UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM 10-QSB |
|
(Mark One) |
[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 |
|
OR |
|
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 033-01289-D |
|
Chapeau, Inc. |
(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as Specified in Its Charter) |
|
Utah 87-0431831 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) |
|
10 Greg Street, Sparks, Nevada 89431 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) |
|
(916) 941-6319 |
(Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) |
|
|
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal |
Year, if Changed Since Last Report) |
Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
As of May 16, 2005, the Issuer had 26,001,308 shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes No X
1
CHAPEAU, INC. |
|
FORM 10-QSB |
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
Page |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
Item 1 Financial Statements 3 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation 13 |
|
Item 3. Controls and Procedures 21 |
|
|
|
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 22 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 23 |
|
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 23 |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 23 |
|
Item 5. Other Information 24 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits 24 |
|
|
SIGNATURES 25 |
2
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Chapeau, Inc., or Chapeau, has included its unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 (the end of our most recently completed fiscal year), and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the period from February 3, 2000 (date of inception of the development stage) through March 31, 2005, and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from February 3, 2000 (date of inception of the development stage) through March 31, 2005, together with unaudited condensed notes thereto. In the opinion of management of Chapeau, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, all of which are normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly present the consolidated financial condition, results of operations , and cash flows of Chapeau for the interim periods presented. The financial statements included in this report on Form 10-QSB should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of Chapeau and the notes thereto for the year ended June 30, 2004, included in our annual report on Form 10-KSB.
3
CHAPEAU, INC. |
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
(Unaudited) |
| | March 31, | | June 30, |
| 2005 | 2004 |
ASSETS |
| | | | |
Current Assets | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 763,082 | | $ 6,352 |
Inventories and related deposits | | 1,327,201 | | 1,224,246 |
Other current assets | | 22,502 | | 31,201 |
Total Current Assets | | 2,112,785 | | 1,261,799 |
| | | | |
Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | 42,722 | 51,953 |
| | | | |
Other Assets | 172,742 | 173,064 |
| | | | |
Total Assets | $ 2,328,249 | $ 1,486,816 |
| | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
| | | | |
Current Liabilities | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ 1,159,955 | | $ 1,111,690 |
Accrued liabilities | | 1,454,544 | | 1,029,472 |
Payable to related party | | 720,000 | | - |
Customer deposits | | 1,176,405 | | 931,280 |
Promissory notes | | 520,350 | | 43,300 |
Current maturities of capitalized lease obligations | | 9,047 | | 8,206 |
Total Current Liabilities | | 5,040,301 | | 3,123,948 |
| | | | |
Long- Term Liabilities | | | | |
Convertible bonds | | 2,302,307 | | 2,002,720 |
Capitalized lease obligations, less current maturities | | 15,980 | | 22,874 |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities | | 7,358,588 | | 5,149,542 |
| | | | |
Shareholders' Deficit | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares | | | | |
authorized; none issued and outstanding | - | - |
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 325,000,000 shares authorized; | | | | |
26,001,308 shares and 24,172,040 shares issued and outstanding | | |
at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively | 26,001 | 24,172 |
Additional paid-in capital | | 7,184,043 | | 6,304,842 |
Deferred compensation | | (50,838) | | (43,074) |
Deficit accumulated prior to date of inception of the | | | | |
development stage | (259,373) | (259,373) |
Deficit accumulated from date of inception of the | | | | |
development stage | (11,930,172) | (9,689,293) |
Total Shareholders' Deficit | | (5,030,339) | | (3,662,726) |
| | | | |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit | | $ 2,328,249 | | $ 1,486,816 |
| | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CHAPEAU, INC. |
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | For the period from |
| | | | | | February 3, 2000 |
| | For the Three Months | | For the Nine Months | | (date of inception |
| | Ended | | Ended | | of the development |
| | March 31, | | March 31, | | stage) through |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 | | March 31, 2005 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | $ - | | $ 194,500 | | $ - | | $ 194,500 | | | $ 170,500 | |
Cost of sales | | - | | 109,823 | | - | | 109,823 | | | 134,823 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross margin | | - | | 84,677 | | - | | 84,677 | | | 35,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | 559,127 | | 626,242 | | 1,573,613 | | 1,470,961 | | | 6,576,454 | |
Research and development expense | | 30,142 | | 138,806 | | 243,689 | | 329,892 | | | 1,853,532 | |
Stock issued for compensation | | - | | - | | - | | - | | | 355,000 | |
Casualty loss | | - | | 200,000 | | - | | 200,000 | | | - | |
Amortization of deferred compensation | | | | | | | | | | | | |
from issuance of stock options | 8,098 | 6,759 | 23,847 | 29,697 | | | 92,863 | |
Write off of intangible assets | | - | | - | | - | | - | | | 318,531 | |
Write off of note receivable | | - | | - | | - | | - | | | 57,330 | |
In-process research and development | | - | | 400,000 | | - | | 400,000 | | | 776,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | (597,367) | | (1,287,130) | | (1,841,149) | | (2,345,873) | | | (9,994,657) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | - | | - | | - | | - | | | 73,126 | |
Interest expense | | (117,950) | | (64,811) | | (313,003) | | (140,579) | | | (726,919) | |
Interest expense from amortization of | | | | | | | | | | | | |
discount on convertible debt and | | | | | | | | |
debt issue costs | (30,441) | - | (86,727) | - | | | (1,281,722) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | | $ (745,758) | | $ (1,351,941) | | $ (2,240,879) | | $ (2,486,452) | | | $ (11,930,172) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share | | $ (0.03) | | $ (0.06) | | $ (0.09) | | $ (0.11) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and Diluted Weighted-Average | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Shares Outstanding | 24,354,967 | 22,834,128 | 24,232,125 | 22,223,858 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CHAPEAU, INC. |
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | For the period from |
| | | | | | February 3, 2000 |
| | For the Nine Months | | (date of inception |
| | Ended | | of the development |
| | March 31, | | stage) through |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | March 31, 2005 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ (2,240,879) | | $ (2,486,452) | | | $ (11,930,172) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net | | | | | | | |
cash used in operating activities | | | | | | |
Write-off of in-process research and | | | | | | | |
development acquired | | - | | 400,000 | | | 776,624 |
Impairment of property and equipment | | - | | - | | | 50,000 |
Casualty loss | | - | | 200,000 | | | - |
Write-off of intangible assets | | - | | - | | | 318,531 |
Interest paid with common stock | | - | | - | | | 23,430 |
Compensation and rent paid with common stock | | - | | - | | | 386,000 |
Amortization of discount on convertible | | | | | | | |
promissory notes and bond issue costs | | 86,727 | | - | | | 1,281,722 |
Amortization of deferred compensation from issuance | | | | | | | |
of stock options | | 23,847 | | 29,696 | | | 92,863 |
Depreciation and amortization | | 11,023 | | 23,026 | | | 223,683 |
Write-off of note receivable | | - | | - | | | 57,330 |
Interest income accrued on advances to Specialized | | - | | - | | | (5,348) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Inventories and related deposits | | (102,955) | | (15,103) | | | (1,327,201) |
Other current assets | | 8,698 | | 33,081 | | | (19,335) |
Other assets | | (11,398) | | (16,361) | | | (107,658) |
Accounts payable | | 48,265 | | 69,127 | | | 1,227,975 |
Accrued liabilities | | 425,072 | | 246,475 | | | 1,589,317 |
Customer deposits | | 245,125 | | 208,500 | | | 1,176,405 |
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | | (1,506,475) | | (1,308,011) | | | (6,185,834) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | | | | | | | |
Issuance of note receivable | | - | | - | | | (200,000) |
Collection of note receivable | | - | | - | | | 142,670 |
Advances paid to Specialized prior to acquisition | | - | | - | | | (397,464) |
Cash acquired in acquisition of Specialized, | | | | | | | |
net of acquisition costs paid | | - | | - | | | 97,018 |
Purchase of property and equipment | | (1,792) | | (39,163) | | | (118,467) |
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities | | (1,792) | | (39,163) | | | (476,243) |
| | | | | | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, | | | | | | | |
net of offering costs | | 750,000 | | - | | | 2,937,285 |
Proceeds from issuance of promissory notes and convertible | | | | | | | |
bonds, and related beneficial conversion feature | | 824,000 | | 1,385,000 | | | 3,597,501 |
Proceeds from issuance of warrants and common | | | | | | | |
stock related to convertible promissory notes | | - | | - | | | 391,499 |
Proceeds from payable to related party | | 720,000 | | - | | | 720,000 |
Payment of promissory note | | (22,950) | | - | | | (22,950) |
Payment of capitalized lease obligations | | (6,053) | | (8,611) | | | (17,171) |
Loan issue costs | | - | | - | | | (181,005) |
Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities | | 2,264,997 | | 1,376,389 | | | 7,425,159 |
Net Increase In Cash And Cash Equivalents | | 756,730 | | 29,215 | | | 763,082 |
Cash And Cash Equivalents At Beginning Of Period | | 6,352 | | 8,735 | | | - |
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Period | | $ 763,082 | | $ 37,950 | | | $ 763,082 |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(A) Organization and Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation, and Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Nature of Operations — Chapeau, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Utah on September 19, 1985. The Company’s prior operations were discontinued in May 1989. The Company was dormant from May 1989 until February 3, 2000 when the Company was reorganized and began activities to develop an electrical power generation system for sale to and use by individual businesses and organizations. In connection with its reorganization, the Company acquired Specialized Energy Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation, in April 2001. From February 3, 2000 through December 31, 2003, the Company had no sales of its power generation systems. Although the Company sold its initial commercial power generation system during the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company continues to be a development stage company due to the lack of significant sales. Since ince ption of the development stage, the major activities of the Company have included raising capital and research, development and marketing of its power generation system. Chapeau, Inc. and Specialized Energy Products, Inc. do business under the name “BluePoint Energy, Inc.” BluePoint Energy, Inc. does not exist as a separate legal entity.
Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Chapeau, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended June 30, 2004 and for the period from February 3, 2000 (date of inception of the development stage) through June 30, 2004, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB, especially the information included in Note 1 to those financial statements, “Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present the Company’s consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2005, its consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and its consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the period from February 3, 2000 (date of inception of the development stage), through March 31, 2005.
The results of operations for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2005, may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2005.
Business Condition – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company is considered to be in the development stage. The Company incurred losses of $745,758 and $1,351,941 during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and incurred losses of $2,240,879 and $2,486,452 and used $1,506,475 and $1,308,011 of cash in its operating activities during the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Through March 31, 2005, the Company has accumulated a deficit during the development stage of $11,930,172 and at March 31, 2005, the Company has a shareholders’ deficit of $5,030,339 and a working capital deficit of $2,927,516. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern . The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
7
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to continue to obtain financing, and ultimately to attain profitable operations. The Company’s success is dependent upon the successful development and marketing of its packaged co-generation and power generation system to the electrical power market. Although the Company has secured purchase orders for its product, it has not yet had significant sales of any products, and has not yet secured sufficient means of financing its operations in the future. To date, the Company has met its short-term cash needs by issuing promissory notes and convertible bonds, and by issuance of its common stock. However, there can be no assurance that such financing will continue to be available or that it will be available on terms favorable to the Company.
Stock-Based Compensation– At March 31, 2005, the Company has outstanding stock options issued to management, employees, consultants and members of the board of directors. The Company accounts for options under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Stock-based compensation expense of $8,097 and $6,760 is reflected in net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and of $23,846 and $29,697 is reflected in net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and on basic and diluted loss per common share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended |
| | March 31, | | March 31, |
| | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
Net loss: | | | | | | | | |
As reported | $ (745,758) | $ (1,351,941) | | $ (2,240,879) | $ (2,486,452) |
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | |
included in reported net loss | 8,097 | 6,760 | | 23,846 | 29,697 |
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense | | | | | | | | |
determined under fair value based method | (43,056) | (88,062) | | (171,869) | (247,331) |
Pro forma net loss | | $ (780,717) | | $ (1,433,243) | | $ (2,388,902) | | $ (2,704,086) |
Basic and diluted loss per share: | | | | | | | | |
As reported | $ (0.03) | $ (0.06) | | $ (0.09) | $ (0.11) |
Pro forma | | $ (0.03) | | $ (0.06) | | $ (0.10) | | $ (0.12) |
| | | | | | | | |
(B)
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Basic loss per share amounts are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted loss per share amounts are computed assuming the issuance of common stock for potentially dilutive common stock equivalents. All outstanding stock options, warrants, convertible promissory notes and bonds, and contingently issuable common stock are currently antidilutive and have been excluded from the diluted loss per share calculations. None of the 34,998,150 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debt, exercise of options or warrants, or otherwise contingently issuable were included in the computation of diluted loss per share at March 31, 2005. None of the 23,463,882 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of debt, exercise of options of warrants, or otherwise contingently issuable were included in the computation of diluted loss per share a t March 31, 2004.
8
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(C) Financing
2004 Convertible Debt and Equity Financing – On April 16, 2004, the Company entered into a Bond Purchase Agreement with Calim Bridge Partners I, LLC, or Calim BP. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company was authorized to issue up to $2,000,000 of five-year 12% Series A Convertible Bonds. The Company issued bonds in the amount of $1,676,000 prior to June 30, 2004 and issued the remaining bonds in the amount of $324,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2004. The terms of the convertible bonds include the following: (1) the bonds are due May 1, 2009; (2) interest on the bonds accrues at 12% per annum, payable on a semiannual basis commencing October 2004; (3) the bonds may be prepaid by the Company at any time subsequent to May 1, 2006; (4) the bonds are convertible into units, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant exercisable for common stock, with an initial conversion price of $0.40 per unit; (5) the conversion price of bonds will be subject to periodic adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, the sale of common stock by the Company at less than the conversion price of the bonds and the issuance of convertible securities with a lower conversion price; and (6) customary registration rights. The warrants to be received in the event of conversion are exercisable at $1.00 per share and have a term of two years after the date of conversion. The Company has made no interest payments under this agreement and was technically in default under the terms of the bonds; however, Calim has provided the Company with a waiver of this default and the bonds are reflected as long-term liabilities. On April 14, 2005, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement, which amended the terms of the Bond Purchase Agreement dated April 16, 2004. See Note F.
The proceeds from the bonds were allocated between the bonds and the valuation of the beneficial conversion option associated with the bonds. The total amount allocated to the beneficial conversion option was $613,702, has been recorded as a discount on the convertible bonds, and is being amortized using the effective yield method as a non-cash charge to interest expense over the period from when the bond proceeds were received through May 1, 2009, the due date of the bonds. The placement fee paid to Calim BP in the amount of $80,000 is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the bonds. Total interest expense from the amortization of discount on convertible debt and debt issue costs was $30,441 and $86,727 for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2005 (none for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2004).
Note Payable to Calim BP– In August 2004, the Company executed a promissory note in favor of Calim BP providing for principal borrowings in the maximum amount of $500,000. During the three months ended September 30, 2004, the Company borrowed $321,000 under the note and borrowed the remaining $179,000 under the note during the three months ended December 31, 2004. The note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum with principal and accrued interest due November 27, 2004. The promissory note was not paid when due on November 27, 2004 and was in default. Calim has provided the Company with a waiver of this default, however, and, on April 14, 2005, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement, under which the principal balance due under this note was converted into part of the initial bond issued under this new agreemen t. See Note F.
Payable to Related Party– The Company has received $720,000 in unsecured advances from Calim BP from November 16, 2004 through March 31, 2005, and an additional $50,000 through April 14, 2005. The unsecured advances accrue interest at 12% per annum. On April 14, 2005, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement, under which the aggregate balance of these unsecured advances totaling $770,000 were converted into part of the initial bond issued under this new agreement. See Note F.
9
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note Payable to Landlord– The Company executed Amendment Number 1 effective October 1, 2004 (the “Amendment”) to the deferred payment and settlement agreement (the “Agreement”) with its landlord in Sparks, Nevada. Under the terms of the amendment, the Company paid the landlord $3,300 in principal against the promissory note issued in connection with the Agreement, and has paid monthly payments of $2,500. The Company has again amended this Agreement effective April 1, 2005. Under the terms of this second amendment, the Company paid $8,898, reducing the amount due to $20,350 at March 31, 2005. The amended note provides for minimum monthly payments of $2,500 with the balance due on October 1, 2005. The note is unsecured, and bears interest at 10%.
Summary information regarding notes payable, bonds payable, and payable to related party for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:
| | | | Promissory Notes, Bonds Payable, and Payable to Related Party | | Unamortized Discount on Bonds Payable | | Promissory Notes, Bonds, and Payable to Related Party, Less Unamortized Discount |
Balance at June 30, 2004 | | $ 2,540,300 | | $ (494,280) | | $ 2,046,020 |
| Issuance of bonds | | 324,000 | | (99,420) | | 224,580 |
| Amortization of discount | | - | | 75,007 | | 75,007 |
| Proceeds from promissory note | | 500,000 | | - | | 500,000 |
| Proceeds from payable to related party | | 720,000 | | - | | 720,000 |
| Payment on note to landlord | | (22,950) | | - | | (22,950) |
Balance at March 31, 2005 | | $ 4,061,350 | | $ (518,693) | | $ 3,542,657 |
| | | | | | | |
Notes, bonds payable, and payable to related party at March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2004 are summarized as follows:
| | | March 31, | | June 30, |
| | | 2005 | | 2004 |
12% convertible bonds, due May 2009, secured | | | | |
| by all assets of the Company | | $ 1,481,307 | | $ 1,181,720 |
12% convertible bonds, due February 2008, | | | | |
| secured by all assets of the Company | | 821,000 | | 821,000 |
12% note payable, unsecured | | 500,000 | | - |
Payable to related party | | 720,000 | | |
10% note payable, unsecured | | 20,350 | | 43,300 |
Total Notes and Bonds Payable, less | | | | |
| Unamortized Discount | | 3,542,657 | | 2,046,020 |
Less current portion | | 1,240,350 | | 43,300 |
Long-Term Bonds Payable | | $ 2,302,307 | | $ 2,002,720 |
| | | | | |
10
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Cogeneration Project Financing Agreement –In August 2003, the Company entered into an agreement that is referred to as a “financing agreement” with Calim Private Equity, LLC, or Calim PE. However, the agreement provides no financing to the Company. Instead, under the agreement, Calim PE, through Calim-BPEP I, a Calim PE managed entity, intends to invest in cogeneration projects that will provide energy for third party users under energy purchase agreements generated by the Company. See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation – Cogeneration Project Financing Arrangements for a description of the terms of this agreement.
(D)
Common Stock
In March 2005, the Company issued 1,829,268 shares of common stock at $0.41 per share in a private placement to a foundation that is presently a shareholder of the Company. Proceeds to the Company were $750,000. In connection with the private placement, the Company also issued to the foundation warrants to acquire 1,829,268 shares of common stock, which warrants have an exercise price of $0.60 per share and expire in March 2007. The president and trustee of the foundation subsequently became a director of the Company.
(E)
Contingent Liabilities
In June 2003, the Company was named as a defendant inU.S. Power Corp. v. Chapeau, Inc. d/b/a BluePoint Energy, Inc. filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This matter involved an alleged breach of contract by the Company in the approximate amount of $295,780, which amount represents U.S. Power Corporation’s deposit paid to the Company to purchase equipment and is recorded as a current liability in customer deposits at March 31, 2005. U.S. Power Corporation also claimed other damages in an undetermined amount. In April 2005, the Company and U.S. Power Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release in connection with this case whereby, among other things, the Company will repay to U.S. Power Corporation $150,000 of U.S. Power Corporation’s deposit in exchange for U.S. Power Corporation’s dismissal of the case and release of all clai ms related thereto. See Note F.
In February 2005, the Company was named as a defendant inIndependent Energy Services, Inc. v. Chapeau, Inc. d/b/a BluePoint Energy, Inc. filed in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Orange. The matter relates to a joint venture between the Company and Independent Energy Services, Inc. (“IES”) involving the development of a cogeneration demonstration project. IES seeks the return of $228,500 that was transferred to the Company in connection with the project and has asserted claims for, among other things, rescission of the joint venture agreement and conversion. The Company has denied the material allegations of IES' suit and intends to defend against the claims. The Company has recorded IES’s transfer in the amount of $228,500 on its balance sheet as a current liability in customer deposits at March 31, 2005. The Company is assessing alternatives available to it with respect to c ompleting this project. This may result in additional cost to us and possible delays in completing the project.
11
CHAPEAU, INC.
dba BLUEPOINT ENERGY, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(F)
Subsequent Events
On April 14, 2005, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement with Calim PE. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company is authorized to issue Series B Convertible Bonds in an aggregate principal amount of up to $2,500,000. On April 14, 2005, the Company converted $1,270,000 in debt with Calim BP representing the balance of the note payable of $500,000 and the balance of the payable to related party of $770,000 into bonds pursuant to the agreement. Subsequent to April 14, 2005, the Company has issued additional bonds in the amount of $100,000. The Company will issue the balance of $1,130,000 available under the agreement to fund development activities. As consideration for entering into the agreement, the Company will pay Calim BP a fee of $100,000. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, the conversion price of Series A Convertible Bonds in th e aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000 issued pursuant to the Bond Purchase Agreement dated April 16, 2004 was reduced from $0.40 to $0.30 per unit and the exercise price of the warrants issuable pursuant to such agreement was reduced from $1.00 to $0.50 per share.
The Series B Convertible Bonds mature on March 31, 2010, accrue interest at 12% per annum, payable on a semiannual basis, and may be prepaid by Chapeau at any time subsequent to May 1, 2007. The bonds are convertible into units, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one warrant, at an initial conversion price of $0.30 per unit, subject to periodic adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to, the sale of common stock at less than the conversion price and the issuance of convertible securities with a lower conversion price. The bonds are secured by substantially all of the assets of Chapeau and have certain registration rights as set forth in the agreement. The warrants to be received in the event of conversion of the bonds are exercisable at $0.50 per share and have a term of two years after the date of conversion.
As discussed in further detail in Note E, also in April 2005, the Company and U.S. Power Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release in connection with a lawsuit initiated against the Company by U.S. Power Corporation whereby the Company will repay to U.S. Power Corporation $150,000 of U.S. Power Corporation’s deposit in exchange for U.S. Power Corporation’s dismissal of the case and release of all claims related thereto.
Also in April 2005, the Company entered into a Confidential Waiver and Release Agreement (the “Agreement”) in connection with the early termination of an employment contract with an employee of the Company. Under the terms of the Agreement, among other things, in exchange for the termination of the employment contract approximately 19 months prior to its expiration, the Company agreed to pay to the employee in 9 equal monthly installments commencing in April 2005 an amount equal to the aggregate of: (i) severance pay equal to six months of the employee’s annual salary; and (ii) certain other amounts as set forth in the employee’s employment contract. At March 31, 2005, the Company included in accrued liabilities the aggregate amount of payments due to the employee under the Agreement in the approximate amount of $123,000.
12
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OR PLAN OF OPERATION
Forward Looking Statements
This discussion and analysis is designed to be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Risk Factors set forth in Chapeau’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. As used herein, “we,” “our,” “us” and the like refer to Chapeau, Inc.
This report and other information made publicly available by Chapeau from time to time may contain certain forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other information relating to Chapeau and its business that are based on the beliefs of our management and assumptions made concerning information then currently available to management. Such statements reflect the views of our management at the time they are made and may not be accurate descriptions of the future. The discussion of future events, including the business prospects of Chapeau, is subject to the material risks listed below and based on assumptions made by management. These risks include the viability of our marketing strategy for the sale of our cogeneration products, our ability to identify and negotiate transactions that provide the potential for future shareholder value, our ability to attract the necessary additional capital to permit us to take advantage of opportunities with which we are presented, and our ability to generate sufficient revenue such that we can support our current cost structure and planned future operations, as well as to pay prior liabilities incurred. Should one or more of these or other risks materialize or if the underlying assumptions of management prove incorrect, actual results of Chapeau may vary materially from those described in the forward looking statements. We do not intend to update these forward looking statements, except as may occur in the regular course of our periodic reporting obligations.
Risk factors
The material risks that we believe are faced by Chapeau as of the date of this report are set forth below. This discussion of risks is not intended to be exhaustive. The risks set forth below and other risks not currently anticipated or fully appreciated by the management could adversely affect the business and prospects of Chapeau.
If we do not receive sufficient purchase orders for our cogeneration products from customers and associated cash deposits, we will need additional financing and failure to obtain such financing would jeopardize our ability to continue as a going concern.While we have secured initial orders from customers, commenced commercial product delivery and recognized initial revenue during the year ended June 30, 2004, we have not reported substantial revenues or net income and we expect to operate at a loss without significant revenues at least for the immediate term. We expect our expenses to continue to grow as we attempt to sell a significant number of systems. Although we have recently received some funding, absent our receipt of sufficient purchase orders from customers and associated cash deposits we will need substantial additional funding from outside sources to continue to grow our busin ess. We cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain that financing, if needed, or, if we are able to obtain such financing, that it will be on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot obtain such financing, we will not be able to continue as a going concern. As a result of these circumstances, the opinion of our independent accountants with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 includes an explanatory paragraph indicating that these matters raise substantial doubts about Chapeau’s ability to continue as a going concern.
13
We have a history of operating losses and may continue to see losses in the future. During this past fiscal quarter, Chapeau sustained a loss of approximately $746,000 and, as of March 31, 2005 had an accumulated deficit of approximately $12 million. Without significant product sales and/or additional funding, we will not be able to continue business operations.
We face competition from a number of companies and may not be able to compete against more established companies with greater resources. We face substantial competition in the sale of co-generation and power generation systems. Most of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do.
Many of our potential customers require third party financing in connection with the purchase of our product and inability to obtain such financing may jeopardize our product sales. A number of our potential customers have indicated that the their ability to submit a purchase order for our products will be contingent upon their obtaining third party financing to finance the purchase of equipment from us. We can provide no assurance that such financing will be available to our customers. If such financing is not generally available, our sales efforts and financial results will be adversely affected.
We depend on a few key employees and the loss of any of those employees may harm our business. We are dependent upon the skill and ability of our management, which currently consists of only three persons. We currently lack depth of management and there is no assurance that we can hire additional qualified personnel, even if our order flow increases and requires additional personnel to conduct our business.
Potential intellectual property claims and litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidation of our proprietary rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, nondisclosure and other contractual provisions and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. Despite efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use aspects of processes and devices that we regard as proprietary. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies, duplicate our technologies or design around our technologies. Effective intelle ctual property protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. Further, our intellectual property rights may be challenged and invalidated or circumvented. Litigation could harm our business and result in substantial settlement or related costs, divert our management and technical resources, and/or require us to discontinue the use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to infringed technology.
Sales of our product are significantly dependent upon capital expenditures by our potential customers. Many companies, including potential customers for our product, had substantially decreased their purchases of capital assets as a result of a previously weak economy. A weakness in the capital expenditure sector of the economy would adversely affect our sales efforts and financial results.
Our product has limited testing in the field and although field results have been satisfactory, failure of the product to satisfactorily perform in real world applications would harm our business. While our principal product has been thoroughly tested in the laboratory, our product does not have a history of operations in the field. Any failure of our product in field performance would adversely affect our ability to sell the product and our financial results.
We depend on a few key suppliers and the loss of any one supplier could harm our business. We currently rely on one sole source supplier for the engine that is the core of our product and a very small number of suppliers for other components, including digital controls and absorption chiller technology. Any problems with these suppliers would adversely affect our business and financial results.
14
We do not have access to credit necessary to finance the manufacture of our products. While we believe that we have good relationships with our suppliers, credit from these suppliers is not easily obtained. Failure to be able to purchase materials on credit in the future would adversely affect our business and financial results.
There is a limited public market for Chapeau’s shares. Although our common stock has been traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, trading has been sporadic and without significant volume. There can be no assurance that an active public market for our common stock will ever develop or be sustained.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to experience volatility. The market price of our common stock has been, and in the future could be, significantly affected by actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, announcements of technical innovations, new products or new contracts, competitors or their customers, developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights and general market conditions.
The conversion or exercise of currently outstanding convertible securities, options and warrants would result in significant dilution to holders of our common stock. As a result of various transactions previously entered by us, as of March 31, 2005, there were outstanding convertible securities and private warrants and options for the conversion and purchase of up to approximately 35 million shares of common stock. This represents significant additional potential dilution for our existing shareholders. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of convertible securities or exercise of warrants are not included in currently outstanding shares.
Use of estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and the related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimated amounts may differ under different assumptions or conditions, and actual results could differ from the estimates.
Overview
Chapeau was formed in 1985 and completed a public offering of its common stock in March of 1986. The Company was originally engaged in the operation of sport clothing stores but was not successful and these operations were discontinued in May 1989. The Company had no business operations from May 1989 until February 3, 2000 when it was reorganized and began development stage activities, principally raising capital and seeking investment or merger opportunities.
Managerial control of Chapeau was transferred to a new board of directors in February 2001. In April 2001, we acquired Specialized Energy Products, Inc., or Specialized, making Specialized a wholly owned subsidiary of Chapeau. Specialized developed customized engines and control panels used by developers and manufacturers of packaged cogeneration and power generation systems supplied to the electrical power market and, subsequent to the acquisition of Specialized, we have focused the Company’s resources on the development of our power generation system.
15
Operations
From February 3, 2000 through December 31, 2003, the Company did not recognize revenue from the sales of its power generation systems. During the quarter ended December 31, 2003, the Company shipped its initial commercial power generation system. Revenue from this initial shipment was deferred to and recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 upon completion of required installation and start-up procedures. The Company continues to be a development stage company due to lack of significant sales.
Prior to the change in managerial control, the expenses of Chapeau were not significant and were composed of general and administrative expenses principally for travel and professional fees. Chapeau has incurred selling, general and administrative expenses in the amount of $6,576,454, and research and development costs of $1,853,532 for the period from February 3, 2000 (date of inception of the development stage) to March 31, 2005, principally since February 2001. Selling, general and administrative expenses principally consist of compensation to management, employees, and the board of directors, legal fees, and consulting services. Research and development expenses principally consist of employee compensation, prototype materials, and outside service costs.
At March 31, 2005, Chapeau had current assets of $2,112,785 and current liabilities of $5,040,301, resulting in a working capital deficit of $2,927,516. Current assets principally consist of cash, inventories and related deposits. Inventories principally represent the cost of engines and related components for systems being assembled. Current liabilities are principally composed of accounts payable, accrued wages and related payroll tax and benefit liabilities, accrued interest, customer deposits, notes payable, and payable to related party.
Plans for Research and Development
We delivered our initial commercial combined heat and power (CHP) cogeneration system during the year ended June 30, 2004. This system utilizes an industry-recognized, well-established natural gas reciprocating engine, employs state-of-the-art emission control technology, is fully functional and, most recently, has received final approval from Underwriters Laboratories Inc., or UL, for UL listing for “Engine Generator for Co-Generation Use”, #46XT; Standard 2200. The UL listing applies to the United States and Canada.
Our cogeneration system, referred to as “Lean-One® CHP Module” for its lean burn configuration and characteristics, employs a proprietary emission process utilizing our super-cooled exhaust gas recirculation, or SC-EGR™, system. Initial independent emissions testing have yielded very favorable results. We developed our SC-EGR™ system and emission process to enable our products to meet and exceed the most stringent air quality management district standards in the U.S. market while maintaining the characteristics of lean burn engine technology, thereby producing high engine efficiencies and longer engine life. To that end, independent testing of the Lean-One® CHP Module was performed by Best Environmental, a California Air Resources Board certified laboratory, at our facility in Sparks, Nevada during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and again in the first quarter o f fiscal 2003. Best Environmental reconfirmed in the latter test that the Lean-One® CHP Module exceeded the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, or SCAQMD, the most restrictive air containment zone in the United States.
In addition, the Lean-One® CHP Module was permitted by SCAQMD for a commercial installation in November of 2003 and has consistently maintained compliance within the permit emissions requirements. Subsequently, and as a consequence of a surprise field examination of the same installation by SCAQMD in September 2004, the Lean-One® CHP Module complied with both the original permitting requirement as well as exceeding necessary and more stringent emission requirements under California Assembly Bill 1685 for the California Energy Commission Self-Generation Incentive Program for 2005.
16
Proprietary protection for our products, processes and know-how is important to our business. Two U.S. patents have been issued covering certain aspects of our cogeneration systems and three patent applications are pending with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. When advisable, we intend to continue to file such applications to protect our technology, inventions and other intellectual properties. We believe our patents and patent applications cover significant proprietary technology in devices, processes and materials.
In addition, we have registered “LEAN ONE” and “BPE” with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the European Economic Community. Trademark applications for “ULTRA LEAN-ULTRA CLEAN,” “COGENERATION FOR THE NEXT GENERATION” and “SC-EGR” are pending with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Contingent upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and/or obtain additional financing, if necessary, we anticipate developing CHP cogeneration and power generation systems complimentary to the Lean-One® CHP Module in additional power configurations. In that connection, we will continue to work toward securing exclusive supply arrangements with certain vendors, including our engine supplier and a developer of certain digital control systems incorporated in the Lean-One® CHP Module.
Liquidity and Sources of Financing
We are currently negotiating for sales of our CHP cogeneration and power generation systems with public utilities and other energy service companies, with significant interest for applications in high demand areas within our initial target geographic markets. As discussed in further detail herein, we have secured initial orders from customers for the purchase of our Lean-One® CHP Modules and made our initial commercial product delivery during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. While we have secured additional orders during the first nine months of this year and the contemplated cash collections in connection with these orders will enable us to meet certain of our cash needs, additional capital will be required for us to continue as an on-going concern over the next 12 months, absent our receipt of sufficient purchase orders from customers and associated cash deposits.
In that connection and as further discussed in Note D of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, in March 2005, we completed a private placement of common stock generating $750,000 in net proceeds. In April 2005, we executed an amendment to an existing bond facility with Calim Bridge Partners I, LLC providing for the issuance of up to $2,500,000 in 12% five-year Series B Convertible Bonds, under which facility we currently have available for future issuance approximately $1,130,000 in additional bonds. See Note F of Notes to Financial Statements in Part I Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB.
In addition, as further discussed in Item 3 of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, the Company is currently in default with respect to certain interest and other obligations currently owing to Calim PE and Calim BP. While Calim has waived these current defaults, there can be no assurance that it will issue similar waivers in the event that the Company should be in default in the future. If either Calim PE or Calim BP delivers a notice of default, then the Company would need to secure alternative sources of capital to satisfy its obligations.
Concurrent with the foregoing, we will continue to seek alternative sources of capital to meet our cash requirements, including other debt financing, issuing equity securities and entering into other financing arrangements. There can be no assurance, however, that any of these potential financing arrangements will be available and, if available, can be obtained on terms favorable to us or in amounts sufficient to meet our cash flow requirements. If we are unable to secure sufficient purchase orders from customers with corresponding cash deposits and/or secure additional working capital as indicated herein, we may not be able to meet our near-term cash requirements to continue business operations as an ongoing concern.
17
Cogeneration Project Financing Arrangements
In August 2003, we entered into an agreement that is referred to as a “financing agreement” with Calim Private Equity, LLC, or Calim PE. However, the agreement provides no financing to us. Instead, under the agreement, Calim PE, through Calim-BPEP I, a Calim PE managed entity, intends to invest in cogeneration projects that will provide energy for third party users under energy purchase agreements generated by us. The financing agreement with Calim PE will allow potential customers with the ability to utilize our Lean-One® cogeneration systems through energy purchase agreements as opposed to purchasing the system, thereby alleviating the potential customers of the financial and commodity risks inherent with capital equipment purchases, including development, installation, operation and maintenance costs. If installation sites are completed, Calim-BPEP I wil l have all risks and rewards related to any energy purchase agreements it enters with potential customers. We will have no obligation to repurchase any cogeneration units sold to Calim BPEP I.
For cogeneration projects funded in connection with the financing agreement, Calim-BPEP I will purchase requisite Lean-One® cogeneration systems from us and pay for site development, construction costs and installation costs associated with installation of the systems at an end users’ site, as well as pay for all ongoing operating and maintenance costs. Calim-BPEP I will also enter into an energy purchase agreement with the end user at the site for the sale and purchase of electricity generated by such system. If any system installations occur, we will receive, under the financing agreement, a management fee for operation and maintenance of the cogeneration systems at user sites and for services related to billing and collection of revenues for Calim-BPEP I. The financing agreement further provides for revenue sharing arrangement between us and Calim-BPEP I based upon 25% o f net cash flows after Calim-BPEP I has received a payout of 100% of its investment at the respective user site.
The agreement gives Calim-BPEP I the right to transfer its interest in a particular site project to us in exchange for our common stock at a per share exchange price of $3.00 for a period of ten years from the date of the agreement; provided, however, that at any time after the fifth year we can demand that Calim-BPEP I transfer its interest in a particular site project to us or forego its right to later exchange its interest in such site project to us for our common stock. As a result of this conversion right, Calim-BPEP I will be a variable interest entity with respect to Chapeau and its operations and balances will be consolidated into the financial statements of the Company upon the sale of any Lean- One® cogeneration systems to Calim-BPEP I. On a consolidated basis, revenue will be recognized from the sale of energy to customers under energy purchase agreements. Intercompany sal es of Lean- One® cogeneration systems to Calim-BPEP I will be eliminated in consolidation and equipment costs and site preparation costs will be capitalized as property and equipment.
To-date, none of our cogeneration systems have been sold through this agreement nor have we received any revenue from this agreement. However, we believe that this agreement is material to our business. For many of our potential customers the availability of financing to fund the purchase of our cogeneration system is a critical factor influencing their decision to purchase. At present, we do not have the financial capacity to provide such financing and, without the alternative provided by this agreement, we believe that the sales of our cogeneration systems will be materially less than if this project financing arrangement is available to potential customers.
Calim has the sole discretion to choose to finance or not to finance any particular project under this agreement. We do not have a similar arrangement with an alternative party in the event that Calim chooses not to participate in a particular project under this agreement and, in such event, we would attempt to find a replacement party, although we can provide no assurances that such replacement party would be available at all or would be willing to participate on terms acceptable to us.
18
��
Plan of Operations
We continue to focus sales and marketing efforts of our CHP systems nationally, with particular emphasis initially in California, New York, and New Jersey, with plans to subsequently expand distribution worldwide. We are seeking to form strategic partnerships and other alliances with certain companies engaged in the distribution of power generation products to achieve both domestic and international marketing and sales objectives. In that connection as discussed in further detail below, we have entered into business arrangements with several such companies. In addition, we are currently in discussions with other companies in connection with sales and marketing of our initial product. While we are optimistic that the business arrangements discussed below and these other discussions will result in positive outcomes for us, there can be no assurance that any other strategic partn erships or other alliances will be formed or, if formed, will be on terms favorable to us or will result in significant sales, if any, of our products.
We are currently negotiating for the sale of our CHP cogeneration and power generation systems, with significant interest for applications in high demand areas within our initial target geographic markets. In addition, during the quarter ended December 31, 2002 we entered into a Joint Strategic Agreement with Southern California Gas Company, or SoCal, whereby SoCal will provide internal funding to certain of its commercial customers sponsoring showcase centers within SoCal’s service territory of central and southern California with the goal of demonstrating the capabilities of distributed power generation and cogeneration utilizing the Lean-One® CHP Module. The initial showcase center was announced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and we are currently working to complete that installation. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, we entered into a Strategic Alliance Agreement w ith URS Corporation, or URS, whereby Chapeau and URS will jointly market our Lean-One® CHP Modules. In August 2003, we entered into a Teaming Agreement with Sempra Energy Solutions in connection with the solicitation of and response to certain project proposals. Also, in August 2003, we entered into an agreement that is referred to as a “financing agreement” with Calim Private Equity, LLC, or Calim PE. However, the agreement provides no financing to us. Instead, under the agreement, Calim PE, through Calim-BPEP I, a Calim PE managed entity, intends to invest in cogeneration projects that will provide energy for third party users under energy purchase agreements generated by us. The financing agreement with Calim PE will provide potential customers with the ability to utilize our Lean-One® cogeneration systems through energy purchase agreements as opposed to purchasing the system, thereby alleviating the potential customers of the financial and commodity risks inherent wi th capital equipment purchases, including development, installation, operation and maintenance costs (see Note C of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB and “Cogeneration Project Financing Arrangements” in Item 2 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB).
Our management anticipates that we should be able to significantly finance our operations from the proceeds from sales resulting from the Joint Strategic Agreement, Strategic Alliance Agreement, Teaming Agreement and Calim financing agreement, if and when realized. However, while we believe that these agreements will help endorse our other selling efforts, we have not yet booked any sales as a result of these agreements and there can be no assurance that we will realize additional sales, if any, as a consequence of any such agreement.
During fiscal 2004, we hired two executive management personnel as well as senior sales professionals to promote Chapeau’s Lean-One® CHP Module product line to the energy industry’s significant West Coast distributed generation market. If we achieve the financing necessary to pursue our plan of operations for the next twelve months, we would anticipate adding a significant number of staff and management personnel during that period.
19
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51.” In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 to make certain technical corrections and address certain implementation issues that had arisen. FIN 46, as revised, clarifies existing accounting literature regarding the consolidation of entities in which a company holds a “controlling financial interest”. A majority voting interest in an entity has generally been considered indicative of a controlling financial interest. FIN 46 specifies other factors (variable interests) which must be considered when determining whether a company holds a controlling financial interest in, and therefore must consolidate, an entity (variable interest entities) . The adoption of FIN 46 had no impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations since the Company has no variable interest entities.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, an amendment of FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95, which addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of that company or liabilities that are based on the fair value of that company’s equity instruments, or that may be settled by issuance of such equity instruments. SFAS 123R eliminates Chapeau’s ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,Accounting for stock Issued to Employees, and requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair value-based method and recognized as expense in the consolidated stateme nt of operations. SFAS 123R is effective for Chapeau beginning January 1, 2006, although early adoption is encouraged by the statement. We are currently evaluating the method and timing of adoption. We are also evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151 (SFAS 151),Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by SFAS 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 151 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations, although the ultimate impact will depend on our future experience with idle facilities, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage).
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153 (SFAS 153),Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS 153 amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on our financial statements.
20
ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules Section 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), we maintain disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to which management under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out, as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, 2005, a review and evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Chapeau in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
21
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In June 2003, Chapeau was named as a defendant inU.S. Power Corp. v. Chapeau, Inc. d/b/a BluePoint Energy, Inc. filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This matter involved an alleged breach of contract by Chapeau in the approximate amount of $295,780, which amount represents U.S. Power Corporation’s deposit paid to us to purchase equipment and is recorded as a current liability in customer deposits at March 31, 2005. U.S. Power Corporation also claimed other damages in an undetermined amount. In April 2005, the Company and U.S. Power Corporation entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release in connection with this case whereby, among other things, the Company will repay to U.S. Power Corporation $150,000 of U.S. Power Corporation’s deposit in exchange for U.S. Power Corporation’s dismissal of the case and release of all cla ims related thereto.
In January 2005, the Company filed an action inChapeau, Inc. d/b/a BluePoint Energy, Inc. v. Gammill Electric, Inc. and Able Crane Service, Inc. in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Placer. The matter involves the recovery from the defendants of damages suffered by the Company in connection with an incident involving the parties in the amount of approximately $200,000 plus interest and reimbursement of certain other costs. In February 2004, one of the Company’s cogeneration systems was significantly damaged during field service repair activities at a customer’s installation facility. The Company was not a party to the related repair activities but the Company supplied a replacement system and returned the damaged system to the Company’s manufacturing facilities for diagnostic evaluation. The Company recorded a casualty loss in its statement of operations for the qua rter ended March 31, 2004 in connection with this event. The Company is seeking recovery of the full amount of the recorded loss plus certain other related costs and expenses from the defendants.
In February 2005, the Company was named as a defendant inIndependent Energy Services, Inc. v. Chapeau, Inc. d/b/a BluePoint Energy, Inc. filed in the Superior Court of State of California, County of Orange. The matter relates to a joint venture between the Company and Independent Energy Services, Inc. (“IES”) involving the development of a cogeneration demonstration project. IES seeks the return of $228,500 that was transferred to the Company in connection with the project and has asserted claims for, among other things, rescission of the joint venture agreement and conversion. The Company has denied the material allegations of IES' suit and intends to defend against the claims. The Company has recorded IES’s transfer in the amount of $228,500 on its balance sheet as a current liability in customer deposits at March 31, 2005. The Company is assessing alternatives available to it with respect to completing this project. This may result in additional cost to us and possible delays in completing the project.
We are presently involved in certain minor legal matters incidental to our business which, if adversely decided, would not have a material adverse affect upon our business or financial condition.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no proceedings pending or threatened against any executive officer or director of Chapeau, whose position in such proceeding would be adverse to that of Chapeau.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Previously furnished on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2005.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Chapeau has not made any interest payments or paid the loan placement fee due under a loan agreement entered into by Chapeau in August 2002 with Calim PE, as amended in December 2002. Calim has not delivered a notice of default in connection with the referenced payments, however, and in January 2003 Calim delivered to Chapeau its notice to convert the aggregate amount of outstanding principal and interest under the loan agreement and related note into convertible bonds, subject to certain other note holders also converting their respective notes into equity, which occurred in February 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, the aggregate amount of approximately $821,000, representing the outstanding principal and substantially all of the accrued interest due under the Calim loan agreement, was converted into convertible bonds. The convertible bonds accrue interest at a rate of 12% per annum payable on a se mi-annual basis. Chapeau has not made any interest payments due under the convertible bonds and was technically in default under the terms of the bonds; however, Calim has provided the Company with a waiver of this default and the bonds are reflected as long-term liabilities. Unpaid loan placement fees and accrued interest in connection with the Calim loan agreement and the convertible bonds in the aggregate amount of approximately $319,000 are included in current liabilities at March 31, 2005.
As discussed in further detail in Note C of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I of this Form 10-QSB, the Company has made no interest payments as required under a bond financing agreement with Calim BP and was technically in default under the terms of the bonds; however, Calim has provided the Company with a waiver of this default and the bonds are reflected as long-term liabilities. Accrued interest under the agreement in the aggregate amount of approximately $220,000 is included in current liabilities at March 31, 2005.
As also discussed in further detail in Note C and Note F of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I of this Form 10-QSB, a 12% per annum interest-bearing note payable to Calim BP in the principal amount of $500,000, together with unpaid accrued interest, was due on November 27, 2004. The promissory note was not paid when due and was in default. Calim has provided the Company with a waiver of this default, however, and, on April 14, 2005, the Company entered into a First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement, under which the principal balance due under this note was converted into part of the initial bond issued under this new agreement. Unpaid principal and accrued interest under the note in the aggregate amount of approximately $532,000 is included in current liabilities at March 31, 2005.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
22
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits
Exhibit Number | | SEC Reference Number | |
Title of Document |
Location |
| | | | | |
1 | | (10) | | First Amendment and Supplement to Bond Purchase Agreement dated April 14, 2005 between Chapeau, Inc. and Calim Private Equity, LLC | This filing |
| | | | | |
2 | | (31) | | Rule 13(a) – 14(a)/15(d) – 14(a) Certification | This filing |
| | | | | |
3 | | (32) | | Section 1350 Certification | This filing |
23
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CHAPEAU, INC.
Dated: May 16, 2005
By/s/ Guy A. Archbold
Guy A. Archbold, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
24