UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________to _________

Commission file number 0-16116

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	95-4052473
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (864) 239-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Units of Limited Partnership Interest

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer£	Accelerated filer£
Non-accelerated filer£(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting companyS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Annual Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of redevelopments, the Partnership’s future financial performance, including the Partnership’s ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors some of which are beyond the Partnership’s control including, without limitation: financing risks, including the availability and cost of financing and the risk that the Partnership’s cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; natural disasters and severe weather such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnership’s property and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; real estate risks, including fluctuations inreal estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; insurance risk; development risks; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership. Readers should carefully review the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the section entitled “Risk Factors” described in Item 1A of this Annual Report and the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd. (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") is a publicly held limited partnership organized under the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act pursuant to a Certificate of Agreement of Limited Partnership (hereinafter referred to as the "Partnership Agreement") dated June 29, 1984, as amended. The Partnership's general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II (the "General Partner"), a California corporation. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2035 unless terminated prior to such date.

The Partnership is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate properties for investment. In 1988 and 1989, during its acquisition phase, the Partnership acquired one apartment complex, three warehouses, and a 70% interest in a joint venture project which ultimately acquired an apartment complex. In 1992, the Partnership acquired the remaining 30% interest of the joint venture. The Partnership continues to own and operate one apartment property. See "Item 2. Description of Property".

The Partnership, through its public offering of Limited Partnership units, sold 12,425 units aggregating $12,425,000. The General Partner contributed capital in the amount of $1,000 for a 1% interest in the Partnership. Since its initial offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are the limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions. The General Partner seeks to maximize the operating results and, ultimately, the net realizable value of the Partnership's property in order to achieve the best possible return for the investors. Such results may best be achieved by holding and operating the propertyor through a property sale or exchange, refinancing, debt restructuring or relinquishment of the asset. The Partnership evaluates its holding periodically to determine the most appropriate strategy for the asset.

The Partnership has no employees. Property management and administrative services are provided by the General Partner and by agents retained by the General Partner. An affiliate of the General Partner has been providing such property management services.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted throughout this Annual Report describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Partnership’s actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

The Partnership’s existing and future debt financing could render it unable to operate, result in foreclosure on its property, prevent it from making distributions on its equity or otherwise adversely affect its liquidity.

The Partnership is subject to the risk that its cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If the Partnership fails to make required payments of principal and interest on secured debt, its lender could foreclose on the property securing such debt, which would result in loss of income and asset value to the Partnership. Payments of principal and interest may leave the Partnership with insufficient cash resources to operate its property or pay distributions.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Partnership’s ability to obtain financing and the cost of available financing and could adversely affect the Partnership’s liquidity.

The Partnership’s ability to obtain financing and the cost of such financing depends on the overall condition of the United States credit markets and the level of involvement of certain government sponsored entities, specifically, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Freddie Mac, and Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, in secondary credit markets. Recently the United States credit markets have experienced significant liquidity disruptions, which have caused the spreads on debt financings to widen considerably and have made obtaining financing more difficult. Further or prolonged disruptions in the credit markets could result in Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae reducing their level of involvement in secondary credit markets which would adversely affect the Partnership’s ability to obtain non-recourse property debt financing.

Failure to generate sufficient net operating income may limit the Partnership’s ability to fund necessary capital expenditures or the Partnership’s ability to repay advances from affiliates.

The Partnership’s ability to fund necessary capital expenditures on its property depends on its ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments. If the Partnership is unable to fund capital expenditures on its property, the Partnership may not be able to preserve the competitiveness of its property, which could adversely affect the Partnership’s net operating income.

The Partnership’s ability to repay advances from affiliates depends on its ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Net operating income and liquidity may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond the Partnership’s control, including:

the general economic climate;
competition from other apartment communities and other housing options;
local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates;
changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance;
increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents;
changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; and
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.

Competition could limit the Partnership’s ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rents.

The Partnership’s apartment property competes for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in a particular area could adversely affect the Partnership’s ability to lease apartments and to increase or maintain rental rates. The current challenges in the credit and housing markets have increased housing inventory that competes with the Partnership’s property.

Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in the Partnership’s incurrence of unanticipated expenses.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped. These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to the Partnership’s property, or affect renovations of the property. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although the Partnership believes that its property is substantially in compliance with present requirements, the Partnership may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA in connection with the ongoing operation of its property.

Potential liability or other expenditures associated with potential environmental contamination may be costly.

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable undersuch laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.

Moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be costly.

The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents. To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

A further description of the Partnership's business is included in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in this Form 10-K.

Item 2. Property

The following table sets forth the Partnership's investment in property:

	Date of
Property	Purchase	Type of Ownership	Use

LakewoodApartments	11/01/89	Fee ownership subject to	Apartment
Tomball, Texas		a first mortgage (1)	256 units

(1) The property is held by a limited partnership in which the Partnership owns a 99% interest.

Schedule of Property

Set forth below for the Partnership's property is the gross carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life, method of depreciation and Federal tax basis.

	Gross
	Carrying	Accumulated	Depreciable	Method of	Federal
Property	Value	Depreciation	Life	Depreciation	Tax Basis
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)

Lakewood
Apartments	$9,404	$4,238	5-40 yrs	S/L	$6,111

See "Note A – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for a description of the Partnership's depreciation and capitalization policies.

Schedule of Property Indebtedness

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the loan encumbering the Partnership's property.

	Principal				Principal
	Balance At	Stated			Balance
	December 31,	Interest	Period	Maturity	Due At
Property	2008	Rate(1)	Amortized	Date	Maturity (2)
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Lakewood Apartments
1st mortgage	$4,238	7.05%	240 months	01/2022	$ - --

(1) Fixed rate mortgage.

(2) See “Note B – Mortgage Note Payable" to the consolidated financial statements included in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information with respect to the Partnership's ability to prepay this loan and other specific details about the loan.

Schedule of Rental Rate and Occupancy

Average annual rental rates and occupancy for 2008 and 2007 for the property are as follows:

	Average Annual		Average Annual
	Rental Rate		Occupancy
	(per unit)
Property	2008	2007	2008	2007

LakewoodApartments	$7,829	$7,440	95%	97%

As noted under "Item 1. Business", the real estate industry is highly competitive. The property is subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The General Partner believes that the property is adequately insured. The residential property is an apartment complex which leases its units for lease terms of one year or less. No tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space. The property is in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this type and age.

Schedule of Real Estate Taxes and Rate

Real estate taxes and rate in 2008 for the property are as follows:

	2008	2008
	Billing	Rate
	(in thousands)

LakewoodApartments	$159	2.69%

Capital Improvements

During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Partnership completed approximately $1,311,000 of capital improvements at Lakewood Apartments, consisting primarily of air conditioning and plumbing upgrades, kitchen and bath upgrades, HVAC improvements, interior improvements, appliance and floor covering replacements andconstruction related to a casualty as discussed in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow and advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2009. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, Partnership reserves, insurance proceeds, or advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to fund such advances. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed, AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the General Partner, were defendants in a lawsuit, filed as a collective action in August 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for time worked in excess of 40 hours per week (“overtime claims”). The plaintiffs also contended that AIMCO Properties, L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call" (“on-call claims”). In March 2007, the court in the District of Columbia decertified the collective action. In July 2007, plaintiffs’ counsel filed individual cases in Federal court in 22 jurisdictions. In the second quarter of 2008, AIMCO Properties, L.P. settled the overtime cases involving 652 plaintiffs and established a framework for resolving the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel. As a result, the lawsuits asserted in the 22 Federal courts will be dismissed. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Partnership paid approximately $6,000 for settlement amounts for alleged unpaid overtime to employees who had worked at the Partnership’s investment property. At this time, the 88 remaining “on-call” claims and the attorneys’ fees claimed by plaintiffs’ counsel are not resolved. The General Partner is uncertain as to the amount of any additional loss that may be allocable to the Partnership. Therefore, the Partnership cannot estimate whether any additional loss will occur or a potential range of loss.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The unit holders of the Partnership did not vote on any matters through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the quarter ended December 31, 2008.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership, offered and sold 12,425 limited partnership units (the "Units") during its offering period through June 25, 1988. As of December 31, 2008, there are 12,420 Units issued and outstanding held by 832 Limited Partners of record. Affiliates of the General Partner owned 6,433 Units or 51.80% at December 31, 2008. No public trading market has developed for the Units, and it is not anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.

No distributions were made during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, property sale and/or refinancing. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the significant amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the General Partner at December 31, 2008, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after capital expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2009 or subsequent periods. See “Item 2. Property – Capital Improvements” for information relating to anticipated capital expenditures at the property.

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 6,433 Units in the Partnership representing 51.80% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2008. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 51.80% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This item should be read with the consolidated financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.

The Partnership’s financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment property, interest rates on the mortgage loan, costs incurred to operate the investment property, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment property to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that areoutside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnership’s financial results.

Results of Operations

The Partnership’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $460,000, compared to approximately $277,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in net loss is due to an increase in total expenses, partially offset by an increase in total revenues. Total expenses increased due to increases in operating and depreciation expenses, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense. Property tax and general and administrative expenses remained relatively constant for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating expenses increased primarily due to clean up costs associated with the casualty discussed below and an increase in utility expenses at Lakewood Apartments. Depreciation expense increased due to property improvements and replacements placed into service during the past twelve months at Lakewood Apartments. The decrease in interest expense is primarily a result of scheduled principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering Lakewood Apartments, which reduced the carrying balance of the loan, and a decrease in interest on advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., as a result of a lower variable interest rate charged on such advances.

Included in general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are management reimbursements to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement, costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.

In September 2008, Lakewood Apartments sustained damages from Hurricane Ike. The damages were approximately $1,076,000, including clean up costs of approximately $211,000. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Partnership removed approximately $256,000 of undepreciated damaged assets and recorded a corresponding receivable for the estimated insurance proceeds. The Partnership does not expect to recognize a loss as insurance proceeds are anticipated to be sufficient to cover the cost of any damages. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the clean up costs of approximately $211,000 are included in operating expenses. Subsequent to December 31, 2008, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $1,011,000 to cover the damages.

Total revenues increased due to increases in both rental and other income. Rental income increased primarily due to an increase in the average rental rate, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy at Lakewood Apartments. Other income increased primarily due to an increase in cable television revenue.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2008, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $277,000, compared to approximately $155,000 at December 31, 2007. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $122,000 is due to approximately $1,051,000 and $254,000 of cash provided by financing and operating activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $1,183,000 of cash used in investing activities. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of advances received from AIMCO Properties, L.P., partially offset by principal payments made on the mortgage encumbering the Partnership’s investment property. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $1,242,000 and $139,000, respectively, to fund capitalimprovements and operating expenses at the investment property. Interest on advances is charged at the prime rate plus 2%, or 5.25% at December 31, 2008. Interest of approximately $166,000 and $187,000 was charged during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the total outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. are approximately $3,392,000 and $1,984,000, respectively, and are included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements.The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2009. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property. Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, insurance proceeds, Partnership reserves or advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The Partnership’s assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Lakewood Apartments of approximately $4,238,000 matures in January 2022, at which time the loan is scheduled to be fully amortized.

No distributions were made during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, property sale and/or refinancing. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the significant amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the General Partner at December 31, 2008, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2009 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 6,433 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 51.80% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2008. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 51.80% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties toAIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

A summary of the Partnership’s significant accounting policies is included in "Note A – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the consolidated financial statements in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data". The General Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the consolidated financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnership’s operating results and consolidated financial condition. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnership’s accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Asset

Investment property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnership’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.

Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnership’s investment property. These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing. Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnership’s asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2008 and 2007

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit - Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners

Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd. at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

March 19, 2009

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except unit data)

	December 31,
Assets	2008	2007
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 277	$ 155
Receivables and deposits	299	26
Other assets	198	210
Investment property (Notes B, E and F):
Land	540	540
Buildings and related personal property	8,864	8,045
	9,404	8,585
Less accumulated depreciation	(4,238)	(4,055)
	5,166	4,530
	$ 5,940	$ 4,921

Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
Accounts payable	$ 240	$ 66
Tenant security deposit liabilities	43	35
Due to affiliates (Note D)	3,675	2,191
Accrued property taxes	159	146
Other liabilities	108	117
Mortgage note payable (Note B)	4,238	4,429
	8,463	6,984

Partners' Deficit
General partner	(185)	(180)
Limited partners (12,420 units issued and
outstanding)	(2,338)	(1,883)
	(2,523)	(2,063)
	$ 5,940	$ 4,921

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008	2007
Revenues:
Rental income	$ 1,845	$ 1,792
Other income	248	230
Total revenues	2,093	2,022

Expenses:
Operating (Note F)	1,361	1,124
General and administrative	126	119
Depreciation	419	380
Interest	495	530
Property taxes	152	146
Total expenses	2,553	2,299

Net loss (Note C)	$ (460)	$ (277)

Net loss allocated to general partner (1%)	$ (5)	$ (3)
Net loss allocated to limited partners (99%)	(455)	(274)
	$ (460)	$ (277)

Net loss per limited partnership unit	$(36.63)	$(22.05)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

(in thousands, except unit data)

	Limited
	Partnership	General	Limited
	Units	Partner	Partners	Total

Original capital contributions	12,425	$ 1	$12,425	$12,426

Partners' deficit at
December 31, 2006	12,425	$ (177)	$(1,609)	$(1,786)

Abandonment of Units (Note A)	(5)	- --	- --	- --

Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2007	- --	(3)	(274)	(277)

Partners' deficit at
December 31, 2007	12,420	(180)	(1,883)	(2,063)

Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008	- --	(5)	(455)	(460)

Partners' deficit at
December 31, 2008	12,420	$ (185)	$(2,338)	$(2,523)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008	2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (460)	$ (277)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	419	380
Amortization of loan costs	10	10
Bad debt expense	49	46
Change in accounts:
Receivables and deposits	(66)	(25)
Other assets	2	(26)
Accounts payable	46	(17)
Tenant security deposit liabilities	8	(2)
Accrued property taxes	13	(1)
Other liabilities	(9)	18
Due to affiliates	242	264
Net cash provided by operating activities	254	370

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Property improvements and replacements	(1,183)	(263)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on mortgage note payable	(191)	(178)
Advances from affiliate	1,242	139
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	1,051	(39)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	122	68

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year	155	87

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year	$ 277	$ 155

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$ 306	$ 319

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:
Property improvements and replacements included in
accounts payable	$ 162	$ 34

Included in property improvements and replacements for the year ended December 31, 2007 are approximately $16,000 of property improvements and replacements which were included in accounts payable at December 31, 2006.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2008

Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization: Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd. (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") is a California limited partnership organized in June 1984 to operate and hold residential and commercial real estate properties. The Partnership's general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "General Partner"), which is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2035, unless terminated prior to such date. As of December 31, 2008, the Partnership operates one residential property located in Texas.

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements of the Partnership include its 99% limited partnership interest in Lakewood AOPL Ltd. The general partner of the consolidated partnership may be removed by the Partnership, therefore, the partnership is controlled and consolidated by the Partnership. All significant interentity balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Allocations to Partners:

Allocations of Profits, Gains and Losses- In accordance with the partnership agreement (the "Partnership Agreement"), any gain from the sale or other disposition of Partnership assets will be allocated first to the General Partner to the extent of the amount of any Incentive Interest (as defined below) to which the General Partner is entitled. Any gain remaining after said allocation will be allocated to the Partners in proportion to their interests in the Partnership; provided that the gain shall first be allocated to Partners with negative account balances, in proportion to such balances, in an amount equal to the sum of such negative capital account balances. The Partnership will allocate other profits and losses 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners. Net loss per limited partnership unit (the “Units”) was computed by dividing the net loss allocated to the limited partners by the number of Units outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal year. Per Unit information has been computed based on 12,420 and 12,425 Units for 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Distributions- Except as discussed below, the Partnership will allocate distributions 1% to the General Partner and 99% to the Limited Partners.

Upon the sale or other disposition, or refinancing, of any asset of the Partnership, the Distributable Net Proceeds shall be distributed as follows: (i) First, to the Partners in proportion to their interests until the Limited Partners have received proceeds equal to their Original Capital Investment applicable to the property; (ii) Second, to the Partners until the Limited Partners have received distributions from all sources equal to their 6% Cumulative Distribution, (iii) Third, to the General Partner until it has received its cumulative distributions in an amount equal to 3% of the aggregate disposition prices of all real properties,mortgages or other investments sold (Initial Incentive Interest); (iv) Fourth, tothe Partners until the Limited Partners have received distributions equal to their 4% (not compounded) Cumulative Distribution, with certain Limited Partners receiving priority distributions ranging from 2% to 6% per annum (not compounded); and (v) Fifth, thereafter, 76% to the Limited Partners in proportion to their interests and 24% to the General Partner (Final Incentive Interest).

Depreciation: Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the investment property and related personal property. For Federal income tax purposes, the modified accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of (1) real property over 27½ years and (2) personal property additions over 5 years.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. Cash balances include approximately $244,000 and $137,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, that are maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.

Investment Property: Investment property consists of one apartment complex and is stated at cost. The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components. Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Costs”, and SFAS No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties.” Costs incurred in connection with capital projects are capitalized where the costs of the project exceed $250. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. The Partnership did not capitalize any costs related to interest, property taxes or operating costs during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007. Capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Expenditures for ordinary repairs, maintenance and apartment turnover costs are expensed as incurred.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, the Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets. No adjustments for impairment of value were necessary for the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Deferred Costs: Loan costs of approximately $199,000 at both December 31, 2008 and 2007, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $69,000 and $59,000, respectively, are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The loan costs are amortized over the term of the related loan agreement.Amortization expense was approximately $10,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and is included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $10,000 for each of the years 2009 through 2013.

Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related leases. Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.

Security Deposits: The Partnership requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease. The security deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the space and is current on rental payments.

Leases: The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less. The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area. Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.

Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. SFAS No. 131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in SFAS No. 131, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.

Advertising Costs: Advertising costs of approximately $64,000 and $77,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are charged to expense as incurred and are included in operating expenses.

Abandoned Units: During 2007, the number of Units decreased by 5 Units due to limited partners abandoning their Units. In abandoning his or her Units, a limited partner relinquishes all right, title and interest in the Partnership as of the date of abandonment.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", as amended by SFAS No. 119, "Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments (except for long term debt) approximates their fair values due to the short term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its long-term debt by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, fully amortizing long-term debt. The fair value of the Partnership's long term debt at the Partnership's incremental borrowing rate approximates its carrying value.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applicable to recurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for the Partnership is generally limited to annual disclosures required by SFAS No. 107. The Partnership adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008, and at that time determined no transition adjustment was required.

Note B – Mortgage Note Payable

The principal terms of the mortgage note payable are as follows:

	Principal		Monthly			Principal
	Balance At		Payment	Stated		Balance
	December 31,		Including	Interest	Maturity	Due At
Property	2008	2007	Interest	Rate	Date	Maturity
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Lakewood
Apartments
1^st mortgage	$4,238	$4,429	$ 41	7.05%	01/2022	$ - --

The mortgage note payable is a fixed rate mortgage that is non-recourse and is secured by a pledge of the Partnership’s property and by a pledge of revenues from the property. The mortgage note payable includes a prepayment penalty if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the property may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.

Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage note payable subsequent to December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):

2009	$ 205
2010	219
2011	235
2012	253
2013	271
Thereafter	3,055
	$ 4,238

Note C – Income Taxes

Taxable income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax returns of its partners. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership. The following is a reconciliation of reported net loss and Federal taxable loss (in thousands, except per unit data):

	2008	2007

Net loss as reported	$ (460)	$ (277)
Add (deduct):
Depreciation differences	11	10
Unearned income	16	6
Miscellaneous	(27)	(16)

Federal taxable loss	$ (460)	$ (277)

Federal taxable income per
limited partnership unit	$ 0.06	$ - --

For 2008 and 2007, allocation under the Internal Revenue Code Section 704(b) results in the limited partners being allocated a non-pro rata amount of taxable income or loss.

The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership’s reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net assets and liabilities (in thousands):

	2008	2007
Net liabilities as reported	$(2,523)	$(2,063)
Land and buildings	249	249
Accumulated depreciation	440	429
Syndication and distribution costs	1,838	1,838
Other	(6)	6
Net (liabilities) assets – Federal tax basis	$ (2)	$ 459

Note D – Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $103,000 and $100,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.

Affiliates of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $163,000 and $80,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the years ended December 31,2008 and 2007 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $101,000 and $17,000, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately $283,000 and $207,000, respectively, of reimbursements and accrued interest were due to affiliates of the General Partner and are included in due to affiliates.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $1,242,000 and $139,000, respectively, to fund capital improvements and operating expenses at the investment property. Interest on advances is charged at the prime rate plus 2%, or 5.25% at December 31, 2008. Interest of approximately $166,000 and $187,000 was charged during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the total outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. are approximately $3,392,000 and $1,984,000, respectively, and are included in due to affiliates. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Partnership insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability, and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $43,000 and $47,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.

Note E – Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation

		Initial Cost
		To Partnership
		(in thousands)

			Buildings	Cost
			and Related	Capitalized
			Personal	Subsequent to
Description	Encumbrance	Land	Property	Acquisition
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)

LakewoodApartments	$ 4,238	$ 483	$ 3,491	$ 5,430

	Gross Amount At Which Carried
		At December 31, 2008
		(in thousands)

			Buildings
			And Related
			Personal		Accumulated	Date	Depreciable
Description		Land	Property	Total	Depreciation	Acquired	Life
					(in thousands)

Lakewood
Apartments		$ 540	$8,864	$9,404	$4,238	11/01/89	5-40 yrs

Reconciliation of “Investment Property and Accumulated Depreciation”:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2008	2007
	(in thousands)
Investment Property
Balance at beginning of year	$8,585	$8,304
Property improvements and replacements	1,311	281
Disposal of assets	(492)	- --
Balance at end of year	$9,404	$8,585

Accumulated Depreciation
Balance at beginning of year	$4,055	$3,675
Additions charged to expense	419	380
Disposal of assets	(236)	- --
Balance at end of year	$4,238	$4,055

The aggregate cost of the investment property for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is approximately $10,145,000 and $8,834,000, respectively. Accumulated depreciation for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is approximately $4,034,000 and $3,626,000, respectively.

Note F – Casualty Event

In September 2008, Lakewood Apartments sustained damages from Hurricane Ike. The damages were approximately $1,076,000, including clean up costs of approximately $211,000. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Partnership removed approximately $256,000 of undepreciated damaged assets and recorded a corresponding receivable for the estimated insurance proceeds. The Partnership does not expect torecognize a loss as insurance proceeds are anticipated to be sufficient to cover the cost of any damages. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the clean up costs of approximately $211,000 are included in operating expenses. Subsequent to December 31, 2008, the Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $1,011,000 to cover the damages.

Note G – Contingencies

The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment property that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

Environmental

Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property, including lead-based paint. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its property, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its property.

Mold

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A(T).Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Partnership’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officers of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by the Partnership’s management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

· pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets;

· provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Partnership’s management; and

· provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Partnership’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, the Partnership’s management used the criteria set forth by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on their assessment, the Partnership’s management concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to the attestation by the Partnership’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There has been no change in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The names of the directors and executive officers of Angeles Realty Corporation II (“ARC II” or the “General Partner”), the Partnership’s general partner, their ages and the nature of all positions with ARC II presently held by them are set forth below. There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors.

Name	Age	Position

Steven D. Cordes	37	Director and Senior Vice President
Harry G. Alcock	46	Director and Executive Vice President
Timothy J. Beaudin	50	President and Chief Operating Officer
David R. Robertson	43	President and Chief Financial Officer
Lisa R. Cohn	40	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Patti K. Fielding	45	Executive Vice President – Securities and Debt; Treasurer
Paul Beldin	35	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Stephen B. Waters	47	Vice President

Steven D. Cordes was appointed as a Director of the General Partner effective March 2, 2009. Mr. Cordes has been a Senior Vice President of the General Partner and AIMCO since May 2007. Mr. Cordes was appointed Senior Vice President – Structured Equity in May 2007. Mr. Cordes joined AIMCO in 2001 as a Vice President of Capital Markets with responsibility for AIMCO’s joint ventures and equity capital markets activity. Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Cordes was a manager in the financial consulting practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Effective March 2009, Mr. Cordes was appointed to serve as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership.

Harry G. Alcock was appointed as a Director of the General Partner in October 2004 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the General Partner in February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President of AIMCO since October 1999. Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of AIMCO since July 1994, serving as Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999. Mr. Alcock focuses on transactions related to AIMCO’s portfolio of properties in the western portion of the United States.

Timothy J. Beaudin was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of the General Partner and AIMCO in October 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Property Operating Officer of the General Partner and AIMCO in October 2008. Mr. Beaudin was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer of AIMCO in February 2009. Mr. Beaudin oversees conventional and affordable property operations and information technology, in addition to redevelopment and construction services. He is also responsible for asset management for conventional properties. Prior to joining AIMCO and beginning in 1995, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate investment trust. During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served as Executive Vice President, with management responsibility for development, construction and asset management.

Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the General Partner and AIMCO in December 2007. From January 2004 to December2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of AIMCO. Ms. Cohn joined AIMCO in July 2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel. Prior to joining AIMCO, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan and Hartson LLP.

Patti K. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President - Securities and Debt of the General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in February 2003. Ms. Fielding was appointed Treasurer of AIMCO and the General Partner in January 2005. Ms. Fielding is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department. Ms. Fielding previously served as Senior Vice President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from January 2000 to February 2003. Ms. Fielding joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a Vice President.

David R. Robertson was appointed President and Chief Investment Officer of AIMCO in February 2009, and on March 1, 2009, he also became Chief Financial Officer of AIMCO and the General Partner. Mr. Robertson joined AIMCO as Executive Vice President in February 2002 and has served as Chief Investment Officer since March 2007. In addition to serving as AIMCO’s chief financial officer, Mr. Robertson is responsible for portfolio strategy, capital allocation, investments, joint ventures, asset management and transaction activities. Since February 1996, Mr. Robertson has served as Chairman of Robeks Corporation, a 150-unit privately held chain of specialty food stores that he founded.

Paul Beldin was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of AIMCO and the General Partner in May 2008. Mr. Beldin joined AIMCO in May 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Beldin served as controller and then as chief financial officer of America First Apartment Investors, Inc., a publicly traded multifamily real estate investment trust, from May 2005 to September 2007 when the company was acquired by Sentinel Real Estate Corporation. Prior to joining America First Apartment Investors, Inc., Mr. Beldin was a senior manager at Deloitte and Touche LLP, where he was employed from August 1996 to May 2005, including two years as an audit manager in SEC services at Deloitte’s national office.

Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice President of the General Partner and AIMCO in April 2004. Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since joining AIMCO in September 1999. Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as the principal financial officer of the General Partner.

One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.

The board of directors of the General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".

The directors and officers of the General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCO's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

None of the directors and officers of the General Partner received any remuneration from the Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Except as noted below, no person or entity was known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Limited Partnership Units (the “Units”) of the Partnership as of December 31, 2008.

Entity	Number of Units	Percentage

AIMCO IPLP, L.P.	405	3.26%
(an affiliate of AIMCO)
CooperRiverProperties, LLC	969	7.80%
(an affiliate of AIMCO)
AIMCO Properties, L.P.	5,059	40.74%
(an affiliate of AIMCO)

Cooper River Properties, LLC and AIMCO IPLP, L.P. are indirectly and ultimately owned by AIMCO. Their business addresses are 55 Beattie Place, Greenville, SC 29601.

AIMCO Properties, L.P. is indirectly and ultimately controlled by AIMCO. Its business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.

No director or officer of the General Partner owns any Units.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's property as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $103,000 and $100,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which are included in operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Affiliates of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $163,000 and $80,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment property on the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment property for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $101,000 and $17,000, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximately $283,000 and $207,000, respectively, of reimbursements were due to affiliates of the General Partner and are included in due to affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $1,242,000 and $139,000, respectively, to fund capital improvements and operating expenses at the investment property. Interest on advances is charged at the prime rate plus 2%, or 5.25% at December 31, 2008. Interest of approximately $166,000 and $187,000 was charged during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the total outstanding advances and accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. are approximately $3,392,000 and $1,984,000, respectively, and are included in due to affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances. For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Neither of the General Partner's directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the General Partner.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership for 2009. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2008 and 2007 are described below.

Audit Fees. Fees for audit services totaled approximately $41,000 and $36,000 for 2008 and 2007, respectively. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnership's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Tax Fees. Fees for tax services totaled approximately $10,000 for both 2008 and 2007.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant are included in Item 8:

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Schedules are omitted for the reason that they are inapplicable or equivalent information has been included elsewhere herein.

(b) Exhibits:

See Exhibit index.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

	By: Angeles Realty Corporation II
	General Partner

	By: /s/Steven D. Cordes
	Steven D. Cordes
	Senior Vice President

	By: /s/Stephen B. Waters
	Stephen B. Waters
	Vice President

	Date: March 23, 2009

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/Harry G. Alcock	Director and Executive	Date: March 23, 2009
Harry G. Alcock	Vice President

/s/Steven D. Cordes	Director and Senior	Date: March 23, 2009
Steven D. Cordes	Vice President

/s/Stephen B. Waters	Vice President	Date: March 23, 2009
Stephen B. Waters

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number Description of Exhibit

3.1 Amendment Certificate and Agreement of the Limited Partnership filed in the Partnership's prospectus dated July 7, 1986, which is incorporated herein by reference.

10.10 Multifamily Note dated December 6, 2001, between Lakewood AOPL and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, a California Corporation, refinancing the mortgage encumbering Lakewood Apartments filed in Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and is incorporated herein by reference.

31.1 Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1 Partnership prospectus filed in registration statement dated June 26, 1987, which is incorporated herein by reference.

99.2 Agreement of Limited Partnership for AOP GP Limited Partnership, L.P. and Angeles Opportunity Properties, Ltd. entered into on September 9, 1993.

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	8th grade Avg

Angeles Opportunity Properties Inactive 10-K2008 FY Annual report

Content analysis

Form 10-K

ANGELES OPPORTUNITY PROPERTIES, LTD.

PART I

Item 1A. Risk Factors

PART II

Results of Operations

Revenue Recognition

Units

Partner

Partners

Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note F – Casualty Event

Note G – Contingencies

Environmental

Mold