
| 12,071 |
| |||||
Accrued expenses |
| 46,981 |
| 89,918 |
| 157,811 |
| (31,100 | ) | 263,610 |
| |||||
Current deferred taxes |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 18,383 |
| 18,383 |
| |||||
Current maturities of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
| 144,461 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 144,461 |
| |||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 536,807 |
| 89,927 |
| 157,811 |
| (12,717 | ) | 771,828 |
| |||||
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases, less current maturities |
| 205,809 |
| 9,725 |
| — |
| — |
| 215,534 |
| |||||
Convertible long-term debt |
| 119,000 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 119,000 |
| |||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 10,381 |
| 27,867 |
| — |
| 13,924 |
| 52,172 |
| |||||
Intercompany liabilities |
| 678,820 |
| 181,218 |
| — |
| (860,038 | ) | — |
| |||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 14,294 |
| 13,039 |
| — |
| — |
| 27,333 |
| |||||
Stockholders’ Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Common stock |
| 68,557 |
| 1,502 |
| 100 |
| (1,602 | ) | 68,557 |
| |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 286,617 |
| 436,858 |
| 3,900 |
| (440,758 | ) | 286,617 |
| |||||
Retained earnings |
| 525,703 |
| 2,328,043 |
| 9,566 |
| (2,337,609 | ) | 525,703 |
| |||||
Common stock subscriptions receivable |
| (39 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (39 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (3,524 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (3,524 | ) | |||||
|
| 877,314 |
| 2,766,403 |
| 13,566 |
| (2,779,969 | ) | 877,314 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cost of shares in treasury |
| 167,356 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 167,356 |
| |||||
Cost of shares in benefits trust |
| 59,264 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 59,264 |
| |||||
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| 650,694 |
| 2,766,403 |
| 13,566 |
| (2,779,969 | ) | 650,694 |
| |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
| $ | 2,215,805 |
| $ | 3,088,179 |
| $ | 171,377 |
| $ | (3,638,800 | ) | $ | 1,836,561 |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| Guarantor |
| Consolidation/ |
|
|
| |||||
January 29, 2005 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 59,032 |
| $ | 8,474 |
| $ | 15,252 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 82,758 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
| 14,150 |
| 16,844 |
| — |
| — |
| 30,994 |
| |||||
Merchandise inventories |
| 205,908 |
| 396,852 |
| — |
| — |
| 602,760 |
| |||||
Prepaid expenses |
| 28,535 |
| 17,450 |
| 21,499 |
| (22,135 | ) | 45,349 |
| |||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 3,140 |
| (28,192 | ) | 5,645 |
| 19,407 |
| — |
| |||||
Other |
| 19,170 |
| 12,097 |
| 64,798 |
| — |
| 96,065 |
| |||||
Assets held for disposal |
| — |
| 665 |
| — |
| — |
| 665 |
| |||||
Total Current Assets |
| 329,935 |
| 424,190 |
| 107,194 |
| (2,728 | ) | 858,591 |
| |||||
Property and Equipment - at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Land |
| 87,314 |
| 174,671 |
| — |
| — |
| 261,985 |
| |||||
Buildings and improvements |
| 315,170 |
| 600,929 |
| — |
| — |
| 916,099 |
| |||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
| 296,732 |
| 336,366 |
| — |
| — |
| 633,098 |
| |||||
Construction in progress |
| 38,240 |
| 2,186 |
| — |
| — |
| 40,426 |
| |||||
|
| 737,456 |
| 1,114,152 |
| — |
| — |
| 1,851,608 |
| |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
| 390,331 |
| 516,246 |
| — |
| — |
| 906,577 |
| |||||
Property and Equipment - Net |
| 347,125 |
| 597,906 |
| — |
| — |
| 945,031 |
| |||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
| 1,585,211 |
| 1,130,247 |
| — |
| (2,715,458 | ) | — |
| |||||
Intercompany receivable |
| — |
| 845,384 |
| 85,881 |
| (931,265 | ) | — |
| |||||
Other |
| 59,900 |
| 3,501 |
| — |
| — |
| 63,401 |
| |||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 2,322,171 |
| $ | 3,001,228 |
| $ | 193,075 |
| $ | (3,649,451 | ) | $ | 1,867,023 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 310,972 |
| $ | 9 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 310,981 |
|
Accrued expenses |
| 60,178 |
| 90,014 |
| 178,614 |
| (22,135 | ) | 306,671 |
| |||||
Deferred income taxes |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 19,406 |
| 19,406 |
| |||||
Current maturities of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
| 40,882 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 40,882 |
| |||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 412,032 |
| 90,023 |
| 178,614 |
| (2,729 | ) | 677,940 |
| |||||
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases, less current maturities |
| 347,315 |
| 5,367 |
| — |
| — |
| 352,682 |
| |||||
Convertible long-term debt |
| 119,000 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 119,000 |
| |||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 11,416 |
| 26,561 |
| — |
| — |
| 37,977 |
| |||||
Intercompany liabilities |
| 765,068 |
| 166,196 |
| — |
| (931,264 | ) | — |
| |||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 13,884 |
| 12,084 |
| — |
| — |
| 25,968 |
| |||||
Stockholders’ Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Common stock |
| 68,557 |
| 1,502 |
| 100 |
| (1,602 | ) | 68,557 |
| |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 284,966 |
| 436,858 |
| 3,900 |
| (440,758 | ) | 284,966 |
| |||||
Retained earnings |
| 536,780 |
| 2,262,637 |
| 10,461 |
| (2,273,098 | ) | 536,780 |
| |||||
Common stock subscriptions receivable |
| (167 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (167 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (4,852 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (4,852 | ) | |||||
|
| 885,284 |
| 2,700,997 |
| 14,461 |
| (2,715,458 | ) | 885,284 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cost of shares in treasury |
| 172,564 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 172,564 |
| |||||
Cost of shares in benefits trust |
| 59,264 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 59,264 |
| |||||
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| 653,456 |
| 2,700,997 |
| 14,461 |
| (2,715,458 | ) | 653,456 |
| |||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
| $ | 2,322,171 |
| $ | 3,001,228 |
| $ | 193,075 |
| $ | (3,649,451 | ) | $ | 1,867,023 |
|
15
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollar amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Merchandise Sales |
| $ | 165,423 |
| $ | 315,185 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 480,608 |
|
Service Revenue |
| 33,204 |
| 63,606 |
| — |
| — |
| 96,810 |
| |||||
Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 7,421 |
| (7,421 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Revenues |
| 198,627 |
| 378,791 |
| 7,421 |
| (7,421 | ) | 577,418 |
| |||||
Costs of Merchandise Sales |
| 121,155 |
| 226,570 |
| — |
| — |
| 347,725 |
| |||||
Costs of Service Revenue |
| 30,375 |
| 56,459 |
| — |
| — |
| 86,834 |
| |||||
Costs of Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 10,551 |
| (10,551 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 151,530 |
| 283,029 |
| 10,551 |
| (10,551 | ) | 434,559 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 44,268 |
| 88,615 |
| — |
| — |
| 132,883 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 2,829 |
| 7,147 |
| — |
| — |
| 9,976 |
| |||||
Gross Loss from Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| (3,130 | ) | 3,130 |
| — |
| |||||
Total Gross Profit (Loss) |
| 47,097 |
| 95,762 |
| (3,130 | ) | 3,130 |
| 142,859 |
| |||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 44,706 |
| 85,290 |
| 74 |
| 3,130 |
| 133,200 |
| |||||
Operating Profit (Loss) |
| 2,391 |
| 10,472 |
| (3,204 | ) | — |
| 9,659 |
| |||||
Equity in Earnings of Subsidiaries |
| 13,597 |
| 19,042 |
| — |
| (32,639 | ) | — |
| |||||
Non-operating (Expense) Income |
| (4,740 | ) | 22,439 |
| 125 |
| (17,341 | ) | 483 |
| |||||
Interest Expense |
| 17,777 |
| 9,693 |
| (895 | ) | (17,341 | ) | 9,234 |
| |||||
(Loss) Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| (6,529 | ) | 42,260 |
| (2,184 | ) | (32,639 | ) | 908 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense |
| (7,389 | ) | 8,415 |
| (950 | ) | — |
| 76 |
| |||||
Net Earnings From Continuing Operations |
| 860 |
| 33,845 |
| (1,234 | ) | (32,639 | ) | 832 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 182 |
| 28 |
| — |
| — |
| 210 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Earnings |
| $ | 1,042 |
| $ | 33,873 |
| $ | (1,234 | ) | $ | (32,639 | ) | $ | 1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2004 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
Merchandise Sales |
| $ | 169,204 |
| $ | 319,512 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 488,716 |
|
Service Revenue |
| 36,331 |
| 68,379 |
| — |
| — |
| 104,710 |
| |||||
Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 7,079 |
| (7,079 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Revenues |
| 205,535 |
| 387,891 |
| 7,079 |
| (7,079 | ) | 593,426 |
| |||||
Costs of Merchandise Sales |
| 121,495 |
| 225,754 |
| — |
| — |
| 347,249 |
| |||||
Costs of Service Revenue |
| 27,942 |
| 52,759 |
| — |
| — |
| 80,701 |
| |||||
Costs of Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 10,326 |
| (10,326 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 149,437 |
| 278,513 |
| 10,326 |
| (10,326 | ) | 427,950 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 47,709 |
| 93,758 |
| — |
| — |
| 141,467 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 8,389 |
| 15,620 |
| — |
| — |
| 24,009 |
| |||||
Gross Loss from Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| (3,247 | ) | 3,247 |
| — |
| |||||
Total Gross Profit (Loss) |
| 56,098 |
| 109,378 |
| (3,247 | ) | 3,247 |
| 165,476 |
| |||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 48,621 |
| 84,749 |
| 77 |
| 3,247 |
| 136,694 |
| |||||
Operating Profit (Loss) |
| 7,477 |
| 24,629 |
| (3,324 | ) | — |
| 28,782 |
| |||||
Equity in Earnings of Subsidiaries |
| 19,671 |
| 20,774 |
| — |
| (40,445 | ) | — |
| |||||
Non-operating (Expense) Income |
| (4,890 | ) | 16,960 |
| 814 |
| (12,414 | ) | 470 |
| |||||
Interest Expense |
| 13,440 |
| 6,774 |
| — |
| (12,414 | ) | 7,800 |
| |||||
Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| 8,818 |
| 55,589 |
| (2,510 | ) | (40,445 | ) | 21,452 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense |
| (4,016 | ) | 12,882 |
| (929 | ) | — |
| 7,937 |
| |||||
Net Earnings From Continuing Operations |
| 12,834 |
| 42,707 |
| (1,581 | ) | (40,445 | ) | 13,515 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| (171 | ) | (681 | ) | — |
| — |
| (852 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Earnings |
| $ | 12,663 |
| $ | 42,026 |
| $ | (1,581 | ) | $ | (40,445 |
| $ | 12,663 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise Sales |
| $ | 323,249 |
| $ | 621,207 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 944,456 |
|
Service Revenue |
| 67,986 |
| 129,202 |
| — |
| — |
| 197,188 |
| |||||
Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 14,875 |
| (14,875 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Revenues |
| 391,235 |
| 750,409 |
| 14,875 |
| (14,875 | ) | 1,141,644 |
| |||||
Costs of Merchandise Sales |
| 243,872 |
| 445,544 |
| — |
| — |
| 689,416 |
| |||||
Costs of Service Revenue |
| 58,550 |
| 112,198 |
| — |
| — |
| 170,748 |
| |||||
Costs of Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 18,269 |
| (18,269 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 302,422 |
| 557,742 |
| 18,269 |
| (18,269 | ) | 860,164 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 79,377 |
| 175,663 |
| — |
| — |
| 255,040 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 9,436 |
| 17,004 |
| — |
| — |
| 26,440 |
| |||||
Gross Loss from Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| (3,394 | ) | 3,394 |
| — |
| |||||
Total Gross Profit |
| 88,813 |
| 192,667 |
| (3,394 | ) | 3,394 |
| 281,480 |
| |||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 91,697 |
| 173,212 |
| 159 |
| 3,394 |
| 268,462 |
| |||||
Operating (Loss) Profit |
| (2,884 | ) | 19,455 |
| (3,553 | ) | — |
| 13,018 |
| |||||
Equity in Earnings of Subsidiaries |
| 28,987 |
| 35,525 |
| — |
| (64,512 | ) | — |
| |||||
Non-operating (Expense) Income |
| (7,972 | ) | 42,033 |
| 174 |
| (32,014 | ) | 2,221 |
| |||||
Interest Expense |
| 38,240 |
| 13,661 |
| (1,738 | ) | (32,014 | ) | 18,149 |
| |||||
(Loss) Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| (20,109 | ) | 83,352 |
| (1,641 | ) | (64,512 | ) | (2,910 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense |
| (18,253 | ) | 17,643 |
| (746 | ) | — |
| (1,356 | ) | |||||
Net (Loss) Earnings From Continuing Operations |
| (1,856 | ) | 65,709 |
| (895 | ) | (64,512 | ) | (1,554 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 124 |
| (302 | ) | — |
| — |
| (178 | ) | |||||
Net (Loss) Earnings |
| $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | 65,407 |
| $ | (895 | ) | $ | (64,512 | ) | $ | (1,732 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Merchandise Sales |
| $ | 329,466 |
| $ | 620,131 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 949,597 |
|
Service Revenue |
| 73,249 |
| 136,713 |
| — |
| — |
| 209,962 |
| |||||
Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 14,149 |
| (14,149 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Revenues |
| 402,715 |
| 756,844 |
| 14,149 |
| (14,149 | ) | 1,159,559 |
| |||||
Costs of Merchandise Sales |
| 235,844 |
| 436,779 |
| — |
| — |
| 672,623 |
| |||||
Costs of Service Revenue |
| 54,488 |
| 104,764 |
| — |
| — |
| 159,252 |
| |||||
Costs of Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 17,490 |
| (17,490 | ) | — |
| |||||
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 290,332 |
| 541,543 |
| 17,490 |
| (17,490 | ) | 831,875 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 93,622 |
| 183,352 |
| — |
| — |
| 276,974 |
| |||||
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 18,761 |
| 31,949 |
| — |
| — |
| 50,710 |
| |||||
Gross Loss from Other Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| (3,341 | ) | 3,341 |
| — |
| |||||
Total Gross Profit |
| 112,383 |
| 215,301 |
| (3,341 | ) | 3,341 |
| 327,684 |
| |||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 95,563 |
| 167,195 |
| 157 |
| 3,341 |
| 266,256 |
| |||||
Operating Profit |
| 16,820 |
| 48,106 |
| (3,498 | ) | — |
| 61,428 |
| |||||
Equity in Earnings of Subsidiaries |
| 41,393 |
| 40,753 |
| — |
| (82,146 | ) | — |
| |||||
Non-operating (Expense) Income |
| (9,365 | ) | 33,550 |
| 1,626 |
| (24,749 | ) | 1,062 |
| |||||
Interest Expense |
| 29,448 |
| 12,399 |
| — |
| (24,749 | ) | 17,098 |
| |||||
Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| 19,400 |
| 110,010 |
| (1,872 | ) | (82,146 | ) | 45,392 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
| (8,138 | ) | 25,626 |
| (693 | ) | — |
| 16,795 |
| |||||
Net Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations |
| 27,538 |
| 84,384 |
| (1,179 | ) | (82,146 | ) | 28,597 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| (324 | ) | (1,059 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,383 | ) | |||||
Net Earnings (Loss) |
| $ | 27,214 |
| $ | 83,325 |
| $ | (1,179 | ) | $ | (82,146 | ) | $ | 27,214 |
|
17
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollar amount in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net (loss) earnings |
| $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | 65,407 |
| $ | (895 | ) | $ | (64,512 | ) | $ | (1,732 | ) |
Net income (loss) from Discontinued Operations |
| 124 |
| (302 | ) | — |
| — |
| (178 | ) | |||||
Net (Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations |
| (1,856 | ) | 65,709 |
| (895 | ) | (64,512 | ) | (1,554 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net (Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Non-cash operating activities |
| 82,456 |
| (110,773 | ) | 74 |
| 64,512 |
| 36,269 |
| |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
| (6,405 | ) | (12,039 | ) | 2,700 |
| — |
| (15,744 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
| 74,195 |
| (57,103 | ) | 1,879 |
| — |
| 18,971 |
| |||||
Net Cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
| 55 |
| (759 | ) | — |
| — |
| (704 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities |
| 74,250 |
| (57,862 | ) | 1,879 |
| — |
| 18,267 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used in Continuing Operations |
| (15,270 | ) | (19,018 | ) | — |
| — |
| (34,288 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Provided by discontinued operations |
| 931 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 931 |
| |||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (14,339 | ) | (19,018 | ) | — |
| — |
| (33,357 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities |
| (106,288 | ) | 77,725 |
| 2,565 |
| — |
| (25,998 | ) | |||||
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash |
| (46,377 | ) | 845 |
| 4,444 |
| — |
| (41,088 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 59,032 |
| 8,474 |
| 15,252 |
| — |
| 82,758 |
| |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 12,655 |
| $ | 9,319 |
| $ | 19,696 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 41,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non- |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| Subsidiary |
| guarantor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2004 |
| Pep Boys |
| Guarantors |
| Subsidiaries |
| Elimination |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net earnings |
| $ | 27,214 |
| $ | 83,325 |
| $ | (1,179 | ) | $ | (82,146 | ) | $ | 27,214 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
| (324 | ) | (1,059 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,383 | ) | |||||
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations |
| 27,538 |
| 84,384 |
| (1,179 | ) | (82,146 | ) | 28,597 |
| |||||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings from Continuing Operations to Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Non-cash operating activities |
| (24,544 | ) | 1,552 |
| 444 |
| 82,146 |
| 59,598 |
| |||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
| (28,939 | ) | (36,037 | ) | (1,147 | ) | — |
| (66,123 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations |
| (25,945 | ) | 49,899 |
| (1,882 | ) | — |
| 22,072 |
| |||||
Net Cash used in discontinued operations |
| (137 | ) | (1,591 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1,728 | ) | |||||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities |
| (26,082 | ) | 48,308 |
| (1,882 | ) | — |
| 20,344 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Used in Continuing Operations |
| (16,531 | ) | (10,846 | ) | — |
| — |
| (27,377 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Provided by discontinued operations |
| 5,030 |
| 5,502 |
| — |
| — |
| 10,532 |
| |||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (11,501 | ) | (5,344 | ) | — |
| — |
| (16,845 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
| 58,622 |
| (42,803 | ) | 3,591 |
| — |
| 19,410 |
| |||||
Net Increase in Cash |
| 21,039 |
| 161 |
| 1,709 |
| — |
| 22,909 |
| |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 43,929 |
| 9,070 |
| 7,985 |
| — |
| 60,984 |
| |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 64,968 |
| $ | 9,231 |
| $ | 9,694 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 83,893 |
|
18
NOTE 15. Contingencies
On July 20, 2005, we received a letter from counsel to the court-appointed receiver of Nikota USA, Inc. (a former merchandise vendor since 2003), which ceased operations in March 2005 after a lender foreclosed on a loan. The letter proposed a meeting between the Company and the counsels for the receiver and the lender to discuss an ongoing dispute between the Company and the receiver regarding the Company’s accounts payable balance and certain returned defective merchandise. The letter included sweeping allegations with respect to the Company’s business practices and was accompanied by a draft complaint against the Company and certain of its employees that alleges breach of contract, unfair business practices under the California Commercial Code, accounting fraud and RICO violations, and purports to seek class action relief for all merchandise vendors to the Company. The Company believes that these allegations are entirely without merit and that the transactions questioned by the receiver’s counsel were properly documented, accounted for and immaterial to the Company’s financial position and results of operations at all times. As of the date of this report, no complaint has been filed, but if necessary, the Company will vigorously defend this matter.
An action entitled “Tomas Diaz Rodriguez; Energy Tech Corporation v. Pep Boys Corporation; Manny, Moe & Jack Corp. Puerto Rico, Inc. d/b/a Pep Boys” was instituted against the Company in the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico, Bayamon Superior Division on March 15, 2002. The action was subsequently removed to, and is currently pending in, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Plaintiffs are distributors of a product that claims to improve gas mileage. The plaintiffs alleged that the Company entered into an agreement with them to act as the exclusive retailer of the product in Puerto Rico that was breached when the Company determined to stop selling the product. On March 29, 2004, the Company’s motion for summary judgment was granted and the case was dismissed. The plaintiff appealed and, on June 3, 2005, the United States Court of Appeal for the First Circuit vacated the summary judgment order and remanded the case to the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico, Bayamon Superior Division for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Company continues to believe that the claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend this action.
The Company is also party to various other actions and claims, including purported class actions, arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with the foregoing matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 16. Comprehensive Income
The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss):
|
| Thirteen Weeks Ended |
| Twenty-six Weeks Ended |
| ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net earnings (loss) |
| $ | 1,042 |
| $ | 12,663 |
| $ | (1,732 | ) | $ | 27,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Minimum pension liability adjustments |
| (3 | ) | — |
| 344 |
| — |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivative financial instrument adjustments |
| 415 |
| 53 |
| 984 |
| 1,113 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
| $ | 1,454 |
| $ | 12,716 |
| (404 | ) | $ | 28,327 |
| |
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are:
|
| July 30, |
| January 29, |
| ||
|
| 2005 |
| 2005 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax |
| $ | (6,858 | ) | $ | (7,203 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Derivative financial instrument adjustment, net of tax |
| 3,334 |
| 2,351 |
| ||
|
| $ | (3,524 | ) | $ | (4,852 | ) |
19
NOTE 17. Subsequent Event
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company announced a share repurchase program for up to $100,000,000 of its common stock. The Company repurchased approximately 1,283,000 shares for approximately $15,523,000 subsequent to July 30, 2005.
20
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The discussion and analysis below for the Company should be read in conjunction with (i) the financial statements and the notes to such financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and (ii) the financial statements and the notes to such financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.
OVERVIEW
The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack is a leader in the automotive aftermarket with 593 stores located throughout 36 states and Puerto Rico. All of our stores feature the nationally-recognized Pep Boys brand name, established through more than 80 years of providing high-quality automotive merchandise and services, and are company-owned, ensuring chain-wide consistency for our customers. We are the only national chain offering automotive service, accessories, tires and parts under one roof, positioning us to achieve our goal of becoming the category dominant one-stop shop for automotive maintenance products and services.
For the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005, our comparative sales decreased by 2.5%, compared to an increase of 6.9% for the thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2004. This decrease in comparable sales was due primarily to a 7.4% decrease in comparable service revenue coupled with a decrease of 1.5% in comparable merchandise sales. Comparable sales were negatively impacted by the short-term disruption experienced in our stores as a result of our recent initiatives designed to improve our long-term performance, such as our store refurbishment program, field reorganization into separate retail and service teams and human resources recruiting and training initiatives.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we continued to reinvest in our existing stores to redesign their interiors and enhance their exterior appeal. At fiscal 2004 year end, approximately 120 stores were in various stages of remodeling while approximately 15 stores had been grand reopended. During the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005, we grand reopened approximately 70 stores in the Chicago, IL and Philadelphia, PA metropolitan markets, while approximately 30-40 additional stores are expected to be remodeled and grand reopened during the remainder of fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, we expect to remodel and grand reopen an additional 200-250 stores, with the balance expected to be completed in fiscal 2007.
The following discussion explains the material changes in our results of operations for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and the significant developments affecting our financial condition since January 29, 2005. We strongly recommend that you read the audited financial statements and footnotes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.
21
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - July 30, 2005
Our cash requirements arise principally from capital expenditures related to existing stores, offices and warehouses and from the purchase of inventory. The primary capital expenditures for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 were attributed to capital maintenance of our existing stores and offices including store remodels. During this period, we invested $42,463,000 in property and equipment. We estimate that capital expenditures related to existing stores, warehouses and offices during the remainder of fiscal 2005 will be approximately $67,500,000, related primarily to the redesign of our existing stores.
We anticipate that our net cash provided by operating activities and our existing line of credit will exceed our principal cash requirements for capital expenditures, debt maturities and inventory purchases in fiscal 2005. The Company expects to utilize current debt facilities and the capital markets to refinance certain indebtedness in 2006 or 2007 in order to fund maturing debt liabilities and capital investments in the business.
Working Capital decreased from $180,651,000 at January 29, 2005 to $51,430,000 at July 30, 2005. At July 30, 2005, we had stockholders’ equity of $650,694,000 and long-term debt, net of current maturities, of $334,534,000. Our long-term debt was 34% of our total capitalization at July 30, 2005 and 42% at January 29, 2005. As of July 30, 2005, we had an available line of credit totaling $225,671,000.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, as a convenience to our vendors, we entered into a vendor financing program with an availability of $20,000,000. Under this program, the Company’s factor makes accelerated and discounted payments to our vendors and the Company, in turn, makes its regularly scheduled full vendor payments to the factor. As of July 30, 2005, the Company had an outstanding balance of $12,071,000 under these arrangements, classified as trade payable program liability in the consolidated balance sheet.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following charts represent the Company’s total contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of July 30, 2005:
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
| Due in less |
| Due in |
| Due in |
| Due After |
| |||||
Obligation |
| Total |
| than 1 year |
| 1-3 years |
| 3-5 years |
| 5 years |
| |||||
Long-term debt (1) |
| $ | 478,505 |
| $ | 144,048 |
| $ | 119,254 |
| $ | 15,012 |
| $ | 200,191 |
|
Operating leases |
| 504,011 |
| 62,943 |
| 119,829 |
| 86,647 |
| 234,592 |
| |||||
Expected scheduled interest payments on all long-term debt |
| 175,343 |
| 30,872 |
| 41,179 |
| 30,000 |
| 73,292 |
| |||||
Capital leases |
| 490 |
| 413 |
| 77 |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Unconditional purchase obligation |
| 3,572 |
| 3,572 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Total cash obligations |
| $ | 1,161,921 |
| $ | 241,848 |
| $ | 280,339 |
| $ | 131,659 |
| $ | 508,075 |
|
(1) Long-term debt includes current maturities
The table excludes our pension obligation. Future plan contributions are dependent upon actual plan asset returns and interest rates. In our financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005, we disclosed that we expected to contribute $1,090,000 to our pension plan in fiscal 2005. As of July 30, 2005, $1,288,000 of contributions have been made, due to significant payments made to two former employees. We now anticipate total pension contributions for fiscal 2005 to be $1,440,000.
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
| Due in less |
| Due in |
| Due in |
| Due After |
| |||||
Commercial Commitments |
| Total |
| than 1 year |
| 1-3 years |
| 3-5 years |
| 5 years |
| |||||
Import letters of credit |
| $ | 3,322 |
| $ | 3,322 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Standby letters of credit |
| 40,093 |
| 26,210 |
| 13,883 |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Surety bonds |
| 10,485 |
| 10,485 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Total commercial commitments |
| $ | 53,900 |
| $ | 40,017 |
| $ | 13,883 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
22
Upon maturity on June 1, 2005, the Company retired the remaining $40,444,000 aggregate principal amount of its 7% Senior Notes with cash from operations and its existing line of credit. In December 2004, the Company repurchased, through a tender offer, $59,556 of these notes. In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company reclassified the $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of these notes then outstanding to current liabilities on the balance sheet.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2005 the Company reclassified $100,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.92% Term Enhanced ReMarketable Securities (TERMS) to current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The TERMS’ initial maturity date is July 7, 2006, unless the underwriter exercises its option to remarket the TERMS through a maturity date of July 7, 2016. If the underwriter exercises such option, the Company has the right to redeem the TERMS prior to such remarketing. The redemption price is based upon the then present value of the remaining payments on the TERMS through July 17, 2016, at 5.45%, discounted at the 10 year Treasury rate.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005 the Company reclassified, to current liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet, $43,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.88% Medium-Term Notes with a stated maturity date of March 6, 2006.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we announced a share repurchase program for up to $100,000,000 of our common stock. Under the program, we may repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time prior to September 8, 2005. As of January 29, 2005, we had repurchased a total of 3,077,000 shares at an average cost of $12.91 ($39,718,000). The Company repurchased approximately 1,283,000 shares subsequent to July 30, 2005.
In October 2001, we entered into a contractual commitment to purchase media advertising services with equal annual purchase requirements totaling $39,773,000 over four years. The remaining minimum purchase requirement for 2005 (the final year of this commitment) is approximately $3,572,000, which the Company expects to meet.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company entered into an operating lease for up to $35,000,000 of certain warehousing and information systems equipment at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. In accordance with FIN 45, the Company has recorded a liability for the fair value of a guarantee associated with this lease. In the second quarter of 2005, we increased our commitments under this lease by $7,532,000. As of July 30, 2005, we had outstanding commitments of $23,688,000 under the lease.
RESTRUCTURING
Following the Profit Enhancement Plan launched in October 2000, the Company conducted a comprehensive review of its operations including individual store performance, the entire management infrastructure and our merchandise and service offerings. On July 31, 2003, the Company announced several restructuring initiatives aimed at realigning its business and continuing to improve upon its profitability. These actions were substantially completed by January 31, 2004 with net costs of approximately $65,986,000. The Company is accounting for these initiatives in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” and SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
STORE CLOSURES
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, our discontinued operations continues to reflect the operating results for the stores remaining from the 33 stores closed on July 31, 2003 as part of our corporate restructuring (see Note 7).
Sales of Stores in Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company sold a closed store for proceeds of $931,000 resulting in a pre-tax gain of $341,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company sold assets held for disposal for proceeds of $3,652,000 resulting in a loss of $157,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company sold assets held for disposal for proceeds of $6,879,000 resulting in a gain of $172,000, which was recorded in discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of operations.
Other Store Sales and Transfers
During the second quarter of 2005 the Company sold a closed store classified as an asset held for disposal for proceeds of $6,912,000 resulting in a pre-tax gain of $5,176,000, which was recorded in costs of merchandise sales on the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2005 the Company sold a closed store classified as an asset held for use for proceeds of $659,000 resulting in a pre-tax loss of $502,000, which was recorded in costs of merchandise sales on the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company reclassified a store in assets held for disposal at April 29, 2005 to assets held for use in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144, as the Company concluded that the sale of the store was no longer expected to occur within one year. This store is valued at its fair value at the date of the subsequent decision to transfer it, which was lower than its carrying amount before it was classified as held for sale adjusted for depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the asset been continuously classified as held and used. The results of operations of this store are not material for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively, and therefore have not been reclassified into continuing operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
23
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents for the periods indicated certain items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues (except as otherwise provided) and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period.
|
| Percentage of Total Revenues |
| Percentage Change |
| ||
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| Favorable |
|
Thirteen weeks ended |
| (Fiscal 2005) |
| (Fiscal 2004) |
| (Unfavorable) |
|
Merchandise Sales |
| 83.2 | % | 82.4 | % | (1.7 | )% |
Service Revenue (1) |
| 16.8 |
| 17.6 |
| (7.5 | ) |
Total Revenues |
| 100.0 |
| 100.0 |
| (2.7 | ) |
Costs of Merchandise Sales (2) |
| 72.4 | (3) | 71.1 | (3) | (0.1 | ) |
Costs of Service Revenue (2) |
| 89.7 | (3) | 77.1 | (3) | (7.6 | ) |
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 75.3 |
| 72.1 |
| (1.5 | ) |
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 27.6 | (3) | 28.9 | (3) | (6.1 | ) |
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 10.3 | (3) | 22.9 | (3) | (58.4 | ) |
Total Gross Profit |
| 24.7 |
| 27.9 |
| (13.7 | ) |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 23.0 |
| 23.0 |
| 2.6 |
|
Operating Profit |
| 1.7 |
| 4.9 |
| (66.4 | ) |
Non-operating Income |
| 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
| 2.8 |
|
Interest Expense |
| 1.6 |
| 1.3 |
| (18.4 | ) |
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
| 0.2 |
| 3.7 |
| (95.8 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense |
| 8.4 | (4) | 37.0 | (4) | 99.0 |
|
Net Earnings from Continuing Operations |
| 0.1 |
| 2.2 |
| (93.8 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.1 |
| (0.1 | ) | 124.6 |
|
Net Earnings |
| 0.2 |
| 2.1 |
| (91.8 | ) |
(1) Service revenue consists of the labor charge for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials.
(2) Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
(3) As a percentage of related sales or revenue, as applicable.
(4) As a percentage of earnings before income taxes.
24
Thirteen Weeks Ended July 30, 2005 vs. Thirteen Weeks Ended July 31, 2004
Total revenues for the second quarter decreased 2.7%. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in comparable revenues (revenues generated by locations in operation during the same period) of 2.5%. Comparable merchandise sales decreased 1.5% while comparable service revenue decreased 7.4%.
Gross profit from merchandise sales decreased as a percentage of merchandise sales, to 27.6% in fiscal 2005 from 28.9% in fiscal 2004. This was a 6.1% or $8,584,000 decrease from the prior year. This decrease as a percentage of merchandise sales was due primarily to increased warehousing and distribution costs and a decrease in merchandise margins, offset by lower occupancy costs. Warehousing costs increased as a result of transitioning operations to the new distribution center in San Bernardino, CA. The decrease in merchandise margins resulted from a less favorable product mix consisting of more sales from lower margin products, in addition to higher freight costs. The decrease in store occupancy costs was due to a gain of $4,675,000 related to the sale of two closed stores, offset by increased costs associated with the new point-of-sale system.
Gross profit from service revenue decreased, as a percentage of service revenue to 10.3% in fiscal 2005 from 22.9% in fiscal 2004. This was a 58.4% or $14,033,000 decrease from the prior year. This decrease, as a percentage of service revenue, was due to decreased service revenue deleveraging occupancy costs, in addition to increased payroll and benefits. The decrease in service revenue resulted from reduced customer traffic. The increase in payroll and benefits was primarily due to a restructuring of field operations on January 30, 2005 whereby approximately $5,200,000 of payroll and related benefit costs of service personnel assisting in the retail function had previously been recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses, but due to current responsibilities are now recognized in costs of service revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, were 23.0% in fiscal 2005 and in fiscal 2004. These expenses remained constant as a percent of sales due primarily to an increase in administrative and net media expenses, offset by a decrease in store expenses. The increase in administrative expenses was primarily due to higher information systems consulting and recruiting costs, while the increase in media expense was due primarily to decreased vendor support funds for cooperative advertising. The decrease in store expenses was primarily caused by a decrease of approximately $5,200,000 in payroll and related benefit costs (see above explanation of field operations restructuring).
Interest expense increased $1,434,000 due primarily to the issuance of longer term subordinated notes and an increase in weighted average indebtedness.
Results from discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2005 was a profit of $210,000 (net of tax) compared to a loss of $852,000 (net of tax) in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. The income recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 is due to a gain on the sale of assets held for disposal related to a closed store.
Net earnings decreased, as a percentage of total revenues, due primarily to a decrease in total gross profit, as a percentage of sales.
25
Results of Operations -
The following table presents for the periods indicated certain items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues (except as otherwise provided) and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period.
|
| Percentage of Total Revenues |
| Percentage Change |
| ||
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| Favorable |
|
Twenty-six weeks ended |
| (Fiscal 2005) |
| (Fiscal 2004) |
| (Unfavorable) |
|
Merchandise Sales |
| 82.7 | % | 81.9 | % | (0.5 | )% |
Service Revenue (1) |
| 17.3 |
| 18.1 |
| (6.1 | ) |
Total Revenues |
| 100.0 |
| 100.0 |
| (1.5 | ) |
Costs of Merchandise Sales (2) |
| 73.0 | (3) | 70.8 | (3) | (2.5 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of Service Revenue (2) |
| 86.6 | (3) | 75.8 | (3) | (7.2 | ) |
Total Costs of Revenues |
| 75.3 |
| 71.7 |
| (3.4 | ) |
Gross Profit from Merchandise Sales |
| 27.0 | (3) | 29.2 | (3) | (7.9 | ) |
Gross Profit from Service Revenue |
| 13.4 | (3) | 24.2 | (3) | (47.9 | ) |
Total Gross Profit |
| 24.7 |
| 28.3 |
| (14.1 | ) |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
| 23.5 |
| 23.0 |
| (0.8 | ) |
Operating Profit |
| 1.2 |
| 5.3 |
| (78.8 | ) |
Non-operating Income |
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 109.1 |
|
Interest Expense |
| 1.6 |
| 1.5 |
| (6.1 | ) |
(Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations |
| (0.2 | ) | 3.9 |
| (106.4 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense |
| (46.6 | )(4) | 37.0 | (4) | 108.1 |
|
Net (Loss) Earnings from Continuing Operations |
| (0.1 | ) | 2.4 |
| (105.4 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax |
| 0.0 |
| (0.1 | ) | 87.1 |
|
Net Earnings (Loss) |
| (0.1 | ) | 2.3 |
| (106.4 | ) |
(1) Service revenue consists of the labor charge for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials.
(2) Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, buying, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
(3) As a percentage of related sales or revenue, as applicable.
(4) As a percentage of earnings before income taxes.
26
Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2005 vs. Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 31, 2004
Total revenues for the first twenty-six weeks decreased 1.5%. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in comparable revenues (revenues generated by locations in operation during the same period) of 1.4%. Comparable merchandise sales decreased 0.4%, while comparable service revenue decreased 6.0%.
Gross profit from merchandise sales decreased, as a percentage of merchandise sales, to 27.0% in fiscal 2005 from 29.2% in fiscal 2004. This was a 7.9% or $21,934,000 decrease from the prior year. This decrease as a percentage of merchandise sales was due primarily to increased warehousing and distribution and occupancy costs, and a decrease in merchandise margin. Warehousing costs increased as a result of transitioning operations to the new distribution center in San Bernardino, CA. The increase in store occupancy costs was due to increased costs associated with the new point-of-sale system and building and equipment maintenance expenses related to the store refurbishment program, offset by a gain of $4,100,000 related to the sale of two closed stores. The decrease in merchandise margin resulted from a less favorable product mix consisting of more sales from lower margin products, in addition to higher freight costs.
Gross profit from service revenue decreased, as a percentage of service revenue to 13.4% in fiscal 2005 from 24.2% in fiscal 2004. This was a 47.9% or $24,270,000 decrease from the prior year. This decrease, as a percentage of service revenue, was due to decreased service revenue deleveraging occupancy costs, in addition to increased payroll and benefits. The decrease in service revenue resulted from reduced customer traffic. The increase in payroll and benefits was primarily due to a restructuring of field operations on January 30, 2005 whereby approximately $9,884,000 of payroll and related benefit costs of service personnel assisting in the retail function had previously been recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses, but due to current responsibilities are now recognized in costs of service revenue.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased, as a percentage of total revenues, to 23.5% in fiscal 2005 from 23.0% in fiscal 2004. This was a 0.8% or $2,206,000 increase from the prior year. This increase, as a percentage of total revenues, was due primarily to an increase in both administrative and net media expenses, offset by a decrease in store expenses. The increase in administrative expenses was primarily due to higher information systems consulting, recruiting, and meeting costs. The increase in net media expense was due primarily to incremental circular advertising and sales promotion expenses of approximately $9,688,000 related to the grand reopenings, and decreased vendor support funds for cooperative advertising. The decrease in store expenses was primarily caused by a decrease of approximately $9,884,000 in payroll and related benefit costs (see above explanation of field operations restructuring), offset by increased workers’ compensation expense, and increased travel expense associated with the store refurbishment program.
Interest expense increased $1,051,000 due primarily to the issuance of longer term subordinated notes and an increase in weighted average indebtedness.
Results from discontinued operations for 2005 was a loss of $178,000 (net of tax) compared to a loss of $1,383,000 (net of tax) in 2004. The change was due primarily to fewer stores in discontinued operations in 2005.
Net earnings decreased, as a percentage of total revenues, due primarily to a decrease in gross profit from merchandise sales, an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and an increase in interest expense, offset by a decrease in the loss from discontinued operations.
27
INDUSTRY COMPARISON
We operate in the U.S. automotive aftermarket, which has two general competitive arenas: the Do-It-For-Me (“DIFM”) (service labor, installed merchandise and tires) market and the Do-It-Yourself (“DIY”) (retail merchandise) market. Generally, the specialized automotive retailers focus on either the “DIY” or “DIFM” areas of the business. We believe that our operation in both the “DIY” and “DIFM” areas of the business positively differentiates us from most of our competitors. Although we manage our store performance at a store level in aggregate, we believe that the following presentation shows the comparison against competitors within the two areas. We compete in the “DIY” area of the business through our retail sales floor and commercial sales business (Retail Sales). Our Service Center Revenue (labor, installed merchandise and tires) primarily competes in the DIFM area of the industry. The following table presents the revenues and gross profit for each area of the business.
|
| Thirteen weeks ended |
| Twenty-six weeks ended |
| ||||||||
|
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| July 30, 2005 |
| July 31, 2004 |
| ||||
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
| Amount |
| Amount |
| Amount |
| Amount |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Retail Sales (1) |
| $ | 355,593 |
| $ | 359,612 |
| $ | 694,948 |
| $ | 696,661 |
|
Service Center Revenue (2) |
| 221,825 |
| 233,814 |
| 446,696 |
| 462,898 |
| ||||
Total Revenues |
| $ | 577,418 |
| $ | 593,426 |
| $ | 1,141,644 |
| $ | 1,159,559 |
|
Gross Profit from Retail Sales (3) |
| $ | 98,274 |
| $ | 99,035 |
| $ | 183,327 |
| $ | 196,214 |
|
Gross Profit from Service Center Revenue (3) |
| 44,585 |
| 66,441 |
| 98,153 |
| 131,470 |
| ||||
Total Gross Profit |
| $ | 142,859 |
| $ | 165,476 |
| $ | 281,480 |
| $ | 327,684 |
|
(1) Excludes revenues from installed products.
(2) Includes revenues from installed products.
(3) Gross Profit from Retail Sales includes the cost of products sold (excluding installations), buying, warehousing nd store occupancy costs. Gross Profit from Service Center Revenue includes the cost of installed products sold, buying, warehousing, service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
28
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections- a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3”. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that retrospective application of a change in accounting principle be limited to the direct effects of the change. Indirect effects of a change in accounting principle, such as a change in nondiscretionary profit-sharing payments resulting from an accounting change, should be recognized in the period of the accounting change. SFAS No. 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, nonfinancial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Early adoption is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 154 as applicable beginning in fiscal 2006.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation Number (FIN) 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”, an interpretation of SFAS 143 (Asset Retirement Obligations). FIN 47 addresses diverse accounting practices that have developed with regard to the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity should have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The provision is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company has not determined the impact that the adoption of FIN 47 will have on its financial position results of operations of cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) or SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supercedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and subsequently issued stock option related guidance. This statement establishes standards for the accounting of transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services, primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods and services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. Entities will be required to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). The grant-date fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models. If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.
The Company was initially required to apply SFAS No. 123R to all awards granted, modified or settled as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. However, on April 14, 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a press release that postpones the application of SFAS No. 123R to no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. For the Company, this is the fiscal year beginning January 29, 2006. The statement also requires the Company to use either the modified-prospective method or modified retrospective method in its transition. Under the modified-prospective method, the Company must recognize compensation cost for all awards subsequent to adopting the standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards outstanding upon adoption. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company must restate its previously issued financial statements to recognize the amounts it previously calculated and reported on a pro-forma basis, as if the prior standard had been adopted. Under both methods, the statement permits the use of either the straight-line or an accelerated method to amortize the cost as an expense for awards with graded vesting. The standard permits and encourages early adoption.
29
The Company has commenced its analysis of the impact of SFAS No. 123R, but has not yet decided: (1) whether to elect early adoption, (2) the early adoption date, if elected, (3) the use of the modified-prospective or modified retrospective method and (4) the election to use straight-line or an accelerated method. Accordingly, the Company has not determined the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. SFAS No. 153 amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provision is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s current financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “ Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 ‘inventory Pricing’.” The standard requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. The provision is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to customer incentives, product returns and warranty obligations, bad debts, inventories, income taxes, financing operations, restructuring costs, retirement benefits, risk participation agreements and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies that may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” as reported in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2005, which disclosures are hereby incorporated by reference.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “guidance,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimates,” “forecasts” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include management’s expectations regarding future financial performance, automotive aftermarket trends, levels of competition, business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and litigation. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements due to factors beyond the control of the Company, including the strength of the national and regional economies, retail and commercial consumers’ ability to spend, the health of the various sectors of the automotive aftermarket, the weather in geographical regions with a high concentration of the Company’s stores, competitive pricing, the location and number of competitors’ stores, product and labor costs and the additional factors described in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company does not utilize financial instruments for trading purposes and holds no derivative financial instruments, that could expose the Company to significant market risk. The Company’s primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is to changes in interest rates. Pursuant to the terms of its revolving credit agreement, changes in the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) could affect the rates at which the Company could borrow funds thereunder. At July 30, 2005, the Company had an outstanding balance of $14,967,000 under this facility.
Additionally, we have $132,000,000 of real estate operating leases, which vary based on changes in LIBOR. The outstanding balance of these leases was $124,905,000 as of July 30, 2005. We have entered into an interest rate swap, which was designated as a cash flow hedge to convert the variable LIBOR portion of these lease payments to a fixed rate of 2.90%, terminating on July 1, 2008 (coterminous with the leases noted above). If the critical terms of the interest rate swap or the hedge item do not change, the interest rate swap will be considered to be highly effective with all changes in fair value included in other comprehensive income. As of July 30, 2005 and January 29, 2005, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $5,282,000 ($3,334,000 net of tax) and $3,721,000 ($2,351,000, net of tax) and these changes in value were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
In connection with the filing of this Form 10-Q, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, re-evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
31
On July 20, 2005, we received a letter from counsel to the court-appointed receiver of Nikota USA, Inc. (a former merchandise vendor since 2003), which ceased operations in March 2005 after a lender foreclosed on a loan. The letter proposed a meeting between the Company and the counsels for the receiver and the lender to discuss an ongoing dispute between the Company and the receiver regarding the Company’s accounts payable balance and certain returned defective merchandise. The letter included sweeping allegations with respect to the Company’s business practices and was accompanied by a draft complaint against the Company and certain of its employees that alleges breach of contract, unfair business practices under the California Commercial Code, accounting fraud and RICO violations, and purports to seek class action relief for all merchandise vendors to the Company. The Company believes that these allegations are entirely without merit and that the transactions questioned by the receiver’s counsel were properly documented, accounted for and immaterial to the Company’s financial position and results of operations at all times. As of the date of this report, no complaint has been filed, but if necessary, the Company will vigorously defend this matter.
An action entitled “Tomas Diaz Rodriguez; Energy Tech Corporation v. Pep Boys Corporation; Manny, Moe & Jack Corp. Puerto Rico, Inc. d/b/a Pep Boys” was instituted against the Company in the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico, Bayamon Superior Division on March 15, 2002. The action was subsequently removed to, and is currently pending in, the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Plaintiffs are distributors of a product that claims to improve gas mileage. The plaintiffs alleged that the Company entered into an agreement with them to act as the exclusive retailer of the product in Puerto Rico that was breached when the Company determined to stop selling the product. On March 29, 2004, the Company’s motion for summary judgment was granted and the case was dismissed. The plaintiff appealed and, on June 3, 2005, the United States Court of Appeal for the First Circuit vacated the summary judgment order and remanded the case to the Court of First Instance of Puerto Rico, Bayamon Superior Division for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Company continues to believe that the claims are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend this action.
The Company is also party to various other actions and claims, including purported class actions, arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with the foregoing matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
32
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
An annual meeting of shareholders was held on June 8, 2005. The shareholders elected the directors shown below.
Directors Elected at Annual Meeting of Shareholders
Name |
| Votes For |
| Votes Withheld |
|
Benjamin Strauss |
| 43,421,604 |
| 12,191,505 |
|
Malcolmn D. Pryor |
| 43,890,579 |
| 11,722,530 |
|
Peter A. Bassi |
| 43,890,324 |
| 11,722,785 |
|
Jane Scaccetti |
| 44,168,822 |
| 11,444,287 |
|
John T. Sweetwood |
| 44,082,069 |
| 11,530,740 |
|
William Leonard |
| 43,902,134 |
| 11,710,975 |
|
Lawrence N. Stevenson |
| 44,068,732 |
| 11,544,377 |
|
M. Shan Atkins |
| 44,200,416 |
| 11,412,693 |
|
Robert H. Hotz |
| 52,361,864 |
| 3,251,245 |
|
The shareholders also voted on the appointment of the Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche, LLP, with 55,184,224 affirmative votes, 346,773 negative votes and 82,112 abstentions.
The shareholders also voted on a shareholder proposal regarding the Company’s Shareholder Rights Plan with 33,050,933 affirmative votes, 10,509,530 negative votes, 322,891 abstentions and 11,729,755 broker nonvotes.
None.
(31.1)** |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(31.2)** |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(32.1)** |
| Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(32.2)** |
| Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
** - - Filed herewith
33
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK |
| ||||||
| (Registrant) |
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Date: | September 7, 2005 |
|
| by: | /s/ Harry F. Yanowitz |
| ||
|
|
| ||||||
|
| Harry F. Yanowitz |
| |||||
|
| Senior Vice President and |
| |||||
34
(31.1)** |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(31.2)** |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(32.1)** |
| Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(32.2)** |
| Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
** - - Filed herewith
35