UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-04409
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
(Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(registrant’s Telephone Number)
September 30
Date of Fiscal Year End
March 31, 2010
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Semiannual Report March 31, 2010 EATON VANCE NATIONAL MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy only applies to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e. fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/ broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio (if applicable) will file a schedule of its portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Economic and Market Conditions
During the six months ending March 31, 2010, the U.S. economy and the capital markets remained relatively stable, despite continued high unemployment and concerns over the U.S. budget. The economy grew at an annualized rate of 5.7% in the fourth quarter of 2009 and an estimated 3.2% in the first quarter of 2010, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.
![(PHOTO OF THOMAS M. METZOLD)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000950123-10-052862/b81007a1b8036702.jpg)
Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
Portfolio Manager
During the six-month period, the municipal bond market’s performance was relatively flat, with slightly negative returns in the fourth quarter of 2009 being offset by positive performance of just over 1% in the first quarter of 2010. For the period, the Fund’s primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index)—a broad-based index of municipal bonds—gained 0.28%.1 This modest performance followed one of the best calendar year periods for municipals in many years, however. Moreover, economic fundamentals continued to improve and demand for municipals remained strong.
The significant performance disparities among the municipal market’s segments, which became historically wide during 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009, began to dissipate during the six-month period. For the first time in almost two years, we witnessed a period in which there were not significant differences in muni performance by maturity, credit quality and sector. In the face of limited tax-exempt supply due to the success of the Build America Bond program, demand from municipal investors remained positive during the period, though the gusto with which they purchased municipal funds waned from 2009 levels. We believe lighter inflows were likely driven by lower yields, a continuation of credit-related headline “noise” and investor preparation for tax bills in March and April.
Management Discussion
During the six months ending March 31, 2010, the Fund’s Class A shares at net asset value underperformed the Index.1 Given the combination of the Fund’s objective of providing tax-exempt income and the municipal yield curve’s historically upward slope, the Fund generally holds longer-maturity bonds relative to the broad market and many of our competitors. Our bias toward long maturities was the basis for much of the Fund’s significant relative outperformance in the first three quarters of 2009, though it detracted from relative performance during the six-month period. Careful investment down the credit spectrum, while aiding performance throughout much of 2009, also detracted during the period as the market’s highest quality bonds performed best.
Management employed leverage in the Fund, through which additional exposure to the municipal market was achieved. Leverage has the impact of magnifying a Fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets.2
As we move ahead, we recognize that many state and local governments face significant budget deficits that are driven primarily by a steep decline in tax revenues. We will continue to monitor any new developments as state and local officials formulate solutions to address these fiscal problems. As in all environments, we maintain our long-term perspective on the markets against the backdrop of relatively short periods of market volatility. We will continue to actively manage the Fund with the same income-focused, relative value approach we have always employed. We believe that this approach, which is based on credit research and decades of experience in the municipal market, will serve municipal investors well over the long term.
Effective December 1, 2009, the Fund changed its name from Eaton Vance National Municipals Fund to Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
2 | | The Fund employs residual interest bond (RIB) financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value). See Note 1I to the financial statements for more information on RIB investments. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
1
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EANAX | | EVHMX | | ECHMX | | EIHMX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
|
Six Months | | | -1.36 | % | | | -1.79 | % | | | -1.79 | % | | | -1.24 | % |
One Year | | | 25.06 | | | | 24.20 | | | | 24.20 | | | | 25.35 | |
Five Years | | | 2.39 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 2.66 | |
10 Years | | | 5.09 | | | | 4.49 | | | | 4.30 | | | | 5.33 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.68 | | | | 5.65 | | | | 4.15 | | | | 4.85 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
|
Six Months | | | -6.04 | % | | | -6.58 | % | | | -2.75 | % | | | -1.24 | % |
One Year | | | 19.07 | | | | 19.20 | | | | 23.20 | | | | 25.35 | |
Five Years | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.31 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 2.66 | |
10 Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.49 | | | | 4.30 | | | | 5.33 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.36 | | | | 5.65 | | | | 4.15 | | | | 4.85 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 4/5/94; Class B: 12/19/85; Class C: 12/3/93; Class I: 7/1/99 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.93 | % | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.68 | % | | | 0.67 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 5.41 | % | | | 4.72 | % | | | 4.72 | % | | | 5.64 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 8.32 | | | | 7.26 | | | | 7.26 | | | | 8.68 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 5.32 | | | | 4.83 | | | | 4.83 | | | | 5.84 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 8.18 | | | | 7.43 | | | | 7.43 | | | | 8.98 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital Long (22+) |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.43 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 17.35 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 3.96 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.01 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | | | | | |
Six Months | | | 0.05 | % | | | | |
One Year | | | 12.86 | | | | | |
Five Years | | | 3.18 | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.45 | | | | | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.23% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 35.00% federal income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 245, 232, 187 and 155 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
2
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 11 to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 24.7 | % |
AA | | | 30.0 | % |
A | | | 24.7 | % |
BBB | | | 12.5 | % |
| | | | |
BB | | | 0.2 | % |
B | | | 3.1 | % |
CCC | | | 0.4 | % |
Not Rated | | | 4.4 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 323 | |
• Average Maturity: | | 26.2 | years |
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 20.4 | years |
• Average Call Protection: | | 11.0 | years |
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 89.26 | |
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 13.9 | % |
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 11 to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 11 to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
3
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (October 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in each table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $986.40 | | | | $3.91 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $982.10 | | | | $7.61 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $982.10 | | | | $7.61 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $987.60 | | | | $2.73 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.00 | | | | $3.98 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.30 | | | | $7.75 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.30 | | | | $7.75 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,022.20 | | | | $2.77 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.79% for Class A shares, 1.54% for Class B shares, 1.54% for Class C shares and 0.55% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
4
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 114.1% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cogeneration — 0.6% |
|
$ | 22,150 | | | Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19 | | $ | 22,157,088 | | | |
| 3,800 | | | Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.50%, 1/1/13 | | | 2,253,514 | | | |
| 21,950 | | | Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.60%, 1/1/19 | | | 12,204,858 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), Junior Liens, (AMT), 6.875%, 1/1/11(1) | | | 427,500 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), Junior Liens, (AMT), 6.95%, 1/1/21(1) | | | 1,429,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 38,472,360 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Education — 6.4% |
|
$ | 15,095 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Claremont McKenna College), 5.00%, 1/1/39 | | $ | 15,470,111 | | | |
| 47,500 | | | Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Yale University), 4.85%, 7/1/37(2) | | | 48,826,485 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Yale University), 4.85%, 7/1/37 | | | 2,569,800 | | | |
| 29,320 | | | Houston, TX, Higher Educational Finance Corp., (Rice University), 4.50%, 11/15/37 | | | 29,346,681 | | | |
| 31,000 | | | Houston, TX, Higher Educational Finance Corp., (Rice University), 4.50%, 5/15/42 | | | 30,867,940 | | | |
| 6,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(2) | | | 6,335,740 | | | |
| 50,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36(2)(3) | | | 55,633,750 | | | |
| 52,190 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36(4) | | | 58,070,247 | | | |
| 4,750 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5.50%, 7/1/36 | | | 5,272,595 | | | |
| 45,615 | | | Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington University), 5.375%, 3/15/39(2) | | | 49,673,671 | | | |
| 20,865 | | | New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Princeton University), 4.25%, 7/1/40 | | | 20,428,713 | | | |
| 14,590 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Vassar College), 4.25%, 7/1/39 | | | 14,086,645 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Vassar College), 5.00%, 7/1/46 | | | 10,299,500 | | | |
| 15,000 | | | North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Duke University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(2) | | | 15,793,950 | | | |
| 16,175 | | | St. Joseph County, IN, Educational Facilities, (University of Notre Dame Du Lac Project), 5.00%, 3/1/36 | | | 17,077,403 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 379,753,231 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 2.4% |
|
$ | 9,260 | | | Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas Energy Co.), (AMT), 5.40%, 5/1/29 | | $ | 4,464,894 | | | |
| 32,500 | | | Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas Energy Co.), (AMT), 8.25%, 5/1/33 | | | 20,239,375 | | | |
| 12,050 | | | Long Island, NY, Electric Power Authority, 5.75%, 4/1/39 | | | 13,126,788 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (Reliant Energy), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/1/30 | | | 4,912,950 | | | |
| 42,200 | | | San Antonio, TX, (Electric and Gas Systems), 5.00%, 2/1/34(2) | | | 44,460,654 | | | |
| 50,975 | | | Vernon, CA, Electric System Revenue, 5.125%, 8/1/21 | | | 52,917,148 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 140,121,809 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.1% |
|
$ | 2,400 | | | Bexar County, TX, Health Facilities, (St. Luke’s Lutheran), Escrowed to Maturity, 7.00%, 5/1/21 | | $ | 3,233,256 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,233,256 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 11.8% |
|
$ | 24,490 | | | California, 5.50%, 11/1/39 | | $ | 24,453,266 | | | |
| 32,360 | | | California, 6.00%, 4/1/38 | | | 34,083,170 | | | |
| 15,690 | | | California, (AMT), 5.05%, 12/1/36 | | | 14,101,544 | | | |
| 94,200 | | | Clark County, NV, 5.00%, 6/1/38(2) | | | 94,884,834 | | | |
| 60,945 | | | Florida Board of Education, 5.00%, 6/1/37(2) | | | 62,962,889 | | | |
| 20,230 | | | Maricopa County, AZ, Community College District, 3.00%, 7/1/23(4) | | | 18,726,506 | | | |
| 56,000 | | | Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, 9.50%, 8/20/10 | | | 55,927,760 | | | |
| 5,275 | | | Newton, MA, 5.00%, 4/1/36 | | | 5,639,555 | | | |
| 11,480 | | | Newton, MA, 5.00%, 4/1/39 | | | 12,228,840 | | | |
| 41,620 | | | Port Authority of Houston, TX, (Harris County), (AMT), 5.625%, 10/1/38(2) | | | 43,638,570 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Port Authority of Houston, TX, (Harris County), (AMT), 5.625%, 10/1/38 | | | 10,484,900 | | | |
| 3,085 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/22 | | | 1,798,740 | | | |
| 19,395 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/24 | | | 10,073,763 | | | |
| 12,960 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/25 | | | 6,366,341 | | | |
| 12,910 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/26 | | | 5,994,888 | | | |
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
General Obligations (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 11,290 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/27 | | $ | 4,941,746 | | | |
| 9,970 | | | Salem-Keizer, OR, School District No. 24J, 0.00%, 6/15/28 | | | 4,129,973 | | | |
| 36,300 | | | San Francisco, CA, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, (Election of 2004), 4.75%, 8/1/37(2) | | | 36,939,062 | | | |
| 57,400 | | | Santa Clara County, CA, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/39(2)(3) | | | 60,121,621 | | | |
| 76,095 | | | Texas, (Transportation Commission-Mobility Fund), 4.50%, 4/1/32 | | | 76,272,301 | | | |
| 115,000 | | | Texas, (Transportation Commission-Mobility Fund), 4.50%, 4/1/33(2) | | | 114,105,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 697,875,569 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 0.1% |
|
$ | 797 | | | Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Community Provider Pooled Loan), 7.75%, 7/1/17 | | $ | 796,936 | | | |
| 1,169 | | | Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 5.50%, 12/1/36(5) | | | 1,196,146 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 5.875%, 12/1/36(5) | | | 1,280,396 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,273,478 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hospital — 15.4% |
|
$ | 34,260 | | | Alabama Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Ascension Health), 5.00%, 11/15/39(2) | | $ | 34,488,514 | | | |
| 6,125 | | | Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority, (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 5.375%, 8/15/29 | | | 6,253,441 | | | |
| 16,640 | | | Allegheny County, PA, Hospital Development Authority, (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 5.50%, 8/15/34 | | | 16,894,426 | | | |
| 18,600 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/32 | | | 18,923,268 | | | |
| 36,700 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Providence Health System), 5.50%, 10/1/39(2)(3) | | | 38,272,045 | | | |
| 49,110 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 11/15/46 | | | 46,487,035 | | | |
| 11,000 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Huntington Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/35 | | | 10,338,790 | | | |
| 10,670 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 7/1/29 | | | 10,475,166 | | | |
| 7,145 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36 | | | 6,812,686 | | | |
| 19,785 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.125%, 7/1/39 | | | 19,072,146 | | | |
| 68,805 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.00%, 3/1/41 | | | 64,198,505 | | | |
| 59,525 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 11/15/48 | | | 56,205,886 | | | |
| 5,095 | | | Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/25 | | | 4,551,771 | | | |
| 12,725 | | | Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35 | | | 10,480,437 | | | |
| 14,320 | | | Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.25%, 2/15/27 | | | 12,935,686 | | | |
| 11,665 | | | Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Catholic Health Initiatives), 4.50%, 9/1/38 | | | 10,935,938 | | | |
| 49,020 | | | Fairfax County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, (Inova Health System), 5.50%, 5/15/35(2) | | | 51,454,333 | | | |
| 42,470 | | | Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Adventist Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/36 | | | 42,585,094 | | | |
| 53,260 | | | Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare), 7.75%, 8/15/34 | | | 60,066,095 | | | |
| 35,300 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (MedStar Health), 4.75%, 5/15/42 | | | 31,717,403 | | | |
| 18,900 | | | Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (Henry Ford Health System), 5.25%, 11/15/46 | | | 16,924,572 | | | |
| 20,655 | | | Michigan Hospital Finance Authority, (McLaren Healthcare), 5.00%, 8/1/35 | | | 19,170,938 | | | |
| 54,300 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36(2) | | | 55,287,988 | | | |
| 12,795 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center), 5.625%, 7/1/37 | | | 12,609,600 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Oneida County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Elizabeth Medical Center), 6.00%, 12/1/29 | | | 3,783,560 | | | |
| 4,065 | | | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando Health, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/26 | | | 4,011,586 | | | |
| 4,150 | | | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando Health, Inc.), 5.375%, 10/1/23 | | | 4,247,650 | | | |
| 41,400 | | | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando Health, Inc.), 5.375%, 10/1/41 | | | 40,690,404 | | | |
| 63,000 | | | South Miami, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Baptist Health), 5.00%, 8/15/37(2) | | | 61,439,490 | | | |
| 75,000 | | | South Miami, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Baptist Health), 5.00%, 8/15/42(2) | | | 72,094,500 | | | |
| 23,690 | | | Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board, (Wellmont Health System), Variable Rate, 5.44%, 9/1/32(13) | | | 21,636,551 | | | |
| 16,675 | | | Washington Township Health Care District, 6.25%, 7/1/39 | | | 17,435,213 | | | |
| 10,480 | | | West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, (United Health System), 5.50%, 6/1/34 | | | 10,409,889 | | | |
| 6,685 | | | West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, (United Health System), 5.50%, 6/1/39 | | | 6,693,958 | | | |
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Hospital (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 8,475 | | | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.125%, 8/15/30 | | $ | 7,563,344 | | | |
| 8,865 | | | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare), 5.25%, 8/15/31 | | | 7,941,888 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 915,089,796 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 4.6% |
|
$ | 6,540 | | | Arkansas Development Finance Authority, MFMR, (Park Apartments), (AMT), 5.95%, 12/1/28 | | $ | 4,173,632 | | | |
| 22,350 | | | California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.75%, 8/1/42 | | | 18,271,796 | | | |
| 35,320 | | | California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.60%, 8/1/38 | | | 33,773,337 | | | |
| 8,215 | | | Lake Creek, CO, (Affordable Housing Corp.), 6.25%, 12/1/23 | | | 8,206,621 | | | |
| 14,375 | | | New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, Multi-Family Housing, (AMT), 6.20%, 7/1/36 | | | 11,765,219 | | | |
| 26,130 | | | New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, Single Family Housing, (AMT), 4.625%, 10/1/27 | | | 25,472,047 | | | |
| 10,640 | | | Texas Student Housing Corp., (University of Northern Texas), 6.85%, 7/1/31 | | | 7,751,134 | | | |
| 22,005 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 4.90%, 1/1/33 | | | 22,033,606 | | | |
| 23,335 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.20%, 10/1/26(2) | | | 24,159,192 | | | |
| 26,900 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.30%, 7/1/35 | | | 27,506,595 | | | |
| 40,250 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.875%, 7/1/35 | | | 42,179,182 | | | |
| 6,940 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), Variable Rate, 31.756%, 10/1/35(5)(6)(7) | | | 7,990,577 | | | |
| 18,345 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, Series A, (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/35 | | | 18,595,409 | | | |
| 18,750 | | | Virginia Housing Development Authority, Series A1, (AMT), 5.10%, 10/1/35 | | | 19,005,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 270,884,284 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 8.6% |
|
$ | 6,365 | | | Austin, TX, (CargoPort Development LLC), (AMT), 8.30%, 10/1/21 | | $ | 6,162,147 | | | |
| 1,980 | | | Broward County, FL, (Lynxs CargoPort), (AMT), 6.75%, 6/1/19 | | | 1,745,449 | | | |
| 2,460 | | | Capital Trust Agency, FL, (Fort Lauderdale Project), (AMT), 5.75%, 1/1/32 | | | 2,075,379 | | | |
| 14,360 | | | Denver, CO, City and County Special Facilities, (United Airlines), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/32 | | | 11,157,002 | | | |
| 37,970 | | | Denver, CO, City and County Special Facilities, (United Airlines), (AMT), 5.75%, 10/1/32 | | | 31,586,863 | | | |
| 5,050 | | | Hardeman County, TN, (Correctional Facilities Corp.), 7.75%, 8/1/17 | | | 4,757,858 | | | |
| 10 | | | Hawaii Department of Transportation Special Facilities, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 7.00%, 6/1/20 | | | 9,786 | | | |
| 40,000 | | | Houston, TX, Airport System, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 6.75%, 7/1/29 | | | 39,444,000 | | | |
| 60,000 | | | Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35 | | | 60,760,800 | | | |
| 49,635 | | | Liberty Development Corp., NY, (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.50%, 10/1/37(8) | | | 52,099,874 | | | |
| 200 | | | Lowndes County, MS, (Weyerhaeuser), 6.80%, 4/1/22 | | | 212,668 | | | |
| 175 | | | Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Air Cargo), (AMT), 7.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 144,081 | | | |
| 5,025 | | | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (American Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 7.10%, 11/1/31 | | | 4,142,711 | | | |
| 18,820 | | | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 6.25%, 9/15/29 | | | 17,615,332 | | | |
| 4,950 | | | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.00%, 6/1/33 | | | 5,247,099 | | | |
| 53,150 | | | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New Jersey American Water Co.), (AMT), 5.70%, 10/1/39 | | | 53,467,306 | | | |
| 36,000 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 7.625%, 8/1/25 | | | 36,469,440 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 7.75%, 8/1/31 | | | 3,037,050 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.00%, 8/1/12 | | | 10,211,600 | | | |
| 12,000 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.00%, 8/1/28 | | | 12,400,080 | | | |
| 12,500 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.50%, 8/1/28 | | | 12,859,500 | | | |
| 149,105 | | | St. John Baptist Parish, LA, (Marathon Oil Corp.), 5.125%, 6/1/37 | | | 140,614,961 | | | |
| 1,600 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 1,436,256 | | | |
| 300 | | | Warren County, MS, (International Paper), (AMT), 6.70%, 8/1/18 | | | 303,294 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 507,960,536 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Bond Bank — 0.0% |
|
$ | 435 | | | Mississippi Development Bank, (Capital Projects), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/24 | | $ | 421,097 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 421,097 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 0.1% |
|
$ | 9,145 | | | Broward County, FL, Educational Facilities Authority, (Nova Southeastern University), (AGC), 4.50%, 4/1/36 | | $ | 8,508,874 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,508,874 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 2.5% |
|
$ | 20,000 | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Pacific Gas and Electric Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.75%, 12/1/23 | | $ | 19,394,200 | | | |
| 49,815 | | | Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.60%, 5/1/26 | | | 45,176,227 | | | |
| 40,660 | | | Long Island, NY, Power Authority, (BHAC), 5.50%, 5/1/33 | | | 44,455,205 | | | |
| 38,190 | | | Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (AEP Texas Central Co.), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.20%, 5/1/30 | | | 36,581,819 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 145,607,451 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 5.2% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | California, (AGC), 4.75%, 9/1/35 | | $ | 4,666,450 | | | |
| 8,485 | | | California, (AGM), 3.25%, 12/1/28 | | | 6,384,708 | | | |
| 23,610 | | | Clark County, NV, (AMBAC), (BHAC), 3.50%, 11/1/27 | | | 20,398,096 | | | |
| 92,810 | | | District of Columbia, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.50%, 6/1/37 | | | 89,834,511 | | | |
| 70,675 | | | District of Columbia, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.75%, 6/1/33 | | | 71,054,525 | | | |
| 12,250 | | | Frisco, TX, Independent School District, (AGM), (PSF Guranteed), 3.75%, 8/15/38(4) | | | 10,758,685 | | | |
| 4,425 | | | Geary County, KS, Unified School District No. 475, (NPFG), 3.00%, 9/1/26 | | | 3,566,506 | | | |
| 13,625 | | | Kendall Kane and Will Counties, IL, Community Unit School District No. 308, (AGM), 0.00%, 2/1/21 | | | 8,235,222 | | | |
| 51,625 | | | Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, (Election of 2005), (AGM), 4.75%, 7/1/32(2) | | | 50,103,095 | | | |
| 7,055 | | | Montgomery County, TX, (Municipal Utility District No. 46 Waterworks and Sewer), (AMBAC), 4.00%, 3/1/30 | | | 6,463,368 | | | |
| 10,655 | | | San Juan, CA, Unified School District, (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/24 | | | 4,697,683 | | | |
| 31,565 | | | Texas, (Transportation Commission-Mobility Fund), (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.50%, 4/1/35 | | | 31,424,220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 307,587,069 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 1.0% |
|
$ | 110 | | | Hinds County, MS, (Mississippi Methodist Hospital), (AMBAC), 5.60%, 5/1/12 | | $ | 111,859 | | | |
| 1,305 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/42 | | | 1,296,374 | | | |
| 38,800 | | | Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Lifebridge Health), (AGC), 4.75%, 7/1/47(2) | | | 37,761,324 | | | |
| 4,675 | | | Medford, OR, Hospital Facilities Authority, (Asante Health System), (AGM), 4.75%, 8/15/36 | | | 4,541,903 | | | |
| 12,000 | | | Medford, OR, Hospital Facilities Authority, (Asante Health System), (AGM), 5.50%, 8/15/28 | | | 12,851,520 | | | |
| 6 | | | Osceola County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, Community Provider Pooled Loan-93 Program, (AGM), 7.75%, 7/1/10 | | | 6,035 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Ministry Health Care), (NPFG), 5.125%, 2/15/22 | | | 5,005,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 61,574,665 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Housing — 0.2% |
|
$ | 3,000 | | | Florida Housing Finance Authority, (Brittany of Rosemont), (AMBAC), (AMT), 6.875%, 8/1/26 | | $ | 3,004,440 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (Rental Housing Program), (AGM), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/49 | | | 10,144,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,149,340 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.3% |
|
$ | 83,305 | | | Hudson Yards, NY, Infrastructure Corp., (NPFG), 4.50%, 2/15/47 | | $ | 72,217,104 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Jackson County, MO, (Harry S. Truman Sports Complex), (AMBAC), 4.50%, 12/1/31 | | | 1,721,335 | | | |
| 250 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 300,215 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 74,238,654 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 5.0% |
|
$ | 89,160 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, (AGC), 5.00%, 6/1/45 | | $ | 82,250,100 | | | |
| 46,605 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, (AGM), 0.00%, 6/1/25 | | | 19,113,643 | | | |
| 50,700 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, (AGM), 0.00%, 6/1/26 | | | 19,349,148 | | | |
| 68,155 | | | Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/34 | | | 12,554,833 | | | |
| 25,000 | | | Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/41 | | | 2,597,750 | | | |
| 1,535 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AGC), 4.50%, 1/1/39 | | | 1,503,364 | | | |
| 11,725 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AGC), 6.375%, 1/1/39 | | | 12,863,849 | | | |
| 6,085 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AGC), 6.50%, 1/1/46 | | | 6,702,262 | | | |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 50,000 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 7.00%, 3/1/49 | | $ | 57,571,500 | | | |
| 53,135 | | | New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (NPFG), 4.75%, 3/1/46 | | | 48,060,607 | | | |
| 36,470 | | | New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.25%, 1/15/34 | | | 34,664,006 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 297,231,062 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Ports — 0.5% |
|
$ | 36,915 | | | Alabama State Dock Authority, (NPFG), (AMT), 4.50%, 10/1/36 | | $ | 30,073,912 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 30,073,912 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 7.8% |
|
$ | 17,105 | | | Baldwin County, AL, Board of Education, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 7/1/37 | | $ | 16,303,289 | | | |
| 13,305 | | | Illinois Sports Facility Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 6/15/23 | | | 6,703,591 | | | |
| 31,010 | | | Illinois Sports Facility Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 6/15/24 | | | 14,637,960 | | | |
| 9,500 | | | Illinois Sports Facility Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 6/15/25 | | | 4,206,505 | | | |
| 37,080 | | | Louisiana Gas and Fuels Tax, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.50%, 5/1/41 | | | 36,168,944 | | | |
| 945 | | | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, (NPFG), 4.00%, 7/1/33 | | | 890,927 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC) (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/29 | | | 11,325,000 | | | |
| 6,000 | | | Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/30 | | | 6,787,680 | | | |
| 14,715 | | | Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place Expansion), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/15/24 | | | 6,625,870 | | | |
| 106,655 | | | Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place Expansion), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/15/32 | | | 27,986,272 | | | |
| 84,310 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 0.00%, 10/1/35 | | | 17,990,911 | | | |
| 218,400 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 0.00%, 10/1/44 | | | 25,354,056 | | | |
| 156,345 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 0.00%, 10/1/45 | | | 16,935,290 | | | |
| 70,970 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 0.00%, 10/1/48 | | | 6,170,132 | | | |
| 189,025 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 0.00%, 4/1/49 | | | 15,817,612 | | | |
| 29,200 | | | New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45 | | | 27,482,164 | | | |
| 5,905 | | | New York Urban Development Corp., Personal Income Tax, (NPFG), 4.50%, 3/15/37 | | | 5,912,736 | | | |
| 615 | | | Opa-Locka, FL, Capital Improvement, (FGIC), (NPFG), 7.00%, 1/1/14 | | | 617,921 | | | |
| 1,729,830 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 103,115,166 | | | |
| 156,820 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 19,108,517 | | | |
| 311,055 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 35,220,758 | | | |
| 248,550 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 26,045,555 | | | |
| 5,900 | | | Regional Transportation Authority, LA, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/15 | | | 4,510,432 | | | |
| 9,300 | | | Regional Transportation Authority, LA, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/21 | | | 4,715,472 | | | |
| 31,935 | | | San Jose, CA, Redevelopment Agency, (Merged Area Redevelopment Project), (XLCA), 4.25%, 8/1/36 | | | 23,800,836 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 464,433,596 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Student Loan — 2.0% |
|
$ | 61,620 | | | Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AGC), (AMT), 6.35%, 1/1/30 | | $ | 62,857,329 | | | |
| 9,435 | | | Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/27 | | | 8,673,124 | | | |
| 50,190 | | | Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/33 | | | 43,315,978 | | | |
| 6,150 | | | New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority, (AGC), (AMT), 6.125%, 6/1/30 | | | 6,490,587 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 121,337,018 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 9.1% |
|
$ | 40,910 | | | Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AGM), 4.50%, 1/1/38 | | $ | 39,278,509 | | | |
| 9,895 | | | Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AGM), (AMT), 5.25%, 1/1/30 | | | 9,846,020 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Chicago, IL, (O’Hare International Airport), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.375%, 1/1/32 | | | 9,792,000 | | | |
| 45,785 | | | Clark County, NV, Airport Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/36 | | | 45,122,949 | | | |
| 18,150 | | | Dallas-Fort Worth, TX, International Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/1/32 | | | 18,149,274 | | | |
| 13,335 | | | E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/37 | | | 1,947,310 | | | |
| 22,385 | | | E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/38 | | | 3,017,498 | | | |
| 57,355 | | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/38 | | | 56,624,297 | | | |
| 7,620 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), (AGC), (CIFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/38 | | | 7,210,958 | | | |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Transportation (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 52,480 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), (AGM), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/41 | | $ | 51,372,147 | | | |
| 104,265 | | | North Texas Tollway Authority, (AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/33 | | | 28,020,176 | | | |
| 58,690 | | | North Texas Tollway Authority, (AGC), 0.00%, 1/1/42 | | | 43,896,012 | | | |
| 27,420 | | | North Texas Tollway Authority, (BHAC), 5.75%, 1/1/48 | | | 28,950,859 | | | |
| 26,520 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGC), (AMT), 4.50%, 9/1/35 | | | 25,134,330 | | | |
| 20,745 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), (AMT), 4.25%, 12/1/32 | | | 18,596,025 | | | |
| 13,575 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGM), (AMT), 4.50%, 12/1/36 | | | 12,809,370 | | | |
| 1,180 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2) | | | 1,214,946 | | | |
| 39,705 | | | San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 3/1/37 | | | 39,412,771 | | | |
| 21,420 | | | San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/47(3) | | | 22,654,649 | | | |
| 15,270 | | | Tampa-Hillsborough County, FL, Expressway Authority, (AMBAC), 4.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 13,087,306 | | | |
| 46,300 | | | Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/22 | | | 22,142,049 | | | |
| 39,980 | | | Texas Turnpike Authority, (Central Texas Turnpike System), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 8/15/38 | | | 40,506,537 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 538,785,992 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 2.3% |
|
$ | 10,445 | | | Castaic Lake, CA, Water Agency, Certificates of Participation, (Water System Improvements), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/21 | | $ | 5,639,987 | | | |
| 150 | | | Gautier, MS, Utility District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.125%, 3/1/19 | | | 152,275 | | | |
| 36,655 | | | Louisville and Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Sewer District and Drainage System, (AGC), 4.25%, 5/15/38 | | | 35,627,194 | | | |
| 14,205 | | | Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.25%, 8/1/35 | | | 15,920,396 | | | |
| 42,630 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Finance Authority, (AGM), (BHAC), 4.25%, 6/15/39 | | | 42,120,998 | | | |
| 18,325 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Finance Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 4.50%, 6/15/39 | | | 18,118,111 | | | |
| 19,670 | | | Spartanburg, SC, Sanitation Sewer District, (NPFG), 4.00%, 3/1/40 | | | 16,314,691 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 133,893,652 | | | |
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.7% |
|
$ | 38,660 | | | Mohave County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Mohave Prison LLC), 8.00%, 5/1/25 | | $ | 43,993,534 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 43,993,534 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nursing Home — 0.8% |
|
$ | 8,775 | | | Hillsborough County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Tampa Bay Retirement Center), 8.00%, 6/1/25 | | $ | 7,707,872 | | | |
| 11,955 | | | Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (Age Institute of Massachusetts), 8.05%, 11/1/25 | | | 11,965,401 | | | |
| 10,960 | | | Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Magnolia Healthcare), 7.99%, 7/1/25 | | | 9,200,811 | | | |
| 9,685 | | | Montgomery County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, (Advancement of Geriatric Health Care Institute), 8.375%, 7/1/23 | | | 9,693,813 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster Community Care), 6.60%, 4/1/24 | | | 3,463,530 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Westminster Community Care), 6.75%, 4/1/34 | | | 3,350,130 | | | |
| 1,915 | | | Westmoreland County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, (Highland Health Systems, Inc.), 9.25%, 6/1/22 | | | 1,607,987 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 46,989,544 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 8.9% |
|
$ | 15,450 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/32 | | $ | 3,761,612 | | | |
| 21,365 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/33 | | | 4,773,368 | | | |
| 12,345 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/34 | | | 2,586,154 | | | |
| 5,470 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/35 | | | 1,074,472 | | | |
| 12,735 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.00%, 7/15/30 | | | 13,098,202 | | | |
| 14,295 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.25%, 7/15/40 | | | 14,799,042 | | | |
| 7,785 | | | Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.375%, 7/15/43 | | | 8,059,032 | | | |
| 762,795 | | | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, OH, 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 27,338,573 | | | |
| 6,800 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/50 | | | 254,320 | | | |
| 2,195 | | | Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55 | | | 42,056 | | | |
| 79,230 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.00%, 6/1/45 | | | 67,976,963 | | | |
| 33,100 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, 5.75%, 6/1/47 | | | 23,449,364 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Main Street National Gas, Inc., GA, 5.50%, 9/15/28 | | | 9,953,800 | | | |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Other Revenue (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 40,855 | | | Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.00%, 6/1/48 | | $ | 31,691,632 | | | |
| 27,650 | | | Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, 6.875%, 6/1/42 | | | 24,764,999 | | | |
| 69,800 | | | New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, (Building Aid), 4.50%, 1/15/38 | | | 68,065,470 | | | |
| 12,000 | | | Non-Profit Preferred Funding Trust, Various States, 4.47%, 9/15/37(5) | | | 9,290,760 | | | |
| 19,000 | | | Non-Profit Preferred Funding Trust, Various States, 4.72%, 9/15/37(5) | | | 14,077,480 | | | |
| 21,350 | | | Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp., AK, 0.00%, 6/1/46 | | | 928,298 | | | |
| 20,625 | | | Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/37 | | | 18,030,994 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Seminole Tribe, FL, 5.25%, 10/1/27(5) | | | 903,960 | | | |
| 2,100 | | | Seminole Tribe, FL, 5.75%, 10/1/22(5) | | | 2,048,886 | | | |
| 23,300 | | | Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, 0.00%, 6/1/36 | | | 2,374,969 | | | |
| 15,000 | | | Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, 0.00%, 6/1/41 | | | 976,500 | | | |
| 27,555 | | | Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Class A, 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 1,060,316 | | | |
| 14,000 | | | Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, CA, Class B, 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 538,720 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/20 | | | 4,983,150 | | | |
| 9,750 | | | Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp., Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/22 | | | 9,648,990 | | | |
| 59,320 | | | Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp., 5.625%, 12/15/17 | | | 63,792,728 | | | |
| 55,270 | | | Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp., 6.25%, 12/15/26 | | | 60,200,637 | | | |
| 32,000 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, 5.00%, 6/1/41 | | | 20,702,080 | | | |
| 102,710 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., VA, 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 3,923,522 | | | |
| 13,070 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., VA, 5.00%, 6/1/47 | | | 8,807,742 | | | |
| 1,775 | | | Tobacco Settlement Management Authority, SC, Escrowed to Maturity, 6.375%, 5/15/30 | | | 2,135,627 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 526,114,418 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pooled Loans — 0.4% |
|
$ | 25,530 | | | Rickenbacker Port Authority, OH, Oasbo Expanded Asset Pool Loan, 5.375%, 1/1/32 | | $ | 26,478,184 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,478,184 | | | |
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 0.6% |
|
$ | 6,035 | | | Arizona Health Facilities Authority, (Care Institute, Inc. - Mesa), 7.625%, 1/1/26(9) | | $ | 4,037,596 | | | |
| 9,345 | | | New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Forsgate), (AMT), 8.625%, 6/1/25(10) | | | 6,352,170 | | | |
| 16,435 | | | North Miami, FL, Health Care Facilities Authority, (Imperial Club), 6.125%, 1/1/42(10) | | | 9,118,138 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Plantation Health Facilities Authority, FL, (Covenant Village of Florida), 5.125%, 12/1/22 | | | 1,673,630 | | | |
| 7,915 | | | Roseville, MN, Elder Care Facility, (Care Institute, Inc. - Roseville), 7.75%, 11/1/23(9) | | | 5,665,161 | | | |
| 12,140 | | | St. Paul, MN, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Care Institute, Inc. - Highland), 8.75%, 11/1/24(9) | | | 9,452,083 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 36,298,778 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 1.6% |
|
$ | 215 | | | Covington Park, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/21 | | $ | 214,809 | | | |
| 1,180 | | | Covington Park, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/31 | | | 1,079,334 | | | |
| 12,705 | | | Denver, CO, Urban Renewal Authority, 8.00%, 12/1/24 | | | 11,964,552 | | | |
| 405 | | | Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District, 5.00%, 11/1/10 | | | 353,707 | | | |
| 530 | | | Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District, 5.00%, 5/1/12 | | | 389,603 | | | |
| 970 | | | Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District, 5.375%, 5/1/37 | | | 717,490 | | | |
| 940 | | | Fish Hawk, FL, Community Development District, 6.125%, 5/1/34 | | | 864,227 | | | |
| 220 | | | Gateway Services, FL, Community Development District, 6.50%, 5/1/33 | | | 203,469 | | | |
| 630 | | | Heritage Harbor South, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 6.20%, 5/1/35 | | | 609,745 | | | |
| 455 | | | Heritage Harbor South, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 6.50%, 5/1/34 | | | 455,610 | | | |
| 1,175 | | | Heritage Springs, FL, Community Development District, 5.25%, 5/1/26 | | | 1,023,378 | | | |
| 180 | | | Longleaf, FL, Community Development District, 6.20%, 5/1/09(11) | | | 89,604 | | | |
| 28,830 | | | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 31,055,676 | | | |
| 880 | | | New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/13 | | | 351,648 | | | |
| 355 | | | New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.35%, 5/1/38 | | | 142,774 | | | |
| 1,105 | | | North Springs, FL, Improvement District, (Heron Bay), 5.20%, 5/1/27 | | | 721,543 | | | |
| 476,395 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | | | 24,972,626 | | | |
| 7,870 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 7,813,572 | | | |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Special Tax Revenue (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 2,210 | | | River Hall, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.45%, 5/1/36 | | $ | 1,067,784 | | | |
| 930 | | | Southern Hills Plantation I, FL, Community Development District, 5.80%, 5/1/35 | | | 474,811 | | | |
| 1,670 | | | Sterling Hill, FL, Community Development District, 6.20%, 5/1/35 | | | 1,525,812 | | | |
| 5,725 | | | University Square, FL, Community Development District, 6.75%, 5/1/20 | | | 5,733,988 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 91,825,762 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Student Loan — 0.5% |
|
$ | 14,800 | | | Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., 5.25%, 12/1/22 | | $ | 15,024,220 | | | |
| 14,470 | | | Iowa Student Loan Liquidity Corp., 5.50%, 12/1/27 | | | 14,533,379 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,557,599 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 10.6% |
|
$ | 2,345 | | | Florida Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, 6.10%, 10/1/22 | | $ | 2,198,883 | | | |
| 16,215 | | | Los Angeles, CA, Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/35(12) | | | 16,550,002 | | | |
| 19,475 | | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, 6.25%, 11/15/23 | | | 22,698,502 | | | |
| 5,225 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.375%, 10/1/35 | | | 5,298,254 | | | |
| 54,610 | | | Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.50%, 10/1/36 | | | 55,661,789 | | | |
| 170,330 | | | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/35 | | | 38,572,932 | | | |
| 91,425 | | | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 0.00%, 12/15/36 | | | 19,450,669 | | | |
| 168,580 | | | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 2008 series A, 0.00%, 12/15/38 | | | 31,851,505 | | | |
| 108,655 | | | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 2009 series A, 0.00%, 12/15/38 | | | 20,471,689 | | | |
| 55,250 | | | New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 5.875%, 12/15/38 | | | 60,376,647 | | | |
| 42,000 | | | New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/35 | | | 43,438,500 | | | |
| 66,265 | | | North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/38 | | | 68,007,107 | | | |
| 20,500 | | | Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/35 | | | 20,810,780 | | | |
| 24,500 | | | Orlando-Orange County, FL, Expressway Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/40 | | | 24,811,885 | | | |
| 13,285 | | | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5.50%, 12/1/41 | | | 13,840,047 | | | |
| 101,490 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.75%, 4/15/37(2) | | | 99,074,538 | | | |
| 28,890 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.25%, 9/15/23(2) | | | 29,837,207 | | | |
| 13,860 | | | Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39 | | | 14,469,147 | | | |
| 38,980 | | | Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, NY, 5.25%, 11/15/34(2) | | | 41,709,574 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 629,129,657 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 3.0% |
|
$ | 27,660 | | | Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 4.00%, 8/1/46 | | $ | 23,656,492 | | | |
| 34,800 | | | Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Waterworks Revenue Authorization), 5.00%, 7/1/37(2) | | | 36,246,288 | | | |
| 12,380 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 4.50%, 6/15/32 | | | 12,310,424 | | | |
| 6,360 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 4.50%, 6/15/38 | | | 6,289,404 | | | |
| 10,065 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.00%, 6/15/31 | | | 10,615,858 | | | |
| 39,990 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.25%, 6/15/40(2) | | | 42,787,700 | | | |
| 42,030 | | | New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.75%, 6/15/40(2) | | | 47,316,954 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 179,223,120 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 114.1% | | |
(identified cost $6,918,509,918) | | $ | 6,763,117,297 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.9% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 51,671 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 4/1/10 | | $ | 51,670,843 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.9% | | |
(identified cost $51,670,843) | | $ | 51,670,843 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 115.0% | | |
(identified cost $6,970,180,761) | | $ | 6,814,788,140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (15.0)% | | $ | (889,828,501 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 5,924,959,639 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF - Permanent School Fund
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
At March 31, 2010, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is as follows:
| | | | |
New York | | | 20.4% | |
California | | | 17.2% | |
Texas | | | 15.7% | |
Florida | | | 10.1% | |
Others, representing less than 10% individually | | | 51.6% | |
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 32.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.1% to 10.4% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Defaulted bond. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for inverse floating-rate security transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $48,067,696. |
|
(4) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(5) | | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions and remain exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At March 31, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $36,788,205 or 0.6% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(6) | | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is |
| | |
| | $27,760,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
|
(7) | | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at March 31, 2010. |
|
(8) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(9) | | Security is in default with respect to scheduled principal payments. |
|
(10) | | Security is in default and making only partial interest payments. |
|
(11) | | Defaulted matured bond. |
|
(12) | | When-issued security. |
|
(13) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at March 31, 2010. |
See notes to financial statements13
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $6,970,180,761) | | $ | 6,814,788,140 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 99,970,135 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 25,430,932 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 10,231,969 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 6,950,421,176 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 925,274,000 | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 45,532,027 | | | |
Payable for when-issued securities | | | 16,458,387 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 3,281,250 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 17,705,579 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 10,278,625 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 1,665,469 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 2,097,699 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 2,254,618 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 913,883 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,025,461,537 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,924,959,639 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 6,868,679,634 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (796,106,130 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 5,504,503 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (153,118,368 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,924,959,639 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 4,101,929,387 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 425,431,840 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.64 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 10.12 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 163,830,144 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 16,991,646 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.64 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,269,331,549 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 131,648,569 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.64 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 389,868,559 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 40,427,187 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.64 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended
| | | | | |
March 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 187,810,587 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 187,810,587 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 10,202,171 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 5,301,697 | | | |
Class B | | | 836,755 | | | |
Class C | | | 6,394,526 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 25,250 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 455,828 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 1,242,072 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 379,453 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 190,109 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 62,901 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 3,693,780 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 65,615 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 28,850,157 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 3,437 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 3,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 28,846,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 158,963,867 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 16,787,936 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 64,108 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 16,852,044 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (290,654,394 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 6,998,240 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (283,656,154 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (266,804,110 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (107,840,243 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements14
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 158,963,867 | | | $ | 318,013,350 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | 16,852,044 | | | | (561,344,164 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (283,656,154 | ) | | | 1,210,034,643 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (107,840,243 | ) | | $ | 966,703,829 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (114,289,031 | ) | | $ | (241,771,751 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (3,944,232 | ) | | | (7,752,057 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (30,143,693 | ) | | | (59,327,988 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (9,504,688 | ) | | | (10,957,709 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (157,881,644 | ) | | $ | (319,809,505 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 248,941,981 | | | $ | 1,130,529,917 | | | |
Class B | | | 7,186,211 | | | | 28,816,819 | | | |
Class C | | | 93,838,215 | | | | 341,933,286 | | | |
Class I | | | 272,204,451 | | | | 227,525,103 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 72,276,005 | | | | 145,210,084 | | | |
Class B | | | 2,262,837 | | | | 4,359,324 | | | |
Class C | | | 17,408,235 | | | | 33,405,104 | | | |
Class I | | | 4,655,283 | | | | 7,953,336 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (841,017,448 | ) | | | (1,124,693,895 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (13,241,787 | ) | | | (26,561,930 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (154,443,379 | ) | | | (286,833,537 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (95,755,937 | ) | | | (186,831,329 | ) | | |
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganizations (see Note 12) | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 193,731,072 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 22,585,159 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 4,387,977 | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 4,745,602 | | | | 6,198,976 | | | |
Class B | | | (4,745,602 | ) | | | (6,198,976 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (385,685,333 | ) | | $ | 515,516,490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | (651,407,220 | ) | | $ | 1,162,410,814 | | | |
|
|
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 6,576,366,859 | | | $ | 5,413,956,045 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 5,924,959,639 | | | $ | 6,576,366,859 | | | |
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | 5,504,503 | | | $ | 4,422,280 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | For The Six Months Ended
| | | |
Cash Flows From
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
Operating Activities | | (Unaudited) | | | |
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations | | $ | (107,840,243 | ) | | |
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
Investments purchased | | | (728,176,665 | ) | | |
Investments sold | | | 1,095,464,747 | | | |
Increase in short-term investments, net | | | (51,670,843 | ) | | |
Net accretion/amortization of premium (discount) | | | (19,243,391 | ) | | |
Decrease in interest receivable | | | 2,810,978 | | | |
Decrease in receivable for investments sold | | | 10,644,915 | | | |
Decrease in receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 1,750,000 | | | |
Decrease in payable for investments purchased | | | (17,667,970 | ) | | |
Increase in payable for when-issued securities | | | 16,458,387 | | | |
Increase in payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 3,281,250 | | | |
Decrease in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee | | | (102,857 | ) | | |
Decrease in payable to affiliate for distribution and service fees | | | (59,123 | ) | | |
Increase in interest expense and fees payable | | | 909,983 | | | |
Decrease in accrued expenses | | | (96,790 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments | | | 290,654,394 | | | |
Net realized gain from investments | | | (16,787,936 | ) | | |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 480,328,836 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
Proceeds from Fund shares sold | | $ | 630,967,074 | | | |
Fund shares redeemed | | | (1,101,966,430 | ) | | |
Distributions paid, net of reinvestments | | | (61,209,309 | ) | | |
Proceeds from secured borrowings | | | 124,860,000 | | | |
Repayment of secured borrowings | | | (65,695,000 | ) | | |
Decrease in demand note payable | | | (7,400,000 | ) | | |
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities | | $ | (480,443,665 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash | | $ | (114,829 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Cash at beginning of period | | $ | 114,829 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of: | | | | | | |
Reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | $ | 96,602,360 | | | |
Cash paid for interest and fees | | | 2,783,797 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements15
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | $ | 10.920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.261 | | | $ | 0.527 | | | $ | 0.533 | | | $ | 0.521 | | | $ | 0.565 | | | $ | 0.574 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.403 | ) | | | 0.984 | | | | (2.431 | ) | | | (0.290 | ) | | | 0.478 | | | | 0.355 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.142 | ) | | $ | 1.511 | | | $ | (1.898 | ) | | $ | 0.231 | | | $ | 1.043 | | | $ | 0.929 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.258 | ) | | $ | (0.531 | ) | | $ | (0.532 | ) | | $ | (0.521 | ) | | $ | (0.533 | ) | | $ | (0.579 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.258 | ) | | $ | (0.531 | ) | | $ | (0.532 | ) | | $ | (0.521 | ) | | $ | (0.533 | ) | | $ | (0.579 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.36 | )%(3) | | | 17.97 | % | | | (17.03 | )% | | | 1.95 | % | | | 9.50 | % | | | 8.69 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,101,929 | | | $ | 4,811,295 | | | $ | 3,987,956 | | | $ | 4,647,177 | | | $ | 3,259,363 | | | $ | 2,147,435 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.67 | %(4) | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.64 | % | | | 0.64 | %(5) | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.77 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.12 | %(4) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.44 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.79 | %(4) | | | 0.93 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 1.26 | %(5) | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.21 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.67 | %(4) | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.63 | %(5) | | | 0.71 | % | | | 0.76 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.44 | %(4) | | | 6.22 | % | | | 5.00 | % | | | 4.44 | % | | | 4.93 | % | | | 5.14 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(3) | | | 46 | % | | | 64 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 54 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements16
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | $ | 10.920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.225 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | $ | 0.454 | | | $ | 0.434 | | | $ | 0.478 | | | $ | 0.482 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.409 | ) | | | 0.992 | | | | (2.435 | ) | | | (0.290 | ) | | | 0.480 | | | | 0.364 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.184 | ) | | $ | 1.456 | | | $ | (1.981 | ) | | $ | 0.144 | | | $ | 0.958 | | | $ | 0.846 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.226 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.448 | ) | | $ | (0.496 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.226 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.448 | ) | | $ | (0.496 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.79 | )%(3) | | | 17.18 | % | | | (17.69 | )% | | | 1.20 | % | | | 8.69 | % | | | 8.15 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 163,830 | | | $ | 179,657 | | | $ | 138,052 | | | $ | 173,176 | | | $ | 140,593 | | | $ | 83,629 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.42 | %(5) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.39 | % | | | 1.39 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.52 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.12 | %(5) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.44 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 2.01 | %(6) | | | 2.08 | % | | | 1.96 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.42 | %(5) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | %(6) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.51 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.69 | %(5) | | | 5.48 | % | | | 4.25 | % | | | 3.69 | % | | | 4.17 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(3) | | | 46 | % | | | 64 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 54 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.19% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements17
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | $ | 10.920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.225 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | $ | 0.453 | | | $ | 0.431 | | | $ | 0.480 | | | $ | 0.486 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.409 | ) | | | 0.992 | | | | (2.434 | ) | | | (0.287 | ) | | | 0.478 | | | | 0.360 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.184 | ) | | $ | 1.456 | | | $ | (1.981 | ) | | $ | 0.144 | | | $ | 0.958 | | | $ | 0.846 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.226 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.448 | ) | | $ | (0.496 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.226 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | $ | (0.449 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.448 | ) | | $ | (0.496 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.79 | )%(3) | | | 17.18 | % | | | (17.69 | )% | | | 1.20 | % | | | 8.69 | % | | | 7.99 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,269,332 | | | $ | 1,367,785 | | | $ | 1,143,256 | | | $ | 1,334,054 | | | $ | 783,143 | | | $ | 388,276 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.42 | %(5) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.39 | % | | | 1.39 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.52 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.12 | %(5) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.44 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | | 1.68 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 2.01 | %(6) | | | 2.08 | % | | | 1.96 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.42 | %(5) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | %(6) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.51 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.69 | %(5) | | | 5.46 | % | | | 4.25 | % | | | 3.68 | % | | | 4.18 | % | | | 4.35 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(3) | | | 46 | % | | | 64 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 54 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.10% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements18
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | $ | 10.920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.275 | | | $ | 0.550 | | | $ | 0.559 | | | $ | 0.549 | | | $ | 0.601 | | | $ | 0.590 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.406 | ) | | | 0.983 | | | | (2.429 | ) | | | (0.289 | ) | | | 0.471 | | | | 0.368 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.131 | ) | | $ | 1.533 | | | $ | (1.870 | ) | | $ | 0.260 | | | $ | 1.072 | | | $ | 0.958 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.269 | ) | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.560 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.562 | ) | | $ | (0.608 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.269 | ) | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.560 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.562 | ) | | $ | (0.608 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.24 | )%(3) | | | 18.28 | % | | | (16.81 | )% | | | 2.20 | % | | | 9.77 | % | | | 8.92 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 389,869 | | | $ | 217,630 | | | $ | 144,692 | | | $ | 139,301 | | | $ | 82,723 | | | $ | 15,208 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.43 | %(4) | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.39 | %(5) | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.52 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.12 | %(4) | | | 0.23 | % | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.62 | % | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.44 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.55 | %(4) | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 1.01 | %(5) | | | 1.08 | % | | | 0.96 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.43 | %(4) | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.39 | % | | | 0.38 | %(5) | | | 0.46 | % | | | 0.51 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.74 | %(4) | | | 6.47 | % | | | 5.26 | % | | | 4.68 | % | | | 5.22 | % | | | 5.27 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 10 | %(3) | | | 46 | % | | | 64 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 58 | % | | | 54 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements19
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance National Municipals Fund) (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap curves provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At September 30, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $54,234,468 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on September 30,
20
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
2010 ($93,535), September 30, 2011 ($211,449), September 30, 2012 ($1,936,962), September 30, 2013 ($2,604,551), September 30, 2014 ($52,732), September 30, 2015 ($314,591), September 30, 2016 ($48,228,662) and September 30, 2017 ($791,986). A capital loss carryforward of $10,266,025 included in the amounts above will be available to the Fund as a result of the reorganizations (see Note 12). Utilization of this capital loss carryforward may be limited in accordance with certain income tax regulations.
Additionally, at September 30, 2009, the Fund had net capital losses of $790,916,637, including $1,783,723 as result of reorganizations (see Note 12), attributable to security transactions incurred after October 31, 2008. These net capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Fund’s taxable year ending September 30, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended September 30, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust, (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
I Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities, also referred to as residual interest bonds, whereby the Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The Inverse Floater held by the Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Fund accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Fund’s liability with respect to
21
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At March 31, 2010, the amount of the Fund’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $925,274,000 and $1,356,624,214, respectively. The range of interest rates on Floating Rate Notes outstanding at March 31, 2010 was 0.27% to 0.39%. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Fund’s average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees were $930,246,115 and 0.80%, respectively.
The Fund may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which the Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Fund had no shortfalls as of March 31, 2010.
The Fund may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Fund’s investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Fund’s investment policies do not allow the Fund to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Fund’s restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Fund’s restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Fund are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
J Financial Futures Contracts — The Fund may enter into financial futures contracts. The Fund’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
K Interest Rate Swaps — The Fund may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, the Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. The Fund is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
L When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Fund may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Fund maintains security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
M Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Fund is the
22
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
amount included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.
N Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to March 31, 2010 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Fund’s management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The net investment income of the Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards, if any), are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets plus a percentage of gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) as presented in the following table and is payable monthly.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Annual
| | | Daily
| | | |
Daily Net Assets | | Asset Rate | | | Income Rate | | | |
|
Up to $500 million | | | 0.300 | % | | | 3.00 | % | | |
$500 million up to $1 billion | | | 0.275 | | | | 2.75 | | | |
$1 billion up to $1.5 billion | | | 0.250 | | | | 2.50 | | | |
$1.5 billion up to $2 billion | | | 0.225 | | | | 2.25 | | | |
$2 billion up to $3 billion | | | 0.200 | | | | 2.00 | | | |
$3 billion and over | | | 0.175 | | | | 1.75 | | | |
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the investment adviser fee amounted to $10,202,171, representing 0.34% (annualized) of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
EVM serves as the administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, EVM earned $51,388 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $458,751 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the six months ended March 31, 2010. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the six months ended March 31, 2010 amounted to $5,301,697 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective
23
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $627,567 and $4,795,895 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% (annualized) of the average daily net assets for Class B and Class C shares. At March 31, 2010, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $5,000,000 and $143,382,000, respectively. The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts equal to 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the Class B and Class C sales commissions and distribution fees and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the six months ended March 31, 2010 amounted to $209,188 and $1,598,631 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $208,000, $102,000 and $81,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $728,176,665 and $1,095,464,747, respectively, for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 25,914,386 | | | | 136,484,542 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 7,588,020 | | | | 17,100,545 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (87,605,236 | ) | | | (138,302,464 | ) | | |
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganizations (see Note 12) | | | — | | | | 22,809,245 | | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 496,189 | | | | 719,489 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (53,606,641 | ) | | | 38,811,357 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 748,495 | | | | 3,446,704 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 237,419 | | | | 513,741 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,379,153 | ) | | | (3,221,270 | ) | | |
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganizations (see Note 12) | | | — | | | | 2,622,652 | | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (495,953 | ) | | | (718,742 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (889,192 | ) | | | 2,643,085 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 9,777,354 | | | | 40,830,304 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,826,505 | | | | 3,928,772 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (16,087,772 | ) | | | (35,332,498 | ) | | |
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganizations (see Note 12) | | | — | | | | 514,275 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (4,483,913 | ) | | | 9,940,853 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
24
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 28,272,387 | | | | 27,315,361 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 488,201 | | | | 933,901 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (9,999,635 | ) | | | (22,553,301 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 18,760,953 | | | | 5,695,961 | | | |
|
|
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at March 31, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 6,046,755,517 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 231,786,056 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (389,027,433 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (157,241,377 | ) | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Fund, it may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. The Fund did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the six months ended March 31, 2010.
10 Financial Instruments
The Fund may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at March 31, 2010 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | Appreciation | | | |
|
6/10 | | 7,000 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (815,149,253 | ) | | $ | (812,875,000 | ) | | $ | 2,274,253 | | | |
|
|
At March 31, 2010, the Fund had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Fund holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. The Fund may purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at March 31, 2010 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivative | | | Liability Derivative | | | |
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 2,274,253(1 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 64,108 | | | $ | 6,998,240 | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding during the six months ended March 31, 2010, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $628,571,000.
25
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
11 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At March 31, 2010, the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,763,117,297 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,763,117,297 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 51,670,843 | | | | — | | | | 51,670,843 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,814,788,140 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,814,788,140 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 2,274,253 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,274,253 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,274,253 | | | $ | 6,814,788,140 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,817,062,393 | | | |
|
|
The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as of September 30, 2009 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
12 Reorganizations
As of the close of business on November 21, 2008, the Fund acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance Florida Plus Municipals Fund (Florida Plus Fund) pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the shareholders of Florida Plus Fund. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of shares of Class A, Class B and Class C shares of the Fund for Class A, Class B and Class C shares of Florida Plus Fund, respectively, each outstanding on November 21, 2008 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Florida Plus Fund |
| | Shares of the
| | | Shares
| | | | | | |
| | Fund Issued | | | Exchanged | | | Net Assets | | | |
|
Class A | | | 17,340,079 | | | | 17,188,093 | | | $ | 139,258,179 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,836,952 | | | | 1,775,751 | | | | 14,756,605 | | | |
Class C | | | 381,353 | | | | 368,500 | | | | 3,063,562 | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 157,078,346 | | | |
|
|
The aggregate net assets of the Fund immediately before the acquisition were $4,679,552,499. The net assets of Florida Plus Fund as presented above, including $8,413,743 of accumulated net realized losses and $29,659,755 of unrealized depreciation, were combined with those of the Fund, resulting in combined net assets of $4,836,630,845.
As of the close of business on September 25, 2009, the Fund acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance Hawaii Municipals Fund (Hawaii Fund), Eaton Vance Mississippi Municipals Fund (Mississippi Fund) and Eaton Vance West Virginia Municipals Fund (West Virginia Fund) pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the shareholders of Hawaii Fund, Mississippi Fund and West Virginia Fund, respectively. The acquisitions were accomplished by a tax-free exchange of shares of Class A, Class B and Class C shares of the Fund for Class A, Class B and Class C shares of Hawaii Fund, Mississippi Fund and West Virginia Fund, respectively, each outstanding on September 25, 2009 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Hawaii Fund |
| | Shares of the
| | | Shares
| | | | | | |
| | Fund Issued | | | Exchanged | | | Net Assets | | | |
|
Class A | | | 1,489,870 | | | | 1,667,144 | | | $ | 14,839,104 | | | |
Class B | | | 233,914 | | | | 258,600 | | | | 2,330,669 | | | |
Class C | | | 21,473 | | | | 23,720 | | | | 213,952 | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 17,383,725 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Mississippi Fund |
| | Shares of the
| | | Shares
| | | | | | |
| | Fund Issued | | | Exchanged | | | Net Assets | | | |
|
Class A | | | 1,292,267 | | | | 1,389,800 | | | $ | 12,870,981 | | | |
Class B | | | 156,107 | | | | 164,169 | | | | 1,555,416 | | | |
Class C | | | 47,772 | | | | 50,193 | | | | 475,994 | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 14,902,391 | | | |
|
|
26
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | West Virginia Fund |
| | Shares of the
| | | Shares
| | | | | | |
| | Fund Issued | | | Exchanged | | | Net Assets | | | |
|
Class A | | | 2,687,029 | | | | 2,953,328 | | | $ | 26,762,808 | | | |
Class B | | | 395,679 | | | | 423,904 | | | | 3,942,469 | | | |
Class C | | | 63,677 | | | | 68,084 | | | | 634,469 | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 31,339,746 | | | |
|
|
The aggregate net assets of the Fund immediately before the acquisitions were $6,437,336,808. The net assets of Hawaii Fund, Mississippi Fund and West Virginia Fund as presented above, including accumulated net realized losses aggregating $4,216,124 and unrealized appreciation aggregating $1,205,209, were combined with those of the Fund, resulting in combined net assets of $6,500,962,670.
13 Name Change
Effective December 1, 2009, the name of the Fund was changed from Eaton Vance National Municipals Fund.
27
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
28
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve- month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance National Municipals Fund (the “Fund”) with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. Specifically, the Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
29
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Funds and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions during 2008 on the Fund’s performance relative to its peer universe in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s strategy of generating current income through investments in higher quality (including insured) municipal bonds with longer maturities. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability of the Fund, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Fund, the structure of each advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
30
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
| | |
Officers Thomas M. Metzold President
William H. Ahern, Jr. Vice President
Craig R. Brandon Vice President
Cynthia J. Clemson Vice President
Adam A. Weigold Vice President
Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer
Maureen A. Gemma Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Paul M. O’Neil Chief Compliance Officer | | Trustees Ralph F. Verni Chairman
Benjamin C. Esty
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Allen R. Freedman
William H. Park
Ronald A. Pearlman
Helen Frame Peters
Heidi L. Steiger
Lynn A. Stout |
31
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Eaton Vance Municipals TrustTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
SemiannualReportMarch312010CaliforniaMassachusettsNewYorkOhioRhodeIslandEATONVANCEMUNICIPALSTRUST |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | |
|
| | | 2 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
California | | | 3 | |
Massachusetts | | | 5 | |
New York | | | 7 | |
Ohio | | | 9 | |
Rhode Island | | | 11 | |
| | | | |
Fund Expenses | | | 13 | |
| | | | |
Financial Statements | | | 16 | |
| | | | |
Board of Trustees’ Annual Approval of the Investment Advisory Agreements | | | 72 | |
| | | | |
Officers and Trustees | | | 75 | |
1
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
INVESTMENT UPDATE
Economic and Market Conditions
During the six months ending March 31, 2010, the U.S. economy and the capital markets remained relatively stable, despite continued high unemployment and concerns over the U.S. budget. The economy grew at an annualized rate of 5.7% in the fourth quarter of 2009 and an estimated 3.2% in the first quarter of 2010, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce.
During the six-month period, the municipal bond market’s performance was relatively flat, with slightly negative returns in the fourth quarter of 2009 being offset by positive performance of just over 1% in the first quarter of 2010. For the period, the Funds’ primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index)—a broad-based index of municipal bonds—gained 0.28%.1 This modest performance followed one of the best calendar year periods for municipals in many years, however. Moreover, economic fundamentals continued to improve and demand for municipals remained strong.
The significant performance disparities among the municipal market’s segments, which became historically wide during 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009, began to dissipate during the six-month period. For the first time in almost two years, we witnessed a period in which there were not significant differences in muni performance by maturity, credit quality and sector. In the face of limited tax-exempt supply due to the success of the Build America Bond program, demand from municipal investors remained positive during the period, though the gusto with which they purchased municipal funds waned from 2009 levels. We believe lighter inflows were likely driven by lower yields, a continuation of credit-related headline “noise” and investor preparation for tax bills in March and April.
Management Discussion
During the six months ending March 31, 2010, the Funds’ Class A shares at net asset value slightly under-performed the Index, with the exception of New York, which slightly outperformed.1 Given the combination of our Funds’ objective of providing tax-exempt income and the municipal yield curve’s historically upward slope, our Funds generally hold longer-maturity bonds relative to the broad market and many of our competitors. Our bias toward long maturities was the basis for much of our significant relative outperformance in the first three quarters of 2009, though it detracted slightly from relative performance during the six-month period. Careful investment down the credit spectrum, while aiding performance throughout much of 2009, also detracted slightly during the period as the market’s highest quality bonds performed best.
Management employed leverage in the Funds, through which additional exposure to the municipal market was achieved. Leverage has the impact of magnifying a Fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets.2
As we move ahead, we recognize that many state and local governments face significant budget deficits that are driven primarily by a steep decline in tax revenues. We will continue to monitor any new developments as state and local officials formulate solutions to address these fiscal problems. As in all environments, we maintain our long-term perspective on the markets against the backdrop of relatively short periods of market volatility. We will continue to actively manage the Funds with the same income-focused, relative value approach we have always employed. We believe that this approach, which is based on credit research and decades of experience in the municipal market, will serve municipal investors well over the long term.
Effective February 19, 2010, Craig R. Brandon became the portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund and Cynthia J. Clemson became the portfolio manager of Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund. Mr. Brandon is a Vice President of Eaton Vance Management (EVM) and has been a portfolio manager of Eaton Vance municipal funds since 2004. Ms. Clemson is a Vice President and Co-Director of Municipal Investments of EVM. She has been a portfolio manager of Eaton Vance municipal funds since 1991.
Effective December 1, 2009, each Fund changed its name from Eaton Vance [State] Municipals Fund to Eaton Vance [State] Municipal Income Fund.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
2 | | The Funds employ residual interest bond (RIB) financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of net asset value). See Note 1I to the financial statements for more information on RIB investments. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Funds’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EACAX | | EVCAX | | ECCAX | | EICAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -0.98 | % | | | -1.37 | % | | | -1.26 | % | | | -0.86 | % |
One Year | | | 16.54 | | | | 15.62 | | | | 15.75 | | | | 16.81 | |
Five Years | | | 2.68 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 1.93 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.07 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.07 | | | | 5.06 | | | | 2.14 | | | | 5.66 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -5.72 | % | | | -6.21 | % | | | -2.23 | % | | | -0.86 | % |
One Year | | | 11.02 | | | | 10.62 | | | | 14.75 | | | | 16.81 | |
Five Years | | | 1.69 | | | | 1.57 | | | | 1.93 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.11 | | | | 4.07 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.75 | | | | 5.06 | | | | 2.14 | | | | 5.66 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 5/27/94; Class B: 12/19/85; Class C: 8/31/04; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 0.84 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.58 | % | | | 3.87 | % | | | 3.87 | % | | | 4.82 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.88 | | | | 6.66 | | | | 6.66 | | | | 8.29 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.24 | | | | 3.70 | | | | 3.70 | | | | 4.70 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.29 | | | | 6.36 | | | | 6.36 | | | | 8.08 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.01 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 13.74 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.69 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.19 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | |
|
Six Months | | | -0.53 | % |
One Year | | | 13.83 | |
Five Years | | | 3.02 | |
10 Years | | | 4.46 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.18% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 41.86% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper California Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 121, 121, 100 and 79 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
3
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 27.7 | % |
AA | | | 23.5 | % |
A | | | 31.7 | % |
BBB | 7.7 | % |
Not Rated | 9.4 | % |
| | | | |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 95 | |
|
• Average Maturity: | | 21.4 | years |
|
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 15.8 | years |
|
• Average Call Protection: | | 8.0 | years |
|
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 93.25 | |
|
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 10.0 | % |
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
4
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETMAX | | EVMAX | | ECMMX | | EIMAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -0.98 | % | | | -1.28 | % | | | -1.44 | % | | | -0.89 | % |
One Year | | | 18.68 | | | | 17.75 | | | | 17.69 | | | | 18.91 | |
Five Years | | | 2.33 | | | | 1.56 | | | | N.A. | | | | 2.53 | |
10 Years | | | 4.53 | | | | 3.77 | | | | N.A. | | | | 4.76 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.21 | | | | 4.54 | | | | 0.97 | | | | 4.62 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -5.68 | % | | | -6.11 | % | | | -2.40 | % | | | -0.89 | % |
One Year | | | 13.01 | | | | 12.75 | | | | 16.69 | | | | 18.91 | |
Five Years | | | 1.33 | | | | 1.22 | | | | N.A. | | | | 2.53 | |
10 Years | | | 4.02 | | | | 3.77 | | | | N.A. | | | | 4.76 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.90 | | | | 4.54 | | | | 0.97 | | | | 4.62 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 4/18/91; Class C: 5/2/06; Class I: 6/17/93 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.04 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 0.84 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.72 | % | | | 4.48 | % | | | 3.96 | % | | | 4.92 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.67 | | | | 7.28 | | | | 6.43 | | | | 7.99 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.44 | | | | 4.43 | | | | 3.91 | | | | 4.86 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.21 | | | | 7.20 | | | | 6.35 | | | | 7.90 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.01 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 13.74 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.69 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.19 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Massachusetts Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | |
|
Six Months | | | 0.03 | % |
One Year | | | 13.55 | |
Five Years | | | 3.56 | |
10 Years | | | 4.77 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.21% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 38.45% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Massachusetts Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 40, 39, 33 and 31 funds for the 6- month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
5
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 15.1 | % |
AA | | | 35.2 | % |
A | | | 32.3 | % |
BBB | 8.1 | % |
BB | 1.3 | % |
Not Rated | 8.0 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 72 | |
|
• Average Maturity: | | 23.8 | years |
|
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 17.4 | years |
|
• Average Call Protection: | | 10.0 | years |
|
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 99.13 | |
|
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 9.3 | % |
|
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
6
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Craig R. Brandon, CFA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETNYX | | EVNYX | | ECNYX | | EINYX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | 0.41 | % | | | -0.02 | % | | | -0.03 | % | | | 0.51 | % |
One Year | | | 22.69 | | | | 21.83 | | | | 21.70 | | | | 23.08 | |
Five Years | | | 2.73 | | | | 1.97 | | | | 1.96 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.86 | | | | 4.17 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.20 | | | | 5.28 | | | | 2.08 | | | | 6.36 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -4.32 | % | | | -4.92 | % | | | -1.01 | % | | | 0.51 | % |
One Year | | | 16.82 | | | | 16.83 | | | | 20.70 | | | | 23.08 | |
Five Years | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.96 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.35 | | | | 4.17 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.88 | | | | 5.28 | | | | 2.08 | | | | 6.36 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 4/15/94; Class B: 8/30/90; Class C: 9/30/03; Class I: 3/3/08 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.02 | % | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.77 | % | | | 0.82 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.71 | % | | | 4.02 | % | | | 4.02 | % | | | 4.93 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.96 | | | | 6.79 | | | | 6.79 | | | | 8.33 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 4.33 | | | | 3.79 | | | | 3.80 | | | | 4.75 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 7.32 | | | | 6.41 | | | | 6.42 | | | | 8.03 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.01 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 13.74 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.69 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.19 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | |
|
Six Months | | | 0.40 | % |
One Year | | | 13.92 | |
Five Years | | | 3.57 | |
10 Years | | | 4.74 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered at net asset value. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.19% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 40.83% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper New York Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 94, 90, 81 and 68 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
7
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 11.9 | % |
AA | | | 46.9 | % |
A | | | 20.1 | % |
BBB | | | 11.1 | % |
BB | 2.3 | % |
B | 1.4 | % |
CCC | 0.4 | % |
Not Rated | 5.9 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 125 | |
|
• Average Maturity: | | 24.8 | years |
|
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 17.0 | years |
|
• Average Call Protection: | | 9.2 | years |
|
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 97.39 | |
|
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 9.4 | % |
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund���s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
8
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: William H. Ahern, Jr., CFA
| | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETOHX | | ECOHX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | -0.65 | % | | | -1.00 | % |
One Year | | | 15.73 | | | | 15.20 | |
Five Years | | | 3.73 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 5.14 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.51 | | | | 2.59 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -5.41 | % | | | -1.97 | % |
One Year | | | 10.24 | | | | 14.20 | |
Five Years | | | 2.73 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.63 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.20 | | | | 2.59 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class C: 2/3/06 |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.88 | % | | | 1.63 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.31 | % | | | 3.59 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.07 | | | | 5.89 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 3.74 | | | | 3.16 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.14 | | | | 5.19 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.01 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 13.74 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.69 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.19 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Ohio Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | | | |
|
Six Months | | | -0.06 | % |
One Year | | | 10.35 | |
Five Years | | | 3.48 | |
10 Years | | | 4.52 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.08% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 39.06% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Ohio Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 43, 43, 35 and 31 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
9
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 33.7 | % |
AA | | | 33.0 | % |
A | | | 19.6 | % |
BBB | 6.9 | % |
B | 0.9 | % |
Not Rated | 5.9 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 115 | |
|
• Average Maturity: | | 21.0 | years |
|
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 13.8 | years |
|
• Average Call Protection: | | 10.1 | years |
|
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 102.33 | |
|
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 5.0 | % |
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions. |
10
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Portfolio Manager: Cynthia J. Clemson
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | ETRIX | | EVRIX | | ERICX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
Six Months | | | 0.15 | % | | | -0.26 | % | | | -0.26 | % |
One Year | | | 14.97 | | | | 14.04 | | | | 14.03 | |
Five Years | | | 2.47 | | | | 1.70 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.56 | | | | 3.78 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.08 | | | | 3.67 | | | | 1.04 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
Six Months | | | -4.62 | % | | | -5.16 | % | | | -1.24 | % |
One Year | | | 9.51 | | | | 9.04 | | | | 13.03 | |
Five Years | | | 1.47 | | | | 1.36 | | | | N.A. | |
10 Years | | | 4.05 | | | | 3.78 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.77 | | | | 3.67 | | | | 1.04 | |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/93; Class B: 6/11/93; Class C: 3/20/06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 0.87 | % | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.62 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distribution Rates/Yields | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Distribution Rate3 | | | 4.35 | % | | | 3.64 | % | | | 3.64 | % |
Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate3,4 | | | 7.43 | | | | 6.22 | | | | 6.22 | |
SEC 30-day Yield5 | | | 3.80 | | | | 3.23 | | | | 3.24 | |
Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield4,5 | | | 6.49 | | | | 5.52 | | | | 5.53 | |
Index Performance6 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays Capital | | Barclays Capital 20 Year |
| | Municipal Bond Index | | Municipal Bond Index |
|
Six Months | | | 0.28 | % | | | -0.01 | % |
One Year | | | 9.69 | | | | 13.74 | |
Five Years | | | 4.58 | | | | 4.69 | |
10 Years | | | 5.58 | | | | 6.19 | |
Lipper Averages7 (Average Annual Total Returns)
| | | | |
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification | | |
|
Six Months | | | 0.26 | % |
One Year | | | 11.26 | |
Five Years | | | 3.49 | |
10 Years | | | 4.57 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. Fund performance during certain periods reflects the strong bond market performance and/or the strong performance of bonds held during those periods. This performance is not typical and may not be repeated. Bond values decline as interest rates rise. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
|
1 | | Six-month returns are cumulative. Other returns are presented on an average annual basis. These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
|
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 2/1/10. Includes interest expense of 0.08% relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions, and as a result net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense. |
|
3 | | The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) by the net asset value at the end of the period. |
|
4 | | Taxable-equivalent figures assume a maximum 41.44% combined federal and state income tax rate. A lower tax rate would result in lower tax-equivalent figures. |
|
5 | | The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
|
6 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
|
7 | | The Lipper Averages are the average annual total returns, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. Lipper Classifications may include insured and uninsured funds, as well as leveraged and unleveraged funds. The Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification contained 127, 125, 111 and 103 funds for the 6-month, 1-year, 5-year and 10-year time periods, respectively. Lipper Averages are available as of month end only. |
11
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Rating Distribution*1
By total investments
| | |
* | | The rating distribution presented above includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. Absent such securities, the Fund’s rating distribution as of 3/31/10 is as follows: |
| | | | |
|
AAA | | | 20.5 | % |
AA | | | 35.4 | % |
A | | | 28.8 | % |
BBB | 10.3 | % |
BB | 0.3 | % |
Not Rated | 4.7 | % |
Fund Statistics2
| | | | |
|
• Number of Issues: | | | 69 | |
|
• Average Maturity: | | 20.5 | years |
|
• Average Effective Maturity: | | 12.3 | years |
|
• Average Call Protection: | | 7.2 | years |
|
• Average Dollar Price: | | $ | 99.20 | |
|
• RIB Leverage3: | | | 1.5 | % |
| | |
1 | | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
|
2 | | Fund holdings information excludes securities held by special purpose vehicles in which the Fund holds a residual interest. See Note 1I to the Fund’s financial statements. |
|
3 | | See Note 1l to the Fund’s financial statements. RIB leverage represents the amount of RIB Floating Rate Notes outstanding as of 3/31/10 as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
12
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in a Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (October 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010).
Actual Expenses: The first section of each table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of each table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in each table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of each table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $990.20 | | | | $4.91 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $986.30 | | | | $8.62 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $987.40 | | | | $8.62 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $991.40 | | | | $3.67 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.00 | | | | $4.99 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.30 | | | | $8.75 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.30 | | | | $8.75 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.20 | | | | $3.73 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.99% for Class A shares, 1.74% for Class B shares, 1.74% for Class C shares and 0.74% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
13
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $990.20 | | | | $4.52 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $987.20 | | | | $7.83 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $985.60 | | | | $8.17 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $991.10 | | | | $3.52 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.40 | | | | $4.58 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.10 | | | | $7.95 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.70 | | | | $8.30 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.40 | | | | $3.58 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.91% for Class A shares, 1.58% for Class B shares, 1.65% for Class C shares and 0.71% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,004.10 | | | | $4.30 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $999.80 | | | | $8.03 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $999.70 | | | | $8.03 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,005.10 | | | | $3.40 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.60 | | | | $4.33 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.90 | | | | $8.10 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.90 | | | | $8.10 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.50 | | | | $3.43 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.86% for Class A shares, 1.61% for Class B shares, 1.61% for Class C shares and 0.68% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
14
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES CONT’D
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $993.50 | | | | $3.73 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $990.00 | | | | $7.44 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.20 | | | | $3.78 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.50 | | | | $7.54 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.75% for Class A shares and 1.50% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (10/1/09) | | | (3/31/10) | | | (10/1/09 – 3/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,001.50 | | | | $3.79 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $997.40 | | | | $7.52 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $997.40 | | | | $7.52 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.10 | | | | $3.83 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.40 | | | | $7.59 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.40 | | | | $7.59 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 0.76% for Class A shares, 1.51% for Class B shares and 1.51% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on September 30, 2009. | |
15
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 111.6% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 7.1% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Claremont McKenna College), 5.00%, 1/1/38 | | $ | 2,554,575 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Lutheran University), 5.00%, 10/1/29 | | | 3,288,285 | | | |
| 1,715 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pomona College), 5.00%, 7/1/45 | | | 1,759,024 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Santa Clara University), 5.25%, 9/1/26 | | | 2,760,700 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Stanford University), 5.25%, 12/1/32(1) | | | 4,142,760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,505,344 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 4.9% |
|
$ | 895 | | | Chula Vista, (San Diego Gas and Electric), 5.875%, 2/15/34 | | $ | 984,419 | | | |
| 2,725 | | | Chula Vista, (San Diego Gas and Electric), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | | 2,656,167 | | | |
| 3,865 | | | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 5.25%, 7/1/38 | | | 4,124,419 | | | |
| 2,170 | | | Vernon, Electric System Revenue, 5.125%, 8/1/21 | | | 2,252,677 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,017,682 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.5% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Sacramento County, SFMR, (GNMA), (AMT), Escrowed to Maturity, 8.25%, 1/1/21 | | $ | 1,353,390 | | | |
| 3,785 | | | Sacramento County, SFMR, (GNMA), (AMT), Escrowed to Maturity, 8.50%, 11/1/16 | | | 4,913,876 | | | |
| 5,765 | | | San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road Bonds, Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 1/1/26 | | | 2,945,223 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,212,489 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 10.9% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | California, 6.00%, 4/1/38 | | $ | 1,053,250 | | | |
| 1,680 | | | California, (AMT), 5.05%, 12/1/36 | | | 1,509,917 | | | |
| 3,825 | | | Los Angeles Unified School District, 5.00%, 1/1/34 | | | 3,869,905 | | | |
| 9,990 | | | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, (Election of 2004), 4.75%, 8/1/37(2) | | | 10,165,874 | | | |
| 5,400 | | | Santa Clara County, (Election of 2008), 5.00%, 8/1/39(2)(3) | | | 5,656,041 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 22,254,987 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hospital — 18.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.25%, 7/1/23 | | $ | 1,016,270 | | | |
| 1,465 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 5.625%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,490,462 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Catholic Healthcare West), 6.00%, 7/1/39 | | | 2,116,120 | | | |
| 4,880 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/39 | | | 4,655,910 | | | |
| 5,910 | | | California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 11/15/46(2) | | | 5,594,642 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Kaiser Hospital), 5.50%, 8/1/31 | | | 2,257,268 | | | |
| 4,885 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Huntington Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 7/1/35 | | | 4,591,363 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/34 | | | 2,391,300 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (John Muir Health), 5.00%, 8/15/36 | | | 2,383,725 | | | |
| 1,760 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Kaiser Permanente), 5.50%, 11/1/32 | | | 1,769,574 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sonoma County Indian Health), 6.40%, 9/1/29 | | | 1,500,495 | | | |
| 2,700 | | | San Benito Health Care District, 5.40%, 10/1/20 | | | 2,408,562 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Torrance Hospital, (Torrance Memorial Medical Center), 5.50%, 6/1/31 | | | 1,007,830 | | | |
| 1,650 | | | Turlock, (Emanuel Medical Center, Inc.), 5.375%, 10/15/34 | | | 1,432,860 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Washington Township Health Care District, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 3,393,487 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 38,009,868 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 2.0% |
|
$ | 3,000 | | | California Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.75%, 8/1/42 | | $ | 2,452,590 | | | |
| 1,335 | | | Commerce, (Hermitage III Senior Apartments), 6.50%, 12/1/29 | | | 1,215,378 | | | |
| 407 | | | Commerce, (Hermitage III Senior Apartments), 6.85%, 12/1/29 | | | 366,011 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,033,979 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 2.3% |
|
$ | 2,750 | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Browning Ferris Industries), (AMT), 5.80%, 12/1/16 | | $ | 2,751,732 | | | |
| 265 | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.125%, 11/1/23 | | | 265,236 | | | |
| 1,700 | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.40%, 4/1/25 | | | 1,718,547 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,735,515 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements16
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 1.2% |
|
$ | 2,575 | | | California Educational Facilities Authority, (Pepperdine University), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/32 | | $ | 2,574,820 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,574,820 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 4.3% |
|
$ | 4,775 | | | California Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Pacific Gas and Electric), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.35%, 12/1/16 | | $ | 4,924,362 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/34 | | | 2,019,040 | | | |
| 1,775 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 1,789,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,733,152 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 7.6% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | California Infrastructure and Economic Development, (Bay Area Toll Bridges), (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 1/1/28, 5.00%, 7/1/33 | | $ | 2,900,475 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | California Infrastructure and Economic Development, (Bay Area Toll Bridges), (FGIC), Prerefunded to 1/1/28, 5.00%, 7/1/29(4) | | | 5,800,950 | | | |
| 15,000 | | | Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agency, Toll Road Bonds, (AGM), (RADIAN), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 1/1/28 | | | 6,915,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,617,025 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 5.0% |
|
$ | 1,700 | | | Allan Hancock, (Joint Community College), (AGM), 4.375%, 8/1/31 | | $ | 1,601,927 | | | |
| 895 | | | California, (AGC), 4.50%, 8/1/30 | | | 842,589 | | | |
| 6,500 | | | Los Angeles Unified School District, (Election of 2005), (AGM), 4.75%, 7/1/32(2) | | | 6,308,380 | | | |
| 2,285 | | | Merced Unified School District, (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/19 | | | 1,393,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,146,083 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 2.4% |
|
$ | 4,920 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), (AGM), 5.75%, 8/15/27(2) | | $ | 5,000,852 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,000,852 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 4.0% |
|
$ | 11,280 | | | Anaheim Public Financing Authority, (Public Improvements), (AGM), 0.00%, 9/1/30 | | $ | 2,984,237 | | | |
| 4,900 | | | Los Angeles County, (Disney Parking), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 9/1/17 | | | 3,550,001 | | | |
| 2,300 | | | Los Angeles County, (Disney Parking), (AMBAC), 0.00%, 3/1/18 | | | 1,587,437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,121,675 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 0.5% |
|
$ | 1,060 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., (AGC), (FGIC), 5.00%, 6/1/38 | | $ | 1,010,689 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,010,689 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 2.9% |
|
$ | 2,530 | | | Ceres Redevelopment Agency, (Ceres Redevelopment Project Area No. 1), (AMBAC), 4.00%, 11/1/31 | | $ | 1,910,454 | | | |
| 4,540 | | | San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transportation District, Sales Tax Revenue, (AGM), 4.25%, 7/1/36 | | | 4,043,778 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,954,232 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 3.4% |
|
$ | 9,420 | | | Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 10/1/33 | | $ | 1,980,649 | | | |
| 1,800 | | | San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Toll Road Bonds, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/24 | | | 597,474 | | | |
| 2,125 | | | San Jose Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 3/1/37 | | | 2,109,360 | | | |
| 2,230 | | | San Jose Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/47 | | | 2,358,537 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,046,020 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 5.2% |
|
$ | 8,000 | | | Clovis Public Financing Authority, Wastewater Revenue, (AMBAC), 4.50%, 8/1/38 | | $ | 7,023,760 | | | |
| 2,290 | | | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, (AGM), 4.75%, 7/1/36 | | | 2,292,473 | | | |
| 1,680 | | | Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, (NPFG), 3.00%, 7/1/30 | | | 1,299,279 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,615,512 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 6.1% |
|
$ | 4,270 | | | Los Angeles County, (Disney Parking), 0.00%, 3/1/16 | | $ | 3,402,592 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Los Angeles County, (Disney Parking), 0.00%, 3/1/17 | | | 1,300,530 | | | |
See notes to financial statements17
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 3,100 | | | Los Angeles County, (Disney Parking), 0.00%, 3/1/20 | | $ | 1,856,435 | | | |
| 5,145 | | | Pasadena Parking Facility, 6.25%, 1/1/18 | | | 5,976,844 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,536,401 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 1.6% |
|
$ | 615 | | | California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles), 5.00%, 12/1/32 | | $ | 593,924 | | | |
| 920 | | | California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, (Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles), 5.00%, 12/1/37 | | | 862,371 | | | |
| 1,655 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., 0.00%, 6/1/37 | | | 1,061,881 | | | |
| 1,060 | | | Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., 5.75%, 6/1/47 | | | 750,947 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,269,123 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.0% |
|
$ | 250 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Senior Living -Presbyterian Homes), 4.75%, 11/15/26 | | $ | 219,142 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Senior Living - Presbyterian Homes), 4.875%, 11/15/36 | | | 835,090 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Senior Living - Presbyterian Homes), 7.25%, 11/15/41 | | | 1,067,670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,121,902 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 10.4% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | Bonita Canyon Public Financing Authority, 5.375%, 9/1/28 | | $ | 2,275,250 | | | |
| 415 | | | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/2/26 | | | 330,925 | | | |
| 665 | | | Brentwood Infrastructure Financing Authority, 5.00%, 9/2/34 | | | 491,814 | | | |
| 1,755 | | | Corona Public Financing Authority, 5.80%, 9/1/20 | | | 1,674,428 | | | |
| 820 | | | Fairfield Improvement Bond Act of 1915, (North Cordelia District), 7.375%, 9/2/18 | | | 848,102 | | | |
| 1,735 | | | Lincoln Public Financing Authority, Improvement Bond Act of 1915, (Twelve Bridges), 6.20%, 9/2/25 | | | 1,739,077 | | | |
| 1,430 | | | Moreno Valley Unified School District, 5.95%, 9/1/34 | | | 1,284,512 | | | |
| 15,995 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | | | 838,458 | | | |
| 6,075 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 6,031,442 | | | |
| 1,400 | | | Santa Margarita Water District, 6.20%, 9/1/20 | | | 1,420,482 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Santaluz Community Facilities District No. 2, 6.20%, 9/1/30 | | | 993,070 | | | |
| 350 | | | Temecula Unified School District, 5.00%, 9/1/27 | | | 306,306 | | | |
| 535 | | | Temecula Unified School District, 5.00%, 9/1/37 | | | 433,462 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Torrance Redevelopment Agency, 5.625%, 9/1/28 | | | 851,940 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Tustin Community Facilities District, 6.00%, 9/1/37 | | | 941,190 | | | |
| 900 | | | Whittier Public Financing Authority, (Greenleaf Avenue Redevelopment), 5.50%, 11/1/23 | | | 866,628 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,327,086 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 3.2% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Bay Area Toll Authority, Toll Bridge Revenue, (San Francisco Bay Area), 5.25%, 4/1/29 | | $ | 532,070 | | | |
| 3,085 | | | Los Angeles Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), 5.00%, 5/15/35(5) | | | 3,148,736 | | | |
| 2,750 | | | Los Angeles Department of Airports, (Los Angeles International Airport), (AMT), 5.375%, 5/15/30 | | | 2,816,138 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,496,944 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 2.5% |
|
$ | 3,160 | | | California Department of Water Resources, 5.00%, 12/1/29 | | $ | 3,358,891 | | | |
| 1,740 | | | Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, (Waterworks Revenue Authorization), 4.75%, 7/1/36(2) | | | 1,759,105 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,117,996 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 111.6% | | |
(identified cost $225,336,959) | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (11.6)% | | $ | (23,835,906 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 204,623,470 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
See notes to financial statements18
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
RADIAN - Radian Group, Inc.
SFMR - Single Family Mortgage Revenue
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 32.7% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.8% to 14.7% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for inverse floating-rate security transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $1,606,041. |
|
(4) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(5) | | When-issued security. |
See notes to financial statements19
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 107.8% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 25.5% |
|
$ | 10,000 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston College), 5.00%, 7/1/42(1) | | $ | 10,169,550 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), 5.45%, 5/15/59 | | | 3,882,000 | | | |
| 3,930 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Boston University), 6.00%, 5/15/59 | | | 4,398,652 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Dexter School), 5.00%, 5/1/37 | | | 4,014,040 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Middlesex School), 5.00%, 9/1/33 | | | 1,008,700 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Milton Academy), 5.00%, 9/1/35 | | | 4,171,480 | | | |
| 3,515 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (New England Conservatory of Music), 5.25%, 7/1/38 | | | 3,284,557 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Wheeler School), 6.50%, 12/1/29 | | | 1,004,350 | | | |
| 7,260 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Berklee College), 5.00%, 10/1/37 | | | 7,238,438 | | | |
| 6,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.00%, 10/1/38(1) | | | 6,335,740 | | | |
| 8,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 5.50%, 7/1/32(2) | | | 9,663,440 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Tufts University), 5.375%, 8/15/38 | | | 5,398,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 60,568,947 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 2.6% |
|
$ | 6,715 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Dominion Energy Brayton Point), (AMT), 5.00%, 2/1/36 | | $ | 6,125,087 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,125,087 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 1.9% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 1/1/20 | | $ | 1,738,845 | | | |
| 2,540 | | | Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Escrowed to Maturity, 5.25%, 12/1/15 | | | 2,872,410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,611,255 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 2.0% |
|
$ | 4,500 | | | Newton, 5.00%, 4/1/36 | | $ | 4,810,995 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,810,995 | | | |
|
|
|
Hospital — 11.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Baystate Medical Center, Inc.), 5.75%, 7/1/36 | | $ | 2,091,740 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Berkshire Health System), 6.25%, 10/1/31 | | | 1,010,610 | | | |
| 935 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Central New England Health Systems), 6.125%, 8/1/13 | | | 936,468 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Children’s Hospital), 5.25%, 12/1/39 | | | 1,280,375 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Children’s Hospital), 5.50%, 12/1/39 | | | 1,047,260 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), 5.00%, 12/1/37 | | | 5,041,650 | | | |
| 2,055 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Healthcare System-Covenant Health), 6.00%, 7/1/22 | | | 2,116,403 | | | |
| 3,320 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Jordan Hospital), 6.75%, 10/1/33 | | | 3,028,172 | | | |
| 6,800 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/32(1) | | | 6,813,430 | | | |
| 4,315 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Southcoast Health System), 5.00%, 7/1/39 | | | 4,173,080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,539,188 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 7.6% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.65%, 12/1/36 | | $ | 1,830,300 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 4.85%, 6/1/40 | | | 4,686,300 | | | |
| 3,960 | | | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.10%, 12/1/37 | | | 3,823,142 | | | |
| 3,875 | | | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.20%, 12/1/37 | | | 3,886,199 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, (AMT), 5.30%, 12/1/37 | | | 3,722,813 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,948,754 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 2.9% |
|
$ | 2,155 | | | Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (American Hingham Water Co.), (AMT), 6.60%, 12/1/15 | | $ | 2,156,983 | | | |
| 5,170 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 4,640,902 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,797,885 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 7.4% |
|
$ | 2,500 | | | Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 5/1/28 | | $ | 2,848,150 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Massachusetts College Building Authority, (XLCA), 5.50%, 5/1/33 | | | 5,589,850 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Education (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 5,460 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (College of the Holy Cross), (AMBAC), 5.25%, 9/1/32(1) | | $ | 6,150,544 | | | |
| 2,800 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Franklin W. Olin College), (XLCA), 5.25%, 7/1/33 | | | 2,831,416 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,419,960 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.1% |
|
$ | 200 | | | Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 1/1/20 | | $ | 231,846 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 231,846 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,650 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/25 | | $ | 1,648,136 | | | |
| 890 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.00%, 11/15/31 | | | 881,821 | | | |
| 785 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Cape Cod Healthcare), (AGC), 5.125%, 11/15/35 | | | 777,762 | | | |
| 1,950 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (The Medical Center of Central Massachusetts), (AMBAC), Variable Rate, 11.882%, 6/23/22(3) | | | 2,057,269 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,364,988 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 5.1% |
|
$ | 2,915 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (100 Cambridge Street Redevelopment), (NPFG), 5.125%, 2/1/34 | | $ | 2,815,598 | | | |
| 8,665 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (WGBH Educational Foundation), (AMBAC), 5.75%, 1/1/42 | | | 9,232,298 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,047,896 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 7.5% |
|
$ | 3,220 | | | Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/1/32 | | $ | 3,262,053 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/1/34 | | | 1,008,400 | | | |
| 7,350 | | | Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 1/1/30 | | | 8,314,908 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Massachusetts School Building Authority, Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 8/15/37 | | | 5,204,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,789,811 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Student Loan — 4.3% |
|
$ | 2,420 | | | Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AGC), (AMT), 6.35%, 1/1/30 | | $ | 2,468,593 | | | |
| 9,070 | | | Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/33 | | | 7,827,773 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,296,366 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 8.8% |
|
$ | 4,165 | | | Massachusetts Port Authority, (Bosfuel Project), (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/32 | | $ | 3,971,161 | | | |
| 7,365 | | | Massachusetts Port Authority, (Bosfuel Project), (FGIC), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/38 | | | 6,839,434 | | | |
| 10,750 | | | Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Metropolitan Highway System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/1/22 | | | 5,656,542 | | | |
| 4,320 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(1) | | | 4,447,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,915,074 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nursing Home — 2.1% |
|
$ | 2,205 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Christopher House), 6.875%, 1/1/29 | | $ | 2,142,576 | | | |
| 2,910 | | | Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, (Age Institute of Massachusetts), 8.05%, 11/1/25 | | | 2,912,532 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,055,108 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 1.3% |
|
$ | 1,590 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum), 5.00%, 5/1/22 | | $ | 1,692,221 | | | |
| 1,195 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum), 5.00%, 5/1/23 | | | 1,265,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,957,547 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 1.6% |
|
$ | 1,400 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Berkshire Retirement Community, Inc./Edgecombe), 5.10%, 7/1/29 | | $ | 1,156,918 | | | |
| 525 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Carleton-Willard Village), 5.625%, 12/1/30 | | | 522,669 | | | |
| 615 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (First Mortgage VOA Concord), 5.125%, 11/1/27 | | | 476,570 | | | |
| 2,465 | | | Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (First Mortgage VOA Concord), 5.20%, 11/1/41 | | | 1,740,314 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,896,471 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Solid Waste — 1.3% |
|
$ | 3,250 | | | Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Resource Recovery, (Ogden Haverhill), (AMT), 5.60%, 12/1/19 | | $ | 3,082,333 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,082,333 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 3.4% |
|
$ | 6,450 | | | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 0.00%, 7/1/23 | | $ | 3,611,355 | | | |
| 3,335 | | | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 0.00%, 7/1/31 | | | 1,159,513 | | | |
| 5,395 | | | Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 1,571,725 | | | |
| 350 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39 | | | 315,207 | | | |
| 1,255 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | | | 1,365,816 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,023,616 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 8.5% |
|
$ | 6,440 | | | Boston Industrial Development Authority, (Harbor Electric Energy Co.), (AMT), 7.375%, 5/15/15 | | $ | 6,463,377 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.00%, 8/1/32 | | | 4,284,640 | | | |
| 8,900 | | | Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 4.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 7,611,814 | | | |
| 1,625 | | | Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, 5.25%, 12/1/15 | | | 1,831,489 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,191,320 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 107.8% | | |
(identified cost $251,502,161) | | $ | 255,674,447 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.4% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 837 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 4/1/10 | | $ | 836,833 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.4% | | |
(identified cost $836,833) | | $ | 836,833 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 108.2% | | |
(identified cost $252,338,994) | | $ | 256,511,280 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (8.2)% | | $ | (19,427,043 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 237,084,237 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Massachusetts municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 32.8% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 1.7% to 13.5% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(3) | | Security has been issued as an inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at March 31, 2010. |
See notes to financial statements22
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 109.1% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cogeneration — 1.0% |
|
$ | 4,250 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Nissequogue Cogeneration Partners Facility), (AMT), 5.50%, 1/1/23 | | $ | 3,557,845 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,557,845 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Education — 19.1% |
|
$ | 1,810 | | | Geneva Industrial Development Agency, (Hobart & William Smith Project), 5.375%, 2/1/33 | | $ | 1,829,494 | | | |
| 3,085 | | | Hempstead Industrial Development Agency, (Adelphi University), 4.50%, 10/1/24 | | | 3,111,932 | | | |
| 4,005 | | | New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (The Juilliard School), 5.00%, 1/1/34 | | | 4,249,385 | | | |
| 1,095 | | | New York City Industrial Development Agency, (St. Francis College), 5.00%, 10/1/34 | | | 1,045,889 | | | |
| 1,560 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Brooklyn Law School), 5.75%, 7/1/33 | | | 1,598,048 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (City University), 6.00%, 7/1/20 | | | 5,775,450 | | | |
| 860 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (City University), 7.50%, 7/1/10 | | | 875,007 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Columbia University), 5.00%, 7/1/38(1) | | | 5,288,650 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/34(2) | | | 10,587,700 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/39 | | | 2,633,200 | | | |
| 2,190 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (New York University), 5.25%, 7/1/48 | | | 2,305,851 | | | |
| 8,500 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Rochester Institute of Technology), 6.00%, 7/1/33 | | | 9,357,650 | | | |
| 1,365 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40(2) | | | 1,443,078 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Rockefeller University), 5.00%, 7/1/40 | | | 5,286,000 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (State University Educational Facilities), 5.50%, 5/15/19 | | | 2,271,180 | | | |
| 2,530 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Vassar College), 4.25%, 7/1/39 | | | 2,442,715 | | | |
| 9,990 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Vassar College), 5.00%, 7/1/46(2) | | | 10,289,201 | | | |
| 10 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Vassar College), 5.00%, 7/1/46 | | | 10,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 70,400,730 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 3.5% |
|
$ | 2,930 | | | Long Island Power Authority, Electric System Revenue, 6.00%, 5/1/33 | | $ | 3,308,204 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, (Brooklyn Union Gas), (AMT), 6.952%, 7/1/26 | | | 5,007,600 | | | |
| 4,800 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Keyspan-Port Jefferson), (AMT), 5.25%, 6/1/27 | | | 4,641,552 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,957,356 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 3.5% |
|
$ | 250 | | | New York City, 5.30%, 4/1/27 | | $ | 271,488 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York City, 5.375%, 4/1/36 | | | 5,378,300 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | New York City, 6.25%, 10/15/28 | | | 4,667,560 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Saratoga County, 4.75%, 7/15/37 | | | 1,022,630 | | | |
| 675 | | | Saratoga County, 4.75%, 7/15/38 | | | 690,275 | | | |
| 780 | | | Southampton, 4.00%, 12/15/26 | | | 791,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,821,828 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care-Miscellaneous — 0.2% |
|
$ | 340 | | | New York City Industrial Development Agency, (A Very Special Place, Inc.), 5.75%, 1/1/29 | | $ | 274,992 | | | |
| 110 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of Long Island Agencies), Series A, 7.50%, 9/1/15 | | | 111,388 | | | |
| 40 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of Long Island Agencies), Series C, 7.50%, 9/1/15 | | | 40,505 | | | |
| 165 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of Long Island Agencies), Series F, 7.50%, 9/1/15 | | | 167,082 | | | |
| 145 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Alliance of Long Island Agencies), Series J, 7.50%, 9/1/15 | | | 146,830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 740,797 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hospital — 12.8% |
|
$ | 845 | | | Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, (Women’s Christian Association), 6.35%, 11/15/17 | | $ | 823,317 | | | |
| 3,055 | | | Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, (Women’s Christian Association), 6.40%, 11/15/29 | | | 2,699,734 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Fulton County Industrial Development Agency, (Nathan Littauer Hospital), 6.00%, 11/1/18 | | | 2,799,480 | | | |
| 4,250 | | | Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, (Highland Hospital), 5.00%, 8/1/22 | | | 4,253,655 | | | |
| 295 | | | Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (North Shore Health System), 5.875%, 11/1/11 | | | 304,930 | | | |
| 4,500 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Lenox Hill Hospital), 5.50%, 7/1/30 | | | 4,143,870 | | | |
| 6,750 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36(2) | | | 6,872,816 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Methodist Hospital), 5.25%, 7/1/33 | | | 1,867,600 | | | |
| 3,305 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Mount Sinai Hospital), 5.50%, 7/1/26 | | | 3,306,686 | | | |
See notes to financial statements23
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Hospital (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 3,155 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (North Shore Hospital), 5.00%, 11/1/34 | | $ | 3,055,113 | | | |
| 4,500 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (NYU Hospital Center), 5.625%, 7/1/37 | | | 4,434,795 | | | |
| 1,420 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.125%, 12/1/29 | | | 1,393,616 | | | |
| 2,830 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.25%, 12/1/37 | | | 2,707,942 | | | |
| 2,750 | | | Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Elizabeth Medical Center), 5.875%, 12/1/29 | | | 2,563,330 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Oneida County Industrial Development Agency, (Elizabeth Medical Center), 6.00%, 12/1/29 | | | 945,890 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Huntington Hospital), 5.875%, 11/1/32 | | | 5,028,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,201,574 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 3.8% |
|
$ | 3,500 | | | New York City Housing Development Corp., MFMR, (AMT), 4.70%, 11/1/40 | | $ | 3,208,345 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | New York City Housing Development Corp., MFMR, (AMT), 5.05%, 11/1/39 | | | 1,981,700 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | New York Housing Finance Agency, 5.25%, 11/1/41 | | | 2,031,680 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 5.20%, 10/1/32 | | | 3,029,670 | | | |
| 2,170 | | | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 5.30%, 4/1/29 | | | 2,176,618 | | | |
| 1,540 | | | New York Mortgage Agency, (AMT), 5.65%, 4/1/30 | | | 1,540,678 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,968,691 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 6.6% |
|
$ | 1,160 | | | Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, (NRG Dunkirk Power), 5.875%, 4/1/42 | | $ | 1,180,254 | | | |
| 4,825 | | | Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.25%, 10/1/35(2) | | | 4,886,336 | | | |
| 4,005 | | | Liberty Development Corp., (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.), 5.50%, 10/1/37 | | | 4,203,888 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | New York Industrial Development Agency, (American Airlines, Inc. - JFK International Airport), (AMT), 8.00%, 8/1/12 | | | 3,574,060 | | | |
| 10,090 | | | Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), 4.875%, 7/1/41 | | | 9,230,029 | | | |
| 1,350 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.125%, 12/1/15 | | | 1,352,160 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 24,426,727 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 2.9% |
|
$ | 6,600 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (City University), (AMBAC), 5.50%, 7/1/35 | | $ | 6,501,990 | | | |
| 2,250 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (St. John’s University), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/37 | | | 2,296,012 | | | |
| 2,010 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (University of Rochester), (AMBAC), 4.25%, 7/1/39 | | | 1,865,381 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,663,383 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 1.8% |
|
$ | 4,250 | | | Long Island Power Authority, (BHAC), 6.00%, 5/1/33 | | $ | 4,864,040 | | | |
| 1,865 | | | New York Power Authority, (NPFG), 4.50%, 11/15/47 | | | 1,848,513 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,712,553 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.0% |
|
$ | 16,945 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 7/1/30 | | $ | 7,188,069 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,188,069 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 2.1% |
|
$ | 2,375 | | | Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/21 | | $ | 2,640,905 | | | |
| 2,700 | | | Brentwood Union Free School District, (AGC), 4.75%, 11/15/22 | | | 2,974,293 | | | |
| 675 | | | Jamestown, (AMBAC), 7.10%, 3/15/12 | | | 754,029 | | | |
| 675 | | | Jamestown, (AMBAC), 7.10%, 3/15/13 | | | 785,430 | | | |
| 515 | | | Jamestown, (AMBAC), 7.10%, 3/15/14 | | | 619,215 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,773,872 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.8% |
|
$ | 15,325 | | | Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., (NPFG), 4.50%, 2/15/47(3) | | $ | 13,285,243 | | | |
| 680 | | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/36 | | | 662,925 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,948,168 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 1.8% |
|
$ | 895 | | | New York City Cultural Resource Trust, (American Museum of Natural History), (NPFG), 5.00%, 7/1/44 | | $ | 911,728 | | | |
| 10,225 | | | New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 0.00%, 3/1/30 | | | 3,423,432 | | | |
| 2,590 | | | New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 0.00%, 3/1/31 | | | 819,139 | | | |
| 4,825 | | | New York City Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 0.00%, 3/1/33 | | | 1,333,823 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,488,122 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements24
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 4.1% |
|
$ | 3,750 | | | New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 4.75%, 11/15/45 | | $ | 3,529,387 | | | |
| 4,970 | | | New York Convention Center Development Corp., Hotel Occupancy Tax, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 11/15/44 | | | 4,881,385 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | New York Urban Development Corp., (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 3/15/34 | | | 1,039,360 | | | |
| 6,750 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/28 | | | 2,036,543 | | | |
| 15,975 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 2,988,603 | | | |
| 4,140 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 610,691 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,085,969 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 4.0% |
|
$ | 6,315 | | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (AGC), 4.50%, 11/15/38 | | $ | 6,234,547 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Niagara Frontier Airport Authority, (Buffalo Niagara International Airport), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.625%, 4/1/29 | | | 3,505,215 | | | |
| 5,080 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AGC), (AMT), 4.50%, 9/1/35 | | | 4,814,570 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,554,332 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 0.6% |
|
$ | 2,535 | | | Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, (Water Services Corp.), (AMBAC), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/35 | | $ | 2,358,311 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,358,311 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 4.8% |
|
$ | 4,820 | | | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (Building Aid), 4.50%, 1/15/38 | | $ | 4,700,223 | | | |
| 10,940 | | | New York City Urban Development Corp., 5.70%, 4/1/20 | | | 12,801,879 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,502,102 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.7% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Albany Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility, (Charitable Leadership), 5.75%, 7/1/26 | | $ | 1,570,060 | | | |
| 10,395 | | | Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 0.00%, 7/15/31 | | | 2,752,596 | | | |
| 1,260 | | | Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.25%, 7/15/40 | | | 1,304,428 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (Building Aid), 5.25%, 1/15/27 | | | 1,069,610 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (Building Aid), 5.25%, 1/15/39 | | | 1,055,360 | | | |
| 1,960 | | | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, (Building Aid), 6.00%, 7/15/33 | | | 2,222,267 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,974,321 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Senior Living / Life Care — 0.9% |
|
$ | 800 | | | Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, (Wartburg Senior Housing, Inc.), 6.20%, 6/1/29 | | $ | 734,504 | | | |
| 2,900 | | | Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, (Jefferson’s Ferry Project), 5.00%, 11/1/28 | | | 2,613,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,348,187 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 8.1% |
|
$ | 6,700 | | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Dedicated Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 11/15/34 | | $ | 6,996,207 | | | |
| 1,605 | | | New York City Transitional Finance Authority, 5.00%, 5/1/36 | | | 1,676,407 | | | |
| 5,500 | | | New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, (University & College Improvements), 5.25%, 3/15/38 | | | 5,910,245 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | New York Urban Development Corp., 5.25%, 3/15/38 | | | 1,071,510 | | | |
| 50,000 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0.00%, 8/1/56 | | | 2,621,000 | | | |
| 9,480 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 9,412,028 | | | |
| 1,890 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | | | 2,056,887 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,744,284 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 10.1% |
|
$ | 3,595 | | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.50%, 11/15/37 | | $ | 3,425,460 | | | |
| 1,915 | | | Nassau County Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/40(4) | | | 1,921,204 | | | |
| 12,000 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 5.00%, 11/15/37(2) | | | 12,469,320 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 6.125%, 6/1/94 | | | 2,924,850 | | | |
| 7,100 | | | Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.75%, 6/15/33 | | | 6,876,279 | | | |
| 9,000 | | | Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5.25%, 11/15/34 | | | 9,630,180 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 37,247,293 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 8.9% |
|
$ | 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/31 | | $ | 196,876 | | | |
| 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/32 | | | 184,298 | | | |
| 335 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/33 | | | 98,889 | | | |
See notes to financial statements25
Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/36 | | $ | 144,758 | | | |
| 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/37 | | | 136,598 | | | |
| 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/38 | | | 128,554 | | | |
| 585 | | | Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, 0.00%, 10/1/39 | | | 121,481 | | | |
| 445 | | | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 4.50%, 6/15/32 | | | 442,499 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.25%, 6/15/40 | | | 1,069,960 | | | |
| 3,450 | | | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.75%, 6/15/40(2) | | | 3,883,975 | | | |
| 10 | | | New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.75%, 6/15/40 | | | 11,258 | | | |
| 12,320 | | | New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water and Drinking Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 4.50%, 6/15/36 | | | 12,319,261 | | | |
| 8,400 | | | New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water and Drinking Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 5.00%, 6/15/37(2) | | | 8,891,736 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water and Drinking Water, (Municipal Water Finance), 5.125%, 6/15/38 | | | 5,306,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,936,793 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 109.1% | | |
(identified cost $394,883,702) | | $ | 401,601,307 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.4% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 1,462 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 4/1/10 | | $ | 1,462,243 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 0.4% | | |
(identified cost $1,462,243) | | $ | 1,462,243 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 109.5% | | |
(identified cost $396,345,945) | | $ | 403,063,550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (9.5)% | | $ | (34,848,597 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 368,214,953 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
MFMR - Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by New York municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 21.0% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.2% to 7.5% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(4) | | When-issued security. |
See notes to financial statements26
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.6% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 2.8% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Case Western Reserve University), 5.00%, 12/1/33 | | $ | 5,147,200 | | | |
| 550 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Case Western Reserve University), 6.50%, 10/1/20 | | | 655,435 | | | |
| 2,100 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Kenyon College), 5.00%, 7/1/44 | | | 2,123,352 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,925,987 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.2% |
|
$ | 1,245 | | | Clyde, Electric System Revenue, (AMT), 6.00%, 11/15/14 | | $ | 1,248,972 | | | |
| 2,290 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 2,200,919 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,449,891 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.2% |
|
$ | 935 | | | North Canton Health Care Facilities, (St. Luke Lutheran), (GNMA), Prerefunded to 3/20/11, 6.10%, 9/20/16 | | $ | 1,001,516 | | | |
| 4,455 | | | North Canton Health Care Facilities, (St. Luke Lutheran), (GNMA), Prerefunded to 3/20/11, 9.55%, 3/20/32 | | | 4,962,781 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, (Fresh Water Improvement), Prerefunded to 6/1/14, 5.00%, 12/1/28(1) | | | 2,281,420 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Richland County Hospital Facilities, (MedCentral Health Systems), Prerefunded to 11/15/10, 6.375%, 11/15/30 | | | 1,046,770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,292,487 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 4.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Beavercreek City School District, 5.00%, 12/1/36 | | $ | 1,039,440 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Butler County, Special Tax Assessment, 5.50%, 12/1/28 | | | 1,113,930 | | | |
| 4,500 | | | Columbus City School District, (School Facilities, Construction and Improvement), 4.75%, 12/1/33 | | | 4,566,600 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Highland Local School District, (School Facilities, Construction and Improvement), 5.50%, 12/1/36 | | | 1,091,660 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Maple Heights City School District, 5.00%, 1/15/37 | | | 4,021,560 | | | |
| 255 | | | Tuscarawas County, (Public Library Improvement), 6.90%, 12/1/11 | | | 255,525 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,088,715 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hospital — 8.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 8/15/36 | | $ | 416,885 | | | |
| 2,480 | | | Erie County Hospital Facilities, (Firelands Regional Medical Center), 5.625%, 8/15/32 | | | 2,291,570 | | | |
| 950 | | | Franklin County, (Nationwide Children’s Hospital), 5.00%, 11/1/34 | | | 953,553 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Miami County, (Upper Valley Medical Center), 5.25%, 5/15/26 | | | 1,250,762 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Montgomery County, (Catholic Health Initiatives), 5.50%, 5/1/34 | | | 1,051,000 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University Hospital Health Systems, Inc.), 4.75%, 1/15/46 | | | 2,254,500 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University Hospital Health Systems, Inc.), 5.25%, 1/15/46 | | | 4,920,250 | | | |
| 4,880 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Cleveland Clinic Health System), 5.25%, 1/1/33 | | | 5,039,478 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission, (Cleveland Clinic Health System), 5.50%, 1/1/39 | | | 2,072,880 | | | |
| 2,075 | | | Richland County Hospital Facilities, (MedCentral Health Systems), 5.25%, 11/15/36 | | | 1,974,985 | | | |
| 830 | | | Richland County Hospital Facilities, (MedCentral Health Systems), 6.375%, 11/15/30 | | | 842,749 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 23,068,612 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 0.4% |
|
$ | 1,145 | | | Ohio Housing Finance Agency, (Residential Mortgage Backed Securities), (FNMA), (GNMA), (AMT), 4.75%, 3/1/37 | | $ | 1,075,476 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,075,476 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 4.0% |
|
$ | 3,105 | | | Cleveland Airport, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.375%, 9/15/27 | | $ | 2,552,154 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Ohio Pollution Control, (Standard Oil), 6.75%, 12/1/15 | | | 1,224,570 | | | |
| 4,000 | | | Ohio Sewer and Solid Waste Disposal Facilities, (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.), (AMT), 6.00%, 7/1/35 | | | 4,003,920 | | | |
| 825 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Allied Waste North America, Inc.), (AMT), 5.15%, 7/15/15 | | | 832,549 | | | |
| 3,165 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 2,841,094 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,454,287 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 4.5% |
|
$ | 2,175 | | | Kent State University, (AGC), 5.00%, 5/1/29 | | $ | 2,250,342 | | | |
| 945 | | | Miami University, (AMBAC), 3.25%, 9/1/26 | | | 798,119 | | | |
See notes to financial statements27
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-Education (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 2,770 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Dayton), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/30 | | $ | 2,823,267 | | | |
| 6,700 | | | University of Cincinnati, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/34 | | | 6,901,603 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,773,331 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 10.0% |
|
$ | 4,300 | | | American Municipal Power-Ohio, Inc., (Prairie State Energy Campus), (AGC), 5.25%, 2/15/33 | | $ | 4,479,740 | | | |
| 2,540 | | | Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/27 | | | 980,669 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Cleveland Public Power System, (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/38 | | | 2,014,500 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Cuyahoga County Utility Systems, (Medical Center Co.), (NPFG), (AMT), 6.10%, 8/15/15 | | | 2,004,040 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Hamilton, Electric System Revenue, (AGM), 4.70%, 10/15/25 | | | 2,063,240 | | | |
| 5,820 | | | Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, (Dayton Power & Light Co.), (BHAC), (FGIC), 4.80%, 1/1/34 | | | 5,853,930 | | | |
| 4,680 | | | Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, (Ohio Power), (AMBAC), 5.15%, 5/1/26 | | | 4,516,060 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/26 | | | 1,287,720 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/27 | | | 1,005,800 | | | |
| 4,750 | | | Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, (NPFG), 0.00%, 2/15/28 | | | 1,801,200 | | | |
| 2,750 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/35 | | | 2,772,852 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,779,751 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.4% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Cincinnati City School District, (Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement), (AGM), Prerefunded to 12/1/13, 5.00%, 12/1/31 | | $ | 1,130,820 | | | |
| 495 | | | Cuyahoga County Hospital, (Cleveland Clinic Health System), (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.125%, 1/1/29 | | | 496,841 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Little Miami School District, (AGM), Prerefunded to 12/1/16, 5.00%, 12/1/34 | | | 1,744,020 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Marysville Exempt Village School District, (School Facilities), (NPFG), Prerefunded to 6/1/15, 5.25%, 12/1/30 | | | 1,168,280 | | | |
| 845 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Xavier University), (CIFG), Prerefunded to 5/1/16, 5.00%, 5/1/22 | | | 968,750 | | | |
| 1,245 | | | Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Xavier University), (CIFG), Prerefunded to 5/1/16, 5.25%, 5/1/21 | | | 1,444,848 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,953,559 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 33.0% |
|
$ | 2,000 | | | Adams County Local School District, (AGM), 4.25%, 12/1/33 | | $ | 1,969,080 | | | |
| 1,300 | | | Brookfield Local School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 1/15/36 | | | 1,361,633 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Canal Winchester Local School District, (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/32 | | | 745,500 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Cincinnati City School District, (Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement), (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/21 | | | 1,125,460 | | | |
| 10,000 | | | Cincinnati City School District, (Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement), (AGM), (FGIC), 5.25%, 12/1/29 | | | 11,352,100 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Cincinnati City School District, (Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement), (AGM), (FGIC), 5.25%, 12/1/30 | | | 5,660,600 | | | |
| 2,155 | | | Cleveland, (AMBAC), 5.50%, 10/1/23 | | | 2,492,861 | | | |
| 1,550 | | | Clyde-Green Springs Exempted Village School District, (AGM), 4.50%, 12/1/31 | | | 1,541,413 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Columbus School District, (Classroom Facilities Construction & Improvement), (AGM), 4.25%, 12/1/32 | | | 4,788,950 | | | |
| 3,700 | | | Fairview Park, (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/25 | | | 3,840,119 | | | |
| 3,085 | | | Hamilton City School District, (AGM), 4.25%, 12/1/30 | | | 3,075,159 | | | |
| 770 | | | Hamilton City School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/18 | | | 868,352 | | | |
| 1,090 | | | Hilliard School District, (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | | 1,147,312 | | | |
| 1,965 | | | Lakewood City School District, (AGM), 4.50%, 12/1/26 | | | 2,033,814 | | | |
| 9,605 | | | Maderia City School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/1/32 | | | 11,146,891 | | | |
| 3,525 | | | Mason City School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/1/31 | | | 4,092,031 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Mount Healthy City School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/31 | | | 1,810,358 | | | |
| 3,500 | | | Mount Healthy City School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/35 | | | 3,589,390 | | | |
| 1,745 | | | Olentangy Local School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/21 | | | 1,901,806 | | | |
| 5,255 | | | Olentangy Local School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 12/1/30 | | | 5,526,211 | | | |
| 550 | | | Orrville City School District, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 12/1/35 | | | 572,121 | | | |
| 1,620 | | | Painesville City School District, (NPFG), 5.00%, 12/1/24 | | | 1,693,807 | | | |
| 2,385 | | | Pickerington Local School District, (NPFG), 4.25%, 12/1/34 | | | 2,333,126 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Pickerington Local School District, (School Facility Contract), (FGIC), (NPFG), 0.00%, 12/1/16 | | | 1,212,450 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Springboro Community City School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/1/30 | | | 5,750,350 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Springboro Community City School District, (AGM), 5.25%, 12/1/32 | | | 5,698,950 | | | |
See notes to financial statements28
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Insured-General Obligations (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 6,705 | | | Westerville City School District, (XLCA), 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | $ | 7,386,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 94,716,474 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 3.1% |
|
$ | 3,550 | | | Butler County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/31 | | $ | 3,472,787 | | | |
| 1,300 | | | Franklin County, (Ohio Health Corp.), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/33 | | | 1,302,899 | | | |
| 1,555 | | | Hamilton County, (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 5/15/32 | | | 1,514,306 | | | |
| 2,575 | | | Lorain County, (Catholic Healthcare Partners), (AGM), Variable Rate, 23.646%, 2/1/29(2)(3)(4) | | | 2,711,475 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,001,467 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 0.8% |
|
$ | 4,760 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/29 | | $ | 1,329,658 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/34 | | | 935,400 | | | |
| 590 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 87,031 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,352,089 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 5.2% |
|
$ | 7,000 | | | Ohio Turnpike Commission, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.50%, 2/15/24 | | $ | 8,101,170 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(5) | | | 5,148,075 | | | |
| 1,595 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/32 | | | 1,564,089 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,813,334 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 3.1% |
|
$ | 5,000 | | | Cleveland Waterworks, (NPFG), 5.00%, 1/1/37 | | $ | 5,120,400 | | | |
| 2,940 | | | Marysville Wastewater Treatment System, (AGC), (XLCA), 4.75%, 12/1/47 | | | 2,911,776 | | | |
| 810 | | | Toledo Waterworks, (NPFG), 5.00%, 11/15/25 | | | 833,935 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,866,111 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 0.6% |
|
$ | 1,455 | | | Franklin County Convention Facilities Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/27 | | $ | 1,564,591 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,564,591 | | | |
|
|
|
Nursing Home — 0.3% |
|
$ | 935 | | | Cuyahoga County Health Care Facilities, (Maple Care Center), (GNMA), (AMT), 8.00%, 8/20/16 | | $ | 968,389 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 968,389 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.9% |
|
$ | 23,090 | | | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 0.00%, 6/1/47 | | $ | 827,546 | | | |
| 2,275 | | | Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 5.875%, 6/1/47 | | | 1,621,051 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Ohio State Building Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/27 | | | 1,596,105 | | | |
| 4,700 | | | Riversouth Authority, (Lazarus Building Redevelopment), 5.75%, 12/1/27 | | | 4,332,366 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,377,068 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pooled Loans — 3.7% |
|
$ | 640 | | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, (Columbia National), (AMT), 5.00%, 5/15/20 | | $ | 560,474 | | | |
| 675 | | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, (Fairmount Project), 5.125%, 5/15/25 | | | 572,278 | | | |
| 90 | | | Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Burrows Paper), (AMT), 7.625%, 6/1/11 | | | 90,375 | | | |
| 1,440 | | | Ohio Economic Development Commission, (Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund), (AMT), 4.85%, 6/1/25 | | | 1,458,288 | | | |
| 7,455 | | | Rickenbacker Port Authority, Oasbo Expanded Asset Pool Loan, 5.375%, 1/1/32(5) | | | 7,732,028 | | | |
| 380 | | | Toledo Lucas County Port Authority, (AMT), 5.125%, 11/15/25 | | | 316,092 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,729,535 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,740 | | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, 7.00%, 12/1/18 | | $ | 1,762,690 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Cuyahoga Community College District, 5.25%, 2/1/29 | | | 2,692,825 | | | |
| 1,375 | | | Cuyahoga County Economic Development, (Shaker Square), 6.75%, 12/1/30 | | | 1,417,707 | | | |
| 675 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | | | 734,603 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,607,825 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 3.9% |
|
$ | 3,000 | | | Cincinnati Water System Authority, 4.50%, 12/1/23 | | $ | 3,139,980 | | | |
| 3,850 | | | Cincinnati Water System Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/32 | | | 4,071,875 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Fresh Water Quality), 4.50%, 12/1/20 | | | 1,061,810 | | | |
| 750 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Fresh Water Quality), 5.00%, 12/1/28 | | | 814,298 | | | |
See notes to financial statements29
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Water and Sewer (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
$ | 750 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Fresh Water Quality), 5.00%, 6/1/30 | | $ | 806,798 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Fresh Water Quality), 5.25%, 6/1/20 | | | 1,174,580 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,069,341 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.6% | | |
(identified cost $280,448,067) | | $ | 285,928,320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 1.9% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 5,296 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 4/1/10 | | $ | 5,296,397 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 1.9% | | |
(identified cost $5,296,397) | | $ | 5,296,397 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 101.5% | | |
(identified cost $285,744,464) | | $ | 291,224,717 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.5)% | | $ | (4,213,721 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 287,010,996 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
GNMA - Government National Mortgage Association
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
XLCA - XL Capital Assurance, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Ohio municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 61.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 2.0% to 27.8% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Security has been issued as a leveraged inverse floater bond. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at March 31, 2010. |
|
(3) | | Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the inverse floater. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $7,725,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the inverse floater. |
|
(4) | | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions and remain exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At March 31, 2010, the aggregate value of these securities is $2,711,475 or 0.9% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(5) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements30
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.5% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Education — 7.5% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Brown University), 4.75%, 9/1/33 | | $ | 506,030 | | | |
| 2,105 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Brown University), 4.75%, 9/1/37 | | | 2,126,408 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (University of Rhode Island), 6.25%, 9/15/34 | | | 1,085,310 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,717,748 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.3% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Hospital Financing-Lifespan Obligation Group), Prerefunded to 8/15/12, 6.50%, 8/15/32 | | $ | 1,124,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,124,600 | | | |
|
|
|
|
General Obligations — 0.3% |
|
$ | 225 | | | Puerto Rico, 0.00%, 7/1/16 | | $ | 165,096 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 165,096 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hospital — 3.0% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Fulton County, GA, Development Authority, (Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta), 5.25%, 11/15/39 | | $ | 504,860 | | | |
| 655 | | | Kansas Development Finance Authority, (Adventist Healthcare), 5.75%, 11/15/38 | | | 698,820 | | | |
| 250 | | | Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Children’s Hospital), 5.25%, 12/1/39 | | | 256,075 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,459,755 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Housing — 3.8% |
|
$ | 900 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (AMT), 4.90%, 4/1/22 | | $ | 901,935 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (AMT), 4.90%, 10/1/28 | | | 991,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,893,535 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Development Revenue — 4.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corp., (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 4.625%, 4/1/16 | | $ | 950,400 | | | |
| 1,250 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, (HOVENSA LLC), (AMT), 4.70%, 7/1/22 | | | 1,122,075 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,072,475 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Education — 8.4% |
|
$ | 1,395 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Bryant College), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 12/1/31 | | $ | 1,398,878 | | | |
| 400 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Higher Education Facilities-Salve Regina University), (RADIAN), 5.125%, 3/15/32 | | | 375,192 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Higher Education Facilities-University of Rhode Island), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 9/15/30 | | | 1,020,050 | | | |
| 350 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Rhode Island School of Design), (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/31 | | | 351,806 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (State Colleges), (AGM), 5.00%, 9/15/40 | | | 992,240 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,138,166 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Electric Utilities — 3.1% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (BHAC), (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/24 | | $ | 276,783 | | | |
| 310 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.25%, 7/1/29 | | | 322,217 | | | |
| 865 | | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, (NPFG), 5.50%, 7/1/16 | | | 945,566 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,544,566 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Escrowed / Prerefunded — 2.8% |
|
$ | 230 | | | Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp., (AGM), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.75%, 8/1/21 | | $ | 287,813 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp., (NPFG), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.80%, 8/1/12 | | | 1,109,380 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,397,193 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-General Obligations — 3.2% |
|
$ | 600 | | | North Kingstown, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.00%, 10/1/25 | | $ | 638,742 | | | |
| 600 | | | Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, (AGM), 4.75%, 8/1/26 | | | 619,500 | | | |
| 325 | | | Warwick, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/15/21 | | | 343,148 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,601,390 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Hospital — 2.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Rhode Island Hospital), (AGM), 5.00%, 5/15/32 | | $ | 995,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 995,970 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements31
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Housing — 5.3% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (Rental Housing Program), (AGM), (AMT), 5.00%, 10/1/48 | | $ | 706,432 | | | |
| 400 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (Rental Housing Program), (AGM), (AMT), 5.25%, 10/1/31 | | | 389,448 | | | |
| 500 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (Rental Housing Program), (AGM), (AMT), 5.50%, 10/1/49 | | | 507,245 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp., (Rental Housing Program), (AGM), (AMT), 5.55%, 10/1/32 | | | 1,002,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,605,725 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 6.9% |
|
$ | 2,300 | | | Convention Center Authority of Rhode Island, (NPFG), 5.25%, 5/15/15(1) | | $ | 2,506,632 | | | |
| 750 | | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., (AMBAC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 8/1/27 | | | 900,645 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,407,277 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Other Revenue — 7.7% |
|
$ | 500 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Providence Public Buildings Authority), (AGM), 5.00%, 5/15/27 | | $ | 512,150 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Public Schools), (AGC), 5.00%, 5/15/34 | | | 1,008,690 | | | |
| 750 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Public Schools), (AGC), 5.25%, 5/15/29 | | | 772,417 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Public Schools), (AGM), 4.75%, 5/15/29 | | | 1,004,370 | | | |
| 500 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Public Schools), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 5/15/27 | | | 512,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,810,547 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Pooled Loans — 2.6% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Student Loan Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.85%, 12/1/36 | | $ | 832,840 | | | |
| 500 | | | Rhode Island Student Loan Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.90%, 12/1/26 | | | 444,935 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,277,775 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Solid Waste — 1.5% |
|
$ | 750 | | | Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corp., (NPFG), (AMT), 5.00%, 3/1/22 | | $ | 738,863 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 738,863 | | | |
|
|
|
Insured-Special Tax Revenue — 6.8% |
|
$ | 265 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/28 | | $ | 79,953 | | | |
| 1,425 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/29 | | | 398,059 | | | |
| 1,625 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 7/1/37 | | | 239,704 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, (FGIC), 0.00%, 7/1/30 | | | 517,160 | | | |
| 1,820 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/1/54 | | | 108,490 | | | |
| 395 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/44 | | | 48,131 | | | |
| 785 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45 | | | 88,886 | | | |
| 630 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/46 | | | 66,018 | | | |
| 750 | | | Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., (Rhode Island Department of Transportation), Motor Fuel Tax Revenue, (AGC), 5.375%, 6/15/27 | | | 798,382 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., (Rhode Island Department of Transportation), Motor Fuel Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/15/26 | | | 1,022,940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,367,723 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Transportation — 8.8% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (AGC), (CIFG), 5.25%, 7/1/41(2) | | $ | 1,544,422 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., (Rhode Island Airport Corp.), (AGC), (AMT), 5.25%, 7/1/38 | | | 971,250 | | | |
| 825 | | | Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., (Rhode Island Airport Corp.), (CIFG), 5.00%, 7/1/31 | | | 788,535 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Economic Development Corp., (T.F. Green Airport), (AGM), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/20 | | | 1,013,090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,317,297 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insured-Water and Sewer — 3.9% |
|
$ | 1,500 | | | Narragansett Bay Commission, (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/35 | | $ | 1,516,680 | | | |
| 350 | | | Rhode Island Clean Water, Water Pollution Control, (NPFG), 5.40%, 10/1/15(3) | | | 388,476 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,905,156 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nursing Home — 2.0% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Tockwotton Home), 6.25%, 8/15/22 | | $ | 960,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 960,430 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements32
Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund as of March 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Other Revenue — 2.8% |
|
$ | 250 | | | Central Falls Detention Facility, 7.25%, 7/15/35 | | $ | 215,830 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corp., (Public Schools), 5.00%, 5/15/29 | | | 1,041,580 | | | |
| 7,125 | | | Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., 0.00%, 6/1/52 | | | 130,245 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,387,655 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Special Tax Revenue — 5.3% |
|
$ | 135 | | | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.625%, 12/1/29 | | $ | 137,253 | | | |
| 145 | | | Guam, Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.75%, 12/1/34 | | | 148,223 | | | |
| 1,405 | | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/57 | | | 1,394,926 | | | |
| 480 | | | Tiverton Obligation Tax Increment, (Mount Hope Bay Village), 6.875%, 5/1/22 | | | 468,264 | | | |
| 100 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 5.00%, 10/1/39 | | | 90,059 | | | |
| 325 | | | Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37 | | | 353,698 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,592,423 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation — 3.1% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5.25%, 6/1/39 | | $ | 1,021,820 | | | |
| 500 | | | Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/39(4) | | | 489,370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,511,190 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Water and Sewer — 2.2% |
|
$ | 1,000 | | | Rhode Island Clean Water Financing Authority, Water Pollution Control, 5.00%, 10/1/30 | | $ | 1,088,700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,088,700 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 99.5% | | |
(identified cost $49,672,900) | | $ | 49,081,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 2.0% |
|
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 991 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 4/1/10 | | $ | 991,094 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments — 2.0% | | |
(identified cost $991,094) | | $ | 991,094 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 101.5% | | |
(identified cost $50,663,994) | | $ | 50,072,349 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.5)% | | $ | (744,326 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 49,328,023 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT - Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC - Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
CIFG - CIFG Assurance North America, Inc.
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG - National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
RADIAN - Radian Group, Inc.
The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by Rhode Island municipalities. In addition, 14.4% of the Fund’s net assets at March 31, 2010 were invested in municipal obligations issued by Puerto Rico. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at March 31, 2010, 62.1% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.6% to 18.0% of total investments.
| | |
(1) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been segregated to cover payable for when-issued securities. |
|
(2) | | Security represents the underlying municipal bond of an inverse floater (see Note 1I). |
|
(3) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(4) | | When-issued security. |
See notes to financial statements33
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2010 | | California Fund | | | Massachusetts Fund | | | New York Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | | $ | 225,336,959 | | | $ | 252,338,994 | | | $ | 396,345,945 | | | |
Unrealized appreciation | | | 3,122,417 | | | | 4,172,286 | | | | 6,717,605 | | | |
|
|
Investments, at value | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | $ | 256,511,280 | | | $ | 403,063,550 | | | |
|
|
Cash | | $ | 172,440 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,332 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 2,555,736 | | | | 3,731,992 | | | | 5,903,635 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | — | | | | — | | | | 612,770 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 428,850 | | | | 231,148 | | | | 594,951 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 231,616,402 | | | $ | 260,474,420 | | | $ | 410,208,238 | | | |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 22,770,000 | | | $ | 22,400,000 | | | $ | 38,240,000 | | | |
Payable for when-issued securities | | | 3,131,306 | | | | — | | | | 1,912,128 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 81,094 | | | | 66,406 | | | | 200,625 | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 125,268 | | | | 45,155 | | | | 64,430 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 295,459 | | | | 178,639 | | | | 651,705 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 327,675 | | | | 411,762 | | | | 468,901 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 79,691 | | | | 84,650 | | | | 138,630 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 52,308 | | | | 63,577 | | | | 96,079 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 40,978 | | | | 47,001 | | | | 89,800 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 89,153 | | | | 92,993 | | | | 130,987 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 26,992,932 | | | $ | 23,390,183 | | | $ | 41,993,285 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 204,623,470 | | | $ | 237,084,237 | | | $ | 368,214,953 | | | |
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 219,822,780 | | | $ | 268,057,944 | | | $ | 388,419,820 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (18,735,741 | ) | | | (35,693,345 | ) | | | (27,562,344 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 442,578 | | | | 597,807 | | | | 465,048 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 3,093,853 | | | | 4,121,831 | | | | 6,892,429 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 204,623,470 | | | $ | 237,084,237 | | | $ | 368,214,953 | | | |
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 183,218,628 | | | $ | 186,046,448 | | | $ | 304,985,237 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 19,046,499 | | | | 21,787,340 | | | | 32,046,976 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.62 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 9.52 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 10.10 | | | $ | 8.97 | | | $ | 9.99 | | | |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 3,395,775 | | | $ | 18,891,613 | | | $ | 10,925,358 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 381,786 | | | | 2,211,678 | | | | 1,146,372 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.89 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 9.53 | | | |
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 12,223,722 | | | $ | 19,849,086 | | | $ | 43,495,236 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,374,175 | | | | 2,323,131 | | | | 4,567,725 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.90 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 9.52 | | | |
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,785,345 | | | $ | 12,297,090 | | | $ | 8,809,122 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 600,860 | | | | 1,440,200 | | | | 925,769 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.63 | | | $ | 8.54 | | | $ | 9.52 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements34
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2010 | | Ohio Fund | | | Rhode Island Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Investments — | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified cost | | $ | 285,744,464 | | | $ | 50,663,994 | | | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 5,480,253 | | | | (591,645 | ) | | |
|
|
Investments, at value | | $ | 291,224,717 | | | $ | 50,072,349 | | | |
|
|
Interest receivable | | $ | 4,086,664 | | | $ | 687,664 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 35,000 | | | | — | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 353,450 | | | | 57,839 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 295,699,831 | | | $ | 50,817,852 | | | |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for floating rate notes issued | | $ | 7,470,000 | | | $ | 750,000 | | | |
Payable for when-issued securities | | | — | | | | 484,930 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 121,406 | | | | 4,375 | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 82,437 | | | | 9,140 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 334,125 | | | | 111,527 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 392,922 | | | | 58,646 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 103,411 | | | | 11,491 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 67,941 | | | | 15,342 | | | |
Interest expense and fees payable | | | 16,163 | | | | 1,998 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 100,430 | | | | 42,380 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 8,688,835 | | | $ | 1,489,829 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 287,010,996 | | | $ | 49,328,023 | | | |
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 304,591,969 | | | $ | 53,604,236 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (22,889,846 | ) | | | (3,651,963 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (75,820 | ) | | | (21,923 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 5,384,693 | | | | (602,327 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 287,010,996 | | | $ | 49,328,023 | | | |
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 257,510,502 | | | $ | 38,715,237 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 28,918,866 | | | | 4,391,204 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.90 | | | $ | 8.82 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.34 | | | $ | 9.26 | | | |
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,532,461 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | — | | | | 724,079 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | — | | | $ | 9.02 | | | |
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 29,500,494 | | | $ | 4,080,325 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,314,604 | | | | 452,026 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.90 | | | $ | 9.03 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements35
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 | | California Fund | | | Massachusetts Fund | | | New York Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 6,056,058 | | | $ | 7,150,126 | | | $ | 10,499,408 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 6,056,058 | | | $ | 7,150,126 | | | $ | 10,499,408 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 496,621 | | | $ | 535,765 | | | $ | 800,775 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 236,431 | | | | 191,602 | | | | 310,166 | | | |
Class B | | | 16,915 | | | | 89,846 | | | | 50,162 | | | |
Class C | | | 61,939 | | | | 89,040 | | | | 203,996 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 3,717 | | | | 4,287 | | | | 6,433 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 66,728 | | | | 76,337 | | | | 102,206 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 40,829 | | | | 51,126 | | | | 91,146 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 47,748 | | | | 44,930 | | | | 44,611 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 9,125 | | | | 11,301 | | | | 17,029 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 924 | | | | 3,709 | | | | 726 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 95,799 | | | | 113,854 | | | | 149,935 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 14,376 | | | | 16,691 | | | | 19,263 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 1,091,152 | | | $ | 1,228,488 | | | $ | 1,796,448 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 729 | | | $ | 194 | | | $ | 1,410 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 729 | | | $ | 194 | | | $ | 1,410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 1,090,423 | | | $ | 1,228,294 | | | $ | 1,795,038 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,965,635 | | | $ | 5,921,832 | | | $ | 8,704,370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 1,601,095 | | | $ | (1,809,326 | ) | | $ | (212,870 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 98,945 | | | | (663,455 | ) | | | 259,166 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 257,784 | | | | 458,409 | | | | 654,082 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) | | $ | 1,957,824 | | | $ | (2,014,372 | ) | | $ | 700,378 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (10,260,552 | ) | | $ | (7,529,682 | ) | �� | $ | (9,644,197 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 439,258 | | | | 660,847 | | | | 1,076,688 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 439,568 | | | | 41,685 | | | | 59,478 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (9,381,726 | ) | | $ | (6,827,150 | ) | | $ | (8,508,031 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (7,423,902 | ) | | $ | (8,841,522 | ) | | $ | (7,807,653 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (2,458,267 | ) | | $ | (2,919,690 | ) | | $ | 896,717 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements36
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Operations
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 | | Ohio Fund | | | Rhode Island Fund | | | |
|
|
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 7,225,718 | | | $ | 1,309,079 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 7,225,718 | | | $ | 1,309,079 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 574,673 | | | $ | 67,922 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 258,797 | | | | 39,240 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 34,593 | | | |
Class C | | | 138,437 | | | | 19,179 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 5,059 | | | | 1,092 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 84,419 | | | | 21,665 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 63,409 | | | | 11,811 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 33,594 | | | | 21,249 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 12,668 | | | | 4,423 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 1,652 | | | | 176 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 19,619 | | | | 5,125 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 3,015 | | | | 8,271 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 1,195,342 | | | $ | 234,746 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 1,186 | | | $ | 88 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 1,186 | | | $ | 88 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 1,194,156 | | | $ | 234,658 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 6,031,562 | | | $ | 1,074,421 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (228,418 | ) | | $ | (89,952 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (49,630 | ) | | | (14,260 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 462 | | | | 92,784 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (277,586 | ) | | $ | (11,428 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (8,578,101 | ) | | $ | (1,064,532 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 606,247 | | | | 21,219 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 343,322 | | | | 8,437 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (7,628,532 | ) | | $ | (1,034,876 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (7,906,118 | ) | | $ | (1,046,304 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (1,874,556 | ) | | $ | 28,117 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements37
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | California Fund | | | Massachusetts Fund | | | New York Fund | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,965,635 | | | $ | 5,921,832 | | | $ | 8,704,370 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | 1,957,824 | | | | (2,014,372 | ) | | | 700,378 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (9,381,726 | ) | | | (6,827,150 | ) | | | (8,508,031 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (2,458,267 | ) | | $ | (2,919,690 | ) | | $ | 896,717 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (4,327,309 | ) | | $ | (4,724,640 | ) | | $ | (7,407,561 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (65,445 | ) | | | (445,976 | ) | | | (216,298 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (240,080 | ) | | | (395,935 | ) | | | (879,488 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (126,233 | ) | | | (309,833 | ) | | | (178,567 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (4,759,067 | ) | | $ | (5,876,384 | ) | | $ | (8,681,914 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 4,599,964 | | | $ | 5,872,044 | | | $ | 13,453,722 | | | |
Class B | | | 342,431 | | | | 171,523 | | | | 894,303 | | | |
Class C | | | 871,994 | | | | 3,436,620 | | | | 5,574,287 | | | |
Class I | | | 4,245,901 | | | | 2,319,657 | | | | 7,547,672 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 2,605,841 | | | | 2,631,546 | | | | 5,112,361 | | | |
Class B | | | 32,490 | | | | 265,583 | | | | 133,299 | | | |
Class C | | | 148,626 | | | | 268,501 | | | | 589,460 | | | |
Class I | | | 660 | | | | 94,921 | | | | 12,711 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (24,546,101 | ) | | | (24,209,626 | ) | | | (39,435,156 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (127,820 | ) | | | (2,078,878 | ) | | | (650,303 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,287,383 | ) | | | (1,929,762 | ) | | | (4,997,333 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,005,719 | ) | | | (662,005 | ) | | | (441,920 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 369,823 | | | | 1,826,658 | | | | 303,282 | | | |
Class B | | | (369,823 | ) | | | (1,826,658 | ) | | | (303,282 | ) | | |
Contingent deferred sales charges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 398 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (14,119,116 | ) | | $ | (13,819,478 | ) | | $ | (12,206,897 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (21,336,450 | ) | | $ | (22,615,552 | ) | | $ | (19,992,094 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 225,959,920 | | | $ | 259,699,789 | | | $ | 388,207,047 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 204,623,470 | | | $ | 237,084,237 | | | $ | 368,214,953 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | 442,578 | | | $ | 597,807 | | | $ | 465,048 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements38
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Ohio Fund | | | Rhode Island Fund | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 6,031,562 | | | $ | 1,074,421 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (277,586 | ) | | | (11,428 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (7,628,532 | ) | | | (1,034,876 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | (1,874,556 | ) | | $ | 28,117 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (5,473,512 | ) | | $ | (854,415 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (132,232 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (514,707 | ) | | | (73,681 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (5,988,219 | ) | | $ | (1,060,328 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 16,336,024 | | | $ | 2,883,517 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 989 | | | |
Class C | | | 2,720,977 | | | | 660,882 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,368,287 | | | | 546,940 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 89,163 | | | |
Class C | | | 329,741 | | | | 47,512 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (22,191,083 | ) | | | (3,980,246 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (568,202 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (2,146,329 | ) | | | (700,539 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 980,030 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (980,030 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (1,582,383 | ) | | $ | (1,019,984 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (9,445,158 | ) | | $ | (2,052,195 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | �� | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of period | | $ | 296,456,154 | | | $ | 51,380,218 | | | |
|
|
At end of period | | $ | 287,010,996 | | | $ | 49,328,023 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of period | | $ | (75,820 | ) | | $ | (21,923 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements39
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Year Ended September 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | California Fund | | | Massachusetts Fund | | | New York Fund | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 11,096,723 | | | $ | 12,799,750 | | | $ | 17,714,350 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (13,934,687 | ) | | | (17,895,498 | ) | | | (18,366,092 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | 28,952,444 | | | | 37,779,050 | | | | 49,951,959 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 26,114,480 | | | $ | 32,683,302 | | | $ | 49,300,217 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (10,057,352 | ) | | $ | (9,936,463 | ) | | $ | (15,586,232 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (133,776 | ) | | | (1,074,651 | ) | | | (447,350 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (507,375 | ) | | | (705,259 | ) | | | (1,531,437 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (87,469 | ) | | | (599,315 | ) | | | (49,988 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (10,785,972 | ) | | $ | (12,315,688 | ) | | $ | (17,615,007 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 18,936,502 | | | $ | 18,657,264 | | | $ | 35,300,886 | | | |
Class B | | | 592,830 | | | | 1,495,542 | | | | 1,763,508 | | | |
Class C | | | 2,358,362 | | | | 3,940,208 | | | | 13,163,145 | | | |
Class I | | | 2,116,015 | | | | 71,704 | | | | 1,234,715 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 5,664,655 | | | | 5,231,503 | | | | 10,043,620 | | | |
Class B | | | 72,499 | | | | 582,007 | | | | 267,450 | | | |
Class C | | | 304,657 | | | | 488,087 | | | | 978,288 | | | |
Class I | | | 14,023 | | | | 207,335 | | | | 15,468 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (63,849,941 | ) | | | (48,405,896 | ) | | | (59,265,227 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (563,856 | ) | | | (4,647,403 | ) | | | (2,007,188 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (6,186,213 | ) | | | (4,741,428 | ) | | | (7,423,296 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (65,893 | ) | | | (3,190,269 | ) | | | (113,788 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 99,036 | | | | 3,756,526 | | | | 428,134 | | | |
Class B | | | (99,036 | ) | | | (3,756,526 | ) | | | (428,134 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (40,606,360 | ) | | $ | (30,311,346 | ) | | $ | (6,042,419 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | (25,277,852 | ) | | $ | (9,943,732 | ) | | $ | 25,642,791 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 251,237,772 | | | $ | 269,643,521 | | | $ | 362,564,256 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 225,959,920 | | | $ | 259,699,789 | | | $ | 388,207,047 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 236,010 | | | $ | 552,359 | | | $ | 442,592 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements40
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the Year Ended September 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | Ohio Fund | | | Rhode Island Fund | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 12,765,042 | | | $ | 2,140,371 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | (9,556,789 | ) | | | (2,300,303 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and swap contracts | | | 40,979,027 | | | | 5,610,787 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 44,187,280 | | | $ | 5,450,855 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (11,471,357 | ) | | $ | (1,665,730 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (188,122 | ) | | | (346,104 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,052,673 | ) | | | (140,964 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (12,712,152 | ) | | $ | (2,152,798 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 24,163,955 | | | $ | 4,261,732 | | | |
Class B | | | 46,908 | | | | 348,005 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,040,054 | | | | 1,275,653 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 7,063,328 | | | | 928,438 | | | |
Class B | | | 93,398 | | | | 223,750 | | | |
Class C | | | 653,955 | | | | 99,599 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (65,826,688 | ) | | | (7,395,345 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (819,720 | ) | | | (1,443,736 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (9,549,727 | ) | | | (940,064 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 234,527 | | | | 1,694,940 | | | |
Class B | | | (234,527 | ) | | | (1,694,940 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares merged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 19,344,200 | | | | — | | | |
Class B | | | (19,344,200 | ) | | | — | | | |
Contingent deferred sales charges | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | 19,600 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (39,114,937 | ) | | $ | (2,641,968 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | (7,639,809 | ) | | $ | 656,089 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 304,095,963 | | | $ | 50,724,129 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 296,456,154 | | | $ | 51,380,218 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (119,163 | ) | | $ | (36,016 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements41
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.940 | | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 10.620 | | | $ | 11.080 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | $ | 10.860 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.229 | | | $ | 0.454 | | | $ | 0.456 | | | $ | 0.458 | | | $ | 0.486 | | | $ | 0.515 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.330 | ) | | | 0.757 | | | | (1.411 | ) | | | (0.280 | ) | | | 0.181 | | | | 0.037 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.101 | ) | | $ | 1.211 | | | $ | (0.955 | ) | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 0.667 | | | $ | 0.552 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.219 | ) | | $ | (0.441 | ) | | $ | (0.450 | ) | | $ | (0.462 | ) | | $ | (0.487 | ) | | $ | (0.512 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.176 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.219 | ) | | $ | (0.441 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.638 | ) | | $ | (0.487 | ) | | $ | (0.512 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.940 | | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 10.620 | | | $ | 11.080 | | | $ | 10.900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.98 | )%(3) | | | 13.91 | % | | | (9.32 | )% | | | 1.61 | % | | | 6.28 | % | | | 5.18 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 183,219 | | | $ | 206,762 | | | $ | 232,090 | | | $ | 261,254 | | | $ | 233,618 | | | $ | 223,528 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.90 | %(4) | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.84 | %(5) | | | 0.86 | % | | | 0.88 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | | 0.18 | % | | | 0.30 | % | | | 0.33 | % | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.23 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.99 | %(4) | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.17 | %(5) | | | 1.23 | % | | | 1.11 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.90 | %(4) | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.82 | %(5) | | | 0.85 | % | | | 0.87 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.78 | %(4) | | | 5.14 | % | | | 4.47 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | 4.45 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 4 | %(3) | | | 21 | % | | | 22 | % | | | 41 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 23 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements42
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.190 | | | $ | 8.480 | | | $ | 9.810 | | | $ | 10.260 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.178 | | | $ | 0.359 | | | $ | 0.351 | | | $ | 0.350 | | | $ | 0.374 | | | $ | 0.399 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.306 | ) | | | 0.696 | | | | (1.295 | ) | | | (0.273 | ) | | | 0.171 | | | | 0.030 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.128 | ) | | $ | 1.055 | | | $ | (0.944 | ) | | $ | 0.077 | | | $ | 0.545 | | | $ | 0.429 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.172 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.351 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.176 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.172 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.386 | ) | | $ | (0.527 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.890 | | | $ | 9.190 | | | $ | 8.480 | | | $ | 9.810 | | | $ | 10.260 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.37 | )%(3) | | | 13.01 | % | | | (9.91 | )% | | | 0.73 | % | | | 5.52 | % | | | 4.50 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 3,396 | | | $ | 3,642 | | | $ | 3,371 | | | $ | 3,545 | | | $ | 4,090 | | | $ | 3,655 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.65 | %(5) | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.59 | %(6) | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.63 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.09 | %(5) | | | 0.18 | % | | | 0.30 | % | | | 0.33 | % | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.23 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.74 | %(5) | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.92 | %(6) | | | 1.98 | % | | | 1.86 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.65 | %(5) | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.57 | %(6) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.62 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.01 | %(5) | | | 4.39 | % | | | 3.72 | % | | | 3.48 | % | | | 3.70 | % | | | 3.94 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 4 | %(3) | | | 21 | % | | | 22 | % | | | 41 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 23 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.17% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements43
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.190 | | | $ | 8.480 | | | $ | 9.810 | | | $ | 10.250 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.179 | | | $ | 0.359 | | | $ | 0.351 | | | $ | 0.348 | | | $ | 0.366 | | | $ | 0.384 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.297 | ) | | | 0.696 | | | | (1.295 | ) | | | (0.261 | ) | | | 0.169 | | | | 0.045 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.118 | ) | | $ | 1.055 | | | $ | (0.944 | ) | | $ | 0.087 | | | $ | 0.535 | | | $ | 0.429 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.172 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.351 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.045 | ) | | | (0.176 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.172 | ) | | $ | (0.345 | ) | | $ | (0.386 | ) | | $ | (0.527 | ) | | $ | (0.375 | ) | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 9.190 | | | $ | 8.480 | | | $ | 9.810 | | | $ | 10.250 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (1.26 | )%(3) | | | 13.01 | % | | | (9.91 | )% | | | 0.83 | % | | | 5.42 | % | | | 4.42 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 12,224 | | | $ | 12,903 | | | $ | 15,667 | | | $ | 11,465 | | | $ | 4,933 | | | $ | 1,725 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.65 | %(5) | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.59 | %(6) | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.63 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.09 | %(5) | | | 0.18 | % | | | 0.30 | % | | | 0.33 | % | | | 0.37 | % | | | 0.23 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.74 | %(5) | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.92 | %(6) | | | 1.98 | % | | | 1.86 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.65 | %(5) | | | 1.66 | % | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.57 | %(6) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.62 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.02 | %(5) | | | 4.40 | % | | | 3.73 | % | | | 3.49 | % | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 4 | %(3) | | | 21 | % | | | 22 | % | | | 41 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 23 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.09% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements44
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.950 | | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 9.530 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.243 | | | $ | 0.481 | | | $ | 0.277 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.332 | ) | | | 0.763 | | | | (0.362 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.089 | ) | | $ | 1.244 | | | $ | (0.085 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | $ | (0.464 | ) | | $ | (0.275 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | $ | (0.464 | ) | | $ | (0.275 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.630 | | | $ | 9.950 | | | $ | 9.170 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (0.86 | )%(4) | | | 14.31 | % | | | (1.08 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,785 | | | $ | 2,653 | | | $ | 110 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.65 | %(5) | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.63 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.09 | %(5) | | | 0.18 | % | | | 0.30 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.74 | %(5) | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.93 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.65 | %(5) | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.60 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.06 | %(5) | | | 5.35 | % | | | 4.79 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 4 | %(4) | | | 21 | % | | | 22 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to September 30, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | For the year ended September 30, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements45
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Massachusetts Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | $ | 9.660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.212 | | | $ | 0.434 | | | $ | 0.428 | | | $ | 0.415 | | | $ | 0.432 | | | $ | 0.449 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.302 | ) | | | 0.774 | | | | (1.459 | ) | | | (0.356 | ) | | | 0.180 | | | | 0.017 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.090 | ) | | $ | 1.208 | | | $ | (1.031 | ) | | $ | 0.059 | | | $ | 0.612 | | | $ | 0.466 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.210 | ) | | $ | (0.418 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.419 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | $ | (0.456 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.210 | ) | | $ | (0.418 | ) | | $ | (0.409 | ) | | $ | (0.419 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | $ | (0.456 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.540 | | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.98 | )%(3) | | | 15.84 | % | | | (11.19 | )% | | | 0.57 | % | | | 6.51 | % | | | 4.90 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 186,046 | | | $ | 206,922 | | | $ | 211,228 | | | $ | 254,366 | | | $ | 197,580 | | | $ | 156,382 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.82 | %(4) | | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.79 | %(5)(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.09 | %(4) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.25 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.42 | % | | | 0.28 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.91 | %(4) | | | 1.04 | % | | | 1.03 | % | | | 1.24 | %(5) | | | 1.21 | % | | | 1.07 | %(5)(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.82 | %(4) | | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.76 | %(5) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.78 | %(5)(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.98 | %(4) | | | 5.59 | % | | | 4.73 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | | 4.48 | % | | | 4.62 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(3) | | | 21 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 15 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses or reduced its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2005). Absent this allocation or reduction, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements46
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Massachusetts Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.500 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | $ | 9.650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.183 | | | $ | 0.376 | | | $ | 0.360 | | | $ | 0.343 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | $ | 0.378 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.299 | ) | | | 0.773 | | | | (1.472 | ) | | | (0.347 | ) | | | 0.179 | | | | 0.026 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.116 | ) | | $ | 1.149 | | | $ | (1.112 | ) | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | $ | 0.541 | | | $ | 0.404 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.184 | ) | | $ | (0.359 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.361 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.184 | ) | | $ | (0.359 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.361 | ) | | $ | (0.384 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contingent deferred sales charges | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.540 | | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.500 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (1.28 | )%(4) | | | 14.97 | % | | | (11.99 | )% | | | (0.07 | )% | | | 5.73 | % | | | 4.39 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 18,892 | | | $ | 23,150 | | | $ | 27,670 | | | $ | 40,938 | | | $ | 48,991 | | | $ | 54,708 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.52 | %(7) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.54 | %(7)(8) | | |
Interest and fee expense(9) | | | 0.09 | %(6) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.25 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.42 | % | | | 0.28 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.58 | %(6) | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.99 | %(7) | | | 1.96 | % | | | 1.82 | %(7)(8) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.51 | %(7) | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.53 | %(7)(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.31 | %(6) | | | 4.85 | % | | | 3.98 | % | | | 3.52 | % | | | 3.75 | % | | | 3.88 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(4) | | | 21 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 15 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses or reduced its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2005). Absent this allocation or reduction, total return would be lower. |
|
(8) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(9) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements47
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Massachusetts Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | September 30, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.850 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.500 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.180 | | | $ | 0.376 | | | $ | 0.361 | | | $ | 0.342 | | | $ | 0.136 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.310 | ) | | | 0.783 | | | | (1.473 | ) | | | (0.346 | ) | | | 0.254 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.130 | ) | | $ | 1.159 | | | $ | (1.112 | ) | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | $ | 0.390 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.180 | ) | | $ | (0.359 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.150 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.180 | ) | | $ | (0.359 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.346 | ) | | $ | (0.150 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.540 | | | $ | 8.850 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.500 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (1.44 | )%(4) | | | 15.10 | % | | | (11.99 | )% | | | (0.07 | )% | | | 4.10 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 19,849 | | | $ | 18,702 | | | $ | 17,704 | | | $ | 17,583 | | | $ | 2,825 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.09 | %(5) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.25 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.42 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.65 | %(5) | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.98 | %(6) | | | 1.96 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.56 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.52 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.22 | %(5) | | | 4.83 | % | | | 3.99 | % | | | 3.53 | % | | | 3.40 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(4) | | | 21 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 28 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 2, 2006, to September 30, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the year ended September 30, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements48
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Massachusetts Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | $ | 9.650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.221 | | | $ | 0.450 | | | $ | 0.446 | | | $ | 0.435 | | | $ | 0.453 | | | $ | 0.468 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.303 | ) | | | 0.774 | | | | (1.458 | ) | | | (0.356 | ) | | | 0.178 | | | | 0.027 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.082 | ) | | $ | 1.224 | | | $ | (1.012 | ) | | $ | 0.079 | | | $ | 0.631 | | | $ | 0.495 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.218 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.428 | ) | | $ | (0.439 | ) | | $ | (0.451 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.218 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.428 | ) | | $ | (0.439 | ) | | $ | (0.451 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.540 | | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 8.050 | | | $ | 9.490 | | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 9.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.89 | )%(3) | | | 16.08 | % | | | (11.00 | )% | | | 0.77 | % | | | 6.72 | % | | | 5.43 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 12,297 | | | $ | 10,926 | | | $ | 13,042 | | | $ | 16,730 | | | $ | 13,227 | | | $ | 11,701 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.62 | %(5) | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.57 | %(6) | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.59 | %(6)(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.09 | %(5) | | | 0.21 | % | | | 0.25 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.42 | % | | | 0.28 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.71 | %(5) | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.83 | % | | | 1.04 | %(6) | | | 1.01 | % | | | 0.87 | %(6)(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.62 | %(5) | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.56 | %(6) | | | 0.57 | % | | | 0.58 | %(6)(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.19 | %(5) | | | 5.80 | % | | | 4.93 | % | | | 4.47 | % | | | 4.69 | % | | | 4.81 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(3) | | | 21 | % | | | 31 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 28 | % | | | 15 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.20% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses or reduced its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended September 30, 2007 and 2005). Absent this allocation or reduction, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements49
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 8.850 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | $ | 10.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.226 | | | $ | 0.459 | | | $ | 0.471 | | | $ | 0.466 | | | $ | 0.476 | | | $ | 0.502 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.191 | ) | | | 0.857 | | | | (1.563 | ) | | | (0.305 | ) | | | 0.170 | | | | (0.090 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.035 | | | $ | 1.316 | | | $ | (1.092 | ) | | $ | 0.161 | | | $ | 0.646 | | | $ | 0.412 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | $ | (0.456 | ) | | $ | (0.458 | ) | | $ | (0.458 | ) | | $ | (0.473 | ) | | $ | (0.512 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.053 | ) | | | (0.123 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | $ | (0.456 | ) | | $ | (0.458 | ) | | $ | (0.511 | ) | | $ | (0.596 | ) | | $ | (0.512 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.520 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 8.850 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 0.41 | %(3) | | | 15.77 | % | | | (10.86 | )% | | | 1.50 | % | | | 6.29 | % | | | 3.88 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 304,985 | | | $ | 332,257 | | | $ | 319,101 | | | $ | 400,671 | | | $ | 393,479 | | | $ | 357,652 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.80 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.08 | %(4) | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.35 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.86 | %(4) | | | 1.02 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.25 | %(5) | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.15 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.78 | %(4) | | | 0.83 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.75 | %(5) | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.79 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.80 | %(4) | | | 5.42 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | | 4.39 | % | | | 4.50 | % | | | 4.65 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(3) | | | 44 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 45 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements50
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.730 | | | $ | 8.870 | | | $ | 10.420 | | | $ | 10.760 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | $ | 10.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.191 | | | $ | 0.396 | | | $ | 0.397 | | | $ | 0.386 | | | $ | 0.396 | | | $ | 0.415 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.198 | ) | | | 0.856 | | | | (1.566 | ) | | | (0.295 | ) | | | 0.181 | | | | (0.083 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.007 | ) | | $ | 1.252 | | | $ | (1.169 | ) | | $ | 0.091 | | | $ | 0.577 | | | $ | 0.332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.381 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.053 | ) | | | (0.123 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.381 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.517 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 9.730 | | | $ | 8.870 | | | $ | 10.420 | | | $ | 10.760 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.02 | )%(3) | | | 14.87 | % | | | (11.53 | )% | | | 0.83 | % | | | 5.59 | % | | | 3.27 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 10,925 | | | $ | 11,064 | | | $ | 10,552 | | | $ | 11,439 | | | $ | 9,488 | | | $ | 6,189 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.55 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.08 | %(5) | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.35 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.61 | %(5) | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.99 | %(6) | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.90 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.54 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.05 | %(5) | | | 4.68 | % | | | 3.96 | % | | | 3.63 | % | | | 3.74 | % | | | 3.84 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(3) | | | 44 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 45 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.16% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements51
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.720 | | | $ | 8.860 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | $ | 10.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.191 | | | $ | 0.395 | | | $ | 0.396 | | | $ | 0.383 | | | $ | 0.391 | | | $ | 0.408 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.198 | ) | | | 0.857 | | | | (1.556 | ) | | | (0.302 | ) | | | 0.176 | | | | (0.077 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.007 | ) | | $ | 1.252 | | | $ | (1.160 | ) | | $ | 0.081 | | | $ | 0.567 | | | $ | 0.331 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.380 | ) | | $ | (0.378 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.053 | ) | | | (0.123 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.392 | ) | | $ | (0.380 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | $ | (0.517 | ) | | $ | (0.431 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.520 | | | $ | 9.720 | | | $ | 8.860 | | | $ | 10.400 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 10.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.03 | )%(3) | | | 14.88 | % | | | (11.46 | )% | | | 0.73 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | | 3.20 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 43,495 | | | $ | 43,214 | | | $ | 32,684 | | | $ | 31,131 | | | $ | 13,889 | | | $ | 4,702 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.51 | %(6) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.54 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.08 | %(5) | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.38 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.48 | % | | | 0.35 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.61 | %(5) | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.99 | %(6) | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.89 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.50 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.53 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.04 | %(5) | | | 4.65 | % | | | 3.97 | % | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.70 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(3) | | | 44 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 45 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.09% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements52
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Fund — Class I |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | September 30, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 8.850 | | | $ | 9.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.238 | | | $ | 0.481 | | | $ | 0.290 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.194 | ) | | | 0.852 | | | | (0.504 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.044 | | | $ | 1.333 | | | $ | (0.214 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.234 | ) | | $ | (0.473 | ) | | $ | (0.276 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.234 | ) | | $ | (0.473 | ) | | $ | (0.276 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.520 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | $ | 8.850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 0.51 | %(4) | | | 16.00 | % | | | (2.51 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 8,809 | | | $ | 1,672 | | | $ | 227 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.60 | %(5) | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.61 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 0.08 | %(5) | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.38 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.68 | %(5) | | | 0.82 | % | | | 0.99 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.60 | %(5) | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.58 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.05 | %(5) | | | 5.61 | % | | | 5.09 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 7 | %(4) | | | 44 | % | | | 45 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 3, 2008, to September 30, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(7) | | For the year ended September 30, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements53
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ohio Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.150 | | | $ | 8.140 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | $ | 9.180 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.190 | | | $ | 0.381 | | | $ | 0.384 | | | $ | 0.382 | | | $ | 0.420 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.252 | ) | | | 1.008 | | | | (1.108 | ) | | | (0.197 | ) | | | 0.137 | | | | 0.142 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.062 | ) | | $ | 1.389 | | | $ | (0.724 | ) | | $ | 0.185 | | | $ | 0.557 | | | $ | 0.606 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.379 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.427 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.379 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | $ | (0.395 | ) | | $ | (0.427 | ) | | $ | (0.466 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 9.150 | | | $ | 8.140 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.65 | )%(3) | | | 17.71 | % | | | (8.09 | )% | | | 1.98 | % | | | 6.15 | % | | | 6.71 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 257,511 | | | $ | 267,068 | | | $ | 251,447 | | | $ | 274,850 | | | $ | 182,719 | | | $ | 140,355 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.77 | %(5) | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.82 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.01 | %(4) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.31 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.35 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.75 | %(4) | | | 0.88 | % | | | 0.97 | % | | | 1.08 | %(5) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.17 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.74 | %(5) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.81 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.27 | %(4) | | | 4.66 | % | | | 4.28 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 4.53 | % | | | 4.97 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 5 | %(3) | | | 10 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 39 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 28 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements54
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Ohio Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | September 30, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.150 | | | $ | 8.130 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.440 | | | $ | 9.300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.156 | | | $ | 0.320 | | | $ | 0.316 | | | $ | 0.310 | | | $ | 0.211 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.249 | ) | | | 1.017 | | | | (1.118 | ) | | | (0.186 | ) | | | 0.160 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.093 | ) | | $ | 1.337 | | | $ | (0.802 | ) | | $ | 0.124 | | | $ | 0.371 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | $ | (0.317 | ) | | $ | (0.308 | ) | | $ | (0.324 | ) | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | $ | (0.317 | ) | | $ | (0.308 | ) | | $ | (0.324 | ) | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.900 | | | $ | 9.150 | | | $ | 8.130 | | | $ | 9.240 | | | $ | 9.440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (1.00 | )%(4) | | | 16.98 | % | | | (8.91 | )% | | | 1.32 | % | | | 4.06 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 29,500 | | | $ | 29,388 | | | $ | 30,157 | | | $ | 30,804 | | | $ | 8,294 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.52 | %(6) | | | 1.53 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.01 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.20 | % | | | 0.31 | % | | | 0.47 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | | 1.83 | %(6) | | | 2.00 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.51 | %(5) | | | 3.92 | % | | | 3.53 | % | | | 3.33 | % | | | 3.45 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 5 | %(4) | | | 10 | % | | | 30 | % | | | 39 | % | | | 24 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, February 3, 2006, to September 30, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the year ended September 30, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements55
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rhode Island Fund — Class A |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 8.380 | | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 9.860 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 9.780 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.194 | | | $ | 0.392 | | | $ | 0.411 | | | $ | 0.411 | | | $ | 0.423 | | | $ | 0.441 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.183 | ) | | | 0.622 | | | | (1.265 | ) | | | (0.225 | ) | | | 0.106 | | | | (0.014 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.011 | | | $ | 1.014 | | | $ | (0.854 | ) | | $ | 0.186 | | | $ | 0.529 | | | $ | 0.427 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.447 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.191 | ) | | $ | (0.394 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.406 | ) | | $ | (0.429 | ) | | $ | (0.447 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 8.380 | | | $ | 9.640 | | | $ | 9.860 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 0.15 | %(3) | | | 12.70 | % | | | (9.14 | )% | | | 1.91 | % | | | 5.56 | % | | | 4.44 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 38,715 | | | $ | 39,064 | | | $ | 37,003 | | | $ | 46,764 | | | $ | 39,291 | | | $ | 29,745 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.74 | %(5) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.77 | %(6) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.02 | %(4) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.35 | % | | | 0.18 | %(6) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.76 | %(4) | | | 0.87 | % | | | 0.96 | % | | | 1.14 | %(5) | | | 1.10 | % | | | 0.95 | %(6) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 0.74 | %(4) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.69 | %(5) | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.75 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.42 | %(4) | | | 4.80 | % | | | 4.43 | % | | | 4.20 | % | | | 4.34 | % | | | 4.49 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 8 | %(3) | | | 27 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 15 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements56
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rhode Island Fund — Class B |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.210 | | | $ | 8.570 | | | $ | 9.860 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | $ | 9.980 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.165 | | | $ | 0.339 | | | $ | 0.349 | | | $ | 0.345 | | | $ | 0.361 | | | $ | 0.377 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.191 | ) | | | 0.640 | | | | (1.298 | ) | | | (0.224 | ) | | | 0.103 | | | | (0.015 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.026 | ) | | $ | 0.979 | | | $ | (0.949 | ) | | $ | 0.121 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.164 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.364 | ) | | $ | (0.382 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.164 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.364 | ) | | $ | (0.382 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.020 | | | $ | 9.210 | | | $ | 8.570 | | | $ | 9.860 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | $ | 9.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | (0.26 | )%(3) | | | 11.92 | % | | | (9.87 | )% | | | 1.20 | % | | | 4.76 | % | | | 3.83 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,532 | | | $ | 8,157 | | | $ | 10,286 | | | $ | 13,989 | | | $ | 18,564 | | | $ | 22,793 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.49 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.52 | %(7) | | |
Interest and fee expense(8) | | | 0.02 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.35 | % | | | 0.18 | %(7) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.71 | % | | | 1.89 | %(6) | | | 1.85 | % | | | 1.70 | %(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.44 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.50 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.67 | %(5) | | | 4.08 | % | | | 3.68 | % | | | 3.45 | % | | | 3.62 | % | | | 3.76 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 8 | %(3) | | | 27 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 15 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Not annualized. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.15% due to a change in the timing of payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the corresponding Portfolio’s allocated expenses while the Fund was making investments directly into the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
See notes to financial statements57
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rhode Island Fund — Class C |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | Year Ended September 30, | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | (Unaudited) | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | September 30, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.220 | | | $ | 8.580 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.165 | | | $ | 0.339 | | | $ | 0.347 | | | $ | 0.344 | | | $ | 0.173 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.191 | ) | | | 0.640 | | | | (1.296 | ) | | | (0.223 | ) | | | 0.065 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.026 | ) | | $ | 0.979 | | | $ | (0.949 | ) | | $ | 0.121 | | | $ | 0.238 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.164 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.164 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.341 | ) | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.030 | | | $ | 9.220 | | | $ | 8.580 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 10.090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (0.26 | )%(4) | | | 11.91 | % | | | (9.85 | )% | | | 1.20 | % | | | 2.40 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,080 | | | $ | 4,159 | | | $ | 3,435 | | | $ | 3,281 | | | $ | 428 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.48 | %(6) | | | 1.50 | %(5) | | |
Interest and fee expense(7) | | | 0.02 | %(5) | | | 0.08 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | 0.40 | % | | | 0.35 | %(5) | | |
Total expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.51 | %(5) | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.71 | % | | | 1.88 | %(6) | | | 1.85 | %(5) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees | | | 1.49 | %(5) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.52 | % | | | 1.44 | %(6) | | | 1.47 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.67 | %(5) | | | 4.07 | % | | | 3.66 | % | | | 3.45 | % | | | 3.23 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 8 | %(4) | | | 27 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 19 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 20, 2006, to September 30, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser was allocated a portion of the Fund’s operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended September 30, 2007). Absent this allocation, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floater securities transactions (see Note 1I). |
|
(8) | | For the year ended September 30, 2006. |
See notes to financial statements58
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust presently consists of twenty-five funds, five of which, each non-diversified, are included in these financial statements. They include Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance California Municipals Fund) (California Fund), Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipals Fund) (Massachusetts Fund), Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance New York Municipals Fund) (New York Fund), Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipals Fund) (Ohio Fund) and Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipals Fund) (Rhode Island Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively, the Funds). The Funds seek to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and from particular state or local income or other taxes. The Ohio Fund offers two classes of shares. The Rhode Island Fund offers three classes of shares. The California Fund and New York Fund offer four classes of shares, and the Massachusetts Fund offered four classes of shares prior to April 29, 2010 (see Note 13). Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares of each Fund automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in each Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations furnished by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations, maturing in sixty days or less, are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap curves provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in municipal obligations, which are exempt from regular federal income
59
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At September 30, 2009, the following Funds, for federal income tax purposes, had capital loss carryforwards which will reduce the respective Fund’s taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Funds of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The amounts and expiration dates of the capital loss carryforwards are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Amount | | | Expiration Date | | | |
|
California | | $ | 658,740 | | | | September 30, 2016 | | | |
| | | 7,884,903 | | | | September 30, 2017 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts | | $ | 856,779 | | | | September 30, 2010 | | | |
| | | 1,430,573 | | | | September 30, 2011 | | | |
| | | 355,911 | | | | September 30, 2012 | | | |
| | | 1,751,809 | | | | September 30, 2013 | | | |
| | | 440,164 | | | | September 30, 2015 | | | |
| | | 91,224 | | | | September 30, 2016 | | | |
| | | 9,824,104 | | | | September 30, 2017 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
New York | | $ | 108,787 | | | | September 30, 2015 | | | |
| | | 2,215,774 | | | | September 30, 2016 | | | |
| | | 2,053,235 | | | | September 30, 2017 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio | | $ | 5,839,721 | | | | September 30, 2011 | | | |
| | | 1,709,089 | | | | September 30, 2013 | | | |
| | | 240,163 | | | | September 30, 2016 | | | |
| | | 5,075,023 | | | | September 30, 2017 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island | | $ | 384,825 | | | | September 30, 2013 | | | |
| | | 71,778 | | | | September 30, 2016 | | | |
| | | 1,132,394 | | | | September 30, 2017 | | | |
Additionally, at September 30, 2009, the California Fund, Massachusetts Fund, New York Fund, Ohio Fund and Rhode Island Fund had net capital losses of $12,518,981, $20,380,851, $24,218,300, $10,152,766 and $2,182,130, respectively, attributable to security transactions incurred after October 31, 2008. These net capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Funds’ taxable year ending September 30, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Funds’ federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended September 30, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the respective custodian agreements, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.
F Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust, (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.
I Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Funds may invest in inverse floating rate securities, also referred to as residual
60
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
interest bonds, whereby a Fund may sell a fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (Inverse Floater). The broker deposits a fixed rate bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the fixed rate bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the fixed rate bond purchased from the Fund (the Fixed Rate Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the Inverse Floater for the underlying Fixed Rate Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Funds account for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in their Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in their Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Interest expense related to the Funds’ liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At March 31, 2010, the amounts of the Funds’ Floating Rate Notes and related interest rates and collateral were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Collateral
| | | |
| | Floating
| | | Interest Rate
| | for Floating
| | | |
| | Rate
| | | or Range of
| | Rate
| | | |
| | Notes
| | | Interest
| | Notes
| | | |
Fund | | Outstanding | | | Rates (%) | | Outstanding | | | |
|
California | | $ | 22,770,000 | | | 0.27 – 0.39 | | $ | 34,484,894 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 22,400,000 | | | 0.28 – 0.39 | | | 33,917,201 | | | |
New York | | | 38,240,000 | | | 0.27 – 0.30 | | | 59,324,162 | | | |
Ohio | | | 7,470,000 | | | 0.33 – 0.47 | | | 12,880,103 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 750,000 | | | 0.39 | | | 1,544,422 | | | |
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Funds’ average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average
| | | | | | |
| | Floating
| | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | | | | | |
| | Notes
| | | Average
| | | |
Fund | | Outstanding | | | Interest Rate | | | |
|
California | | $ | 22,770,000 | | | | 0.84 | % | | |
Massachusetts | | | 27,025,192 | | | | 0.84 | | | |
New York | | | 38,195,330 | | | | 0.79 | | | |
Ohio | | | 7,470,000 | | | | 0.53 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 750,000 | | | | 1.37 | | | |
The Funds may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Funds had no shortfalls as of March 31, 2010.
The Funds may also purchase Inverse Floaters from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying fixed rate bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to Inverse Floaters purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments. The Funds’ investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate securities typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of inverse floating rate securities are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Funds’ investment policies do not allow the Funds to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Funds’ restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Funds’ Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Funds’ restrictions apply. Inverse Floaters held by the Funds are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
J Financial Futures Contracts — The Funds may enter into financial futures contracts. The Funds’ investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute
61
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, a Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
K Interest Rate Swaps — The Funds may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, a Fund makes periodic payments at a fixed interest rate and, in exchange, receives payments based on the interest rate of a benchmark industry index. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. A Fund is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
L When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
M Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to March 31, 2010 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Funds’ management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The net investment income of each Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards, if any), are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of a Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to each Fund. The fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets plus a percentage of gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) as presented in the following table (except for California Fund) and is payable monthly.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Annual
| | | Daily
| | | |
Daily Net Assets | | Asset Rate | | | Income Rate | | | |
|
Up to $20 million | | | 0.10 | % | | | 1.00 | % | | |
$20 million up to $40 million | | | 0.20 | | | | 2.00 | | | |
$40 million up to $500 million | | | 0.30 | | | | 3.00 | | | |
On average daily net assets of $500 million or more, the rates are reduced. For California Fund, the annual asset rate and daily income rate are 0.30% and 3.00%, respectively, on average daily net assets of up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level.
62
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
For the six months ended March 31, 2010, investment adviser fees incurred by the Funds and the effective annual rates, as a percentage of average daily net assets, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investment
| | | Effective
| | | |
Fund | | Adviser Fee | | | Annual Rate | | | |
|
California | | $ | 496,621 | | | | 0.47 | % | | |
Massachusetts | | | 535,765 | | | | 0.44 | | | |
New York | | | 800,775 | | | | 0.43 | | | |
Ohio | | | 574,673 | | | | 0.40 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 67,922 | | | | 0.27 | | | |
EVM serves as administrator of each Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of each Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Funds’ principal underwriter, received a portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the Funds. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5). Sub-transfer agent fees earned by EVM and Class A sales charges that the Funds were informed were received by EVD for the six months ended March 31, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | EVM’s Sub-
| | | | | | |
| | Transfer Agent
| | | EVD’s Class A
| | | |
Fund | | Fees | | | Sales Charges | | | |
|
California | | $ | 2,064 | | | $ | 16,937 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 2,548 | | | | 18,853 | | | |
New York | | | 3,958 | | | | 39,407 | | | |
Ohio | | | 3,122 | | | | 57,545 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 607 | | | | 3,826 | | | |
Except for Trustees of the Funds who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Funds out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
Each Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that each Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to each Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Trustees approved distribution and service fee payments equal to 0.20% (0.25% for California Fund) per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the six months ended March 31, 2010 for Class A shares amounted to the following:
| | | | | | |
| | Class A
| | | |
| | Distribution and
| | | |
Fund | | Service Fees | | | |
|
California | | $ | 236,431 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 191,602 | | | |
New York | | | 310,166 | | | |
Ohio | | | 258,797 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 39,240 | | | |
Each Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require each Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the respective Funds. Each Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by each Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. Such payments were discounted during portions of the six months ended March 31, 2010 with respect to Class B of the Massachusetts Fund. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Funds paid or accrued to EVD the following distribution fees, representing 0.75% (annualized) (0.67% for Class B of the Massachusetts Fund) of the average daily net assets of each Fund’s Class B and Class C shares:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B
| | | Class C
| | | |
| | Distribution
| | | Distribution
| | | |
Fund | | Fees | | | Fees | | | |
|
California | | $ | 12,686 | | | $ | 46,454 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 69,193 | | | | 70,295 | | | |
New York | | | 39,602 | | | | 161,050 | | | |
Ohio | | | — | | | | 109,293 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 27,310 | | | | 15,141 | | | |
63
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
At March 31, 2010, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Class B | | | Class C | | | |
|
California | | $ | 31,000 | | | $ | 1,025,000 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,878,000 | | | |
New York | | | 276,000 | | | | 3,143,000 | | | |
Ohio | | | — | | | | 2,810,000 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 999,000 | | | | 395,000 | | | |
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Funds to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to that class. The Trustees approved service fee payments equal to 0.20% (0.25% for California Fund) per annum of each Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the Class B and Class C sales commissions and distribution fees and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the six months ended March 31, 2010 amounted to the following:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B
| | | Class C
| | | |
Fund | | Service Fees | | | Service Fees | | | |
|
California | | $ | 4,229 | | | $ | 15,485 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 20,653 | | | | 18,745 | | | |
New York | | | 10,560 | | | | 42,946 | | | |
Ohio | | | — | | | | 29,144 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 7,283 | | | | 4,038 | | | |
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under each Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to each Fund. For the six months ended March 31, 2010, the Funds were informed that EVD received approximately the following amounts of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | |
|
California | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 300 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 9,000 | | | | 6,000 | * | | | 2,000 | | | |
New York | | | 19,000 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 4,000 | | | |
Ohio | | | 11,000 | | | | — | | | | 100 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 9,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | | 40 | | | |
| | |
* | | Includes $398 that was paid directly to the Massachusetts Fund for days when no Uncovered Distribution Charges existed. |
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the six months ended March 31, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fund | | Purchases | | | Sales | | | |
|
California | | $ | 9,686,384 | | | $ | 21,576,326 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 19,749,313 | | | | 40,029,346 | | | |
New York | | | 27,029,008 | | | | 38,578,125 | | | |
Ohio | | | 14,031,571 | | | | 13,970,494 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 4,103,092 | | | | 5,123,867 | | | |
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
Each Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Funds) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
California Fund |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 478,125 | | | | 2,169,408 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 272,277 | | | | 639,509 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,549,360 | ) | | | (7,328,538 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 38,933 | | | | 12,028 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (1,760,025 | ) | | | (4,507,593 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
64
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
California Fund (continued) |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 38,249 | | | | 73,370 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,671 | | | | 8,820 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (14,428 | ) | | | (70,636 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (42,023 | ) | | | (12,981 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (14,531 | ) | | | (1,427 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 98,496 | | | | 295,098 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 16,792 | | | | 37,169 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (144,850 | ) | | | (776,735 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (29,562 | ) | | | (444,468 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 438,649 | | | | 260,585 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 69 | | | | 1,595 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (104,621 | ) | | | (7,371 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 334,097 | | | | 254,809 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Fund |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 689,216 | | | | 2,414,904 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 310,335 | | | | 670,397 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,837,778 | ) | | | (6,390,397 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 214,114 | | | | 477,309 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (1,624,113 | ) | | | (2,827,787 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 20,085 | | | | 196,404 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 31,299 | | | | 74,570 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (243,413 | ) | | | (612,384 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (213,934 | ) | | | (476,840 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (405,963 | ) | | | (818,250 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 403,031 | | | | 501,235 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 31,640 | | | | 62,458 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (225,791 | ) | | | (647,353 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 208,880 | | | | (83,660 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 270,232 | | | | 9,024 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 11,192 | | | | 26,720 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (77,599 | ) | | | (419,880 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 203,825 | | | | (384,136 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
New York Fund |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,422,783 | | | | 4,148,971 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 543,708 | | | | 1,184,532 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (4,167,846 | ) | | | (7,214,253 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 32,123 | | | | 47,131 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (2,169,232 | ) | | | (1,833,619 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
65
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
New York Fund (continued) |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 95,599 | | | | 212,266 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 14,159 | | | | 31,437 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (68,605 | ) | | | (248,966 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (32,086 | ) | | | (47,055 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 9,067 | | | | (52,318 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 588,680 | | | | 1,544,671 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 62,649 | | | | 114,608 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (529,565 | ) | | | (903,265 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 121,764 | | | | 756,014 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class I | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 798,968 | | | | 158,359 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,351 | | | | 1,849 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (46,818 | ) | | | (13,598 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 753,501 | | | | 146,610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio Fund |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,837,705 | | | | 5,585,228 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 379,784 | | | | 861,047 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,493,135 | ) | | | (8,186,081 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | — | | | | 30,123 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (275,646 | ) | | | (1,709,683 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | | | | September 30, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | | | | | 5,928 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | | | | | 11,970 | | | |
Redemptions | | | | | | | (108,141 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | | | | | (30,112 | ) | | |
Merger to Class A shares | | | | | | | (2,644,707 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | | | | | (2,765,062 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | �� | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 305,270 | | | | 630,268 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 37,191 | | | | 79,736 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (241,168 | ) | | | (1,204,468 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 101,293 | | | | (494,464 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island Fund |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class A | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 328,136 | | | | 524,672 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 62,224 | | | | 113,581 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (451,330 | ) | | | (920,369 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 111,185 | | | | 206,204 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 50,215 | | | | (75,912 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class B | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 92 | | | | 40,543 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 9,913 | | | | 26,870 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (63,005 | ) | | | (180,245 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (108,600 | ) | | | (201,367 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (161,600 | ) | | | (314,199 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
66
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island Fund (continued) |
| | Six Months Ended
| | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2010
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Class C | | (Unaudited) | | | September 30, 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 73,284 | | | | 151,576 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 5,278 | | | | 11,928 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (77,846 | ) | | | (112,659 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 716 | | | | 50,845 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | At the close of business on December 5, 2008, the Ohio Fund’s Class B shares were merged into Class A shares. |
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at March 31, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
California Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 202,463,881 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 10,704,620 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (7,479,125 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 3,225,495 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Massachusetts Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 229,340,758 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 9,609,388 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (4,838,866 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 4,770,522 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
New York Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 361,239,202 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 15,855,588 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (12,271,240 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 3,584,348 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Ohio Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 278,568,205 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 11,384,968 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,198,456 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 5,186,512 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Rhode Island Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Aggregate cost | | $ | 49,803,767 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,636,152 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (2,117,570 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (481,418 | ) | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Funds participate with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Funds solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to each Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Funds, a Fund may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. The Funds did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the six months ended March 31, 2010.
10 Financial Instruments
The Funds may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of their investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and interest rate swaps and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at March 31, 2010 is as follows:
67
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Fund | | Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
California | | 6/10 | | 173 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (20,186,329 | ) | | $ | (20,089,625 | ) | | $ | 96,704 | | | |
|
|
Massachusetts | | 6/10 | | 100 U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note | | Short | | $ | (11,577,775 | ) | | $ | (11,625,000 | ) | | $ | (47,225 | ) | | |
| | 6/10 | | 75 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | | (8,751,300 | ) | | | (8,709,375 | ) | | | 41,925 | | | |
|
|
New York | | 6/10 | | 428 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (49,940,754 | ) | | $ | (49,701,500 | ) | | $ | 239,254 | | | |
|
|
Ohio | | 6/10 | | 105 U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note | | Short | | $ | (12,156,664 | ) | | $ | (12,206,250 | ) | | $ | (49,586 | ) | | |
| | 6/10 | | 189 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | | (21,984,088 | ) | | | (21,947,625 | ) | | | 36,463 | | | |
|
|
Rhode Island | | 6/10 | | 8 U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note | | Short | | $ | (926,222 | ) | | $ | (930,000 | ) | | $ | (3,778 | ) | | |
| | 6/10 | | 4 U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | | (466,736 | ) | | | (464,500 | ) | | | 2,236 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps |
California Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 3,500,000 | | | 4.609% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | June 15, 2010/ June 15, 2040 | | $ | (25,338 | ) | | |
|
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 5,212,500 | | | 4.665 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | May 24, 2010/ May 24, 2040 | | | (99,930 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 6,237,500 | | | 4.609% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | June 15, 2010/ June 15, 2040 | | $ | (45,155 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 8,900,000 | | | 4.609% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | June 15, 2010/ June 15, 2040 | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 4,300,000 | | | 4.665% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | May 24, 2010/ May 24, 2040 | | $ | (82,437 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island Fund |
|
| | | | | Annual
| | Floating
| | Effective Date/
| | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | | Fixed Rate
| | Rate
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | | Paid By Fund | | Paid To Fund | | Date | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Co. | | $ | 1,262,500 | | | 4.609% | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | June 15, 2010/ June 15, 2040 | | $ | (9,140 | ) | | |
|
|
The effective date represents the date on which a Fund and the counterparty to the interest rate swap contract begin interest payment accruals.
At March��31, 2010, the Funds had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Funds hold fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, each Fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts. The Funds may also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The Funds enter into interest rate swap contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in a Fund’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Fund for those swaps in a liability position. At March 31, 2010, the fair value of interest rate swaps with credit-related contingent features in a liability position was equal to the fair value of the liability derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. The value of securities pledged as collateral, if any, for open interest rate swap contracts at March 31, 2010 is disclosed in a note to each Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which a Fund invests, including swap contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At March 31, 2010, the maximum amount of loss the Funds would incur due to counterparty risk was equal to the fair value of the asset derivative related to interest rate swaps included in the table below for each respective Fund. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of a Fund if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds
68
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
The fair values of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at March 31, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
| | Asset Derivative | | | Liability Derivative | | | |
|
California Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | $ | 96,704 | (1) | | $ | — | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (125,268 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 96,704 | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | |
|
|
Massachusetts Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | $ | 41,925 | (1) | | $ | (47,225 | )(3) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (45,155 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 41,925 | | | $ | (92,380 | ) | | |
|
|
New York Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | $ | 239,254 | (1) | | $ | — | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (64,430 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 239,254 | | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | |
|
|
Ohio Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | $ | 36,463 | (1) | | $ | (49,586 | )(3) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (82,437 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 36,463 | | | $ | (132,023 | ) | | |
|
|
Rhode Island Fund | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | $ | 2,236 | (1) | | $ | (3,778 | )(3) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (9,140 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,236 | | | $ | (12,918 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). |
|
(3) | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Fund | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
California | | $ | 356,729 | | | $ | 878,826 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | (205,046 | ) | | | 702,532 | | | |
New York | | | 913,248 | | | | 1,136,166 | | | |
Ohio | | | (49,168 | ) | | | 949,569 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 78,524 | | | | 29,656 | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts and swap contracts. |
The average notional amounts of futures contracts and interest rate swaps outstanding during the six months ended March 31, 2010, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Notional Amount |
| | |
Fund | | Futures Contacts | | | Interest Rate Swaps | | | |
|
California | | $ | 17,300,000 | | | $ | 8,713,000 | | | |
Massachusetts | | | 25,000,000 | | | | 6,238,000 | | | |
New York | | | 42,800,000 | | | | 8,900,000 | | | |
Ohio | | | 30,971,429 | | | | 4,300,000 | | | |
Rhode Island | | | 1,200,000 | | | | 1,263,000 | | | |
11 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
69
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At March 31, 2010, the inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
California Fund |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 96,704 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 96,704 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 96,704 | | | $ | 228,459,376 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 228,556,080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps | | $ | — | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (125,268 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Fund |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 255,674,447 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 255,674,447 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 836,833 | | | | — | | | | 836,833 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 256,511,280 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 256,511,280 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 41,925 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 41,925 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 41,925 | | | $ | 256,511,280 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 256,553,205 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | (47,225 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (47,225 | ) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (45,155 | ) | | | — | | | | (45,155 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (47,225 | ) | | $ | (45,155 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (92,380 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Fund |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 401,601,307 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 401,601,307 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 1,462,243 | | | | — | | | | 1,462,243 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 403,063,550 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 403,063,550 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 239,254 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 239,254 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 239,254 | | | $ | 403,063,550 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 403,302,804 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps | | $ | — | | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (64,430 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio Fund |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 285,928,320 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 285,928,320 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 5,296,397 | | | | — | | | | 5,296,397 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 291,224,717 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 291,224,717 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 36,463 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 36,463 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 36,463 | | | $ | 291,224,717 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 291,261,180 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | (49,586 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (49,586 | ) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (82,437 | ) | | | — | | | | (82,437 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (49,586 | ) | | $ | (82,437 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (132,023 | ) | | |
|
|
70
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds as of March 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island Fund |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Tax-Exempt Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 49,081,255 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 49,081,255 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 991,094 | | | | — | | | | 991,094 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,072,349 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,072,349 | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | 2,236 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,236 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,236 | | | $ | 50,072,349 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 50,074,585 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | (3,778 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,778 | ) | | |
Interest Rate Swaps | | | — | | | | (9,140 | ) | | | — | | | | (9,140 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (3,778 | ) | | $ | (9,140 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (12,918 | ) | | |
|
|
The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of September 30, 2009 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
12 Name Change
Effective December 1, 2009, the names of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund and Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipal Income Fund were changed from Eaton Vance California Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance New York Municipals Fund, Eaton Vance Ohio Municipals Fund and Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipals Fund, respectively.
13 Subsequent Event
On April 26, 2010, the Trustees of the Massachusetts Fund approved the conversion of the Fund’s Class B shares to Class A shares as a result of the Fund’s extinguishment of Uncovered Distribution Charges under its Class B Plan. Such conversion is expected to be completed in June 2010. Effective April 29, 2010, Class B of the Massachusetts Fund is no longer available for purchase or exchange.
71
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
72
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of the following funds:
| | |
| • | Eaton Vance California Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance New York Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Ohio Municipals Fund |
| • | Eaton Vance Rhode Island Municipals Fund |
(the “Funds”), each with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for each Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Funds, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Funds by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by each Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Funds, and recent changes in the identity of such personnel. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. Specifically, the Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Funds. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to each Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
73
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Funds and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the respective investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared each Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for each Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions during 2008 on each Fund’s performance relative to its peer universe in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s strategy of generating current income through investments in higher quality (including insured) municipal bonds with longer maturities. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that the performance of each Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by each Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered each Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to each Fund that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to each Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationship with the Funds.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability of each Fund, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and each Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of each Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of each Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and each Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of each Fund, the structure of each advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
74
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Funds
OFFICERS AND TRUSTEES
| | |
Officers Thomas M. Metzold President
William H. Ahern, Jr. Vice President
Craig R. Brandon Vice President
Cynthia J. Clemson Vice President
Adam A. Weigold Vice President
Barbara E. Campbell Treasurer
Maureen A. Gemma Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
Paul M. O’Neil Chief Compliance Officer | | Trustees Ralph F. Verni Chairman
Benjamin C. Esty
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Allen R. Freedman
William H. Park
Ronald A. Pearlman
Helen Frame Peters
Heidi L. Steiger
Lynn A. Stout |
75
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Eaton Vance Municipals TrustTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
Not required in this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
| | |
|
(a)(1) | | Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
| | |
(a)(2)(i) | | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. |
| | |
(a)(2)(ii) | | President’s Section 302 certification. |
| | |
(b) | | Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
| | | | |
|
By: | | /s/ Thomas M. Metzold Thomas M. Metzold | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | May 12, 2010 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | |
|
By: | | /s/ Barbara E. Campbell Barbara E. Campbell | | |
| | Treasurer | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | May 12, 2010 | | |
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Thomas M. Metzold Thomas M. Metzold | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | May 12, 2010 | | |