Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality of Loans | 5. Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality of Loans As previously mentioned in Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company’s January 1, 2020 adoption of CECL resulted in a significant change to our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses since December 31, 2019. Portfolio segmentation has been redefined under CECL and therefore prior year tables are presented separately. The Day 1 increase in the allowance for credit loss on loans relating to adoption of ASU 2016-13 was $3.0 million, which decreased retained earnings by $2.3 million and increased the deferred tax asset by $0.7 million. There were no new loans purchased with credit deterioration during the months ended June The Company made a policy election to report AIR in the other assets line item on the balance sheet. AIR on loans totaled at June and was included in the allowance for loan credit losses to estimate the impact of accrued interest receivable related to loans with short-term modifications due to the pandemic as the length of time between interest recognition and the write-off of uncollectible interest could exceed days which exempts these loans from our policy election for accrued interest receivable. The estimated allowance for credit losses related to AIR at June was . The Day March and June allowance for credit losses calculations incorporated a -quarter forecast period to account for forecast economic conditions under each scenario utilized in the measurement. For periods beyond the -quarter forecast, the model reverted to long-term economic conditions over a -quarter reversion period on a straight-line basis. The quantitative model as of Day incorporated a baseline economic outlook sourced from a reputable -party that reflected economic conditions over the forecast period that were fairly consistent with current conditions at December Additionally, downside and upside scenarios were incorporated and weighted, along with the baseline outlook, to accommodate other potential economic conditions in the quantitative model. These scenarios and their respective weightings are evaluated at each measurement date and reflect management’s expectations as of Day The quantitative model as of March incorporated a baseline economic outlook sourced from a reputable -party that reflected continued economic deterioration, with unemployment peaking in the quarter of and remaining elevated well above the pre-COVID- pandemic levels into and a near-term negative GDP environment with a rebound beginning in the half of and stabilizing in A short-term reduction in prepayment and curtailment speeds was also applied to more reasonably model payment behavior during the COVID- national emergency. Additionally, downside and upside scenarios were incorporated and weighted, along with the baseline outlook, to accommodate other potential economic conditions in the quantitative model. These scenarios and their respective weightings are evaluated at each measurement date and reflect management’s expectations as of March Additional adjustments for COVID- related factors were not incorporated in the forecasts, such as the mitigating impact of unprecedented stimulus, including direct payments to individuals, increased unemployment benefits, deferral/modification initiatives and various government-sponsored loan programs. These factors were considered through a separate quantitative process and incorporated into the estimate for allowance for credit losses at March The quantitative model as of June incorporated a baseline economic outlook sourced from a reputable -party that reflected continued economic deterioration from the March forecasts, with unemployment peaking in the quarter of the measurement but sharply improving in the third quarter while remaining elevated well above the pre-COVID- pandemic levels for the entire forecast period and into ; GDP is forecast to rebound strongly in the third quarter followed by moderately negative growth in the fourth quarter with increasing growth through and stabilization in A short-term reduction in prepayment and curtailment speeds was also applied to more reasonably model payment behavior during the COVID- national emergency. Additionally, downside and upside scenarios were incorporated and weighted, along with the baseline outlook, to accommodate other potential economic conditions in the quantitative model. These scenarios and their respective weightings are evaluated at each measurement date and reflect management’s expectations as of June Additional adjustments for COVID- related factors were not incorporated in the forecasts, such as the mitigating impact of unprecedented stimulus, including direct payments to individuals, increased unemployment benefits, deferral/modification initiatives and various government-sponsored loan programs. The commercial & industrial and consumer segment models were based upon change in unemployment, with forecast values as of June well outside the observed historical experience. Therefore, adjustment was required to produce outputs more aligned with default expectations given the forecast economic environment. These factors were considered through a separate quantitative process and incorporated into the estimate for allowance for credit losses at June The following tables present the activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Total Balance as of March 31, 2020 $ 42,212 $ 37,546 $ 20,242 $ 100,000 Charge-offs (709 ) (6,178 ) (490 ) (7,377 ) Recoveries 113 1,810 114 2,037 Provision 8,770 6,916 3,154 18,840 Ending Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ 50,386 $ 40,094 $ 23,020 $ 113,500 (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Total Balance as of January 1, 2020 (after adoption of ASC 326) $ 27,156 $ 32,122 $ 16,721 $ 75,999 Charge-offs (1,729 ) (13,069 ) (805 ) (15,603 ) Recoveries 341 4,045 238 4,624 Provision 24,618 16,996 6,866 48,480 Ending Balance as of June 30, 2020 $ 50,386 $ 40,094 $ 23,020 $ 113,500 The increase in the allowance for credit losses from Day 1 to March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 was primarily due to macroeconomic factors surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. Individually Evaluated Loans As of June there were relationships identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis. As of March only relationship was identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis which had an amortized cost basis of $ million. This loan’s allowance for credit loss was $ million and was determined by an estimate of the fair value of the collateral which consisted of business assets (accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment). As of Day there were no relationships identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis. The following table sets forth information with regard to past due and nonperforming loans by loan segment: (In thousands) 31-60 Days Past Due Accruing 61-90 Days Past Due Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Accruing Total Past Due Accruing Nonaccrual Current Recorded Total Loans As of June 30, 2020 Commercial Loans: Commercial & Industrial $ 550 $ 39 $ 90 $ 679 $ 2,992 $ 1,125,180 $ 1,128,851 Commercial Real Estate 371 1,197 - 1,568 8,550 2,325,876 2,335,994 Paycheck Protection Plan - - - - - 510,097 510,097 Total Commercial Loans $ 921 $ 1,236 $ 90 $ 2,247 $ 11,542 $ 3,961,153 $ 3,974,942 Consumer Loans: Auto $ 6,012 $ 1,418 $ 673 $ 8,103 $ 2,452 $ 1,038,232 $ 1,048,787 Other Consumer 3,310 1,546 1,042 5,898 243 586,108 592,249 Total Consumer Loans $ 9,322 $ 2,964 $ 1,715 $ 14,001 $ 2,695 $ 1,624,340 $ 1,641,036 Residential $ 4,688 $ 1,238 $ 252 $ 6,178 $ 11,330 $ 1,994,505 $ 2,012,013 Total Loans $ 14,931 $ 5,438 $ 2,057 $ 22,426 $ 25,567 $ 7,579,998 $ 7,627,991 As of June 30, 2020, there were no loans in non-accrual without an allowance for credit losses. Credit Quality Indicators The Company has developed an internal loan grading system to evaluate and quantify the Company’s loan portfolio with respect to quality and risk. The system focuses on, among other things, financial strength of borrowers, experience and depth of borrower’s management, primary and secondary sources of repayment, payment history, nature of the business and outlook on particular industries. The internal grading system enables the Company to monitor the quality of the entire loan portfolio on a consistent basis and provide management with an early warning system, enabling recognition and response to problem loans and potential problem loans. Commercial Grading System For C&I, PPP and CRE loans, the Company uses a grading system that relies on quantifiable and measurable characteristics when available. This includes comparison of financial strength to available industry averages, comparison of transaction factors (loan terms and conditions) to loan policy and comparison of credit history to stated repayment terms and industry averages. Some grading factors are necessarily more subjective such as economic and industry factors, regulatory environment and management. C&I and CRE loans are graded Doubtful, Substandard, Special Mention and Pass. The increase in non-pass credits from December 31, 2019 was primarily due to the Company’s proactive approach to downgrade loans that were both in payment deferral due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in higher risk industries such as entertainment, restaurants, retail, healthcare and accommodations. Doubtful A Doubtful loan has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as a loss is deferred. Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital and lack the resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Pending events can include mergers, acquisitions, liquidations, capital injections, the perfection of liens on additional collateral, the valuation of collateral and refinancing. Generally, pending events should be resolved within a relatively short period and the ratings will be adjusted based on the new information. Nonaccrual treatment is required for Doubtful assets because of the high probability of loss. Substandard Substandard loans have a high probability of payment default or they have other well-defined weaknesses. They require more intensive supervision by bank management. Substandard loans are generally characterized by current or expected unprofitable operations, inadequate debt service coverage, inadequate liquidity or marginal capitalization. Repayment may depend on collateral or other credit risk mitigants. For some Substandard loans, the likelihood of full collection of interest and principal may be in doubt and those loans should be placed on nonaccrual. Although Substandard assets in the aggregate will have a distinct potential for loss, an individual asset’s loss potential does not have to be distinct for the asset to be rated Substandard. Special Mention Special Mention loans have potential weaknesses that may, if not checked or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. These loans pose elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a Substandard classification. Borrowers may be experiencing adverse operating trends (i.e., declining revenues or margins) or may be struggling with an ill-proportioned balance sheet (i.e., increasing inventory without an increase in sales, high leverage, tight liquidity). Adverse economic or market conditions, such as interest rate increases or the entry of a new competitor, may also support a Special Mention rating. Although a Special Mention loan has a higher probability of default than a Pass asset, its default is not imminent. Pass Loans graded as Pass encompass all loans not graded as Doubtful, Substandard or Special Mention. Pass loans are in compliance with loan covenants and payments are generally made as agreed. Pass loans range from superior quality to fair quality. Pass loans also include any portion of a government guaranteed loan, including PPP loans. Consumer and Residential Grading System Consumer and Residential loans are graded as either Nonperforming or Performing. Nonperforming Nonperforming loans are loans that are 1) over 90 days past due and interest is still accruing or 2) on nonaccrual status. Performing All loans not meeting any of the above criteria are considered Performing. The following tables illustrate the Company’s credit quality by loan class by vintage: (In thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis Revolving Loans Converted to Term Total Commercial & Industrial By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 188,416 $ 215,181 $ 109,174 $ 61,336 $ 46,937 $ 42,658 $ 361,229 $ 976 $ 1,025,907 Special Mention 700 16,231 7,001 5,833 4,111 3,923 30,708 - 68,507 Substandard 1,186 3,574 9,791 3,336 1,147 6,468 8,715 1 34,218 Doubtful - - - 219 - - - - 219 Total Commercial & Industrial $ 190,302 $ 234,986 $ 125,966 $ 70,724 $ 52,195 $ 53,049 $ 400,652 $ 977 $ 1,128,851 Commercial Real Estate By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 241,844 $ 395,753 $ 263,881 $ 320,976 $ 225,572 $ 452,302 $ 82,421 $ 703 $ 1,983,452 Special Mention 3,221 45,851 38,192 57,295 41,079 65,378 10,713 - 261,729 Substandard 196 4,528 6,197 3,976 4,597 60,062 11,257 - 90,813 Total Commercial Real Estate $ 245,261 $ 446,132 $ 308,270 $ 382,247 $ 271,248 $ 577,742 $ 104,391 $ 703 $ 2,335,994 Paycheck Protection Plan By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 510,097 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 510,097 Total Paycheck Protection Plan $ 510,097 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 510,097 Auto By Payment Activity: Performing $ 134,078 $ 381,783 $ 261,558 $ 164,661 $ 73,374 $ 30,184 $ 24 $ - $ 1,045,662 Nonperforming 69 872 1,169 576 439 - - - 3,125 Total Auto $ 134,147 $ 382,655 $ 262,727 $ 165,237 $ 73,813 $ 30,184 $ 24 $ - $ 1,048,787 Other Consumer By Payment Activity: Performing $ 107,544 $ 196,607 $ 153,420 $ 70,130 $ 21,537 $ 22,642 $ 19,065 $ 18 $ 590,963 Nonperforming 148 231 330 263 178 124 12 - 1,286 Total Other Consumer $ 107,692 $ 196,838 $ 153,750 $ 70,393 $ 21,715 $ 22,766 $ 19,077 $ 18 $ 592,249 Residential By Payment Activity: Performing $ 109,485 $ 229,947 $ 235,193 $ 198,283 $ 179,197 $ 766,771 $ 266,042 $ 15,514 $ 2,000,432 Nonperforming 34 485 651 1,365 351 8,695 - - 11,581 Total Residential $ 109,519 $ 230,432 $ 235,844 $ 199,648 $ 179,548 $ 775,466 $ 266,042 $ 15,514 $ 2,012,013 Total Loans $ 1,297,018 $ 1,491,043 $ 1,086,557 $ 888,249 $ 598,519 $ 1,459,207 $ 790,186 $ 17,212 $ 7,627,991 Troubled Debt Restructuring When the Company modifies a loan in a troubled debt restructuring, such modifications generally include one or a combination of the following: an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; temporary reduction in the interest rate; or change in scheduled payment amount. Residential and Consumer TDRs occurring during 2020 were due to the reduction in the interest rate or extension of the term. An allowance for impaired commercial and consumer loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, except when the sole (remaining) source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan an impairment charge would be recorded. The Company began offering short-term loan modifications to assist borrowers during the COVID-19 national emergency. The CARES Act, along with a joint agency statement issued by banking regulatory agencies, provides that short-term modifications made in response to COVID-19 do not need to be accounted for as a TDR. The Company evaluated the short-term modification programs provided to its borrowers and has concluded the modifications were generally made to borrowers who were in good standing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the modifications were temporary and minor in nature and therefore do not qualify for designation as TDRs. The following tables illustrate the recorded investment and number of modifications designated as TDRs, including the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and the recorded investment in the loans after restructuring: Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Consumer Loans: Auto - $ - $ - 1 $ 44 $ 44 Total Consumer Loans - $ - $ - 1 $ 44 $ 44 Residential 7 $ 269 $ 294 14 $ 960 $ 1,029 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 7 $ 269 $ 294 15 $ 1,004 $ 1,073 The following table illustrates the recorded investment and number of modifications for TDRs where a concession has been made and subsequently defaulted during the period: Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Commercial Loans: Commercial & Industrial - $ - 1 $ 387 Commercial Real Estate 1 168 1 168 Total Commercial Loans 1 $ 168 2 $ 555 Residential 26 $ 1,505 38 $ 2,192 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 27 $ 1,673 40 $ 2,747 Allowance for Loan Losses Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the Company’s calculated allowance for loan losses used the incurred loss methodology. The following tables are disclosures related to the allowance for loan losses in prior periods. The following table illustrates the changes in the allowance for loan losses by our portfolio segments: (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Real Estate Total Balance as of March 31, 2019 $ 32,159 $ 36,804 $ 2,442 $ 71,405 Charge-offs (1,171 ) (6,927 ) (334 ) (8,432 ) Recoveries 118 1,742 55 1,915 Provision 2,046 4,915 316 7,277 Ending Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 33,152 $ 36,534 $ 2,479 $ 72,165 (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Real Estate Total Balance as of December 31, 2018 $ 32,759 $ 37,178 $ 2,568 $ 72,505 Charge-offs (1,918 ) (14,360 ) (608 ) (16,886 ) Recoveries 212 3,141 109 3,462 Provision 2,099 10,575 410 13,084 Ending Balance as of June 30, 2019 $ 33,152 $ 36,534 $ 2,479 $ 72,165 The following table illustrates the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment by portfolio segments: (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Real Estate Total As of December 31, 2019 Allowance for loan losses $ 34,525 $ 35,647 $ 2,793 $ 72,965 Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment - - - - Allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 34,525 $ 35,647 $ 2,793 $ 72,965 Ending balance of loans $ 3,444,266 $ 2,246,676 $ 1,445,156 $ 7,136,098 Ending balance of originated loans individually evaluated for impairment 3,488 7,044 7,721 18,253 Ending balance of acquired loans collectively evaluated for impairment 115,266 23,733 125,879 264,878 Ending balance of originated loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 3,325,512 $ 2,215,899 $ 1,311,556 $ 6,852,967 The following tables set forth information with regard to past due and nonperforming loans by loan class: (In thousands) 31-60 Days Past Due Accruing 61-90 Days Past Due Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Accruing Total Past Due Accruing Nonaccrual Current Recorded Total Loans As of December 31, 2019 Originated Commercial Loans: C&I $ 1,227 $ - $ - $ 1,227 $ 1,177 $ 838,502 $ 840,906 CRE 3,576 - - 3,576 4,847 1,941,143 1,949,566 Business Banking 794 162 - 956 7,035 530,537 538,528 Total Commercial Loans $ 5,597 $ 162 $ - $ 5,759 $ 13,059 $ 3,310,182 $ 3,329,000 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 11,860 $ 2,108 $ 1,005 $ 14,973 $ 2,175 $ 1,176,487 $ 1,193,635 Specialty Lending 3,153 2,087 1,307 6,547 - 535,516 542,063 Direct 2,564 564 478 3,606 2,475 481,164 487,245 Total Consumer Loans $ 17,577 $ 4,759 $ 2,790 $ 25,126 $ 4,650 $ 2,193,167 $ 2,222,943 Residential Real Estate $ 1,179 $ 190 $ 663 $ 2,032 $ 5,872 $ 1,311,373 $ 1,319,277 Total Originated Loans $ 24,353 $ 5,111 $ 3,453 $ 32,917 $ 23,581 $ 6,814,722 $ 6,871,220 Acquired Commercial Loans: C&I $ 149 $ - $ - $ 149 $ - $ 19,215 $ 19,364 CRE - - - - - 60,937 60,937 Business Banking 397 287 - 684 382 33,899 34,965 Total Commercial Loans $ 546 $ 287 $ - $ 833 $ 382 $ 114,051 $ 115,266 Consumer Loans: Direct $ 136 $ 58 $ - $ 194 $ 105 $ 23,434 $ 23,733 Total Consumer Loans $ 136 $ 58 $ - $ 194 $ 105 $ 23,434 $ 23,733 Residential Real Estate $ 575 $ 20 $ 264 $ 859 $ 1,106 $ 123,914 $ 125,879 Total Acquired Loans $ 1,257 $ 365 $ 264 $ 1,886 $ 1,593 $ 261,399 $ 264,878 Total Loans $ 25,610 $ 5,476 $ 3,717 $ 34,803 $ 25,174 $ 7,076,121 $ 7,136,098 The following table provides information on impaired loans specifically evaluated for impairment: December 31, 2019 (In thousands) Recorded Investment Balance (Book) Unpaid Principal Balance (Legal) Related Allowance Originated With no related allowance recorded: Commercial Loans: C&I $ 76 $ 302 $ CRE 2,410 2,437 Business Banking 1,002 1,443 Total Commercial Loans $ 3,488 $ 4,182 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 154 $ 242 Direct 6,862 8,335 Specialty Lending 28 28 Total Consumer Loans $ 7,044 $ 8,605 Residential Real Estate $ 7,721 $ 9,754 Total $ 18,253 $ 22,541 Total Loans $ 18,253 $ 22,541 $ - The following table summarizes the average recorded investments on loans specifically evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 (In thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Originated Commercial Loans: C&I $ 326 $ - $ 383 $ 1 CRE 4,212 31 4,248 61 Business Banking 1,090 5 1,159 11 Total Commercial Loans $ 5,628 $ 36 $ 5,790 $ 73 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 221 $ 4 $ 198 $ 6 Direct 7,553 98 7,636 196 Total Consumer Loans $ 7,774 $ 102 $ 7,834 $ 202 Residential Real Estate $ 7,455 $ 82 $ 7,323 $ 159 Total Originated $ 20,857 $ 220 $ 20,947 $ 434 Total Loans $ 20,857 $ 220 $ 20,947 $ 434 The following tables illustrate the Company’s credit quality by loan class: (In thousands) As of December 31, 2019 Originated Commercial Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: C&I CRE Total Pass $ 782,763 $ 1,868,678 $ 2,651,441 Special Mention 28,380 30,519 58,899 Substandard 29,257 50,369 79,626 Doubtful 506 - 506 Total $ 840,906 $ 1,949,566 $ 2,790,472 Business Banking Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: Business Banking Total Non-classified $ 524,725 $ 524,725 Classified 13,803 13,803 Total $ 538,528 $ 538,528 Consumer Credit Exposure By Payment Activity: Indirect Auto Specialty Lending Direct Total Performing $ 1,190,455 $ 540,756 $ 484,292 $ 2,215,503 Nonperforming 3,180 1,307 2,953 7,440 Total $ 1,193,635 $ 542,063 $ 487,245 $ 2,222,943 Residential Real Estate Credit Exposure By Payment Activity: Residential Real Estate Total Performing $ 1,312,742 $ 1,312,742 Nonperforming 6,535 6,535 Total $ 1,319,277 $ 1,319,277 Acquired Commercial Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: C&I CRE Total Pass $ 17,801 $ 60,545 $ 78,346 Special Mention 1,269 - 1,269 Substandard 294 392 686 Total $ 19,364 $ 60,937 $ 80,301 Business Banking Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: Business Banking Total Non-classified $ 32,030 $ 32,030 Classified 2,935 2,935 Total $ 34,965 $ 34,965 Consumer Credit Exposure By Payment Activity: Direct Total Performing $ 23,628 $ 23,628 Nonperforming 105 105 Total $ 23,733 $ 23,733 Residential Real Estate Credit Exposure By Payment Activity: Residential Real Estate Total Performing $ 124,509 $ 124,509 Nonperforming 1,370 1,370 Total $ 125,879 125,879 The following table illustrates the recorded investment and number of modifications for modified loans, including the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and the recorded investment in the loans after restructuring: Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial Loans: C&I - $ - $ - 1 $ 65 $ 65 Business Banking - - - 2 388 388 Total Commercial Loans - $ - $ - 3 $ 453 $ 453 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto 4 $ 60 $ 60 9 $ 134 $ 134 Direct 2 68 77 8 388 398 Total Consumer Loans 6 $ 128 $ 137 17 $ 522 $ 532 Residential Real Estate 2 $ 369 $ 381 8 $ 757 $ 786 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 8 $ 497 $ 518 28 $ 1,732 $ 1,771 The following table illustrates the recorded investment and number of modifications for TDRs where a concession has been made and subsequently defaulted during the period: Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto - $ - 2 $ 17 Direct 14 496 19 958 Total Consumer Loans 14 $ 496 21 $ 975 Residential Real Estate 8 $ 429 13 $ 644 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 22 $ 925 34 $ 1,619 |