UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
OR
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-16760
MGM MIRAGE
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| | |
Delaware | | 88-0215232 |
| | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) | | |
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
(Address of principal executive offices — Zip Code)
(702) 693-7120
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):þ Yeso No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o Yeso No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
| | |
Class | | Outstanding at November 7, 2005 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value | | 284,661,416 shares |
MGM MIRAGE AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
I N D E X
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
MGM MIRAGE AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
ASSETS
|
| | | | | | | | |
Current assets | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 265,442 | | | $ | 435,128 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 298,657 | | | | 204,151 | |
Inventories | | | 106,257 | | | | 70,333 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 58,534 | | | | 28,928 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | 129,775 | | | | 81,662 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 858,665 | | | | 820,202 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 16,396,269 | | | | 8,914,142 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Other assets | | | | | | | | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | 911,852 | | | | 842,640 | |
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net | | | 1,695,078 | | | | 233,335 | |
Deposits and other assets, net | | | 488,099 | | | | 304,710 | |
| | | | | | |
Total other assets | | | 3,095,029 | | | | 1,380,685 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,349,963 | | | $ | 11,115,029 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 161,013 | | | $ | 198,050 | |
Income taxes payable | | | 65,518 | | | | 4,991 | |
Current portion of long-term debt | | | 14 | | | | 14 | |
Accrued interest on long-term debt | | | 172,053 | | | | 116,997 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 869,897 | | | | 607,925 | |
| | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 1,268,495 | | | | 927,977 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 3,376,735 | | | | 1,802,008 | |
Long-term debt | | | 12,271,362 | | | | 5,458,848 | |
Other long-term obligations | | | 188,194 | | | | 154,492 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | | | | | | |
Common stock, $.01 par value: authorized 600,000,000 shares; issued 356,313,839 and 347,147,868 shares; outstanding 287,624,124 and 280,739,868 shares | | | 3,563 | | | | 3,472 | |
Capital in excess of par value | | | 2,564,313 | | | | 2,346,329 | |
Deferred compensation | | | (5,502 | ) | | | (10,878 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost 68,689,715 and 66,408,000 shares | | | (1,205,916 | ) | | | (1,110,551 | ) |
Retained earnings | | | 1,889,926 | | | | 1,544,499 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | | (1,207 | ) | | | (1,167 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 3,245,177 | | | | 2,771,704 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 20,349,963 | | | $ | 11,115,029 | |
| | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
MGM MIRAGE AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended | | | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | 805,277 | | | $ | 540,957 | | | $ | 2,184,468 | | | $ | 1,651,371 | |
Rooms | | | 478,462 | | | | 223,001 | | | | 1,208,277 | | | | 690,266 | |
Food and beverage | | | 368,186 | | | | 205,262 | | | | 963,848 | | | | 635,066 | |
Entertainment | | | 114,904 | | | | 67,099 | | | | 318,762 | | | | 200,312 | |
Retail | | | 75,248 | | | | 46,023 | | | | 189,590 | | | | 139,193 | |
Other | | | 127,291 | | | | 63,006 | | | | 295,099 | | | | 180,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,969,368 | | | | 1,145,348 | | | | 5,160,044 | | | | 3,496,315 | |
Less: Promotional allowances | | | (161,125 | ) | | | (108,952 | ) | | | (431,710 | ) | | | (320,958 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,808,243 | | | | 1,036,396 | | | | 4,728,334 | | | | 3,175,357 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | 415,236 | | | | 262,619 | | | | 1,115,792 | | | | 813,216 | |
Rooms | | | 143,065 | | | | 60,266 | | | | 337,949 | | | | 185,251 | |
Food and beverage | | | 239,581 | | | | 120,149 | | | | 594,358 | | | | 360,478 | |
Entertainment | | | 82,839 | | | | 48,126 | | | | 227,705 | | | | 142,339 | |
Retail | | | 48,475 | | | | 29,849 | | | | 123,292 | | | | 88,988 | |
Other | | | 76,853 | | | | 38,258 | | | | 180,835 | | | | 109,482 | |
General and administrative | | | 288,728 | | | | 160,972 | | | | 696,805 | | | | 458,673 | |
Corporate expense | | | 32,112 | | | | 19,183 | | | | 90,554 | | | | 53,379 | |
Preopening and start-up expenses | | | 6,147 | | | | 1,584 | | | | 12,568 | | | | 3,584 | |
Restructuring costs (credit) | | | 11 | | | | 1,587 | | | | (59 | ) | | | 5,901 | |
Property transactions, net | | | 22,637 | | | | 1,677 | | | | 28,633 | | | | 5,354 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 161,566 | | | | 101,245 | | | | 423,734 | | | | 296,282 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,517,250 | | | | 845,515 | | | | 3,832,166 | | | | 2,522,927 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | 49,006 | | | | 31,476 | | | | 114,936 | | | | 85,190 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 339,999 | | | | 222,357 | | | | 1,011,104 | | | | 737,620 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-operating income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest income | | | 3,156 | | | | 1,421 | | | | 10,172 | | | | 3,440 | |
Interest expense, net | | | (193,150 | ) | | | (95,262 | ) | | | (461,966 | ) | | | (277,694 | ) |
Non-operating items from unconsolidated affiliates | | | (4,344 | ) | | | (6,419 | ) | | | (11,535 | ) | | | (19,314 | ) |
Other, net | | | 1,894 | | | | (435 | ) | | | (15,578 | ) | | | (10,162 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | (192,444 | ) | | | (100,695 | ) | | | (478,907 | ) | | | (303,730 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 147,555 | | | | 121,662 | | | | 532,197 | | | | 433,890 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (54,345 | ) | | | (45,495 | ) | | | (186,740 | ) | | | (158,920 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 93,210 | | | | 76,167 | | | | 345,457 | | | | 274,970 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discontinued operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on disposal of $74,352 (three months 2004) and $82,538 (nine months 2004) | | | — | | | | 75,529 | | | | — | | | | 94,207 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | — | | | | (24,815 | ) | | | — | | | | (31,731 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | — | | | | 50,714 | | | | — | | | | 62,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 93,210 | | | $ | 126,881 | | | $ | 345,457 | | | $ | 337,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share of common stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | 1.21 | | | $ | 0.99 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 0.18 | | | | — | | | | 0.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 1.21 | | | $ | 1.21 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share of common stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 1.16 | | | $ | 0.95 | |
Discontinued operations | | | — | | | | 0.18 | | | | — | | | | 0.22 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 1.16 | | | $ | 1.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
MGM MIRAGE AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 30, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 345,457 | | | $ | 337,446 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 423,734 | | | | 296,776 | |
Provision for doubtful accounts | | | 21,695 | | | | (7,734 | ) |
Property transactions, net | | | 28,633 | | | | 5,354 | |
Net loss on early extinguishment of debt | | | 18,139 | | | | 5,527 | |
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations | | | — | | | | (82,538 | ) |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | (102,424 | ) | | | (65,876 | ) |
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates | | | 67,397 | | | | 41,500 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 59,822 | | | | 16,924 | |
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation | | | 85,011 | | | | 22,943 | |
Change in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (10,164 | ) | | | (23,009 | ) |
Inventories | | | (1,396 | ) | | | (1,162 | ) |
Income taxes receivable and payable | | | (49,316 | ) | | | 56,472 | |
Prepaid expenses and other | | | (9,243 | ) | | | (5,880 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | (67,547 | ) | | | (17,872 | ) |
Other | | | (11,630 | ) | | | 10,753 | |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 798,168 | | | | 589,624 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition of Mandalay Resort Group, net of cash acquired | | | (4,427,085 | ) | | | — | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (428,288 | ) | | | (526,483 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of the Golden Nugget Subsidiaries and MGM Grand Australia Subsidiaries, net | | | — | | | | 345,730 | |
Hurricane Katrina insurance proceeds | | | 20,000 | | | | — | |
Dispositions of property and equipment | | | 7,660 | | | | 14,996 | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | (177,000 | ) | | | (9,225 | ) |
Change in construction payable | | | (24,079 | ) | | | (13,653 | ) |
Other | | | (31,558 | ) | | | (13,304 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (5,060,350 | ) | | | (201,939 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | | | | |
Net borrowings (repayments) under bank credit facilities with maturities of 90 days or less | | | 1,135,000 | | | | (1,458,989 | ) |
Borrowings under bank credit facilities with maturities longer than 90 days | | | 3,500,000 | | | | — | |
Issuance of long-term debt | | | 880,156 | | | | 1,528,957 | |
Repayment of long-term debt | | | (1,408,992 | ) | | | (52,149 | ) |
Debt issuance costs | | | (50,171 | ) | | | (13,209 | ) |
Issuance of common stock | | | 132,548 | | | | 89,821 | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | (84,966 | ) | | | (348,895 | ) |
Other | | | (11,079 | ) | | | (2,808 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 4,092,496 | | | | (257,272 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) for the period | | | (169,686 | ) | | | 130,413 | |
Balance, beginning of period | | | 435,128 | | | | 279,606 | |
| | | | | | |
Balance, end of period | | $ | 265,442 | | | $ | 410,019 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures | | | | | | | | |
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized | | $ | 399,943 | | | $ | 267,517 | |
Federal, state and foreign income taxes paid, net of refunds | | | 85,889 | | | | 98,046 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
MGM MIRAGE AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization.MGM MIRAGE (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on January 29, 1986. As of September 30, 2005, approximately 55% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were owned by Tracinda Corporation, a Nevada corporation wholly-owned by Kirk Kerkorian. MGM MIRAGE acts largely as a holding company and, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, primarily operates and invests in casino resorts. On April 25, 2005, the Company completed its merger with Mandalay Resort Group (“Mandalay”).
The Company owns and operates the following casino resorts in Las Vegas, Nevada: Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay, The Mirage, Luxor, Treasure Island (“TI”), New York-New York, Excalibur, Monte Carlo, Circus Circus Las Vegas, Slots-A-Fun and Boardwalk, which will close in early 2006 in preparation for Project CityCenter (see below). The Company owns three resorts in Primm, Nevada, at the California/Nevada state line – Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s and the Primm Valley Resort – as well as two championship golf courses located near the resorts. Other Nevada operations include Circus Circus Reno, Colorado Belle and Edgewater in Laughlin, Gold Strike and Nevada Landing in Jean, and Railroad Pass in Henderson. The Company has a 50% investment in Silver Legacy in Reno, which is adjacent to Circus Circus Reno. In addition, the Company owns a 50% interest in The Residences at MGM Grand, which is adjacent to MGM Grand Las Vegas. The Residences is a condominium-hotel development, with three towers currently under construction. The Company also owns Shadow Creek, an exclusive world-class golf course located approximately ten miles north of its Las Vegas Strip resorts.
The Company and its local partners own MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, which operates a casino in an interim facility located in downtown Detroit, Michigan. The Company also owns and operates two resorts in Mississippi – Beau Rivage in Biloxi and Gold Strike Tunica. The Company has 50% interests in two resorts outside of Nevada – Borgata and Grand Victoria. Borgata is a casino resort located on Renaissance Point in the Marina area of Atlantic City, New Jersey. Boyd Gaming Corporation owns the other 50% of Borgata and also operates the resort. The Company owns additional land adjacent to Borgata, a portion of which consists of common roads, landscaping and master plan improvements, a portion of which is being utilized for an expansion of Borgata, and a portion of which is available for future development. Grand Victoria is a riverboat in Elgin, Illinois that was previously owned by Mandalay. An affiliate of Hyatt Gaming owns the other 50% of Grand Victoria and also operates the resort.
The Company owns 50% of MGM Grand Paradise Limited, a joint venture with Pansy Ho Chiu-king formed to develop, build and operate a hotel-casino resort, MGM Grand Macau, in Macau S.A.R. In April 2005, MGM Grand Paradise Limited obtained a subconcession allowing it to conduct gaming operations. Construction of MGM Grand Macau, which is estimated to cost approximately $1 billion, began in the second quarter of 2005 and the resort is anticipated to open in the second half of 2007.
The Company owns 66 acres adjacent to Bellagio on which it is developing Project CityCenter. The first phase of Project CityCenter is anticipated to open in 2009 and will consist of a 4,000-room casino resort, significant retail and entertainment facilities, boutique hotels and residential developments at an estimated cost of $5 billion.
Basis of presentation.As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2004 annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2005, the results of its operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, and cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications, which have no effect on previously reported net income, have been made to the 2004 financial statements to conform to the 2005 presentation.
4
Financial Statement Impact of Hurricane Katrina.Beau Rivage sustained significant damage in late August 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina and has been closed since and will remain closed for the foreseeable future. The Company maintains insurance covering both property damage and business interruption as a result of the storm. The deductible under this coverage is $15 million, based on the amount of damage incurred. Based on current estimates, insurance proceeds are expected to exceed the net book value of damaged assets; therefore, the Company will not record an impairment charge related to the storm and upon ultimate settlement of the claim will likely record a gain. Damaged assets with a net book value of $104 million have been written off, and a corresponding insurance receivable has been recorded.
Business interruption coverage covers lost profits and other costs incurred during the construction period and up to six months following the re-opening of the facility. Expected costs during the interruption period are less than the anticipated business interruption proceeds; therefore, post-storm costs of $16 million through September 30, 2005 are being offset by the expected recoveries and a corresponding insurance receivable has been recorded. Post-storm costs and expected recoveries are recorded net within “General and administrative” expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, except for depreciation of non-damaged assets, which is classified as “Depreciation and amortization.”
The insurance receivable is recorded within “Deposits and other assets, net” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Through September 30, 2005, the Company has received $20 million from its insurers, leaving a net receivable of $100 million at September 30, 2005.
NOTE 2 — ACQUISITION
On April 25, 2005, the Company closed its merger with Mandalay under which the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Mandalay for $71 in cash for each share of Mandalay’s common stock. The Company believes that the acquisition enhances the Company’s portfolio of resorts on the Las Vegas Strip, provides additional sites for future development and expands the Company’s employee and customer bases significantly. These factors result in the recognition of certain intangible assets, discussed below, and significant goodwill. The total merger consideration included (in thousands):
| | | | |
Cash consideration for outstanding Mandalay shares and stock options | | $ | 4,831,944 | |
Estimated fair value of Mandalay long-term debt | | | 2,849,225 | |
Transaction costs and expenses and other | | | 111,127 | |
| | | |
| | | 7,792,296 | |
Less: Net proceeds from the sale of MotorCity Casino | | | (519,685 | ) |
| | | |
| | $ | 7,272,611 | |
| | | |
Cash paid, net of cash acquired, was $4.4 billion. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The allocation is preliminary and may be adjusted up to one year after the acquisition.
5
The following table sets forth the preliminary allocation of purchase price (in thousands):
| | | | |
Current assets (including cash of $134,245) | | $ | 414,207 | |
Property and equipment | | | 7,181,521 | |
Goodwill | | | 1,230,430 | |
Other intangible assets | | | 245,940 | |
Other assets | | | 283,930 | |
Assumed liabilities, excluding long-term debt | | | (598,999 | ) |
Deferred taxes | | | (1,484,418 | ) |
| | | |
| | $ | 7,272,611 | |
| | | |
The amount allocated to intangible assets includes existing Mandalay intangible assets and the recognition of customer lists with an estimated value of $12 million and an estimated useful life of five years and trade names and trademarks with an estimated value of $234 million and an indefinite life. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized.
The operating results for Mandalay are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date of the acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information for the Company has been prepared assuming the Mandalay acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2004.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | Nine Months |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2004 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Net revenues | | $ | 1,808,243 | | | $ | 1,701,877 | | | $ | 5,630,993 | | | $ | 5,201,121 | |
Operating income | | | 339,999 | | | | 328,213 | | | | 1,173,394 | | | | 1,117,688 | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 93,210 | | | | 83,241 | | | | 367,287 | | | | 341,921 | |
Net income | | | 93,210 | | | | 133,955 | | | | 367,287 | | | | 404,397 | |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.30 | | | $ | 1.29 | | | $ | 1.22 | |
Net income | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.49 | | | | 1.29 | | | | 1.44 | |
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.29 | | | $ | 1.24 | | | $ | 1.18 | |
Net income | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 1.24 | | | | 1.40 | |
NOTE 3 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and other intangible assets consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Goodwill: | | | | | | | | |
Mandalay acquisition (2005) | | $ | 1,230,430 | | | $ | — | |
Mirage acquisition (2000) | | | 76,342 | | | | 76,342 | |
Other | | | 7,415 | | | | 7,415 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 1,314,187 | | | | 83,757 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | | |
Detroit development rights | | | 102,556 | | | | 115,056 | |
Trademarks, license rights and other | | | 251,754 | | | | 17,554 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 354,310 | | | | 132,610 | |
| | | | | | |
Other intangible assets, net | | | 26,581 | | | | 16,968 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,695,078 | | | $ | 233,335 | |
| | | | | | |
6
NOTE 4 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In January 2004, the Company completed the sale of the Golden Nugget Las Vegas in downtown Las Vegas and the Golden Nugget Laughlin in Laughlin, Nevada (the “Golden Nugget Subsidiaries”), with net proceeds to the Company of $210 million. In July 2004, the Company completed the sale of the subsidiaries that own and operate MGM Grand Australia with net proceeds to the Company of $136 million.
The results of the Golden Nugget Subsidiaries and MGM Grand Australia are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Net revenues of discontinued operations were $4 million and $45 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Included in income from discontinued operations is an allocation of interest expense ($0.2 million and $2 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004) based on the ratio of the net assets of the discontinued operations to the total consolidated net assets and debt of the Company. Included in discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 is a gain on the sale of MGM Grand Australia of $74 million. Also, included in discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is a gain on the sale of the Golden Nugget Subsidiaries of $8 million.
NOTE 5 — INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Marina District Development Company — Borgata (50%) | | $ | 450,621 | | | $ | 405,322 | |
Elgin Riverboat Resort—Riverboat Casino — Grand Victoria (50%) | | | 241,031 | | | | — | |
MGM Grand Paradise Limited — Macau (50%) | | | 185,144 | | | | 3,002 | |
Circus and Eldorado Joint Venture — Silver Legacy (50%) | | | 26,242 | | | | — | |
MGM Grand Newcastle (Holdings) Ltd. (50%) | | | 8,814 | | | | 9,633 | |
Victoria Partners — Monte Carlo (50%) | | | — | | | | 424,683 | |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 911,852 | | | $ | 842,640 | |
| | | | | | |
The Company also owns 50% of The Residences at MGM Grand, a limited liability company, the other 50% of which is owned by an affiliate of Turnberry Associates. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had a negative investment balance of $7 million and $3 million, respectively, recorded as other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, representing cumulative losses of the venture.
The Company’s original investment in MGM Grand Paradise Limited (“Paradise”) consists of a $112.5 million payment for 50% of Paradise’s ordinary share capital and a non-interest bearing shareholder loan of $67.5 million. The Company has committed to make available to Paradise an interest bearing loan facility of $100 million which is subordinated to third party financing, repayment of the shareholder loans and required shareholder distributions (which begin once the shareholder loans have been repaid).
The Company recorded its share of the results of operations of unconsolidated affiliates as follows (including the Company’s share of Monte Carlo’s results through April 25, 2005):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | $ | 49,006 | | | $ | 31,476 | | | $ | 114,936 | | | $ | 85,190 | |
Preopening and start-up credit (expenses) | | | 1,430 | | | | — | | | | (977 | ) | | | — | |
Non-operating items from unconsolidated affiliates | | | (4,344 | ) | | | (6,419 | ) | | | (11,535 | ) | | | (19,314 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 46,092 | | | $ | 25,057 | | | $ | 102,424 | | | $ | 65,876 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
7
NOTE 6 — LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | December 31, | |
| | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Senior credit facility | | $ | 4,685,000 | | | $ | 50,000 | |
$300 million 6.95% senior notes, repaid at maturity in 2005, net | | | — | | | | 300,087 | |
$176.4 million 6.625% senior notes, repaid at maturity in 2005, net | | | — | | | | 176,096 | |
$200 million 6.45% senior notes, due 2006, net | | | 200,893 | | | | — | |
$244.5 million 7.25% senior notes, due 2006, net | | | 239,091 | | | | 235,511 | |
$710 million 9.75% senior subordinated notes, due 2007, net | | | 707,909 | | | | 706,968 | |
$200 million 6.75% senior notes, due 2007, net | | | 191,976 | | | | 189,115 | |
$492.2 million 10.25% senior subordinated notes, due 2007, net | | | 533,228 | | | | — | |
$180.4 million 6.75% senior notes, due 2008, net | | | 171,375 | | | | 168,908 | |
$196.2 million 9.5% senior notes, due 2008, net | | | 214,377 | | | | — | |
$200 million 6.875% senior notes, redeemed in 2005, net | | | — | | | | 199,095 | |
$226.3 million 6.5% senior notes, due 2009, net | | | 228,653 | | | | — | |
$1.05 billion 6% senior notes, due 2009, net | | | 1,055,546 | | | | 1,056,453 | |
$297.6 million 9.375% senior subordinated notes, due 2010, net | | | 326,787 | | | | — | |
$825 million 8.5% senior notes, due 2010, net | | | 822,582 | | | | 822,214 | |
$400 million 8.375% senior subordinated notes, due 2011 | | | 400,000 | | | | 400,000 | |
$132.4 million 6.375% senior notes, due 2011, net | | | 133,771 | | | | — | |
$550 million 6.75% senior notes, due 2012 | | | 550,000 | | | | 550,000 | |
$150 million 7.625% senior subordinated debentures, due 2013, net | | | 156,128 | | | | — | |
$525 million 5.875% senior notes, due 2014, net | | | 522,547 | | | | 522,301 | |
$875 million 6.625% senior notes, due 2015, net | | | 880,115 | | | | — | |
$100 million 7.25% senior debentures, due 2017, net | | | 82,497 | | | | 81,919 | |
Floating rate convertible senior debentures due 2033 | | | 8,472 | | | | — | |
$150 million 7% debentures due 2036, net | | | 155,976 | | | | — | |
$4.3 million 6.7% debentures, due 2096 | | | 4,265 | | | | — | |
Other notes | | | 188 | | | | 195 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 12,271,376 | | | | 5,458,862 | |
Less: Current portion | | | (14 | ) | | | (14 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | $ | 12,271,362 | | | $ | 5,458,848 | |
| | | | | | |
Total interest incurred for the three month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $202 million and $101 million, respectively, of which $9 million and $6 million, respectively, was capitalized. Total interest incurred for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $480 million and $292 million, respectively, of which $18 million and $14 million, respectively, was capitalized.
At September 30, 2005, the senior credit facility had total capacity of $7.0 billion. The senior credit facility matures in 2010 and consists of a $5.5 billion revolving credit facility and $1.5 billion term loan facility.
In June 2005, the Company issued $500 million of 6.625% senior notes due 2015 through a Rule 144A offering and in September 2005, the Company issued an additional $375 million of 6.625% senior notes due 2015 through a Rule 144A offering. As required by the indenture, the Company has initiated exchange offers to exchange the Rule 144A notes for notes registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.
In May 2005, the Company initiated a tender offer for several issuances of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes totaling $1.5 billion, as required by the change of control provisions contained in the respective indentures. Holders of $155 million of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes redeemed their holdings, resulting in a gain on early retirement of debt of $1 million, classified as “Other, net” in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. Holders of Mandalay’s floating rate convertible senior debentures with a principal amount of $394 million had the right to redeem the debentures for $566 million through June 30, 2005. $388 million of principal of the convertible senior debentures were tendered for redemption and redeemed for $558 million.
8
In February 2005, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding 6.875% senior notes due February 2008 at the present value of future interest payments plus accrued interest at the date of redemption. The Company recorded a loss on retirement of debt of $20 million in the first quarter of 2005, classified as “Other, net” in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. As a result of the redemption of the February 2008 senior notes and the repayment of the $300 million 6.95% senior notes that matured in February 2005, the Company applied for, and received, release of collateral under its senior credit facility and all of its senior notes. Therefore, the Company’s senior credit facility and senior notes are now unsecured, but are still subject to guarantees by the Company and each of its subsidiaries, excluding MGM Grand Detroit, LLC and certain minor subsidiaries.
The Company attempts to limit its exposure to interest rate risk by managing the mix of its long-term fixed rate borrowings and short-term borrowings under its bank credit facilities. In the past, the Company has utilized interest rate swap agreements to manage this risk. At September 30, 2005, the Company had no outstanding interest rate swaps. All of the Company’s interest rate swaps have met the criteria for using the “shortcut method” allowed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133. The amounts received for the termination of past interest rate swaps, including the last $100 million swap terminated in May 2005, have been added to the carrying value of the related debt obligations and are being amortized and recorded as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining life of that debt.
The Company’s long-term debt obligations contain certain customary covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. At September 30, 2005, the Company was required to maintain a maximum leverage ratio (debt to EBITDA, as defined) of 7.5:1 and a maximum senior leverage ratio of 5.75:1. Also at September 30, 2005, the Company was required to maintain a minimum coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest charges, as defined) of 2.0:1. As of September 30, 2005, the Company’s leverage, senior leverage and interest coverage ratios were 5.4:1, 4.5:1 and 3.1:1, respectively.
NOTE 7 — INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
The weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the calculation of basic earnings per share) | | | 286,752 | | | | 275,572 | | | | 284,938 | | | | 279,867 | |
Potential dilution from stock options and restricted stock | | | 12,133 | | | | 8,948 | | | | 11,815 | | | | 9,366 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share) | | | 298,885 | | | | 284,520 | | | | 296,753 | | | | 289,233 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
NOTE 8 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net income | | $ | 93,210 | | | $ | 126,881 | | | $ | 345,457 | | | $ | 337,446 | |
Currency translation adjustment | | | (270 | ) | | | 16 | | | | (1,422 | ) | | | (5,097 | ) |
Reclassification of cumulative translation adjustment — MGM Grand Australia | | | — | | | | (6,141 | ) | | | — | | | | (6,141 | ) |
Derivative income from unconsolidated affiliate, net of tax | | | 377 | | | | 416 | | | | 1,382 | | | | 2,032 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | $ | 93,317 | | | $ | 121,172 | | | $ | 345,417 | | | $ | 328,240 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
9
NOTE 9 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stock split. In May 2005, the Company completed a 2-for-1 stock split effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend. The additional shares were issued on May 18, 2005 to stockholders of record on May 4, 2005. All share and per share data in the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto have been restated for all periods presented to reflect the 100% stock dividend.
Stock repurchases. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company repurchased 2 million shares of common stock at a total cost of $85 million, leaving 18 million shares available under a July 2004 authorization. The Company repurchased 0.2 million and 16 million shares of common stock in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, at a total cost of $5 million and $349 million, respectively.
NOTE 10 — STOCK OPTION PLANS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | Average | |
| | Shares | | | Exercise | |
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 | | (000’s) | | | Price | |
|
Outstanding at beginning of period | | | 30,729 | | | $ | 14.15 | |
Granted | | | 14,444 | | | | 35.22 | |
Exercised | | | (9,151 | ) | | | 14.49 | |
Terminated | | | (567 | ) | | | 21.35 | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at end of period | | | 35,455 | | | | 22.53 | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable at end of period | | | 9,949 | | | | 14.19 | |
| | | | | | | |
As of September 30, 2005, the aggregate number of shares subject to options available for grant under the Company’s 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan was 6.7 million.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation, including employee stock option plans, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25.” Had the Company accounted for these plans under the fair value method allowed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS 148”), the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to recognize the fair value of employee stock options.
The following are required disclosures under SFAS 123 and SFAS 148:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 93,210 | | | $ | 126,881 | | | $ | 345,457 | | | $ | 337,446 | |
Stock-based compensation under SFAS 123 | | | (15,017 | ) | | | (5,445 | ) | | | (31,367 | ) | | | (17,364 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma | | $ | 78,193 | | | $ | 121,436 | | | $ | 314,090 | | | $ | 320,082 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 0.33 | | | $ | 0.46 | | | $ | 1.21 | | | $ | 1.21 | |
Stock-based compensation under SFAS 123 | | | (0.06 | ) | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) | | | (0.07 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.44 | | | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | 1.14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As reported | | $ | 0.31 | | | $ | 0.45 | | | $ | 1.16 | | | $ | 1.17 | |
Stock-based compensation under SFAS 123 | | | (0.05 | ) | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.10 | ) | | | (0.06 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pro forma | | $ | 0.26 | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 1.06 | | | $ | 1.11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
10
The stock-based compensation included in the table above represents the after-tax amount of pro forma compensation related to stock option plans. Reported net income includes $1 million, net of tax, of amortization of restricted stock compensation for each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and $3 million and $4 million, net of tax, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). Under the original standard, SFAS 123, companies had the option of recording stock options issued to employees at fair value or intrinsic value, which generally leads to no expense being recorded. The Company opted to use the intrinsic value method and make required disclosures of fair value expense. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the intrinsic value alternative. SFAS 123(R) is effective for the Company on January 1, 2006, at which time share-based payments must be recorded at fair value.
NOTE 11 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Detroit Development Agreement.Under the August 2002 revised development agreement with the City of Detroit, MGM Grand Detroit, LLC and the Company are subject to certain obligations in exchange for the ability to develop a permanent casino complex. The Company recorded an intangible asset (development rights, deemed to have an indefinite life) in connection with its obligations under the revised development agreement. Outstanding obligations include continued letter of credit support for $50 million of bonds issued by the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Detroit, which mature in 2009. In addition, the City required an indemnification of up to $20 million related to the Lac Vieux and certain other litigation, of which $2.5 million had been paid as of September 30, 2005. In addition to the above obligations, the Company will pay the City of Detroit 1% of gaming revenues (2% if annual revenues exceed $400 million) beginning January 1, 2006.
Until April 2005, the ability to construct the permanent casino facility was subject to resolution of the Lac Vieux litigation. In April 2005, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on the three pending appeals, approved the settlement agreement between Lac Vieux and the two other Detroit casino developers, dismissed Lac Vieux’s request for a reselection process for our subsidiary’s casino franchise and lifted the injunction prohibiting the City and the Detroit developers from commencing construction of the permanent hotel and casino complexes. As a result of the resolution of the Lac Vieux litigation, the Company determined that the necessary accrual for the indemnification to the City was $5 million, and recorded a reduction in accrued liabilities and a corresponding reduction in the development rights intangible asset.
The Company has acquired the land for the permanent casino facility and is currently in the process of finalizing its plans for the permanent facility. The ultimate timing, cost and scope of the project are subject to risks attendant to large-scale projects.
New York Racing Association.The Company has entered into a definitive agreement with the New York Racing Association (“NYRA”) to manage video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) at NYRA’s Aqueduct horseracing facility in metropolitan New York. The Company will assist in the development of the approximately $170 million facility, including providing project financing, and will manage the facility for a term of five years (extended automatically if the financing provided by the Company is not fully repaid) for a fee. Recent legislative changes will allow the Company to operate the VLTs past the expiration date of the current Aqueduct franchise agreement.
United Kingdom. The Company has been pursuing several development opportunities in the United Kingdom. Legislation approved in April 2005 includes authorization for only one initial regional casino (unlimited table games and a maximum of 1,250 slot machines) and eight large casinos (unlimited table games and a maximum of 150 slot machines), a significant reduction from previous proposals. The Company entered into the agreements described below to further its development efforts.
11
The Company has an agreement with Newcastle United PLC to create a 50-50 joint venture which would build a major new mixed-use development, including casino development, on a site adjacent to Newcastle’s football stadium. Newcastle United PLC contributed the land to the joint venture, and the Company made an equity investment of £5 million ($8.8 million based on exchange rates at September 30, 2005). The agreement is cancelable, and the equity investment refundable, if certain conditions are not met within specified time frames, including the implementation of appropriate gaming legislation and tax thresholds, as well as required planning and other approvals.
The Company had an agreement with the Earls Court and Olympia Group, which operates large trade show facilities in London, to develop an entertainment and gaming facility, which the Company would operate in space leased from Olympia. The Company made a refundable deposit of £1.8 million ($3.2 million based on exchange rates at September 30, 2005) on the lease. The Company does not believe that the site will be a viable option under the current legislation and, in the third quarter of 2005, the lease agreement was terminated and the Company received a refund of the £1.8 million deposit.
The Residences at MGM Grand.In July 2004, this venture obtained construction financing for up to $210 million for the development of Tower 1. The Company has provided a guaranty for up to 50% of the interest and principal obligations on the construction financing. The remaining 50% of interest and principal obligations is guaranteed by affiliates of the venture’s other member. These affiliates and the Company have also jointly and severally provided a completion guaranty. The Company recorded the value of its guaranty obligation, approximately $2 million, in other long-term liabilities.
NOTE 12 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Mandalay Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.Mandalay sponsored a defined benefit pension plan (the “Mandalay SERP”) under which certain key employees earned supplemental pension benefits based upon their respective years of service, compensation and tier category set out in the plan document. The Mandalay SERP has been terminated and lump-sum payouts to the plan participants in the aggregate amount of $145 million were made in July 2005.
NOTE 13 — PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS, NET
Net property transactions consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Write-downs and impairments | | $ | 20,575 | | | $ | 473 | | | $ | 20,575 | | | $ | 473 | |
Demolition costs | | | 1,304 | | | | 681 | | | | 5,569 | | | | 4,600 | |
Net losses on sale or disposal of fixed assets | | | 758 | | | | 523 | | | | 2,489 | | | | 281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 22,637 | | | $ | 1,677 | | | $ | 28,633 | | | $ | 5,354 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Write-downs and impairments in 2005 consist of assets replaced or disposed of in connection with expansion and remodeling activity at Bellagio, Mirage and TI, based on the net book value of assets replaced or disposed of. During 2005, demolition costs related primarily to room remodel activity at MGM Grand Las Vegas, construction of a new showroom at The Mirage and site preparation for the Bellagio employee parking garage. During 2004, demolition costs related primarily to the Bellagio expansion and room remodel projects and site preparation for The Residences at MGM Grand.
12
NOTE 14 — CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Company’s subsidiaries (excluding MGM Grand Detroit, LLC and certain minor subsidiaries) have fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, payment of the senior credit facility, the senior notes and the senior subordinated notes. Separate condensed financial statement information for the subsidiary guarantors and non-guarantors as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of September 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Current assets | | $ | 76,926 | | | $ | 704,279 | | | $ | 77,460 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 858,665 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 7,506 | | | | 16,305,442 | | | | 95,293 | | | | (11,972 | ) | | | 16,396,269 | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | 14,226,055 | | | | 170,984 | | | | — | | | | (14,397,039 | ) | | | — | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | 127,902 | | | | 885,083 | | | | 241,032 | | | | (342,165 | ) | | | 911,852 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 90,165 | | | | 1,978,383 | | | | 114,629 | | | | — | | | | 2,183,177 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 14,528,554 | | | $ | 20,044,171 | | | $ | 528,414 | | | $ | (14,751,176 | ) | | $ | 20,349,963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 240,024 | | | $ | 1,247,543 | | | $ | 43,911 | | | $ | (262,983 | ) | | $ | 1,268,495 | |
Intercompany accounts | | | (1,958,758 | ) | | | 2,016,854 | | | | (58,096 | ) | | | — | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 3,376,735 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,376,735 | |
Long-term debt | | | 9,623,699 | | | | 2,597,735 | | | | 49,928 | | | | — | | | | 12,271,362 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 1,677 | | | | 186,375 | | | | 142 | | | | — | | | | 188,194 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 3,245,177 | | | | 13,995,664 | | | | 492,529 | | | | (14,488,193 | ) | | | 3,245,177 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 14,528,554 | | | $ | 20,044,171 | | | $ | 528,414 | | | $ | (14,751,176 | ) | | $ | 20,349,963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, 2004 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Current assets | | $ | 48,477 | | | $ | 541,537 | | | $ | 230,188 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 820,202 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 8,266 | | | | 8,820,342 | | | | 97,506 | | | | (11,972 | ) | | | 8,914,142 | |
Investments in subsidiaries | | | 8,830,922 | | | | 192,290 | | | | — | | | | (9,023,212 | ) | | | — | |
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | | | 127,902 | | | | 1,056,903 | | | | — | | | | (342,165 | ) | | | 842,640 | |
Other non-current assets | | | 67,672 | | | | 346,201 | | | | 124,172 | | | | — | | | | 538,045 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,083,239 | | | $ | 10,957,273 | | | $ | 451,866 | | | $ | (9,377,349 | ) | | $ | 11,115,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities | | $ | 132,279 | | | $ | 726,581 | | | $ | 69,117 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 927,977 | |
Intercompany accounts | | | (231,630 | ) | | | 206,698 | | | | 24,932 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 1,802,008 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,802,008 | |
Long-term debt | | | 4,607,118 | | | | 851,730 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,458,848 | |
Other non-current liabilities | | | 1,760 | | | | 102,595 | | | | 50,137 | | | | — | | | | 154,492 | |
Stockholders’ equity | | | 2,771,704 | | | | 9,069,669 | | | | 307,680 | | | | (9,377,349 | ) | | | 2,771,704 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 9,083,239 | | | $ | 10,957,273 | | | $ | 451,866 | | | $ | (9,377,349 | ) | | $ | 11,115,029 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
13
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net revenues | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,700,591 | | | $ | 107,652 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,808,243 | |
Equity in subsidiaries’ earnings | | | 299,894 | | | | 29,410 | | | | — | | | | (329,304 | ) | | | — | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino and hotel operations | | | — | | | | 948,585 | | | | 57,464 | | | | — | | | | 1,006,049 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 275,357 | | | | 13,371 | | | | — | | | | 288,728 | |
Corporate expense | | | 1,950 | | | | 30,162 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 32,112 | |
Preopening and start-up expenses | | | — | | | | 6,147 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,147 | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | 11 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11 | |
Property transactions, net | | | — | | | | 22,637 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,637 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 603 | | | | 154,476 | | | | 6,487 | | | | — | | | | 161,566 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,553 | | | | 1,437,375 | | | | 77,322 | | | | — | | | | 1,517,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | — | | | | 35,185 | | | | 13,821 | | | | — | | | | 49,006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 297,341 | | | | 327,811 | | | | 44,151 | | | | (329,304 | ) | | | 339,999 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | (155,948 | ) | | | (34,072 | ) | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | (189,994 | ) |
Other, net | | | 5,207 | | | | (7,826 | ) | | | 169 | | | | — | | | | (2,450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 146,600 | | | | 285,913 | | | | 44,346 | | | | (329,304 | ) | | | 147,555 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (53,390 | ) | | | — | | | | (955 | ) | | | — | | | | (54,345 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 93,210 | | | $ | 285,913 | | | $ | 43,391 | | | $ | (329,304 | ) | | $ | 93,210 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net revenues | | $ | — | | | $ | 931,561 | | | $ | 104,835 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,036,396 | |
Equity in subsidiaries’ earnings | | | 255,726 | | | | 25,141 | | | | — | | | | (280,867 | ) | | | — | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino and hotel operations | | | — | | | | 506,758 | | | | 52,509 | | | | — | | | | 559,267 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 144,248 | | | | 16,724 | | | | — | | | | 160,972 | |
Corporate expense | | | 978 | | | | 18,205 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,183 | |
Preopening and start-up expenses | | | — | | | | 1,584 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,584 | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,587 | | | | — | | | | 1,587 | |
Property transactions, net | | | (55 | ) | | | 1,732 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,677 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 261 | | | | 93,175 | | | | 7,809 | | | | — | | | | 101,245 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,184 | | | | 765,702 | | | | 78,629 | | | | — | | | | 845,515 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | — | | | | 31,476 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 31,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 254,542 | | | | 222,476 | | | | 26,206 | | | | (280,867 | ) | | | 222,357 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | (82,042 | ) | | | (12,019 | ) | | | 220 | | | | — | | | | (93,841 | ) |
Other, net | | | 801 | | | | (7,683 | ) | | | 28 | | | | — | | | | (6,854 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 173,301 | | | | 202,774 | | | | 26,454 | | | | (280,867 | ) | | | 121,662 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (44,568 | ) | | | — | | | | (927 | ) | | | — | | | | (45,495 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 128,733 | | | | 202,774 | | | | 25,527 | | | | (280,867 | ) | | | 76,167 | |
Discontinued operations, net | | | (1,852 | ) | | | — | | | | 52,566 | | | | — | | | | 50,714 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 126,881 | | | $ | 202,774 | | | $ | 78,093 | | | $ | (280,867 | ) | | $ | 126,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net revenues | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,397,280 | | | $ | 331,054 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,728,334 | |
Equity in subsidiaries’ earnings | | | 927,484 | | | | 110,378 | | | | — | | | | (1,037,862 | ) | | | — | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino and hotel operations | | | — | | | | 2,405,281 | | | | 174,650 | | | | — | | | | 2,579,931 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 655,158 | | | | 41,647 | | | | — | | | | 696,805 | |
Corporate expense | | | 8,813 | | | | 81,741 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 90,554 | |
Preopening and start-up expenses | | | — | | | | 12,568 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,568 | |
Restructuring costs (credit) | | | — | | | | (59 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (59 | ) |
Property transactions, net | | | — | | | | 28,329 | | | | 304 | | | | — | | | | 28,633 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 1,580 | | | | 402,255 | | | | 19,899 | | | | — | | | | 423,734 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 10,393 | | | | 3,585,273 | | | | 236,500 | | | | — | | | | 3,832,166 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | — | | | | 96,263 | | | | 18,673 | | | | — | | | | 114,936 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 917,091 | | | | 1,018,648 | | | | 113,227 | | | | (1,037,862 | ) | | | 1,011,104 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | (373,965 | ) | | | (79,061 | ) | | | 1,232 | | | | — | | | | (451,794 | ) |
Other, net | | | (14,293 | ) | | | (12,926 | ) | | | 106 | | | | — | | | | (27,113 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 528,833 | | | | 926,661 | | | | 114,565 | | | | (1,037,862 | ) | | | 532,197 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (183,376 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,364 | ) | | | — | | | | (186,740 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 345,457 | | | $ | 926,661 | | | $ | 111,201 | | | $ | (1,037,862 | ) | | $ | 345,457 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net revenues | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,854,538 | | | $ | 320,819 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,175,357 | |
Equity in subsidiaries’ earnings | | | 736,505 | | | | 91,305 | | | | — | | | | (827,810 | ) | | | — | |
Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino and hotel operations | | | — | | | | 1,542,159 | | | | 157,595 | | | | — | | | | 1,699,754 | |
General and administrative | | | — | | | | 414,018 | | | | 44,655 | | | | — | | | | 458,673 | |
Corporate expense | | | 5,736 | | | | 47,643 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 53,379 | |
Preopening and start-up expenses | | | 129 | | | | 3,455 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,584 | |
Restructuring costs | | | — | | | | 4,314 | | | | 1,587 | | | | — | | | | 5,901 | |
Property transactions, net | | | (1,521 | ) | | | 6,529 | | | | 346 | | | | — | | | | 5,354 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 783 | | | | 272,842 | | | | 22,657 | | | | — | | | | 296,282 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 5,127 | | | | 2,290,960 | | | | 226,840 | | | | — | | | | 2,522,927 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from unconsolidated affiliates | | | — | | | | 85,190 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 85,190 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 731,378 | | | | 740,073 | | | | 93,979 | | | | (827,810 | ) | | | 737,620 | |
Interest income (expense), net | | | (233,439 | ) | | | (40,004 | ) | | | (811 | ) | | | — | | | | (274,254 | ) |
Other, net | | | 220 | | | | (29,731 | ) | | | 35 | | | | — | | | | (29,476 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | 498,159 | | | | 670,338 | | | | 93,203 | | | | (827,810 | ) | | | 433,890 | |
Provision for income taxes | | | (157,408 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,512 | ) | | | — | | | | (158,920 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations | | | 340,751 | | | | 670,338 | | | | 91,691 | | | | (827,810 | ) | | | 274,970 | |
Discontinued operations, net | | | (3,305 | ) | | | 7,362 | | | | 58,419 | | | | — | | | | 62,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 337,446 | | | $ | 677,700 | | | $ | 150,110 | | | $ | (827,810 | ) | | $ | 337,446 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | (329,028 | ) | | $ | 1,016,886 | | | $ | 110,310 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 798,168 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (4,587,820 | ) | | | (415,471 | ) | | | (53,756 | ) | | | (3,303 | ) | | | (5,060,350 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 4,916,959 | | | | (590,806 | ) | | | (236,960 | ) | | | 3,303 | | | | 4,092,496 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | |
| | | | | | Guarantor | | | Non-Guarantor | | | | | | | |
| | Parent | | | Subsidiaries | | | Subsidiaries | | | Elimination | | | Consolidated | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | (282,572 | ) | | $ | 763,922 | | | $ | 108,274 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 589,624 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | | | (5,993 | ) | | | (319,913 | ) | | | 127,194 | | | | (3,227 | ) | | | (201,939 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 311,479 | | | | (519,769 | ) | | | (52,209 | ) | | | 3,227 | | | | (257,272 | ) |
15
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Overview
At September 30, 2005, our primary operations consisted of 24 wholly-owned casino resorts and 50% investments in three other casino resorts, including:
| | |
Las Vegas, Nevada: | | Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay, The Mirage, Luxor, TI, New York-New York, Excalibur, Monte Carlo, Circus Circus Las Vegas, Slots-A-Fun and Boardwalk (Boardwalk will close in early 2006 in preparation for Project CityCenter — see “Other Factors Affecting Liquidity”). |
| | |
Other domestic: | | The Primm Valley Resorts (Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s and Primm Valley Resort) in Primm, Nevada; Circus Circus Reno and Silver Legacy (50% owned) in Reno, Nevada; Colorado Belle and Edgewater in Laughlin, Nevada; Gold Strike and Nevada Landing in Jean, Nevada; Railroad Pass in Henderson, Nevada; MGM Grand Detroit; Beau Rivage in Biloxi, Mississippi and Gold Strike Tunica in Tunica, Mississippi; Borgata (50% owned) in Atlantic City, New Jersey; and Grand Victoria (50% owned) in Elgin, Illinois. |
Other operations include the Shadow Creek golf course in North Las Vegas; two golf courses at Primm Valley; a 50% investment in The Residences at MGM Grand, a hotel condominium development in Las Vegas; and a 50% investment in MGM Grand Paradise Limited, which is constructing a casino resort in Macau.
On April 25, 2005, we closed our merger with Mandalay Resort Group (“Mandalay”) under which we acquired Mandalay for $71 in cash for each share of common stock of Mandalay. The total merger consideration included equity value of approximately $4.83 billion, the assumption or repayment of other outstanding Mandalay debt with a fair value of approximately $2.85 billion and $111 million of transaction costs, offset by the $520 million received by Mandalay from the sale of its interest in MotorCity Casino in Detroit, Michigan. We believe that the acquisition enhances our portfolio of resorts on the Las Vegas Strip, provides additional sites for future development and expands our employee and customer bases significantly. These factors result in the recognition of certain intangible assets and significant goodwill.
We operate primarily in one segment, the operation of casino resorts, which includes offering gaming, hotel, dining, entertainment, retail, convention services and other resort amenities. Giving effect to the Mandalay merger, over half of our net revenues are now derived from non-gaming activities, a higher percentage than many of our competitors, as our operating philosophy is to provide a complete resort experience for our guests, including non-gaming amenities which command a premium price based on their quality. We believe that we own several of the premier casino resorts in the world, and a main focus of our strategy is to continually reinvest in these resorts to maintain that competitive advantage.
We generate a majority of our net revenues and operating income from our resorts in Las Vegas, Nevada, which exposes us to certain risks outside of our control, such as competition from other recently opened Las Vegas resorts, including several expanded resorts and a major new competitor, and the impact from expansion of gaming in California. We are also exposed to risks related to tourism and the general economy, including national and global economic conditions and terrorist attacks or other global events.
16
As a resort-based company, our operating results are highly dependent on the volume of customers at our resorts, which in turn impacts the price we can charge for our hotel rooms and other amenities. We also generate a significant portion of our operating income from high-end gaming customers, which can cause variability in our results. Key performance indicators related to revenue are:
• | | Gaming revenue indicators — table games drop and slot handle (volume indicators); “win” or “hold” percentage, which is not fully controllable by us. Our normal table games win percentage is in the range of 18% to 22% of table games drop and our normal slot win percentage is in the range of 6.5% to 7.5% of slot handle; |
|
• | | Hotel revenue indicators — hotel occupancy (volume indicator); average daily rate (“ADR”, price indicator); revenue per available room (“REVPAR”), a summary measure of hotel results combining ADR and occupancy rate. |
Financial Statement Impact of Hurricane Katrina
Beau Rivage sustained significant damage in late August 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina and has been closed since and will remain closed for the foreseeable future. The Company maintains insurance covering both property damage and business interruption as a result of the storm. The deductible under this coverage is $15 million, based on the amount of damage incurred. Based on current estimates, insurance proceeds are expected to exceed the net book value of damaged assets; therefore, the Company will not record an impairment charge related to the storm and upon ultimate settlement of the claim will likely record a gain. The damaged assets have been written off and a corresponding insurance receivable has been recorded.
Business interruption coverage covers lost profits and other costs incurred during the period of construction and up to six months following the re-opening of the facility. The costs expected to be incurred during the interruption period are less than the anticipated business interruption proceeds, therefore, post-storm costs are being offset by the expected recoveries. All post-storm costs and expected recoveries are recorded net within “General and administrative” expenses, except for depreciation of non-damaged assets, which is classified as “Depreciation and amortization.”
Financial Results
The following discussion is based on our consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. References to “same-store” results exclude the Mandalay resorts and Monte Carlo for all periods. Same-store results also exclude Beau Rivage for all periods. On a consolidated basis, the most important factors and trends contributing to our operating performance for the period were:
• | | The addition of Mandalay’s resorts on April 25, 2005. For the five months we owned the Mandalay resorts, net revenue for those operations was $1.2 billion and operating income was $293 million. |
|
• | | Strong hotel and gaming operating trends. We experienced strong first quarter gaming volumes during key casino events such as the Super Bowl, Chinese New Year and March Madness, and second and third quarter trends continued to be positive, even with the April opening of a major new competitor on the Las Vegas Strip; |
|
• | | Continued year-over-year increases in room pricing and increased visitation, driving hotel occupancy and increased revenues at our restaurants, entertainment venues and other resort amenities; |
|
• | | The December 2004 opening of the Spa Tower and related amenities at Bellagio and the ongoing repositioning of MGM Grand Las Vegas, highlighted by KÀ, the new Cirque du Soleil show, and the West Wing and SKYLOFTS room enhancements; |
|
• | | The continued success of Borgata, of which we own 50%; |
|
• | | The closure of Beau Rivage in August 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Beau Rivage earned operating income of $5 million and $41 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, versus $18 million and $46 million for the respective 2004 periods. |
17
As a result of the above factors and trends, our net revenue increased 74% in the third quarter over the prior year quarter. On a same-store basis, revenue growth was 10% in the quarter. Year to date, net revenue increased 49%, or 12% on a same-store basis.
Our operating income in 2005 increased 53% for the quarter and 37% for the nine months, due to the strong revenue trends and the addition of Mandalay. Also positively impacting operating income in the quarter and year-to-date periods was increased income from Borgata. Our operating margin was 19% in the 2005 quarter versus 21% in the 2004 quarter. This is due largely to a lower-than-normal bad debt provision in the 2004 quarter. For the nine month periods, the operating margin was 21% in 2005 versus 23% in 2004, due to the $29 million increase in the bad debt provision and a $10 million increase in workers compensation reserves in the second quarter of 2005. In addition, the gaming tax rate applicable to MGM Grand Detroit increased from 18 percent to 24 percent in September 2004, negatively impacting operating margins at that property for the 2005 quarter and year-to-date periods.
Income from continuing operations increased 22% and 26% over the 2004 quarter and nine month periods, respectively. Increased operating income was offset in part by higher interest expense resulting from the Mandalay merger.
Operating Results — Detailed Revenue Information
The following table presents details of our net revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | | | | Percentage | | | | | | | | | | | Percentage | | | | |
| | 2005 | | | Change | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | Change | | | 2004 | |
| | (Dollars in thousands) | |
Casino revenue, net: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table games | | $ | 290,860 | | | | 36 | % | | $ | 213,789 | | | $ | 849,369 | | | | 22 | % | | $ | 695,807 | |
Slots | | | 486,771 | | | | 55 | % | | | 313,961 | | | | 1,263,181 | | | | 39 | % | | | 910,017 | |
Other | | | 27,646 | | | | 109 | % | | | 13,207 | | | | 71,918 | | | | 58 | % | | | 45,547 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino revenue, net | | | 805,277 | | | | 49 | % | | | 540,957 | | | | 2,184,468 | | | | 32 | % | | | 1,651,371 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-casino revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rooms | | | 478,462 | | | | 115 | % | | | 223,001 | | | | 1,208,277 | | | | 75 | % | | | 690,266 | |
Food and beverage | | | 368,186 | | | | 79 | % | | | 205,262 | | | | 963,848 | | | | 52 | % | | | 635,066 | |
Entertainment, retail and other | | | 317,443 | | | | 80 | % | | | 176,128 | | | | 803,451 | | | | 55 | % | | | 519,612 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Non-casino revenue | | | 1,164,091 | | | | 93 | % | | | 604,391 | | | | 2,975,576 | | | | 61 | % | | | 1,844,944 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 1,969,368 | | | | 72 | % | | | 1,145,348 | | | | 5,160,044 | | | | 48 | % | | | 3,496,315 | |
Less: Promotional allowances | | | (161,125 | ) | | | 48 | % | | | (108,952 | ) | | | (431,710 | ) | | | 35 | % | | | (320,958 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 1,808,243 | | | | 74 | % | | $ | 1,036,396 | | | $ | 4,728,334 | | | | 49 | % | | $ | 3,175,357 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On a same-store basis, table games revenue increased 3% in the third quarter, as volume increased 2%, including a 10% increase in baccarat volume, and hold percentages were near the middle of the Company’s normal range in both periods. Slot revenue increased 4% on a same-store basis, on top of a 9% year-over-year increase in 2004. The addition of the Spa Tower led to increased slot utilization at Bellagio, as Bellagio’s slot revenues increased 13%.
Non-casino revenue increased in 2005 primarily due to strong conference and group business and higher room rates in all segments, as well as the success of the Spa Tower and other amenities in garnering an increased share of customer spending. In the third quarter of 2005, same-store REVPAR was $131, up 10% from the prior year quarter, on top of a year-over-year increase of 9% in the 2004 quarter. REVPAR at our Las Vegas Strip resorts was $147 in the 2005 quarter on a same-store basis, an increase of 9%. REVPAR for the nine months on a same-store basis was up 14% company-wide, and 13% at our Las Vegas Strip resorts. Increases in food and beverage and other revenue areas resulted from successful new restaurants and other resort amenities and the addition of KÀ at MGM Grand Las Vegas and the Spa Tower at Bellagio.
18
Operating Results — Details of Certain Charges
Preopening and start-up expenses were $6 million in the 2005 quarter versus $2 million in 2004, and included amounts related primarily to Project CityCenter, The Residences at MGM Grand, and new restaurants at MGM Grand Las Vegas. For the nine months, preopening and start-up expenses were $13 million in 2005 versus $4 million in 2004, and included costs related to the above projects and MGM Grand Macau.
Property transactions, net consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months | | | Nine Months | |
For the periods ended September 30, | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | |
| | (In thousands) | |
Write-downs and impairments | | $ | 20,575 | | | $ | 473 | | | $ | 20,575 | | | $ | 473 | |
Demolition costs | | | 1,304 | | | | 681 | | | | 5,569 | | | | 4,600 | |
Net losses on sale or disposal of fixed assets | | | 758 | | | | 523 | | | | 2,489 | | | | 281 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 22,637 | | | $ | 1,677 | | | $ | 28,633 | | | $ | 5,354 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Write-downs and impairments in 2005 consist of assets replaced or disposed of in connection with expansion and remodeling activity at Bellagio, Mirage and TI, based on the net book value of assets replaced or disposed of. During 2005, demolition costs related primarily to room remodel activity at MGM Grand Las Vegas, construction of a new showroom at The Mirage and site preparation for the Bellagio employee parking garage. During 2004, demolition costs related primarily to the Bellagio expansion and room remodel projects and site preparation for The Residences at MGM Grand.
Non — operating Results
Net interest expense increased to $193 million in the 2005 third quarter and $462 million for the year-to-date period from $95 million and $278 million in the respective 2004 periods, due primarily to the funding of the Mandalay merger with bank credit facility borrowings. In 2005, “Other, net” for the nine-month period includes a $20 million loss on early retirement of debt related to the early redemption of our 6.875% senior notes due 2008 in the first quarter of 2005, a $1 million gain on redemption of Mandalay debt in the second quarter of 2005, and $7 million of income in the first quarter of 2005 from the favorable resolution of a pre-acquisition contingency related to the Mirage Resorts acquisition. In 2004, “Other, net” for the nine-month period included a $6 million loss on early retirement of debt related to the repurchase of $49 million of our senior notes.
Our effective income tax rate on continuing operations was 37% and 35%, respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005. This includes the impact of two tax adjustments. We recorded a net tax benefit of $11 million in the second quarter, adjusted downward by $1 million in the third quarter, related to the repatriated proceeds from the sale of MGM Grand Australia, which qualified for a special one-time tax deduction of 85 percent on certain repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. We also recorded additional provision of $3 million in the second quarter relating to state deferred income taxes in Illinois resulting from the Mandalay merger. Excluding these adjustments, our tax rate for the quarter and nine months was 36%, which is slightly lower than the prior year periods.
Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations in 2004 represents the operations of MGM Grand Australia through its sale in July 2004 and the Golden Nugget Subsidiaries through their sale in January 2004, a pre-tax gain of $8 million from the sale of the Golden Nugget Subsidiaries, and a pre-tax gain of $74 million from the sale of MGM Grand Australia.
19
Factors Affecting Future Results
Our investment in The Residences at MGM Grand is accounted for under the equity method. To date, almost all costs incurred by the venture have been capitalized as part of the project costs. The venture does not recognize revenue and cost of sales until closing occurs, which is essentially when the tower is complete. We will record our share of the venture’s profit within “Income from unconsolidated affiliates” in the period the venture recognizes revenue and cost of sales. We will receive an equity distribution for our share of the venture’s profits shortly thereafter. Currently, three towers are under construction, with the first two towers sold out. We expect the first tower to be completed in the second quarter of 2006, the second tower to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the third tower to be completed in mid-2007. Upon completion of each tower, MGM Grand Las Vegas will earn additional revenue from managing participating owners’ units as part of the resort’s hotel inventory, with commission fees paid to the owners.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows — Operating Activities
Operating cash flow was $798 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, a significant increase from $590 million in the prior year period. This largely reflects the additional operating income, excluding depreciation and amortization, from Mandalay offset in part by higher interest payments due to the additional debt to fund the Mandalay merger. At September 30, 2005, we held cash and cash equivalents of $265 million. Despite the addition of Mandalay, the September 30, 2005 balance is lower than the year-end 2004 balance due to the repatriation of the MGM Grand Australia sales proceeds in 2005, the implementation of our centralized treasury management at the Mandalay resorts, and the typical higher cash balances held at our resorts at year-end.
Cash Flows — Investing Activities
Our primary investing cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were the $4.4 billion purchase of Mandalay, $428 million of capital expenditures and the $177 million investment in MGM Grand Paradise. Capital expenditures were made primarily for:
| • | | Ongoing room enhancements — West Wing and SKYLOFTS — MGM Grand Las Vegas; |
|
| • | | Other projects at MGM Grand Las Vegas, including a new poker room, new lounge, relocated race and sports book, and new restaurants; |
|
| • | | The remodeled theatre at The Mirage in preparation for a new show by Cirque du Soleil based on the music of the Beatles, along with other projects at The Mirage; |
|
| • | | A new golf course at Beau Rivage; |
|
| • | | Project CityCenter; |
|
| • | | Land for the permanent casino in Detroit. |
In 2004, capital expenditures were higher, $526 million, as we were constructing two major projects — the Spa Tower at Bellagio and the KÀ theatre at MGM Grand Las Vegas.
Cash Flows — Financing Activities
In the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we borrowed net debt of $4.1 billion; however, we repaid net debt of over $500 million after the Mandalay merger. We used borrowings from our bank credit facility to fund the Mandalay acquisition and repay certain fixed-rate long-term debt. At September 30, 2005 our bank credit facility had a balance of $4.7 billion, with available liquidity of $2.3 billion.
In the first quarter of 2005, we repaid at their scheduled maturity two issues of senior notes due in 2005 ($176.4 million of 6.625% senior notes and $300 million of 6.95% senior notes) and redeemed one issue of senior notes due in 2008 ($200 million of 6.875% senior notes). With the redemption of the 2008 senior notes and the repayment of the 6.95% senior notes, the Company’s bank credit facility and senior notes are now unsecured.
20
In addition, in the second quarter of 2005, we initiated a tender offer for several issuances of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes totaling $1.5 billion. Holders of $155 million of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes redeemed their holdings. Holders of Mandalay’s floating rate convertible senior debentures with a principal amount of $394 million had the right to redeem the debentures for $566 million through June 30, 2005. $388 million of principal of the convertible debentures were tendered for redemption and redeemed for $558 million.
In June 2005, we issued $500 million of 6.625% senior notes due 2015 through a Rule 144A offering and in September 2005, we issued an additional $375 million of 6.625% senior notes due 2015 through a Rule 144A offering. As required by the indenture, we have initiated exchange offers to exchange the Rule 144A notes for notes registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933.
We repurchased 2 million shares of our common stock in the first nine months of 2005 at a cost of $85 million leaving 18 million shares available under our current share repurchase authorization. We received proceeds of $133 million from the exercise of stock options in the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Other Factors Affecting Liquidity
We have several projects and proposed developments which will or could require significant funding in the next several years. We have acquired the land for our permanent casino facility in Detroit, Michigan and are currently in the process of finalizing our plans for the permanent facility. The ultimate timing, cost and scope of the project are subject to risks attendant to large-scale projects.
We have committed to providing project financing for the VLT facility at NYRA’s Aqueduct horseracing facility. The facility is estimated to cost $170 million, and we will assist in the development and will manage the facility for a fee.
We have committed to make available an interest bearing loan facility of $100 million to MGM Grand Paradise Limited, and the venture intends to obtain third party financing to fund the remaining project costs for MGM Grand Macau. Construction on MGM Grand Macau, which is estimated to cost approximately $1 billion, began in the second quarter of 2005, and the resort is anticipated to open in the second half of 2007.
In November 2004, we announced a plan to develop Project CityCenter, a multi-billion dollar urban metropolis, on 66 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip, between Bellagio and Monte Carlo. We anticipate that the first phase of Project CityCenter will include a 4,000-room casino resort, boutique hotels, approximately 550,000 square feet of retail shops, dining and entertainment venues, and 1,650 residential units. We expect that construction of Project CityCenter will begin in 2006 and that the first phase will open in 2009 at a cost of approximately $5 billion. The design, budget and schedule of Project CityCenter are still preliminary, however, and the ultimate timing, cost and scope are subject to risks attendant to large-scale projects. Construction has begun on the Bellagio employee parking garage, which is necessary to clear the Project CityCenter site, a portion of which is currently used as surface parking for Bellagio employees.
In April 2005, we and our partner CapitaLand, together with 11 other applicants, were successful in qualifying for the second round of the Request for Proposals process for the development of an integrated resort complex in the Marina Bayfront of Singapore. The Singapore government is currently in the process of finalizing the Request for Proposals, which is scheduled to be issued in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our variable rate long-term debt. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate risk by managing the mix of our long-term fixed rate borrowings and short-term borrowings under our bank credit facilities.
As of September 30, 2005, long-term fixed rate borrowings represented approximately 62% of our total borrowings. Assuming a 100 basis-point change in LIBOR at September 30, 2005, our annual interest cost would change by approximately $47 million.
21
Safe Harbor Provision
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Certain information included in this report contains statements that are forward-looking, such as statements relating to plans for future expansion and other business development activities, as well as other capital spending, financing sources, the effects of regulation (including gaming and tax regulations) and competition. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those relating to competition, development and construction activities, risks associated with the integration of Mandalay, dependence on existing management, leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates), domestic or international economic conditions (including sensitivity to fluctuations in foreign currencies), pending or future legal proceedings, changes in federal or state tax laws or the administration of such laws, changes in gaming laws or regulations (including the legalization of gaming in certain jurisdictions) and application for licenses and approvals under applicable jurisdictional laws and regulations (including gaming laws and regulations).
For a more complete description of risk factors, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Additionally, we are updating our risk factor disclosure to include the following:
Extreme weather conditions may cause significant property damage and interruption of our operations in certain areas.
Certain of our casino properties are located in areas that may be subject to extreme weather conditions, including, but not limited to, hurricanes. Such extreme weather conditions may interrupt our operations, damage our properties, and reduce the number of customers who visit our facilities in such areas. Although we maintain both property and business interruption insurance coverage for certain extreme weather conditions, such coverage is subject to deductibles and limits on maximum benefits, including limitation on the coverage period for business interruption, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to fully collect, if at all, on claims resulting from such extreme weather conditions. Furthermore, such extreme weather conditions may interrupt or impede access to our affected properties and may cause visits to our affected properties to decrease for an indefinite period. In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina caused significant damage to our Beau Rivage resort. See “Financial Statement Impact of Hurricane Katrina.”
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Market Risk” in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2005. This conclusion is based on an evaluation conducted under the supervision and with the participation of Company management. Disclosure controls and procedures are those controls and procedures which ensure that information required to be disclosed in this filing is accumulated and communicated to management and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. In making our assessment of changes in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, we have excluded the Mandalay operations because these operations were acquired in a business combination in 2005. These operations represent approximately 45% of our total assets at September 30, 2005 and approximately 25% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. We intend to disclose any material changes in internal control over financial reporting at the Mandalay operations in the first annual assessment of internal control over financial reporting in which we are required to include Mandalay, which will be as of December 31, 2006.
22
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Lac Vieux Litigation
For a complete description of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case of Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Michigan Gaming Control Board, et. al., see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, the casino developers, including our subsidiary, were prohibited from developing permanent casino complexes under an injunction issued by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. In April 2005, the 6th Circuit Court filed an unpublished opinion which effectively resolved all the outstanding issues of the case, and affirmed the District Court’s approval of the settlement agreement between Lac Vieux and the two other Detroit developers, dismissed the Lac Vieux Tribe’s appeal requesting reselection of our subsidiary’s casino franchise, and dissolved the previously-entered injunction which prohibited construction of the permanent casino facilities. The ruling became final in July 2005 after the expiration of the Lac Vieux Tribe’s period for application for reconsideration by the 6th Circuit Court and/or petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Boardwalk Shareholder Litigation
For a complete description of the facts and circumstances surrounding this litigation, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In March 2005, the District Court for Clark County, Nevada granted summary judgment in our favor. In May 2005 plaintiffs filed an appeal of the dismissal to the Nevada Supreme Court. At a mediation conference mandated by court rule, the parties reached a settlement agreement on terms favorable to us, which is in the process of documentation and is subject to final approval by the Nevada Supreme Court.
Poulos Slot Machine Litigation
For a complete description of the facts and circumstances surrounding this litigation, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In June 2002, the U.S. District Court in Nevada ruled that the plaintiffs met certain prerequisite requirements for class action status, but the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification, on the grounds that the proposed class lacked the cohesiveness required to settle common claims against the casino industry. The court had previously stayed discovery pending resolution of these class certification issues. In August 2004, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s ruling denying class action status for the case. In November 2004, the District Court set a discovery deadline of April 2005 and trial in September 2005. After plaintiffs’ dismissal of certain operator and cruise ship defendants, the remaining defendants in April 2005 filed dispositive motions for summary judgment. In September 2005, the District Court entered an order granting summary judgment to all defendants that remained in the case on all of plaintiffs’ claims, dismissed the case in its entirety and entered judgment in favor of defendants. Later in September 2005, the defendants who prevailed timely filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. In October 2005, plaintiffs filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of the judgment granting summary judgment to defendants, and of two prior discovery orders that had been entered in the case. The appeal remains pending.
Mandalay Resort Group Shareholder Litigation
On April 25, 2005, the Company consummated its acquisition of Mandalay Resort Group, a Nevada corporation (“Mandalay”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 15, 2004 (the “Merger Agreement”), among the Company, MGM MIRAGE Acquisition Co. #61, a Nevada corporation, that was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and Mandalay. The acquisition was effected by merging Merger Sub with and into Mandalay (the “Merger”), with Mandalay continuing as the surviving corporation.
23
In connection with the Merger, Mandalay and its directors were named defendants inStephen Ham, Trustee for the J.C. Ham Residuary Trust v. Mandalay Resort Group, et al., which was filed in June 2004 in the 8th Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada, andRobert Lowinger v. Mandalay Resort Group, et al., which was filed in June 2004, also in the 8th Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada. Both of these actions make claims concerning the Merger, including claims of breach of fiduciary duty against Mandalay’s directors, and seek injunctive relief and unspecified monetary damages. The plaintiffs in both actions agreed that Mandalay and the directors did not need to respond to the pending complaints, as they intended to file a joint amended complaint and consolidate both actions. In December 2004, the plaintiff inHamfiled a motion for temporary restraining order and motion for preliminary injunction enjoining the Mandalay shareholder vote on the proposed merger and for an order shortening time to allow plaintiff to conduct expedited discovery. The plaintiff’s motion was denied. In January 2005, the plaintiff inHamfiled an amended complaint for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the defendants’ approval of the proposed merger. Mandalay moved to dismiss the amended complaint in April 2005. In October 2005, the Nevada District Court issued a minute order dismissing theHamcase, pursuant to which entry of a formal order and judgment thereon is in process. Plaintiff in theLowingercase has indicated his intention to file a voluntary dismissal of his action, but the dismissal has not yet been filed. The Company will continue to monitor and protect its interest in these cases until their final conclusion.
Other
We and our subsidiaries are also defendants in various other lawsuits most of which relate to routine matters incidental to our business. We do not believe that the outcome of this other pending litigation, considered in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Our share repurchases are only conducted under repurchase programs approved by our Board of Directors and publicly announced. The following table includes information about our share repurchases for the quarter ended September 30, 2005:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Shares Purchased | | | Maximum | |
| | Total | | | Average | | | As Part of a | | | Shares Still | |
| | Shares | | | Price Per | | | Publicly-Announced | | | Available for | |
| | Purchased | | | Share | | | Program | | | Repurchase | |
July 1 — July 31, 2005 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | | 20,000,000 | (1) |
August 1 — August 31, 2005 | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 42.48 | | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 18,000,000 | (1) |
September 1 — September 30, 2005 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,000,000 | (1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2,000,000 | | | | 42.48 | | | | 2,000,000 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
(1) | | The July 2004 repurchase program was announced in July 2004 for up to 20 million shares with no expiration. |
24
Item 6. Exhibits
| | |
4.1 | | Supplemental Indenture, dated September 9, 2005, among MGM MIRAGE, certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2005 (the “September 9, 2005 8-K”)). |
| | |
4.2 | | Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 9, 2005, among MGM MIRAGE, certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, and certain initial purchasers parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the September 9, 2005 8-K). |
| | |
10.1* | | Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2005 between the Company and J. Terrence Lanni (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2005 (the “September 16, 2005 8-K”)). |
| | |
10.2* | | Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2005 between the Company and Robert H. Baldwin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the September 16, 2005 8-K). |
| | |
10.3* | | Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2005 between the Company and John Redmond (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the September 16, 2005 8-K). |
| | |
10.4* | | Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2005 between the Company and James J. Murren (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the September 16, 2005 8-K). |
| | |
10.5* | | Employment Agreement, dated September 16, 2005 between the Company and Gary N. Jacobs (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the September 16, 2005 8-K). |
| | |
10.6 | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007) dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York N.A., as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.7 | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 8.5% Senior Notes due 2010), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York N.A., as successor to U.S. Trust Company, National Association, for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.8 | | Guarantee (Mirage Resorts, Incorporated 7.25% Senior Notes due 2006), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.9 | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.10 | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 6.45% Senior Notes due 2006), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank (Colorado), N.A., as successor in interest to First Interstate Bank of Nevada, N.A., as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.11 | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York N.A., successor to the United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee for the benefit of holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.6). |
| | |
* | | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
25
| | | | |
| 10.12 | | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 6.0% Senior Notes due 2009), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.7). |
| | | | |
| 10.13 | | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 6.0% Senior Notes due 2009 (Exchange Notes)), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.7). |
| | | | |
| 10.14 | | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 5.875% Senior Notes due 2014), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.7). |
| | | | |
| 10.15 | | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 5.875% Senior Notes due 2014 (Exchange Notes)), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.7). |
| | | | |
| 10.16 | | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 6.75% Senior Notes due 2012), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.7). |
| | | | |
| 10.17 | | | Guarantee (Mirage Resorts, Incorporated 6.75% Senior Notes due 2007 and 7.25% Debentures due 2017), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.8). |
| | | | |
| 10.18 | | | Guarantee (Mirage Resorts, Incorporated 6.75% Senior Notes due 2008), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor in interest to PNC Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.8). |
| | | | |
| 10.19 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 10.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.9). |
| | | | |
| 10.20 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 9.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2010), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.9). |
| | | | |
| 10.21 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 6.70% Senior Notes due 2096), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as successor in interest to First Interstate Bank of Nevada, N.A., as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
26
| | | | |
| 10.22 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 7.0% Senior Notes due 2036), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
| | | | |
| 10.23 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 9.5% Senior Notes due 2008), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
| | | | |
| 10.24 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group Floating Rate Convertible Senior Debentures due 2033), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
| | | | |
| 10.25 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 6.5% Senior Notes due 2009), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
| | | | |
| 10.26 | | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 6.375% Senior Notes due 2011), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein (substantially in the form of Exhibit 10.10). |
| | | | |
| 31.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
| | | | |
| 31.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
| | | | |
| 32.1 | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| | | | |
| 32.2 | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
| MGM MIRAGE | |
Date: November 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ J. TERRENCE LANNI | |
| | J. Terrence Lanni | |
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
|
| | | | |
| | |
Date: November 9, 2005 | /s/ JAMES J. MURREN | |
| James J. Murren | |
| President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |
|
28
Exhibit Index
| | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description |
10.6 | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007) dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York N.A., as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.7 | | Guarantee (MGM MIRAGE 8.5% Senior Notes due 2010), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York N.A., as successor to U.S. Trust Company, National Association, for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.8 | | Guarantee (Mirage Resorts, Incorporated 7.25% Senior Notes due 2006), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.9 | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of The Bank of New York, as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
10.10 | | Guarantee (Mandalay Resort Group 6.45% Senior Notes due 2006), dated as of April 25, 2005, by certain subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank (Colorado), N.A., as successor in interest to First Interstate Bank of Nevada, N.A., as trustee for the benefit of the holders of the Notes pursuant to the Indenture referred to therein. |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
29