EXHIBIT 99.1
COOK INLET ENERGY
ESTIMATED FUTURE RESERVES
AND INCOME
AS OF APRIL 30, 2010
SEC PARAMETERS

RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.
HOUSTON, TEXAS





SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
DEFINITIONS OF RESERVES
The following information is taken from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission:
PART 210—FORM AND CONTENT OF AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANY ACT OF 1935, INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940, INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940, AND ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT OF 1975
Rules of General Application
§ 210.4-10 Financial accounting and reporting for oil and gas producing activities pursuant to the Federal securities laws and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
Reserves
Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.
Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
(i)
The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:
(A)
The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and
(B)
Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.
(ii)
In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.
(iii)
Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.
(iv)
Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:
(A)
Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and
Page 2
Securities and Exchange Commission
§ 210.4-10 Definitions (of Reserves)
Modified, Effective 2009 for Filings of 12/31/2009 and Thereafter
(B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.
(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.
Reasonable certainty.If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence thatthe quantities will be recovered. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. A high degree of confidence exists if the quantity is much more likely to be achieved than not, and, as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.
Reliable technology.Reliable technology is a grouping of one or more technologies (including computational methods)that has been field tested and has been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation.
Probable Reserves
Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.
(i)
When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.
(ii)
Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.
(iii)
Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.
Possible Reserves
Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.
(i)
When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.
(ii)
Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.
(iii)
Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.
(iv)
The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.
(v)
Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identify directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than
Page 3
Securities and Exchange Commission
§ 210.4-10 Definitions (of Reserves)
Modified, Effective 2009 for Filings of 12/31/2009 and Thereafter
formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore, and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.
(vi) Pursuant to paragraph (a)(22)(iii) of this section, where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.
Developed Oil and Gas Reserves
Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:
(i)
Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and
(ii)
Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.
Undeveloped Oil and Gas Reserves
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(i)
Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.
(ii)
Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time.
(iii)
Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.
Additional Definitions:
Deterministic Estimate
The method of estimating reserves or resources is called deterministic when a single value for each parameter (from the geoscience, engineering, or economic data) in the reserves calculation is used in the reserves estimation procedure.
Probabilistic Estimate
The method of estimation of reserves or resources is called probabilistic when the full range of values that could reasonably occur for each unknown parameter (from the geoscience and engineering data) is used to generate a full range of possible outcomes and their associated probabilities of occurrence.
Reasonable Certainty
If deterministic methods are used, reasonable certainty means a high degree of confidence that the quantities will be recovered. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the estimate. A high degree of confidence exists if the quantity is much more likely to be achieved than not, and, as changes due to increased availability of geoscience (geological, geophysical, and geochemical), engineering, and economic data are made to estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) with time, reasonably certain EUR is much more likely to increase or remain constant than to decrease.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | COOK INLET ENERGY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | VARIOUS COOK INLET PROPERTIES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | AS OF APRIL 30, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | SORTED BY RESERVE CATEGORY THEN BY PV 10 VALUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | RESERVE | LIFE | | GROSS | GROSS | NET | NET | NET | SEV | AD VAL | OP | CAPITAL | CASH | DISC |
| FIELD | | LEASE | | RESERVOIR | | OPERATOR | MAJOR | | CATEGORY | INDEX | | OIL | | GAS | | | OIL | | GAS | | SALES | TAX | TAX | COST | COST | FLOW | @ 10% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (YRS) | | (BBLS) | (MMCF) | (BBLS) | (MMCF) | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($) | |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 6 | HEMLOCK‐SEG B | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED PRODUCING | 11.7 | 1,231,161 | ‐ | 982,968 | ‐ | 61,578,864 | 29,489 | 677,043 | ‐ | ‐ | 60,872,340 | 41,805,372 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 04A | HEMLOCK CENTRAL FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 17.3 | 1,321,895 | ‐ | 1,196,315 | ‐ | 72,770,288 | 40,675 | 1,090,944 | 2,326,535 | 2,300,000 | 67,012,132 | 40,711,360 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 05A | HEMLOCK SOUTH FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 14.5 | 1,124,721 | ‐ | 1,017,873 | ‐ | 62,235,480 | 34,608 | 933,013 | 1,979,509 | 2,400,000 | 56,888,364 | 37,628,652 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 03A | HEMLOCK SOUTH FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 14.4 | 1,124,721 | ‐ | 1,017,872 | ‐ | 62,257,528 | 34,608 | 933,344 | 1,979,509 | 4,600,000 | 54,710,064 | 35,910,716 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT NORTH STEPOUT | HEMLOCK NS02 | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 16.1 | 1,191,013 | ‐ | 1,077,867 | ‐ | 65,615,496 | 36,647 | 983,683 | 2,096,183 | 4,600,000 | 57,898,984 | 34,559,560 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 02A | HEMLOCK SOUTH FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 15.1 | 1,124,721 | ‐ | 1,017,873 | ‐ | 62,078,648 | 34,608 | 930,661 | 1,979,509 | 3,500,000 | 55,633,872 | 34,546,572 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 9 | HEMLOCK‐SEG B | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 11.6 | 1,100,000 | ‐ | 871,721 | ‐ | 54,807,884 | 29,639 | 602,561 | ‐ | 6,000,000 | 48,175,680 | 33,807,856 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT SOUTH STEPOUT | HEMLOCK SSO | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 16.6 | 1,191,013 | ‐ | 1,077,867 | ‐ | 65,466,312 | 36,647 | 981,445 | 2,096,183 | 4,600,000 | 57,752,032 | 32,869,412 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 5 | HEMLOCK‐SEG B | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED PRODUCING | 11.7 | 755,796 | ‐ | 603,433 | ‐ | 37,802,568 | 20,517 | 415,603 | ‐ | ‐ | 37,366,448 | 25,662,210 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 01 | HEMLOCK | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED NON PRODUCING | 17.2 | 699,999 | ‐ | 633,499 | ‐ | 38,404,336 | 19,005 | 575,780 | 1,231,999 | 2,000,000 | 34,577,548 | 19,714,830 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 8 | HEMLOCK‐SEG C | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 5.6 | 523,000 | ‐ | 401,324 | ‐ | 25,417,388 | 13,645 | 279,441 | ‐ | 6,000,000 | 19,124,302 | 15,571,347 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 07 | HEMLOCK | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED NON PRODUCING | 11.3 | 245,605 | ‐ | 222,272 | ‐ | 13,571,477 | 7,557 | 203,459 | 432,265 | 2,000,000 | 10,928,197 | 6,507,471 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 1A | HEMLOCK‐SEG A | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED PRODUCING | 2.8 | 80,000 | ‐ | 60,221 | ‐ | 3,823,974 | 1,807 | 42,044 | ‐ | 275,000 | 3,505,123 | 3,153,506 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 7A | HEMLOCK‐SEG A | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED PRODUCING | 9.9 | 61,183 | ‐ | 48,494 | ‐ | 3,048,848 | 1,649 | 33,519 | ‐ | ‐ | 3,013,681 | 2,206,829 |
WEST FORELAND | WF 1 (9200‐9400) | WF#1 9200 & 9400` SAND | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 9.3 | | ‐ | 790,733 | | ‐ | 637,928 | 3,088,212 | ‐ | 12,353 | 1,068,480 | ‐ | 2,007,379 | 1,598,020 |
RAPTOR | RAPTOR 1 | TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 10.7 | | ‐ | 3,819,000 | | ‐ | 3,341,625 | 16,176,808 | ‐ | 177,945 | 577,500 | 10,600,000 | 4,821,363 | 1,470,797 |
WEST FORELAND | WF 2 LONG STRING | WF#2‐9200` SAND | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 8.2 | | ‐ | 460,376 | | ‐ | 371,412 | 1,798,004 | ‐ | 7,192 | 633,080 | ‐ | 1,157,732 | 945,785 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 1 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 3.8 | | ‐ | 254,313 | | ‐ | 65,262 | 315,932 | ‐ | 12,637 | 81,000 | ‐ | 222,295 | 202,910 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 3 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED UNDEVELOPED | 4.8 | | ‐ | 1,482,168 | | ‐ | 380,354 | 1,841,293 | ‐ | 73,652 | 99,000 | 1,350,000 | 318,642 | 180,375 |
KUSTATAN | KUSTATAN FIELD #1 | TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 3.3 | | ‐ | 5,639 | | ‐ | 4,906 | 23,749 | ‐ | 95 | 10,000 | ‐ | 13,654 | 11,223 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 2 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 0.7 | | ‐ | 17,257 | | ‐ | 4,428 | 21,438 | ‐ | 858 | 14,400 | ‐ | 6,181 | 6,052 |
WEST FORELAND | WF 2 SHORT STRING | WF#2‐8500` SAND | COOK INLET | GAS | PROVED PRODUCING | 0.2 | | ‐ | 1,640 | | ‐ | 1,346 | 6,515 | ‐ | 26 | 2,000 | ‐ | 4,489 | 4,455 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 05 | HEMLOCK | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED PRODUCING | 0.0 | | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
KUSTATAN FACILITY | KUSTATAN FACILITY EXPENSES | | | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED | 15.7 | | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 21,620,000 | ‐ | (21,620,000) | (11,226,233) |
REDOUBT SHOAL | FIXED OPERATING COSTS | OSPREY PLATFORM | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED EXPENSES | 9.7 | | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 25,853,000 | ‐ | (25,853,000) | (17,656,712) |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | FIXED OPERATING COSTS | HEMLOCK | COOK INLET | OIL | PROVED EXPENSES | 11.7 | | ‐ | ‐ | | | ‐ | | ‐ | | ‐ | | ‐ | | ‐ | | 46,760,000 | | ‐ | | (46,760,000) | (28,220,450) |
| | | | | | | | | | | 253.5 | | 11,774,828 | | 6,831,125 | | 10,229,599 | 4,807,260 | 652,151,042 | 341,100 | 8,967,296 | 110,840,152 | 50,225,000 | 481,777,500 | 311,971,914 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT SOUTH STEPOUT | HEMLOCK SSO | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 16.3 | 1,191,013 | ‐ | 1,077,867 | ‐ | 65,541,360 | 36,647 | 982,571 | 2,096,183 | 4,600,000 | 57,825,960 | 33,704,180 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 09 | HEMLOCK NORTHERN FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.1 | 847,012 | ‐ | 766,546 | ‐ | 46,688,640 | 26,063 | 699,939 | 1,490,741 | 4,600,000 | 39,871,900 | 23,155,658 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 13 | HEMLOCK NORTHERN FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.3 | 847,012 | 207,518 | | 766,546 | 187,804 | 47,545,376 | 26,063 | 712,790 | 1,490,741 | 4,600,000 | 40,715,792 | 23,104,140 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT 14 | HEMLOCK NORTHERN FB | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.6 | 847,012 | ‐ | 766,546 | ‐ | 46,583,168 | 26,063 | 698,357 | 1,490,741 | 4,600,000 | 39,768,004 | 22,020,252 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT NORTH STEPOUT | HEMLOCK NS02 | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 23.3 | 838,264 | ‐ | 758,629 | ‐ | 45,046,184 | 25,793 | 675,306 | 1,475,344 | ‐ | 42,869,732 | 19,219,020 |
SABRE | SABRE 1 | G SAND | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 11.7 | 1,152,500 | ‐ | 697,839 | ‐ | 43,840,252 | 23,727 | 481,982 | 1,904,981 | 13,020,000 | 28,409,566 | 18,108,768 |
SABRE | SABRE 2 | G SAND | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.5 | 1,152,500 | ‐ | 697,839 | ‐ | 43,611,640 | 23,727 | 479,467 | 1,943,480 | 10,220,000 | 30,944,966 | 18,075,952 |
WEST MCARTHUR RIVER | WMRU 7A | 8500' GAS | COOK INLET | GAS | PROBABLE NON‐PRODUCING | 8.6 | | ‐ | 6,340,000 | | ‐ | 5,034,908 | 24,373,988 | ‐ | 268,114 | ‐ | 2,000,000 | 22,105,874 | 15,635,683 |
SWORD | SWORD 1 | G SAND | COOK INLET | OIL | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 14.9 | 1,106,500 | ‐ | 639,004 | ‐ | 39,907,092 | 21,726 | 438,739 | 1,983,058 | 10,220,000 | 27,243,568 | 15,406,769 |
SABRE | SABRE 3 | BELUGA‐STERLING | COOK INLET | GAS | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 11.9 | | ‐ | 5,769,999 | | ‐ | 3,493,734 | 16,913,166 | ‐ | 186,045 | 442,750 | 10,220,000 | 6,064,371 | 1,902,775 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 2 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROBABLE NON PRODUCING | 5.7 | | ‐ | 773,382 | | ‐ | 198,465 | 960,770 | ‐ | 38,431 | 108,000 | 75,000 | 739,340 | 617,549 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 2 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROBABLE NON PRODUCING | 8.0 | | ‐ | 757,698 | | ‐ | 194,440 | 941,286 | ‐ | 37,651 | 50,400 | 75,000 | 778,235 | 432,276 |
THREE MILE CREEK | THREE MILE CREEK 1 | BELUGA/TYONEK | COOK INLET | GAS | PROBABLE NON PRODUCING | 5.4 | | ‐ | 543,211 | | ‐ | 139,399 | 674,830 | ‐ | 26,993 | 36,000 | 75,000 | 536,836 | 362,249 |
COSMOPOLITAN | HANSEN OFFSET 1 | STARCHKOF/HEMLOCK | PIONEER | GAS | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.9 | 482,718 | ‐ | 2,414 | ‐ | 150,977 | ‐ | 604 | ‐ | ‐ | 150,373 | 99,768 |
COSMOPOLITAN | HANSEN OFFSET 1 | TYONEK | PIONEER | GAS | PROBABLE UNDEVELOPED | 21.8 | | ‐ | 2,618,001 | | | ‐ | | 13,090 | | 63,369 | | ‐ | | 253 | | ‐ | | ‐ | | 63,115 | | 13,075 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 194.9 | | 8,464,532 | | 17,009,808 | | 6,173,228 | 9,261,840 | 422,842,098 | 209,808 | 5,727,241 | 14,512,420 | 64,305,000 | 338,087,632 | 191,858,114 |
REDOUBT SHOAL | REDOUBT SOUTH STEPOUT | HEMLOCK SSO | COOK INLET | OIL | POSSIBLE UNDEVELOPED | 16.8 | 1,191,013 | ‐ | 1,077,867 | ‐ | 65,415,764 | 36,647 | 980,687 | 2,096,183 | 4,600,000 | 57,702,252 | 32,324,120 |
SABRE | SABRE 4 | BELUGA‐STERLING | COOK INLET | GAS | POSSIBLE UNDEVELOPED | 13.2 | | ‐ | 8,593,000 | | | ‐ | | 5,203,061 | | 25,188,014 | | ‐ | | 277,068 | | 500,500 | | 10,220,000 | | 14,190,449 | | 6,715,096 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 29.9 | | 1,191,013 | | 8,593,000 | | 1,077,867 | 5,203,061 | 90,603,778 | 36,647 | 1,257,755 | 2,596,683 | 14,820,000 | 71,892,701 | 39,039,216 |
Note: There are differences in the addition as a result of computer program rounding of numbers.
RALPH E. DAVIS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-1529