UNITED STATES | |||||||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |||||||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | |||||||
FORM 10-Q | |||||||
(Mark One) | |||||||
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||||
For the quarterly period ended | October 31, 2012 | ||||||
or | |||||||
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||||
For the transition period from | to | ||||||
Commission File Number: | 000-14798 | ||||||
American Woodmark Corporation | |||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) | |||||||
Virginia | 54-1138147 | ||||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | ||||||
3102 Shawnee Drive, Winchester, Virginia | 22601 | ||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | ||||||
(540) 665-9100 | |||||||
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) | |||||||
Not Applicable | |||||||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ___ No X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of November 28, 2012, 14,536,345 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PAGE | ||
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | NUMBER |
Item 1. | Financial Statements (unaudited) | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets--October 31, 2012 and April 30, 2012 | 3 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations--Three months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011; Six months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 | 4 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Three months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011; Six months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 | 5 | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows--Six months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 | 6 | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements--October 31, 2012 | 7-11 | |
Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12-18 |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 18 |
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 18 |
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 18 |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 18 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 19 |
Item 6. | Exhibits | 20 |
SIGNATURES | 21 | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
October 31, | April 30, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current Assets | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 63,050 | $ | 66,620 | ||||
Customer receivables, net | 41,172 | 32,533 | ||||||
Inventories | 28,092 | 22,340 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable and other | 2,601 | 2,523 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 10,950 | 7,086 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 145,865 | 131,102 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 74,231 | 75,375 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 7,064 | 7,064 | ||||||
Promotional displays, net | 5,672 | 5,073 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 29,019 | 34,969 | ||||||
Other assets | 7,295 | 11,538 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 269,146 | $ | 265,121 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 22,975 | $ | 19,492 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 959 | 875 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses | 22,178 | 21,963 | ||||||
Accrued marketing expenses | 10,347 | 8,756 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | 4,801 | 8,135 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 61,260 | 59,221 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 23,721 | 23,790 | ||||||
Defined benefit pension liabilities | 47,651 | 50,547 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 1,511 | 1,543 | ||||||
Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | -- | -- | ||||||
Common stock, no par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding shares: at October 31, 2012: 14,503,520 at April 30, 2012: 14,395,273 | 98,395 | 96,205 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 63,933 | 61,422 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss - | ||||||||
Defined benefit pension plans | (27,325 | ) | (27,607 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders' Equity | 135,003 | 130,020 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 269,146 | $ | 265,121 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
3
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 159,760 | $ | 128,418 | $ | 308,012 | $ | 259,617 | ||||||||
Cost of sales and distribution | 134,966 | 112,304 | 261,175 | 225,096 | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit | 24,794 | 16,114 | 46,837 | 34,521 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 14,973 | 14,508 | 29,493 | 30,484 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 6,624 | 6,166 | 12,263 | 12,507 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges, net | 84 | -- | 861 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Insurance recoveries | (399 | ) | -- | (399 | ) | -- | ||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) | 3,512 | (4,560 | ) | 4,619 | (8,485 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 166 | 137 | 317 | 274 | ||||||||||||
Other income | (25 | ) | (174 | ) | (84 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | 3,371 | (4,523 | ) | 4,386 | (8,431 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 1,421 | (1,547 | ) | 1,875 | (2,739 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 1,950 | $ | (2,976 | ) | $ | 2,511 | $ | (5,692 | ) | ||||||
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 14,498,269 | 14,330,954 | 14,456,938 | 14,315,318 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 14,677,640 | 14,330,954 | 14,626,899 | 14,315,318 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||||||
Cash dividends per share | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
4
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,950 | $ | (2,976 | ) | $ | 2,511 | $ | (5,692 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | ||||||||||||||||
Change in pension benefits | 141 | 331 | 282 | 662 | ||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) | $ | 2,091 | $ | (2,645 | ) | $ | 2,793 | $ | (5,030 | ) | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
5
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 2,511 | $ | (5,692 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7,572 | 11,486 | ||||||
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 100 | 69 | ||||||
Gain on sales of assets held for sale | (487 | ) | -- | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,761 | 1,833 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,723 | (2,929 | ) | |||||
Pension contributions (in excess of) less than expense | (2,435 | ) | 3,215 | |||||
Other non-cash items | (182 | ) | (854 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Customer receivables | (8,752 | ) | 2,534 | |||||
Inventories | (5,469 | ) | (346 | ) | ||||
Income taxes receivable and other assets | (637 | ) | 449 | |||||
Accounts payable | 3,483 | (3,140 | ) | |||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses | 215 | 2,456 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses | (1,157 | ) | (1,202 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities | (1,754 | ) | 7,879 | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Payments to acquire property, plant and equipment | (5,129 | ) | (2,990 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment | 75 | 15 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of assets held for sale | 6,447 | -- | ||||||
Investment in promotional displays | (2,873 | ) | (1,665 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities | (1,480 | ) | (4,640 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (336 | ) | (309 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | -- | 18 | ||||||
Payment of dividends | -- | (1,287 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Used by Financing Activities | (336 | ) | (1,578 | ) | ||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (3,570 | ) | 1,661 | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period | 66,620 | 55,420 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period | $ | 63,050 | $ | 57,081 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
6
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE A--BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three- and six-month periods ended October 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012 filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).
NOTE B--NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present comprehensive income and its components as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance effective May 1, 2012 and now includes a Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the interim financial statements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
NOTE C—NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Numerator used in basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,950 | $ | (2,976 | ) | $ | 2,511 | $ | (5,692 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net earnings (loss) per common share - | ||||||||||||||||
weighted-average shares | 14,498 | 14,331 | 14,457 | 14,315 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock units | 180 | -- | 170 | -- | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net earnings (loss) per common share - | ||||||||||||||||
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions | 14,678 | 14,331 | 14,627 | 14,315 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.40 | ) |
Potentially dilutive securities of 1.4 million and 2.0 million shares for the six-month periods ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of net earnings (loss) per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
7
NOTE D--STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has various stock compensation plans. During the quarter ended October 31, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved grants of a total of 20,000 service-based restricted stock units to non-employee directors. These service-based restricted stock units vest daily through the end of the two-year vesting period as long as the recipient continuously remains a member of the Board, and entitle the recipient to receive one share of the Company’s common stock per unit granted. During the six months ended October 31, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company also approved grants of non-statutory stock options and service-based and performance-based restricted stock units to key employees. The employee non-statutory stock option grants totaled 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $17.62 per share. The options vest evenly over a three-year period and have a ten-year contractual term. The employee performance-based restricted stock units totaled 129,075 units and the employee service-based restricted stock units totaled 43,025 units. The performance-based restricted stock units entitle the recipients to receive one share of the Company’s common stock per unit granted if applicable performance conditions are met and the recipient remains continuously employed with the Company until the units vest. The service-based units entitle the recipients to receive one share of the Company’s common stock per unit granted if they remain continuously employed with the Company until the units vest. The Company’s restricted stock units granted to employees cliff-vest three years from the grant date.
For the three- and six-month periods ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales and distribution | $ | 131 | $ | 138 | $ | 308 | $ | 298 | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 189 | 187 | 430 | 389 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 456 | 529 | 1,023 | 1,146 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 776 | $ | 854 | $ | 1,761 | $ | 1,833 |
NOTE E--CUSTOMER RECEIVABLES
The components of customer receivables were:
October 31, | April 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2012 | ||||||
Gross customer receivables | $ | 43,324 | $ | 34,572 | ||||
Less: | ||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | (118 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||
Allowance for returns and discounts | (2,034 | ) | (1,946 | ) | ||||
Net customer receivables | $ | 41,172 | $ | 32,533 |
8
NOTE F--INVENTORIES
The components of inventories were:
October 31, | April 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2012 | ||||||
Raw materials | $ | 11,370 | $ | 9,412 | ||||
Work-in-process | 17,301 | 14,543 | ||||||
Finished goods | 9,592 | 8,734 | ||||||
Total FIFO inventories | 38,263 | 32,689 | ||||||
Reserve to adjust inventories to LIFO value | (10,171 | ) | (10,349 | ) | ||||
Total LIFO inventories | $ | 28,092 | $ | 22,340 |
Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Since these items are estimated, interim results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
NOTE G--PRODUCT WARRANTY
The Company estimates outstanding warranty costs based on the historical relationship between warranty claims and revenues. The warranty accrual is reviewed monthly to verify that it properly reflects the remaining obligation based on the anticipated expenditures over the balance of the obligation period. Adjustments are made when actual warranty claim experience differs from estimates. Warranty claims are generally made within three months of the original shipment date.
The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s warranty liability:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Beginning balance at May 1 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 1,738 | ||||
Accrual | 4,953 | 4,432 | ||||||
Settlements | (4,747 | ) | (4,392 | ) | ||||
Ending balance at October 31 | $ | 2,091 | $ | 1,778 |
NOTE H--CASH FLOW
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
October 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 240 | $ | 185 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 157 | $ | 160 |
9
NOTE I--PENSION BENEFITS
Effective April 30, 2012, the Company froze all future benefit accruals under the Company��s hourly and salary defined-benefit pension plans.
Net periodic pension cost consisted of the following for the three months and six months ended October 31, 2012 and 2011.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | -- | $ | 1,283 | $ | -- | $ | 2,566 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 1,565 | 1,677 | 3,130 | 3,353 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (1,641 | ) | (1,656 | ) | (3,282 | ) | (3,312 | ) | ||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss | 231 | 522 | 462 | 1,044 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | -- | 20 | -- | 40 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost | $ | 155 | $ | 1,846 | $ | 310 | $ | 3,691 |
Based on the enactment of the pension funding stabilization provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21”) on July 9, 2012, the Company expects to contribute $4.9 million to its pension plans in fiscal 2013, which represents required funding. MAP-21 had the effect of reducing expected funding requirements for the Company’s pension plans for fiscal 2013 by allowing the Company to calculate the discount rate for funding purposes based on an average of rates spread over a longer period of time. As of October 31, 2012, $2.7 million of contributions had been made. The Company made contributions of $2.9 million to its pension plans in fiscal 2012.
NOTE J—RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, the continuing impact of the housing economy’s lengthy downturn caused the Company to announce a restructuring plan (“2012 Restructuring Plan”) that committed to the closing of two of the Company’s manufacturing plants located in Hardy County, West Virginia and Hazard, Kentucky, offering its previously idled plant in Tahlequah, Oklahoma for sale, and realigning its retirement program, including freezing the Company’s defined benefit pension plans. Operations ceased at the Hazard plant in April 2012 and at the Hardy County plant in May 2012. The 2012 Restructuring Plan was adopted to reduce costs and increase the Company’s capacity utilization rates.
During fiscal 2012, the Company recognized pre-tax restructuring charges of $15.9 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan. During the six months ended October 31, 2012, the Company recognized pre-tax restructuring charges of $0.9 million related to the 2012 Restructuring Plan. In addition, the Company recognized recurring operating costs for the closed facilities of $0.3 million for the six months ended October 31, 2012 that are expected to continue until the plants are sold.
A reserve for restructuring charges in the amount of $0.1 million is included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2012 which primarily relates to severance costs accrued but not yet paid. Below is the summary of the restructuring reserve balance as of October 31, 2012:
2012 Restructuring Plan | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Restructuring reserve balance as of April 30, 2012 | $ | 2,817 | ||
Additions | 231 | |||
Payments | (2,910 | ) | ||
Reserve balance as of October 31, 2012 | $ | 138 |
10
As of October 31, 2012, the Company had a total of two manufacturing plants classified as held for sale, which were closed in the 2012 Restructuring Plan. During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company sold its closed plant located in Tahlequah, Oklahoma and recognized a gain of $0.3 million on the sale. The gain was included in restructuring charges on the Company’s statements of operations. The Company believes that the remaining $3.0 million net book value of the two properties classified as held for sale is fully recoverable. These assets are included in Other Assets on the Company’s balance sheet at October 31, 2012.
NOTE K—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company utilizes the hierarchy of fair value measurements to classify certain of its assets and liabilities based upon the following definitions:
Level 1- Investments with quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company’s cash equivalents are invested in money market funds, mutual funds and United States Treasury instruments. The Company’s mutual fund investment assets represent contributions made and invested on behalf of the Company’s named executive officers in a supplementary employee retirement plan. |
Level 2- Investments with observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities. |
Level 3- Investments with unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 3 assets or liabilities. |
The following table summarizes the fair values of assets that are recorded in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2012 and April 30, 2012 at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||
As of October 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 45,939 | $ | - - | $ | - - | ||||||
Mutual funds | 1,364 | - - | - - | |||||||||
Total assets at fair value | $ | 47,303 | $ | - - | $ | - - | ||||||
As of April 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 38,874 | $ | - - | $ | - - | ||||||
Mutual funds | 1,357 | - - | - - | |||||||||
Total assets at fair value | $ | 40,231 | $ | - - | $ | - - |
NOTE L--OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is involved in suits and claims in the normal course of business, including without limitation product liability and general liability claims and claims pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company consults with its legal counsel to ascertain the reasonable likelihood that such claims may result in a loss. As required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 450, “Contingencies,” (ASC 450), the Company categorizes the various suits and claims into three categories according to their likelihood for resulting in potential loss: those that are probable, those that are reasonably possible, and those that are deemed to be remote. The Company accounts for these loss contingencies in accordance with ASC 450. Where losses are deemed to be probable and estimable, accruals are made. Where losses are deemed to be reasonably possible or remote, a range of loss estimates is determined and considered for disclosure. Where no loss estimate range can be made, the Company and its counsel perform a worst-case estimate. In determining these loss range estimates, the Company considers known values of similar claims and consults with independent counsel.
The Company believes that the aggregate range of loss stemming from the various suits and asserted and unasserted claims which were deemed to be either probable or reasonably possible was not material as of October 31, 2012.
11
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes, both of which are included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. The Company’s critical accounting policies are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains statements concerning the Company’s expectations, plans, objectives, future financial performance, and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In most cases, the reader can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “expect,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “plan,” “may” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements contained in this report, including in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are based on current expectations and our actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company participates in an industry that is subject to rapidly changing conditions and there are numerous factors that could cause the Company to experience a decline in sales and/or earnings or deterioration in financial condition. These include but are not limited to:
· | general economic or business conditions and instability in the financial and credit markets, including their potential impact on our (i) sales and operating costs and access to financing, and (ii) customers and suppliers and their ability to obtain financing or generate the cash necessary to conduct their respective businesses; |
· | the cyclical nature of the Company’s industry, which is particularly sensitive to changes in consumer confidence, the amount of consumers’ income available for discretionary purchases, and the availability and terms of consumer credit; |
· | economic weakness in a specific channel of distribution; |
· | the loss of sales from specific customers due to their loss of market share, bankruptcy or switching to a competitor; |
· | risks associated with domestic manufacturing operations, including fluctuations in capacity utilization and the prices and availability of key raw materials as well as fuel, transportation, warehousing and labor costs and environmental compliance and remediation costs; |
· | the need to respond to price or product initiatives launched by a competitor; |
· | the Company’s ability to successfully implement initiatives related to increasing market share, new products, maintaining and increasing its sales force and new product displays; and |
· | sales growth at a rate that outpaces the Company’s ability to install new capacity or a sales decline that requires reduction or realignment of the Company’s manufacturing capacity. |
Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements is contained in this report, including elsewhere in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and also in the Company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, filed with the SEC, including under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” Item 1A, "Risk Factors," and Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." While the Company believes that these risks are manageable and will not adversely impact the long-term performance of the Company, these risks could, under certain circumstances, have a material adverse impact on its operating results and financial condition.
12
Any forward-looking statement that the Company makes, speaks only as of the date of this report. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Overview
American Woodmark Corporation manufactures and distributes kitchen cabinets and vanities for the remodeling and new home construction markets. Its products are sold on a national basis directly to home centers, major builders and home manufacturers, and through a network of independent dealers and distributors. At October 31, 2012, the Company operated 9 manufacturing facilities and 9 service centers across the country.
The three-month period ended October 31, 2012 was the Company’s second quarter of its fiscal year that ends on April 30, 2013 (fiscal 2013). During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, housing market conditions remained far below levels experienced when the housing market peaked in 2006. Key measures such as single-family housing starts and the level of Gross Private Residential Fixed Investment reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce were less than half of their previous levels. However, several key indicators have begun or continued to trend positively during calendar 2012. Each of the trends listed below favorably impacted the housing market during the second quarter of the Company’s fiscal 2013:
· | Private sector employment increased during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, as it has in every month since March 2010 on a seasonally adjusted basis, according to data provided by the U.S. Department of Labor; |
· | Consumer confidence reported by the University of Michigan improved by over 30% compared with one year ago, reaching its highest levels in five years; |
· | Existing home sales levels and the median price per existing home sold improved from one year ago by 13% and by 11%, respectively, according to data provided by the National Association of Realtors; and |
· | Single-family housing starts for the first six months of the Company’s fiscal 2013 improved by 28% compared with one year ago, according to data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce. |
The Company sells its products to two separate sales channels within the housing market; remodeling and new construction. The Company believes there is no single indicator that directly correlates with cabinet remodeling market activity. For this reason, the Company considers several of the above indicators as well as several others, including mortgage interest rates and sales reported by the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association (KCMA), a trade organization which reports the aggregate sales that have been reported by its members, which include the largest cabinet manufacturers in the United States. Regarding new construction market activity for cabinets, the Company believes that fluctuations in single-family housing starts are the best indicator. During the first half of the Company’s fiscal 2013, single-family construction starts rose by 28% above prior year levels. During this same period, cabinet sales reported by KCMA’s members increased at a mid single-digit rate. Since the sales reported by KCMA’s members include both remodel and new construction sales, and because the increase in new construction starts likely drove a double-digit increase in new construction market cabinet sales, the Company believes that remodeling market cabinet sales were flat to slightly down during this period.
Faced with a stagnant remodeling market, the Company’s largest remodeling customers and competitors continued to utilize an elevated level of sales promotions in the Company’s product category to boost sales. These promotions consisted of free products and cash discounts to consumers based upon the amount and/or type of cabinets they purchased. The Company strives to maintain its promotional levels in line with market activity, with a goal of remaining competitive. The Company experienced promotional levels during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 that were in line with those of its previous quarter and its prior year levels. The Company’s remodeling sales rose by double digits and by mid-single digits during the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2013, respectively, compared with prior year, in a market that appears to have been flat to slightly down.
13
The Company continued to realize strong market share gains in its new construction channel, where sales increased by more than 40% in both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2013 when compared to the same periods of fiscal 2012, significantly outpacing the 28% improvement in single-family housing starts. The Company’s total net sales rose by 24% during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and by 19% during its first half, indicative of market share gains in both its remodeling and new construction sales channels.
During the third quarter of its prior fiscal year, the Company announced several initiatives designed to reduce its cost base (the 2012 Restructuring), including the permanent closure of two manufacturing plants, the decision to place a previously closed manufacturing facility for sale, and the realignment of its retirement program, including the freezing of its pension plans. The Company recorded restructuring charges of $15.9 million (pre-tax) and $10.0 million (after-tax) during fiscal 2012. The Company recorded $0.1 million (pre-tax and after-tax) during the second quarter of fiscal 2013 and $0.9 million (pre-tax) and $0.5 million (after-tax) during the first half of fiscal 2013 in connection with these initiatives. Because the bulk of these restructuring efforts were completed by October 31, 2012, the Company expects that its future out-of-pocket costs will be reduced as the fiscal year progresses. The Company sold its previously closed plant in Tahlequah, Oklahoma and continues to include in “Other Assets” at an aggregate $3.0 million book value the two plants held for sale that were included in the 2012 Restructuring.
The Company regularly assesses its long-lived assets to determine if any impairment has occurred and regularly evaluates its deferred tax assets to determine whether a valuation allowance is necessary. The Company has concluded that none of the long-lived assets pertaining to its 9 manufacturing plants or any of its other long-lived assets were impaired and that no valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets was necessary as of October 31, 2012.
The Company’s sales increase helped its gross margin rate improve to 15.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, compared with 12.5% in the prior year’s second quarter and to 15.2% in the first half of fiscal 2013, compared with 13.3% in the prior year’s first half. The improvement in the Company’s gross margin during the three- and six-month periods of fiscal 2013 was driven by reductions in fixed overhead costs associated with the plant closures performed in connection with the 2012 Restructuring, and by the beneficial impact of increased sales volume. These beneficial factors were partially offset by operational inefficiencies connected with the transition of production related to the plant closures during a period of significant sales growth, and by the unfavorable impact of higher material costs.
Exclusive of restructuring charges, the Company earned net income of $2.0 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2013, compared with a net loss of $3.0 million in the second quarter of its prior fiscal year, and earned net income of $3.0 million for the first half of fiscal 2013, compared with a net loss of $5.7 million in the same period of the prior year.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
October 31, | October 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2011 | Percent Change | 2012 | 2011 | Percent Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 159,760 | $ | 128,418 | 24 | % | $ | 308,012 | $ | 259,617 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 24,794 | 16,114 | 54 | 46,837 | 34,521 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses | 14,973 | 14,508 | 3 | 29,493 | 30,484 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 6,624 | 6,166 | 7 | 12,263 | 12,507 | (2 | ) |
Net Sales. Net sales were $159.8 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2013, an increase of 24% compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2012. For the first six months of 2013, net sales were $308.0 million, reflecting a 19% increase compared with the same period of fiscal 2012. Overall unit volume for the three- and six-month periods ended October 31, 2012 improved by 22% and 15%, respectively. Average revenue per unit increased 2% and 3% during the three- and six-month periods ended October 31, 2012, respectively, driven by modest improvements in the Company’s sales mix and pricing.
14
Gross Profit. Gross profit margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2013 was 15.5%, compared with 12.5% for the same period of fiscal 2012. Gross profit margin was 15.2% for the first half of fiscal 2013, compared with 13.3% in the first half of fiscal 2012. The improvement in gross profit margin was due primarily to the beneficial impact of higher sales volume and the reduction in fixed overhead costs associated with the Company’s two plant closures in April and May of 2012. This favorability was partially offset by an increase in material and freight costs. Specific changes and additional information included:
· | Overhead and labor costs improved by a combined 5.2% of net sales in the second quarter and 4.2% in the first six months of fiscal 2013, respectively, compared with the comparable prior year periods, as increased sales volume caused increased absorption of fixed overhead costs. The recent plant closures caused overhead costs to be reduced; however, this favorable impact was partially offset by labor inefficiencies that were driven by the transition of production related to the recent plant closures during a period of significant sales growth; and |
· | Materials and freight costs increased as a percentage of net sales by 2.2% during the second quarter and 2.3% during the first six months of fiscal 2013, respectively, compared with the comparable prior year periods, driven primarily by production inefficiencies resulting from the recent plant closures, as well as inflationary pressures in finishing materials, lumber, cartons, imported components, and diesel fuel. |
Selling and Marketing Expenses. Selling and marketing expenses were 9.4% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, compared with 11.3% of sales for the same period in fiscal 2012. For the first six months of fiscal 2013, selling and marketing costs were 9.6% of sales, compared with 11.7% of sales for same period of fiscal 2012. Sales and marketing costs increased by 3% in relation to the 24% increase in net sales during the second quarter of fiscal 2013, and decreased by 3% in relation to the 19% increase in net sales for the first half of fiscal 2013. The improvement in sales and marketing costs in comparison to net sales is due to reduced spending on product displays and cost reductions related to the Company’s retirement plan changes, which were offset by increased sales compensation and staffing costs related to the Company’s increased sales levels.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses were 4.1% of sales in the second quarter and 4.0% of sales in the first half of fiscal 2013, compared with 4.8% of sales in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2012. General and administrative costs increased by 7% during the second quarter and decreased by 2% during the first six months of fiscal 2013 compared with the prior year, driven by savings from the aforementioned retirement plan changes, offset by increased incentive-based compensation expenses. As of October 31, 2012, the Company had less than $0.1 million of accounts with aggregate receivables from customers with a higher perceived level of risk.
Effective Income Tax Rates. The Company’s effective income tax rates for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2013 were 42.1% and 42.7%, respectively, compared with 34.2% and 32.5%, respectively, in the comparable periods for fiscal 2012. The higher effective tax rates in fiscal 2013 were the result of relatively consistent amounts of permanent tax differences in relation to the net income generated in the first half of fiscal 2013 as compared with the net losses generated in the prior year’s first half.
Outlook. The Company expects that housing prices will finally bottom during its fiscal year 2013 and begin to improve over prior year levels for the first time in several years. The Company expects that remodeling market cabinet sales will correlate with existing home pricing activity and be relatively flat during fiscal 2013. The Company expects that its remodeling sales will grow at a rate that exceeds that of industry-wide cabinet sales for the remodeling market by several percentage points. The Company regularly assesses market conditions for pricing and promotional levels. The Company believes that the promotional environment appears to be gradually easing, suggesting that the Company may be able to reduce its promotional level run rate somewhat for the upcoming spring selling season.
The Company expects that single-family housing starts and new construction cabinet market sales will grow in the mid-teens during its fiscal year 2013, and that the Company’s new construction sales growth will continue to exceed this level for the remainder of its fiscal year.
15
Because both the Company’s first half sales increase and its market outlook have exceeded its original expectations for fiscal 2013, the Company now expects that it has the opportunity to operate profitably for the remainder of fiscal 2013, even though the entirety of the expected net benefits to be derived from its restructuring initiatives has been delayed by several months.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $70.1 million at October 31, 2012, representing a $1.8 million increase from its July 31, 2012 levels, but a $3.6 million decrease from its April 30, 2012 balance. At October 31, 2012, total long-term debt (including current maturities) was $24.7 million, flat with its balance at April 30, 2012. The Company’s ratio of long-term debt to total capital was 14.9% at October 31, 2012 compared with 15.5% at April 30, 2012.
The Company’s main source of liquidity is its existing cash and cash equivalents on hand and cash generated from its operating activities. The Company maintains a $35 million secured revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). Pursuant to the terms of the Wells Fargo credit facility, $7.1 million of the Company’s cash served as security for borrowings under this facility and was classified as restricted cash at both October 31, 2012 and April 30, 2012.
Cash used by operating activities in the first half of fiscal 2013 was $1.8 million, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $7.9 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in cash generated by operating activities was driven primarily by plant closure and severance payments related to the recently completed restructuring activities, by resumption in funding the Company’s pension plans, by incentive compensation payments pertaining to the prior year, and by investments made in growing the Company’s accounts receivable and inventory levels commensurate with its 19% increase in sales over the prior year’s first six months.
The Company’s investing activities primarily consist of capital expenditures and investments in promotional displays. Net cash used for investing activities was $1.5 million in the first half of fiscal 2013, compared with $4.6 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2012. The decrease in cash used of $3.1 million was driven by the receipt of $6.4 million in proceeds from the sales of a closed facility and equipment from the closed plants, partly offset by increases aggregating $3.3 million in outflows for capital expenditures and promotional displays. The Company’s year-to-date gross investment in capital expenditures and promotional displays for fiscal 2013 was $8.0 million through October 31, 2012. The Company expects that it will expend approximately $15 million for total gross investment in capital expenditures and promotional displays during fiscal 2013, compared with $9.9 million in fiscal 2012. The increased level of investment during fiscal 2013 primarily represents machinery and equipment enhancements to enable production volume to increase, as well as an increase in the number of sales display units expected to be deployed.
The Company generated negative free cash flow (defined as net cash provided by operating activities less net cash used for investing activities) of $3.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2013, compared with positive free cash flow of $3.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012. The Company’s free cash flow declined by $6.4 million during the first six months of fiscal 2013, driven by the reduction in cash flow from operating activities, offset in part by the reduction in cash used for investing activities.
During the first six months of fiscal 2013, net cash used for financing activities was $0.3 million, compared with $1.6 million of net cash used in the comparable period of the prior fiscal year. The Company discontinued its dividend after making its payment in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year, which reduced the Company’s outflow during the current fiscal year. The Company made no repurchases of its common stock during either period and had $93.3 million of remaining stock repurchases authorized by its Board of Directors as of October 31, 2012.
The Company can borrow up to $35 million under the Wells Fargo credit facility; however, the Company must maintain cash and specified investments held in accounts pledged to Wells Fargo having a collateral value of at least 50% of the Company’s aggregate indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo. At October 31, 2012, $10 million of loans and $3.7 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the Wells Fargo facility and $7.1 million of the Company’s cash was held as security.
16
On May 29, 2012, the Company and Wells Fargo amended the credit facility and its related security arrangements. These modifications reduced the amount of the Company’s cash and securities that is required to be held as security from 100% to 50% of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo. As a result, the Company’s restricted cash was reduced to its present level of $7.1 million, and the Company agreed to pledge substantially all of its assets as security for the Company’s indebtedness and other obligations to Wells Fargo. Other amendments to the credit facility (a) reduced the allowable ratio of the Company’s total liabilities to its tangible net worth to a maximum of 1.4 to 1.0 at the end of each fiscal quarter (on a rolling four quarter basis), (b) added a requirement for the Company to maintain a cash flow to fixed charges ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 at the end of each fiscal quarter, and (c) added a requirement that the Company maintain an asset coverage ratio of not less than 1.47 to 1.0 at the end of each calendar month.
The Company was in compliance with all covenants specified in the amended credit facility as of October 31, 2012, as follows: (a) the Company’s ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth was 0.99 to 1.0; (b) cash flow to fixed charges was 1.76 to 1.0; and (c) its asset coverage ratio was 5.11 to 1.0.
The credit facility does not limit the Company’s ability to use unrestricted cash to pay dividends or repurchase its common stock.
Cash flow from operations combined with accumulated cash and cash equivalents on hand are expected to be more than sufficient to support forecasted working capital requirements, service existing debt obligations and fund investments in capital expenditures and promotional displays for fiscal 2013.
The timing of the Company’s contractual obligations as of April 30, 2012 is summarized in the table below.
FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Total Amounts | 2013 | 2014-2015 | 2016-2017 | 2018 and Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility | $ | 10,000 | $ | -- | $ | 10,000 | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||||
Economic development loans | 3,524 | -- | -- | 2,234 | 1,290 | |||||||||||||||
Term loans | 3,858 | 328 | 718 | 804 | 2,008 | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 7,283 | 547 | 1,131 | 1,140 | 4,465 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term debt (a) | 2,460 | 480 | 902 | 599 | 479 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 13,729 | 3,665 | 6,206 | 3,803 | 55 | |||||||||||||||
Pension contributions (b) | 30,410 | 7,350 | 11,970 | 11,090 | -- | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 71,264 | $ | 12,370 | $ | 30,927 | $ | 19,670 | $ | 8,297 |
(a) | Interest commitments under interest bearing debt consist of interest under the Company’s primary loan agreement, term loans and capitalized lease agreements. Amounts outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility, $10 million at April 30, 2012, bear a variable interest rate determined by the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.25%. Interest under the Company’s term loans and capitalized lease agreements is fixed at rates between 2% and 6.5%. Interest commitments under interest bearing debt for the Company’s revolving credit facility are at LIBOR plus the spread in effect as of April 30, 2012, throughout the remaining term of the facility. |
(b) | The estimated obligations for the Company’s two frozen defined benefit pension plans as of April 30, 2012 set forth in the table were determined based upon the discount rate and other assumptions at fiscal year end. Future pension funding contributions beyond 2017 had not been determined at that time. The enactment of the pension funding stabilization provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (“MAP-21”) on July 9, 2012 had the effect of reducing expected funding requirements for the Company’s pension plans for fiscal 2013 by allowing the Company to calculate the discount rate for funding purposes based on an average of rates spread over a longer period of time. Based on MAP-21, the Company expects to contribute $4.9 million to the pension plans in fiscal 2013. Projected contributions beyond fiscal 2013 have not yet been determined. |
17
Seasonal and Inflationary Factors
The Company’s business has historically been subject to seasonal influences, with higher sales typically realized in the second and fourth fiscal quarters.
The costs of the Company’s products are subject to inflationary pressures and commodity price fluctuations. The Company has generally been able over time to recover the effects of inflation and commodity price fluctuations through sales price increases.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies as disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Since the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012, the Company had no material exposure to changes in interest rates for its debt agreements.
The Company does not currently use commodity or interest rate derivatives or similar financial instruments to manage its commodity price or interest rate risks. See “Seasonal and Inflationary Factors” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above for additional information regarding the effects inflation and commodity price fluctuations have on the costs of the Company’s products.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective. In addition, there has been no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various suits and claims in the normal course of business all of which constitute ordinary, routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business. The Company does not have any litigation that does not constitute ordinary, routine litigation incidental to its business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk factors that may affect the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition are described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. Additional risks are discussed elsewhere in this report, including in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Outlook.”
18
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 24, 2007, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s common stock. This authorization has no expiration date. In the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company did not repurchase any shares under this authorization. At October 31, 2012, $93.3 million remained authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock.
19
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description |
3.1 (a) | Articles of Incorporation as amended effective August 12, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2003; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
3.1 (b) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation effective September 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on August 31, 2004; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
3.2 | Bylaws – as amended and restated December 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
4.1 | The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2). |
4.2 | Amended and Restated Stockholder’s Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form S-1 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1986; Commission File No. 33-6245). Pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii), instruments that define the rights of holders of the Registrant’s long-term debt securities, where the long-term debt securities authorized under each such instrument do not exceed 10 percent of the Registrant’s total assets, have been omitted and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on request. |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act (Filed Herewith). |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act (Filed Herewith). |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed Herewith). |
101 | Interactive Data File for the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Filed Herewith).# |
# Under Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections.
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN WOODMARK CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/Jonathan H. Wolk | |
Jonathan H. Wolk | |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
Date: November 30, 2012 | |
Signing on behalf of the | |
registrant and as principal | |
financial and accounting officer |
21
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Description |
3.1 (a) | Articles of Incorporation as amended effective August 12, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2003; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
3.1 (b) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation effective September 10, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on August 31, 2004; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
3.2 | Bylaws – as amended and restated December 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010; Commission File No. 000-14798). |
4.1 | The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Registrant as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2). |
4.2 | Amended and Restated Stockholder’s Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form S-1 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1986; Commission File No. 33-6245). Pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii), instruments that define the rights of holders of the Registrant’s long-term debt securities, where the long-term debt securities authorized under each such instrument do not exceed 10 percent of the Registrant’s total assets, have been omitted and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on request. |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act (Filed Herewith). |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act (Filed Herewith). |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Filed Herewith). |
101 | Interactive Data File for the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Filed Herewith).# |
# Under Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections.