UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
or
o |
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period to
Commission file number 0-15658
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
| 47-0210602 |
(State of Incorporation) |
| (I.R.S. Employer |
|
| Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1025 Eldorado Blvd., Broomfield, CO |
| 80021 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
(720) 888-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
| Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
| Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares outstanding of each class of the issuer’s common stock, as of July 29, 2011:
Common Stock: 1,782,267,194 shares
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| Part I - Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. | Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
|
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 32 | |
|
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
44 | ||
|
|
|
44 | ||
|
|
|
45 | ||
|
|
|
46 | ||
|
|
|
47 | ||
|
| |
Certifications |
|
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||
(dollars in millions, except per share data) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| $ | 913 |
| $ | 892 |
| $ | 1,827 |
| $ | 1,792 |
|
Coal Mining |
| 19 |
| 16 |
| 34 |
| 26 |
| ||||
Total Revenue |
| 932 |
| 908 |
| 1,861 |
| 1,818 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Costs and Expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| 347 |
| 358 |
| 704 |
| 729 |
| ||||
Coal Mining |
| 19 |
| 16 |
| 34 |
| 28 |
| ||||
Total Cost of Revenue |
| 366 |
| 374 |
| 738 |
| 757 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 207 |
| 223 |
| 411 |
| 448 |
| ||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 357 |
| 338 |
| 714 |
| 681 |
| ||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| ||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| 930 |
| 936 |
| 1,863 |
| 1,887 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
| 2 |
| (28 | ) | (2 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||
Interest expense |
| (160 | ) | (145 | ) | (317 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishments of debt, net |
| (23 | ) | (5 | ) | (43 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
| 3 |
| 9 |
| 6 |
| 16 |
| ||||
Total Other Expense |
| (180 | ) | (141 | ) | (354 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss Before Income Taxes |
| (178 | ) | (169 | ) | (356 | ) | (406 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income Tax Expense |
| (3 | ) | — |
| (30 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Loss |
| $ | (181 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | (386 | ) | $ | (407 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share |
| $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Shares Used to Compute Basic and Diluted Loss per Share (in thousands): |
| 1,703,838 |
| 1,660,009 |
| 1,692,574 |
| 1,653,743 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in millions, expect par value) |
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 584 |
| $ | 616 |
|
Restricted cash and securities |
| 632 |
| 2 |
| ||
Receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $18 and $17, respectively |
| 294 |
| 264 |
| ||
Other |
| 112 |
| 90 |
| ||
Total Current Assets |
| 1,622 |
| 972 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $7,658 and $7,241, respectively |
| 5,228 |
| 5,302 |
| ||
Restricted Cash and Securities |
| 120 |
| 120 |
| ||
Goodwill |
| 1,429 |
| 1,427 |
| ||
Other Intangibles, net |
| 323 |
| 371 |
| ||
Other Assets, net |
| 140 |
| 163 |
| ||
Total Assets |
| $ | 8,862 |
| $ | 8,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 336 |
| $ | 329 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 875 |
| 180 |
| ||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
| 65 |
| 84 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
| 169 |
| 146 |
| ||
Current portion of deferred revenue |
| 144 |
| 151 |
| ||
Other |
| 83 |
| 66 |
| ||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 1,672 |
| 956 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-Term Debt, less current portion |
| 6,349 |
| 6,268 |
| ||
Deferred Revenue, less current portion |
| 745 |
| 736 |
| ||
Other Liabilities |
| 528 |
| 552 |
| ||
Total Liabilities |
| 9,294 |
| 8,512 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders’ Deficit: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares: no shares issued or outstanding |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 2,900,000,000 shares: 1,705,394,953 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 1,670,478,384 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
| 17 |
| 17 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 11,657 |
| 11,603 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (41 | ) | (98 | ) | ||
Accumulated deficit |
| (12,065 | ) | (11,679 | ) | ||
Total Stockholders’ Deficit |
| (432 | ) | (157 | ) | ||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit |
| $ | 8,862 |
| $ | 8,355 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||
(dollars in millions) |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (386 | ) | $ | (407 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 411 |
| 448 |
| ||
Non-cash compensation expense attributable to stock awards |
| 42 |
| 30 |
| ||
Loss on extinguishments of debt, net |
| 43 |
| 59 |
| ||
Change in fair value of embedded derivative |
| — |
| (10 | ) | ||
Accretion of debt discount and amortization of debt issuance costs |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| ||
Accrued interest on long-term debt |
| 23 |
| 4 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
| 27 |
| (2 | ) | ||
Other, net |
| (10 | ) | — |
| ||
Changes in working capital items: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Receivables |
| (27 | ) | 7 |
| ||
Other current assets |
| (18 | ) | (12 | ) | ||
Payables |
| 3 |
| (5 | ) | ||
Deferred revenue |
| (4 | ) | (27 | ) | ||
Other current liabilities |
| — |
| (36 | ) | ||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
| 131 |
| 77 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
| (240 | ) | (186 | ) | ||
(Increase) Decrease in restricted cash and securities, net |
| (34 | ) | 4 |
| ||
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment |
| 4 |
| — |
| ||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (270 | ) | (182 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt borrowings, net of issuance costs |
| 766 |
| 613 |
| ||
Payments on and repurchases of long-term debt |
| (662 | ) | (890 | ) | ||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
| 104 |
| (277 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 3 |
| (12 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (32 | ) | (394 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 616 |
| 836 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 584 |
| $ | 442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash interest paid |
| $ | 267 |
| $ | 262 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | (1 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt issued and proceeds placed into escrow |
| $ | 600 |
| $ | — |
|
Long-term debt issued in exchange transaction |
| $ | 300 |
| $ | — |
|
Long-term debt retired in exchange transaction |
| $ | 295 |
| $ | — |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Level 3 Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Level 3” or the “Company”) is a facilities based provider (that is, a provider that owns or leases a substantial portion of the plant, property and equipment necessary to provide its services) of a broad range of integrated communications services. The Company has created its communications network generally by constructing its own assets, but also through a combination of purchasing and leasing from other companies and facilities. The Company’s network is an advanced, international, facilities based communications network. The Company designed its network to provide communications services, which employ and take advantage of rapidly improving underlying optical, Internet Protocol, computing and storage technologies.
The Company is also engaged in coal mining through its two 50% owned joint-venture surface mines, one each in Montana and Wyoming.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Level 3 Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries in which it has a controlling interest, which are enterprises engaged in the communications and coal mining businesses. Fifty-percent-owned mining joint ventures are consolidated on a pro rata basis. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
As part of its consolidation policy, the Company considers its controlled subsidiaries, investments in the business in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary or does not have effective control but has the ability to significantly influence operating and financial policies, and variable interests resulting from economic arrangements that give the Company rights to economic risks or rewards of a legal entity. The Company does not have variable interests in a variable interest entity where it is required to consolidate the entity as the primary beneficiary or where it has concluded it is not the primary beneficiary.
The accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, which was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2011 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In the opinion of the Company’s management, these financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the interim periods presented herein. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for a full fiscal year.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Correction of Immaterial Error
During the first quarter of 2011, Level 3 identified an error in the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements related to the recognition of deferred tax liabilities attributable to certain indefinite-lived intangible assets with an indeterminate future reversal period that the Company is unable to consider as a source of income for the realization of its deferred tax assets. The Company recorded income tax expense of approximately $26 million during the first quarter of 2011 for taxable temporary differences associated with deferred taxes on certain indefinite-lived intangible assets. The purchased indefinite-lived intangible assets arose in prior periods, and the adjustment did not affect income taxes paid, and did not materially affect any of the Company’s previously reported results of operations or financial condition, or the current period results of operations or financial condition.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that clarifies the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring an entity to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. The amendment also eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. Level 3 is required to adopt this guidance retrospectively as of January 1, 2012.
(2) Pending Acquisition of Global Crossing
On April 10, 2011, the Company and a subsidiary of Level 3 entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) with Global Crossing Limited (“Global Crossing”) pursuant to which the Company expects to acquire Global Crossing in a tax-free, stock-for-stock (the “Amalgamation”) transaction valued at approximately $3 billion, based on Level 3’s closing stock price on April 8, 2011, including the assumption of approximately $1.1 billion of net debt. See Note 14 — Subsequent Events for additional information.
In connection with this transaction, Level 3 has also signed a voting agreement and stockholder rights agreement with a subsidiary of Singapore Technologies Telemedia (“ST Telemedia”), the company that owns approximately 60 percent of Global Crossing’s voting stock, whereby ST Telemedia has agreed to vote in favor of the transaction and allow ST Telemedia to designate members to the Level 3 Board of Directors approximately proportionate to their stock ownership.
Level 3 also announced the adoption of a Stockholder Rights Plan to protect its U.S. federal net operating losses from certain Internal Revenue Code Section 382 restrictions. This plan is designed to deter trading that would result in a change of control (as defined in that Code Section), and therefore protect the Company’s ability to use its federal net operating losses in the future.
The acquisition of Global Crossing Limited is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. The Company is responding to regulatory requests for additional information and continues to expect that the transaction will close before the end of 2011.
In addition, concurrently with the execution of the Amalgamation Agreement, Level 3 Financing, Inc. and the Company entered into a financing commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) that provides for a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate amount of $650 million. In July 2011, the Company announced the marketing of a $650 million senior secured term loan, the proceeds of which will be used to reduce the senior secured portion of the bridge commitment to zero and will be used to complete the financings necessary to effect the Global Crossing transaction. The Commitment Letter also provides for a $1.1 billion senior unsecured bridge facility, if up to $1.1 billion of senior notes or certain other securities are not issued by Level 3 Financing, Inc., the Company or another of its subsidiaries to finance the Amalgamation on or prior to closing of the acquisition. The Company, through an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Level 3 Escrow, Inc., issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of that subsidiary’s 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 in June 2011(see Note 8 — Long-Term Debt), and subsequently sold in July 2011 an additional $600 million aggregate principal amount of that subsidiary’s 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 (see Note 14 — Subsequent Events), which in aggregate, reduce the financing commitment provided by the senior unsecured bridge facility to zero. The Company expects the financings, together with cash balances, to be sufficient to provide the financing necessary to consummate the Amalgamation and to refinance certain existing indebtedness of Global Crossing.
(3) Loss Per Share
The Company computes basic net loss per share by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and includes the dilutive effect of common stock that would be issued assuming conversion or exercise of outstanding convertible notes, stock options, stock based compensation awards and other dilutive securities. No such items were included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, because the Company incurred a net loss in each of these periods and the effect of inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The effect of approximately 703 million and 624 million shares issuable pursuant to the various series of convertible notes outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, have not been included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive to the computation. In addition, the effect of the approximately 43 million and 39 million outperform stock options, restricted stock units and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 2010 have not been included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive to the computation.
(4) Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2011 are as follows (in millions):
|
| Communications |
| Coal |
| Total |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
| $ | 1,427 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,427 |
|
Effect of foreign currency rate change |
| 2 |
| — |
| 2 |
| |||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
| $ | 1,429 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,429 |
|
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new accounting guidance that requires entities with goodwill assigned to reporting units with negative carrying value to perform an allocated fair value test of goodwill impairment if certain qualitative factors indicate that such goodwill could be impaired. Based on its qualitative assessment as of January 1, 2011, the Company determined the test was not required. Furthermore, there were no events or changes in circumstances during the first six months of 2011 that indicated the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable.
(5) Acquired Intangible Assets
Identifiable acquisition-related intangible assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows (in millions):
|
| Gross |
| Accumulated |
| Net |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Customer Contracts and Relationships |
| $ | 743 |
| $ | (529 | ) | $ | 214 |
|
Patents and Developed Technology |
| 141 |
| (84 | ) | 57 |
| |||
|
| 884 |
| (613 | ) | 271 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Vyvx Trade Name |
| 32 |
| — |
| 32 |
| |||
Wireless Licenses |
| 20 |
| — |
| 20 |
| |||
|
| $ | 936 |
| $ | (613 | ) | $ | 323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Customer Contracts and Relationships |
| $ | 743 |
| $ | (488 | ) | $ | 255 |
|
Patents and Developed Technology |
| 140 |
| (76 | ) | 64 |
| |||
|
| 883 |
| (564 | ) | 319 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Vyvx Trade Name |
| 32 |
| — |
| 32 |
| |||
Wireless Licenses |
| 20 |
| — |
| 20 |
| |||
|
| $ | 935 |
| $ | (564 | ) | $ | 371 |
|
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company determined that the useful life of certain customer relationships and developed technology should be reduced based on adverse economic conditions affecting customer attrition associated with these assets, which prospectively increased amortization expense by approximately $3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The gross carrying amount of identifiable acquisition-related intangible assets in the table above is subject to change due to foreign currency fluctuations, as a portion of the Company’s identifiable acquisition-related intangible assets are related to foreign subsidiaries.
Acquired finite-lived intangible asset amortization expense was $24 million and $49 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and $23 million and $46 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2011, estimated amortization expense for the Company’s finite-lived acquisition-related intangible assets over the next five years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):
2011 (remaining six months) |
| $ | 45 |
|
2012 |
| 69 |
| |
2013 |
| 51 |
| |
2014 |
| 39 |
| |
2015 |
| 28 |
| |
2016 |
| 21 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 18 |
| |
|
| $ | 271 |
|
(6) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, interest rate swaps and long-term debt (including the current portion) as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company also had embedded derivative contracts included in its financial position as of December 31, 2010. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their fair values at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The interest rate swaps and embedded derivative contracts are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. See Note 7 — Derivative Financial Instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, reflects the original amounts borrowed net of unamortized discounts, premiums and debt discounts and was $7.2 billion as of June 30, 2011 and $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2010.
GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
Fair Value Hierarchy
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value measurement of each class of assets and liabilities is dependent upon its categorization within the fair value hierarchy, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement of each class of asset and liability. GAAP establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
The table below presents the fair values for each class of Level 3’s liabilities measured on a recurring basis as well as the input levels used to determine these fair values as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
| Fair Value Measurement Using |
| ||||||||||||
|
| Total |
| Quoted Prices |
| Significant |
| ||||||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value in the Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest Rate Swap Liabilities (included in other non-current liabilities) |
| $ | 100 |
| $ | 108 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 100 |
| $ | 108 |
|
Embedded Derivatives in Convertible Debt (included in other non-current liabilities) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Total Derivative Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value in the Financial Statements |
| $ | 100 |
| $ | 108 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 100 |
| $ | 108 |
|
Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value in the Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Long-term Debt, including the current portion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Senior Notes |
| $ | 4,120 |
| $ | 2,885 |
| $ | 4,307 |
| $ | 2,789 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Convertible Notes |
| 1,331 |
| 1,788 |
| 718 |
| 697 |
| 1,419 |
| 1,189 |
| ||||||
Term Loans |
| 1,679 |
| 1,679 |
| 1,655 |
| 1,632 |
| — |
| ��� |
| ||||||
Commercial Mortgage |
| 66 |
| 67 |
|
|
| — |
| 79 |
| 79 |
| ||||||
Capital Leases and Other |
| 28 |
| 29 |
|
|
| — |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| ||||||
Total Long-term Debt, including the current portion: |
| $ | 7,224 |
| $ | 6,448 |
| $ | 6,680 |
| $ | 5,118 |
| $ | 1,526 |
| $ | 1,297 |
|
The Company does not have any liabilities measured using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs.
Derivatives
The interest rate swaps are measured in accordance with the GAAP Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance using discounted cash flow techniques that use observable market inputs, such as LIBOR-based forward yield curves, forward rates, and the specific swap rate stated in each of the swap agreements. The embedded derivative contracts are priced using inputs that are observable in the market, such as the Company’s stock price, risk-free interest rate and other contractual terms of certain of the Company’s convertible senior notes.
Senior Notes
The estimated fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes approximated $4.3 billion at June 30, 2011 and $2.8 billion at December 31, 2010 based on market prices. The fair value of each instrument was based on the June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 trading quotes as provided by large financial institutions that trade in the Company’s securities. The pricing quotes provided by these market participants incorporate spreads to the Treasury curve, security coupon (which ranges from LIBOR plus 3.75% to 11.875%), corporate and security credit ratings, maturity date (ranging from 2014 to 2019) and liquidity, among other security characteristics and relative value at both the borrower entity level and across other securities of similar terms.
The 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019 are obligations of the Company and are not guaranteed by its subsidiaries. The remaining Senior Notes are obligations of Level 3 Financing, Inc. and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Level 3 Communications, Inc., and with respect to the 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019, are also fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Level 3 Communications, LLC, which is a first tier, wholly owned subsidiary of Level 3 Financing, Inc.
Convertible Notes
The estimated fair value of the Company’s actively traded Convertible Notes, including the 3.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 and the 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016, approximated $718 million at June 30, 2011. The estimated fair value of the Company’s actively traded Convertible Notes was $697 million at December 31, 2010, including the two notes above as well as the 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011, which were redeemed in the first quarter of 2011. The fair value of the Company’s actively traded Convertible Notes is based on the trading quotes as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 provided by large financial institutions that trade in the Company’s securities. The estimated fair value of the Company’s Convertible Notes that are not actively traded, such as the 7% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, the 7% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015, Series B, and the 15% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013, approximated $1.419 billion at June 30, 2011. A portion of the Company’s 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013 were converted subsequent to June 30, 2011, as discussed in Note 14 — Subsequent Events. At December 31, 2010, the estimated fair value of the Company’s Convertible Notes that are not actively traded included the above notes and the 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013, which were redeemed in the first quarter of 2011, was $1.2 billion. To estimate the fair value of the Convertible Notes that are not actively traded, Level 3 used a Black-Scholes valuation model and an income approach using discounted cash flows. The most significant inputs affecting the valuation are the pricing quotes provided by market participants that incorporate spreads to the Treasury curve, security coupon (ranging from 7% to 15%), convertible optionality, corporate and security credit ratings, maturity date (ranging from 2013 to 2015), liquidity, and other equity option inputs, such as the risk-free rate, underlying stock price, strike price of the embedded derivative, estimated volatility and maturity inputs for the option component and for the bond component, among other security characteristics and relative value at both the borrower entity level and across other securities with similar terms. The fair value of each instrument is obtained by adding together the value derived by discounting the security’s coupon or interest payment using a risk-adjusted discount rate and the value calculated from the embedded equity option based on the estimated volatility of the Company’s stock price, conversion rate of the particular Convertible Note, remaining time to maturity, and risk-free rate.
The Convertible Notes are unsecured obligations of Level 3 Communications, Inc. No subsidiary of Level 3 Communications, Inc. has provided a guarantee of the Convertible Notes.
Term Loans
The fair value of the Term Loans was approximately $1.7 billion at June 30, 2011 and $1.6 billion at December 31, 2010, respectively. The fair value of each loan is based on the June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 trading quotes as provided by large financial institutions that trade in the Company’s Term Loans. The pricing quotes provided by these market participants incorporate LIBOR curve expectations, interest spread, which is LIBOR plus 2.25% for the $1.4 billion Tranche A Term Loan (aggregate principal value) and LIBOR plus 8.5% for the $280 million Tranche B Term Loan (aggregate principal value), LIBOR floor (only applicable to the Tranche B Term Loan at 3.0% minimum), corporate and loan credit ratings, maturity date (March 2014) and liquidity, among other loan characteristics and relative value across other instruments of similar terms.
The Term Loans are secured by a pledge of the equity interests in certain domestic subsidiaries of Level 3 Financing, Inc. and 65% of the equity interest in Level 3 Financing, Inc.’s Canadian subsidiary and liens on the assets of Level 3 Communications, Inc. and certain domestic subsidiaries of Level 3 Financing, Inc. In addition, Level 3 Communications, Inc. and certain domestic subsidiaries of Level 3 Financing, Inc. have provided full and unconditional guarantees of the obligations under the Term Loans.
Commercial Mortgage
The fair value of the Commercial Mortgage was approximately $79 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 as compared to the carrying amounts of $66 million and $67 million, respectively. The Commercial Mortgage is not actively traded and its fair value is estimated by management using a valuation model based on an income approach. The significant inputs used to estimate fair value of this debt instrument using discounted cash flows include the anticipated scheduled mortgage payments and observable market yields on other actively traded debt of similar characteristics and collateral type.
The Commercial Mortgage is a secured obligation of HQ Realty, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. HQ Realty, Inc.’s obligations under the Commercial Mortgage are secured by a first priority lien on the Company’s headquarters campus located at 1025 Eldorado Boulevard, Broomfield, Colorado 80021 and certain HQ Realty, Inc. cash and reserve accounts.
The assets of HQ Realty, Inc. are not available to satisfy any third party obligations other than those of HQ Realty, Inc. In addition, the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries other than HQ Realty, Inc. are not available to satisfy the obligations of HQ Realty, Inc.
(7) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rate movements. The Company’s primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to decrease the volatility of its earnings and cash flows affected by changes in the underlying rates. To achieve this objective, the Company enters into financial derivatives, primarily interest rate swap agreements, the values of which change in the opposite direction of the anticipated future cash flows. The Company has floating rate long-term debt (see Note 8 — Long-Term Debt). These obligations expose the Company to variability in interest payments due to changes in interest rates. If interest rates increase, interest expense increases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense also decreases. The Company has designated its interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges. Swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the lives of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements is reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCI”) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged transaction affects earnings, due to the fact that the interest rate swap agreements qualify as effective cash flow hedges. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
In March 2007, Level 3 Financing Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, entered into two interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest payments on $1 billion notional amount of floating rate debt. The two interest rate swap agreements are with different counterparties and are for $500 million each. The transactions were effective beginning in April 2007 and mature in January 2014. The Company uses interest rate swaps to convert specific variable rate debt issuances into fixed rate debt. Under the terms of the interest rate swap transactions, the Company receives interest payments based on rolling three month LIBOR terms and pays interest at the fixed rate of 4.93% under one arrangement and 4.92% under the other. The Company evaluates the effectiveness of the hedges on a quarterly basis. The Company measures effectiveness by offsetting the change in the variable portion of the interest rate swaps with the changes in interest expense paid due to fluctuations in the LIBOR-based interest rate. During the periods presented, these derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing obligations. The Company recognizes any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the hedged item in the consolidated statements of operations. All components of the interest rate swaps were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Hedge ineffectiveness for the Company’s cash flow hedges was not material in any period presented.
The Company also has certain equity conversion rights associated with debt instruments, which are not designated as hedging instruments, but are considered derivative instruments. The Company’s primary objective associated with including such conversion rights in certain of its debt instruments is to reduce the contractual interest rate and related current cash borrowing cost of the debt instruments. The Company did not have a remaining liability associated with its equity conversion rights as of June 30, 2010. As a result of the September 2010 issuance of $175 million of 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2016, the Company did not have a sufficient number of authorized and unissued common shares available to settle all of the equity conversion rights and make-whole premiums associated with its convertible debt. Certain of these derivative instruments were classified as liabilities at December 31, 2010 due to a potential requirement to settle the conversion rights in cash as a result of the Company not having a sufficient number of authorized and unissued shares of common stock to cover all potentially convertible shares, for which the conversion rights were carried at fair value. The fair value of the embedded derivative liability at December 31, 2010 was not significant. As a result of the exchange and redemption of the Company’s outstanding 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013 and 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011, the fair value of these derivative instruments, which was insignificant, was reclassified into stockholders’ equity during the first quarter of 2011, as the Company had sufficient authorized and unissued shares of common stock available to settle all of the potential conversion rights. The Company has recognized the gains or losses from changes in fair values of these derivative instruments in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. As the Company was no longer required to recognize a liability for the equity conversion rights associated with its debt instruments during the first quarter 2011, Level 3 did not have any gains or losses reflected in its operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Changes in these derivatives resulted in the Company recognizing a $8 million and $10 million gain during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The Company is exposed to credit related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties. The counterparties to any of the financial derivatives the Company enters into are major institutions with investment grade credit ratings. The Company evaluates counterparty credit risk before entering into any hedge transaction and continues to closely monitor the financial market and the risk that its counterparties will default on their obligations. This credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in such contracts, should any of these counterparties fail to perform as contracted.
Amounts accumulated in AOCI related to derivatives are indirectly recognized in earnings as periodic settlements occur throughout the term of the swaps, when the related interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:
Interest Rate Derivative |
| Number of |
| Notional |
| |
Interest rate swaps |
| Two |
| $ | 1,000 |
|
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as follows (in millions):
|
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, 2011 |
| December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||
Derivatives designated as |
| Balance Sheet |
| Fair |
| Balance Sheet |
| Fair |
| ||
Cash flow hedging contracts |
| Other noncurrent liabilities |
| $ | 100 |
| Other noncurrent liabilities |
| $ | 108 |
|
|
| Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, 2011 |
| December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||
Derivatives not designated as |
| Balance Sheet |
| Fair |
| Balance Sheet |
| Fair |
| ||
Embedded equity conversion rights |
| Other noncurrent liabilities |
| $ | — |
| Other noncurrent liabilities |
| $ | — |
|
The amount of gains (losses) recognized in Other Comprehensive Loss consists of the following (in millions):
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Cash flow hedging contracts |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Three months ended June 30, |
| $ | (2 | ) | $ | (13 | ) |
Six months ended June 30, |
| $ | 8 |
| $ | (21 | ) |
The amount of gains (losses) reclassified from AOCI to Income/Loss (effective portions) consists of the following (in millions):
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
| Income Statement Location |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Cash flow hedging contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Three months ended June 30, |
| Interest Expense |
| $ | (12 | ) | $ | (11 | ) |
Six months ended June 30, |
| Interest Expense |
| $ | (23 | ) | $ | (23 | ) |
Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments of the variability of cash flows associated with floating-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in AOCI. These amounts subsequently are reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment of the hedged debt obligation in the same period in which the related interest on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings. Amounts currently included in AOCI will be reclassified to earnings prior to the settlement of these cash flow hedging contracts in 2014. The Company estimates that $46 million of net losses on the interest rate swaps (based on the estimated LIBOR curve as of June 30, 2011) will be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedging contracts qualify as effective hedge relationships, and as a result, hedge ineffectiveness was not material in any of the periods presented.
The effect of the Company’s derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on net loss is as follows (in millions):
Derivatives not designated as |
| Location of Gain Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
| ||
hedging instruments |
| Income/Loss on Derivative |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
Embedded equity conversion rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Three months ended June 30, |
| Other Income (Expense)—Other, net |
| $ | — |
| $ | 8 |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
| Other Income (Expense)—Other, net |
| $ | — |
| $ | 10 |
|
(8) Long-Term Debt
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, long-term debt was as follows:
(dollars in millions) |
| June 30, |
| December 31, |
| ||
Senior Secured Term Loan due 2014 |
| $ | 1,680 |
| $ | 1,680 |
|
Senior Notes due 2014 (9.25%) |
| 807 |
| 1,250 |
| ||
Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2015 (4.215% as of June 30, 2011 and 4.344% as of December 31, 2010) |
| 300 |
| 300 |
| ||
Senior Notes due 2017 (8.75%) |
| 700 |
| 700 |
| ||
Senior Notes due 2018 (10.0%) |
| 640 |
| 640 |
| ||
Senior Notes due 2019 (11.875%) |
| 605 |
| — |
| ||
Senior Notes due 2019 (9.375%) |
| 500 |
| — |
| ||
Senior Notes due 2019 (8.125%) |
| 600 |
| — |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 (5.25%) |
| — |
| 196 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 (3.5%) |
| 294 |
| 294 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 (15.0%) |
| 400 |
| 400 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013 (9.0%) |
| — |
| 295 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (7.0%) |
| 200 |
| 200 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 Series B (7.0%) |
| 275 |
| 275 |
| ||
Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (6.5%) |
| 201 |
| 201 |
| ||
Commercial Mortgage due 2015 (9.86%) |
| 66 |
| 67 |
| ||
Capital Leases |
| 28 |
| 29 |
| ||
Total Debt Obligations |
| 7,296 |
| 6,527 |
| ||
Unamortized (Discount) Premium: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Discount on Senior Secured Term Loan due 2014 |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||
Premium on Senior Notes due 2014 (9.25%) |
| 4 |
| 7 |
| ||
Discount on Senior Notes due 2018 (10.0%) |
| (11 | ) | (12 | ) | ||
Discount on Senior Notes due 2019 (11.875%) |
| (11 | ) | — |
| ||
Discount on Senior Notes due 2019 (9.375%) |
| (10 | ) | — |
| ||
Discount on Senior Notes due 2019 (8.125%) |
| (4 | ) | — |
| ||
Discount on Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 (5.25%) |
| — |
| (20 | ) | ||
Discount on Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 (3.5%) |
| (20 | ) | (29 | ) | ||
Discount on Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 (7.0%) |
| (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||
Discount due to embedded derivative contracts |
| (16 | ) | (21 | ) | ||
Total Unamortized (Discount) Premium |
| (72 | ) | (79 | ) | ||
Carrying Value of Debt |
| 7,224 |
| 6,448 |
| ||
Less current portion |
| (875 | ) | (180 | ) | ||
Long-term Debt, less current portion |
| $ | 6,349 |
| $ | 6,268 |
|
Approximately $294 million of the Company’s 3.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2012 have been reclassified into the current portion of long-term debt based on the contractual maturity date in June 2012. In addition, approximately $600 million aggregate principal of Level 3 Escrow’s 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 have been presented within the current portion of long-term debt due to certain conditions discussed below.
2011 Debt Issuance and Related Redemptions
8.125% Senior Notes Due 2019
In June 2011, Level 3 Escrow, Inc. (“Level 3 Escrow”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Level 3 Communications, Inc., issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “8.125% Senior Notes”). The Company issued the 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 to investors at a price of 99.264% of their principal amount. The debt issuance discount of approximately $4 million is reflected as a reduction in long-term debt and is being amortized as interest expense over the beginning initial term of the 8.125% Senior Notes using the effective interest method. As a result of certain conditions that could require Level 3 Escrow to redeem the notes on or before April 10, 2012, discussed further below, the initial term of the 8.125% Senior Notes is deemed to be through April 2012. When the contingency is resolved, the Company will reclassify these notes into long-term debt and the remaining related debt issue discount will be amortized as interest expense over the remaining term of the 8.125% Senior Notes. The 8.125% Senior Notes will mature on July 1, 2019 and are not guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries. Interest on the notes accrues at 8.125% per year and is payable on January 1 and July 1, beginning on January 1, 2012.
The gross proceeds from the offering of the 8.125% Senior Notes were deposited into a segregated escrow account and will remain in escrow until the date of the satisfaction of certain escrow conditions including, but not limited to, the substantially concurrent consummation of the proposed acquisition by Level 3 of Global Crossing pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement and the assumption of the 8.125% Senior Notes by Level 3 Financing, Inc. (the “Notes Assumption”). If the escrow conditions are not satisfied on or before April 10, 2012 (or any earlier date on which Level 3 determines that any of such escrow conditions cannot be
satisfied), Level 3 Escrow will be required to redeem the 8.125% Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 8.125% Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Prior to the Notes Assumption, Level 3 and Level 3 Financing will not be liable for the obligations of Level 3 Escrow for principal, premium or interest payments with respect to the 8.125% Senior Notes. Following the Notes Assumption, the 8.125% Senior Notes will be senior unsecured obligations of Level 3 Financing, ranking equal in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness of Level 3 Financing, and Level 3 will guarantee the 8.125% Senior Notes.
Following the release of the escrowed funds in connection with the Notes Assumption, the escrowed funds will be used to refinance certain existing indebtedness of Global Crossing in connection with the closing of the amalgamation. The gross proceeds from the offering reduce the outstanding bridge commitment that Level 3 has in place with certain financial institutions in connection with refinancing certain Global Crossing indebtedness. See Note 2 — Pending Acquisition of Global Crossing.
Following the Notes Assumption, the 8.125% Senior Notes will be subject to redemption at the option of Level 3 Financing, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice, (i) prior to July 1, 2015, at 100% of the principal amount of 8.125% Senior Notes so redeemed plus (A) the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the Indenture, as of the redemption date and (B) accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including, the redemption date, and on and after April 1, 2015, at the redemption prices set forth below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including the redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve months beginning April 1, of the years indicated below:
Year |
| Redemption |
|
2015 |
| 104.063 | % |
2016 |
| 102.031 | % |
2017 |
| 100.000 | % |
At any time or from time to time after the Notes Assumption and on or prior to April 1, 2014, up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Senior Notes may be redeemed at a redemption price equal to 108.125% of the principal amount of the 8.125% Senior Notes so redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds contributed from one or more private placements of Level 3 or underwritten public offerings of common stock of Level 3 resulting, in each case, in gross proceeds of at least $100 million in the aggregate. However, at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Senior Notes must remain outstanding immediately after giving effect to such redemption. Any such redemption shall be made within 90 days following such private placement or public offering upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice.
The offering of the 8.125% Senior Notes was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the 8.125% Senior Notes may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. The 8.125% Senior Notes were sold to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and non-U.S. persons outside the United States under Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
9.375% Senior Notes Due 2019
On March 4, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Level 3 Financing, Inc. (“Level 3 Financing”) issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “9.375% Senior Notes”) at a price of 98.001% of their principal amount. The net proceeds from the offering, were used to redeem a portion of Level 3 Financing’s outstanding 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014 on April 4, 2011. The debt issuance discount of approximately $10 million is reflected as a reduction in long-term debt and is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 9.375% Senior Notes using the effective interest method. The 9.375% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Level 3 Financing, ranking equal in right of payment with all other senior unsecured obligations of Level 3 Financing. Level 3 has guaranteed the 9.375% Senior Notes. The 9.375% Senior Notes will mature on April 1, 2019. Interest on the Notes will be payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on October 1, 2011.
Debt issuance costs of approximately $11 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the 9.375% Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method.
The 9.375% Senior Notes Due 2019 are subject to redemption at the option of Level 3 Financing in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, prior to April 1, 2015, at 100% of the principal amount of 9.375% Senior Notes so redeemed plus (A) the
applicable make-whole premium set forth in the Indenture, as of the redemption date and (B) accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including, the redemption date, and on or after April 1, 2015 at the redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve months beginning April 1, of the years indicated below:
Year |
| Redemption |
|
2015 |
| 104.688 | % |
2016 |
| 102.344 | % |
2017 |
| 100.000 | % |
At any time or from time to time on or prior to April 1, 2014, Level 3 Financing may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 9.375% Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 109.375% of the principal amount of the 9.375% Senior Notes so redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including, the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds contributed to the capital of Level 3 Financing from one or more private placements or underwritten public offerings of common stock of Level 3 resulting, in each case, in gross proceeds of at least $100 million in the aggregate. However, at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 9.375% Senior Notes must remain outstanding immediately after giving effect to such redemption. Any such redemption shall be made within 90 days following such private placement or public offering upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice.
The offering of the 9.375% Senior Notes was not originally registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the 9.375% Senior Notes may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. On March 4, 2011, in connection with the offering, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which Level 3 agreed to file a registration statement to exchange the offered notes with new notes that are substantially identical in all material respects, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to be declared effective no later than 270 days after the issuance of the offered notes. The 9.375% Senior Notes were sold to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and non-U.S. persons outside the United States under Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
11.875% Senior Notes Due 2019
In January 2011, in two separate transactions, Level 3 Communications, Inc. issued a total of $605 million aggregate principal amount of its 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019 (“11.875% Senior Notes”). The Company issued a portion of its 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019 to investors at a price of 98.173% of their principal amount. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019, which included an $11 million debt issuance discount, were used to redeem the Company’s 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 and exchange the 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013 during the first quarter of 2011. The net discount of approximately $11 million is reflected as a reduction in long-term debt and is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 11.875% Senior Notes using the effective interest method. The 11.875% Senior Notes will mature on February 1, 2019 and are not guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries. Interest on the notes accrues at 11.875% per year and is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning April 1, 2011.
Debt issuance costs of approximately $8 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the 11.875% Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method.
The 11.875% Senior Notes are subject to redemption at the option of Level 3 Communications, Inc. in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, prior to February 1, 2015, at 100% of the principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes so redeemed plus (A) the applicable make-whole premium set forth in the Indenture, as of the redemption date and (B) accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including, the redemption date, and on or after April 1, 2015 at the redemption prices (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve months beginning February 1, of the years indicated below:
Year |
| Redemption |
|
2015 |
| 105.938 | % |
2016 |
| 102.969 | % |
2017 |
| 100.000 | % |
At any time or from time to time on or prior to February 1, 2014, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 11.875% Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 111.875% of the principal amount of the 11.875% Senior Notes so redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon (if any) up to, but not including, the redemption date, with the net cash proceeds contributed to the capital of Level 3 from one or more private placements of Level 3 or underwritten public offerings of common stock of Level 3 resulting, in each case, in gross proceeds of at least $100 million in the aggregate. However, at least 65% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 11.875% Senior Notes must remain outstanding immediately after giving effect to such redemption. Any such redemption shall be made within 90 days following such private placement or public offering upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days’ prior notice.
The offering of the 11.875% Senior Notes was not originally registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the 11.875% Senior Notes may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. In connection with the offering, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which Level 3 agreed to file a registration statement to exchange the offered notes with new notes that are substantially identical in all material respects, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to be declared effective no later than 270 days after the issuance of the offered notes. The 11.875% Senior Notes were sold to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and non-U.S. persons outside the United States under Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
2011 Debt Redemptions and Exchanges
On July 15, 2011, certain holders converted approximately $128 million of its 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013. See Note 14 — Subsequent Events for further discussion.
In April 2011, in connection with the issuance of the 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019, together with cash on hand, the Company redeemed approximately $443 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014 at a price of 104.625% of the principal amount. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of the portion of the aggregate principal amount of its 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014 retired of approximately $23 million in the second quarter of 2011.
In the first quarter of 2011, in connection with the issuance of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019, the Company redeemed the outstanding $196 million aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 at a price of 100.75% of the principal amount and exchanged the outstanding $295 million aggregate principal amount of 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013. The Company recognized a loss of $20 million in the first quarter as a result of the redemption of the 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 and the exchange of the 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013.
2010 Debt Issuances
6.5% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2016
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company issued $175 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (the “6.5% Convertible Senior Notes”). The net proceeds from the issuance of the 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes were approximately $170 million after deducting debt issuance costs. In connection with the issuance of the Company’s 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes, the Company granted an overallotment option to the underwriters to purchase up to an additional $26 million aggregate principal amount of these notes less the underwriting discount. The underwriters exercised the overallotment option in full during the fourth quarter of 2010, and the Company received net proceeds of approximately $25.5 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions. The 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes will mature on October 1, 2016 and have an interest rate of 6.5% per annum with interest payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1, beginning April 1, 2011.
Debt issuance costs of approximately $6 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes using the effective interest rate method.
10% Senior Notes Due 2018
During the first quarter of 2010, Level 3 Financing, Inc. issued $640 million in aggregate principal amount of its 10% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “10% Senior Notes”) in a private offering. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 10% Senior Notes were $613 million after deducting a $13 million discount and approximately $14 million of debt issuance costs. The net proceeds were used to fund Level 3 Financing, Inc.’s purchase of its 12.25% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “12.25% Senior Notes”) in a concurrent tender offer and consent solicitation. The 10% Senior Notes will mature on February 1, 2018 and are guaranteed by Level 3
Communications, Inc. and Level 3 Communications, LLC (see Note 13—Condensed Consolidating Financial Information). Interest on the notes accrues at 10% per year and is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, beginning August 1, 2010.
The offering of the 10% Senior Notes was not originally registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and included a registration rights agreement. In June 2010, all of the originally placed notes were exchanged for a new issue of 10% Senior Notes due 2018 with identical terms and conditions, other than those related to registration rights, in a registered exchange offer and are now freely tradable.
2010 Tender Offer
In the first quarter of 2010, Level 3 Financing, Inc. commenced a tender offer to purchase for cash any and all of the outstanding $550 million aggregate principal amount of its 12.25% Senior Notes for a price equal to $1,080.00 per $1,000 principal amount of the notes, which included $1,050.00 as the tender offer consideration and $30.00 as a consent payment (the “12.25% Tender Offer”). In connection with the 12.25% Tender Offer, Level 3 and Level 3 Financing, Inc. solicited consents to certain proposed amendments to the indenture governing the 12.25% Senior Notes to eliminate substantially all of the covenants, certain repurchase rights and certain events of default and related provisions contained in the indenture.
Holders of the 12.25% Senior Notes, representing approximately 99.4% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 12.25% Senior Notes, participated in the tender offer. At the expiration of the tender offer, an aggregate principal amount of approximately $547 million of notes had been tendered. The Company redeemed in full the remaining $3 million aggregate principal of the 12.25% Senior Notes, at a redemption price equal to 106.125% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The Company recognized a loss associated with the 12.25% Tender Offer of approximately $55 million.
2010 Debt Repayments and Repurchases
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company repaid the $38 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2010 that matured on July 15, 2010.
In the second quarter of 2010, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding $172 million aggregate principal amount of its 10% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 for a price equal to $1,016.70 per $1,000 principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including the redemption date. The Company used cash on hand to fund the redemption of these notes and recognized a loss on extinguishment of approximately $4 million.
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company repaid $111 million aggregate principal amount of its 6% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2010 that matured on March 15, 2010. In addition, in various transactions during the first quarter of 2010, the Company repurchased $3 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011, the remaining $3 million of its 10.75% Senior Notes due 2011, and $2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2010. Repurchases were made at prices to par ranging from 95% to 100%, and the Company recognized a net loss on these repurchases of less than $1 million.
Long-Term Debt Maturities
Aggregate future contractual maturities of long-term debt and capital leases (excluding issue discounts, premiums and fair value adjustments) were as follows as of June 30, 2011 (in millions):
2011 (remaining six months) |
| $ | 2 |
|
2012 |
| 899 |
| |
2013 |
| 406 |
| |
2014 |
| 2,494 |
| |
2015 |
| 832 |
| |
2016 |
| 204 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 2,459 |
| |
|
| $ | 7,296 |
|
(9) Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes non-cash compensation expense and capitalized non-cash compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30 |
| June 30 |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
OSO |
| $ | 2 |
| $ | 3 |
| $ | 4 |
| $ | 6 |
|
Restricted Stock Units and Shares |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| ||||
401(k) Match Expense |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 7 |
| 6 |
| ||||
Restricted Stock Unit Bonus Grant |
| 8 |
| 5 |
| 24 |
| 10 |
| ||||
|
| 17 |
| 14 |
| 42 |
| 30 |
| ||||
Capitalized Noncash Compensation |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||
|
| $ | 17 |
| $ | 14 |
| $ | 42 |
| $ | 30 |
|
The Company capitalizes non-cash compensation for those employees directly involved in the construction of the network, installation of services for customers or development of business support systems. As of June 30, 2011, there were approximately 17 million outperform stock option appreciation units (“OSOs”) outstanding. As of June 30, 2011, there were approximately 25 million nonvested restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) outstanding.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company revised the eligibility criteria and grant schedule for its non-cash compensation. Effective April 1, 2010, the Company’s OSOs are granted quarterly to certain levels of management and its RSUs are granted annually on July 1 to management and certain other eligible employees. During 2010 and 2011, there were no changes to the vesting schedule, or any other aspects of the Company’s non-cash compensation plans.
(10) Comprehensive Loss
The components of total comprehensive loss, net of taxes, were as follows (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss |
| $ | (181 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | (386 | ) | $ | (407 | ) |
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
| 8 |
| (49 | ) | 50 |
| (96 | ) | ||||
Change in unrealized holding gain (loss) on interest rate swaps |
| (2 | ) | (13 | ) | 8 |
| (21 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
| — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | — |
| ||||
Comprehensive loss |
| $ | (175 | ) | $ | (231 | ) | $ | (329 | ) | $ | (524 | ) |
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, were as follows (in millions):
|
| June 30, 2011 |
| December 31, 2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
| $ | 105 |
| $ | 55 |
|
Accumulated net unrealized holding gain (loss) on investment and interest rate swaps |
| (100 | ) | (108 | ) | ||
Other, net |
| (46 | ) | (45 | ) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| $ | (41 | ) | $ | (98 | ) |
(11) Segment Information
Accounting guidance for the disclosures about segments of an enterprise defines operating segments as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and which is evaluated regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s operating segments are managed separately and represent separate strategic business units that offer different products or services and serve different markets. The Company’s reportable segments include: communications and coal mining (see Note 1 — Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies). Other business interests, which are not reportable segments, include corporate assets and overhead costs that are not attributable to a specific segment.
The Company evaluates performance based upon Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the Company, as net income (loss) from the consolidated statements of operations before (1) income tax benefit (expense), (2) total other income (expense), (3) non-cash impairment charges included within restructuring and impairment charges, (4) depreciation and amortization expense and (5) non-cash stock compensation expense included within selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.
Segment information for the Company’s Communications and Coal Mining businesses is summarized as follows (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenue from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| $ | 913 |
| $ | 892 |
| $ | 1,827 |
| $ | 1,792 |
|
Coal Mining |
| 19 |
| 16 |
| 34 |
| 26 |
| ||||
|
| $ | 932 |
| $ | 908 |
| $ | 1,861 |
| $ | 1,818 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| $ | 226 |
| $ | 209 |
| $ | 451 |
| $ | 411 |
|
Coal Mining |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (2 | ) |
Communications revenue consists of:
1) Core Network Services includes revenue from transport, infrastructure, data, and local and enterprise voice communications services.
2) Wholesale Voice Services includes revenue from long distance voice services, including domestic voice termination, international voice termination and toll free services.
3) Other Communications Services includes revenue from managed modem and its related reciprocal compensation services and SBC Contract Services, which includes revenue from the SBC Master Services Agreement, which was obtained in the December 2005 acquisition of WilTel.
Communications revenue attributable to each of these services is as follows (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Core Network Services Revenue |
| $ | 744 |
| $ | 699 |
| $ | 1,473 |
| $ | 1,400 |
|
Wholesale Voice Services Revenue |
| 151 |
| 163 |
| 315 |
| 328 |
| ||||
Other Communications Revenue |
| 18 |
| 30 |
| 39 |
| 64 |
| ||||
Total Communications Revenue |
| $ | 913 |
| $ | 892 |
| $ | 1,827 |
| $ | 1,792 |
|
The following information provides a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA by operating segment, as defined by the Company, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
| Communications |
| Coal |
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (178 | ) | $ | (1 | ) |
Income tax expense |
| 3 |
| — |
| ||
Total other (income) expense |
| 178 |
| — |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 206 |
| 1 |
| ||
Non-cash compensation expense |
| 17 |
| — |
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 226 |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Net Loss for reportable segments |
|
|
| $ | (179 | ) | |
Unallocated corporate expense |
|
|
| (2 | ) | ||
Consolidated Net Loss |
|
|
| $ | (181 | ) |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
|
| Communications |
| Coal |
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (379 | ) | $ | (2 | ) |
Income tax expense |
| 30 |
| — |
| ||
Total other (income) expense |
| 349 |
| — |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 409 |
| 2 |
| ||
Non-cash compensation expense |
| 42 |
| — |
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 451 |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Net Loss for reportable segments |
|
|
| $ | (381 | ) | |
Unallocated corporate expense |
|
|
| (5 | ) | ||
Consolidated Net Loss |
|
|
| $ | (386 | ) |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
| Communications |
| Coal |
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (167 | ) | $ | (1 | ) |
Income tax expense |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Total other (income) expense |
| 140 |
| — |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 222 |
| 1 |
| ||
Non-cash compensation expense |
| 14 |
| — |
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 209 |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Net Loss for reportable segments |
|
|
| $ | (168 | ) | |
Unallocated corporate income |
|
|
| (1 | ) | ||
Consolidated Net Loss |
|
|
| $ | (169 | ) |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
|
| Communications |
| Coal |
| ||
Net loss |
| $ | (402 | ) | $ | (3 | ) |
Income tax expense |
| 1 |
| — |
| ||
Total other (income) expense |
| 336 |
| (1 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 446 |
| 2 |
| ||
Non-cash compensation expense |
| 30 |
| — |
| ||
Adjusted EBITDA |
| $ | 411 |
| $ | (2 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Net Loss for reportable segments |
|
|
| $ | (405 | ) | |
Unallocated corporate expense |
|
|
| (2 | ) | ||
Consolidated Net Loss |
|
|
| $ | (407 | ) |
(12) Commitments, Contingencies and Other Items
Level 3 Communications, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (the “companies”) are parties to a number of purported class action lawsuits involving the companies’ right to install fiber optic cable network in railroad right-of-ways adjacent to plaintiffs’ land. The only lawsuit in which a class has been certified against the companies occurred in Koyle, et. al. v. Level 3 Communications, Inc., et. al., a purported two state class action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. In November 2005, the court granted class certification only for the state of Idaho. The companies have defeated motions for class certification in a number of these
actions but expect that plaintiffs in the pending lawsuits will continue to seek certification of statewide or multi-state classes. In general, the companies obtained the rights to construct their networks from railroads, utilities, and others, and have installed their networks along the rights-of-way so granted. Plaintiffs in the purported class actions assert that they are the owners of lands over which the companies’ fiber optic cable networks pass, and that the railroads, utilities, and others who granted the companies the right to construct and maintain their networks did not have the legal authority to do so. The complaints seek damages on theories of trespass, unjust enrichment and slander of title and property, as well as punitive damages. The companies have also received, and may in the future receive, claims and demands related to rights-of-way issues similar to the issues in these cases that may be based on similar or different legal theories.
The companies negotiated a series of class settlements affecting all persons who own or owned land next to or near railroad rights of way in which the companies have installed their fiber optic cable network. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Kingsborough v. Sprint Communications Co. L.P. granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement; however, on September 10, 2009, the court denied a motion for final approval of the settlement on the basis that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed the case.
In November 2010, the companies negotiated revised settlement terms for a series of state class settlements affecting all persons who own or owned land next to or near railroad rights of way in which the companies have installed their fiber optic cable network. The companies are currently negotiating certain procedural issues with legal counsel representing the interests of the current and former landowners with respect to presentment of the settlement in applicable jurisdictions. The settlement affecting current and former landowners in the state of Idaho was presented to the United States District Court for the District of Idaho and final approval of the settlement was granted on June 23, 2011. The settlement has been presented to federal courts in several additional states for approval.
It is still too early for the Company to reach a conclusion as to the ultimate outcome of these actions. However, management believes that the companies have substantial defenses to the claims asserted in all of these actions (and any similar claims which may be named in the future), and intends to defend them vigorously if a satisfactory settlement is not ultimately approved for all affected landowners. Additionally, management believes that any resulting liabilities for these actions, beyond amounts reserved, will not materially affect the Company’s financial condition or future results of operations, but could affect future cash flows.
In February 2009, Level 3 Communications, Inc., certain of its current officers and a former officer were named as defendants in purported class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, which have been consolidated as In re Level 3 Communications, Inc. Securities Litigation (Civil Case No. 09-cv-00200-PAB-CBS). The plaintiffs in each complaint allege, in general, that throughout the purported class period specified in the complaint that the defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s integration activities, business and operations. The complaints seek damages based on purported violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On May 4, 2009, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff in the case, and on September 29, 2009, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”). A motion to dismiss the Complaint was filed by the Company and the other named defendants. While the motion to dismiss the Complaint was pending, the court granted the lead plaintiff’s motion to further amend the Complaint (the “Amended Compliant”). Thereafter, the Company and the other defendants named in the Amended Complaint filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint with prejudice. The court granted this motion to dismiss with prejudice, and the plaintiff has appealed the decision to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
It remains too early for the Company to reach a conclusion as to the ultimate outcome of these actions. However, management believes that the Company has substantial defenses to the claims asserted in all of these actions (and any similar claims which may be named in the future) and intends to defend these actions vigorously.
In March 2009, Level 3 Communications, Inc., as a nominal defendant, certain of its directors and its current officers, and a former officer, were named as defendants in purported stockholder derivative actions in the District Court, Broomfield County, Colorado, which have been consolidated as In re Level 3 Communications, Inc. Derivative Litigation (Lead Case No. 2009CV59). On December 11, 2009, Level 3 Communications, Inc., as a nominal defendant, certain of its directors and current officers, and a former officer, were named as defendants in a purported stockholder derivative action in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in Iron Workers District Council Of Tennessee Valley & Vicinity Pension Plan v. Level 3 Communications, Inc., et. al.(Civil Case No. 09cv02914). The Plaintiffs allege that during the period specified in the complaints the named defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s integration activities, business and operations. The complaints seek damages on behalf of the Company based on purported breaches of fiduciary duties for disseminating false and misleading statements and failing to maintain internal controls; unjust enrichment; abuse of control; gross mismanagement; waste of corporate assets; and, with respect to certain defendants, breach of fiduciary duties in connection with the resignation of Kevin O’Hara. The parties have agreed to a
temporary stay of all activities in these actions pending the outcome of the motion to dismiss or other relevant time periods in the securities litigation described above.
It remains too early for the Company to reach a conclusion as to the ultimate outcome of these derivative actions. However, management believes that the complaints have numerous deficiencies including that each plaintiff failed to make a demand on the Company’s Board of Directors before filing the suit.
In March 2009, late April 2009 and early May 2009, Level 3 Communications, Inc., the Level 3 Communications, Inc. 401(k) Plan Committee and certain current and former officers and directors of Level 3 Communications, Inc. were named as defendants in purported class action lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. These cases have been consolidated as Walter v. Level 3 Communications, Inc., et. al., (Civil Case No. 09cv00658). The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary and other duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) with respect to investments in the Company’s common stock held in individual participant accounts in the Level 3 Communications, Inc. 401(k) Plan. The complaint claims that those investments were imprudent for reasons that are similar to those alleged in the securities and derivative actions described above.
The parties have reached a settlement in principle and are preparing settlement documents for presentation to the court for approval. Additionally, management believes that any resulting liabilities for these actions, beyond amounts reserved, will not materially affect the Company’s financial condition or future results of operations, but could affect future cash flows.
It remains too early for the Company to reach a conclusion as to the ultimate outcome of these ERISA actions. However, management believes that the Company has substantial defenses to the claims asserted in all of these actions (and any similar claims which may be named in the future) and intends to defend these actions vigorously if the settlement is not approved.
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to many other legal proceedings. Management believes that any resulting liabilities for these legal proceedings, beyond amounts reserved, will not materially affect the Company’s financial condition or future results of operations, but could affect future cash flows.
Letters of Credit
It is customary in Level 3’s industries to use various financial instruments in the normal course of business. These instruments include letters of credit. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued on behalf of Level 3 in accordance with specified terms and conditions. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Level 3 had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $22 million, which are collateralized by cash, and are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as restricted cash. The Company does not believe it is reasonable to estimate the fair value of the letters of credit and does not believe exposure to loss is reasonably possible nor material.
(13) Condensed Consolidating Financial Information
Level 3 Financing, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has issued Senior Notes that are unsecured obligations of Level 3 Financing; however, they are also jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by Level 3 Communications, Inc. and Level 3 Communications, LLC. Level 3 Communications, LLC has also provided a guarantee of the 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which will become registered securities upon the completion of the exchange offer dated July 1, 2011.
In conjunction with the registration of the Senior Notes, the accompanying condensed consolidating financial information has been prepared and presented pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10 “Financial statements of guarantors and affiliates whose securities collateralize an issue registered or being registered.”
The operating activities of the separate legal entities included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements are interdependent. The accompanying condensed consolidating financial information presents the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of each legal entity and, on an aggregate basis, the other non-guarantor subsidiaries based on amounts incurred by such entities, and is not intended to present the operating results of those legal entities on a stand-alone basis. Level 3 Communications, LLC leases equipment and certain facilities from other wholly owned subsidiaries of Level 3 Communications, Inc. These transactions are eliminated in the consolidated results of the Company.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 576 |
| $ | 416 |
| $ | (60 | ) | $ | 932 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 224 |
| 199 |
| (57 | ) | 366 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| — |
| — |
| 104 |
| 103 |
| — |
| 207 |
| ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 1 |
| — |
| 306 |
| 53 |
| (3 | ) | 357 |
| ||||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| 1 |
| — |
| 634 |
| 355 |
| (60 | ) | 930 |
| ||||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
| (1 | ) | — |
| (58 | ) | 61 |
| — |
| 2 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
| (55 | ) | (99 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | — |
| (160 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense) affiliates, net |
| 211 |
| 358 |
| (515 | ) | (54 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Equity in net earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
| (336 | ) | (572 | ) | 36 |
| — |
| 872 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other, net |
| — |
| (23 | ) | 3 |
| — |
| — |
| (20 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
| (180 | ) | (336 | ) | (477 | ) | (59 | ) | 872 |
| (180 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
| (181 | ) | (336 | ) | (535 | ) | 2 |
| 872 |
| (178 | ) | ||||||
Income Tax Expense |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (3 | ) | — |
| (3 | ) | ||||||
Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (181 | ) | $ | (336 | ) | $ | (535 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 872 |
| $ | (181 | ) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 1,136 |
| $ | 837 |
| $ | (112 | ) | $ | 1,861 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 436 |
| 408 |
| (106 | ) | 738 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| — |
| — |
| 207 |
| 204 |
| — |
| 411 |
| ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 1 |
| — |
| 613 |
| 106 |
| (6 | ) | 714 |
| ||||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1,256 |
| 718 |
| (112 | ) | 1,863 |
| ||||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
| (1 | ) | — |
| (120 | ) | 119 |
| — |
| (2 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
| (112 | ) | (197 | ) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | — |
| (317 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense) affiliates, net |
| 421 |
| 719 |
| (1,031 | ) | (109 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Equity in net earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
| (673 | ) | (1,172 | ) | 78 |
| — |
| 1,767 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other, net |
| (21 | ) | (23 | ) | 6 |
| 1 |
| — |
| (37 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
| (385 | ) | (673 | ) | (949 | ) | (114 | ) | 1,767 |
| (354 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
| (386 | ) | (673 | ) | (1,069 | ) | 5 |
| 1,767 |
| (356 | ) | ||||||
Income Tax Expense |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (30 | ) | — |
| (30 | ) | ||||||
Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (386 | ) | $ | (673 | ) | $ | (1,069 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 1,767 |
| $ | (386 | ) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 501 |
| $ | 462 |
| $ | (55 | ) | $ | 908 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 197 |
| 229 |
| (52 | ) | 374 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| — |
| — |
| 110 |
| 113 |
| — |
| 223 |
| ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| — |
| — |
| 294 |
| 47 |
| (3 | ) | 338 |
| ||||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| ||||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| — |
| — |
| 601 |
| 390 |
| (55 | ) | 936 |
| ||||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
| — |
| — |
| (100 | ) | 72 |
| — |
| (28 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
| (49 | ) | (94 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | — |
| (145 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense) affiliates, net |
| 201 |
| 328 |
| (480 | ) | (49 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Equity in net earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
| (325 | ) | (558 | ) | 43 |
| — |
| 840 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other, net |
| 4 |
| (1 | ) | (6 | ) | 7 |
| — |
| 4 |
| ||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
| (169 | ) | (325 | ) | (443 | ) | (44 | ) | 840 |
| (141 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
| (169 | ) | (325 | ) | (543 | ) | 28 |
| 840 |
| (169 | ) | ||||||
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit |
| — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | 1 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (169 | ) | $ | (325 | ) | $ | (544 | ) | $ | 29 |
| $ | 840 |
| $ | (169 | ) |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 990 |
| $ | 940 |
| $ | (112 | ) | $ | 1,818 |
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cost of Revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 396 |
| 467 |
| (106 | ) | 757 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| — |
| — |
| 218 |
| 230 |
| — |
| 448 |
| ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 1 |
| — |
| 588 |
| 98 |
| (6 | ) | 681 |
| ||||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1 |
| ||||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| 1 |
| — |
| 1,202 |
| 796 |
| (112 | ) | 1,887 |
| ||||||
Operating (Loss) Income |
| (1 | ) | — |
| (212 | ) | 144 |
| — |
| (69 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
| (101 | ) | (188 | ) | — |
| (5 | ) | — |
| (294 | ) | ||||||
Interest income (expense) affiliates, net |
| 398 |
| 649 |
| (935 | ) | (112 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Equity in net earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
| (709 | ) | (1,115 | ) | 87 |
| — |
| 1,737 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other, net |
| 6 |
| (55 | ) | (6 | ) | 12 |
| — |
| (43 | ) | ||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
| (406 | ) | (709 | ) | (854 | ) | (105 | ) | 1,737 |
| (337 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes |
| (407 | ) | (709 | ) | (1,066 | ) | 39 |
| 1,737 |
| (406 | ) | ||||||
Income Tax Expense |
| — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | ||||||
Net (Loss) Income |
| $ | (407 | ) | $ | (709 | ) | $ | (1,067 | ) | $ | 39 |
| $ | 1,737 |
| $ | (407 | ) |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
June 30, 2011
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 156 |
| $ | 7 |
| $ | 350 |
| $ | 71 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 584 |
|
Restricted cash and securities |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 631 |
| — |
| 632 |
| ||||||
Receivable, net |
| — |
| — |
| 74 |
| 220 |
| — |
| 294 |
| ||||||
Due from (to) affiliates |
| 12,402 |
| 12,013 |
| (26,838 | ) | 2,423 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Other |
| 4 |
| 13 |
| 61 |
| 34 |
| — |
| 112 |
| ||||||
Total Current Assets |
| 12,562 |
| 12,033 |
| (26,352 | ) | 3,379 |
| — |
| 1,622 |
| ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
| — |
| — |
| 2,861 |
| 2,367 |
| — |
| 5,228 |
| ||||||
Restricted Cash and Securities |
| 18 |
| — |
| 21 |
| 81 |
| — |
| 120 |
| ||||||
Goodwill and Other Intangibles, net |
| — |
| — |
| 512 |
| 1,240 |
| — |
| 1,752 |
| ||||||
Investment in Subsidiaries |
| (11,024 | ) | (18,289 | ) | 3,366 |
| — |
| 25,947 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other Assets, net |
| 15 |
| 45 |
| 7 |
| 73 |
| — |
| 140 |
| ||||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 1,571 |
| $ | (6,211 | ) | $ | (19,585 | ) | $ | 7,140 |
| $ | 25,947 |
| $ | 8,862 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 52 |
| $ | 283 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 336 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 275 |
| — |
| 2 |
| 598 |
| — |
| 875 |
| ||||||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
| — |
| — |
| 59 |
| 6 |
| — |
| 65 |
| ||||||
Accrued interest |
| 59 |
| 106 |
| — |
| 4 |
| — |
| 169 |
| ||||||
Current portion of deferred revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 111 |
| 33 |
| — |
| 144 |
| ||||||
Other |
| — |
| 1 |
| 52 |
| 30 |
| — |
| 83 |
| ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 335 |
| 107 |
| 276 |
| 954 |
| — |
| 1,672 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Long-Term Debt, less current portion |
| 1,652 |
| 4,609 |
| 23 |
| 65 |
| — |
| 6,349 |
| ||||||
Deferred Revenue, less current portion |
| — |
| — |
| 682 |
| 63 |
| — |
| 745 |
| ||||||
Other Liabilities |
| 16 |
| 101 |
| 149 |
| 262 |
| — |
| 528 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| — |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| (432 | ) | (11,028 | ) | (20,715 | ) | 5,796 |
| 25,947 |
| (432 | ) | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| $ | 1,571 |
| $ | (6,211 | ) | $ | (19,585 | ) | $ | 7,140 |
| $ | 25,947 |
| $ | 8,862 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
December 31, 2010
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 173 |
| $ | 7 |
| $ | 350 |
| $ | 86 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 616 |
|
Restricted cash and securities |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| — |
| 2 |
| ||||||
Receivable, net |
| — |
| — |
| 46 |
| 218 |
| — |
| 264 |
| ||||||
Due from (to) affiliates |
| 11,927 |
| 11,424 |
| (26,093 | ) | 2,742 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||||
Other |
| 4 |
| 10 |
| 41 |
| 35 |
| — |
| 90 |
| ||||||
Total Current Assets |
| 12,104 |
| 11,441 |
| (25,655 | ) | 3,082 |
| — |
| 972 |
| ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
| — |
| — |
| 2,937 |
| 2,365 |
| — |
| 5,302 |
| ||||||
Restricted Cash and Securities |
| 18 |
| — |
| 21 |
| 81 |
| — |
| 120 |
| ||||||
Goodwill and Other Intangibles, net |
| — |
| — |
| 543 |
| 1,255 |
| — |
| 1,798 |
| ||||||
Investment in Subsidiaries |
| (10,437 | ) | (17,176 | ) | 3,575 |
| — |
| 24,038 |
| — |
| ||||||
Other Assets, net |
| 9 |
| 65 |
| 6 |
| 83 |
| — |
| 163 |
| ||||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 1,694 |
| $ | (5,670 | ) | $ | (18,573 | ) | $ | 6,866 |
| $ | 24,038 |
| $ | 8,355 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Accounts payable |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 57 |
| $ | 271 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 329 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 176 |
| — |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| — |
| 180 |
| ||||||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
| — |
| — |
| 78 |
| 6 |
| — |
| 84 |
| ||||||
Accrued interest |
| 47 |
| 99 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 146 |
| ||||||
Current portion of deferred revenue |
| — |
| — |
| 115 |
| 36 |
| — |
| 151 |
| ||||||
Other |
| — |
| 1 |
| 65 |
| — |
| — |
| 66 |
| ||||||
Total Current Liabilities |
| 224 |
| 100 |
| 317 |
| 315 |
| — |
| 956 |
| ||||||
Long-Term Debt, less current portion |
| 1,612 |
| 4,564 |
| 24 |
| 68 |
| — |
| 6,268 |
| ||||||
Deferred Revenue, less current portion |
| — |
| — |
| 673 |
| 63 |
| — |
| 736 |
| ||||||
Other Liabilities |
| 15 |
| 107 |
| 154 |
| 276 |
| — |
| 552 |
| ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| (157 | ) | (10,441 | ) | (19,741 | ) | 6,144 |
| 24,038 |
| (157 | ) | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
| $ | 1,694 |
| $ | (5,670 | ) | $ | (18,573 | ) | $ | 6,866 |
| $ | 24,038 |
| $ | 8,355 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities |
| $ | (82 | ) | $ | (180 | ) | $ | 85 |
| $ | 308 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 131 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Capital expenditures |
| — |
| — |
| (94 | ) | (146 | ) | — |
| (240 | ) | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash and securities, net |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (34 | ) | — |
| (34 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| — |
| — |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| — |
| 4 |
| ||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| — |
| — |
| (93 | ) | (177 | ) | — |
| (270 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Long-term debt borrowings, net of issuance costs |
| 292 |
| 474 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 766 |
| ||||||
Payments on and repurchases of long-term debt, including current portion and refinancing costs |
| (197 | ) | (463 | ) | — |
| (2 | ) | — |
| (662 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) due from affiliates, net |
| (30 | ) | 169 |
| 8 |
| (147 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
| 65 |
| 180 |
| 8 |
| (149 | ) | — |
| 104 |
| ||||||
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3 |
| — |
| 3 |
| ||||||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (17 | ) | — |
| — |
| (15 | ) | — |
| (32 | ) | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 173 |
| 7 |
| 350 |
| 86 |
| — |
| 616 |
| ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 156 |
| $ | 7 |
| $ | 350 |
| $ | 71 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 584 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
|
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Level 3 |
| Other |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| ||||||
|
| (dollars in millions) |
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities |
| $ | (83 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | $ | 398 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 77 |
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Capital expenditures |
| — |
| — |
| (72 | ) | (114 | ) | — |
| (186 | ) | ||||||
Decrease in restricted cash and securities, net |
| — |
| — |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| — |
| 4 |
| ||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| — |
| — |
| (70 | ) | (112 | ) | — |
| (182 | ) | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Long-term debt borrowings, net of issuance costs |
| — |
| 613 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 613 |
| ||||||
Payments on and repurchases of long-term debt, including current portion and refinancing costs |
| (290 | ) | (599 | ) | (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| (890 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) due from affiliates, net |
| 138 |
| 161 |
| 50 |
| (349 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||||
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities |
| (152 | ) | 175 |
| 49 |
| (349 | ) | — |
| (277 | ) | ||||||
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (12 | ) | — |
| (12 | ) | ||||||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| (235 | ) | (1 | ) | (83 | ) | (75 | ) | — |
| (394 | ) | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
| 236 |
| 8 |
| 431 |
| 161 |
| — |
| 836 |
| ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
| $ | 1 |
| $ | 7 |
| $ | 348 |
| $ | 86 |
| $ | — |
| 442 |
| |
(14) Subsequent Events
In July 2011, the Company announced the marketing of a $650 million senior secured term loan. The proceeds will be used to complete the financings necessary to effect the Global Crossing transaction, and reduced the outstanding senior secured term loan facility commitment to zero. See Note 2 — Pending Global Crossing Acquisition for further discussion.
On July 15, 2011, certain holders converted approximately $128 million of the Company’s 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013 to common equity. Upon conversion, the Company issued an aggregate of approximately 71 million shares of Level 3’s common stock, representing the approximately 556 shares per $1,000 note into which the notes were then convertible. Level 3 also paid an aggregate of $29 million in cash, equivalent to $225 per $1,000 note, representing interest that would have been due from conversion through the maturity date, which will be recognized in the third quarter of 2011 as a loss on inducement. Following the partial conversion of the 15% Convertible Senior Notes, approximately $272 million principal amount of the 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013 remain outstanding. The 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013 are not callable prior to maturity in January 2013.
In July 2011, Level 3 Escrow issued an additional $600 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 in a private offering. This offering represented an additional offering of the 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 that was issued on June 9, 2011 and was treated under the indenture as a single series of notes. The gross proceeds from the offering of the notes were
deposited into a segregated escrow account until certain escrow conditions are satisfied, and reduced the outstanding bridge commitment to zero that Level 3 had in place with certain financial institutions in connection with the Global Crossing acquisition. See Note 2 — Pending Global Crossing Acquisition for further discussion.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Level 3 Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Level 3” or the “Company”) consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto), included elsewhere herein and the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
This document contains forward looking statements and information that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company. When used in this document, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “estimate” and “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this document. For a more detailed description of these risks and factors, please see the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and Item 1A in Part II of this Form 10-Q.
Level 3 Communications, Inc., through its operating subsidiaries, is primarily engaged in the communications business, with additional operations in coal mining.
Communications Business
The Company is a facilities-based provider of a broad range of communications services. Revenue for communications services is recognized on a monthly basis as these services are provided. For contracts involving private line, wavelengths and dark fiber services, Level 3 may receive up-front payments for services to be delivered for a period of generally up to 20 years. In these situations, Level 3 defers the revenue and amortizes it on a straight-line basis to earnings over the term of the contract.
Communications revenue consists of:
· Core Network Services
· Wholesale Voice Services
· Other Communications Services
The first two categories of Communications revenue are in different phases of the service life cycle from Other Communication Services, requiring different levels of investment and focus and providing different contributions to the Company’s Communications operating results. Management of Level 3 believes that growth in revenue from its Core Network Services is critical to the long-term success of its communications business. The Company also believes it must continue to effectively manage gross margin contribution from its Wholesale Voice Services and the positive cash flows from its Other Communications Services. Core Network Services revenue represents higher margin services and Wholesale Voice Services revenue represents lower margin services. The Company believes that trends in its communications business are best gauged by analyzing revenue trends in Core Network Services. Core Network Services includes revenue from transport, infrastructure, data, and local and enterprise voice communications services. Wholesale Voice Services includes revenue from long distance voice services, including domestic voice termination, international voice termination and toll free services. Other Communications Services includes revenue from managed modem and its related reciprocal compensation services and SBC Contract Services, which includes revenue from the “SBC Master Services Agreement,” which was obtained in the December 2005 acquisition of WilTel Communications Group, LLC (“WilTel”).
Core Network Services
The Company’s transport services include metropolitan and intercity wavelengths, private line, Ethernet private line, professional services and transoceanic services. The Company’s infrastructure services include dark fiber and colocation services.
Growth in transport and infrastructure revenue is largely dependent on increased demand for bandwidth services and available capital of companies requiring communications capacity for their own use or in providing capacity as a service provider to their customers. These expenditures may be in the form of monthly payments or up-front payments for private line, wavelength or dark fiber services. The Company is focused on providing end-to-end transport services to its customers to directly connect customer locations with a private network. Pricing for end-to-end metropolitan transport services have been relatively stable. For intercity transport services, the Company continues to experience pricing pressure for point-to-point locations, particularly in locations where a large number of carriers co-locate their facilities. An increase in demand may be partially offset by declines in unit pricing.
Data services primarily include the Company’s high speed Internet protocol service (“IP”), dedicated Internet access (“DIA”) service, ATM and frame relay services, IP and Ethernet virtual private network (“VPN”) services, content delivery network (“CDN”) services, and Vyvx broadcast services. Level 3’s Internet protocol service is a high quality and high-speed Internet access (“HSIP”) service offered in a variety of capacities. The Company’s VPN services permit businesses of any size to replace multiple networks with a single, cost-effective solution that greatly simplifies the converged transmission of voice, video, and data. This convergence to a single platform can be obtained without sacrificing the quality of service or security levels of traditional ATM and frame relay offerings. VPN services also permit customers to prioritize network application traffic so that high priority applications, such as voice and video, are not compromised in performance by the flow of low priority applications such as email.
The Company believes that one of the largest sources of future incremental demand for the Company’s Core Network Services will be from customers that are seeking to distribute their feature rich content or video over the Internet. Revenue growth in this area is dependent on the continued increase in demand from customers and the pricing environment. An increase in the reliability and security of information transmitted over the Internet and declines in the cost to transmit data have resulted in increased utilization of e-commerce or web based services by businesses. Although the pricing for data services is currently stable, the IP market is generally characterized by price compression and high unit growth rates depending upon the type of service. The Company experienced price compression in the high-speed IP market in 2010 and expects that pricing for its high-speed IP services will continue to decline during 2011.
The Company, through its Level 3 Vyvx Services business, provides video transport services over the Company’s fiber-optic network and via satellite. It carries live broadcast content from the originating source such as sporting events, special events or other live studio produced programming to production studios, broadcast master control centers and other destinations within the broadcasters’ delivery chain.
For live events where the location is not known in advance, such as breaking news stories in remote locations, the Company provides an integrated satellite and fiber-optic network-based service to transmit the content to its customers. Most of Level 3 Vyvx’s customers for these services contract for the service on an event-by-event basis; however, there are some customers who have purchased a dedicated point-to-point service, which enables these customers to transmit programming between fixed locations at any time.
The Company has developed content distribution services through the acquisition of the Content Delivery Network services business (“CDN Business”) of SAVVIS, which it purchased in January 2007 from SAVVIS, and the acquisition of Dublin, Ireland based Servecast Ltd., which it purchased in July 2007. The Company believes that the addition of the CDN Business with its strong, broad portfolio of patents has and will continue to help the Company secure its commercial efforts in the heavily patented CDN market, in which a number of competitors have significant, patented intellectual property.
The Company’s Core Network Services also include local and enterprise voice services. Local voice services are primarily components that enable other service providers to deliver business or consumer-ready voice services to their end customers. Enterprise voice services are business-grade voice services that the Company sells directly to its business customers.
The following provides a discussion of the Company’s Core Network Services revenue in terms of wholesale, large enterprise and federal, mid-market, and European customers.
· Wholesale includes revenue from international and domestic carriers, cable companies, wireless companies, voice service providers and the majority of former Content Market Group customers.
· Large Enterprise and Federal includes Fortune® 300 and other large enterprises that purchase communications services in a manner similar to carriers, including financial services, healthcare and systems integrators, federal government agencies and academic consortia, plus certain large former Content Markets Group customers, such as portal and search engine companies.
· Mid-Market includes medium enterprises generally outside the Fortune® 300, regional service providers, certain academic institutions and state and local governments.
· Europe includes the largest European consumers of bandwidth, including the largest European and international carriers, large system integrators, voice service providers, cable operators, Internet service providers, content providers, large enterprises, and government and education sectors.
The Company believes that the alignment of Core Network Services around customer groups should allow it to drive growth while enabling it to better focus on the needs of its customers. Each of these groups is supported by dedicated employees in sales. Each of these groups is also supported by non-dedicated, centralized service or product management and development, corporate marketing, global network services, engineering, information technology, and corporate functions, including legal, finance, strategy and human resources.
Core Network Services revenue by customer group was as follows (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
Wholesale |
| $ | 358 |
| 342 |
| $ | 709 |
| 685 |
| ||
Large Enterprise and Federal |
| 148 |
| 142 |
| 292 |
| 278 |
| ||||
Mid-Market |
| 158 |
| 146 |
| 313 |
| 297 |
| ||||
European |
| 80 |
| 69 |
| 159 |
| 140 |
| ||||
Total Core Network Services |
| $ | 744 |
| $ | 699 |
| $ | 1,473 |
| $ | 1,400 |
|
The classification of customers within each customer group can change based upon sales team assignments, merger and acquisition activity by customers and other factors.
Wholesale Voice Services
The Company offers Wholesale Voice Services that target large and existing markets. The revenue potential for Wholesale Voice Services is large; however, the pricing and margins are expected to continue to decline over time as a result of the new low-cost IP and optical-based technologies. In addition, the market for Wholesale Voice Services is being targeted by many competitors, several of which are larger and have more financial resources than the Company.
Other Communications Services
The Company’s Other Communications Services are mature services that are not critical areas of emphasis for the Company. Other Communications Services includes revenue from managed modem and its related reciprocal compensation services and SBC Contract Services, which includes revenue derived under the SBC Master Services Agreement that was obtained in the WilTel acquisition. The Company and its customers continue to see consumers migrate from narrow band dial-up services to higher speed broadband services as the narrow band market matures. The Company expects ongoing declines in Other Communications Services revenue similar to what has been experienced over the past several years.
The Company receives compensation from other carriers when it terminates traffic originating on those carriers’ networks. This reciprocal compensation is based on interconnection agreements with the respective carriers or rates mandated by the FCC. The Company has interconnection agreements in place for the majority of traffic subject to reciprocal compensation. In addition, a majority of the Company’s existing reciprocal compensation revenue is associated with agreements that are in effect through 2011 or beyond. The Company continues to negotiate new interconnection agreements or amendments to its existing interconnection agreements with local carriers as needed. The Company earns reciprocal compensation revenue from providing managed modem services, which are declining. The Company also receives reciprocal compensation from its voice services. In this case, reciprocal compensation is reported within Core Network Services revenue.
Communications Business Strategy and Objectives
The Company’s management continues to review all existing lines of business and service offerings to determine how those lines of business and service offerings enhance the Company’s focus on delivery of communications services and meeting its financial objectives. To the extent that certain lines of business, business groups or service offerings are not considered to be compatible with the delivery of the Company’s services or with meeting its financial objectives, Level 3 may exit those lines of business or stop offering those services.
The Company is focusing its attention on the following operational and financial objectives:
· growing Core Network Services revenue by increasing sales and improving the customer experience to increase customer retention and reduce customer churn;
· achieving sustainable generation of positive cash flows from operations in excess of capital expenditures;
· reducing network costs and operating expenses;
· continuing to show improvement in Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue;
· localizing certain decision making and interaction with its m id-market enterprise customers, including leveraging its existing network assets;
· managing Wholesale Voice Services for margin contribution; and
· refinancing its future debt maturities.
The Company’s management believes the introduction of new services or technologies, as well as the further development of existing technologies, may reduce the cost or increase the supply of certain services similar to those provided by Level 3. The ability of the Company to anticipate, adapt and invest in these technology changes in a timely manner may affect the Company’s future success.
On April 10, 2011, the Company and a subsidiary of Level 3 entered into an Amalgamation Agreement with Global Crossing Limited pursuant to which the Company will acquire Global Crossing in a tax-free, stock-for-stock transaction valued at approximately $3 billion, based on Level 3’s closing stock price on April 8, 2011, including the assumption of approximately $1.1 billion of net debt. The transaction will create a combined business with a unique capability to meet local, national and global customer requirements in a wide range of markets. The acquisition of Global Crossing Limited is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. The Company is responding to regulatory requests for additional information and continues to expect that the transaction will close before the end of 2011. Level 3 will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and could make additional acquisitions in the future.
The successful integration of acquired businesses into Level 3 is important to the success of Level 3. The Company must identify synergies and integrate acquired networks and support organizations, while maintaining the service quality levels expected by customers to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisitions. Successful integration of any acquired businesses will depend on the Company’s ability to manage the operations, realize opportunities for revenue growth presented by strengthened service offerings and expanded geographic market coverage, and eliminate redundant and excess costs to fully realize the expected synergies. If the Company is not able to efficiently and effectively integrate any businesses or operations it acquires, the Company may experience material negative consequences to its business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Company has ongoing process and system development work that is being implemented as part of its continued efforts that have improved and are expected to further improve the full spectrum of the customer experience, including service activation and service management systems and customer billing as well as various operational efficiency improvements. The Company remains focused on auditing and migrating network inventory data from legacy applications to its central applications.
The Company continues to manage its cost structure and operating expenses carefully and to concentrate its capital expenditures on those technologies and assets that enable the Company to further develop its Core Network Services. In addition, the Company’s operating results and financial condition could be negatively affected, if as a result of economic conditions:
· customers defer or forego purchases of the Company’s services;
· customers are unable to make timely payments to the Company;
· the demand for, and prices of, the Company’s services are reduced as a result of actions by the Company’s competitors or otherwise;
· key suppliers upon which the Company relies are unable to provide the Company with the materials or services it needs for its network on a timely basis; or
· the Company’s financial counterparties, insurance providers or other contractual counterparties are unable to, or do not meet, their contractual commitments to the Company.
The Company has also been focused on improving its liquidity, financial condition, and extending the maturity dates of certain debt.
In June 2011, Level 3 Escrow, Inc. issued $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 in a private transaction. The gross proceeds from the offering of the 8.125% Senior Notes were deposited into a segregated escrow account and will remain in escrow until certain escrow conditions are satisfied including, but not limited to, the substantially concurrent consummation of the proposed acquisition, by Level 3 of Global Crossing pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement.
In July 2011, Level 3 Escrow, Inc. issued an additional $600 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 in a private offering. This offering represents an additional offering of the 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 that were issued in June 2011. In July 2011, the Company also issued an aggregate of approximately 71 million shares of Level 3’s common stock to convert $128 million of its 15% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2013 to equity. See Note 14 — Subsequent Events in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In the first quarter of 2011, Level 3 Financing, Inc. issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.375% Senior Notes due 2019 in a private transaction. The net proceeds from the offering, together with cash on hand, was used to partially redeem approximately $443 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014 in April 2011.
Also in the first quarter of 2011, the Company issued $605 million aggregate principal amount of its 11.875% Senior Notes due 2019 in two private transactions. Approximately $300 million was issued in exchange for all of the Company’s outstanding 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013, and a portion of the net proceeds from another transaction were used to redeem the Company’s outstanding 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011.
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company issued $175 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (the “6.5% Convertible Senior Notes”) and an additional $26 million aggregate principal amount in the fourth quarter, for a total of $201 million aggregate principal amount, for net proceeds of approximately $195 million. In addition, the Company repaid $38 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2010 that had matured during the third quarter.
In the second quarter of 2010, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding $172 million aggregate principal amount of its 10% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 with available cash.
In the first quarter of 2010, Level 3 Financing, Inc. issued $640 million aggregate principal amount of 10% Senior Notes due 2018 for net proceeds of $613 million and repurchased $550 million of the total outstanding 12.25% Senior Notes due 2013 primarily through a tender offer.
Also in the first quarter of 2010, the Company repaid $111 million aggregate principal amount of its 6% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2010 that matured. In addition, in various transactions during the first quarter of 2010, the Company, or its subsidiaries, repurchased $3 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011, the remaining $3 million of its 10.75% Senior Notes due 2011, and $2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2010.
The Company will continue to look for opportunities to improve its financial position and focus its resources on growing revenue and managing costs for the communications business.
Coal Mining
Level 3, through its two 50% owned joint-venture surface mines, one each in Montana and Wyoming, sells coal primarily through long-term contracts with public utilities. The long-term contracts for the delivery of coal establish the price, volume, and quality requirements of the coal to be delivered. Revenue under these and other contracts is generally recognized when coal is shipped to the customer.
Critical Accounting Policies
Refer to Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a description of the Company’s critical accounting policies.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
| Three Months Ended |
| Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| Change |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| Change |
| ||||
(dollars in millions) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| % |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| % |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| $ | 913 |
| $ | 892 |
| 2 | % | $ | 1,827 |
| $ | 1,792 |
| 2 | % |
Coal Mining |
| 19 |
| 16 |
| 19 | % | 34 |
| 26 |
| 31 | % | ||||
Total revenue |
| 932 |
| 908 |
| 3 | % | 1,861 |
| 1,818 |
| 2 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Costs and Expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications |
| 347 |
| 358 |
| (3 | )% | 704 |
| 729 |
| (3 | )% | ||||
Coal Mining |
| 19 |
| 16 |
| 19 | % | 34 |
| 28 |
| 21 | % | ||||
Total Cost of Revenue |
| 366 |
| 374 |
| (2 | )% | 738 |
| 757 |
| (3 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
| 207 |
| 223 |
| (7 | )% | 411 |
| 448 |
| (8 | )% | ||||
Selling, General and Administrative |
| 357 |
| 338 |
| 6 | % | 714 |
| 681 |
| 5 | % | ||||
Restructuring Charges |
| — |
| 1 |
| (100 | )% | — |
| 1 |
| (100 | )% | ||||
Total Costs and Expenses |
| 930 |
| 936 |
| (1 | )% | 1,863 |
| 1,887 |
| (1 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating Loss |
| 2 |
| (28 | ) | NM |
| (2 | ) | (69 | ) | (97 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
| — |
| — |
| — | % | — |
| — |
| — | % | ||||
Interest expense |
| (160 | ) | (145 | ) | 10 | % | (317 | ) | (294 | ) | 8 | % | ||||
Loss on extinguishments of debt, net |
| (23 | ) | (5 | ) | NM |
| (43 | ) | (59 | ) | (27 | )% | ||||
Other, net |
| 3 |
| 9 |
| (67 | )% | 6 |
| 16 |
| (63 | )% | ||||
Total Other Expense |
| (180 | ) | (141 | ) | 28 | % | (354 | ) | (337 | ) | 5 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Loss Before Income Taxes |
| (178 | ) | (169 | ) | 5 | % | (356 | ) | (406 | ) | (12 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income Tax Expense |
| (3 | ) | — |
| NM |
| (30 | ) | (1 | ) | NM |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Loss |
| $ | (181 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | 7 | % | $ | (386 | ) | $ | (407 | ) | (5 | )% |
NM — Not meaningful
Communications revenue consists of:
1) Core Network Services includes revenue from transport, infrastructure, data, and local and enterprise voice communications services.
2) Wholesale Voice Services includes revenue from long distance voice services, including domestic voice termination, international voice termination and toll free services.
3) Other Communications Services includes revenue from managed modem and its related reciprocal compensation services and SBC Contract Services, which includes revenue from the SBC Master Services Agreement, which was obtained in the December 2005 acquisition of WilTel.
Communications revenue attributable to each of these services is as follows (in millions):
|
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Communications Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Core Network Services Revenue |
| $ | 744 |
| $ | 699 |
| $ | 1,473 |
| $ | 1,400 |
|
Wholesale Voice Services Revenue |
| 151 |
| 163 |
| 315 |
| 328 |
| ||||
Other Communications Revenue |
| 18 |
| 30 |
| 39 |
| 64 |
| ||||
Total Communications Revenue |
| $ | 913 |
| $ | 892 |
| $ | 1,827 |
| $ | 1,792 |
|
Comparisons of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 to the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Communications revenue increased approximately 2% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010. The increase in Communications revenue was driven by strong growth in the Company’s Core Network Services revenue from several existing services offset by declines in Wholesale Voice Services revenue and Other Communications Services revenue.
The Company experienced increases within Core Network Services revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods of 2010, primarily within transport, data, and IP services, offset by declines in voice services. The Company experienced strong growth in data and IP services revenue during the second quarter of 2011, which was driven by end customer demand, including the requirement for enterprise bandwidth, as well as rich content distribution driving sales in CDN services. The growth in transport services is primarily due to strong demand for broadband services, such as wavelengths and Ethernet, offset slightly by declines in longhaul and private line services. The decline within voice services during the second quarter of 2011 was the result of lower usage and an expected reduction in revenue supporting a contract with the U.S. Census Bureau in the second half of 2010. The Company continues to experience strong demand for transport, infrastructure and data services for complex nationwide solutions and its CDN services.
The decrease in Wholesale Voice Services revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010 is primarily due to a decline in usage. The Company continues to concentrate its sales efforts on maintaining incremental gross margins in the 30% range for these services. The Company expects to experience some volatility in revenue as a result of this strategy.
Other Communications Revenue declined to $18 million and $39 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from $30 million and $64 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The decrease is the result of a decline in managed modem revenue as a result of the continued migration from narrow band dial-up services to higher speed broadband services by end user customers, especially in large metropolitan areas. The Company expects managed modem revenue to continue to decline in the future due to an increase in the number of subscribers migrating to broadband services.
Reciprocal compensation revenue from managed modem services also declined in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods of 2010 as a result of the continuing decline in demand for managed modem services. The Company has historically earned the majority of its reciprocal compensation revenue from managed modem services, although the Company continues to generate a portion of its reciprocal compensation revenue from voice services, which is reported within Core Network Services revenue. To the extent the Company is unable to sign new interconnection agreements or signs new agreements or amends existing agreements containing lower rates, or there is a significant decline in the Company’s managed modem dial-up business, or FCC or state regulations change such that carriers are not required to compensate other carriers for terminating ISP-bound traffic, reciprocal compensation revenue may experience further declines over time.
Also contributing to the decrease in Other Communications Services revenue was lower SBC Contract Services revenue as a result of the migration of the SBC traffic to the AT&T network.
Coal mining revenue increased to $19 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $16 million in the same period of 2010, and increased to $34 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $26 million in the same period of 2010. The
increase in the six months period ended June 30, 2011 from the same period in 2010 related to an increase in contractual selling prices with customers in 2011 under new contracts that commenced later in 2010 and during the first quarter of 2011. In addition, the revenue in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 benefited from an increase in the volume of tons mined in the second quarter of 2011.
Cost of Revenue for the communications business includes leased capacity, right-of-way costs, access charges, satellite transponder lease costs, and other third party costs directly attributable to the network, but excludes depreciation and amortization and related impairment expenses.
Cost of revenue for the communications business, as a percentage of communications revenue was 38% and 39% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 40% and 41% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The Company has benefited from higher margin on-net Core Network Services and a decrease in lower margin Wholesale Voice Services, as well as an improving gross margin mix. Additionally, the Company continues to decrease its lower margin voice and certain private line services, and to implement initiatives to reduce both fixed and variable network expenses.
Coal mining cost of revenue approximated 100% of coal mining revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and 100% and 108% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in coal mining cost of revenue as a percentage of coal mining revenue in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 is primarily driven by higher revenue in 2011 under new contracts that commenced later in 2010 and during the first quarter of 2011, partially offset by higher fuel and production costs.
Depreciation and Amortization expense decreased 7% to $207 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $223 million in the second quarter of 2010 and decreased to $411 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $448 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease is primarily attributable to the reduction in depreciation expense associated with shorter-lived fixed assets becoming fully depreciated and the effect of foreign currency fluctuations.
Selling, General and Administrative expenses include salaries, wages and related benefits (including non-cash, stock-based compensation expenses), property taxes, travel, insurance, rent, contract maintenance, advertising, accretion expense on asset retirement obligations and other administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include certain network related expenses such as network facility rent, utilities and maintenance costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 6% to $357 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $338 million in the second quarter of 2010 and increased 5% to $714 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $681 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily a result of transaction costs associated with the Global Crossing acquisition and higher employee compensation and related costs as the Company continued to increase its sales, support and customer installation activity headcount during 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses included approximately $8 million of transaction costs associated with the Global Crossing acquisition for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were $17 million and $42 million, respectively, and in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $14 million and $30 million, respectively, of non-cash, stock-based compensation expenses related to grants and expected grants of outperform stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock shares, shares issued and accruals for the Company’s discretionary bonus, and shares issued for the Company’s matching contribution for the 401(k) plan. The increase in non-cash, stock-based compensation expense is primarily due to higher headcount, an increase in the discretionary stock-based bonus expected to be distributed to employees, and an adjustment to the 2010 stock bonus grant issued in 2011 due to a higher stock price on the grant date.
Restructuring Charges remained constant at less than $1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010, as the Company had not initiated any significant new workforce reduction plans in 2010 or 2011.
The Company may experience restructuring charges in 2011 in connection with the efforts to optimize its cost structure or for other reasons. Additional restructuring activities could result in additional headcount reductions and related charges.
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by the Company, is net income (loss) from the consolidated statements of operations before (1) income tax benefit (expense), (2) total other income (expense), (3) non-cash impairment charges included within restructuring charges, (4) depreciation and amortization expense and (5) non-cash stock compensation expense included within selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement under GAAP and may not be used in the same way by other companies. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is an important part of the Company’s internal reporting and is a key measure used by management to evaluate profitability and operating performance of the Company and to make resource allocation decisions.
Management believes such measurement is especially important in a capital-intensive industry such as telecommunications. Management also uses Adjusted EBITDA to compare the Company’s performance to that of its competitors and to eliminate certain non-cash and non-operating items in order to consistently measure from period to period its ability to fund capital expenditures, fund growth, service debt and determine bonuses.
Adjusted EBITDA excludes non-cash impairment charges and non-cash stock compensation expense because of the non-cash nature of these items. Adjusted EBITDA also excludes interest income, interest expense and income tax benefit (expense), because these items are associated with the Company’s capitalization and tax structures. Adjusted EBITDA also excludes depreciation and amortization expense because these non-cash expenses reflect the effect of capital investments which management believes should be evaluated through cash flow measures. Adjusted EBITDA excludes net other income (expense) because these items are not related to the primary operations of the Company.
There are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including the difficulty associated with comparing companies that use similar performance measures whose calculations may differ from the Company’s calculations. Additionally, this financial measure does not include certain significant items such as interest income, interest expense, income tax benefit (expense), depreciation and amortization expense, non-cash impairment charges, non-cash stock compensation expense and net other income (expense). Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP.
Note 11- Segment Information, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA for each of the Company’s reportable operating segments.
Adjusted EBITDA for the communications business was $226 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $209 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $451 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $411 million in the same period during 2010. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the communications business in 2011 is primarily attributable to the growth in the Company’s revenue, in addition to the decline in cost of revenue, offset slightly by higher selling, general and administrative expenses.
Interest Income remained constant at less than $1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and during the same period of 2010, due to low average returns on the Company’s investment portfolio, as well as a decrease in the average invested balance during the respective periods.
The Company invests its funds primarily in government and government agency securities, money market funds and commercial paper depending on liquidity requirements. The Company’s investment strategy generally provides lower yields on the funds than would be obtained on alternative investments, but reduces the risk to principal in the short term prior to these funds being used in the Company’s business.
Interest Expense increased 10% to $160 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $145 million in the second quarter of 2010. Interest Expense increased 8% to $317 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $294 million in the second quarter of 2010. Interest expense increased as a result of higher average interest rates in 2011 as compared to 2010, and higher average debt balance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010. See Note 8 - Long-Term Debt, and Note 14 — Subsequent Events, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Level 3’s financing activities.
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net was a loss of $23 million and $43 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to a loss of $5 million and $59 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The loss recorded during 2011 was related to a $23 million charge recognized for the portion of the 9.25% Senior Notes due 2014 retired in April 2011 and a $20 million charge recorded in the first quarter of 2011 was the result of the redemption of the 5.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 in February 2011 and exchange of the 9% Convertible Senior Discount Notes due 2013 in January 2011. The loss recorded during 2010 was related to a $4 million charge recognized as a result of the redemption of the Company’s 10% Convertible Senior Notes due 2011 in May 2010 and a $55 million charge recognized in connection with the 12.25% Tender Offer and consent solicitation in January 2010. See Note 8 - Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more details regarding the Company’s financing activities.
Other, net was $3 million of income in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $9 million of income in the second quarter of 2010 and $6 million of income in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $16 million of income in the same period of 2010. Other, net is primarily comprised of gains and losses from the change in the fair value of certain derivative investments, as well as gains and losses on the sale of non-operating assets, realized foreign currency gains and losses and other income.
Income Tax Expense was $3 million and $30 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and less than $1 million and $1 million, in the same periods in 2010. The income tax expense during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily related to an out of period adjustment due to taxable temporary differences associated with certain indefinite-lived intangible assets that the Company is unable to use to offset its deferred tax assets. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details. The income tax expense in 2010 and during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily related to state income taxes.
The Company incurs income tax expense attributable to income in various Level 3 subsidiaries, including the coal business, that are required to file state or foreign income tax returns on a separate legal entity basis. The Company also recognizes accrued interest and penalties in income tax expense related to uncertain tax benefits.
Financial Condition - June 30, 2011
Cash flows used in operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively are summarized as follows:
|
| Six Months Ended |
| |||||||
|
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
|
|
| |||
(dollars in millions) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Change |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
| $ | 131 |
| $ | 77 |
| $ | 54 |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
| (270 | ) | (182 | ) | (88 | ) | |||
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities |
| 104 |
| (277 | ) | 381 |
| |||
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| 3 |
| (12 | ) | 15 |
| |||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
| $ | (32 | ) | $ | (394 | ) | $ | 362 |
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities increased by $54 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in the Company’s net loss of approximately $21 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 and a decrease in the use of cash for working capital items recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities increased by $88 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily as a result of cash placed into escrow to fund a portion of unaccrued interest and the issuance discount in connection with the $600 million aggregate principal amount of the 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019, and additional capital expenditures, which totaled $240 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $186 million for the same period of 2010.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $104 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a use of cash of $277 million in the same period of 2010 as a result of a decrease in debt payments and repurchases and an increase in new issuances in 2011. See Note 8 - Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more details regarding the Company’s debt transaction activities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company incurred a net loss of $386 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $407 million during the same period of 2010. The Company used $240 million for capital expenditures and had $104 million of cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2011. This compares to $186 million of cash used for capital expenditures and $277 million of cash flows used in financing activities for the same period of 2010.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $584 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. The Company continues to be very active in the financial markets, having completed or announced the issuance of over $2.5 billion of senior notes or other securities in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and continuing through July 2011, to be used in part to complete the acquisition of Global Crossing. In July 2011, certain holders also converted approximately $128 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 15% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 to equity. See Note 8 - Long-Term Debt, and Note 14 — Subsequent Events, of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Level 3’s financing activities. Although the Company cannot be assured it will be able to continue to refinance its debt or to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, Level 3 has no remaining maturities in 2011 and has approximately $294 million of long-term debt due to mature within twelve months of June 30, 2011, excluding capital leases, mortgage payments, debt discounts, premiums and fair value adjustments. The $294 million of long-term debt does not include the $600 million of senior notes that have been classified as current due to certain conditions discussed below.
Capital expenditures for 2011 are expected to be slightly higher than the $436 million incurred in 2010 as the Company invests in base capital expenditures (estimated capital required to keep the network operating efficiently and support new service development) with the remaining capital expenditures expected to be project based where capital is required to expand the network prior to a specific customer revenue opportunity or success-based, which is tied to incremental revenue. As of June 30, 2011, and including conversion of approximately $128 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 15% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013 completed in July 2011, the Company had long-term debt contractual obligations, including capital lease and commercial mortgage obligations and excluding premium and discounts on debt issuance and fair value adjustments, of approximately $2 million that mature during the remainder of 2011, $899 million that mature in 2012, and $278 million that mature in 2013. The $899 million that mature in 2012 includes $600 million of senior notes that have been classified as current due to certain conditions that could require the notes to be repaid during the current period with cash held in escrow that is presented in restricted cash and securities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011. See Note 8 — Long-Term Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2010, the Company issued $841 million total aggregate principal amount of senior notes, and repaid or repurchased $585 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes and convertible senior notes with proceeds from such offerings. In addition, the Company also repaid or repurchased $122 million aggregate principal amount of its debt securities in various transactions throughout 2010.
In addition to the $584 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand at June 30, 2011, $124 million of current and non-current restricted cash and securities are used to collateralize outstanding letters of credit, long-term debt, certain operating obligations of the Company and certain reclamation liabilities associated with the coal mining business. Based on information available at this time, the Company believes that its current liquidity and anticipated future cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund its business for at least the next twelve months.
On April 10, 2011, the Company, Apollo Amalgamation Sub, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted limited liability company and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Amalgamation Sub”), and Global Crossing Limited, a Bermuda exempted limited liability company (“Global Crossing”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation (the “Amalgamation Agreement”) pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, Amalgamation Sub and Global Crossing will amalgamate pursuant to Bermuda law (the “Amalgamation”). Concurrently with the execution of the Amalgamation Agreement, Level 3 Financing, Inc. and the Company entered into a financing commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”), Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”), and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGMI” and, together with Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, the “Lenders”). The Commitment Letter was subsequently amended and restated on April 19, 2011, to add Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Bank AG Cayman Islands Branch, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., Credit Suisse AG and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as Lenders. Level 3 expects the financing under the Commitment Letter, together with cash balances, to be sufficient to provide the financing necessary to consummate the Amalgamation and to refinance certain existing indebtedness of Global Crossing. The Commitment Letter provides for a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate amount of $650 million. In July 2011, the Company announced the marketing of a $650 million senior secured term loan, the proceeds of which will be used to complete the financings necessary to effect the Global Crossing transaction and reduced this commitment to zero. The Commitment Letter also provides for a $1.1 billion senior unsecured bridge facility, if up to $1.1 billion of senior notes or certain other securities are not issued by Level 3 Financing, Inc. or the Company to finance the Amalgamation on or prior to the closing of the Amalgamation. The gross proceeds of $1.2 billion from the two offerings of Level 3 Escrow’s 8.125% Senior Notes due 2019 completed in June 2011 and July 2011, reduced the outstanding bridge commitment to zero. The financing commitments of the Lenders are subject to certain conditions set forth in the Commitment Letter.
The Company may elect to secure additional capital in the future, at acceptable terms, to improve its liquidity or fund acquisitions. In addition, in an effort to reduce future cash interest payments as well as future amounts due at maturity or to extend debt maturities, Level 3 or its affiliates may, from time to time, issue new debt, enter into debt for debt, debt for equity or cash transactions to purchase its outstanding debt securities in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Level 3 will evaluate any such transactions in light of the existing market conditions and the possible dilutive effect to stockholders. The amounts involved in any such transaction, individually or in the aggregate, may be material.
In addition to raising capital through the debt and equity markets, the Company may sell or dispose of existing businesses, investments or other non-core assets.
Consolidation of the communications industry is expected to continue. Level 3 will continue to evaluate consolidation opportunities and could make additional acquisitions in the future.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Level 3 is subject to market risks arising from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had borrowed a total of approximately $2.0 billion primarily under a Senior Secured Term Loan due 2014 and Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2015 that bear interest at LIBOR rates plus an applicable margin. As the LIBOR rates fluctuate, so too will the interest expense on amounts borrowed under the debt instruments. The weighted average interest rate on the variable rate instruments at June 30, 2011, was approximately 4.1%.
In March 2007, Level 3 Financing, Inc. entered into two interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest payments on $1 billion notional amount of floating rate debt. The two interest rate swap agreements are with different counterparties and are for $500 million each. The interest rate swap agreements were effective beginning in 2007 and mature in January 2014. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, Level 3 receives interest payments based on rolling three month LIBOR terms and pays interest at the fixed rate of 4.93% under one arrangement and 4.92% under the other. Level 3 has designated the interest rate swap agreements as a cash flow hedge on the interest payments for $1 billion of floating rate debt.
The remaining, or unhedged, variable rate debt of approximately $1 billion has a weighted average interest rate of 5.6% at June 30, 2011. A hypothetical increase in the weighted average rate by 1% point (i.e. a weighted average rate of 6.6%) would increase the Company’s annual interest expense by approximately $10 million. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $5.3 billion (excluding fair value adjustments, discounts and premiums) of fixed rate debt bearing a weighted average interest rate of 9.2%. A decline in interest rates in the future will not benefit the Company with respect to the fixed rate debt due to the terms and conditions of the indentures relating to that debt that would require the Company to repurchase the debt at specified premiums if redeemed early.
Indicated changes in interest rates are based on hypothetical movements and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur. Future earnings and losses will be affected by actual fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency rates.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The Company conducts a portion of its business in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the currency in which the Company’s consolidated financial statements are reported. Correspondingly, the Company’s operating results could be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate volatility relative to the U.S. dollar. The Company’s European subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency, as the majority of their revenue and purchases are transacted in their local currencies. Although the Company continues to evaluate strategies to mitigate risks related to the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, the Company will likely recognize gains or losses from international transactions. Changes in foreign currency rates could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of June 30, 2011. Based upon such review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal controls. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the second quarter of 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company has provided an update to legal proceedings involving the Company in Note 12 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1, of this Form 10-Q. This disclosure is hereby incorporated by reference to this Item 1.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in Level 3’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect Level 3’s business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in Level 3’s Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. For example, these risks now include the Company’s ability to successfully complete the pending acquisition of Global Crossing, including timely receipt all stockholder and regulatory approvals, and realization of the anticipated benefits of the transaction. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to Level 3 or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect Level 3’s business, financial condition and/or operating results. The Risk Factors included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, have not materially changed other than as set forth below.
Level 3 has substantial debt, which may hinder its growth and put Level 3 at a competitive disadvantage.
Level 3’s substantial debt may have important consequences, including the following:
· the ability to obtain additional financing for acquisitions, working capital, investments and capital or other expenditures could be impaired or financing may not be available on acceptable terms;
· a substantial portion of Level 3’s cash flows will be used to make principal and interest payments on outstanding debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations and future business opportunities;
· a substantial decrease in cash flows from operating activities or an increase in expenses could make it difficult to meet debt service requirements and force modifications to operations;
· Level 3 has more debt than certain of its competitors, which may place Level 3 at a competitive disadvantage; and
· substantial debt may make Level 3 more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy generally.
Level 3 has substantial deficiencies of earnings to cover fixed charges of approximately $356 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Level 3 had deficiencies of earnings to cover fixed charges of approximately $406 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately $713 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, approximately $617 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, approximately $264 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, approximately $1.1 billion for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and approximately $742 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Level 3 may not be able to repay its existing debt; failure to do so or refinance the debt could prevent Level 3 from implementing its strategy and realizing anticipated profits.
If Level 3 were unable to refinance its debt or to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, Level 3’s ability to operate its business would be impaired. As of June 30, 2011, Level 3 had an aggregate of approximately $7.2 billion of long-term debt on a consolidated basis including current maturities, premiums and discounts, capital leases and its commercial mortgage, and approximately $432 million of stockholders’ deficit. Of this long-term debt, and including the July 2011 conversion of approximately $128 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 15% Convertible Senior Notes due 2013, approximately $2 million is due to mature in the remaining six months of 2011, approximately $899 million is due to mature in 2012, and $278 million is due to mature in 2013, in each case excluding debt discounts, premiums and fair value adjustments.
Level 3’s ability to make interest and principal payments on its debt and borrow additional funds on favorable terms depends on the future performance of the business. If Level 3 does not have enough cash flow in the future to make interest or principal payments on its debt, Level 3 may be required to refinance all or a part of its debt or to raise additional capital. Level 3 cannot be sure that it will be able to refinance its debt or raise additional capital on acceptable terms.
Level 3 may not be able to successfully or timely complete the pending acquisition of Global Crossing or realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction.
The completion of the pending Global Crossing transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement,
including the expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and applicable antitrust laws in certain other jurisdictions, receipt of certain regulatory and governmental approvals (including receipt of approval from the Federal Communications Commission and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States), there being no material adverse effect on the Company or Global Crossing prior to the closing of the transaction and other customary conditions. The transaction also requires the approval of both Global Crossing’s shareholders and the Company’s stockholders. The Company will be unable to complete the pending acquisition of Global Crossing until each of the conditions to closing are either satisfied or waived.
In deciding whether to grant certain of the government approvals, the relevant governmental entity will make a determination of whether, among other things, the transaction is in the public interest. Regulatory entities may impose certain requirements or obligations as conditions for their approval or in connection with their review. Level 3 can provide no assurance that it will obtain the necessary approvals or that any required conditions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company following the completion of the Global Crossing transaction. In addition, Level 3 can provide no assurance that these conditions will not result in the abandonment of the Global Crossing transaction. Depending on the reasons for not completing the transaction, the Company could be required to pay Global Crossing a termination fee that ranges from $70 million to $120 million and, in certain circumstances, certain expenses incurred by Global Crossing in pursuing the Amalgamation.
For these and other reasons, the Company’s failure to complete the Global Crossing transaction could adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition, and could negatively affect the trading price of the Company’s equity and debt securities. If the Global Crossing transaction is completed, Level 3 can provide no assurance that the anticipated benefits of the transaction will be fully realized in the time frame anticipated or at all, or that the costs or difficulties related to the integration of Global Crossing’s operations into Level 3’s will not be greater than expected.
Mine and Health Administration Safety Disclosure and Pattern or Potential Pattern of Violations.
We are engaged in coal mining through our subsidiary, KCP, Inc. (“KCP”). KCP has a 50% interest in two mines, which are operated by a subsidiary of Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. (“PKS”). Decker Coal Company (“Decker”) is a joint venture with Western Minerals, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Cloud Peak Energy Inc. Black Butte Coal Company (“Black Butte”) is a joint venture with Bitter Creek Coal Company, a subsidiary of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. The Decker mine is located in southeastern Montana and the Black Butte mine is located in southwestern Wyoming. The coal mines use the surface mining method. We also own other properties that were formerly engaged in surface mining of coal, but those properties have either been fully reclaimed and are on a monitoring status or are in the process of being reclaimed.
The operation of our mines is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). The following disclosures are provided pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”), which was enacted in July 2010; Section 1503 of the Act requires certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Mine Act. Under the Act, the SEC is authorized to issue rules and regulations to carry out the purposes of these provisions, but has not done so as of the date of this quarterly report. While we believe the following disclosures meet the requirements of the Act, it is possible that any rule-making by the SEC will require disclosures to be presented in a form that differs from this presentation. All of our mining operations are located within the western United States.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, in accordance with Section 1503 of the Act, we present the following information with respect to the mines that we operate and those in which we have a 50 percent joint venture ownership interest:
Item |
| Big Horn |
| Black Butte |
| Decker |
| Rosebud |
| |
Section 104 S&S citations (#)(1) |
| — |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| — |
| |
Section 104(b) orders (#)(2) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Section 104(d) citations and orders (#)(3) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Section 110(b)(2) violations (#)(4) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Section 107(a) orders (#)(5) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Proposed MSHA assessments ($)(6) |
| — |
| $ | 5,396 |
| — |
| — |
|
Fatalities (#)(7) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Section 104(e) notices(8) |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |
Pending Mine Safety Commission legal actions (including any contested penalties for citations issued)(9) |
| — |
| 32 |
| 1 |
| — |
| |
(1) |
| Total number of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a coal mine safety or health hazard under section 104 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 814) (the Act) for which we received a citation from MSHA. |
|
|
|
(2) |
| Total number of orders issued under section 104(b) of the Act (30 U.S.C. 814(b)). |
|
|
|
(3) |
| Total number of citations and orders for unwarrantable failure of Level 3 to comply with mandatory health or safety standards under section 104(d) of the Act (30 U.S.C. 814(d)). |
|
|
|
(4) |
| Total number of flagrant violations under section 110(b)(2) of the Act (30 U.S.C. 820(b)(2)). |
|
|
|
(5) |
| Total number of imminent danger orders issued under section 107(a) of the Act (30 U.S.C. 817(a)). |
|
|
|
(6) |
| Total dollar value of proposed assessments during the reporting period from MSHA under the Act (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). |
|
|
|
(7) |
| Total number of mining-related fatalities. |
|
|
|
(8) |
| Any coal mines owned and operated by us that received written notice from MSHA of (A) a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of coal mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of such Act (30 U.S.C. 814(e)); or (B) the potential to have such a pattern. |
|
|
|
(9) |
| Any pending legal action before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission involving a coal mine owned and operated by us. |
Exhibits filed as a part of this report are listed below.
12 |
| Statements Re Computation of Ratios |
|
|
|
31.1 |
| Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2 |
| Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1 |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101 |
| The following materials from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Level 3 Communications, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements*. |
|
| * Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 3, 2011 | /s/ Eric J. Mortensen |
| Eric J. Mortensen |
| Senior Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |