YOUR BOARD IS ALWAYS OPEN TO GOOD IDEAS FROM ANYONE – INCLUDING DRIVER – AND HAS ALREADY TAKEN ACTION ON INVESTOR FEEDBACK
Your Board welcomes feedback and ideas from all investors, including Driver. That is why we have participated in numerous calls, meetings and email communications with Driver since late October of 2022 in order to better understand the New York activist fund’s concerns and proposals. In short, the Board is doing exactly what a board should do: listening to its shareholders and implementing any suggestions that benefit the Company’s stakeholders. We have incorporated shareholders’ ideas into our strategy over the years – including a share buyback program that we’ve been very active on – and plan to take more action in the near future.
For example, at this year’s Annual Meeting, we are asking you to vote FOR a proposal to approve a new stock incentive plan, which will support changes to the compensation structure for senior management and the Board. This proposal, which was based on feedback from shareholders and ISS, would allow the Company to implement Board-approved changes to the current compensation program from an all-cash framework to one where senior management and the Board are compensated in part with Company stock based on certain target performance metrics. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF YOUR BOARD LISTENING TO A GOOD SUGGESTION, EVALUATING IT AND TAKING PROMPT ACTION.
In fact, the nominating committee of the Board even went so far as to interview Driver’s candidates to learn more about their ideas, backgrounds and capabilities in a good faith effort to vet their qualifications for Board service. We concluded that Driver’s nominees would not be additive in any positive way to our Board due to their lack of relevant ties to the community and our market area, lack of public board experience and lack of “boots-on-the-ground” community bank operating experience, as well as Driver’s notorious track record of publicly attacking and attempting to embarrass bank leadership teams. We firmly believe putting an activist investor on our Board would do more harm than good by overemphasizing short-term goals and compromising our ability to attract talented employees, win business and engage with potential merger and acquisition partners.
DRIVER IS FORCING A LONG, COSTLY AND ENTIRELY UNNECESSARY PROXY FIGHT THAT SHOWS THE NEW YORK FUND’S TRUE COLORS
Your Board has kept an open door to all investors, including Driver. So why do we find ourselves embroiled in a long and costly proxy fight?
We believe the answer is simple: Driver is more interested in public notoriety and short-term gains than in engaging constructively with Company leadership to help build a better bank. In its eight campaigns since 2019, Driver has attempted to publicly smear and humiliate bank boards and management teams. In our view, public notoriety and an eventual sale are the true motivations behind Driver’s campaign at the Company.
Driver’s scorched earth approach may play well in the news and in Wall Street circles but has no place in your Company’s boardroom.
3