UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| X | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
OR
| _ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number 033-37587
Pruco Life Insurance
Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
| Arizona | | 22-1944557 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
213 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
|
(973) 802-6000 |
| (Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code) |
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T ((§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
| Non-accelerated filer | | x | | Smaller reporting Company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant: N/A
As of March 10, 2014, 250,000 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock (par value $10) were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required to be furnished pursuant to Part III of this Form 10-K is set forth in, and is hereby incorporated by reference herein from, Prudential Financial, Inc.’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 13, 2014, to be filed by Prudential Financial, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the year ended December 31, 2013.
Pruco Life Insurance Company meets the conditions set
forth in General Instruction (I) (1) (a) and (b) on Form 10-K
and is therefore filing this Form with reduced disclosure.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain of the statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including but not limited to those in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “includes,” “plans,” “assumes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “should,” “will,” “shall” or variations of such words are generally part of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries will be those anticipated by management. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and there are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements, including, among others: (1) general economic, market and political conditions, including the performance and fluctuations of fixed income, equity, real estate and other financial markets; (2) the availability and cost of additional debt or equity capital or external financing for our operations; (3) interest rate fluctuations or prolonged periods of low interest rates; (4) the degree to which we choose not to hedge risks, or the potential ineffectiveness or insufficiency of hedging or risk management strategies we do implement, with regard to variable annuity or other product guarantees; (5) any inability to access our credit facilities; (6) reestimates of our reserves for future policy benefits and claims; (7) differences between actual experience regarding mortality, longevity, morbidity, persistency, surrender experience, interest rates or market returns and the assumptions we use in pricing our products, establishing liabilities and reserves or for other purposes; (8) changes in our assumptions related to deferred policy acquisition costs; (9) changes in our financial strength or credit ratings; (10) statutory reserve requirements associated with term and universal life insurance policies under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX; (11) investment losses, defaults and counterparty non-performance; (12) competition in our product lines and for personnel; (13) difficulties in marketing and distributing products through current or future distribution channels; (14) changes in tax law; (15) regulatory or legislative changes, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (16) inability to protect our intellectual property rights or claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others; (17) adverse determinations in litigation or regulatory matters and our exposure to contingent liabilities; (18) domestic or international military actions, natural or man-made disasters including terrorist activities or pandemic disease, or other events resulting in catastrophic loss of life; (19) ineffectiveness of risk management policies and procedures in identifying, monitoring and managing risks; (20) interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems; and (21) changes in statutory or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), practices or policies. Pruco Life Insurance Company does not intend, and is under no obligation, to update any particular forward-looking statement included in this document. See “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for discussion of certain risks relating to our business and investment in our securities.
3
Part 1
Item 1. Business
Overview
Pruco Life Insurance Company, or (the “Company,” “Pruco Life,” “we” or “our”), is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, or “Prudential Insurance,” which in turn is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., or “Prudential Financial.” The Company was organized in 1971 under the laws of the State of Arizona. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in the District of Columbia, Guam, and in all states except New York.
The Company has three subsidiaries, including one wholly owned life insurance subsidiary, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, or “PLNJ,” and two investment subsidiaries formed in 2009 for the purpose of holding certain commercial loan and other investments. Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries are together referred to as the Company and all financial information is shown on a consolidated basis.
PLNJ is a stock life insurance company organized in 1982 under the laws of the state of New Jersey. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in New Jersey and New York.
On January 2, 2013, Prudential Insurance acquired the individual life insurance business of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (“The Hartford”) through a reinsurance transaction. Under the agreement, Prudential Insurance paid The Hartford cash consideration of $615 million, primarily in the form of a ceding commission to provide reinsurance for approximately 700,000 life insurance policies with net retained face amount in force of approximately $141 billion. This acquisition increases our scale in the U.S. individual life insurance market, particularly universal life products, and provides complimentary distribution opportunities through expanded wirehouse and bank distribution channels.
In connection with this transaction, Prudential Insurance retroceded to the Company, the portion of the assumed business that is classified as guaranteed universal life insurance (“GUL”) with account values of approximately $4 billion as of January 2, 2013. The Company has reinsured more than 79,000 GUL policies with a net retained face amount in force of approximately $30 billion. The Company then retroceded all of the GUL policies to an affiliated captive reinsurance company. Collectively, these transactions do not have a material impact on equity, as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), or the statutory capital and surplus of the Company.
Prudential Insurance may make additional capital contributions to the Company, as needed, to enable it to comply with its reserve and capital requirements and fund expenses in connection with its business. Prudential Insurance is under no obligation to make such contributions and its assets do not back the benefits payable under the Company’s policyholders’ contracts.
Competition
We compete with other providers of retirement savings and accumulation products, including large, well-established insurance and financial services companies, primarily based on our innovative product features and our risk management strategies. The Company also competes with large, well-established life insurance companies in a mature market. We compete primarily based on price, service, distribution channel relationships, brand recognition and financial strength. Due to the large number of competitors, pricing is competitive. Factors that could influence our ability to competitively price products while achieving targeted returns include: the cost and availability of financing for statutory reserves required for certain term and universal life insurance policies; the availability, utilization and timing of tax deductions associated with statutory reserves; product designs that impact the amount of statutory reserves and the associated tax deductions; and the level and volatility of interest rates. We also compete based on brand recognition, the breadth of our distribution platform and our customer service capabilities.
In recent years, we have experienced a dynamic competitive landscape within the annuities marketplace, prompted by challenging global financial markets. We proactively monitor changes in the marketplace, and have taken actions to adapt our products to the current environment in order to maintain appropriate return prospects and improve our risk profile. These actions have included variable annuity product modifications for new sales to scale back benefits, change pricing, and reduce commissions, as well as the closing of a share class. We also suspended or limited additional contractholder deposits for variable annuities with certain optional living benefit riders that are no longer being offered. Similarly, certain of our competitors have taken actions to implement modifications which scale back benefits or to exit, or limit their presence in, the variable annuity marketplace. Despite these actions, our contract retention has been strong, and we believe our product offerings are competitive relative to substitute products currently available in the marketplace.
We have implemented pricing actions and premium limits in 2013 to manage sales of no-lapse guarantee universal life products. These steps are in line with our strategy to manage the Individual Life business for steady, consistent sales growth across a balanced product portfolio and to avoid overconcentration in any one product type. We will continue to adjust our overall product portfolio based on the market and our strategy. We feel our pricing actions in 2013 have been consistent with those taken by our peer competitors who are committed to the guaranteed universal life market. Smaller competitors have taken this opportunity to improve their price position to gain market share in this space.
Products
Individual Annuities
The Company offers a wide array of annuities, including variable annuities with (1) fixed interest rate allocation options, subject to a market value adjustment, that are registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and (2) fixed-rate allocation options not subject to a market value adjustment and not registered with the SEC. The Company also offers fixed annuitization options during the payout phase of its variable annuities.
4
We offer variable annuities that provide our contractholders with tax-deferred asset accumulation together with a base death benefit and a suite of optional guaranteed death and living benefits and annuitization options. The majority of our currently sold contracts include an optional living benefit guarantee which provides, among other features, the ability to make withdrawals based on the highest daily contract value plus a minimum return, credited for a period of time. This guaranteed contract value is a notional amount that forms the basis for determining periodic withdrawals for the life of the contractholder, and cannot be accessed as a lump-sum surrender value. Certain optional living benefits can also be purchased with a companion optional death benefit, also based on a highest daily contract value. In the first quarter of 2013, we launched the Prudential Defined Income Variable Annuity (“PDI”) to complement the variable annuity products we offer with the highest daily benefit, which provides for guaranteed lifetime withdrawal payments but restricts contractholder asset allocation to a single bond sub-account within the separate account. In addition, certain inforce contracts include guaranteed benefits which are not currently offered, such as annuitization benefits based on a guaranteed notional amount and benefits payable at specified dates after the accumulation period. Most contracts also guarantee the contractholder a return of total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals upon death.
Excluding our new PDI product, the majority of our variable annuities generally provide our contractholders with the opportunity to allocate purchase payments to sub-accounts that invest in underlying proprietary and non-proprietary mutual funds, frequently under asset allocation programs, and fixed-rate accounts. The fixed-rate accounts that are invested in the general account are credited with interest at rates we determine, subject to certain minimums. We also offer fixed annuities that provide a guarantee of principal and interest credited at rates we determine, subject to certain contractual minimums. Certain investments made in the fixed-rate accounts of our variable annuities and certain fixed annuities impose a market value adjustment if the contract is not held to maturity.
As of December 31, 2013, approximately $81 billion or 90% of total variable annuity account values contain a living benefit feature, compared to approximately $64.7 billion or 89% as of December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $76.5 billion or 94% of variable annuity account values with living benefit features included an asset transfer feature in the product design, compared to approximately $60.3 billion or 93% as of December 31, 2012. The increase in account values with living benefits and the asset transfer feature reflects the impact of new business sales.
Term Life Insurance
The Company offers a variety of term life insurance products which represent 62% of our net individual life insurance in force at December 31, 2013, that provide coverage for a specified time period. Most term products include a conversion feature that allows the policyholder to convert the policy into permanent life insurance coverage. The Company also offers term life insurance that provides for a return of premium if the insured is alive at the end of the level premium period. There continues to be significant demand for term life insurance protection.
Variable Life Insurance
The Company offers a number of individual variable life insurance products, which represent 24% of our net individual life insurance in force at December 31, 2013, that provide a return linked to an underlying investment portfolio selected by the policyholder while providing the policyholder with the flexibility to change both the death benefit and premium payments. The policyholder generally has the option of investing premiums in a fixed rate option that is part of our general account or investing in separate account investment options consisting of equity and fixed income funds. Funds invested in the fixed rate option will accrue interest at rates that we determine, subject to certain contractual minimums. In the separate accounts, the policyholder bears the fund performance risk. The Company also offers a variable product that allows for a more flexible guarantee against lapse where policyholders can select the guarantee period. While variable life insurance continues to be an important product, marketplace demand continues to favor term and universal life insurance. A significant portion of the Company’s insurance profits, however, is associated with our large in force block of variable policies. Profit patterns on these policies are not level and insureds generally begin paying reduced policy charges as the policies age. This reduction in policy charges, coupled with net policy count and insurance in force runoff over time, reduces our expected future profits from this product line.
Universal Life Insurance
The Company offers universal life insurance products, which represent 14% of our net individual life insurance in force at December 31, 2013, which feature flexible premiums, a choice of guarantees against lapse, and a crediting rate that we determine, subject to certain contractual minimums. In addition, we offer universal life insurance products that allow the policyholder to allocate a portion of their account balance into an index account that provides a return consistent with the S&P 500 index performance over the following year, subject to certain participation rates and contractual minimums and maximums. Our universal life products also offer a policy rider which allows the policyholder to access accelerated death benefits when a chronic or terminal illness, meeting certain contractual requirements, exists. The Company’s profits from universal life insurance are impacted by mortality and expense margins and net interest spread.
Marketing and Distribution
Third Party Distribution
Our individual life and annuity products are offered through a diverse group of unaffiliated third party channels, including independent financial planners, general agencies, producer groups, wirehouses, banks and broker-dealers. We focus on sales through independent intermediaries who provide life insurance solutions to protect individuals, families and businesses and support estate and wealth transfer planning. Additionally, our variable annuity products are distributed through insurance agents, including Prudential agents who are registered representatives of broker-dealers. Our third party distribution efforts are supported by a network of internal and external wholesalers.
5
Prudential Insurance Agents
Prudential Insurance Agents, our affiliated agency channel, distribute Prudential variable, term, and universal life insurance, variable and fixed annuities, and investment products with proprietary and non-proprietary investment options as well as selected insurance products manufactured by other companies primarily to customers in the U.S. mass and mass affluent markets, as well as small business owners. Prudential Insurance pays Prudential Insurance Agents at a market rate to distribute our products. The Company is charged a distribution expense by Prudential Insurance related to this arrangement. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of Expense Charges and Allocations.
Underwriting and Pricing
We earn asset management fees determined as a percentage of the average assets of the mutual funds in our variable annuity products, net of subadvisory expenses. Additionally, we earn mortality and expense fees for various insurance-related options and features based on the average daily net asset value of the annuity separate accounts or the amount of guaranteed value under the optional living benefit, as applicable. We also receive administrative service fees from many of the proprietary and non-proprietary mutual funds.
We price our variable annuities based on an evaluation of the risks assumed and considering applicable hedging costs. Our pricing is also influenced by competition, and by assumptions regarding contractholder behavior, including persistency, benefit utilization and the timing and efficiency of withdrawals for contracts with living benefit features, as well as other assumptions. Significant deviations in actual experience from our pricing assumptions could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products. To encourage persistency, most of our variable and fixed annuities have surrender or withdrawal charges for a specified number of years. In addition, the living benefit features of our variable annuity products encourage persistency because the potential value of the living benefit is fully realized only if the contract persists.
We price our fixed annuities as well as the fixed-rate accounts of our variable annuities based on many assumptions, including investment returns, expenses, competition and persistency. We seek to maintain a spread between the return on our general account invested assets and the interest we credit on our fixed annuities and the fixed-rate accounts of our variable annuities.
For our fully underwritten life insurance, underwriters follow detailed policies and procedures to assess and quantify the risk of our individual life insurance products based on the age, gender, health and occupation of the applicant and amount of insurance requested. We base premiums and policy charges for individual life insurance on expected death benefits, surrender benefits, expenses and required reserves. We use assumptions for mortality and morbidity, longevity, interest rates, expenses, policy persistency, premium payment patterns, separate account fund performance and product-generated tax deductions, as well as the level, cost and availability of financing certain statutory reserves, in pricing policies. Deviations in actual experience from our pricing assumptions may adversely or positively impact the profitability of our products.
Reserves
We establish reserves in accordance with U.S. GAAP for future contractholder benefits and expenses. For our guaranteed minimum death and income benefits, we base the reserves on assumptions we believe to be appropriate for investment yield, persistency, withdrawal timing and efficiency, mortality and morbidity rates. Reserves also include claims reported but not yet paid, and claims incurred but not yet reported. Certain of the living benefit guarantee features on variable annuity contracts are accounted for as embedded derivatives and are carried at fair value. The fair values of these benefit features are calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature, and are based on assumptions a market participant would use in valuing these embedded derivatives. These features are generally reinsured with an affiliated company, Pruco Re. For interest sensitive life insurance contracts, fixed annuities, and the fixed rate accounts of variable life and annuity contracts, we establish liabilities for contractholders’ account balances that represent cumulative gross premium payments plus credited interest, less withdrawals, expenses and cost of insurance charges.
Reinsurance
The Company participates in reinsurance with its parent company, Prudential Insurance, and affiliates Prudential Life Insurance Company of Taiwan Inc., or “Prudential of Taiwan”, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Captive Company, or “PARCC”, Universal Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Company, or “UPARC”, Pruco Re, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Term Company, or “PAR TERM”, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company or “PAR U”, and Prudential Universal Reinsurance Company, or “PURC” and unaffiliated companies in order to provide risk diversification, additional capacity for future growth and limit the maximum net loss potential arising from large risks. The Company also uses reinsurance as part of its risk management and capital management strategies for certain of its variable annuity optional living benefit features. Life reinsurance is accomplished through various plans of reinsurance, primarily yearly renewable term and coinsurance. Reinsurance ceded arrangements do not discharge the Company as the primary insurer. Ceded balances would represent a liability of the Company in the event the reinsurers were unable to meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements. We believe a material reinsurance liability resulting from such inability of reinsurers to meet their obligations is unlikely.
We have reinsured the majority of our mortality risk. As of the end of 2013, the maximum amount of mortality risk we may retain on any policy is generally $100,000. In October 2013, the Company increased the maximum amount of mortality risk on any life to $3.5 million for certain COLI policies. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to these affiliated reinsurance arrangements.
6
Regulation
Overview
Our businesses are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision. The purpose of these regulations is primarily to protect our customers and the overall financial system. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations. The financial market dislocations in recent years produced, and are expected to continue to produce, extensive changes in existing laws and regulations, and regulatory frameworks, applicable to our businesses, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act discussed below.
State insurance laws regulate all aspects of our business, and state insurance departments in the District of Columbia, Guam and all states except New York monitor our insurance operations. The Company is domiciled in Arizona and its principal insurance regulatory authority is the Arizona Department of Insurance. Our subsidiary PLNJ is domiciled in New Jersey and its principal insurance regulatory authority is the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. Generally, our insurance products must be approved by the insurance regulators in the state in which they are sold. Our insurance products are substantially affected by federal and state tax laws.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
As part of the federal government’s response to the financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) was signed into law in July 2010. Dodd-Frank directs government agencies and bodies to conduct certain studies and promulgate regulations implementing the law, a process that is underway and expected to continue. Dodd-Frank subjects Prudential Financial to substantial additional federal regulation, primarily as a “Designated Financial Company” as discussed below. We cannot predict with any certainty the results of the studies or the requirements of the regulations recently or not yet adopted or how Dodd-Frank and such regulations will affect the financial markets generally, impact our business, credit or financial strength ratings, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition or make it advisable or require us to hold or raise additional capital.
Regulation as a Designated Financial Company
Dodd-Frank established a Financial Stability Oversight Council (“Council”) which is authorized to subject non-bank financial companies such as Prudential Financial to stricter prudential standards and to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) if the Council determines that material financial distress at Prudential Financial or the scope of Prudential Financial’s activities could pose a threat to the financial stability of the U.S. On September 19, 2013, the Council made a final determination that Prudential Financial is a Designated Financial Company. As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial is now subject to supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and to stricter prudential standards, which include or will include requirements and limitations (some of which are the subject of ongoing rule-making) relating to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, stress-testing, overall risk management, resolution plans, early remediation, management interlocks and credit concentration; and may also include additional standards regarding capital, public disclosure, short-term debt limits, and other related subjects at the discretion of the FRB and the Council.
Under Dodd-Frank, key aspects of Prudential Financial’s regulation as a Designated Financial Company include:
| | • | | In December 2011, the FRB published for comment proposed rules implementing certain of the new standards. Under the proposed rules, a Designated Financial Company would be required to calculate its minimum risk-based capital and leverage requirements as if it were a bank holding company in accordance with capital requirements published by the FRB for bank holding companies (as further discussed below) and be subject to the minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios that were in effect for insured depository institutions at the time of the proposed rules: a minimum Tier-1 risk-based capital ratio of 4%, a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. We cannot predict whether the final rules implementing these standards will require compliance with these proposed minimum ratios, the more stringent minimum ratios currently in effect for insured depository institutions, or other minimum ratios to be established by the FRB. However, the proposed rules indicate that the FRB may consider that adjustments to such requirements may be appropriate with respect to Designated Financial Companies. Designated Financial Companies of Prudential Financial’s size would be required to submit annual capital plans to the FRB demonstrating their ability to satisfy the required capital ratios under baseline and stressed conditions. The FRB indicated in the proposed rules that it intends to issue, in addition to such capital requirements, a proposal requiring a risk-based capital surcharge for such companies, or a subset thereof. The proposed rules also include enhanced liquidity requirements, which would require Designated Financial Companies to maintain a liquidity buffer of highly liquid unencumbered assets sufficient to meet projected cash flows under required stress-testing, and to establish and maintain a contingency funding plan and concentration and other exposure limits to address liquidity needs and risk. Under the proposed rules, a Designated Financial Company would be required to limit its credit exposure to any unaffiliated entity (including sovereign issuers other than the United States) to no more than 25% of its consolidated capital stock and surplus or to no more than 10% with respect to any “major counterparty,” which includes any Designated Financial Company or bank holding company with more than $500 billion of total consolidated assets. |
The proposed rules implement, as required by Dodd-Frank, the establishment of an “early remediation” regime, whereby failure to meet defined measures of financial condition (including exceeding certain capital and leverage ratios or market indicator thresholds, the occurrence of adverse stress test results or other financial triggers) would result in remedial action by the FRB. Depending on the degree of financial distress, such remedial action could result in: heightened FRB supervisory review; limitations or prohibitions on capital distributions, acquisitions and/or asset growth; requirements to raise additional capital or take other actions to improve capital adequacy; limitations or on transactions with affiliates; restrictions on product offerings and/or requirements to sell assets; or recommendation for
7
resolution under the special orderly liquidation process discussed further below. The proposed rules would require that a Designated Financial Company, determined by the Council to pose a grave threat to financial stability of the U.S., maintain a debt-to-equity ratio of no more than 15-to-1 until the limitation is no longer necessary.
We cannot predict the form in which these proposed regulations ultimately will be adopted. Dodd-Frank authorizes the FRB to tailor its application of enhanced prudential standards to different companies on an individual basis or by category, taking into consideration financial activities involved and other factors. The FRB has stated that it expects to take into account the differences among bank holding companies and Designated Financial Companies, including insurance companies, when applying these enhanced prudential standards. Nevertheless, we cannot predict how the FRB will apply these prudential standards to Prudential Financial as a Designated Financial Company.
| | • | | Section 171 of Dodd-Frank (the Collins Amendment) requires that Designated Financial Companies be subject to capital requirements that are no less stringent than the requirements generally applicable to insured depository institutions and that are not quantitatively lower than the requirements in effect for insured depository institutions as of July 21, 2010. In July 2013, the FRB approved final rules, based on accords established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, that substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies compared to the current general risk-based capital rules. The rules include provisions affecting the calculation of regulatory capital and risk-weighting of assets, and establish new minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios and a capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer. The FRB has also proposed a supplemental leverage ratio for a subset of large banking organizations. The final rules also eliminate the use of external credit ratings to determine risk-weights for regulatory capital purposes. Although Designated Financial Companies are not directly subject to the final rules, and the final rules exempt savings and loan holding companies that are predominantly engaged in insurance activities, the final rules may serve as a “floor” for Designated Financial Companies such as Prudential Financial under the Collins Amendment and provide the basis for the enhanced prudential standards to be applied by the FRB to Designated Financial Companies. Regulations that have been adopted to date include a modification to the general risk-based capital rules in order to address appropriate capital requirements for low-risk assets held by non-bank financial companies such as Prudential Financial, and would permit flexibility in the application of certain capital requirements imposed by Dodd-Frank to non-bank financial companies. We cannot predict what capital regulations the FRB will promulgate with respect to Designated Financial Companies or how or when such capital regulations will be applied to Prudential Financial. |
| | • | | As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial is subject to stress tests to be promulgated by the FRB to determine whether, on a consolidated basis, it has the capital necessary to absorb losses as a result of adverse economic conditions. Prudential Financial will be required to submit to annual stress tests conducted by the FRB and to conduct internal annual and semi-annual stress tests to be provided to the FRB. Under final rules published by the FRB in October 2012, Designated Financial Companies must comply with these requirements the calendar year after the year in which a company first becomes subject to the FRB’s minimum regulatory capital requirements discussed above, although the FRB has the discretion to accelerate or extend the effective date. The final rules require baseline, adverse and severely adverse scenarios to be used. The FRB will provide the scenarios to be used in the internal annual stress tests, although companies will be required to develop their own scenarios for the internal semi-annual stress tests. The FRB has indicated that it may tailor the application of the stress test requirements to Designated Financial Companies on an individual basis or by category. Summary results of such stress tests would be required to be publicly disclosed. We cannot predict the manner in which the stress tests will ultimately be designed, conducted and disclosed with respect to Prudential Financial or whether the results of such stress tests will cause us to alter our business practices or affect the perceptions of regulators, rating agencies, customers, counterparties or investors of our financial strength. |
| | • | | Under final rules published by the FRB and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in November 2011, Prudential Financial is required as a Designated Financial Company to submit to the FRB and FDIC, and periodically update in the event of material events, an annual plan for rapid and orderly dissolution in the event of severe financial distress. |
| | • | | As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial must seek pre-approval from the FRB for acquisition of certain companies engaged in financial activities. |
| | • | | The Council may recommend that state insurance regulators or other regulators apply new or heightened standards and safeguards for activities or practices we and other insurers or other financial services companies engage in. We cannot predict whether any such recommendations will be made or their effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. |
| | • | | As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial could be subject to additional capital requirements for, and other restrictions on, proprietary trading and sponsorship of, and investment in, hedge, private equity and other covered funds. |
Other Regulation under Dodd-Frank
Other key aspects of Dodd-Frank’s impact on us include:
| | • | | Dodd-Frank creates a new framework for regulation of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives markets which could impact various activities of Prudential Global Funding LLC (“PGF”), Prudential Financial and its insurance subsidiaries, which use derivatives for various purposes (including hedging interest rate, foreign currency and equity market exposures). Dodd-Frank generally requires swaps, subject to a determination by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) or SEC as to which swaps are covered, entered into by all counterparties except non-financial end users to be executed through a centralized exchange or regulated facility and to be cleared through a regulated clearinghouse. The CFTC has made a determination that certain categories of swaps, including certain types of interest rate swaps, will be subject to the mandatory clearing requirement; it is anticipated that other categories of swaps will become subject to this requirement in the future. Swap dealers and major swap participants (“MSPs”) are subject to capital and margin (i.e., collateral) requirements that will be imposed by the applicable prudential regulator or the CFTC or SEC, as well as business conduct rules and reporting requirements. In November 2012, the Secretary of the Treasury determined to exclude most foreign currency swaps and forwards |
8
| | from the foregoing requirements. We believe Prudential Financial, PGF and Prudential Financial’s insurance subsidiaries should not be considered dealers or MSPs subject to registration and the capital and margin requirements. In April, 2013, the CFTC adopted a rule to exempt certain affiliated entities within a corporate group from the foregoing clearing requirements. This exemption is available for swaps entered into between PGF, Prudential Financial and its insurance subsidiaries, such as the Company, subject to certain conditions, including compliance with documentation and reporting requirements. The SEC and CFTC have issued regulations defining “swaps” and are required to determine whether and how “stable value contracts” should be treated as swaps and, although we believe otherwise, various other products offered by our insurance subsidiaries might be treated as swaps; if regulated as swaps, we cannot predict how the rules would be applied to such products or the effect on their profitability or attractiveness to our clients. Finally, the new regulatory scheme imposed on all market participants may increase the costs of hedging generally and, because banking institutions will be required to conduct at least a portion of their OTC derivatives businesses outside their depositary institutions, may affect the credit risk these counterparties pose to us and the degree to which we are able to enter into transactions with such counterparties. We cannot predict the effect of the foregoing on our hedging costs, our hedging strategy or implementation thereof or whether we will need or choose to increase and/or change the composition of the risks we do not hedge. |
| | • | | Dodd-Frank established a Federal Insurance Office (“FIO”) within the Department of the Treasury headed by a director appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury. While not having a general supervisory or regulatory authority over the business of insurance, the FIO director performs various functions with respect to insurance, including serving as a non-voting member of the Council and coordinating with the FRB in the application of any stress tests required to be conducted with respect to an insurer. On December 12, 2013, FIO issued its report, as required under Dodd-Frank, on how to modernize and improve the system of insurance regulation in the United States. In its report, FIO advocates closer coordination between state insurance regulators and a harmonization of state insurance laws across a number of insurance regulatory issues and responsibilities and also makes recommendations for direct federal involvement in certain areas of insurance regulation. |
| | • | | Title II of Dodd-Frank provides that a financial company may be subject to a special orderly liquidation process outside the federal bankruptcy code, administered by the FDIC as receiver, upon a determination (with the approval of the FIO director if – as is true with respect to Prudential Financial – the largest United States subsidiary is an insurer) that the company is in default or in danger of default and presents a systemic risk to U.S. financial stability. Were Prudential Financial subject to such a proceeding, the Company would remain subject to rehabilitation and liquidation proceedings under state law, although the FDIC has discretion and authority to initiate resolution of an insurer under state law if its state insurance regulator has not filed the appropriate judicial action within 60 days of a systemic risk determination. However, Prudential Financial’s non-insurance U.S. subsidiaries engaged in financial activities would be subject to any special orderly liquidation process so commenced. |
| | • | | Dodd-Frank includes various securities law reforms that may affect our business practices and the liabilities and/or exposures associated therewith. In January 2011, the SEC staff issued a study that recommends that the SEC adopt a uniform federal fiduciary standard of conduct for registered broker-dealers and investment advisers that provide retail investors personalized investment advice about securities. |
International and Global Regulatory Initiatives
In addition to the adoption of Dodd-Frank in the United States, lawmakers around the world are actively reviewing the causes of the financial crisis and exploring steps to avoid similar problems in the future. In many respects, this work is being led by the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”), consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations. The G20, the FSB and related governmental bodies have developed proposals to address such issues as financial group supervision, capital and solvency standards, systemic economic risk, corporate governance including executive compensation, and a host of related issues associated with responses to the financial crisis.
On July 18, 2013, the FSB identified Prudential Financial as a global systemically important insurer (“G-SII”). U.S. financial regulators are thereby expected to enhance their regulation of Prudential Financial to achieve a number of regulatory objectives, including:
| | • | | Enhanced group-wide supervision, |
| | • | | Enhanced capital standards, including basic capital requirements applicable to all group activities and, for business deemed to be non-traditional/non-insurance, higher loss absorption capacity requirements (expected to begin to be implemented in 2019), |
| | • | | Enhanced liquidity planning and management, and |
| | • | | Development of a risk reduction plan (expected to be completed within 12 months of G-SII designation) and recovery and resolution plans (expected to be developed and agreed by the end of 2014). |
Policy measures applicable to G-SIIs would need to be implemented by legislation or regulation in each applicable jurisdiction. We cannot predict the outcome of our identification as a G-SII on the regulation of our businesses.
At the direction of the FSB, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (the “IAIS”) is developing a model framework (“ComFrame”) for the supervision of internationally active insurance groups (“IAIGs”) that contemplates “group wide supervision” across national boundaries. Prudential Financial qualifies as an IAIG. In October 2013, the IAIS announced that it expects to develop a risk-based global insurance capital standard by 2016 applicable to IAIGs, with full implementation scheduled to begin in 2019. In addition, the IAIS seeks to promote the financial stability of IAIGs by endorsing: uniform standards for insurer corporate governance and enterprise risk management; group-wide supervision of IAIGs; a framework for group capital adequacy assessment that accounts for group-wide risks; additional regulatory and disclosure requirements for insurance groups; and the establishment of ongoing supervisory colleges. ComFrame also requires each IAIG to conduct a group-wide risk and solvency assessment to monitor and manage its overall solvency. At this time, we cannot predict what additional capital requirements, compliance costs or other burdens these requirements would impose on us, if adopted.
9
State Insurance Regulation
State insurance authorities have broad administrative powers with respect to all aspects of the insurance business including: licensing to transact business; licensing agents; admittance of assets to statutory surplus; regulating premium rates for certain insurance products; approving policy forms; regulating unfair trade and claims practices; establishing reserve requirements and solvency standards; fixing maximum interest rates on life insurance policy loans and minimum accumulation or surrender values; regulating the type, amounts and valuations of investments permitted, regulating reinsurance transactions, including the role of captive reinsurers, and other matters.
State insurance laws and regulations require the Company to file financial statements with state insurance departments everywhere it does business in accordance with accounting practices and procedures prescribed or permitted by these departments. The Company’s operations and accounts are subject to examination by those departments at any time.
State insurance departments conduct periodic examinations of the books and records, financial reporting, policy filings and market conduct of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or “NAIC”. During 2013, the Arizona insurance regulator substantially completed a coordinated risk focused financial examination for the five year period ended December 31, 2011 for the Company as part of the normal five year examination and found no material deficiencies.
Financial Regulation
Dividend Payment Limitations.The Arizona insurance law regulates the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Company. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of Dividend Restrictions.
Risk-Based Capital.In order to enhance the regulation of insurers’ solvency, the NAIC adopted a model law to implement risk-based capital requirements for life insurance companies. All states have adopted the NAIC’s model law or a substantially similar law. The risk-based capital, or RBC, calculation, which regulators use to assess the sufficiency of an insurer’s statutory capital, measures the risk characteristics of a company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items. In general, RBC is calculated by applying factors to various asset, premium, claim, expense and reserve items. Within a given risk category, these factors are higher for those items with greater underlying risk and lower for items with lower underlying risk. Insurers that have less statutory capital than the RBC calculation requires are considered to have inadequate capital and are subject to varying degrees of regulatory action depending upon the level of capital inadequacy.
Insurance Reserves and Regulatory Capital. State insurance laws require us to analyze the adequacy of our reserves annually. Our appointed actuary must submit an opinion that our reserves, when considered in light of the assets we hold with respect to those reserves, make adequate provision for our contractual obligations and related expenses.
PLNJ is a licensed insurance company in New York, but is not domiciled in New York. The New York Department of Financial Services (“NY DFS”) has notified PLNJ that it does not agree with PLNJ’s calculation of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for New York purposes in respect of certain variable annuity products. PLNJ is currently in discussions with the NY DFS regarding the proper level of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for these products. If PLNJ is ultimately required to establish material additional reserves on a New York statutory accounting basis or cause material amounts of additional collateral to be posted with respect to such variable annuity or other products, PLNJ’s ability to deploy capital for other purposes could be affected.
The NAIC has developed a principles-based reserving approach for life insurance products. The timing and the effect of these changes are still uncertain since the changes have to be adopted by each state and the approach can be further modified prior to adoption.
Captive Reinsurance Companies. The NAIC, the New York State Department of Financial Services and other regulators have increased their focus on life insurers’ use of captive reinsurance companies. We cannot predict what, if any, changes may result from these reviews. If applicable insurance laws are changed in a way that impairs the use of captive reinsurance companies, our ability to write certain products and efficiently manage their associated risks could be adversely affected and we may need to increase prices on certain products, modify certain products or find alternate financing sources, any of which could adversely affect our competitiveness, capital and financial position and results of operations.
Solvency Modernization Initiative.State insurance regulators have focused attention on U.S. insurance solvency regulation pursuant to the NAIC’s “Solvency Modernization Initiative.” The Solvency Modernization Initiative focuses on the entire U.S. financial regulatory system and all aspects of financial regulation affecting insurance companies. Though broad in scope, the NAIC has stated that the Solvency Modernization Initiative will focus on: (1) capital requirements; (2) corporate governance and risk management; (3) group supervision; (4) statutory accounting and financial reporting; and (5) reinsurance. This initiative has resulted in the recent adoption of the NAIC Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (“ORSA”) model act which, following enactment at the state level, will require larger insurers to, at least annually beginning in 2015, assess the adequacy of its and its group’s risk management and current and future solvency position. We cannot predict the additional capital requirements or compliance costs these requirements may impose.
IRIS Tests. The NAIC has developed a set of financial relationships or tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System, or “IRIS,” to assist state regulators in monitoring the financial condition of insurance companies and identifying companies that require special attention or action by insurance regulatory authorities. Generally, regulators will begin to investigate or monitor an insurance company if its ratios fall outside the usual ranges for four or more of the ratios. If an insurance company has insufficient capital, regulators may act to reduce the amount of insurance it can issue. Based on our most recent statutory filing (as of December 31, 2013), the Company is not subject to regulatory scrutiny based on these ratios.
Market Conduct Regulation
State insurance laws and regulations include numerous provisions governing the marketplace activities of insurers, including provisions governing the form and content of disclosure to consumers, illustrations, advertising, sales practices and complaint handling. State regulatory authorities generally enforce these provisions through periodic market conduct examinations.
10
Insurance Guaranty Association Assessments
Each state has insurance guaranty association laws under which insurers doing business in the state are members and may be assessed by state insurance guaranty associations for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. Typically, states assess each member insurer in an amount related to the member insurer’s proportionate share of the business written by all member insurers in the state. While we cannot predict the amount and timing of any future assessments on the Company under these laws, we have established estimated reserves for future assessments relating to insurance companies that are currently subject to insolvency proceedings.
State and Federal Securities Regulation
Our variable life insurance products, as well as our variable annuity products, generally are “securities” within the meaning of federal securities laws, registered under the federal securities laws and subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or “FINRA”. Federal securities regulation may affect investment advice, sales and related activities with respect to these products.
In certain states, our variable life insurance and variable annuity products are considered “securities” within the meaning of state securities laws. As securities, these products may be subject to certain requirements. Also, sales activities with respect to these products generally are subject to state securities regulation. Such regulation may affect investment advice, sales and related activities for these products.
U.S. Tax Legislation
The American Taxpayer’s Relief Act (the “Act”) was signed into law on January 2, 2013. The Act permanently extended the reduced Bush-era individual tax rates for certain taxpayers and permanently increased those rates for higher income taxpayers. Higher tax rates increase the benefits of tax deferral on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance. The Act also made permanent the current $5 million (indexed for inflation) per person estate tax exemption and increased the top estate tax rate from 35% to 40%.
Notwithstanding the passage of the Act, there continues to be uncertainty regarding U.S. taxes both for individuals and corporations. There continues to be discussions in Washington concerning the need to reform the tax code, primarily by lowering tax rates and broadening the base by reducing or eliminating certain tax expenditures. Reducing or eliminating certain expenditures could make our products less attractive to customers. It is unclear whether or when Congress may take up overall tax reform and what would be the impact of reform on the Company and its products. However, even in the absence of overall tax reform, the large federal deficit increases the possibility that Congress will raise revenue by enacting legislation to increase the taxes paid by individuals and/or corporations. This can be accomplished by either raising rates or otherwise changing the tax rules.
Current U.S. federal income tax laws generally permit certain holders to defer taxation on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance products until payments are actually made to the policyholder or other beneficiary and to exclude from taxation the death benefit paid under a life insurance contract. Congress from time to time considers legislation that could make our products less attractive to consumers, including legislation that would reduce or eliminate the benefit of this deferral on some annuities and insurance products.
Additionally, legislative or regulatory changes could also impact the amount of taxes that we pay, thereby affecting our consolidated net income. For example, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service intend to address through guidance the methodology to be followed in determining the dividends received deduction, or DRD, related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to U.S. tax and is a significant component of the difference between our actual tax expense and expected tax amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. For the last several years, the revenue proposals included in the Obama Administration’s budgets included a proposal that would change the method used to determine the amount of the DRD. A change in the DRD including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of the deduction through guidance or legislation could increase actual tax expense and reduce the Company’s consolidated net income.
For additional discussion of possible tax legislative and regulatory risks that could affect our business, see “Risk Factors.”
USA Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act of 2001, enacted in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, contains anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws applicable to broker-dealers and other financial services companies, including insurance companies. The Patriot Act seeks to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering. Anti-money laundering laws outside of the U.S. contain provisions that may be different, conflicting or more rigorous. The increased obligations of financial institutions to identify their customers, watch for and report suspicious transactions, respond to requests for information by regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, and share information with other financial institutions require the implementation and maintenance of internal practices, procedures and controls.
Privacy Regulation
We are subject to federal and state laws and regulations that require financial institutions and other businesses to protect the security and confidentiality of personal information, including health-related and customer information and to notify customers and other individuals about their policies and practices relating to the collection and disclosure of health-related and customer information. State laws regulate use and disclosure of social security numbers. Federal and state laws require notice to affected individuals, law enforcement, regulators and others if there is a breach of the security of certain personal information, including social security numbers, and require holders of certain personal information to protect the security of the data. Federal regulations require financial institutions and creditors to implement effective programs to detect, prevent, and mitigate
11
identity theft. Federal and state laws and regulations regulate the ability of financial institutions to make telemarketing calls and to send unsolicitede-mail or fax messages to consumers and customers. Federal law and regulation regulate the permissible uses of certain personal information, including consumer report information. Federal and state governments and regulatory bodies may be expected to consider additional or more detailed regulation regarding these subjects and the privacy and security of personal information.
Holding Company Regulation
We are subject to the Arizona insurance company law which requires us to register with the insurance department and to furnish annually financial and other information about the operations of the Company. Generally, all transactions with affiliates that affect the Company must be fair and reasonable and, if material, require prior notice and approval or non-disapproval by the Arizona insurance department.
Most states have insurance laws that require regulatory approval of a direct or indirect change of control of an insurer or an insurer’s holding company. Laws such as these that apply to us prevent any person from acquiring control of Prudential Financial or of its insurance subsidiaries unless that person has filed a statement with specified information with the insurance regulators and has obtained their prior approval. Under most states’ statutes, acquiring 10% or more of the voting stock of an insurance company or its parent company is presumptively considered a change of control, although such presumption may be rebutted. Accordingly, any person who acquires 10% or more of the voting securities of Prudential Financial without the prior approval of the insurance regulators of the states in which its U.S. insurance companies are domiciled will be in violation of these states’ laws and may be subject to injunctive action requiring the disposition or seizure of those securities by the relevant insurance regulator or prohibiting the voting of those securities and to other actions determined by the relevant insurance regulator. In addition, many state insurance laws require prior notification to state insurance departments of a change in control of a non-domiciliary insurance company doing business in that state.
Currently, there are several proposals to amend state insurance holding company laws to increase the scope of regulation of insurance holding companies (such as Prudential Financial). The NAIC, has promulgated model laws for adoption internationally and in the United States that would provide for “group wide” supervision of Prudential Financial as an insurance holding company in addition to the current regulation of Prudential Financial’s insurance subsidiaries. While the timing of their adoption and content will vary by jurisdiction, we have identified the following areas of focus in these model laws: (1) uniform standards for insurer corporate governance; (2) group-wide supervision of insurance holding companies; (3) adjustments to risk-based capital calculations to account for group-wide risks; and (4) additional regulatory and disclosure requirements for insurance holding companies. At this time, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty what additional capital requirements, compliance costs or other burdens these requirements would impose on Prudential Financial or the Company, if adopted.
In October 2013, several of Prudential Financial’s domestic and foreign insurance regulators convened a supervisory college. The purpose of the supervisory college is to promote ongoing supervisory coordination, facilitate the sharing of information among regulators and to enhance each regulator’s understanding of the Company’s risk profile.
Unclaimed Property Laws
We are subject to the laws and regulations of states and other jurisdictions concerning the identification, reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned funds, and we are subject to audit and examination for compliance with these requirements. For additional discussion of these matters, see “Litigation and Regulatory Matters” in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Segments
The Company currently operates as one reporting segment. Revenues, net income and total assets can be found on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Employees
The Company has no employees. Services to the Company are primarily provided by employees of Prudential Insurance.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risks. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” above and the risks of our business described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Risks Relating to Economic, Market and Political Conditions
The Company is indirectly owned by Prudential Financial. It is possible that we may need to rely on Prudential Financial or our direct parent company, Prudential Insurance, to meet our capital, liquidity and other needs in the future.
Market fluctuations and general economic, market and political conditions may adversely affect our business and profitability.
Our business and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected by conditions in the global financial markets and by economic conditions generally.
12
Even under relatively favorable market conditions, our insurance and annuities products, as well as our investment returns and our access to and cost of financing, are sensitive to fixed income, equity, real estate and other market fluctuations and general economic, market and political conditions. These fluctuations and conditions could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and liquidity, including in the following respects:
| | • | | The profitability of many of our insurance and annuities products depends in part on the value of the separate accounts supporting these products, which fluctuate substantially depending on the foregoing conditions. |
| | • | | A change in market conditions, such as high inflation and high interest rates, could cause a change in consumer sentiment adversely affecting sales and persistency of our savings and protection products. Conversely, low inflation and low interest rates could cause persistency of these products to vary from that anticipated and adversely affect profitability (as further described below). Similarly, changing economic conditions and unfavorable public perception of financial institutions can influence customer behavior, including but not limited to increasing claims or surrenders in certain product lines. |
| | • | | Sales of our products and services may decline, and lapses and surrenders of certain insurance products may increase if a market downturn, increased market volatility or other market conditions result in customers becoming dissatisfied with their investments or products. |
| | • | | A market decline could further result in guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products being higher than current account values or our pricing assumptions would support, requiring us to materially increase reserves for such products and may cause customers to retain contracts in force in order to benefit from the guarantees, thereby increasing their cost to us. Any increased cost may or may not be more than offset by the favorable impact of greater persistency from prolonged fee streams. Our valuation of the liabilities for the minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products requires us to consider the market perception of our risk of non-performance, and a decrease in our own credit spreads resulting from ratings upgrades or other events or market conditions could cause the recorded value of these liabilities to increase, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position. |
| | • | | Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection we purchase. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms which could adversely affect the profitability of future business or our willingness to write future business. |
| | • | | Derivative instruments we and our affiliates hold to hedge and manage interest rate and equity risks associated with our products and businesses might not perform as intended or expected resulting in higher realized losses and unforeseen stresses on liquidity. Market conditions can limit availability of hedging instruments and also further increase the cost of executing product related hedges and such costs may not be recovered in the pricing of the underlying products being hedged. We execute our hedges through an affiliate that, in turn, may execute hedges with unaffiliated counterparties. Accordingly, our derivative-based hedging strategies also rely on the performance of this affiliate and on the performance of its unaffiliated counterparties to such hedges. These unaffiliated counterparties may fail to perform for various reasons resulting in losses on uncollateralized positions. |
| | • | | Positions that we are required to mark-to-market may cause, and have caused, volatility in reported results of operations due to market fluctuations. |
| | • | | We have significant investment and derivative portfolios, including but not limited to corporate and asset-backed securities, equities and commercial real estate. Economic conditions as well as adverse capital market conditions, including but not limited to a lack of buyers in the marketplace, volatility, credit spread changes, benchmark interest rate changes and declines in value of underlying collateral will impact the credit quality, liquidity and value of our investments and derivatives, potentially resulting in higher capital charges and unrealized or realized losses. Valuations may include assumptions or estimates that may have significant period to period changes which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition and in certain cases under U.S. GAAP such period to period changes in the value of investments are not recognized in our results of operations or consolidated statements of financial position. |
| | • | | Opportunities for investment of available funds at appropriate returns may be limited, including due to the current low interest rate environment or other factors, with possible negative impacts on our overall results. Limited opportunities for attractive investments may lead to holding cash for long periods of time and increased use of derivatives for duration management and other portfolio management purposes. The increased use of derivatives may increase the volatility of our U.S. GAAP results and our statutory capital. |
| | • | | Regardless of market conditions, certain investments we hold, including private bonds, commercial mortgages and alternative asset classes (such as private equity, hedge funds and real estate) are relatively illiquid. If we needed to sell these investments, we may have difficulty doing so in a timely manner at a price that we could otherwise realize. |
| | • | | Certain features of our products and components of investment strategies depend on active and liquid markets, and, if market liquidity is strained or the capacity of the financial markets to absorb our transactions is inadequate, these products may not perform as intended. |
| | • | | Fluctuations in our operating results as well as realized gains and losses on our investment and derivative portfolios may impact the Company’s tax profile and its ability to optimally utilize tax attributes. |
Our investments, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by adverse developments in the global economy, or in the U.S. economy (including as a result of uncertainty about the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy or the ongoing debate over the federal debt ceiling). Global or U.S. economic activity and financial markets may in turn be negatively affected by adverse developments or conditions in specific geographical regions.
13
Interest rate fluctuations or prolonged periods of low interest rates could adversely affect our business and profitability and require us to increase reserves and statutory capital.
Our insurance and annuity products, and our investment returns, are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, and changes in interest rates could adversely affect our investment returns and results of operations, including in the following respects:
| | • | | Some of our products expose us to the risk that changes in interest rates will reduce the spread between the amounts that we are required to pay under the contracts and the rate of return we are able to earn on our general account investments supporting the contracts. When interest rates decline, we have to reinvest in lower yielding instruments, potentially reducing net investment income. Since many of our policies and contracts have guaranteed minimum interest or crediting rates or limit the resetting of interest rates, the spreads could decrease and potentially become negative. When interest rates rise, we may not be able to replace the assets in our general account as quickly with the higher yielding assets needed to fund the higher crediting rates necessary to keep these products and contracts competitive. In addition, rising interest rates could cause a decline in the market value of fixed income assets the Company holds which in turn could result in lower asset management fees earned. |
| | • | | When interest rates rise, policy loans and surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts may increase as policyholders seek to buy products with perceived higher returns, requiring us to sell investment assets potentially resulting in realized investment losses, or requiring us to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and deferred sales inducements. Also, an increase in interest rates accompanied by unexpected extensions of certain lower yielding investments could reduce our profitability. |
| | • | | A decline in interest rates accompanied by unexpected prepayments of certain investments could require us to reinvest at lower rates and reduce our profitability. |
| | • | | Changes in interest rates coupled with greater than expected client withdrawals for certain products can result in increased costs associated with our guarantees. |
| | • | | Changes in the relationship between long-term and short-term interest rates could adversely affect the profitability of some of our products. |
| | • | | Changes in interest rates could increase our costs of financing. |
| | • | | Our mitigation efforts with respect to interest rate risk are primarily focused on maintaining an investment portfolio with diversified maturities that has a key rate duration profile that is approximately equal to the key rate duration profile of our estimated liability cash flow profile. However, this estimate of the liability cash flow profile is complex and could turn out to be inaccurate, especially during volatile times. In addition, there are practical and capital market limitations on our ability to accomplish this matching. Due to these and other factors we may need to liquidate investments prior to maturity at a loss in order to satisfy liabilities or be forced to reinvest funds in a lower rate environment. Although we take measures to manage the economic risks of investing in a changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to effectively mitigate, and we may sometimes choose based on economic considerations and other factors not to fully mitigate, the interest rate risk of our assets relative to our liabilities. |
| | • | | For certain of our products, a delay between the time we make changes in interest rate and other assumptions used for product pricing and the time we are able to reflect these assumptions in products available for sale could negatively impact the long-term profitability of products sold during the intervening period. |
Recent periods have been characterized by low interest rates. A prolonged period during which interest rates remain at levels lower than those anticipated in our pricing may result in greater costs associated with certain of our product features which guarantee death benefits or income streams for stated periods or for life; higher costs for derivative instruments used to hedge certain of our product risks; or shortfalls in investment income on assets supporting policy obligations, each of which may require us to record charges to increase reserves. In addition to compressing spreads and reducing net investment income, such an environment may cause policies to remain in force for longer periods than we anticipated in our pricing, potentially resulting in greater claims costs than we expected and resulting in lower overall returns on business in force. Reflecting these impacts in recoverability and loss recognition testing under U.S. GAAP may require us to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC and deferred sales inducements, or DSI, as well as to increase required reserves for future policyholder benefits. In addition, certain statutory capital and reserve requirements are based on formulas or models that consider interest rates, and a period of low interest rates may continue to increase the statutory capital we are required to hold as well as the amount of assets we must maintain to support statutory reserves.
Adverse capital market conditions could significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, our access to capital and our cost of capital and that of our ultimate parent company, Prudential Financial. Under such conditions, Prudential Financial may seek additional debt or equity capital but may be unable to obtain such.
Adverse capital market conditions could affect the availability and cost of borrowed funds and could impact our ability to refinance existing borrowings, thereby ultimately impacting our profitability and ability to support or grow our businesses. We need liquidity to pay our operating expenses, interest and maturities on our debt. During times of market stress, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient and some of our alternative sources of liquidity, such as commercial paper issuance, securities lending and repurchase arrangements and other forms of borrowings in the capital markets, may be unavailable to Prudential Financial.
Disruptions, uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets may force Prudential Financial to delay raising capital, issue shorter tenor securities than would be optimal, bear an unattractive cost of capital or be unable to raise capital at any price, which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility.
Prudential Financial may seek additional debt or equity financing to satisfy our needs. However, the availability of additional financing depends on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, and Prudential Financial’s credit ratings and credit capacity. Prudential Financial may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. Actions taken to access financing by Prudential Financial may in turn cause rating agencies to reevaluate its ratings.
14
Disruptions in the capital markets could adversely affect our ability to access sources of liquidity, as well as threaten to reduce our capital below a level that is consistent with our existing ratings objectives. Therefore, we may need to take actions, which may include but are not limited to: (1) undertake capital management activities, including reinsurance transactions; (2) limit or curtail sales of certain products and/or restructure existing products; (3) undertake further asset sales or internal asset transfers; (4) seek temporary or permanent changes to regulatory rules; and (5) maintain greater levels of cash balances or for longer periods thereby reducing investment returns. Certain of these actions may require regulatory approval and/or agreement of counterparties which are outside of our control or have economic costs associated with them.
Risks Relating to Estimates, Assumptions and Valuations
Our profitability may decline if mortality experience, longevity experience, morbidity experience, persistency experience, utilization experience or expenses differ significantly from our pricing expectations.
We set prices for many of our insurance and annuity products based upon expected claims and payment patterns, using assumptions for mortality rates, or likelihood of death, longevity rates or likelihood of survival (including the effect of improvement in life expectancy trends), and morbidity rates, or likelihood of sickness or disability, of our policyholders. In addition to the potential effect of natural or man-made disasters, significant changes in mortality, longevity or morbidity could emerge gradually over time, due to changes in the natural environment, the health habits of the insured population, treatment patterns and technologies for disease or disability, the economic environment, or other factors. Pricing of our insurance and deferred annuity products are also based in part upon expected persistency of these products, which is the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Persistency may be significantly impacted by the value of guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products being higher than current account values in light of poor equity market performance or extended periods of low interest rates as well as other factors. Persistency could be adversely affected generally by developments affecting client perception of us, including perceptions arising from adverse publicity. Many of our products also provide our customers with wide flexibility with respect to the amount and timing of premium deposits and/or the amount and timing of withdrawals from the policy’s value. Results may vary based on differences between actual and expected premium deposits and withdrawals for these products, especially if these product features are relatively new to the marketplace. The pricing of certain of our variable annuity products that contain optional living benefit guarantees is also based on assumptions about utilization rates, or the percentage of contracts that will utilize the benefit during the contract duration, including the timing of the first lifetime income withdrawal. Results may vary based on differences between actual and expected benefit utilization. The development of a secondary market for life insurance, including life settlements or “viaticals” and investor owned life insurance, and third-party investor strategies in the annuities business, could adversely affect the profitability of existing business and our pricing assumptions for new business.
Significant deviations in actual experience from our pricing assumptions could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits during the life of the policy or contract, the adjustments permitted under the terms of the policies or contracts may not be sufficient to maintain profitability or may cause the policies or contracts to lapse. Many of our products do not permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits or limit those adjustments during the life of the policy or contract. Even if permitted under the policy or contract, we may not be able or willing to raise premiums or adjust other charges sufficiently, or at all, for regulatory or competitive reasons.
If our reserves for future policyholder benefits and expenses are inadequate, we may be required to increase our reserves, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We establish reserves in accordance with U.S. GAAP for future policyholder benefits and expenses. While these reserves generally exceed our best estimate of the liability for future benefits and expenses, if we conclude based on updated assumptions that our reserves, together with future premiums, are insufficient to cover future policy benefits and expenses, including unamortized DAC and DSI, we would need to accelerate the amortization of these DAC or DSI balances and then increase our reserves and incur income statement charges, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. The determination of our best estimate of the liability is based on data and models that include many assumptions and projections which are inherently uncertain and involve the exercise of significant judgment, including the levels of and/or timing of receipt or payment of premiums, benefits, expenses, interest credits, investment results (including equity market returns), retirement, mortality, longevity, morbidity and persistency. We cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that we will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits and expenses or whether the assets supporting our policy liabilities, together with future premiums, will be sufficient for payment of benefits and expenses. If we conclude that our reserves, together with future premiums, are insufficient to cover future policy benefits and expenses, we may seek to increase premiums where we are able to do so.
For certain of our products, market performance and interest rates (as well as the regulatory environment, as discussed further below) impact the level of statutory reserves and statutory capital we are required to hold, and may have an adverse effect on returns on capital associated with these products. We finance noneconomic reserves associated with our Individual Life business. Marketplace capacity for reserve funding structures may be limited as a result of market conditions generally. Our ability to efficiently manage capital and economic reserve levels may be impacted, thereby impacting profitability and returns on capital.
We may be required to accelerate the amortization of DAC or DSI, or be required to establish a valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
DAC represents the costs that vary with and are directly related to the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance and annuity contracts, and we generally amortize these costs over the expected lives of the contracts. DSI represents amounts that are credited to a policyholder’s account balance as an inducement to purchase the contract, and we amortize these costs over the expected lives of the contracts. Management periodically tests the DAC and DSI recorded on our balance sheet to determine if the amount is recoverable under current assumptions. In addition, we regularly review the estimates and assumptions underlying DAC and DSI for those products for which we amortize DAC and DSI in proportion to gross profits or gross margins. Given changes in facts and circumstances, these tests and reviews could lead to reductions in DAC and DSI that could have an
15
adverse effect on the results of our operations and our financial condition. Among other things, significant or sustained equity market declines as well as investment losses could result in acceleration of amortization of the DAC and DSI related to variable annuity and variable universal life contracts, resulting in a charge to income. As discussed earlier, the amortization of DAC and DSI is also sensitive to changes in interest rates.
Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are assessed periodically by management to determine if they are realizable. Factors in management’s determination include the performance of the business, the ability to generate capital gains from a variety of sources, and tax planning strategies. If based on available information, it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset will not be realized then a valuation allowance must be established with a corresponding charge to net income. Such charges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
Our valuation of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
During periods of market disruption, it may be difficult to value certain of our investment securities, such as sub-prime mortgage backed securities, if trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. There may be cases where certain assets in normally active markets with significant observable data become inactive with insufficient observable data due to the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more complex. These values may not be ultimately realizable in a market transaction, and such values may change very rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
The decision on whether to record an other-than-temporary impairment or write-down is determined in part by management’s assessment of the financial condition and prospects of a particular issuer, projections of future cash flows and recoverability of the particular security. Management’s conclusions on such assessments are highly judgmental and include assumptions and projections of future cash flows which may ultimately prove to be incorrect as assumptions, facts and circumstances change.
Credit and Counterparty Risks
A downgrade or potential downgrade in our financial strength or Prudential Financial’s credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase policy surrenders and withdrawals, increase our borrowing costs and/or hurt our relationships with creditors, distributors or trading counterparties.
A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could potentially, among other things, limit our ability to market products, reduce our competitiveness, increase the number or value of policy surrenders and withdrawals, increase our borrowing costs and potentially make it more difficult to borrow funds, adversely affect the availability of financial guarantees, such as letters of credit, cause additional collateral requirements or other required payments under certain agreements, allow our affiliated counterparty to terminate derivative agreements, and/or hurt our relationships with creditors, distributors or trading counterparties thereby potentially negatively affecting our profitability, liquidity and/or capital. In addition, we consider our own risk of non-performance in determining the fair value of certain of our liabilities, including insurance liabilities that are classified as embedded derivatives under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, changes in Prudential Financial’s credit rating or our financial strength ratings may affect the fair value of our liabilities.
We cannot predict what additional actions rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of rating agencies, which could adversely affect our business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, our ratings could be downgraded at any time and without advance notice by any rating agency.
Losses due to defaults by others, including issuers of investment securities or reinsurance, bond insurers and our derivative instrument counterparties, downgrades in the ratings of securities we hold or of bond insurers, insolvencies of insurers in jurisdictions where we write business and other factors affecting our counterparties or the value of their securities could adversely affect the value of our investments, the realization of amounts contractually owed to us, result in assessments or additional statutory capital requirements or reduce our profitability or sources of liquidity.
Issuers and borrowers whose securities or loans we hold, customers, vendors, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps and other derivative contracts, reinsurers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial intermediaries and guarantors, including bond insurers, may default on their obligations to us or be unable to perform service functions that are significant to our business due to bankruptcy, insolvency, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud or other reasons. Such defaults could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. A downgrade in the ratings of bond insurers could also result in declines in the value of our fixed maturity investments supported by guarantees from bond insurers.
In addition, we and our reinsurance affiliate use derivative instruments to hedge various risks, including certain guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products. We and our reinsurance affiliate enter into a variety of derivative instruments, including options, forwards, interest rate, credit default and currency swaps with an affiliate. Amounts that we expect to collect under current and future contracts, including, but not limited to reinsurance contracts, are subject to counterparty risk. Our obligations under our products are not changed by our hedging activities and we are liable for our obligations even if our derivative counterparties, including reinsurers, do not pay us. Such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
16
Under state insurance guaranty association laws, we are subject to assessments, based on the share of business we write in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants.
Certain Product Related Risks
Guarantees within certain of our products that protect policyholders may decrease our earnings or increase the volatility of our results of operations or financial position under U.S. GAAP if our hedging or risk management strategies prove ineffective or insufficient.
Certain of our products, particularly our variable annuity products, include guarantees of minimum surrender values or income streams for stated periods or for life, which may be in excess of account values. Downturns in equity markets, increased equity volatility, or (as discussed above) reduced interest rates could result in an increase in the valuation of liabilities associated with such guarantees, resulting in increases in reserves and reductions in net income. We use a variety of affiliated reinsurance hedging and risk management strategies, including product features, to mitigate these risks in part. These strategies may, however, not be fully effective. We and our reinsurance affiliates may also choose not to fully hedge these risks. Hedging instruments may not effectively offset the costs of guarantees or may otherwise be insufficient in relation to our obligations. Hedging instruments also may not change in value correspondingly with associated liabilities due to equity market or interest rate conditions or other reasons. We and our reinsurance affiliate sometimes choose to hedge these risks on a basis that does not correspond to their anticipated or actual impact upon our results of operations or financial position under U.S. GAAP. Changes from period to period in the valuation of these policy benefits, and in the amount of our obligations effectively hedged, will result in volatility in our results of operations and financial position under U.S. GAAP. Estimates and assumptions we make in connection with hedging activities may fail to reflect or correspond to our actual long-term exposure in respect of our guarantees. Further, the risk of increases in the costs of our guarantees not covered by our hedging and other capital and risk management strategies may become more significant due to changes in policyholder behavior driven by market conditions or other factors. The above factors, individually or collectively, may have a material adverse effect on our and our reinsurance affiliates results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
We may not be able to mitigate the reserve strain associated with Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX, potentially resulting in a negative impact on our capital position or in a need to increase prices and/or reduce sales of term or universal life products.
Our life insurance business is subject to a regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” and a supporting guideline entitled “The Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies,” commonly known as “Guideline AXXX.” This regulation and supporting guideline require insurers to establish statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees that are consistent with the statutory reserves required for other individual life insurance policies with similar guarantees. Many market participants believe that this level of reserves is excessive. Prudential Financial uses captive reinsurance companies that are affiliates of the Company to implement reinsurance and capital management actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX on our term and universal life insurance business. As we continue to underwrite term and universal life business, we expect to have borrowing needs to finance statutory reserves required under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX. However, if we are unsuccessful in obtaining additional financing as a result of market conditions or otherwise, this could require us to increase prices and or/reduce our sales of term or universal life products and/or have a negative impact on our capital position.
We may experience difficulty in marketing and distributing products through our current and future distribution channels.
Although we distribute our products through a wide variety of distribution channels, we do maintain relationships with certain key distributors. We periodically negotiate the terms of these relationships, and there can be no assurance that such terms will remain acceptable to us or such third parties. An interruption in certain key relationships could materially affect our ability to market our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Distributors may elect to reduce or terminate their distribution relationships with us, including for such reasons as adverse developments in our business, adverse rating agency actions or concerns about market-related risks. We are also at risk that key distribution partners may merge, change their business models in ways that affect how our products are sold, or terminate their distribution contracts with us or that new distribution channels could emerge and adversely impact the effectiveness of our distribution efforts. An increase in bank and broker-dealer consolidation activity could increase competition for access to distributors, result in greater distribution expenses and impair our ability to market products through these channels. Consolidation of distributors and/or other industry changes may also increase the likelihood that distributors will try to renegotiate the terms of any existing selling agreements to terms less favorable to us.
When our products are distributed through unaffiliated firms, we may not be able to monitor or control the manner of their distribution despite our training and compliance programs. If our products are distributed by such firms in an inappropriate manner, or to customers for whom they are unsuitable, we may suffer reputational and other harm to our business.
Regulatory and Legal Risks
Our business is heavily regulated and changes in regulation may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision. The purpose of this regulation is primarily to protect our customers. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations. The financial market dislocations we have experienced in the recent past have produced, and are expected to continue to produce, extensive changes in existing laws and regulations, and regulatory frameworks, applicable to our business.
Prudential Financial, the holding company for all of our operations, is subject to supervision by the FRB as a “Designated Financial Company” pursuant to Dodd-Frank. As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial is expected to be subject to substantial additional regulation as discussed further herein. In addition, the FSB, consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations, identified Prudential Financial as a global systemically important insurer. As a result, U.S. financial regulators are expected to enhance their regulation of Prudential
17
Financial to achieve a number of regulatory objectives. This additional regulation is likely to increase our operational, compliance and risk management costs, and could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition, including potentially increasing our capital levels and therefore reducing our return on capital.
The Company is subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC relating to public reporting and disclosure, accounting and financial reporting, and corporate governance matters. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations adopted in furtherance of that Act substantially increased the requirements in these and other areas for the Company and certain of our affiliates. Our internal controls over financial reporting may have gaps or other deficiencies and there is no assurance that significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal controls may not occur in the future. Any such gaps or deficiencies may require significant resources to remediate and may also expose the Company to litigation, regulatory fines or penalties or other losses.
Many insurance regulatory and other governmental or self-regulatory bodies have the authority to review our products and business practices and those of our agents and employees and to bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. These actions can result in substantial fines, penalties or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities and could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations or financial condition.
Insurance regulators continue to develop a principles-based reserving approach for life insurance products. The timing and the effect of these changes are uncertain.
PLNJ is a licensed insurance company in New York, but is not domiciled in New York. The NY DFS has notified PLNJ that it does not agree with PLNJ’s calculation of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for New York purposes in respect of certain variable annuity products. PLNJ is currently in discussions with the NY DFS regarding the proper level of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for these products. If PLNJ is ultimately required to establish material additional reserves on a New York statutory accounting basis or cause material amounts of additional collateral to be posted with respect to such variable annuity or other products, PLNJ’s ability to deploy capital for other purposes could be affected.
Recently, the NAIC, the New York State Department of Financial Services and other regulators have increased their focus on life insurers’ use of captive reinsurance companies. We use captive reinsurance in our insurance operations to more effectively manage our reserves and capital on an economic basis and to enable the aggregation and transfer of risks. We cannot predict what, if any, changes may result from the regulatory reviews. If applicable insurance laws are changed in a way that impairs the use of captive reinsurance companies, our ability to write certain products and efficiently manage their associated risks could be adversely affected and we may need to increase prices on certain products, modify certain products or find alternate financing sources, any of which could adversely affect our competitiveness, capital and financial position and results of operations. Given the uncertainty of the ultimate outcome of these reviews, at this time we are unable to estimate their expected effects on our future capital and financial position and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Captive Reinsurance Companies” for information on our use of captive reinsurance companies.
The NAIC is reviewing life insurers’ use of separate accounts that are insulated (where assets of the separate account equal to the reserves and other contract liabilities with respect to the account may not be charged with liabilities arising out of any other business of the company) for products that are not variable, which might lead to a recommendation against the allowance of insulation for certain products. We cannot predict what, if any, changes may result from this review and possible recommendations. If applicable insurance laws are changed in a way that impairs the use of insulation for certain contracts, our ability to compete effectively in certain markets may be adversely affected. In addition, our financial results and liquidity and capital position may also be adversely affected.
The failure of the Company to meet applicable Risk Based Capital, or RBC, requirements or minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements could subject the Company to further examination or corrective action by state insurance regulators. The failure to maintain the RBC ratios of the Company at desired levels could also adversely impact our competitive position, including as a result of downgrades to our financial strength ratings.
Currently, there are several proposals to amend state insurance holding company laws to increase the scope of the regulation of insurance holding companies (such as Prudential Financial). These proposals include imposing standards for insurer corporate governance, risk management, group-wide supervision of insurance holding companies, adjustments to risk-based capital calculations to account for group-wide risks, and additional regulatory and disclosure requirements for insurance holding companies. In addition, state insurance regulators have focused attention on U.S. insurance solvency regulation pursuant to the NAIC’s “Solvency Modernization Initiative”, including regulatory review of companies’ risk management practices and analyses. This initiative has resulted in the recent adoption of the NAIC Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (“ORSA”) model act which, following enactment at the state level, will require larger insurers, beginning in 2015, to assess the adequacy of their and their group’s risk management and current and future solvency position. At this time, we cannot predict with any degree of certainty what additional capital requirements, compliance costs or other burdens these requirements may impose on Prudential Financial or its subsidiaries.
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase our direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
See “Business—Regulation” for discussion of regulation of our business.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has and will subject the Company, our parent and our affiliates to substantial additional federal regulation and we cannot predict the effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
On September 19, 2013, the Council made a final determination that Prudential Financial should be subject to stricter prudential regulatory standards and supervision by the FRB as a “Designated Financial Company” pursuant to Dodd-Frank, thereby subjecting us to substantial federal regulation, much of it pursuant to regulations not yet promulgated. Dodd-Frank directs existing and newly-created government agencies and bodies to
18
promulgate regulations implementing the law, a process that is underway and expected to continue over the next few years. We cannot predict with any certainty the requirements of the regulations recently or not yet adopted or how Dodd-Frank and such regulations will affect the financial markets generally, impact our business, Prudential Financial’s credit ratings or our financial strength ratings, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition or advise or require us to hold or raise additional capital. Key aspects of Dodd-Frank’s impact on us include:
| | • | | As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial is now subject to supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and to stricter prudential standards, which include or will include requirements and limitations (some of which are the subject of ongoing rule-making) relating to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity and credit concentration, and a requirement to prepare and submit an annual plan for rapid and orderly dissolution in the event of severe financial distress. Failure to meet defined measures of financial condition could result in substantial restrictions on our business and capital distributions. Prudential Financial is now also subject to stress tests to be promulgated by the FRB which could cause Prudential Financial to alter our business practices or affect the perceptions of regulators, rating agencies, customers, counterparties or investors of our financial strength. We cannot predict the requirements of the regulations not yet adopted or how the FRB will apply these prudential standards to Prudential Financial as a Designated Financial Company. As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial must also seek pre-approval from the FRB for acquisition of certain companies engaged in financial activities. |
| | • | | As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial could also be subject to additional capital requirements for, and other restrictions on, proprietary trading and sponsorship of, and investment in, hedge, private equity and other covered funds. |
| | • | | The Council could recommend new or heightened standards and safeguards for activities or practices in which Prudential Financial and other financial services companies engage. We cannot predict whether any such recommendations will be made or their effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. |
| | • | | Dodd-Frank creates a new framework for regulation of the OTC derivatives markets which could impact various activities of PGF, Prudential Financial and the Company, which use derivatives for various purposes (including hedging interest rate, foreign currency and equity market exposures). Final regulations adopted could substantially increase the cost of hedging and related operations, affect the profitability of our products or their attractiveness to our clients or cause us to alter our hedging strategy or implementation thereof or increase and/or change the composition of the risks we do not hedge. |
| | • | | Title II of Dodd-Frank provides that a financial company such as Prudential Financial may be subject to a special orderly liquidation process outside the federal bankruptcy code, administered by the FDIC as receiver, upon a determination that Prudential Financial is in default or in danger of default and presents a systemic risk to U.S. financial stability. We cannot predict how creditors of Prudential Financial or its insurance and non-insurance subsidiaries, including the holders of Prudential Financial debt, will evaluate this potential or whether it will impact our financing or hedging costs. |
See “Business—Regulation” for further discussion of the impact of Dodd-Frank on our business.
Foreign governmental actions could subject us to substantial additional regulation.
In addition to the adoption of Dodd-Frank in the United States, the FSB, consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations, and the G20 have issued a series of proposals intended to produce significant changes in how financial companies, particularly companies that are members of large and complex financial groups, should be regulated.
On July 18, 2013, the FSB identified Prudential Financial as a G-SII. The framework policy measures for G-SIIs published by the IAIS include enhanced group-wide supervision, enhanced capital standards (including basic capital requirements applicable to all group activities and higher loss absorption capacity requirements for business deemed to be non-traditional/non-insurance), enhanced liquidity planning and management, and development of a risk reduction plan and recovery and resolution plans. Policy measures applicable to G-SIIs would need to be implemented by legislation or regulation in each applicable jurisdiction. We cannot predict the outcome of our identification as a G-SII on the regulation of our businesses.
At the direction of the FSB, the IAIS is developing a model framework (“ComFrame”) for the supervision of IAIGs that contemplates “group wide supervision” across national boundaries, including uniform standards for insurer corporate governance and enterprise risk management, a framework for group capital adequacy assessment that accounts for group-wide risks, and the establishment of ongoing supervisory colleges. Prudential Financial qualifies as an IAIG. In October 2013, the IAIS announced that it expects to develop a risk-based global insurance capital standard applicable to IAIGs with implementation scheduled to begin in 2019. At this time, we cannot predict what additional capital requirements, compliance costs or other burdens these requirements would impose on us, if adopted.
Changes in accounting requirements could negatively impact our reported results of operations and our reported financial position.
Accounting standards are continuously evolving and subject to change. For example, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) have ongoing projects to revise accounting standards for insurance contracts. While the final resolution of changes to U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards pursuant to these projects is unclear, changes to the manner in which we account for insurance products, or other changes in accounting standards, could have a material effect on our reported results of operations and financial condition. Further, changes in accounting standards may impose special demands on issuers in areas such as corporate governance, internal controls and disclosure, and may result in substantial conversion costs to implement.
Changes in U.S. federal, state or local income tax laws could make some of our products less attractive to consumers and increase our tax costs.
There is uncertainty regarding U.S. taxes both for individuals and corporations. Discussions in Washington continue concerning the need to reform the tax code, primarily by lowering the tax rates and broadening the base by reducing or eliminating certain tax expenditures. Reducing or eliminating certain tax expenditures could make our products less attractive to customers. It is unclear whether or when Congress may take up overall tax reform and what would be the impact of reform on the Company and its products.
19
However even in the absence of overall tax reform, the large federal deficit, as well as the budget constraints faced by many states and localities, increases the likelihood that Congress and state and local governments will raise revenue by enacting legislation increasing the taxes paid by individuals and corporations. This can be accomplished either by raising rates or otherwise changing the tax rules.
Congress from time to time considers legislation that could make our products less attractive to consumers, Current U.S. federal income tax laws generally permit certain holders to defer taxation on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance products until payments are actually made to the policyholder or other beneficiary and to exclude from taxation the death benefit paid under a life insurance contract. While higher tax rates increase the benefits of tax deferral on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance, making our products more attractive to consumers, legislation that reduces or eliminates deferral would have a potential negative effect on our products.
Congress, as well as state and local governments, also considers from time to time legislation that could increase the amount of corporate taxes we pay, thereby reducing earnings, for example, changes in the law relating to tax reserving methodologies for term life or universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees or other products could result in higher current taxes.
The Obama Administration’s Revenue Proposals include proposals which, if enacted, would affect the taxation of life insurance companies and certain life insurance products. In particular, the proposals would affect the treatment of corporate owned life insurance policies, or COLI, by limiting the availability of certain interest deductions for companies that purchase those policies. The proposals would also change the method used to determine the amount of dividend income received by a life insurance company on assets held in separate accounts used to support products, including variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts, that is eligible for the dividends received deduction, or DRD. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between our actual tax expense and the expected tax amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. If proposals of this type were enacted, the Company’s sale of COLI, variable annuities, and variable life insurance products could be adversely affected and the Company’s actual tax expense could increase, thereby reducing earnings.
The products we sell have different tax characteristics, in some cases generating tax deductions for the Company. The level of profitability of certain of our products is significantly dependent on these characteristics and our ability to continue to generate taxable income, which is taken into consideration when pricing products and is a component of our capital management strategies. Accordingly, changes in tax law, our ability to generate taxable income, or other factors impacting the availability or value of the tax characteristics generated by our products, could impact product pricing and returns or require us to reduce our sales of these products or implement other actions that could be disruptive to our businesses. In addition, the adoption of “principles based” approaches for statutory reserves may lead to significant changes to the way tax reserves are determined and thus reduce future tax deductions.
Legal and regulatory actions are inherent in our business and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial position or harm our business or reputation.
We are, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our business. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. Legal liability or adverse publicity in respect of these or future legal or regulatory actions could have an adverse affect on us or cause us reputational harm, which in turn could harm our business prospects.
Material pending litigation and regulatory matters affecting us, and certain risks to our businesses presented by such matters, are discussed under “Litigation and Regulatory Matters” in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. Our reserves for litigation and regulatory matters may prove to be inadequate. It is possible that our results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.
We rely on a combination of contractual rights with Prudential Insurance’s employees and third parties and on copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect our intellectual property. Although we endeavor to protect our rights, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property. We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability. This would represent a diversion of resources that may be significant and our efforts may not prove successful. The inability to secure or protect our intellectual property assets could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to compete.
We may be subject to claims by third parties for (i) patent, trademark or copyright infringement, (ii) breach of copyright, trademark or license usage rights, or (iii) misappropriation of trade secrets. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could result in significant expense and liability for damages. If we were found to have infringed or misappropriated a third-party patent or other intellectual property right, we could in some circumstances be enjoined from providing certain products or services to our customers or from utilizing and benefiting from certain methods, processes, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or licenses. Alternatively, we could be required to enter into costly licensing arrangements with third parties or implement a costly work around. Any of these scenarios could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Operational Risks
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, could harm our business.
We depend heavily on our telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems and on the integrity and timeliness of data we use to run our businesses and service our customers. These systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events or
20
circumstances wholly or partly beyond our control. Further, we face the risk of operational and technology failures by others, including clearing agents, exchanges and other financial intermediaries and of vendors and parties to which we outsource the provision of services or business operations. If these parties do not perform as anticipated, we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs and other adverse effects on our business. These risks are heightened by our offering of increasingly complex products, such as those that feature automatic asset transfer or re-allocation strategies, and by our employment of complex investment, trading and hedging programs.
Despite our implementation of a variety of security measures, our information technology and other systems could be subject to physical or electronic break-ins, unauthorized tampering or other security breaches, resulting in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to customers or in the misappropriation of our intellectual property or proprietary information.
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems, whether due to actions by us or others, could delay or disrupt our ability to do business and service our customers, harm our reputation, subject us to substantial regulatory sanctions and other claims, lead to a loss of customers and revenues and otherwise adversely affect our business.
Other Risks
Our risk management policies and procedures may prove to be ineffective and leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could adversely affect our businesses or result in losses.
We have developed an enterprise-wide risk management framework to mitigate risk and loss to the Company, and we maintain policies, procedures and controls intended to identify, measure, monitor, report and analyze the risks to which the Company is exposed.
However, there are inherent limitations to risk management strategies because there may exist, or develop in the future, risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. If our risk management framework proves ineffective, the Company may suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected. As our businesses change and the markets in which we operate evolve, our risk management framework may not evolve at the same pace as those changes. As a result, there is a risk that new products or new business strategies may present risks that are not appropriately identified, monitored or managed. In times of market stress, unanticipated market movements or unanticipated claims experience resulting from greater than expected mortality, longevity or morbidity, the effectiveness of our risk management strategies may be limited, resulting in losses to the Company. In addition, under difficult or less liquid market conditions, our risk management strategies may not be effective because other market participants may be using the same or similar strategies to manage risk under the same challenging market conditions. In such circumstances, it may be difficult or more expensive for the Company to mitigate risk due to the activity of such other market participants.
Many of our risk management strategies or techniques are based upon historical customer and market behavior and all such strategies and techniques are based to some degree on management’s subjective judgment. We cannot provide assurance that our risk management framework, including the underlying assumptions or strategies, will be accurate and effective.
Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies, procedures and controls to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies, procedures and controls may not be fully effective.
Models are utilized by our businesses and corporate areas primarily to project future cash flows associated with pricing products, calculating reserves and valuing assets, as well as in evaluating risk and determining capital requirements, among other uses. These models may not operate properly and rely on assumptions and projections that are inherently uncertain. As our businesses continue to grow and evolve, the number and complexity of models we utilize expands, increasing our exposure to error in the design, implementation or use of models, including the associated input data and assumptions.
Past or future misconduct by Prudential Insurance’s employees or employees of our vendors could result in violations of law by us, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. There can be no assurance that controls and procedures that we employ, which are designed to monitor associates’ business decisions and prevent us from taking excessive or inappropriate risks, will be effective. We review our compensation policies and practices as part of our overall risk management program, but it is possible that our compensation policies and practices could inadvertently incentivize excessive or inappropriate risk taking. If our associates take excessive or inappropriate risks, those risks could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
In our investments in which we hold a minority interest, or that are managed by third parties, we lack management and operational control over operations, which may prevent us from taking or causing to be taken actions to protect or increase the value of those investments. In those jurisdictions where we are constrained by law from owning a majority interest in jointly owned operations, our remedies in the event of a breach by a joint venture partner may be limited (e.g., we may have no ability to exercise a “call” option).
The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters could adversely affect our operations, results of operations and financial condition.
The occurrence of natural disasters, including hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, fires, explosions, pandemic disease and man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and military actions, could adversely affect our operations, results of operations or financial condition, including in the following respects:
| | • | | Catastrophic loss of life due to natural or man-made disasters could cause us to pay benefits at higher levels and/or materially earlier than anticipated and could lead to unexpected changes in persistency rates. |
21
| | • | | A natural or man-made disaster could result in disruptions in our operations, losses in our investment portfolio or the failure of our counterparties to perform, or cause significant volatility in global financial markets. |
| | • | | A terrorist attack affecting financial institutions in the United States or elsewhere could negatively impact the financial services industry in general and our business operations, investment portfolio and profitability in particular. |
| | • | | Pandemic disease could have a severe adverse effect on our business. The potential impact of such a pandemic on our results of operations and financial position is highly speculative, and would depend on numerous factors, including: the effectiveness of vaccines and the rate of contagion; the regions of the world most affected; the effectiveness of treatment for the infected population; the rates of mortality and morbidity among various segments of the insured population; the collectability of reinsurance; the possible macroeconomic effects of a pandemic on the Company’s asset portfolio; the effect on lapses and surrenders of existing policies, as well as sales of new policies; and many other variables. |
The above risks are more pronounced in respect of geographic areas, including major metropolitan centers, where we have concentrations of customers, concentrations of employees or significant operations, and in respect of countries and regions in which we operate subject to a greater potential threat of military action or conflict.
There can be no assurance that our business continuation plans and insurance coverages would be effective in mitigating any negative effects on our operations or profitability in the event of a terrorist attack or other disaster.
Climate change, and its regulation, may affect the prospects of companies and other entities whose securities we hold and other counterparties, including reinsurers, and affect the value of investments, including real estate investments that we hold. Our current evaluation is that the near term effects of climate change and climate change regulation on the Company are not material, but we cannot predict the long term impacts on us from climate change or its regulation.
Intense competition, including the impact of government sponsored programs and other actions on us and our competitors, could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our market share or profitability.
We face intense competition from domestic and foreign insurance companies, asset managers and diversified financial institutions, both for the ultimate customers for our products and, for distribution through non-affiliated distribution channels. We compete based on a number of factors including brand recognition, reputation, quality of service, quality of investment advice, investment performance of our products, product features, scope of distribution and distribution arrangements, price, perceived financial strength and credit and financial strength ratings. A decline in our competitive position as to one or more of these factors could adversely affect our profitability and assets under management. Many of our competitors are large and well-established and some have greater market share or breadth of distribution, offer a broader range of products, services or features, assume a greater level of risk, have lower profitability expectations or have higher financial strength or credit ratings than we do. The proliferation and growth of non-affiliated distribution channels puts pressure on our captive sales channels to increase their productivity and reduce their costs in order to remain competitive, and we run the risk that the marketplace will make a more significant or rapid shift to non-affiliated or direct distribution alternatives than we anticipate or are able to achieve ourselves, potentially adversely affecting our market share and results of operations. The competitive landscape in which we operate may be further affected by government sponsored programs, as well as by longer term fiscal policies, adopted in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. in response to dislocations in financial markets and the economy. Competitors that receive governmental financing or other assistance or subsidies, including governmental guarantees of their obligations, or that are not subject to the same regulatory constraints, may have or obtain pricing or other competitive advantages. Changes in laws and regulations in response to adverse market and economic conditions may result in us being classified differently than competitors for purposes of capital and other requirements, potentially affecting our ability to compete and the competitive landscape generally.
Competition for desirable non-affiliated distribution channels is also intense. The loss of key personnel or non-affiliated distribution channels could have an adverse effect on our business and profitability.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Office space is provided by Prudential Insurance, as described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements under “Litigation and Regulatory Matters” for a description of material pending litigation and regulatory matters affecting us, and certain risks to our business presented by such matters.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
22
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance. There is no public market for the Company’s common stock.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) of Form 10-K.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the Forward-Looking Statements included below the Table of Contents, “Risk Factors,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s narrative addresses the financial condition of Pruco Life as of December 31, 2013, compared with December 31, 2012, and its results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Overview
The Company sells variable and fixed annuities, universal life insurance, variable life insurance and term life insurance primarily through affiliated and unaffiliated distributors in the United States. The Company also had marketed individual life insurance through its branch office in Taiwan. All insurance activity of the Taiwan branch has been ceded to an affiliate and the related assets and liabilities continue to be reflected in the Company’s statements of financial position.
Regulatory Developments
On September 19, 2013, the Council made a final determination that Prudential Financial should be subject to stricter prudential regulatory standards and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (as a “Designated Financial Company”) pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. On October 18, 2013, Prudential Financial confirmed that it would not seek to rescind the final determination of the Council. As a Designated Financial Company under the Dodd-Frank Act, Prudential Financial is now subject to supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and to stricter prudential regulatory standards, which include or will include requirements (some of which are subject to future rulemaking) regarding risk-based capital and leverage, liquidity, stress-testing, overall risk management, resolution plans, early remediation, and credit concentration; and may also include additional standards regarding capital, public disclosure, short-term debt limits, and other related subjects as appropriate. Prudential Financial must also seek pre-approval from the Federal Reserve for the acquisition of certain companies engaged in financial activities. See “Business—Regulation” and “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding the potential impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the Company, including as a result of these stricter prudential standards.
On July 18, 2013, the FSB, consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations, identified Prudential Financial as aG-SII. U.S. financial regulators are thereby expected to enhance their regulation of Prudential Financial to achieve a number of regulatory objectives, including enhanced group-wide supervision, enhanced capital standards (including basic capital and higher loss absorption capacity requirements), and development of a risk management plan (expected to be completed within 12 months of G-SII designation) and recovery and resolution plans (“RRP plans”; expected to be developed and agreed by the end of 2014). Higher loss absorption capacity requirements are expected to begin to be implemented in 2019.
At the direction of the FSB, the IAIS is developing ComFrame for the supervision of IAIGs that contemplates “group wide supervision” across national boundaries. Prudential Financial qualifies as an IAIG. In October 2013, the IAIS announced that it expects to develop a risk-based global insurance capital standard by 2016 applicable to IAIGs, with full implementation scheduled to begin in 2019. In addition, the IAIS seeks to promote the financial stability of IAIGs by endorsing: uniform standards for insurer corporate governance and enterprise risk management; group-wide supervision of IAIGs; a framework for group capital adequacy assessment that accounts for group-wide risks; additional regulatory and disclosure requirements for insurance groups; and the establishment of ongoing supervisory colleges. In October 2013 several of Prudential Financial’s domestic and foreign insurance regulators convened a supervisory college. The purpose of the supervisory college is to promote ongoing supervisory coordination, facilitate the sharing of information among regulators and to enhance each regulator’s understanding of Prudential Financial’s risk profile.
ComFrame also requires each IAIG to conduct its own risk and solvency assessment (“ORSA”) to monitor and manage its overall solvency. In addition, state insurance regulators have focused attention on U.S. insurance solvency regulation pursuant to the NAIC’s “Solvency Modernization Initiative.” This initiative has resulted in the recent adoption of the NAIC Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment model act which, following enactment at the state level, will require a large insurer beginning in 2015 to at least annually assess the adequacy of its and its group’s risk management and current and future solvency position.
PLNJ is a licensed insurance company in New York, but is not domiciled in New York. The NY DFS has notified PLNJ that it does not agree with PLNJ’s calculation of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for New York purposes in respect of certain variable annuity products. PLNJ is currently in discussions with the NY DFS regarding the proper level of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for
23
reinsurance) for these products. If PLNJ is ultimately required to establish material additional reserves on a New York statutory accounting basis or cause material amounts of additional collateral to be posted with respect to such variable annuity or other products, PLNJ’s ability to deploy capital for other purposes could be affected.
In addition, the NAIC, the NYDFS and other regulators have increased their focus on life insurers’ use of captive reinsurance companies. If applicable insurance laws are changed in a way that impairs the use of captive reinsurance companies, our ability to write certain products and efficiently manage their associated risks could be adversely affected and we may need to increase prices on certain products, modify certain products or find alternate financing sources, any of which could adversely affect our competitiveness, capital and financial position and results of operations.
At this time we cannot predict the final outcome of the above regulatory developments, including what additional capital requirements, compliance and regulatory costs, or other burdens may be imposed on the Company.
Revenues and Expenses
The Company earns revenues principally from insurance premiums; mortality, expense, and asset administration fees from insurance and investment products; and investment of general account and other funds. The Company earns premiums primarily from the sale of individual life insurance. The Company earns mortality, expense fees, and asset administration fees on the servicing of universal life and separate account products including variable life insurance and variable annuities. The Company’s operating expenses principally consist of insurance benefits provided and reserves established for anticipated future insurance benefits, general business expenses, commissions and other costs of selling and servicing the various products we sell and interest credited on general account liabilities.
Effective February 25, 2013, the Advanced Series Trust (“AST”) adopted a Rule 12b-1 Plan under the Investment Company Act of 1940 with respect to most of the AST portfolios that are offered through the Company’s variable annuity and variable life investment products. Under the Rule 12b-1 Plan, AST pays an affiliate of the Company for distribution and administrative services. Prior to the adoption of the 12b-1 Plan, the Company received an administrative service fee from AST and incurred expenses associated with administration services provided.
Profitability
The Company’s profitability depends principally on its ability to price our insurance and annuity products at a level that enables us to earn a margin over the costs associated with providing benefits and administering those products. Profitability also depends on, among other items, our actuarial and policyholder behavior experience on insurance and annuity products, our ability to attract and retain customer assets, generate and maintain favorable investment results, and manage expenses.
See “Risk Factors” for a discussion of risks that have materially affected and may affect in the future the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition, or cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.
Industry Trends
Our businesses are impacted by financial markets, economic conditions, regulatory oversight, and a variety of trends that affect the industries where we compete.
Financial and Economic Environment. Although economic and financial conditions continue to show signs of improvement, global market conditions and uncertainty continue to be factors in the markets in which we operate.
Interest rates in the U.S. remain lower than historical levels, despite recent increases, and continue to negatively impact the profitability of certain products we offer as well as returns on the investment portfolio backing our insurance liabilities.
The low interest rate environment we have experienced in recent years has impacted the profitability of certain products we offer as well as returns on the investment portfolio backing our insurance liabilities.
Regulatory Environment. Financial market dislocations have produced, and are expected to continue to produce, extensive changes in existing laws and regulations, and regulatory frameworks applicable to our businesses. Prudential Financial is now subject to stricter prudential regulatory standards and supervision by the FRB as a Designated Financial Company. The use of captive reinsurance companies is also under increased scrutiny. In addition, state insurance laws regulate all aspects of our businesses and our insurance products are substantially affected by federal and state tax laws. Insurance regulators have begun to implement significant changes in the way in which industry participants must determine statutory reserves and statutory capital, particularly for products with embedded options and guarantees such as variable annuities, and universal life products with secondary guarantees.
Demographics Income protection, wealth accumulation and the needs of retiring baby boomers continue to shape the insurance industry. Retirement security is one of the most critical issues in the U.S. for individuals and the investment professionals and institutions that support them. The risk and responsibility of retirement savings continues to shift to employees, away from the government and employers. Life insurance ownership among U.S. households remains low, with consumers citing other financial priorities and cost of insurance as reasons for the lack of coverage.
Competitive Environment. For the annuities business, traditional competitors continue to take actions to either exit the marketplace or de-risk products in response to recent market volatility. We proactively monitor changes in the annuity marketplace, and have taken actions to adapt our
24
products to the current environment in order to maintain appropriate return prospects and improve our risk profile. We believe our current product offerings are competitively positioned and that our differentiated risk management strategies will provide us with an attractive risk and profitability profile.
The individual life market is mature and, due to the large number of competitors, competition is driven mainly by price and service. The economy has exacerbated pressure on pricing, creating an even greater challenge of maintaining pricing discipline. Many of our competitors took pricing actions in 2012 in response to the low interest rate environment. Our individual life sales in 2013 benefited from a strong competitive position as a result of these competitor actions, as well as expanded distribution opportunities from Prudential Insurance’s acquisition of The Hartford’s individual life business. In 2013 we implemented additional product design and pricing changes designed to shift sales away from guaranteed products toward non-guaranteed products. Maintaining our competitive positioning is dependent on sources of financing for the reserves associated with this business and timely utilization of the associated tax benefits.
Accounting Policies & Pronouncements
Application of Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Management, on an ongoing basis, reviews estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements. If management determines that modifications in assumptions and estimates are appropriate given current facts and circumstances, the Company’s results of operations and financial position as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements could change significantly.
The following sections discuss the accounting policies applied in preparing our consolidated financial statements that management believes are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments.
Deferred Policy Acquisition and Other Costs
We capitalize costs that are directly related to the acquisition or renewal of insurance and annuity contracts. These costs primarily include commissions, as well as costs of policy issuance and underwriting and certain other expenses that are directly related to successfully negotiated contracts. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the authoritative guidance adopted effective January 1, 2012, regarding which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal contracts qualify for deferral. We have also deferred costs associated with sales inducements offered in the past related to our variable and fixed annuity contracts. Sales inducements are amounts that are credited to the policyholder’s account balance as an inducement to purchase the contract. For additional information about sales inducements, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We generally amortize these deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC, and deferred sales inducements, or DSI, over the expected lives of the contracts, based on our estimates of the level and timing of gross profits or gross premiums, depending on the type of contract. As described in more detail below, in calculating DAC and DSI amortization we are required to make assumptions about investment returns, mortality, persistency, and other items that impact our estimates of the level and timing of gross profits or gross premiums. We also periodically evaluate the recoverability of our DAC and DSI. For certain contracts, this evaluation is performed as part of our premium deficiency testing, as discussed further below in “—Policyholder Liabilities.” As of December 31, 2013, DAC for our life products was $1 billion and DAC for our annuity products was $4 billion. As of December 31, 2013, DSI was $1 billion, related entirely to our annuity products.
Amortization methodologies
DAC associated with term life policies is amortized in proportion to gross premiums.
DAC and DSI associated with the variable and universal life policies and the variable and fixed annuity contracts is generally amortized over the expected life of these policies in proportion to total gross profits. Total gross profits include both actual gross profits and estimates of gross profits for future periods. In calculating gross profits, we consider mortality, persistency, and other elements as well as rates of return on investments associated with these contracts and the cost related to our guaranteed minimum death and guaranteed minimum income benefits. For variable annuities, actual gross profits also include the impacts of the embedded derivatives associated with certain of the optional living benefit features of our variable annuity contracts and related hedging activities, and actual gross profits used to determine amortization rates include the difference between the change in the fair value of hedge positions and the change in the value of an internally-defined hedge target related to these features. In calculating amortization expense, we estimate the amounts of gross profits that will be included in our U.S. GAAP results and utilize these estimates to calculate amortization rates and expense amounts. In addition, in calculating gross profits, we include the profits and losses related to contracts issued by the Company that are reported in affiliated legal entities other than the Company as a result of, for example, reinsurance agreements with those affiliated entities, as discussed below. The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Prudential Financial (an SEC registrant) and has extensive transactions and relationships with other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial, including reinsurance agreements, as discussed in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Incorporating all product-related profits and losses in gross profits, including those that are reported in affiliated legal entities, produces a DAC amortization pattern representative of the total economics of the products. For a further discussion of the amortization of DAC and DSI, see “—Results of Operations.”
We also regularly evaluate and adjust the related DAC and DSI balances with a corresponding charge or credit to current period earnings for the impact of actual gross profits and changes in our projections of estimated future gross profits on our DAC and DSI amortization rates. Adjustments to the DAC and DSI balances include the impact to our estimate of total gross profits of the annual review of assumptions, our quarterly adjustments for current period experience and our quarterly adjustments for market performance. Each of these adjustments is further discussed below in “Annual assumptions review and quarterly adjustments.”
25
Annual assumptions review and quarterly adjustments
Annually, during the third quarter, we perform a comprehensive review of the assumptions used in estimating gross profits for future periods. Over the last several years, the Company’s most significant assumption updates resulting in a change to expected future gross profits and the amortization of DAC and DSI have been related to lapse experience and other contractholder behavior assumptions, mortality, and revisions to expected future rates of returns on investments. These assumptions may also cause potential significant variability in amortization expenses in the future. The impact on our results of operations of changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and we are unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time.
The quarterly adjustments for current period experience referred to above reflect the impact of differences between actual gross profits for a given period and the previously estimated expected gross profits for that period. To the extent each period’s actual experience differs from the previous estimate for that period, the assumed level of total gross profits may change. In these cases, we recognize a cumulative adjustment to all previous periods’ amortization, also referred to as an experience true-up adjustment.
The quarterly adjustments for market performance referred to above reflect the impact of changes to our estimate of total gross profits to reflect actual fund performance and market conditions. A significant portion of gross profits for our variable annuity contracts are dependent upon the total rate of return on assets held in separate account investment options. This rate of return influences the fees we earn, costs we incur associated with the guaranteed minimum death and guaranteed minimum income benefit features related to our variable annuity contracts, as well as other sources of profit. Returns that are higher than our expectations for a given period produce higher than expected account balances, which increase the future fees we expect to earn and decrease the future costs we expect to incur associated with the guaranteed minimum death and guaranteed minimum income benefit features related to our variable annuity contracts. The opposite occurs when returns are lower than our expectations. The changes in future expected gross profits are used to recognize a cumulative adjustment to all prior periods’ amortization.
The near-term future rate of return assumptions used in evaluating DAC and DSI are derived using a reversion to the mean approach, a common industry practice. Under this approach, we consider the historical equity returns over a period of time and initially adjust future projected equity returns over the next four years (the “near term”) so that the assets are projected to grow at the long-term expected rate of return for the entire period. If the near-term projected future rate of return is greater than our near-term maximum future rate of return of 13%, we use our maximum future rate of return. As of December 31 2013, our variable annuities and variable life insurance businesses assume an 8.0% long-term equity expected rate of return and a 3.9% near-term mean reversion equity rate of return.
The weighted average rate of return assumptions for these businesses consider many factors specific to each business, including asset durations, asset allocations and other factors. We generally update the near term equity rates of return and our estimate of total gross profits each quarter to reflect the result of the reversion to the mean approach, which assumes a convergence to the long-term equity expected rates of return. These market performance related adjustments to our estimate of total gross profits result in cumulative adjustments to prior amortization, reflecting the application of the new required rate of amortization to all prior periods’ gross profits.
DAC and DSI Sensitivities
For variable annuity contracts, DAC and DSI are sensitive to changes in our future rate of return assumptions due primarily to the significant portion of gross profits that is dependent upon the total rate of return on assets held in separate account investment options.
The following table provides a demonstration of the sensitivity of each of these balances relative to our future rate of return assumptions by quantifying the adjustments to each balance that would be required assuming both an increase and decrease in our future rate of return by 100 basis points. The sensitivity includes an increase and decrease of 100 basis points to both the future rate of return assumptions in all years. The information below is for illustrative purposes only and considers only the direct effect of changes in our future rate of return on the DAC and DSI balances and not changes in any other assumptions such as persistency, mortality, or expenses included in our evaluation of DAC and DSI. Further, this information does not reflect changes in reserves, such as the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and optional living benefit features of our variable annuity products, or the impact that changes in such reserves may have on the DAC and DSI balance.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| | |
| | | Increase/(Decrease) in
DAC | | | Increase/(Decrease) in
DSI | |
| |
| | | (in millions) | |
Decrease in future rate of return by 100 basis points | | $ | (27 | ) | | $ | (14 | ) |
Increase in future rate of return by 100 basis points | | $ | 25 | | | $ | 13 | |
For our variable and universal life policies, a significant portion of our gross profits is derived from mortality margins. As a result, our estimates of future gross profits are significantly influenced by our mortality assumptions. Our mortality assumptions are used to estimate future death claims over the life of these policies and may be developed based on Company experience, industry experience and/or other factors. Unless a material change in mortality experience that we feel is indicative of a long term trend is observed in an interim period, we generally update our mortality assumptions annually in the third quarter. Updates to our mortality assumptions in future periods could have a significant adverse or favorable effect on the results of our operations.
The following table provides a demonstration of the sensitivity of that DAC balance relative to our future mortality assumptions by quantifying the adjustments that would be required, assuming both an increase and decrease in our future mortality rate by 1%. The information below is for illustrative purposes only and considers only the direct effect of changes in our mortality assumptions on the DAC balance with no changes in any
26
other assumptions such as persistency, future rate of return, or expenses included in our evaluation of DAC. Further, this information also does not reflect changes in unearned revenue reserve which would partially offset the adjustments to the DAC balance reflected below.
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| | | Increase/(Decrease) in
DAC | |
| |
| | | (in millions) | |
Decrease in future mortality by 1% | | $ | 10 | |
Increase in future mortality by 1% | | $ | (10 | ) |
In addition to the impact of mortality experience relative to our assumptions, other factors may also drive variability in amortization expense, particularly during the third quarter when assumption updates are performed. As noted above, however, the impact on our results of operations of changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and we are unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time. In the third quarter of 2013, updates to mortality assumptions drove the most significant changes to amortization expense.
See “Results of Operations” for a discussion of the impact of DAC and DSI amortization on our results of the life and annuities products.
Valuation of Investments, Including Derivatives, and the Recognition of Other-than-Temporary Impairments
Our investment portfolio consists of public and private fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage and other loans, equity securities, other invested assets and derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices or the values of securities. Derivative financial instruments we generally use include swaps, futures, forwards and options. We are also party to financial instruments that contain derivative instruments that are “embedded” in the financial instruments. Management believes the following accounting policies related to investments, including derivatives, are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions. Each of these policies is discussed further within other relevant disclosures related to the investments and derivatives, as referenced below.
| | • | | Valuation of investments, including derivatives |
| | • | | Recognition of other-than-temporary impairments |
| | • | | Determination of the valuation allowance for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans |
We present our investments classified as available for sale, including fixed maturity and equity securities, our investments classified as trading, our derivatives, and our embedded derivatives at fair value in the consolidated statements of financial position. For additional information regarding the key estimates and assumptions surrounding the determination of fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities, as well as derivative instruments, embedded derivatives and other investments, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For our investments classified as available-for-sale, the impact of changes in fair value is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net,” a separate component of equity. For our investments classified as trading, the impact of changes in fair value is recorded within “Other income.” In addition, investments classified as available-for-sale, are subject to impairment reviews to identify when a decline in value is other-than-temporary. For a discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity and equity securities, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Commercial mortgage and other loans are carried primarily at unpaid principal balances, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and expenses and unamortized premiums or discounts and a valuation allowance for losses. For a discussion of our policies regarding the valuation allowance for commercial mortgage and other loans see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Policyholder Liabilities
Future Policy Benefit Reserves
We establish reserves for future policy benefits to, or on behalf of, policyholders in the same period in which the policy is issued or acquired, using methodologies prescribed by U.S. GAAP. The reserving methodologies used for our businesses include the following:
| | • | | For most long duration contracts, we utilize best estimate assumptions as of the date the policy is issued or acquired with provisions for the risk of adverse deviation, as appropriate. After the liabilities are initially established, we perform premium deficiency tests using best estimate assumptions as of the testing date without provisions for adverse deviation. If the liabilities determined based on these best estimate assumptions are greater than the net reserves (i.e., U.S. GAAP reserves net of any DAC or DSI asset), the existing net reserves are adjusted by first reducing these assets by the amount of the deficiency or to zero through a charge to current period earnings. If the deficiency is more than these asset balances for insurance contracts, we then increase the net reserves by the excess, again through a charge to current period earnings. If a premium deficiency is recognized, the assumptions as of the premium deficiency test date are locked in and used in subsequent valuations. |
27
| | • | | For certain reserves, such as our contracts with guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDB”), guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIB”) and no lapse guarantees, we utilize current best estimate assumptions in establishing reserves. The reserves are subject to adjustments based on annual reviews of assumptions and quarterly adjustments for experience, including market performance, and the reserves may be adjusted through a benefit or charge to current period earnings. |
| | • | | For certain product guarantees, primarily the optional living benefit features of the variable annuity products, the benefits are accounted for as embedded derivatives, with fair values calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to contractholders less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature. Under U.S. GAAP, the fair values of these benefit features are based on assumptions a market participant would use in valuing these embedded derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are recorded quarterly through a benefit or charge to current period earnings. |
The assumptions used in establishing reserves are generally based on the Company’s experience, industry experience and/or other factors, as applicable. We typically update our actuarial assumptions, such as mortality, morbidity, retirement and policyholder behavior assumptions, annually in the third quarter of each year, unless a material change is observed in an interim period that we feel is indicative of a long-term trend. Generally, we do not expect trends to change significantly in the short-term and, to the extent these trends may change, we expect such changes to be gradual over the long-term. In a sustained low interest rate environment, there is an increased likelihood that the reserves determined based on best estimate assumptions may be greater than the net liabilities. The following paragraphs provide additional details about our reserves for our individual life and annuity businesses.
The future policy benefit reserves related to term life products are determined as the present value of expected future benefits to or on behalf of policyholders and maintenance expenses less the present value of future net premiums, which are discussed more fully in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For these reserves, we utilize best estimate assumptions as of the date the policy is issued or acquired with provisions for the risk of adverse deviation, as described above. The primary assumptions used in determining expected future benefits and expenses include mortality, lapse, and maintenance expense assumptions. For variable and universal life products which contain no lapse guarantees, reserves are established using current best estimate assumptions, as described above.
Future policy benefits also include reserves for the GMDB and GMIB features of our variable annuities, and for the optional living benefit features that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. As discussed above, in establishing reserves for GMDBs and GMIBs, we utilize current best estimate assumptions. The primary assumptions used in establishing these reserves include the timing of annuitization, lapse, withdrawal and mortality assumptions, as well as interest rate and equity market return assumptions. Our lapse assumption includes a base lapse rate that takes into account the applicability of any surrender charges. Additionally, a dynamic lapse rate adjustment reduces the base lapse rate when the benefit amount is greater than the account value, as in-the-money contracts are less likely to lapse.
The reserves for certain optional living benefit features, including guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum income and withdrawal benefits (“GMIWB”), are accounted for as embedded derivatives, with fair values calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature. This methodology could result in either a liability or contra-liability balance, given changing capital market conditions and various actuarial assumptions. Since there is no observable active market for the transfer of these obligations, the valuations are calculated using internally-developed models with option pricing techniques. The models are based on a risk neutral valuation framework and incorporate premiums for risks inherent in valuation techniques, inputs, and the general uncertainty around the timing and amount of future cash flows. The significant inputs to the valuation models for these embedded derivatives include capital market assumptions, such as interest rate levels and volatility assumptions, the Company’s market-perceived risk of its own non-performance (“NPR”), as well as actuarially determined assumptions, including contractholder behavior, such as lapse rates, benefit utilization rates, withdrawal rates, and mortality rates. Capital market inputs and actual contractholders’ account values are updated each quarter based on capital market conditions as of the end of the quarter, including interest rates, equity markets and volatility. In the risk neutral valuation, the initial swap curve drives the total returns used to grow the contractholders’ account values. The Company’s discount rate assumption is based on the LIBOR swap curve adjusted for an additional spread relative to LIBOR to reflect NPR. Actuarial assumptions, including contractholder behavior and mortality, are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon emerging experience, future expectations and other data, including any observable market data, such as available industry studies or market transactions such as acquisitions and reinsurance transactions. For additional information regarding the valuation of these optional living benefit features, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sensitivity for Future Policy Benefit Reserves
We expect the future policy benefit reserves related to our variable annuities that are based on current best estimate assumptions, and those that represent embedded derivatives recorded at fair value to be the ones most likely to drive variability in earnings from period to period.
For the GMDB and GMIB features of our variable annuities, the reserves for these contracts are significantly influenced by the future rate of return assumptions. The following table provides a demonstration of the sensitivity of the reserves for GMDBs and GMIBs related to variable annuity contracts relative to our future rate of return assumptions by quantifying the adjustments to these reserves that would be required assuming both a 100 basis point increase and decrease in our future rate of return. The sensitivity includes an increase and decrease of 100 basis points to both the near-term future rate of return assumptions used over the next four years, and the long-term expected rate of return used thereafter. The information below is for illustrative purposes only and considers only the direct effect of changes in our future rate of return on operating results due to the
28
change in the reserve balance and not changes in any other assumptions such as persistency or mortality included in our evaluation of the reserves, or any changes on DAC or other balances, discussed above in “—Deferred Policy Acquisition and Other Costs.”
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| | | Increase/(Decrease) in
GMDB/GMIB Reserves | |
| |
| | | (in millions) | |
Decrease in future rate of return by 100 basis points | | $ | 67 | |
Increase in future rate of return by 100 basis points | | $ | (55 | ) |
In addition to the impact of market performance relative to our future rate of return assumptions, other factors may also drive variability in the change in reserves, particularly during the third quarter when assumption updates are performed. As noted above, however, the impact on our results of operations of changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and we are unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time. In the third quarter of 2013, updates to lapse rate and utilization rate assumptions drove the most significant changes to these reserves.
For a discussion of adjustments to the reserves for GMDBs and GMIBs for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, see “—Results of Operations”.
For the optional living benefit features of certain variable annuities that are accounted for as embedded derivatives, the changes in reserves are significantly impacted by changes in both the capital markets assumptions and actuarial assumptions. Capital market inputs and actual policyholders’ account values are updated each quarter based on capital market conditions as of the end of the quarter, while actuarial assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon emerging experience, future expectations and other data. For additional information about the impacts of capital markets assumptions, including interest rates, NPR credit spreads and equity returns, refer to “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below. For actuarial assumptions, historical experience on which to base predictions about future sources of volatility is limited due to the fact this block of business is relatively new. In the third quarter of 2013, updates to lapse rate assumptions drove the most significant changes to these reserves. Other factors may also drive variability in the change in reserves, particularly during the third quarter when assumption updates are performed. As noted above, however, the impact on our results of operations of changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and we are unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time.
The Company’s liability for future policy benefits also includes reserves based on the present value of estimated future payments to or on behalf of policyholders related to contracts that have annuitized, where the timing and amount of payment depends on policyholder mortality. Expected mortality is generally based on the Company’s experience, industry data, and/or other factors. Interest rate assumptions are based on factors such as market conditions and expected investment returns. Although mortality and interest rate assumptions are “locked-in” upon the issuance of new insurance or annuity business with fixed and guaranteed terms, significant changes in experience or assumptions may require the Company to provide for expected future losses on a product by establishing premium deficiency reserves. Premium deficiency reserves are established, if necessary, when the liability for future policy benefits plus the present value of expected future gross premiums are determined to be insufficient to provide for expected future policy benefits and expenses.
Unearned revenue reserves
Our unearned revenue reserve, or URR, is reported as a component of “Policyholders’ account balances,” gross of reinsurance with a partial offset in Reinsurance Recoverables. The URR balance is $674 million as of December 31, 2013. This reserve primarily relates to variable and universal life products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and are generally amortized over the expected lives of the contracts in proportion to the products’ estimated gross profits, similar to DAC as discussed above.
For the variable and universal life policies, a significant portion of our gross profits is derived from mortality margins. As a result, our estimates of future gross profits are significantly influenced by our mortality assumptions. Our mortality assumptions are used to estimate future death claims over the life of these policies and are developed based on Company experience, industry experience and/or other factors. Unless a material change in mortality experience that we feel is indicative of a long term trend is observed in an interim period, we generally update our mortality assumptions annually in the third quarter. Updates to our mortality assumptions in future periods could have a significant adverse or favorable effect on the results of the Company.
The following table provides a demonstration of the sensitivity of that URR balance relative to our future mortality assumptions by quantifying the adjustments that would be required, assuming both an increase and decrease in our future mortality rate by 1%. The information below is for illustrative purposes only and considers only the direct effect of changes in our mortality assumptions on the URR balance and not changes in any other assumptions such as persistency, future rate of return, expenses or changes in reserves included in our evaluation of URR. It does not reflect changes in assets, such as DAC, which would partially offset the adjustments to the URR balance reflected below. The impact of DAC is discussed in more detail above in “—Deferred Policy Acquisition and Other Costs.”
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| | | Increase/
(Decrease) in URR | |
| |
| | | (in millions) | |
Decrease in future mortality by 1% | | $ | 16 | |
Increase in future mortality by 1% | | $ | (16 | ) |
29
In addition to the impact of mortality experience relative to our assumptions, other factors may also drive variability in the change in reserves, particularly during the third quarter when assumption updates are performed. As noted above, however, the impact on our results of operations of changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and we are unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time. In the third quarter of 2013, updates to mortality assumptions drove the most significant changes to our URR.
Taxes on Income
Our effective tax rate is based on income, non-taxable and non-deductible items, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Inherent in determining our annual tax rate are judgments regarding business plans, planning opportunities and expectations about future outcomes.
An increase or decrease in our effective tax rate by one percent of income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, would have resulted in a decrease or increase in our consolidated income from continuing operations in 2013 of $21.0 million.
The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest that relate to tax years still subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other taxing authorities. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact in 2011, 2012 and 2013 of changes to our total unrecognized tax benefits. We do not anticipate any significant changes within the next 12 months to our total unrecognized tax benefits related to tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired.
Reserves for contingencies
A contingency is an existing condition that involves a degree of uncertainty that will ultimately be resolved upon the occurrence of future events. Under U.S. GAAP, reserves for contingencies are required to be established when the future event is probable and its impact can be reasonably estimated, such as in connection with an unresolved legal matter. The initial reserve reflects management’s best estimate of the probable cost of ultimate resolution of the matter and is revised accordingly as facts and circumstances change and, ultimately, when the matter is brought to closure.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
There were no new accounting pronouncements adopted during 2013 requiring the application of critical accounting estimates. See Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of newly issued accounting pronouncements, including further discussion of the authoritative guidance adopted in 2012 addressing which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral.
Changes in Financial Position
December 31, 2013 versus December 31, 2012
Total assets increased $27,101 million, from $102,222 million at December 31, 2012 to $129,323 million at December 31, 2013.
Separate account assets increased $19,515 million, from $80,887 million at December 31, 2012 to $100,402 million at December 31, 2013, primarily driven by market appreciation and positive net flows from variable annuity new business sales.
Reinsurance recoverables increased $6,626 million from $7,032 million at December 31, 2012 to $13,658 million at December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily driven by liabilities ceded arising from coinsurance of the Hartford Life GUL business, the impact of the amendment to the coinsurance agreement with PAR U in 2013, and the impact of term and universal life business growth which increased ceded reserves and ceded policyholders’ account balances. Partially offsetting this is a decrease related to the mark-to-market of the reinsurance recoverable related to the reinsured liability for variable annuity living benefits accounted for as embedded derivatives, primarily driven by higher interest rates and equity markets. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding affiliated reinsurance transactions.
Deferred policy acquisition and deferred sales inducement costs increased $1,557 million from $4,467 million at December 31, 2012 to $6,024 million at December 31, 2013. The increase is primarily driven by the capitalization of commissions related to variable annuity new business sales and write-ups primarily associated with the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefits and related hedge positions.
Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in total investments of $559 million from $9,092 million at December 31, 2012 to $8,533 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease in total investments included the sale of invested assets related to transfers to separate accounts and the transfer of assets to PAR U during 2013 as part of amendments to the coinsurance agreement, partially offset by continued universal life and term business growth.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $105 million from $412 million at December 31, 2012 to $307 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by dividends to Prudential Insurance and the investment of cash accumulated at the end of 2012 due to a surge in Universal Life sales.
Total liabilities increased $26,210 million, from $98,706 million at December 31, 2012 to $124,916 million at December 31, 2013.
Separate account liabilities increased $19,515 million, offsetting the increase in separate account assets described above.
Policyholder account balances increased $5,746 million, from $8,557 million at December 31, 2012 to $14,303 million at December 31, 2013, primarily driven by liabilities assumed related to coinsurance of the Hartford Life GUL business and continued universal life business growth.
30
Other liabilities increased $239 million, from $727 million at December 31, 2012 to $966 million at December 31, 2013, related to an increase in reinsurance payables driven by the mark-to-market of the reinsurance recoverable related to the liability for variable annuity living benefit embedded derivatives, as described above.
Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities increased $220 million, from $6,697 million at December 31, 2012 to $6,917 million at December 31, 2013, primarily driven by liabilities assumed related to coinsurance of the Hartford Life GUL business and an increase in reserves supporting term and universal life business arising from business growth partially offset by a decrease in the mark-to-market of the liability for living benefit embedded derivatives, as described above.
Income (Loss) from Operations before Income Taxes
2013 to 2012 Annual Comparison. Income from operations before income taxes increased $1,239 million from income of $865 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $2,105 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Results for both periods include the impact on the amortization of DAC, DSI, and URR and reserves for the GMDB and GMIB features, of the mark-to-market of the living benefit embedded derivative liability and related hedge positions and of changes in the estimated profitability of the business, as discussed in more detail below.
Excluding these items, income from operations before income taxes increased $458 million. This increase was primarily driven by higher fee income, net of distribution and amortization costs, related to higher average variable annuity account values invested in separate accounts due to market appreciation and positive net flows from new business sales. Also contributing to the increase was comparative impact in realized investment gains resulting from coinsurance arrangements with affiliates related to our individual life products.
The DAC and DSI impact of the mark-to-market of the living benefit embedded derivative liability and related hedge positions reflected a favorable variance of $570 million, from an amortization benefit of $537 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to an amortization benefit of $1,107 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The favorable variance was primarily driven by a larger benefit in current year due to larger NPR losses and from the impact of assumption updates compared to prior year.
Adjustments to the reserves for the GMDB/GMIB features of our products and to the amortization of DAC/DSI/URR included the impact from changes in the estimated profitability of the business. These adjustments resulted in a net benefit of $208 million and a net charge of $3 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The net benefit in 2013 primarily reflected the annual review and update of assumptions, driven by reductions to our lapse and GMIB utilization rate assumptions to reflect our review of emerging experience, future expectations, and other refinements in our annuity products. This also reflected the impact of positive market performance on customer accounts relative to our assumptions in our annuity products and a favorable mortality assumption update in our life products. The net charge in 2012 primarily reflected the annual review and update of assumptions performed in that period, driven by reductions to our long-term interest and equity rate of return assumptions, as well as updates to actuarial assumptions and other refinements. This net charge was partially offset by the impact of positive market performance on annuity customer accounts relative to our assumptions.
For variable annuity and variable and universal life contracts, we generally amortize DAC and DSI over the expected lives of the contracts based on the level and timing of gross profits on the underlying products. In calculating gross profits, we consider mortality, persistency, and other elements as well as rates of return on investments associated with these contracts and include gross profits related to these contracts that are reported in affiliated legal entities other than the Company as a result of, for example, reinsurance agreements with those affiliated entities. For additional information regarding our best estimate of gross profits used to set amortization rates, see “—Accounting Policies & Pronouncements—Application of Critical Accounting Estimates.”
Revenues, Benefits and Expenses
2013 to 2012 Annual Comparison. Revenues increased $471 million year over year. This increase was primarily driven by an increase of $392 million in policy charges and fee income, consisting primarily of mortality and expense and other insurance charges, as well as asset management fees assessed on policyholders’ fund balances primarily driven by higher annuity average separate account asset balances due to market appreciation and positive net flows from new business sales and growth in universal life products, partially offset by the impact of assumption updates in our life products. Also contributing to the increase was a $143 million increase in realized investment gains, primarily driven by a $245 million favorable comparative impact from coinsurance arrangements with affiliates related to our life products, partially offset by a decrease of $83 million reflecting an unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market related to embedded derivatives associated with our non-reinsured living benefit features and related hedges in our annuity products. The increase was partially offset by a $54 million decrease in other income primarily driven by unfavorable variance related to the coinsurance arrangements with affiliates in our life products.
Benefits and expenses decreased $768 million. This decrease was primarily driven by a favorable variance of $485 million in DAC amortization and $120 million in interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, which includes DSI amortization. Lower DAC and DSI amortization is mainly related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the living benefit embedded derivative liability and related hedge positions and the impact of changes in the estimated profitability of the business, as discussed above. Also contributing to the decrease was a decrease of $175 million in policyholders’ benefits, including changes in reserves, mainly driven by adjustments to the GMDB and GMIB reserves related to the impact of changes in the estimated profitability of the business, as discussed above.
For additional information regarding the coinsurance arrangements with affiliates related to our life products, see Note 13 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash resources to meet the payment obligations of the Company. Capital refers to the long term financial resources available to support the operations of our businesses, fund business growth, and provide a cushion to withstand adverse circumstances. The ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity and capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and our access to the capital markets through affiliates as described herein.
Management monitors the liquidity of Prudential Financial, Prudential Insurance and the Company on a daily basis and projects borrowing and capital needs over a multi-year time horizon through our quarterly planning process. We believe that cash flows from the sources of funds available to us are sufficient to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of Prudential Financial and the Company, including reasonably foreseeable stress scenarios. We have a capital management framework in place that governs the allocation of capital and approval of capital uses, and we forecast capital sources and uses on a quarterly basis. We also employ a “Capital Protection Framework” to ensure the availability of capital resources to maintain adequate capitalization and competitive risk-based capital ratios under various stress scenarios.
On September 19, 2013, the Financial Stability Oversight Council made a final determination that Prudential Financial is a “Designated Financial Company” under the Dodd-Frank Act. As a Designated Financial Company, Prudential Financial is now subject to supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and to stricter prudential regulatory standards, which include or will include requirements and limitations (some of which are the subject of ongoing rule-making) relating to risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity, stress-testing, overall risk management, resolution plans, early remediation; and may also include additional standards regarding capital, public disclosure, short-term debt limits, and other related subjects. In addition, on July 18, 2013, the Financial Stability Board, consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations, identified Prudential Financial as a global systemically important insurer. See “—Executive Summary—Regulatory Developments” above, as well as “Business—Regulation” and “Risk Factors” for information on these recent actions and their impact.
In July and December of 2013 the Company paid dividends in the amounts of $155 million and $268 million respectively to Prudential Insurance.
Capital
Our capital management framework is primarily based on statutory risk based capital measures. The Risk Based Capital, or RBC, ratio is a primary measure of the capital adequacy of the Company. RBC is calculated based on statutory financial statements and risk formulas consistent with the practices of the NAIC. RBC considers, among other things, risks related to the type and quality of the invested assets, insurance-related risks associated with an insurer’s products and liabilities, interest rate risks and general business risks. RBC ratio calculations are intended to assist insurance regulators in measuring an insurer’s solvency and ability to pay future claims. The reporting of RBC measures is not intended for the purpose of ranking any insurance company or for use in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotional activities, but is available to the public. As of December 31, 2013 the Company’s RBC ratio exceeds the minimum level required by applicable insurance regulations.
The regulatory capital level of the Company can be materially impacted by interest rate and equity market fluctuations, changes in the values of derivatives, the level of impairments recorded, credit quality migration of the investment portfolio, and business growth, among other items. Further, the recapture of business subject to reinsurance arrangements due to defaults by, or credit quality migration affecting, the reinsurers or for other reasons could result in higher required statutory capital levels.
Our regulatory capital levels are also affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. As discussed above in “—Executive Summary—Regulatory Developments,” the NY DFS has notified PLNJ that it does not agree with PLNJ’s calculation of statutory reserves (including the applicable credit for reinsurance) for New York purposes in respect of certain variable annuity products. If PLNJ is ultimately required to establish material additional reserves on a New York statutory accounting basis or cause material amounts of additional collateral to be posted with respect to such variable annuity or other products, PLNJ’s ability to deploy capital for other purposes could be affected.
Capital Protection Framework
We employ a “Capital Protection Framework” to ensure that sufficient capital resources are available to maintain adequate capitalization and a competitive risk based capital ratio, under reasonably various stress scenarios. The Capital Protection Framework incorporates the potential impacts from market related stresses, including equity markets, real estate, interest rates, and credit losses. Potential sources of capital include on-balance sheet capital, derivatives, reinsurance and contingent sources of capital. Although we continue to enhance our approach, we believe we currently have access to sufficient resources to maintain adequate capitalization and a competitive RBC ratio under a range of potential stress scenarios.
The Capital Protection Framework includes a program, managed at the Prudential Financial parent company level, designed to mitigate the impact of a severe equity market stress event on the statutory capital of Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries, as a whole. The program focuses on tail risk to protect statutory capital in a cost-effective manner under stress scenarios. To support this tail risk, in addition to holding on-balance sheet and other contingent sources of capital, as part of this program the Company has purchased equity index-linked derivatives that are designed to mitigate the impact of a severe equity market stress event on statutory capital. Prudential Financial assesses the composition of the hedging program on an ongoing basis and may change it from time to time based on an evaluation of its risk position or other factors.
32
Affiliated Captive Reinsurance Companies
Prudential Financial and the Company use captive reinsurance companies to more effectively manage its reserves and capital on an economic basis and to enable the aggregation and transfer of risks. The captive reinsurance companies assume business from affiliates only. To support the risks they assume, the captives are capitalized to a level we believe is consistent with the “AA” financial strength rating targets of Prudential Financial’s insurance subsidiaries. All of the captive reinsurance companies are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Prudential Financial and are located domestically, typically in the state of domicile of the direct writing insurance subsidiary that cedes the majority of business to the captive. In addition to state insurance regulation, our captives are subject to internal policies governing their activities. Prudential Financial provides support to these captives, typically through net worth maintenance agreements, and in the normal course of business will contribute capital to the captives to support business growth and other needs. In addition, in connection with financing arrangements, Prudential Financial may guarantee certain of the captives’ obligations.
Recently, the NAIC, the New York State Department of Financial Services and other regulators have increased their focus on life insurers’ use of captive reinsurance companies. We cannot predict what, if any, changes may result from these reviews. If insurance laws are changed in a way that restricts our use of captive reinsurance companies in the future, our ability to write certain products and efficiently manage their associated risks could be adversely affected and we may need to increase prices on certain products, modify certain products or find alternate financing sources, any of which could adversely affect our competitiveness, capital and financial position and results of operations. Given the uncertainty of the ultimate outcome of these reviews, at this time we are unable to estimate their expected effects on our capital and financial position and results of operations.
Our life insurance business is subject to a regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” and a supporting guideline entitled “The Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Guideline AXXX.” The regulation and supporting guideline require insurers to establish statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees that are consistent with the statutory reserves required for other individual life insurance policies with similar guarantees. Many market participants believe that these levels of reserves are non-economic. Prudential Financial uses captive reinsurance companies that are affiliates of the Company to implement reinsurance and capital management actions to satisfy these reserve requirements, by financing these non-economic reserves through the issuance of surplus notes by the captives, which are treated as capital for statutory purposes. The affiliated reinsurance agreements are described further in Note 13.
We also manage certain risks associated with our variable annuity products through arrangements with an affiliated captive reinsurance company. We reinsure variable annuity living benefit guarantees to an affiliated captive reinsurance company, Pruco Re. This enables Prudential Financial to aggregate these risks within Pruco Re and manage them more efficiently through a hedging program. Since Pruco Re is domiciled and subject to regulation in the State of Arizona, the Company is able to claim statutory reinsurance reserve credit for business ceded to Pruco Re without any need for Pruco Re to collateralize its obligations under the reinsurance arrangement. However, for business ceded to Pruco Re by PLNJ, Pruco Re must collateralize its obligations under the reinsurance arrangement in order for PLNJ to claim a reinsurance reserve credit for its business ceded. This requirement is satisfied by Pruco Re depositing assets into statutory reserve credit trusts.
Liquidity
Our liquidity is managed to ensure stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of cash flows to meet all of our obligations. Liquidity is provided by a variety of sources, as described more fully below, including portfolios of liquid assets. Our investment portfolios are integral to the overall liquidity of the Company. We segment our investment portfolios and employ an asset/liability management approach specific to the requirements of each of our product lines. This enhances the discipline applied in managing the liquidity, as well as the interest rate and credit risk profiles, of each portfolio in a manner consistent with the unique characteristics of the product liabilities. We use a projection process for cash flows from operations to ensure sufficient liquidity to meet projected cash outflows, including claims. The impact of Prudential Funding, LLC’s financing capacity on liquidity (as described below) is considered in the internal liquidity measures of the Company.
Liquidity is measured against internally developed benchmarks that take into account the characteristics of both the asset portfolio and the liabilities that they support. We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset and credit quality) in calculating internal liquidity measures to evaluate liquidity under various stress scenarios, including company-specific and market-wide events. We believe we have adequate liquidity, including under these stress scenarios.
Cash Flow
The principal sources of the Company’s liquidity are premiums and certain annuity considerations, investment and fee income, investment maturities and sales as well as internal borrowings. The principal uses of that liquidity include benefits, claims, and payments to policyholders and contractholders in connection with surrenders, withdrawals and net policy loan activity. Other uses of liquidity include commissions, general and administrative expenses, purchases of investments, and payments in connection with financing activities.
We believe that the cash flows from our operations are adequate to satisfy our current liquidity requirements. The continued adequacy of this liquidity will depend upon factors such as future securities market conditions, changes in interest rate levels, contractholder perceptions of our financial strength, customer behavior, catastrophic events and the relative safety and attractiveness of competing products, each of which could lead to reduced cash inflows or increased cash outflows. Our cash flows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, proceeds from maturities and sales of invested assets and investment income, net of amounts reinvested. The primary liquidity risks with respect to these cash flows are the risk of default by debtors or bond insurers, our counterparties’ willingness to extend repurchase and/or securities lending arrangements, commitments to invest and market volatility. We closely manage these risks through our credit risk management process and regular monitoring of
33
our liquidity position. In managing our liquidity, we consider the risk of policyholder and contractholder withdrawals of funds earlier than our assumptions when selecting assets to support these contractual obligations. We use surrender charges and other contract provisions to mitigate the extent, timing and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by customers from annuity contracts and deposit liabilities.
Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than our annuity reserves and deposit liabilities because policyholders may be subject to a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new insurance policy. Our annuity reserves with guarantee features may be less susceptible to withdrawal than historical experience indicates, due to the current value of these guarantee features to policyholders as a result of market declines in recent years as well as the unavailability of comparable products in the marketplace. Gross account withdrawals were consistent with our assumptions in asset/liability management, and the associated cash outflows did not have a material adverse impact on our overall liquidity.
Liquid Assets
Liquid assets include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and fixed maturities that are not designated as held-to-maturity and public equity securities. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company had liquid assets of $5,994 million and $6,676 million, respectively. The portion of liquid assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was $323 million and $524 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, $5,265 million, or 93%, of the fixed maturity investments in company general account portfolios were rated high or highest quality based on NAIC or equivalent rating. The remaining $386 million, or 7%, of these fixed maturity investments were rated other than high or highest quality.
Given the size and liquidity profile of our investment portfolios, we believe that claim experience, including customer withdrawals and surrenders, varying from our projections does not constitute a significant liquidity risk. Our asset/liability management process takes into account the expected maturity of investments and expected claim payments as well as the specific nature and risk profile of the liabilities. To the extent we need to pay claims in excess of projections, we may borrow temporarily or sell investments sooner than anticipated to pay these claims, which may result in increased borrowing costs or realized investment gains or losses affecting results of operations. The payment of claims and sale of investments earlier than anticipated would have an impact on the reported level of cash flow from operating and investing activities, respectively, in our financial statements. Historically, there has been no significant variation between the expected maturities of our investments and the payment of claims.
Prudential Funding, LLC
Prudential Financial and Prudential Funding, LLC, or Prudential Funding, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance, borrow funds in the capital markets primarily through the direct issuance of commercial paper. The borrowings serve as an additional source of financing to meet our working capital needs. Prudential Funding operates under a support agreement with Prudential Insurance whereby Prudential Insurance has agreed to maintain Prudential Funding positive tangible net worth at all times.
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Market risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from change in the value of assets, liabilities or derivative instruments as a result of absolute or relative changes in factors affecting financial markets, such as changes in interest rates, equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and credit spreads.
To varying degrees, the investment activities supporting all of our products and services generate exposure to market risk. The primary source of our exposure to market risk is “other than trading” activities conducted in our insurance and annuity operations. The market risk incurred and our strategies for managing this risk vary by product. The market risk associated with “trading” activities is immaterial.
Market Risk Management
Risk management includes the identification and measurement of various forms of risk, the establishment of risk thresholds and the creation of processes intended to maintain risks within these thresholds while optimizing returns on the underlying assets or liabilities. As an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, the Company benefits from the risk management strategies implemented by its parent. Risk range limits are established for each type of market risk, and are approved by the Investment Committee of the Prudential Financial Board of Directors and subject to ongoing review.
Our risk management process utilizes a variety of tools and techniques, including:
| • | | Measures of price sensitivity to market changes (e.g., interest rates, equity index prices, foreign exchange, credit spreads) |
| • | | Value-at-Risk, or “VaR” measures |
| • | | Asset/liability management analytics |
| • | | Stress scenario testing |
| • | | Risk management governance, including policies, limits and a market risk oversight committee |
34
Market Risk Mitigation
Risk mitigation takes three primary forms:
| | 1. | Managing assets to liability-based limits on net exposure. For example, investment policies identify target durations for assets based on liability characteristics and asset portfolios are managed to within ranges around them. This mitigates potential unanticipated economic losses from interest rate movements. |
| | 2. | Hedging non-strategic exposures. For example, our investment policies generally require hedging currency risk for all cash flows not offset by similarly denominated liabilities. |
| | 3. | Management of portfolio concentration risk. For example, ongoing monitoring and management at the enterprise level of key rate, currency and other concentration risks support diversification efforts to mitigate exposure to individual markets and sources of liquidity strain. |
Market Risk Related to Interest Rates
Assets that subject us to interest rate risk primarily include fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage and other loans and policy loans. Liabilities that subject us to interest rate risk primarily include policyholder account balances relating to interest-sensitive life insurance, annuity and other investment-type contracts, as well as through outstanding short-term and long-term debt. Changes in interest rates create risk that the resulting changes in asset values will differ from the changes in the value of the liabilities relating to the underlying or hedged products. Derivatives that subject us to interest rate risk primarily include interest rate swaps. Additionally, changes in interest rates may impact other items including, but not limited to, the following:
| • | | Net investment spread between the amounts that we are required to pay and the rate of return we are able to earn on investments for certain products supported by general account investments |
| • | | Asset-based fees earned on assets under management or contractholder account values |
| • | | Estimated total gross profits and the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs |
| • | | Net exposure to the guarantees provided under certain products |
In order to mitigate the unfavorable impact that the current interest rate environment has on our net interest margins, we employ a proactive asset-liability management program, which includes strategic asset allocation and derivative strategies within a disciplined risk management framework. These strategies seek to match the characteristics of our products, and to closely approximate the interest rate sensitivity of the assets with the estimated interest rate sensitivity of the product liabilities. Our asset-liability management program also helps manage duration gaps, currency and other risks between assets and liabilities through the use of derivatives. We adjust this dynamic process as products change, as customer behavior changes and as changes in the market environment occur. As a result, our asset-liability management process has permitted us to manage interest-sensitive products successfully through several market cycles.
We use duration and convexity analyses to measure price sensitivity to interest rate changes. Duration measures the relative sensitivity of the fair value of a financial instrument to changes in interest rates. Convexity measures the rate of change of duration with respect to changes in interest rates. We use asset/liability management and derivative strategies to manage our interest rate exposure by legal entity by matching the relative sensitivity of asset and liability values to interest rate changes, or controlling “duration mismatch” of assets and liabilities. We have duration mismatch constraints tailored to the rate sensitivity of products in each entity. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the difference between the duration of assets and the target duration of liabilities in our duration-managed portfolios was within our limits. We consider risk-based capital and tax implications as well as current market conditions in our asset/liability management strategies.
The Company also mitigates interest rate risk through a market value adjusted (“MVA”) provision on certain of the Company’s fixed investment options. This MVA provision limits interest rate risk by subjecting the contractholder to an MVA when funds are withdrawn or transferred to variable investment options before the end of the guarantee period. In the event of rising interest rates, which generally make the fixed maturity securities underlying the guarantee less valuable, the MVA could be negative. In the event of declining interest rates, which generally make the fixed maturity securities underlying the guarantee more valuable, the MVA could be positive. The resulting increase or decrease in the value of the fixed option, from calculation of the MVA, is designed to offset the decrease or increase in the market value of the securities underlying the guarantee.
We assess the impact of interest rate movements on the value of our financial assets, financial liabilities and derivatives using hypothetical test scenarios that assume either upward or downward 100 basis point parallel shifts in the yield curve from prevailing interest rates, reflecting changes in either credit spreads or the risk-free rate. The following table sets forth the net estimated potential loss in fair value on these financial instruments from a hypothetical 100 basis point upward shift as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. This table is presented on a gross basis and excludes offsetting impacts to insurance liabilities that are not considered financial liabilities under U.S. GAAP. This scenario results in the greatest net exposure to interest rate risk of the hypothetical scenarios tested at those dates. While the test scenario is for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect our expectations regarding future interest rates or the performance of fixed-income markets, it is a near-term, reasonably possible hypothetical change that illustrates the potential impact of such events. These test scenarios do not measure the changes in value that could result from non-parallel shifts in the yield curve, which we would expect to produce different changes in discount rates for different maturities. As a result, the actual loss in fair
35
value from a 100 basis point change in interest rates could be different from that indicated by these calculations. The estimated changes in fair values do not include separate account assets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | Notional | | | Fair Value | | | Hypothetical
Change in
Fair Value | | | Notional | | | Fair Value | | | Hypothetical
Change in
Fair Value | |
| | | (in millions) | |
Financial Assets with Interest Rate Risk: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available for sale | | $ | - | | | $ | 5,668 | | | $ | (358) | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,144 | | | $ | (325) | |
Policy loans (1) | | | - | | | | 1,087 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,455 | | | | (116) | |
Commercial loans | | | - | | | | 1,612 | | | | (71) | | | | - | | | | 1,617 | | | | (65) | |
Derivatives: (2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Swaps | | | 3,100 | | | | (155) | | | | (186) | | | | 2,272 | | | | 81 | | | | (191) | |
Options | | | 40,739 | | | | 10 | | | | (1) | | | | 24,243 | | | | 38 | | | | (3) | |
Forwards | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | (0) | | | | 5 | | | | - | | | | (0) | |
Financial Liabilities with Interest Rate Risk: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Contracts | | | - | | | | (892) | | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | (793) | | | | 2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Estimated Potential Loss | | | - | | | | - | | | | (614) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (698) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (1) | In the fourth quarter of 2013, we implemented a change in valuation methodology regarding policy loans. For additional information, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| | (2) | Includes fixed maturities classified as trading securities under U.S. GAAP, but are held for “other than trading” activities. |
| | (3) | Excludes variable annuity optional living benefits accounted for as embedded derivatives. |
The tables above do not include approximately $20,328 million and $14,457 million of insurance reserve and deposit liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are not considered financial liabilities. We believe that the interest rate sensitivities of these insurance liabilities would serve as an offset to the net interest rate risk of the financial assets and financial liabilities set forth in these tables. The tables above also exclude variable annuity optional living benefits accounted for as embedded derivatives as the Company generally reinsures the risks associated with these benefits to an affiliated reinsurance company, Pruco Re, as part of its risk management strategy. See “Item 1. Business—Products—Individual Annuities” for information regarding the reinsurance to Pruco Re and the living benefit hedging program, which is primarily executed within Pruco Re.
The Company also sells certain universal life products that contain a no lapse guarantee provision and has entered into an agreement with UPARC to reinsure these guarantees that are accounted for as an embedded derivative. This embedded derivative incurs market risk primarily in the form of interest rate risk. Interest sensitivity can result in changes in the value of the underlying contractual guarantees, which are determined using a risk neutral valuation model.
Market Risk Related to Equity Prices
We have exposure to equity price risk through our investments in equity securities, equity-based derivatives and certain variable annuity and other living benefit feature embedded derivatives. As discussed above, our variable annuity optional living benefits accounted for as embedded derivatives are generally reinsured to an affiliate as part of our risk management strategy. Our equity based derivatives are primarily held as part of our capital hedging program, discussed below. Changes in equity prices create risk that the resulting changes in asset values will differ from the changes in the value of the liabilities relating to the underlying or hedged products. Additionally, changes in equity prices may impact other items including, but not limited to, the following:
| • | | Asset-based fees earned on assets under management or contractholder account value |
| • | | Estimated total gross profits and the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs |
| • | | Net exposure to the guarantees provided under certain products |
We manage investment equity price risk against benchmarks in respective markets. We benchmark our return on equity holdings against a blend of market indices, mainly the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 for U.S. equities. For equity investments within the separate accounts, the investment risk is borne primarily by the separate account contractholder rather than by the Company.
Our capital hedging program is managed at the Prudential Financial parent company level. The program broadly addresses equity market exposure of the overall statutory capital of Prudential Financial as a whole, under stress scenarios. The Company owns a portion of the derivatives related to the program. The program focuses on tail risk in order to protect statutory capital in a cost-effective manner under stress scenarios. Prudential Financial assesses the composition of the hedging program on an ongoing basis and may change it from time to time based on an evaluation of its risk position or other factors. Our estimated equity price risk associated with these capital hedges as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $5 million and $14 million respectively, estimated based on a hypothetical 10% decline in equity benchmark market levels, which would partially offset an overall decline in our capital position related to the equity market decline.
Market Risk Related to Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk in its domestic general account investment portfolios and previously through its operations in Taiwan.
36
For our domestic general account investment portfolios our foreign currency exchange rate risk arises primarily from investments that are denominated in foreign currencies. We manage this risk by hedging substantially all domestic foreign currency-denominated fixed-income investments into U.S. dollars. We generally do not hedge all of the foreign currency risk of our investments in equity securities of unaffiliated foreign entities.
The Company has foreign currency obligations related to its historic operations in Taiwan. Such currency obligations are offset by foreign currency assets from reinsurance agreements the Company entered into when the Company’s Taiwan operation was transferred to an affiliated company in 2001. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to these affiliated reinsurance arrangements.
We manage our foreign currency exchange rate risks within specified limits, and by using VaR-based analysis. This statistical technique estimates, at a specified confidence level, the potential pre-tax loss in portfolio market value that could occur over an assumed time horizon due to adverse market movements.
Although VaR models are a recognized tool for risk management, they have inherent limitations, including reliance on historical data that may not be indicative of future market conditions or trading patterns. Accordingly, VaR models should not be viewed as a predictor of future results. We may incur losses that could be materially in excess of the amounts indicated by the models on a particular trading day or over a period of time, and there have been instances when results have fallen outside the values generated by our VaR models. A VaR model does not estimate the greatest possible loss. The results of these models and analysis thereof are subject to the judgment of our risk management personnel.
Derivatives
We use derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce market risk from changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates, including their use to alter interest rate or foreign currency exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities. Our derivatives primarily include swaps, futures, options and forward contracts that are exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter market. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of derivative activities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Information required with respect to this Item 8 regarding Financial Statements and Supplementary Data is set forth within the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Independent Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In order to ensure that the information we must disclose in our filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of December 31, 2013. Based on such evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. No change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) occurred during the year ended December 31, 2013 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
We have adopted Prudential Financial’s code of business conduct and ethics, known as “Making the Right Choices.” Making the Right Choices is posted at www.investor.prudential.com.
In addition, we have adopted Prudential Financial’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which we refer to herein as the “Corporate Governance Principles and Practices.” Prudential Financial’s Corporate Governance Principles and Practices are available free of charge at www.investor.prudential.com.
Certain of the information called for by this item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to the relevant portions of Prudential Financial’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 13, 2014 to be filed by Prudential Financial with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2013 (the “Proxy Statement”).
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information called for by this item is hereby incorporated herein by reference to the relevant portions of the Proxy Statement.
37
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| (a) | (1) and (2) Financial Statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are listed in the accompanying “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” hereof and are filed as part of this Report. |
| | | | |
| (a) (3) | | Exhibits | | |
| | |
| 2. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 3(i)(a) | | The Articles of Incorporation of Pruco Life Insurance Company (as amended through October 19, 1993) are incorporated by reference to the initial Registration Statement on Form S-6 of Pruco Life Variable Appreciable Account as filed July 2, 1996, Registration No. 333-07451. | | |
| | |
| 3(ii) | | By-Laws of Pruco Life Insurance Company (as amended through May 6, 1997) are incorporated by reference toForm 10-Q as filed August 15, 1997, Registration No. 33-37587. | | |
| | |
| 9. | | None. | | |
| | |
| 10. | | None. | | |
| | |
| 11. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 12. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 13. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 16. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 18. | | None. | | |
| | |
| 22. | | None. | | |
| | |
| 23. | | Not applicable. | | |
| | |
| 24. | | Powers of Attorney. | | |
| | |
| 31.1 | | Section 302 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer. | | |
| | |
| 31.2 | | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | | |
| | |
| 32.1 | | Section 906 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer. | | |
| | |
| 32.2 | | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | | |
| | |
| |
| 101.INS | | -XBRL Instance Document. |
| |
| 101.SCH | | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
| |
| 101.CAL | | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
| |
| 101.LAB | | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
| |
| 101.PRE | | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
| |
| 101.DEF | | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Newark, and State of New Jersey, on the 10th day of March 2014.
| | |
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (Registrant) |
| |
| By: | | /s/ Stephen Pelletier |
| | Stephen Pelletier |
| | Senior Vice President, performing the functions of the principal executive officer as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 10, 2014.
| | |
Signature | | Title |
| |
Robert F. O’Donnell | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
| |
/s/ Yanela C. Frias Yanela C. Frias | | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
| |
*Kent D. Sluyter Kent D. Sluyter | | Director |
| |
*Kenneth Y. Tanji Kenneth Y. Tanji | | Director |
| |
*Bernard J. Jacob Bernard J. Jacob | | Director |
| |
*John Chieffo John Chieffo | | Director |
| |
*Richard F. Lambert Richard F. Lambert | | Director |
| | |
| |
| * By: | | /s/ Joseph D. Emanuel |
| | Joseph D. Emanuel |
| | (Attorney-in-Fact) |
39
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
40
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of Pruco Life Insurance Company (“the Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness, as of December 31, 2013, of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, based on the framework established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment under that framework, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of our principal executive and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, regarding the internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.
March 10, 2014
41
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Pruco Life Insurance Company:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pruco Life Insurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of The Prudential Insurance Company of America) and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As described in Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company has entered into extensive transactions with affiliated entities.
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
New York, New York
March 10, 2014
42
Part I—Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands, except share amounts)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2013 – $5,538,933; 2012 – $5,662,255) | | $ | 5,651,401 | | | $ | 6,135,765 | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost: 2013 – $567; 2012 – $3,119) | | | 771 | | | | 4,327 | |
Trading account assets, at fair value | | | 18,892 | | | | 11,376 | |
Policy loans | | | 1,086,772 | | | | 1,079,714 | |
Short-term investments | | | 16,002 | | | | 112,337 | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | | 1,532,165 | | | | 1,463,977 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 226,704 | | | | 284,489 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total investments | | | 8,532,707 | | | | 9,091,985 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 307,243 | | | | 412,109 | |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | | | 5,034,299 | | | | 3,679,061 | |
Accrued investment income | | | 89,465 | | | | 90,653 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | 13,657,859 | | | | 7,032,175 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | 262,362 | | | | 183,044 | |
Deferred sales inducements | | | 989,889 | | | | 787,891 | |
Income taxes | | | - | | | | 9,910 | |
Other assets | | | 45,983 | | | | 47,453 | |
Separate account assets | | | 100,402,349 | | | | 80,887,276 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 129,322,156 | | | $ | 102,221,557 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ account balances | | $ | 14,303,330 | | | $ | 8,557,077 | |
Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities | | | 6,916,669 | | | | 6,696,813 | |
Cash collateral for loaned securities | | | 84,867 | | | | 48,068 | |
Income taxes | | | 186,015 | | | | - | |
Short-term debt to affiliates | | | 274,900 | | | | 272,000 | |
Long-term debt to affiliates | | | 1,592,000 | | | | 1,511,000 | |
Payables to parent and affiliates | | | 191,065 | | | | 6,694 | |
Other liabilities | | | 964,740 | | | | 726,737 | |
Separate account liabilities | | | 100,402,349 | | | | 80,887,276 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 124,915,935 | | | | 98,705,665 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (See Note 12) | | | | | | | | |
| | |
EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, ($10 par value; 1,000,000 shares, authorized; 250,000 shares, issued and outstanding) | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,500 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 804,237 | | | | 818,303 | |
Retained earnings | | | 3,542,838 | | | | 2,427,628 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 56,646 | | | | 267,461 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL EQUITY | | | 4,406,221 | | | | 3,515,892 | |
| | | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 129,322,156 | | | $ | 102,221,557 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
43
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premiums | | $ | 56,851 | | | $ | 68,136 | | | $ | 72,787 | |
Policy charges and fee income | | | 1,880,925 | | | | 1,534,763 | | | | 1,109,495 | |
Net investment income | | | 419,011 | | | | 417,510 | | | | 439,950 | |
Asset administration fees | | | 332,288 | | | | 286,302 | | | | 203,508 | |
Other income | | | 20,149 | | | | 74,013 | | | | 43,861 | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities | | | (12,268) | | | | (34,926) | | | | (71,348) | |
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
transferred to other comprehensive income | | | 7,827 | | | | 28,692 | | | | 62,379 | |
Other realized investment gains (losses), net | | | (9,009) | | | | (150,213) | | | | 271,052 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total realized investment gains (losses), net | | | (13,450) | | | | (156,447) | | | | 262,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL REVENUES | | | 2,695,774 | | | | 2,224,277 | | | | 2,131,684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ benefits | | | 178,924 | | | | 353,494 | | | | 312,211 | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | | 45,737 | | | | 165,992 | | | | 502,585 | |
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs | | | (524,311) | | | | (38,969) | | | | 973,203 | |
General, administrative and other expenses | | | 890,794 | | | | 878,383 | | | | 697,884 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
TOTAL BENEFITS AND EXPENSES | | | 591,144 | | | | 1,358,900 | | | | 2,485,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 2,104,630 | | | | 865,377 | | | | (354,199) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | 250,601 | | | | 216,654 | | | | 42,474 | |
Deferred | | | 315,819 | | | | (35,614) | | | | (263,930) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Income tax expense (benefit) | | | 566,420 | | | | 181,040 | | | | (221,456) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 1,538,210 | | | $ | 684,337 | | | $ | (132,743 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | 224 | | | | 192 | | | | (178) | |
Net unrealized investment gains (losses): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized investment gains (losses) for the period | | | (290,636) | | | | 105,543 | | | | 122,946 | |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | (33,920) | | | | (22,644) | | | | (75,822) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) | | | (324,556) | | | | 82,899 | | | | 47,124 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax | | | (324,332) | | | | 83,091 | | | | 46,946 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Income tax expense (benefit) related to: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | 78 | | | | 67 | | | | (62) | |
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) | | | (113,595) | | | | 29,191 | | | | 16,479 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | (113,517) | | | | 29,258 | | | | 16,417 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | (210,815) | | | | 53,833 | | | | 30,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 1,327,395 | | | $ | 738,170 | | | $ | (102,214) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
44
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Common
Stock | | | | | Additional
Paid-in
Capital | | | | | Retained
Earnings | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss) | | | | | Total Equity | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | | | $ | 2,500 | | | | | $ | 792,226 | | | | | $ | 1,902,185 | | | | | $ | 183,099 | | | | | $ | 2,880,010 | |
Contributed Capital-Parent/Child Asset Transfers | | | | | - | | | | | | 3,543 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 3,543 | |
Affiliated asset transfers | | | | | - | | | | | | 40,252 | | | | | | (26,151) | | | | | | - | | | | | | 14,101 | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (132,743) | | | | | | - | | | | | | (132,743) | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 30,529 | | | | | | 30,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (102,214) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | | $ | 2,500 | | | | | $ | 836,021 | | | | | $ | 1,743,291 | | | | | $ | 213,628 | | | | | $ | 2,795,440 | |
Contributed Capital-Parent/Child Asset Transfers | | | | | - | | | | | | (17,718) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (17,718) | |
Affiliated asset transfers | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 684,337 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 684,337 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | �� | | - | | | | | | 53,833 | | | | | | 53,833 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 738,170 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | | $ | 2,500 | | | | | $ | 818,303 | | | | | $ | 2,427,628 | | | | | $ | 267,461 | | | | | $ | 3,515,892 | |
Dividend to Parent | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (423,000) | | | | | | - | | | | | | (423,000) | |
Capital-Asset Transfer Activity (Parent-Child) | | | | | - | | | | | | (14,066) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (14,066) | |
Comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,538,210 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,538,210 | |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (210,815) | | | | | | (210,815) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,327,395 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | | | $ | 2,500 | | | | | $ | 804,237 | | | | | $ | 3,542,838 | | | | | $ | 56,646 | | | | | $ | 4,406,221 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
45
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 1,538,210 | | | $ | 684,337 | | | $ | (132,743) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policy charges and fee income | | | (113,831) | | | | (163,640) | | | | (127,683) | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | | 45,737 | | | | 165,992 | | | | 502,585 | |
Realized investment (gains) losses, net | | | 13,450 | | | | 156,447 | | | | (262,083) | |
Amortization and other non-cash items | | | (43,677) | | | | (56,322) | | | | (68,098) | |
Change in: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits and other insurance liabilities | | | 1,185,681 | | | | 1,337,078 | | | | 870,582 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | (1,211,151) | | | | (1,117,361) | | | | (798,474) | |
Accrued investment income | | | (4,286) | | | | (6,372) | | | | 6,785 | |
Receivables from parent and affiliates | | | (88,490) | | | | 5,571 | | | | 46,595 | |
Payables to parent and affiliates | | | 23,110 | | | | 855 | | | | (48,064) | |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | | | (1,346,386) | | | | (1,210,728) | | | | (123,100) | |
Income taxes payable | | | 341,965 | | | | 81,763 | | | | (412,217) | |
Deferred sales inducements | | | (20,871) | | | | (199,005) | | | | (289,642) | |
Other, net | | | (1,855) | | | | 7,961 | | | | 156,698 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities | | $ | 317,606 | | | $ | (313,424) | | | $ | (678,859) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from the sale/maturity/prepayment of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available for sale | | $ | 1,570,701 | | | $ | 1,019,890 | | | $ | 1,069,922 | |
Short-term investments | | | 662,351 | | | | 1,424,173 | | | | 1,167,039 | |
Policy loans | | | 130,655 | | | | 131,511 | | | | 122,721 | |
Ceded policy loans | | | (9,156) | | | | (7,951) | | | | (1,861) | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | | 207,340 | | | | 149,621 | | | | 82,098 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 12,933 | | | | 11,557 | | | | 10,612 | |
Equity securities, available for sale | | | 13,596 | | | | 9,862 | | | | 10,355 | |
Trading account assets, at fair value | | | 7,524 | | | | 14,325 | | | | 5,174 | |
Payments for the purchase/origination of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fixed maturities, available for sale | | | (1,934,430) | | | | (1,646,619) | | | | (1,135,456) | |
Short-term investments | | | (566,100) | | | | (1,253,361) | | | | (1,203,342) | |
Policy loans | | | (101,357) | | | | (129,521) | | | | (102,230) | |
Ceded policy loans | | | 9,687 | | | | 16,320 | | | | 5,538 | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | | (367,857) | | | | (239,086) | | | | (204,951) | |
Other long-term investments | | | (84,859) | | | | (75,664) | | | | (70,641) | |
Equity securities, available for sale | | | (10,574) | | | | (5,024) | | | | (8,528) | |
Trading account assets, at fair value | | | (9,478) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Notes receivable from parent and affiliates, net | | | 4,641 | | | | 5,714 | | | | 6,842 | |
Other, net | | | 160 | | | | (1,885) | | | | 2,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities | | $ | (464,223) | | | $ | (576,138) | | | $ | (243,951) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ account deposits | | $ | 3,091,818 | | | $ | 4,154,752 | | | $ | 3,044,607 | |
Ceded policyholders’ account deposits | | | (413,181) | | | | (312,528) | | | | (117,916) | |
| | | |
Policyholders’ account withdrawals | | | (2,399,425) | | | | (3,178,207) | | | | (2,555,035) | |
Ceded policyholders’ account withdrawals | | | 47,114 | | | | 31,419 | | | | 8,824 | |
Net change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase and cash collateral for loaned securities | | | 36,799 | | | | (146,074) | | | | 114,612 | |
Dividend to parent | | | (423,000) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Contributed/Distributed capital - parent/child asset transfers | | | (3,374) | | | | (20,900) | | | | 3,543 | |
Net change in financing arrangements (maturities 90 days or less) | | | (155,100) | | | | 29,000 | | | | 129,000 | |
Net change in long-term borrowing | | | 21,100 | | | | 3,786 | | | | (59,401) | |
Drafts outstanding | | | 239,000 | | | | 453,000 | | | | 277,000 | |
46
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities | | $ | 41,751 | | | $ | 1,014,248 | | | $ | 845,234 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | (104,866) | | | | 124,686 | | | | (77,576) | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR | | | 412,109 | | | | 287,423 | | | | 364,999 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD | | $ | 307,243 | | | $ | 412,109 | | | $ | 287,423 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income taxes paid, net of refunds | | $ | (250,087) | | | $ | 134,603 | | | $ | 166,606 | |
Interest paid | | $ | 40,209 | | | $ | 43,717 | | | $ | 33,104 | |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Significant Non Cash Transactions
Cash Flows from Investing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes $56 million of increases in fixed maturities, available for sale and $132 million of decreases in fixed maturities, available for sale related to the amendments of the reinsurance agreements between the Company and UPARC, an affiliate, and the Company, and PAR U, an affiliate in the first quarter of 2013. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on related party transactions.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes $192 million of increases in fixed maturities, available for sale, and commercial mortgages and $704 million of decreases in fixed maturities, available for sale, and commercial mortgages related to the amendments of the reinsurance agreements between the Company and UPARC, an affiliate, and the Company, and PAR U, an affiliate, in the third quarter of 2013. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on related party transactions.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes $4,951 million of increases in fixed maturities, available for sale, commercial mortgages, short-term investments, and trading account assets related to the coinsurance of Guaranteed Universal Life (“GUL”) business assumed from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford Life Business. Cash Flows from Investing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes $4,952 million of decreases in fixed maturities, available for sale, commercial mortgages, short-term investments, and trading account assets related to the subsequent retrocession of this GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance to PAR U, an affiliate. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on related party transactions.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes $12 million of decreases in Contributed/Distributed capital-parent/child asset transfers related to the coinsurance of GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford Life Business.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 excludes $202 million of decreases in fixed maturities, available for sale and commercial mortgages related to the coinsurance transaction between the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary PLNJ and PAR U, in the third quarter of 2012. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on related party transactions.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities in the 2011 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows excludes $313 million of increases in fixed maturities, available for sale related to a non-cash transfer of assets to the Company. These assets were received as consideration of premium due to the Company for the recapture of policies issued prior to January 1, 2011 previously reinsured by Universal Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Company, or “UPARC,” an affiliate (See Note 13).
Cash Flows from Investing Activities in the 2011 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows also excludes $1,054 million of decreases in fixed maturities available for sale related to the coinsurance transaction with PAR U, an affiliate (See Note 13). The assets transferred included $1,009 million of consideration for the initial premium due under the coinsurance agreement with this affiliate and $45 million to Prudential Insurance, the Company’s parent company, to settle tax expenses arising from this coinsurance transaction.
47
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Pruco Life Insurance Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, or “Prudential Insurance,” which in turn is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., or “Prudential Financial.” Pruco Life Insurance Company was organized in 1971 under the laws of the State of Arizona. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities, primarily through affiliated and unaffiliated distributors, in the District of Columbia, Guam, and in all States except New York.
The Company has three subsidiaries, including one wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, or “PLNJ,” and two subsidiaries formed in 2009 for the purpose of holding certain commercial loan investments. Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries are together referred to as the Company and all financial information is shown on a consolidated basis.
PLNJ is a stock life insurance company organized in 1982 under the laws of the state of New Jersey. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in New Jersey and New York only.
Acquisition of The Hartford’s Individual Life Insurance Business
On January 2, 2013, Prudential Insurance acquired the individual life insurance business of The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (“The Hartford”) through a reinsurance transaction. Under the agreement, Prudential Insurance paid The Hartford cash consideration of $615 million, primarily in the form of a ceding commission to provide reinsurance for approximately 700,000 life insurance policies with net retained face amount in force of approximately $141 billion. This acquisition increases our scale in the U.S. individual life insurance market, particularly universal life products, and provides complimentary distribution opportunities through expanded wirehouse and bank distribution channels.
In connection with this transaction, Prudential Insurance retroceded to the Company, the portion of the assumed business that is classified as guaranteed universal life insurance (“GUL”) with account values of approximately $4 billion as of January 2, 2013. The Company has reinsured more than 79,000 GUL policies with a net retained face amount in force of approximately $30 billion. The Company then retroceded all of the GUL policies to an affiliated captive reinsurance company. Collectively, these transactions do not have a material impact on equity, as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), or the statutory capital and surplus of the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The most significant estimates include those used in determining deferred policy acquisition costs and related amortization; amortization of deferred sales inducements; valuation of investments including derivatives and the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments (“OTTI”); future policy benefits including guarantees; provision for income taxes and valuation of deferred tax assets; and reserves for contingent liabilities, including reserves for losses in connection with unresolved legal matters.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRONOUNCEMENTS
Investments and Investment Related Liabilities
The Company’s principal investments are fixed maturities; equity securities; commercial mortgage and other loans; policy loans; other long-term investments, including joint ventures (other than operating joint ventures), limited partnerships, and real estate; and short-term investments. Investments and investment-related liabilities also include securities repurchase and resale agreements and securities lending transactions. The accounting policies related to each are as follows:
Fixed maturities are comprised of bonds, notes and redeemable preferred stock. Fixed maturities classified as “available-for-sale” are carried at fair value. See Note 10 for additional information regarding the determination of fair value. Fixed maturities that the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as “held-to-maturity.” The amortized cost of fixed maturities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Interest income, as well as the related amortization of premium and
48
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
accretion of discount is included in “Net investment income” under the effective yield method. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, the effective yield is based on estimated cash flows, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also vary based on other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral, including default rates and changes in value. These assumptions can significantly impact income recognition and the amount of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and other comprehensive income. For high credit quality mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities (those rated AA or above), cash flows are provided quarterly, and the amortized cost and effective yield of the security are adjusted as necessary to reflect historical prepayment experience and changes in estimated future prepayments. The adjustments to amortized cost are recorded as a charge or credit to net investment income in accordance with the retrospective method. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities rated below AA or those for which an other than temporary impairment has been recorded, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively for any changes in estimated cash flows. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities classified as “available-for-sale,” net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”), deferred sales inducements (“DSI”), future policy benefits, and policyholder account balances that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” (“AOCI”).
Trading account assets, at fair value, represents equity securities held in support of a deferred compensation plan and other fixed maturity securities carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Asset administration fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in “Net investment income.”
Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value, are comprised of common stock, and non-redeemable preferred stock, and are carried at fair value. The associated unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs, DSI, future policy benefits, and policyholder account balances that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in AOCI. The cost of equity securities is written down to fair value when a decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments. Dividends from these investments are recognized in “Net investment income” when earned.
Commercial mortgage and other loans consist of commercial mortgage loans, agricultural loans and uncollateralized loans. Commercial mortgage and other loans held for investment are generally carried at unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and expenses and net of an allowance for losses. Commercial mortgage and other loans acquired, including those related to the acquisition of a business, are recorded at fair value when purchased, reflecting any premiums or discounts to unpaid principal balances.
Interest income, as well as prepayment fees and the amortization of the related premiums or discounts, related to commercial mortgage and other loans, are included in “Net investment income.”
Impaired loans include those loans for which it is probable that amounts due will not all be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company defines “past due” as principal or interest not collected at least 30 days past the scheduled contractual due date. Interest received on loans that are past due, including impaired and non-impaired loans as well as loans that were previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring, is either applied against the principal or reported as net investment income based on the Company’s assessment as to the collectability of the principal. See Note 3 for additional information about the Company’s past due loans.
The Company discontinues accruing interest on loans after the loans become 90 days delinquent as to principal or interest payments, or earlier when the Company has doubts about collectability. When the Company discontinues accruing interest on a loan, any accrued but uncollectible interest on the loan and other loans backed by the same collateral, if any, is charged to interest income in the same period. Generally, a loan is restored to accrual status only after all delinquent interest and principal are brought current and, in the case of loans where the payment of interest has been interrupted for a substantial period, or the loan has been modified, a regular payment performance has been established.
The Company reviews the performance and credit quality of the commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio on an on-going basis. Loans are placed on watch list status based on a predefined set of criteria and are assigned one of three categories. Loans are placed on “early warning” status in cases where, based on the Company’s analysis of the loan’s collateral, the financial situation of the borrower or tenants or other market factors, it is believed a loss of principal or interest could occur. Loans are classified as “closely monitored” when it is determined that there is a collateral deficiency or other credit events that may lead to a potential loss of principal or interest. Loans “not in good standing” are those loans where the Company has concluded that there is a high probability of loss of principal, such as when the loan is delinquent or in the process of foreclosure. As described below, in determining the allowance for losses, the Company evaluates each loan on the watch list to determine if it is probable that amounts due will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are measures commonly used to assess the quality of commercial mortgage loans. The loan-to-value ratio compares the amount of the loan to the fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan, and is commonly expressed as a percentage. Loan-to-value ratios greater than 100% indicate that the loan amount exceeds the collateral value. A smaller loan-to-value ratio indicates a greater excess of collateral value over the loan amount. The debt service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments. Debt service coverage ratios less than 1.0 times indicate that property operations do not generate enough income to cover the loan’s current debt payments. A larger debt service coverage ratio indicates a greater excess of net operating income over the debt service payments. The values utilized in calculating these ratios are developed as part of the Company’s periodic review of the commercial mortgage loan and agricultural loan portfolio, which includes an internal appraisal of the underlying collateral value. The Company’s periodic review also includes a quality re-rating process, whereby the internal quality rating originally assigned at underwriting is updated based on current loan, property and market information using a proprietary quality rating system. The loan-to-value ratio is the most significant of several inputs used to establish the
49
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
internal credit rating of a loan which in turn drives the allowance for losses. Other key factors considered in determining the internal credit rating include debt service coverage ratios, amortization, loan term, estimated market value growth rate and volatility for the property type and region. See Note 3 for additional information related to the loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage ratios related to the Company’s commercial mortgage and agricultural loan portfolios.
The allowance for losses includes a loan specific reserve for each impaired loan that has a specifically identified loss and a portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. For impaired commercial mortgage and other loans, the allowances for losses are determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or based upon the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The portfolio reserves for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses in the commercial mortgage and agricultural loan portfolio segments considers the current credit composition of the portfolio based on an internal quality rating, (as described above). The portfolio reserves are determined using past loan experience, including historical credit migration, loss probability and loss severity factors by property type. These factors are reviewed each quarter and updated as appropriate.
The allowance for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans can increase or decrease from period to period based on the factors noted above. “Realized investment gains (losses), net” includes changes in the allowance for losses. “Realized investment gains (losses), net” also includes gains and losses on sales, certain restructurings, and foreclosures.
When a commercial mortgage or other loan is deemed to be uncollectible, any specific valuation allowance associated with the loan is reversed and a direct write down to the carrying amount of the loan is made. The carrying amount of the loan is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in value.
In situations where a loan has been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring and the loan has subsequently defaulted, this factor is considered when evaluating the loan for a specific allowance for losses in accordance with the credit review process noted above.
See Note 3 for additional information about commercial mortgage and other loans that have been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring.
Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal balances. Interest income on policy loans is recognized in “Net investment income” at the contract interest rate when earned. Policy loans are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the associated insurance policies.
Securities repurchase and resale agreements and securities loaned transactions are used primarily to earn spread income, to borrow funds, or to facilitate trading activity. As part of securities repurchase agreements or securities loaned transactions, the Company transfers U.S. and foreign debt and equity securities, or as well as U.S. government and government agency securities and receives cash as collateral. As part of securities resale agreements, the Company invests cash and receives as collateral U.S. government securities or other debt securities. For securities repurchase agreements and securities loaned transactions used to earn spread income, the cash received is typically invested in cash equivalents, short-term investments or fixed maturities.
Securities repurchase and resale agreements that satisfy certain criteria are treated as secured borrowing or secured lending arrangements. These agreements are carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently resold or reacquired, as specified in the respective transactions. For securities purchased under agreements to resell, the Company’s policy is to take possession or control of the securities either directly or through a third party custodian. These securities are valued daily and additional securities or cash collateral is received, or returned, when appropriate to protect against credit exposure. Securities to be resold are the same, or substantially the same, as the securities received. For securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the market value of the securities to be repurchased is monitored, and additional collateral is obtained where appropriate, to protect against credit exposure. Securities to be repurchased are the same, or substantially the same, as those sold. Income and expenses related to these transactions executed within the insurance companies used to earn spread income are reported as “Net investment income;” however, for transactions used for funding purposes, the associated borrowing cost is reported as interest expense (included in “General and administrative expenses”).
Securities loaned transactionsare treated as financing arrangements and are recorded at the amount of cash received. The Company obtains collateral in an amount equal to 102% and 105% of the fair value of the domestic and foreign securities, respectively. The Company monitors the market value of the securities loaned on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained as necessary. Substantially all of the Company’s securities loaned transactions are with large brokerage firms. Income and expenses associated with securities loaned transactions used to earn spread income are reported as “Net investment income;” however, for securities loaned transactions used for funding purposes the associated rebate is reported as interest expense (included in “General and administrative expenses”).
Other long-term investmentsconsist of the Company’s investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships, other than operating joint ventures, as well as wholly-owned investment real estate and other investments. Joint venture and partnership interests are either accounted for using the equity method of accounting or under the cost method when the Company’s partnership interest is so minor (generally less than 3%) that it exercises virtually no influence over operating and financial policies. The Company’s income from investments in joint ventures and partnerships accounted for using the equity method or the cost method, other than the Company’s investment in operating joint ventures, is included in “Net investment income.” The carrying value of these investments is written down, or impaired, to fair value when a decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary. In applying the equity method or the cost method (including assessment for other-than-temporary impairment), the Company uses financial information provided by the investee, generally on a one to three month lag.
Short-term investments primarily consist of highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of twelve months or less and greater than three months when purchased. These investments are generally carried at fair value and include certain money market investments, short-term debt securities issued by government sponsored entities and other highly liquid debt instruments.
50
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Realized investment gains (losses) are computed using the specific identification method. Realized investment gains and losses are generated from numerous sources, including the sale of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships and other types of investments, as well as adjustments to the cost basis of investments for net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings. Realized investment gains and losses are also generated from prepayment premiums received on private fixed maturity securities, allowance for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans, and fair value changes on embedded derivatives and free-standing derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. See “Derivative Financial Instruments” below for additional information regarding the accounting for derivatives.
The Company’s available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to identify other-than-temporary impairments in value. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. With regard to available-for-sale equity securities, the Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. When it is determined that a decline in value of an equity security is other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the equity security is reduced to its fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings.
An other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings for a debt security in an unrealized loss position when the Company either (a) has the intent to sell the debt security or (b) more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For all debt securities in unrealized loss positions that do not meet either of these two criteria, the Company analyzes its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of projected future cash flows with the amortized cost of the security. The net present value is calculated by discounting the Company’s best estimate of projected future cash flows at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. The Company may use the estimated fair value of collateral as a proxy for the net present value if it believes that the security is dependent on the liquidation of collateral for recovery of its investment. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized.
When an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet these criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and its net present value calculated as described above. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” (“OCI”). Unrealized gains or losses on securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings is tracked as a separate component of AOCI.
For debt securities, the split between the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income and the net amount recognized in earnings is driven principally by assumptions regarding the amount and timing of projected cash flows. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also include other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. The Company has developed these estimates using information based on its historical experience as well as using market observable data, such as industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings and other data relevant to the collectability of a security, such as the general payment terms of the security and the security’s position within the capital structure of the issuer.
The new cost basis of an impaired security is not adjusted for subsequent increases in estimated fair value. In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment, the impaired security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. For debt securities, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis may be accreted into net investment income in future periods, including increases in cash flow on a prospective basis. In certain cases where there are decreased cash flow expectations, the security is reviewed for further cash flow impairments.
Unrealized investment gains and losses are also considered in determining certain other balances, including deferred policy acquisition costs, DSI, certain future policy benefits, policyholder account balances and deferred tax assets or liabilities. These balances are adjusted, as applicable, for the impact of unrealized gains or losses on investments as if these gains or losses had been realized, with corresponding credits or charges included in AOCI. Each of these balances is discussed in greater detail below.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, certain money market investments and other debt instruments with maturities of three months or less when purchased, other than cash equivalents that are included in “Trading account assets, at fair value.” The Company also engages in overnight borrowing and lending of funds with Prudential Financial and affiliates which are considered cash and cash equivalents.
51
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Costs that vary with and that are directly related to the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance and annuity business are deferred to the extent such costs are deemed recoverable from future profits. Such DAC primarily include commissions, costs of policy issuance and underwriting, and certain other expenses that are directly related to successfully negotiated contracts. See below under “Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements” for a discussion of the authoritative guidance adopted effective January 1, 2012, regarding which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. In each reporting period, capitalized DAC is amortized to “Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs,” net of the accrual of imputed interest on DAC balances. DAC is subject to periodic recoverability testing. DAC, for applicable products, is adjusted for the impact of unrealized gains or losses on investments as if these gains or losses had been realized, with corresponding credits or charges included in AOCI.
Deferred policy acquisition costs related to interest sensitive and variable life products and fixed and variable deferred annuity products are generally deferred and amortized over the expected life of the contracts (at least 30 years) in proportion to gross profits arising principally from investment margins, mortality and expense margins, and surrender charges, based on historical and anticipated future experience, which is updated periodically. The Company uses a reversion to the mean approach for equities to derive the future equity return assumptions.
However, if the projected equity return calculated using this approach is greater than the maximum equity return assumption, the maximum equity return is utilized. In addition to the gross profit components previously mentioned, the impact of the embedded derivatives associated with certain optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity contracts and related hedging activities are also included in actual gross profits used as the basis for calculating current period amortization and, in certain instances, in management’s estimate of total gross profits used for setting the amortization rate, regardless of which affiliated legal entity this activity occurs. In calculating gross profits, profits and losses related to contracts issued by the Company that are reported in affiliated legal entities other than the Company as a result of, for example, reinsurance agreements with those affiliated entities are also included. The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Prudential Financial (an SEC registrant) and has extensive transactions and relationships with other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial, including reinsurance agreements, as described in Note 13. Incorporating all product-related profits and losses in gross profits, including those that are reported in affiliated legal entities, produces a DAC amortization pattern representative of the total economics of the products. The effect of changes to total gross profits on unamortized DAC is reflected in “Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs” in the period such total gross profits are revised. DAC related to non-participating traditional individual life insurance is amortized in proportion to gross premiums.
For some products, policyholders can elect to modify product benefits, features, rights or coverages by exchanging a contract for a new contract or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. These transactions are known as internal replacements. If policyholders surrender traditional life insurance policies in exchange for life insurance policies that do not have fixed and guaranteed terms, the Company immediately charges to expense the remaining unamortized DAC on the surrendered policies. For other internal replacement transactions, except those that involve the addition of a non-integrated contract feature that does not change the existing base contract, the unamortized DAC is immediately charged to expense if the terms of the new policies are not substantially similar to those of the former policies. If the new terms are substantially similar to those of the earlier policies, the DAC is retained with respect to the new policies and amortized over the expected life of the new policies.
Deferred Sales Inducements
The Company offered various types of sales inducements to contractholders related to fixed and variable deferred annuity contracts. The Company defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the anticipated life of the policy using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. Sales inducements balances are subject to periodic recoverability testing. The Company records amortization of deferred sales inducements in “Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances.” Deferred sales inducements, for applicable products, is adjusted for the impact of unrealized gains or losses on investments as if these gains or losses had been realized, with corresponding credits or charges included in AOCI. See Note 7 for additional information regarding sales inducements.
Separate Account Assets and Liabilities
Separate account assets are reported at fair value and represent segregated funds that are invested for certain contractholders and other customers. The assets consist primarily of equity securities, fixed maturities, real estate related investments, real estate mortgage loans and short term investments and derivative instruments. The assets of each account are legally segregated and are generally not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities primarily represent the contractholders’ account balance in separate account assets and to a lesser extent borrowings of the separate account, and will be equal and offsetting to total separate account assets. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding separate account arrangements with contractual guarantees. The investment income and realized investment gains or losses from separate accounts generally accrue to the contractholders and are not included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations. Mortality, policy administration and surrender charges assessed against the accounts are included in “Policy charges and fee income.” Asset administration fees charged to the accounts are included in “Asset administration fees.”
52
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other assets consist primarily of premiums due, certain restricted assets, and receivables resulting from sales of securities that had not yet settled at the balance sheet date. Other liabilities consist primarily of accrued expenses, reinsurance payables, technical overdrafts, derivatives, and payables resulting from purchases of securities that had not yet been settled at the balance sheet date.
Reinsurance recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables include corresponding receivables associated with reinsurance arrangements with affiliates. For additional information about these arrangements see Note 13.
Future Policy Benefits
The Company’s liability for future policy benefits is comprised of liabilities for guarantee benefits related to certain nontraditional long-duration life and annuity contracts, which are discussed more fully in Note 7. These reserves represent reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and optional living benefit features on our variable annuity products and no lapse guarantees for our variable and universal life products. The optional living benefits are primarily accounted for as embedded derivatives, with fair values calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature. For additional information regarding the valuation of these optional living benefit features, see Note 10.
The Company’s liability for future policy benefits also includes reserves based on the present value of estimated future payments to or on behalf of policyholders related to contracts that have fixed and guaranteed terms, where the timing and amount of payment depends on policyholder mortality, and maintenance expenses less the present value of future net premiums. Expected mortality is generally based on the Company’s experience, industry data, and/or other factors. Interest rate assumptions are based on factors such as market conditions and expected investment returns. Although mortality and interest rate assumptions are “locked-in” upon the issuance of new insurance or annuity business with fixed and guaranteed terms, significant changes in experience or assumptions may require the Company to provide for expected future losses on a product by establishing premium deficiency reserves. Premium deficiency reserves are established, if necessary, when the liability for future policy benefits plus the present value of expected future gross premiums are determined to be insufficient to provide for expected future policy benefits and expenses. Premium deficiency reserves do not include a provision for the risk of adverse deviation. Any adjustments to future policy benefit reserves to net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in AOCI. See Note 7 for additional information regarding future policy benefits.
Policyholders’ Account Balances
The Company’s liability for policyholders’ account balances primarily represents the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date. This liability is primarily associated with the general accumulated account deposits, plus interest credited, less policyholder withdrawals and other charges assessed against the general account balance. These policyholders’ account balances also include provision for benefits under non-life contingent payout annuities and certain unearned revenues.
Contingent Liabilities
Amounts related to contingent liabilities are accrued if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount is reasonably estimable. Management evaluates whether there are incremental legal or other costs directly associated with the ultimate resolution of the matter that are reasonably estimable and, if so, they are included in the accrual.
Insurance Revenue and Expense Recognition
Premiums from individual life products, other than interest-sensitive and variable life contracts, are recognized when due. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any gross premium in excess of the net premium (i.e., the portion of the gross premium required to provide for all expected future benefits and expenses) is generally deferred and recognized into revenue in a constant relationship to insurance inforce. Benefits are recorded as an expense when they are incurred. Benefits and expenses for these products also include amortization of DAC. A liability for future policy benefits is recorded when premiums are recognized using the net premium method.
Revenues for variable deferred annuity contracts consist of charges against contractholder account values for mortality and expense risks, administration fees, surrender charges and an annual maintenance fee per contract. Revenues for mortality and expense risk charges and administration fees are recognized as assessed against the contractholder. Surrender charge revenue is recognized when the surrender charge is assessed against the contractholder at the time of surrender. Benefits and expenses for these products also include amortization of DAC and DSI. Benefit reserves for the variable investment options on annuity contracts represent the account value of the contracts and are included in “Separate account liabilities.”
Revenues for variable immediate annuity and supplementary contracts with life contingencies consist of certain charges against contractholder account values including mortality and expense risks and administration fees. These charges and fees are recognized as revenue when assessed against the contractholder. Benefit reserves for variable immediate annuity contracts represent the account value of the contracts and are included in “Separate account liabilities.”
53
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Revenues for fixed immediate annuity and fixed supplementary contracts with and without life contingencies consist of net investment income. In addition, revenues for fixed immediate annuity contracts with life contingencies also consist of single premium payments recognized as annuity considerations when received. Benefit reserves for these contracts are based on applicable actuarial standards with assumed interest rates that vary by contract year. Reserves for contracts without life contingencies are included in “Policyholders’ account balances” while reserves for contracts with life contingencies are included in “future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities.” Assumed interest rates ranged from 0.00% to 14.75% at December 31, 2013, and from 1.00% to 14.75% at December 31, 2012.
Revenues for variable life insurance contracts consist of charges against contractholder account values or separate accounts for expense charges, administration fees, cost of insurance charges, taxes and surrender charges. Certain contracts also include charges against premium to pay state premium taxes. All of these charges are recognized as revenue when assessed against the contractholder. Fees assessed that represent compensation to the Company for services to be provided in future periods and certain other fees are generally deferred and amortized into revenue over the life of the related contracts in proportion to estimated gross profits. Benefits and expenses for these products also include amortization of DAC. Benefit reserves for variable life insurance contracts represent the account value of the contracts and are included in “Separate account liabilities.”
Certain individual annuity contracts provide the holder a guarantee that the benefit received upon death or annuitization will be no less than a minimum prescribed amount, and certain individual life contracts provide no lapse guarantees. These benefits are accounted for as insurance contracts and are discussed in further detail in Note 7. The Company also provides contracts with certain living benefits which are considered embedded derivatives. These contracts are discussed in further detail in Note 7.
Amounts received as payment for interest-sensitive or variable contracts are reported as deposits to “Policyholders’ account balances” and/or “Separate account liabilities.” Revenues from these contracts are reflected in “Policy charges and fee income” consisting primarily of fees assessed during the period against the policyholders’ account balances for mortality and other benefit charges, policy administration charges and surrender charges. In addition to fees, the Company earns investment income from the investment of deposits in the Company’s general account portfolio. Fees assessed that represent compensation to the Company for services to be provided in future periods and certain other fees are generally deferred and amortized into revenue over the life of the related contracts in proportion to estimated gross profits. Benefits and expenses for these products include claims in excess of related account balances, expenses of contract administration, interest credited to policyholders’ account balances and amortization of DAC and DSI.
Premiums, benefits and expenses are stated net of reinsurance ceded to other companies.
Asset Administration Fees
The Company receives asset administration fee income from contractholders’ account balances invested in The Prudential Series Funds or, “PSF,” which are a portfolio of mutual fund investments related to the Company’s separate account products. Also, the Company receives fee income calculated on contractholder separate account balances invested in the Advanced Series Trust Funds (see Note 13). In addition, the Company receives fees from contractholders’ account balances invested in funds managed by companies other than affiliates of Prudential Insurance. Asset administration fees are recognized as income when earned.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign exchange rates, financial indices, values of securities or commodities, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns, and liquidity. Values can also be affected by changes in estimates and assumptions, including those related to counterparty behavior and non-performance risk used in valuation models. Derivative financial instruments generally used by the Company include swaps, futures, forwards and options and may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Derivative positions are carried at fair value, generally by obtaining quoted market prices or through the use of valuation models.
Derivatives are used to manage the interest rate and currency characteristics of assets or liabilities. Additionally, derivatives may be used to seek to reduce exposure to interest rate, credit, foreign currency and equity risks associated with assets held or expected to be purchased or sold, and liabilities incurred or expected to be incurred. As discussed in detail below and in Note 11, all realized and unrealized changes in fair value of derivatives are recorded in current earnings, with the exception of the effective portion of cash flow hedges. Cash flows from derivatives are reported in the operating, investing, or financing activities sections in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows based on the nature and purpose of the derivative.
Derivatives are recorded either as assets, within “Other trading account assets, at fair value” or “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” except for embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host contract. The Company nets the fair value of all derivative financial instruments with counterparties for which a master netting arrangement has been executed.
The Company designates derivatives as either (1) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge); or (2) a derivative that does not qualify for hedge accounting.
To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk of the hedged item. Effectiveness of the hedge is formally assessed at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship. Even if a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, there may be an element of ineffectiveness of the hedge. Under such circumstances, the ineffective portion is recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
54
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company formally documents at inception all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions.
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge and is determined to be highly effective, changes in its fair value are recorded in AOCI until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows being hedged (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). At that time, the related portion of deferred gains or losses on the derivative instrument is reclassified and reported in the income statement line item associated with the hedged item.
If it is determined that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge or management removes the hedge designation, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The component of AOCI related to discontinued cash flow hedges is reclassified to the income statement line associated with the hedged cash flows consistent with the earnings impact of the original hedged cash flows.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, or because it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the specified time period, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Any asset or liability that was recorded pursuant to recognition of the firm commitment is removed from the balance sheet and recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Gains and losses that were in AOCI pursuant to the hedge of a forecasted transaction are recognized immediately in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
If a derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting, all changes in its fair value, including net receipts and payments, are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” without considering changes in the fair value of the economically associated assets or liabilities.
The Company is a party to financial instruments that contain derivative instruments that are “embedded” in the financial instruments. At inception, the Company assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded instrument are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the financial instrument (i.e., the host contract) and whether a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that (1) the embedded instrument possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and (2) a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded instrument qualifies as an embedded derivative that is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and changes in its fair value are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” For certain financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would need to be bifurcated and reported at fair value, the Company may elect to classify the entire instrument as a trading account asset and report it within “Trading account assets, at fair value.”
The Company sells variable annuity contracts that include optional living benefit features that may be treated from an accounting perspective as embedded derivatives. The Company has reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain of these benefit features to an affiliate, Pruco Reinsurance Ltd. (“Pruco Re”). The embedded derivatives related to the living benefit features and the related reinsurance agreements are carried at fair value and included in “Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities” and “Reinsurance recoverables” or “Other liabilities,” respectively. Changes in the fair value are determined using valuation models as described in Note 10, and are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
The Company, excluding its subsidiaries, also sells certain universal life products that contain a no lapse guarantee provision that is reinsured with an affiliate, UPARC. The reinsurance of this no lapse guarantee results in an embedded derivative that incurs market risk primarily in the form of interest rate risk. Interest rate sensitivity can result in changes in the reinsurance recoverables that are carried at fair value and included in “Reinsurance recoverables,” and changes in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” In the third quarter of 2011, the Company amended its reinsurance agreement resulting in a recapture of a portion of this business (See Note 13) effective July 1, 2011. Pursuant to the recapture amendment, the settlement of the recapture premium occurred subsequent to the effective date of the recapture. As a result, the recapture premium was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between this date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through the settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from an asset portfolio within UPARC. This settlement feature was accounted for as a derivative.
Concurrent with the recapture discussed above, the Company entered into a new coinsurance agreement with an affiliate, PAR U effective July 1, 2011. The settlement of the initial coinsurance premium also occurred subsequent to the effective date of the coinsurance agreement and contains a settlement provision similar to the recapture premium, discussed above. The adjustment to the initial coinsurance premium was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from both an asset portfolio within the Company, as well as an asset portfolio within UPARC. The settlement feature of this agreement was accounted for as a derivative (See Note 13 for additional information about this agreement).
In the third quarter of 2012, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, PLNJ, entered a new coinsurance agreement with an affiliate, PAR U effective July 1, 2012. The settlement of the initial coinsurance premium occurred subsequent to the effective date of the coinsurance agreement. As a result, the settlement was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between the effective date and the settlement date. This adjustment to the initial coinsurance premium was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from an asset portfolio within PLNJ. The settlement feature of this agreement was accounted for as a derivative (See Note 13 for additional information about this agreement).
55
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
In the third quarter of 2013, the Company further amended its reinsurance agreement with UPARC resulting in the recapture of a portion of this business (See Note 13 for additional information about this agreement) effective July 1, 2013. Pursuant to the recapture amendment, the settlement of the recapture premium occurred subsequent to the effective date of the recapture. As a result, the recapture premium was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between the effective date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the interest earned from the effective date through the settlement date related to fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgages held by UPARC. This settlement feature was accounted for as a derivative.
Concurrent with the recapture discussed above, the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, amended its coinsurance agreement with PAR U effective July 1, 2013. The settlement of the initial coinsurance premium also occurred subsequent to the effective date and the amendment contains a settlement provision similar to the recapture premium discussed above. The adjustment to the coinsurance premium was equal to the interest earned from the effective date through the settlement date related to fixed maturity securities and commercial mortgages from both an asset portfolio within the Company, as well as an asset portfolio within UPARC. The settlement feature of this agreement was accounted for as a derivative (See Note 13 for additional information about this agreement).
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Liabilities for short-term and long-term debt are primarily carried at an amount equal to unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized discount or premium. Original-issue discount or premium and debt-issue costs are recognized as a component of interest expense over the period the debt is expected to be outstanding, using the interest method of amortization. Short-term debt is debt coming due in the next twelve months, including that portion of debt otherwise classified as long-term. The short-term debt caption may exclude short-term debt items the Company intends to refinance on a long-term basis in the near term. See Note 13 for additional information regarding short-term and long-term debt.
Income Taxes
The Company is a member of the federal income tax return of Prudential Financial and primarily files separate company state and local tax returns. Pursuant to the tax allocation arrangement with Prudential Financial, total federal income tax expense is determined on a separate company basis. Members with losses record tax benefits to the extent such losses are recognized in the consolidated federal tax provision.
Deferred income taxes are recognized, based on enacted rates, when assets and liabilities have different values for financial statement and tax reporting purposes. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized.
Items required by tax regulations to be included in the tax return may differ from the items reflected in the financial statements. As a result, the effective tax rate reflected in the financial statements may be different than the actual rate applied on the tax return. Some of these differences are permanent such as expenses that are not deductible in the Company’s tax return, and some differences are temporary, reversing over time, such as valuation of insurance reserves. Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in future years for which the Company has already recorded the tax benefit in the Company’s income statement. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized in the Company’s financial statements for which payment has been deferred, or expenditures for which the Company has already taken a deduction in the Company’s tax return but have not yet been recognized in the Company’s financial statements.
The application of U.S. GAAP requires the Company to evaluate the recoverability of the Company’s deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance if necessary to reduce the Company’s deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Considerable judgment is required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance the Company may consider many factors, including: (1) the nature of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; (2) whether they are ordinary or capital; (3) in which tax jurisdictions they were generated and the timing of their reversal; (4) taxable income in prior carryback years as well as projected taxable earnings exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; (5) the length of time that carryovers can be utilized in the various taxing jurisdictions; (6) any unique tax rules that would impact the utilization of the deferred tax assets; and (7) any tax planning strategies that the Company would employ to avoid a tax benefit from expiring unused. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, will be realized.
U.S. GAAP prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on tax returns. The application of this guidance is a two-step process, the first step being recognition. The Company determines whether it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be sustained upon examination. If a tax position does not meet the more likely than not recognition threshold, the benefit of that position is not recognized in the financial statements. The second step is measurement. The Company measures the tax position as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate resolution with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. This measurement considers the amounts and probabilities of the outcomes that could be realized upon ultimate settlement using the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date.
The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties which relate to tax years still subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other taxing jurisdictions. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. Generally, for tax years which produce net operating losses, capital losses or tax credit carryforwards (“tax attributes”), the
56
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
statute of limitations does not close, to the extent of these tax attributes, until the expiration of the statute of limitations for the tax year in which they are fully utilized. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the liability for income taxes. The Company classifies all interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense.
See Note 9 for additional information regarding income taxes.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance establishing a single definition of a public entity for use in financial accounting and reporting guidance. This new guidance is effective for all current and future reporting periods and did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or financial statement disclosures.
In July 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding derivatives. The guidance permits the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting, in addition to the United States Treasury rate and London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The guidance also removes the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The guidance is effective for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013 and should be applied prospectively. Adoption of the guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and financial statement disclosures.
In February 2013, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. Under the guidance, an entity is required to separately present information about significant items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component as well as changes in accumulated other comprehensive income balances by component in either the financial statements or the notes to the financial statements. The guidance does not change the items that are reported in other comprehensive income, does not change when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income, and does not amend any existing requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2012 and should be applied prospectively. The disclosures required by this guidance are included in Note 3.
In December 2011 and January 2013, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the disclosure of recognized derivative instruments (including bifurcated embedded derivatives), repurchase agreements and securities borrowing/lending transactions that are offset in the statement of financial position or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement (irrespective of whether they are offset in the statement of financial position). This new guidance requires an entity to disclose information on both a gross and net basis about instruments and transactions within the scope of this guidance. This new guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and should be applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The disclosures required by this guidance are included in Note 11.
Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted retrospectively new authoritative guidance to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. Under the amended guidance acquisition costs are to include only those costs that are directly related to the acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts by applying a model similar to the accounting for loan origination costs. An entity may defer incremental direct costs of contract acquisition with independent third parties or employees that are essential to the contract transaction, as well as the portion of employee compensation, including payroll fringe benefits, and other costs directly related to underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical inspection, and contract selling for successfully negotiated contracts. Prior period financial information presented in these financial statements has been adjusted to reflect the retrospective adoption of the amended guidance. The impact of the retrospective adoption of this guidance on previously reported December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 balances was a reduction in “Deferred policy acquisition costs” of $672 million and $684 million, an increase in “Policyholders’ Account Balances” of $3 million and $3 million, and a reduction in “Total equity” of $469 million and $446 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, “Other Liabilities” increased $48 million and “Reinsurance Recoverables” increased $2 million related to the impact of this guidance on the 2011 coinsurance agreement with PAR U (see Note 13), The impact of the retrospective adoption of this guidance on previously reported income from continuing operations before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was a decrease of $34 million, $125 million and $53 million, respectively. The lower level of costs now qualifying for deferral will be only partially offset by a lower level of amortization of “Deferred policy acquisition costs,” and, as such, will initially result in lower earnings in future periods primarily reflecting lower deferrals of wholesaler costs. While the adoption of this amended guidance changes the timing of when certain costs are reflected in the Company’s results of operations, it has no effect on the total acquisition costs to be recognized over time and has no impact on the Company’s cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. The updated guidance eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the updated guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not change the items that are reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The Company opted to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements included herein reflect the adoption of this updated guidance.
In May 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the fair value measurements and disclosure requirements. The updated guidance clarifies existing guidance related to the application of fair value measurement methods and requires expanded disclosures. This new guidance is effective for
57
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively. The expanded disclosures required by this guidance are included in Note 10. Adoption of this guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the assessment of effective control for repurchase agreements. This new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2011, and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and financial statement disclosures.
In April 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance clarifying which restructurings constitute troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in their evaluation of whether conditions exist that constitute a troubled debt restructuring. This new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual reporting period of adoption. The Company’s adoption of this guidance in the third quarter of 2011 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or financial statement disclosures.
Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses, or tax credit carryforwards exist. This new guidance is effective for interim or annual reporting periods that begin after December 15, 2013, and should be applied prospectively, with early application permitted. This guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and financial statement disclosures.
In January 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance for troubled debt restructurings clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and when a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan. The new guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. This guidance can be elected for prospective adoption or by using a modified retrospective transition method. This guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or financial statement disclosures.
3. INVESTMENTS
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
The following tables provide information relating to fixed maturities and equity securities (excluding investments classified as trading) as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | December 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | Amortized
Cost | | | | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | | | Fair
Value | | | | | Other-than-
temporary
Impairments
in AOCI (3) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies | | | | $ | 89,497 | | | | | $ | 5,910 | | | | | $ | 1,882 | | | | | $ | 93,525 | | | | | $ | - | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | | | 83,807 | | | | | | 1,518 | | | | | | 6,374 | | | | | | 78,951 | | | | | | - | |
Foreign government bonds | | | | | 20,357 | | | | | | 3,640 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 23,997 | | | | | | - | |
Public utilities | | | | | 796,747 | | | | | | 32,303 | | | | | | 29,281 | | | | | | 799,769 | | | | | | - | |
Redeemable preferred stock | | | | | 681 | | | | | | 126 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 807 | | | | | | - | |
All other corporate securities | | | | | 3,661,419 | | | | | | 168,717 | | | | | | 89,343 | | | | | | 3,740,793 | | | | | | (252) | |
Asset-backed securities (1) | | | | | 216,081 | | | | | | 8,687 | | | | | | 2,677 | | | | | | 222,091 | | | | | | (7,783) | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | | | 510,255 | | | | | | 20,316 | | | | | | 8,563 | | | | | | 522,008 | | | | | | - | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities (2) | | | | | 160,089 | | | | | | 10,870 | | | | | | 1,499 | | | | | | 169,460 | | | | | | (973) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | $ | 5,538,933 | | | | | $ | 252,087 | | | | | $ | 139,619 | | | | | $ | 5,651,401 | | | | | $ | (9,008) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Public utilities | | | | $ | 131 | | | | | $ | 29 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 160 | | | | | | | |
Industrial, miscellaneous & other | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 12 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 16 | | | | | | | |
Mutual funds | | | | | 91 | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | 91 | | | | | | | |
Non-redeemable preferred stocks | | | | | 341 | | | | | | 163 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 504 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity securities, available-for-sale | | | | $ | 567 | | | | | $ | 207 | | | | | $ | 3 | | | | | $ | 771 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Includes credit-tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types. |
58
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| (2) | Includes publicly-traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. |
| (3) | Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in AOCI, which were not included in earnings. Amount excludes $14 million of net unrealized gains on impaired available-for-sale securities relating to changes in the value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Amortized
Cost | | | | | Gross
Unrealized
Gains | | | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | | | Fair
Value | | | | | Other-than-
temporary
Impairments
in AOCI (3) | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies | | $ | 172,541 | | | | | $ | 15,088 | | | | | $ | 10 | | | | | $ | 187,619 | | | | | $ | - | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | 79,166 | | | | | | 6,516 | | | | | | 485 | | | | | | 85,197 | | | | | | - | |
Foreign government bonds | | | 21,709 | | | | | | 5,802 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 27,511 | | | | | | - | |
Public utilities | | | 620,654 | | | | | | 68,512 | | | | | | 1,334 | | | | | | 687,832 | | | | | | - | |
Redeemable preferred stock | | | 6,400 | | | | | | 360 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 6,760 | | | | | | - | |
Corporate securities | | | 3,601,052 | | | | | | 309,470 | | | | | | 6,480 | | | | | | 3,904,042 | | | | | | (344 | ) |
Asset-backed securities (1) | | | 360,258 | | | | | | 19,362 | | | | | | 6,146 | | | | | | 373,474 | | | | | | (21,330 | ) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | 446,558 | | | | | | 42,932 | | | | | | 69 | | | | | | 489,421 | | | | | | - | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities (2) | | | 353,917 | | | | | | 20,228 | | | | | | 236 | | | | | | 373,909 | | | | | | (1,095 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | $ | 5,662,255 | | | | | $ | 488,270 | | | | | $ | 14,760 | | | | | $ | 6,135,765 | | | | | $ | (22,769) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Public utilities | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | | | |
Industrial, miscellaneous & other (4) | | | 1,566 | | | | | | 1,118 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 2,684 | | | | | | | |
Mutual funds (4) | | | 157 | | | | | | 6 | | | | | | 9 | | | | | | 154 | | | | | | | |
Non-redeemable preferred stocks | | | 1,396 | | | | | | 93 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,489 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total equity securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 3,119 | | | | | $ | 1,217 | | | | | $ | 9 | | | | | $ | 4,327 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Includes credit-tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types. |
| (2) | Includes publicly-traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. |
| (3) | Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in AOCI, which were not included in earnings. Amount excludes $22 million of net unrealized gains or losses on impaired available-for-sale securities relating to changes in the value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date. |
| (4) | Prior period has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. |
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities by contractual maturities at December 31, 2013, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Available-for-Sale | |
| | | Amortized Cost | | | Fair Value | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Due in one year or less | | $ | 264,190 | | | $ | 268,309 | |
Due after one year through five years | | | 1,110,508 | | | | 1,200,139 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | | 1,422,256 | | | | 1,463,339 | |
Due after ten years | | | 1,855,554 | | | | 1,806,055 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | 216,081 | | | | 222,091 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | 510,255 | | | | 522,008 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | | | 160,089 | | | | 169,460 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 5,538,933 | | | $ | 5,651,401 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Asset-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, and residential mortgage-backed securities are shown separately in the table above, as they are not due at a single maturity date.
59
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The following table depicts the sources of fixed maturity proceeds and related investment gains (losses), as well as losses on impairments of both fixed maturities and equity securities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales | | $ | 816,125 | | | $ | 116,493 | | | $ | 218,200 | |
Proceeds from maturities/repayments | | | 760,433 | | | | 903,272 | | | | 836,724 | |
Gross investment gains from sales, prepayments and maturities | | | 60,261 | | | | 31,720 | | | | 83,600 | |
Gross investment losses from sales and maturities | | | (22,380 | ) | | | (1,171 | ) | | | (411 | ) |
| | | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sales | | $ | 13,603 | | | $ | 9,862 | | | $ | 6,397 | |
Proceeds from maturities/repayments | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | 3,958 | |
Gross investment gains from sales | | | 1,337 | | | | 1,027 | | | | 3,857 | |
Gross investment losses from sales | | | (791 | ) | | | (529 | ) | | | 0 | |
| | | |
Fixed maturity and equity security impairments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities recognized in earnings (1) | | $ | (4,441 | ) | | $ | (6,236 | ) | | $ | (8,969 | ) |
Writedowns for impairments on equity securities | | | (67 | ) | | | (2,168 | ) | | | (2,255 | ) |
| (1) | Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of the impairment. |
As discussed in Note 2, a portion of certain other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses on fixed maturity securities are recognized in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” (“OCI”). For these securities, the net amount recognized in earnings (“credit loss impairments”) represents the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Any remaining difference between the fair value and amortized cost is recognized in OCI. The following table sets forth the amount of pre-tax credit loss impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company as of the dates indicated, for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI, and the corresponding changes in such amounts.
Credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31,
2013 | | | | | Year Ended
December 31,
2012 | |
| | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 27,702 | | | | | $ | 31,507 | |
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities which matured, paid down, prepaid or were sold during the period | | | (14,330 | ) | | | | | (4,126 | ) |
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period | | | - | | | | | | (3,240 | ) |
Credit loss impairment recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired | | | 31 | | | | | | 15 | |
Additional credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities previously impaired | | | 798 | | | | | | 2,266 | |
Increases due to the passage of time on previously recorded credit losses | | | 915 | | | | | | 2,430 | |
Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected | | | (456 | ) | | | | | (1,150 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 14,660 | | | | | $ | 27,702 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Trading Account Assets
The following table sets forth the composition of “Trading account assets” as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Amortized
Cost | | | Fair
Value | | | Amortized
Cost | | | Fair
Value | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities | | $ | 14,118 | | | $ | 16,162 | | | $ | 7,647 | | | $ | 8,099 | |
Equity securities (1) | | | 1,388 | | | | 2,730 | | | | 3,083 | | | | 3,277 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total trading account assets | | $ | 15,506 | | | $ | 18,892 | | | $ | 10,730 | | | $ | 11,376 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Included in equity securities are perpetual preferred stock securities that have characteristics of both debt and equity securities. |
The net change in unrealized gains (losses) from trading account assets still held at period end, recorded within “Other income” was $2.7 million, ($0.5) million and ($0.5) million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
60
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
The Company’s commercial mortgage and other loans are comprised as follows, as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Amount
(in thousands) | | | | | % of
Total | | | | | Amount
(in thousands) | | | | | % of
Total | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans by property type: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Retail | | $ | 467,059 | | | | | | 30.5 | % | | | | $ | 461,939 | | | | | | 31.4 | % |
Apartments/Multi-Family | | | 298,365 | | | | | | 19.5 | | | | | | 239,623 | | | | | | 16.3 | |
Industrial | | | 272,239 | | | | | | 17.7 | | | | | | 273,900 | | | | | | 18.6 | |
Office | | | 195,499 | | | | | | 12.8 | | | | | | 237,566 | | | | | | 16.2 | |
Other | | | 102,294 | | | | | | 6.6 | | | | | | 89,548 | | | | | | 6.1 | |
Hospitality | | | 90,085 | | | | | | 5.9 | | | | | | 50,052 | | | | | | 3.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial mortgage loans | | | 1,425,541 | | | | | | 93.0 | | | | | | 1,352,628 | | | | | | 92.0 | |
Agricultural property loans | | | 107,118 | | | | | | 7.0 | | | | | | 117,377 | | | | | | 8.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial and agricultural mortgage loans by property type | | | 1,532,659 | | | | | | 100.0 | % | | | | | 1,470,005 | | | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Valuation allowance | | | (8,904) | | | | | | | | | | | | (6,028) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net commercial and agricultural mortgage loans by property type | | | 1,523,755 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,463,977 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Loans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Uncollateralized loans | | | 8,410 | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other loans | | | 8,410 | | | | | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total commercial mortgage and other loans | | $ | 1,532,165 | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,463,977 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The commercial mortgage and agricultural property loans are geographically dispersed throughout the United States and other countries with the largest concentrations in California (20%), New Jersey (11%), and Texas (10%) at December 31, 2013.
Activity in the allowance for losses for all commercial mortgage and other loans, as of the dates indicated, is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Allowance for losses, beginning of year | | $ | 6,028 | | | | | | | $ | 12,813 | | | | | | | $ | 21,428 | |
Addition to / (release of) allowance of losses | | | 2,876 | | | | | | | | (1,551 | ) | | | | | | | (8,615 | ) |
Charge-offs, net of recoveries | | | - | | | | | | | | (5,234 | ) | | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for losses, end of year (1) | | $ | 8,904 | | | | | | | $ | 6,028 | | | | | | | $ | 12,813 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Agricultural loans represent $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million of the ending allowance at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
The following tables set forth the allowance for credit losses and the recorded investment in commercial mortgage and other loans as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Allowance for Credit Losses: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment (1) | | $ | 3,084 | | | | | $ | 372 | |
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment (2) | | | 5,820 | | | | | | 5,656 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total ending balance | | $ | 8,904 | | | | | $ | 6,028 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Recorded Investment: (3) | | | | | | | | | | |
Ending balance gross of reserves: individually evaluated for impairment (1) | | $ | 6,392 | | | | | $ | 6,415 | |
Ending balance gross of reserves: collectively evaluated for impairment (2) | | | 1,534,677 | | | | | | 1,463,590 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total ending balance, gross of reserves | | $ | 1,541,069 | | | | | $ | 1,470,005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | There were no agricultural or uncollateralized loans individually evaluated for impairments at December 31, 2013 and 2012. |
| (2) | Agricultural loans collectively evaluated for impairment had a recorded investment of $107 million and $117 million and a related allowance of $0.3 million and $0.4 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Uncollateralized loans collectively evaluated for impairment had a recorded investment of $8 million and $0 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and no related allowance for both periods. |
| (3) | Recorded investment reflects the balance sheet carrying value gross of related allowance. |
Impaired loans include those loans for which it is probable that all amounts due will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired commercial mortgage and other loans identified in management’s specific review of probable loan losses and the related allowance for losses, as of both December 31, 2013 and 2012, had a recorded investment and unpaid principal balance of $6.4 million and related
61
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
allowance of $3.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, primarily related to other property types. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company held no impaired agricultural or uncollateralized loans. Net investment income recognized on these loans totaled $0 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Impaired commercial mortgage and other loans with no allowance for losses are loans in which the fair value of the collateral or the net present value of the loans’ expected future cash flows equals or exceeds the recorded investment. The Company had no such loans at December 31, 2013 and 2012. See Note 2 for information regarding the Company’s accounting policies for non-performing loans.
As described in Note 2 loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are measures commonly used to assess the quality of commercial mortgage and other loans. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, 97% of the $1.5 billion recorded investment and 96% of the $1.5 billion recorded investment, respectively, had a loan-to-value ratio of less than 80%. As of both December 31, 2013 and 2012, 96% of the recorded investment had a debt service coverage ratio of 1.0X or greater. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 4% or $61 million and 4% or $59 million, respectively, of the recorded investment had a loan-to-value ratio greater than 100% or debt service coverage ratio less than 1.0X, reflecting loans where the mortgage amount exceeds the collateral value or where current debt payments are greater than income from property operations; none of which related to agricultural or uncollateralized loans.
As of both December 31, 2013 and 2012, $1.4 billion of commercial mortgage and other loans were in current status and $6.4 million were classified as past due, primarily related to other property types. As of both December 31, 2013 and 2012, $6.4 million of commercial mortgage and other loans, were in non-accrual status based upon the recorded investment gross of allowance for credit losses, primarily related to other property types. Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended after the loans become 90 days delinquent as to principal or interest payments, or earlier when the Company has doubts about collectability and loans for which a loan specific reserve has been established. See Note 2 for further discussion regarding nonaccrual status loans. The Company defines current in its aging of past due commercial mortgage and agricultural loans as less than 30 days past due.
For the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no commercial mortgage and other loans sold or acquired.
The Company’s commercial mortgage and other loans may occasionally be involved in a troubled debt restructuring. As of both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no significant commitments to fund to borrowers that have been involved in troubled debt restructuring. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no adjusted pre-modification outstanding recorded investments or post-modification outstanding recorded investments. No payment defaults on commercial mortgage and other loans were modified as a troubled debt restructuring within the 12 months preceding the respective period. See Note 2 for additional information related to the accounting for troubled debt restructurings.
Other Long-Term Investments
The following table sets forth the composition of “Other long-term investments” at December 31 for the years indicated:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Company’s investment in Separate accounts | | $ | 29,739 | | | $ | 28,584 | |
Joint ventures and limited partnerships | | | 196,538 | | | | 136,977 | |
Derivatives | | | 427 | | | | 118,928 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total other long-term investments | | $ | 226,704 | | | $ | 284,489 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the years ended December 31, was from the following sources:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | $ | 278,747 | | | $ | 270,790 | | | $ | 300,850 | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | | 1 | | | | 52 | | | | 227 | |
Trading account assets | | | 657 | | | | 981 | | | | 1,582 | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | | 84,006 | | | | 84,232 | | | | 81,282 | |
Policy loans | | | 59,287 | | | | 58,007 | | | | 56,716 | |
Short-term investments and cash equivalents | | | 654 | | | | 1,003 | | | | 1,052 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 15,023 | | | | 21,224 | | | | 16,421 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross investment income | | | 438,375 | | | | 436,289 | | | | 458,130 | |
Less: investment expenses | | | (19,364) | | | | (18,779) | | | | (18,180) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 419,011 | | | $ | 417,510 | | | $ | 439,950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
62
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
There were no non-income producing assets included in fixed maturities as of December 31, 2013. Non-income producing assets represent investments that have not produced income for the preceding twelve months.
Realized Investment Gains (Losses), Net
Realized investment gains (losses), net, for the years ended December 31, were from the following sources:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities | | $ | 33,440 | | | $ | 24,314 | | | $ | 74,220 | |
Equity securities | | | 480 | | | | (1,670) | | | | 1,602 | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | | 5,494 | | | | 7,307 | | | | 8,615 | |
Joint ventures and limited partnerships | | | (83) | | | | - | | | | (265) | |
Derivatives | | | (52,799) | | | | (186,425) | | | | 177,855 | |
Other | | | 18 | | | | 27 | | | | 56 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | (13,450) | | | $ | (156,447) | | | $ | 262,083 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The balance of and changes in each component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” for the years ended December 31, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | |
| | | Foreign Currency
Translation
Adjustment | | | Net Unrealized
Investment Gains
(Losses) (1) | | | Total Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | $ | 249 | | | $ | 182,850 | | | $ | 183,099 | |
Change in component during period (2) | | | (116) | | | | 30,645 | | | | 30,529 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | $ | 133 | | | $ | 213,495 | | | $ | 213,628 | |
Change in component during period (2) | | | 124 | | | | 53,709 | | | | 53,833 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | $ | 257 | | | $ | 267,204 | | | $ | 267,461 | |
Change in other comprehensive income before reclassifications | | | 224 | | | | (290,636) | | | | (290,412) | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCI | | | - | | | | (33,920) | | | | (33,920) | |
Income tax benefit (expense) | | | (78) | | | | 113,595 | | | | 113,517 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | 403 | | | $ | 56,243 | | | $ | 56,646 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Includes cash flow hedges of ($5) million, $0 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31, 2013 | | | Year Ended
December 31, 2012 | | | Year Ended
December 31, 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (1)(2): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized investment gains (losses): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedges—Currency/Interest rate (3) | | $ | 329 | | | $ | 1,754 | | | $ | (108) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities (4) | | | 33,591 | | | | 20,890 | | | | 75,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total net unrealized investment gains (losses) | | | 33,920 | | | | 22,644 | | | | 75,822 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total reclassifications for the period | | $ | 33,920 | | | $ | 22,644 | | | $ | 75,822 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | All amounts are shown before tax. |
| (2) | Positive amounts indicate gains/benefits reclassified out of AOCI. Negative amounts indicate losses/costs reclassified out of AOCI. |
| (3) | See Note 11 for additional information on cash flow hedges. |
| (4) | See table below for additional information on unrealized investment gains (losses), including the impact on deferred policy acquisition and other costs, future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances. |
63
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
Net unrealized investment gains and losses on securities classified as “available-for-sale” and certain other long-term investments and other assets are included in the Company’s Statements of Financial Position as a component of AOCI. Changes in these amounts include reclassification adjustments to exclude from “Other comprehensive income (loss)” those items that are included as part of “Net income” for a period that had been part of “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in earlier periods. The amounts for the periods indicated below, split between amounts related to fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized, and all other net unrealized investment gains and losses, are as follows:
Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investments | | | | | Deferred
Policy
Acquisition
Costs and
Other Costs | | | | | Future Policy
Benefits and
Policy Holder
Account
Balances(2) | | | | | Deferred
Income Tax
(Liability)
Benefit | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Related To Net
Unrealized
Investment
Gains (Losses) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | | | $ | (24,704 | ) | | | | $ | 13,813 | | | | | $ | (7,103 | ) | | | | $ | 6,271 | | | | | $ | (11,723 | ) |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | (3,779 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,322 | | | | | | (2,457 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | 9,623 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (3,369 | ) | | | | | 6,254 | |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(1) | | | | | 212 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (75 | ) | | | | | 137 | |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | (3,626 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,268 | | | | | | (2,358 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 4,167 | | | | | | (1,459 | ) | | | | | 2,708 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | | $ | (18,648 | ) | | | | $ | 10,187 | | | | | $ | (2,936 | ) | | | | $ | 3,958 | | | | | $ | (7,439 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | 11,444 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (4,005 | ) | | | | | 7,439 | |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | 6,755 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (2,364 | ) | | | | | 4,391 | |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(1) | | | | | (169 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 59 | | | | | | (110 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | (9,892 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 3,462 | | | | | | (6,430 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 3,499 | | | | | | (1,225 | ) | | | | | 2,274 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | | $ | (618 | ) | | | | $ | 295 | | | | | $ | 563 | | | | | $ | (115 | ) | | | | $ | 125 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | 1,053 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (369 | ) | | | | | 684 | |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | 4,114 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (1,440 | ) | | | | | 2,674 | |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(1) | | | | | (51 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 18 | | | | | | (33 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | (3,619 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,266 | | | | | | (2,353 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,256 | | | | | | (439 | ) | | | | | 817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | | | $ | 4,498 | | | | | $ | (3,324 | ) | | | | $ | 1,819 | | | | | $ | (1,079 | ) | | | | $ | 1,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Represents “transfers in” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss. |
| (2) | Balances are net of reinsurance. |
64
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
All Other Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses in AOCI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on
Investments(1) | | | | | Deferred
Policy
Acquisition
Costs and
Other Costs | | | | | Future Policy
Benefits and
Policy Holder
Account
Balances(3) | | | | | Deferred
Income Tax
(Liability)
Benefit | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Related To Net
Unrealized
Investment
Gains (Losses) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | | | $ | 400,404 | | | | | $ | (194,158 | ) | | | | $ | 92,690 | | | | | $ | (104,367 | ) | | | | $ | 194,569 | |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | 128,890 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (45,090 | ) | | | | | 83,800 | |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | (85,445 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 29,905 | | | | | | (55,540 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(2) | | | | | (212 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 73 | | | | | | (139 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | 14,638 | | | | | | - | | | | | | (5,124 | ) | | | | | 9,514 | |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (17,345 | ) | | | | | 6,070 | | | | | | (11,275 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | | $ | 443,637 | | | | | $ | (179,520 | ) | | | | $ | 75,345 | | | | | $ | (118,533 | ) | | | | $ | 220,929 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | 90,693 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (31,738 | ) | | | | | 58,955 | |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | (29,399 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 10,290 | | | | | | (19,109 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(2) | | | | | 169 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (59 | ) | | | | | 110 | |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | (40,688 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 14,065 | | | | | | (26,623 | ) |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 50,488 | | | | | | (17,671 | ) | | | | | 32,817 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | | $ | 505,100 | | | | | $ | (220,208 | ) | | | | $ | 125,833 | | | | | $ | (143,646 | ) | | | | $ | 267,079 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period | | | | | (343,964 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 120,388 | | | | | | (223,576 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income | | | | | (38,034 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 13,312 | | | | | | (24,722 | ) |
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(2) | | | | | 51 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (18 | ) | | | | | 33 | |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | | - | | | | | | 177,178 | | | | | | - | | | | | | (62,012 | ) | | | | | 115,166 | |
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits and policyholders’ account balances | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (122,540 | ) | | | | | 42,889 | | | | | | (79,651 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | | | $ | 123,153 | | | | | $ | (43,030 | ) | | | | $ | 3,293 | | | | | $ | (29,087 | ) | | | | $ | 54,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Includes cash flow hedges. See Note 11 for information on cash flow hedges. |
| (2) | Represents “transfers out” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss. |
| (3) | Balances are net of reinsurance. |
The table below presents net unrealized gains (losses) on investments by asset class at December 31:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized | | $ | 4,498 | | | $ | (618) | | | $ | (18,648) | |
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale—all other | | | 107,970 | | | | 474,128 | | | | 411,366 | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | | 204 | | | | 1,208 | | | | (1,359) | |
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges(1) | | | (4,701) | | | | 147 | | | | 2,523 | |
Other investments | | | 19,680 | | | | 29,617 | | | | 31,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments | | $ | 127,651 | | | $ | 504,482 | | | $ | 424,989 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | See Note 11 for more information on cash flow hedges. |
65
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Duration of Gross Unrealized Loss Positions for Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual fixed maturity securities and equity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the dates indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| | | Less than twelve months | | | Twelve months or more | | | Total | |
| | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government authorities and agencies | | $ | 24,123 | | | $ | 1,882 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 24,123 | | | $ | 1,882 | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | 51,216 | | | | 5,904 | | | | 2,496 | | | | 470 | | | | 53,712 | | | | 6,374 | |
Foreign government bonds | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Corporate securities | | | 1,596,468 | | | | 101,780 | | | | 97,731 | | | | 16,844 | | | | 1,694,199 | | | | 118,624 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | 93,021 | | | | 1,418 | | | | 11,782 | | | | 1,259 | | | | 104,803 | | | | 2,677 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | 116,371 | | | | 6,706 | | | | 19,605 | | | | 1,857 | | | | 135,976 | | | | 8,563 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | | | 42,121 | | | | 1,472 | | | | 3,225 | | | | 27 | | | | 45,346 | | | | 1,499 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,923,320 | | | $ | 119,162 | | | $ | 134,839 | | | $ | 20,457 | | | $ | 2,058,159 | | | $ | 139,619 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 44 | | | $ | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Less than twelve months | | | Twelve months or more | | | Total | |
| | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | | | Fair Value | | | Gross
Unrealized
Losses | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. government authorities and agencies | | $ | 4,338 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 4,338 | | | $ | 10 | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | 21,128 | | | | 485 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 21,128 | | | | 485 | |
Foreign government bonds | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Corporate securities | | | 290,127 | | | | 7,070 | | | | 18,221 | | | | 744 | | | | 308,348 | | | | 7,814 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | 44,821 | | | | 76 | | | | 24,997 | | | | 6,070 | | | | 69,818 | | | | 6,146 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | 12,549 | | | | 60 | | | | 521 | | | | 9 | | | | 13,070 | | | | 69 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | | | 20,276 | | | | 164 | | | | 4,347 | | | | 72 | | | | 24,623 | | | | 236 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 393,239 | | | $ | 7,865 | | | $ | 48,086 | | | $ | 6,895 | | | $ | 441,325 | | | $ | 14,760 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Equity securities, available-for-sale | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 9 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 54 | | | $ | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The gross unrealized losses, related to fixed maturities at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are composed of $136 million and $9 million, respectively, related to high or highest quality securities based on NAIC or equivalent rating and $4 million and $6 million, respectively, related to other than high or highest quality securities based on NAIC or equivalent rating. At December 31, 2013, $5 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines in value of greater than 20%, all of which had been in that position for less than six months, as compared to $6 million at December 31, 2012 that represented declines in value of greater than 20%, $0 million of which had been in that position for less than six months. At December 31, 2013, the $20 million of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in commercial mortgage-backed securities and the consumer non-cyclical, utility, and basic industry sectors of the Company’s corporate securities. At December 31, 2012, the $7 million of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in asset-backed securities and the consumer cyclical and consumer non-cyclical sectors of the Company’s corporate securities. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment to earnings for other-than-temporary impairments for these securities was not warranted at December 31, 2013 and 2012. These conclusions are based on a detailed analysis of the underlying credit and cash flows on each security. The gross unrealized losses are primarily attributable to credit spread widening and increased liquidity discounts. At December 31, 2013, the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis.
At December 31, 2013, none of the gross unrealized losses, related to equity securities, represented declines in value of greater than 20%. At December 31, 2012, less than $1 million of the gross unrealized losses, related to equity securities, represented declines in value of greater than 20%, none of which have been in that position for less than six months. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments for these equity securities was not warranted at December 31, 2013 or 2012.
66
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Securities Pledged and Special Deposits
The Company pledges as collateral investment securities it owns to unaffiliated parties through certain transactions, including securities lending, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, collateralized borrowings and postings of collateral with derivative counterparties. At December 31, the carrying value of investments pledged to third parties as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position included the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale | | $ | 81,849 | | | $ | 46,115 | |
Trading account assets | | | - | | | | 187 | |
Equity Securities | | | - | | | | 9 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total securities pledged | | $ | 81,849 | | | $ | 46,311 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2013, the carrying amount of the associated liabilities supported by the pledged collateral was $85 million. Of this amount, $85 million was “Cash collateral for loaned securities.” There were no “Securities sold under agreements to repurchase.” As of December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of the associated liabilities supported by the pledged collateral was $48 million. Of this amount, $48 million was “Cash collateral for loaned securities.” There were no “Securities sold under agreements to repurchase.”
Fixed maturities of $4 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 were on deposit with governmental authorities or trustees as required by certain insurance laws.
4. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
The balances of and changes in deferred policy acquisition costs as of and for the years ended December 31, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 3,679,061 | | | $ | 2,545,600 | | | $ | 2,693,689 | |
Capitalization of commissions, sales and issue expenses | | | 822,075 | | | | 1,171,759 | | | | 1,096,301 | |
Amortization- Impact of assumption and experience unlocking and true-ups | | | (9,167 | ) | | | 60,313 | | | | (25,242 | ) |
Amortization- All other | | | 533,478 | | | | (21,345 | ) | | | (947,961 | ) |
Change in unrealized investment gains and losses | | | 167,880 | | | | (53,651 | ) | | | 9,973 | |
Ceded DAC upon Coinsurance Treaty with PAR U and PURC (See Note 13) | | | (159,028 | ) | | | (23,616 | ) | | | (281,160 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 5,034,299 | | | $ | 3,679,061 | | | $ | 2,545,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred acquisition costs include reductions in capitalization and amortization related to reinsurance expense allowances resulting from the coinsurance treaties with PARCC, PAR TERM, PAR U and PURC, reductions for the initial balance transferred to PAR U and PURC at inception of the coinsurance agreements and the pass through of the GUL business related to the acquisition of The Hartford Life company assumed from Prudential Insurance and subsequently retroceded to PAR U as discussed in Note 13.
Capitalization balances related to reinsurance amounted to $285 million, $249 million, and $208 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Amortization balances related to reinsurance amounted to $89 million, $180 million and $70 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Reinsurance impacts to the change in unrealized gains/(losses) resulted in a decrease in the deferred acquisition cost asset of $161 million in 2013 and increased the deferred acquisition cost asset $44 million and $147 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
5. POLICYHOLDERS’ LIABILITIES
Future Policy Benefits
Future policy benefits at December 31, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Life insurance – domestic | | $ | 5,768,262 | | | $ | 3,804,994 | |
Life insurance – Taiwan | | | 1,151,503 | | | | 1,109,723 | |
Individual and group annuities | | | 320,451 | | | | 338,505 | |
Policy claims and other contract liabilities | | | (323,547) | | | | 1,443,591 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total future policy benefits | | $ | 6,916,669 | | | $ | 6,696,813 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Life insurance liabilities include reserves for death benefits and other policy benefits. Individual and Group annuity liabilities include reserves for annuities that are in payout status.
67
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Future policy benefits for domestic and Taiwan individual non-participating traditional life insurance policies are generally equal to the aggregate of (1) the present value of future benefit payments and related expenses, less the present value of future net premiums, and (2) any premium deficiency reserves. Assumptions as to mortality and persistency are based on the Company’s experience, and in certain instances, industry experience, when the basis of the reserve is established. Interest rates range from 2.50% to 8.25% for setting domestic insurance reserves and 6.18% to 7.43% for setting Taiwan reserves.
Future policy benefits for individual and group annuities and supplementary contracts are generally equal to the aggregate of (1) the present value of expected future payments, and (2) any premium deficiency reserves. Assumptions as to mortality are based on the Company’s experience, industry data, and/or other factors when the basis of the reserve is established. The interest rates used in the determination of present values range from 0.00% to 14.75%, with approximately 1.78% of the reserves based on an interest rate in excess of 8.00%. The interest rate used in the determination of group annuities reserves is 14.75%.
Future policy benefits for other contract liabilities are generally equal to the present value of expected future payments based on the Company’s experience. The interest rates used in the determination of the present values range from 0.39% to 5.01%.
The Company’s liability for future policy benefits is also inclusive of liabilities for guaranteed benefits related to certain nontraditional long-duration life and annuity contracts. Liabilities for guaranteed benefits accounted for as embedded derivatives are primarily in other contract liabilities. The remaining liabilities for guaranteed benefits are primarily reflected with the underlying contract. See Note 7 for additional information regarding liabilities for guaranteed benefits related to certain nontraditional long-duration contracts.
Policyholders’ Account Balances
Policyholders’ account balances at December 31, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Interest-sensitive life contracts | | $ | 11,456,129 | | | $ | 5,327,169 | |
Individual annuities | | | 1,624,523 | | | | 1,736,810 | |
Guaranteed interest accounts | | | 450,738 | | | | 820,502 | |
Other | | | 771,941 | | | | 672,596 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total policyholders’ account balances | | $ | 14,303,330 | | | $ | 8,557,077 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ account balances represent an accumulation of account deposits plus credited interest less withdrawals, expenses and mortality charges, if applicable. These policyholders’ account balances also include provisions for benefits under non-life contingent payout annuities. Interest crediting rates range from 0.42% to 4.60% for interest-sensitive contracts. Interest crediting rates for individual annuities may range from 0.00% to 9.00% with 0.00% of policyholders’ account balances with interest crediting rates in excess of 8.00%. Interest crediting rates for guaranteed interest accounts range from 1.00% to 6.00%. Interest crediting rates range from 0.50% to 8.00% for other. Included in interest-sensitive life contracts at December 31, 2013, are $4.7 billion GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford life business.
6. REINSURANCE
The Company participates in reinsurance with its affiliates Prudential of Taiwan, PARCC, UPARC, Pruco Re, PAR TERM, PURC, and PAR U, and its parent company, Prudential Insurance, in order to provide risk diversification, additional capacity for future growth and limit the maximum net loss potential. On January 2, 2013, the Company began to assume GUL business from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford Life Business. The GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance is subsequently retroceded to PAR U. Collectively, reinsurance of this GUL business does not have a material impact on the equity of the Company. Life reinsurance is accomplished through various plans of reinsurance, primarily yearly renewable term and coinsurance. Reinsurance ceded arrangements do not discharge the Company as the primary insurer. Ceded balances would represent a liability of the Company in the event the reinsurers were unable to meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The Company believes a material reinsurance liability resulting from such inability of reinsurers to meet their obligations is unlikely. The affiliated reinsurance agreements are described further in Note 13.
The Company has entered into various reinsurance agreements with an affiliate, Pruco Re, to reinsure its living benefit features sold on certain of its annuities as part of its risk management and capital management strategies. For additional details on these agreements, see Note 13.
Reinsurance premiums, commissions, expense reimbursements, benefits and reserves related to reinsured long-duration contracts are accounted for using assumptions consistent with those used to account for the underlying contracts. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers, for long duration reinsurance arrangements, are estimated in a manner consistent with the claim liabilities and policy benefits associated with the reinsured policies. The affiliated reinsurance agreements are described further in Note 13.
68
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Reinsurance amounts included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Premiums direct and assumed | | $ | 1,319,390 | | | $ | 1,221,990 | | | $ | 1,127,239 | |
Premiums ceded | | | (1,262,539) | | | | (1,153,854) | | | | (1,054,452) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Premiums | | $ | 56,851 | | | $ | 68,136 | | | $ | 72,787 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Policy charges and fees direct and assumed | | $ | 2,401,216 | | | $ | 2,048,167 | | | $ | 1,438,273 | |
Policy charges and fees ceded | | | (520,291) | | | | (513,404) | | | | (328,778) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policy charges and fees | | $ | 1,880,925 | | | $ | 1,534,763 | | | $ | 1,109,495 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Policyholders’ benefits direct and assumed | | $ | 1,260,166 | | | $ | 1,666,650 | | | $ | 1,445,993 | |
Policyholders’ benefits ceded | | | (1,081,242) | | | | (1,313,157) | | | | (1,133,782) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ benefits | | $ | 178,924 | | | $ | 353,494 | | | $ | 312,211 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Realized capital gains (losses) net, associated with derivatives | | $ | (2,058,885) | | | $ | (53,842) | | | $ | 1,185,096 | |
Assumed balances are subsequently 100% retroceded to PAR U.
Reinsurance premiums ceded for interest-sensitive life products are accounted for as a reduction of policy charges and fee income. Reinsurance premiums ceded for term insurance products are accounted for as a reduction of premiums.
Realized investment gains and losses include the impact of reinsurance agreements that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are recognized through “Realized investment gains (losses).” The Company has entered into reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain living benefit options on variable annuities to Pruco Re. The Company also entered into an agreement with UPARC to reinsure a portion of the no-lapse guarantee provision on certain universal life products. See Note 13 for additional information on reinsurance agreements with affiliates. These reinsurance agreements are derivatives and have been accounted for in the same manner as an embedded derivative. See Note 11 for additional information related to the accounting for embedded derivatives.
Reinsurance recoverables included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Domestic life insurance-affiliated | | $ | 12,494,746 | | | $ | 4,619,282 | |
Domestic individual annuities-affiliated (1) | | | 642 | | | | 1,287,660 | |
Domestic life insurance-unaffiliated | | | 4,832 | | | | 9,673 | |
Taiwan life insurance-affiliated | | | 1,157,639 | | | | 1,115,560 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 13,657,859 | | | $ | 7,032,175 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| (1) | December 31, 2013 excludes $388 million reclassed to other liabilities due to the mark-to-market impact discussed above. |
Substantially all reinsurance contracts are with affiliates as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. These contracts are described further in Note 13.
The gross and net amounts of life insurance face amount in force as of December 31, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Direct gross life insurance face amount in force | | $ | 661,834,408 | | | $ | 612,238,145 | | | $ | 569,684,855 | |
Assumed gross life insurance face amount in force | | | 44,691,950 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Reinsurance ceded | | | (650,340,432) | | | | (557,559,303) | | | | (517,857,797) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net life insurance face amount in force | | $ | 56,185,926 | | | $ | 54,678,842 | | | $ | 51,827,058 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
7. CERTAIN NONTRADITIONAL LONG-DURATION CONTRACTS
The Company issues traditional variable annuity contracts through its separate accounts for which investment income and investment gains and losses accrue directly to, and investment risk is borne by, the contractholder. The Company also issues variable annuity contracts with general and
69
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
separate account options where the Company contractually guarantees to the contractholder a return of no less than total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals (“return of net deposits”). In certain of these variable annuity contracts, the Company also contractually guarantees to the contractholder a return of no less than (1) total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals plus a minimum return (“minimum return”), and/or (2) the highest contract value on a specified date adjusted for any withdrawals (“contract value”). These guarantees include benefits that are payable in the event of death, annuitization or at specified dates during the accumulation period and withdrawal and income benefits payable during specified periods. The Company also issues annuity contracts with market value adjusted investment options (“MVAs”), which provide for a return of principal plus a fixed rate of return if held to maturity, or, alternatively, a “market adjusted value” if surrendered prior to maturity or if funds are allocated to other investment options. The market value adjustment may result in a gain or loss to the Company, depending on crediting rates or an indexed rate at surrender, as applicable. The Company also issues fixed deferred annuity contracts without MVA that have a guaranteed credited rate and annuity benefit.
In addition, the Company issues certain variable life, variable universal life and universal life contracts where the Company contractually guarantees to the contractholder a death benefit even when there is insufficient value to cover monthly mortality and expense charges, whereas otherwise the contract would typically lapse (“no lapse guarantee”). Variable life and variable universal life contracts are offered with general and separate account options similar to variable annuities.
The assets supporting the variable portion of both traditional variable annuities and certain variable contracts with guarantees are carried at fair value and reported as “Separate account assets” with an equivalent amount reported as “Separate account liabilities.” Amounts assessed against the contractholders for mortality, administration, and other services are included within revenue in “Policy charges and fee income” and changes in liabilities for minimum guarantees are generally included in “Policyholders’ benefits.”
For those guarantees of benefits that are payable in the event of death, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the current guaranteed minimum death benefit in excess of the current account balance at the balance sheet date. The Company’s primary risk exposures for these contracts relates to actual deviations from, or changes to, the assumptions used in the original pricing of these products, including fixed income and equity market returns, contract lapses and contractholder mortality.
For guarantees of benefits that are payable at annuitization, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the present value of the minimum guaranteed annuity payments available to the contractholder determined in accordance with the terms of the contract in excess of the current account balance. The Company’s primary risk exposures for these contracts relates to actual deviations from, or changes to, the assumptions used in the original pricing of these products, including fixed income and equity market returns, benefit utilization, timing of annuitization, contract lapses and contractholder mortality.
For guarantees of benefits that are payable at withdrawal, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the present value of the minimum guaranteed withdrawal payments available to the contractholder determined in accordance with the terms of the contract in excess of the current account balance. For guarantees of accumulation balances, the net amount at risk is generally defined as the guaranteed minimum accumulation balance minus the current account balance. The Company’s primary risk exposures for these contracts relates to actual deviations from, or changes to, the assumptions used in the original pricing of these products, including equity market returns, interest rates, market volatility or contractholder behavior used in the original pricing of these products.
The Company’s contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract; therefore, the amounts listed may not be mutually exclusive. The liabilities related to the net amount at risk are reflected within “Future policy benefits.” As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had the following guarantees associated with these contracts, by product and guarantee type:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | |
| | | In the Event of
Death | | | At Annuitization/
Accumulation (1) | | | | | In the Event of
Death | | | At Annuitization/
Accumulation (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Variable Annuity Contracts | | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | |
Return of Net Deposits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Account value | | $ | 70,025,044 | | | $ | N/A | | | | | $ | 55,348,881 | | | $ | N/A | |
Net amount at risk | | | 46,013 | | | | N/A | | | | | $ | 144,758 | | | | N/A | |
Average attained age of contractholders | | | 62 | | | | N/A | | | | | | 61 | | | | N/A | |
Minimum return or contract value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Account value | | $ | 20,498,033 | | | $ | 81,142,995 | | | | | $ | 17,627,105 | | | $ | 64,710,758 | |
Net amount at risk | | $ | 1,274,286 | | | $ | 1,085,030 | | | | | $ | 1,937,955 | | | $ | 2,177,244 | |
Average attained age of contractholders | | | 67 | | | | 62 | | | | | | 66 | | | | 61 | |
Average period remaining until earliest expected annuitization | | | N/A | | | | 0.09 years | | | | | | N/A | | | | 0.23 years | |
| (1) | Includes income and withdrawal benefits as described herein |
70
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| |
| | | In the Event of Death | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Variable Life, Variable Universal Life and Universal Life Contracts | | | | | | | | |
No Lapse Guarantees | | | | | | | | |
Separate account value | | $ | 2,958,551 | | | $ | 2,686,820 | |
General account value | | $ | 3,922,205 | | | $ | 2,922,481 | |
Net amount at risk | | $ | 80,432,427 | | | $ | 66,004,950 | |
Average attained age of contractholders | | | 53 years | | | | 52 years | |
Account balances of variable annuity contracts with guarantees were invested in separate account investment options as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Equity funds | | $ | 55,455,438 | | | $ | 42,765,421 | |
Bond funds | | | 29,937,112 | | | | 24,280,753 | |
Money market funds | | | 3,301,910 | | | | 3,618,360 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 88,694,460 | | | $ | 70,664,534 | |
| | | | | | | | |
In addition to the above mentioned amounts invested in separate account investment options, $1.829 billion and $2.311 billion of account balances of variable annuity contracts with guarantees, inclusive of contracts with MVA feature, were invested in general account investment options in 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 there were no transfers of assets, other than cash, from the general account to any separate account, and accordingly no gains or losses recorded.
Liabilities for Guaranteed Benefits
The table below summarizes the changes in general account liabilities for guarantees on variable contracts. The liabilities for guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDB”), and guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIB”) are included in “Future policy benefits” and the related changes in the liabilities are included in “Policyholders’ benefits.” Guaranteed minimum income and withdrawal benefits (“GMIWB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”) features are accounted for as bifurcated embedded derivatives and are recorded at fair value within “Future policy benefits”. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives, including changes in the Company’s own risk of non-performance, along with any fees attributed or payments made relating to the derivative, are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” See Note 10 for additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of these embedded derivatives.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | GMDB | | | | | GMIB | | | GMWB/GMIWB/ GMAB | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Variable Annuity | | | Variable Life,
Variable Universal
Life & Universal
Life | | | | | Variable Annuity | | | | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | $ | 48,829 | | | $ | 161,107 | | | | | $ | 26,718 | | | $ | (452,823) | | | $ | (216,169) | |
Incurred guarantee benefits (1) | | | 87,111 | | | | 66,082 | | | | | | 7,120 | | | | 1,365,810 | | | | 1,526,123 | |
Paid guarantee benefits | | | (38,305) | | | | (2,280) | | | | | | (828) | | | | - | | | | (41,413) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | | $ | 97,635 | | | $ | 224,909 | | | | | $ | 33,010 | | | $ | 912,987 | | | $ | 1,268,541 | |
Incurred guarantee benefits (1) | | | 145,022 | | | | 94,007 | | | | | | 21,916 | | | | 504,903 | | | | 765,849 | |
Paid guarantee benefits | | | (40,590) | | | | (13,929) | | | | | | (540) | | | | - | | | | (55,059) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | | $ | 202,067 | | | $ | 304,987 | | | | | $ | 54,386 | | | $ | 1,417,890 | | | $ | 1,979,330 | |
Incurred guarantee benefits (1)(2) | | | 28,033 | | | | 101,484 | | | | | | (30,882) | | | | (1,766,290) | | | | (1,667,655) | |
Paid guarantee benefits | | | (26,306) | | | | (3,090) | | | | | | (1,148) | | | | - | | | | (30,544) | |
Other (2)(3) | | | 4,060 | | | | 1,340,869 | | | | | | 98 | | | | - | | | | 1,345,027 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | 207,854 | | | $ | 1,744,250 | | | | | $ | 22,454 | | | $ | (348,400) | | | $ | 1,626,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Incurred guarantee benefits include the portion of assessments established as additions to reserves as well as changes in estimates affecting the reserves. Also includes changes in the fair value of features accounted for as embedded derivatives.
(2) Incurred benefits include GMDB liabilities assumed related to the Hartford GUL business, which was subsequently 100% retroceded to PAR Universal.
(3) Includes $1.5 billion related to the initial GMDB liability assumed related to the Hartford business, which was subsequently 100% retroceded to PAR Universal.
71
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The GMDB liability is determined each period end by estimating the accumulated value of a portion of the total assessments to date less the accumulated value of the excess death benefits. The GMIB liability associated with variable annuities is determined each period by estimating the accumulated value of a portion of the total assessments to date less the accumulated value of the excess income benefits. The portion of assessments used is calculated at each valuation date such that, the present value of excess benefits and the portion of the present value of total expected assessments over the lifetime of the contracts are equal. The Company regularly evaluates the estimates used and adjusts the GMDB and GMIB liability balances, with an associated charge or credit to earnings.
The GMAB features provide the contractholder with a guaranteed return of initial account value or an enhanced value if applicable. The most significant of the Company’s GMAB features are the guaranteed return option (“GRO”) features, which includes an asset transfer feature that reduces the Company’s exposure to these guarantees. The GMAB liability is calculated as the present value of future expected payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature.
The GMWB features provide the contractholder with access to a guaranteed remaining balance if the account value is reduced to zero through a combination of market declines and withdrawals. The guaranteed remaining balance is generally equal to the protected value under the contract, which is initially established as the greater of the account value or cumulative deposits when withdrawals commence, less cumulative withdrawals. The contractholder also has the option, after a specified time period, to reset the guaranteed remaining balance to the then-current account value, if greater. The contractholder accesses the guaranteed remaining balance through payments over time, subject to maximum annual limits. The GMWB liability is calculated as the present value of future expected payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature.
The GMIWB features, taken collectively, provide a contractholder two optional methods to receive guaranteed minimum payments over time, a “withdrawal” option or an “income” option. The withdrawal option (which was available under only one of the GMIWBs the Company no longer offers) guarantees that a contractholder can withdraw an amount each year until the cumulative withdrawals reach a total guaranteed balance. The income option (which varies among the Company’s GMIWBs) in general guarantees the contractholder the ability to withdraw an amount each year for life (or for joint lives, in the case of any spousal version of the benefit) where such amount is equal to a percentage of a protected value under the benefit. The contractholder also has the potential to increase this annual amount, based on certain subsequent increases in account value that may occur. The GMIWB can be elected by the contractholder upon issuance of an appropriate deferred variable annuity contract or at any time following contract issue prior to annuitization. Certain GMIWB features include an asset transfer feature that reduces the Company’s exposure to these guarantees. The GMIWB liability is calculated as the present value of future expected payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature.
Sales Inducements
The Company generally defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the life of the policy using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize deferred policy acquisition costs. These deferred sales inducements are included in “Deferred Sales Inducements” in the Company’s Statements of Financial Position. The Company offered various types of sales inducements, including: (1) a bonus whereby the policyholder’s initial account balance is increased by an amount equal to a specified percentage of the customer’s initial deposit and (2) additional credits after a certain number of years a contract is held. Changes in deferred sales inducements, reported as “Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances,” are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
| | | |
Balance, beginning of year | | $ | 787,891 | | | $ | 542,742 | | | $ | 537,943 | |
Capitalization | | | 20,871 | | | | 198,955 | | | | 289,642 | |
Amortization-Impact of assumption and experience unlocking and true-ups | | | 14,613 | | | | 53,108 | | | | (24,919) | |
Amortization-All other | | | 160,835 | | | | (9,985) | | | | (260,964) | |
Change in unrealized investment gains (losses) | | | 5,679 | | | | 3,071 | | | | 1,040 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance, end of year | | $ | 989,889 | | | $ | 787,891 | | | $ | 542,742 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 8. | STATUTORY NET INCOME AND SURPLUS AND DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS |
The Company is required to prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Arizona Department of Insurance. Statutory accounting practices primarily differ from GAAP by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions and valuing investments, deferred taxes, and certain assets on a different basis.
Statutory net income (loss) for the Company amounted to $553 million, $591 million, and ($589) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 respectively. Statutory surplus of the Company amounted to $2,387 million and $2,211 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
72
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Arizona Department of Insurance. Prescribed statutory accounting practices include publications of the NAIC, state laws, regulations, and general administrative rules. Permitted statutory accounting practices encompass all accounting practices not so prescribed.
The Company is subject to Arizona law, which limits the amount of dividends that insurance companies can pay to stockholders without approval of the Arizona Department of Insurance. The maximum dividend, which may be paid in any twelve-month period without notification or approval, is limited to the greater of 10% of statutory surplus as of December 31 of the preceding year or the net gain from operations of the preceding calendar year. Cash dividends may only be paid out of surplus derived from realized net profits. Based on these limitations, there is a capacity to pay a dividend of $656 million in 2014 without prior approval. The Company paid dividends of $423 million in 2013. In 2011 and 2012, there were no dividends nor any returns of capital paid by the Company to the parent company.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Current tax expense (benefit): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. | | $ | 250,601 | | | $ | 216,654 | | | $ | 42,474 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 250,601 | | | | 216,654 | | | | 42,474 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. | | | 315,819 | | | | (35,614) | | | | (263,930) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 315,819 | | | | (35,614) | | | | (263,930) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Total income tax expense on continuing operations | | | 566,420 | | | | 181,040 | | | | (221,456) | |
Total income tax expense (benefit) reported in equity related to: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (113,517) | | | | 29,258 | | | | 16,417 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | (7,574) | | | | (9,540) | | | | 1,908 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 445,329 | | | $ | 200,758 | | | $ | (203,131) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company’s actual income tax expense for the years ended December 31, differs from the expected amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change for the following reasons:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
| | | |
Expected federal income tax expense | | $ | 736,621 | | | $ | 302,882 | | | $ | (123,964) | |
Non-taxable investment income | | | (149,933) | | | | (108,463) | | | | (81,031) | |
Tax credits | | | (20,935) | | | | (14,460) | | | | (15,977) | |
Other | | | 667 | | | | 1,081 | | | | (484) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations | | $ | 566,420 | | | $ | 181,040 | | | $ | (221,456) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The dividends received deduction (“DRD”) reduces the amount of dividend income subject to U.S. tax and is the primary component of the non-taxable investment income shown in the table above, and, as such, is a significant component of the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The DRD for the current period was estimated using information from 2012 and current year results, and was adjusted to take into account the current year’s equity market performance. The actual current year DRD can vary from the estimate based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the amount of dividends received that are eligible for the DRD, changes in the amount of distributions received from mutual fund investments, changes in the account balances of variable life and annuity contracts, and the Company’s taxable income before the DRD.
In August 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which included, among other items, guidance on the methodology to be followed in calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. In September 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-61. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended Revenue Ruling 2007-54 and informed taxpayers that the U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS intend to address through new guidance the issues considered in Revenue Ruling 2007-54, including the methodology to be followed in determining the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. In May 2010, the IRS issued an Industry Director Directive (“IDD”) confirming that the methodology for calculating the DRD set forth in Revenue Ruling 2007-54 should not be followed. The IDD also confirmed that the IRS guidance issued before Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which guidance the Company relied upon in calculating its DRD, should be used to determine the DRD. In
73
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
February 2014, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2014-7, which modified and superseded Revenue Ruling 2007-54, by removing the provisions of Revenue Ruling 2007-54 related to the methodology to be followed in calculating the DRD and obsoleting Revenue Ruling 2007-61. However, there remains the possibility that the IRS and the U.S. Treasury will address, through subsequent guidance, the issues related to the calculation of the DRD. For the last several years, the revenue proposals included in the Obama Administration’s budgets included a proposal that would change the method used to determine the amount of the DRD. A change in the DRD, including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of this deduction through guidance or legislation, could increase actual tax expense and reduce the Company’s consolidated net income. These activities had no impact on the Company’s 2011, 2012 or 2013 results.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, resulted from the items listed in the following table:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | | |
Insurance reserves | | $ | 1,551,346 | | | $ | 1,436,802 | |
Investments | | | 82,821 | | | | - | |
Other | | | - | | | | 824 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets | | $ | 1,634,167 | | | $ | 1,437,626 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | | $ | 1,412,944 | | | $ | 960,414 | |
Deferred sales inducements | | | 346,461 | | | | 275,762 | |
Net unrealized gains on securities | | | 46,247 | | | | 176,441 | |
Investments | | | - | | | | 2,315 | |
Other | | | 1,232 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities | | | 1,806,884 | | | | 1,414,932 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | | $ | (172,717) | | | $ | 22,694 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The application of U.S. GAAP requires the Company to evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance if necessary to reduce the deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. Considerable judgment is required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance the Company considers many factors, including: (1) the nature of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; (2) whether they are ordinary or capital; (3) in which tax jurisdictions they were generated and the timing of their reversal; (4) taxable income in prior carryback years as well as projected taxable earnings exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; (5) the length of time that carryovers can be utilized in the various taxing jurisdictions; (6) any unique tax rules that would impact the utilization of the deferred tax assets; and (7) any tax planning strategies that the Company would employ to avoid a tax benefit from expiring unused. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowances, will be realized. The company had no valuation allowance as of December 31, 2013, and 2012.
Management believes that based on its historical pattern of taxable income, the Company will produce sufficient income in the future to realize its deferred tax assets. Adjustments to the valuation allowance will be made if there is a change in management’s assessment of the amount of deferred tax asset that is realizable.
The Company’s income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes includes income (loss) from domestic operations of $2,104.6 million, $865.4 million and ($354.2) million, and no income from foreign operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest that relate to tax years still subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other taxing authorities. The completion of review or the expiration of the Federal statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the liability for income taxes.
The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | | | | (in thousands) | |
| | | | |
Balance at January 1, | | $ | | | | | - | | | $ | 113 | | | $ | 1,620 | |
Increases in unrecognized tax benefits-prior years | | | | | | | - | | | | 464 | | | | - | |
(Decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits-prior years | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,507) | |
Increases in unrecognized tax benefits-current year | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
(Decreases) in unrecognized tax benefits-current year | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Settlements with taxing authorities | | | | | | | - | | | | (577) | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, | | $ | | | | | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 113 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective rate | | | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
74
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company does not anticipate any significant changes within the next 12 months to its total unrecognized tax benefits related to tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired.
The Company classifies all interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties as income tax expense (benefit). In December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized nothing in the statement of operations and recognized no liabilities in the statement of financial position for tax-related interest and penalties.
Listed below are the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdiction, at December 31, 2013:
| | | | |
Major Tax Jurisdiction | | Open Tax Years | |
United States | | | 2004 - 2013 | |
During 2004 through 2006, the Company’s parent, Prudential Financial, Inc., entered into two transactions that involved, among other things, the payment of foreign income taxes that were credited against the Company’s U.S. tax liability. On May 23, 2011, the IRS issued notices of proposed adjustments disallowing the foreign tax credits claimed and related transaction expenses. The total amount of the proposed adjustments for the transactions was approximately $200 million of tax and penalties. During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company reached agreement with the IRS on the resolution of the proposed foreign tax credits disallowance. The impact to the 2011 results attributable to the settlement was an increase to tax expense of approximately $93 million. The settlement of the foreign tax credit transactions for 2004 through 2006 marked the conclusion of the IRS audits for those years. As a result, all unrecognized tax positions plus interest relating to tax years prior to 2007 were recognized in 2011. As such, 2011 benefited from a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $70 million, including the impact from the foreign tax credit disallowance.
For tax years 2007 through 2013, the Company is participating in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”). Under CAP, the IRS assigns an examination team to review completed transactions contemporaneously during these tax years in order to reach agreement with the Company on how they should be reported in the tax returns. If disagreements arise, accelerated resolutions programs are available to resolve the disagreements in a timely manner before the tax returns are filed. It is management’s expectation this program will shorten the time period between the filing of the Company’s federal income tax returns and the IRS’s completion of its examination of the returns.
10. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Fair Value Measurement – Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative fair value guidance establishes a framework for measuring fair value that includes a hierarchy used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1- Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level 1 assets and liabilities primarily include certain cash equivalents, short term investments and equity securities that trade on an active exchange market.
Level 2- Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, and other market observable inputs. The Company’s Level 2 assets and liabilities include: fixed maturities (corporate public and private bonds, most government securities, certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, etc.), certain equity securities (mutual funds, which do not actively trade and are priced based on a net asset value), certain short-term investments and certain cash equivalents (primarily commercial paper), and certain over-the-counter derivatives.
Level 3- Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. The assets and liabilities in this category may require significant judgment or estimation in determining the fair value. The Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities primarily include: certain private fixed maturities and equity securities, certain manually priced public equity securities and fixed maturities, certain highly structured over-the-counter derivative contracts, certain consolidated real estate funds for which the Company is the general partner, and embedded derivatives resulting from certain products with guaranteed benefits.
75
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Assets and Liabilities by Hierarchy Level - The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Netting (1) | | | Total | |
| |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies | | $ | - | | | $ | 93,525 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 93,525 | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | - | | | | 78,951 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 78,951 | |
Foreign government bonds | | | - | | | | 23,997 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 23,997 | |
Corporate securities | | | - | | | | 4,523,076 | | | | 18,293 | | | | - | | | | 4,541,369 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | - | | | | 141,157 | | | | 80,934 | | | | - | | | | 222,091 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 522,008 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 522,008 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 169,460 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 169,460 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total | | | - | | | | 5,552,174 | | | | 99,227 | | | | - | | | | 5,651,401 | |
Trading account assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate securities | | | - | | | | 14,183 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 14,183 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | - | | | | 1,978 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,978 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Equity securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,731 | | | | - | | | | 2,731 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total | | | - | | | | 16,161 | | | | 2,731 | | | | - | | | | 18,892 | |
Equity securities, available for sale | | | 112 | | | | 90 | | | | 569 | | | | - | | | | 771 | |
Short-term investments | | | 9,216 | | | | 6,768 | | | | 18 | | | | - | | | | 16,002 | |
Cash equivalents | | | 5,962 | | | | 199,825 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 205,787 | |
Other long-term investments | | | - | | | | 73,647 | | | | 1,168 | | | | (73,219) | | | | 1,596 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | - | | | | - | | | | 11,400 | | | | - | | | | 11,400 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | - | | | | 170,761 | | | | 4,121 | | | | - | | | | 174,882 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total excluding separate account assets | | | 15,290 | | | | 6,019,426 | | | | 119,234 | | | | (73,219) | | | | 6,080,731 | |
| | | | | |
Separate account assets (2) | | | 973,192 | | | | 99,149,315 | | | | 279,842 | | | | - | | | | 100,402,349 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 988,482 | | | $ | 105,168,741 | | | $ | 399,076 | | | $ | (73,219) | | | $ | 106,483,080 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits (4) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (348,399) | | | $ | - | | | $ | (348,399) | |
Other liabilities (3) | | | - | | | | 218,467 | | | | 388,268 | | | | (73,051) | | | | 533,684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 218,467 | | | $ | 39,869 | | | $ | (73,051) | | | $ | 185,285 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
76
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Netting (1) | | | Total | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fixed maturities, available for sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies | | $ | - | | | $ | 187,619 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 187,619 | |
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions | | | - | | | | 85,197 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 85,197 | |
Foreign government bonds | | | - | | | | 27,511 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 27,511 | |
Corporate securities | | | - | | | | 4,561,653 | | | | 36,981 | | | | - | | | | 4,598,634 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | - | | | | 264,747 | | | | 108,727 | | | | - | | | | 373,474 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 489,421 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 489,421 | |
Residential mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 373,909 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 373,909 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total | | | - | | | | 5,990,057 | | | | 145,708 | | | | - | | | | 6,135,765 | |
Trading account assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-backed securities | | | - | | | | 4,008 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,008 | |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities | | | - | | | | 4,091 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,091 | |
Equity securities | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3,277 | | | | - | | | | 3,277 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total | | | - | | | | 8,099 | | | | 3,277 | | | | - | | | | 11,376 | |
| | | | | |
Equity securities, available for sale | | | 2,683 | | | | 155 | | | | 1,489 | | | | - | | | | 4,327 | |
Short-term investments | | | 81,308 | | | | 31,029 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 112,337 | |
Cash equivalents | | | 10,305 | | | | 307,394 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 317,699 | |
Other long term investments | | | - | | | | 187,384 | | | | 988 | | | | (68,689) | | | | 119,683 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,287,157 | | | | - | | | | 1,287,157 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | - | | | | 184,128 | | | | 1,995 | | | | - | | | | 186,123 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sub-total excluding separate account assets | | | 94,296 | | | | 6,708,246 | | | | 1,440,614 | | | | (68,689) | | | | 8,174,467 | |
| | | | | |
Separate account assets (2) | | | 345,437 | | | | 80,293,584 | | | | 248,255 | | | | - | | | | 80,887,276 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 439,733 | | | $ | 87,001,830 | | | $ | 1,688,869 | | | $ | (68,689) | | | $ | 89,061,743 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits (4) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,417,891 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,417,891 | |
Other liabilities | | | - | | | | 68,689 | | | | - | | | | (68,689) | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 68,689 | | | $ | 1,417,891 | | | $ | (68,689) | | | $ | 1,417,891 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) “Netting” amounts represents swap variation margin of $0.2 million and $0 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 30, 2012, respectively, and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty, subject to master netting arrangements.
(2) Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account assets classified as Level 3 consist primarily of real estate and real estate investment funds. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
(3) Reinsurance of variable annuity living benefit features classified as “Reinsurance Recoverables” at December 31, 2012 were reclassified to “Other Liabilities” – at December 31, 2013 as they were in a net liability position.
(4) For the year ended December 31, 2013, the net embedded derivative asset position of $348 million includes $1,228 million of embedded derivatives in an asset position and $880 million of embedded derivatives in a liability position. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the net embedded derivative liability position of $1,418 million includes $431 million of embedded derivatives in an asset position and $1,849 million of embedded derivatives in a liability position.
The methods and assumptions the Company uses to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.
Fixed Maturity Securities - The fair values of the Company’s public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent pricing services. Prices for each security are generally sourced from multiple pricing vendors, and a vendor hierarchy is maintained by asset type based on historical pricing experience and vendor expertise. The Company ultimately uses the price from the pricing service highest in the vendor hierarchy based on the respective asset type. The pricing hierarchy is updated for new financial products and recent pricing experience. Consistent with the fair value hierarchy described above, securities with validated quotes from pricing services are generally reflected within Level 2, as they are primarily based on observable pricing for similar assets and/or other market observable inputs. If the pricing information received from third party pricing services is not reflective of market activity or other inputs observable in the market, the Company may challenge the price through a formal process with the pricing service. If the pricing service updates the price to be more consistent with the presented market observations, the security remains within Level 2.
Internally-developed valuations or indicative broker quotes are also used to determine fair value in circumstances where vendor pricing is not available, or where the Company ultimately concludes that pricing information received from the independent pricing service is not reflective of market activity. If the Company concludes the values from both pricing services and brokers are not reflective of market activity, it may over-ride the information with an internally-developed valuation. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, over-rides on a net basis were not material. Pricing service over-rides, internally-developed valuations and indicative broker quotes are generally included in Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
77
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The fair value of private fixed maturities, which are comprised of investments in private placement securities, originated by internal private asset managers, are primarily determined using a discounted cash flow model. If the fair value is determined using pricing inputs that are observable in the market, the securities have been reflected within Level 2; otherwise a Level 3 classification is used.
Trading Account Assets - Trading account assets consist primarily of asset-backed securities, perpetual preferred stock and commercial mortgage-backed securities whose fair values are determined consistent with similar instruments described above under “Fixed Maturity Securities” and below under “Equity Securities.”
Equity Securities - Equity securities consist principally of investments in common and preferred stock of publicly traded companies, perpetual preferred stock, privately traded securities, as well as mutual fund shares. The fair values of most publicly traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and are classified within Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Estimated fair values for most privately traded equity securities are determined using discounted cash flow, earnings multiple and other valuation models that require a substantial level of judgment around inputs and therefore are classified within Level 3. The fair values of mutual fund shares that transact regularly (but do not trade in active markets because they are not publicly available) are based on transaction prices of identical fund shares and are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of perpetual preferred stock are based on inputs obtained from independent pricing services that are primarily based on indicative broker quotes. As a result, the fair values of perpetual preferred stock are classified as Level 3.
Derivative Instruments - Derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets, within “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” except for embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host contract. The fair values of derivative contracts can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns, non-performance risk (“NPR”), liquidity and other factors. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made to reflect the cost of exiting significant risk positions, and consider the bid-ask spread, maturity, complexity, and other specific attributes of the underlying derivative position.
The majority of the Company’s derivative positions are traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative market and are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. OTC derivatives classified within Level 2 are valued using models that utilize actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers, third-party pricing vendors and/or recent trading activity. The Company’s policy is to use mid-market pricing in determining its best estimate of fair value. The fair values of most OTC derivatives, including interest rate, cross currency swaps, currency forward contracts and single name credit default swaps are determined using discounted cash flow models. The fair values of European style option contracts are determined using Black Scholes option pricing models. These models’ key inputs include the contractual terms of the respective contract, along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, credit spreads, equity prices, index dividend yields, non-performance risk, volatility and other factors.
The Company’s cleared interest rate swaps and credit derivatives linked to an index are valued using models that utilize actively quoted or observable market inputs, including overnight indexed swap discount rates, obtained from external market data providers, third-party pricing vendors and/or recent trading activity. These derivatives are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
To reflect the market’s perception of its own and the counterparty’s non-performance risk, the Company incorporates additional spreads over LIBOR into the discount rate used in determining the fair value of OTC derivative assets and liabilities that are not otherwise collateralized.
Derivatives classified as Level 3 include structured products. These derivatives are valued based upon models such as Monte Carlo simulation models and other techniques that utilize significant unobservable inputs. Level 3 methodologies are validated through periodic comparison of the Company’s fair values to external broker-dealer values. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were derivatives with the fair value of $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, classified within Level 3, and all other derivatives were classified within Level 2. See Note 11 for more details on the fair value of derivative instruments by primary underlying.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments - Cash equivalents and short-term investments include money market instruments, commercial paper and other highly liquid debt instruments. Certain money market instruments are valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible for identical assets and are primarily classified as Level 1. The remaining instruments in this category are generally fair valued based on market observable inputs and, these investments have primarily been classified within Level 2.
Separate Account Assets - Separate Account Assets include fixed maturity securities, treasuries, equity securities and real estate investments for which values are determined consistent with similar instruments described above under “Fixed Maturity Securities,” “Equity Securities” and “Other Long-Term Investments.”
Receivables from Parent and Affiliates - Receivables from parent and affiliates carried at fair value include affiliated bonds within our legal entity whose fair value are determined consistent with similar securities described above under “Fixed Maturity Securities” managed by affiliated asset managers.
Reinsurance Recoverables - Reinsurance recoverables carried at fair value include the reinsurance of our living benefit guarantees on certain of our variable annuities. These guarantees are accounted for as embedded derivatives and are recorded in “Reinsurance Recoverables” or “Other Liabilities” when fair value is in an asset or liability position, respectively. The methods and assumption used to estimate the fair value are consistent with those described below in “Future Policy Benefits.” The reinsurance agreements covering these guarantees are derivatives with fair value determined in the same manner as the living benefit guarantee.
The Company also has an agreement with UPARC, an affiliated captive reinsurance company, to reinsure risks associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision available on a portion of certain universal life products (See Note 13). Under this agreement, the Company pays a premium to
78
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
UPARC to reinsure the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision. Reinsurance of this risk is accounted for as an embedded derivative which is included in “Reinsurance recoverables”. The fair value of this embedded derivative is the present value of expected reimbursement from UPARC for cost of insurance charges the Company is unable to collect from policyholders, less the present value of reinsurance premiums that is attributable to the embedded derivative feature. This methodology could result in either an asset or liability, given changes in capital market conditions and various policyholder behavior assumptions. Significant inputs to the valuation model for this embedded derivative include capital market assumptions, such as interest rates, estimated non-performance risk of the counterparty, and various assumptions that are actuarially determined, including lapse rates, premium payment patterns, and mortality rates. This embedded derivative had a value of $11.4 million and zero at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, primarily due to NPR. The increase is primarily driven by assumption updates including mortality improvement and a lower lapse risk factor as well as the net impact of changes in interest rates and NPR.
Future Policy Benefits - The liability for future policy benefits primarily includes general account liabilities for the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity contracts, including guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum income and withdrawal benefits (“GMIWB”), accounted for as embedded derivatives. The fair values of the GMAB, GMWB, and GMIWB liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the optional living benefit feature. This methodology could result in either a liability or contra-liability balance, given changing capital market conditions and various actuarial assumptions. Since there is no observable active market for the transfer of these obligations, the valuations are calculated using internally developed models with option pricing techniques. The models are based on a risk neutral valuation framework and incorporate premiums for risks inherent in valuation techniques, inputs, and the general uncertainty around the timing and amount of future cash flows. The determination of these risk premiums requires the use of management judgment.
The significant inputs to the valuation models for these embedded derivatives include capital market assumptions, such as interest rate levels and volatility assumptions, the Company’s market-perceived risk of its own non-performance, as well as actuarially determined assumptions, including contractholder behavior, such as lapse rates, benefit utilization rates, withdrawal rates, and mortality rates. Since many of these assumptions are unobservable and are considered to be significant inputs to the liability valuation, the liability included in future policy benefits has been reflected within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Capital market inputs and actual policyholders’ account values are updated each quarter based on capital market conditions as of the end of the quarter, including interest rates, equity markets, and volatility. In the risk neutral valuation, the initial swap curve drives the total return used to grow the policyholders’ account values. The Company’s discount rate assumption is based on the LIBOR swap curve adjusted for an additional spread relative to LIBOR to reflect NPR.
Actuarial assumptions, including contractholder behavior and mortality, are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon emerging experience, future expectations and other data, including any observable market data, such as available industry studies or market transactions such as acquisitions and reinsurance transactions. These assumptions are generally updated in the third quarter of each year unless a material change that the Company feels is indicative of a long term trend is observed in an interim period.
Transfers between Levels 1 and 2 – Periodically there are transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for assets held in the Company’s Separate Account. The classification of Separate Account funds may vary dependent on the availability of information to the public. Should a fund’s net asset value become publicly observable, the fund would be transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. During the year ended December 31, 2013, $463 million was transferred from Level 2 to Level 1. During the year ended December 31, 2012, $1.9 million was transferred from Level 1 to Level 2. Transfers between levels are generally reported at the values as of the beginning of the period in which the transfers occur. There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Level 3 Assets and Liabilities by Price Source - The table below presents the balances of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value with their corresponding pricing sources.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2013 | |
| | | Internal (1) | | | | | External (2) | | | | | Total | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Corporate securities | | $ | 15,100 | | | | | $ | 3,193 | | | | | $ | 18,293 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | 355 | | | | | | 80,579 | | | | | | 80,934 | |
Short-term investments | | | 18 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 18 | |
Equity securities | | | 569 | | | | | | 2,731 | | | | | | 3,300 | |
Other long-term investments | | | - | | | | | | 1,168 | | | | | | 1,168 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | 11,400 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 11,400 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | - | | | | | | 4,121 | | | | | | 4,121 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal excluding separate account assets | | | 27,442 | | | | | | 91,792 | | | | | | 119,234 | |
| | | | | |
Separate account assets | | | 81,795 | | | | | | 198,047 | | | | | | 279,842 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 109,237 | | | | | $ | 289,839 | | | | | $ | 399,076 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits | | $ | (348,399 | ) | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | (348,399 | ) |
Other liabilities | | | 388,268 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 388,268 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 39,869 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 39,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
79
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Internal (1) | | | | | External (2) | | | | | Total | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Corporate securities | | $ | 31,356 | | | | | $ | 5,625 | | | | | $ | 36,981 | |
Asset-backed securities | | | 5,929 | | | | | | 102,798 | | | | | | 108,727 | |
Equity securities | | | 1,489 | | | | | | 3,277 | | | | | | 4,766 | |
Other long-term investments | | | 232 | | | | | | 756 | | | | | | 988 | |
Reinsurance recoverables | | | 1,287,157 | | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,287,157 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | - | | | | | | 1,995 | | | | | | 1,995 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal excluding separate account assets | | | 1,326,163 | | | | | | 114,451 | | | | | | 1,440,614 | |
| | | | | |
Separate account assets | | | 77,286 | | | | | | 170,969 | | | | | | 248,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,403,449 | | | | | $ | 285,420 | | | | | $ | 1,688,869 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits | | $ | 1,417,891 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 1,417,891 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,417,891 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 1,417,891 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Represents valuations which could incorporate internally-derived and market inputs. See below for additional information related to internally developed valuation for significant items in the above table.
(2) Represents unadjusted prices from independent pricing services and independent non-binding broker quotes where pricing inputs are not readily available.
Quantitative Information Regarding Internally Priced Level 3 Assets and Liabilities– The table below presents quantitative information on significant internally-priced Level 3 assets and liabilities.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2013 |
| | | Fair Value | | | Valuation Techniques | | Unobservable Inputs | | Minimum | | Maximum | | Weighted
Average | | Impact of Increase in
Input on Fair Value
(1) |
| | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Corporate securities | | $ | 15,100 | | | Discounted cash flow | | Discount rate | | 8.28% | | 15.00% | | 10.61% | | Decrease |
| | | | | | Market Comparables | | EBITDA Multiples (2) | | 5.0X | | 7.0X | | 5.91X | | Increase |
| | | | | | | Liquidation | | Liquidation value | | 11.61% | | 38.49% | | 31.83% | | Increase |
Reinsurance recoverables | | $ | 11,400 | | | See the Reinsurance Recoverable section above for an explanation of the fair value determination. |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits (3) | | $ | (348,399) | | | Discounted cash flow | | Lapse rate (4) | | 0% | | 11% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | NPR spread (5) | | 0.08% | | 1.09% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | | Utilization rate (6) | | 70% | | 94% | | | | Increase |
| | | | | | | | Withdrawal rate (7) | | 86% | | 100% | | | | Increase |
| | | | | | | | Mortality rate (8) | | 0% | | 13% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | | | Equity Volatility curve | | 15% | | 28% | | | | Increase |
Other Liabilities | | | 388,268 | | | Represents reinsurance of variable annuity living benefits in a liability position. Fair values are determined in the same manner as future policy benefits | | |
80
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2012 |
| | | Fair Value | | | Valuation Techniques | | Unobservable Inputs | | Minimum | | Maximum | | Weighted
Average | | Impact of Increase in
Input on Fair Value
(1) |
| | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Corporate securities | | $ | 31,356 | | | Discounted cash flow | | Discount rate | | 8.90% | | 17.50% | | 10.60% | | Decrease |
| | | | | | Cap at call price | | Call price | | 100% | | 100% | | | | Increase |
| | | | | | | Liquidation | | Liquidation value | | 98% | | 98% | | | | Increase |
Reinsurance recoverables | | $ | 1,287,157 | | | Fair values are determined in the same manner as future policy benefits | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Future policy benefits (3) | | $ | 1,417,891 | | | Discounted cash flow | | Lapse rate (4) | | 0% | | 14% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | NPR spread (5) | | 0.20% | | 1.60% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | | Utilization rate (6) | | 70% | | 94% | | | | Increase |
| | | | | | | | Withdrawal rate (7) | | 85% | | 100% | | | | Increase |
| | | | | | | | Mortality rate (8) | | 0% | | 13% | | | | Decrease |
| | | | | | | | | Equity Volatility curve | | 19% | | 34% | | | | Increase |
| (1) | Conversely, the impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact for the fair value as that presented in the table. |
| (2) | EBITDA multiples represent multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and are amounts used when the reporting entity has determined that market participants would use such multiples when pricing the investments. |
| (3) | Future policy benefits primarily represent general account liabilities for the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity contracts which are accounted for as embedded derivatives. Since the valuation methodology for these liabilities uses a range of inputs that vary at the contract level over the cash flow projection period, presenting a range, rather than weighted average, is a more meaningful representation of the unobservable inputs used in the valuation. |
| (4) | Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the benefit amount and the policyholder account value and reflect other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse adjustment reduces the base lapse rate when the benefit amount is greater than the account value, as in-the-money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower for the period where surrender charges apply. |
| (5) | To reflect NPR, the Company incorporates an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuation of individual living benefit contracts in a liability position and generally not to those in a contra-liability position. In determining the NPR spread, the Company reflects the financial strength ratings of the Company and its affiliates as these are insurance liabilities and senior to debt. The additional spread over LIBOR is determined by utilizing the credit spreads associated with issuing funding agreements, adjusted for any illiquidity risk premium. |
| (6) | The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contracts that will utilize the benefit during the contract duration, and begin lifetime withdrawals at various time intervals from contract inception. The remaining contractholders are assumed to either begin lifetime withdrawals immediately or never utilize the benefit. These assumptions vary based on the product type, the age of the contractholder and the age of the contract. The impact of changes in these assumptions is highly dependent on the contract type and age of the contractholder at the time of the sale and the timing of the first lifetime income withdrawal. |
| (7) | The withdrawal rate assumption estimates the magnitude of annual contractholder withdrawals relative to the maximum allowable amount under the contract. The fair value of the liability will generally increase the closer the withdrawal rate is to 100%. |
| (8) | Range reflects the mortality rate for the vast majority of business with living benefits, with policyholders ranging from 35 to 90 years old. While the majority of living benefits have a minimum age requirement, certain benefits do not have an age restriction. This results in contractholders for certain benefits with mortality rates approaching 0%. Based on historical experience, the Company applies a set of age and duration specific mortality rate adjustments compared to standard industry tables. A mortality improvement assumption is also incorporated into the overall mortality table. |
Interrelationships Between Unobservable Inputs – In addition to the sensitivities of fair value measurements to changes in each unobservable input in isolation, as reflected in the table above, interrelationships between these inputs may also exist, such that a change in one unobservable input may give rise to a change in another, or multiple, inputs. Examples of such interrelationships for significant internally-priced Level 3 assets and liabilities are as follows:
Corporate Securities – The rate used to discount future cash flows reflects current risk free rates plus credit and liquidity spread requirements that market participants would use to value an asset. The discount rate may be influenced by many factors, including market cycles, expectations of default, collateral, term, and asset complexity. Each of these factors can influence discount rates, either in isolation, or in response to other factors.
Future Policy Benefits – The unobservable contractholder behavior inputs related to the liability for the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity contracts included in future policy benefits are generally based on emerging experience, future expectations and other data. While experience for these products is still emerging, the Company expects benefit utilization and withdrawal rates to generally be correlated with lapse rates. However, behavior is generally highly dependent on the facts and circumstances surrounding the individual contractholder, such as their liquidity needs or tax situation, which could drive lapse behavior independent of other contractholder behavior assumptions. The dynamic lapse adjustment assumes lower lapses when the benefit amount is greater than the account value, as in-the-money contracts are less likely to lapse. Therefore, to the extent more efficient contractholder behavior results in greater in-the-moneyness at the contract level, the dynamic lapse function will reduce lapse rates for those contracts. Similarly, to the extent that increases in equity volatility are correlated with overall declines in the capital markets, the dynamic lapse function will lower overall lapse rates as contracts become more in-the-money.
81
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Separate Account Assets – In addition to the significant internally-priced Level 3 assets and liabilities presented and described above, the Company also has internally-priced separate account assets reported within Level 3. Changes in the fair value of separate account assets are borne by customers and thus are offset by changes in separate account liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. As a result, changes in value associated with these investments do not impact the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. In addition, fees earned by the Company related to the management of most separate account assets classified as Level 3 do not change due to changes in the fair value of these investments. Quantitative information about significant internally-priced Level 3 separate account assets is as follows:
Real Estate and Other Invested Assets – Separate account assets include $81.8 million and $77.3 million of investments in real estate as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, that are classified as Level 3 and reported at fair value which is determined by the Company’s equity in net assets of the entities. Fair value estimates of real estate are based on property appraisal reports prepared by independent real estate appraisers. Key inputs and assumptions to the appraisal process include rental income and expense amounts, related growth rates, discount rates and capitalization rates. Because of the subjective nature of inputs and the judgment involved in the appraisal process, real estate investments are typically included in the Level 3 Classification. Key unobservable inputs to real estate valuation include capitalization rates, which ranged from 5.00% to 10.00% (6.82% weighted average) as of December 31, 2013 and 5.50% to 9.50% (7.30% weighted average) as of December 31, 2012 and discount rates which ranged from 6.75% to 11.00% (7.90% weighted average) as of December 31, 2013 and 7.00% to 11.50% (8.30% weighted average) as of December 31, 2012.
Valuation Process for Fair Value Measurements Categorized within Level 3 –The Company has established an internal control infrastructure over the valuation of financial instruments that requires ongoing oversight by its various Business Groups. These management control functions are segregated from the trading and investing functions. For invested assets, the Company has established oversight teams, often in the form of Pricing Committees within each asset management group. The teams, which typically include representation from investment, accounting, operations, legal and other disciplines are responsible for overseeing and monitoring the pricing of the Company’s investments and performing periodic due diligence reviews of independent pricing services. An actuarial valuation team oversees the valuation of optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity contracts.
The Company has also established policies and guidelines that require the establishment of valuation methodologies and consistent application of such methodologies. These policies and guidelines govern the use of inputs and price source hierarchies and provide controls around the valuation processes. These controls include appropriate review and analysis of investment prices against market activity or indicators of reasonableness, approval of price source changes, price overrides, methodology changes and classification of fair value hierarchy levels. For optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity products, the actuarial valuation unit periodically performs baseline testing of contract input data and actuarial assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon emerging experience, future expectations and other data, including any observable market data, such as available industry studies. The valuation policies and guidelines are reviewed and updated as appropriate.
Within the trading and investing functions, the Company has established policies and procedures that relate to the approval of all new transaction types, transaction pricing sources and fair value hierarchy coding within the financial reporting system. For variable annuity product changes or new launches of optional living benefit features, the actuarial valuation unit validates input logic and new product features and agrees new input data directly to source documents.
82
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities -The following tables provide summaries of the changes in fair values of Level 3 assets and liabilities as of the dates indicated, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities still held at the end of their respective periods.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | Fixed Maturities Available For Sale | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Corporate Securities | | | | | Asset- Backed Securities | | | | | Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities | | | | | Trading Account
Assets - Equity
Securities | | | | | Equity
Securities,
Available
for Sale | | | | | Short Term
Investments | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | | | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 36,981 | | | | | $ | 108,727 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 3,277 | | | | | $ | 1,489 | | | | | $ | - | | | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | (1,177 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 427 | | | | | | - | | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 953 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (1,641 | ) | | | | | (294 | ) | | | | | (3 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 71 | | | | | | - | | | |
Net investment income | | | 90 | | | | | | 257 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Purchases | | | 14,996 | | | | | | 33,078 | | | | | | 12,524 | | | | | | 380 | | | | | | 65 | | | | | | - | | | |
Sales | | | (2,329 | ) | | | | | (1 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | (1,499 | ) | | | | | (1,483 | ) | | | | | - | | | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Settlements | | | (22,446 | ) | | | | | (23,098 | ) | | | | | (3,434 | ) | | | | | (380 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | 112 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 18 | | | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | (6,293 | ) | | | | | (35,239 | ) | | | | | (9,087 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Other (4) | | | - | | | | | | (2,496 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 18,293 | | | | | $ | 80,934 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 2,731 | | | | | $ | 569 | | | | | $ | 18 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | (1,648 | ) | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 869 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | |
83
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Other Long-
term
Investments | | | | | Receivables
from Parents and
Affiliates | | | | | Separate
Account Assets
(1) | | | | | Reinsurance
Recoverable | | | | | Future Policy
Benefits | | | | | Other Liabilities
(5) | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | | | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 988 | | | | | $ | 1,995 | | | | | $ | 248,255 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | (1,417,891 | ) | | | | $ | 1,287,157 | | | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | (232 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,966 | | | | | | 11,400 | | | | | | 2,342,621 | | | | | | (2,210,096 | ) | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | 144 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 18,978 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | - | | | | | | (25 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Net investment income | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Purchases | | | 268 | | | | | | 5,147 | | | | | | 80,302 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 534,671 | | | |
Sales | | | - | | | | | | (3,495 | ) | | | | | (69,659 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (576,331 | ) | | | | | - | | | |
Settlements | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | | | (1,997 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Other (4) | | | - | | | | | | 2,496 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 1,168 | | | | | $ | 4,121 | | | | | $ | 279,842 | | | | | $ | 11,400 | | | | | $ | 348,399 | | | | | $ | (388,268) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 11,400 | | | | | $ | 2,318,266 | | | | | $ | (2,188,291 | ) | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | 122 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 18,978 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Fixed Maturities, Available for Sale | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury
Securities | | | Corporate
Securities | | | Asset-Backed
Securities | | | Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities | | | Other Trading
Account Assets-
Equity
Securities | | | Equity
Securities,
Available for
Sale | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 4,696 | | | $ | 23,720 | | | $ | 62,429 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,362 | | | $ | 2,652 | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | - | | | | (3,454) | | | | 687 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,423) | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (35) | | | | - | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | 4 | | | | 4,070 | | | | 2,840 | | | | (65) | | | | - | | | | 264 | |
Net investment income | | | - | | | | 101 | | | | 364 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Purchases | | | - | | | | 8,714 | | | | 62,524 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Sales | | | - | | | | (89) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Settlements | | | - | | | | (8,656) | | | | (14,566) | | | | (2,496) | | | | (50) | | | | - | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | 23,995 | | | | 5,702 | | | | 5,246 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | (16,120) | | | | (11,253) | | | | (2,688) | | | | - | | | | (4) | |
Other (4) | | | (4,700) | | | | 4,700 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | - | | | $ | 36,981 | | | $ | 108,727 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,277 | | | $ | 1,489 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (35) | | | $ | - | |
84
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Other Long-
term
Investments | | | | | Reinsurance
Recoverables | | | | | Receivables
from Parents
and Affiliates | | | | | Separate
Account Assets
(1) | | | | | Future Policy
Benefits | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | | | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 686 | | | | | $ | 868,824 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 222,323 | | | | | | (912,986 | ) | | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | (4,659 | ) | | | | | 2,937 | | | | | | - | | | | | | (1,476 | ) | | | | | (61,390 | ) | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | (7 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 12,377 | | | | | | - | | | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (5 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Net investment income | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Purchases | | | 4,966 | | | | | | 415,396 | | | | | | 2,000 | | | | | | 94,515 | | | | | | - | | | |
Sales | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (79,484 | ) | | | | | - | | | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | (443,515 | ) | | |
Settlements | | | 2 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 988 | | | | | | 1,287,157 | | | | | $ | 1,995 | | | | | $ | 248,255 | | | | | | (1,417,891) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | (4,549 | ) | | | | | 17,516 | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | | (76,581 | ) | | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | (7 | ) | | | | | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | | - | | | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | $ | - | | | | | | - | | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 12,377 | | | | | | - | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |
| | | Fixed Maturities, Available for Sale | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | U.S. Treasury
Securities | | | Corporate
Securities | | | Asset-
Backed
Securities | | | Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities | | | Other Trading
Account Assets-
Equity
Securities | | | Equity
Securities,
Available for
Sale | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | - | | | $ | 49,050 | | | $ | 59,770 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,792 | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | - | | | | (3,311) | | | | 803 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,315) | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (595) | | | | - | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (4) | | | | (1,126) | | | | (694) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 2,840 | |
Net investment income | | | - | | | | 219 | | | | 768 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Purchases | | | 4,700 | | | | 7,534 | | | | 23,001 | | | | 5,019 | | | | - | | | | 1,696 | |
Sales | | | - | | | | (678) | | | | (8,160) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | 883 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Settlements | | | - | | | | (20,679) | | | | (9,094) | | | | - | | | | (5,000) | | | | (99) | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | 10,444 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,695 | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | (18,616) | | | | (3,965) | | | | (5,019) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Other (4) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 8,957 | | | | (8,957) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 4,696 | | | $ | 23,720 | | | $ | 62,429 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,362 | | | $ | 2,652 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | - | | | $ | (4,319) | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (2,918) | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (876) | | | $ | - | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
85
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | | |
| | | Other Long-
term
investments | | | Receivables
from Parents
and Affiliates | | | Reinsurance
Recoverable | | | Separate
Account
Assets (1) | | | Future Policy
Benefits | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Fair Value, beginning of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | - | | | $ | 24,278 | | | $ | (373,000) | | | $ | 198,451 | | | $ | 452,822 | |
Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | | 102 | | | | - | | | | 934,112 | | | | 388 | | | | (1,091,846) | |
Asset management fees and other income | | | (46) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,815 | | | | - | |
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | | | - | | | | (55) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Net investment income | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Purchases | | | 630 | | | | 431 | | | | 307,712 | | | | 86,744 | | | | - | |
Sales | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (65,075) | | | | - | |
Issuances | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (273,962) | |
Settlements | | | - | | | | (3) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Transfers into Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Transfers out of Level 3 (2) | | | - | | | | (24,651) | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value, end of period assets/(liabilities) | | $ | 686 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 868,824 | | | $ | 222,323 | | | $ | (912,986) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Realized investment gains (losses), net | | $ | 75 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 973,717 | | | $ | - | | | $ | (1,085,926) | |
Asset management fees and other income | | $ | (46) | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,815 | | | $ | - | |
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. |
| (2) | Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. |
| (3) | Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts. |
| (4) | Other primarily represents reclasses of certain assets between reporting categories. |
| (5) | Reinsurance of variable annuity living benefit features classified as “Reinsurance Recoverables” at December 31, 2012, were reclassified to “Other Liabilities” – at December 31, 2013 as they were in a net liability position. |
Transfers- Transfers into Level 3 are generally the result of unobservable inputs utilized within valuation methodologies and the use of indicative broker quotes for assets that were previously valued using observable inputs. Transfers out of Level 3 are generally due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company is able to validate.
For the year ended December 31, 2011 the majority of the Equity Securities Available for Sale transfers into Level 3 were due to the determination that the pricing inputs for perpetual preferred stocks provided by third party pricing services were primarily based on indicative broker quotes which could not always be verified against directly observable market information. Perpetual preferred stocks were included in Equity Securities Available for Sale and subsequently transferred to Trading Account Assets. During the same period, the pricing and valuation methodology related to an affiliated bond reported in Other Assets totaled $24.7 million was re-evaluated and subsequently updated to utilize observable inputs and transferred out of Level 3.
86
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below presents the carrying amount and fair value by fair value hierarchy level of certain financial instruments that are not reported at fair value. However, in some cases, as described below, the carrying amount equals or approximates fair value.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | |
| | | Fair Value | | | Carrying
Amount (1) | | | Fair Value | | | Carrying
Amount | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | | | Total | | | Total | | | Total | |
| | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial mortgage and other loans | | $ | - | | | $ | 7,827 | | | $ | 1,604,247 | | | $ | 1,612,074 | | | $ | 1,532,165 | | | $ | 1,616,804 | | | $ | 1,463,977 | |
Policy loans | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,086,772 | | | | 1,086,772 | | | | 1,086,772 | | | | 1,455,412 | | | | 1,079,714 | |
Other long term investments | | | - | | | | - | | | | 4,751 | | | | 4,751 | | | | 4,268 | | | | 2,491 | | | | 2,119 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | 45,317 | | | | 56,139 | | | | - | | | | 101,456 | | | | 101,456 | | | | 94,410 | | | | 94,410 | |
Accrued investment income | | | - | | | | 89,465 | | | | - | | | | 89,465 | | | | 89,465 | | | | 90,653 | | | | 90,653 | |
Receivables from parents and affiliates | | | - | | | | 87,849 | | | | - | | | | 87,849 | | | | 87,481 | | | | (3,146 | ) | | | (3,751 | ) |
Other assets | | | - | | | | 34,060 | | | | - | | | | 34,060 | | | | 34,060 | | | | 32,782 | | | | 32,176 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 45,317 | | | $ | 275,340 | | | $ | 2,695,770 | | | $ | 3,016,427 | | | $ | 2,935,667 | | | $ | 3,289,406 | | | $ | 2,759,298 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Policyholders’ Account Balances - Investment Contracts | | $ | - | | | $ | 851,607 | | | $ | 40,451 | | | $ | 892,058 | | | $ | 901,860 | | | $ | 793,280 | | | $ | 796,816 | |
Cash collateral for loaned securities | | | - | | | | 84,867 | | | | - | | | | 84,867 | | | | 84,867 | | | | 48,068 | | | | 48,068 | |
Short-term debt | | | - | | | | 275,268 | | | | - | | | | 275,268 | | | | 274,900 | | | | 272,981 | | | | 272,000 | |
Long-term debt | | | - | | | | 1,644,827 | | | | - | | | | 1,644,827 | | | | 1,592,000 | | | | 1,563,185 | | | | 1,511,000 | |
Payables to parent and affiliates | | | - | | | | 45,649 | | | | - | | | | 45,649 | | | | 45,649 | | | | 6,694 | | | | 6,694 | |
Other liabilities | | | - | | | | 270,339 | | | | - | | | | 270,339 | | | | 270,339 | | | | 224,751 | | | | 224,751 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,172,557 | | | $ | 40,451 | | | $ | 3,213,008 | | | $ | 3,169,615 | | | $ | 2,908,959 | | | $ | 2,859,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Carrying values presented herein differ from those in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Position because certain items within the respective financial statement captions are not considered financial instruments or out of scope under authoritative guidance relating to disclosures of the fair value of financial instruments. Financial statement captions excluded from the above table are not considered financial instruments. |
The fair values presented above have been determined by using available market information and by applying market valuation methodologies, as described in more detail below.
Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
The fair value of most commercial mortgage loans is based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate plus an appropriate credit spread for similar quality loans. The quality ratings for these loans, a primary determinant of the credit spreads and a significant component of the pricing process, are based on an internally-developed methodology.
Policy Loans
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company changed the valuation technique used to fair value policy loans. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the fair value of policy loans was determined by discounting expected cash flows at the current loan coupon rate. As a result the carrying value of the policy loans approximates the fair value for the year ended December 31, 2013. Prior to this change, the fair value of U.S. insurance policy loans was calculated by discounting expected cash flows based upon current U.S. Treasury rates and historical loan repayment patterns.
Other Long-term Investments
Other long-term investments include investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships. The estimated fair values of these cost method investments are generally based on the Company’s share of the net asset value (“NAV”) as provided in the financial statements of the investees. In certain circumstances, management may adjust the NAV by a premium or discount when it has sufficient evidence to support applying such adjustments. For the year end December 31, 2013 and 2012, no such adjustments were made.
Cash, Accrued Investment Income, Receivables from Parent and Affiliates and Other Assets
The Company believes that due to the short-term nature of certain assets, the carrying value approximates fair value. These assets include: cash, accrued investment income, and other assets that meet the definition of financial instruments, including receivables, such as unsettled trades and accounts receivable. Also included in receivables from parents and affiliates is an affiliated note whose fair value is determined in the same manner as the underlying debt described below under “Short-Term and Long-Term Debt”.
87
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Policyholders’ Account Balances - Investment Contracts
Only the portion of policyholders’ account balances related to products that are investment contracts (those without significant mortality or morbidity risk) are reflected in the table above. For fixed deferred annuities, payout annuities and other similar contracts without life contingencies, fair values are derived using discounted projected cash flows based on interest rates that are representative of the Company’s financial strength ratings, and hence reflect the Company’s own non-performance risk. For those balances that can be withdrawn by the customer at any time without prior notice or penalty, the fair value is the amount estimated to be payable to the customer as of the reporting date, which is generally the carrying value.
Cash Collateral for Loaned Securities
This represents the collateral received or paid in connection with loaning or borrowing securities, similar to the securities sold under agreement to repurchase below. For these transactions, the carrying value of the related asset/liability approximates fair value as they equal the amount of cash collateral received/paid.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
The fair value of short-term and long-term debt is generally determined by either prices obtained from independent pricing services, which are validated by the Company, or discounted cash flow models. These fair values consider the Company’s own non-performance risk. Discounted cash flow models predominately use market observable inputs such as the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt and financial instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. For commercial paper issuances and other debt with a maturity of less than 90 days, the carrying value approximates fair value.
Other Liabilities and Payables to Parent and Affiliates
Other liabilities and payables to parent and affiliates are primarily payables, such as unsettled trades, drafts, escrow deposits and accrued expense payables. Due to the short term until settlement of most of these liabilities, the Company believes that carrying value approximates fair value.
11. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Types of Derivative Instruments and Derivative Strategies
Interest Rate Contracts
Interest rate swaps are used by the Company to reduce risks from changes in interest rates, manage interest rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (including duration mismatches) and to hedge against changes in the value of assets it owns or anticipates acquiring or selling. Swaps may be attributed to specific assets or liabilities or may be used on a portfolio basis. Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed-rate and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount. Generally, no cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract and no principal payments are made by either party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty at each due date.
Equity Contracts
Equity index options are contracts which will settle in cash based on differentials in the underlying indices at the time of exercise and the strike price. The Company uses combinations of purchases and sales of equity index options to hedge the effects of adverse changes in equity indices within a predetermined range.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Currency derivatives, including currency swaps and forwards, are used by the Company to reduce risks from changes in currency exchange rates with respect to investments denominated in foreign currencies that the Company either holds or intends to acquire or sell.
Under currency forwards, the Company agrees with other parties to deliver a specified amount of an identified currency at a specified future date. Typically, the price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at the specified future date. The Company executes forward sales of the hedged currency in exchange for U.S. dollars at a specified exchange rate. The maturities of these forwards correspond with the future periods in which the non-U.S. dollar-denominated earnings are expected to be generated. These earnings hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Under currency swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at an exchange rate and calculated by reference to an agreed principal amount. Generally, the principal amount of each currency is exchanged at the beginning and termination of the currency swap by each party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty for payments made in the same currency at each due date.
88
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Credit Contracts
Credit derivatives are used by the Company to enhance the return on the Company’s investment portfolio by creating credit exposure similar to an investment in public fixed maturity cash instruments. With credit derivatives the Company can sell credit protection on an identified name, and in return receive a quarterly premium. With credit default derivatives, this premium or credit spread generally corresponds to the difference between the yield on the referenced name’s public fixed maturity cash instruments and swap rates, at the time the agreement is executed. If there is an event of default by the referenced name, as defined by the agreement, then the Company is obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the referenced defaulted security or similar security or pay the referenced amount less the auction recovery rate. See credit derivatives written section for discussion of guarantees related to credit derivatives written. In addition to selling credit protection, the Company has purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio.
Embedded Derivatives
The Company sells variable annuity products, which may include guaranteed benefit features that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. The Company has reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain of these benefit features to an affiliate, Pruco Re. The embedded derivatives related to the living benefit features and the related reinsurance agreements are carried at fair value. These embedded derivatives are marked to market through “Realized investment gains (losses), net” based on the change in value of the underlying contractual guarantees, which are determined using valuation models, as described in Note 10.
The fair value of the living benefit feature embedded derivatives included in “Future policy benefits” was an asset of $348 million and a liability of $1,418 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The fair value of the embedded derivatives related to the reinsurance of certain of these benefits to Pruco Re included in “Reinsurance recoverables” was a liability of $388 million and an asset of $1,287 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Company has invested in fixed maturities in the past that, in addition to a stated coupon, provided a return based upon the results of an underlying portfolio of fixed income investments and related investment activity. The Company accounted for these investments as available-for-sale fixed maturities containing embedded derivatives. Such embedded derivatives are marked to market through “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” based upon the change in value of the underlying portfolio.
Some of the Company’s universal life products contain a no-lapse guarantee provision that is reinsured with an affiliate, UPARC. The reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative related to the interest rate risk of the reinsurance contract. Fluctuations in interest rates can result in mark-to-market changes in the value of the underlying contractual guarantees and impact the amount of premiums and benefits paid between the Company and UPARC. See Note 8 for additional information on the agreement with UPARC.
The table below provides a summary of the gross notional amount and fair value of derivatives contracts used in a non-broker-dealer capacity, excluding embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host, by the primary underlying. Many derivative instruments contain multiple underlyings.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | Notional | | | Gross Fair Value | | | | | Notional | | | Gross Fair Value | |
| Primary Underlying | | | | Amount | | | Assets | | | Liabilities | | | | | Amount | | | Assets | | | Liabilities | |
| | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
Derivatives Designated as Hedge Accounting Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Swaps | | | | $ | 249,601 | | | $ | 6,304 | | | $ | (11,583) | | | | | $ | 145,174 | | | $ | 4,152 | | | $ | (3,904) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Qualifying Hedges | | | | $ | 249,601 | | | $ | 6,304 | | | $ | (11,583) | | | | | $ | 145,174 | | | $ | 4,152 | | | $ | (3,904) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives Not Qualifying as Hedge Accounting Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | | $ | 2,434,400 | | | $ | 47,475 | | | $ | (185,222) | | | | | $ | 1,729,400 | | | $ | 109,855 | | | $ | (22,930) | |
| | | | | | | | |
Currency | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Forwards | | | | | 507 | | | | 2 | | | | - | | | | | | 5,424 | | | | 48 | | | | - | |
Credit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps | | | | | 14,275 | | | | 15 | | | | (862) | | | | | | 14,275 | | | | 614 | | | | (894) | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Swaps | | | | | 69,450 | | | | 211 | | | | (3,325) | | | | | | 62,468 | | | | 1,516 | | | | (2,064) | |
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return Swaps | | | | | 332,000 | | | | - | | | | (8,057) | | | | | | 320,377 | | | | 762 | | | | (6,073) | |
Equity Options | | | | | 40,739,168 | | | | 19,639 | | | | (9,418) | | | | | | 24,243,020 | | | | 70,669 | | | | (32,824) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Non-Qualifying Hedges | | | | | 43,589,800 | | | | 67,342 | | | | (206,884) | | | | | | 26,374,964 | | | | 183,464 | | | | (64,785) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Derivatives (1) | | | | $ | 43,839,401 | | | $ | 73,646 | | | $ | (218,467) | | | | | $ | 26,520,138 | | | $ | 187,616 | | | $ | (68,689) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
89
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | (1) | Excludes embedded derivatives which contain multiple underlyings. The fair value of these embedded derivatives was an asset of $348 million and a liability of $1,441 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, included in “Future policy benefits” and “Fixed maturities, available-for-sale.” |
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
The following table presents recognized derivative instruments (including bifurcated embedded derivatives), and repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements that are offset in the balance sheet, and/or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in the balance sheet.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2013 | |
| | | Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Financial
Instruments | | | Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position | | | Net
Amounts
Presented in
the Statement
of Financial
Position | | | Financial
Instruments/
Collateral | | | Net Amount | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Offsetting of Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | | $ | 73,219 | | | $ | (73,219 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Securities purchased under agreement to resell | | | 56,139 | | | | - | | | | 56,139 | | | | (56,139 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 129,358 | | | $ | (73,219 | ) | | $ | 56,139 | | | $ | (56,139 | ) | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | | $ | 218,467 | | | $ | (73,051 | ) | | $ | 145,416 | | | $ | (136,593 | ) | | $ | 8,823 | |
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | $ | 218,467 | | | $ | (73,051 | ) | | $ | 145,416 | | | $ | (136,593 | ) | | $ | 8,823 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | December 31, 2012 | |
| | | Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Financial
Instruments | | | Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position | | | Net
Amounts
Presented in
the Statement
of Financial
Position | | | Financial
Instruments/
Collateral | | | Net Amount | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Offsetting of Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | | $ | 187,372 | | | $ | (68,689 | ) | | $ | 118,683 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 118,683 | |
Securities purchased under agreement to resell | | | 203,437 | | | | - | | | | 203,437 | | | | (203,437 | ) | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 390,809 | | | $ | (68,689 | ) | | $ | 322,120 | | | $ | (203,437 | ) | | $ | 118,683 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Offsetting of Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives | | $ | 68,689 | | | $ | (68,689 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Liabilities | | $ | 68,689 | | | $ | (68,689 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For information regarding the rights of offset associated with the derivative assets and liabilities in the table above see “Credit Risk” below. For securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the Company monitors the value of the securities and maintains collateral, as appropriate, to protect against credit exposure. Where the Company has entered into repurchase and resale agreements with the same counterparty, in the event of default, the Company would generally be permitted to exercise rights of offset. For additional information on the Company’s accounting policy for securities repurchase and resale agreements, see Note 2 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flow Hedges
The primary derivative instruments used by the Company in its cash flow hedge accounting relationships are currency swaps. These instruments are only designated for hedge accounting in instances where the appropriate criteria are met. The Company does not use futures, options, credit, equity or embedded derivatives in any of its cash flow hedge accounting relationships.
90
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The following tables provide the financial statement classification and impact of derivatives used in qualifying and non-qualifying hedge relationships, excluding the offset of the hedged item in an effective hedge relationship:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | |
| | | | | Realized
Investment
Gains/(Losses) | | | | | Net
Investment
Income | | | | | Other
Income | | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
| Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 1,029 | | | | | $ | (794) | | | $ | | | | | (4,848) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash flow hedges | | | | | - | | | | | | 1,029 | | | | | | (794) | | | | | | | | (4,848) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate | | | | | (191,954) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | |
Currency | | | | | 51 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | | (3,450) | | | | | | - | | | | | | (17) | | | | | | | | - | |
Credit | | | | | (1,106) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | |
Equity | | | | | (130,714) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | |
Embedded Derivatives | | | | | 274,374 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-qualifying hedges | | | | | (52,799) | | | | | | - | | | | | | (17) | | | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | (52,799) | | | | | $ | 1,029 | | | | | $ | (811) | | | | | | | $ | (4,848) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |
| | | | | Realized
Investment
Gains/(Losses) | | | | | Net
Investment
Income | | | | | | Other
Income | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
| Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 707 | | | $ | | | | | 46 | | | | | $ | (2,376) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash flow hedges | | | | | - | | | | | | 707 | | | | | | | | 46 | | | | | | (2,376) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate | | | | | 1,309 | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Currency | | | | | (147) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | | (866) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | (6) | | | | | | - | |
Credit | | | | | (763) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Equity | | | | | (69,527) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Embedded Derivatives | | | | | (116,431) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-qualifying hedges | | | | | (186,425) | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | (6) | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | (186,425) | | | | | $ | 707 | | | | | | | $ | 40 | | | | | $ | (2,376) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
91
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | Realized
Investment
Gains/(Losses) | | | | | Net Investment Income | | | | | Other
Income | | | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) | |
| | | | | (in thousands) | |
| Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flow hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | $ | (337) | | | | | $ | 233 | | | | | $ | 49 | | | | | $ | 1,715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cash flow hedges | | | | | (337) | | | | | | 233 | | | | | | 49 | | | | | | 1,715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate | | | | | 90,706 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Currency | | | | | 175 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Currency/Interest Rate | | | | | 1,102 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Credit | | | | | 733 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Equity | | | | | (3,264) | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
Embedded Derivatives | | | | | 88,740 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total non-qualifying hedges | | | | | 178,192 | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 177,855 | | | | | $ | 233 | | | | | $ | 49 | | | | | $ | 1,715 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (1) | Amounts deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” |
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the ineffective portion of derivatives accounted for using hedge accounting was not material to the Company’s results of operations and there were no material amounts reclassified into earnings relating to instances in which the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transaction did not occur by the anticipated date or within the additional time period permitted by the authoritative guidance for the accounting for derivatives and hedging.
Presented below is a roll forward of current period cash flow hedges in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” before taxes:
| | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | $ | 808 | |
Net deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedges from January 1 to December 31, 2011 | | | 1,607 | |
Amount reclassified into current period earnings | | | 108 | |
| | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | 2,523 | |
Net deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedges from January 1 to December 31, 2012 | | | (622) | |
Amount reclassified into current period earnings | | | (1,754) | |
| | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2012 | | | 147 | |
Net deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedges from January 1 to December 31, 2013 | | | (4,519) | |
Amount reclassified into current period earnings | | | (329) | |
| | | | |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | | $ | (4,701) | |
| | | | |
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any qualifying cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions other than those related to the variability of the payment or receipt of interest or foreign currency amounts on existing financial instruments. The maximum length of time for which these variable cash flows are hedged is 20 years. Income amounts deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” as a result of cash flow hedges are included in “Net unrealized investment gains (losses)” in the Consolidated Statements of Equity.
Credit Derivatives
The Company has no exposure from credit derivatives where it has written credit protection as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
The Company has purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $14 million of outstanding notional amounts, reported at fair value as a liability of less than $1 million for both periods.
Prior to disposal in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company held certain externally-managed investments in the European market which contained embedded derivatives. Their fair values were primarily driven by changes in credit spreads. These investments were medium-term notes that were collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of investment grade European fixed income securities, including corporate bonds and asset-backed securities, and derivatives, as well as varying degrees of leverage. The notes had a stated coupon and provided a return based on the performance of the underlying portfolios and the level of leverage. The Company invested in these notes to earn a coupon through maturity, consistent with its investment purpose for other debt securities. The notes were accounted for under U.S. GAAP as available-for-sale fixed maturity securities with bifurcated embedded derivatives (total return swaps). Changes in the value of the fixed maturity securities were reported in Equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)” and changes in the market value of the embedded total return swaps are
92
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
included in current period earnings in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these investments was $64 million on December 31, 2012. The fair value of the embedded derivatives included in “Fixed maturities, available-for-sale” was a liability of $23 million on December 31, 2012.
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparty to financial derivative transactions.
The Company has credit risk exposure to an affiliate, Prudential Global Funding, LLC (“PGF”), related to its OTC derivative transactions. PGF manages credit risk with external counterparties by entering into derivative transactions with highly rated major international financial institutions and other creditworthy counterparties, and by obtaining collateral where appropriate, see Note 13. Additionally, limits are set on single party credit exposures which are subject to periodic management review.
Under fair value measurements, the Company incorporates the market’s perception of its own and the counterparty’s non-performance risk in determining the fair value of the portion of its OTC derivative assets and liabilities that are uncollateralized. Credit spreads are applied to the derivative fair values on a net basis by counterparty. To reflect the Company’s own credit spread a proxy based on relevant debt spreads is applied to OTC derivative net liability positions. Similarly, the Company’s counterparty’s credit spread is applied to OTC derivative net asset positions.
12. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND LITIGATION AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Commitments
The Company has made commitments to fund $24.9 million of commercial loans as of December 31, 2013. The Company also made commitments to purchase or fund investments, mostly private fixed maturities, of $116 million as of December 31, 2013.
Contingent Liabilities
On an ongoing basis, the Company’s internal supervisory and control functions review the quality of sales, marketing and other customer interface procedures and practices and may recommend modifications or enhancements. From time to time, this review process results in the discovery of product administration, servicing or other errors, including errors relating to the timing or amount of payments or contract values due to customers. In certain cases, if appropriate, the Company may offer customers remediation and may incur charges, including the costs of such remediation, administrative costs and regulatory fines.
The Company is subject to the laws and regulations of states and other jurisdictions concerning the identification, reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned funds, and is subject to audit and examination for compliance with these requirements. For additional discussion of these matters, see “Litigation and Regulatory Matters” below.
It is possible that the results of operations or the cash flow of the Company in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected as a result of payments in connection with the matters discussed above or other matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. Management believes, however, that ultimate payments in connection with these matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
Litigation and Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of its business. Pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to the Company and proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industry in which it operates. The Company is subject to class action lawsuits and other litigation involving a variety of issues and allegations involving sales practices, claims payments and procedures, premium charges, policy servicing and breach of fiduciary duty to customers. The Company is also subject to litigation arising out of its general business activities, such as its investments, contracts, leases and labor and employment relationships, including claims of discrimination and harassment, and could be exposed to claims or litigation concerning certain business or process patents. In some of the pending legal and regulatory actions, plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. In addition, the Company, along with other participants in the businesses in which it engages, may be subject from time to time to investigations, examinations and inquiries, in some cases industry-wide, concerning issues or matters upon which such regulators have determined to focus. In some of the Company’s pending legal and regulatory actions, parties are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. The outcome of litigation or a regulatory matter, and the amount or range of potential loss at any particular time, is often inherently uncertain. The following is a summary of certain pending proceedings.
The Company establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of that loss can be reasonably estimated. For litigation and regulatory matters where a loss may be reasonably possible, but not probable, or is probable but not reasonably estimable, no accrual is established, but the matter, if material, is disclosed, including matters discussed below. As of December 31, 2013,
93
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses in excess of accruals established is not currently estimable. The Company reviews relevant information with respect to its litigation and regulatory matters on a quarterly and annual basis and updates its accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible loss based on such reviews.
In January 2013, a qui tam action on behalf of the State of Florida, Total Asset Recovery Services v. Met Life Inc., et al., Manulife Financial Corporation, et. al., Prudential Financial, Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, and Prudential Insurance Agency, LLC, filed in the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida, was served on Prudential Insurance. The complaint alleges that Prudential Insurance failed to escheat life insurance proceeds to the State of Florida in violation of the Florida False Claims Act and seeks injunctive relief, compensatory damages, civil penalties, treble damages, prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees and costs. In March 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In August 2013, the court dismissed the complaint with prejudice. In September 2013, plaintiff filed an appeal with Florida’s Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in Leon County.
In October 2012, the State of West Virginia, through its State Treasurer, filed a lawsuit, State of West Virginia ex. Rel. John D. Perdue v. PRUCO Life Insurance Company, in the Circuit Court of Putnam County, West Virginia. The complaint alleges violations of the West Virginia Uniform Unclaimed Property Fund Act by failing to properly identify and report all unclaimed insurance policy proceeds which should either be paid to beneficiaries or escheated to West Virginia. The complaint seeks to examine the records of the Company to determine compliance with the West Virginia Uniform Unclaimed Property Fund Act, and to assess penalties and costs in an undetermined amount. In April 2013, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In December 2013, the Court granted the Company’s motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. In January 2014, the State of West Virginia appealed the decision.
In January 2012, a Global Resolution Agreement entered into by the Company and a third party auditor became effective upon its acceptance by the unclaimed property departments of 20 states and jurisdictions. Under the terms of the Global Resolution Agreement, the third party auditor acting on behalf of the signatory states will compare expanded matching criteria to the Social Security Master Death File (“SSMDF”) to identify deceased insureds and contractholders where a valid claim has not been made. In February 2012, a Regulatory Settlement Agreement entered into by the Company to resolve a multi-state market conduct examination regarding its adherence to state claim settlement practices became effective upon its acceptance by the insurance departments of 20 states and jurisdictions. The Regulatory Settlement Agreement applies prospectively and requires the Company to adopt and implement additional procedures comparing its records to the SSMDF to identify unclaimed death benefits and prescribes procedures for identifying and locating beneficiaries once deaths are identified. Substantially all other jurisdictions that are not signatories to the Global Resolution Agreement or the Regulatory Settlement Agreement have entered into similar agreements with the Company.
The Company is one of several companies subpoenaed by the New York Attorney General regarding its unclaimed property procedures. Additionally, the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) has requested that 172 life insurers (including the Company) provide data to the NYDFS regarding use of the SSMDF. The New York Office of Unclaimed Funds is conducting an audit of the Company’s compliance with New York’s unclaimed property laws. In February 2012, the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General requested information regarding the Company’s unclaimed property procedures. In December 2013, this matter was closed without prejudice. In May 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Insurance Division, which requires the Company to take additional steps to identify deceased insureds and contract holders where a valid claim has not been made.
In December 2010, a purported state-wide class action complaint, Phillips v. Prudential Financial, Inc, was filed in state court and removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The complaint makes allegations under Illinois law, on behalf of a class of Illinois residents whose death benefit claims were settled by retained assets accounts. In March 2011, the complaint was amended to drop Prudential Financial as a defendant and add the Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America as a defendant. The matter is now captioned Phillips v. Prudential Insurance and Pruco Life Insurance Company. In November 2011, the complaint was dismissed. In December 2011, plaintiff appealed the dismissal. In May 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s putative class action complaint. In August 2013, plaintiff’s time to appeal the dismissal expired.
The Company’s litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. It is possible that the Company’s results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. Management believes, however, that, based on information currently known to it, the ultimate outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has extensive transactions and relationships with Prudential Insurance and other affiliates. Although we seek to ensure that these transactions and relationships are fair and reasonable, it is possible that the terms of these transactions are not the same as those that would result from transactions among unrelated parties.
94
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Expense Charges and Allocations
Many of the Company’s expenses are allocations or charges from Prudential Insurance or other affiliates. These expenses can be grouped into general and administrative expenses and agency distribution expenses.
The Company’s general and administrative expenses are charged to the Company using allocation methodologies based on business production processes. Management believes that the methodology is reasonable and reflects costs incurred by Prudential Insurance to process transactions on behalf of the Company. The Company operates under service and lease agreements whereby services of officers and employees, supplies, use of equipment and office space are provided by Prudential Insurance. The Company reviews its allocation methodology periodically which it may adjust accordingly. General and administrative expenses also include allocations of stock compensation expenses related to a stock option program and a deferred compensation program issued by Prudential Financial. The expense charged to the Company for the stock option program was $1 million for years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and less than $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The expense charged to the Company for the deferred compensation program was $7 million, $6 million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company is charged for its share of employee benefits expenses. These expenses include costs for funded and non-funded contributory and non-contributory defined benefit pension plans. Some of these benefits are based on final group earnings and length of service while others are based on an account balance, which takes into consideration age, service and earnings during career. The Company’s share of net expense for the pension plans was $22 million, $18 million and $18 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Prudential Insurance sponsors voluntary savings plans for its employee’s 401(k) plans. The plans provide for salary reduction contributions by employees and matching contributions by the Company of up to 4% of annual salary. The Company’s expense for its share of the voluntary savings plan was $8 million for years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
The Company is charged distribution expenses from Prudential Insurance’s agency network for both its domestic life and annuity products through a transfer pricing agreement, which is intended to reflect a market based pricing arrangement.
The Company pays commissions and certain other fees to Prudential Annuities Distributors, Incorporated (“PAD”) in consideration for PAD’s marketing and underwriting of the Company’s products. Commissions and fees are paid by PAD to broker-dealers who sell the Company’s products. Commissions and fees paid by the Company to PAD were $877 million, $1,222 million and $1,144 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Corporate Owned Life Insurance
The Company has sold four Corporate Owned Life Insurance or, “COLI,” policies to Prudential Insurance, and one to Prudential Financial. The cash surrender value included in separate accounts for these COLI policies was $2,595 million at December 31, 2013 and $2,390 million at December 31, 2012. Fees related to these COLI policies were $42 million, $35 million and $33 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company retains the majority of the mortality risk associated with these COLI policies. In October 2013, the Company increased the maximum amount of mortality risk on any life to $3.5 million for certain COLI policies.
Derivative Trades
In its ordinary course of business, the Company enters into OTC derivative contracts with an affiliate, PGF.
Reinsurance with Affiliates
The Company participates in reinsurance with its affiliates Prudential of Taiwan, PARCC, UPARC, Pruco Re, PAR TERM, PURC and PAR U, and its parent company, Prudential Insurance, in order to provide risk diversification, additional capacity for future growth and limit the maximum net loss potential. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of these agreements.
Reinsurance amounts included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
| | |
Reinsurance recoverable | | $ | 13,657,859 | | | $ | 7,032,175 | |
Policy loans | | | (64,720 | ) | | | (52,767 | ) |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | | | (1,627,838 | ) | | | (1,112,195 | ) |
Policyholders’ account balances | | | 4,681,356 | | | | - | |
Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities | | | 1,359,340 | | | | - | |
Other liabilities (reinsurance payables) | | | 618,781 | | | | 309,478 | |
95
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The reinsurance recoverables by counterparty is broken out below.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,
2013 | | | December 31,
2012 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
UPARC | | $ | 44,835 | | | $ | 28,655 | |
PAR U | | | 8,091,712 | | | | 1,633,026 | |
PURC | | | 940,218 | | | | - | |
PARCC | | | 2,411,157 | | | | 2,299,391 | |
PAR TERM | | | 816,787 | | | | 486,012 | |
Prudential Insurance | | | 190,035 | | | | 172,198 | |
Pruco Re (1) | | | 642 | | | | 1,287,660 | |
Prudential of Taiwan | | | 1,157,639 | | | | 1,115,560 | |
Unaffiliated | | | 4,832 | | | | 9,673 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Reinsurance Recoverables | | $ | 13,657,859 | | | $ | 7,032,175 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| (1) | December 31, 2013 excludes $388 million reclassed to other liabilities due to the mark-to-market impact discussed above. |
Reinsurance amounts, excluding investment gains (losses) on affiliated asset transfers, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) at December 31, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
Premiums | | $ | (1,262,539 | ) | | $ | (1,153,853 | ) | | $ | (1,054,452 | ) |
Policy charges and fee income | | | (475,692 | ) | | | (513,404 | ) | | | (328,778 | ) |
Net investment income | | | (2,096 | ) | | | (1,500 | ) | | | (808 | ) |
Other income | | | (31,119 | ) | | | 30,303 | | | | 3,183 | |
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balance | | | (72,977 | ) | | | (51,990 | ) | | | (23,998 | ) |
Policyholders’ benefits | | | (1,325,428 | ) | | | (1,313,157 | ) | | | (1,133,782 | ) |
Reinsurance expense allowances, net of capitalization and amortization | | | (181,440 | ) | | | (249,008 | ) | | | (132,961 | ) |
Realized investment gains (losses) net | | | (2,058,885 | ) | | | (53,842 | ) | | | 1,185,096 | |
UPARC
Through June 30, 2011 the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, reinsured its Universal Protector policies having no-lapse guarantees with UPARC, an affiliated company. UPARC reinsured an amount equal to 90% of the net amount at risk related to the first $1 million in face amount plus 100% of the net amount at risk related to the face amount in excess of $1 million as well as 100% of the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision of these policies.
Effective July 1, 2011, the agreement between the Company and UPARC to reinsure its Universal Protector policies having no-lapse guarantees was amended for policies with effective dates prior to January 1, 2011. Under the amended agreement, UPARC reinsures an amount equal to 27% of the net amount at risk related to the first $1 million in face amount plus 30% of the net amount at risk related to the face amount in excess of $1 million as well as 30% of the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision of these policies. During the first quarter of 2013, the agreement between the Company and UPARC was further amended to revise language relating to the consideration due to the Company.
Effective July 1, 2013 the agreement between the Company and UPARC to reinsure its Universal Protector policies having no-lapse guarantees was further amended for policies with effective dates January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012. Under the amended agreement, UPARC reinsures an amount equal to 27% of the net amount at risk related to the first $1 million in face amount plus 30% of the net amount at risk related to the face amount in excess of $1 million as well as 30% of the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision of these policies. Policies with effective dates January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 are reinsured with UPARC under the terms of the initial reinsurance agreement described above.
PAR U
Effective July 1, 2011, the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, entered into an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR U, an affiliated company, to reinsure an amount equal to 70% of all the risks associated with its Universal Protector policies having no lapse guarantees as well as its Universal Plus policies, with effective dates prior to January 1, 2011. During the first quarter of 2013, the agreement between the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, and PAR U was amended to revise language relating to the consideration due to PAR U.
Effective July 1, 2012, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, PLNJ, entered into an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR U, an affiliated company, to reinsure an amount equal to 95% of all the risks associated with its universal life policies. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the agreement between PLNJ and PAR U was amended to revise language relating to the consideration due to PAR U.
96
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
On January 2, 2013 the Company began to assume GUL business from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford Life Business. The GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance is subsequently retroceded to PAR U. Collectively, reinsurance of the GUL business does not have a material impact on the equity of the Company.
Effective July 1, 2013, the agreement between the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, and PAR U was amended for policies with effective dates from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012. Under the amended agreement, PAR U reinsures an amount equal to 70% of all the risks associated with its Universal Protector policies having no lapse guarantees as well as its Universal Plus policies, with effective dates from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012 in addition to policies covered by the initial reinsurance agreement discussed above.
Effective October 1, 2013, the Company entered into an Assumption and Novation Agreement with PAR U and PURC. Under this agreement, PAR U novates, assigns, and transfers to PURC all of its rights, title, interests, duties, obligations, and liabilities under the aforementioned amendment entered into on July 1, 2013. PURC will succeed PAR U and become the counterparty to the Company with respect to the novated business. There is no financial impact to the Company as a result of this transaction.
PURC
The Company, excluding its subsidiaries, reinsures an amount equal to 70% of all the risks associated with its Universal Protector policies having no lapse guarantees as well as its Universal Plus policies, with effective dates from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012.
PARCC
The Company reinsures 90% of the risk under its term life insurance policies, with effective dates prior to January 1, 2010, through an automatic coinsurance agreement with PARCC.
PAR TERM
The Company reinsures 95% of the risk under its term life insurance policies with effective dates January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2013, through an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR TERM.
Prudential Insurance
The Company has a yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement with Prudential Insurance and reinsures the majority of all mortality risks not otherwise reinsured.
On January 2, 2013, the Company began to assume GUL business from Prudential Insurance in connection with the acquisition of the Hartford Life Business. The GUL business assumed from Prudential Insurance is subsequently retroceded to PAR U. Collectively, reinsurance of this GUL business does not have a material impact on the equity of the Company.
The Company has reinsured a group annuity contract with Prudential Insurance, in consideration for a single premium payment by the Company, providing reinsurance equal to 100% of all payments due under the contract.
Pruco Re
The Company uses reinsurance as part of its risk management and capital management strategies for certain of its optional living benefit features. Starting from 2005, the Company has entered into various automatic coinsurance agreements with Pruco Re, an affiliated company, to reinsure its living benefit features sold on certain of its annuities.
Taiwan Branch Reinsurance Agreement
On January 31, 2001, the Company transferred all of its assets and liabilities associated with its Taiwan branch, including its Taiwan insurance book of business to Prudential of Taiwan, an affiliated company.
The mechanism used to transfer this block of business in Taiwan is referred to as a “full acquisition and assumption” transaction. Under this mechanism, the Company is jointly liable with Prudential of Taiwan for two years from the giving of notice to all obligees for all matured obligations and for two years after the maturity date of not-yet-matured obligations. Prudential of Taiwan is also contractually liable, under indemnification provisions of the transaction, for any liabilities that may be asserted against the Company.
The transfer of the insurance related assets and liabilities was accounted for as a long-duration coinsurance transaction under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Under this accounting treatment, the insurance related liabilities remain on the books of the Company and an offsetting reinsurance recoverable is established. These assets and liabilities are denominated in US dollars.
97
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Affiliated Asset Administration Fee Income
The Company participates in a revenue sharing agreement with AST Investment Services, Inc., formerly known as American Skandia Investment Services, Inc, whereby the Company receives fee income calculated on contractholder separate account balances invested in the Advanced Series Trust, formerly known as American Skandia Trust. Income received from AST Investment Services, Inc. related to this agreement was $311 million, $227 million and $153 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These revenues are recorded as “Asset administration fees” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
The Company participates in a revenue sharing agreement with Prudential Investments LLC, whereby the Company receives fee income from policyholders’ account balances invested in The Prudential Series Fund (“PSF”). Income received from Prudential Investments LLC, related to this agreement was $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. These revenues are recorded as “Asset administration fees” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Affiliated Investment Management Expenses
In accordance with an agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. (“PIMI”), the Company pays investment management expenses to PIMI who acts as investment manager to certain Company general account and separate account assets. Investment management expenses paid to PIMI related to this agreement was $14.6 million, $14.1 million and $13.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These expenses are recorded as “Net Investment Income” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Affiliated Asset Transfers
From time to time, the Company participates in affiliated asset trades with parent and sister companies. Book and market value differences for trades with a parent and sister are recognized within Additional paid-in-capital (“APIC”) and Realized investment gain(loss), respectively.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliate | | Date | | Transaction | | Security Type | | Fair
Value | | | Book
Value | | | Additional
Paid-in
Capital, Net
of Tax
Increase/
(Decrease) | | | Realized
Investment
Gain/
(Loss) | | | Derivative
Gain/
(Loss) | |
| | | | | | | | | (in millions) | |
UPARC | | Oct-11 | | Transfer In | | Fixed Maturities | | $ | 350 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 37 | |
PAR U | | Oct-11 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities | | | 1,006 | | | | 943 | | | | - | | | | 63 | | | | (61) | |
PAR U | | Oct-11 | | Sale | | Fixed Maturities | | | 92 | | | | 84 | | | | - | | | | 8 | | | | - | |
Prudential Financial | | Nov-11 | | Sale | | Fixed Maturities | | | 45 | | | | 41 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Dec-11 | | Sale | | Commercial Loans | | | 21 | | | | 19 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | - | |
PARCC | | Dec-11 | | Sale | | Fixed Maturities | | | 38 | | | | 36 | | | | - | | | | 2 | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Apr-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 3 | | | �� | 2 | | | | (1) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Financial | | Apr-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 28 | | | | 25 | | | | (2) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Jun-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 91 | | | | 74 | | | | (11) | | | | - | | | | - | |
PAR U | | Sep-12 | | Sale | | Fixed Maturities & Commercial Mortgages | | | 156 | | | | 142 | | | | - | | | | 14 | | | | (5) | |
Prudential Financial | | Sep-12 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities | | | 46 | | | | 41 | | | | 3 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Nov-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 110 | | | | 102 | | | | (5) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Financial | | Nov-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 12 | | | | 12 | | | | (1) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Dec-12 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 59 | | | | 56 | | | | (2) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Jan-13 | | Transfer In | | Fixed Maturities | | | 126 | | | | 108 | | | | (12) | | | | - | | | | - | |
PAR U | | Jan-13 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities | | | 126 | | | | 108 | | | | - | | | | 18 | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Jan-13 | | Transfer In | | Fixed Maturities, Commercial Mortgages,Short-term Investments, & Trading Account Assets | | | 4,825 | | | | 4,825 | | | | (1) | | | | - | | | | - | |
PAR U | | Jan-13 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities, Commercial Mortgages,Short-term Investments, & Trading Account Assets | | | 4,826 | | | | 4,821 | | | | - | | | | 5 | | | | - | |
UPARC | | Feb-13 | | Transfer In | | Fixed Maturities | | | 56 | | | | 52 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
PAR U | | Feb-13 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities | | | 132 | | | | 122 | | | | - | | | | 10 | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Mar-13 | | Purchased | | Fixed Maturities | | | 47 | | | | 44 | | | | (2) | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Insurance | | Sep-13 | | Sale | | Commercial Mortgages | | | 2 | | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | - | | | | - | |
Prudential Financial | | Sep-13 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities | | | 25 | | | | 25 | | | | (1) | | | | - | | | | - | |
UPARC | | Sep-13 | | Transfer In | | Fixed Maturities & Private Equity | | | 192 | | | | 189 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 3 | |
PARU | | Sep-13 | | Transfer Out | | Fixed Maturities, Commercial Mortgages, & Private Equity | | | 704 | | | | 694 | | | | - | | | | 10 | | | | (15) | |
98
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Debt Agreements
The Company is authorized to borrow funds up to $2.2 billion from affiliates to meet its capital and other funding needs.
The following table provides the breakout of the Company’s short-term and long-term debt with affiliates:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliate | | Date Issued | | | Amount of Notes -
December 31, 2013 | | | Amount of Notes -
December 31, 2012 | | | Interest Rate | | | Date of Maturity | |
| | | | | | (in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | |
PFI | | | 11/15/2010 | | | $ | 66,000 | | | $ | 66,000 | | | | 3.01% | | | | 11/13/2015 | |
PFI | | | 6/20/2011 | | | | 150,000 | | | | 200,000 | | | | 1.64% - 3.17% | | | | 6/2013 - 6/2016 | |
PFI | | | 12/15/2011 | | | | 159,000 | | | | 212,000 | | | | 2.65% - 3.61% | | | | 12/2013 - 12/2016 | |
PFI | | | 12/16/2011 | | | | 33,000 | | | | 44,000 | | | | 2.65% - 3.61% | | | | 12/2013 - 12/2016 | |
PFI | | | 12/20/2012 | | | | 88,000 | | | | 267,000 | | | | 1.37% | | | | 12/15/2015 | |
Prudential Insurance | | | 12/20/2010 | | | | 204,000 | | | | 204,000 | | | | 3.47% | | | | 12/21/2015 | |
Washington Street Investment | | | 6/20/2012 | | | | 316,000 | | | | 395,000 | | | | 1.15% - 3.02% | | | | 6/2013 - 6/2017 | |
Washington Street Investment | | | 12/17/2012 | | | | 264,000 | | | | 330,000 | | | | 0.95% - 1.87% | | | | 12/2013 - 12/2017 | |
Washington Street Investment | | | 12/17/2012 | | | | 52,000 | | | | 65,000 | | | | 0.95% - 1.87% | | | | 12/2013 - 12/2017 | |
PFI | | | 11/15/2013 | | | | 9,000 | | | | - | | | | 2.24% | | | | 12/15/2018 | |
PFI | | | 11/15/2013 | | | | 23,000 | | | | - | | | | 3.19% | | | | 12/15/2020 | |
Prudential Insurance | | | 12/6/2013 | | | | 120,000 | | | | - | | | | 2.60% | | | | 12/15/2018 | |
Prudential Insurance | | | 12/6/2013 | | | | 130,000 | | | | - | | | | 4.39% | | | | 12/15/2023 | |
Prudential Insurance | | | 12/6/2013 | | | | 250,000 | | | | - | | | | 3.64% | | | | 12/15/2020 | |
Pru Funding, LLC | | | 12/31/2013 | | | | 2,900 | | | | - | | | | 0.23% | | | | 1/7/2014 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Loans Payable to Affiliates | | | | | | $ | 1,866,900 | | | $ | 1,783,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The total interest expense to the Company related to loans payable to affiliates was $40.2 million, $43.7 million, and $33.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Contributed Capital and Dividends
In July and December of 2013 the Company paid dividends in the amounts of $155 million and $268 million respectively to Prudential Insurance.
| 14. | QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) |
The unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | March 31 | | | June 30 | | | September 30 | | | December 31 | |
| | | | |
| | | (in thousands) | |
| | | | |
2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 690,333 | | | $ | 656,314 | | | $ | 681,086 | | | $ | 668,041 | |
Total benefits and expenses | | | 235,444 | | | | 229,901 | | | | (178,013 | ) | | | 303,812 | |
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes | | | 454,889 | | | | 426,413 | | | | 859,099 | | | | 364,229 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 347,055 | | | $ | 311,997 | | | $ | 577,646 | | | $ | 301,512 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 498,074 | | | $ | 561,203 | | | $ | 540,685 | | | $ | 624,315 | |
Total benefits and expenses | | | (140,737 | ) | | | 1,054,097 | | | | 181,818 | | | | 263,722 | |
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes | | | 638,811 | | | | (492,894 | ) | | | 358,867 | | | | 360,593 | |
Net income (loss) | | $ | 461,304 | | | $ | (353,363 | ) | | $ | 315,599 | | | $ | 260,797 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
99
