Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack (PBY) 10-Q 2011 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 30, 2011
OR
o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from             to           

Commission File No.  1-3381

The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	23-0962915
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer ID number)
incorporation or organization)
3111 W. Allegheny Ave. Philadelphia, PA	19132
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

215-430-9000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o  No  x

As of August 26, 2011, there were 52,674,692 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

Index

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets — July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations - Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010	5
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29
Item 5.	Other Information	30
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	30
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	30
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	30
Item 5.	Other Information	30
Item 6.	Exhibits	31
SIGNATURES		32
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		33

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

	July 30, 2011			January 29, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	61,977		$	90,240
Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,191 and $1,551	21,731			19,540
Merchandise inventories	584,297			564,402
Prepaid expenses	19,694			28,542
Other current assets	50,891			60,812
Total current assets	738,590			763,536
Property and equipment - net	693,742			700,981
Goodwill	48,584			2,549
Deferred income taxes	67,988			66,019
Other long-term assets	31,700			23,587
Total assets	$	1,580,604		$	1,556,672
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	230,884		$	210,440
Trade payable program liability	61,440			56,287
Accrued expenses	206,627			236,028
Deferred income taxes	58,825			56,335
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,079			1,079
Total current liabilities	558,855			560,169
Long-term debt less current maturities	294,583			295,122
Other long-term liabilities	75,688			70,046
Deferred gain from asset sales	146,573			152,875
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $1 per share: authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 68,557,041 shares	68,557			68,557
Additional paid-in capital	295,934			295,361
Retained earnings	424,923			402,600
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(15,870		)	(17,028		)
Treasury stock, at cost — 15,883,352 shares and 15,971,910 shares	(268,639		)	(271,030		)
Total stockholders’ equity	504,905			478,460
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,580,604		$	1,556,672

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	July 30, 2011			July 31, 2010			July 30, 2011			July 31, 2010
Merchandise sales	$	415,267		$	406,179		$	823,894		$	815,368
Service revenue	107,327			98,676			212,240			199,520
Total revenues	522,594			504,855			1,036,134			1,014,888
Costs of merchandise sales	287,721			282,362			573,050			566,158
Costs of service revenue	99,663			87,992			192,752			176,634
Total costs of revenues	387,384			370,354			765,802			742,792
Gross profit from merchandise sales	127,546			123,817			250,844			249,210
Gross profit from service revenue	7,664			10,684			19,488			22,886
Total gross profit	135,210			134,501			270,332			272,096
Selling, general and administrative expenses	113,268			113,108			222,168			224,740
Net (loss) gain from dispositions of assets	(3		)	2,449			86			2,494
Operating profit	21,939			23,842			48,250			49,850
Non-operating income	569			621			1,156			1,205
Interest expense	6,444			6,643			12,941			13,251
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and discontinued operations	16,064			17,820			36,465			37,804
Income tax expense	2,173			7,021			10,169			14,845
Earnings from continuing operations before discontinued operations	13,891			10,799			26,296			22,959
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	52			(201		)	15			(411		)
Net earnings	13,943			10,598			26,311			22,548
Retained earnings, beginning of period	412,716			384,451			402,600			374,836
Cash dividends	(1,586		)	(1,581		)	(3,171		)	(3,160		)
Shares issued and other	(150		)	(223		)	(817		)	(979		)
Retained earnings, end of period	$	424,923		$	393,245		$	424,923		$	393,245
Basic earnings per share:
Earnings from continuing operations	$	0.26		$	0.21		$	0.49		$	0.44
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—			(0.01		)	—			(0.01		)
Basic earnings per share	$	0.26		$	0.20		$	0.49		$	0.43
Diluted earnings per share:
Earnings from continuing operations	$	0.26		$	0.20		$	0.49		$	0.43
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—			—			—			—
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.26		$	0.20		$	0.49		$	0.43
Cash dividends per share	$	0.03		$	0.03		$	0.06		$	0.06

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

Twenty-six weeks ended	July 30, 2011			July 31, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	26,311		$	22,548
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by continuing operations:
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	(15		)	411
Depreciation and amortization	39,654			36,656
Amortization of deferred gain from asset sales	(6,302		)	(6,299		)
Stock compensation expense	1,908			1,998
Deferred income taxes	4,238			5,600
Net gain from disposition of assets	(86		)	(2,494		)
Loss from asset impairment	389			970
Other	272			179
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions:
Decrease in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other	21,816			19,673
(Increase) decrease in merchandise inventories	(12,917		)	186
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	12,043			(6,298		)
Decrease in accrued expenses	(33,202		)	(14,917		)
(Decrease) increase in other long-term liabilities	(2,831		)	911
Net cash provided by continuing operations	51,278			59,124
Net cash used in discontinued operations	(44		)	(1,249		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	51,234			57,875
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(30,636		)	(27,284		)
Proceeds from dispositions of assets	89			4,077
Premiums paid on life insurance policies	(795		)	(500		)
Collateral investment	(4,763		)	500
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(42,757		)	(144		)
Net cash used in continuing operations	(78,862		)	(23,351		)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations	—			569
Net cash used in investing activities	(78,862		)	(22,782		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under line of credit agreements	5,045			16,290
Payments under line of credit agreements	(5,045		)	(16,290		)
Borrowings on trade payable program liability	59,097			63,808
Payments on trade payable program liability	(53,944		)	(42,627		)
Payment for finance issuance cost	(2,441		)	—
Debt payments	(539		)	(540		)
Dividends paid	(3,171		)	(3,160		)
Other	363			463
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(635		)	17,944
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(28,263		)	53,037
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	90,240			39,326
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	61,977		$	92,363
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	629		$	810
Cash paid for interest	$	11,523		$	11,452
Non-cash investing activities:
Accrued purchases of property and equipment	$	1,416		$	662

See notes to consolidated financial statements

5

THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack and subsidiaries (the “Company”) consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales, costs and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and other related disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and the Company includes any revisions to its estimates in the results for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted, as permitted by Rule 10-01 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X, “Interim Financial Statements.” It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011. The results of operations for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year.

The consolidated financial statements presented herein are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of July 30, 2011 and for all periods presented have been made.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Accordingly, references to fiscal years 2011 and 2010 refer to the fiscal year ending January 28, 2012 and the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011, respectively.

The Company maintains a trade payable program that is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase account receivables owed by the Company from its vendors. The Company, in turn, makes the regularly scheduled full vendor payments to the bank participants. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 as a result of the Company’s review, the Company determined that the gross amount of borrowings and payments on the trade payable program shown on the statement of cash flows under “Cash flows from financing activities” included certain vendors that had not participated in the trade payable program. As such, the Company made an equal and offsetting adjustment to reduce the trade payables borrowings and payments line items within financing activities by $106.1 million for the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2010. The full year impact of this adjustment is to reduce the line items $225.2 million and $90.3 million for the years ended January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively.  These adjustments have no net impact on net cash used in financing activities or on any other cash flow line items.

NOTE 2—NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-29 “Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations” (“ASU 2010-29”). This accounting standard update clarifies that SEC registrants presenting comparative financial statements should disclose in their pro forma information revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for material business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 during the first quarter of the current fiscal year.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU 2011-04”), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2011-04 and has not yet determined the impact the adoption will have on the consolidated financial statements.

6

In June of 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 was issued to improve the comparability of financial reporting between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and eliminates previous U.S. GAAP guidance that allowed an entity to present components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as part of its statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. With the issuance of ASU 2011-05, companies are now required to report all components of OCI either in a single continuous statement of total comprehensive income, which includes components of both OCI and net income, or in a separate statement appearing consecutively with the statement of income. ASU 2011-05 does not affect current guidance for the accounting of the components of OCI, or which items are included within total comprehensive income, and is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The application of this guidance affects presentation only and therefore is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 3—ACQUISITIONS

During the current fiscal year, the Company acquired the assets related to seven service and tire centers located in the Seattle-Tacoma area, the assets related to seven service and tire centers located in the Houston, Texas area and all outstanding shares of capital stock of Tire Stores Group Holding Corporation which operated an 85-store chain in Florida, Georgia and Alabama under the name Big 10. Collectively, the acquired stores produced approximately $94.7 million in sales annually based on audited and unaudited pre-acquisition historical information. The total purchase price of these stores was approximately $42.6 million in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. The acquisitions were financed through cash flows provided by operations. The results of operations of these acquired stores are included in the Company’s results from their respective acquisition dates.

The Company has recorded its initial accounting for these acquisitions in accordance with accounting guidance on business combinations. The acquisitions resulted in goodwill related to, among other things, growth opportunities and assembled workforces. A portion of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The Company has recorded finite-lived intangible assets at their estimated fair value related to trade name, favorable and unfavorable leases.

The Company expensed all costs related to these acquisitions during fiscal 2011. The total costs related to these acquisitions were $1.3 million and are included in the consolidated statement of operations within selling, general and administrative expenses.

The purchase price of the acquisitions have been preliminarily allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, with the remainder recorded as goodwill on the basis of estimated fair values, as follows:

	As of
	Acquisition
(dollar amounts in thousands)	Dates
Current assets	$	11,498
Intangible assets	830
Other non-current assets	7,177
Current liabilities	(13,468		)
Long-term liabilities	(9,458		)
Total net identifiable assets acquired	$	(3,421	)
Total consideration transferred, net of cash acquired	$	42,614
Less: total net identifiable assets acquired	(3,421		)
Goodwill	$	46,035

Intangible assets consist of trade names ($0.6 million) and favorable leases ($0.2 million). Long-term liabilities includes unfavorable leases ($9.1 million). The trade names are being amortized over their estimated useful life of 3 years. The favorable and unfavorable lease intangible assets and liabilities are being amortized to rent expense over their respective lease terms, ranging from 2 to 16 years.

7

Sales and net earnings for the fiscal 2011 acquired stores totaled $21.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively for the period from acquisition date through July 30, 2011.

The purchase price allocation remains preliminary for some of the acquired stores due to the finalization of certain valuation adjustments. The Company believes that this will be finalized by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and that any adjustments to the purchase price allocation will not be material.

As our acquisitions (including Big 10) were immaterial to our operating results both individually and in aggregate for the thirteen and twenty six week periods ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, pro forma results of operations are not disclosed.

NOTE 4—MERCHANDISE INVENTORIES

Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each fiscal year based on inventory and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs. If the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method of costing inventory had been used by the Company, inventory would have been $518.6 million and $486.0 million as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively.

The Company’s inventory, consisting primarily of auto parts and accessories, is used on vehicles typically having long lives. Because of this, and combined with the Company’s historical experience of returning excess inventory to the Company’s vendors for full credit, the risk of obsolescence is minimal. The Company establishes a reserve for excess inventory for instances where less than full credit will be received for such returns or where the Company anticipates items will be sold at retail prices that are less than recorded costs. The reserve is based on management’s judgment, including estimates and assumptions regarding marketability of products, the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods and on historical experiences where the Company received less than full credit from vendors for product returns. The Company also provides for estimated inventory shrinkage based upon historical levels and the results of its cycle counting program. The Company’s inventory adjustments for these matters were approximately $5.5 million at July 30, 2011 and $6.0 million at January 29, 2011.

NOTE 5—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The Company’s property and equipment as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011 was as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30, 2011			January 29, 2011
Property and equipment
Land	$	204,023		$	204,023
Buildings and improvements	857,687			848,268
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	707,709			685,481
Construction in progress	4,020			8,781
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(1,079,697		)	(1,045,572		)
Property and equipment — net	$	693,742		$	700,981

NOTE 6—WARRANTY RESERVE

The Company provides warranties for both its merchandise sales and service labor. Warranties for merchandise are generally covered by the respective vendors, with the Company covering any costs above the vendor’s stipulated allowance. Service labor is warranted in full by the Company for a limited specific time period. The Company establishes its warranty reserves based on historical experiences. These costs are included in either costs of merchandise sales or costs of service revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

The reserve for warranty cost activity for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 and the fifty-two weeks ended January 29, 2011 is as follows:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30,2011			January 29, 2011
Beginning balance	$	673		$	694
Additions related to current period sales	6,346			12,261
Warranty costs incurred in current period	(6,346		)	(12,282		)
Ending balance	$	673		$	673

8

NOTE 7—DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

The following are the components of debt and financing arrangements:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30, 2011			January 29, 2011
7.50% Senior Subordinated Notes, due December 2014	$	147,565		$	147,565
Senior Secured Term Loan, due October 2013	148,097			148,636
Revolving Credit Agreement, expiring July 2016	—			—
Long-term debt	295,662			296,201
Current maturities	(1,079		)	(1,079		)
Long-term debt less current maturities	$	294,583		$	295,122

As of July 30, 2011, 126 stores collateralized the Senior Secured Term Loan.

On July 26, 2011, the Company amended and restated its Revolving Credit Agreement. The Company’s ability to borrow under the Revolving Credit Agreement is based on a specific borrowing base consisting of inventory and accounts receivable up to a maximum availability of $300.0 million. The amendment reduced the interest rate applicable to borrowings by 75 basis points to a rate between London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.00% to 2.50% and extended the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Agreement to July 26, 2016. The related refinancing fees of $2.4 million are being amortized over the new five year life. As of July 30, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement and $30.0 million of availability was utilized to support outstanding letters of credit. Taking this into account and the borrowing base requirements, as of July 30, 2011, there was $201.0 million of availability remaining.

Several of the Company’s debt agreements require compliance with covenants. The most restrictive of these covenants, an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) requirement, is triggered if the Company’s availability under its credit agreement drops below $50.0 million. As of July 30, 2011, the Company had an availability of $201.0 million and was in compliance with all covenants contained in its debt agreements.

Interest rates that are currently available to the Company for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value for debt issues that are not quoted on an exchange. The estimated fair value of long-term debt including current maturities was $300.5 million and $298.3 million as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively.

NOTE 8—SALE-LEASEBACK TRANSACTIONS

The Company did not execute any sale-leaseback transactions during the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011. During the twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2010, the Company sold one property to an unrelated third party for net proceeds of $1.6 million. Concurrent with this sale, the Company entered into an agreement to lease the property back from the purchaser over a minimum lease term of 15 years. The Company classified this lease as an operating lease. The Company actively uses this property and considers the lease as a normal leaseback. The Company recorded a deferred gain of $0.4 million.

The Company operated 725 store locations at July 30, 2011, of which 232 were owned and 493 were leased.

9

NOTE 9—INCOME TAXES

The Company recognizes taxes payable for the current year, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. The Company must assess the likelihood that any recorded deferred tax assets will be recovered against future taxable income. To the extent the Company believes it is more likely than not that the asset will not be recoverable, a valuation allowance must be established. All available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered to determine whether based on the weight of that evidence a valuation allowance is needed. To establish this positive evidence, the Company considers future projections of income and various tax planning strategies for generating income sufficient to utilize the deferred tax assets. Due to an organizational restructuring of its subsidiaries and the Company’s improved profitability and projected future income, the Company released $3.4 million (net of federal tax) of valuation allowance relating primarily to certain unitary state net operating loss carryforwards and credits during the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011.

For income tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011, the Company did not have a material change to its uncertain tax position liabilities.

NOTE 10—ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following are the components of other comprehensive income:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended					Twenty-six Weeks Ended
(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30, 2011		July 31, 2010			July 30, 2011		July 31, 2010
Net earnings	$	13,943	$	10,598		$	26,311	$	22,548
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Defined benefit plan adjustment	253		265			473		530
Derivative financial instrument adjustment	170		(1,800		)	685		(1,597		)
Comprehensive income	$	14,366	$	9,063		$	27,469	$	21,481

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30, 2011			January 29, 2011
Defined benefit plan adjustment, net of tax	$	(6,103	)	$	(6,576	)
Derivative financial instrument adjustment, net of tax	(9,767		)	(10,452		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(15,870	)	$	(17,028	)

NOTE 11—IMPAIRMENTS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded a $0.4 million and a $0.8 million impairment charge, respectively, related to stores classified as held and used. The Company used a probability-weighted approach and estimates of expected future cash flows to determine the fair value of the stores. Discount and growth rate assumptions were derived from current economic conditions, management’s expectations and projected trends of current operating results. The fair market value estimate is classified as a Level 3 measure within the fair value hierarchy. Of the $0.4 million impairment charge in fiscal 2011, $0.1 million was charged to costs of merchandise sales, and $0.3 million was charged to costs of service revenues. Of the $0.8 million impairment charge in fiscal 2010, $0.6 million was charged to costs of merchandise sales, and $0.2 million was charged to costs of service revenue.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company also recorded a $0.2 million impairment charge related to a store classified as held for disposal. The Company lowered its selling price reflecting declines in the commercial real estate market. The fair market value of the store is classified as a Level 2 measure within the fair value hierarchy. Substantially all of this impairment was charged to costs of merchandise sales.

The Company did not sell any properties during the twenty-six week period ending July 30, 2011.

During the thirteen week period ended July 31, 2010, the Company sold one store classified as held for disposal for net proceeds of $0.8 million and recognized a net gain of $0.2 million. During the twenty-six week period ended July 31, 2010, the Company sold

10

four stores classified as held for disposal for net proceeds of $2.9 million and recognized a net gain of $0.3 million.

Assets held for sale were $0.4 million as of July 30, 2011 and $0.5 million as of January 29, 2011 and are recorded within other current assets.

NOTE 12—EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for earnings from continuing operations and net earnings:

		Thirteen Weeks Ended					Twenty-six Weeks Ended
(in thousands, except per share amounts)		July 30, 2011		July 31, 2010			July 30, 2011		July 31, 2010
(a)	Earnings from continuing operations	$	13,891	$	10,799		$	26,296	$	22,959
	Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax	52		(201		)	15		(411		)
	Net earnings	$	13,943	$	10,598		$	26,311	$	22,548
(b)	Basic average number of common shares outstanding during period	52,952		52,682			52,901		52,609
	Common shares assumed issued upon exercise of dilutive stock options, net of assumed repurchase, at the average market price	697		447			691		426
(c)	Diluted average number of common shares assumed outstanding during period	53,649		53,129			53,592		53,035
	Basic earnings per share:
	Earnings from continuing operations (a/b)	$	0.26	$	0.21		$	0.49	$	0.44
	Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		(0.01		)	—		(0.01		)
	Basic earnings per share	$	0.26	$	0.20		$	0.49	$	0.43
	Diluted earnings per share:
	Net earnings from continuing operations (a/c)	$	0.26	$	0.20		$	0.49	$	0.43
	Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		—			—		—
	Diluted earnings per share	$	0.26	$	0.20		$	0.49	$	0.43

At July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively, there were 2,682,000 and 2,402,000 outstanding options and restricted stock units. Certain stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares for the periods then ended and therefore would be anti-dilutive. The total numbers of such shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation are 830,000 and 1,088,000 for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The total numbers of such shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation

11

are 888,000 and 1,071,000 for the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 13—BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has a qualified 401(k) savings plan and a separate plan for employees residing in Puerto Rico, which cover all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of age with one or more years of service. The Company also maintains a non-qualified defined contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Account Plan”) for key employees designated by the Board of Directors. The Company’s contribution to these plans for fiscal 2011 is contingent upon meeting certain performance metrics. The Company has not recorded any contribution expense for these plans in the first half of 2011. The Company’s expense related to the savings plans and the Account Plan for the thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2010 was approximately $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and for the twenty six-weeks ended July 31, 2010, approximately $1.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

The Company also has a frozen defined benefit pension plan covering the Company’s full-time employees hired on or before February 1, 1992. The Company’s expense for its pension plan follows:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-six Weeks Ended
(dollar amounts in thousands)	July 30, 2011			July 31, 2010			July 30, 2011			July 31, 2010
Interest cost	627			640			1,278			1,280
Expected return on plan assets	(721		)	(537		)	(1,372		)	(1,075		)
Amortization of net loss	405			422			756			843
Net periodic benefit cost	$	311		$	525		$	662		$	1,048

The defined benefit pension plan is subject to minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as amended. While the Company has no minimum funding requirement during fiscal 2011, it made a $3.0 million discretionary contribution to the defined benefit pension plan on April 28, 2011.

NOTE 14—EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company has stock-based compensation plans, under which it grants stock options and restricted stock units to key employees and members of its Board of Directors. The Company generally recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The following table summarizes the options under the Company’s plan:

	Number of Shares
Outstanding — January 29, 2011	1,831,802
Granted	265,139
Exercised	(28,226	)
Forfeited	(2,483	)
Expired	(30,683	)
Outstanding — July 30, 2011	2,035,549

In the first half of fiscal year 2011, the Company granted approximately 265,000 stock options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $5.38. These options have a seven year term and vest over a three year period with a third vesting on each of the three grant date anniversaries. The compensation expense recorded during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011, for the options granted was minimal.

In the first half of fiscal year 2010, the Company granted approximately 303,000 stock options with a weighted average grant date fair value of $4.26. These options have a seven year term and vest over a three year period with a third vesting on each of the three grant date anniversaries. The compensation expense recorded during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2010, for the options granted was minimal.

12

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatilities for a time period similar to that of the expected term blended with market based implied volatility at the time of the grant. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve for issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term.

The following are the weighted-average assumptions:

	July 30, 2011		July 31, 2010
Dividend yield	1.04	%	1.35	%
Expected volatility	58.17	%	55.71	%
Risk-free interest rate range:
High	1.90	%	2.01	%
Low	1.60	%	1.71	%
Ranges of expected lives in years	4 - 5		4 - 5

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

Performance Based Awards

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company granted approximately 95,000 restricted stock units that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and the Company achieves a return on invested capital target for fiscal year 2013. The number of underlying shares that may be issued upon vesting will range from 0% to 150%, depending upon the Company achieving the financial targets in fiscal year 2013. The fair value for these awards was $12.48 at the date of the grant. The compensation expense recorded for these restricted stock units was minimal during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company granted approximately 105,000 restricted stock units that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and the Company achieves a return on invested capital target for fiscal year 2012. The number of underlying shares that may be issued upon vesting will range from 0% to 150%, depending upon the Company achieving the financial targets in fiscal year 2012. The fair value for these awards was $10.34 at the date of the grant. The compensation expense recorded for these restricted stock units during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, was minimal.

Market Based Awards

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company granted approximately 48,000 restricted stock units that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and will become exercisable if the Company satisfies a total shareholder return target in fiscal 2013. The number of underlying shares that may become exercisable will range from 0% to 175% depending upon whether the market condition is achieved. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate a $14.73 grant date fair value. The compensation expense recorded for these restricted stock units during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011, was minimal.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company granted approximately 52,000 restricted stock units that will vest if the employees remain continuously employed through the third anniversary date of the grant and will become exercisable if the Company satisfies a total shareholder return target in fiscal 2012. The number of underlying shares that may become exercisable will range from 0% to 175% depending upon whether the market condition is achieved. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate a $12.99 grant date fair value. The compensation expense recorded for these restricted stock units during the thirteen weeks and twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, was minimal.

Other Awards

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company granted approximately 50,000 and 61,000 restricted stock units related to officers’ deferred bonus matches under the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which vest over a three year period.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company granted approximately 42,000 restricted stock units to its non-employee directors of the board that vested immediately. The fair value was $10.67 per unit and the Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $0.4 million for these restricted stock units.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company granted approximately 52,000 restricted stock units to its non-employee directors of

13

the board that vested immediately. The fair value was $9.55 per unit and the Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $0.5 million for these restricted stock units.

The following table summarizes the units under the Company’s plan, assuming maximum vesting of underlying shares for the performance and market based awards described above:

	Number of RSUs
Nonvested — January 29, 2011	432,331
Granted	321,314
Forfeited	(3,051	)
Vested	(99,911	)
Nonvested — July 30, 2011	650,683

NOTE 15—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVES

The Company’s fair value measurements consist of (a) non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) and (b) all financial assets and liabilities.

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. There is a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table provides information by level for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value, on a recurring basis:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	Fair Value at		Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
Description	July 30, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	61,977	$	61,977	$	—	$	—
Collateral investments (1)	14,400		14,400		—		—
Liabilities:
Current liabilities
Contingent consideration (2)	288		—		—		288
Other liabilities
Derivative liability (3)	15,387		—		15,387		—
Contingent consideration (3)	1,136		—		—		1,136

(dollar amounts in thousands)	Fair Value at		Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as
Description	January 29, 2011		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	90,240	$	90,240	$	—	$	—
Collateral investments (1)	9,638		9,638		—		—
Liabilities:
Current liabilities
Contingent consideration (2)	288		—		—		288
Other liabilities
Derivative liability (3)	16,424		—		16,424		—
Contingent consideration (3)	1,224		—		—		1,224

14

(1) included in other long-term assets

(2) included in accrued liabilities

(3) included in other long-term liabilities

During fiscal 2010, the Company invested $9.6 million in restricted accounts as collateral for its retained liabilities included within existing insurance programs in lieu of previously outstanding letters of credit. During the twenty-six weeks of fiscal 2011, the company invested an additional $4.8 million. The collateral investment is included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Company has one interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge on $145.0 million of the Company’s Senior Secured Term Loan that is due in October 2013. The swap is used to minimize interest rate exposure and overall interest costs by converting the variable component of the total interest rate to a fixed rate of 5.036%. Since February 1, 2008, this swap was deemed to be fully effective and all adjustments in the interest rate swap’s fair value have been recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The table below shows the effect of the Company’s interest rate swap on the consolidated financial statements for the periods indicated:

(dollar amounts in thousands)	Amount of Gain in Other Comprehensive Income/ (Loss) (Effective Portion)			Earnings Statement Classification	Amount of Loss Recognized in Earnings (Effective Portion) (a)
Thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011	$	150		Interest expense	$	(1,772	)
Thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2010	$	(1,801	)	Interest expense	$	(1,753	)
Twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011	$	648		Interest expense	$	(3,491	)
Twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2010	$	(1,621	)	Interest expense	$	(3,448	)

(a) represents the effective portion of the loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

The fair value of the derivative was $15.4 million and $16.4 million payable at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Of the $1.0 million decrease in the fair value during the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011, $0.7 million net of tax was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

Certain assets, such as goodwill and long-lived assets, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances such as when there is evidence of impairment. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered level 2 or level 3 measures under the fair value hierarchy.

NOTE 16—LEGAL MATTERS

The Company is party to various actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with all such matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. However, there exists a reasonable possibility of loss in excess of the amounts accrued, the amount of which cannot currently be estimated. While the Company does not believe that the amount of such excess loss could be material to the Company’s financial position, any such loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the period(s) during which the underlying matters are resolved.

15

NOTE 17—SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTOR INFORMATION

The Company’s Notes are fully and unconditionally and joint and severally guaranteed by certain of the Company’s direct and indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries—namely, The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, The Pep Boys—Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. (the “Pep Boys of Delaware”); Pep Boys—Manny Moe & Jack of Puerto Rico, Inc.; Tire Stores Group Holding Corporation (on and after May 5, 2011); Big 10 Tire Stores, LLC (on and after May 5, 2011) and PBY Corporation (at and prior to January 29, 2011), (collectively, the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). The Notes are not guaranteed by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Colchester Insurance Company.

The following consolidating information presents, in separate columns, the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011 and the related condensed consolidating statements of operations for the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 for (i) the Company (“Pep Boys”) on a parent only basis, with its investment in subsidiaries recorded under the equity method, (ii) the Subsidiary Guarantors on a combined basis, (iii) the subsidiary of the Company that does not guarantee the Notes, and (iv) the Company on a consolidated basis. The Company made an immaterial adjustment to the January 29, 2011 amounts reported for cash, intercompany receivables and intercompany liabilities to account for certain intercompany borrowing activity between Pep Boys and a subsidiary guarantor.

On January 29, 2011, The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack of Pennsylvania made a capital contribution of $264.0 million to Pep Boys of Delaware consisting of intercompany receivables due from the latter. This contribution resulted in an increase in the Pep Boys’ investment in subsidiaries and the Subsidiary Guarantors’ stockholders’ equity. On January 30, 2011, the Company merged PBY Corporation into Pep Boys of Delaware and accordingly, The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California became the wholly owned subsidiary of  Pep Boys of Delaware. This merger did not affect the presentation of the following condensed consolidating information.

On May 5, 2011, The Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack acquired Tire Store Group Holdings Corporation and its subsidiary Big 10 Tire Stores, LLC. As a result of this acquisition, The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack of Pennsylvania increased its investment in subsidiaries by $9.4 million (see Note 3 - Acquisitions).

16

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)

As of July 30, 2011	Pep Boys		Subsidiary Guarantors		Subsidiary Non- Guarantors		Consolidation/ Elimination			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,187	$	31,475	$	10,315	$	—		$	61,977
Accounts receivable, net	8,409		13,322		—		—			21,731
Merchandise inventories	194,605		389,692		—		—			584,297
Prepaid expenses	7,723		10,892		6,836		(5,757		)	19,694
Other current assets	872		879		54,049		(4,909		)	50,891
Total current assets	231,796		446,260		71,200		(10,666		)	738,590
Property and equipment—net	237,515		444,484		30,521		(18,778		)	693,742
Investment in subsidiaries	2,148,583		—		—		(2,148,583		)	—
Intercompany receivables	—		1,373,918		67,464		(1,441,382		)	—
Goodwill	2,549		46,035		—		—			48,584
Deferred income taxes	16,457		51,531		—		—			67,988
Other long-term assets	29,708		1,992		—		—			31,700
Total assets	$	2,666,608	$	2,364,220	$	169,185	$	(3,619,409	)	$	1,580,604
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	223,457	$	7,427	$	—	$	—		$	230,884
Trade payable program liability	61,440		—		—		—			61,440
Accrued expenses	18,860		55,362		138,162		(5,757		)	206,627
Deferred income taxes	25,984		37,750		—		(4,909		)	58,825
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,079		—		—		—			1,079
Total current liabilities	330,820		100,539		138,162		(10,666		)	558,855
Long-term debt less current maturities	294,583		—		—		—			294,583
Other long-term liabilities	31,496		44,192		—		—			75,688
Deferred gain from asset sales	63,422		101,929		—		(18,778		)	146,573
Intercompany liabilities	1,441,382		—		—		(1,441,382		)	—
Total stockholders’ equity	504,905		2,117,560		31,023		(2,148,583		)	504,905
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,666,608	$	2,364,220	$	169,185	$	(3,619,409	)	$	1,580,604

17

As of January 29, 2011	Pep Boys		Subsidiary Guarantors		Subsidiary Non- Guarantors		Consolidation/ Elimination			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	37,912	$	42,779	$	9,549	$	—		$	90,240
Accounts receivable, net	8,976		10,564		—		—			19,540
Merchandise inventories	198,062		366,340		—		—			564,402
Prepaid expenses	11,839		17,649		16,202		(17,148		)	28,542
Other current assets	2,260		936		62,655		(5,039		)	60,812
Total current assets	259,049		438,268		88,406		(22,187		)	763,536
Property and equipment—net	236,853		452,230		30,862		(18,964		)	700,981
Investment in subsidiaries	2,093,479		—		—		(2,093,479		)	—
Intercompany receivables	—		1,361,656		79,270		(1,440,926		)	—
Goodwill	2,549		—		—		—			2,549
Deferred income taxes	15,749		50,270		—		—			66,019
Other long-term assets	22,392		1,195		—		—			23,587
Total assets	$	2,630,071	$	2,303,619	$	198,538	$	(3,575,556	)	$	1,556,672
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	210,440	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	210,440
Trade payable program liability	56,287		—		—		—			56,287
Accrued expenses	23,341		62,168		167,667		(17,148		)	236,028
Deferred income taxes	23,024		38,350		—		(5,039		)	56,335
Current maturities of long-term debt	1,079		—		—		—			1,079
Total current liabilities	314,171		100,518		167,667		(22,187		)	560,169
Long-term debt less current maturities	295,122		—		—		—			295,122
Other long-term liabilities	35,870		34,176		—		—			70,046
Deferred gain from asset sales	65,522		106,317		—		(18,964		)	152,875
Intercompany liabilities	1,440,926		—		—		(1,440,926		)	—
Total stockholders’ equity	478,460		2,062,608		30,871		(2,093,479		)	478,460
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,630,071	$	2,303,619	$	198,538	$	(3,575,556	)	$	1,556,672

18

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary Non-			Consolidation /
Thirteen Weeks Ended July 30, 2011	Pep Boys			Guarantors			Guarantors			Elimination			Consolidated
Merchandise sales	$	137,881		$	277,386		$	—		$	—		$	415,267
Service revenue	37,113			70,214			—			—			107,327
Other revenue	—			—			5,732			(5,732		)	—
Total revenues	174,994			347,600			5,732			(5,732		)	522,594
Costs of merchandise sales	98,345			189,785			—			(409		)	287,721
Costs of service revenue	32,886			66,815			—			(38		)	99,663
Costs of other revenue	—			—			5,830			(5,830		)	—
Total costs of revenues	131,231			256,600			5,830			(6,277		)	387,384
Gross profit from merchandise sales	39,536			87,601			—			409			127,546
Gross profit from service revenue	4,227			3,399			—			38			7,664
Gross profit from other revenue	—			—			(98		)	98			—
Total gross profit	43,763			91,000			(98		)	545			135,210
Selling, general and administrative expenses	38,562			74,698			80			(72		)	113,268
Net gain from dispositions of assets	—			(3		)	—			—			(3		)
Operating profit	5,201			16,299			(178		)	617			21,939
Non-operating (expense) income	(4,216		)	15,852			618			(11,685		)	569
Interest expense (income)	17,534			499			(521		)	(11,068		)	6,444
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	(16,549		)	31,652			961			—			16,064
Income tax (benefit) expense	(3,100		)	5,114			159			—			2,173
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	27,365			—			—			(27,365		)	—
Net earnings from continuing operations	13,916			26,538			802			(27,365		)	13,891
Discontinued operations, net of tax	27			25			—			—			52
Net earnings	$	13,943		$	26,563		$	802		$	(27,365	)	$	13,943

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary Non-			Consolidation /
Thirteen Weeks Ended July 31, 2010	Pep Boys			Guarantors			Guarantors			Elimination			Consolidated
Merchandise sales	$	141,019		$	265,160		$	—		$	—		$	406,179
Service revenue	35,729			62,947			—			—			98,676
Other revenue	—			—			5,736			(5,736		)	—
Total revenues	176,748			328,107			5,736			(5,736		)	504,855
Costs of merchandise sales	99,511			183,260			—			(409		)	282,362
Costs of service revenue	31,186			56,844			—			(38		)	87,992
Costs of other revenue	—			—			5,091			(5,091		)	—
Total costs of revenues	130,697			240,104			5,091			(5,538		)	370,354
Gross profit from merchandise sales	41,508			81,900			—			409			123,817
Gross profit from service revenue	4,543			6,103			—			38			10,684
Gross profit from other revenue	—			—			645			(645		)	—
Total gross profit	46,051			88,003			645			(198		)	134,501
Selling, general and administrative expenses	41,258			72,576			89			(815		)	113,108
Net gain from dispositions of assets	2,218			231			—			—			2,449
Operating profit	7,011			15,658			556			617			23,842
Non-operating (expense) income	(4,163		)	20,313			617			(16,146		)	621
Interest expense (income)	16,306			6,393			(527		)	(15,529		)	6,643
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	(13,458		)	29,578			1,700			—			17,820
Income tax (benefit) expense	(5,311		)	11,663			669			—			7,021
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	18,784			—			—			(18,784		)	—
Net earnings from continuing operations	10,637			17,915			1,031			(18,784		)	10,799
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(39		)	(162		)	—			—			(201		)
Net earnings	$	10,598		$	17,753		$	1,031		$	(18,784	)	$	10,598

19

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary Non-			Consolidation /
Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2011	Pep Boys			Guarantors			Guarantors			Elimination			Consolidated
Merchandise sales	$	279,262		$	544,632		$	—		$	—		$	823,894
Service revenue	75,648			136,592			—			—			212,240
Other revenue	—			—			11,466			(11,466		)	—
Total revenues	354,910			681,224			11,466			(11,466		)	1,036,134
Costs of merchandise sales	197,518			376,348			—			(816		)	573,050
Costs of service revenue	65,974			126,854			—			(76		)	192,752
Costs of other revenue	—			—			11,656			(11,656		)	—
Total costs of revenues	263,492			503,202			11,656			(12,548		)	765,802
Gross profit from merchandise sales	81,744			168,284			—			816			250,844
Gross profit from service revenue	9,674			9,738			—			76			19,488
Gross profit from other revenue	—			—			(190		)	190			—
Total gross profit	91,418			178,022			(190		)	1,082			270,332
Selling, general and administrative expenses	76,386			145,767			166			(151		)	222,168
Net gain from dispositions of assets	—			86			—			—			86
Operating profit	15,032			32,341			(356		)	1,233			48,250
Non-operating (expense) income	(8,491		)	31,921			1,234			(23,508		)	1,156
Interest expense (income)	34,859			1,400			(1,043		)	(22,275		)	12,941
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	(28,318		)	62,862			1,921			—			36,465
Income tax (benefit) expense	(7,714		)	17,347			536			—			10,169
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	46,896			—			—			(46,896		)	—
Net earnings from continuing operations	26,292			45,515			1,385			(46,896		)	26,296
Discontinued operations, net of tax	19			(4		)	—			—			15
Net earnings	$	26,311		$	45,511		$	1,385		$	(46,896	)	$	26,311

				Subsidiary			Subsidiary Non-			Consolidation /
Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 31, 2010	Pep Boys			Guarantors			Guarantors			Elimination			Consolidated
Merchandise sales	$	285,444		$	529,924		$	—		$	—		$	815,368
Service revenue	72,370			127,150			—			—			199,520
Other revenue	—			—			11,472			(11,472		)	—
Total revenues	357,814			657,074			11,472			(11,472		)	1,014,888
Costs of merchandise sales	200,507			366,467			—			(816		)	566,158
Costs of service revenue	62,356			114,354			—			(76		)	176,634
Costs of other revenue	—			—			11,561			(11,561		)	—
Total costs of revenues	262,863			480,821			11,561			(12,453		)	742,792
Gross profit from merchandise sales	84,937			163,457			—			816			249,210
Gross profit from service revenue	10,014			12,796			—			76			22,886
Gross profit from other revenue	—			—			(89		)	89			—
Total gross profit	94,951			176,253			(89		)	981			272,096
Selling, general and administrative expenses	81,311			143,511			170			(252		)	224,740
Net gain from dispositions of assets	2,080			414			—			—			2,494
Operating profit	15,720			33,156			(259		)	1,233			49,850
Non-operating (expense) income	(8,413		)	40,521			1,233			(32,136		)	1,205
Interest expense (income)	32,352			12,851			(1,049		)	(30,903		)	13,251
(Loss) earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	(25,045		)	60,826			2,023			—			37,804
Income tax (benefit) expense	(9,856		)	23,905			796			—			14,845
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	37,778			—			—			(37,778		)	—
Net earnings from continuing operations	22,589			36,921			1,227			(37,778		)	22,959
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(41		)	(370		)	—			—			(411		)
Net earnings	$	22,548		$	36,551		$	1,227		$	(37,778	)	$	22,548

20

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)

Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 30, 2011	Pep Boys			Subsidiary Guarantors			Subsidiary Non- Guarantors			Consolidation / Elimination			Consolidated
Net earnings	$	26,311		$	45,511		$	1,385		$	(46,896	)	$	26,311
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings to Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Continuing Operations	(29,167		)	23,091			471			45,663			40,058
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	15,989			(19,417		)	(11,663		)	—			(15,091		)
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations	13,133			49,185			(9,807		)	(1,233		)	51,278
Net cash (used in) discontinued operations	19			(63		)	—			—			(44		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	13,152			49,122			(9,807		)	(1,233		)	51,234
Net cash used in continuing operations	(21,257		)	(57,605		)	—			—			(78,862		)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations	—			—			—			—			—
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(21,257		)	(57,605		)	—			—			(78,862		)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities	(9,620		)	(2,821		)	10,573			1,233			(635		)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(17,725		)	(11,304		)	766			—			(28,263		)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	37,912			42,779			9,549			—			90,240
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,187		$	31,475		$	10,315		$	—		$	61,977

Twenty-six Weeks Ended July 31, 2010	Pep Boys			Subsidiary Guarantors			Subsidiary Non- Guarantors			Consolidation / Elimination			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	22,548		$	36,551		$	1,227		$	(37,778	)	$	22,548
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations	(17,866		)	18,057			285			36,545			37,021
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	12,796			(3,933		)	(9,308		)	—			(445		)
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations	17,478			50,675			(7,796		)	(1,233		)	59,124
Net cash used in discontinued operations	(43		)	(1,206		)	—			—			(1,249		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	17,435			49,469			(7,796		)	(1,233		)	57,875
Net cash used in continuing operations	(13,509		)	(9,842		)	—			—			(23,351		)
Net cash provided by discontinued operations	—			569			—			—			569
Net cash used in investing activities	(13,509		)	(9,273		)	—			—			(22,782		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	41,895			(37,564		)	12,380			1,233			17,944
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	45,821			2,632			4,584			—			53,037
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	25,844			10,279			3,203			—			39,326
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	71,665		$	12,911		$	7,787		$	—		$	92,363

21

ITEM 2  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

The following discussion and analysis explains the results of operations for the second fiscal quarter and first half of 2011 and 2010 and significant developments affecting our financial condition for the six months ended July 30, 2011. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated interim financial statements and the notes to such consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the consolidated financial statements and the notes to such financial statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

INTRODUCTION

The Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack is the leading national chain offering automotive service, tires, parts and accessories. This positioning allows us to streamline the distribution channel and pass the savings on to our customers facilitating our vision to be the automotive solutions provider of choice for the value-oriented customer. The majority of our stores are in a Supercenter format, which serves both “do-it-for-me” (“DIFM”), which includes service labor, installed merchandise and tires, and “do-it-yourself” (“DIY”) customers with the highest quality service and merchandise offerings. Most of our Supercenters also have a commercial sales program that provides delivery of tires, parts and other products to automotive repair shops and dealers. In 2009, as part of our long-term strategy to lead with automotive service, we began complementing our existing Supercenter store base with Service & Tire Centers. These Service & Tire Centers are designed to capture market share and leverage our existing Supercenters and support infrastructure. This growth will occur both organically and through acquisitions. The growth is targeted at existing markets, but may include new markets opportunistically. The objective is to grow our market share and to leverage inventory, marketing, distribution and support costs. Acquisitions will be used to accelerate growth in markets where the Company is under-penetrated.

In the first half of fiscal 2011, we added 103 Service & Tire Centers and one Supercenter, including 99 Service & Tire Centers acquired in three separate transactions. As of July 30, 2011, we operated 561 Supercenters and 156 Service & Tire Centers, as well as 8 legacy Pep Boys Express (retail only) stores throughout 35 states and Puerto Rico.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Net earnings for the second quarter of 2011 were $13.9 million, a $3.3 million improvement over the $10.6 million reported for the second quarter of 2010. This improvement was primarily due to the release of $3.4 million of state tax valuation allowances. The current year second quarter also included, on a pre-tax basis, a $0.4 million asset impairment charge and $1.0 million of acquisition related expenses, while the prior year included, on a pre-tax basis, a $2.5 million gain from asset dispositions and the reversal of a $1.0 million inventory related accrual, partially offset by a $1.0 million asset impairment charge. Our diluted earnings per share for the second quarter and the first six months of 2011 were $0.26 and $0.49, respectively, an improvement of $0.06 each over the $0.20 and $0.43 recorded for the corresponding periods of 2010.

Total revenue increased for the second quarter of 2011 by 3.5% as compared to the same period of the prior year as a result of our aggressive location growth. For the second quarter of 2011, comparable store sales (sales generated by locations in operation during the same period) decreased by 2.0%. This decrease in comparable store sales was comprised of a 0.3% increase in comparable store service revenue offset by a 2.5% decrease in comparable store merchandise sales.

Sales of our services and non-discretionary products are impacted by miles driven. For March through June 2011, unleaded gasoline prices averaged $3.75 per gallon (national average) as compared to $2.80 in the corresponding period of the prior year. We believe the significant increase in gasoline prices led to a decline in miles driven in March through June 2011, after growing moderately over the previous 12 months. This change in trend combined with the financial burden of higher gasoline prices, continued high unemployment and negative consumer confidence in the overall U.S. economy depressed our second quarter sales. We believe these factors have also led customers to maintain their existing vehicles, rather than purchasing new ones which, in turn, has partially offset the negative impact the reduction in miles driven has had on our sales of services and non-discretionary products. These same factors have negatively affected sales in our discretionary product categories like accessories and complementary merchandise. Given the nature of these macroeconomic factors, we cannot predict whether or for how long these trends will continue, nor can we predict to what degree these trends will affect us in the future.

22

Our primary response to fluctuations in customer demand is to adjust our service and product assortment, store staffing and advertising messages. We believe that we are well positioned to help our customers save money and meet their needs in a challenging macroeconomic environment. In 2011, we have continued our “surround sound” media campaign that utilizes television, radio and direct mail advertising to communicate our “DOES EVERYTHING. FOR LESS.” brand message and have focused on “execution excellence” in our stores in order to earn the TRUST of our customers every day.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion explains the material changes in our results of operations.

Analysis of Statement of Operations

Thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011 vs. Thirteen weeks ended July 31, 2010

The following table presents for the periods indicated certain items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues (except as otherwise provided) and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period.

	Percentage of Total Revenues				Percentage Change
Thirteen weeks ended	July 30, 2011 (Fiscal 2011)		July 31, 2010 (Fiscal 2010)		Favorable (Unfavorable)
Merchandise sales	79.5	%	80.5	%	2.2	%
Service revenue (1)	20.5		19.5		8.8
Total revenues	100.0		100.0		3.5
Costs of merchandise sales (2)	69.3	(3)	69.5	(3)	(1.9	)
Costs of service revenue (2)	92.9	(3)	89.2	(3)	(13.3	)
Total costs of revenues	74.1		73.4		(4.6	)
Gross profit from merchandise sales	30.7	(3)	30.5	(3)	3.0
Gross profit from service revenue	7.1	(3)	10.8	(3)	(28.3	)
Total gross profit	25.9		26.6		0.5
Selling, general and administrative expenses	21.7		22.4		(0.1	)
Net gain (loss) from dispositions of assets	—		0.5		—
Operating profit	4.2		4.7		(8.0	)
Non-operating income	0.1		0.1		(8.5	)
Interest expense	1.2		1.3		3.0
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	3.1		3.5		(9.9	)
Income tax expense	13.5	(4)	39.4	(4)	69.0
Earnings from continuing operations	2.7		2.1		28.6
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		—		—
Net earnings	2.7		2.1		31.6

(1)	Service revenue consists of the labor charge for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials.
(2)	Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, purchasing, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
(3)	As a percentage of related sales or revenue, as applicable.
(4)	As a percentage of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.

Total revenue for the second quarter of 2011 increased by $17.7 million to $522.6 million from $504.9 million in the second quarter of 2010, while comparable store sales for the second quarter of 2011 decreased 2.0% as compared to the second quarter of 2010. This decrease in comparable store sales consisted of an increase of 0.3% in comparable store service revenue offset by a decrease of 2.5% in comparable store merchandise sales. Total comparable store sales decreased due to lower customer counts in all three lines of business partially offset by an increase in the average transaction amount per customer. While our total revenue figures were favorably impacted by the opening or acquisition of new stores, a new store is not added to our comparable store sales until it reaches its 13th

23

month of operation. Non-comparable stores contributed an additional $27.7 million of total revenue in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010.

Total merchandise sales increased 2.2%, or $9.1 million, to $415.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to $406.2 million during the prior year quarter. The increase in merchandise sales was due to our non-comparable stores which contributed an additional $19.3 million of sales in the quarter, partially offset by a decline in comparable store merchandise sales of 2.5%, or $10.2 million. The decrease in comparable store merchandise sales was driven primarily by lower comparable store customer counts partially offset by a higher average transaction amount per customer. Total service revenue increased 8.8%, or $8.7 million, to $107.3 million in the second quarter of 2011 from the $98.7 million recorded in the prior year quarter. The increase in service revenue was comprised of a $0.3 million, or 0.3%, increase in comparable store service revenue and our new non-comparable stores  contributed an additional $8.4 million of service revenues. The increase in comparable store service revenue was due to higher average transaction amount per customer mostly offset by a decrease in customer counts.

We believe that comparable store customer counts decreased due to macroeconomic conditions, while the average transaction amount per customer increased due to selling price increases implemented to reflect the inflation in material costs. We believe that the significant increase in gasoline prices led to a decline in miles driven, which combined with the financial burden of higher gasoline prices, continued high unemployment and negative consumer confidence in the overall U.S. economy depressed our second quarter sales. These negative economic conditions were somewhat mitigated by the continued aging of the U.S. light vehicle fleet as consumers spent more money on maintaining their vehicles as opposed to buying new vehicles. Over the long-term, we believe that utilizing innovative marketing programs to communicate our value-priced, differentiated service and merchandise assortment will drive increased customer counts and that our continued focus on delivering a better customer experience than our competitors will convert those increased customer counts into sales improvements consistently over all lines of business.

Gross profit from merchandise sales increased by $3.7 million, or 3.0%, to $127.5 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $123.8 million in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit margin from merchandise sales increased to 30.7% for the second quarter of 2011 from 30.5% for the second quarter of 2010. The current and prior year included $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, of asset impairment charges. Excluding this item, gross profit margin from merchandise sales remained flat at 30.7%.

Gross profit from service revenue decreased by $3.0 million, or 28.3%, to $7.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $10.7 million recorded in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit margin from service revenue decreased to 7.1% for the second quarter of 2011 from 10.8% for the prior year quarter. In accordance with GAAP, service revenue is limited to labor sales (excludes any revenue from installed parts and materials) and costs of service revenues includes the fully loaded service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. The decrease in gross profit from service revenue was due to the opening or acquisition of new Service & Tire Centers. The 85 Big 10 locations acquired in the second quarter of 2011, which were accretive to our second quarter earnings, depressed gross profit margin from service revenues by 249 basis points. The organic new stores opened by the Company, which are still in their ramp up stage for sales while incurring their full amount of fixed expenses, including payroll and occupancy costs (rent, utilities and building maintenance), negatively affected gross profit margin from service revenue by 290 basis points and 140 basis points in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Excluding the impact of both the acquired and the new organic Service & Tire Centers, gross profit from service revenue increased to 12.8% for the second quarter of 2011 from 12.5% for the second quarter of 2010. The increase in gross profit, exclusive of all new locations, was primarily due to higher service revenues, which better leveraged the fixed component of service payroll and store occupancy costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 21.7% for the second quarter of 2011 from 22.4% for the second quarter of 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat compared to the prior year second quarter at $113.3 million. Lower media expense and short-term performance based compensation accruals of $3.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, were offset by acquisition and transition costs of $1.6 million and increased store operating expenses of $2.1 million due to the increase in the number of stores operated by the company and higher fuel costs associated with our commercial fleet. The reduction as a percent to sales reflects improved leverage of selling, general and administrative expenses achieved through increased sales volumes in the current year second quarter.

Net gains from the disposition of assets were not significant for the second quarter of 2011 and were $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2010. Interest expense declined by $0.2 million to $6.4 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2010.

Our income tax expense for the second quarter of 2011 was $2.2 million, or an effective rate of 13.5%, as compared to an expense of $7.0 million, or an effective rate of 39.4%, for the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter 2011 income tax expense includes the benefit of the release of $3.4 million (net of federal tax) of valuation allowance relating primarily to certain unitary state net operating loss carryforwards and credits during the thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2011. The annual rate depends on a number of factors, including the jurisdiction in which operating profit is earned and the timing and nature of discrete items.

24

As a result of the foregoing, we reported net earnings of $13.9 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to net earnings of $10.6 million in the prior year period. Our basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.26 as compared to $0.20 in the prior year period.

Twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011 vs. Twenty-six weeks ended July 31, 2010

The following table presents for the periods indicated certain items in the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues (except as otherwise provided) and the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared to the indicated prior period.

	Percentage of Total Revenues				Percentage Change
Twenty-six  weeks ended	July 30, 2011 (Fiscal 2011)		July 31, 2010  (Fiscal 2010)		Favorable (Unfavorable)
Merchandise sales	79.5	%	80.3	%	1.0	%
Service revenue (1)	20.5		19.7		6.4
Total revenues	100.0		100.0		2.1
Costs of merchandise sales (2)	69.6	(3)	69.4	(3)	(1.2	)
Costs of service revenue (2)	90.8	(3)	88.5	(3)	(9.1	)
Total costs of revenues	73.9		73.2		(3.1	)
Gross profit from merchandise sales	30.5	(3)	30.6	(3)	0.7
Gross profit from service revenue	9.2	(3)	11.5	(3)	(14.9	)
Total gross profit	26.1		26.8		(0.7	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	21.4		22.1		1.1
Net gain (loss) from dispositions of assets	—		0.2		—
Operating profit	4.7		4.9		(3.2	)
Non-operating income	0.1		0.1		(4.1	)
Interest expense	1.3		1.3		2.3
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	3.5		3.7		(3.5	)
Income tax expense	27.9	(4)	39.3	(4)	31.5
Earnings from continuing operations	2.5		2.3		14.5
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		—		—
Net earnings	2.5		2.2		16.7

(1)	Service revenue consists of the labor charge for installing merchandise or maintaining or repairing vehicles, excluding the sale of any installed parts or materials.
(2)	Costs of merchandise sales include the cost of products sold, purchasing, warehousing and store occupancy costs. Costs of service revenue include service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses.
(3)	As a percentage of related sales or revenue, as applicable.
(4)	As a percentage of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.

Total revenue for the first half of 2011 increased by $21.2 million to $1,036.1 million from $1,014.9 million in the first half of 2010, while comparable store sales for the first half of 2011 decreased by $13.2 million, or 1.3%, as compared to the first half of 2010. The decrease in comparable store sales consisted of an increase of 0.9% in comparable store service revenue offset by a decrease of 1.8% in comparable store merchandise sales. Total comparable store sales decreased due to lower customer counts in all three lines of business partially offset by an increase in the average transaction amount per customer. While our total revenue figures were favorably impacted by the opening of the new stores, a new store is not added to our comparable store sales until it reaches its 13th month of operation. Non-comparable stores contributed an additional $34.4 million of total revenue in the first half of 2011 as compared to the prior year period.

Gross profit from merchandise sales increased by $1.6 million, or 0.7%, to $250.8 million for the first half of 2011 from $249.2 million in the first half of 2010. Gross profit from merchandise sales decreased slightly to 30.4% from 30.6% for the prior year period. The decrease in gross profit margins was primarily due to higher store occupancy costs which increased as a percent of merchandise sales by 25 basis points. The increase in occupancy costs was due to (i) higher depreciation expense as a result of increased capital investment in new and existing stores, and (ii) an increase in the number of Superhub locations leading to higher delivery costs. These costs were partially offset by improved product gross margins of 17 basis points.

25

Gross profit from service revenue decreased by $3.4 million, or 14.9%, to $19.5 million for the first half of 2011 from $22.9 million in the first half of 2010. Gross profit from service revenue decreased to 9.2% from 11.5% for the prior year period. In accordance with GAAP, service revenue is limited to labor sales (excludes any revenue from installed parts and materials) and costs of service revenue includes the fully loaded service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. The decrease in gross profit from service revenue was due to the opening or acquisition of new Service & Tire Centers. The 85 Big 10 locations acquired in the second quarter of 2011, which were accretive to our first half earnings, depressed gross profit margin from service revenues by 126 basis points. The organic new stores opened by the Company, which are still in their ramp up stage for sales while incurring their full amount of fixed expenses, including payroll and occupancy costs (rent, utilities and building maintenance), negatively affected gross profit margin from service revenue by 283 basis points and 143 basis points in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Excluding the impact of both the acquired and the new organic Service & Tire Centers, gross profit from service revenue increased to 13.4% for the first half of 2011 from 13.0% for the first half of 2010. The increase in gross profit, exclusive of all new locations, was primarily due to higher service revenues, which better leveraged the fixed component of service payroll and store occupancy costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenues decreased to 21.4% for the first half of 2011 as compared to 22.1% the prior year period. The reduction as a percent to sales reflects improved leverage of selling, general and administrative expenses achieved through increased sales volumes in the first half of 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.6 million, or 1.1%, compared to the first half of 2010 due to lower media expense of $3.7 million and lower short-term performance based compensation accruals of $2.4 million, partially offset by increased store selling expenses of $1.7 million as a result of our store growth and acquisition and transition costs of $1.9 million.

Net gains from the disposition of assets were not significant for the first half of 2011 and were $2.5 million for the first half of 2010.

Interest expense for the first half of 2011 was $12.9 million, a decrease of $0.3 million compared to the prior year period.

Our income tax expense for the first half of 2011 was $10.2 million, or an effective rate of 27.9%, as compared to an expense of $14.8 million, or an effective rate of 39.3%, for the first half of 2010. The change was primarily due to the release of valuation allowances on state net operating loss carry forwards and credits. The annual rate is dependent on a number of factors, including the jurisdiction in which operating profit is earned and the timing and nature of discrete items.

As a result of the foregoing, we reported net earnings of $26.3 million for the first half of 2011 as compared to net earnings of $22.5 million in the prior year period. Our basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.49 as compared to $0.43 in the prior year period.

INDUSTRY COMPARISON

We operate in the U.S. automotive aftermarket, which has two general lines of business: (1) the Service business, defined as Do-It-For-Me (service labor, installed merchandise and tires) and (2) the Retail business, defined as Do-It-Yourself (retail merchandise) and commercial. Generally, specialized automotive retailers focus on either the Retail or Service area of the business. We believe that operation in both the Retail and Service areas of the business positively differentiates us from most of our competitors. Although we manage our store performance at a store level in aggregation, we believe that the following presentation, which includes the reclassification of revenue from installed products from retail sales to service center revenue, shows an accurate comparison against competitors within the two sales arenas. We compete in the Retail area of the business through our retail sales floor and commercial sales business. Our Service Center business competes in the Service area of the industry.

The following table presents the revenues and gross profit for each area of our business:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-six Weeks Ended
	July 30,		July 31,		July 30,		July 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Service Center Revenue (1)	$	260,836	$	236,051	$	508,165	$	476,377
Retail Sales (2)	261,759		268,804		527,969		538,511
Total revenues	$	522,595	$	504,855	$	1,036,134	$	1,014,888
Gross profit from Service Center Revenue (3)	$	60,671	$	55,671	$	119,632	$	113,512
Gross profit from Retail Sales (3)	74,541		78,830		150,700		158,584
Total gross profit	$	135,212	$	134,501	$	270,332	$	272,096

(1)	Includes revenues from installed products.
(2)	Excludes revenues from installed products.

26

(3) Gross profit from Service Center Revenue includes the cost of installed products sold, purchasing, warehousing, service center payroll and related employee benefits and service center occupancy costs. Occupancy costs include utilities, rents, real estate and property taxes, repairs and maintenance and depreciation and amortization expenses. Gross profit from Retail Sales includes the cost of products sold, purchasing, warehousing and store occupancy costs.

CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY

Our cash requirements arise principally from (1) the purchase of inventory and capital expenditures related to existing and new stores, offices and distribution centers, (2) debt service and (3) contractual obligations. Cash flows realized through the sales of automotive services, tires, parts and accessories are our primary source of liquidity. Net cash provided by operating activities was $51.2 million in the first half of 2011, as compared to $57.9 million in the prior year period. The $6.6 million decrease from the prior year period was due to an unfavorable period to period change in operating assets and liabilities of $14.6 million partially offset by increased net earnings (net of non-cash adjustments) of $6.8 million and a decrease in net cash used in discontinued operations of $1.2 million. The change in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to favorable changes in inventory, net of accounts payable of $5.2 million, offset by unfavorable changes in accrued expenses and other current assets of $16.1 million, and in all other long-term liabilities of $3.7 million.

In fiscal year 2011, the increased investment in inventory of $12.9 million was funded entirely by the improvement in our trade vendor payment terms. Taking into consideration changes in our trade payable program liability (shown as cash flows from financing activities on the consolidated statements of cash flows), cash generated from accounts payable was $17.2 million and $14.9 million for the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The ratio of accounts payable, including our trade payable program, to inventory was 50.0% at July 30, 2011, 47.3% at January 29, 2011 and 45.1% at July 31, 2010, respectively. The increase in inventory of $19.9 million since the end of fiscal 2010 year end, (including inventory acquired as part of store acquisitions which is shown in acquisition, net of cash acquired on the consolidated statement of cash flows) was due to (i) investment in our new or acquired stores of $8.6 million, (ii) higher inventory balances due to increase in commodity pricing including tires and oil based products of $7.1 million and (iii) increased inventory coverage in certain tire and hard part categories.

The change in accrued liabilities and other current assets was primarily due to a reduction in sales tax and employee payroll tax accruals of $10.4 million due to the timing of payments to taxing authorities and the reduction in 401(k) employer match and supplemental executive retirement plan pension accruals of $4.3 million. The change in other long-term liabilities was primarily due to a voluntary pension contribution of $3.0 million in the current year.

Cash used in investing activities was $78.9 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $22.8 million in the prior year period, an increase of $56.1 million. During the first half of 2011, we acquired 99 Service & Tire Centers through three separate transactions, including 85 stores in Florida, Georgia and Alabama, seven stores in Houston and seven stores in the Seattle/Tacoma market for $42.8 million, net of cash acquired (see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements). During the first half of 2011 we invested $4.8 million in a restricted account as collateral for retained liabilities included within existing insurance programs in lieu of previously outstanding letters of credit. Capital expenditures were $30.6 million and $27.3 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Capital expenditures for the first half of 2011, in addition to our regularly scheduled store and distribution center improvements and information technology enhancements, included the addition of four new Service & Tire Centers and one new Supercenter. During the first half of 2010, we sold four properties classified as held for sale for net proceeds of $2.9 million, of which $0.6 million is included in discontinued operations, and completed one sale leaseback transaction for net proceeds of $1.6 million.

Our targeted capital expenditures for fiscal 2011 are $80.0 million. Our fiscal year 2011 capital expenditures include the addition of approximately 35 new locations (excluding the 85 Big 10 stores), the conversion of 24 Supercenters into Superhubs and required expenditures for our existing stores, offices and distribution centers. These expenditures are expected to be funded by cash on hand and net cash generated from operating activities. Additional capacity, if needed, exists under our existing line of credit.

In the first half of 2011, cash used in financing activities was $0.6 million, as compared to cash provided from financing of $17.9 million in the prior year period, primarily due to a smaller increase in our trade payable program of $16.0 million. The trade payable program is funded by various bank participants who have the ability, but not the obligation, to purchase, directly from our vendors, account receivables owed by Pep Boys. As of July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, we had an outstanding balance of $61.4 million and $56.3 million, respectively (classified as trade payable program liability on the consolidated balance sheet). In the current year second quarter, we paid $2.4 million in financing costs to amend and restate our revolving credit agreement to reduce its interest rate by 75 basis points and to extend its maturity to July 2016.

We anticipate that cash on hand and cash generated by operating activities will exceed our expected cash requirements in fiscal year 2011. In addition, we expect to have excess availability under our existing revolving credit agreement during the entirety of fiscal year 2011. As of July 30, 2011, we had zero drawn on our revolving credit facility and maintained undrawn availability of $201.0 million.

27

Our working capital was $179.7 million and $203.4 million at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Our long-term debt, as a percentage of our total capitalization, was 36.8% and 38.2% at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively.

Contractual Obligations

During the current fiscal year, in connection with the acquisitions discussed in note 3, the Company assumed additional lease obligations totaling $122.0 million over an average of 14 years. There have been no other significant developments with respect to our contractual obligations since January 29, 2011. For a discussion of our other contractual obligations, see a discussion of future commitments under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-29 “Business Combinations (Topic 805) — Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations” (“ASU 2010-29”). This accounting standard update clarifies that SEC registrants presenting comparative financial statements should disclose in their pro forma information revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the current period business combinations had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for material business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 during the first quarter of the current fiscal year.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) — Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU 2011-04”), which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. The Company is currently evaluating ASU 2011-04 and has not yet determined the impact the adoption will have on the consolidated financial statements.

In June of 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 was issued to improve the comparability of financial reporting between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and eliminates previous U.S. GAAP guidance that allowed an entity to present components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as part of its statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. With the issuance of ASU 2011-05, companies are now required to report all components of OCI either in a single continuous statement of total comprehensive income, which includes components of both OCI and net income, or in a separate statement appearing consecutively with the statement of income. ASU 2011-05 does not affect current guidance for the accounting of the components of OCI, or which items are included within total comprehensive income, and is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The application of this guidance affects presentation only and therefore is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to customer incentives, product returns and warranty obligations, bad debts, inventories, income taxes, financing operations, restructuring costs, retirement benefits, share-based compensation, risk participation agreements, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies that may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity, refer to “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

28

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “guidance,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimates,” “forecasts” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include management’s expectations regarding implementation of its long-term strategic plan, future financial performance, automotive aftermarket trends, levels of competition, business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and litigation. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be achieved. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements due to factors beyond our control, including the strength of the national and regional economies, retail and commercial consumers’ ability to spend, the health of the various sectors of the automotive aftermarket, the weather in geographical regions with a high concentration of our stores, competitive pricing, the location and number of competitors’ stores, product and labor costs and the additional factors described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements that become untrue because of subsequent events.

ITEM 3   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary market risk exposure with regard to financial instruments is due to changes in interest rates. Pursuant to the terms of our Revolving Credit Agreement, changes in LIBOR or the Prime Rate could affect the rates at which we could borrow funds thereunder. At July 30, 2011, we had no borrowings under this facility. Additionally, we have a $148.1 million Senior Secured Term Loan that bears interest at three month LIBOR plus 2.0%.

We have an interest rate swap for a notional amount of $145.0 million, which is designated as a cash flow hedge on our Senior Secured Term Loan. We record the effective portion of the change in fair value through accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The fair value of the derivative was $15.4 million and $16.4 million payable at July 30, 2011 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Of the $1.0 million decrease in the liabilities during the twenty-six weeks ended July 30, 2011, $0.7 million net of tax was recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet.

ITEM 4  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

29

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 5   OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is party to various actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that amounts accrued for awards or assessments in connection with all such matters are adequate and that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. However, there exists a reasonable possibility of loss in excess of the amounts accrued, the amount of which cannot currently be estimated. While the Company does not believe that the amount of such excess loss could be material to the Company’s financial position, any such loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the period(s) during which the underlying matters are resolved.

ITEM 1A  RISK FACTORS

There have been no changes to the risks described in the Company’s previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.

ITEM 2    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3    DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4  (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5  OTHER INFORMATION

None.

30

ITEM 6  EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS (1)	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

(1) In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

31

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK
	(Registrant)
Date: September 7, 2011	by:	/s/ Raymond L. Arthur
	Raymond L. Arthur
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

32

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS (1)	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF(1)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

(1) In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

33