SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN
PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the registrant [ X ]
Filed by a party other than the registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ X ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________________________
(Name of person(s) filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ X ] No fee required
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: ______________________________________ |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:______________________________________ |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): _________________________ |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: _____________________________________________ |
(5) | Total fee Paid: _________________________________________________________________________ |
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) | Amount previously paid: _________________________________________________________________ |
(2) | Form, schedule, or registration statement no.: __________________________________________________ |
(3) | Filing party: ___________________________________________________________________________ |
(4) | Date filed: ____________________________________________________________________________ |
| |
---|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b87e6/b87e604c8b6a1ec6927b618722e11e397ffb55dd" alt="" | | NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION 311 Woodworth Avenue P.O. Box 1029 Alma, Michigan 48801 | |
The annual meeting of the shareholders of Firstbank Corporation will be held at the Heritage Center on the campus of Alma College, West Superior Street, Alma, Michigan 48801, on Monday, April 25, 2005, at 4:30 p.m. (Alma time) to consider and vote upon:
1. The election of two directors to hold office for three year terms.
2. Proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized common stock.
3. Any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 4, 2005, will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment of the meeting.
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
Samuel G. Stone, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer |
Alma, Michigan
March 15, 2005
IMPORTANT
All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting.WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT PROMPTLYIN THE POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. This will assure your representation and a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting. If you do attend the meeting in person and if you have submitted a proxy card, it will not be necessary for you to vote in person at the meeting. However, if you attend the meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you will be given an opportunity to do so.
PROXY STATEMENT
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
311 Woodworth Avenue
P.O. Box 1029
Alma, Michigan 48801
Telephone: (989) 463-3131
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Firstbank Corporation (the “Corporation”) to be voted at the annual meeting of its shareholders, to be held at the Heritage Center on the campus of Alma College, West Superior Street, Alma, Michigan 48801, on Monday, April 25, 2005, at 4:30 p.m. (Alma time), and at any adjournment of the meeting for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This proxy statement and form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders on or about March 15, 2005.
If a proxy in the accompanying form is properly executed, duly returned, and not revoked, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the annual meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders and at any adjournment of that meeting. Where a shareholder specifies a choice, a proxy will be voted as specified. If no choice is specified, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted for election of all nominees of the Board of Directors. The Corporation’s management does not know of any other matters to be presented at the annual meeting. If other matters are presented, the shares represented by proxy will be voted at the discretion of the persons designated as proxies who will take into consideration the recommendations of the Corporation’s management.
Any shareholder executing a proxy in the enclosed form has the power to revoke it by notifying the Secretary of the Corporation in writing at the address indicated above at any time before it is exercised, or by appearing at the meeting and voting in person.
Solicitation of proxies is being made by mail. Directors, officers, and regular employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries may also solicit proxies in person or by telephone without additional compensation. In addition, banks, brokerage firms, and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries may solicit proxies from the beneficial owners of shares they hold and may be reimbursed by the Corporation for reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy material to beneficial owners of the Corporation’s stock. The Corporation will pay all expenses of soliciting proxies.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nominations and Voting
The Board of Directors has nominated Edward B. Grant and Samuel A. Smith for election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting to serve three year terms that will expire in 2008. Messrs. Grant and Smith are incumbents.
The proposed nominees are willing to be elected and to serve. In the event that any nominee is unable to serve or is otherwise unavailable for election, which is not now contemplated, the incumbent Board of Directors may or may not select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, all proxies will be voted for the person so selected. If a substitute nominee is not so selected, all proxies will be voted for the election of the remaining nominees. Proxies will not be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.
A vote of shareholders holding a plurality of shares voting is required to elect directors. For the purpose of counting votes on this proposal, abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares not voted will not be counted as shares voted.
Shareholder nominations may be made directly by a shareholder by written notice delivered or mailed to the secretary of the Corporation not less than ten (10) nor more than fifty (50) days prior to the annual meeting. However, if a shareholder wishes the Board of Directors to consider a nomination as a part of a slate of nominees approved by the Board of Directors, the nomination process described below must be followed.
1
The Nomination Process
Director nominees are considered and must be approved by the directors on the Board who are independent under SEC and NASDAQ Standards. The Board searches for potential candidates that it identifies by a variety of means as deemed appropriate by the Board.
The Board has not established specific minimum age, education, years of business experience or specific types of skills for potential candidates, but, in general, expects qualified candidates will have ample experience and a proven record of business success and leadership. In general, the Board requires that each of its members will have the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; will consistently exercise sound and objective business judgment; and will have a comfort with diversity in its broadest sense. In addition, it is anticipated that the Board as a whole will have individuals with significant appropriate senior management and leadership experience, a comfort with technology, a long-term and strategic perspective, and the ability to advance constructive debate. It will be important for the Board as a whole to operate in an atmosphere where the chemistry of the individuals is a key element.
The independent directors will consider shareholder nominations for directors submitted in accordance with the following procedure. A notice relating to the nomination must be given in writing to the Corporation not later than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting. Such notice must be accompanied by the nominee’s written consent, contain information relating to the business experience and background of the nominee and contain information with respect to the nominating shareholder and persons acting in concert with the nominating shareholder. There are no differences in the manner in which the independent directors evaluate a candidate that is recommended for nomination for membership on the Corporation’s Board by a shareholder. As of this time, the Board has not received any recommended nominations from any of the Corporation’s shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting.
Upon receipt of information concerning a shareholder proposed candidate, the Chair of the Board assesses the Board’s needs, primarily whether or not there is a current or pending vacancy or a possible need to fulfill by adding or replacing a director, and then develops a director profile by comparing the current state of Board characteristics with the desired state and the candidate’s qualifications. The profile and the candidate’s submitted information are provided to the Board for discussion. Similarly, if at any time the Board determines there may be a need to add or replace a director, the Chair of the Board develops a Director profile by comparing the current state of Board characteristics with the desired state. If no candidates are apparent from any source, the Board will determine the appropriate method to conduct a search. The Board has, to date, not paid any third party fee to assist in identifying and evaluating nominees.
The Corporation has not established a nominating committee because it desires active participation of all Board members in the analysis and process of making nominations. In addition, nominations are approved by directors who are independent, ensuring the integrity of the nomination process in the same manner that establishing a nominating committee would. The Board has not adopted nomination charter provisions but it has approved the procedure described above.
A vote of shareholders holding a plurality of shares voting is required to elect directors. For the purpose of counting votes on this proposal, abstentions, broker non-votes and other shares not voted will not be counted as shares voted.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES AS DIRECTORS
2
PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK
The Board of Directors recommends that the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation be amended to increase the Corporation’s authorized number of shares of common stock from 10,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares.
Under Michigan law, the Corporation may only issue shares of common stock to the extent that the shares are authorized by the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation. Currently, the Articles of Incorporation authorize 10,000,000 shares of common stock and 300,000 shares of preferred stock. The proposed amendment will increase the authorized common stock to 20,000,000 shares, and the preferred stock will remain at 300,000 shares. As of March 4, 2005, 5,331,113 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
The purpose of the amendment is to provide additional shares of common stock for future issuance. The additional authorized shares will provide the Corporation with added flexibility in its corporate planning and strategies. The additional shares of common stock could be utilized for a variety of purposes, including future stock splits, stock dividends, employee benefit plans, equity-based acquisitions, strategic corporate relationships, and other corporate purposes. The Corporation has a history of distributing authorized but unissued common shares to its shareholders in stock dividends and stock splits. If the Board chooses to continue this practice, availability of ample authorized but unissued common shares would be required. Also, the Board of Directors has in the past used, and may in the future wish to use, common shares as the form of consideration in the acquisition of smaller financial institutions. The availability of additional shares of common stock is particularly important in the event that the Board of Directors needs to expedite any of the foregoing actions and avoid the time and expense of seeking shareholder approval in connection with a specific potential issuance of common stock. If the amendment is approved by the shareholders, the Board of Directors does not intend to solicit further shareholder approval prior to the issuance of any additional shares of common stock, except as may be required by applicable law or the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq National Stock Market.
The additional shares of common stock for which authorization is sought would become part of the existing class of common stock and have the same rights and privileges as the shares of common stock presently outstanding. If authorized, the increase in common stock will not have any immediate effect on the existing rights of common stockholders. To the extent that additional authorized shares are issued in the future, they may decrease the existing shareholders’ percentage equity ownership and, depending on the price at which they are issued, could be dilutive to the existing shareholders. Ownership of the Corporation’s common stock confers no preemptive rights.
In addition, the increase in the authorized common stock that would result from approval of the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation could have an anti-takeover effect. If a person or company commenced an unsolicited change in control attempt against the Corporation, the Board of Directors could delay, discourage, or even possibly prevent the change in control, without further shareholder approval, by issuing additional shares of common stock up to the total authorized number of shares thereby diluting the voting rights of the existing shareholders to an extent proportionate to the number of shares issued. The Board of Directors is not presently aware of any attempt to takeover or acquire the Corporation, nor are they currently aware of any specific effort or takeover threat.
If the proposal is approved by the shareholders, the first paragraph of Article III of the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, would read in its entirety as follows:
| “The total authorized capital stock of the corporation is twenty million (20,000,000) shares of common stock, all of one class with equal voting rights, and three hundred thousand (300,000) shares of preferred stock.” |
The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting of shareholders is required to approve the proposed amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation. For the purpose of counting votes on this proposal, abstentions, broker non-votes, and other shares not voted have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE CORPORATION’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.
3
VOTING SECURITIES
At the close of business on March 4, 2005, the record date for determination of the shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting, the Corporation had issued and outstanding 5,331,113 shares of its Common Stock, the only class of voting securities presently outstanding. Each share entitles its holder to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at the meeting.
The following table shows certain information concerning the number of shares of Common Stock held by the only shareholder who is known to management of the Corporation to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation as of March 4, 2005.
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) |
---|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Sole Voting and Investment Power | Shared Voting or Investment Power(2) | Total Beneficial Ownership | Total Percent of Class |
---|
Firstbank Corporation 401(k) Plan 311 Woodworth Avenue Alma, Michigan 48801 | | | | 277,819 | | 277,819 | (3) | 5 | .2% |
4
The following table shows certain information concerning the shares of the Corporation beneficially owned by each of the Corporation’s directors and nominees for director, by the executive officers named in the summary compensation table below, and by all directors and executive officers as a group as of December 31, 2004.
| Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) |
---|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner | Sole Voting And Investment Power | Shared Voting or Investment Power(2) | Total Beneficial Ownership | Percent of Class |
---|
|
William L. Benear | | 18,629 | (4)(5) | 0 | | 18,629 | (4)(5) | * | |
|
Duane A. Carr | | 18,215 | | 0 | | 18,215 | | * | |
|
David W. Fultz | | 0 | | 525 | | 525 | (2) | * | |
|
William E. Goggin | | 13,112 | | 6,248 | | 19,360 | (2) | * | |
|
Edward B. Grant | | | | 8,615 | | 8,615 | (2) | * | |
|
Dale A. Peters | | 16,895 | (4)(5) | 9,700 | | 26,595 | (2)(4)(5) | * | |
|
David D. Roslund | | 3,037 | | 1,972 | | 5,009 | (2) | * | |
|
Samuel A. Smith | | 1,388 | | 4,572 | | 5,960 | (2) | * | |
|
Samuel G. Stone | | 16,998 | (4)(5) | 0 | | 16,998 | (4)(5) | * | |
|
Thomas R. Sullivan | | 42,415 | (4)(5) | 0 | | 42,415 | (4)(5) | * | |
|
James E. Wheeler II | | 17,752 | (4)(5) | 16,177 | | 33,929 | (2)(4)(5) | * | |
|
All Directors and Executive Officers | | 148,441 | | 47,809 | | 196,250 | |
as a Group (11 Persons) | |
*Represents less than 1 percent of the outstanding shares.
| (1) | The numbers of shares stated are based on information furnished by each person listed and includes shares personally owned of record by that person and shares which under applicable regulations are deemed to be otherwise beneficially owned by that person. Under these regulations a beneficial owner of a security includes any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to the security. Voting power includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security. Investment power includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the security. A person will also be considered the beneficial owner of a security if the person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days. |
| (2) | Includes shares as to which the indicated person is legally entitled to share voting or investment power by reason of joint ownership, trust, or other contract or property right and shares held by spouses and children over whom the indicated person may have substantial influence by reason of the relationship. |
| (3) | ABN AMRO Trust Services Company serves as the trustee of the 401(k) plan. The trustee has voting and limited investment power over shares, if any, held by the 401(k) trust, which have not been allocated to individual accounts and limited investment power over shares which have been allocated to individual accounts. David L. Miller, an officer of the Corporation, is the plan administrator and directs the trustee as to the voting of the shares held by the 401(k) trust that have not been allocated to an individual account, if any. The plan administrator disclaims beneficial ownership of shares held by the 401(k) (except shares allocated to his individual account under the 401(k)) and 401(k) shares that are not reported as beneficially owned by the administrator, unless the shares have been allocated to his individual account under the 401(k). |
5
| At the November 2002 Board of Directors meeting, the Directors approved terminating the ESOP provisions of the 401(k) plan. The ESOP, invested entirely in Firstbank Corporation stock, restricted the participant’s ability to diversify. During March 2003, each participant was given various options to roll-over their ESOP balance to a qualified plan, including Firstbank Corporation 401(k), or take a distribution. At that time, participants that rolled their balance into the Firstbank Corporation 401(k) plan made new investment elections. |
| (4) | Includes shares allocated to individual accounts under the 401(k). |
| (5) | Shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days are included in the table. The number of shares subject to such options for Mr. Benear is 16,989 shares; Mr. Peters is 16,895 shares; Mr. Stone is 11,976 shares; Mr. Sullivan is 12,537 shares; and Mr. Wheeler is 13,254 shares. |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation provide that the Board of Directors will be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in number as practicable, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. The present Board of Directors consists of seven persons who are elected to the Board of Directors for terms of three years each by the Corporation’s shareholders.
Biographical information concerning the current directors and the nominees who are nominated for election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting is presented below. Except as otherwise indicated, all directors and nominees have had the same principal employment for over five years. With the exception of Mr. Sullivan, the Corporation’s President and Chief Executive Officer, all directors and director nominees have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent under the NASDAQ Listing Standards.
A. Nominees for 3-Year Terms Expiring in 2008
| Edward B. Grant (age 55) has been a director of Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) since 1988 and of the Corporation since 1990. He has served as Chairman of the Board of Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) since 1989. Mr. Grant is the General Manager of Public Broadcasting at Central Michigan University. |
| Samuel A. Smith(age 52) was appointed as a director of the Corporation by the Board of Directors upon the resignation of Mr. Benson Munger in June, 2003. He has served on the board of directors of Firstbank – St. Johns since its inception in June, 2000. Mr. Smith is the owner of Smith Family Funeral Homes, Inc. headquartered in Elsie, Michigan. |
B. Directors with 3-Year Terms Expiring in 2006
| David D. Roslund (age 64) has been a director of Firstbank – Alma since March, 1990 and of the Corporation since January, 1995. Mr. Roslund has also served as a director of Firstbank – Alma since June, 2000. Mr. Roslund, a certified public accountant, is the Administrator of Wilcox Health Care Center, a nursing home facility located in Alma, Michigan. He also is an investor in, and manager of, several local small businesses. |
| Thomas R. Sullivan (age 54) became President & Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank Corporation in January, 2000. He has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) since 1991. He has also served as a director of Firstbank – Alma, Firstbank – West Branch and Firstbank – Lakeview since January, 2000 and as a director of Firstbank – St. Johns since June, 2000. Mr. Sullivan also served as Vice President of the Corporation from 1991 to 1996 and Executive Vice President of the Corporation from 1996 to 2000. |
6
C. Directors with 3 Year Terms Expiring in 2007
| Duane A. Carr (age 65) has been a director of Firstbank — Lakeview since April, 1980 and of the Corporation since April, 1998. He is an attorney with the law firm Miel & Carr in Stanton, Michigan. He is also an active farmer in Carr Farms Partnership in Lakeview, Michigan. |
| David W. Fultz(age 57) has been a director of Firstbank – West Branch since October, 1994. He is the owner of Fultz Insurance Agency located in St. Helen, Michigan and Kirtland Insurance Agency located in Rose City, Michigan. |
| William E. Goggin (age 59) has been a director of Firstbank — Alma since February, 1974 and of the Corporation since December, 1985. Mr. Goggin has served as Chairman of the Board of the Corporation since 1986 and Chairman of the Board of Firstbank — Alma since 1974. He is an attorney with the law firm Goggin & Baker in Alma, Michigan. |
The Board of Directors of the Corporation held 12 regularly scheduled meetings during 2004. All incumbent directors attended at least 75 percent of all meetings of the Board of Directors and any committees on which they served.
The Board of Directors of the Corporation does not have a standing nominating committee. All members of the Board of Directors perform the function of the nominating committee. In making nominations for election to the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors will consider recommendations of shareholders. Shareholders who wish to recommend nominees should submit their recommendations in writing, delivered or mailed, to the Secretary of the Corporation.
Independence Of Directors and Attendance at Meetings
The Board of Directors of the Corporation is composed of a majority of independent directors (as independence is defined in the NASDAQ Listing Standards). During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Corporation and the Banks held a total of 72 regular meetings. Various committees of the Boards held meetings as needed. Each director attended at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the total meetings of the Boards of Directors and meetings of the committees on which they served. The Corporation also encourages all members of the Board to attend the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders each year. All members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation attended the Corporation’s 2004 annual meeting.
Communication With the Corporation’s Board of Directors
Shareholders may communicate with members of the Corporation’s Board by mail addressed to the full Board, a specific member of the Board, or to a particular committee of the Board at 311 Woodworth Avenue. Alma, Michigan 48801.
Code of Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Corporation’s executive officers (including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and principal Financial Officer) and all of the directors. The Corporation’s Code of Ethics can be obtained free of charge by sending a request to the Corporation’s corporate secretary at 311 Woodworth Avenue, Alma, Michigan 48801. Any changes or waivers to the Code of Ethics will be disclosed on the Corporation’s website.
Compensation of Directors
All members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors also serve on the board of directors of a subsidiary bank. Only outside directors receive compensation for their service in each of those capacities.
The Corporation pays its Chairman of the Board a retainer of $3,000 per year and 100 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $1,000 per year. Additionally, each outside corporate director, including the Chairman, receives 400 shares of the Corporation’s common stock as a retainer and is paid a fee for attendance at meetings of the board or board committees. A fee of $600 is paid for each regular Board of Directors meeting attended, $250 for each conference call in which the director participates, $1,000 for each full day and $750 for each half day special Board of Directors meeting attended. Directors who serve on the Corporation’s Audit and Compensation Committees are paid $250 for each committee meeting attended.
7
Each outside director of the Corporation is also a director of Firstbank — Alma, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant), Firstbank — West Branch, Firstbank — Lakeview, or Firstbank — St. Johns. Outside Chairman of the Boards of Directors of the banks each receive 100 shares of the Corporation’s common stock as a retainer. Additionally, each outside member of a Bank Board, including the Chairman, receives a retainer of 100 shares of Firstbank Corporation common stock per year and is paid a fee for attendance at bank board meetings. A fee of $400 is paid for each regular Bank Board of Directors meeting attended, $750 for each full day and $500 for each half day special Bank Board of Directors meeting attended. Outside directors who serve on a committee of the bank board are paid $100 for each committee meeting attended.
Directors of all the banks have the option of receiving meeting fees in cash or to purchase Firstbank Corporation common stock. Directors of the Corporation and each subsidiary bank may also elect to defer their director fees under the Firstbank Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferrals are discretionary and each director is permitted to select an investment option for the deferred fees under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Corporation’s accounting and financial reporting process. For this purpose, the Audit Committee performs several functions. For example, the Audit Committee evaluates the performance of and assesses the qualifications of the independent auditors; appoints and approves the compensation of the independent auditors; determines whether to retain or terminate the existing independent auditors or to appoint and engage new independent auditors; reviews and approves the retention of the auditors to perform the internal audit functions and services which the independent auditors are not permitted to perform; reviews the financial statements to be included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K; and discusses with management and the independent auditors the results of the annual audit and the results of the Corporation’s quarterly financial statements. The Audit Committee is composed of Messrs. Grant, Roslund, Smith and Fultz. The Audit Committee met 8 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
All members of the Corporation’s Audit Committee are independent (as independence is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASD listing standards). Mr. Grant has been designated by the Board as the Audit Committee’s financial expert. Mr. Grant is independent of management, as such term is used in item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Corporation has adopted a written Audit Committee Charter that was attached as Exhibit A to the Corporation’s proxy statement for the 2004 Annual Shareholders Meeting. On March 10, 2005, the Audit Committee submitted to the Board the following report.
Audit Committee Report
We have reviewed and discussed with management the Corporation’s audited financial statements as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2004.
We have discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
We have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by Independence Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as amended, by the Independence Standards Board and have discussed with the auditors the auditors’ independence.
8
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommend to the Board of Directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
| Respectfully submitted,
Edward B. Grant David D. Roslund Samuel A Smith David W. Fultz |
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee is comprised of the outside directors of the Board of the Corporation and, as a committee, they administer the Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan of 1993 (the “1993 Plan”) and the Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan of 1997, as amended (the “1997 Plan”). The Corporation’s Board of Directors has the responsibility for establishing the formal employee benefit plans which are available to the employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. These plans currently include a qualified 401(k) plan (under which employees can direct investment in Firstbank Corporation stock), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the 1993 Plan, and the 1997 Plan. The compensation committee of the Corporation also reviews and formally approves the compensation to be paid to the chief executive officers of the subsidiary banks, each of whom is also an officer of the Corporation. Recommendation of the compensation of the subsidiary bank chief executive officers is, however, the role of the Boards of Directors of the subsidiary banks.
Executive Compensation Report
Mr. Sullivan serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank Corporation and Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant). With the exception of Mr. Sullivan, all officers of the Corporation who are also officers of one of its affiliates, serve as officers of the Corporation as an incident to their primary service as an officer and employee of a subsidiary bank. Although there is a great deal of communication between the Board of Directors of the Corporation and the Boards of Directors of the banks, except as to subsidiary bank chief executive officers, the Boards of Directors of the banks retain authority and responsibility for setting compensation for their own officers, including those officers who also serve as officers of the Corporation.
All officers receive a salary and, if net income is satisfactory, an annual cash bonus. It is the policy of the Corporation and the banks to set salaries at levels which will be competitive with other comparable financial institutions in order to enable the Corporation and the banks to retain, and when needed, attract qualified executive officers. Information on compensation levels of other institutions is obtained from compensation surveys published by the Michigan Bankers Association and other sources. In setting salaries, the Corporation and the banks also seek to assure relative fairness in the compensation of officers and to recognize the value of the contribution that each makes to the Corporation’s success. Annual cash bonuses are based on a discretionary evaluation of the performance of the Corporation and the subsidiary bank, if any, of which the officer serves. Bonuses also take into account recognition of specific personal achievements of the individual officers.
During the third quarter of 2001, the accounting firm of Plante & Moran LLP conducted a compensation study for the Corporation. This study, among other things, included a local, regional, and national survey of financial institutions comparable in size to the Corporation. The information from this study, was updated in the second quarter of 2004, and is used primarily for establishing compensation levels and incentive programs.
During 2004, stock options were awarded under the 1997 Plan to all full-time benefit eligible employees as of December 31, 2004. The number of shares subject to each option was based on the position and discretionary assessment of the performance of each grantee. All options are granted for a term of ten years but terminate, subject to certain limited exercise provisions, in the event of retirement or other termination. All options of 50 shares or less become fully vested one year after the grant date. Options in greater amounts vest over a period of five years from the date of the grant with 20% of the option vesting on each yearly anniversary of the date of the grant.
9
The Corporation generally maintains a conservative level of perquisites and personal benefits. The dollar value of perquisites and personal benefits provided to executive officers does not exceed 10% of each executive officer’s respective annual salary and bonus.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that publicly held corporations may not deduct compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million annually, with certain exemptions. The Corporation’s Board of Directors has examined its executive compensation policies in light of Section 162(m) and the regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service to implement that section. It is not expected that any portion of the Corporation’s deduction for employee remuneration will be disallowed in 2004 or in future years by reason of actions expected to be taken in 2005.
The salary of Thomas R. Sullivan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant), is reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Mr. Sullivan’s bonus is reviewed by a collective effort between the Firstbank Corporation and Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) Boards of Directors with the final approval residing with the Corporate Board. In recommending and approving Mr. Sullivan’s salary, the committee and the boards consider a survey of compensation paid to executive officers by Michigan financial institutions of more or less comparable size. Mr. Sullivan’s salary, bonus, and stock option awards were also based on a discretionary evaluation of Mr. Sullivan’s personal performance and the operating results of the Corporation and Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant). For this purpose, the committee and the Boards of Directors focused on the earnings of the Corporation and Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) in the year just completed, the quality and productivity of the management team, administrative staffing, and continuing improvements made in loan quality, loan and loan allowance management, and loan documentation and procedure.
| Respectfully submitted,
Duane A. Carr William E. Goggin Edward B. Grant Samuel A. Smith David D. Roslund David W. Fultz |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The compensation committee is comprised of the outside members of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Mr. Sullivan, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, has served on the Board of Directors and participated in deliberations concerning compensation of other executive officers. Mr. Sullivan, however, has been excused from meetings at which decisions with respect to his own compensation have been made. The entire Board of Directors, except Mr. Sullivan, serves as a committee to administer the 1993 and 1997 Plans.
10
STOCK PERFORMANCE
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the common stock of the Corporation to the KBW 50 Index, published by Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the NASDAQ Bank Index, assuming a $100 investment at the end of 1999. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index is a broad equity market index. The KBW 50 Index is composed of 50 money center and regional bank holding companies. The NASDAQ Bank Index is composed of 523 banks and savings institutions as well as companies performing functions closely related to banking, such as check cashing agencies, currency exchanges, safe deposit companies and corporations for banking abroad. Cumulative total return is measured by dividing (i) the sum of (A) the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and (B) the difference between the share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period; by (ii) the share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6d1e/c6d1e82eabba98a8c4e2cf5bb61896b24b02ca7f" alt=""
The table below shows dollar values for cumulative total shareholder return plotted in the graph above.
| 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |
---|
Firstbank Corporation | | $100 | .00 | $106 | .12 | $116 | .77 | $166 | .78 | $223 | .55 | $224 | .77 |
S & P 500 | | $100 | .00 | $90 | .89 | $80 | .09 | $62 | .39 | $80 | .29 | $89 | .02 |
NASDAQ Bank | | $100 | .00 | $120 | .06 | $115 | .11 | $107 | .00 | $143 | .42 | $157 | .83 |
KBW 50 | | $100 | .00 | $117 | .64 | $125 | .14 | $127 | .22 | $163 | .14 | $184 | .84 |
11
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
For the year 2004, executive officers of the Corporation were compensated as previously described by Firstbank Corporation and/or Firstbank — Alma, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant), Firstbank — West Branch, Firstbank — Lakeview or Firstbank — St. Johns in accordance with their employment with the applicable banks. Presented below is the remuneration paid for the three years ended December 31, 2004, to the five most highly compensated officers of the Corporation whose salary and bonus exceeded $100,000.
Summary Compensation Table
| Year | | Annual Compensation | Long Term | All Other |
---|
Name and Principal Position | | Salary(1) | Bonus(1) | Compensation | Compensation(3) |
---|
| | | | Shares Underlying Options(2) | |
---|
|
Thomas R. Sullivan | | 2004 | | $240,708 | | $60,044 | | 1,575 | | $13,579 | |
Executive Vice President & | | 2003 | | $224,996 | | $81,426 | | 1,653 | | $13,459 | |
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Corporation | | 2002 | | $200,000 | | $95,463 | | 1,736 | | $ 5,980 | |
|
Samuel G. Stone | | 2004 | | $164,992 | | $39,382 | | 1,312 | | $ 9,171 | |
Executive Vice President & | | 2003 | | $157,438 | | $50,434 | | 1,378 | | $ 8,838 | |
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Corporation | | 2002 | | $140,000 | | $53,008 | | 1,447 | | $ 6,477 | |
|
James E. Wheeler II | | 2004 | | $139,045 | | $28,023 | | 1,312 | | $ 7,330 | |
Vice President of the | | 2003 | | $130,679 | | $35,083 | | 1,378 | | $ 7,383 | |
Corporation and President & Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank - Alma | | 2002 | | $127,000 | | $45,088 | | 1,447 | | $ 4,304 | |
Dale A. Peters | | 2004 | | $128,776 | | $26,434 | | 1,312 | | $ 7,061 | |
Vice President of the | | 2003 | | $121,833 | | $39,336 | | 1,378 | | $ 6,792 | |
Corporation and President & Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank - West Branch | | 2002 | | $115,000 | | $41,346 | | 1,447 | | $ 5,556 | |
|
William L. Benear | | 2004 | | $127,638 | | $25,567 | | 1,312 | | $ 6,799 | |
Vice President of the | | 2003 | | $120,711 | | $33,063 | | 1,378 | | $ 4,652 | |
Corporation and President & Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank - Lakeview | | 2002 | | $110,000 | | $37,802 | | 1,447 | | $ 4,610 | |
| (1) | Includes compensation voluntarily deferred under the 401(k) and under the Firstbank Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. |
| (2) | The numbers of shares subject to stock options have been adjusted to reflect stock dividends. |
12
| (3) | All other compensation for the year ended December 31, 2004, is comprised of matching contributions under the 401(k) and deferred compensation plans as follows: |
| |
---|
Thomas R. Sullivan | | $13,579 | |
Samuel G. Stone | | $ 9,171 | |
James E. Wheeler II | | $ 7,330 | |
Dale A. Peters | | $ 7,061 | |
William L. Benear | | $ 6,799 | |
Stock Option Information
Stock options are believed to help align the interests of employees with the interests of shareholders by promoting stock ownership by employees and by rewarding them in appreciation by the price of the Corporation’s stock. Stock options which were granted or outstanding during 2004 were granted under the 1997 Plan.
The following tables set forth information concerning stock options granted to, exercised by and retained by the named executive officers of the Corporation during 2004.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
| Individual Grants | | | Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term(3) |
---|
Name | Number of Shares Underlying Options Granted(2) | Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees In Fiscal Year | Exercise Price(1) | | Expiration Date | 5% | 10% |
---|
Thomas R. Sullivan | | 1,575 | | 3 | .01% | $26 | .97 | | | 11/22/14 | | $26,715 | | $67,702 | |
Samuel G. Stone | | 1,312 | | 2 | .51 | 26 | .97 | | | 11/22/14 | | 22,263 | | 56,418 | |
James E. Wheeler II | | 1,312 | | 2 | .51 | 26 | .97 | | | 11/22/14 | | 22,263 | | 56,418 | |
Dale A. Peters | | 1,312 | | 2 | .51 | 26 | .97 | | | 11/22/14 | | 22,263 | | 56,418 | |
William L. Benear | | 1,312 | | 2 | .51 | 26 | .97 | | | 11/22/14 | | 22,263 | | 56,418 | |
Option Exercises in 2004 and Year End Option Values
Name | Shares Acquired on Exercise | Value Realized | Number of Shares Underlying Unexercised Options at Year End(2) Exerciable/Unexercisable | Value of Unexercised In-The-Money Options at Year End(4) Exerciable/Unexercisable |
---|
Thomas R. Sullivan | | 8,844 | | $113,414 | | 12,537 | | 5,052 | | $132,660 | | $26,626 | |
Samuel G. Stone | | 0 | | 0 | | 11,976 | | 6,444 | | 152,807 | | 51,826 | |
James E. Wheeler II | | 0 | | 0 | | 13,254 | | 4,210 | | 161,789 | | 22,189 | |
Dale A. Peters | | 1,033 | | 14,132 | | 16,895 | | 4,210 | | 216,645 | | 22,189 | |
William L. Benear | | 7,785 | | 110,649 | | 16,989 | | 4,210 | | 253,165 | | 22,189 | |
| (1) | The per share exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of the common stock on the date each option was granted, as adjusted, for the stock dividend issued in December 2004. All outstanding options were granted for a term of ten years. Options terminate, subject to certain limited exercise provisions, in the event of retirement or other termination. No option is exercisable until one year after the date of grant, except for options granted in 1994, which became fully vested six months after the date of grant. The right to exercise options vests over five years with 20% becoming vested on each yearly anniversary of the date of the grant. |
| (2) | The numbers have been adjusted in accordance with the 1993 Plan and the 1997 Plan to reflect stock dividends. |
13
| (3) | These amounts are based on assumed rates of appreciation over the entire option period without any discount to present value. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises will be dependent upon future overall market conditions and on the future performance of the Corporation’s common stock. Amounts realized, if any, may be more or less than the amounts reflected in the table. |
| (4) | The value of unexercised options reflects the increase in market value of the Corporation’s common stock from the date of grant through December 31, 2004 (when the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock was $28.94 per share). Value actually realized upon exercise by the named executives will depend upon the value of the Corporation’s common stock at the time of exercise. |
Severance Benefit Agreements
The Corporation has entered into individual severance benefit agreements with the named executives as well as certain other of its senior officers. These agreements provide severance benefits if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause within two (2) years after a change-in-control or within six (6) months before a change-in-control of the Corporation. For the purpose of these agreements, a “change-in-control” is defined as a purchase, merger, buyout, consolidation or other reorganization under the terms of which more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the outstanding stock of the Corporation becomes held by any group of less than ten (10) individuals, a banking entity, a trust, a corporation or any other business entity. Severance benefits will not be payable if the Corporation terminates the executive’s employment for cause or if the executive resigns for reasons other than a substantial change in the terms or conditions of the executive’s employment. An executive may resign as a result of a substantial change in the terms or conditions of his employment after a change-in-control and retain the benefits provided under the agreement. A substantial change in terms or conditions of employment will be deemed to have occurred if any of the following occurs: the Corporation reduces the executive’s base salary; the Corporation discriminates against the executive as to bonuses, salary increases or fringe benefits; the executive is assigned duties which result in a significant reduction or material change in the executive’s authority or responsibility; or the executive is relocated to a place in excess of twenty-five (25) miles from the location where the executive was based at the time the agreement was executed. The agreements continue indefinitely unless the Corporation takes action to terminate by giving notice at least two (2) years prior to the anniversary date of the agreements when the termination is to be effective. These agreements provide a severance benefit of a lump sum payment equal to one and one-half years salary and incentive bonus and continuation of benefits coverage for two (2) years. The agreements provide that benefits payable under them will be reduced or delayed to the extent necessary so that they would not become subject to any excise taxes imposed with respect to so-called “parachute payments” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The Exchange Act requires the Corporation’s directors, officers and persons who own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). SEC regulations require such reporting persons to furnish the Corporation with copies of all such reports they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no filings were required for those persons, the Corporation believes that from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, its directors, officers and greater than 10% shareholders complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that Mr. Samuel Smith purchased 88.6117 shares on January 23, 2004 which were not reported until March 12, 2004.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Directors and officers of the Corporation and their associates were customers of, and had transactions with, the Corporation’s subsidiary banks in the ordinary course of business between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2004. All loans and commitments included in such transactions were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. All loans to directors, officers and their associates were current as of December 31, 2004.
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The financial statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, have been examined by Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, certified public accountants, as independent auditors of the Corporation for the 2004 fiscal year. A representative of Crowe Chizek and Company LLC will be at the annual meeting of shareholders and will have an opportunity to make a statement and be available to answer appropriate questions. Crowe Chizek and Company LLC has been the Corporation’s auditors for many years.
Audit Fees
The following table shows the fees for professional services of Crowe Chizek for audit and other services they provided to Firstbank for 2004 and 2003:
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Audit Fees (1) | | $298,000 | | $101,300 | |
Audit-Related Fees (2) | | 63,135 | | 19,450 | |
Tax Fees (3) | | 24,900 | | 35,825 | |
All Other Fees | | 0 | | 0 | |
1. Includes the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Crowe Chizek in 2003 and 2004 for the audit of Firstbank’s annual financial statements, and review of financial statements included in Firstbank’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Included in 2004 audit fees, are aggregate fees billed for the audit of the Company’s Sarbanes/Oxley section 404 compliance for internal controls.
2. Principally audits of employee benefit plan, FHLB audits of Schedules of Eligible Collateral (2003 only), and consultation regarding Firstbank’s implementation of Sarbanes/Oxley section 404 (2004 only).
3. Principally tax compliance services (including U.S. federal and state tax returns), cost segregation studies, review of quarterly tax computations and consultations regarding various tax strategies.
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services and non-audit services that are to be performed for Firstbank by its independent auditors. Under the Audit Committee’s policy, authority to pre-approve permitted services has been delegated to the Audit Committee chairman who can act alone for circumstances when pre-approval is not obtained from the full Audit Committee. Any pre-approval by the delegated authority is required to be reported to the Audit Committee at its next meeting. For 2004, all of the services described in the table above were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Shareholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2006 annual meeting must be received by the Corporation for inclusion in its proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting by November 16, 2005. Shareholder proposals should be made in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and should be addressed to Samuel G. Stone, Secretary, Firstbank Corporation, 311 Woodworth Avenue, Alma, Michigan 48801. Proxies to be solicited by the Corporation to vote at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2005 may confer discretionary authority on the persons named as proxies to vote on any matter if the Corporation does not have notice of the matter by February 1, 2006.
15
Firstbank Corporation
2004
Annual Report
This 2004 Annual Report contains audited financial statements and a detailed financial review. This is Firstbank Corporation’s 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders. Although attached to our proxy statement, this report is not part of our proxy statement, is not deemed to be soliciting material and is not deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) except to the extent that it is expressly incorporated by reference in a document filed with the SEC.
The 2004 Report to Shareholders accompanies this proxy statement. That report presents information concerning the business and financial results of Firstbank Corporation in a format and level of detail that we believe shareholders will find useful and informative. Shareholders who would like to receive even more detailed information than that contained in this 2004 Annual Report are invited to request our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Firstbank Corporation’s Form 10-K Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission will be provided to any shareholder, without charge, upon written request. Requests should be addressed to Samuel G. Stone, Chief Financial Officer, Firstbank Corporation, 311 Woodworth Avenue, P.O. Box 1029, Alma, Michigan 48801-6029. Firstbank Corporation’s Form 10-K Annual Report may also be accessed through out website www.firstbankmi.com.
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
The theme for this year’s Annual Report to Shareholders is Designing a Vibrant Future. We chose that theme because it reflects the steps we are taking to ensure that the shareholders, customers, employees, and communities we serve continue to benefit from their association with Firstbank Corporation.
The year of 2004 was another successful year for our company, even though we posted somewhat lower earnings than the prior year. Our net income of over $10.3 million was the third highest level of earnings ever achieved. In light of the soft economy in our markets, the rising interest rates that brought a halt to the mortgage refinance activity of prior years, and the uncertainties caused by the Iraq war and our national election, we are very pleased with the results. The impact of the rising rates – and the associated decline in residential mortgage volume – is clearly illustrated by the decline in our gains from the sale of mortgage loans from $8.6 million in 2003 to $2.7 million in 2004.
We continued to maintain our long term focus on growth and asset quality during 2004 as well. Our levels of net charge-off of loans, and non-performing assets, have remained low and compare very favorably with our peers. This strong commitment to asset quality does occasionally limit growth opportunities; however, we did post loan growth of 5.6% in a soft economy, and exceeded $800 million in total assets for the first time at year end.
We are also committed to the effective management of our shareholders capital investment in Firstbank. As a result, during 2004 the board of directors authorized the repurchase of shares through a tender offer process at a price of $28.57 (adjusted for the 5% stock dividend in December). This process allowed shareholders to elect whether to maintain their investment in Firstbank or to sell their shares directly back to the company for little or no brokerage cost. The company repurchased 600,000 of the shares tendered, and since that repurchase we have achieved improved valuation for our shares, increased earnings per share, and increased our return on shareholders’ equity. I am also very pleased to report that $100 invested in Firstbank Corporation common stock on December 31, 1999 with all dividends reinvested, was valued at $225 on December 31, 2004, a five year compound annual growth rate of 17.6% per year!
After posting a 9.8% improvement in earnings per share in the fourth quarter of 2004 versus 2003, we look forward to 2005 with enthusiasm and optimism. With the end of the mortgage refinance boom we have refocused our efforts on maintaining and expanding our relationship with existing customers, while also identifying and pursuing new business opportunities throughout our markets. Even though the Michigan economy continues to struggle, we believe that we have growth opportunities available, and are taking aggressive action to upgrade our sales and service capabilities.
As always, the success of Firstbank Corporation rests squarely on the shoulders of our people. We are fortunate to have outstanding individuals serving throughout the company from the front lines to the board rooms. Their dedication, hard work, commitment, and professionalism have positioned Firstbank Corporation as one of the leading community banking organizations in Michigan.
During 2004 we said farewell to two long time members of the Firstbank family. Sadly, Gerald L. Nielsen, who had served as a member of the Firstbank – Lakeview board of directors since 1986, passed away on August 6, 2004. Jerry’s dedication and insight will truly be missed throughout Firstbank and the entire Lakeview community. Jim Taylor, who had most recently served as President of Firstbank – St. Johns, retired in December and we wish him a happy and healthy retirement. Jim joined Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) in 1988, and in 2000 was named the first Chief Executive Officer of the St. Johns bank. His leadership was instrumental in the success of that affiliate, and has positioned us for future growth. David M. Brown has been selected to succeed Jim as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Firstbank – St. Johns, and we welcome him into the Firstbank family.
Thank you for your investment in Firstbank Corporation. We appreciate the support and encouragement of our shareholders, and always welcome your comments or suggestions.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Thomas R. Sullivan
Thomas R. Sullivan
President & Chief Executive Officer
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Firstbank Corporation
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except per Share Data)
For the year: | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 |
---|
Interest income | | $ 44,092 | | $ 44,229 | | $ 49,248 | | $ 55,510 | | $ 54,224 | |
Net interest income | | 32,382 | | 31,631 | | 32,987 | | 30,917 | | 28,697 | |
Provision for loan losses | | (425 | ) | 550 | | 1,170 | | 1,467 | | 736 | |
Non-interest income | | 10,051 | | 15,878 | | 12,133 | | 9,940 | | 5,539 | |
Non-interest expense | | 28,361 | | 28,895 | | 26,237 | | 25,756 | | 21,052 | |
Net income | | 10,358 | | 12,056 | | 11,826 | | 9,122 | | 8,543 | |
At year end: | |
Total assets | | 806,135 | | 776,500 | | 767,520 | | 751,990 | | 733,267 | |
Total earning assets | | 752,943 | | 720,976 | | 709,857 | | 696,681 | | 679,322 | |
Loans | | 673,056 | | 639,613 | | 611,058 | | 606,076 | | 600,767 | |
Deposits | | 603,267 | | 567,554 | | 576,909 | | 561,139 | | 537,224 | |
Other borrowings | | 120,840 | | 114,324 | | 98,942 | | 107,838 | | 122,259 | |
Shareholders' equity | | 72,864 | | 85,744 | | 80,181 | | 72,426 | | 64,204 | |
Average balances: | |
Total assets | | 787,076 | | 764,693 | | 750,476 | | 737,681 | | 687,190 | |
Total earning assets | | 735,730 | | 716,636 | | 700,823 | | 688,483 | | 637,317 | |
Loans | | 653,878 | | 602,733 | | 601,306 | | 603,134 | | 553,201 | |
Deposits | | 591,270 | | 573,467 | | 562,971 | | 546,984 | | 510,194 | |
Other borrowings | | 107,207 | | 97,541 | | 99,939 | | 107,733 | | 105,593 | |
Shareholders' equity | | 79,278 | | 83,317 | | 76,356 | | 68,101 | | 62,675 | |
Per share: (1) | |
Basic earnings | | $ 1.83 | | 2.03 | | 1.99 | | 1.56 | | 1.44 | |
Diluted earnings | | $ 1.79 | | 1.97 | | 1.94 | | 1.53 | | 1.43 | |
Cash dividends | | $ 0.79 | | 0.71 | | 0.64 | | 0.58 | | 0.53 | |
Shareholders' equity | | $ 13.69 | | $ 14.48 | | $ 13.55 | | $ 12.22 | | $ 11.07 | |
Financial ratios: | |
Return on average assets | | 1.32 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.24 | % |
Return on average equity | | 13.06 | % | 14.47 | % | 15.50 | % | 13.40 | % | 13.63 | % |
Average equity to average assets | | 10.07 | % | 10.90 | % | 10.17 | % | 9.23 | % | 9.12 | % |
Dividend payout ratio | | 42.56 | % | 35.29 | % | 32.61 | % | 37.50 | % | 36.73 | % |
Firstbank – St. Johns results are included from June 16, 2000, the date of inception.
Gladwin Land Company, Inc. results are included from May 8, 2000, the date of acquisition.
(1) All per share amounts are adjusted for stock dividends.
The Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission will be provided to any shareholder, without charge, upon written request. Requests should be addressed to: Samuel G. Stone, Chief Financial Officer, Firstbank Corporation, 311 Woodworth Avenue, P.O. Box 1029, Alma, Michigan 48801-6029 The Company’s Form 10-K may also be viewed through our web site atwww.firstbankmi.com.
3
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The purpose of this section of the annual report is to provide a narrative discussion about Firstbank Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. Please refer to the consolidated financial statements and the selected financial data presented in this report in addition to the following discussion and analysis.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Highlights
Firstbank Corporation (“the Company”) had net income of $10,358,000 for 2004 compared with $12,056,000 in 2003, a decrease of $1,698,000, or 14.1%. These results reflect continued strength of core banking activities and favorable developments relating to classified loans, but a substantial reduction in mortgage refinances and resulting secondary market sales during the year. The mortgage refinancing levels of 2003 were at record levels with the historically low interest rates and were expected to decline significantly in 2004.
Management believes that standard performance indicators help evaluate performance. Firstbank posted a return on average assets of 1.32%, 1.58%, and 1.58% for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Total average assets increased $22 million in 2004, $14 million in 2003, and $13 million in 2002. Diluted earnings per share were $1.79, $1.97, and $1.94 for the same time periods. Return on equity was 13.06% in 2004, 14.47% in 2003, and 15.50% in 2002.
In 2000, 2002, and again in 2003, the Board of Directors authorized share repurchase programs that helped maintain capital and return on equity at appropriate levels. In June of 2004, the Board of Directors further authorized a self tender offer to repurchase shares of its common stock, which resulted in 600,000 shares, or 10.7% of the then outstanding shares of stock being repurchased for a total purchase price of $18 million. The company initially borrowed $11.0 million on its line of credit and utilized cash held by the parent company to fund the remaining $7.0 million of the purchase.
In October of 2004, Firstbank Capital Trust I (“the trust”), an unconsolidated special purpose trust of the Company, sold 10,000 variable rate trust preferred securities, at $1,000 per trust preferred security, for a total of $10 million in Trust Preferred Securities. The initial rate on the Trust Preferred Securities was 4.05% and will adjust quarterly to the then current 90 day LIBOR rate plus 1.99%. Firstbank Corporation issued subordinated debt to the trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offering. The debentures represent the sole assets of the trust. The Company used the proceeds of this transaction to provide long term funding for the self tender offer transaction described in the preceding paragraph, and paid off its line of credit borrowing.
Including the self tender shares repurchased discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the Company repurchased 706,700 shares of its common stock in 2004, 176,100 in 2003, and 122,710 shares in 2002.
Net Interest Income
The core business of the Company is earning interest on loans and securities while paying interest on deposits and borrowings. Interest rates in the first half of 2004 remained at historically low levels, and then began to rise in the second half of the year. During the first half of the year, interest spreads between earning assets and the cost of funding those assets compressed, continuing a pattern which began in 2002. As short term rates began to rise in the second half of the year the interest spread began to expand. The combination of higher earning asset balances and the improving interest spread resulted in the Company’s net interest income increasing by $751,000 in 2004, a 2.3% increase when compared to 2003. The net interest margin for the year decreased to 4.47% compared to 4.50% in 2003, and 4.80% in 2002. During 2004, the Company’s average loan to average deposit ratio was 110%, compared to 105% in 2003, and 107% in 2002.
A critical task of management is to price assets and liabilities so that the spread between the interest earned on assets and the interest paid on liabilities is maximized without unacceptable risks. While interest rates on earning assets and interest bearing liabilities are subject to market forces, in general and in the short run, the Company can exert more control over deposit rates than earning asset rates. However, competitive forces and the need to maintain and grow deposits as a funding source place limitations on the degree of control over deposit rates.
4
The following table presents a summary of net interest income for 2004, 2003, and 2002.
Summary of Consolidated Net Interest Income (dollars in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, 2004 | Year Ended December 31, 2003 | Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
---|
Average Assets | Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate | Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate | Average Balance | Interest | Average Rate |
---|
Interest Earning Assets: Taxable securities | | $ 49,656 | | $ 1,655 | | 3 | .33% | $54,501 | | $ 1,817 | | 3 | .33% | $47,694 | | $ 2,310 | | 4 | .84% |
Tax exempt securities(1) | | 21,413 | | 1,418 | | 6 | .62% | 21,980 | | 1,590 | | 7 | .23% | 25,362 | | 1,751 | | 6 | .90% |
|
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
Total Securities | | 71,069 | | 3,073 | | 4 | .32% | 76,481 | | 3,407 | | 4 | .45% | 73,056 | | 4,061 | | 5 | .56% |
|
Loans(1) (2) | | 653,878 | | 41,395 | | 6 | .33% | 602,733 | | 41,048 | | 6 | .81% | 601,306 | | 45,434 | | 7 | .56% |
Federal funds sold | | 8,304 | | 106 | | 1 | .28% | 35,875 | | 381 | | 1 | .06% | 23,668 | | 370 | | 1 | .56% |
Interest bearing deposits | | 2,479 | | 34 | | 1 | .37% | 1,547 | | 6 | | 0 | .38% | 2,793 | | 43 | | 1 | .54% |
|
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
Total Earning Assets | | 735,730 | | 44,608 | | 6 | .06% | 716,636 | | 44,842 | | 6 | .26% | 700,823 | | 49,908 | | 7 | .12% |
|
Nonaccrual loans | | 667 | | | | | | 795 | | | | | | 880 | | | | | |
Less allowance for loan | |
Loss | | (11,259 | ) | | | | | (11,695 | ) | | | | | (11,308 | ) | | | | |
Cash and due from banks | | 23,539 | | | | | | 21,144 | | | | | | 21,625 | | | | | |
Other non-earning assets | | 38,399 | | | | | | 37,813 | | | | | | 38,456 | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ 787,076 | | | | | | $ 764,693 | | | | | | $ 750,476 | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Average Liabilities | |
Interest Bearing Liabilities: | |
Demand | | $ 184,660 | | $ 1,441 | | 0 | .78% | $183,361 | | $ 1,711 | | 0 | .93% | $171,376 | | $ 2,847 | | 1 | .66% |
Savings | | 99,717 | | 602 | | 0 | .60% | 91,151 | | 669 | | 0 | .73% | 78,512 | | 899 | | 1 | .15% |
Time | | 202,378 | | 5,410 | | 2 | .67% | 202,812 | | 6,153 | | 3 | .03% | 224,932 | | 8,258 | | 3 | .67% |
|
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
Total Deposits | | 486,755 | | 7,453 | | 1 | .53% | 477,324 | | 8,533 | | 1 | .79% | 474,820 | | 12,004 | | 2 | .53% |
|
Federal funds purchased | |
and repurchase agreements | | 30,983 | | 289 | | 0 | .93% | 29,245 | | 240 | | 0 | .82% | 31,143 | | 422 | | 1 | .36% |
FHLB advances and | |
notes payable | | 73,951 | | 3,874 | | 5 | .24% | 68,296 | | 3,825 | | 5 | .60% | 69,195 | | 3,835 | | 5 | .54% |
Subordinated Debentures | | 2,273 | | 94 | | 4 | .14% | 0 | | 0 | | | | 0 | | 0 | | | |
|
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
Total Interest Bearing | |
Liabilities | | 593,962 | | 11,710 | | 1 | .97% | 574,865 | | 12,598 | | 2 | .19% | 575,158 | | 16,261 | | 2 | .83% |
|
Demand Deposits | | 104,515 | | | | | | 96,143 | | | | | | 88,151 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total Funds | | 698,477 | | | | | | 671,008 | | | | | | 663,309 |
|
Other Non-Interest Bearing | |
Liabilities | | 9,321 | | | | | | 10,368 | | | | | | 10,811 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities | | 707,798 | | | | | | 681,376 | | | | | | 674,120 |
|
Average Shareholders' Equity | | 79,278 | | | | | | 83,317 | | | | | | 76,356 |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities and | |
Shareholders' Equity | | $ 787,076 | | | | | | $764,693 | | | | | | $750,476 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Net Interest Income(1) | | | | $32,898 | | | | | | $32,244 | | | | | | $33,647 | |
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Rate Spread(1) | | | | | | 4 | .09% | | | | | 4 | .07% | | | | | 4 | .29% |
Net Interest Margin (percent of | |
|
Average earning assets (1) | | | | | | 4 | .47% | | | | | 4 | .50% | | | | | 4 | .80% |
(1) | Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35% for all periods presented. |
(2) | Interest income includes amortization of loan fees of $1,396,000, $1,472,000, and $1,395,000 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. |
Interest on nonaccrual loans is not included.
In 2004, the average rate realized on earning assets was 6.06%, a decrease of 20 basis points from the 2003 results of 6.26%, and a 106 basis point reduction from the 7.12% realized in 2002. During 2002, the prime rate held steady for the first three quarters and then decreased 50 basis points in the fourth quarter. In 2003 the prime rate continued to move lower, remaining unchanged in the first quarter and then decreasing 25 basis points in the second quarter and remaining at that level for the second half of the year. In 2004, the prime rate was unchanged in the first and second quarters, and then moved up in five 25 basis points increments in the third and fourth quarters to its year end level of 5.25%. As of December 31, 2004, slightly over 40% of the loan portfolio was comprised of variable rate instruments. Except for a relatively small portion of these loans that are affected under current interest rate conditions by interest rate floors or ceilings, these loans will re-price monthly or quarterly as rates change. The remaining 60% of the loan portfolio is made up of fixed rate loans that do not re-price until maturity. Of the fixed rate loans approximately $93 million, or nearly 23% of the fixed rate loan portfolio, matures within the next twelve months and are subject to rate adjustments at maturity.
5
As rates declined in 2002 and 2003, maturing securities in the investment portfolio could not be replaced with securities of comparable quality bearing equal or higher yields. Quality standards were maintained and portfolio yields declined. Although short term interest rates moved up in the second half of 2004, longer term rates have remained basically unchanged. As a result, maturing securities continue to run off from the investment portfolio at higher rates than comparable current offerings, reducing the overall investment portfolio yield from 4.45% in 2003 to 4.32% in 2004. In the current rate environment, management expects to be able to replace maturing investments in the portfolio with securities of high quality, and similar yields.
The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities was 1.97% in 2004, compared to 2.19% in 2003, and 2.83% in 2002. Deposit rates decreased during 2004 as maturing time deposits were re-priced to lower rates and average rates paid on checking and savings deposits were lower in response to the prime rate reductions of 2002 and 2003. The Company began using brokered CDs in the third quarter of 2004 to assist with increased funding needs. The brokered CDs carry an interest rate that is generally higher than the rate offered in its local markets and were issued with original maturities ranging from three to twelve months.
In past years the Company has funded a portion of its loan growth with borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank and notes payable. During 2004, the average outstanding balance of FHLB advances and notes payable increased $5.6 million and the year end balance increased $4.2 million when compared to 2003 balances. While FHLB borrowings are an economical method of funding loans when increased core deposits are not available, the cost is typically higher than the Company’s core deposit costs. The average rate of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and notes payable funding decreased 36 basis points in 2004, to 5.24%, when compared to the 2003 rate of 5.60%, because new advances were at lower rates than maturing notes. Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank carry significant prepayment penalties that act as a deterrent to prepayment. In October of 2004, the Company issued $10.3 million in subordinated debentures, at a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.99%. The Company utilizes short term borrowing, made up of Federal Funds Purchased and Repurchase Agreements as a source of liquidity and to balance the daily cash needs of the Company. Average short term borrowed funds increased by $1.7 million when 2004 is compared with 2003.
The 2004 rate spread of 4.09% is two basis points higher than the 2003 result of 4.07%, but 20 basis points lower than the 2002 result of 4.29%. Tax equivalent net interest income increased $654,000 in 2004 as an increase in total average earning assets of $19 million more than offset the narrower net interest margin. The net interest margin of 4.47% for 2004 was three basis points below the 2003 results, and 33 basis points lower than in 2002. An increase in the rate spread was the result of rates on average earning assets decreasing 20 basis points while the average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased 22 basis points. The three basis point decrease in the net interest margin was a result of a lower percentage of earning assets being funded by non interest bearing liabilities and equity. Average earning assets represented 93% of total average assets in 2004 and 94% in 2003.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses in 2004 was an expense recovery of $425,000 compared with expense of $550,000 in 2003, and $1,170,000 in 2002. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 114 Accounting by Creditor for the Impairment of a Loan, the Company sets aside specific reserves for loans that it determines to be impaired by charging its provision for loan losses. Likewise, if a loan for which reserves had been established pays off, or the risk of loss to the Company is otherwise eliminated, the Company is required to reverse those specific reserves. During 2004, favorable events pertaining to a few impaired loans, for which specific loan loss reserves had been established, caused the Company to reverse provision expense. Management believes the events that transpired in 2004 are rare in occurrence and does not anticipate similar events to occur on a regular basis in the future.
6
At December 31, 2004, the allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans was 1.58% compared to 1.83% and 1.92% at December 31, 2003, and December 31, 2002, respectively. Net charged off loans totaled $621,000 in 2004, compared to $459,000 in 2003, and $672,000 in 2002. During 2004 recoveries of previously charged off loans were $309,000, compared to $319,000 in 2003, and $363,000 in 2002. Net charged off loans as a percent of average loans were 0.09% in 2004, 0.08% in 2003, and 0.11% in 2002. Total nonperforming loans were 0.28% of ending loans at December 31, 2004, compared to 0.22% and 0.63% at the two previous year ends. Management maintains the allowance for loan losses at a level considered appropriate. The allowance balance is established after considering past loan loss experience, current economic conditions, volume, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, delinquencies, and other relevant factors. Management uses a quantitative and qualitative methodology for analyzing factors which impact the allowance for loan losses consistently across its five banking subsidiaries. The process applies risk factors for historical charge-offs and delinquency experience, portfolio segment weightings, and industry and regional factors and trends as they affect the banks’ portfolios. The consideration of exposures to industries most affected by current risks in the economic and political environment and the review of risks in certain credits that either are, or are not, considered part of the non-performing loan category contributed to the establishment of the allowance levels at each bank. Management believes that the analysis described above provides a consistent basis for the current provision level.
Non-interest Income
Non-interest income declined sharply in 2004, primarily from a 69% reduction in gains on the sale of mortgage loans. Overall, non-interest income was down $5.8 million, or 36.7%. Gain on sale of mortgage loans in 2003 and 2002 benefited from forty year lows in mortgage interest rates which fueled mortgage refinance activity. The lower gains in 2004 are reflective of a more typical level of refinance activity and a return to more traditional new loan business.
When a mortgage is refinanced or pre-paid, capitalized mortgage servicing rights relating to that mortgage are written off. During 2002 and 2003, mortgage servicing income was affected by the refinance activity, causing net servicing income (serving income, net of amortization of capitalized serving rights) to swing to a net expense position. In 2004, with reduced levels of refinancing, the net servicing income, while still a negative $55,000 was largely neutral as compared with a negative $1.1 million in 2003 and a negative $709,000 in 2002.
Courier and cash delivery services income increased 45.7% to $1,072,000 in 2004 after having increased 30.5% in 2003. This revenue is from the operations of 1st Armored Incorporated, which operates an armored car and courier business, and does not include income from servicing Firstbank affiliates. In 2004, 1st Armored began servicing coin counting machines located in super markets for a single customer, which contributed $229,000 to revenue.
The mortgage refinance boom of 2002 and 2003 also benefited two of the Company’s non banking subsidiaries which provided title insurance and real estate appraisal services to customers. In 2004, as with gains on the sale of mortgage loans, business was down with decreased mortgage refinance activity. Real estate appraisal fees contributed $604,000 in 2004 down from $912,000 in 2003 and $857,000 in 2002. Title insurance sales declined to $618,000 compared with $1,104,000 in 2003 and $726,000 in 2002.
Other non-interest income decreased $465,000, or 25.8%, when the results of 2004 are compared to 2003. The lower level of income was primarily due to higher gains on the sale of other real estate owned and from the sale of certain customer lists associated with the brokerage business in 2003. When comparing 2003 to 2002 results, other non-interest income was $346,000 higher.
Non-interest Expense
Salary and employee benefits expenses decreased $480,000, or 3.0%, when 2004 is compared with 2003. Temporary staffing and overtime associated with originating, processing and managing secondary market sales related to the high volume in the mortgage business in 2003 were scaled back. The reduction in staffing was partially offset by annual salary increments, merit raises and normal staffing requirements related to growth in other business areas. Employee benefit costs increased 10.9% as well, primarily from higher employee group insurance cost which increased 18.6% in 2004. The Company employed 365 full time equivalent employees at the end of 2004, 25 fewer than at the same time in 2003. Salary and benefit expenses were $1,951,000 higher when 2003 is compared with 2002 as the Company expanded its work force to meet the demands of mortgage refinance activity, staffed new branch facilities and paid for annual merit and incentive increases.
7
Expenses of occupancy and equipment increased $141,000, or 3.8%, over the 2003 level primarily from higher depreciation expense on equipment as the Company upgraded its technology and phone systems. Occupancy and equipment expense had increased $53,000, in 2003 over the 2002 level.
Amortization of intangible assets decreased $34,000, or 10.1%, during 2004 as amortization was reduced due to the sale of certain customer lists related to the brokerage business in 2003. Intangible amortization decreased $26,000 in 2003 compared with 2002 also due to the sale of certain customer lists related to the brokerage business. Included in other non interest expense for 2004 was a $415,000 charge relating to impairment of goodwill at the Company’s Gladwin Land Company and CA Hanes, Realty Inc. businesses. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Corporation determined that goodwill at its Gladwin Land Company and CA Hanes Realty, Inc. subsidiaries was impaired. The Company uses a discounted future cash flow model to evaluate the goodwill of its non banking subsidiaries. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the $314,000 of goodwill at Gladwin Land was determined to be fully impaired, and was written off in its entirety. The $376,000 of goodwill at CA Hanes Realty, Inc. was determined to be partially impaired and written down by $101,000 to a remaining value of $275,000.
Michigan single business tax expense increased $297,000 in 2004. During the fourth quarter of 2004 the Company performed a comprehensive review of its tax asset and liability accounts in order to adjust previous estimates of contingent tax liabilities. As a result, the Company increased its single business tax liability and the corresponding expense in the amount of $365,000. Proposed changes to the Michigan Single Business Tax, by the Governor of Michigan, could substantially increase the Company’s expense in years beginning in 2006.
Expenses for outside professional services decreased $397,000 to $1,598,000 in 2004 compared to $1,995,000 in 2003. Title search fees and costs paid to independent contractors in the title, appraisal and real estate sales operations accounted for substantially all of the reduction. These costs were largely driven by the high level of mortgage refinance activity in 2003. Professional service fees increased in 2003 above 2002‘s level by $436,000 with fees associated with mortgage refinancing driving the increase.
Advertising and special promotion expense decreased to $290,000 from $787,000 in 2003 primarily due to promotional expense for mortgage refinances in 2003. Advertising and promotional expense was higher in 2003 than the previous year by $265,000 for promotional expenditures relating to mortgage refinance activity.
Other non-interest expense increased from $5,679,000 in 2003 to $5,908,000 in 2004. Included in 2004 expense is the goodwill impairment charged discussed above and $205,000 relating to the cost of the Company’s implementation of newly enacted procedures on internal controls required by section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Other non-interest expense declined $186,000, or 3.1%. Prior year expenses had decreased from 2002 by $22,000.
Federal Income Tax
The Company’s effective federal income tax rates were 29% for 2004, and 33% for 2003 and 2002. As discussed above, the Company performed a comprehensive review of its tax asset and liability accounts in order to adjust previous estimates of contingent tax liabilities. As a result, the Company reduced its federal tax liability and the corresponding expense in the amount of $529,000. Excluding this adjustment, the Company’s federal income tax rate for 2004 would have been 32%. The Company’s investment in securities and loans which provide income exempt from federal income tax is the principal cause of the difference between the effective tax rates noted above and the statutory tax rate of 35% for all three years.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets at December 31, 2004 were $806 million, exceeding December 31, 2003 total assets of $777 million by $29 million, or 3.7%. Loans held for sale in the secondary market decreased 52.7% at December 31, 2004, when compared to the balance at December 31, 2003, reflecting the slower mortgage origination business at the end of the year. Total portfolio loans, net of allowance for loan loss, increased 5.9% at December 31, 2004 compared with the balance at the previous year end. Commercial loans decreased $1.9 million, or 1.8%. Residential mortgage and commercial mortgage loans increased $26.5 million, or 12.9%, and $22.3 million, or 11.0% respectively. Construction loans were lower at December 31, 2004, falling $7.2 million, or 13.1%, from the previous year end. Consumer loans were $3.8 million, or 6.3% lower at the current year end.
8
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | Change | % Change |
---|
Commercial | | $110,508 | | $112,384 | | $(1,876 | ) | (2 | )% |
Commercial real estate | | 225,372 | | 203,080 | | 22,292 | | 11 | % |
Residential real estate | | 231,341 | | 204,844 | | 26,497 | | 13 | % |
Construction | | 47,920 | | 55,160 | | (7,240 | ) | (13 | )% |
Consumer | | 56,315 | | 60,128 | | (3,813 | ) | (6 | )% |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | 671,456 | | 635,596 | | 35,860 | | 6 | % |
|
Mortgages serviced for others | | $472,100 | | $464,400 | | $ 7,700 | | 2 | % |
Total securities available for sale increased $1.7 million, or 2.5%, roughly keeping pace with overall asset growth. Securities available for sale were 9.0% of total assets at year end 2004, compared with 9.1% at the end of 2003.
Premises and equipment decreased by $445,000 after recognized depreciation of $1,954,000. The decrease in premise and equipment resulted from current year depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures.
Total deposits increased at the end of 2004 to $603 million, an increase of 6.3%, compared to $568 million at year end 2003. In the middle of 2004, the Company entered the brokered CD market to expand its available funding sources. At the end of the year, $15.3 million of brokered CDs had been added to the balance sheet. Brokered CDs generally carry a higher interest rate than locally generated CDs of similar duration, but are available in large dollar pools which results in lower operational cost than smaller dollar local deposits. Including the brokered CDs, total time deposits increased $31.5 million, or 16.7% compared with the end of 2003. Non-interest bearing demand deposit balances increased $3.9 million, or 3.8%, while interest bearing demand deposits decreased by $4.6 million, or 2.5% and savings account balances increased $4.9 million, or 5.1%. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased by $4.1 million and federal funds purchased decreased $12.0 million.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and notes payable increased by $4.2 million at December 31, 2004 as compared to December 31, 2003. Note K and Note L of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements have additional discussion of borrowings. The Company also issued $10.3 million in subordinated debentures in the fourth quarter of 2004. Note M of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements has additional discussion of that issuance.
Asset Quality
Loans are carried at an amount which management believes will be collected. A balance considered not collectible is charged against (reduction of) the allowance for loan losses. In 2004, net charged off loans were $621,000 compared to $459,000 in 2003. Net charged off loans as a percentage of average loans were 0.09% and 0.08% in 2004 and 2003.
Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days past due and any loans where the terms have been renegotiated. Total nonperforming loans were $1.9 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The average investment in impaired loans was $1.6 million during 2004 compared to $3.5 million during 2003. At year end, impaired loans were $1.4 million compared with $3.4 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease in impaired loans was mainly due to full or partial repayment of several loans that were classified as impaired at the end of the prior year. Please refer to Note F of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on impaired loans. Total nonaccrual loans were $1,456,000 at December 31, 2004, compared to $834,000 at the end of 2003.
The allowance for loan losses was decreased $1,046,000, or 9.0%, during 2004. The allowance for loan losses represents 1.58% of outstanding loans at the end of 2004 as compared to 1.83% at December 31, 2003. As previously discussed under the provision for loan losses heading, favorable events pertaining to a few impaired loans, for which specific loan loss reserves had been established, caused the Company to reverse allowance. Management believes the events that transpired in 2004 are rare in occurrence and does not anticipate similar events to occur on a regular basis in the future. Management maintains the allowance at a level which they believe adequately provides for losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Such losses are estimated by a variety of factors, including specific examination of certain borrowing relationships and consideration of historical losses incurred on certain types of credits. Management focuses on early identification of problem credits through ongoing reviews by management, loan personnel and an outside loan review specialist.
9
LIQUIDITY AND INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY
Asset liability management aids the Company in achieving reasonable and predictable earnings and liquidity while maintaining a balance between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of the Company’s customers. These customers may be either borrowers needing to meet their credit requirements or depositors wanting to withdraw funds. Management of interest rate sensitivity attempts to manage the level of varying net interest margins and to achieve consistent net interest income through periods of changing interest rates. The net interest margin was 4.47% in 2004 compared to 4.50% in 2003. Loan yields declined 48 basis points, from 6.81% in 2003, to 6.33% in 2004. Deposit costs decreased 26 basis points from 1.79% in 2003 to 1.53% in 2004. With low yields on loans through most of the year, demand was strong, and average loans outstanding increased by $51 million. Average total earning assets increased a smaller $19 million as loans were funded, in part, by a shift from lower yielding federal funds sold.
Rising interest rates in the second half of the year allowed the Company to increase its year end balance of time deposits by $31.5 million. Also contributing to the increase in time deposits was the addition of $15.3 million of brokered CDs. The Company continued to maintain its short term funding needs through the use of overnight funding, and ended the year with $10.3 million of federal funds purchased. The use of FHLB advances continued to be a significant source of longer term funding, with advances increasing from the prior year end by $4.2 million. The company also added $10.3 million in subordinated debentures during the year to fund its capital management strategy. Early in the fourth quarter, Firstbank Capital Trust I (“the trust”) raised $10.3 million of funding through the issuance of variable interest trust preferred securities. The Company then issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offering. The trust is an unconsolidated subsidiary and accordingly this funding is shown on the balance sheet as subordinated debentures. The rate on these securities is adjustable quarterly to the then current LIBOR rate plus 1.99%
A decision to increase deposit rates affects most rates currently paid and, therefore, has an immediate negative impact on net interest margin. With the exception of variable rate loans, an increase in loan rates does not affect the yield until a new loan is made. During the first half of the year, the Company’s net interest margin compressed as pressure to raise rates on deposits came in advance of prime rate increases, which primarily affect loans. In the second half of 2004 the prime rate increased five times in 25 basis points increments, bringing the prime rate to 5.25% at year end. While deposit rates continued to move higher in the second half, the Company was able to increase rates on variable rate loans at a faster pace, causing the net interest margin to expand.
The principal sources of liquidity for the Company are maturing securities, federal funds purchased or sold, loan payments by borrowers, investment securities, loans held for sale, deposit or deposit equivalent growth and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Securities maturing or re-pricing within one year at December 31, 2004 were $22.9 million, compared to $13.6 million at December 31, 2003. Total investments available for sale increased $1.7 million to $72.5 million.
10
The table below shows the interest sensitivity gaps for five different intervals as of December 31, 2004. Deposits that do not have a fixed maturity date are shown as immediately re-pricing according to reporting conventions.
| Maturity or Re-Pricing Frequency (Dollars in Millions) |
---|
| 1 Day | 2 Days through 3 Months | 4 Months through 12 Months | 13 Months through 5 Years | 5 + Years |
---|
Interest Earning Assets: Loans | | $ 258 | .3 | $ 56 | .8 | $ 57 | .1 | $ 254 | .2 | $ 46 | .7 |
Securities | | | .5 | 22 | .4 | 20 | .3 | 24 | .5 | 3 | .4 |
Other earning assets | | 2 | .1 | 0 | .0 | 0 | .0 | 0 | .0 | 6 | .7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | | $ 260 | .9 | $ 79 | .2 | $ 77 | .4 | $ 278 | .7 | $ 56 | .8 |
Interest Bearing Liabilities: | |
Deposits | | $ 277 | .3 | $ 62 | .1 | $ 113 | .0 | $ 150 | .9 | $ 0 | .0 |
Other interest bearing liabilities | | 39 | .1 | 65 | .2 | | .7 | 10 | .0 | 5 | .8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | | $ 316 | .4 | $ 127 | .3 | $ 113 | .7 | $ 160 | .9 | $ 5 | .8 |
|
Interest Sensitivity Gap | | (55 | .5) | (48 | .1) | (36 | .3) | 117 | .8 | 51 | .0 |
|
Cumulative Gap | | (55 | .5) | (103 | .6) | (139 | .9) | (22 | .1) | 28 | .9 |
For the one day interval, maturities of interest bearing liabilities exceed those of interest earning assets by $55.5 million. Included in the one day maturity classification are $277.3 million in savings and checking accounts which are contractually available to the Company’s customers immediately, but in practice, function as core deposits with considerably longer maturities. In the two day through the five year time frame, interest sensitive assets exceed interest sensitive liabilities, resulting in a cumulative position of interest sensitive liabilities exceeding interest sensitive assets by $22.1 million through five years. For the time period greater than five years, the positive relationship changes to an asset sensitive position, such that cumulatively, interest sensitive assets exceed interest sensitive liabilities by $28.9 million.
Showing a negative cumulative gap through the twelve month period does not necessarily result in a corresponding increase in net interest income during a declining rate environment. In practice, deposit rates do not change as rapidly as would be indicated by the contractual availability of deposit balances to customers. Some of the gain associated with the lowering of deposit costs is mitigated by rate decreases on variable rate loans and by fixed rate loan customers’ ability to use new, lower rate loans to prepay existing higher rate loans. Conversely, showing a negative cumulative gap through the twelve month period does not necessarily result in a corresponding decrease in net interest income during a rising rate environment for similar reasons. Due to the behavior of deposits, contrary to the GAP information as shown, management believes that an increase in interest rates will result in an increased spread and increased earnings. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates would likely result in a decrease in spreads and net income.
Interest rate sensitivity varies with different types of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Overnight investments, on which rates change daily, and loans tied to the prime rate differ considerably from long term investment securities and fixed rate loans. Time deposits over $100,000 and money market accounts are more interest sensitive than regular savings accounts. Comparison of the re-pricing intervals of interest earning assets to interest bearing liabilities is a measure of the interest sensitivity gap. Balancing interest rate sensitivity is a continual challenge in a changing rate environment. The Company uses a sophisticated computer program to perform analysis of interest rate risk, assist with its asset liability management, and model and measure interest rate sensitivity.
11
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABLILITES, AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments that may require future cash payments.
The following table presents, as of December 31, 2004, significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date.
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
Contractual Obligation | One Year or less | 1 -3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | More than 5 Years | Total |
---|
Federal Funds Borrowed and | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements(1) | | $39,102 | | $ 0 | | $ 0 | | $ 0 | | $39,102 | |
Long Term Debt(1) | | 16,826 | | 15,519 | | 7,540 | | 46,187 | | 86,072 | |
Subordinated Debt(2) | | 192 | | 534 | | 132 | | 0 | | 858 | |
Operating Leases | | 479 | | 959 | | 959 | | 22,207 | | 24,604 | |
(1) Contractual payments including principal and interest.
(2) Contractual interest payments based on current interest rate.
Further discussion of the nature of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s operating lease obligations represent short and long-term lease and rental payments, primarily for facilities, and to a lesser degree for certain software and data processing equipment.
The following table details the amounts and expected maturities of significant commitments as of December 31, 2004 .
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| One Year Or Less | One to Three Years | Three to Five Years | Over Five Years | Total |
---|
Credit: Commercial real estate | | $47,970 | | $6,852 | | $17,042 | | $ 471 | | $72,335 | |
Residential real estate | | 21,711 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 21,711 | |
Construction loans | | 5,651 | | 1,751 | | 63 | | 1 | | 7,466 | |
Revolving home equity and credit card lines | | 2,895 | | 8,214 | | 16,675 | | 332 | | 28,116 | |
Other | | 787 | | 857 | | 704 | | 833 | | 3,181 | |
Commercial letters of credit | | 6,432 | | 458 | | 225 | | 2,330 | | 9,445 | |
Commitments to extend credit, including loan commitments, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit, do not necessarily represent future cash requirements in that these commitments often expire with being drawn upon. Further discussion of these commitments is included in Note Q to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Certain of the Company’s accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances. Facts and circumstances which could affect these judgments include, but without limitation, changes in interest rate, in local and national economic conditions or the financial condition of borrowers. The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note A of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
12
Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, determining the fair value of securities and other financial instruments, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, and estimating state and federal contingent tax liabilities.
Allowance for Loan LossesThe allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Management uses a quantitative and qualitative methodology for analyzing factors which impact the allowance for loan losses consistently across its five banking subsidiaries. The process applies risk factors for historical charge-offs and delinquency experience, portfolio segment weightings and industry and regional factors and trends as they affect the banks’ portfolios. The consideration of exposures to industries potentially most affected by current risks in the economic and political environment and the review of potential risks in certain credits that either are, or are not, considered part of the non-performing loan category contributed to the establishment of the allowance levels at each bank. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
Loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis for impairment. A loan is impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Loans considered to be impaired are reduced to the present value of expected future cash flows or to the fair value of collateral by allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to such loans. If these allocations cause an increase in the allowance for loan losses such increase is reported as provision for loan loss. Increases or decreases in carrying value due to changes in estimates of future payments or the passage of time are reported as reductions or increases in the provision for loan losses.
Smaller balance homogeneous loans such as residential first mortgage loans secured by one to four family residences, residential construction, automobile, home equity and second mortgage loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment. Commercial loans and first mortgage loans secured by other properties are evaluated individually for impairment. When credit analysis of the borrower’s operating results and financial condition indicates the underlying ability of the borrower’s business activity is not sufficient to generate adequate cash flow to service the business’ cash needs, including the Company’s loans to the borrower, the loan is evaluated for impairment. Often this is associated with a delay or shortfall in payments of 90 days or less. Commercial loans are rated on a scale of 1 to 8, with grades 1 to 4 being pass grades, 5 being special attention or watch, 6 substandard, 7 doubtful, and 8 loss. Loans graded 5, 6, 7, and 8 are considered for impairment. Loans are generally moved to nonaccrual status when 90 days or more past due. These loans are often considered impaired. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
Fair Value of Securities and Other Financial InstrumentsSecurities available for sale consist of bonds and notes which might be sold prior to maturity due to changes in interest rate, prepayment risks, yield and availability of alternative investments, liquidity needs or other factors. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at their fair value. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than carrying value; (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; and (3) the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Market values for securities available for sale are obtained from outside sources and applied to individual securities within the portfolio. The difference between the amortized cost and the current market value of securities is recorded as a valuation adjustment and reported in other comprehensive income.
Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights Mortgage servicing rights are recognized as assets for the allocated value of retained servicing rights on loans sold. Servicing rights are expensed in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues.
The Company utilizes a discounted cash flow model to determine the value of its servicing rights. The valuation model utilizes mortgage prepayment speeds, the remaining life of the mortgage pool, delinquency rates, the Company’s cost to service loans, and other factors to determine the cash flow that the Company will receive from serving each grouping of loans. These cash flows are then discounted based on current interest rate assumptions to arrive at the fair value for the right to service those loans. Impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of the rights, using groupings of the underlying loans as to interest rates. Any impairment of a grouping is reported as a valuation allowance.
13
Contingent Tax Liabilities State and Federal contingent tax liabilities are estimated based on the Company’s exposures to interpretation of the US tax code. The Company estimates its contingent tax liabilities by determining the amount of income that may be at risk of an adverse interpretation by taxing authorities on specific issues, multiplied by its effective tax rate, to determine its gross exposure. Once this exposure is determined, an estimate of the probability of an adverse adjustment being required is determined and applied to the gross liability to determine the contingent tax reserve.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Share Based Payments, was revised and requires that all public companies record compensation cost for stock options provided to employees in return for employee service. The cost is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is expensed over the employee service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options. This will apply to all awards granted or modified after the first quarter or year beginning after June 15, 2005. Compensation cost will also be recorded for prior option grants that vest after the date of adoption. The effect on results of operations will depend on the level of future option grants and the calculation of the fair value of the options granted at such future date, as well as the vesting periods provided, and so cannot currently be predicted. Existing options that will vest after adoption date are expected to result in additional compensation expense of approximately $186,000 during the balance of 2005, $103,000 in 2006, $57,000 in 2007, and $27,000 in 2008. There will be no significant effect on financial position as total equity will not change.
Statement of Position 03-3requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at acquisition. It applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that showed evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was made. The effect on results of operations and financial position of the Company will depend on the effect of future loan purchases and/or acquisitions and therefore cannot be quantified at this time.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company faces market risk to the extent that both earnings and the fair market values of its financial instruments are affected by changes in interest rates. The Company manages this risk with static GAP analysis and simulation modeling.During 2004 as the prime rate increased and fixed rate commercial mortgages in the Company’s portfolio replaced variable rate commercial loans, Firstbank’s simulations showed decreased sensitivity to changes in interest rates. However, the Company maintained an overall position which results in positive changes in projected earnings related to increases in rates, and negative changes in projected earnings related to decreases in rates. As of the date of this annual report the Company does not know of nor expect there to be any material change in the general nature of its primary market risk exposure in the near term.
The Company’s market risk exposure is mainly comprised of its vulnerability to interest rate risk. The Company does not accept significant interest rate risk in its mortgage banking operations. To manage its interest rate risk in mortgage banking the Company generally locks in its sale price to the purchaser of a loan at the same time it makes a rate commitment to the borrower. Prevailing interest rates and interest rate relationships in the future will be primarily determined by market factors which are outside of the Company’s control. All information provided in response to this item consists of forward looking statements. Reference is made to the section captioned “Forward Looking Statements” in this annual report for a discussion of the limitations on the Company’s responsibility for such statements.
The following tables provide information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. They show expected maturity date values for loans and securities which were calculated without adjusting the instruments’ contractual maturity dates for expected prepayments. Maturity date values for interest bearing core deposits were not based on estimates of the period over which the deposits would be outstanding, but rather, the opportunity for re-pricing. The Company believes that re-pricing dates, as opposed to expected maturity dates, may be more relevant in analyzing the value of such instruments and are reported as such in the following tables. Fair value is computed as the present value of expected cash flows at rates in effect at the date indicated.
14
Principal/Notional Amounts Maturing in:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
As of December 31, 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value 12/31/04 |
---|
Rate Sensitive Assets: Fixed interest rate loans | | $92,978 | | $60,220 | | $59,411 | | $55,678 | | $56,111 | | $75,115 | | $399,512 | | $392,012 | |
Average interest rate | | 6.55% | | 7.00% | | 6.86% | | 6.70% | | 6.64% | | 7.59% | | | | | |
Variable interest rate loans | | 80,468 | | 25,685 | | 37,786 | | 53,186 | | 58,362 | | 18,057 | | 273,544 | | 259,781 | |
Average interest rate | | 5.30% | | 5.27% | | 5.39% | | 5.33% | | 5.23% | | 5.65% | | | | | |
Fixed interest rate securities | | 13,745 | | 18,395 | | 11,921 | | 7,611 | | 4,501 | | 14,042 | | 70,216 | | 70,216 | |
Average interest rate | | 3.92% | | 3.62% | | 4.16% | | 4.56% | | 4.55% | | 4.28% | | | | | |
Variable interest rate | |
securities | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,259 | | 2,259 | | 2,259 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.05% | | | | | |
Other interest bearing assets | | 2,057 | | | | | | | | | | 5,355 | | 7,412 | | 7,412 | |
Average interest rate | | 1.52% | | | | | | | | | | 4.39% | | | | | |
Rate Sensitive Liabilities: | |
Savings and interest bearing | |
checking | | 277,344 | | | | | | | | | | | | 277,344 | | 274,756 | |
Average interest rate | | 0.76% | | | | | | | | | |
Time deposits | | 140,492 | | 32,006 | | 25,442 | | 9,959 | | 11,677 | | 139 | | 219,715 | | 221,046 | |
Average interest rate | | 2.35% | | | | | | 2.97% | | 4.01% | | 3.30% | | 3.72% | | 3.97% | |
Fixed interest rate | |
borrowings | | 22,471 | | 1,521 | | 8,172 | | 2,301 | | 25 | | 46,190 | | 80,680 | | 82,605 | |
Average interest rate | | 3.88% | | 2.35% | | 4.18% | | 3.40% | | 6.00% | | 5.67% | |
Variable interest rate | |
borrowings | | 1,000 | | | | | | | | | | 10,310 | | 11,310 | | 11,304 | |
Average interest rate | | 2.48% | | | | | | | | | | 4.65% | |
Repurchase agreements | | 28,850 | | | | | | | | | | | | 28,850 | | 28,850 | |
Average interest rate | | 8.00% | |
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
As of December 31, 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value 12/31/04 |
---|
Fixed interest rate loans | | $107,714 | | $57,627 | | $63,111 | | $38,502 | | $51,271 | | $65,241 | | $383,466 | | $384,234 | |
Average interest rate | | 6.79% | | 7.54% | | 7.20% | | 7.28% | | 6.84% | | 8.16% | |
Variable interest rate loans | | 83,576 | | 17,734 | | 22,282 | | 42,943 | | 67,360 | | 22,252 | | 256,147 | | 254,715 | |
Average interest rate | | 4.20% | | 4.69% | | 4.93% | | 4.79% | | 4.66% | | 4.46% | |
Fixed interest rate securities | | 8,055 | | 14,358 | | 9,419 | | 18,329 | | 4,414 | | 16,095 | | 70,669 | | 70,669 | |
Average interest rate | | 1.62% | | 2.02% | | 2.65% | | 3.52% | | 3.36% | | 4.78% | |
Variable interest rate | |
securities | | | | | | | | | | | | 62 | | 62 | | 62 | |
Average interest rate | | | | | | | | | | | | 6.36% | |
Other interest bearing assets | | 5,703 | | | | | | | | | | 4,929 | | 10,632 | | 10,632 | |
Average interest rate | | 0.51% | |
Rate Sensitive Liabilities: | |
Savings and interest bearing | |
checking | | 277,037 | | | | | | | | | | | | 277,037 | | 277,037 | |
Average interest rate | | 0.63% | |
Time deposits | | 124,407 | | 26,447 | | 13,217 | | 16,869 | | 7,178 | | 103 | | 188,221 | | 191,111 | |
Average interest rate | | 2.18% | | 3.45% | | 3.89% | | 4.45% | | 3.20% | | 4.13% | |
Fixed interest rate | |
borrowings | | 24,800 | | 10,823 | | 0 | | 5,157 | | 2,372 | | 46,403 | | 89,555 | | 93,576 | |
Average interest rate | | 1.45% | | 5.58% | | 0.00% | | 5.02% | | 3.48% | | 5.65% | |
Variable interest rate | |
borrowings | | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | 0 | | 0 | |
Average interest rate | | 0.00% | |
Repurchase agreements | | 24,769 | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,769 | | 24,769 | |
Average interest rate | | 1.62% | |
15
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company obtains funds for its operating expenses and dividends to shareholders through dividends from its subsidiary banks. In general, the subsidiary banks pay only those amounts required to meet holding company cash requirements, while maintaining appropriate capital at the banks. Capital is maintained at the subsidiary banks to support growth.
Bank regulators have established risk based capital guidelines for banks and bank holding companies. Minimum capital levels are established under these guidelines and each asset category is assigned a perceived risk weighting. Off balance sheet items, such as loan commitments and standby letters of credit, also require capital allocations.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s total capital to risk weighted assets exceeded the minimum requirement for capital adequacy purposes of 8% by $31.6 million. Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets exceeded the minimum of 4% by $49.6 million, and Tier 1 capital to average assets exceeded the minimum of 4% by $43.7 million. For a more complete discussion of capital requirements please refer to Note U of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures specified customer deposits and assesses premium rates based on defined criteria. Insurance assessment rates may vary from bank to bank based on the factors that measure the perceived risk of a financial institution. One condition for maintaining the lowest risk assessment, and therefore, the lowest insurance rate, is the maintenance of capital at the “well capitalized” level. Each of the Company’s affiliate banks has exceeded the regulatory criteria for a “well capitalized” financial institution and each bank pays the lowest assessment rate assigned by the FDIC.
A certain level of capital growth is desirable to maintain an appropriate ratio of equity to total assets. The compound annual growth rate for total average assets for the past five years was 5.3%. The compound annual growth rate for average equity over the same period was 5.5%.
Management has determined one way of maintaining capital adequacy is to maintain a reasonable rate of internal capital growth. The percentage return on average equity times the percentage of earnings retained after dividends equals the internal growth percentage. The following table illustrates this relationship:
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Return on average equity | | 13 | .06% | 14 | .47% | 15 | .50% |
Multiplied by | |
Percentage of earnings retained | | 57 | .44% | 64 | .71% | 67 | .39% |
Equals | |
Internal capital growth | | 7 | .50% | 9 | .36% | 10 | .45% |
The Company has retained between 57% and 67% of its earnings from 2002 to 2004. To achieve the goal of acceptable internal capital growth, management intends to continue its efforts to increase the Company’s return on average equity while maintaining a reasonable cash dividend.
As an additional enhancement to capital growth the Company offers a dividend reinvestment program. The Firstbank Corporation Dividend Reinvestment Plan was first offered in 1988. At December 31, 1988, 123 owners holding 209,856 shares participated in the Plan. By the end of 2004, 1,654 owners holding 2,211,310 shares were participating in the Plan.
The Company is not aware of any recommendations by regulatory authorities at December 31, 2004, which are likely to have a material effect on Firstbank Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources or operations.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report including, without limitation, management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, and other sections of the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders, contain forward-looking statements that are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry, the economy, and about the Company itself. Words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “determine”, “estimate”, “expect”, “forecast”, “intend”, “is likely”, “plan”, “project”, “opinion”, “should”, variations of such terms, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood, and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in such forward looking statements. Internal and external factors that may cause such a difference include changes in interest rates and interest rate relationships; demand for products and services; the degree of competition by traditional and non-traditional competitors; changes in banking regulations; changes in tax laws; changes in prices, levies, and assessments; the impact of technological advances; governmental and regulatory policy changes; the outcomes of pending and future litigation and contingencies; trends in customer behavior and customer ability to repay loans; software failure, errors or miscalculations; the ability of the Company to locate and correct all data sensitive computer codes; and the vicissitudes of the national economy. The Company undertakes no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
16
COMMON STOCK DATA
Firstbank Corporation Common Stock was held by 1,658 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2004. Total shareholders number approximately 2,822, including those whose shares are held in nominee name through brokerage firms. The Company’s shares are listed on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol FBMI and are traded by several brokers. The range of high and low sales prices for shares of common stock for each quarterly period during the past two years is as follows:
Quarter | High | | Low | |
---|
4th `04 | | $ 28 | .57 | $26 | .76 |
3rd `04 | | $ 28 | .12 | $26 | .67 |
2nd `04 | | $ 27 | .79 | $25 | .04 |
1st `04 | | $ 29 | .68 | $25 | .02 |
4th `03 | | $ 30 | .38 | $28 | .37 |
3rd `03 | | $ 32 | .88 | $27 | .06 |
2nd `03 | | $ 30 | .66 | $26 | .37 |
1st `03 | | $ 26 | .72 | $22 | .76 |
The prices quoted above were obtained from the NASDAQ.com through the Company’s market makers. Prices have been adjusted to reflect stock dividends.
The following table summarizes cash dividends paid per share (adjusted for stock dividends) of common stock during 2004 and 2003.
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
First Quarter | | $ | .1905 | $ | .1723 |
Second Quarter | | | .2000 | | .1814 |
Third Quarter | | | .2000 | | .1814 |
Fourth Quarter | | | .2000 | | .1814 |
Total | | $ | .7905 | $ | .7165 |
The Company’s principal sources of funds to pay cash dividends are the earnings of and dividends paid by the subsidiary banks. Under current regulations the subsidiary banks are restricted in their ability to transfer funds in the form of cash dividends, loans, and advances to the Company (See Note S of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). As of January 1, 2005, approximately $22.0 million of the subsidiaries’ retained earnings were available for transfer in the form of dividends to the Company without prior regulatory approval. In addition, the subsidiaries’ 2005 earnings are expected to be available for distributions as dividends to the Company.
17
MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Firstbank Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this report have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments.
We, as management of Firstbank Corporation, are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The system of internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement presentation.
The Audit Committee, consisting entirely of independent directors, meets regularly with management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviews audit plans and results, as well as management’s actions taken in discharging responsibilities for accounting, financial reporting, and internal control. Crowe Chizek and Company, LLC, independent registered public accounting firm, and the internal auditors have direct and confidential access to the Audit committee at all times to discuss the results of their examinations.
Management assessed the Corporation’s system of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting as described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2004 its system of internal control over financial reporting is effective and meets the criteria of the “Internal Control – Integrated Framework”. Crowe Chizek and Company LLC, independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
| |
---|
| | FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
/s/ Thomas R. Sullivan Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/Samuel G. Stone Samuel G. Stone Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
Dated: February 25, 2005
18
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Firstbank Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Firstbank Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Firstbank Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also in our opinion, Firstbank Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Firstbank Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated February 25, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
| /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
February 25, 2005
Grand Rapids, Michigan
19
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Firstbank Corporation
Alma, Michigan
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Firstbank Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Firstbank Corporation at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Firstbank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
| /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
Grand Rapids, Michigan
February 25, 2005
20
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except for Share Data)
| December 31, |
---|
ASSETS | 2004 | 2003 |
---|
|
Cash and due from banks | | $ 23,715 | | $ 27,442 | |
Short term investments | | 2,057 | | 5,703 | |
|
| |
| |
Total cash and cash equivalents | | 25,772 | | 33,145 | |
Securities available for sale | | 72,475 | | 70,731 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 5,355 | | 4,929 | |
Loans held for sale | | 1,969 | | 4,160 | |
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $10,581 in 2004 and | |
$11,627 in 2003 | | 660,506 | | 623,826 | |
Premises and equipment, net | | 17,658 | | 18,103 | |
Goodwill | | 4,465 | | 4,880 | |
Core deposits and other intangibles | | 2,395 | | 2,698 | |
Accrued interest receivable and other assets | | 15,540 | | 14,028 | |
|
| |
| |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $806,135 | | $776,500 | |
|
| |
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
|
LIABILITIES | |
Deposits: | |
Non-interest bearing demand accounts | | $106,208 | | $102,296 | |
Interest bearing accounts: | |
Demand | | 177,067 | | 181,642 | |
Savings | | 100,277 | | 95,395 | |
Time | | 219,715 | | 188,221 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Deposits | | 603,267 | | 567,554 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight borrowings | | 39,100 | | 47,069 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | 71,315 | | 67,121 | |
Notes payable | | 115 | | 134 | |
Subordinated Debentures | | 10,310 | | 0 | |
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities | | 9,164 | | 8,878 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Liabilities | | 733,271 | | 690,756 | |
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | |
Preferred stock; no par value, 300,000 shares authorized, none issued | |
Common stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; | |
5,322,137 and 5,642,304 shares issued and outstanding in 2004 and 2003 | | $ 64,713 | | $ 75,591 | |
Retained earnings | | 7,816 | | 9,187 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 335 | | 966 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Shareholders' Equity | | 72,864 | | 85,744 | |
|
| |
| |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | $806,135 | | $776,500 | |
|
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
21
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except for Per Share Data)
| Year Ended December 31, |
---|
Interest Income: | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Loans, including fees | | $ 41,350 | | $ 40,989 | | $ 45,387 | |
Securities: | |
Taxable | | 1,655 | | 1,818 | | 2,310 | |
Exempt from federal income tax | | 951 | | 1,035 | | 1,138 | |
Short term investments | | 136 | | 387 | | 413 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total Interest Income | | 44,092 | | 44,229 | | 49,248 | |
|
Interest Expense: | |
Deposits | | 7,453 | | 8,533 | | 12,004 | |
FHLB Advances, notes payable and subordinated debentures | | 3,968 | | 3,825 | | 3,835 | |
Other | | 289 | | 240 | | 422 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total Interest Expense | | 11,710 | | 12,598 | | 16,261 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net Interest Income | | 32,382 | | 31,631 | | 32,987 | |
Provision for loan losses | | (425 | ) | 550 | | 1,170 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses | | 32,808 | | 31,081 | | 31,817 | |
|
Non-Interest Income: | |
Service charges on deposit accounts | | 2,813 | | 2,534 | | 2,419 | |
Gain on sale of mortgage loans | | 2,663 | | 8,560 | | 5,879 | |
Mortgage servicing, net of amortization | | (55 | ) | (1,100 | ) | (709 | ) |
Trust fees | | 0 | | 0 | | 108 | |
Gain on sale of securities | | 54 | | 390 | | 17 | |
Courier and cash delivery services | | 1,072 | | 736 | | 564 | |
Real estate appraisal services | | 604 | | 912 | | 857 | |
Commissions on real estate sales | | 945 | | 940 | | 816 | |
Title insurance fees | | 618 | | 1,104 | | 726 | |
Other | | 1,337 | | 1,802 | | 1,456 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total Non-Interest Income | | 10,051 | | 15,878 | | 12,133 | |
Non-Interest Expense: | |
Salaries and employee benefits | | 15,718 | | 16,198 | | 14,247 | |
Occupancy and equipment | | 3,866 | | 3,725 | | 3,672 | |
Amortization of intangibles | | 302 | | 336 | | 362 | |
Michigan single business tax | | 472 | | 175 | | 174 | |
Outside professional services | | 1,598 | | 1,995 | | 1,559 | |
Advertising and promotions | | 497 | | 787 | | 522 | |
Other | | 5,908 | | 5,679 | | 5,701 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total Non-Interest Expense | | 28,361 | | 28,895 | | 26,237 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Income Before Federal Income Taxes | | 14,497 | | 18,064 | | 17,713 | |
Federal Income Taxes | | 4,139 | | 6,008 | | 5,887 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
NET INCOME | | $ 10,358 | | $ 12,056 | | $ 11,826 | |
Other comprehensive income: | |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of tax | |
and reclassification effects | | (631 | ) | (526 | ) | 426 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | | $ 9,727 | | $ 11,530 | | $ 12,252 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Basic earnings per share | | $ 1.83 | | $ 2.03 | | $ 1.99 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ 1.79 | | $ 1.97 | | $ 1.94 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
22
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004, 2003, AND 2002
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except for Share and per Share Data)
| Common Stock | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Total |
---|
Balances at January 1, 2002 | | $ 63,100 | | $ 8,260 | | 1,066 | | $ 72,426 | |
Net income for 2002 | | | | 11,826 | | | | 11,826 | |
Cash dividends - $.64 per share | | | | (3,857) | | | | (3,857) | |
5% stock dividend - 255,595 shares | | (6,474) | | (6,474) | | | | | |
Issuance of 37,331 shares of common stock | |
through exercise of stock options | | 566 | | | | | | 566 | |
Issuance of 54,764 shares of common stock | |
through the dividend reinvestment plan | | 1,210 | | | | | | 1,210 | |
Issuance of 10,434 shares of common stock | |
from supplemental shareholder investments | | 235 | | | | | | 235 | |
Purchase of 122,710 shares of stock | | (2,963 | ) | | | | | (2,963 | ) |
Issuance of 13,533 shares of common stock | | 312 | | | | | | 312 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation on | |
securities available for sale, net of tax of $229 | | | | | | 426 | | 426 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 | | 68,934 | | 9,755 | | 1,492 | | 80,181 | |
|
Net income for 2003 | | | | 12,056 | | | | 12,056 | |
Cash dividends - $.71 per share | | | | (4,254) | | | | (4,254) | |
5% stock dividend -268,635 shares | | 8,370 | | (8,370) | | | | | |
Issuance of 122,733 shares of common stock | |
through exercise of stock options | | 2,060 | | | | | | 2,060 | |
Issuance of 37,817 shares of common stock | |
through the dividend reinvestment plan | | 1,137 | | | | | | 1,137 | |
Issuance of 6,858 shares of common stock | |
from supplemental shareholder investments | | 209 | | | | | | 209 | |
Purchase of 176,100 shares of stock | | (5,551 | ) | | | | | (5,551 | ) |
Issuance of 14,261 shares of common stock | | 432 | | | | | | 432 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation on | |
securities available for sale, net of tax of $276 | | | | | | (526) | | (526 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | 75,591 | | 9,187 | | 966 | | 85,744 | |
|
Net income for 2004 | | | | 10,358 | | | | 10,358 | |
Cash dividends - $.79 per share | | | | (4,409) | | | | (4,409) | |
5% stock dividend - 252,935 shares | | 7,320 | | (7,320) | | | | | |
Issuance of 72,248 shares of common stock | |
through exercise of stock options | | 1,291 | | | | | | 1,291 | |
Issuance of 41,104 shares of common stock | |
through the dividend reinvestment plan | | 1,140 | | | | | | 1,140 | |
Issuance of 5,967 shares of common stock | |
from supplemental shareholder investments | | 168 | | | | | | 168 | |
Purchase of 706,700 shares of stock | | (21,195 | ) | | | | | (21,195) | |
Issuance of 14,279 shares of common stock | | 398 | | | | | | 398 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation on | |
securities available for sale, net of tax of $348 | | | | | | (631) | | (631) | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2004 | | $ 64,713 | | $ 7,816 | | $ 335 | | $ 72,864 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
| Year Ended December 31, |
---|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Net income | | $ 10,358 | | $ 12,056 | | $ 11,826 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from | |
operating activities: | |
Provision for loan losses | | (425 | ) | 550 | | 1,170 | |
Depreciation of premises and equipment | | 1,954 | | 1,682 | | 1,534 | |
Net amortization of security premiums/discounts | | 203 | | 645 | | 374 | |
Gain on sale of securities | | (54 | ) | (390 | ) | (17 | ) |
Amortization and impairment of intangibles | | 718 | | 336 | | 362 | |
Gain on sale of mortgage loans | | (2,663 | ) | (8,560 | ) | (5,879 | ) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans | | 119,401 | | 375,588 | | 270,864 | |
Loans originated for sale | | (114,547 | ) | (361,525 | ) | (268,926 | ) |
Deferred federal income tax benefit | | 384 | | (42 | ) | 109 | |
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets | | (1,548 | ) | 236 | | (904 | ) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities | | 286 | | (2,609 | ) | 901 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | 14,067 | | 17,967 | | 11,414 | |
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale | | 227 | | 1,149 | | 530 | |
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale | | 36,164 | | 32,916 | | 49,446 | |
Purchase of securities available for sale | | (39,263 | ) | (42,402 | ) | (45,784 | ) |
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | (426 | ) | (183 | ) | (113 | ) |
Net increase in portfolio loans | | (36,255 | ) | (34,638 | ) | (1,713 | ) |
Net purchases of premises and equipment | | (1,509 | ) | (2,271 | ) | (1,424 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
NET CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | (41,062 | ) | (45,429 | ) | 942 | |
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |
Net increase (decrease) in deposits | | 35,713 | | (9,355 | ) | 15,770 | |
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to | |
repurchase and overnight borrowings | | (7,969 | ) | 16,711 | | (1,865 | ) |
Retirement of notes payable and other borrowings | | (11,019 | ) | (17 | ) | (2,717 | ) |
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings | | 7,000 | | 3,000 | | 3,500 | |
Retirement of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings | | (2,806 | ) | (4,312 | ) | (7,814 | ) |
Proceeds from subordinated debentures and other borrowings | | 21,310 | |
| | | 0 | | 0 |
Cash dividends and cash paid in lieu of fractional shares on | |
stock dividend | | (4,409 | ) | (4,254 | ) | (3,857 | ) |
Purchase of common stock | | (21,195 | ) | (5,551 | ) | (2,963 | ) |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock | | 2,997 | | 3,838 | | 2,323 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | 19,622 | | 60 | | 2,377 | |
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (7,373 | ) | (27,402 | ) | 14,733 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 33,145 | | 60,547 | | 45,814 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | | $ 25,772 | | $ 33,145 | | $ 60,547 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |
Cash paid during the year for: | |
Interest | | $ 13,412 | | $ 13,196 | | $ 16,744 | |
Income taxes | | $ 3,975 | | $ 6,250 | | $ 5,433 | |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations:Firstbank Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company. Each subsidiary bank of the Company is a full service community bank. The subsidiary banks offer all customary banking services, including the acceptance of checking, savings and time deposits, and the making of commercial, agricultural, real estate, personal, home improvement, automobile and other installment and consumer loans. The consolidated assets of the Company, of $806 million as of December 31, 2004, primarily represent commercial and retail banking activity. Mortgage loans serviced for others of $472 million, as of December 31, 2004, are not included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
Principles of Consolidation:The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, Firstbank – Alma; Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant); Firstbank – West Branch; Firstbank – Lakeview; and Firstbank – St. Johns (the “Banks”); 1st Armored, Incorporated; Gladwin Land Company, Incorporated; 1st Title, Incorporated; and C.A. Hanes Realty, Incorporated, after elimination of inter-company accounts and transactions. These subsidiaries are wholly owned, except C.A. Hanes Realty, which has a 45% minority interest. During 2001, each of the Company’s five banks formed its own Mortgage Company. The operating results of these mortgage companies are consolidated into each Bank’s financial statements. During 2004 the Company formed a special purpose trust, Firstbank Capital Trust I, for the sole purpose of issuing variable interest trust preferred securities. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the trust is not consolidated into the financial statements of the Company.
Use of Estimates:The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain Significant Estimates:The primary estimates incorporated into the Company’s financial statements, which are susceptible to change in the near term, include the allowance for loan losses, the determination of the fair value of certain financial instruments, determination of state and federal tax liabilities, and the valuation of mortgage servicing rights.
Current Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations:The Company’s business is concentrated in the mid-central section of the lower peninsula of Michigan. Management is of the opinion that no concentrations exist that make the Company vulnerable to the risk of a near term severe impact. While the loan portfolio is diversified, the customers’ ability to honor their debts is partially dependent on the local economies. The Company’s service area is primarily dependent on manufacturing (automotive and other), agricultural and recreational industries. Most commercial and agricultural loans are secured by business assets, including commercial and agricultural real estate and federal farm agency guarantees. Generally, consumer loans are secured by various items of personal property and mortgage loans are secured by residential real estate. The Company’s funding sources include time deposits and other deposit products which bear interest. Periods of rising interest rates result in an increase in the cost of funds to the Company and an increase in yields on certain assets. Conversely, periods of falling interest rates result in a decrease in yields on certain assets and costs of certain funds.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks and short term investments, which include interest bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, and overnight money market fund investments. Generally, federal funds and overnight money market funds are purchased for a one day period. The Company reports customer loan transactions, deposit transactions and repurchase agreements and overnight borrowings on a net basis within its cash flow statement.
Securities Available for Sale:Securities available for sale consist of bonds and notes which might be sold prior to maturity due to changes in interest rate, prepayment risks, yield and availability of alternative investments, liquidity needs or other factors. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at their fair value and the related unrealized holding gain or loss (the difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the securities so classified) is reported in other comprehensive income. Other securities such as Federal Home Loan Bank stock are carried at cost. Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method anticipating prepayments. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.
25
Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been less than carrying value; (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer; and (3) the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Mortgage Banking Activities:Servicing rights are recognized as assets for the allocated value of retained servicing rights on loans sold. Servicing rights are expensed in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenues. Impairment is evaluated based on the fair value of the rights, using groupings of the underlying loans as to interest rates. Any impairment of a grouping is reported as a valuation allowance.
Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage serving rights is netted against loan servicing fee income.
Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market, as determined by outstanding commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and charged to earnings.
Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold with servicing rights retained. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the servicing right. Gains and losses on sales of mortgage loans are based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related loan sold. The Company generally locks in its sale price to the purchaser of the loan at the same time it makes a rate commitment to the borrower.
Loans:Loans receivable, for which management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or payoff are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of any deferred fees or costs on originated loans, unamortized premiums or discounts. Loan origination fees and certain origination costs are capitalized and recognized as an adjustment to yield of the related loan. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term without anticipating prepayments. Interest income on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan becomes 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in process of collection. Consumer and credit card loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. In all cases loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued, but not received, for loans placed on nonaccrual status, is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all of the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Allowance for Loan Losses:The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Management uses a quantitative and qualitative methodology for analyzing factors which impact the allowance for loan losses consistently across its five banking subsidiaries. The process applies risk factors for historical charge-offs and delinquency experience, portfolio segment weightings and industry and regional factors and trends as they affect the banks’ portfolios. The consideration of exposures to industries potentially most affected by current risks in the economic and political environment and the review of potential risks in certain credits that either are, or are not, considered part of the non-performing loan category contributed to the establishment of the allowance levels at each bank. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
Loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis for impairment. A loan is impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Loans considered to be impaired are reduced to the present value of expected future cash flows or to the fair value of collateral by allocating a portion of the allowance for loan losses to such loans. If these allocations cause an increase in the allowance for loan losses such increase is reported as provision for loan loss. Increases or decreases in carrying value due to changes in estimates of future payments or the passage of time are reported as reductions or increases in the provision for loan losses.
26
Smaller balance homogeneous loans such as residential first mortgage loans secured by one to four family residences, residential construction, automobile, home equity and second mortgage loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment. Commercial loans and first mortgage loans secured by other properties are evaluated individually for impairment. When credit analysis of the borrower’s operating results and financial condition indicates the underlying ability of the borrower’s business activity is not sufficient to generate adequate cash flow to service the business’ cash needs, including the Company’s loans to the borrower, the loan is evaluated for impairment. Often this is associated with a delay or shortfall in payments of 90 days or less. Commercial loans are rated on a scale of 1 to 8, with grades 1 to 4 being pass grades, 5 being special attention or watch, 6 substandard, 7 doubtful, and 8 loss. Loans graded 5, 6, 7, and 8 are considered for impairment. Loans are generally moved to nonaccrual status when 90 days or more past due. These loans are often considered impaired. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
Premises and Equipment:Premises and equipment are stated on the basis of cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets, primarily by accelerated methods for income tax purposes and by the straight line method for financial reporting purposes. Buildings and related components have useful lives ranging from 5 to 33 years. Furniture, fixtures and equipment have useful lives ranging from 3 to 7 years.
Other Real Estate:Other real estate (included as a component of other assets) includes properties acquired through either a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure and is initially recorded at the fair value when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These properties are evaluated periodically and if fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:Goodwill results from business acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment is recognized in the period identified.
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank and branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then are amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives.
Long Term Assets:Premises and equipment, core deposit and other intangible assets, and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, a charge is taken to earnings, and the assets are written down to fair value.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments:Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Income Taxes:The Company records income tax expense based on the amount of taxes due on its tax return plus the change in deferred taxes, computed based on the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Stock Splits and Dividends:Dividends issued in stock are reported by transferring the market value of the stock issued from retained earnings to common stock. Fractional shares are issued or are paid in cash. Earnings and dividends per share are restated for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of the financial statements. A stock dividend of 5% was paid on December 31, 2004, to shareholders of record as of December 17, 2004. A stock dividend of 5% was paid on December 31, 2003, to shareholders of record as of December 18, 2003. A stock dividend of 5% was paid on December 31, 2002, to shareholders of record as of December 18, 2002.
27
Stock Compensation:Employee compensation expense under stock options is reported using the intrinsic value method. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income as all options granted had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market price of the underlying common stock at date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if expense was measured using the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Net income as reported | | $ 10,358,000 | | $ 12,056,000 | | $ 11,826,000 | |
Deduct stock-based compensation expense determined | |
under fair value based method | | 183,000 | | 135,000 | | 134,000 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Pro forma net income | | $ 10,175,000 | | $ 11,921,000 | | $ 11,692,000 | |
|
Basic earnings per share as reported | | $1.83 | | $2.03 | | 1.99 | |
Pro forma basic earnings per share | | $1.80 | | $2.01 | | 1.97 | |
|
Diluted earnings per share as reported | | $1.79 | | $1.97 | | 1.94 | |
Pro forma diluted earnings per share | | $1.76 | | $1.95 | | 1.92 | |
The pro forma effects are computed using option pricing models and using the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant date.
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Risk-free interest rate | | 4 | .20% | 4 | .04% | 4 | .55% |
Expected option life | | 7 Yea | rs | 7 Yea | rs | 7 Yea | rs |
Expected stock price volatility | | 23 | .7% | 21 | .8% | 20 | .9% |
Dividend yield | | 3 | .0% | 3 | .0% | 3 | .0% |
Earnings Per Share:Basic earnings per share is based on weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effect of additional common shares that may be issued under stock options. All per share amounts are restated for stock dividends and stock splits through the date of issuance of the financial statements.
Comprehensive Income:Comprehensive income consists of net income and changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, which is recognized as a separate component of equity. Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, net of tax.
Effect of Newly Issued But not Yet Effective Accounting Standards: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R requires all public companies to record compensation cost for stock options provided to employees in return for employee service. The cost is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is expensed over the employee service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options. This will apply to awards granted or modified after the first quarter of or year beginning after June 15, 2005. Compensation cost will also be recorded for prior option grants that vest after the date of adoption. The effect on results of operations will depend on the level of future options grants and the calculation of the fair value of the options grated at such future date, as well as the vesting periods provided, and so cannot currently be predicted. Existing options that will vest after adoption date are expected to result in additional compensation expense of approximately $186,000 during the balance of 2005, $103,000 in 2006, $57,000 in 2007, and $27,000 in 2008. There will be no significant effect on financial position as total equity will not change.
Statement of Position 03-3requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at acquisition. It applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that showed evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was made. The effect on results of operations and financial position of the Company will depend on the effect of future loan purchases and/or acquisitions and therefore cannot be quantified at this time.
28
Loss Contingencies:Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there now are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate in Note V. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Reclassification:Certain 2003 and 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards:During 2004, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,FASB Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity,EITF Issue No. 03-16, Accounting for Investments in Limited Liability Companies,and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin: NO. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. Adoption of the new standards did not materially affect the Company’s operating results or financial condition.
Segment Information:While the Company’s chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of various products and services, substantially all of the Company’s operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a company wide basis. Accordingly, all of the Company’s operations are considered by Management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment. There are no material separately identifiable reporting segments.
NOTE B – ACQUISITIONS/DIVESTURES
There are no acquisitions or divestures for 2002, 2003 or 2004.
NOTE C – RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Company’s subsidiary banks are required to maintain average reserve balances in the form of cash and non-interest bearing balances due from the Federal Reserve Bank. The average reserve balances required to be maintained at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $4,151,000 and $3,269,000, respectively. These balances do not earn interest.
NOTE D – SECURITIES
The fair value of securities available for sale was as follows:
| Fair Value | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses |
---|
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
Securities Available for Sale: December 31, 2004: U.S. governmental agency | | $37,399 | | $ 13 | | $(198 | ) |
States and political subdivisions | | 30,581 | | 731 | | (66 | ) |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | 3,021 | | 35 | | (21 | ) |
Equity | | 1,474 | | 14 | | (0 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | $72,475 | | $ 793 | | $(285 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
December 31, 2003: | |
U.S. governmental agency | | $40,073 | | $ 286 | | $(11 | ) |
States and political subdivisions | | 29,404 | | 1,212 | | (1 | ) |
Equity | | 1,254 | | 0 | | 0 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | $70,731 | | $1,498 | | $(12 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
29
Securities with unrealized losses at year end 2004 and 2003 not recognized in income are as follows:
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total |
---|
| Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss | Fair Value | Unrealized Loss |
---|
Description of Securities December 31, 2004 US Government Agencies | | $3,978 | | $(14 | ) | $28,931 | | $(184 | ) | $32,909 | | $(198 | ) |
States and Political Subdivisions | | 0 | | 0 | | 6,554 | | (66 | ) | 6,554 | | (66 | ) |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | 0 | | 0 | | 2,201 | | (21 | ) | 2,201 | | (21 | ) |
Equity | | 3 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | 3 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Temporarily Impaired | | $3,981 | | $(14 | ) | $37,686 | | $(271 | ) | $41,667 | | $(285 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
US Government Agencies | | $3,144 | | $(3 | ) | $ 5,993 | | $ (8 | ) | $ 9,137 | | $(11 | ) |
States and Political Subdivisions | | 686 | | (1 | ) | 0 | | 0 | | 686 | | (1 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total Temporarily Impaired | | $3,830 | | $(4 | ) | $ 5,993 | | $ (8 | ) | $ 9,823 | | $(12 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Unrealized losses on securities shown in the previous table have not been recognized into income because the issuers bonds are of high credit quality, management has the intent and ability to hold these bonds for the foreseeable future, and the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity, or interest rate reset dates.
Gross realized gains (losses) on sales and calls of securities were:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Gross realized gains | | $54 | | $390 | | $ 30 | |
Gross realized losses | | 0 | | 0 | | (13 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net realized gains (losses) | | $54 | | $390 | | $ 17 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
The fair value of securities at December 31, 2004, by stated maturity, is shown below. Actual maturities may differ from stated maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
| Fair Value (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
Due in one year or less | | $13,745 | |
Due after one year through five years | | 42,429 | |
Due after five years through ten years | | 8,596 | |
Due after ten years | | 6,231 | |
|
| |
Total | | 71,001 | |
Equity securities | | 1,474 | |
|
| |
Total securities | | $72,475 | |
|
| |
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, securities with a carrying value approximating $56,427,000 and $59,510,000 were pledged to secure public trust deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for such other purposes as required or permitted by law.
NOTE E – SECONDARY MORTGAGE MARKET ACTIVITIES
Loans serviced for others, which are not reported as assets, total $472,067,000 at December 31, 2004, and $464,400,000 at December 31, 2003.
30
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Servicing rights: Beginning of year | | $ 2,537 | | $ 2,062 | |
Additions | | 885 | | 2,713 | |
Amortized to expense | | (1,232 | ) | (2,233 | ) |
Valuation Impairment | | (2 | ) | (5 | ) |
|
| |
| |
End of year | | $ 2,188 | | $ 2,537 | |
|
| |
| |
Management has determined that a valuation allowance of $6,137 is necessary at December 31, 2004. A valuation allowance of $4,533 was required at December 31, 2003.
NOTE F – LOANS
Loans at year end were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Commercial | | $110,508 | | $112,384 | |
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate: | |
Residential | | 231,341 | | 204,844 | |
Commercial | | 225,372 | | 203,080 | |
Construction | | 47,920 | | 55,160 | |
Consumer | | 54,485 | | 57,541 | |
Credit Card | | 1,830 | | 2,587 | |
|
| |
| |
Subtotal | | 671,456 | | 635,596 | |
Less: | |
Allowance for loan losses | | 10,581 | | 11,627 | |
Net deferred loan costs | | 369 | | 143 | |
|
| |
| |
Loans, net | | $660,506 | | $623,826 | |
|
| |
| |
Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Beginning balance | | $ 11,627 | | $ 11,536 | | $ 11,038 | |
Provision for loan losses | | (425 | ) | 550 | | 1,170 | |
Loans charged off | | (930 | ) | (778 | ) | (1,035 | ) |
| | 309 | | 319 | | 363 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Ending balance | | $ 10,581 | | $ 11,627 | | $ 11,536 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Impaired loans were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Year end loans with no allocated allowance for loan losses | | $ 170 | | $1,879 | |
Year end loans with allocated allowance for loan losses | | 1,262 | | 1,544 | |
|
| |
| |
Total | | $1,432 | | $3,423 | |
|
| |
| |
Amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated | | $ 610 | | $ 843 | |
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Nonaccrual loans at year end | | $1,456 | | $ 834 | | $ 630 | |
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual at year end | | 408 | | 581 | | 3,130 | |
Average of impaired loans during the year | | 1,605 | | 3,522 | | 4,754 | |
Interest income recognized during impairment | | 31 | | 168 | | 283 | |
Cash-basis interest income recognized | | 5 | | 30 | | 32 | |
Approximately $37,051,000 and $37,146,000 of commercial loans were pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago at December 31, 2004 and 2003 to secure potential overnight borrowings.
31
NOTE G – PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Year end premises and equipment were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Land | | $ 3,989 | | $ 3,995 | |
Buildings | | 16,105 | | 16,089 | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 14,409 | | 13,892 | |
|
| |
| |
Total | | 34,503 | | 33,976 | |
Less: | |
Accumulated depreciation | | (16,845 | ) | (15,873 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total | | $ 17,658 | | $ 18,103 | |
|
| |
| |
Rent expense was $252,000 for 2004, $194,000 for 2003, and $173,000 for 2002. Rental commitments for the next five years under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (before considering renewal options that generally are present):
(In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
2005 | | $190 | |
2006 | | 188 | |
2007 | | 174 | |
2008 | | 171 | |
2009 | | 132 | |
|
| |
Total | | $855 | |
|
| |
NOTE H – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year is as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
Balance at January 1, 2004 | | $ 4,880 | |
Impairment write down | | (415 | ) |
Goodwill from acquisitions during the year | | 0 | |
|
| |
Balance at December 31, 2004 | | $ 4,465 | |
|
| |
In the fourth quarter of 2004, the company determined that goodwill at its Gladwin Land Company and CA Hanes Realty, Inc. subsidiaries was impaired. The Company uses a discounted future cash flow model to evaluate the goodwill of its non banking subsidiaries. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the $314,000 of goodwill at Gladwin Land was determined to be fully impaired, and was written off in its entirety. The $376,000 of goodwill at CA Hanes Realty, Inc. was determined to be partially impaired and written down by $101,000 to a remaining value of $275,000.
Acquired Intangible Assets
Acquired intangible assets at year end were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
| Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization |
---|
Amortized intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Core deposit premium resulting from | |
branch acquisitions | | $4,740 | | $2,352 | | $4,740 | | $2,053 | |
Other customer relationship intangibles | | 20 | | 13 | | 20 | | 9 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
Total | | $4,760 | | $2,365 | | $4,760 | | $2,062 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
32
Aggregate amortization expense was $303,000, $336,000, and $362,000 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
2005 | | $301 | |
2006 | | 300 | |
2007 | | 298 | |
2008 | | 297 | |
2009 | | 293 | |
NOTE I – FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
Federal income taxes consist of the following:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Current expense | | $3,755 | | $ 6,050 | | $5,778 | |
Deferred expense (benefit) | | 384 | | (42 | ) | 109 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Total | | $4,139 | | $ 6,008 | | $5,887 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
A reconciliation of the difference between federal income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% in 2004, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Tax at statutory rate | | $ 5,074 | | $ 6,322 | | $ 6,200 | |
Adjustment of federal tax contingent liability | | (529 | ) | 0 | | 0 | |
Effect of tax-exempt interest | | (329 | ) | (365 | ) | (374 | ) |
Other | | (77 | ) | 51 | | 61 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Federal income taxes | | $ 4,139 | | $ 6,008 | | $ 5,887 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Effective tax rate | | 29 | % | 33 | % | 33 | % |
The federal tax accrual was reduced in the fourth quarter of the 2004 to reflect managements current estimate of contingent tax liabilities.
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at December 31st year end:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | |
Allowance for loan losses | | $ 3,703 | | $ 4,069 | |
Deferred compensation | | 1,123 | | 1,048 | |
Other | | 43 | | 325 | |
|
| |
| |
Total deferred tax assets | | 5,069 | | 5,442 | |
|
| |
| |
Deferred tax liabilities: | |
Fixed assets | | (1,482 | ) | (1,450 | ) |
Mortgage servicing rights | | (768 | ) | (890 | ) |
Purchase accounting adjustment | | (313 | ) | (357 | ) |
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale | | (208 | ) | (520 | ) |
Other | | (406 | ) | (262 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Total deferred tax liabilities | | (3,177 | ) | (3,479 | ) |
|
| |
| |
Net deferred tax assets | | $ 1,892 | | $ 1,963 | |
|
| |
| |
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is required when it is considered more likely than not that all or part of the benefits related to such assets will not be realized. Management has determined that no such allowance is required at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
Deferred tax assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
33
NOTE J – DEPOSITS
Time deposits of $100,000 or more were $68,922,000 and $38,924,000 at year end 2004 and 2003. In 2004, the Company began to use brokered CDs as an avenue for funding. There were $15.3 million of brokered CDs included in time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2004 were as follows:
Year | (In Thousands of Dollars) Amount |
---|
2005 | | $138,526 | |
2006 | | 33,468 | |
2007 | | 25,534 | |
2008 | | 10,062 | |
2009 | | 11,986 | |
2010 and after | | 139 | |
|
| |
Total | | $219,715 | |
|
| |
NOTE K – BORROWINGS
Information relating to securities sold under agreements to repurchase is as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
At December 31: Outstanding Balance | | $28,850 | | $24,769 | |
Average Interest Rate | | 1.10% | | .65% | |
Daily Average for the Year: | |
Outstanding Balance | | $25,390 | | $26,762 | |
Average Interest Rate | | .87% | | .79% | |
Maximum Outstanding at any Month End | | $30,993 | | $32,780 | |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) generally have original maturities of less than one year. Repurchase agreements are treated as financings and the obligations to repurchase securities sold are reflected as liabilities. Securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets of the Company and are primarily held in safekeeping by correspondent banks. Repurchase agreements are offered principally to certain large deposit customers as deposit equivalent investments.
The Company had overnight borrowings of $10,250,000 at December 31, 2004. There were $22,300,000 overnight borrowings at December 31, 2003.
The Company established a line of credit agreement with LaSalle Bank, Chicago, Illinois on June 30, 2003 at a variable interest rate chosen by the Company of either, LaSalle Bank’s prime commercial borrowing rate, or LIBOR plus 2.25%. This agreement allows for a revolving line of credit up to an aggregate principal amount of $25,000,000. The collateral for this agreement consists of all outstanding capital stock of Firstbank – Alma, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) and Firstbank – West Branch. At December 31, 2003, there was no outstanding balance. In 2004, the Company accessed $11 million of the LaSalle Bank line of credit as temporary funding for its self tender offer. Those funds were repaid in October when the Company issued variable interest subordinated debt for long term funding.
Firstbank – Alma has notes payable with a total balance of $115,000 and $134,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003. These notes mature on January 1, 2010 and were part of the consideration paid for a subsidiary, which has since been sold.
34
NOTE L – FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
Long term borrowings have been secured from the Federal Home Loan Bank to fund the Company’s loan growth. At year end, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
Maturities February 2005 through November 2022 at | | | | | |
fixed rates ranging from 1.65% to 7.3%, averaging 5.21% | | $71,315 | | $67,121 | |
Each Federal Home Loan Bank advance is payable at its maturity date with a prepayment penalty. The advances were collateralized by $142,145,000 and $135,350,000 of first mortgage loans under a blanket lien arrangement at year end 2004 and 2003. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $27,376,000 of additional borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Maturities of FHLB advances are as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
2005 | | $13,202 | |
2006 | | 1,500 | |
2007 | | 8,149 | |
2008 | | 2,277 | |
2009 | | 0 | |
2010 and after | | 46,187 | |
|
| |
Total | | $71,315 | |
|
| |
NOTE M – SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
A trust formed by the Company issued $10,310,000 of LIBOR plus 1.99% variable rate trust preferred securities in 2004 as part of a pooled offering of such securities. The Company issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offering; the debentures represent the sole assets of the trust. The Company may redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, any time on or after October 18, 2009 at 100% of the principal amount of the securities. The debentures are required to be paid in full on October 18, 2034.
NOTE N – BENEFIT PLANS
The 401(k) plan, a defined contribution plan, is an IRS qualified 401(k) salary deferral plan, under which employees can direct investment in Firstbank Corporation stock. Both employee and employer contributions may be made to the plan. Due to the March 2003 ESOP termination, at year end 2003, there were no ESOP shares outstanding. During March 2003, each participant was given various options to roll-over their ESOP balance to a qualified plan, including Firstbank Corporation 401(k), or take a distribution. At that time, participants that rolled their balance into the Firstbank Corporation 401(k) plan made new investment elections. At year end 2002, there were 195,972 ESOP shares outstanding with a market value of $4,919,000. The Company’s 2004, 2003 and 2002 matching 401(k) contributions charged to expense were $410,000, $407,000, and $357,000, respectively. The percent of the Company’s matching contribution to the 401(k) is determined annually by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors had established the Firstbank Corporation Affiliate Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”). The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, passed in October, had significant impact on the design and operation of non-qualified deferred compensation plans. As a result of these changes, future deferrals into the “Plan” were suspended effective December 31, 2004. Prior to December 31, 2004, Directors of the holding company and each affiliate bank were eligible to participate in the Plan. In addition, key management of the holding company and affiliate banks as designated by the Board of Directors were eligible to participate. The plan is a nonqualified plan as defined by the Internal Revenue Code, and as such, all contributions are invested at the recommendation of the participant and are assets of the Company. The Company recognizes a corresponding liability to each participant. The plan allowed Directors to defer their director fees and key management to defer a portion of their salaries into the Plan.
35
NOTE O – STOCK OPTIONS
The Firstbank Corporation Stock Option Plans of 1993 and 1997 (“Plans”), as amended, provide for the grant of 359,171 and 538,592 shares of stock, respectively, in either restricted form or under option. Options may be either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options. The Plan of 1993 terminated April 26, 2003. The 1997 Plan will terminate April 28, 2007. The Board, at its discretion, may terminate either or both Plans prior to the Plans’ termination dates.
Each option granted under the Plans may be exercised in whole or in part during such period as is specified in the option agreement governing that option. Options are issued with exercise prices equal to the stock’s market value at date of issuance. The length of time available for a nonqualified stock option to be exercised is governed by each option agreement, but has not been more than ten years from the grant date.
Incentive stock options may not be exercised after ten years from the grant date. In November 2001, the Board of Directors changed the ten year vesting schedule to five years with 20% of the options granted vesting each year. The new schedule was retroactive to the 1993 options. To date, the accelerated vesting schedule had no impact on compensation expense or net income as reported. However, the accelerated vesting schedule did impact pro forma net income and earnings per share for 2004, 2003 and 2002.
The following is a summary of option transactions which occurred during 2002, 2003 and 2004:
| Number Of Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
---|
Outstanding - January 1, 2002 | | 539,446 | | $ 14 | .45 |
Granted | | 56,319 | | $ 21 | .16 |
Exercised | | (43,369 | ) | $ 9 | .94 |
Cancelled | | (21,692 | ) | $ 19 | .50 |
|
| |
Outstanding - December 31, 2002 | | 530,704 | | $ 15 | .32 |
Granted | | 59,479 | | $ 28 | .86 |
Exercised | | (135,365 | ) | $ 10 | .44 |
Cancelled | | (5,185 | ) | $ 18 | .62 |
|
| |
Outstanding - December 31, 2003 | | 449,633 | | $ 18 | .23 |
Granted | | 52,369 | | $ 26 | .97 |
Exercised | | (75,860 | ) | $ 13 | .77 |
Cancelled | | (244 | ) | $ 15 | .64 |
|
| |
Outstanding - December 31, 2004 | | 425,898 | | $ 19 | .47 |
|
| |
Available for Grant - December 31, 2004 | | 72,258 | |
Available for Exercise - December 31, 2004 | | 278,622 | | $ 17 | .07 |
Available for Exercise - December 31, 2003 | | 302,239 | | $ 16 | .30 |
Available for Exercise - December 31, 2002 | | 380,518 | | $ 14 | .14 |
As of December 31, 2004, the range of options outstanding and exercisable was as follows.
| Outstanding | Exercisable |
---|
|
Range of Exercise Prices | Number | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
---|
$ 7.59 - $11.44 | | 69,145 | | 3 | .0 | $8 | .71 | 67,276 | | $8 | .74 |
$14.90 - $16.98 | | 131,956 | | 5 | .8 | $15 | .72 | 105,716 | | $15 | .85 |
$21.16 - $22.74 | | 113,389 | | 5 | .7 | $22 | .04 | 84,649 | | $22 | .28 |
$26.97 - $28.86 | | 111,408 | | 9 | .4 | $27 | .97 | 20,981 | | $28 | .86 |
|
| | | |
| |
| | 425,898 | | 6 | .3 | $ 19 | .47 | 278,622 | | $17 | .07 |
|
| | | |
| |
The fair value of options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 is estimated using the Black-Scholes model and the following weighted average information: risk free interest rate of 4.20%, 4.04%, and 4.55%; expected life of 7 years; expected volatility of stock price of 23.7%, 21.8%, and 20.9%, and expected dividends of 3.6% in 2004 and 3.0% in 2003 and 2002. The fair values of each option granted in 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $6.40, $6.28, and $3.50, respectively. The aggregate fair value of the options granted in 2004, 2003, and 2002 were $319,048, $373,304, and $196,670, respectively.
36
NOTE P – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Loans to principal officers, directors, and their affiliates in 2004 were as follows:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
Beginning balance | | $ 33,560 | |
New loans | | 26,641 | |
Repayments | | (25,836 | ) |
|
| |
Ending balance | | $ 34,365 | |
|
| |
Deposits from principal officers, directors, and their affiliates at year end 2004 and 2003 were $10,525,000 and $11,436,000, respectively.
NOTE Q – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit and overdraft protection are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are met and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off-balance sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were as follows at year end:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
| Fixed Rate | Variable Rate | Fixed Rate | Variable Rate |
---|
Commitments to make loans | | $32,996 | | $ 8,398 | | $30,932 | | $12,004 | |
(at market rates) | |
Unused lines of credit and letters of | |
Credit | | $10,196 | | $79,748 | | $14,596 | | $70,209 | |
Standby Letters of Credit | | $ 20 | | $10,896 | | $ 817 | | $11,164 | |
Commitments to make loans are generally made for periods of 60 days or less. The fixed rate loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 1.93% to 10.5% and maturities ranging from 15 years to 30 years.
NOTE R – CONTINGENCIES
From time to time certain claims are made against the Company and its banking subsidiaries in the normal course of business. There were no outstanding claims considered by management to be material at December 31, 2004.
NOTE S – DIVIDEND LIMITATION OF SUBSIDIARIES
Capital guidelines adopted by Federal and State regulatory agencies and restrictions imposed by law limit the amount of cash dividends the banks can pay to the Company. At December 31, 2004, using the most restrictive of these conditions for each bank, the aggregate cash dividends that the banks can pay the Company without prior approval was $22,006,000. It is not the intent of management to have dividends paid in amounts which would reduce the capital of the banks to levels below those which are considered prudent by management and in accordance with guidelines of regulatory authorities.
37
NOTE T – STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On July 23, 2002 the Corporation announced a stock repurchase plan authorizing the repurchase of up to $10 million in Firstbank Corporation common stock. As of December 31, 2002, 122,710 shares had been repurchased at an average price of $24.05 per share. During 2003, the Corporation had repurchased 168,100 shares of its stock at an average price of $31.49 per share under the 2002 authorization.
On November 25, 2003, the Corporation announced a repurchase plan that re-established the authorized limit for share repurchases, from that point forward, of up to $10 million of Firstbank Corporation common stock. As of December 31, 2003, the Corporation had repurchased 8,000 shares of its stock at an average price of $32.21 under the new authorization.
During 2004 the Corporation repurchased 106,700 shares of its common stock for an average cost per share of $29.95 under the November 2003 repurchase plan.
On June 15, 2004, the Corporation announced a self tender offer to purchase up to 500,000 shares of its common stock, plus up to 2% of outstanding shares, at a price of $30.00 per share and suspended activity under its repurchase program. The offer to purchase shares expired on July 30, 2004 with the tender offer over subscribed. On August 5, 2004, the Corporation accepted 600,000 shares of those tendered for a total cost of $18.0 million.
The Corporation has remaining authority to repurchase up to $6,546,888 in shares under the November 2003 repurchase plan.
NOTE U – CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.
At year end 2004 and 2003, the most recent regulatory notifications categorize the Company as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed that classification.
38
Actual and required capital amounts at year end (in Thousands of Dollars) and ratios are presented below:
| Actual | Minimum Required For Capital Adequacy Purposes | to Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions |
---|
| Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio |
---|
2004 Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated | | 83,777 | | 12 | .85% | 52,142 | | 8 | .00% | 65,177 | | 10 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 21,455 | | 11 | .76 | 14,596 | | 8 | .00 | 18,246 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 17,498 | | 11 | .22 | 12,474 | | 8 | .00 | 15,593 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 18,934 | | 11 | .41 | 13,273 | | 8 | .00 | 16,591 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 11,638 | | 12 | .67 | 7,346 | | 8 | .00 | 9,182 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 5,242 | | 11 | .10 | 3,777 | | 8 | .00 | 4,722 | | 10 | .00 |
|
Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Risk Weighted Assets | |
Consolidated | | 75,702 | | 11 | .61% | 26,071 | | 4 | .00% | 39,106 | | 6 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 19,162 | | 10 | .50 | 7,298 | | 4 | .00 | 10,947 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 15,545 | | 9 | .97 | 6,237 | | 4 | .00 | 9,356 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 16,852 | | 10 | .16 | 6,637 | | 4 | .00 | 9,955 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 10,484 | | 11 | .42 | 3,673 | | 4 | .00 | 5,509 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 4,649 | | 9 | .85 | 1,889 | | 4 | .00 | 2,833 | | 6 | .00 |
|
Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Average Assets | |
Consolidated | | 75,702 | | 9 | .46% | 32,016 | | 4 | .00% | 40,020 | | 5 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 19,162 | | 8 | .10 | 9,458 | | 4 | .00 | 11,822 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 15,545 | | 8 | .73 | 7,120 | | 4 | .00 | 8,900 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 16,852 | | 7 | .86 | 8,576 | | 4 | .00 | 10,720 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 10,484 | | 9 | .40 | 4,462 | | 4 | .00 | 5,578 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 4,649 | | 8 | .96 | 2,076 | | 4 | .00 | 2,595 | | 5 | .00 |
|
2003 | | | |
Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets | |
Consolidated | | $84,808 | | 13 | .89% | $48,832 | | 8 | .00% | $61,041 | | 10 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 21,459 | | 12 | .32 | 13,932 | | 8 | .00 | 17,415 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 17,306 | | 12 | .18 | 11,363 | | 8 | .00 | 14,203 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 18,591 | | 12 | .03 | 12,365 | | 8 | .00 | 15,456 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 11,585 | | 12 | .53 | 7,396 | | 8 | .00 | 9,244 | | 10 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 4,810 | | 11 | .60 | 3,317 | | 8 | .00 | 4,146 | | 10 | .00 |
|
Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Risk Weighted Assets | |
Consolidated | | $77,199 | | 12 | .65% | $24,416 | | 4 | .00% | $36,624 | | 6 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 19,261 | | 11 | .06 | 6,966 | | 4 | .00 | 10,449 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 15,522 | | 10 | .93 | 5,681 | | 4 | .00 | 8,522 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 16,648 | | 10 | .77 | 6,182 | | 4 | .00 | 9,273 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 10,422 | | 11 | .27 | 3,698 | | 4 | .00 | 5,547 | | 6 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 4,289 | | 10 | .34 | 1,658 | | 4 | .00 | 2,488 | | 6 | .00 |
|
Tier 1 (Core) Capital to Average Assets | |
Consolidated | | $77,199 | | 10 | .11% | $30,529 | | 4 | .00% | $38,161 | | 5 | .00% |
Firstbank - Alma | | 19,261 | | 8 | .00 | 9,631 | | 4 | .00 | 12,038 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant | | 15,522 | | 9 | .51 | 6,530 | | 4 | .00 | 8,163 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - West Branch | | 16,648 | | 8 | .59 | 7,749 | | 4 | .00 | 9,686 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - Lakeview | | 10,422 | | 9 | .06 | 4,599 | | 4 | .00 | 5,749 | | 5 | .00 |
Firstbank - St. Johns | | 4,289 | | 9 | .79 | 1,752 | | 4 | .00 | 2,191 | | 5 | .00 |
39
NOTE V – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at year end:
| (In Thousands of Dollars) |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
| Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value |
---|
Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 25,772 | | $ 25,772 | | $ 33,145 | | $ 33,145 | |
Securities available for sale | | 72,475 | | 72,475 | | 70,731 | | 70,731 | |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | | 5,355 | | 5,355 | | 4,929 | | 4,929 | |
Loans held for sale | | 1,969 | | 1,969 | | 4,160 | | 4,160 | |
Loans, net | | 660,506 | | 639,243 | | 623,826 | | 623,162 | |
Accrued interest receivable | | 2,675 | | 2,675 | | 2,598 | | 2,598 | |
Financial Liabilities: | |
Deposits | | (603,267 | ) | (602,358 | ) | (567,554 | ) | (570,424 | ) |
Securities sold under agreements to | |
repurchase and overnight borrowings | | (39,100 | ) | (39,100 | ) | (47,069 | ) | (47,069 | ) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | | (71,315 | ) | (73,240 | ) | (67,121 | ) | (71,120 | ) |
Notes payable and Subordinated Debentures | | (10,425 | ) | (10,419 | ) | (134 | ) | (156 | ) |
Accrued interest payable | | (846 | ) | (846 | ) | (625 | ) | (625 | ) |
The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value are described as follows: The carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short term borrowings, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, short term debt, and variable rate loans or deposits that re-price frequently and fully. Security fair values are based on market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security and information about the issuer. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent re-pricing or re-pricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis or underlying collateral values. Fair value of loans held for sale is based on market quotes. Fair value of debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair value of off-balance sheet items is based on the current fees or cost that would be charged to enter into or terminate such arrangements. The fair value of off-balance sheet items was not material to the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
NOTE W – BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
| Year Ended December 31 |
---|
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
(In Thousands, Except per Share Data) Basic Earnings per Share | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $10,358 | | $12,056 | | $11,826 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | 5,652 | | 5,942 | | 5,952 | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ 1.83 | | $ 2.03 | | $ 1.99 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted Earnings per Share | |
Net income | | $10,358 | | $12,056 | | $11,826 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding | | 5,652 | | 5,942 | | 5,952 | |
Add dilutive effects of assumed exercises of options | | 128 | | 160 | | 138 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Weighted average common and dilutive potential | |
Common shares outstanding | | 5,781 | | 6,102 | | 6,090 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Diluted earnings per share | | $ 1.79 | | $ 1.97 | | $ 1.94 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Stock options for 59,039, 59,039, and 145,529 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for 2004, 2003, and 2002 because they were anti-dilutive.
40
NOTE X – FIRSTBANK CORPORATION (PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (In Thousands of Dollars)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
Years Ended December 31st
| 2004 | 2003 |
---|
ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 4,071 | | $ 6,727 | |
Commercial loans | | 465 | | 549 | |
Investment in and advances to banking subsidiaries | | 70,338 | | 71,014 | |
Other assets | | 12,452 | | 11,021 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Assets | | $87,326 | | $89,311 | |
|
| |
| |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | $ 4,152 | | $ 3,567 | |
Subordinated Debentures | | 10,310 | | 0 | |
Shareholders' equity | | 72,864 | | 85,744 | |
|
| |
| |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | | $87,326 | | $89,311 | |
|
| |
| |
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Years Ended December 31st | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Dividends from banking subsidiaries | | $ 11,350 | | $ 10,270 | | $ 10,478 | |
Other income | | 4,663 | | 4,835 | | 4,080 | |
Other expense | | (6,849 | ) | (6,239 | ) | (5,308 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Income before income tax and undistributed subsidiary income | | 9,164 | | 8,866 | | 9,250 | |
Income tax benefit | | 1,239 | | 457 | | 396 | |
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income | | (45 | ) | 2,733 | | 2,180 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net income | | 10,358 | | 12,056 | | 11,826 | |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities, net of tax and | |
classification effects | | (631 | ) | (526 | ) | 426 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Comprehensive income | | $ 9,727 | | $ 11,530 | | $ 12,252 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
Years Ended December 31 | | 2004 | | 2003 | | 2002 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |
Net income | | $ 10,358 | | $ 12,056 | | $ 11,826 | |
Adjustments: | |
Equity in undistributed subsidiary income | | 45 | | (2,733 | ) | (2,180 | ) |
Change in other assets | | (1,122 | ) | (1,050 | ) | (335 | ) |
Change in other liabilities | | 586 | | 899 | | (450 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash from operating activities | | 9,867 | | 9,172 | | 8,861 | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |
Purchases of Securities AFS | | (310 | ) | 0 | | 0 | |
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Net decrease (increase) in commercial loans | | 84 | | 741 | | 10 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash from investing activities | | (226 | ) | 741 | | 10 | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | 21,310 | | 0 | | 0 | |
Payments of long-term debt | | (11,000 | ) | 0 | | (2,700 | ) |
Proceeds from stock issuance | | 2,997 | | 3,838 | | 2,323 | |
Purchase of common stock | | (21,195 | ) | (5,551 | ) | (2,963 | ) |
Dividends paid and cash paid in lieu of fractional shares | |
on stock dividend | | (4,409 | ) | (4,255 | ) | (3,857 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net cash from financing activities | | (12,297 | ) | (5,968 | ) | (7,197 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | (2,656 | ) | 3,945 | | 1,674 | |
Beginning cash and cash equivalents | | 6,727 | | 2,782 | | 1,108 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Ending cash and cash equivalents | | $ 4,071 | | $ 6,727 | | $ 2,782 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
41
NOTE Y – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Other comprehensive income components and related taxes were as follows (In Thousands of Dollars):
| 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
---|
Change in unrealized holding gains and losses on available for sale securities | | $(925 | ) | $(419 | ) | $ 674 | |
Less reclassification adjustments for gains and losses later recognized in income | | 54 | | 390 | | 17 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
Net unrealized gains and losses | | (979 | ) | (809 | ) | 657 | |
Tax effect | | 348 | | 283 | | (231 | ) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | $(631 | ) | $(526 | ) | $ 426 | |
|
| |
| |
| |
NOTE Z – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except per Share Data)
| 2004 |
---|
| 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Year |
---|
Interest income | | $10,829 | | $10,698 | | $11,091 | | $11,474 | | $44,092 | |
Net interest income | | 8,013 | | 7,888 | | 8,116 | | 8,365 | | 32,382 | |
Income before federal income taxes | | 3,966 | | 3,778 | | 3,934 | | 2,819 | | 14,497 | |
Net income | | 2,681 | | 2,565 | | 2,657 | | 2,455 | | 10,358 | |
Basic earnings per share | | 0.45 | | 0.44 | | 0.48 | | 0.46 | | 1.83 | |
Diluted earnings per share | | 0.44 | | 0.43 | | 0.47 | | 0.45 | | 1.79 | |
| 2003 |
---|
| 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Year |
---|
Interest income | | $11,445 | | 11,162 | | 10,878 | | 10,744 | | 44,229 | |
Net interest income | | 7,956 | | 7,885 | | 7,858 | | 7,932 | | 31,631 | |
Income before federal income taxes | | 4,955 | | 5,064 | | 4,306 | | 3,739 | | 18,064 | |
Net income | | 3,295 | | 3,373 | | 2,875 | | 2,513 | | 12,056 | |
Basic earnings per share | | 0.56 | | 0.57 | | 0.48 | | 0.42 | | 2.03 | |
Diluted earnings per share | | 0.54 | | 0.55 | | 0.47 | | 0.41 | | 1.97 | |
All per share amounts have been adjusted for stock dividends and stock splits.
42
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
William E. Goggin, Chairman Chairman, Firstbank - Alma Attorney, Goggin & Baker
Duane A. Carr Attorney, Miel and Carr
Edward B. Grant, Ph.D., CPA Chairman, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) General Manager, Public Broadcasting, Central Michigan University
David W. Fultz Owner, Fultz Insurance Agency Owner, Kirtland Insurance Agency
David D. Roslund, CPA Administrator, Wilcox Health Care Center (Long-Term Care Facility) Small Business Investor and Manager
Samuel A. Smith Owner, Smith Family Funeral Homes, Inc.
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
| OFFICERS
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer
Samuel G. Stone Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary & Treasurer
William L. Benear Vice President
David M. Brown Vice President
David L. Miller Vice President
Dale A. Peters Vice President
James M. Taylor Vice President (retired 12/31/2004)
James E. Wheeler, II Vice President
NON-BANK SUBSIDIARY
Gladwin Land Company |
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION 311 Woodworth Avenue P. O. Box 1029 Alma, Michigan 48801 (989) 463-3131
| FIRSTBANK CORPORATION OPERATIONS CENTER 308 Woodworth Avenue Alma, Michigan 48801
|
43
FIRSTBANK - ALMA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
William E. Goggin, Chairman Chairman, Firstbank Corporation Attorney, Goggin & Baker
Martha A. Bamfield, D.D.S. Dentist, Nester & Bamfield, DDS, PC
Cindy Bosley Chief Administrative Officer, Masonic Pathways
Edward J. DeGroat, CCIM Commercial Real Estate Operator
Paul Lux Owner, Lux Funeral Homes, Inc.
Donald L. Pavlik Superintendent, Alma Public Schools
David D. Roslund, CPA Administrator, Wilcox Health Care Center Small Business Investor and Manage
Victor V. Rozas Physician
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
Saundra J. Tracy, Ph.D. President, Alma College
James E. Wheeler, II President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank - Alma Vice President, Firstbank Corporation
| OFFICERS
James E. Wheeler, II President & Chief Executive Officer
Richard A. Barratt Executive Vice President
Gregory A. Daniels Vice President
Marita A. Harkness Vice President
Gerald E. Kench Vice President
Timothy M. Lowe Vice President
Joan S. Welke Vice President
Pamela K. Winters Vice President
SUBSIDIARY
Firstbank - Alma Mortgage Company
|
OFFICE LOCATIONS
Alma 7455 N. Alger Road (989) 463-3134
230 Woodworth Ave. (989) 463-3137 311 Woodworth Ave. (989) 463-3131 | Ashley 114 S. Sterling St. (989) 847-2394
Merrill 125 W. Saginaw St. (989) 643-7253
Riverdale/Vestaburg 9002 W. Howard City-Edmore Rd. (989) 268-5445 | Auburn 4710 S. Garfield Rd. (989) 662-4459
St. Charles 102 Pine St. (989) 865-9918 | Ithaca 219 E. Center St. (989) 875-4107
St. Louis 135 W. Washington Ave. (989) 681-5758 |
44
FIRSTBANK (MT. PLEASANT)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Edward B. Grant, Ph.D., CPA, Chairman General Manager, Public Broadcasting, Central Michigan University
Steve K. Anderson President & CEO, Cadillac Tire Center, Cadillac President & CEO, Upper Lakes Tire, Gaylord
Jack D. Benson Management Consultant Formerly - President, Old Kent Bank of Cadillac
Ralph M. Berry Owner, Berry Funeral Home
Glen D. Blystone, CPA Blystone & Bailey, CPA's, PC
Kenneth C. Bovee Partner, Keystone Property Management, Inc.
Sibyl M. Ellis President, Someplace Special, Inc.
Robert E. List, CPA Shareholder, Weinlander Fitzhugh, CPA's Manager, Clare and Gladwin Offices
William M. McClintic Attorney, W.M. McClintic, PC
J. Regan O'Neill President and Co-Founder, Network Reporting Corporation President and Co-Founder, NetMed Transcription Services, LLC
Phillip R. Seybert President, P.S. Equities, Inc.
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
Arlene A. Yost Secretary and Treasurer, Jay's Sporting Goods, Inc.
| OFFICERS
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer
John Buckley Community Bank President - Cadillac
Douglas J. Ouellette Executive Vice President
Mark B. Perry Senior Vice President
Robert L. Wheeler Senior Vice President
Cheryl Gaudard Vice President
Daniel J. Timmins Vice President
Roger Trudell Vice President
SUBSIDIARY
Firstbank - Mt. Pleasant Mortgage Company
|
OFFICE LOCATIONS
Mt. Pleasant 102 S. Main St. (989) 773-2600
4699 Pickard St. (989) 773-2335 2013 S. Mission St. (989) 773-3959
1925 E. Remus Rd. (989) 775-8528 | Clare 806 N. McEwan Ave. (989) 386-7313
Cadillac 114 W. Pine St. (231) 775-9000 | Shepherd 258 W. Wright Ave. (989) 828-6625 | Winn 2783 Blanchard Rd. (989) 866-2210 |
45
FIRSTBANK - WEST BRANCH
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Joseph M. Clark, Chairman Owner, Morse Clark Furniture
Bryon A. Bernard CEO, Bernard Building Center
David W. Fultz Owner, Fultz Insurance Agency Owner, Kirtland Insurance Agency
Robert T. Griffin Owner and President, Griffin Beverage Company Northern Beverage Co. and West Branch Tank & Trailer
Charles A. Hanes President, C. A. Hanes, Inc.
Christine R. Juarez Attorney, Juarez and Juarez, PLLC
Norman J. Miller Owner, Miller Farms and Miller Dairy Equipment and Feed
Dale A. Peters President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank - West Branch Vice President, Firstbank Corporation
Jeffrey C. Schubert, D.D.S. Dentist
Camila J. Steckling, CPA Weinlander Fitzhugh, CPA's Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
Mark D. Weber, MD C.A. Hanes Realty, Incorporated Orthopedic Surgeon
| OFFICERS
Dale A. Peters President & Chief Executive Officer
Daniel H. Grenier Executive Vice President
Michael F. Ehinger Vice President
Danny J. Gallagher Vice President
Eileen S. McGregor Vice President
Larry M. Schneider Vice President
Mark D. Wait Vice President
Marie A. Wilkins Vice President
SUBSIDIARIES
1ST Armored, Incorporated 1st Title, Incorporated C.A. Hanes Realty, Incorporated Firstbank - West Branch Mortgage Company
|
OFFICE LOCATIONS
West Branch 502 W. Houghton Ave. (989) 345-7900
601 W. Houghton Ave. (989) 345-7900 2087 S. M-76 (989) 345-5050
2375 M-30 (989) 345-6210 | Fairview 1979 Miller Rd. (989) 848-2243
Rose City 505 S. Bennett St. (989) 685-3909
| Hale 3281 M-65 (989) 728-7566
St. Helen 1990 N. St. Helen Rd. (989) 389-1311
| Higgins Lake 4522 W. Higgins Lake Dr. (989) 821-9231 |
46
FIRSTBANK - LAKEVIEW
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kenneth A. Rader, Chairman Owner, Ken Rader Farms
William L. Benear President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank - Lakeview Vice President, Firstbank Corporation
Duane A. Carr Attorney, Miel and Carr
V. Dean Floria Sheridan Township Supervisor
Chalmer Gale Hixson, Chairman Owner, Country Corner Supermarket Owner, A Flair for Hair Owner, Harry Chalmers, Inc. Owner, Powderhorn Ranch
Gerald L. Nielsen Owner, Nielsen's TV & Appliance
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Office, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
| OFFICERS
William L. Benear President & Chief Executive Officer
Kim D. vonKronenberger Executive Vice President
Karen McKenzie Vice President
Dianne Stilson Vice President
SUBSIDIARY
Firstbank - Lakeview Mortgage Company
|
OFFICE LOCATION
Lakeview 506 Lincoln Ave. (989) 352-7271 9531 N. Greenville Rd. (989) 352-8180 | Canadian Lakes 10049 Buchanan Rd. Stanwood, MI (231) 972-4200
Remus 201 W. Wheatland Ave. (989) 967-3602 | Howard City 20020 Howard City-Edmore Rd. (231) 937-4383
Morley 101 E. 4th St. (231) 856-7652
|
47
FIRSTBANK - ST. JOHNS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John M. Sirrine, Chairman Owner, John M. Sirrine & Associates, Inc., Accountants
David M. Brown President & Chief Executive Officer (effective 1/1/2005)
Ann M. Flermoen, D.D.S. Dentist
William G. Jackson Attorney, William G. Jackson, PC
Frank Pauli President, St. Johns Ford-Mercury, Inc.
Sara Clark-Pierson Attorney, Certified Public Accountant, Clark Family Enterprises
Donald A. Rademacher Owner, RSI Home Improvement, Inc.
Samuel A. Smith Owner, Smith Funeral Homes, Inc.
Thomas R. Sullivan President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank Corporation President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant)
James M. Taylor President & Chief Executive Officer, Firstbank - St. Johns Vice President, Firstbank Corporation (retired 12/31/2004)
| OFFICERS
James M. Taylor President & Chief Executive Officer (retired 12/31/2004)
David M. Brown President & Chief Executive Officer (effective 1/1/2005)
Craig A. Bishop Vice President
Lawrence Kruger Vice President
Peggy Underwood Vice President
SUBSIDIARY
Firstbank - St. Johns Mortgage Company
|
OFFICE LOCATIONS
St. Johns 201 N. Clinton Ave. (989) 227-8383
1501 Glastonbury Dr. (989)227-6995 | |
48
BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Firstbank Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company. As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s subsidiaries are Firstbank – Alma; Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant); Firstbank – West Branch; Firstbank – Lakeview; Firstbank – St. Johns; 1st Armored, Incorporated; Gladwin Land Company; 1st Title, Incorporated;, and C.A. Hanes Realty, Incorporated. As of December 31, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 365 people on a full-time equivalent basis.
The Company is in the business of banking. Each subsidiary bank of the Company is a full service community bank. The subsidiary banks offer all customary banking services, including the acceptance of checking, savings and time deposits and the making of commercial, agricultural, real estate, personal, home improvement, automobile and other installment and consumer loans. Trust services are offered to customers through Citizens Bank Wealth Management in the Firstbank – Alma main office. Deposits of each of the banks are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The banks obtain most of their deposits and loans from residents and businesses in Bay, Clare, Gratiot, Iosco, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, Ogemaw, Oscoda, Roscommon, Saginaw, and parts of Clinton and Wexford counties. Firstbank – Alma has its main office and one branch in Alma, Michigan, and one branch located in each of the following areas: Ashley, Auburn, Ithaca, Merrill, Pine River Township (near Alma), St. Charles, St. Louis, and Vestaburg, Michigan. Firstbank (Mt. Pleasant) has its main office in Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, two branches located in Union Township (near Mt. Pleasant), and one branch located in each of the following areas: Cadillac, Clare, Mt. Pleasant, Shepherd, and Winn, Michigan. Firstbank – West Branch has its main office in West Branch, Michigan, and one branch located in each of the following areas: Fairview, Hale, Higgins Lake, Rose City, St. Helen, and West Branch Township (near West Branch), Michigan. Firstbank – Lakeview has its main office and one branch in Lakeview, Michigan, and one branch located in each of the following areas: Canadian Lakes, Howard City, Morley, and Remus, Michigan. Firstbank – St. Johns has its main office and one branch located in St. Johns, Michigan. The banks have no material foreign assets or income.
The principal sources of revenues for the Company and its subsidiaries are interest and fees on loans and non-interest revenue resulting from banking and non-bank subsidiary activity. On a consolidated basis, interest and fees on loans accounted for approximately 76% of total revenues in 2004, 68% in 2003, and 74% in 2002. Non-interest revenue accounted for approximately 19% of total revenue in 2004, 27% in 2003, and 20% in 2002. Interest on securities accounted for approximately 5% of total revenue in each of 2004, 2003, and 2002.
49
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Annual Meeting: The annual meeting of shareholders will be held on Monday, April 25, 2005, 4:30 p.m., Heritage Center, Alma College, Alma, Michigan.
Independent Auditors: Crowe Chizek and Company LLC Grand Rapids, Michigan
General Counsel: Varnum Riddering Schmidt & Howlett, LLP Grand Rapids, Michigan
| Stock Information: Organizations making a market in Firstbank Corporation Common Stock include:
Archipelago, LLC BrokerageAmerica, LLC B-Trade Services, LLC Goldman, Sachs & Company Howe Barnes Investments, Inc. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Knight Equity Markets, L.P. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Morgan Stanley & Company., Inc. Oppenheimes & Company., Inc. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. Robert W. Baird & Company, Inc. Sandler O'Neill & Partners Schwab Capital Markets Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. Susquehanna Capital Group THE BRUT ECN, LLC Trident Securities, Inc. UBS Securities, LLC
For research information and/or investment recommendations, contact:
Howe Barnes Investments, Inc. (800) 800-4693
Oppenheimer & Co. (800) 863-5434
Ryan Beck & Co., Inc. (973) 549-4000
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (314) 342-2000
Registrar and Transfer Company is Firstbank Corporation's Transfer Agent. You may contact the Investor Relations Department at: (800) 368-5948
|
50
REVOCABLE PROXY
FIRST BANK CORPORATION
[X] PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
For Annual Meeting of Shareholderson
April 25, 2005
The undersigned, a shareholder of FIRSTBANK CORPORATION, hereby appoints THOMAS R. SULLIVAN and SAMUEL G. STONE as proxies, each with full power to act without the other and to appoint his substitute and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote as designated hereon, all shares of Firstbank Corporation that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Firstbank Corporation to be held April 25, 2005 and at any adjournment thereof.
Please be sure to sign and date this Proxy in the box below. Date ________, 2005
__________________________________________________________________________________
Shareholder sign above Co-holder (if any) sign above
1. In the ELECTION OF DIRECTORS (except as marked to the contrary below):
For [ ] Withhold [ ] For All Except [ ]
Edward B. Grant
Samuel A. Smith
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark “For All Except” and write that nominee’s name in the space provided below.
_________________________________
2. Proposal to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized common stock.
For [ ] Against [ ] Abstain [ ]
3. Upon all matters which may properly come before the meeting, including matters incident to the conduct of the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
For [ ] Against [ ] Abstain [ ]
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN A MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE BELOW SIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1, “FOR” THE PROPOSAL IN ITEM 2 AND IN THE PROXIES’ DISCRETION ON OTHER MATTERS WHICH PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING.
Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership or limited liability company, please sign in partnership or company name by authorized person.
Detach above card, sign, date and mail in postage paid envelope provided.
FIRSTBANK CORPORATION
PLEASE MARK/SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY
PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE
IF YOUR ADDRESS HAS CHANGED, PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH THE PROXY IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________