Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality of Loans | 6. Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality of Loans As previously mentioned in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company’s January 1, 2020 adoption of CECL resulted in a significant change to our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses since December 31, 2019. Portfolio segmentation has been redefined under CECL and therefore prior year tables are presented separately. The Day 1 increase in the allowance for credit loss on loans relating to adoption of ASU 2016-13 was $3.0 million, which decreased retained earnings by $2.3 million and increased the deferred tax asset by $0.7 million. There were no loans purchased with credit deterioration during the year ended December 31, 2020. During 2020, the Company purchased $51.9 million of consumer loans at a 1% discount. The allowance for credit losses recorded for these loans on the purchase date was $3.6 million. The Company made a policy election to report AIR in the other assets line item on the balance sheet. AIR on loans totaled $23.7 million at December 31, 2020 and was included in the allowance for loan credit losses to estimate the impact of accrued interest receivable related to loans with modifications due to the pandemic as the length of time between interest recognition and the write-off of uncollectible interest could exceed 120 days, exempting these loans from our policy election for accrued interest receivable. The estimated allowance for credit losses related to AIR at December 31, 2020 was $0.6 million. The Day 1 and December 31, 2020 allowance for credit losses calculation incorporated a 6-quarter forecast period to account for forecast economic conditions under each scenario utilized in the measurement. For periods beyond the 6-quarter forecast, the model reverted to long-term economic conditions over a 4-quarter reversion period on a straight-line basis. The quantitative model as of December 31, 2020 incorporated a baseline economic outlook, along with alternative upside and downside scenarios sourced from a reputable third-party to accommodate other potential economic conditions in the model. The baseline outlook reflected an unemployment rate environment above pre-COVID-19 levels for the entire forecast period, though steadily improving, before returning to low single digits by the end of 2023. Northeast GDP’s annual growth was expected to start 2021 in the low to mid-single digits, with a peak growth rate of 8% in the fourth quarter of 2021 and steadily falling back down to normalized levels through 2023 and 2024. Other utilized economic variables show improvement in their respective forecasts, namely business output. Key assumptions in the baseline economic outlook included an additional stimulus package passed at the same timing and a comparable level to that of the actual $900 billion COVID-19 relief package passed in December 2020 along with no significant secondary surge in COVID-19 cases or pandemic-related business closures. The alternative downside scenario assumed deteriorated economic and epidemiological conditions from the baseline outlook. In the same way, the alternative upside scenario assumed a faster economic recovery and more effective management of the COVID-19 virus from the baseline outlook. These scenarios and their respective weightings are evaluated at each measurement date and reflect management’s expectations as of December 31, 2020. Additional adjustments were made for COVID-19 related factors not incorporated in the forecasts, such as the mitigating impact of unprecedented stimulus in 2020, including direct payments to individuals, increased unemployment benefits, the Company’s loan deferral and modification initiatives and various government-sponsored loan programs. The commercial & industrial and consumer segment models were based upon percent change in unemployment with modeled values as of December 31, 2020 well outside the observed historical experience. Therefore, adjustments were required to produce outputs more aligned with default expectations given the forecast economic environment. Additionally, the Company identified a slightly higher level of criticized and classified loans during 2020 than those contemplated by the model during similar economic conditions in the past for which an adjustment was made for estimated expected additional losses above modeled output. These factors were considered through a separate quantitative process and incorporated into the estimate for allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2020. The allowance for credit losses totaled $110.0 million at December 31, 2020, compared to $73.0 million at December 31, 2019. The allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans was 1.47% at December 31, 2020, compared to 1.02% at December 31, 2019. The increase in the allowance for credit losses from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the deteriorated economic forecast due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The provision for loan losses was $51.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, compared to $25.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. The increase to provision expense was driven by the deteriorated economic forecast due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company expects that with the adoption of CECL beginning on January 1, 2020, provision expense may become more volatile due to changes in CECL model assumptions of credit quality, macroeconomic factors and conditions, and loan composition, which drive the allowance for credit losses balance. The following table illustrate the changes in the allowance for credit losses by our portfolio segments: (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Total Balance as of January 1, 2020 (after adoption of ASC 326) $ 27,156 $ 32,122 $ 16,721 $ 75,999 Charge-offs (4,005 ) (21,938 ) (1,135 ) (27,078 ) Recoveries 786 8,541 618 9,945 Provision 27,005 19,078 5,051 51,134 Ending Balance as of December 31, 2020 $ 50,942 $ 37,803 $ 21,255 $ 110,000 The increase in the allowance for credit losses from Day 1 to December 31, 2020 was primarily due to the deterioration of macroeconomic factors surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. Individually Evaluated Loans As of December 31, 2020, there were five relationships identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis which had an amortized cost basis of $15.2 million. The allowance for credit loss was $3.2 million and was determined by an estimate of the fair value of the collateral which consisted of business assets (accounts receivable, inventory and machinery, real estate and equipment). As of Day 1, there were no relationships identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis. The following table sets forth information with regard to past due and nonperforming loans by loan segment: (In thousands) 31-60 Days Past Due Accruing 61-90 Days Past Due Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Accruing Total Past Due Accruing Nonaccrual Current Recorded Total Loans As of December 31, 2020 Commercial Loans: C&I $ 2,235 $ 2,394 $ 23 $ 4,652 $ 4,278 $ 1,116,686 $ 1,125,616 CRE 682 - 470 1,152 19,971 2,391,162 2,412,285 PPP - - - - - 430,810 430,810 Total Commercial Loans $ 2,917 $ 2,394 $ 493 $ 5,804 $ 24,249 $ 3,938,658 $ 3,968,711 Consumer Loans: Auto $ 9,125 $ 1,553 $ 866 $ 11,544 $ 2,730 $ 877,831 $ 892,105 Other Consumer 3,711 1,929 1,272 6,912 290 640,952 648,154 Total Consumer Loans $ 12,836 $ 3,482 $ 2,138 $ 18,456 $ 3,020 $ 1,518,783 $ 1,540,259 Residential $ 2,719 $ 309 $ 518 $ 3,546 $ 17,378 $ 1,968,991 $ 1,989,915 Total Loans $ 18,472 $ 6,185 $ 3,149 $ 27,806 $ 44,647 $ 7,426,432 $ 7,498,885 As of December 31, 2020, there were no loans in nonaccrual without an allowance for credit losses. Credit Quality Indicators The Company has developed an internal loan grading system to evaluate and quantify the Company’s loan portfolio with respect to quality and risk. The system focuses on, among other things, financial strength of borrowers, experience and depth of borrower’s management, primary and secondary sources of repayment, payment history, nature of the business and outlook on particular industries. The internal grading system enables the Company to monitor the quality of the entire loan portfolio on a consistent basis and provide management with an early warning system, enabling recognition and response to problem loans and potential problem loans. Commercial Grading System For C&I, PPP and CRE loans, the Company uses a grading system that relies on quantifiable and measurable characteristics when available. This includes comparison of financial strength to available industry averages, comparison of transaction factors (loan terms and conditions) to loan policy and comparison of credit history to stated repayment terms and industry averages. Some grading factors are necessarily more subjective such as economic and industry factors, regulatory environment and management. C&I and CRE loans are graded Doubtful, Substandard, Special Mention and Pass. The increase in non-pass credits from December 31, 2019 was primarily due to the Company’s proactive approach to downgrade loans that were both in payment deferral due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in higher risk industries such as entertainment, restaurants, retail, healthcare and accommodations. Doubtful A Doubtful loan has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as a loss is deferred. Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital and lack the resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Pending events can include mergers, acquisitions, liquidations, capital injections, the perfection of liens on additional collateral, the valuation of collateral and refinancing. Generally, pending events should be resolved within a relatively short period and the ratings will be adjusted based on the new information. Nonaccrual treatment is required for Doubtful assets because of the high probability of loss. Substandard Substandard loans have a high probability of payment default or they have other well-defined weaknesses. They require more intensive supervision by bank management. Substandard loans are generally characterized by current or expected unprofitable operations, inadequate debt service coverage, inadequate liquidity or marginal capitalization. Repayment may depend on collateral or other credit risk mitigants. For some Substandard loans, the likelihood of full collection of interest and principal may be in doubt and those loans should be placed on nonaccrual. Although Substandard assets in the aggregate will have a distinct potential for loss, an individual asset’s loss potential does not have to be distinct for the asset to be rated Substandard. Special Mention Special Mention loans have potential weaknesses that may, if not checked or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. These loans pose elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a Substandard classification. Borrowers may be experiencing adverse operating trends (i.e., declining revenues or margins) or may be struggling with an ill-proportioned balance sheet (i.e., increasing inventory without an increase in sales, high leverage, tight liquidity). Adverse economic or market conditions, such as interest rate increases or the entry of a new competitor, may also support a Special Mention rating. Although a Special Mention loan has a higher probability of default than a Pass asset, its default is not imminent. Pass Loans graded as Pass encompass all loans not graded as Doubtful, Substandard or Special Mention. Pass loans are in compliance with loan covenants and payments are generally made as agreed. Pass loans range from superior quality to fair quality. Pass loans also include any portion of a government guaranteed loan, including PPP loans. Consumer and Residential Grading System Consumer and Residential loans are graded as either Nonperforming or Performing. Nonperforming Nonperforming loans are loans that are 1) over 90 days past due and interest is still accruing or 2) on nonaccrual status. Performing All loans not meeting any of the above criteria are considered Performing. The following tables illustrate the Company’s credit quality by loan class by vintage a (In thousands) 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Prior Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis Revolving Loans Converted to Term Total C&I By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 331,921 $ 182,329 $ 91,230 $ 41,856 $ 32,625 $ 32,609 $ 322,674 $ 412 $ 1,035,656 Special Mention 20,064 6,534 5,053 4,702 1,624 2,830 13,614 - 54,421 Substandard 338 6,364 10,219 3,388 791 4,272 9,945 14 35,331 Doubtful - - - 207 - 1 - - 208 Total C&I $ 352,323 $ 195,227 $ 106,502 $ 50,153 $ 35,040 $ 39,712 $ 346,233 $ 426 $ 1,125,616 CRE By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 469,919 $ 361,187 $ 256,154 $ 271,874 $ 212,197 $ 383,690 $ 113,128 $ 4,034 $ 2,072,183 Special Mention 2,051 44,034 22,260 55,039 36,830 43,537 1,297 11,524 216,572 Substandard 536 5,307 18,298 15,691 6,018 62,168 1,501 4,642 114,161 Doubtful - 1,897 - - - 7,472 - - 9,369 Total CRE $ 472,506 $ 412,425 $ 296,712 $ 342,604 $ 255,045 $ 496,867 $ 115,926 $ 20,200 $ 2,412,285 PPP By Internally Assigned Grade: Pass $ 430,810 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 430,810 Total PPP $ 430,810 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 430,810 Auto By Payment Activity: Performing $ 197,881 $ 314,034 $ 201,850 $ 115,977 $ 45,495 $ 13,250 $ 22 $ - $ 888,509 Nonperforming 359 1,140 1,135 525 437 - - - 3,596 Total Auto $ 198,240 $ 315,174 $ 202,985 $ 116,502 $ 45,932 $ 13,250 $ 22 $ - $ 892,105 Other Consumer By Payment Activity: Performing $ 234,628 $ 178,411 $ 127,549 $ 55,676 $ 14,255 $ 17,414 $ 18,588 $ 71 $ 646,592 Nonperforming 339 418 307 265 90 133 10 - 1,562 Total Other Consumer $ 234,967 $ 178,829 $ 127,856 $ 55,941 $ 14,345 $ 17,547 $ 18,598 $ 71 $ 648,154 Residential By Payment Activity: Performing $ 237,338 $ 210,505 $ 213,437 $ 182,993 $ 164,424 $ 684,495 $ 268,878 $ 9,991 $ 1,972,061 Nonperforming 1,245 659 2,318 2,535 902 10,195 - - 17,854 Total Residential $ 238,583 $ 211,164 $ 215,755 $ 185,528 $ 165,326 $ 694,690 $ 268,878 $ 9,991 $ 1,989,915 Total Loans $ 1,927,429 $ 1,312,819 $ 949,810 $ 750,728 $ 515,688 $ 1,262,066 $ 749,657 $ 30,688 $ 7,498,885 Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures As of December 31, 2020, the allowance for losses on unfunded commitments totaled $6.4 million, compared to $0.9 million as of December 31, 2019. Prior to January 1, 2020, the Company calculated the allowance for losses on unfunded commitments using the incurred loss methodology. Troubled Debt Restructuring When the Company modifies a loan in a troubled debt restructuring, such modifications generally include one or a combination of the following: an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; temporary reduction in the interest rate; or change in scheduled payment amount. Residential and Consumer TDRs occurring during 2020 were due to the reduction in the interest rate or extension of the term. An allowance for impaired commercial and consumer loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, except when the sole (remaining) source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. If management determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan an impairment charge would be recorded. The Company began offering loan modifications to assist borrowers during the COVID-19 national emergency. The CARES Act, along with a joint agency statement issued by banking regulatory agencies, provides that modifications made in response to COVID-19 do not need to be accounted for as a TDR. The Company evaluated the modification programs provided to its borrowers and has concluded the modifications were generally made in accordance with the CARES Act guidance to borrowers who were in good standing prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and are not required to be designated as TDRs. See Note 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements for more information. The following tables illustrate the recorded investment and number of modifications designated as TDRs, including the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and the recorded investment in the loans after restructuring: Year Ended December 31, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial Loans: C&I 1 $ 22 $ 22 Total Commercial Loans 1 $ 22 $ 22 Consumer Loans: Auto 1 $ 44 $ 44 Total Consumer Loans 1 $ 44 $ 44 Residential 35 $ 2,834 $ 2,960 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 37 $ 2,900 $ 3,026 The following table illustrates the recorded investment and number of modifications for TDRs where a concession has been made and subsequently defaulted during the year: Year Ended December 31, 2020 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Commercial Loans: C&I 1 $ 387 CRE 1 168 Total Commercial Loans 2 $ 555 Consumer Loans: Auto 1 $ 6 Total Consumer Loans 1 $ 6 Residential 61 $ 3,213 Total Trouble Debt Restructurings 64 $ 3,774 Allowance for Loan Losses Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the Company’s calculated allowance for loan losses under the incurred loss methodology. The following tables are disclosures related to the allowance for loan losses in prior periods. The following tables illustrate the changes in the allowance for loan losses by our portfolio segments: (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Real Estate Total Balance as of December 31, 2018 $ 32,759 $ 37,178 $ 2,568 $ 72,505 Charge-offs (3,151 ) (28,398 ) (991 ) (32,540 ) Recoveries 534 6,913 141 7,588 Provision 4,383 19,954 1,075 25,412 Ending Balance as of December 31, 2019 $ 34,525 $ 35,647 $ 2,793 $ 72,965 Balance as of December 31, 2017 $ 27,606 $ 36,830 $ 5,064 $ 69,500 Charge-offs (3,463 ) (29,752 ) (913 ) (34,128 ) Recoveries 1,178 6,821 306 8,305 Provision 7,438 23,279 (1,889 ) 28,828 Ending Balance as of December 31, 2018 $ 32,759 $ 37,178 $ 2,568 $ 72,505 The following table illustrates the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment by portfolio segments: (In thousands) Commercial Loans Consumer Loans Residential Real Estate Total As of December 31, 2019 Allowance for loan losses $ 34,525 $ 35,647 $ 2,793 $ 72,965 Allowance for loans individually evaluated for impairment - - - - Allowance for loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 34,525 $ 35,647 $ 2,793 $ 72,965 Ending balance of loans $ 3,444,266 $ 2,246,676 $ 1,445,156 $ 7,136,098 Ending balance of originated loans individually evaluated for impairment 3,488 7,044 7,721 18,253 Ending balance of acquired loans collectively evaluated for impairment 115,266 23,733 125,879 264,878 Ending balance of originated loans collectively evaluated for impairment $ 3,325,512 $ 2,215,899 $ 1,311,556 $ 6,852,967 The following table sets forth information with regard to past due and nonperforming loans by loan class: (In thousands) 31-60 Days Past Due Accruing 61-90 Days Past Due Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Accruing Total Past Due Accruing Nonaccrual Current Recorded Total Loans As of December 31, 2019 Originated Commercial Loans: C&I $ 1,227 $ - $ - $ 1,227 $ 1,177 $ 838,502 $ 840,906 CRE 3,576 - - 3,576 4,847 1,941,143 1,949,566 Business Banking 794 162 - 956 7,035 530,537 538,528 Total Commercial Loans $ 5,597 $ 162 $ - $ 5,759 $ 13,059 $ 3,310,182 $ 3,329,000 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 11,860 $ 2,108 $ 1,005 $ 14,973 $ 2,175 $ 1,176,487 $ 1,193,635 Specialty Lending 3,153 2,087 1,307 6,547 - 535,516 542,063 Direct 2,564 564 478 3,606 2,475 481,164 487,245 Total Consumer Loans $ 17,577 $ 4,759 $ 2,790 $ 25,126 $ 4,650 $ 2,193,167 $ 2,222,943 Residential Real Estate $ 1,179 $ 190 $ 663 $ 2,032 $ 5,872 $ 1,311,373 $ 1,319,277 Total Originated Loans $ 24,353 $ 5,111 $ 3,453 $ 32,917 $ 23,581 $ 6,814,722 $ 6,871,220 Acquired Commercial Loans: C&I $ 149 $ - $ - $ 149 $ - $ 19,215 $ 19,364 CRE - - - - - 60,937 60,937 Business Banking 397 287 - 684 382 33,899 34,965 Total Commercial Loans $ 546 $ 287 $ - $ 833 $ 382 $ 114,051 $ 115,266 Consumer Loans: Direct $ 136 $ 58 $ - $ 194 $ 105 $ 23,434 $ 23,733 Total Consumer Loans $ 136 $ 58 $ - $ 194 $ 105 $ 23,434 $ 23,733 Residential Real Estate $ 575 $ 20 $ 264 $ 859 $ 1,106 $ 123,914 $ 125,879 Total Acquired Loans $ 1,257 $ 365 $ 264 $ 1,886 $ 1,593 $ 261,399 $ 264,878 Total Loans $ 25,610 $ 5,476 $ 3,717 $ 34,803 $ 25,174 $ 7,076,121 $ 7,136,098 The following table provides information on loans specifically evaluated for impairment: December 31, 2019 (In thousands) Recorded Investment Balance (Book) Unpaid Principal Balance (Legal) Related Allowance Originated With no related allowance recorded: Commercial Loans: C&I $ 76 $ 302 CRE 2,410 2,437 - Business Banking 1,002 1,443 Total Commercial Loans $ 3,488 $ 4,182 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 154 $ 242 Direct 6,862 8,335 Specialty Lending 28 28 Total Consumer Loans $ 7,044 $ 8,605 Residential Real Estate $ 7,721 $ 9,754 Total $ 18,253 $ 22,541 Total Loans $ 18,253 $ 22,541 $ - The following table summarizes the average recorded investments on loans specifically evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized: December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 (In thousands) Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Originated Commercial Loans: C&I $ 242 $ 1 $ 453 $ 1 CRE 3,311 123 4,078 128 Business Banking 1,089 24 1,018 26 Total Commercial Loans $ 4,642 $ 148 $ 5,549 $ 155 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto $ 192 $ 10 $ 179 $ 10 Direct 7,387 382 7,922 431 Specialty Lending 7 1 - - Total Consumer Loans $ 7,586 $ 393 $ 8,101 $ 441 Residential Real Estate $ 7,505 $ 350 $ 6,779 $ 305 Total Originated $ 19,733 $ 891 $ 20,429 $ 901 Total Loans $ 19,733 $ 891 $ 20,429 $ 901 Under the incurred loss method, classified loans, including all TDRs and nonaccrual Commercial loans that are graded Substandard, Doubtful or Loss, with outstanding balances of $1.0 million or more are evaluated for impairment through the Company’s quarterly status review process. In the third quarter of 2019 the threshold for evaluating loans for impairment was increased from $750 thousand. In determining that we will be unable to collect all principal and/or interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreements, we consider factors such as payment history and changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, local economic conditions, historical loss experience and the conditions of the various markets in which the collateral may be liquidated. For loans that are identified as impaired, impairment is measured by one of three methods: 1) the fair value of collateral less cost to sell, 2) present value of expected future cash flows or 3) the loan’s observable market price. These impaired loans are reviewed on a quarterly basis for changes in the level of impairment. Impaired amounts are charged off immediately if such amounts are determined by management to be uncollectable. Any change to the previously recognized impairment loss is recognized as a component of the provision for loan losses. The following tables illustrate the Company’s credit quality by loan class: (In thousands) As of December 31, 2019 Originated Commercial Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: C&I CRE Total Pass $ 782,763 $ 1,868,678 $ 2,651,441 Special Mention 28,380 30,519 58,899 Substandard 29,257 50,369 79,626 Doubtful 506 - 506 Total $ 840,906 $ 1,949,566 $ 2,790,472 Business Banking Credit Exposure Business By Internally Assigned Grade: Banking Total Non-classified $ 524,725 $ 524,725 Classified 13,803 13,803 Total $ 538,528 $ 538,528 Consumer Credit Exposure Specialty By Payment Activity: Indirect Auto Lending Direct Total Performing $ 1,190,455 $ 540,756 $ 484,292 $ 2,215,503 Nonperforming 3,180 1,307 2,953 7,440 Total $ 1,193,635 $ 542,063 $ 487,245 $ 2,222,943 Residential Real Estate Credit Exposure Residential By Payment Activity: Real Estate Total Performing $ 1,312,742 $ 1,312,742 Nonperforming 6,535 6,535 Total $ 1,319,277 $ 1,319,277 Acquired Commercial Credit Exposure By Internally Assigned Grade: C&I CRE Total Pass $ 17,801 $ 60,545 $ 78,346 Special Mention 1,269 - 1,269 Substandard 294 392 686 Total $ 19,364 $ 60,937 $ 80,301 Business Banking Credit Exposure Business By Internally Assigned Grade: Banking Total Non-classified $ 32,030 $ 32,030 Classified 2,935 2,935 Total $ 34,965 $ 34,965 Consumer Credit Exposure By Payment Activity: Direct Total Performing $ 23,628 $ 23,628 Nonperforming 105 105 Total $ 23,733 $ 23,733 Residential Real Estate Credit Exposure Residential By Payment Activity: Real Estate Total Performing $ 124,509 $ 124,509 Nonperforming 1,370 1,370 Total $ 125,879 $ 125,879 The following tables illustrate the recorded investment and number of modifications for modified loans, including the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and the recorded investment in the loans after restructuring: Year Ended December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Commercial Loans: C&I 1 $ 65 $ 65 CRE 1 402 402 Business Banking 3 425 431 Total Commercial Loans 5 $ 892 $ 898 Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto 9 $ 134 $ 134 Direct 11 450 480 Total Consumer Loans 20 $ 584 $ 614 Residential Real Estate 12 $ 1,032 $ 1,091 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 37 $ 2,508 $ 2,603 The following table illustrates the recorded investment and number of modifications for TDRs where a concession has been made and subsequently defaulted during the period: Year Ended December 31, 2019 (Dollars in thousands) Number of Contracts Recorded Investment Consumer Loans: Indirect Auto 3 $ 18 Direct 29 1,385 Total Consumer Loans 32 $ 1,403 Residential Real Estate 23 $ 1,203 Total Troubled Debt Restructurings 55 $ 2,606 |