NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2013 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Datawatch and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In 2013, the Company dissolved its’ international operation, Datawatch Europe Limited, and recorded a gain on disposition of investment of approximately $374,000. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Accounting Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and judgments, which are evaluated on an on-going basis, that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates and judgments. In particular, significant estimates and judgments include those related to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns reserve, useful lives of property and equipment, the valuation of net deferred tax assets, acquired intellectual property and other intangible assets and share-based awards. |
|
The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue allocated to software products, specified upgrades and enhancements is recognized upon delivery of the related product, upgrades or enhancements. Revenue is allocated by vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value to customer support (primarily maintenance) and is recognized ratably over the term of the support, and revenue allocated using VSOE to service elements (primarily training and consulting) is recognized as the services are performed. The residual method of revenue recognition is used for multi-element arrangements when the VSOE of the fair value does not exist for one of the delivered elements. Under the residual method, the arrangement fee is recognized as follows: (1) the total fair value of the undelivered elements, as supported by VSOE, is deferred and subsequently recognized as such items are delivered or completed and (2) the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount allocated to the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements. |
|
The Company licenses its software products directly to end-users, through value added resellers and through distributors. Sales to distributors and resellers accounted for approximately 45%, 31% and 41% of total sales for the years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenue from the sale of all software products (when separately sold) is generally recognized at the time of shipment, provided there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fee is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured, persuasive evidence of the arrangement exists and there are no significant obligations remaining. The Company’s software product offerings do not require customization. The Company’s software products can be installed and used by customers on their own with little or no configuration required. Multi-user licenses marketed by the Company are sold as a right to use the number of licenses, and the license fee revenue is recognized upon delivery of all software required to satisfy the number of licenses sold. Upon delivery, the licensing fee is payable without further delivery obligations by the Company. |
|
Datawatch software products are generally sold in multiple element arrangements which may include software licenses, professional services and customer support. In such multiple element arrangements, the Company applies the residual method in determining revenue to be allocated to the software license. In applying the residual method, the Company deducts from the sale proceeds the VSOE of fair value of the professional services and customer support in determining the residual fair value of the software license. The VSOE of fair value of the services and customer support is based on the amounts charged for these elements when sold separately. Professional services include advanced modeling, application design, implementation and configuration and process optimization with revenue recognized as the services are performed. These services are generally delivered on a time and materials basis, are billed on a current basis as the work is performed, and generally do not involve modification or customization of the software or any unusual acceptance clauses or terms. The Company has established VSOE of fair value for the majority of its professional services using the bell-shaped curve method. Customer support is typically provided under a maintenance agreement which provides technical support and rights to unspecified software maintenance updates and bug fixes on a when-and-if available basis. Revenue from customer support services is deferred and recognized ratably over the period of support (generally one year). Such deferred amounts are recorded as part of deferred revenue in the Company’s accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company has established VSOE of fair value for the majority of its customer support based on stated renewal rates only if the rate is determined to be substantive and falls within the Company’s customary pricing practices. VSOE of fair value for sales through the Company’s distribution channel was established using the bell-shaped curve method. VSOE calculations are updated and reviewed quarterly. |
|
The Company also licenses its enterprise software using a subscription model. At the time a customer enters into a binding agreement to purchase a subscription, the customer is invoiced for an initial 90 day service period and an account receivable and deferred revenue are recorded. Beginning on the date the software is installed at the customer site and is available for use by the customer, and provided that all other criteria for revenue recognition are met, the deferred revenue amount is recognized ratably over the period the service is provided. The customer is then invoiced every 90 days and revenue is recognized ratably over the period of the subscription. The subscription arrangement includes software, maintenance and unspecified future upgrades on a when-and-if available basis including major version upgrades. The subscription renewal rate is the same as the initial subscription rate. Subscriptions can be cancelled by the customer at any time by providing 90 days prior written notice following the first year of the subscription term |
|
The Company’s software products are sold under warranty against certain defects in material and workmanship for a period of 30 days from the date of purchase. The Company also offers a 30 day money-back guarantee on its Datawatch Modeler (formerly Monarch Professional) product sold directly to end-users. Additionally, the Company provides its distributors with stock-balancing rights. Revenue from the sale of software products to distributors and resellers is recognized at the time of shipment providing all other criteria for revenue recognition as stated above are met and (i) the distributor or reseller is unconditionally obligated to pay for the products, including no contingency as to product resale, (ii) the distributor or reseller has independent economic substance apart from the Company, (iii) the Company is not obligated for future performance to bring about product resale, and (iv) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s experience and history with its distributors and resellers allows for reasonable estimates of future returns. Among other things, estimates of potential future returns are made based on the inventory levels at, and the returns history with, the various distributors and resellers, which the Company monitors frequently. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance for Loan Losses Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. The Company analyzes accounts receivable and the composition of the accounts receivable aging, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual results could differ from the allowances recorded, and this difference could have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Receivables are written off against these allowances in the period they are determined to be uncollectible. |
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, changes to and ending balances of the allowance for doubtful accounts were approximately as follows: |
|
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts balance - beginning of year | | $ | 107 | | $ | 78 | | $ | 129 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts | | | – | | | 93 | | | 92 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deductions against the allowance for doubtful accounts | | | -64 | | | -64 | | | -143 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts balance - end of year | | $ | 43 | | $ | 107 | | $ | 78 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales Returns Reserve [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Sales Returns Reserve |
|
The Company maintains reserves for potential future product returns from distributors. The Company estimates future product returns based on its experience and history with the Company’s various distributors and resellers as well as by monitoring inventory levels at such companies. Adjustments are recorded as increases or decreases in revenue in the period of adjustment. Actual returns have historically been within the range estimated by management. Actual results could differ from the reserve for sales returns recorded, and this difference could have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. |
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, changes to and ending balances of the sales returns reserve were approximately as follows: |
|
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales returns reserve balance - beginning of year | | $ | 105 | | $ | 70 | | $ | 35 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Additions to the sales returns reserve | | | – | | | 117 | | | 101 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deductions against the sales returns reserve | | | -85 | | | -82 | | | -66 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales returns reserve balance - end of year | | $ | 20 | | $ | 105 | | $ | 70 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research, Development, and Computer Software, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Capitalized Software Development Costs |
|
The Company capitalizes certain software development costs as well as purchased software upon achieving technological feasibility of the related products. Software development costs incurred and software purchased prior to achieving technological feasibility are charged to engineering and product development expense as incurred. Commencing upon initial product release, capitalized costs are amortized to cost of software licenses using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the product (which approximates the ratio that current gross revenues for a product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for that product), which is generally 4 to 24 months. |
|
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, amounts related to capitalized and purchased software development costs were approximately as follows: |
|
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized and purchased software balance - beginning of year | | $ | 30 | | $ | 14 | | $ | 396 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized software development costs | | | 440 | | | 54 | | | – | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization of capitalized software development costs and | | | -120 | | | -38 | | | -382 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
purchased software | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized and purchased software balance - end of year | | $ | 350 | | $ | 30 | | $ | 14 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash deposited with banks and highly liquid securities consisting of money market investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Concentration of Credit Risks and Major Customers |
|
Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash is maintained with what management believes to be a high-credit quality financial institution. At times, deposits held at this bank may exceed the federally insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s deposits are financially sound and have minimal credit risk. Risks associated with cash and cash equivalents are mitigated by the Company’s investment policy, which limits the Company’s investing of excess cash into only money market mutual funds. |
|
The Company licenses its products and services to U.S. and non-U.S. distributors and other software resellers, as well as to end users, under customary credit terms. Two customers, Ingram Micro, Inc. and Lifeboat Distribution, individually accounted for the following percentages of total revenue and accounts receivable for the periods indicated: |
|
| | Percentage of total revenue | | | Percentage of total | | | | | | |
| | for the years ended | | | accounts receivable at | | | | | | |
| | September 30, | | | September 30, | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ingram Micro, Inc. | | | * | | | | * | | | | 13 | % | | | * | | | | * | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lifeboat Distribution | | | 20 | % | | | 17 | % | | | 15 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 19 | % | | | | | |
* Revenues were less than 10% of the Company’s total revenue and accounts receivable in the respective period. |
|
The Company licenses to Lifeboat Distribution under a distribution agreement which automatically renews for successive one-year terms unless terminated. On December 6, 2011, the Company exercised a 90 day notice provision under a distribution agreement with Ingram Micro, Inc. to terminate its relationship with that distributor. The termination was effective March 6, 2012. Effective March 7, 2012, Lifeboat Distribution became the sole North American distributor for the Company’s Datawatch Modeler platform. In addition to the customers listed above, one additional customer, Unisys Belgium, individually accounted for approximately 24% of total accounts receivable at September 30, 2012. Two additional customers, Xerox and Thomson Reuters, accounted for approximately 19% and 23%, respectively of total accounts receivable at September 30, 2013. Other than these customers, no other customer constitutes a significant portion (more than 10%) of revenues or accounts receivable for the periods presented. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Deferred Revenue [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Deferred Revenue |
|
Deferred revenue consisted of the following at September 30: |
|
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (In thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maintenance | | $ | 6,907 | | $ | 5,167 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
License | | | 69 | | | 1,257 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | 235 | | | 136 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 7,211 | | | 6,560 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Long-term portion of deferred maintenance | | | -214 | | | -265 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Current portion of deferred revenue | | $ | 6,997 | | $ | 6,295 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Maintenance deferred revenue consists of the unearned portion of customer support services provided by the Company to customers who purchased maintenance agreements for the Company’s products. Maintenance revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the maintenance period, generally 12 months. |
|
Other deferred revenue consists of deferred subscription and professional services revenue generated from arrangements that are invoiced in accordance with the terms and conditions of the arrangement but do not meet all the criteria for revenue recognition and are, therefore, deferred until all revenue recognition criteria are met. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Inventories |
|
Inventories consist of software components, primarily software manuals, compact disks and retail packaging materials. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Property and Equipment |
|
Property and equipment consists of office equipment, furniture and fixtures, software and leasehold improvements, all of which are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or over the terms, if shorter, of the related leases. Useful lives and lease terms range from three to seven years. Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $145,000, $137,000 and $197,000, respectively, for the years ended September 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Long-Lived Assets |
|
The Company periodically evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated remaining useful lives of long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles may warrant revision or that the carrying value of these assets may be impaired. To determine whether assets have been impaired, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows for the estimated remaining useful life of the respective assets are compared to the carrying value. To the extent that the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value, the fair value of the asset is determined and an impairment is recognized. If such fair value is less than the current carrying value, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquired Intellectual Property, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Acquired Intellectual Property |
|
On March 30, 2012, the Company acquired the intellectual property which consisted primarily of the source code underlying its Datawatch Modeler (formerly Monarch Professional) and Datawatch Automator (formerly Data Pump) products pursuant to an Option Purchase Agreement dated as of April 29, 2004 by and among the Company, Personics Corporation, Raymond J. Huger and Math Strategies, as amended (the “Option Agreement”). Under the formula contained in the Option Agreement, the purchase price paid for the intellectual property assets was approximately $8,541,000 which was calculated based on a multiple of the aggregate royalties paid to Math Strategies by the Company for the four fiscal quarters preceding the exercise of the option. Additionally, the Company capitalized approximately $75,000 in closing costs and adjustments pursuant to a Supplemental Agreement dated March 30, 2012 between the Company and Raymond J. Huger. In fiscal 2013, the Company acquired additional intellectual property as noted in the Panopticon transaction totaling $7,900,000. The acquired intellectual property assets are being amortized to cost of software licenses using the straight-line method over the estimated life of the asset, ranging from five to seven and a half years. Amortization expense related to the acquired intellectual property assets for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $1,811,000 and $871,000, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense related to the acquired intellectual property is as follows (in thousands): |
|
Fiscal Years Ending September 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 | | $ | 2,777 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2015 | | | 2,777 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 | | | 2,777 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2017 | | | 1,905 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | | 1,053 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thereafter | | | 2,545 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total estimated future amortization expense | | $ | 13,834 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Intangible Assets |
|
Intangible assets consist of acquired intellectual property. Other intangible assets consist of internally developed software, trade names, patents and customer lists acquired through business combinations. The values allocated to the majority of these intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset and are recorded in cost of software licenses. The values allocated to customer relationships are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset and are recorded in sales and marketing expenses. The values allocated to loan acquisition costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the life of the debt and are recorded in interest income and other income (expense), net. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable and an impairment loss is recognized when it is probable that the estimated cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. |
|
Other intangible assets, net, were comprised of the following at September 30, 2013 and 2012: |
|
| | Weighted | | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | | | | | |
| | Average | | Gross | | | | | | | Gross | | | | | | | | | | | |
Identified Intangible | | Useful Life | | Carrying | | Accumulated | | Net Carrying | | Carrying | | Accumulated | | Net Carrying | | | | | |
Asset | | in Years | | Amount | | Amortization | | Amount | | Amount | | Amortization | | Amount | | | | | |
| | | | (In thousands) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capitalized software | | 1 | | $ | 1,630 | | $ | 1,280 | | $ | 350 | | $ | 1,190 | | $ | 1,160 | | $ | 30 | | | | | |
Purchased software | | 5 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 700 | | | 700 | | | – | | | | | |
Patents | | 20 | | | 160 | | | 73 | | | 87 | | | 160 | | | 65 | | | 95 | | | | | |
Customer lists | | 14 | | | 8,990 | | | 1,401 | | | 7,589 | | | 1,790 | | | 1,195 | | | 595 | | | | | |
Assembled Workforce | | – | | | 620 | | | – | | | 620 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | | | |
Non-compete agreements | | 1 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 640 | | | 640 | | | – | | | | | |
Trademark | | 3 | | | 120 | | | 4 | | | 116 | | | 21 | | | 21 | | | – | | | | | |
Loan acquisition costs | | 4 | | | 167 | | | 49 | | | 118 | | | 88 | | | 16 | | | 72 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 11,687 | | $ | 2,807 | | $ | 8,880 | | $ | 4,589 | | $ | 3,797 | | $ | 792 | | | | | |
|
The intangible asset amounts amortized to cost of software licenses totaled approximately $128,000, $46,000 and $390,000 for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Intangible asset amounts amortized to sales and marketing expense totaled approximately $206,000, $166,000 and $166,000 for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Intangible asset amounts amortized to interest expense totaled approximately $33,000 and $16,000 for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no intangible asset amounts amortized to interest income and other income (expense), net in fiscal year 2011. Intangible asset amounts amortized to general and administrative expense totaled approximately $4,000 for fiscal 2013. There were no intangible assets amortized to general and administrative for fiscal years 2012 and 2011. During the fiscal year 2013, the Company wrote off fully amortized intangible assets totaling approximately $1,361,000. |
|
The estimated future amortization expense related to amortizing intangible assets was as follows (in thousands): |
|
Fiscal Years Ending September 30, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2014 | | $ | 1,096 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2015 | | | 733 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 | | | 633 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2017 | | | 494 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2018 | | | 985 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thereafter | | | 4,939 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total estimated future amortization expense | | $ | 8,880 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Goodwill, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Goodwill |
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of acquired businesses. Indefinite-lived intangibles are intangible assets whose useful lives are indefinite in that their lives extend beyond the foreseeable horizon – that is there is no foreseeable limit on the period of time over which they are expected to contribute to the cash flows of the reporting entity. The Company accounts for goodwill in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), under which goodwill and intangible assets having indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events indicate possible impairment. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Financial Instruments |
|
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable and their carrying values approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Fair value is the price that would be received for an asset or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company is required to classify certain assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy. |
|
| · | Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Level 2 – Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| · | Level 3 – Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured and disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands): |
|
| | September 30, 2013 | | September 30, 2012 | |
| | Fair Value | | Estimated | | Fair Value | | Estimated | |
| | Measurement | | Fair | | Measurement | | | Fair | |
| | Using Input Types | | Value | | Using Input Types | | Value | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 2,234 | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | 2,234 | | $ | 2,234 | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | 2,234 | |
Total assets at fair value | | | 2,234 | | | – | | | – | | | 2,234 | | | 2,234 | | | – | | | – | | | 2,234 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Line of credit | | $ | 900 | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | 900 | | $ | 900 | | $ | – | | $ | – | | $ | 900 | |
Note payable | | | 3,945 | | | – | | | – | | | 3,945 | | | 4,000 | | | – | | | – | | | 4,000 | |
Debt discount | | | – | | | -860 | | | – | | | -860 | | | – | | | -1,017 | | | – | | | -1,017 | |
Total liabilities at fair value | | $ | 4,845 | | $ | -860 | | $ | – | | $ | 3,985 | | $ | 4,900 | | | -1,017 | | | – | | | 3,883 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and operating loss carryforwards and credits. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce the net deferred tax assets to amounts the Company believes are more likely than not to be realized. |
|
The Company follows the accounting guidance for uncertain tax positions. This guidance clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Net (Loss) Income Per Share |
|
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the impact, when dilutive, of the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units using the treasury stock method. |
|
|
The following table presents the options and restricted stock units that were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share, because the effect was antidilutive for the years ended 2012 and 2011: |
|
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quantity of option shares not included | | | - | | | 123,105 | | | 105,819 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average exercise price | | $ | - | | $ | 12.3 | | $ | 5.18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
As the Company was in a net loss position for the year end September 30, 2013, all common stock equivalents in fiscal 2013 were antidilutive. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions |
|
Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at rates in effect at each balance sheet date. Revenues, expenses and cash flows are translated into U.S. dollars at average rates prevailing during the respective period. The related translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.” Included in comprehensive (loss) income are the foreign currency translation adjustments. Foreign currency translation losses arising during fiscal 2013 and 2011 were approximately $162,000 and $121,000. Foreign currency translation gain arising during fiscal 2012 was approximately $82,000. |
|
Gains and losses resulting from transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the applicable unit’s functional currency are included in the operating results of the Company and were a loss of $41,000 and $126,000 for the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and gain of $89,000, for the year ended September 30, 2011. The foreign currency loss in 2012 was attributable primarily to the settlement of intercompany balances due to the dissolution of one of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and the repatriation of international funds to the U.S. required by the Company’s line of credit facility which was entered into in March 2012. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Advertising and Promotional Materials |
|
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $290,000, $9,000 and $138,000 in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Direct mail/direct response costs are expensed over the period in which the associated revenue is recognized, generally three to six months from the date of the mailing. Direct mail expense was approximately $7,000, $9,000 and $52,000, in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. There were no deferred direct mail/direct response costs at September 30, 2013, 2012 or 2011. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Share-Based Compensation |
|
All share-based awards, including grants of employee stock options and restricted stock units, are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value at date of grant. |
|
The Company recognizes the fair value of share-based awards over the requisite service period of the individual awards, which generally equals the vesting period. All of the Company’s share-based awards are accounted for as equity instruments and there have been no liability awards granted. See additional share-based compensation disclosure in Note 7 to the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Segment Information |
|
The Company has determined that it has only one reportable segment. The Company’s chief operating decision maker, its Chief Executive Officer, does not manage any part of the Company separately, and the allocation of resources and assessment of performance is based solely on the Company’s consolidated operations and operating results. See Note 9 for information about the Company’s revenue by product lines and geographic operations. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Guarantees, Indemnifications and Warranties Policies [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Guarantees and Indemnifications |
|
The Company’s software products are sold under warranty against certain defects in material and workmanship for a period of 30 days from the date of purchase. The Company has never incurred significant expense under its product or service warranties and does not expect to do so in the future. As a result, the Company believes its exposure related to these warranty agreements is minimal. Accordingly, there are no liabilities recorded for warranty claims as of September 30, 2013 or 2012. |
|
The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally its customers, in connection with any patent, copyright or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to the Company’s products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the Company believes its exposure related to these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these potential obligations as of September 30, 2013 or 2012. |
|
Certain of the Company’s agreements also provide for the performance of services at customer sites. These agreements may contain indemnification clauses, whereby the Company will indemnify the customer from any and all damages, losses, judgments, costs and expenses for acts of its employees or subcontractors resulting in bodily injury or property damage. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has general and umbrella insurance policies that would enable it to recover a portion of any amounts paid. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, the Company believes its exposure related to these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these potential obligations as of September 30, 2013 or 2012. |
|
As permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreements with its directors whereby the Company will indemnify them for certain events or occurrences while the director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the director indemnification period is for the later of ten years after the date that the director ceases to serve in such capacity or the final termination of proceedings against the director as outlined in the indemnification agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company’s director and officer insurance policy limits the Company’s exposure and would enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage for directors, the Company believes its exposure related to these indemnification agreements is minimal. The Company has no liabilities recorded for these potential obligations as of September 30, 2013 or 2012. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Research and Development Expense, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Research and Development Costs |
|
Research and development costs are expenses as incurred. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity .” This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (fiscal 2015). The amendments should be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity elects to early adopt the amendments, it should apply them as of the beginning of the entity’s fiscal year of adoption. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. |
|
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” This ASU simplifies how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment which improve consistency in impairment testing requirements among long-lived asset categories. These amended standards permit an assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. For assets in which this assessment concludes it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, these amended standards eliminate the requirement to perform quantitative impairment testing as outlined in the previously issued standards. The guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. |
|
In June 2011, the FASB issued an ASU that provides amendments on the presentation of comprehensive income. The amendments require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendments do not change the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, with one amount shown for the aggregate income tax expense or benefit related to the total of other comprehensive income items. In both cases, the tax effect for each component must be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or presented in the statement in which other comprehensive income is presented. The amendments do not affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This amendment was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively. This ASU was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the Company elected the two-statement approach. |
|
The Company has considered all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and does not believe the adoption of such pronouncements will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |