On June 29, 2021, a purported stockholder of Independent filed a lawsuit against Independent and its directors in the Massachusetts Superior Court, captioned Dean Drulias vs. Independent Bank Corp., et al. (the “Drulias Lawsuit”). The plaintiff generally alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties by agreeing to overpay for Meridian in the proposed merger with Independent in large part due to their conflicts of interest. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants further breached their fiduciary duties by disseminating a deceptive, incomplete and misleading proxy statement to Independent stockholders regarding the proposed merger of Meridian with and into Independent and the related proposed issuance of Independent shares. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, rescissory relief or damages, declaratory relief, compensatory or punitive damages as allowed by law, and an award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
On July 6, 2021, a purported stockholder of Meridian filed a lawsuit against Meridian and its directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Michael Rubin vs. Meridian Bancorp, Inc., et al., Docket No. 1:21-cv-05806 (the “Rubin Lawsuit”). The plaintiff generally alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by disclosing materially incomplete and misleading information to Meridian stockholders about the previously announced proposed merger. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, rescissory relief or damages, declaratory relief, and an award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
On July 26, 2021, a purported stockholder of Meridian filed a lawsuit against Meridian and its directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Paul Parshall vs. Meridian Bancorp, Inc., et al., Docket No. 1:21-cv-06330 (the “Parshall Lawsuit”). The plaintiff generally alleges that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by disclosing materially incomplete and misleading information to Meridian stockholders about the previously announced proposed merger. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, rescissory relief or damages, declaratory relief, and an award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
On July 26, 2021, a purported stockholder of Meridian filed a lawsuit against Meridian and its directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, captioned Jeffrey Justice vs. Meridian Bancorp, Inc., et al., Docket No. 2:21-cv-03317 (the “Justice Lawsuit,” and together with the Stein Lawsuit, Whitfield Lawsuit, Bresnahan Lawsuit, Drulias Lawsuit, Rubin Lawsuit and Parshall Lawsuit, the “Merger Litigation”). The plaintiff generally alleges that the defendants violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by disclosing materially incomplete and misleading information to Meridian stockholders about the previously announced proposed merger. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, rescissory relief or damages, dissemination of a corrected registration statement, declaratory relief, and an award of attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
On July 27, 2021, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, Meridian and Independent have agreed to make additional disclosures (the “Additional Disclosures”) to supplement the disclosures contained in the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 2021 and first mailed to shareholders of Meridian and stockholders of Independent on June 28, 2021. The Additional Disclosures are set forth below and should be read in conjunction with the joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Independent and Meridian believe that the Additional Disclosures moot plaintiffs’ disclosure claims asserted in the Merger Litigation and, as a result, expect that the plaintiffs will not seek injunctive relief against the merger.
This decision to make the Additional Disclosures will not affect the merger consideration to be paid in connection with the merger of Meridian with and into Independent or the timing of the special meetings of Independent’s stockholders and Meridian’s shareholders.
Independent, Meridian and the other defendants have vigorously denied, and continue to vigorously deny, that they have committed or aided and abetted in the commission of any violation of law or engaged in any of the wrongful acts that were or could have been alleged in the lawsuits, and expressly maintain that,