UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________to__________
Commission File Number: 0-15057
P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 71-0633135 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification no.) |
297 West Henri De Tonti, Tontitown, Arkansas 72770
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (479) 361-9111
N/A |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý | No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o | No o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer ý | |||
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o | No ý |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class | Outstanding at July 27, 2010 | |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value | 9,414,607 |
Form 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information | |
Part II. Other Information | |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) (in thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,746 | $ | 9,870 | ||||
Accounts receivable-net: | ||||||||
Trade | 53,494 | 45,911 | ||||||
Other | 1,950 | 1,551 | ||||||
Inventories | 789 | 750 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and deposits | 5,432 | 5,258 | ||||||
Marketable equity securities | 15,223 | 14,921 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes-current | 1,597 | 1,401 | ||||||
Income taxes refundable | - | 467 | ||||||
Total current assets | 92,231 | 80,129 | ||||||
Property and equipment: | ||||||||
Land | 4,924 | 4,924 | ||||||
Structures and improvements | 13,723 | 13,665 | ||||||
Revenue equipment | 295,673 | 297,788 | ||||||
Office furniture and equipment | 7,957 | 7,929 | ||||||
Total property and equipment | 322,277 | 324,306 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (144,013 | ) | (145,526 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment | 178,264 | 178,780 | ||||||
Other assets: | ||||||||
Other | 1,665 | 1,747 | ||||||
Total other assets | 1,665 | 1,747 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 272,160 | $ | 260,656 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 17,243 | $ | 14,492 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 10,650 | 10,504 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 13,415 | 10,331 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 85 | - | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 41,393 | 35,327 | ||||||
Long-term debt-less current portion | 33,804 | 27,202 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes-less current portion | 49,345 | 51,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 124,542 | 113,529 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | - | - | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 11,373,207 and | ||||||||
11,372,207 shares issued; 9,414,607 and 9,413,607 shares outstanding | ||||||||
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively | 114 | 114 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 77,826 | 77,704 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 2,486 | 3,063 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,958,600 shares | (29,127 | ) | (29,127 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 96,319 | 95,373 | ||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 147,618 | 147,127 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 272,160 | $ | 260,656 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) (in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue, before fuel surcharge | $ | 71,940 | $ | 62,367 | $ | 142,299 | $ | 122,637 | ||||||||
Fuel surcharge | 13,298 | 6,109 | 24,786 | 11,658 | ||||||||||||
Total operating revenues | 85,238 | 68,476 | 167,085 | 134,295 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES AND COSTS: | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits | 26,974 | 24,012 | 53,970 | 48,085 | ||||||||||||
Fuel expense | 24,692 | 16,560 | 48,992 | 31,483 | ||||||||||||
Rent and purchased transportation | 11,286 | 9,544 | 22,322 | 18,620 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation | 6,505 | 8,570 | 13,042 | 17,380 | ||||||||||||
Operating supplies and expenses | 7,127 | 6,823 | 14,090 | 13,226 | ||||||||||||
Operating taxes and licenses | 1,273 | 1,402 | 2,321 | 2,696 | ||||||||||||
Insurance and claims | 3,195 | 3,131 | 6,433 | 6,173 | ||||||||||||
Communications and utilities | 664 | 638 | 1,370 | 1,336 | ||||||||||||
Other | 1,230 | 1,292 | 2,284 | 2,450 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposition of equipment | (28 | ) | 68 | (29 | ) | 24 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses and costs | 82,918 | 72,040 | 164,795 | 141,473 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | 2,320 | (3,564 | ) | 2,290 | (7,178 | ) | ||||||||||
NON-OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSE) | 379 | 200 | 388 | (667 | ) | |||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE | (606 | ) | (629 | ) | (1,107 | ) | (1,293 | ) | ||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 2,093 | (3,993 | ) | 1,571 | (9,138 | ) | ||||||||||
FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT): | ||||||||||||||||
Current | 1,409 | - | 2,165 | - | ||||||||||||
Deferred | (578 | ) | (1,637 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (3,436 | ) | ||||||||
Total federal and state income tax expense (benefit) | 831 | (1,637 | ) | 625 | (3,436 | ) | ||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 1,262 | $ | (2,356 | ) | $ | 946 | $ | (5,702 | ) | ||||||
INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 9,415 | 9,410 | 9,414 | 9,410 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 9,421 | 9,412 | 9,419 | 9,412 | ||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) (in thousands) | ||||||||
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 946 | $ | (5,702 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 13,042 | 17,380 | ||||||
Bad debt expense | 1 | 486 | ||||||
Stock compensation-net of excess tax benefits | 118 | 29 | ||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes | (1,540 | ) | (3,436 | ) | ||||
Reclassification of unrealized loss on marketable equity securities | 60 | 1,105 | ||||||
Gain on sale or reclass of marketable equity securities | (316 | ) | (206 | ) | ||||
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of equipment | (29 | ) | 24 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts receivable | (7,751 | ) | 4,573 | |||||
Prepaid expenses, inventories, and other assets | (131 | ) | (2,026 | ) | ||||
Income taxes refundable | 552 | 18 | ||||||
Trade accounts payable | 2,576 | (2,246 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses | 147 | 1,203 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,675 | 11,202 | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (19,357 | ) | �� | (8,761 | ) | |||
Proceeds from disposition of equipment | 7,035 | 8,092 | ||||||
Change in restricted cash | (232 | ) | (464 | ) | ||||
Purchases of marketable equity securities | (1,557 | ) | - | |||||
Sales of marketable equity securities | 622 | 84 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (13,489 | ) | (1,049 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit | 186,606 | 164,524 | ||||||
Repayments under line of credit | (186,606 | ) | (168,268 | ) | ||||
Borrowings of long-term debt | 15,047 | 6,737 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt | (5,361 | ) | (10,547 | ) | ||||
Borrowings under margin account | - | 12,872 | ||||||
Repayments under margin account | - | (14,784 | ) | |||||
Exercise of stock options | 4 | - | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 9,690 | (9,466 | ) | |||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 3,876 | 687 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-Beginning of period | 9,870 | 858 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-End of period | $ | 13,746 | $ | 1,545 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION- | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: | ||||||||
Interest | $ | 1,058 | $ | 1,320 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 1,725 | $ | 86 | ||||
NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES- | ||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable | $ | 213 | $ | 65 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock Shares / Amount | Additional Paid-In Capital | Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Treasury Stock | Retained Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 9,414 | $ | 114 | $ | 77,704 | $ | 3,063 | $ | (29,127 | ) | $ | 95,373 | $ | 147,127 | ||||||||||||||||||
Components of comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 946 | 946 | 946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (577 | ) | (577 | ) | (577 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 369 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options-shares issued | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
including tax benefits | 1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 118 | 118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 | 9,415 | $ | 114 | $ | 77,826 | $ | 2,486 | $ | (29,127 | ) | $ | 96,319 | $ | 147,618 | ||||||||||||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
June 30, 2010
NOTE A: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In management’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Operating results for t he six-month period ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In order to conform to industry practice, during 2010 the Company began to classify federal fuel taxes paid on the purchase of fuel as a component of Fuel expense rather than as a component of Operating taxes and licenses. This reclassification has no effect on net operating income, net income or earnings per share. The Company has made corresponding reclassifications to comparative periods shown.
NOTE B: RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, FASB issued ASC Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU 2010-06”), which updates ASC 820-10-20, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures for fair value measurements and provides clarification for existing disclosure requirements. More specifically, ASU 2010-06 will require (a) an entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements from one measurement date to another and to describe the reasons for the transfers; and (b) information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to be presented separately (i.e., the activity must be presented on a gr oss basis rather than net) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). ASU 2010-06 clarifies existing disclosure requirements for the level of disaggregation used for classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value and requires disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flow.
NOTE C: MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company accounts for its marketable securities in accordance with ASC Topic 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. ASC Topic 320 requires companies to classify their investments as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. The Company’s investments in marketable securities are classified as either trading or available-for-sale and consist of equity securities. Management determines the appropriate classification of these securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method and interest and dividends on securities are included in non-operating income.
Marketable equity securities are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on equity securities classified as available-for-sale are included, net of tax, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities, and increases or decreases in value on trading securities, if any, are included in the determination of net income. A quarterly evaluation is performed in order to judge whether declines in value below cost should be considered temporary and when losses are deemed to be other-than-temporary. Several factors are considered in this evaluation process including the severity and duration of the decline in value, the financial condition and near-term outlook for the specific issuer and the Company’s ability to hold the securities. There were no securities in a cumulative loss position for twelve months or longer at June 30, 2010. However, based on the severity of declines in certain securities during the first six months of 2010 and the fact that the Company has no evidence that indicates these securities will regain a value equal to or greater than their cost basis, their declines in value have been determined to be other-than-temporary. As a result of this evaluation, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1,000 in non-operating income (expense) in its statement of operations for the quarter ending June 30, 2010. These declines came primarily from our equity securities in the financial sector. The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $109,000 of non-operating income (expense) in its statement of operations for the quarter ending June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2010, equity securities classified as available-for-sale and equity securities classified as trading had a cost basis of approximately $10,566,000 and $463,000, respectively, and fair market values of approximately $14,695,000 and $528,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had net unrealized losses in market value on securities classified as available-for-sale of approximately $425,000, net of deferred income taxes. Also during this period, the Company recognized gains on trading securities of approximately $1,000, net of deferred income taxes. During the quarter ending June 30, 2010, the Company had net unrealized losses in market value on securities classified as available-for-sale of approximately $1,108,000, net of deferred income taxes and recognized gains on trading securities of ap proximately $10,000, net of deferred income taxes. As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale had gross unrealized gains of approximately $4,943,000 and gross unrealized losses of approximately $814,000. As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s marketable securities that are classified as trading had gross recognized gains of approximately $64,000 and gross recognized losses of approximately $200. As of June 30, 2010, the total net unrealized gain, net of deferred income taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income was approximately $2,486,000.
The following table shows the Company’s investments’ approximate gross unrealized losses and fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These investments consist of equity securities. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 there were no investments that had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer.
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||
Equity securities – Available for sale | $ | 2,837 | $ | 814 | $ | 756 | $ | 140 | ||||||||
Equity securities – Trading | 63 | - | 62 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 2,900 | $ | 814 | $ | 818 | $ | 141 |
The market value of the Company’s equity securities are used as collateral against any outstanding margin account borrowings. As of June 30, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Company’s margin account.
NOTE D: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company maintains a stock option plan under which incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options may be granted. On March 2, 2006, the Company’s Board of Director’s adopted, and shareholders later approved, the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”). Under the 2006 Plan 750,000 shares are reserved for the issuance of stock options to directors, officers, key employees and others. The option exercise price under the 2006 Plan is the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted. The fair market value is determined by the average of the highest and lowest sales prices for a share of the Company’s common stock, on its primary exchange, on the same date that the option is granted. During the first six months of 2010, options for 16,000 shares were issued under the 2006 Plan at an option exercise price of $14.32 per share, and at June 30, 2010, 670,000 shares were available for granting future options.
Outstanding incentive stock options at June 30, 2010, must be exercised within six years from the date of grant and vest in increments of 20% each year. Outstanding nonqualified stock options at June 30, 2010, must be exercised within five to ten years from the date of grant.
The total grant date fair value of options vested during the first six months of 2010 was approximately $118,000. As of June 30, 2010, the Company did not have any stock-based compensation plans with unrecognized stock-based compensation expense. Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, recognized in Salaries, wages and benefits during the first six months of 2010 was approximately $118,000 which resulted from the annual grant of an option for 2,000 shares to each non-employee director during the first quarter of 2010. The recognition of stock-based compensation expense decreased diluted and basic earnings per common share by approximately $0.01 during the six months ending June 30, 2010 but did not have a recognizable impact on diluted or basic earnings per share reported for the second quarter ending June 30, 2010. Total pre-t ax stock-based compensation expense, recognized in Salaries, wages and benefits was approximately $29,000 during the first six months of 2009 as a result of the annual grant of an option for 2,000 shares to each non-employee director during the first quarter of 2009. The recognition of stock-based compensation expense decreased diluted and basic earnings per common share by approximately $0.01 during the six months ending June 30, 2009 but did not have a recognizable impact on diluted or basic earnings per share reported for the second quarter ending June 30, 2009. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the first six months of 2010 and 2009 was $7.38 per share and $1.84 per share, respectively.
The fair value of the Company’s employee stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton (“BSM”) option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
Six Months Ended | |||
June 30, | |||
2010 | 2009 | ||
Dividend yield | 0% | 0% | |
Volatility | 64.31% | 58.07% | |
Risk-free rate range | 1.80% | 1.57% | |
Expected life | 4.3 years | 4.4 years | |
Fair value of options | $7.38 | $1.84 |
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The estimated volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. The risk free rate for the periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected life of the options was calculated based on the historical exercise behavior.
Information related to option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Shares Under Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value* | |||||
(per share) | (in years) | |||||||
Outstanding-beginning of year | 186,500 | $21.02 | ||||||
Granted | 16,000 | 14.32 | ||||||
Exercised | (1,000) | 3.84 | ||||||
Cancelled/forfeited/expired | (10,000) | 18.27 | ||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 | 191,500 | $20.69 | 2.4 | $135,250 | ||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 | 191,500 | $20.69 | 2.4 | $135,250 | ||||
___________________________ | ||||||||
* The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The per share market value of our common stock, as determined by the closing price on June 30, 2010, was $15.03. |
The number, weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and the number and weighted average exercise price of options exercisable as of June 30, 2010 are as follows:
Exercise Price | Shares Under Outstanding Options | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term | Shares Under Exercisable Options | |||
(in years) | ||||||
$3.84 | 11,000 | 3.7 | 11,000 | |||
$14.32 | 16,000 | 4.7 | 16,000 | |||
$14.98 | 16,000 | 2.7 | 16,000 | |||
$19.88 | 12,500 | 2.3 | 12,500 | |||
$22.92 | 14,000 | 1.7 | 14,000 | |||
$23.22 | 108,000 | 2.2 | 108,000 | |||
$26.73 | 14,000 | 0.9 | 14,000 | |||
191,500 | 2.4 | 191,500 |
Cash received from option exercises totaled approximately $4,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. There were no option exercises during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company issues new shares upon option exercise.
NOTE E: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company follows the guidance provided by ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting, in its identification of operating segments. The Company has determined that it has a total of two operating segments whose primary operations can be characterized as either Truckload Services or Brokerage and Logistics Services, however in accordance with the aggregation criteria provided by FASB ASC Topic 280 the Company has determined that the operations of the two operating segments can be aggregated into a single reporting segment, motor carrier operations. Truckload Services revenues and Brokerage and Logistics Services revenues, each before fuel surcharges, were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Truckload Services revenue | $ | 60,812 | 84.5 | $ | 53,255 | 85.4 | $ | 120,793 | 84.9 | $ | 104,904 | 85.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage and Logistics Services revenue | 11,128 | 15.5 | 9,112 | 14.6 | 21,506 | 15.1 | 17,733 | 14.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 71,940 | 100.0 | $ | 62,367 | 100.0 | $ | 142,299 | 100.0 | $ | 122,637 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE F: TREASURY STOCK
The Company accounts for Treasury stock using the cost method and as of June 30, 2010, 1,958,600 shares were held in the treasury at an aggregate cost of approximately $29,127,000.
NOTE G: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income was comprised of net income plus or minus market value adjustments related to our marketable securities. The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,262 | $ | (2,356 | ) | $ | 946 | $ | (5,702 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income: | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on marketable | ||||||||||||||||
securities included in net income, net of income taxes | (189 | ) | - | (189 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for unrealized losses on marketable | ||||||||||||||||
securities included in net income, net of income taxes | 1 | 68 | 37 | 715 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of marketable securities, net of income taxes | (1,108 | ) | 1,225 | (425 | ) | (49 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (1,063 | ) | $ | 369 | $ | (5,036 | ) |
NOTE H: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Diluted earnings per share computations assume the exercise of stock options to purchase shares of common stock. The shares assumed exercised are based on the weighted average number of shares under options outstanding during the period and only include those options for which the exercise price is less than the average share price during the period. The net additional shares issuable are calculated based on the treasury stock method and are added to the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.
A reconciliation of the basic and diluted income per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 1,262 | $ | (2,356 | ) | $ | 946 | $ | (5,702 | ) | ||||||
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 9,415 | 9,410 | 9,414 | 9,410 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 9,421 | 9,412 | 9,419 | 9,412 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.13 | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | 0.10 | $ | (0.61 | ) |
Options to purchase 180,500 and 246,500 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have an anti-dilutive effect.
NOTE I: INCOME TAXES
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. and Canadian federal income tax laws as well as the income tax laws of multiple state jurisdictions. The major tax jurisdictions in which we operate generally provide for a deficiency assessment statute of limitation period of three years and as a result, the Company’s tax years 2006 through 2009 remain open to examination in those jurisdictions.
The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. As of June 30, 2010, an adjustment to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for uncertain tax positions has not been required as management believes that the Company’s tax positions taken in income tax returns filed or to be filed are supported by clear and unambiguous income tax laws. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions, if any, in income tax expense. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has not recognized or accrued any interest or penalties related to uncertain income tax positions.
NOTE J: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable equity securities, accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, and borrowings.
The Company follows guidance under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, with regard to financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
Level 2: | Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable; or other inputs not directly observable, but derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. | ||
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity. |
The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized below:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Level 1: | ||||||||
Marketable securities | $ | 15,223 | $ | 14,921 |
The Company’s investments in marketable securities are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices. The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.
The carrying amount for the line of credit approximates fair value because the line of credit interest rate is adjusted frequently.
For long-term debt other than the line of credit, the fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying value and estimated fair value of this other long-term debt at June 30, 2010 was as follows:
Carrying Value | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 47,219 | $ | 47,260 |
The Company follows guidance provided by ASC 825, Financial Instruments, and did not elect the fair value option for our financial instruments.
NOTE K: NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
During the first six months of 2010, the Company’s subsidiaries entered into installment obligations totaling approximately $15.0 million for the purpose of purchasing revenue equipment. These obligations are each payable in 36 monthly installments at an interest rate of 4.85%.
NOTE L: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
During the third quarter of 2010 the 5% employee pay rate reduction implemented during June 2009 was eliminated. Subsequent events have been evaluated for recognition and disclosure through the date these financial statements were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may relate to expected future financial and operating results or events, and are thus prospective. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, excess capacity in the trucking industry; surplus inventories; recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers’ business cycles; increases or rapid fluctuations in fuel prices, interest rates, fuel taxes, tolls, license an d registration fees; the resale value of the Company’s used equipment and the price of new equipment; increases in compensation for and difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers and owner-operators; increases in insurance premiums and deductible amounts relating to accident, cargo, workers' compensation, health, and other claims; unanticipated increases in the number or amount of claims for which the Company is self insured; inability of the Company to continue to secure acceptable financing arrangements; seasonal factors such as harsh weather conditions that increase operating costs; competition from trucking, rail, and intermodal competitors including reductions in rates resulting from competitive bidding; the ability to identify acceptable acquisition candidates, consummate acquisitions, and integrate acquired operations; a significant reduction in or termination of the Company's trucking service by a key customer; and other factors, including risk factors, included from time to time in filings made by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company undertakes no obligation to update or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
The Company’s administrative headquarters are in Tontitown, Arkansas. From this location we manage operations conducted through wholly owned subsidiaries based in various locations around the United States and Canada. The operations of these subsidiaries can generally be classified into either truckload services or brokerage and logistics services. Truckload services include those transportation services in which we utilize company owned trucks or owner-operator owned trucks. Brokerage and logistics services consist of services such as transportation scheduling, routing, mode selection, transloading and other value added services related to the transportation of freight which may or may not involve the usage of company owned or owner-operator owned equipment. Both our truckload operations and our brokerage/logistics operations ha ve similar economic characteristics and are impacted by virtually the same economic factors as discussed elsewhere in this Report. All of the Company’s operations are in the motor carrier segment.
For both operations, substantially all of our revenue is generated by transporting freight for customers and is predominantly affected by the rates per mile received from our customers, equipment utilization, and our percentage of non-compensated miles. These aspects of our business are carefully managed and efforts are continuously underway to achieve favorable results. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, truckload services revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, represented 84.5% and 84.9%, respectively, of total revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, with remaining revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, being generated from brokerage and logistics services. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, truckload services revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, represented 85.4% and 85.5%, respectively, of total revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, with remaining revenues, excluding fuel surcharges, being generated from brokerage and logistics services.
The main factors that impact our profitability on the expense side are costs incurred in transporting freight for our customers. Currently our most challenging costs include fuel, driver recruitment, training, wage and benefit costs, independent broker costs (which we record as purchased transportation), insurance, and maintenance and capital equipment costs.
In discussing our results of operations we use revenue, before fuel surcharge, (and fuel expense, net of surcharge), because management believes that eliminating the impact of this sometimes volatile source of revenue allows a more consistent basis for comparing our results of operations from period to period. During the three and six months ending June 30, 2010, approximately $13.3 million and $24.8 million, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue was generated from fuel surcharges. During the three and six months ending June 30, 2009 approximately $6.1 million and $11.7 million, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue was generated from fuel surcharges. We may also discuss certain changes in our expenses as a percentage of revenue, before fuel surcharge, rather than absolute dollar changes. We do this because we believe the high variable cost nature of certain expenses makes a comparison of changes in expenses as a percentage of revenue more meaningful than absolute dollar changes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – TRUCKLOAD SERVICES
The following table sets forth, for truckload services, the percentage relationship of expense items to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, for the periods indicated. Fuel costs are shown net of fuel surcharges.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues, before fuel surcharge | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits | 43.4 | 44.1 | 43.7 | 44.9 | ||||||||||||
Fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge | 18.7 | 19.7 | 20.0 | 19.0 | ||||||||||||
Rent and purchased transportation | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation | 10.7 | 16.1 | 10.8 | 16.6 | ||||||||||||
Operating supplies and expenses | 11.7 | 12.8 | 11.6 | 12.6 | ||||||||||||
Operating taxes and license | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Insurance and claims | 5.2 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||
Communications and utilities | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Other | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale or disposal of property | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 96.4 | 107.1 | 98.4 | 107.4 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 3.6 | (7.1 | ) | 1.6 | (7.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-operating income (expense) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | (0.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (0.8 | ) | (1.2 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 3.3 | (7.9 | ) | 1.1 | (9.2 | ) |
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, truckload services revenue, before fuel surcharges, increased 14.2% to $60.8 million as compared to $53.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of miles traveled from 42.9 million miles during the second quarter of 2009 to 49.5 million miles during the second quarter of 2010. The comparative increase in miles traveled resulted primarily from an increase in equipment utilization. During the second quarter of 2010, improved truckload freight demand had a positive impact on our equipment utilization and contributed to an increase in the average number of miles traveled per truck each work day from 392 miles during the second quarter of 2009 to 449 miles during the second quarter of 2010. Improved equipment utilization also resulted in a 30.8% decrease in our empty miles traveled ratio for the periods compared which equated to approximately $1.6 million in additional revenue for the periods compared. Partially offsetting the increase in revenue attributable to the factors discussed above was the negative effect on revenues of a decrease in the number of work days during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009. Work days, which typically represent weekdays (excluding major holidays), decreased from 64 days during the second quarter of 2009 to 63 days during the second quarter 2010, and based on current average truckload services revenue per work day, had the effect of decreasing revenue by approximately $1.0 million for the periods compared.
Salaries, wages and benefits decreased from 44.1% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, in the second quarter of 2009 to 43.4% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to both the continued effect of the 5% employee pay rate reduction implemented during June 2009 and the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as general and administrative wages, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, salaries, wages and benefits increased from $23.5 million during the second quarter of 2009 to $26.4 million during the second quarter of 2010 as the number of company driver compensated miles increased from 42.9 million miles during the second quarter of 2009 to 49.5 million miles during the second quarter of 2010. The second quarter 2009 salaries, wages and benefits percentage and dollar-based expense were each lower as a result of officer life insurance proceeds of approximately $0.8 million received during the second quarter of 2009. The 5% employee pay rate reduction implemented during June 2009 was eliminated during the third quarter of 2010, and as a result, Salaries, wages and benefits are the expected to increase during the remainder of 2010.
Fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge, decreased from 19.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 18.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to a decrease in the average surcharge-adjusted fuel price paid per gallon of diesel fuel from $1.33 during the second quarter of 2009 to $1.26 during the second quarter of 2010. Fuel surcharge collections vary from period to period as they are generally based on changes in fuel prices from period to period so that during periods of rising fuel prices fuel surcharge collections increase while fuel surcharge collections decrease during periods of falling fuel prices. On a dollar basis, fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge, increased from $10.5 million during the second quarter of 20 09 to $11.4 million during the second quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily related to an increase in the number of gallons of diesel fuel purchased during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009 as the number miles traveled increased to 49.5 million during the second quarter of 2010 from
42.9 million during the second quarter of 2009. Effective January 1, 2010, the Company began to classify federal fuel taxes paid on the purchase of fuel as a component of Fuel expense rather than as a component of Operating taxes and licenses. The Company has made corresponding reclassifications to comparative periods.
Rent and purchased transportation decreased from 2.4% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 1.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease relates to a decrease in amounts paid for third-party equipment rentals and a decrease in amounts paid to third-party transportation companies for intermodal services.
Depreciation decreased from 16.1% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 10.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates in part to the interaction of higher revenues during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009 and the fixed-cost nature of depreciation expense. On a dollar basis, depreciation decreased from $8.6 million during the second quarter of 2009 to $6.5 million during the second quarter of 2010. The dollar-based decrease relates primarily to action taken by the Company during the fourth quarter of 2009 in which management renegotiated trade-in terms with a certain manufacturer to extend the expected useful life of certain equipment from either three or four years to five years. This extension has the effect of lowering periodic depreciation expense and increasing the number of depreciable periods. Also contributing to the decrease was the reduction in depreciation expense associated with the sale or trade of trucks during the last six months of 2009 and the first six months of 2010. During the first quarter of 2010 the Company purchased 91 new trucks which have not yet been placed in service as of June 30, 2010. These trucks are expected to be placed in service during the remainder of the year and are expected to increase depreciation expense beginning in the third quarter of 2010.
Operating supplies and expenses decreased from 12.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 11.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as drop lot rentals and new tire amortization, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, operating supplies and expenses increased from $6.8 million during the second quarter of 2009 to $7.1 million during the second quarter of 2010 primarily due to an increase in amounts paid for truck repairs.
Operating taxes and licenses decreased from 2.6% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 2.1% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as registration fees, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, operating taxes and licenses decreased from $1.4 million during the second quarter of 2009 to $1.3 million during the second quarter of 2010.
Insurance and claims decreased from 5.9% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 5.2% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of lower auto liability and physical damage claims expenses with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, insurance and claims expense increased from $3.1 million during the second quarter of 2009 to $3.2 million during the second quarter of 2010. The dollar-based increase relates primarily to an increase in auto liability insurance premiums for the periods compared. During the second quarter of 2010, the number of miles traveled, which serves as the basis for calculating auto liability insurance premiums, increased to 49.5 million from 42.9 million mi les during the second quarter of 2009.
Other expenses decreased from 2.3% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 1.9% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2010. The decrease relates primarily to a decrease in uncollectible revenue expense.
The truckload services division operating ratio, which measures the ratio of operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges, to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, decreased from 107.1% for the second quarter 2009 to 96.4% for the second quarter of 2010.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
For the first six months ended June 30, 2010, truckload services revenue, before fuel surcharges, increased 15.1% to $120.8 million as compared to $104.9 million for the first six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of miles traveled from 83.5 million miles during the first six months of 2009 to 98.2 million miles during the first six months of 2010. The comparative increase in miles traveled resulted primarily from an increase in equipment utilization. During the first six months of 2010, improved truckload freight demand had a positive impact on our equipment utilization and contributed to an increase in the average number of miles traveled per truck each work day from 377 miles during the first six months of 2009 to 447 miles during the first six months of 2010. Improved equipment utilization also resulted in a 26.0% decrease in our empty miles traveled ratio for the periods
compared which equated to approximately $2.6 million in additional revenue for the periods compared. Partially offsetting the increase in revenue attributable to the factors discussed above was the negative effect on revenue of a decrease in the average rate charged per total mile and a decrease in the number of work days during the first six months of 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009. During the first six months of 2010, the average rate charged to customers per total mile decreased by $0.03 as compared to the average rate charged during the first six months of 2009 which, based on 2010 total miles, negatively impacted revenue by approximately $2.6 million. Work days, which typically represent weekdays (excluding major holidays), decreased from 127 days during the second quarter of 2009 to 126 days during the second qu arter 2010, and based on current average truckload services revenue per work day, had the effect of decreasing revenue by approximately $1.0 million for the periods compared.
Salaries, wages and benefits decreased from 44.9% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, in the first six months of 2009 to 43.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as general and administrative wages, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. Based on a dollar comparison, salaries, wages and benefits increased from $47.1 million during the first six months of 2009 to $52.8 million during the first six months of 2010 as the number of driver compensated miles increased from 83.5 million miles during the first six months of 2009 to 98.2 million miles during the first six months of 2010. The 2009 salaries, wages and benefits percentage and dollar-based expense were each lo wer as a result of officer life insurance proceeds of approximately $0.8 million received during the second quarter of 2009. The 5% employee pay rate reduction implemented during June 2009 was eliminated during the third quarter of 2010, and as a result, Salaries, wages and benefits are the expected to increase during the remainder of 2010.
Fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge, increased from 19.0% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 20.0% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010 which, on a dollar basis, represented an increase from $19.9 million during the first six months of 2009 to $24.2 million during the first six months of 2010. The increase was primarily related to an increase in the number of gallons of diesel fuel purchased during the first six months of 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 as the number miles traveled increased to 98.2 million during the first six months of 2010 from 83.5 million during the first six months 2009. Also contributing to the increase was an increase in the average surcharge-adjusted fuel price paid per gallon of diesel fuel from $1.27 during the firs t six months of 2009 to $1.33 during the first six months of 2010. Fuel surcharge collections vary from period to period as they are generally based on changes in fuel prices from period to period so that during periods of rising fuel prices fuel surcharge collections increase while fuel surcharge collections decrease during periods of declining fuel prices. Effective January 1, 2010, the Company began to classify federal fuel taxes paid on the purchase of fuel as a component of Fuel expense rather than as a component of Operating taxes and licenses. The Company has made corresponding reclassifications to comparative periods.
Depreciation decreased from 16.6% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 10.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates in part to the interaction of higher revenues during the first six months of 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 and the fixed-cost nature of depreciation expense. On a dollar basis, depreciation decreased from $17.4 million during the first six months of 2009 to $13.0 million during the first six months of 2010. The dollar-based decrease relates primarily to action taken by the Company during the fourth quarter of 2009 in which management renegotiated trade-in terms with a certain manufacturer to extend the expected useful life of certain equipment from either three or four years to fiv e years. This extension has the effect of lowering periodic depreciation expense and increasing the number of depreciable periods. Also contributing to the decrease was the reduction in depreciation expense associated with the sale or trade of trucks during the last six months of 2009 and the first six months of 2010. During the first quarter of 2010 the Company purchased 91 new trucks which have not yet been placed in service as of June 30, 2010. These trucks are expected to be placed in service during the remainder of the year and are expected to increase depreciation expense beginning in the third quarter of 2010.
Operating supplies and expenses decreased from 12.6% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 11.6% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as drop lot rentals and new tire amortization, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, operating supplies and expenses increased from $13.2 million during the first six months of 2009 to $14.1 million during the first six months of 2010 primarily due to an increase in amounts paid for truck repairs.
Operating taxes and licenses decreased from 2.5% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 1.9% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of expenses with fixed-cost characteristics, such as registration fees, with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, operating taxes and licenses decreased from $2.7 million during the first six months of 2009 to $2.3 million during the first six months of 2010.
Insurance and claims decreased from 5.9% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 5.3% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease, as a percentage of revenue, relates to the interaction of lower auto liability and physical damage claims expenses with an increase in revenues for the periods compared. On a dollar basis, insurance and claims expense increased from $6.2 million during the first six months of 2009 to $6.4 million during the first six months of 2010. The dollar-based increase relates primarily to an increase in auto liability insurance premiums for the periods compared. During the first six months of 2010, the number of miles traveled, which serves as the basis for calculating auto liability insurance premiums, increased to 98.2 million from 83.5 million miles during the first six months of 2009.
Other expenses decreased from 2.2% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 1.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2010. The decrease relates primarily to a decrease in uncollectible revenue expense.
The truckload services division operating ratio, which measures the ratio of operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges, to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, decreased from 107.4% for the first six months 2009 to 98.4% for the first six months of 2010.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – LOGISTICS AND BROKERAGE SERVICES
The following table sets forth, for logistics and brokerage services, the percentage relationship of expense items to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, for the periods indicated. Brokerage service operations occur specifically in certain divisions; however, brokerage operations occur throughout the Company in similar operations having substantially similar economic characteristics. Rent and purchased transportation, which includes costs paid to third party carriers, are shown net of fuel surcharges.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(percentages) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues, before fuel surcharge | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits | 5.3 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 5.8 | ||||||||||||
Rent and purchased transportation | 92.3 | 90.5 | 91.6 | 89.8 | ||||||||||||
Operating supplies and expenses | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Insurance and claims | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Communications and utilities | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Other | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 98.9 | 97.5 | 98.2 | 96.9 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | 1.1 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Non-operating income | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (0.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income taxes | 0.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 3.0 |
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, logistics and brokerage services revenue, before fuel surcharges, increased 22.1% to $11.1 million as compared to $9.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the number of loads brokered during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009.
Rent and purchased transportation increased from 90.5% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the second quarter of 2009 to 92.3% of revenues, before fuel surcharges during the second quarter of 2010. The increase relates to an increase in amounts charged by third party logistics and brokerage service providers.
The logistics and brokerage services division operating ratio, which measures the ratio of operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges, to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, increased from 97.5% for the second quarter 2009 to 98.9% for the second quarter of 2010.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
For the first six months ended June 30, 2010, logistics and brokerage services revenue, before fuel surcharges, increased 21.3% to $21.5 million as compared to $17.7 million for the first six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the number of loads brokered during the first six months of 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009.
Rent and purchased transportation increased from 89.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharges, during the first six months of 2009 to 91.6% of revenues, before fuel surcharges during the first six months of 2010. The increase relates to an increase in amounts charged by third party logistics and brokerage service providers.
The logistics and brokerage services division operating ratio, which measures the ratio of operating expenses, net of fuel surcharges, to operating revenues, before fuel surcharges, increased from 96.9% for the first six months of 2009 to 98.2% for the first six months of 2010.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – COMBINED SERVICES
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Net income for all divisions was approximately $1.3 million, or 1.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharge for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to net loss of $2.4 million or 3.8% of revenues, before fuel surcharge for the second quarter of 2009. The increase in income resulted in an increase in diluted earnings per share to $0.13 for the second quarter of 2010 from a diluted loss per share of $0.25 for the second quarter of 2009.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Net income for all divisions was approximately $0.9 million, or 0.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharge for the first six months of 2010 as compared to net loss of $5.7 million or 4.7% of revenues, before fuel surcharge for the first six months of 2009. The increase in income resulted in an increase in diluted earnings per share to $0.10 for the first six months of 2010 from a diluted loss per share of $0.61 for the first six months of 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The growth of our business has required, and will continue to require, a significant investment in new revenue equipment. Our primary sources of liquidity have been funds provided by operations, proceeds from the sales of revenue equipment, issuances of equity securities, borrowings under our line of credit, installment note agreements, and borrowings under our investment margin account.
During the first six months of 2010, we generated $7.7 million in cash from operating activities. Investing activities used $13.5 million in cash in the first six months of 2010. Financing activities generated $9.7 million in cash in the first six months of 2010.
Our primary use of funds is for the purchase of revenue equipment. We typically use installment notes, our existing line of credit on an interim basis, proceeds from the sale or trade of equipment, and cash flows from operations, to finance capital expenditures and repay long-term debt.
Occasionally, we finance the acquisition of revenue equipment through installment notes with fixed interest rates and terms ranging from 12 to 48 months. During the first six months of 2010, the Company’s subsidiaries entered into installment obligations totaling approximately $15.0 million for the purpose of purchasing revenue equipment. These obligations are payable in 36 monthly installments at an interest rate of 4.85%.
During the remainder of 2010, we expect to purchase 27 new tractors while continuing to sell or trade older equipment, which we expect to result in net capital expenditures of approximately $2.1 million. Management believes we will be able to finance our near term needs for working capital over the next twelve months, as well as any planned capital expenditures during such period, with cash balances, cash flows from operations, and borrowings believed to be available from financing sources. We will continue to have significant capital requirements over the long-term, which may require us to incur debt or seek additional equity capital. The availability of additional capital will depend upon prevailing market conditions, the market price of our common stock and several other factors over which we have limited control, as well as our fin ancial condition and results of operations. Nevertheless, based on our recent operating results, current cash position, anticipated future cash flows, and sources of financing that we expect will be available to us, we do not expect that we will experience any significant liquidity constraints in the foreseeable future.
During the first six months of 2010 we maintained a $30.0 million revolving line of credit. Amounts outstanding under the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR (determined as of the first day of each month) plus 1.95% (2.30% at June 30, 2010), are secured by our accounts receivable and mature on May 31, 2011; however, the Company has the intent and ability to extend the terms of this line of credit for an additional one year period until May 31, 2012. At June 30, 2010 outstanding advances on the line of credit were approximately $2.2 million, consisting entirely of letters of credit, with availability to borrow $27.8 million.
Trade accounts receivable increased from $45.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $53.5 million at June 30, 2010. The increase relates to a general increase in revenue, which flows through the accounts receivable account, during the first six months of 2010 as compared to the revenues generated during the last quarter of 2009.
Accounts payable increased from $14.5 million at December 31, 2009 to $17.2 million at June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily related to an increase in amounts accrued for the purchase of fuel.
Current maturities of long-term debt increased from $10.3 million at December 31, 2009 to $13.4 million at June 30, 2010. The increase relates primarily to the current portion of installment note borrowings of approximately $15.0 million during the first six months of 2010.
Long-term debt increased from $27.2 million at December 31, 2009 to $33.8 million at June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily related to the non-current portion of installment note borrowings of approximately $15.0 million during the first six months of 2010.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note B to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of the most recent accounting pronouncements and their impact, if any, on the Company.
Our primary market risk exposures include equity price risk, interest rate risk, and commodity price risk (the price paid to obtain diesel fuel for our trucks). The potential adverse impact of these risks and the general strategies we employ to manage such risks are discussed below.
The following sensitivity analyses do not consider the effects that an adverse change may have on the overall economy nor do they consider additional actions we may take to mitigate our exposure to such changes. Actual results of changes in prices or rates may differ materially from the hypothetical results described below.
Equity Price Risk
We hold certain actively traded marketable equity securities which subjects the Company to fluctuations in the fair market value of its investment portfolio based on the current market price of such securities. The recorded value of marketable equity securities increased to $15.2 million at June 30, 2010 from $14.9 million at December 31, 2009. The increase during the first six months of 2010 reflects additional purchases of approximately $1.7 million, sales of approximately $308,000, return of capital proceeds of approximately $104,000, and a decrease in the fair market value of approximately $948,000. A 10% decrease in the market price of our marketable equity securities would cause a corresponding 10% decrease in the carrying amounts of these securities, or approximately $1.5 million. For additional information with respect to the m arketable equity securities, see Note C to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Interest Rate Risk
Our line of credit bears interest at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus a fixed percentage. Accordingly, changes in LIBOR, which are effected by changes in interest rates, will affect the interest rate on, and therefore our costs under, the line of credit. Assuming $2.0 million of variable rate debt was outstanding, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in LIBOR for a one year period would result in approximately $20,000 of additional interest expense.
Commodity Price Risk
Prices and availability of all petroleum products are subject to political, economic and market factors that are generally outside of our control. Accordingly, the price and availability of diesel fuel, as well as other petroleum products, can be unpredictable. Because our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, significant increases in diesel fuel costs could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Based upon our 2009 fuel consumption, a 10% increase in the average annual price per gallon of diesel fuel would increase our annual fuel expenses by $6.6 million.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evalu ating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Based on management’s evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The nature of our business routinely results in litigation, primarily involving claims for personal injuries and property damage incurred in the transportation of freight. We believe that all such routine litigation is adequately covered by insurance and that adverse results in one or more of those cases would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K: | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2002) |
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2007.) |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer | |
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
P.A.M. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. | |
Dated: August 6, 2010 | By: /s/ Daniel H. Cushman |
Daniel H. Cushman | |
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
(principal executive officer) | |
Dated: August 6, 2010 | By: /s/ Lance K. Stewart |
Lance K. Stewart | |
Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial | |
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer | |
(principal accounting and financial officer) | |
Index to Exhibits to Form 10-Q
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2002.) | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's Form 8-K filed on December 11, 2007.) | |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | ||
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer | ||
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
22