As previously disclosed, on January 14, 2020, Pope Resources, a Delaware limited partnership (“Pope” or the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 1, 2020 (as amended and as may be further amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”) by and among Rayonier Inc. (“Rayonier”), Rayonier, L.P., (“Opco”), Rayonier Operating Company LLC (“ROC”), Rayonier Operating Company Holdings, LLC, Pacific GP Merger Sub I, LLC (“Merger Sub 1”), Pacific GP Merger Sub II, LLC (“Merger Sub 2”), Pacific LP Merger Sub III, LLC (“Merger Sub 3”), Pope, Pope MGP, Inc. (“MGP”) and Pope EGP, Inc (“EGP”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub 3 will merge with and into Pope, with Pope surviving such merger as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Opco (such transaction, the “Merger”).
In connection with the proposed Merger, on April 6, 2020 Rayonier, Opco and Pope filed a proxy statement/prospectus (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”), which Proxy Statement/Prospectus was mailed on or about April 6, 2020 to Pope unitholders of record as of March 30, 2020.
Four lawsuits challenging disclosures made in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus have been filed as of the date of this Current Report on Form8-K. On March 19, 2020, a purported Pope unitholder filed a lawsuit against Pope and its board of directors alleging that, among other things, the Proxy Statement/Prospectus contained materially incomplete and misleading information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin the proposed Merger, an award of rescissory damages and plaintiffs’ costs, including attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is captionedSteinv.Pope Resources, et al., No.1:20-CV-00387, and is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On March 26, 2020, a purported Pope unitholder filed a putative class action purportedly on behalf of the unitholders of Pope against Pope, its board of directors, Rayonier, ROC, Merger Sub 1, Merger Sub 2, Merger Sub 3, MGP and EGP alleging that, among other things, the Proxy Statement/Prospectus contained materially incomplete and misleading information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin the proposed Merger, an award of rescissory damages and plaintiffs’ costs, including attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is captionedThompson v.Pope Resources, et al., No.1:20-CV-00432, and is also pending in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On April 14, 2020, a purported Pope unitholder filed a putative class action purportedly on behalf of the unitholders of Pope against Pope, its board of directors and Rayonier alleging, among other things, that members of the Pope board of directors breached their duty of loyalty under the Pope limited partnership agreement and Delaware law in connection with entering into the Merger Agreement, that Rayonier aided and abetted such breach and that the Proxy Statement/Prospectus misrepresents or omits material information. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin the proposed Merger, an award of compensatory and/or rescissory damages and plaintiffs’ costs, including attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is captionedLaidlawv.Pope Resources, et al.,No. 20-2-00755-18, and is pending in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for Kitsap County. On April 17, 2020, another purported Pope unitholder filed a lawsuit against Pope and its board of directors alleging that, among other things, the Proxy Statement/Prospectus contained false and misleading information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin the proposed Merger, an award of rescissory damages and plaintiff’s costs, including attorneys’ fees. This lawsuit is captionedArzonetti v. Pope Resources, et al., No.1:20-cv-03102, and is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Pope believes that the claims asserted in the complaints are without merit and supplemental disclosures are not required or necessary under applicable laws. However, in order to avoid the risk of the lawsuits delaying or otherwise adversely affecting the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in defending the lawsuits, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, Pope is voluntarily supplementing the Proxy Statement/Prospectus as described in this Current Report on Form8-K. Each of the plaintiffs has agreed that, following the filing of this Current Report on Form8-K, they will dismiss their respective actions in their entirety, with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs.
These additional disclosures in this Current Report on Form8-K supplement the disclosures contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, which in turn should be read in its entirety. To the extent that information in this Current Report on Form8-K differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the information in this Current Report on Form8-K shall supersede or supplement the information in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. In addition, these supplemental disclosures will not affect the merger consideration to be received by Pope unitholders in connection with the Merger or the timing of the special meeting of Pope unitholders scheduled for May 5, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, at the offices of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, 920 Fifth Avenue Suite 3300, Seattle, Washington 98104, as described further in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.