UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-04791
|
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
|
Joseph J. Mantineo AllianceBernstein L.P. 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10105 |
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 221-5672
Date of fiscal year end: October 31, 2012
Date of reporting period: April 30, 2012
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT
AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund
National Portfolio
High Income Municipal Portfolio
California Portfolio
New York Portfolio
Semi-Annual Report
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g81g54.jpg)
Investment Products Offered
|
•Are Not FDIC Insured •May Lose Value •Are Not Bank Guaranteed |
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.
This shareholder report must be preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current shareholders of the Fund.
You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AllianceBernstein’s website at www.alliancebernstein.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330. AllianceBernstein publishes full portfolio holdings for the Fund monthly at www.alliancebernstein.com.
AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds.
AllianceBernstein® and the AB Logo are registered trademarks and service marks used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.
June 21, 2012
Semi-Annual Report
This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for the portfolios of AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund (the “Portfolios”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended April 30, 2012.
Investment Objective and Policies
The investment objective of the National, California and New York Portfolios of this Fund is to earn the highest level of current income, exempt from federal income tax, and in the case of the California and New York Portfolios, state taxation of the respective state, that is available without assuming what AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) considers to be undue risk to principal or income. Each of the National Portfolio, California Portfolio and New York Portfolio invests principally in high-yielding, predominantly investment-grade municipal securities. The investment objective of the High Income Municipal Portfolio is to earn the highest level of current income, exempt from federal income tax, that is available consistent with what the Adviser considers to be an appropriate level of risk. The High Income Municipal Portfolio invests principally in high-yielding municipal securities that may be non-investment grade or investment grade.
Each Portfolio invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities with interest that is exempt from federal income tax. These securities may pay interest that is subject to the federal Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”)
for certain taxpayers. Each of the Portfolios that invest in a named state pursues its objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities issued by the named state or municipal securities with interest that is otherwise exempt from the named state’s income tax. The National Portfolio may invest 25% or more of its net assets in a single state.
The National, California and New York Portfolios may also invest in forward commitments, Tender Option Bond transactions (“TOBs”), zero coupon municipal securities and variable, floating and inverse floating rate municipal securities and derivatives, such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.
The High Income Municipal Portfolio may invest without limit in lower-rated securities (“junk bonds”), which may include securities having the lowest rating, and in unrated securities that, in the Adviser’s judgment, would be lower-rated securities if rated. The High Income Portfolio may invest in fixed-income securities with any maturity or duration. The Portfolio will seek to increase income for shareholders by investing in longer-maturity bonds. Consistent with its objective of seeking a higher level of income, the Portfolio may experience greater volatility and a higher risk of loss of principal than other municipal funds. The Portfolio may also invest in forward commitments; zero coupon municipal securities and variable, floating and inverse floating rate municipal securities and certain types of mortgage related securities. The Portfolio
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 1 | |
may invest in derivatives, such as options, futures, forwards and swaps. The Portfolio may make short sales of securities or maintain a short position, and may use other investment techniques. The Portfolio may use leverage for investment purposes to increase income through the use of TOBs and derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps.
Investment Results
The tables on pages 7 show performance for each Portfolio compared with its benchmark, the Barclays Capital (“BC”) Municipal Bond Index, for the six- and 12-month periods ended April 30, 2012.
For both the six- and 12-month periods ended April 30, 2012, Class A shares of the National, California and High Income Portfolios outperformed their benchmark, while Class A shares of the New York Portfolio underperformed its benchmark, before sales charges. The Team continues to focus buying activity on revenue bonds; this has yet to significantly affect performance of the Portfolios. Nevertheless, this strategy remains a core stance as the Municipal Bond Investment Team (the “Team”) expects state and local governments to continue to face budgetary challenges.
A more detailed description of the contribution to each Portfolio’s relative performance due to security and sector selection versus the benchmark for the six- and 12-month periods ended April 30, 2012 follows.
National Portfolio – Class A shares of the National Portfolio outperformed
their benchmark for both the six- and 12-month periods, before sales charges. Over both periods, yield curve positioning benefited performance. For the six-month period, an underweight to prerefunded bonds benefited performance; security selection contributed in the general obligation and industrial sectors and detracted in the special tax sectors. During the 12-month period, an underweight to prerefunded bonds and an overweight to healthcare bonds benefited performance; security selection detracted in the health care and special tax sectors and benefited in the general obligation sector.
High Income Municipal Portfolio – Class A shares of the High Income Municipal Portfolio outperformed their benchmark for six- and 12-month periods, before sales charges. Over both periods, yield curve positioning and a relatively larger weight in lower-rated bonds benefited performance. During both periods, an overweight to the healthcare sector benefited performance; security selection contributed in the special tax sector and detracted in the health care sector.
California Portfolio – Class A shares of the California Portfolio outperformed their benchmark for both the six- and 12-month periods, before sales charges. Over both periods, yield curve positioning benefited performance. For both periods, security selection contributed in the transportation, education and general obligation sectors, and detracted in the leasing sector.
| | |
2 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio – Class A shares of the New York Portfolio underperformed their benchmark for both the six- and 12-month periods, before sales charges. Over both periods, yield curve positioning benefited performance. For the six-month period, security selection detracted in the health care and special tax sectors and contributed in the general obligation sector. During the 12-month period, security selection detracted in the health care sector and contributed in the special tax sector.
Leverage, achieved through the usage of TOBs, benefited the total return of the High Income Municipal Portfolio, and had an immaterial impact on the total return of the National and California Portfolios for the 12-month period. During this period, leverage increased the overall interest rate sensitivity and interest rates generally declined.
For the six-month period ended April 30, 2012, leverage achieved through the usage of TOBs, benefited the performance of the High Income Municipal Portfolio and had an immaterial impact on the performance of the National or California Portfolios.
Credit default swaps were used in the High Income Portfolio for investment purposes and added to performance for both periods.
The New York Portfolio did not use leverage during either the six- or 12-month periods. Interest rate swaps were also used in all four Portfolios for hedging purposes and these had an immaterial impact on performance for the six- or 12-month periods.
Market Review & Investment Strategy
Volatility continued during the six-month period ended April 30, 2012, as global markets remained highly correlated with headlines emanating from Europe’s ongoing debt crisis. During the early part of 2012, stocks rose across the globe and corporate debt outperformed government debt. During the 12-month period ended April 30, 2012, municipal investors were generally well rewarded for assuming risk, regardless of whether it was interest rate or credit risk. The longest-maturity bonds performed best in the municipal market. In terms of credit risk, the lower the bond’s rating, the better the performance.
The Team believes the Portfolios are well-positioned with respect to interest rate risk. The Team has generally avoided long-maturity bonds that have significant potential for loss of principal if interest rates rise. Instead, when buying highly rated bonds that are generally expected to perform in line with changes in overall yields, the Team has focused on shorter-maturity bonds that capture most of the yield of these longer-maturity bonds with less downside risk to principal.
In the Team’s view, the extra yield for medium and lower credit-quality bonds is still high by historical standards. Where possible, the Team has added to its holdings of this type both to supplement the Portfolios’ incomes and to benefit overall performance when this extra yield, or credit spread, contracts.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 3 | |
The Portfolios may purchase municipal securities that are insured under policies issued by certain insurance companies. Historically, insured municipal securities typically received a higher credit rating, which meant that the issuer of the securities paid a lower interest rate. As a result of declines in the credit quality and associated downgrades of most fund insurers, insurance has less value than it did in the past. The market now values insured municipal securities primarily based on the credit quality of the issuer of the security with little value given to the insurance feature. In purchasing such insured securities, the Adviser evaluates the risk and return of municipal securities through its own research. If an insurance company’s rating is downgraded or the company becomes insolvent, the prices of municipal securities insured by the insurance company may decline. As of April 30, 2012, the Portfolios’ percentages of total investments in insured bonds and in insured bonds that have been prerefunded are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Insured Bonds* | | | Prerefunded/ ETM** Bonds | |
National | | | 29.23 | % | | | 0.78 | % |
High Income | | | 3.93 | % | | | 0.00 | % |
California | | | 26.33 | % | | | 0.41 | % |
New York | | | 26.96 | % | | | 3.20 | % |
* | | Breakdowns expressed as a percentage of total investments. |
The Team believes that downgrades in insurance company ratings or insurance company insolvencies present limited risk to the Portfolios. The Portfolios generally invest in investment-grade, as the underlying credit quality of the insured municipal securities reduces the risk of a significant reduction in the value of the insured municipal security.
| | |
4 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
Benchmark Disclosure
The unmanaged BC Municipal Bond Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. The BC Municipal Bond Index represents the performance of the long-term tax-exempt bond market consisting of investment grade bonds. An investor cannot invest directly in an index, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Portfolios.
A Word About Risk
Market Risk: The value of the Portfolios’ assets will fluctuate as the bond market fluctuates. The value of the Portfolios’ investments may decline, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, simply because of economic changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.
Credit Risk: An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations.
Municipal Market Risk: This is the risk that special factors may adversely affect the value of municipal securities and have a significant effect on the yield or value of the Portfolios’ investments in municipal securities. These factors include economic conditions, political or legislative changes, uncertainties related to the tax status of municipal securities, or the rights of investors in these securities. To the extent that the Portfolios invest more of its assets in a particular state’s municipal securities, the Portfolios may be vulnerable to events adversely affecting that state, including economic, political and regulatory occurrences, court decisions, terrorism and catastrophic natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. The Portfolios’ investments in certain municipal securities with principal and interest payments that are made from the revenues of a specific project or facility, and not general tax revenues, may have increased risks. Factors affecting the project or facility, such as local business or economic conditions, could have a significant effect on the project’s ability to make payments of principal and interest on these securities.
Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.
Inflation Risk: This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Portfolios’ assets can decline as can the value of the Portfolios’ distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.
Leverage Risk (High Income Municipal): To the extent the Portfolio uses leveraging techniques, such as TOBs, its net asset value (“NAV”) may be more volatile because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of changes in interest rates and any increase or decrease in the value of the Portfolio’s investments.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 5 | |
Historical Performance
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
Liquidity Risk: Liquidity risk exists when particular investments, such as lower-rated securities, are difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the Portfolios from selling out of these illiquid securities at an advantageous price. Derivatives and securities involving substantial market and credit risk tend to involve greater liquidity risk. The Portfolios are subject to liquidity risk because the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets.
Derivatives Risk: Investments in derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Portfolios, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments.
Management Risk: The Portfolios are subject to management risk because it is an actively managed investment fund. The Adviser will apply its investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions, but there is no guarantee that its techniques will produce the intended results.
These risks are more fully discussed in the Portfolios’ prospectus.
An Important Note About Historical Performance
The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Portfolios will fluctuate, so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown on the following pages represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by visiting www.alliancebernstein.com.
All fees and expenses related to the operation of the Portfolios have been deducted. NAV returns do not reflect sales charges; if sales charges were reflected, the Portfolios’ quoted performance would be lower. SEC returns and the Portfolios’ returns shown in the line graphs reflect the applicable sales charges for each share class: a 3% maximum front-end sales charge for Class A shares; the applicable contingent deferred sales charge for Class B shares (3% year 1, 2% year 2, 1% year 3, 0% year 4); a 1% 1 year contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares. Prior to October 1, 2009, the maximum front-end sales charge for Class A shares of the Portfolio was 4.25%. If the Class A annualized returns for the Portfolios and National, California and New York Portfolios returns shown in the line graphs reflected the deduction of the former maximum front-end sales charge, its returns would be lower. Returns for the different share classes will vary due to their different expenses associated with each class. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | |
6 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Historical Performance
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
THE PORTFOLIOS VS. THEIR BENCHMARK PERIODS ENDED APRIL 30, 2012 | | NAV Returns | | | |
| 6 Months | | | 12 Months | | | |
National Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6.12% | | | | 12.16% | | | |
|
Class B* | | | 5.66% | | | | 11.41% | | | |
|
Class C | | | 5.76% | | | | 11.40% | | | |
|
Advisor Class** | | | 6.28% | | | | 12.50% | | | |
|
BC Municipal Bond Index | | | 5.50% | | | | 11.36% | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | NAV Returns | | | |
| | 6 Months | | | 12 Months | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 9.93% | | | | 19.81% | | | |
|
Class C | | | 9.56% | | | | 18.98% | | | |
|
Advisor Class* | | | 10.00% | | | | 20.06% | | | |
|
BC Municipal Bond Index | | | 5.50% | | | | 11.36% | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | NAV Returns | | | |
| | 6 Months | | | 12 Months | | | |
California Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6.16% | | | | 11.99% | | | |
|
Class B* | | | 5.70% | | | | 11.11% | | | |
|
Class C | | | 5.80% | | | | 11.11% | | | |
|
Advisor Class** | | | 6.32% | | | | 12.32% | | | |
|
BC Municipal Bond Index | | | 5.50% | | | | 11.36% | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | NAV Returns | | | |
| | 6 Months | | | 12 Months | | | |
New York Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 5.07% | | | | 10.08% | | | |
|
Class B* | | | 4.62% | | | | 9.23% | | | |
|
Class C | | | 4.71% | | | | 9.32% | | | |
|
Advisor Class** | | | 5.23% | | | | 10.41% | | | |
|
BC Municipal Bond Index | | | 5.50% | | | | 11.36% | | | |
|
* Effective January 31, 2009, Class B shares are no longer available for purchase to new investors. Please see Note A for more information. ** Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or investment advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds. Please keep in mind that high, double-digit returns are highly unusual and cannot be sustained. Investors should also be aware that these returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See Benchmark and Historical Performance disclosures on pages 5 and 6.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 7 | |
Historical Performance
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF APRIL 30, 2012 | |
| | NAV Returns | | | SEC Returns | | | SEC Yields** | | | Taxable Equivalent Yields*** | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 2.78 | % | | | 4.28 | % |
1 Year | | | 12.16 | % | | | 8.78 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.84 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.94 | % | | | 4.62 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 2.15 | % | | | 3.31 | % |
1 Year | | | 11.41 | % | | | 8.41 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.11 | % | | | 4.11 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years(a) | | | 4.51 | % | | | 4.51 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 2.17 | % | | | 3.34 | % |
1 Year | | | 11.40 | % | | | 10.40 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.10 | % | | | 4.10 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.21 | % | | | 4.21 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | 3.16 | % | | | 4.86 | % |
1 Year | | | 12.50 | % | | | 12.50 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception* | | | 6.77 | % | | | 6.77 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS (WITH ANY APPLICABLE SALES CHARGES) AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END (MARCH 31, 2012) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | SEC Returns | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.34 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.00 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.59 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8.81 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.90 | % |
10 Years(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.47 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10.91 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.91 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.18 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13.02 | % |
Since Inception* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6.52 | % |
The Portfolio’s current prospectus fee table shows the Portfolio’s total annual operating expense ratios as 0.88%, 1.60%, 1.58% and 0.58% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements. Contractual fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements will limit the Portfolio’s annual operating expenses, excluding any interest expense, to 0.75%, 1.45%, 1.45% and 0.45% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively. These waivers/reimbursements extend through January 31, 2013 and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one-year terms. Absent reimbursements or waivers, performance would have been lower. The Financial Highlights section of this report sets forth expense ratio data for the current reporting period; the expense ratios shown above may differ from the expense ratios in the Financial Highlights section since they are based on different time periods.
(a) | | Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after six years. |
* | | Inception Date: 8/6/08 for Advisor Class shares. |
** | | SEC Yields are calculated based on SEC guidelines for the 30-day period ended April 30, 2012. |
*** | | Taxable equivalent yields are based on SEC yields and a 35% marginal Federal income tax rate and maximum state taxes where applicable. |
† | | This share class is offered at NAV to eligible investors and its SEC returns are the same as the NAV returns. Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or investment advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds. The inception date for Advisor Class shares is listed above. |
See Historical Performance disclosures on pages 5-6.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | |
8 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Historical Performance
HIGH INCOME MUNICIPAL PORTFOLIO
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF APRIL 30, 2012 | |
| | NAV Returns | | | SEC Returns | | | SEC Yields** | | | Taxable Equivalent Yields*** | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 4.22 | % | | | 6.49 | % |
1 Year | | | 19.81 | % | | | 16.20 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception | | | 10.07 | % | | | 8.59 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 3.65 | % | | | 5.62 | % |
1 Year | | | 18.98 | % | | | 17.98 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception | | | 9.31 | % | | | 9.31 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | 4.66 | % | | | 7.17 | % |
1 Year | | | 20.06 | % | | | 20.06 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception | | | 10.35 | % | | | 10.35 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS (WITH ANY APPLICABLE SALES CHARGES) AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END (MARCH 31, 2012) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | SEC Returns | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 15.87 | % |
Since Inception | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7.89 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 17.57 | % |
Since Inception | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8.66 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19.77 | % |
Since Inception | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.70 | % |
The Portfolio’s current prospectus fee table shows the Portfolio’s total annual operating expense ratios as 1.06%, 1.76%, and 0.76% for Class A, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements. Contractual fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements will limit the Portfolio’s annual operating expenses, excluding any interest expense, to 0.80%, 1.50% and 0.50% for Class A, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively. These waivers/reimbursements extend through January 31, 2013 and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one-year terms. Absent reimbursements or waivers, performance would have been lower. The Financial Highlights section of this report sets forth expense ratio data for the current reporting period; the expense ratios shown above may differ from the expense ratios in the Financial Highlights section since they are based on different time periods.
Inception date: 1/26/2010.
(a) | | Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after six years. |
** | | SEC Yields are calculated based on SEC guidelines for the 30-day period ended April 30, 2012. |
*** | | Taxable equivalent yields are based on SEC yields and a 35% marginal Federal income tax rate and maximum state taxes where applicable. |
† | | This share class is offered at NAV to eligible investors and its SEC returns are the same as the NAV returns. Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or investment advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds. The inception date for Advisor Class shares is listed above. |
See Historical Performance disclosures on pages 5-6.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 9 | |
Historical Performance
CALIFORNIA PORTFOLIO
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF APRIL 30, 2012 | |
| | NAV Returns | | | SEC Returns | | | SEC Yields** | | | Taxable Equivalent Yields*** | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 2.33 | % | | | 4.00 | % |
1 Year | | | 11.99 | % | | | 8.67 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.86 | % | | | 4.22 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 5.08 | % | | | 4.76 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1.69 | % | | | 2.90 | % |
1 Year | | | 11.11 | % | | | 8.11 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.14 | % | | | 4.14 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years(a) | | | 4.66 | % | | | 4.66 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1.71 | % | | | 2.93 | % |
1 Year | | | 11.11 | % | | | 10.11 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.13 | % | | | 4.13 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.35 | % | | | 4.35 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | 2.70 | % | | | 4.63 | % |
1 Year | | | 12.32 | % | | | 12.32 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception* | | | 6.69 | % | | | 6.69 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS (WITH ANY APPLICABLE SALES CHARGES) AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END (MARCH 31, 2012) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | SEC Returns | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.50 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.02 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.75 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.12 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.94 | % |
10 Years(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.64 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11.01 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.91 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.33 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13.23 | % |
Since Inception* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6.44 | % |
The Portfolio’s current prospectus fee table shows the Portfolio’s total annual operating expense ratios as 0.86%, 1.58%, 1.56% and 0.55% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements. Contractual fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements will limit the Portfolio’s annual operating expenses to 0.75%, 1.45%, 1.45% and 0.45% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively. These waivers/reimbursements extend through January 31, 2013 and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one-year terms. Absent reimbursements or waivers, performance would have been lower. The Financial Highlights section of this report sets forth expense ratio data for the current reporting period; the expense ratios shown above may differ from the expense ratios in the Financial Highlights section since they are based on different time periods.
(a) | | Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after six years. |
* | | Inception Date: 8/6/08 for Advisor Class shares. |
** | | SEC Yields are calculated based on SEC guidelines for the 30-day period ended April 30, 2012. |
*** | | Taxable equivalent yields are based on SEC yields and a 35% marginal Federal income tax rate and maximum state taxes where applicable. |
† | | This share class is offered at NAV to eligible investors and its SEC returns are the same as the NAV returns. Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or investment advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds. The inception date for Advisor Class shares is listed above. |
See Historical Performance disclosures on pages 5-6.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | |
10 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Historical Performance
NEW YORK PORTFOLIO
HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF APRIL 30, 2012 | |
| | NAV Returns | | | SEC Returns | | | SEC Yields** | | | Taxable Equivalent Yields*** | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1.94 | % | | | 3.28 | % |
1 Year | | | 10.08 | % | | | 6.78 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.81 | % | | | 4.16 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.98 | % | | | 4.66 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1.30 | % | | | 2.20 | % |
1 Year | | | 9.23 | % | | | 6.23 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.07 | % | | | 4.07 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years(a) | | | 4.52 | % | | | 4.52 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 1.31 | % | | | 2.21 | % |
1 Year | | | 9.32 | % | | | 8.32 | % | | | | | | | | |
5 Years | | | 4.08 | % | | | 4.08 | % | | | | | | | | |
10 Years | | | 4.23 | % | | | 4.23 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | 2.30 | % | | | 3.89 | % |
1 Year | | | 10.41 | % | | | 10.41 | % | | | | | | | | |
Since Inception* | | | 6.26 | % | | | 6.26 | % | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS (WITH ANY APPLICABLE SALES CHARGES) AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END (MARCH 31, 2012) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | SEC Returns | |
Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7.40 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.01 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.61 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7.13 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.94 | % |
10 Years(a) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.48 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9.00 | % |
5 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3.93 | % |
10 Years | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4.18 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1 Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11.10 | % |
Since Inception* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6.08 | % |
The Portfolio’s current prospectus fee table shows the Portfolio’s total annual operating expense ratios as 0.87%, 1.59%, 1.57% and 0.57% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements. Contractual fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements will limit the Portfolio’s annual operating expenses to 0.75%, 1.45%, 1.45% and 0.45% for Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class, respectively. These waivers/reimbursements extend through January 31, 2013 and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one-year terms. Absent reimbursements or waivers, performance would have been lower. The Financial Highlights section of this report sets forth expense ratio data for the current reporting period; the expense ratios shown above may differ from the expense ratios in the Financial Highlights section since they are based on different time periods.
(a) | | Assumes conversion of Class B shares into Class A shares after six years. |
* | | Inception Date: 8/6/08 for Advisor Class shares. |
** | | SEC Yields are calculated based on SEC guidelines for the 30-day period ended April 30, 2012. |
*** | | Taxable equivalent yields are based on SEC yields and a 35% marginal Federal income tax rate and maximum state taxes where applicable. |
† | | This share class is offered at NAV to eligible investors and its SEC returns are the same as the NAV returns. Please note that this share class is for investors purchasing shares through accounts established under certain fee-based programs sponsored and maintained by certain broker-dealers and financial intermediaries, institutional pension plans and/or investment advisory clients of, and certain other persons associated with, the Adviser and its affiliates or the Funds. The inception date for Advisor Class shares is listed above. |
See Historical Performance disclosures on pages 5-6.
(Historical Performance continued on next page)
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 11 | |
Historical Performance
FUND EXPENSES
(unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchase payments, contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution (12b-1) fees; and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period as indicated below.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed annual rate of return of 5% before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds by comparing this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value November 1, 2011 | | | Ending Account Value April 30, 2012 | | | Expenses Paid During Period* | | | Annualized Expense Ratio* | |
National Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,061.20 | | | $ | 3.89 | | | | 0.76 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,021.08 | | | $ | 3.82 | | | | 0.76 | % |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,056.60 | | | $ | 7.47 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.60 | | | $ | 7.32 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,057.60 | | | $ | 7.47 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.60 | | | $ | 7.32 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,062.80 | | | $ | 2.36 | | | | 0.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,022.58 | | | $ | 2.31 | | | | 0.46 | % |
| | |
12 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Fund Expenses
FUND EXPENSES
(unaudited)
(continued from previous page)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value November 1, 2011 | | | Ending Account Value April 30, 2012 | | | Expenses Paid During Period* | | | Annualized Expense Ratio* | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,099.30 | | | $ | 4.65 | | | | 0.89 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,020.44 | | | $ | 4.47 | | | | 0.89 | % |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,095.60 | | | $ | 8.28 | | | | 1.59 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,016.96 | | | $ | 7.97 | | | | 1.59 | % |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,100.00 | | | $ | 3.08 | | | | 0.59 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,021.93 | | | $ | 2.97 | | | | 0.59 | % |
California Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,061.60 | | | $ | 3.90 | | | | 0.76 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,021.08 | | | $ | 3.82 | | | | 0.76 | % |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,057.00 | | | $ | 7.47 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.60 | | | $ | 7.32 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,058.00 | | | $ | 7.47 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.60 | | | $ | 7.32 | | | | 1.46 | % |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,063.20 | | | $ | 2.36 | | | | 0.46 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,022.58 | | | $ | 2.31 | | | | 0.46 | % |
New York Portfolio | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,050.70 | | | $ | 3.82 | | | | 0.75 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,021.13 | | | $ | 3.77 | | | | 0.75 | % |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,046.20 | | | $ | 7.38 | | | | 1.45 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.65 | | | $ | 7.27 | | | | 1.45 | % |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,047.10 | | | $ | 7.38 | | | | 1.45 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,017.65 | | | $ | 7.27 | | | | 1.45 | % |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Actual | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,052.30 | | | $ | 2.30 | | | | 0.45 | % |
Hypothetical** | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,022.63 | | | $ | 2.26 | | | | 0.45 | % |
* | | Expenses are equal to each classes’ annualized expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
** | | Assumes 5% return before expenses. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 13 | |
Fund Expenses
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
QUALITY RATING BREAKDOWN*
Highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g18c73.jpg)
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g14f58.jpg)
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g86y61.jpg)
* | | All data are as of April 30, 2012. The Portfolio’s quality rating breakdowns are expressed as a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments in municipal securities and may vary over time. Each Portfolio also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details). The quality ratings are determined by using the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc.(“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd.(“Fitch”). These ratings are a measure of the quality and safety of a bond or portfolio, based on the issuer’s financial condition. AAA is the highest (best) and D is the lowest (worst). If applicable, the pre-refunded category includes bonds which are secured by U.S. Government Securities and therefore have been deemed high-quality investment grade by the Adviser. If applicable, Not Applicable (N/A) includes non credit worthy investments; such as, equities, currency contracts, futures and options. If applicable, the Not Rated category includes bonds that are not rated by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization. |
| | |
14 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Portfolio Summary
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
QUALITY RATING BREAKDOWN*
Highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g52m10.jpg)
* | | All data are as of April 30, 2012. The Portfolio’s quality rating breakdown is expressed as a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments in municipal securities and may vary over time. The Portfolio also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details). The quality ratings are determined by using the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc.(“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd.(“Fitch”). These ratings are a measure of the quality and safety of a bond or portfolio, based on the issuer’s financial condition. AAA is the highest (best) and D is the lowest (worst). If applicable, the pre-refunded category includes bonds which are secured by U.S. Government Securities and therefore have been deemed high-quality investment grade by the Adviser. If applicable, Not Applicable (N/A) includes non credit worthy investments; such as, equities, currency contracts, futures and options. If applicable, the Not Rated category includes bonds that are not rated by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 15 | |
Portfolio Summary
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 100.7% | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 100.7% | | | | | | | | |
Alabama – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Birmingham AL Wtrwks Brd 5.00%, 1/01/31 | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,994,300 | |
Jefferson Cnty AL LT Sch Wts Series 04A 5.25%, 1/01/18-1/01/23 | | | 3,900 | | | | 3,858,567 | |
AGM Series 2004 5.50%, 1/01/21 | | | 1,000 | | | | 993,330 | |
Jefferson Cnty AL Swr FGIC 5.00%, 2/01/41 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 375 | | | | 379,001 | |
5.00%, 2/01/41 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 625 | | | | 631,906 | |
Univ of Alabama at Birmingham Hosp Series 08A 5.75%, 9/01/22 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,481,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 20,338,604 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Arizona – 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
Arizona Hlth Fac Auth (Phoenix Children’s Hospital) 1.25%, 2/01/42(a) | | | 3,850 | | | | 3,619,462 | |
Dove Mountain Resort CFD AZ Series 2001 6.75%, 12/01/16 | | | 1,240 | | | | 1,092,614 | |
Estrella Mtn CFD AZ Desert Vlg 7.375%, 7/01/27 | | | 2,278 | | | | 2,305,245 | |
Phoenix AZ Civic Impt Corp. (Phoenix AZ Wastewater) NPFGC Series 04 5.00%, 7/01/23 | | | 1,750 | | | | 1,896,510 | |
Pima Cnty AZ IDA (American Charter Sch Fdntn) Series 2007A 5.50%, 7/01/26 | | | 4,245 | | | | 4,187,226 | |
5.625%, 7/01/38 | | | 1,760 | | | | 1,602,198 | |
Pima Cnty AZ IDA (Horizon Learning Ctr) Series 05 5.125%, 6/01/20 | | | 3,310 | | | | 3,261,508 | |
Queen Creek AZ ID #1 5.00%, 1/01/26 | | | 1,900 | | | | 1,905,130 | |
Salt Verde Fin Corp. Gas (Citigroup, Inc.) 5.25%, 12/01/23 | | | 3,685 | | | | 4,026,157 | |
Sundance AZ CFD #1 Series 02 7.75%, 7/01/22 | | | 366 | | | | 366,223 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 24,262,273 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
16 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
California – 11.3% | | | | | | | | |
California Dept Wtr Res Cen Vy Series 2012AL 5.00%, 12/01/29(b) | | $ | 8,255 | | | $ | 9,645,307 | |
Series 2013 AM 5.00%, 12/01/25(b) | | | 12,300 | | | | 14,490,015 | |
California Econ Recovery (California Econ Rec Spl Tax) Series 2009A 5.25%, 7/01/21 | | | 6,390 | | | | 7,759,505 | |
California GO 5.00%, 11/01/32 | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,790,500 | |
5.25%, 4/01/30 | | | 15 | | | | 15,024 | |
AGM 5.00%, 2/01/29 | | | 1,445 | | | | 1,498,696 | |
AMBAC 5.00%, 4/01/27 | | | 1,230 | | | | 1,232,632 | |
California Statewide CDA (Enloe Med Ctr) 6.25%, 8/15/28 | | | 1,715 | | | | 1,934,503 | |
Series 2008A 5.375%, 8/15/20 | | | 510 | | | | 572,659 | |
5.50%, 8/15/23 | | | 80 | | | | 88,333 | |
Chula Vista CA IDR (San Diego Gas & Elec Co.) Series 96A 5.30%, 7/01/21 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,317,760 | |
Los Angeles CA Dept Arpts (Los Angeles Intl Airport) Series 2009A 5.25%, 5/15/29 | | | 9,260 | | | | 10,534,454 | |
Los Angeles CA Harbor Dept Series 2009C 5.25%, 8/01/24 | | | 17,205 | | | | 20,384,312 | |
Manteca CA USD GO NPFGC Series 01 Zero Coupon, 9/01/31 | | | 11,910 | | | | 3,557,755 | |
Ontario CA Redev Fin Auth NPFGC Series 93 5.80%, 8/01/23 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,199,960 | |
San Bernardino Cnty CA COP Series 2009 5.25%, 8/01/26 | | | 1,910 | | | | 2,036,480 | |
San Diego CA Pub Fac Fin Auth (San Diego CA Wtr) Series A 5.00%, 8/01/30(b) | | | 10,045 | | | | 11,490,476 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 17 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
San Diego Cnty CA Wtr Auth AGM Series 08A 5.00%, 5/01/25 | | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 3,340,860 | |
San Francisco City/Cnty CA Arpt Commn (San Francisco CA Intl Airport) Series 2010A 4.90%, 5/01/29 | | | 2,800 | | | | 3,079,692 | |
Tejon Ranch CA Pub Fac Fin CFD #2008-1 Series 2010A 7.375%, 9/01/40 | | | 2,820 | | | | 2,911,142 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 110,880,065 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Colorado – 3.0% | | | | | | | | |
Colorado Edl & Cultural Facs Auth (Knowledge Quest Charter Sch) Series 05 6.50%, 5/01/36 | | | 470 | | | | 439,257 | |
Colorado HFA SFMR (Colorado HFA) Series 99A-2 6.45%, 4/01/30 | | | 245 | | | | 257,551 | |
Colorado Hlth Fac Auth (Evangelical Luth Good Sam Soc) 5.25%, 6/01/19-6/01/23 | | | 2,200 | | | | 2,402,328 | |
Colorado Hlth Fac Auth (Parkview Medical Center) Series 04 5.00%, 9/01/25 | | | 690 | | | | 698,887 | |
Denver CO Urban Renewal Auth (Stapleton) Series 2010B-1 5.00%, 12/01/24-12/01/25 | | | 9,175 | | | | 9,841,482 | |
E-470 Pub Hwy Auth CO 5.25%, 9/01/25 | | | 2,900 | | | | 3,116,166 | |
5.375%, 9/01/26 | | | 3,600 | | | | 3,881,340 | |
Park Creek Met Dist CO Series 05 5.50%, 12/01/30 | | | 1,900 | | | | 2,045,464 | |
PV Wtr & San Met Dist CO Series 06 Zero Coupon, 12/15/17(c)(d) | | | 3,122 | | | | 1,092,700 | |
Regional Trnsp Dist CO (Denver Transit Partners) 6.00%, 1/15/41 | | | 2,400 | | | | 2,632,320 | |
Three Springs Metro District #3 CO Series 2010 7.75%, 12/01/39 | | | 1,950 | | | | 2,006,297 | |
| | |
18 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Todd Creek Farms Met Dist #1 CO 6.125%, 12/01/22(c)(d) | | $ | 1,210 | | | $ | 544,500 | |
Series 04 6.125%, 12/01/19(d) | | | 820 | | | | 410,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 29,368,292 | |
| | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia – 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia (Catholic Univ of America) 5.00%, 10/01/34 | | | 700 | | | | 740,026 | |
District of Columbia (Friendship Pub Charter Sch) ACA 5.00%, 6/01/26 | | | 1,000 | | | | 972,390 | |
District of Columbia Tax Incr 5.25%, 12/01/26 | | | 9,600 | | | | 11,448,480 | |
District of Columbia Wtr & Swr Auth AGC Series 2008A 5.00%, 10/01/23 | | | 4,125 | | | | 4,812,019 | |
Washington DC Conv Ctr Ded Tax AMBAC 5.00%, 10/01/23 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,303,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 23,276,865 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Florida – 6.7% | | | | | | | | |
Beacon Tradeport CDD FL Series 02B 7.25%, 5/01/33 | | | 1,005 | | | | 1,025,070 | |
Bonnet Creek Resort CDD FL Series 02 7.25%, 5/01/18 | | | 4,000 | | | | 3,992,320 | |
Capital Trust Agy FL (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.25%, 1/01/19 | | | 445 | | | | 443,758 | |
Series 03 5.75%, 1/01/32 | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,834,640 | |
Collier Cnty FL IDA (Allete) Series 96 6.50%, 10/01/25 | | | 705 | | | | 707,813 | |
Crossings at Fleming Is CDD FL Series 00C 7.05%, 5/01/15 | | | 790 | | | | 757,025 | |
7.10%, 5/01/30 | | | 2,240 | | | | 2,112,320 | |
Dade Cnty FL HFA MFHR (Golden Lakes Apts) Series 97A 6.00%, 11/01/32 | | | 250 | | | | 249,980 | |
6.05%, 11/01/39 | | | 750 | | | | 748,005 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 19 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Florida HFC MFHR (Sable Chase Apts) AGM Series 00 6.00%, 5/01/40 | | $ | 3,515 | | | $ | 3,534,333 | |
Florida HFC MFHR (Spring Harbor Apts) Series 99C-1 5.90%, 8/01/39 | | | 2,205 | | | | 2,205,198 | |
Florida HFC MFHR (Waverly Apts) AGM Series 00C-1 6.50%, 7/01/40 | | | 2,790 | | | | 2,797,059 | |
Hollywood FL Cmnty Redev Agy (Beach CRA) XLCA 5.00%, 3/01/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,148,650 | |
Jacksonville FL Excise Tax AMBAC Series 02B 5.00%, 10/01/26 | | | 3,925 | | | | 3,974,494 | |
Marshall Creek CDD FL Series 02A 6.625%, 5/01/32 | | | 2,405 | | | | 2,069,238 | |
Miami Beach FL Hlth Fac Auth (Mt. Sinai Medical Center FL) Series 01A 6.80%, 11/15/31 | | | 2,795 | | | | 2,828,288 | |
Miami-Dade Cnty FL Ed Fac Auth (Univ of Miami FL) Series 08A 5.20%, 4/01/24 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,733,350 | |
Miromar Lakes CDD FL Series 00A 7.25%, 5/01/12 | | | 5,160 | | | | 4,902,000 | |
Northern Palm Beach Cnty FL ID #27-B Series 02 6.40%, 8/01/32 | | | 1,020 | | | | 1,021,071 | |
Orange Cnty FL HFA MFHR (Loma Vista Apts) Series 99G 5.50%, 3/01/32 | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,934,240 | |
Orlando FL Spl Assmt Conroy Rd Series 98A 5.80%, 5/01/26 | | | 2,985 | | | | 2,985,627 | |
Palm Beach Cnty FL (Sinai Residences of Boca Raton) 2.00%, 6/01/16 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,526,225 | |
| | |
20 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Pasco Cnty FL HFA MFHR (Pasco Woods Apts) Series 99A 5.90%, 8/01/39 | | $ | 3,620 | | | $ | 3,620,471 | |
Pier Park CDD FL Series 02-1 7.15%, 5/01/34 | | | 3,085 | | | | 3,091,386 | |
Preserve at Wilderness CDD FL Series 02A 7.10%, 5/01/33 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,315 | | | | 1,328,150 | |
Tara CDD FL Series 00A 7.15%, 5/01/31 | | | 1,590 | | | | 1,590,875 | |
Village Ctr CDD FL NPFGC 5.125%, 10/01/28 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,015,230 | |
West Palm Beach Cmnty Redev Agy 5.00%, 3/01/25-3/01/29 | | | 4,620 | | | | 4,804,993 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 65,981,809 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Guam – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Guam COP Series 2010A 6.875%, 12/01/40 | | | 515 | | | | 552,688 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Illinois – 7.4% | | | | | | | | |
Chicago IL Brd of Ed GO AGM Series 07 5.00%, 12/01/24 | | | 15,000 | | | | 16,505,700 | |
Chicago IL GO AGM Series 2010 3682 5.00%, 1/01/29(e) | | | 7,000 | | | | 7,680,190 | |
Chicago IL O’Hare Intl Arpt (O’Hare Intl Arpt) XLCA Series 03B-1 5.25%, 1/01/34 | | | 5,100 | | | | 5,217,708 | |
Chicago IL Recovery Zone (BP PLC) 6.125%, 12/01/18 | | | 4,820 | | | | 5,014,342 | |
Chicago IL SA Lakeshore East Series 03 6.75%, 12/01/32 | | | 1,572 | | | | 1,649,688 | |
Chicago IL Sales Tax AGM Series 05 5.00%, 1/01/25 | | | 6,905 | | | | 7,380,685 | |
Chicago IL Tax Increment (Diversey/Narragansett Proj) 7.46%, 2/15/26 | | | 2,455 | | | | 2,457,087 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 21 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Gilberts IL SSA #1 Series 03 6.00%, 3/01/28 | | $ | 2,312 | | | $ | 2,172,448 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Greenfields of Geneva) Series 2010A 8.25%, 2/15/46 | | | 2,250 | | | | 2,288,183 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Illinois Institute of Technology) Series 06A 5.00%, 4/01/31 | | | 750 | | | | 642,345 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Park Place of Elmhurst) Series 2010A 8.25%, 5/15/45 | | | 2,225 | | | | 2,254,771 | |
Illinois Sports Fac Auth Spl Tax AMBAC Series 01 5.50%, 6/15/30 | | | 7,000 | | | | 7,619,920 | |
Manhattan SSA #2004-1 IL Series 05 5.875%, 3/01/28 | | | 2,181 | | | | 2,148,808 | |
Matteson IL GO 8.00%, 12/01/29(f) | | | 3,350 | | | | 2,917,080 | |
Metro Pier & Expo Auth IL Spl Tax NPFGC Series 02A 5.25%, 6/15/42 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,551,485 | |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth IL 6.00%, 6/01/28 | | | 2,320 | | | | 2,634,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 72,134,730 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Indiana – 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Hendricks Cnty IN GO 5.50%, 7/15/23 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,165 | | | | 1,295,550 | |
Indianapolis IN Loc Bond Bank (Marion Cnty IN Cap Impt Brd) Series 2011K 5.00%, 6/01/27 | | | 6,840 | | | | 7,614,972 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8,910,522 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Kansas – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Lenexa KS Hlth Care Fac (Lakeview Village, Inc.) 5.25%, 5/15/22 | | | 1,260 | | | | 1,220,839 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Louisiana – 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Lafayette LA Communications XLCA 5.25%, 11/01/20-11/01/23 | | | 8,765 | | | | 9,645,054 | |
| | |
22 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Agric Fin Auth (Louisiana Agric Fin Auth Lease) 5.25%, 9/15/17 | | $ | 1,130 | | | $ | 1,208,818 | |
Louisiana Loc Govt Envrn Fac & CDA (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.65%, 1/01/25 | | | 605 | | | | 605,587 | |
Louisiana Loc Govt Envrn Fac & CDA (Jefferson Parish LA) Series 2009A 5.00%, 4/01/26 | | | 715 | | | | 780,315 | |
New Orleans LA GO NPFGC Series 05 5.00%, 12/01/29 | | | 3,990 | | | | 4,085,560 | |
5.25%, 12/01/21 | | | 4,495 | | | | 4,843,497 | |
RADIAN 5.00%, 12/01/18-12/01/19 | | | 4,140 | | | | 4,610,095 | |
RADIAN Series A 5.00%, 12/01/22 | | | 1,060 | | | | 1,138,239 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 26,917,165 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Maryland – 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Anne Arundel Cnty MD Spl Oblig (National Business Park North) 6.10%, 7/01/40 | | | 885 | | | | 917,816 | |
Maryland CDA SFMR (Maryland CDA) Series 00A 6.10%, 7/01/38 | | | 6,285 | | | | 6,291,285 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,209,101 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts – 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Dev Fin Agy (Emerson College) Series A 5.50%, 1/01/30 | | | 4,750 | | | | 5,108,768 | |
Massachusetts Dev Fin Agy (Seven Hills Foundation) RADIAN Series 99 5.15%, 9/01/28 | | | 6,035 | | | | 6,021,361 | |
Massachusetts Hlth & Ed Facs Auth (Berkshire Health Sys) RADIAN Series 01E 5.70%, 10/01/25 | | | 5,800 | | | | 5,861,654 | |
Massachusetts Hlth & Ed Facs Auth (Cape Cod Healthcare) RADIAN Series 01C 5.25%, 11/15/31 | | | 1,600 | | | | 1,614,496 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 23 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Hlth & Ed Facs Auth (Caregroup, Inc.) NPFGC Series 08 5.375%, 2/01/26 | | $ | 1,250 | | | $ | 1,390,000 | |
Massachusetts Hlth & Ed Facs Auth (Mass Eye & Ear Infirmary) Series 2010C 5.375%, 7/01/35 | | | 2,245 | | | | 2,346,586 | |
Massachusetts Port Auth (Delta Airlines, Inc.) AMBAC Series 2001A 5.50%, 1/01/19 | | | 4,000 | | | | 3,876,240 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 26,219,105 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Michigan – 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Detroit MI City SD GO Series 2012A 5.00%, 5/01/27-5/01/30 | | | 7,965 | | | | 8,817,348 | |
Detroit MI Wtr Supply Sys AGM Series 2006A 5.00%, 7/01/24 | | | 9,980 | | | | 10,409,040 | |
Plymouth MI Ed Ctr Charter Sch Series 05 5.375%, 11/01/30 | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,801,600 | |
Wayne State Univ MI Series 2009 5.00%, 11/15/29 | | | 5,215 | | | | 5,671,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 26,699,405 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minnesota – 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Maple Grove MN Hlth Care Sys (Maple Grove Hospital) 5.00%, 5/01/22 | | | 1,350 | | | | 1,429,987 | |
Minneapolis MN Common Bond Fd 6.00%, 12/01/40 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,314,940 | |
Shakopee MN Hlthcare Fac (St Francis Reg Medical Ctr) Series 04 5.10%, 9/01/25 | | | 2,700 | | | | 2,766,447 | |
Tobacco Securitization Auth MN 5.25%, 3/01/31 | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,937,805 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 12,449,179 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Mississippi – 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Mississippi Dev Bank (Mississippi Lease Dept of Corrections) 5.25%, 8/01/27 | | | 15,000 | | | | 16,876,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
24 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Missouri – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Kansas City MO IDA Arpt (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.25%, 1/01/30 | | $ | 1,915 | | | $ | 1,864,942 | |
Kansas City MO Spl Oblig (Kansas City MO Lease – Dntn Arena) Series 08C 5.00%, 4/01/28 | | | 14,000 | | | | 15,197,840 | |
Missouri Dev Finance Brd (Crackerneck Creek MO Tax Alloc) Series 05C 5.00%, 3/01/26 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,022,540 | |
Missouri Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Lutheran Senior Svcs) 5.50%, 2/01/42 | | | 1,880 | | | | 1,969,093 | |
Riverside MO IDA (Riverside Horizons Proj) ACA Series 07A 5.00%, 5/01/27 | | | 650 | | | | 672,321 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 20,726,736 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nevada – 6.4% | | | | | | | | |
Carson City NV Hosp (Carson Tahoe Hospital) RADIAN Series 03A 5.125%, 9/01/29 | | | 4,800 | | | | 4,852,128 | |
Clark Cnty NV Airport PFC (Mccarran Airport) 5.25%, 7/01/18 | | | 9,090 | | | | 10,633,300 | |
Clark Cnty NV GO AMBAC Series 2006 5.00%, 11/01/23 | | | 13,250 | | | | 14,817,342 | |
Clark Cnty NV SD GO NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 6/15/22 | | | 5,720 | | | | 6,293,316 | |
Las Vegas NV Wtr Dist NPFGC-RE Series 05 5.00%, 6/01/27 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,388,000 | |
Nevada GO NPFGC-RE Series 2007B 5.00%, 12/01/25 | | | 5,800 | | | | 6,505,512 | |
Nevada Sys Hgr Ed (Univ of Nevada) AMBAC Series 2005B 5.00%, 7/01/26 | | | 6,715 | | | | 7,218,155 | |
AMBAC Series B 5.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 6,985 | | | | 7,541,216 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 63,248,969 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 25 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
New Hampshire – 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
New Hampshire Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Covenant Health Sys) Series 04 5.375%, 7/01/24 | | $ | 1,680 | | | $ | 1,757,431 | |
New Hampshire Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Dartmouth Hitchcock Oblig Grp) AGM Series 02 5.50%, 8/01/27 | | | 2,250 | | | | 2,269,058 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 4,026,489 | |
| | | | | | | | |
New Jersey – 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
Morris-Union NJ Jt Comm COP RADIAN Series 04 5.00%, 5/01/27 | | | 3,675 | | | | 3,759,819 | |
New Jersey EDA (New Jersey Lease Sch Fac) Series 05 5.25%, 3/01/25 | | | 6,200 | | | | 6,792,410 | |
Union Cnty NJ Util Auth (Union Cnty NJ) Series 2011A 5.25%, 12/01/31 | | | 4,340 | | | | 4,710,419 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 15,262,648 | |
| | | | | | | | |
New Mexico – 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Clayton NM Jail Proj CIFG NA 5.00%, 11/01/25-11/01/27 | | | 13,095 | | | | 13,407,704 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
New York – 9.6% | | | | | | | | |
Erie Cnty NY IDA AGM Series 04 5.75%, 5/01/25 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,100 | | | | 1,219,119 | |
5.75%, 5/01/26 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,433,160 | |
New York NY GO 5.125%, 12/01/27(e) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,154,430 | |
5.25%, 9/01/23 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,870,250 | |
Series 04G 5.00%, 12/01/23 | | | 895 | | | | 987,803 | |
Series 2003A 5.50%, 8/01/21 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 625 | | | | 665,663 | |
5.50%, 8/01/21 | | | 4,375 | | | | 4,642,050 | |
New York NY IDA (Lycee Francais) Series 02C 6.80%, 6/01/28 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,568,700 | |
| | |
26 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
New York NY Mun Wtr Fin Auth Series EE 5.00%, 6/15/31 | | $ | 19,415 | | | $ | 22,414,229 | |
New York NY Trnsl Fin Auth Series 2002B 5.00%, 2/01/27 | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,636,500 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Orange Regl Med Ctr) Series 2008 6.50%, 12/01/21 | | | 1,760 | | | | 1,967,979 | |
New York St HFA (New York St Pers Income Tax) NPFGC-RE Series 05A 5.00%, 9/15/25 | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,315,980 | |
New York St Liberty Corp. (National Sports Museum Proj) 6.125%, 2/15/19(c)(d) | | | 1,188 | | | | 12 | |
New York St Liberty Dev Corp (4 World Trade Ctr Proj) 5.00%, 11/15/31 | | | 2,775 | | | | 3,032,242 | |
New York St Pers Income Tax Series 2010A 5.00%, 3/15/27 | | | 5,355 | | | | 6,328,860 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ 5.00%, 7/15/30 | | | 12,200 | | | | 14,295,838 | |
Triborough Brdg & Tunl Auth NY 5.00%, 1/01/28 | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,748,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 94,281,615 | |
| | | | | | | | |
North Carolina – 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Iredell Cnty NC COP (Iredell Cnty Sch Proj) AGM 5.25%, 6/01/22 | | | 920 | | | | 1,060,696 | |
North Carolina Eastern Mun Pwr Agy AMBAC Series 05A 5.25%, 1/01/20 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,126,990 | |
North Carolina Med Care Comm (Pennybyrn at Maryfield) 6.00%, 10/01/23 | | | 3,305 | | | | 3,079,863 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,267,549 | |
| | | | | | | | |
North Dakota – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Ward Cnty ND Hlth Care Fac (Trinity Health) Series 2006 5.125%, 7/01/18-7/01/20 | | | 2,065 | | | | 2,195,402 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 27 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Ohio – 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
Cleveland OH Inc. Tax (Cleveland Police & Fire Pension) 5.25%, 5/15/24 | | $ | 5,500 | | | $ | 6,217,145 | |
Cleveland OH Pub Pwr Sys NPFGC-RE Series 06A 5.00%, 11/15/18 | | | 2,835 | | | | 3,196,576 | |
Cuyahoga Cnty OH Port Auth (University Square Proj) Series 01 7.35%, 12/01/31 | | | 8,400 | | | | 8,542,128 | |
Toledo-Lucas Cnty OH Port Auth (CSX Corp., Inc.) Series 92 6.45%, 12/15/21 | | | 6,730 | | | | 8,295,667 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 26,251,516 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Oregon – 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Forest Grove OR (Pacific Univ) RADIAN Series 05A 5.00%, 5/01/28 | | | 2,995 | | | | 3,032,318 | |
Oregon Hsg & Cmnty Svc SFMR (Oregon Hsg & Cmnty Svc) Series 02B 5.45%, 7/01/32 | | | 1,330 | | | | 1,330,612 | |
Tri-County Met Trnsp Dist OR Grant Prog Series 2011A 5.00%, 10/01/27 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,456,810 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,819,740 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Montgomery Cnty PA Hgr Ed Fac (Abington Memorial Hosp) Series 02A 5.125%, 6/01/32 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,023,400 | |
Montgomery Cnty PA IDA (New Regional Medical Ctr) 5.25%, 8/01/33 | | | 4,735 | | | | 5,277,063 | |
Pennsylvania IDA (Pennsylvania SRF) Series 08A 5.50%, 7/01/23 | | | 3,940 | | | | 4,552,473 | |
Philadelphia PA IDA (Leadership Learning Partners) Series 05A 5.25%, 7/01/24(d) | | | 1,030 | | | | 907,008 | |
| | |
28 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Pittsburgh & Allegheny PA Sports & Exhibition Auth (Pittsburgh-Allegheny Cnty PA Sales Tax) AGM 5.00%, 2/01/31 | | $ | 6,925 | | | $ | 7,569,579 | |
Susquehanna PA Arpt Fac (Aero Harrisburg LLC) Series 99 5.50%, 1/01/24 | | | 440 | | | | 382,857 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 20,712,380 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico Elec Pwr Auth 5.25%, 7/01/25 | | | 7,090 | | | | 7,727,320 | |
Puerto Rico GO 5.25%, 7/01/23 | | | 1,700 | | | | 1,783,283 | |
Series 01A 5.50%, 7/01/19 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,130,400 | |
Series 03A 5.25%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 500 | | | | 528,605 | |
Series 04A 5.25%, 7/01/19 | | | 2,880 | | | | 3,046,752 | |
Puerto Rico Govt Dev Bank Series 06B 5.00%, 12/01/15 | | | 500 | | | | 543,770 | |
Puerto Rico HFA MFHR (Puerto Rico HFA Cap Fund) 5.125%, 12/01/27 | | | 1,065 | | | | 1,150,924 | |
Univ of Puerto Rico Series 06Q 5.00%, 6/01/19-6/01/20 | | | 4,460 | | | | 4,710,652 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 20,621,706 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island – 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island EDC (Providence Place Mall) RADIAN Series 00 6.125%, 7/01/20 | | | 5,055 | | | | 5,056,314 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
South Carolina – 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Dorchester Cnty SC SD #2 Lease Series 06 5.00%, 12/01/30 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,650,315 | |
AGC 5.00%, 12/01/29 | | | 400 | | | | 441,900 | |
Newberry Inv IN Children SC (Newberry Cnty SC SD Lease) AGC Series 05 5.00%, 12/01/27 | | | 6,225 | | | | 6,493,671 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8,585,886 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 29 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Tennessee – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Sullivan Cnty TN Hlth & Hfb (Wellmont Hlth Sys Proj) Series 06C 5.00%, 9/01/22 | | $ | 1,990 | | | $ | 2,115,390 | |
5.25%, 9/01/26 | | | 275 | | | | 289,861 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,405,251 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Texas – 11.3% | | | | | | | | |
Alvin TX ISD GO Series 2004B 5.00%, 2/15/28 | | | 1,290 | | | | 1,467,594 | |
Bexar Cnty TX Hlth Fac Dev (Army Retirement Residence) 5.00%, 7/01/27 | | | 475 | | | | 484,267 | |
Camino Real Regl Mob Auth TX 5.00%, 2/15/21 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,006,030 | |
Series 2008 5.00%, 8/15/21 | | | 75 | | | | 75,146 | |
Corpus Christi TX Gen Arpt AGM Series 00B 5.375%, 2/15/30 | | | 7,100 | | | | 7,132,660 | |
Dallas Fort Worth TX Intl Arpt NPFGC-RE Series 01 5.50%, 11/01/35 | | | 5,065 | | | | 5,073,256 | |
Ector Cnty TX ISD GO 5.25%, 8/15/27 | | | 160 | | | | 167,365 | |
El Paso Cnty TX Hosp Dist GO AGC Series 2008A 5.00%, 8/15/23 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,757,000 | |
Frisco TX ISD GO 5.00%, 8/15/31 | | | 3,335 | | | | 3,871,802 | |
Grapevine TX Arpt Fac (Cargo Acquisition Group) 6.50%, 1/01/24 | | | 925 | | | | 925,194 | |
Guad Blanco River Auth TX NPFGC Series 04A 5.00%, 8/15/24 | | | 1,895 | | | | 1,904,342 | |
Harrison Cnty TX Hlth Fac Dev Corp. (Good Shepherd Hlth Sys) 5.25%, 7/01/28 | | | 5,700 | | | | 5,824,773 | |
Hidalgo Cnty TX Hlth Fac Svcs (Mission Hospital, Inc.) Series 05 5.00%, 8/15/14-8/15/19 | | | 730 | | | | 757,667 | |
Houston TX IDC (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.375%, 1/01/23 | | | 2,790 | | | | 2,789,777 | |
| | |
30 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Magnolia TX ISD GO 5.00%, 8/15/20 | | $ | 6,165 | | | $ | 7,280,988 | |
North Texas Hgr Ed Auth (United Regl Hlth Care Sys) AGM Series 07 5.00%, 9/01/24 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,089,020 | |
North Texas Tollyway Auth TX (Texas St Hwy Fund Third Tier) Series 2011D 5.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 7,500 | | | | 8,477,625 | |
San Antonio TX Elec & Gas 5.00%, 2/01/25 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 65 | | | | 72,905 | |
5.00%, 2/01/25 | | | 2,435 | | | | 2,659,799 | |
Series 08 5.00%, 2/01/26 | | | 6,830 | | | | 7,730,331 | |
Series 2009A 5.25%, 2/01/24 | | | 3,260 | | | | 3,929,832 | |
San Antonio TX GO Series 02 5.00%, 2/01/22-2/01/23 | | | 840 | | | | 843,083 | |
Seguin Hgr Ed Fac Corp. TX (Texas Lutheran Univ) Series 04 5.25%, 9/01/28 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,015,890 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (Buckingham Senior Living) 5.50%, 11/15/22 | | | 2,210 | | | | 2,259,593 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (MRC Crestview Proj) 8.125%, 11/15/44 | | | 2,150 | | | | 2,291,427 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (Stayton at Museum Way) 8.00%, 11/15/28 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,146,880 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (LBJ Managed Lanes Project) 7.00%, 6/30/40 | | | 9,040 | | | | 10,534,674 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (Nte Mobility Partners LLC Project) 6.875%, 12/31/39 | | | 2,280 | | | | 2,621,065 | |
Texas Turnpike Auth (Central Texas Turnpike) AMBAC Series 02A 5.50%, 8/15/39 | | | 9,500 | | | | 9,528,690 | |
Tyler TX Hlth Fac Dev Corp. (Mother Frances Hosp Reg Hlth) 5.25%, 7/01/26 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,109,700 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 31 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Wichita TX ISD GO Series 2007 5.00%, 2/01/27 | | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | 6,764,280 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 110,592,655 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Utah – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Timber Lakes UT Wtr Spl Svc Dist 8.125%, 6/15/31 | | | 840 | | | | 887,158 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Virginia – 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Bell Creek CDA VA Series 03A 6.75%, 3/01/22 | | | 257 | | | | 261,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Washington – 7.4% | | | | | | | | |
Clark Cnty WA PUD #1 5.00%, 1/01/23 | | | 12,635 | | | | 14,334,155 | |
Energy Northwest WA (Bonneville Power Admin) Series 2006 5.00%, 7/01/24 | | | 4,055 | | | | 4,553,806 | |
AMBAC 5.00%, 7/01/21 | | | 11,470 | | | | 12,586,604 | |
FYI Properties (Washington St Lease Dept Info Svc Proj) 5.25%, 6/01/26 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,494,000 | |
Series 2009 5.00%, 6/01/27 | | | 615 | | | | 675,608 | |
King Cnty WA SD #414 GO NPFGC 5.00%, 12/01/24 | | | 4,500 | | | | 5,075,055 | |
Tacoma WA Refuse Util XLCA Series 06 5.00%, 12/01/18 | | | 3,615 | | | | 4,080,359 | |
Washington St GO 5.00%, 7/01/24(e) | | | 9,000 | | | | 10,732,050 | |
AMBAC 5.00%, 1/01/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,579,400 | |
NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 1/01/27 | | | 6,380 | | | | 7,203,339 | |
Washington St HFC (Skyline at First Hill Proj) Series 2007A 5.625%, 1/01/27-1/01/38 | | | 3,490 | | | | 2,847,420 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 72,161,796 | |
| | | | | | | | |
West Virginia – 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Fairmont WV St College NPFGC-RE Series 02A 5.375%, 6/01/27 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,528,525 | |
| | |
32 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
West Virginia EDA (West Virginia Lottery) Series 2010A 5.00%, 6/15/35 | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 5,507,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8,035,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Wisconsin – 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Milwaukee WI (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.50%, 1/01/25 | | | 1,915 | | | | 1,915,019 | |
Oneida Tribe of Indians WS Retail Sales 6.50%, 2/01/31(g) | | | 2,465 | | | | 2,735,066 | |
Wisconsin Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Ministry Health Care, Inc.) Series 2012A 5.00%, 8/15/32(b) | | | 2,300 | | | | 2,470,131 | |
Wisconsin Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Wheaton Franciscan Hlthcare Sys) 5.25%, 8/15/20 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,448,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 12,569,016 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Municipal Obligations (cost $937,191,880) | | | | | | | 987,675,059 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Shares | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies – 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio, 0.12%(h) (cost $20,995,957) | | | 20,995,957 | | | | 20,995,957 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Investments – 102.8% (cost $958,187,837) | | | | | | | 1,008,671,016 | |
Other assets less liabilities – (2.8)% | | | | | | | (27,578,522 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets – 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 981,092,494 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 33 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
INTEREST RATE SWAP TRANSACTIONS (see Note D)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Rate Type | | | | |
Swap Counterparty | | Notional Amount (000) | | | Termination Date | | | Payments made by the Portfolio | | | Payments received by the Portfolio | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 6,300 | | | | 10/21/16 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.129 | % | | $ | 944,237 | |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 2,500 | | | | 7/30/26 | | | | 4.090 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | | (673,804 | ) |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 2,500 | | | | 11/15/26 | | | | 4.378 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | | (796,985 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (526,552 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | Variable interest rate based on the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index. |
(a) | | Floating Rate Security. Stated interest rate was in effect at April 30, 2012. |
(b) | | When-Issued or delayed delivery security. |
(c) | | Security is in default and is non-income producing. |
(e) | | Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Fund (see Note I). |
(f) | | Indicates a security that has a zero coupon that remains in effect until a predetermined date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until final maturity. |
(g) | | Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. This security is considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At April 30, 2012, the market value of this security amounted to $2,735,066 or 0.3% of net assets. |
(h) | | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end. |
As of April 30, 2012, the Fund held 30.8% of net assets in insured bonds (of this amount 2.6% represents the Fund’s holding in pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity bonds).
Glossary:
ACA – ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation
AGC – Assured Guaranty Corporation
AGM – Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMBAC – Ambac Assurance Corporation
CDA – Community Development Authority
CDD – Community Development District
CFD – Community Facilities District
CIFG NA – CIFG Assurance North America Inc.
COP – Certificate of Participation
CRA – Community Redevelopment Agency
EDA – Economic Development Agency
EDC – Economic Development Corporation
ETM – Escrowed to Maturity
FGIC – Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GO – General Obligation
HFA – Housing Finance Authority
HFC – Housing Finance Corporation
ID – Improvement District
IDA – Industrial Development Authority/Agency
IDC – Industrial Development Corporation
IDR – Industrial Development Revenue Bond
ISD – Independent School District
MFHR – Multi-Family Housing Revenue
NPFGC – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation
| | |
34 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
NPFGC-RE – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation Reinsuring FGIC
PFC – Passenger Facility Charge
PUD – Public Utility District
RADIAN – Radian Asset Assurance Inc.
SD – School District
SFMR – Single Family Mortgage Revenue
SRF – State Revolving Fund
SSA – Special Services Area
USD – Unified School District
XLCA – XL Capital Assurance Inc.
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 35 | |
National Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
HIGH INCOME MUNICIPAL PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 109.9% | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 109.9% | | | | | | | | |
Alabama – 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Cullman Cnty AL Hlth Care Auth (Cullman Regl Med Ctr) Series 2009A 6.25%, 2/01/23 | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,030,330 | |
Jefferson Cnty AL LT Sch Wts Series 2004A 4.75%, 1/01/25 | | | 530 | | | | 496,811 | |
5.00%, 1/01/24 | | | 3,365 | | | | 3,238,140 | |
Montgomery AL Med Clinic BD (Jackson Hospital & Clinic) 5.25%, 3/01/36 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,008,190 | |
Pell City AL Spl Care Fac Fin Auth (Noland Health Services) 5.00%, 12/01/39 | | | 7,875 | | | | 8,091,956 | |
Phenix City AL IDB (Meadwestvaco Corp.) Series 2002A 6.35%, 5/15/35 | | | 4,300 | | | | 4,314,964 | |
Selma AL IDB (International Paper Co.) Series 2010A 5.80%, 5/01/34 | | | 4,615 | | | | 4,969,155 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 23,149,546 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Alaska – 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Koyukuk AK Hlth Care Fac (Tanana Chiefs Conference) 7.75%, 10/01/41 | | | 4,550 | | | | 4,808,804 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Arizona – 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Apache Cnty AZ IDA (Tucson Electric Power Co.) Series A 4.50%, 3/01/30 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,012,540 | |
Arizona Hlth Fac Auth (Beatitudes Campus) 5.10%, 10/01/22 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,365,060 | |
Downtown Phoenix Hotel Corp. AZ FGIC Series 2005A 5.00%, 7/01/40 | | | 6,930 | | | | 6,362,086 | |
Mohave Cnty AZ IDA (Mohave Correctional Fac Prog) 8.00%, 5/01/25 | | | 4,900 | | | | 5,825,512 | |
| | |
36 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Phoenix AZ IDA (Great Hearts Academies) 6.30%, 7/01/42 | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,020,100 | |
Pima Cnty AZ IDA (American Charter Sch Fdntn) Series 2007A 5.50%, 7/01/26 | | | 2,105 | | | | 2,076,351 | |
5.625%, 7/01/38 | | | 3,825 | | | | 3,482,051 | |
Quechan Indian Tribe Series 2012A 9.75%, 5/01/25 | | | 2,400 | | | | 2,430,456 | |
Salt Verde Fin Corp. Gas (Citigroup, Inc.) Series 2007 5.00%, 12/01/37 | | | 16,625 | | | | 16,865,231 | |
Tempe AZ IDA (Friendship Village of Tempe) Series 2012A 6.25%, 12/01/42-12/01/46 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,104,655 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 44,544,042 | |
| | | | | | | | |
California – 15.1% | | | | | | | | |
Assn Bay Area Govt CA Non-Prof (Episcopal Senior Communities) 6.125%, 7/01/41 | | | 2,400 | | | | 2,549,184 | |
Bay Area Toll Authority CA Series 2010 3694 5.00%, 4/01/25(a) | | | 7,570 | | | | 8,514,357 | |
California Ed Fac Auth (California Clg of Arts) 5.00%, 6/01/30 | | | 1,140 | | | | 1,149,006 | |
California Ed Fac Auth (Univ of The Pacific) Series 2012A 5.00%, 11/01/42 | | | 1,300 | | | | 1,396,538 | |
California Mun Fin Auth (Azusa Pacific University) Series 2011B 7.75%, 4/01/31 | | | 3,430 | | | | 3,882,417 | |
California Mun Fin Auth (Emerson College) 6.00%, 1/01/42 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,138,260 | |
California Mun Fin Auth (Goodwill Industries, Inc.) Series 2012A 6.625%, 1/01/32(b) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,000,230 | |
6.875%, 1/01/42(b) | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,500,330 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 37 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
California Mun Fin Auth (UTS Bioenergy LLC) 7.50%, 12/01/32(b) | | $ | 3,910 | | | $ | 4,044,465 | |
| | | | | | | | |
California Poll Cntl Fin Auth (Waste Management, Inc.) 5.125%, 7/01/31 | | | 2,250 | | | | 2,408,288 | |
California Pub Wks Brd (California Pub Wks Brd Lease) Series 2011A 5.00%, 10/01/17 | | | 6,490 | | | | 7,501,726 | |
California Statewide CDA (Amino Inglewood CA High Sch) Series 2011A 7.25%, 8/01/41 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,116,960 | |
California Statewide CDA (Front Porch Communities) 5.125%, 4/01/37(c) | | | 3,300 | | | | 3,303,399 | |
California Statewide CDA (Rocketship Four-Mosiac Elementary) Series 2011A 8.50%, 12/01/41 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,213,600 | |
California Statewide CDA (Rocklin Academy) Series 2011A 8.25%, 6/01/41 | | | 4,050 | | | | 4,277,002 | |
California Statewide CDA (Thomas Jefferson Sch Law) Series 2008A 7.25%, 10/01/38(c) | | | 4,650 | | | | 5,019,303 | |
Chino CA CFD #2009-1 6.75%, 9/01/40 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,031,440 | |
Compton CA CRA (Compton CA Tax Alloc) Series 2010A 5.50%, 8/01/30 | | | 2,635 | | | | 2,715,736 | |
Series 2010B 5.00%, 8/01/25 | | | 1,420 | | | | 1,457,531 | |
Golden St Tobacco Sec CA (Golden St Tob Securitization) Series 2007A-1 5.125%, 6/01/47 | | | 9,890 | | | | 7,326,710 | |
Los Angeles CA Dept Arpts (Los Angeles Intl Airport) Series 2010B 5.00%, 5/15/31 | | | 7,230 | | | | 7,925,309 | |
| | |
38 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Los Angeles CA Regl Arpts Impt Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.) Series 2002C 7.50%, 12/01/24 | | $ | 4,625 | | | $ | 4,618,617 | |
Los Angeles CA USD GO Series 2010 3670 5.25%, 7/01/25(a) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,166,490 | |
Norco CA Redev Agy (Norco CA Redev Agy Proj #1) Series 2010 6.00%, 3/01/36 | | | 450 | | | | 479,120 | |
Oakland CA USD GO Series 2012A 5.50%, 8/01/32 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,606,650 | |
Richmond CA Cmnty Redev Agy (Richmond CA Merged Proj Areas) Series 2010A 6.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,235 | | | | 1,333,899 | |
San Buenaventura CA Hosp (Community Memorial Hlth System) 7.50%, 12/01/41 | | | 4,500 | | | | 5,283,945 | |
San Francisco City/Cnty CA COP Series 2009A 5.00%, 4/01/29 | | | 3,115 | | | | 3,330,465 | |
San Jose CA Arpt Series 2007A 5.00%, 3/01/37 | | | 9,745 | | | | 9,785,734 | |
Southern CA Logistics Arpt Auth Proj 5.00%, 12/01/36 | | | 3,600 | | | | 2,167,848 | |
Southern CA Pub Pwr Auth (Los Angeles CA Dept W&P Pwr) 5.25%, 7/01/27(a) | | | 9,960 | | | | 11,813,159 | |
Tejon Ranch CA Pub Fac Fin CFD #2008-1 Series 2010A 7.375%, 9/01/40 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,064,640 | |
Tobacco Securitization Auth Southern CA Series 2006A1-SNR 5.125%, 6/01/46 | | | 10,800 | | | | 8,106,588 | |
Vernon CA Elec Sys Series 2012A 5.50%, 8/01/41 | | | 1,400 | | | | 1,448,650 | |
West Contra Costa CA Hlth Dist 6.25%, 7/01/42 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,477,550 | |
Yucaipa CA CFD #98-1 5.375%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,700 | | | | 1,775,293 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 134,930,439 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 39 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
Colorado – 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Colorado Hlth Fac Auth (American Baptist Homes of The Midwest) Series 2009A 7.75%, 8/01/39 | | $ | 965 | | | $ | 1,022,253 | |
Denver CO City & Cnty Arpt (Denver Intl Airport) 5.00%, 11/15/15 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,807,350 | |
Series 2011B 5.00%, 11/15/17 | | | 8,020 | | | | 9,219,872 | |
| | | | | | | | |
E-470 Pub Hwy Auth CO 5.25%, 9/01/25 | | | 600 | | | | 644,724 | |
5.375%, 9/01/26 | | | 3,800 | | | | 4,096,970 | |
Fitzsimons Vlg Met Dist #1 CO Series 2010A 7.50%, 3/01/40 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,562,715 | |
Park Creek Met Dist CO 5.50%, 12/01/37 | | | 2,300 | | | | 2,452,053 | |
Regional Trnsp Dist CO (Denver Transit Partners) 6.00%, 1/15/41 | | | 5,810 | | | | 6,372,408 | |
Three Springs Metro District #3 CO Series 2010 7.75%, 12/01/39 | | | 2,550 | | | | 2,623,619 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 30,801,964 | |
| | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia – 2.5% | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia (American Society of Hematology) 5.00%, 7/01/36-7/01/42(b) | | | 3,400 | | | | 3,538,092 | |
District of Columbia (Center for Strategic and Intl Studies DC) 6.625%, 3/01/41 | | | 1,850 | | | | 2,001,885 | |
District of Columbia (Howard Univ) Series 2011A 6.25%, 10/01/32 | | | 4,205 | | | | 4,813,211 | |
District of Columbia Pers Income Tax 5.00%, 12/01/29(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,735,800 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 22,088,988 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Florida – 6.5% | | | | | | | | |
Alachua Cnty FL Hlth Fac Auth (Terraces At Bonita Springs) 8.125%, 11/15/46 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,196,150 | |
Capital Trust Agency FL (Million Air One) 7.75%, 1/01/41 | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,818,285 | |
| | |
40 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Citizens Ppty Ins Corp. FL AGM 5.00%, 6/01/15 | | $ | 6,105 | | | $ | 6,700,787 | |
Lee Cnty FL IDA (Shell Point/Alliance Oblig Group) 5.00%, 11/15/22-11/15/32 | | | 2,600 | | | | 2,541,069 | |
Lee Cnty FL Port Auth Arpt (Southwest Florida Intl Airport) AGM Series 2011A 5.00%, 10/01/27 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,336,300 | |
Martin Cnty FL Hlth Fac Auth (Martin Mem Med Ctr) 5.50%, 11/15/42 | | | 7,400 | | | | 7,638,058 | |
Miami Beach FL Hlth Fac Auth (Mt. Sinai Medical Center FL) 5.375%, 11/15/28 | | | 1,120 | | | | 1,121,109 | |
6.75%, 11/15/21 | | | 2,970 | | | | 3,232,875 | |
Miami-Dade Cnty FL Aviation (Miami-Dade Intl Airport) 5.00%, 10/01/33 | | | 3,850 | | | | 3,982,478 | |
Mid-Bay Brdg Auth FL Series 2011A 7.25%, 10/01/40 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,639,480 | |
Palm Beach Cnty FL (Sinai Residences of Boca Raton) 2.00%, 6/01/16 | | | 2,450 | | | | 2,475,700 | |
Palm Beach Cnty FL Hlth Fac Auth (Waterford Retirement Communities) 5.875%, 11/15/37 | | | 4,250 | | | | 4,499,220 | |
St. John’s Cnty FL IDA (Presbyterian Retirement Svc) Series 2010A 5.875%, 8/01/40 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,292,400 | |
Volusia Cnty FL Ed Fac Auth (Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ) RADIAN Series 2005 5.00%, 10/15/35 | | | 1,840 | | | | 1,797,717 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 58,271,628 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Georgia – 2.4% | | | | | | | | |
Appling Cnty Dev Auth GA (Oglethorpe Power Corp.) 2.50%, 1/01/38 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,026,320 | |
De Kalb Cnty GA Hosp Auth (De Kalb Medical Center) 6.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,115,650 | |
6.125%, 9/01/40 | | | 6,100 | | | | 6,662,115 | |
Metro Atlanta Rapid Tran Auth GA 5.00%, 7/01/29(a) | | | 10,220 | | | | 11,391,927 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 21,196,012 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 41 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Guam – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Guam COP Series 2010A 6.875%, 12/01/40 | | $ | 910 | | | $ | 976,594 | |
Guam GO Series 2009A 7.00%, 11/15/39 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,093,410 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,070,004 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Idaho – 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Idaho Hsg & Fin Assn (Battelle Energy Alliance LLC TDF Proj) Series 2010A 7.00%, 2/01/36 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,394,160 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Illinois – 7.1% | | | | | | | | |
Chicago IL GO AGM Series 2010 3682 5.00%, 1/01/29(a) | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,291,510 | |
Chicago IL O’Hare Intl Arpt (O’Hare Intl Arpt) Series 2010B 5.00%, 1/01/26 | | | 1,285 | | | | 1,410,776 | |
Chicago IL Recovery Zone (BP PLC) 6.125%, 12/01/18 | | | 3,215 | | | | 3,344,629 | |
Chicago IL Tax Increment (Metramarket Chicago Proj) Series 2010A 6.87%, 2/15/24 | | | 1,260 | | | | 1,333,564 | |
Chicago IL Transit Authority Sales Tax 5.25%, 12/01/31 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,637,300 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Greenfields of Geneva) Series 2010A 8.25%, 2/15/46 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,067,880 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Illinois Institute of Technology) 5.00%, 4/01/19 | | | 2,980 | | | | 2,839,165 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Navistar International Corp.) 6.50%, 10/15/40 | | | 1,900 | | | | 2,056,313 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (OSF Healthcare Sys) 6.00%, 5/15/39 | | | 5,860 | | | | 6,509,522 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Park Place of Elmhurst) Series 2010A 8.125%, 5/15/40 | | | 1,250 | | | | 1,261,275 | |
8.25%, 5/15/45 | | | 2,775 | | | | 2,812,130 | |
| | |
42 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Illinois Finance Auth (Provena Health) Series B 6.00%, 5/01/34 | | $ | 2,025 | | | $ | 2,215,694 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Swedish Covenant Hospital) 6.00%, 8/15/38 | | | 3,360 | | | | 3,729,499 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (The Admiral at The Lake) Series 2010A 8.00%, 5/15/46 | | | 4,800 | | | | 5,016,096 | |
Illinois Finance Auth (Uno Charter Sch Network, Inc.) Series 2011A 7.125%, 10/01/41 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,712,925 | |
Illinois GO 5.00%, 3/01/33 | | | 4,900 | | | | 5,188,414 | |
Matteson IL GO 8.00%, 12/01/29(d) | | | 5,000 | | | | 4,353,850 | |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth IL 6.00%, 6/01/28 | | | 4,885 | | | | 5,546,771 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 63,327,313 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Indiana – 3.3% | | | | | | | | |
Indiana Finance Auth (Kings Daughters Hospital) 5.50%, 8/15/40 | | | 6,000 | | | | 6,103,200 | |
Indiana Mun Pwr Agy Series 2011A 5.00%, 1/01/31 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,352,440 | |
Indianapolis IN Loc Bond Bank (Marion Cnty IN Cap Impt Brd) Series 2011K 5.00%, 6/01/27 | | | 1,800 | | | | 2,003,940 | |
Knox Cnty IN Econ Dev (Good Samaritan Hospital) Series 2012A 5.00%, 4/01/37-4/01/42(b) | | | 11,740 | | | | 12,213,141 | |
Whiting IN Envrn Fac (BP PLC) 5.00%, 1/01/16 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,598,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 29,271,021 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Iowa – 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin Corp. IA Series 2005C 5.625%, 6/01/46 | | | 8,500 | | | | 6,943,395 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 43 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Kansas – 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Wyandotte Cnty/Kansas City KS Uni Govt (Wyandotte Cnty/Kansas City KS Sales Tax) Series 2010B Zero Coupon, 6/01/21 | | $ | 9,250 | | | $ | 6,247,635 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Kentucky – 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky Econ Dev Fin Auth (Baptist Healthcare Sys) 5.25%, 8/15/46 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,145,620 | |
Kentucky Econ Dev Fin Auth (Owensboro Med Hlth Sys) Series 2010A 6.00%, 6/01/30 | | | 3,540 | | | | 4,050,751 | |
6.375%, 6/01/40 | | | 2,900 | | | | 3,317,513 | |
Louisville & Jefferson Cnty KY (Norton Healthcare) 5.25%, 10/01/36 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,072,280 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 11,586,164 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Louisiana – 2.8% | | | | | | | | |
Jefferson Parish LA Hosp Svc Dist #2 (East Jefferson General Hospital) 6.375%, 7/01/41 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,826,500 | |
Louisiana Gas and Fuels Tax 5.00%, 5/01/26(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,154,400 | |
Louisiana Loc Govt Envrn Fac & CDA (Woman’s Hospital Foundation) Series 2010A 5.625%, 10/01/30 | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,331,736 | |
5.875%, 10/01/40 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,292,680 | |
6.00%, 10/01/44 | | | 1,740 | | | | 1,918,454 | |
St John Baptist Parish LA (Marathon Oil Corp.) Series 2007A 5.125%, 6/01/37 | | | 4,800 | | | | 4,972,128 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 25,495,898 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Maine – 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Maine Hlth & Higher Edl Facs (Maine General Medical Center) 6.75%, 7/01/41 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,363,090 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Maryland – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Anne Arundel Cnty MD Spl Oblig (National Business Park North) 6.10%, 7/01/40 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,037,080 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
44 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Massachusetts – 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts Port Auth (Delta Airlines, Inc.) AMBAC Series 2001A 5.00%, 1/01/27 | | $ | 1,475 | | | $ | 1,302,130 | |
5.50%, 1/01/13-1/01/19 | | | 6,800 | | | | 6,676,421 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,978,551 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Michigan – 3.2% | | | | | | | | |
Detroit MI City SD GO Series 2012A 5.00%, 5/01/30(e) | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,092,920 | |
5.00%, 5/01/31 | | | 3,015 | | | | 3,284,722 | |
Detroit MI Wtr Supply Sys Series 2011C 5.25%, 7/01/27 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,217,600 | |
Michigan Hosp Fin Auth (Henry Ford Hlth Sys) Series 2006A 5.25%, 11/15/46 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,038,740 | |
Michigan Hosp Fin Auth (Presbyterian Villages of Michigan) 5.50%, 11/15/35 | | | 1,750 | | | | 1,567,545 | |
Michigan Pub Edl Fac Auth (Dr. Joseph F. Pollack – Pace) 8.00%, 4/01/30 | | | 1,195 | | | | 1,305,179 | |
Series 2010 8.00%, 4/01/40 | | | 500 | | | | 543,200 | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin Corp. MI Series 2007A 6.00%, 6/01/48 | | | 7,430 | | | | 5,830,544 | |
Wayne Cnty MI Arpt Auth (Detroit Metro Wayne Cnty Arpt) 5.00%, 12/01/14 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,288,480 | |
NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 12/01/27 | | | 4,630 | | | | 4,761,307 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 28,930,237 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minnesota – 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Cottage Grove MN Sr Hsg (PHS Cottage Grove, Inc.) Series 2006A 6.00%, 12/01/46 | | | 1,775 | | | | 1,780,769 | |
Minneapolis-St Paul MN Metro Arpt Commn (Minneapolis-St Paul MN Intl Arpt) FGIC Series 2007B 5.00%, 1/01/22 | | | 2,750 | | | | 3,015,072 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 45 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
St. Louis Park MN Hlth Care Facs (Park Nicollet Health Svcs) Series 2009 5.75%, 7/01/39 | | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 3,300,390 | |
Tobacco Securitization Auth MN 5.25%, 3/01/31 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,097,290 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 9,193,521 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Missouri – 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Missouri Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Lutheran Senior Svcs) 5.50%, 2/01/42 | | | 1,520 | | | | 1,592,033 | |
6.00%, 2/01/41 | | | 1,750 | | | | 1,904,892 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 3,496,925 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nebraska – 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Central Plains Energy Proj Gas (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) 5.00%, 9/01/42(b) | | | 4,825 | | | | 4,836,242 | |
5.25%, 9/01/37(b) | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,594,725 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,430,967 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nevada – 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Reno NV Hosp (Renown Regl Med Ctr) Series 2007A 5.25%, 6/01/41 | | | 7,870 | | | | 8,145,844 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
New Hampshire – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
New Hampshire Bus Fin Auth (Waste Management, Inc.) Series 2010 3.50%, 8/01/24 | | | 1,450 | | | | 1,486,250 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
New Jersey – 3.8% | | | | | | | | |
Burlington Cnty NJ Brdg Commn (The Evergreens) 5.625%, 1/01/38 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,517,360 | |
New Jersey EDA (Continental Airlines) 6.25%, 9/15/29 | | | 5,705 | | | | 5,730,387 | |
6.40%, 9/15/23 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,009,990 | |
7.00%, 11/15/30 | | | 3,535 | | | | 3,549,564 | |
Series 1999 6.25%, 9/15/19 | | | 375 | | | | 376,500 | |
New Jersey Hlth Care Fac Fin Auth (Holy Name Hospital) 5.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 5,240 | | | | 5,486,228 | |
New Jersey Hlth Care Fac Fin Auth (St Joseph Health Sys) 6.625%, 7/01/38 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,715,670 | |
| | |
46 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
New Jersey Hlth Care Fac Fin Auth (Trinitas Regional Medical Center) Series 2007A 5.25%, 7/01/30 | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 2,080,420 | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin Corp. NJ Series 2007 1A 4.75%, 6/01/34 | | | 3,000 | | | | 2,316,210 | |
5.00%, 6/01/41 | | | 7,480 | | | | 5,908,602 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 33,690,931 | |
| | | | | | | | |
New York – 7.9% | | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Trnsp Auth NY Series 2011D 5.00%, 11/15/25 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,889,425 | |
Metropolitan Trnsp Auth NY (Metro Trnsp Auth NY Ded Tax) 5.00%, 11/15/31(a) | | | 10,740 | | | | 12,166,487 | |
Nassau Cnty NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) Series 2007A 6.50%, 1/01/27 | | | 1,865 | | | | 1,521,784 | |
6.70%, 1/01/43 | | | 2,190 | | | | 1,628,813 | |
New York NY GO 5.125%, 12/01/27(a) | | | 7,340 | | | | 8,473,516 | |
New York NY IDA (American Airlines, Inc.) 7.75%, 8/01/31 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,052,400 | |
8.00%, 8/01/28 | | | 5,550 | | | | 5,695,909 | |
Series 2005 7.50%, 8/01/16 | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,139,759 | |
New York NY Transitional Fin Auth 5.00%, 2/01/26(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,712,400 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (New York St Pers Income Tax) Series 20103800 5.00%, 2/15/29(a) | | | 7,500 | | | | 8,492,850 | |
New York St Liberty Dev Corp. (7 World Trade Ctr Proj) 5.00%, 3/15/44 | | | 1,900 | | | | 1,970,319 | |
Newburgh NY CSD GO 4.75%, 6/29/12 | | | 2,375 | | | | 2,374,905 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ (Delta Airlines, Inc.) 6.00%, 12/01/42 | | | 2,285 | | | | 2,573,344 | |
Suffolk Cnty NY IDA (New York Institute of Technology) 5.00%, 3/01/26 | | | 50 | | | | 51,389 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 47 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Ulster Cnty NY IDA (Kingston Regl Sr Lvg Corp.) 5.25%, 9/15/16 | | $ | 1,250 | | | $ | 1,052,838 | |
6.00%, 9/15/27 | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,426,760 | |
Series A 6.00%, 9/15/37 | | | 3,000 | | | | 2,086,770 | |
Yonkers NY GO Series 2011A 5.00%, 10/01/17 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,348,330 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 70,657,998 | |
| | | | | | | | |
North Carolina – 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina Med Care Comm (Galloway Ridge at Fearrington) 6.00%, 1/01/39 | | | 1,020 | | | | 1,075,549 | |
North Carolina Med Care Comm (Pennybyrn at Maryfield) Series A 6.125%, 10/01/35 | | | 6,350 | | | | 5,550,154 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,625,703 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Ohio – 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
Buckeye OH Tob Stlmnt Fin Auth Series 2007A-2 5.875%, 6/01/47 | | | 10,150 | | | | 7,893,655 | |
Cleveland OH Arpt Sys Series 2012A 5.00%, 1/01/29-1/01/30 | | | 9,000 | | | | 9,665,190 | |
Erie Cnty OH Hosp (Firelands Regional Med Ctr) 5.25%, 8/15/46 | | | 3,710 | | | | 3,746,506 | |
Series 2002A 5.625%, 8/15/32 | | | 2,225 | | | | 2,254,392 | |
Series 2006A 5.00%, 8/15/36 | | | 1,290 | | | | 1,293,354 | |
Gallia Cnty OH Hosp (Holzer Health Sys) Series 2012A 8.00%, 7/01/42 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,178,350 | |
Lorain Cnty OH Port Auth (United States Steel Corp.) 6.75%, 12/01/40 | | | 1,250 | | | | 1,384,463 | |
Pinnacle Cmnty Infra Fin Auth (Pinnacle Club of Grove City) Series 04A 6.00%, 12/01/22 | | | 1,252 | | | | 1,174,539 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 32,590,449 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
48 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Oregon – 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Oregon Dept of Admin Svcs (Oregon Lottery) Series 2011A 5.25%, 4/01/25(a) | | $ | 7,310 | | | $ | 8,906,796 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Pennsylvania – 4.8% | | | | | | | | |
Allegheny Cnty PA Hgr Ed Bldg Auth (Chatham Univ) Series 2012A 5.00%, 9/01/35 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,030,040 | |
Allegheny Cnty PA IDA (United States Steel Corp.) 6.75%, 11/01/24 | | | 2,875 | | | | 3,184,379 | |
Cumberland Cnty PA Mun Auth (Asbury Atlantic, Inc.) 6.125%, 1/01/45 | | | 4,170 | | | | 4,283,591 | |
Montgomery Cnty PA IDA (Philadelphia Presbyterian Homes, Inc.) 6.50%, 12/01/25 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,500,680 | |
Norristown PA Area SD COP 5.00%, 4/01/32(b) | | | 3,900 | | | | 3,915,249 | |
Pennsylvania Econ Dev Fin Auth (Amtrak) Series 2012A 5.00%, 11/01/41 | | | 8,620 | | | | 8,992,039 | |
Pennsylvania St 5.00%, 11/15/29(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,792,800 | |
Philadelphia PA Arpt (Philadelphia Intl Airport) Series 2011A 5.00%, 6/15/25 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,458,450 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 43,157,228 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico – 3.7% | | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Swr Auth Series 2012A 5.25%, 7/01/42 | | | 11,500 | | | | 11,499,195 | |
Puerto Rico Elec Pwr Auth 5.25%, 7/01/25 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,269,670 | |
Series 2010ZZ 5.25%, 7/01/23 | | | 2,455 | | | | 2,726,302 | |
Series 2012A 5.00%, 7/01/42(b) | | | 6,525 | | | | 6,514,495 | |
Puerto Rico GO Series 2012A 5.00%, 7/01/41 | | | 3,820 | | | | 3,773,510 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 49 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Puerto Rico Pub Fin Corp. Series B 6.00%, 8/01/26 | | $ | 1,620 | | | $ | 1,858,772 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Fin Corp. 5.00%, 8/01/24 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,354,780 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 32,996,724 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island – 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island Hlth & Ed Bldg Corp. (Tockwotton Home) 8.375%, 1/01/46 | | | 4,500 | | | | 4,706,010 | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin Corp. RI (Rhode Island Tobacco Asset Sec) 6.25%, 6/01/42 | | | 3,160 | | | | 3,174,315 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 7,880,325 | |
| | | | | | | | |
South Carolina – 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina St Public Svc A | | | | | | | | |
5.00%, 1/01/32(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,954,700 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
South Dakota – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Sioux Falls SD Hlth Fac (Dow Rummel Village) 5.00%, 11/15/26 | | | 1,020 | | | | 955,811 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Tennessee – 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Johnson City TN Hlth & Ed (Mountain States Health Alliance Auxiliar) 5.50%, 7/01/36 | | | 6,815 | | | | 7,120,517 | |
Memphis Shelby Cnty Arpt Auth TN (Memphis Intl Airport) Series 2011A-2 5.00%, 7/01/15 | | | 3,135 | | | | 3,460,162 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 10,580,679 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Texas – 9.6% | | | | | | | | |
Austin TX Convention Ctr Enterprise Series 2006B 6.00%, 1/01/20(c) | | | 1,195 | | | | 1,292,476 | |
Brazos River TX Hbr Nav Dist (Dow Chemical Co.) Series 2008A 5.95%, 5/15/33 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,392,250 | |
Central TX Regl Mobility Auth 6.00%, 1/01/41 | | | 5,600 | | | | 6,162,856 | |
Clifton TX Hgr Ed Fac Auth (Idea Public Schools) 5.75%, 8/15/41 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,089,170 | |
| | |
50 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Harrison Cnty TX Hlth Fac Dev Corp. (Good Shepherd Hlth Sys) 5.25%, 7/01/28 | | $ | 3,800 | | | $ | 3,883,182 | |
Houston TX Arpt Sys Series 2012A 5.00%, 7/01/32 | | | 1,815 | | | | 1,924,735 | |
Houston TX Util Sys Series 2011D 5.00%, 11/15/28(a) | | | 9,600 | | | | 11,164,320 | |
Love Field Arpt Modernization Corp. TX (Southwest Airlines Co.) 5.25%, 11/01/40 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,613,750 | |
North Texas Ed Fin Corp. (Uplift Education) Series A 5.125%, 12/01/42 | | | 3,765 | | | | 3,789,887 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (Buckingham Senior Living) 5.25%, 11/15/16 | | | 750 | | | | 785,025 | |
5.50%, 11/15/22 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,089,760 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (MRC Crestview Proj) 8.125%, 11/15/44 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,197,340 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (Northwest Sr Hsg Corp. – Edgemere Proj) Series 2006A 6.00%, 11/15/36 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,571,675 | |
Tarrant Cnty TX Cult Ed Fac Fin Corp. (Stayton at Museum Way) 8.00%, 11/15/28 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,146,880 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (LBJ Managed Lanes Project) 7.00%, 6/30/40 | | | 7,450 | | | | 8,681,783 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners LLC Project) 6.875%, 12/31/39 | | | 6,450 | | | | 7,414,855 | |
Travis Cnty TX Hlth Fac (Longhorn Village) Series A 7.00%, 1/01/32 | | | 8,000 | | | | 8,045,280 | |
Tyler TX Hlth Fac Dev Corp. (East Texas Medical Center) 5.375%, 11/01/37 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,515,975 | |
Tyler TX Hlth Fac Dev Corp. (Mother Frances Hosp Reg Hlth) 5.00%, 7/01/33 | | | 2,400 | | | | 2,450,136 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 51 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Series 2007B 5.00%, 7/01/37 | | $ | 3,520 | | | $ | 3,593,533 | |
Viridian Mun Mgmt Dist TX 9.00%, 12/01/37 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,260,520 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 86,065,388 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Utah – 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
Timber Lakes UT Wtr Spl Svc Dist 8.125%, 6/15/31 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,224,560 | |
Utah St Charter Sch Fin Auth (Early Light Academy) 8.50%, 7/15/46 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,124,260 | |
Utah St Charter Sch Fin Auth (Hawthorn Academy) 8.25%, 7/15/46 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,106,520 | |
Utah St Charter Sch Fin Auth (North Star Academy) Series 2010A 7.00%, 7/15/45 | | | 1,840 | | | | 1,939,323 | |
Utah St Charter Sch Fin Auth (Vista at Entrada Sch of Performing Arts) | | | | | | | | |
6.30%, 7/15/32 | | | 850 | | | | 858,814 | |
6.55%, 7/15/42 | | | 1,890 | | | | 1,909,354 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 13,162,831 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Virginia – 3.0% | | | | | | | | |
Mosaic Dist VA CDA Series 2011A 6.875%, 3/01/36 | | | 2,915 | | | | 3,179,274 | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin Corp. VA Series 2007B1 5.00%, 6/01/47 | | | 11,990 | | | | 8,197,683 | |
Virginia Commonwealth Transp Brd Tr 5.00%, 5/15/26(a)
| | | 8,275 | | | | 9,828,052 | |
Virginia Small Business Fin Auth (Elizabeth River Crossing LLC) | | | | | | | | |
5.50%, 1/01/42(b) | | | 5,400 | | | | 5,547,690 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 26,752,699 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Washington – 3.8% | | | | | | | | |
Seattle WA Mun Light & PWR 5.00%, 2/01/26(a) | | | 7,500 | | | | 8,784,300 | |
Washington St 5.00%, 7/01/25(a) | | | 10,000 | | | | 11,794,500 | |
Washington St GO 5.00%, 7/01/24(a) | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,962,250 | |
| | |
52 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
Washington St HFC (Skyline at First Hill Proj) Series 2007A 5.625%, 1/01/27-1/01/38 | | $ | 5,425 | | | $ | 4,402,093 | |
Washington St Hgr Ed Fac Auth (Whitworth Univ) 5.25%, 10/01/46 | | | 3,250 | | | | 3,382,340 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 34,325,483 | |
| | | | | | | | |
West Virginia – 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
West Virginia Hosp Fin Auth (Thomas Health Sys) 6.50%, 10/01/38 | | | 2,445 | | | | 2,476,712 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Wisconsin – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Oneida Tribe of Indians WS Retail Sales 6.50%, 2/01/31(c) | | | 435 | | | | 482,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Wisconsin St Hlth & Ed Fac Auth (Wheaton Franciscan Hlthcare Sys) 5.25%, 8/15/24 | | | 1,490 | | | | 1,577,596 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,060,255 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Municipal Obligations (cost $929,429,725) | | | | | | | 984,030,190 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Shares | | | | |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies – 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio, 0.12%(f) (cost $14,697,666) | | | 14,697,666 | | | | 14,697,666 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Investments – 111.6% (cost $944,127,391) | | | | | | | 998,727,856 | |
Other assets less liabilities – (11.6)% | | | | | | | (103,414,541 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets – 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 895,313,315 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 53 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
INTEREST RATE SWAP TRANSACTIONS (see Note D)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Rate Type | | | | |
Swap Counterparty | | Notional Amount (000) | | | Termination Date | | | Payments made by the Portfolio | | | Payments received by the Portfolio | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | | $ | 15,000 | | | | 12/2/24 | | | | 3.013 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | $ | (1,973,913) | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA | | | 8,500 | | | | 7/9/25 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 3.167 | % | | | 1,259,510 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. | | | 2,500 | | | | 3/17/22 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 3.073 | % | | | 340,286 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. | | | 3,000 | | | | 6/11/22 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 2.965 | % | | | 378,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 4,646 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | Variable interest rate based on the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index. |
CREDIT DEFAULT SWAP CONTRACTS ON INDICES (see Note D)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Swap Counterparty & Referenced Obligation | | Fixed Deal (Pay) Receive Rate | | | Implied Credit Spread at April 30, 2012 | | | Notional Amount (000) | | | Market Value | | | Upfront Premiums Paid (Received) | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
Sale Contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc.: CDX-NAHYS 5.00% 12/20/16* | | | 5.00 | % | | | 5.53 | % | | $ | 21,340 | | | $ | (302,317 | ) | | $ | (1,127,807 | ) | | $ | 825,490 | |
(a) | | Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Fund (see Note I). |
(b) | | When-Issued or delayed delivery security. |
(c) | | Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At April 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $10,097,837 or 1.1% of net assets. |
(d) | | Indicates a security that has a zero coupon that remains in effect until a predetermined date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until final maturity. |
(e) | | Position, or a portion thereof, has been segregated to collateralize interest rate swaps. The aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $709,800. |
(f) | | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end. |
As of April 30, 2012, the Fund held 4.4% of net assets in insured bonds (of this amount 0.0% represents the Fund’s holding in pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity bonds).
Glossary:
AGM – Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMBAC – Ambac Assurance Corporation
CDA – Community Development Authority
CFD – Community Facilities District
COP – Certificate of Participation
CRA – Community Redevelopment Agency
| | |
54 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
CSD – Central/Community School District
EDA – Economic Development Agency
FGIC – Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
GO – General Obligation
HFC – Housing Finance Corporation
IDA – Industrial Development Authority/Agency
IDB – Industrial Development Board
NPFGC-RE – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation Reinsuring FGIC
RADIAN – Radian Asset Assurance Inc.
SD – School District
USD – Unified School District
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 55 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
CALIFORNIA PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 102.6% | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 102.6% | | | | | | | | |
California – 93.4% | | | | | | | | |
Acalanes CA UHSD GO AGM Series 05B 5.25%, 8/01/24 | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 5,556,200 | |
Banning CA Util Auth Wtr NPFGC-RE Series 05 5.25%, 11/01/30 | | | 8,405 | | | | 8,840,295 | |
Bay Area Toll Auth CA Series 2009F1 5.25%, 4/01/27 | | | 7,500 | | | | 8,791,050 | |
Series 2010S-2 5.00%, 10/01/30 | | | 2,350 | | | | 2,597,643 | |
Beaumont CA Fing Auth AMBAC Series C 5.00%, 9/01/26 | | | 3,305 | | | | 3,313,659 | |
Butte-Glenn CCD CA GO NPFGC Series 05B 5.00%, 8/01/25 | | | 3,620 | | | | 3,951,049 | |
California Dept Wtr Res Cen Vy 5.00%, 12/01/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,857,450 | |
Series 2008AE 5.00%, 12/01/27 | | | 2,680 | | | | 3,094,784 | |
Series 2009AF 5.00%, 12/01/29 | | | 2,225 | | | | 2,537,234 | |
Series 2012AL 5.00%, 12/01/29(a) | | | 5,150 | | | | 6,017,363 | |
Series 2013 AM 5.00%, 12/01/25(a) | | | 7,700 | | | | 9,070,985 | |
California Econ Recovery (California Econ Rec Spl Tax) Series 2009A 5.25%, 7/01/21 | | | 5,725 | | | | 6,951,982 | |
California Ed Fac Auth (California Clg of Arts) Series 01 5.875%, 6/01/30 | | | 2,200 | | | | 2,201,760 | |
California Ed Fac Auth (Univ of The Pacific) 5.00%, 11/01/21-11/01/26 | | | 1,890 | | | | 2,096,147 | |
Series 04 5.00%, 11/01/20 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,059,100 | |
5.25%, 5/01/34 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,027,000 | |
Series 2012A 5.00%, 11/01/30 | | | 1,250 | | | | 1,375,950 | |
| | |
56 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
California GO 5.00%, 8/01/22-2/01/32 | | $ | 17,180 | | | $ | 18,601,400 | |
5.00%, 2/01/32 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 4,420 | | | | 4,680,117 | |
5.125%, 6/01/31 | | | 20 | | | | 20,025 | |
5.25%, 2/01/30-4/01/30 | | | 7,580 | | | | 7,592,203 | |
5.30%, 4/01/29 | | | 5 | | | | 5,276 | |
Series 03 5.25%, 2/01/24 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,694,215 | |
California Hlth Fac Fin Auth (Catholic Healthcare West) Series G 5.50%, 7/01/25 | | | 3,180 | | | | 3,584,019 | |
California Hlth Fac Fin Auth (Cottage Healthcare Sys) NPFGC Series 03B 5.00%, 11/01/23 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,544,625 | |
California Mun Fin Auth (UTS Bioenergy LLC) 7.50%, 12/01/32(a) | | | 2,825 | | | | 2,922,152 | |
California Poll Cntl Fin Auth (Tracy Material Recovery) ACA Series 99A 5.70%, 8/01/14 | | | 2,320 | | | | 2,320,766 | |
California Pub Wks Brd (CA Lease Mental Hlth Coalinga) Series 04A 5.50%, 6/01/22 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,704,645 | |
Series 2004A 5.50%, 6/01/23 | | | 3,290 | | | | 3,476,905 | |
California Pub Wks Brd (CA Lease Richmond Lab) XLCA Series 05B 5.00%, 11/01/30 | | | 4,270 | | | | 4,386,913 | |
California Pub Wks Brd (Univ of California Lease) Series 04F 5.00%, 11/01/26 | | | 8,065 | | | | 8,610,194 | |
Series 05C 5.00%, 4/01/23 | | | 3,130 | | | | 3,414,642 | |
California Rural Home Mtg Series 00B 6.25%, 12/01/31 | | | 50 | | | | 50,018 | |
Series 00D 6.00%, 12/01/31 | | | 80 | | | | 80,784 | |
California Statewide CDA (San Diego Space/Sci Fdtn) Series 96 7.50%, 12/01/16 | | | 1,425 | | | | 1,475,060 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 57 | |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
California Statewide CDA MFHR (Highland Creek Apts) Series 01K 5.40%, 4/01/34 | | $ | 5,635 | | | $ | 5,719,525 | |
California Statewide CDA MFHR (Santa Paula Village Apts) Series 98D 5.43%, 5/01/28 | | | 1,880 | | | | 1,881,034 | |
Capistrano CA USD GO AGM Series 01B Zero Coupon, 8/01/25 | | | 8,000 | | | | 4,246,320 | |
NPFGC-RE Series 00A 6.00%, 8/01/24 | | | 1,550 | | | | 1,556,169 | |
Chino CA Redev Agy Tax Alloc (Chino CA Redev Proj Area B) AMBAC Series 01B 5.25%, 9/01/30 | | | 3,420 | | | | 3,419,761 | |
Coachella Valley CA USD COP AMBAC 5.00%, 9/01/23 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,588,250 | |
Commerce CA Jt Pwrs Fin Auth (Commerce CA Lease Cmnty Ctr) XLCA Series 04 5.00%, 10/01/34 | | | 1,715 | | | | 1,724,192 | |
Corona CA CFD #97-2 (Corona CA CFD #97-2 Eagle Glen) Series 98 5.875%, 9/01/23 | | | 5,425 | | | | 5,446,321 | |
E CA Mun Wtr Dist CFD #2001-01A Series 02 6.40%, 9/01/32 | | | 3,410 | | | | 3,445,839 | |
East Palo Alto CA Pub Fin Auth (Univ Circle Gateway/101 Proj) RADIAN Series 05A 5.00%, 10/01/25 | | | 5,070 | | | | 5,074,512 | |
Encinitas Ranch CA Golf Auth Series 04 5.50%, 9/01/23-9/01/24 | | | 1,110 | | | | 1,116,215 | |
5.60%, 9/01/26 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,002,290 | |
Fremont CA USD GO AGM Series 05B 5.00%, 8/01/26 | | | 1,745 | | | | 1,879,505 | |
Fullerton CA Redev Agy RADIAN 5.00%, 4/01/21 | | | 3,250 | | | | 3,429,075 | |
Gilroy CA USD GO NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 8/01/27 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,551,045 | |
| | |
58 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Huntington Pk CA Pub Fin Auth (Huntington Pk CA Tax Alloc) AGM Series 2004A 5.25%, 9/01/17 | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,099,890 | |
Irvine CA Pub Fac Auth Assmt Series 2012A 3.25%, 9/02/19 | | | 1,220 | | | | 1,231,883 | |
4.00%, 9/02/22 | | | 1,355 | | | | 1,392,168 | |
4.25%, 9/02/24 | | | 1,530 | | | | 1,574,982 | |
Jurupa CA USD GO NPFGC-RE Series 04 5.00%, 8/01/22 | | | 1,340 | | | | 1,407,643 | |
Kaweah Delta CA Hlthcare NPFGC Series 04 5.25%, 8/01/25-8/01/26 | | | 3,780 | | | | 4,087,679 | |
La Verne CA CFD #88-1 Series 98 5.875%, 3/01/14 | | | 1,525 | | | | 1,535,507 | |
Lammersville CA SD CFD #2002 Series 02 6.375%, 9/01/32 | | | 4,250 | | | | 4,305,122 | |
Lancaster CA Redev Agy (Lancaster CA Redev Tax Incr) XLCA Series 04 5.00%, 12/01/23 | | | 1,575 | | | | 1,596,199 | |
Long Beach CA Bond Fin Auth (Long Beach CA Lease Aquarium) 5.00%, 11/01/28-11/01/30 | | | 11,485 | | | | 12,780,878 | |
Los Angeles CA Cmnty Redev Agy (Los Angeles CA CRA Bunker Hill) Series 04L 5.00%, 3/01/17 | | | 2,565 | | | | 2,582,621 | |
5.10%, 3/01/19 | | | 1,350 | | | | 1,356,318 | |
Los Angeles CA Dept Arpts (Los Angeles Intl Airport) Series 2009A 5.25%, 5/15/29 | | | 8,340 | | | | 9,487,834 | |
Series 2010A 5.00%, 5/15/25 | | | 8,915 | | | | 10,324,105 | |
Series A 5.00%, 5/15/27 | | | 3,560 | | | | 4,073,067 | |
Los Angeles CA Dept W&P Pwr AMBAC 5.00%, 7/01/24 | | | 5,250 | | | | 5,835,952 | |
AMBAC Series 2006A-2 5.00%, 7/01/31 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,538,950 | |
Los Angeles CA Harbor Dept 5.00%, 8/01/26 | | | 21,450 | | | | 24,614,733 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 59 | |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Los Angeles CA MFHR (Park Plaza West Apts) 5.50%, 1/20/43 | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 5,035,700 | |
Los Angeles CA USD GO Series 2010 3670 5.25%, 7/01/25(b) | | | 8,000 | | | | 9,331,920 | |
Los Angeles Cnty CA Met Trnsp Auth (Los Angeles Cnty CA MTA Sales Tax) 5.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 1,260 | | | | 1,487,959 | |
Marin CA Muni Wtr Dist AMBAC Series 04 5.25%, 7/01/20 | | | 3,040 | | | | 3,172,240 | |
Met Wtr Dist Southern CA Wtr Series 2011C 5.00%, 10/01/24 | | | 3,425 | | | | 4,206,722 | |
Mount Diablo CA USD GO Series 2012B-2 5.00%, 7/01/27 | | | 3,200 | | | | 3,654,368 | |
Murrieta Vly CA USD GO AGM Series 05B 5.125%, 9/01/29 | | | 1,500 | | | | 1,579,245 | |
Norco CA Redev Agy (Norco CA Redev Agy Proj #1) Series 2010 5.875%, 3/01/32 | | | 1,580 | | | | 1,681,152 | |
6.00%, 3/01/36 | | | 1,125 | | | | 1,197,799 | |
AMBAC Series 05 5.00%, 3/01/26 | | | 1,900 | | | | 1,917,309 | |
RADIAN Series 04 5.00%, 3/01/24 | | | 3,060 | | | | 3,038,213 | |
Oakland CA USD GO NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 8/01/22 | | | 8,975 | | | | 9,486,575 | |
Ontario CA COP NPFGC Series 04 5.25%, 7/01/21 | | | 1,700 | | | | 1,802,493 | |
Orange Cnty CA COP AMBAC 6.00%, 6/01/21 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 830 | | | | 994,564 | |
Palm Springs CA COP Series 91B Zero Coupon, 4/15/21 (Pre- refunded/ETM)(c) | | | 37,500 | | | | 30,967,500 | |
Palmdale CA Wtr Dist NPFGC-RE Series 04 5.00%, 10/01/24 | | | 1,775 | | | | 1,807,589 | |
Palo Alto CA Univ AVE AD 5.00%, 9/02/25-9/02/30 | | | 3,290 | | | | 3,593,610 | |
| | |
60 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Pittsburg CA Redev Agy (Los Medanos Cmnty Dev Proj) NPFGC Series 03A 5.00%, 8/01/21 | | $ | 6,410 | | | $ | 6,554,866 | |
Placentia-Yorba Lnda CA USD GO (Placentia-Yorba Lnda USD CA GO) NPFGC-RE Series 06 5.00%, 10/01/27 | | | 4,200 | | | | 4,350,150 | |
Port of Oakland CA Series L 5.375%, 11/01/27 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 280 | | | | 286,633 | |
NPFGC-RE Series 2002L 5.375%, 11/01/27 | | | 2,220 | | | | 2,254,921 | |
Redding CA Elec Sys COP NPFGC Series 92A 11.99%, 7/01/22 (Pre-refunded/ETM)(d) | | | 1,210 | | | | 1,804,086 | |
Richmond CA Cmnty Redev Agy (Richmond CA Merged Proj Areas) Series 2010A 5.75%, 9/01/24-9/01/25 | | | 1,985 | | | | 2,196,768 | |
6.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 1,395 | | | | 1,506,712 | |
Riverside CA CCD GO NPFGC Series C 5.00%, 8/01/25 | | | 1,720 | | | | 1,923,786 | |
Rocklin CA USD CFD #1 NPFGC Series 04 5.00%, 9/01/25 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,010,680 | |
Sacramento CA USD GO AGM Series 04D 5.25%, 7/01/21-7/01/23 | | | 8,525 | | | | 8,853,931 | |
Sacramento Cnty CA Hsg Auth MFHR (Cottage Estates Apts) Series 00B 6.00%, 2/01/33 | | | 5,190 | | | | 5,119,779 | |
Sacramento Cnty CA Hsg Auth MFHR (Verandas Apts) Series 00H 5.70%, 3/01/34 | | | 2,875 | | | | 2,888,857 | |
San Bernardino Cnty CA CFD #2002-1 Series 02-1 5.90%, 9/01/33 | | | 4,750 | | | | 4,814,362 | |
San Bernardino Cnty CA COP Series 2009 5.25%, 8/01/26 | | | 1,635 | | | | 1,743,270 | |
San Diego CA Hsg Auth MFHR Series 98C 5.25%, 1/20/40 | | | 6,105 | | | | 6,107,015 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 61 | |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
San Diego CA Pub Fac Fin Auth (San Diego CA Lease) 5.25%, 3/01/25 | | $ | 15,000 | | | $ | 16,393,800 | |
San Diego CA USD GO NPFGC Series 04E-1 5.00%, 7/01/23-7/01/24 | | | 3,240 | | | | 3,533,013 | |
San Diego Cnty CA COP Series 04A 5.50%, 9/01/44 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,590,200 | |
San Diego Cnty CA Wtr Auth Series 2011B 5.00%, 5/01/29-5/01/30 | | | 16,115 | | | | 18,452,661 | |
San Diego Cnty CA Wtr Auth COP AGM Series A 5.00%, 5/01/27 | | | 3,500 | | | | 3,731,105 | |
San Francisco City/Cnty CA USD GO 5.00%, 6/15/27 | | | 3,315 | | | | 3,738,458 | |
San Francisco City/Cnty CA Arpt Commn (San Francisco CA Intl Airport) Series 2010A 4.90%, 5/01/29 | | | 2,200 | | | | 2,419,758 | |
Series 2012A 5.00%, 5/01/27-5/01/28 | | | 7,000 | | | | 7,728,170 | |
AGM Series 00A 6.125%, 1/01/27 | | | 1,480 | | | | 1,481,954 | |
San Francisco City/Cnty CA Pub Util Wtr 5.00%, 11/01/27 | | | 12,000 | | | | 14,220,600 | |
Series 2009B 5.00%, 11/01/27 | | | 4,705 | | | | 5,421,007 | |
San Joaquin Hls Trnsp Corr CA Series 93 Zero Coupon, 1/01/20 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 20,000 | | | | 17,290,800 | |
Zero Coupon, 1/01/21 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 20,000 | | | | 16,664,800 | |
Zero Coupon, 1/01/23 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 25,000 | | | | 19,374,750 | |
San Joaquin Hls Trnsp Corr CA (San Joaquin Hills Toll Road CA) NPFGC Series A Zero Coupon, 1/15/36 | | | 47,415 | | | | 10,059,566 | |
San Jose CA Hotel Tax 6.125%, 5/01/31 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,517,750 | |
San Juan CA USD GO Series 2012B 5.00%, 8/01/28 | | | 7,395 | | | | 8,342,669 | |
Santa Ana CA USD GO Series 2008A 5.25%, 8/01/28 | | | 5,400 | | | | 5,900,310 | |
| | |
62 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Santa Clara CA Elec Series 2011A 5.00%, 7/01/30 | | $ | 1,810 | | | $ | 1,982,493 | |
Semitropic Wtr Dist CA XLCA Series 04A 5.50%, 12/01/23 | | | 1,640 | | | | 1,773,152 | |
South Gate CA PFA (South Gate CA Tax Alloc) XLCA Series 02 5.125%, 9/01/24 | | | 1,800 | | | | 1,804,752 | |
Southern CA Pub Pwr Auth 5.00%, 7/01/23 | | | 3,200 | | | | 3,696,480 | |
Southwestern CA CCD GO NPFGC Series 05 5.00%, 8/01/24 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,114,860 | |
Stockton CA PFA (Stockton CA Redev Projs) RADIAN Series 06A 5.00%, 9/01/17 | | | 2,285 | | | | 2,181,924 | |
Tejon Ranch CA Pub Fac Fin CFD #1 5.25%, 9/01/26-9/01/28 | | | 2,375 | | | | 2,459,037 | |
5.50%, 9/01/30-9/01/33 | | | 2,135 | | | | 2,192,989 | |
Torrance CA COP (Torrance CA COP Pub Impt) AMBAC Series 05B 5.00%, 6/01/24 | | | 3,365 | | | | 3,439,434 | |
Univ of California Series K 5.00%, 5/15/21 | | | 4,550 | | | | 5,108,831 | |
AGM Series 05B 5.00%, 5/15/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,255,100 | |
West Contra Costa CA Hlth Dist AMBAC Series 04 5.375%, 7/01/21-7/01/24 | | | 4,720 | | | | 4,964,478 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 622,614,869 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Arizona – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Dove Mountain Resort CFD AZ Series 2001 6.75%, 12/01/16 | | | 1,325 | | | | 1,167,510 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Illinois – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth IL 6.00%, 6/01/28 | | | 890 | | | | 1,010,568 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Nevada – 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Henderson NV LID # T-14 AGM Series A 5.00%, 3/01/22 | | | 2,475 | | | | 2,607,140 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 63 | |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
| | |
Ohio – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Lorain Cnty OH Port Auth (United States Steel Corp.) 6.75%, 12/01/40 | | $ | 1,110 | | | $ | 1,229,403 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Puerto Rico – 7.5% | | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico Conv Ctr Dist Auth (Puerto Rico Hotel Occupancy Tax) AMBAC Series A 5.00%, 7/01/17 | | | 10,730 | | | | 11,646,342 | |
Puerto Rico GO 5.25%, 7/01/23 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,146,970 | |
Series 01A 5.50%, 7/01/19 | | | 1,880 | | | | 2,125,152 | |
Series 03A 5.25%, 7/01/23 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 800 | | | | 845,768 | |
Puerto Rico Govt Dev Bank Series 06B 5.00%, 12/01/15 | | | 500 | | | | 543,770 | |
Puerto Rico HFA MFHR (Puerto Rico HFA Cap Fund) 5.125%, 12/01/27 | | | 295 | | | | 318,801 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Fin Corp. Series 2009A 5.50%, 8/01/28 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 175 | | | | 227,059 | |
5.50%, 8/01/28 | | | 20,825 | | | | 23,256,943 | |
Univ of Puerto Rico 5.00%, 6/01/18 | | | 4,930 | | | | 5,276,333 | |
Series 06Q 5.00%, 6/01/19 | | | 2,490 | | | | 2,647,268 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 50,034,406 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Texas – 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (LBJ Managed Lanes Project) 7.00%, 6/30/40 | | | 3,050 | | | | 3,554,287 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners LLC Project) 6.875%, 12/31/39 | | | 1,525 | | | | 1,753,125 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 5,307,412 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Municipal Obligations (cost $622,925,473) | | | | | | | 683,971,308 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
64 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Shares | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies – 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. –Government STIF Portfolio, 0.12%(e) (cost $60,270) | | | 60,270 | | | $ | 60,270 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Investments – 102.6% (cost $622,985,743) | | | | | | | 684,031,578 | |
Other assets less liabilities – (2.6)% | | | | | | | (17,429,302 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets – 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 666,602,276 | |
| | | | | | | | |
INTEREST RATE SWAP TRANSACTIONS (see Note D)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Rate Type | | | | |
Swap Counterparty | | Notional Amount (000) | | | Termination Date | | | Payments made by the Portfolio | | | Payments received by the Portfolio | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
Citibank, N.A. | | $ | 6,500 | | | | 1/25/26 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.108 | % | | $ | 1,739,481 | |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 2,800 | | | | 10/1/16 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.147 | % | | | 425,001 | |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 3,100 | | | | 10/21/16 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.129 | % | | | 464,625 | |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 14,500 | | | | 7/30/26 | | | | 4.090 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | | (3,908,065 | ) |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | | 10,200 | | | | 8/9/26 | | | | 4.063 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | | (2,798,182 | ) |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. | | $ | 15,000 | | | | 11/15/26 | | | | 4.378 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | $ | (4,781,911) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (8,859,051 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | Variable interest rate based on the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index. |
(a) | | When-Issued or delayed delivery security. |
(b) | | Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Fund (see Note I). |
(c) | | Position, or a portion thereof, has been segregated to collateralize interest rate swaps. The aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $12,033,558. |
(d) | | Variable rate coupon, rate shown as of April 30, 2012. |
(e) | | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end. |
As of April 30, 2012, the Fund held 27.0% of net assets in insured bonds (of this amount 1.6% represents the Fund’s holding in pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity bonds).
Glossary:
ACA – ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation
AD – Assessment District
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 65 | |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
AGM – Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMBAC – Ambac Assurance Corporation
CCD – Community College District
CDA – Community Development Authority
CFD – Community Facilities District
COP – Certificate of Participation
CRA – Community Redevelopment Agency
ETM – Escrowed to Maturity
GO – General Obligation
HFA – Housing Finance Authority
LID – Local Improvement District
MFHR – Multi-Family Housing Revenue
MTA – Metropolitan Transportation Authority
NPFGC – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation
NPFGC-RE – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation Reinsuring FGIC
PFA – Public Finance Authority
RADIAN – Radian Asset Assurance Inc.
SD – School District
UHSD – Unified/Union High School District
USD – Unified School District
XLCA – XL Capital Assurance Inc.
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
66 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
California Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
NEW YORK PORTFOLIO
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 98.4% | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 98.4% | | | | | | | | |
New York – 87.7% | | | | | | | | |
Albany Cnty NY Arpt Auth AGM 5.00%, 12/15/25-12/15/26 | | $ | 4,540 | | | $ | 5,004,586 | |
Albany NY IDA (St. Peter’s Hosp) Series A 5.75%, 11/15/22 | | | 795 | | | | 904,821 | |
Cortland Cnty NY IDA (Cortland Memorial Hospital) RADIAN Series 02 5.25%, 7/01/32 | | | 2,700 | | | | 2,706,723 | |
Dutchess Cnty NY IDA (Bard College) 5.00%, 8/01/19-8/01/21 | | | 1,450 | | | | 1,603,615 | |
East Rochester NY HSG Auth (St. John’s Meadows Proj) Series 2010A 5.00%, 4/20/27 | | | 2,550 | | | | 2,851,844 | |
Erie Cnty NY Fiscal Stability Auth (Erie Cnty NY Sales Tax) Series 2010A 5.00%, 5/15/22-5/15/23 | | | 9,965 | | | | 11,892,929 | |
Series 2011C 5.00%, 12/01/28 | | | 7,260 | | | | 8,421,455 | |
Erie Cnty NY GO NPFGC Series 05A 5.00%, 12/01/20 | | | 5,990 | | | | 6,544,494 | |
Erie Cnty NY IDA AGM Series 04 5.75%, 5/01/25 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,400 | | | | 1,551,606 | |
Glen Cove NY IDA Series 92B Zero Coupon, 10/15/19 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 11,745 | | | | 10,468,788 | |
Hempstead NY Local Dev Corp. (Hofstra Univ) 5.00%, 7/01/28 | | | 650 | | | | 711,945 | |
Herkimer Cnty NY IDA (Herkimer Cnty NY CC Stud Hsg) Series 00 6.50%, 11/01/30 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,020,220 | |
Long Island Pwr Auth NY NPFGC-RE Series 06A 5.00%, 12/01/19-12/01/24 | | | 8,300 | | | | 9,203,342 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 67 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Metropolitan Trnsp Auth NY Series 02 5.25%, 11/15/31 | | $ | 5,000 | | | $ | 5,109,750 | |
Series 02A 5.125%, 11/15/31 | | | 5,500 | | | | 5,617,095 | |
Series 2011D 5.00%, 11/15/29 | | | 4,300 | | | | 4,785,771 | |
Series 2012C 5.00%, 11/15/31(a) | | | 6,000 | | | | 6,697,440 | |
Metropolitan Trnsp Auth NY (Metro Trnsp Auth NY Ded Tax) Series A 5.25%, 11/15/30 | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,228,200 | |
NPFGC 5.00%, 11/15/18-11/15/21 | | | 11,890 | | | | 13,868,270 | |
Monroe Cnty NY IDA MFHR (Southview Towers Apts) Series 00 6.25%, 2/01/31 | | | 1,130 | | | | 1,131,345 | |
Montgomery Cnty NY IDA (New York St BOCES Prog) XLCA Series 05A 5.00%, 7/01/24 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,020,870 | |
Nassau Cnty NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside) Series 2007A 6.50%, 1/01/27 | | | 2,120 | | | | 1,729,856 | |
New York Conv Ctr Dev Corp. (New York Hotel Unit Fee) AMBAC Series 05 5.00%, 11/15/30 | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,511,300 | |
New York NY GO 5.00%, 1/01/21 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,743,550 | |
Series 04G 5.00%, 12/01/23 | | | 3,225 | | | | 3,559,400 | |
Series 04I 5.00%, 8/01/21 | | | 11,400 | | | | 12,470,802 | |
Series 05J 5.00%, 3/01/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,473,900 | |
AGM Series 04E 5.00%, 11/01/21 | | | 4,000 | | | | 4,417,240 | |
XLCA Series 04I 5.00%, 8/01/18 | | | 10,000 | | | | 10,993,600 | |
New York NY HDC MFHR (New York NY HDC) Series 02A 5.50%, 11/01/34 | | | 10 | | | | 10,040 | |
| | |
68 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
NPFGC-RE Series 05P6-A 5.00%, 7/01/19 | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,907,900 | |
New York NY Hlth & Hosp Corp. AMBAC Series 03A 5.25%, 2/15/22 | | | 5,700 | | | | 5,887,530 | |
New York NY IDA Series 01B 6.375%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 1,810 | | | | 1,827,937 | |
New York NY IDA (Airis JFK 1 LLC) Series 01A 5.50%, 7/01/28 | | | 9,000 | | | | 8,431,560 | |
New York NY IDA (Lycee Francais) Series 02C 6.80%, 6/01/28 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,568,700 | |
New York NY IDA (Spence School) 5.20%, 7/01/34 | | | 3,155 | | | | 3,163,897 | |
New York NY IDA (Terminal One Group Assn) Series 05 5.50%, 1/01/24 | | | 800 | | | | 839,608 | |
New York NY Mun Wtr Fin Auth 5.00%, 6/15/27 | | | 15,110 | | | | 17,167,982 | |
Series CC 2008 5.125%, 6/15/30 | | | 10,300 | | | | 11,483,985 | |
New York NY TFA Bldg Aid NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 7/15/21(b) | | | 7,000 | | | | 7,930,650 | |
New York NY Trnsl Fin Auth 5.00%, 11/01/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,659,350 | |
Series 2011B 5.00%, 2/01/25 | | | 11,000 | | | | 13,005,410 | |
New York NY Trst for Cult Res AMBAC Series 01D 5.125%, 7/01/31 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 14,000 | | | | 14,111,720 | |
New York NY Trst for Cult Res (Whitney Museum of American Art) 5.00%, 7/01/31 | | | 9,675 | | | | 10,517,112 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth Series 02-34 5.20%, 2/01/32 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 3,965 | | | | 4,189,419 | |
Series 04A 5.25%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 575 | | | | 635,605 | |
NPFGC Series 03A 5.00%, 7/01/22 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,274,550 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 69 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Cabrini Westchester) 5.10%, 2/15/26 | | $ | 1,850 | | | $ | 2,098,529 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Cornell Univ) 5.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 2,465 | | | | 2,902,044 | |
Series B 5.00%, 7/01/27 | | | 4,925 | | | | 5,820,759 | |
Series C 5.00%, 7/01/29 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,344,420 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Eger Hlth and Rehab Ctr) Series 00 6.10%, 8/01/37 | | | 1,980 | | | | 1,997,642 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Leake and Watts Svcs) NPFGC Series 04 5.00%, 7/01/22-7/01/23 | | | 3,275 | | | | 3,408,954 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Maimonides Med Ctr) NPFGC Series 04 5.75%, 8/01/29 | | | 3,515 | | | | 3,755,531 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Manhattan College) RADIAN Series 2007A 5.00%, 7/01/27 | | | 2,445 | | | | 2,516,492 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Montefiore Medical Center) NPFGC-RE Series 04 5.00%, 8/01/23 | | | 1,860 | | | | 2,009,265 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Mount Sinai Hospital) Series 2010A 5.00%, 7/01/26 | | | 6,795 | | | | 7,342,405 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (New York St BOCES Prog) AGM Series 04 5.00%, 8/15/23 | | | 3,175 | | | | 3,310,414 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (New York St Lease Suny) 5.00%, 5/15/29 | | | 6,350 | | | | 7,359,713 | |
Series 2012A 5.00%, 5/15/27 | | | 2,700 | | | | 3,154,653 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (New York St Pers Income Tax) 5.00%, 3/15/27 | | | 2,350 | | | | 2,693,523 | |
| | |
70 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (New York Univ) Series 2008A 5.00%, 7/01/29 | | $ | 4,220 | | | $ | 4,631,619 | |
Series 2012A 5.00%, 7/01/31-7/01/32 | | | 6,000 | | | | 6,896,670 | |
NPFGC-RE Series 04A 5.00%, 7/01/24 | | | 2,240 | | | | 2,421,014 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (North Shore – LIJ Hospital) 5.00%, 5/01/22 | | | 1,405 | | | | 1,567,559 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (NYU Hosp Center) Series 07A 5.00%, 7/01/22 | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,322,364 | |
Series B 5.25%, 7/01/24 | | | 690 | | | | 756,426 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Orange Regl Med Ctr) Series 2008 6.50%, 12/01/21 | | | 1,240 | | | | 1,386,531 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Ozanam Hall Queens Nursing) 5.00%, 11/01/21 | | | 1,000 | | | | 929,350 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Rochester Inst of Technology) 5.00%, 7/01/23-7/01/25 | | | 5,335 | | | | 6,055,421 | |
5.75%, 7/01/24 | | | 5,165 | | | | 5,980,399 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (SS Joachim & Anne Residence) Series 02 5.25%, 7/01/27 | | | 1,000 | | | | 999,950 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (State Univ of New York) 5.00%, 7/01/27-7/01/35 | | | 12,360 | | | | 13,890,095 | |
Series 2011A 5.00%, 7/01/28 | | | 6,690 | | | | 7,777,861 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Univ of Rochester) Series 04A 5.25%, 7/01/23-7/01/24 | | | 1,250 | | | | 1,314,221 | |
New York St Dormitory Auth (Westchester Cnty NY Lease Court) Series 06A 5.00%, 8/01/17 | | | 9,510 | | | | 11,018,001 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 71 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
New York St Dormitory Auth Rev Nonst Sup Dept (Rockefeller Univ) Series B 5.00%, 7/01/33 | | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 3,482,100 | |
New York St Energy Res & Dev Auth (Long Island Lighting Co.) Series 95A 5.30%, 8/01/25 | | | 7,500 | | | | 7,504,425 | |
New York St Envrn Fac Corp. (New York NY Mun Wtr Fin Auth) 5.00%, 6/15/29 | | | 2,000 | | | | 2,266,180 | |
New York St Liberty Corp. (National Sports Museum Proj) 6.125%, 2/15/19(c) | | | 792 | | | | 8 | |
New York St Liberty Dev Corp (4 World Trade Ctr Proj) 5.00%, 11/15/31 | | | 2,225 | | | | 2,431,258 | |
New York St Mortgage Agy SFMR (New York St Mortgage Agy) Series 01-31A 5.30%, 10/01/31 | | | 8,435 | | | | 8,438,543 | |
Series 82 5.65%, 4/01/30 | | | 1,495 | | | | 1,495,912 | |
New York St Pwr Auth NPFGC 5.00%, 11/15/21 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,486,270 | |
NPFGC Series C 5.00%, 11/15/19 | | | 680 | | | | 803,542 | |
New York St Thruway Auth (New York St Pers Income Tax) 5.00%, 3/15/26-3/15/27 | | | 11,000 | | | | 12,764,200 | |
Series 2010A 5.00%, 3/15/28 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,831,500 | |
AMBAC Series 04A 5.00%, 3/15/24 | | | 5,000 | | | | 5,490,050 | |
New York St Thruway Auth (New York St Thruway Auth Ded Tax) AMBAC Series 05B 5.00%, 4/01/21 | | | 7,500 | | | | 8,385,525 | |
NPFGC-RE Series 05B 5.00%, 4/01/17 | | | 12,750 | | | | 14,641,335 | |
Niagara Frontier Trnsp Auth NY (Buffalo Niagara Intl Airport) NPFGC 5.625%, 4/01/29 | | | 2,500 | | | | 2,500,725 | |
| | |
72 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Onondaga Cnty NY IDA (Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.) Series 99 6.25%, 12/01/34 | | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 2,002,960 | |
Onondaga Cnty NY IDA (Bristol- Myers Squibb) 5.75%, 3/01/24 | | | 4,000 | | | | 5,038,200 | |
Onondaga Cnty NY IDA (Cargo Acquisition Group) Series 02 6.125%, 1/01/32 | | | 1,290 | | | | 1,236,594 | |
Onondaga Cnty NY Trst for Cult Res (Syracuse Univ) 5.00%, 12/01/28-12/01/29 | | | 2,135 | | | | 2,439,870 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ 5.00%, 7/15/31 | | | 18,000 | | | | 20,444,940 | |
Port Authority of NY & NJ (Delta Airlines, Inc.) NPFGC Series 97-6 5.75%, 12/01/22 | | | 6,820 | | | | 6,833,435 | |
Rensselaer Cnty NY IDA (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.) Series 2006 5.00%, 3/01/26 | | | 7,505 | | | | 7,982,168 | |
Sachem NY CSD GO NPFGC-RE 5.00%, 10/15/21-10/15/22 | | | 5,415 | | | | 6,064,906 | |
Seneca Cnty NY IDA (New York Chiropractic College) 5.00%, 10/01/27 | | | 925 | | | | 970,954 | |
Suffolk Cnty NY EDA (Catholic Hlth Svcs of Long Island) 5.00%, 7/01/28 | | | 5,990 | | | | 6,585,226 | |
Suffolk Cnty NY EDC (Peconic Landing at Southold) 5.875%, 12/01/30 | | | 2,340 | | | | 2,549,407 | |
Suffolk Cnty NY IDA (New York Institute of Technology) 5.00%, 3/01/26 | | | 1,150 | | | | 1,181,947 | |
Triborough Brdg & Tunl Auth NY 5.00%, 11/15/24-11/15/26 | | | 16,715 | | | | 18,898,665 | |
Troy Res Corp. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.) Series 2010A 5.00%, 9/01/30 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,302,010 | |
Ulster Cnty NY IDA (Kingston Regl Sr Lvg Corp.) 6.00%, 9/15/27 | | | 1,175 | | | | 838,222 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 73 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Westchester Cnty Hlth Care Corp. NY 6.00%, 11/01/30 | | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 1,149,830 | |
Yonkers NY IDA (Malotz Skilled Nursing Fac) NPFGC Series 99 5.65%, 2/01/39 | | | 700 | | | | 702,464 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 576,262,908 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Arizona – 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Dove Mountain Resort CFD AZ Series 2001 6.75%, 12/01/16 | | | 935 | | | | 823,866 | |
Goodyear AZ IDA (Litchfield Park Svc Co.) Series 01 6.75%, 10/01/31 | | | 1,000 | | | | 1,002,060 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 1,825,926 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Florida – 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Crossings at Fleming Is CDD FL Series 00C 7.10%, 5/01/30 | | | 5,490 | | | | 5,177,070 | |
Hammock Bay CDD FL Series 04A 6.15%, 5/01/24 | | | 650 | | | | 653,874 | |
Marshall Creek CDD FL Series 02A 6.625%, 5/01/32 | | | 890 | | | | 765,747 | |
Midtown Miami CDD FL Series 04A 6.00%, 5/01/24 | | | 2,060 | | | | 2,076,872 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 8,673,563 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Georgia – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Atlanta GA Tax Allocation (Eastside Proj) Series 05B 5.60%, 1/01/30 | | | 500 | | | | 506,595 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Guam – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Guam Wtrworks Auth Series 05 6.00%, 7/01/25 | | | 500 | | | | 515,590 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Illinois – 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Plano IL SSA #3 (Plano Il SSA #3 Lakewood Spr) Series 05A 5.95%, 3/01/28 | | | 1,267 | | | | 1,286,486 | |
| | |
74 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Auth IL 6.00%, 6/01/28 | | $ | 785 | | | $ | 891,344 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,177,830 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Minnesota – 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Tobacco Securitization Auth MN 5.25%, 3/01/31 | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,291,870 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Nevada – 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Clark Cnty NV SID #142 (Clark Cnty NV SID#142 Mtns Edg) Series 03 6.10%, 8/01/18 | | | 1,365 | | | | 1,410,755 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
North Carolina – 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina Med Care Comm (Pennybyrn at Maryfield) Series A 6.125%, 10/01/35 | | | 1,000 | | | | 874,040 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Ohio – 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Columbiana Cnty Port Auth OH (Apex Environmental LLC) Series 04A 7.125%, 8/01/25(c)(d) | | | 1,200 | | | | 1,000,920 | |
Lorain Cnty OH Port Auth (United States Steel Corp.) 6.75%, 12/01/40 | | | 975 | | | | 1,079,881 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2,080,801 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico – 6.5% | | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico Elec Pwr Auth 5.00%, 7/01/22 | | | 2,085 | | | | 2,243,648 | |
5.375%, 7/01/24 | | | 5,225 | | | | 5,760,406 | |
Series 08WW 5.375%, 7/01/23 | | | 405 | | | | 448,631 | |
Puerto Rico GO 5.25%, 7/01/23 | | | 1,600 | | | | 1,678,384 | |
Series 01A 5.50%, 7/01/19 | | | 915 | | | | 1,034,316 | |
Puerto Rico Govt Dev Bank Series 06B 5.00%, 12/01/15 | | | 500 | | | | 543,770 | |
Puerto Rico HFA MFHR 5.00%, 12/01/20 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 3,420 | | | | 3,660,426 | |
Puerto Rico HFA MFHR (Puerto Rico HFA Cap Fund) 5.00%, 12/01/20 | | | 1,795 | | | | 1,869,923 | |
5.125%, 12/01/27 | | | 1,495 | | | | 1,615,617 | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 75 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount (000) | | | U.S. $ Value | |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
Puerto Rico HFC SFMR (Puerto Rico HFC) Series 01A 5.20%, 12/01/33 | | $ | 1,470 | | | $ | 1,471,058 | |
Puerto Rico Mun Fin Agy Series 05A 5.25%, 8/01/23 | | | 935 | | | | 971,325 | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Fin Corp. | | | | | | | | |
Series 2009A | | | | | | | | |
5.50%, 8/01/28 (Pre-refunded/ETM) | | | 125 | | | | 162,185 | |
5.50%, 8/01/28 | | | 14,875 | | | | 16,612,102 | |
Univ of Puerto Rico 5.00%, 6/01/22 | | | 255 | | | | 264,692 | |
Series 06Q | | | | | | | | |
5.00%, 6/01/20 | | | 4,225 | | | | 4,426,110 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 42,762,593 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Texas - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (LBJ Managed Lanes Project) | | | | | | | | |
7.00%, 6/30/40 | | | 2,700 | | | | 3,146,418 | |
7.50%, 6/30/32 | | | 1,225 | | | | 1,486,599 | |
Texas Private Acvty Bond Srfc Trnsp Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners LLC Project) 6.875%, 12/31/39 | | | 1,350 | | | | 1,551,946 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 6,184,963 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Virginia - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Bell Creek CDA VA Series 03A 6.75%, 3/01/22 | | | 100 | | | | 101,814 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Municipal Obligations (cost $606,251,038) | | | | | | | 646,669,248 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Shares | | | | |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies – 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio, 0.12%(e) (cost $7,168,373) | | | 7,168,373 | | | | 7,168,373 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Total Investments – 99.5% (cost $613,419,411) | | | | | | | 653,837,621 | |
Other assets less liabilities – 0.5% | | | | | | | 3,342,607 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Net Assets – 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 657,180,228 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
76 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
INTEREST RATE SWAP TRANSACTIONS (see Note D)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Rate Type | | | | |
Swap Counterparty | | Notional Amount (000) | | | Termination Date | | | Payments made by the Portfolio | | | Payments received by the Portfolio | | | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |
Citibank, N.A. | | $ | 2,200 | | | | 1/25/26 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.108 | % | | $ | 588,747 | |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | | 4,500 | | | | 6/15/15 | | | | 3.777 | % | | | SIFMA | * | | | (520,397 | ) |
Merrill Lynch Capital Services Inc. | | | 3,100 | | | | 10/1/16 | | | | SIFMA | * | | | 4.147 | % | | | 470,537 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 538,887 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | Variable interest rate based on the Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Index. |
(a) | | When-Issued or delayed delivery security. |
(b) | | Position, or a portion thereof, has been segregated to collateralize interest rate swaps. The aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $543,816. |
(e) | | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end. |
As of April 30, 2012, the Portfolio held 26.8% of net assets in insured bonds (of this amount 11.9% represents the Portfolio’s holding in pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity bonds).
Glossary:
AGM – Assured Guaranty Municipal
AMBAC – Ambac Assurance Corporation
CDA – Community Development Authority
CDD – Community Development District
CFD – Community Facilities District
CSD – Central/Community School District
EDA – Economic Development Agency
EDC – Economic Development Corporation
ETM – Escrowed to Maturity
GO – General Obligation
HDC – Housing Development Corporation
HFA – Housing Finance Authority
HFC – Housing Finance Corporation
IDA – Industrial Development Authority/Agency
MFHR – Multi-Family Housing Revenue
NPFGC – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation
NPFGC-RE – National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation Reinsuring FGIC
RADIAN – Radian Asset Assurance Inc.
SFMR – Single Family Mortgage Revenue
SID – Special Improvement District
SSA – Special Services Area
XLCA – XL Capital Assurance Inc.
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 77 | |
New York Portfolio—Portfolio of Investments
STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | National | | | High Income Municipal | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Investments in securities, at value Unaffiliated issuers (cost $937,191,880 and $929,429,725, respectively) | | $ | 987,675,059 | | | $ | 984,030,190 | |
Affiliated issuers (cost $20,995,957 and $14,697,666, respectively) | | | 20,995,957 | | | | 14,697,666 | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 15,275,444 | | | | 16,168,537 | |
Receivable for capital stock sold | | | 4,198,664 | | | | 12,014,467 | |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | 3,005,613 | | | | 7,846,467 | |
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | | 944,237 | | | | 1,978,559 | |
Unrealized appreciation on credit default swap contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | 825,490 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 1,032,094,974 | | | | 1,037,561,376 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 37,825,250 | | | | 33,990,274 | |
Payable for floating rate notes issued(a) | | | 9,200,000 | | | | 103,320,000 | |
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | | 1,470,789 | | | | 1,973,913 | |
Payable for capital stock redeemed | | | 956,829 | | | | 202,731 | |
Dividends payable | | | 802,690 | | | | 952,293 | |
Distribution fee payable | | | 288,448 | | | | 208,651 | |
Advisory fee payable | | | 253,721 | | | | 238,145 | |
Transfer Agent fee payable | | | 44,647 | | | | 5,670 | |
Administrative fee payable | | | 25,639 | | | | 16,580 | |
Premium received on credit default swap contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | 1,127,807 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 134,467 | | | | 211,997 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 51,002,480 | | | | 142,248,061 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 981,092,494 | | | $ | 895,313,315 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock, at par | | $ | 94,647 | | | $ | 81,782 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 931,524,115 | | | | 847,359,853 | |
Distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (433,828 | ) | | | (844 | ) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (49,067 | ) | | | (7,558,077 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | | | 49,956,627 | | | | 55,430,601 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 981,092,494 | | | $ | 895,313,315 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
78 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
Net Asset Value Per Share—54,300,000,000 shares of capital stock authorized, $.001 par value
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | Net Assets | | | Shares Outstanding | | | Net Asset Value | |
Class A | | $ | 690,092,848 | | | | 66,562,920 | | | $ | 10.37 | * |
| |
Class B | | $ | 6,123,228 | | | | 591,438 | | | $ | 10.35 | |
| |
Class C | | $ | 153,870,149 | | | | 14,856,893 | | | $ | 10.36 | |
| |
Advisor Class | | $ | 131,006,269 | | | | 12,635,857 | | | $ | 10.37 | |
| |
| | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 441,640,018 | | | | 40,329,741 | | | $ | 10.95 | * |
| |
Class C | | $ | 143,614,343 | | | | 13,120,865 | | | $ | 10.95 | |
| |
Advisor Class | | $ | 310,058,954 | | | | 28,331,268 | | | $ | 10.94 | |
| |
* | | The maximum offering price per share for Class A of National Portfolio and High Income Municipal Portfolio was $10.69 and $11.29, respectively, which reflects a sales charge of 3.00%. |
(a) | | Represents short-term floating rate certificates issued by tender option bond trusts (see Note I). |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 79 | |
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
| | | | | | | | |
| | California | | | New York | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Investments in securities, at value Unaffiliated issuers (cost $622,925,473 and $606,251,038, respectively) | | $ | 683,971,308 | | | $ | 646,669,248 | |
Affiliated issuers (cost $60,270 and $7,168,373, respectively)(a) | | | 60,270 | | | | 7,168,373 | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 7,868,329 | | | | 9,468,784 | |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | | 4,164,439 | | | | 1,602,091 | |
Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | | 2,629,107 | | | | 1,059,284 | |
Receivable for capital stock sold | | | 720,778 | | | | 1,350,376 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 699,414,231 | | | | 667,318,156 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | | 15,125,350 | | | | 6,647,580 | |
Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | | 11,488,158 | | | | 520,397 | |
Payable for floating rate notes issued(b) | | | 4,445,000 | | | | – 0 | – |
Payable for capital stock redeemed | | | 661,085 | | | | 1,441,259 | |
Dividends payable | | | 523,138 | | | | 486,472 | |
Distribution fee payable | | | 212,624 | | | | 210,233 | |
Advisory fee payable | | | 192,028 | | | | 193,647 | |
Administrative fee payable | | | 21,593 | | | | 20,102 | |
Transfer Agent fee payable | | | 19,696 | | | | 22,144 | |
Collateral received from broker | | | – 0 | – | | | 500,000 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 123,283 | | | | 96,094 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 32,811,955 | | | | 10,137,928 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 666,602,276 | | | $ | 657,180,228 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock, at par | | $ | 59,066 | | | $ | 63,884 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 615,146,116 | | | | 616,684,873 | |
Undistributed/(distributions in excess of) net investment income | | | 13,589 | | | | (369,552 | ) |
Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (803,279 | ) | | | (156,074 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | | | 52,186,784 | | | | 40,957,097 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 666,602,276 | | | $ | 657,180,228 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
80 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
Net Asset Value Per Share—54,300,000,000 shares of capital stock authorized, $.001 par value
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
California Portfolio | | Net Assets | | | Shares Outstanding | | | Net Asset Value | |
Class A | | $ | 524,575,972 | | | | 46,479,527 | | | $ | 11.29 | * |
| |
Class B | | $ | 2,556,186 | | | | 226,519 | | | $ | 11.28 | |
| |
Class C | | $ | 109,620,762 | | | | 9,715,386 | | | $ | 11.28 | |
| |
Advisor Class | | $ | 29,849,356 | | | | 2,644,959 | | | $ | 11.29 | |
| |
| | | |
New York Portfolio | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 533,185,079 | | | | 51,825,135 | | | $ | 10.29 | * |
| |
Class B | | $ | 12,056,976 | | | | 1,173,432 | | | $ | 10.27 | |
| |
Class C | | $ | 94,023,284 | | | | 9,144,780 | | | $ | 10.28 | |
| |
Advisor Class | | $ | 17,914,889 | | | | 1,740,846 | | | $ | 10.29 | |
| |
* | | The maximum offering price per share for Class A of California Portfolio and New York Portfolio was $11.64 and $10.61, respectively, which reflects a sales charge of 3.00%. |
(a) | | Includes investment of cash collateral of $500,000 received from broker for interest rate swap agreements for the New York Portfolio. |
(b) | | Represents short-term floating rate certificates issued by tender option bond trusts (see Note I). |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 81 | |
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | National | | | High Income Municipal | |
Investment Income | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 22,105,329 | | | $ | 20,831,708 | |
Dividends—Affiliated issuers | | | 4,217 | | | | 2,978 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total income | | | 22,109,546 | | | | 20,834,686 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | |
Advisory fee (see Note B) | | | 2,077,605 | | | | 1,747,045 | |
Distribution fee—Class A | | | 987,300 | | | | 519,050 | |
Distribution fee—Class B | | | 34,620 | | | | – 0 | – |
Distribution fee—Class C | | | 735,417 | | | | 555,312 | |
Transfer agency—Class A | | | 146,546 | | | | 39,812 | |
Transfer agency—Class B | | | 2,286 | | | | – 0 | – |
Transfer agency—Class C | | | 35,660 | | | | 14,364 | |
Transfer agency—Advisor Class | | | 24,504 | | | | 27,913 | |
Custodian | | | 118,986 | | | | 73,705 | |
Registration fees | | | 66,632 | | | | 84,015 | |
Administrative | | | 32,462 | | | | 32,624 | |
Printing | | | 26,590 | | | | 34,992 | |
Audit | | | 22,084 | | | | 29,137 | |
Legal | | | 17,578 | | | | 5,579 | |
Directors’ fees | | | 6,738 | | | | 6,474 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 13,831 | | | | 6,436 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total expenses before interest expense | | | 4,348,839 | | | | 3,176,458 | |
Interest expense | | | 40,377 | | | | 326,021 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 4,389,216 | | | | 3,502,479 | |
Less: expenses waived and reimbursed by the Adviser (see Note B) | | | (513,898 | ) | | | (355,051 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | | 3,875,318 | | | | 3,147,428 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 18,234,228 | | | | 17,687,258 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain on: | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | | 302,923 | | | | 2,136,441 | |
Swap contracts | | | 104,444 | | | | 160,754 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | | 35,798,063 | | | | 45,117,406 | |
Swap contracts | | | (277,766 | ) | | | 399,058 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net gain on investment transactions | | | 35,927,664 | | | | 47,813,659 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations | | $ | 54,161,892 | | | $ | 65,500,917 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
82 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | | | |
| | California | | | New York | |
Investment Income | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 15,671,634 | | | $ | 13,658,172 | |
Dividends—Affiliated issuers | | | 1,393 | | | | 3,934 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total income | | | 15,673,027 | | | | 13,662,106 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | |
Advisory fee (see Note B) | | | 1,475,092 | | | | 1,414,254 | |
Distribution fee—Class A | | | 775,684 | | | | 771,528 | |
Distribution fee—Class B | | | 13,966 | | | | 65,983 | |
Distribution fee—Class C | | | 540,791 | | | | 431,635 | |
Transfer agency—Class A | | | 82,112 | | | | 93,545 | |
Transfer agency—Class B | | | 811 | | | | 3,643 | |
Transfer agency—Class C | | | 18,986 | | | | 17,312 | |
Transfer agency—Advisor Class | | | 4,324 | | | | 2,610 | |
Custodian | | | 93,534 | | | | 88,096 | |
Printing | | | 28,294 | | | | 29,068 | |
Administrative | | | 27,838 | | | | 28,904 | |
Audit | | | 22,137 | | | | 16,132 | |
Legal | | | 14,861 | | | | 14,742 | |
Registration fees | | | 14,133 | | | | 11,106 | |
Directors’ fees | | | 6,450 | | | | 6,738 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 11,875 | | | | 9,765 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total expenses before interest expense | | | 3,130,888 | | | | 3,005,061 | |
Interest expense | | | 19,402 | | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | | | | | |
Total expenses | | | 3,150,290 | | | | 3,005,061 | |
Less: advisory fee waived (see Note B) | | | (325,355 | ) | | | (321,662 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net expenses | | | 2,824,935 | | | | 2,683,399 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 12,848,092 | | | | 10,978,707 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on: | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | | 2,444,025 | | | | 456,035 | |
Swap contracts | | | (557,970 | ) | | | 24,144 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of: | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | | 25,583,853 | | | | 19,037,071 | |
Swap contracts | | | (1,343,331 | ) | | | 121,937 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net gain on investment transactions | | | 26,126,577 | | | | 19,639,187 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations | | $ | 38,974,669 | | | $ | 30,617,894 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 83 | |
Statement of Operations
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | National | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 18,234,228 | | | $ | 37,493,838 | |
Net realized gain on investment transactions | | | 407,367 | | | | 1,505,765 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments | | | 35,520,297 | | | | (11,283,481 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | | 54,161,892 | | | | 27,716,122 | |
Dividends to Shareholders from | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (13,314,163 | ) | | | (28,216,388 | ) |
Class B | | | (116,540 | ) | | | (362,561 | ) |
Class C | | | (2,462,913 | ) | | | (5,248,756 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (2,408,624 | ) | | | (3,869,592 | ) |
Capital Stock Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 61,422,213 | | | | (56,690,372 | ) |
Capital Contributions | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from third party regulatory settlement (see Note E) | | | – 0 | – | | | 54 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total increase (decrease) | | | 97,281,865 | | | | (66,671,493 | ) |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 883,810,629 | | | | 950,482,122 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of ($433,828) and ($365,816), respectively) | | $ | 981,092,494 | | | $ | 883,810,629 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
84 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 17,687,258 | | | $ | 25,159,999 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | 2,297,195 | | | | (7,834,205 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments | | | 45,516,464 | | | | (4,004,271 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | | 65,500,917 | | | | 13,321,523 | |
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (8,954,278 | ) | | | (14,115,104 | ) |
Class C | | | (2,485,990 | ) | | | (3,642,925 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (6,650,145 | ) | | | (8,139,951 | ) |
Net realized gain on investment transactions | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | – 0 | – | | | (580,680 | ) |
Class C | | | – 0 | – | | | (181,716 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | – 0 | – | | | (305,055 | ) |
Capital Stock Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase | | | 292,297,589 | | | | 159,050,123 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total increase | | | 339,708,093 | | | | 145,406,215 | |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 555,605,222 | | | | 410,199,007 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of ($844) and undistributed net investment income of $402,311, respectively) | | $ | 895,313,315 | | | $ | 555,605,222 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 85 | |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | California | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 12,848,092 | | | $ | 28,344,628 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | 1,886,055 | | | | (3,889,939 | ) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments | | | 24,240,522 | | | | (5,640,608 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | | 38,974,669 | | | | 18,814,081 | |
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (9,968,886 | ) | | | (22,511,724 | ) |
Class B | | | (44,140 | ) | | | (136,567 | ) |
Class C | | | (1,706,793 | ) | | | (3,772,277 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (569,819 | ) | | | (829,448 | ) |
Net realized gain on investment transactions | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | – 0 | – | | | (646,295 | ) |
Class B | | | – 0 | – | | | (5,621 | ) |
Class C | | | – 0 | – | | | (127,783 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | – 0 | – | | | (14,140 | ) |
Capital Stock Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease | | | (4,495,341 | ) | | | (81,619,517 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total increase (decrease) | | | 22,189,690 | | | | (90,849,291 | ) |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 644,412,586 | | | | 735,261,877 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $13,589 and distributions in excess of ($544,865), respectively) | | $ | 666,602,276 | | | $ | 644,412,586 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
86 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | |
| | New York | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 10,978,707 | | | $ | 22,587,585 | |
Net realized gain on investment transactions | | | 480,179 | | | | 2,761,033 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments | | | 19,159,008 | | | | (7,335,433 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | | 30,617,894 | | | | 18,013,185 | |
Dividends to Shareholders from | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (9,271,890 | ) | | | (18,983,863 | ) |
Class B | | | (192,674 | ) | | | (611,653 | ) |
Class C | | | (1,253,048 | ) | | | (2,516,062 | ) |
Advisor Class | | | (285,372 | ) | | | (522,871 | ) |
Capital Stock Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 39,906,428 | | | | (42,784,833 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total increase (decrease) | | | 59,521,338 | | | | (47,406,097 | ) |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | 597,658,890 | | | | 645,064,987 | |
| | | | | | | | |
End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of ($369,552) and ($345,275), respectively) | | $ | 657,180,228 | | | $ | 597,658,890 | |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 87 | |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal | |
Increase (Decrease) in Cash from Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Interest and dividends received | | $ | 15,931,483 | | | | | |
Interest expense paid | | | (326,021 | ) | | | | |
Operating expenses paid | | | (2,576,401 | ) | | | | |
Purchases of long-term investments | | | (346,361,411 | ) | | | | |
Proceeds from disposition of long-term investments | | | 36,992,564 | | | | | |
Purchases of short-term investments, net | | | (13,575,631 | ) | | | | |
Proceeds from swap contracts, net | | | 638,322 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash from operating activities | | | | | | $ | (309,277,095 | ) |
Financing Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Cash dividends paid | | | (7,528,580 | ) | | | | |
Subscriptions of capital stock, net | | | 274,440,675 | | | | | |
Increase in payable for floating rate notes issued | | | 42,365,000 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash from financing activities | | | | | | | 309,277,095 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net increase in cash | | | | | | | – 0 | – |
Cash at beginning of period | | | | | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | | | | | |
Cash at end of period | | | | | | $ | – 0 | – |
| | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations to Net Decrease in Cash from Operating Activities: | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | | | | | $ | 65,500,917 | |
Adjustments: | | | | | | | | |
Increase in interest and dividends receivable | | $ | (5,568,415 | ) | | | | |
Net accretion of bond discount and amortization of bond premium | | | 665,212 | | | | | |
Increase in accrued expenses | | | 245,006 | | | | | |
Purchases of long-term investments | | | (346,361,411 | ) | | | | |
Proceeds from disposition of long-term investments | | | 36,992,564 | | | | | |
Purchases of short-term investments, net | | | (13,575,631 | ) | | | | |
Proceeds on swap contracts, net | | | 638,322 | | | | | |
Net realized gain on investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (2,297,195 | ) | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities | | | (45,516,464 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total adjustments | | | | | | | (374,778,012 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash from operating activities | | | | | | $ | (309,277,095 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements.
| | |
88 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Statement of Cash Flows
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
April 30, 2012 (unaudited)
NOTE A
Significant Accounting Policies
AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end management investment company. The Fund, which is a Maryland corporation, operates as a series company currently comprised of the diversified National Portfolio, High Income Municipal Portfolio, California Portfolio and New York Portfolio (the “Portfolios”). The California Portfolio II, formerly a series of the Fund, was acquired by the California Portfolio and ceased operations on January 23, 2009. The National II Portfolio, formerly a series of the Fund, was acquired by the National Portfolio and ceased operations on June 26, 2009. The High Income Municipal Portfolio commenced operations on January 26, 2010. Each series is considered to be a separate entity for financial reporting and tax purposes. The National Portfolio, California Portfolio and New York Portfolio offer Class A, Class B, Class C and Advisor Class shares. The High Income Municipal Portfolio offers Class A, Class C, and Advisor Class shares. Class A shares are sold with a front-end sales charge of up to 3% for purchases up to $500,000; purchases of $500,000 or more are not subject to a sales charge. With respect to purchases of $500,000 or more, Class A shares redeemed within one year of purchase may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge of 1%. Class B shares are currently sold with a contingent deferred sales charge which declines from 3% to zero depending on the period of time the shares are held. Effective January 31, 2009, sales of Class B shares of the Portfolio to new investors were suspended. Class B shares will only be issued (i) upon the exchange of Class B shares from another AllianceBernstein Mutual Fund, (ii) for purposes of dividend reinvestment, (iii) through the Portfolios’ Automatic Investment Program (the “Program”) for accounts that established the Program prior to January 31, 2009, and (iv) for purchases of additional shares by Class B shareholders as of January 31, 2009. The ability to establish a new Program for accounts containing Class B shares was suspended as of January 31, 2009. Class B shares will automatically convert to Class A shares six years after the end of the calendar month of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge of 1% on redemptions made within the first year after purchase. Advisor Class shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge and are not subject to ongoing distribution expenses. All four classes of shares have identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights, except that the classes bear different distribution and transfer agency expenses. Each class has exclusive voting rights with respect to its distribution plan. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolios.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 89 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Security Valuation
Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Fund’s Board of Directors.
In general, the market value of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: Securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter market (“OTC”) put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price in the case of listed options); open futures contracts are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. government securities and other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are valued at amortized cost if their original maturity was 60 days or less; or by amortizing their fair value as of the 61st day prior to maturity if their original term to maturity exceeded 60 days; fixed-income securities, including mortgage backed and asset backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker/dealers. In cases where broker/dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security. Swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties. Investments in money market funds are valued at their net asset value each day.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Portfolios may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Portfolios value their securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of these foreign markets
| | |
90 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred in the interim and may materially affect the value of those securities.
2. Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Portfolios would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The U.S. GAAP disclosure requirements establish a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Portfolios. Unobservable inputs reflect the Portfolios’ own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
| • | | Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| • | | Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
| • | | Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolios’ own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 91 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
The following tables summarize the valuation of the Portfolios’ investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 882,827,660 | | | $ | 104,847,399 | | | $ | 987,675,059 | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 20,995,957 | | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 20,995,957 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments in Securities | | | 20,995,957 | | | | 882,827,660 | | | | 104,847,399 | | | | 1,008,671,016 | |
Other Financial Instruments*: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 944,237 | | | | 944,237 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | (1,470,789 | ) | | | (1,470,789 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 20,995,957 | | | $ | 882,827,660 | | | $ | 104,320,847 | | | $ | 1,008,144,464 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 795,652,969 | | | $ | 188,377,221 | | | $ | 984,030,190 | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 14,697,666 | | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 14,697,666 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments in Securities | | | 14,697,666 | | | | 795,652,969 | | | | 188,377,221 | | | | 998,727,856 | |
Other Financial Instruments*: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 1,978,559 | | | | 1,978,559 | |
Credit Default Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | 825,490 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 825,490 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | (1,973,913 | ) | | | (1,973,913 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 14,697,666 | | | $ | 796,478,459 | | | $ | 188,381,867 | | | $ | 999,557,992 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
92 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
California Portfolio | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 625,996,500 | | | $ | 57,974,808 | | | $ | 683,971,308 | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 60,270 | | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 60,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments in Securities | | | 60,270 | | | | 625,996,500 | | | | 57,974,808 | | | | 684,031,578 | |
Other Financial Instruments*: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 2,629,107 | | | | 2,629,107 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | (11,488,158 | ) | | | (11,488,158 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 60,270 | | | $ | 625,996,500 | | | $ | 49,115,757 | | | $ | 675,172,527 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
New York Portfolio | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 612,119,168 | | | $ | 34,550,080 | | | $ | 646,669,248 | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 7,168,373 | | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 7,168,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments in Securities | | | 7,168,373 | | | | 612,119,168 | | | | 34,550,080 | | | | 653,837,621 | |
Other Financial Instruments*: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 1,059,284 | | | | 1,059,284 | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | (520,397 | ) | | | (520,397 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 7,168,373 | | | $ | 612,119,168 | | | $ | 35,088,967 | | | $ | 654,376,508 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 93 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
Following is a reconciliation of investments in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value. The transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy assumes the financial instrument was transferred at the beginning of the reporting period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | | Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | Total | |
Balance as of 10/31/11 | | $ | 108,793,911 | | | $ | (248,786 | ) | | $ | 108,545,125 | |
Accrued discounts/(premiums) | | | 21,217 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 21,217 | |
Realized gain (loss) | | | (550,431 | ) | | | 104,444 | | | | (445,987 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 3,740,033 | | | | (277,766 | ) | | | 3,462,267 | |
Purchases | | | 3,652,538 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 3,652,538 | |
Sales | | | (5,893,010 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (5,893,010 | ) |
Settlements | | | – 0 | – | | | (104,444 | ) | | | (104,444 | ) |
Transfers in to Level 3 | | | 6,568,552 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 6,568,552 | |
Transfers out of Level 3 | | | (11,485,411 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (11,485,411 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of 4/30/12 | | $ | 104,847,399 | | | $ | (526,552 | ) | | $ | 104,320,847 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Investments held as of 4/30/12* | | $ | 3,141,603 | | | $ | (198,365 | ) | | $ | 2,943,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | | Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | Total | |
Balance as of 10/31/11 | | $ | 138,274,159 | | | $ | 1,165,152 | | | $ | 139,439,311 | |
Accrued discounts/(premiums) | | | 219,358 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 219,358 | |
Realized gain (loss) | | | 1,093 | | | | 98,278 | | | | 99,371 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 7,891,472 | | | | (338,502 | ) | | | 7,552,970 | |
Purchases | | | 50,481,726 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 50,481,726 | |
Sales | | | (180,000 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (180,000 | ) |
Settlements | | | – 0 | – | | | (98,278 | ) | | | (98,278 | ) |
Transfers in to Level 3 | | | 11,334,197 | | | | (822,004 | ) | | | 10,512,193 | |
Transfers out of Level 3 | | | (19,644,784 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (19,644,784 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of 4/30/12 | | $ | 188,377,221 | | | $ | 4,646 | | | $ | 188,381,867 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Investments held as of 4/30/12* | | $ | 7,891,472 | | | $ | (338,502 | ) | | $ | 7,552,970 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
94 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
California Portfolio | | Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | | Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | Total | |
Balance as of 10/31/11 | | $ | 43,699,117 | | | $ | (7,515,720 | ) | | $ | 36,183,397 | |
Accrued discounts/(premiums) | | | 7,455 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 7,455 | |
Realized gain (loss) | | | 530,262 | | | | (557,970 | ) | | | (27,708 | ) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 1,041,543 | | | | (1,343,331 | ) | | | (301,788 | ) |
Purchases | | | 7,427,454 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 7,427,454 | |
Sales | | | (22,020,800 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (22,020,800 | ) |
Settlements | | | – 0 | – | | | 557,970 | | | | 557,970 | |
Transfers in to Level 3 | | | 30,572,950 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 30,572,950 | |
Transfers out of Level 3 | | | (3,283,173 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (3,283,173 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of 4/30/12 | | $ | 57,974,808 | | | $ | (8,859,051 | ) | | $ | 49,115,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Investments held as of 4/30/12* | | $ | 1,618,475 | | | $ | (1,343,331 | ) | | $ | 275,144 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
New York Portfolio | | Long-Term Municipal Bonds | | | Interest Rate Swap Contracts | | | Total | |
Balance as of 10/31/11 | | $ | 28,619,698 | | | $ | 416,950 | | | $ | 29,036,648 | |
Accrued discounts/(premiums) | | | 6,986 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 6,986 | |
Realized gain (loss) | | | 439 | | | | 24,144 | | | | 24,583 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 462,633 | | | | 121,937 | | | | 584,570 | |
Purchases | | | 801,480 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 801,480 | |
Sales | | | (408,450 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (408,450) | |
Settlements | | | – 0 | – | | | (24,144 | ) | | | (24,144) | |
Transfers in to Level 3 | | | 9,342,291 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 9,342,291 | |
Transfers out of Level 3 | | | (4,274,997 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | (4,274,997 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of 4/30/12 | | $ | 34,550,080 | | | $ | 538,887 | | | $ | 35,088,967 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Investments held as of 4/30/12* | | $ | 462,633 | | | $ | 121,937 | | | $ | 584,570 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | | The unrealized appreciation/depreciation is included in net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments in the accompanying statement of operations. |
3. Taxes
It is each Portfolio’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required.
In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Portfolios’ tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (the current and the prior three tax years, as applicable) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolios’ financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 95 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
4. Investment Income and Investment Transactions
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Each Portfolio may buy and sell securities from other affiliated funds in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Each Portfolio has adopted procedures to ensure that all such transactions are done in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17a-7. Investment gains and losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Portfolios amortize premiums and accrete original issue discount and market discount as adjustments to interest income.
5. Class Allocations
All income earned and expenses incurred by the Portfolios are borne on a pro-rata basis by each settled class of shares, based on the proportionate interest in each Portfolio represented by the net assets of such class, except for class specific expenses which are allocated to the respective class. Expenses of the Fund are charged to each Portfolio in proportion to net assets. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated among the various share classes based on respective net assets.
6. Dividends and Distributions
Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.
NOTE B
Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, the Portfolios pay the Adviser at the annual rates as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Daily Net Assets | |
Portfolio | | First $2.5 Billion | | | Next $2.5 Billion | | | In Excess of $5 Billion | |
National | | | .45 | % | | | .40 | % | | | .35 | % |
High Income Municipal | | | .50 | % | | | .45 | % | | | .40 | % |
California | | | .45 | % | | | .40 | % | | | .35 | % |
New York | | | .45 | % | | | .40 | % | | | .35 | % |
Such fees are accrued daily and paid monthly.
| | |
96 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
The Adviser has agreed to waive its fees and bear certain expenses to the extent necessary to limit the total Portfolio operating expenses as a percentage of daily average net assets on an annual basis (the “Expense Caps”) as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | January 26, 2010(a) to January 31, 2013 | |
Portfolio | | Class A | | | Class C | | | Advisor Class | |
High Income Municipal | | | .80 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | .50 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Effective January 1, 2009 | |
Portfolio | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | Advisor Class(b) | |
National | | | .75 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | .45 | % |
California | | | .75 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | .45 | % |
New York | | | .75 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | .45 | % |
Fees waived and expenses borne by the Adviser are subject to repayment by the High Income Municipal Portfolio until January 26, 2013. No repayment will be made that would cause the Portfolio’s total annualized operating expenses to exceed the net fee percentages set forth above or would have exceeded the amount of offering expenses as recorded by the Portfolio on or before January 31, 2012.
This contractual agreement extends through the end of the Portfolios’ current fiscal year and may be extended by the Adviser for additional one year terms.
(a) | | Commenced operations on January 26, 2010. |
(b) | | Commenced distributions on August 6, 2008. |
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, such reimbursements amounted to $513,898, $355,051, $325,355 and $321,662 for National, High Income Municipal, California and New York Portfolios, respectively.
Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement, each Portfolio may reimburse the Adviser for certain legal and accounting services provided to each Portfolio by the Adviser. For the six months ended April 30, 2012, such fees amounted to $32,462, $32,624, $27,838 and $28,904 for National, High Income Municipal, California and New York Portfolios, respectively.
The Portfolios compensate AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, under a Transfer Agency Agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the Portfolios. ABIS may make payments to intermediaries that provide omnibus account services, sub-accounting services and/or networking services. Such compensation retained by ABIS amounted to: National Portfolio, $92,431; High Income Municipal Portfolio, $25,394; California Portfolio, $48,041 and New York Portfolio, $49,635 for the six months ended April 30, 2012.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 97 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, serves as the distributor of the Portfolios’ shares. The Distributor has advised the Portfolios that it has retained front-end sales charges from the sale of Class A shares and received contingent deferred sales charges imposed upon redemptions by shareholders of Class A, Class B and Class C shares for each Portfolio for the six months ended April 30, 2012 as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Front-End Sales Charges | | | Contingent Deferred Sales Charges | |
Portfolio | | Class A | | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | |
National | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 7,148 | | | $ | 974 | | | $ | 4,557 | |
High Income Municipal | | | – 0 | – | | | 1,987 | | | | NA | | | | 9,277 | |
California | | | 100 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 83 | | | | 3,817 | |
New York | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | 302 | | | | 2,671 | |
The Portfolios may invest in the AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc.—Government STIF Portfolio (“Government STIF Portfolio”), an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. The Government STIF Portfolio is offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and is not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Government STIF Portfolio pays no investment management fees but does bear its own expenses. A summary of the Portfolios’ transactions in shares of the Government STIF Portfolio for the six months ended April 30, 2012 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Market Value October 31, 2011 (000) | | | Purchases at Cost (000) | | | Sales Proceeds (000) | | | Market Value April 30, 2012 (000) | | | Dividend Income (000) | |
National | | $ | 6,388 | | | $ | 94,355 | | | $ | 79,747 | | | $ | 20,996 | | | $ | 4 | |
High Income Municipal | | | 1,122 | | | | 143,808 | | | | 130,232 | | | | 14,698 | | | | 3 | |
California | | | – 0 | – | | | 39,500 | | | | 39,440 | | | | 60 | | | | 1 | |
New York | | | 978 | | | | 68,314 | | | | 62,124 | | | | 7,168 | | | | 4 | |
NOTE C
Distribution Services Agreement
The Portfolios have adopted a Distribution Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Under the Agreement, the Portfolios pay distribution and servicing fees to the Distributor at an annual rate of .30 of 1% of the Portfolios’ average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares and 1% of the Portfolios’ average daily net assets attributable to both Class B and Class C shares. There are no distribution and servicing fees on the Advisor Class shares. The fees are accrued daily and paid monthly. The Agreement provides that the Distributor will use such payments in their entirety for distribution assistance and promotional activities.
| | |
98 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
Since the commencement of the Portfolios’ operations, the distributor has incurred expenses in excess of the distribution costs reimbursed by each Portfolio as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Class B | | | Class C | |
National | | $ | 3,443,599 | | | $ | 5,778,779 | |
High Income Municipal | | | NA | | | | 860,544 | |
California | | | 6,843,160 | | | | 6,719,474 | |
New York | | | 6,077,431 | | | | 3,752,632 | |
While such costs may be recovered from the Portfolios in future periods so long as the Agreement is in effect, the rate of the distribution and servicing fees payable under the Agreement may not be increased without a shareholder vote. In accordance with the Agreement, there is no provision for recovery of unreimbursed distribution costs incurred by the Distributor beyond the current fiscal year for Class A shares. The Agreement also provides that the Adviser may use its own resources to finance the distribution of the Portfolios’ shares.
NOTE D
Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment and U.S. government securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended April 30, 2012, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Portfolio | | Investments | | | Government Securities | | | Investments | | | Government Securities | |
National | | $ | 129,719,982 | | | $ | – 0 | – | | $ | 41,862,940 | | | $ | – 0 | – |
High Income Municipal | | | 373,926,736 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 42,959,291 | | | | – 0 | – |
California | | | 102,177,206 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 99,638,103 | | | | – 0 | – |
New York | | | 72,509,266 | | | | – 0 | – | | | 34,224,455 | | | | – 0 | – |
The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation (excluding swap transactions) are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross Unrealized | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation | |
Portfolio | | Appreciation | | | (Depreciation) | | |
National | | $ | 56,605,729 | | | | $ (6,122,550) | | | $ | 50,483,179 | |
High Income Municipal | | | 55,732,456 | | | | (1,131,991 | ) | | | 54,600,465 | |
California | | | 64,549,829 | | | | (3,503,994 | ) | | | 61,045,835 | |
New York | | | 42,758,294 | | | | (2,340,084 | ) | | | 40,418,210 | |
1. Derivative Financial Instruments
Each Portfolio may use derivatives in an effort to earn income and enhance returns, to replace more traditional direct investments, to obtain exposure to
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 99 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
otherwise inaccessible markets (collectively, “investment purposes”), or to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio.
The principal type of derivatives utilized by the Portfolios, as well as the methods in which they may be used are:
Each Portfolio may enter into swaps to hedge their exposure to interest rates or credit risk. A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. In addition, collateral may be pledged or received by the Portfolio in accordance with the terms of the respective swap agreements to provide value and recourse to the Portfolio or its counterparties in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency by one of the parties to the swap agreement.
Risks may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to the swap contract to comply with the terms of the swap contract. The loss incurred by the failure of a counterparty is generally limited to the net interim payment to be received by the Portfolio, and/or the termination value at the end of the contract. Therefore, the Portfolio considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap contract in evaluating potential counterparty risk. This risk is mitigated by having a netting arrangement between the Portfolio and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Portfolio to cover the Portfolio’s exposure to the counterparty. Additionally, risks may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. The Portfolio accrues for the interim payments on swap contracts on a daily basis, with the net amount recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts on the statement of assets and liabilities, where applicable. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain/(loss) on swaps on the statement of operations, in addition to any realized gain/(loss) recorded upon the termination of swap contracts. Fluctuations in the value of swap contracts are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts on the statement of operations.
Interest Rate Swaps:
Each Portfolio is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Portfolio holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To help hedge against this risk and to maintain its ability to generate income at prevailing market rates, the Portfolio may enter into interest rate swap
| | |
100 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
contracts. Interest rate swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional amount. The Portfolio may elect to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate, or, receive a fixed rate and pay a floating rate on a notional amount.
In addition, each Portfolio may enter into interest rate swap transactions to preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio, or protecting against an increase in the price of securities the Portfolio anticipates purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange by a Portfolio with another party of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments) computed based on a contractually-based principal (or “notional”) amount. Interest rate swaps are entered into on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted out, with the Portfolio receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments).
During the six months ended April 30, 2012, the National Portfolio, High Income Municipal Portfolio, California Portfolio and New York Portfolio held interest rate swaps for hedging purposes.
Credit Default Swaps:
Each Portfolio may enter into credit default swaps, including to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to defaults by corporate and sovereign issuers held by the Portfolio, or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. The Portfolio may purchase credit protection (“Buy Contract”) or provide credit protection (“Sale Contract”) on the referenced obligation of the credit default swap. During the term of the swap agreement, the Portfolio receives/(pays) fixed payments from/(to) the respective counterparty, calculated at the agreed upon rate applied to the notional amount. The accrual for these interim payments is recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts on the statement of assets and liabilities. Upfront premiums paid or received in connection with credit default swap contracts are recognized as cost or proceeds on the statement of assets and liabilities and are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the contract. Amortized upfront premiums are included in net realized gain/(loss) from swaps on the statement of operations. If the Portfolio is a buyer/(seller) of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the Portfolio will either (i) receive from the seller/(pay to the buyer) of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap contract (the “Maximum Payout Amount”) and deliver/(take delivery of) the referenced obligation or (ii) receive/(pay) a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 101 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
Credit default swaps may involve greater risks than if a Portfolio had invested in the referenced obligation directly. Credit default swaps are subject to general market risk, liquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. If the Portfolio is a buyer of protection and no credit event occurs, it will lose the payments it made to its counterparty. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the value of the referenced obligation received by the Portfolio coupled with the periodic payments previously received, may be less than the Maximum Payout Amount it pays to the buyer, resulting in a net loss to the Portfolio.
During the six months ended April 30, 2012, the High Income Municipal Portfolio held credit default swaps for non-hedging purposes.
Implied credit spreads utilized in determining the market value of credit default swaps on issuers as of period end are disclosed in the portfolio of investments. The implied spreads serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and typically reflect the likelihood of default by the issuer of the referenced obligation. The implied credit spread of a particular reference obligation also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may reflect upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Widening credit spreads typically represent a deterioration of the referenced obligation’s credit soundness and greater likelihood of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. A credit spread identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the referenced obligation.
In certain circumstances Maximum Payout Amounts may be partially offset by recovery values of the respective referenced obligations, upfront premium received upon entering into the agreement, or net amounts received from settlement of buy protection credit default swap agreements entered into by the Portfolio for the same reference obligation with the same counterparty. At April 30, 2012, the High Income Municipal Portfolio had Sale Contracts outstanding with Maximum Payout Amounts aggregating $21,340,000, with net unrealized appreciation of $825,490, and a term of 4 years, as reflected in the portfolio of investments.
Documentation governing the Portfolios’ OTC derivatives may contain provisions for early termination of such transaction in the event the net assets of the Portfolio decline below specific levels set forth in the documentation (“net asset contingent features”). If these levels are triggered, the Portfolios’ counterparty has the right to terminate such transaction and require the Portfolio to pay or receive a settlement amount in connection with the terminated transaction. As of April 30, 2012, the National Portfolio had OTC derivatives with contingent features in net liability positions in the amount of $526,552. There were no assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such derivatives at April 30, 2012.
| | |
102 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
If a trigger event had occurred at April 30, 2012 for those derivatives in a net liability position the full amount would be required to be posted by the Portfolio. As of April 30, 2012, the High Income Municipal Portfolio had OTC derivatives with contingent features in net liability positions in the amount of $714,403. There were no assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such derivatives at April 30, 2012. If a trigger event had occurred at April 30, 2012, for those derivatives in a net liability position, the full amount would be required to be posted by the Portfolio. As of April 30, 2012, the California Portfolio had OTC derivatives with contingent features in net liability positions in the amount of $10,598,532. The fair value of assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such derivatives was $12,033,558 at April 30, 2012. If a trigger event had occurred at April 30, 2012, for those derivatives in a net liability position, no additional amounts would be required to be posted by the Portfolio. As of April 30, 2012, the New York Portfolio had OTC derivatives with contingent features in net liability positions in the amount of $520,397. The fair value of assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such derivatives was $543,816 at April 30, 2012. If a trigger event had occurred at April 30, 2012, for those derivatives in a net liability position, no additional amounts would be required to be posted by the Portfolio.
At April 30, 2012, the Portfolios had entered into the following derivatives:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Derivative Type | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | |
Interest rate contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 944,237 | | | Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 1,470,789 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 944,237 | | | | | $ | 1,470,789 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Type | | Location of Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | | Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) | |
Interest rate contracts | | Net realized gain (loss) on swap contracts; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts | | $ | 104,444 | | | $ | (277,766 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 104,444 | | | $ | (277,766 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 103 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, the average monthly notional amount of interest rate swaps was $14,011,429.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Derivative Type | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | |
Interest rate contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 1,978,559 | | | Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 1,973,913 | |
| | | | |
Credit contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on credit default swap contracts | | | 825,490 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 2,804,049 | | | | | $ | 1,973,913 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Type | | Location of Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | | Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) | |
Interest rate contracts | | Net realized gain (loss) on swap contracts; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts | | $ | 62,475 | | | $ | (338,502 | ) |
| | | |
Credit contracts | | Net realized gain (loss) on swap contracts; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts | | | 98,279 | | | | 737,560 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 160,754 | | | $ | 399,058 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, the average monthly notional amount of interest rate swaps was $29,000,000 and the average monthly notional amount of credit default swaps was $13,645,705.
| | |
104 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
California Portfolio | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Derivative Type | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | |
Interest rate contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 2,629,107 | | | Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 11,488,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 2,629,107 | | | | | $ | 11,488,158 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Type | | Location of Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | | Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) | |
Interest rate contracts | | Net realized gain (loss) on swap contracts; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts | | $ | (557,970 | ) | | $ | (1,343,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | (557,970 | ) | | $ | (1,343,331 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, the average monthly notional amount of interest rate swaps was $52,100,000.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Derivative Type | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | | Fair Value | |
Interest rate contracts | | Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 1,059,284 | | | Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swap contracts | | $ | 520,397 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 1,059,284 | | | | | $ | 520,397 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 105 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended April 30, 2012:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative Type | | Location of Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | Realized Gain or (Loss) on Derivatives | | | Change in Unrealized Appreciation or (Depreciation) | |
Interest rate contracts | | Net realized gain (loss) on swap contracts; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swap contracts | | $ | 24,144 | | | $ | 121,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | | $ | 24,144 | | | $ | 121,937 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, the average monthly notional amount of interest rate swaps was $9,800,000.
NOTE E
Capital Stock
The Fund has allocated 18,100,000,000 of authorized shares to the National Portfolio of which 6,000,000,000 is allocated to each of Class A, Class B and Class C shares and 100,000,000 is allocated to Advisor Class shares; 9,100,000,000 of authorized shares to the High Income Municipal Portfolio of which 3,000,000,000 is allocated to each of Class A, Class B (not currently offered) and Class C shares and 100,000,000 is allocated to Advisor Class shares; 18,050,000,000 of authorized shares to the California Portfolio, of which 6,000,000,000 is allocated to each of Class A, Class B and Class C shares and 50,000,000 is allocated to Advisor Class shares and 9,050,000,000 of authorized shares to the New York Portfolio of which 3,000,000,000 is allocated to each of Class A, Class B and Class C shares and 50,000,000 is allocated to Advisor Class shares. Transactions in capital shares for each class were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio* | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 9,129,952 | | | | 9,176,341 | | | | | $ | 93,233,857 | | | $ | 89,815,270 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 736,179 | | | | 1,527,061 | | | | | | 7,510,098 | | | | 14,846,423 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted from Class B | | | 120,341 | | | | 294,057 | | | | | | 1,236,838 | | | | 2,861,563 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (7,816,477 | ) | | | (17,558,882 | ) | | | | | (79,534,472 | ) | | | (169,567,788 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 2,169,995 | | | | (6,561,423 | ) | | | | $ | 22,446,321 | | | $ | (62,044,532 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
106 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio* | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 17,647 | | | | 36,314 | | | | | $ | 181,258 | | | $ | 355,236 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 6,506 | | | | 19,801 | | | | | | 66,209 | | | | 191,840 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted to Class A | | | (120,543 | ) | | | (294,448 | ) | | | | | (1,236,838 | ) | | | (2,861,563 | ) | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (48,924 | ) | | | (286,204 | ) | | | | | (501,003 | ) | | | (2,759,934 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net decrease | | | (145,314 | ) | | | (524,537 | ) | | | | $ | (1,490,374 | ) | | $ | (5,074,421 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,781,564 | | | | 1,777,414 | | | | | $ | 18,207,380 | | | $ | 17,311,053 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 153,272 | | | | 332,200 | | | | | | 1,562,189 | | | | 3,225,586 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (1,161,902 | ) | | | (3,307,401 | ) | | | | | (11,878,471 | ) | | | (31,865,092 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 772,934 | | | | (1,197,787 | ) | | | | $ | 7,891,098 | | | $ | (11,328,453 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class | | | |
Shares sold | | | 4,271,937 | | | | 5,953,155 | | | | | $ | 43,674,186 | | | $ | 58,138,862 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 167,726 | | | | 294,154 | | | | | | 1,713,145 | | | | 2,862,831 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (1,256,141 | ) | | | (4,030,497 | ) | | | | | (12,812,163 | ) | | | (39,244,659 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase | | | 3,183,522 | | | | 2,216,812 | | | | | $ | 32,575,168 | | | $ | 21,757,034 | | | |
| | | |
* | | For the year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio received $54, related to a third-party’s settlement of regulatory proceedings involving allegations of improper trading. This amount is presented in the Portfolio’s statement of changes in net assets. Neither the Portfolio nor its affiliates were involved in the proceedings or the calculation of the payment. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 18,246,848 | | | | 15,162,614 | | | | | $ | 194,558,672 | | | $ | 149,580,661 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 470,076 | | | | 776,398 | | | | | | 4,990,654 | | | | 7,649,612 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (5,745,012 | ) | | | (11,071,618 | ) | | | | | (60,889,448 | ) | | | (109,841,911 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase | | | 12,971,912 | | | | 4,867,394 | | | | | $ | 138,659,878 | | | $ | 47,388,362 | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 107 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 5,165,458 | | | | 3,830,571 | | | | | $ | 54,986,969 | | | $ | 38,095,349 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 134,291 | | | | 231,058 | | | | | | 1,425,094 | | | | 2,273,638 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (694,900 | ) | | | (1,993,118 | ) | | | | | (7,373,560 | ) | | | (19,555,570 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase | | | 4,604,849 | | | | 2,068,511 | | | | | $ | 49,038,503 | | | $ | 20,813,417 | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 11,533,252 | | | | 14,583,258 | | | | | $ | 122,624,983 | | | $ | 145,302,474 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 384,046 | | | | 575,460 | | | | | | 4,073,128 | | | | 5,668,144 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (2,079,228 | ) | | | (6,098,288 | ) | | | | | (22,098,903 | ) | | | (60,122,274 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase | | | 9,838,070 | | | | 9,060,430 | | | | | $ | 104,599,208 | | | $ | 90,848,344 | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,925,715 | | | | 2,155,117 | | | | | $ | 21,453,906 | | | $ | 22,855,198 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 453,782 | | | | 1,080,721 | | | | | | 5,045,439 | | | | 11,420,218 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted from Class B | | | 33,853 | | | | 117,487 | | | | | | 380,204 | | | | 1,242,135 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (3,148,150 | ) | | | (10,908,090 | ) | | | | | (35,061,106 | ) | | | (114,974,866 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net decrease | | | (734,800 | ) | | | (7,554,765 | ) | | | | $ | (8,181,557 | ) | | $ | (79,457,315 | ) | | |
| | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 844 | | | | 4,937 | | | | | $ | 9,397 | | | $ | 51,982 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 3,055 | | | | 8,945 | | | | | | 33,958 | | | | 94,378 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted to Class A | | | (33,857 | ) | | | (117,487 | ) | | | | | (380,204 | ) | | | (1,242,135 | ) | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (8,573 | ) | | | (112,951 | ) | | | | | (96,047 | ) | | | (1,183,123 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net decrease | | | (38,531 | ) | | | (216,556 | ) | | | | $ | (432,896 | ) | | $ | (2,278,898 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | |
108 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 461,146 | | | | 736,914 | | | | | $ | 5,139,809 | | | $ | 7,785,820 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 85,922 | | | | 197,577 | | | | | | 955,091 | | | | 2,087,262 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (666,108 | ) | | | (1,832,510 | ) | | | | | (7,392,216 | ) | | | (19,249,762 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net decrease | | | (119,040 | ) | | | (898,019 | ) | | | | $ | (1,297,316 | ) | | $ | (9,376,680 | ) | | |
| | | |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 856,896 | | | | 1,571,791 | | | | | $ | 9,508,917 | | | $ | 16,536,391 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends and distributions | | | 30,916 | | | | 45,731 | | | | | | 344,174 | | | | 485,305 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (396,456 | ) | | | (708,607 | ) | | | | | (4,436,663 | ) | | | (7,528,320 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase | | | 491,356 | | | | 908,915 | | | | | $ | 5,416,428 | | | $ | 9,493,376 | | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 6,019,461 | | | | 11,582,846 | | | | | $ | 61,341,453 | | | $ | 112,501,190 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 635,902 | | | | 1,075,937 | | | | | | 6,473,144 | | | | 10,507,103 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted from Class B | | | 200,781 | | | | 646,049 | | | | | | 2,048,938 | | | | 6,319,708 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (4,502,771 | ) | | | (15,426,775 | ) | | | | | (45,947,113 | ) | | | (149,480,966 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 2,353,373 | | | | (2,121,943 | ) | | | | $ | 23,916,422 | | | $ | (20,152,965 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 16,683 | | | | 26,186 | | | | | $ | 170,252 | | | $ | 256,111 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 15,096 | | | | 46,075 | | | | | | 152,969 | | | | 448,420 | | | |
| | | |
Shares converted to Class A | | | (201,015 | ) | | | (646,775 | ) | | | | | (2,048,938 | ) | | | (6,319,708 | ) | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (77,085 | ) | | | (474,090 | ) | | | | | (782,170 | ) | | | (4,585,088 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net decrease | | | (246,321 | ) | | | (1,048,604 | ) | | | | $ | (2,507,887 | ) | | $ | (10,200,265 | ) | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 109 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | | | |
| | Shares | | | | | Amount | | | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | | | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | |
| | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 1,812,094 | | | | 1,653,637 | | | | | $ | 18,507,396 | | | $ | 16,256,937 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | 96,000 | | | | 176,573 | | | | | | 976,405 | | | | 1,723,049 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (716,003 | ) | | | (2,951,083 | ) | | | | | (7,310,193 | ) | | | (28,610,999 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 1,192,091 | | | | (1,120,873 | ) | | | | $ | 12,173,608 | | | $ | (10,631,013 | ) | | |
| | | |
Advisor Class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold | | | 756,253 | | | | 594,323 | | | | | $ | 7,710,142 | | | $ | 5,768,386 | | | |
| | | |
Shares issued in reinvestment of dividends | | | (25,621 | ) | | | 24,861 | | | | | | (262,165 | ) | | | 243,046 | | | |
| | | |
Shares redeemed | | | (110,118 | ) | | | (799,706 | ) | | | | | (1,123,692 | ) | | | (7,812,022 | ) | | |
| | | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | 620,514 | | | | (180,522 | ) | | | | $ | 6,324,285 | | | $ | (1,800,590 | ) | | |
| | | |
NOTE F
Risks Involved in Investing in the Portfolios
Municipal Market Risk and Concentration of Credit Risk—This is the risk that special factors may adversely affect the value of municipal securities and have a significant effect on the yield or value of the Portfolio’s investments in municipal securities. These factors include economic conditions, political or legislative changes, uncertainties related to the tax status of municipal securities, or the rights of investors in these securities. The New York and California Portfolios of the AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund are State Portfolios that may invest a large portion of their assets in a particular state’s municipal securities and their various political subdivisions. To the extent that these Portfolios invest more of their assets in a particular state’s municipal securities, these Portfolios may be vulnerable to events adversely affecting that state, including economic, political and regulatory occurrences, court decisions, terrorism and catastrophic natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. These Portfolios’ investments in certain municipal securities with principal and interest payments that are made from the revenues of a specific project or facility, and not general tax revenues, may have increased risks. Factors affecting the project or facility, such as local business or economic conditions, could have a significant effect on the project’s ability to make payments of principal and interest on these securities.
Derivatives Risk—The Portfolios may enter into derivative transactions such as forwards, options, futures and swaps. Derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses
| | |
110 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
for the Portfolios, and subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments. Derivatives may result in significant losses, including losses that are far greater than the value of the derivatives reflected in the statement of assets and liabilities.
Financing and Related Transactions; Leverage and Other Risks—The Portfolios may utilize financial leverage, including tender option bond transactions, to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value. These objectives may not be achieved in all interest rate environments. Leverage creates certain risks for shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of the net asset value. If income from the securities purchased from the funds made available by leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, the Portfolio’s return will be less than if leverage had not been used. As a result, the amounts available for distribution as dividends and other distributions will be reduced. During periods of rising short-term interest rates, the interest paid on the floaters in tender option bond transactions would increase, which may adversely affect the Portfolios’ income and distribution to shareholders. A decline in distributions would adversely affect the Portfolios’ yield and possibly the market value of its shares. If rising short-term rates coincide with a period of rising long-term rates, the value of the long-term municipal bonds purchased with the proceeds of leverage would decline, adversely affecting the net asset value and possibly the market value of the shares.
In a tender option bond transaction, the Portfolios may transfer a highly rated fixed-rate municipal security to a broker, which, in turn, deposits the bond into a special purpose vehicle (typically, a trust) usually sponsored by the broker. The Portfolios receive cash and a residual interest security (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) issued by the trust in return. The trust simultaneously issues securities, which pay an interest rate that is reset each week based on an index of high-grade short-term seven-day demand notes. These securities, sometimes referred to as “floaters”, are bought by third parties, including tax-exempt money market funds, and can be tendered by these holders to a liquidity provider at par, unless certain events occur. The Portfolios continue to earn all the interest from the transferred bond less the amount of interest paid on the floaters and the expenses of the trust, which include payments to the trustee and the liquidity provider and organizational costs. The Portfolios also use the cash received from the transaction for investment purposes or to retire other forms of leverage. Under certain circumstances, the trust may be terminated and collapsed, either by the Portfolios or upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, or in the event holders of the floaters tender their securities to the liquidity provider. See Note I to the Financial Statements “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Connection with Securities Held” for more information about tender option bond transactions.
The Portfolios may also purchase inverse floaters from a tender option bond trust in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. The income received from an inverse floater varies inversely with the
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 111 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
short-term interest rate paid on the floaters issued by the trust. The prices of inverse floaters are subject to greater volatility than the prices of fixed-income securities that are not inverse floaters. Investments in inverse floaters may amplify the risks of leverage. If short-term interest rates rise, the interest payable on the floaters would increase and income from the inverse floaters decrease.
Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Portfolios enter into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Portfolios’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Portfolios have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expect the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Portfolios have not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.
NOTE G
Joint Credit Facility
A number of open-end mutual funds managed by the Adviser, including the Portfolios, participate in a $140 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”) intended to provide short-term financing, if necessary, subject to certain restrictions in connection with abnormal redemption activity. Commitment fees related to the Facility are paid by the participating funds and are included in miscellaneous expenses in the statement of operations. The Portfolios did not utilize the Facility during the six months ended April 30, 2012.
NOTE H
Distributions to Shareholders
The tax character of distributions to be paid for the year ending October 31, 2012 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year. The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 480,252 | | | $ | 436,521 | |
Tax-exempt income | | | 37,217,045 | | | | 35,317,271 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total distributions paid | | $ | 37,697,297 | | | $ | 35,753,792 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
Undistributed tax-exempt net investment income | | $ | 740,570 | |
Accumulated capital and other losses | | | – 0 | –(a) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 13,960,528 | (b) |
| | | | |
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit) | | $ | 14,701,098 | (c) |
| | | | |
(a) | | During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio utilized capital loss carryforwards of $1,296,025. The Portfolio had $9,179,009 of capital loss carryforwards expire in the fiscal year. |
| | |
112 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
(b) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the tax treatment of swap income, and the tax treatment of tender option bonds. |
(c) | | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable. |
| | | | | | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 1,854,474 | | | $ | 1,180,384 | |
Tax-exempt income | | | 25,110,957 | | | | 6,091,008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total distributions paid | | $ | 26,965,431 | | | $ | 7,271,392 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
Undistributed tax-exempt net investment income | | $ | 1,470,957 | |
Accumulated capital and other losses | | | (9,173,188 | )(a) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 9,108,514 | (b) |
| | | | |
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit) | | $ | 1,406,283 | (c) |
| | | | |
(a) | | On October 31, 2011, the Portfolio had a net capital loss carryforward of $9,173,188 which expires in the year 2019. |
(b) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales, the tax treatment of swap income, and the tax treatment of tender option bonds. |
(c) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) are attributable primarily to dividends payable and the amortization of offering costs. |
| | | | | | | | |
California Portfolio | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 616,108 | | | $ | 514,753 | |
Net long-term capital gains | | | 724,574 | | | | – 0 | – |
Total taxable distributions paid | | | 1,340,682 | | | | 514,753 | |
Tax-exempt income | | | 26,703,173 | | | | 29,500,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total distributions paid | | $ | 28,043,855 | | | $ | 30,014,753 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
Accumulated capital and other losses | | $ | (2,658,003) | (a) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 28,123,766 | (b) |
| | | | |
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit) | | $ | 25,465,763 | (c) |
| | | | |
(a) | | On October 31, 2011, the Portfolio had a net capital loss carryforward of $2,658,003 which expires in the year 2019. |
(b) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax treatment of swap income and the tax treatment of tender option bonds. |
(c) | | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 113 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
| | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 229,249 | | | $ | 222,344 | |
Tax-exempt income | | | 22,405,200 | | | | 21,666,478 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total distributions paid | | $ | 22,634,449 | | | $ | 21,888,822 | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2011, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
Undistributed tax-exempt net investment income | | $ | 257,209 | |
Accumulated capital and other losses | | | (627,355) | (a) |
Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | | | 21,839,927 | (b) |
| | | | |
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit) | | $ | 21,469,781 | (c) |
| | | | |
(a) | | On October 31, 2011, the Portfolio had a net capital loss carryforward of $627,355 of which $320 expires in the year 2015 and $627,035 expires in the year 2017. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, the Portfolio utilized capital loss carryforwards of $2,553,061. The Portfolio had $943,094 of capital loss carryforwards expire in the fiscal year. |
(b) | | The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the tax treatment of swap income. |
(c) | | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable. |
For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period. These post-enactment capital losses must be utilized prior to the pre-enactment capital losses, which are subject to expiration. Post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered short-term as under previous regulation.
NOTE I
Floating Rate Notes Issued in Connection with Securities Held
Each Portfolio may engage in tender option bond transactions in which the Portfolio may transfer a fixed rate bond (“Fixed Rate Bond”) to a broker for cash. The broker deposits the “Fixed Rate Bond” into a Special Purpose Vehicle (the “SPV”, which is generally organized as a trust), organized by the broker. The Portfolio buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (“Inverse Floater”). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (“Floating Rate Notes”) which are sold to third parties. The Floating Rate Notes pay interest at rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to a liquidity provider for redemption at par. The Inverse Floater held by the Portfolio gives the Portfolio the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the trustee transfer the Fixed Rate
| | |
114 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
Bond held by the SPV to the Portfolio, thereby collapsing the SPV. The SPV may also be collapsed in certain other circumstances. In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, the Portfolio accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in its portfolio of investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its statement of assets and liabilities. Interest expense related to the Portfolios liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The interest expense is also included in the Portfolios expense ratio. At April 30, 2012, the amount of the Portfolio’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding was $9,200,000, $103,320,000 and $4,445,000 and the related interest rate was 0.25% to 0.35%, 0.25% to 0.35% and 0.25% for National, High Income Municipal and California Portfolios, respectively.
Each Portfolio may also purchase Inverse Floaters in the secondary market without first owning the underlying bond. Such an Inverse Floater is included in the portfolio of investments but is not required to be treated as a secured borrowing and reflected in the Portfolio’s financial statements as a secured borrowing.
NOTE J
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) to develop common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments are intended to improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The ASU is effective during interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implication of this ASU and its impact on the financial statements has not been determined.
In December 2011, the FASB issued an ASU related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities in financial statements. The amendments in this update require an entity to disclose both gross and net information for derivatives and other financial instruments that are either offset in the statement of assets and liabilities or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The ASU is effective during interim or annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. At this time, management is evaluating the implication of this ASU and its impact on the financial statements has not been determined.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 115 | |
Notes to Financial Statements
��
NOTE K
Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the Portfolios’ financial statements through this date.
| | |
116 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Notes to Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio | |
| | Class A | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.04 | | | | $ 9.62 | | | | $ 8.90 | | | | $ 10.03 | | | | $ 10.22 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .20 | | | | .43 | | | | .41 | | | | .40 | | | | .42 | | | | .44 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .41 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | .42 | | | | .74 | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | (.19 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .61 | | | | .36 | | | | .83 | | | | 1.14 | | | | (.71 | ) | | | .25 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.21 | ) | | | (.43 | ) | | | (.41 | ) | | | (.42 | ) | | | (.42 | ) | | | (.44 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.37 | | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.04 | | | | $ 9.62 | | | | $ 8.90 | | | | $ 10.03 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 6.12 | % | | | 3.80 | % | | | 8.81 | % | | | 13.11 | % | | | (7.32 | )% | | 2.52 | | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $690,093 | | | | $641,972 | | | | $712,033 | | | | $642,319 | | | | $401,886 | | | | $361,701 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .76 | %(d) | | | .76 | % | | | .76 | %(e) | | | .74 | % | | | .68 | % | | | .68 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .75 | %(d) | | | .75 | % | | | .75 | %(e) | | | .74 | % | | | .68 | % | | | .68 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .87 | %(d) | | | .88 | % | | | .87 | %(e) | | | .89 | % | | | .91 | % | | | .92 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .86 | %(d) | | | .87 | % | | | .87 | %(e) | | | .89 | % | | | .91 | % | | | .92 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 4.03 | %(d) | | | 4.42 | % | | | 4.16 | %(e) | | | 4.47 | % | | | 4.31 | % | | | 4.38 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 5 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 15 | % |
See | | footnote summary on page 131. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 117 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio | |
| | Class B | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.02 | | | | $ 9.61 | | | | $ 8.89 | | | | $ 10.02 | | | | $ 10.21 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .17 | | | | .36 | | | | .34 | | | | .34 | | | | .35 | | | | .37 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .39 | | | | (.06 | ) | | | .41 | | | | .73 | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | (.19 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .56 | | | | .30 | | | | .75 | | | | 1.07 | | | | (.78 | ) | | | .18 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.36 | ) | | | (.34 | ) | | | (.35 | ) | | | (.35 | ) | | | (.37 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.35 | | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.02 | | | | $ 9.61 | | | | $ 8.89 | | | | $ 10.02 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.66 | % | | | 3.19 | % | | | 7.97 | % | | | 12.35 | % | | | (7.97 | )% | | | 1.81 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $6,123 | | | | $7,334 | | | | $12,640 | | | | $19,492 | | | | $14,988 | | | | $25,332 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.46 | %(d) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.46 | %(e) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.45 | %(d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.59 | %(d) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.60 | %(e) | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.63 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.58 | %(d) | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.59 | %(e) | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.63 | % | | | 1.63 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.35 | %(d) | | | 3.74 | % | | | 3.48 | %(e) | | | 3.80 | % | | | 3.61 | % | | | 3.69 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 5 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 15 | % |
See | | footnote summary on page 131. |
| | |
118 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio | |
| | Class C | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.03 | | | | $ 9.61 | | | | $ 8.89 | | | | $ 10.02 | | | | $ 10.21 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .17 | | | | .36 | | | | .34 | | | | .34 | | | | .35 | | | | .37 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .40 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | .42 | | | | .73 | | | | (1.13 | ) | | | (.19 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .57 | | | | .29 | | | | .76 | | | | 1.07 | | | | (.78 | ) | | | .18 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.36 | ) | | | (.34 | ) | | | (.35 | ) | | | (.35 | ) | | | (.37 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.36 | | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.03 | | | | $ 9.61 | | | | $ 8.89 | | | | $ 10.02 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.76 | % | | | 3.09 | % | | | 8.07 | % | | | 12.34 | % | | | (7.98 | )% | | | 1.81 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $153,870 | | | | $140,265 | | | | $153,200 | | | | $131,971 | | | | $63,704 | | | | $60,613 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.46 | %(d) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.46 | %(e) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.45 | %(d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.38 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.57 | %(d) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.58 | %(e) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.62 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.56 | %(d) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.57 | %(e) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.62 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.33 | %(d) | | | 3.72 | % | | | 3.47 | %(e) | | | 3.76 | % | | | 3.61 | % | | | 3.68 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 5 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 15 | % |
See | | footnote summary on page 131. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 119 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | National Portfolio | |
| | Advisor Class | |
| Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | | | August 6, 2008(f) to October 31, | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.04 | | | | $ 9.62 | | | | $ 8.90 | | | | $ 9.66 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .22 | | | | .46 | | | | .44 | | | | .42 | | | | .09 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .40 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | .42 | | | | .74 | | | | (.74 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .62 | | | | .39 | | | | .86 | | | | 1.16 | | | | (.65 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.22 | ) | | | (.46 | ) | | | (.44 | ) | | | (.44 | ) | | | (.11 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.37 | | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.04 | | | | $ 9.62 | | | | $ 8.90 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 6.28 | % | | | 4.11 | % | | | 9.14 | % | | | 13.45 | % | | | (6.79 | )% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $131,006 | | | | $94,240 | | | | $72,609 | | | | $39,245 | | | | $1,482 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .46 | %(d) | | | .46 | % | | | .46 | %(e) | | | .45 | % | | | .38 | %(d) |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .45 | %(d) | | | .45 | % | | | .45 | %(e) | | | .45 | % | | | .38 | %(d) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .57 | %(d) | | | .58 | % | | | .57 | %(e) | | | .57 | % | | | .69 | %(d) |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .56 | %(d) | | | .57 | % | | | .57 | %(e) | | | .57 | % | | | .69 | %(d) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 4.32 | %(d) | | | 4.70 | % | | | 4.45 | %(e) | | | 4.55 | % | | | 5.19 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 5 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 13 | % | | | 11 | % | | | 24 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | |
120 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal Portfolio | |
| | Class A | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | �� | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | January 26, 2010(f) to October 31, 2010 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | | | | $ 10.00 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .27 | | | | .54 | | | | .40 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .73 | | | | (.42 | ) | | | .71 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net asset value from operations | | | 1.00 | | | | .12 | | | | 1.11 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.27 | ) | | | (.56 | ) | | | (.42 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.03 | ) | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | | | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.27 | ) | | | (.59 | ) | | | (.42 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.95 | | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 9.93 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 11.31 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $441,640 | | | | $279,661 | | | | $240,484 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .89 | %(d) | | | .92 | % | | | .90 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .80 | %(d) | | | .80 | % | | | .78 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .99 | %(d) | | | 1.06 | % | | | 1.27 | %(d)(e) |
Expenses, before waivers/reimbursements, excluding interest expense | | | .90 | %(d) | | | .94 | % | | | 1.15 | %(d)(e) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 5.06 | %(d) | | | 5.51 | % | | | 5.29 | %(d)(e) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 43 | % | | | 27 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 121 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal Portfolio | |
| | Class C | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | January 26, 2010(f) to October 31, 2010 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | | | | $ 10.00 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .23 | | | | .47 | | | | .36 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .74 | | | | (.42 | ) | | | .69 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net asset value from operations | | | .97 | | | | .05 | | | | 1.05 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.24 | ) | | | (.49 | ) | | | (.36 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.03 | ) | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.24 | ) | | | (.52 | ) | | | (.36 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.95 | | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 9.56 | % | | | .76 | % | | | 10.73 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $143,614 | | | | $87,012 | | | | $68,911 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.59 | %(d) | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.59 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.50 | %(d) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.47 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.70 | %(d) | | | 1.76 | % | | | 2.00 | % (d)(e) |
Expenses, before fee waivers/reimbursements, excluding interest expense | | | 1.60 | %(d) | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.87 | %(d)(e) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 4.36 | %(d) | | | 4.81 | % | | | 4.63 | %(d)(e) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 43 | % | | | 27 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | |
122 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | High Income Municipal Portfolio | |
| | Advisor Class | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, 2011 | | | January 26, 2010(f) to October 31, 2010 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | | | | $ 10.00 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .28 | | | | .57 | | | | .43 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .73 | | | | (.42 | ) | | | .70 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net asset value from operations | | | 1.01 | | | | .15 | | | | 1.13 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.29 | ) | | | (.59 | ) | | | (.44 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.03 | ) | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.29 | ) | | | (.62 | ) | | | (.44 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.22 | | | | $ 10.69 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 10.00 | % | | | 1.77 | % | | | 11.56 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $310,059 | | | | $188,932 | | | | $100,804 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .59 | %(d) | | | .62 | % | | | .57 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .50 | %(d) | | | .50 | % | | | .45 | %(d)(e)(g) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .70 | %(d) | | | .76 | % | | | 1.12 | %(d)(e) |
Expenses, before fee waivers/reimbursements, excluding interest expense | | | .60 | %(d) | | | .64 | % | | | 1.00 | %(d)(e) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 5.39 | %(d) | | | 5.81 | % | | | 5.56 | %(d)(e) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 43 | % | | | 27 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 123 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | |
| | Class A | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.51 | | | | $ 9.85 | | | | $ 10.88 | | | | $ 11.07 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .22 | | | | .46 | | | | .46 | | | | .47 | | | | .46 | | | | .46 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .44 | | | | (.10 | ) | | | .42 | | | | .64 | | | | (1.04 | ) | | | (.20 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .66 | | | | .36 | | | | .88 | | | | 1.11 | | | | (.58 | ) | | | .26 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.21 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | ��– | | | (.01 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.21 | ) | | | (.46 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) | | | (.45 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 11.29 | | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.51 | | | | $ 9.85 | | | | $ 10.88 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 6.16 | % | | | 3.47 | % | | | 8.49 | % | | | 11.56 | % | | | (5.52 | )% | | | 2.45 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $524,576 | | | | $511,656 | | | | $599,027 | | | | $610,558 | | | | $553,120 | | | | $594,039 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .76 | %(d) | | | .76 | % | | | .75 | %(e) | | | .75 | % | | | .77 | % | | | .77 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .75 | %(d) | | | .75 | % | | | .75 | %(e) | | | .75 | % | | | .77 | % | | | .77 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .85 | %(d) | | | .86 | % | | | .85 | %(e) | | | .86 | % | | | .85 | % | | | .85 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .85 | %(d) | | | .85 | % | | | .84 | %(e) | | | .86 | % | | | .85 | % | | | .85 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 4.03 | %(d) | | | 4.39 | % | | | 4.30 | %(e) | | | 4.61 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 4.19 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 15 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 21 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | |
124 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | |
| | Class B | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.50 | | | | $ 9.84 | | | | $ 10.87 | | | | $ 11.07 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .18 | | | | .39 | | | | .38 | | | | .39 | | | | .38 | | | | .38 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .43 | | | | (.11 | ) | | | .43 | | | | .65 | | | | (1.03 | ) | | | (.20 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .61 | | | | .28 | | | | .81 | | | | 1.04 | | | | (.65 | ) | | | .18 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.01 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 11.28 | | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.50 | | | | $ 9.84 | | | | $ 10.87 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.70 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 7.85 | % | | | 10.80 | % | | | (6.18 | )% | | | 1.65 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $2,556 | | | | $2,872 | | | | $5,267 | | | | $8,845 | | | | $16,413 | | | | $43,581 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.46 | %(d) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.45 | %(d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.58 | %(d) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.57 | %(e) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.56 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.58 | %(d) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.56 | %(e) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.56 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.33 | %(d) | | | 3.70 | % | | | 3.61 | %(e) | | | 3.93 | % | | | 3.57 | % | | | 3.48 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 15 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 21 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 125 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | |
| | Class C | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.83 | | | | $ 10.93 | | | | $ 10.50 | | | | $ 9.84 | | | | $10.88 | | | | $ 11.07 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .18 | | | | .39 | | | | .39 | | | | .39 | | | | .38 | | | | .38 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .44 | | | | (.11 | ) | | | .41 | | | | .65 | | | | (1.04 | ) | | | (.19 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .62 | | | | .28 | | | | .80 | | | | 1.04 | | | | (.66 | ) | | | .19 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.01 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.17 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.38 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 11.28 | | | | $ 10.83 | | | | $ 10.93 | | | | $ 10.50 | | | | $ 9.84 | | | | $ 10.88 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.80 | % | | | 2.75 | % | | | 7.75 | % | | | 10.79 | % | | | (6.28 | )% | | | 1.73 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $109,621 | | | | $106,547 | | | | $117,354 | | | | $118,726 | | | | $101,126 | | | | $111,697 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.46 | %(d) | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | % |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.45 | % (d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.47 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.56 | %(d) | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.55 | %(e) | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.55 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | 1.55 | %(d) | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.55 | %(e) | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.55 | % | | | 1.55 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.33 | %(d) | | | 3.69 | % | | | 3.60 | %(e) | | | 3.91 | % | | | 3.60 | % | | | 3.49 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 15 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 21 | % |
See | | footnote summary on page 131. |
| | |
126 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Portfolio | |
| | Advisor Class | |
| Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | | | August 6 2008(f) to October 31, 2008 | |
| | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.51 | | | | $ 9.85 | | | | $ 10.51 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .24 | | | | .49 | | | | .49 | | | | .48 | | | | .08 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .44 | | | | (.10 | ) | | | .42 | | | | .66 | | | | (.63 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .68 | | | | .39 | | | | .91 | | | | 1.14 | | | | (.55 | ) |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends and Distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.23 | ) | | | (.48 | ) | | | (.48 | ) | | | (.48 | ) | | | (.11 | ) |
Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions | | | – 0 | – | | | (.01 | ) | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – | | | – 0 | – |
| | | | |
Total dividends and distributions | | | (.23 | ) | | | (.49 | ) | | | (.48 | ) | | | (.48 | ) | | | (.11 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 11.29 | | | | $ 10.84 | | | | $ 10.94 | | | | $ 10.51 | | | | $ 9.85 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 6.32 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | | 8.82 | % | | | 11.89 | % | | | (5.20 | )% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $29,849 | | | | $23,338 | | | | $13,614 | | | | $8,455 | | | | $1,735 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .46 | %(d) | | | .46 | % | | | .45 | %(e) | | | .45 | % | | | .47 | %(d) |
Expenses, net of fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .45 | %(d) | | | .45 | % | | | .45 | %(e) | | | .45 | % | | | .47 | %(d) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .55 | %(d) | | | .55 | % | | | .55 | %(e) | | | .55 | % | | | .55 | %(d) |
Expenses, before fee waivers, excluding interest expense | | | .55 | %(d) | | | .55 | % | | | .54 | %(e) | | | .55 | % | | | .55 | %(d) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 4.31 | %(d) | | | 4.65 | % | | | 4.59 | %(e) | | | 4.80 | % | | | 4.98 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 15 | % | | | 12 | % | | | 8 | % | | | 9 | % | | | 2 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 127 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | |
| | Class A | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.69 | | | | $ 9.01 | | | | $ 9.82 | | | | $ 9.97 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .18 | | | | .38 | | | | .37 | | | | .38 | | | | .40 | | | | .41 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .32 | | | | (.04 | ) | | | .32 | | | | .68 | | | | (.81 | ) | | | (.15 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .50 | | | | .34 | | | | .69 | | | | 1.06 | | | | (.41 | ) | | | .26 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.18 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.37 | ) | | | (.38 | ) | | | (.40 | ) | | | (.41 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.29 | | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.69 | | | | $ 9.01 | | | | $ 9.82 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.07 | % | | | 3.56 | % | | | 7.26 | % | | | 12.03 | % | | | (4.31 | ) % | | | 2.62 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $533,185 | | | | $493,133 | | | | $516,566 | | | | $444,600 | | | | $368,524 | | | | $356,989 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .75 | %(d) | | | .75 | % | | | .75 | %(e) | | | .72 | % | | | .58 | % | | | .58 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .85 | %(d) | | | .87 | % | | | .86 | %(e) | | | .88 | % | | | .88 | % | | | .90 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.60 | %(d) | | | 3.90 | % | | | 3.76 | %(e) | | | 4.09 | % | | | 4.17 | % | | | 4.12 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 5 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | |
128 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | |
| | Class B | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.00 | | | | $ 9.68 | | | | $ 9.00 | | | | $ 9.80 | | | | $ 9.96 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .15 | | | | .31 | | | | .30 | | | | .32 | | | | .33 | | | | .34 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .31 | | | | (.04 | ) | | | .32 | | | | .68 | | | | (.79 | ) | | | (.16 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .46 | | | | .27 | | | | .62 | | | | 1.00 | | | | (.46 | ) | | | .18 | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.15 | ) | | | (.31 | ) | | | (.30 | ) | | | (.32 | ) | | | (.34 | ) | | | (.34 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.27 | | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.00 | | | | $ 9.68 | | | | $ 9.00 | | | | $ 9.80 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 4.62 | % | | | 2.85 | % | | | 6.53 | % | | | 11.28 | % | | | (4.88 | )% | | | 1.82 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $12,057 | | | | $14,134 | | | | $24,682 | | | | $36,520 | | | | $46,000 | | | | $74,342 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.45 | %(d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.42 | % | | | 1.28 | % | | | 1.28 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.57 | %(d) | | | 1.59 | % | | | 1.58 | %(e) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.61 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 2.91 | %(d) | | | 3.22 | % | | | 3.08 | %(e) | | | 3.43 | % | | | 3.46 | % | | | 3.42 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 5 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 129 | |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | |
| | Class C | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.68 | | | | $ 9.01 | | | | $ 9.81 | | | | $ 9.96 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .15 | | | | .31 | | | | .30 | | | | .31 | | | | .33 | | | | .34 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .32 | | | | (.05 | ) | | | .33 | | | | .68 | | | | (.79 | ) | | | (.15 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .47 | | | | .26 | | | | .63 | | | | .99 | | | | (.46 | ) | | | .19 | |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.15 | ) | | | (.31 | ) | | | (.30 | ) | | | (.32 | ) | | | (.34 | ) | | | (.34 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.28 | | | | $ 9.96 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.68 | | | | $ 9.01 | | | | $ 9.81 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 4.71 | % | | | 2.74 | % | | | 6.62 | % | | | 11.14 | % | | | (4.88 | )% | | | 1.91 | % |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $94,023 | | | | $79,223 | | | | $90,789 | | | | $67,718 | | | | $49,821 | | | | $46,305 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | 1.45 | %(d) | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.45 | %(e) | | | 1.42 | % | | | 1.28 | % | | | 1.28 | % |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | 1.55 | %(d) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.56 | %(e) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.60 | % |
Net investment income(a) | | | 2.90 | %(d) | | | 3.20 | % | | | 3.05 | %(e) | | | 3.38 | % | | | 3.47 | % | | | 3.43 | % |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 10 | % | | | 5 | % |
See footnote summary on page 131.
| | |
130 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Financial Highlights
Selected Data For A Share Of Capital Stock Outstanding Throughout Each Period
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Portfolio | |
| | Advisor Class | |
| | Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 (unaudited) | | | Year Ended October 31, | | | August 6, 2008(f) to October 31, | |
| | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.69 | | | | $ 9.02 | | | | $ 9.60 | |
| | | | |
Income From Investment Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income(a)(b) | | | .19 | | | | .41 | | | | .40 | | | | .41 | | | | .08 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions | | | .33 | | | | (.04 | ) | | | .32 | | | | .67 | | | | (.56 | ) |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations | | | .52 | | | | .37 | | | | .72 | | | | 1.08 | | | | (.48 | ) |
| | | | |
Less: Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (.20 | ) | | | (.41 | ) | | | (.40 | ) | | | (.41 | ) | | | (.10 | ) |
| | | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $ 10.29 | | | | $ 9.97 | | | | $ 10.01 | | | | $ 9.69 | | | | $ 9.02 | |
| | | | |
Total Return | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total investment return based on net asset value(c) | | | 5.23 | % | | | 3.87 | % | | | 7.58 | % | | | 12.25 | % | | | (4.98 | )% |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | | $17,915 | | | | $11,169 | | | | $13,028 | | | | $7,584 | | | | $4,868 | |
Ratio to average net assets of: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses, net of fee waivers | | | .45 | %(d) | | | .45 | % | | | .45 | %(e) | | | .42 | % | | | .28 | %(d) |
Expenses, before fee waivers | | | .55 | %(d) | | | .57 | % | | | .55 | %(e) | | | .58 | % | | | .49 | %(d) |
Net investment income(a) | | | 3.88 | %(d) | | | 4.21 | % | | | 4.03 | %(e) | | | 4.37 | % | | | 4.95 | %(d) |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 6 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 10 | % |
(a) | | Net of fees and expenses waived/reimbursed by the Adviser. |
(b) | | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(c) | | Total investment return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemption on the last day of the period. Initial sales charges or contingent deferred sales charges are not reflected in the calculation of total investment return. Total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
(e) | | The ratio includes expenses attributable to costs of proxy solicitation. |
(f) | | Commencement of operations. |
(g) | | The Adviser agreed to voluntarily reimburse an additional .02%, .03% and .05% of the Portfolio’s Class A, Class C and Advisor Class expenses, respectively. |
See notes to financial statements.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 131 | |
Financial Highlights
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
| | |
William H. Foulk, Jr.(1), Chairman John H. Dobkin(1) Michael J. Downey(1) D. James Guzy(1) Nancy P. Jacklin(1) | | Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer Garry L. Moody(1) Marshall C. Turner, Jr.(1) Earl D. Weiner(1) |
OFFICERS
| | |
Philip L. Kirstein, Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer Robert (Guy) B. Davidson III,(2) Senior Vice President Douglas J. Peebles, Senior Vice President Michael G. Brooks,(2) Vice President | | Fred S. Cohen,(2) Vice President Wayne D. Godlin,(2) Vice President Terrance T. Hults,(2) Vice President Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Phyllis J. Clarke, Controller |
| | |
Custodian and Accounting Agent State Street Bank and Trust Company One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 Principal Underwriter AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. 1345 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10105 Legal Counsel Seward & Kissel LLP One Battery Park Plaza New York, NY 10004 | | Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP 5 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Transfer Agent AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. P.O. Box 786003 San Antonio, TX 78278-6003 Toll-Free (800) 221-5672 |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee. Mr. Foulk is the sole member of the Fair Value Pricing Committee. |
(2) | The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Fund’s portfolios are made by the Municipal Bond Investment Team. Messrs. Brooks, Davidson, Godlin and Hults are the investment professionals with the most significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of the High Income Municipal Portfolio. Messrs. Brooks, Cohen, Davidson, Godlin and Hults are the investment professionals with the most significant responsibility for the day-to-day management of the California, National and New York Portfolios. |
| | |
132 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Board of Directors
Information Regarding the Review and Approval of the Fund’s Advisory Agreement
The disinterested directors (the “directors”) of AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) unanimously approved the continuance of the Fund’s Advisory Agreement with the Adviser in respect of each of the following portfolios (each, a “Portfolio” and collectively, the “Portfolios”) at a meeting held on November 1-3, 2011:
| • | | AllianceBernstein High Income Municipal Portfolio |
Prior to approval of the continuance of the Advisory Agreement, the directors had requested from the Adviser, and received and evaluated, extensive materials. They reviewed the proposed continuance of the Advisory Agreement with the Adviser and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Adviser, who advised on the relevant legal standards. The directors also reviewed an independent evaluation prepared by the Fund’s Senior Officer (who is also the Fund’s Independent Compliance Officer) of the reasonableness of the advisory fee in the Advisory Agreement in respect of each Portfolio, in which the Senior Officer concluded that the contractual fee for each Portfolio was reasonable. The directors also discussed the proposed continuance in private sessions with counsel and the Fund’s Senior Officer.
The directors considered their knowledge of the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser to the Portfolios gained from their experience as directors or trustees of most of the registered investment companies advised by the Adviser, their overall confidence in the Adviser’s integrity and competence they have gained from that experience, the Adviser’s initiative in identifying and raising potential issues with the directors and its responsiveness, frankness and attention to concerns raised by the directors in the past, including the Adviser’s willingness to consider and implement organizational and operational changes designed to improve investment results and the services provided to the AllianceBernstein Funds. The directors noted that they have four regular meetings each year, at each of which they receive presentations from the Adviser on the investment results of the Portfolios and review extensive materials and information presented by the Adviser.
The directors also considered all other factors they believed relevant, including the specific matters discussed below. In their deliberations, the directors did not identify any particular information that was all-important or controlling, and different directors may have attributed different weights to the various factors. The directors determined that the selection of the Adviser to manage each Portfolio and the overall arrangements between each Portfolio and the Adviser, as
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 133 | |
provided in the Advisory Agreement, including the advisory fee, were fair and reasonable in light of the services performed, expenses incurred and such other matters as the directors considered relevant in the exercise of their business judgment. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the directors’ determinations included the following:
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services Provided
The directors considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement, including the quality of the investment research capabilities of the Adviser and the other resources it has dedicated to performing services for each Portfolio. They also noted the professional experience and qualifications of each Portfolio’s portfolio management team and other senior personnel of the Adviser. The directors also considered that the Advisory Agreement provides that the Portfolios will reimburse the Adviser for the cost to it of providing certain clerical, accounting, administrative and other services provided at the Portfolios’ request by employees of the Adviser or its affiliates. Requests for these reimbursements are approved by the directors on a quarterly basis and, to the extent requested and paid, result in a higher rate of total compensation from each Portfolio to the Adviser than the fee rate stated in the Advisory Agreement. The directors noted that the methodology used to determine the reimbursement amounts had been reviewed by an independent consultant retained by the Fund’s Senior Officer. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Adviser’s role in coordinating the activities of the Portfolios’ other service providers, also were considered. The directors concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided to each of the Portfolios under the Advisory Agreement.
Costs of Services Provided and Profitability
The directors reviewed a schedule of the revenues, expenses and related notes indicating the profitability of each Portfolio to the Adviser for calendar years 2009 and 2010 that had been prepared with an expense allocation methodology arrived at in consultation with an independent consultant retained by the Fund’s Senior Officer. The directors reviewed the assumptions and methods of allocation used by the Adviser in preparing fund-specific profitability data and noted that there are a number of potentially acceptable allocation methodologies for information of this type. The directors noted that the profitability information reflected all revenues and expenses of the Adviser’s relationship with the Portfolios, including those relating to its subsidiaries which provide transfer agency and distribution services to the Portfolios. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability with advisory contracts for unaffiliated funds because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors. The directors focused on the profitability of the Adviser’s relationships with the Portfolios before taxes and distribution expenses. The directors noted that AllianceBernstein High Income Municipal Portfolio (January 2010 inception) was not profitable to the Adviser in 2010. The
| | |
134 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
directors concluded that they were satisfied that the Adviser’s level of profitability from its relationship with each other Portfolio was not unreasonable.
Fall-Out Benefits
The directors considered the other benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolios, including but not limited to, benefits relating to 12b-1 fees and sales charges received by the Fund’s principal underwriter (which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser) in respect of certain classes of the Portfolios’ shares and transfer agency fees paid by the Portfolios to a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser. The directors recognized that the Adviser’s profitability would be somewhat lower without these benefits. The directors understood that the Adviser also might derive reputational and other benefits from its association with the Portfolios.
Investment Results
In addition to the information reviewed by the directors in connection with the meeting, the directors receive detailed performance information for each Portfolio at each regular Board meeting during the year. At the November 2011 meeting, the directors reviewed information prepared by Lipper showing the performance for Class A shares of each Portfolio as compared with that of a group of funds selected by Lipper (the “Performance Group”) and as compared with that of a broader array of funds selected by Lipper (the “Performance Universe”), and information prepared by the Adviser showing performance of the Class A Shares of each Portfolio as compared with the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), in each case for the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year periods, as applicable, ended July 31, 2011 and (in the case of comparisons with the Index) the since inception period.
California Portfolio
The directors noted that the Portfolio (December 1986 inception) was in the 3rd quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 1-year period, in the 3rd quintile of the Performance Group and 2nd quintile of the Performance Universe for the 3-year period, in the 2nd quintile of the Performance Group and 1st quintile of the Performance Universe for the 5-year period, and in the 1st quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 10-year period. The Portfolio lagged the Index in the 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year periods and outperformed the Index in the since inception period. The directors also noted the Portfolio’s acquisition of all the assets and liabilities of the Fund’s California Portfolio II effective January 2009. Based on their review, the directors concluded that the Portfolio’s performance was satisfactory.
National Portfolio
The directors noted that the Portfolio (December 1986 inception) was in the 1st quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 1-year period, in the 3rd quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 135 | |
Universe for the 3- and 10-year periods, and in the 2nd quintile of the Performance Group and 3rd quintile of the Performance Universe for the 5-year period. The Portfolio outperformed the Index in the 1-year and the since inception periods and lagged the Index in the 3-, 5- and 10-year periods. The directors also noted the Portfolio’s acquisitions of all the assets and liabilities of the Fund’s National Portfolio II and AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund II – Florida Portfolio effective June 2009. Based on their review, the directors concluded that the Portfolio’s performance was satisfactory.
New York Portfolio
The directors noted that the Portfolio (December 1986 inception) was in the 1st quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 1-year period, in the 3rd quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 3-year period, and in the 2nd quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 5- and 10-year periods. The Portfolio outperformed the Index in the since inception period and lagged the Index in all other periods. Based on their review, the Directors concluded that the Portfolio’s relative performance over time had been satisfactory.
AllianceBernstein High Income Municipal Portfolio
The directors noted that the Portfolio (January 2010 inception) was in the 2nd quintile of the Performance Group and the Performance Universe for the 1-year period, and that it outperformed the Index in the 1-year and the since inception periods. Based on their review, the directors concluded that the Portfolio’s relative performance was satisfactory.
Advisory Fees and Other Expenses
The directors considered the advisory fee rate paid or payable by each Portfolio to the Adviser and information prepared by Lipper concerning advisory fee rates paid by other funds in the same Lipper category as the Portfolio at a common asset level. The directors recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of advisory fees because there are variations in the services that are included in the fees paid by other funds.
The Adviser informed the directors that there were no institutional products managed by it that have an investment style substantially similar to that of a Portfolio. The directors reviewed the relevant fee information from the Adviser’s Form ADV and noted that the Adviser charged institutional clients lower fees for advising comparably sized institutional accounts using strategies that differ from those of the Portfolios but which invest in fixed income municipal securities.
The Adviser reviewed with the directors the significantly greater scope of the services it provides to the Portfolios relative to institutional clients. The Adviser also noted that because mutual funds are constantly issuing and redeeming their shares, they are more difficult to manage than an institutional account, where
| | |
136 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
the assets tend to be relatively stable. In light of the substantial differences in services rendered by the Adviser to institutional clients as compared to funds such as the Portfolios, the directors considered these fee comparisons inapt and did not place significant weight on them in their deliberations.
The directors also considered the total expense ratio of the Class A shares of each Portfolio in comparison to the fees and expenses of funds within two comparison groups created by Lipper: an Expense Group and an Expense Universe. Lipper described an Expense Group as a representative sample of funds similar to a Portfolio and an Expense Universe as a broader group, consisting of all funds in the Portfolio’s investment classification/objective with a similar load type as the Portfolio. The Class A expense ratio of each Portfolio was based on the Portfolio’s latest fiscal year. The expense ratios of the Portfolios reflected fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements as a result of undertakings by the Adviser or, in the case of AllianceBernstein High Income Municipal Portfolio, an expense limitation agreement between the Adviser and the Portfolio. The directors noted that it was likely that the expense ratios of some of the other funds in each Portfolio’s Lipper category also were lowered by waivers or reimbursements by those funds’ investment advisers, which in some cases might be voluntary or temporary. The directors view the expense ratio information as relevant to their evaluation of the Adviser’s services because the Adviser is responsible for coordinating services provided to the Portfolios by others.
California Portfolio
National Portfolio
New York Portfolio
The information reviewed by the directors showed that, at each Portfolio’s current size, its contractual effective advisory fee rate of 45 basis points, plus the 1 basis point impact of the administrative expense reimbursement in the latest fiscal year, was lower than the Expense Group median. The directors noted that each Portfolio’s total expense ratio, which reflected a cap by the Adviser, was lower than the Expense Group and the Expense Universe medians. The directors concluded that each Portfolio’s expense ratio was satisfactory.
AllianceBernstein High Income Municipal Portfolio
The information reviewed by the directors showed that, at the Portfolio’s current size, its contractual effective advisory fee of 50 basis points was lower than the Expense Group median. The directors noted that in the Portfolio’s latest fiscal year, the administrative expense reimbursement of 4 basis points had been waived by the Adviser. The directors noted that the Portfolio’s total expense ratio, which reflected an expense limitation agreement between the Adviser and the Portfolio, was lower than the Expense Group and the Expense Universe medians. The directors concluded that the Portfolio’s expense ratio was satisfactory.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 137 | |
Economies of Scale
The directors noted that the advisory fee schedule for each Portfolio contains breakpoints that reduce the fee rates on assets above specified levels. The directors took into consideration prior presentations by an independent consultant on economies of scale in the mutual fund industry and for the AllianceBernstein Funds, and by the Adviser concerning certain of its views on economies of scale. The directors also had requested and received from the Adviser certain updates on economies of scale at the May 2011 meetings. The directors believe that economies of scale may be realized (if at all) by the Adviser across a variety of products and services, and not only in respect of a single fund. The directors noted that there is no established methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to the fund-specific services provided by a fund’s adviser and to the economies of scale that an adviser may realize in its overall mutual fund business or those components of it which directly or indirectly affect a fund’s operations. The directors observed that in the mutual fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Portfolios, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. The directors also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all. Having taken these factors into account, the directors concluded that the Portfolios’ shareholders would benefit from a sharing of economies of scale in the event a Portfolio’s net assets exceed a breakpoint in the future.
| | |
138 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUMMARY OF SENIOR OFFICER’S EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT1
The following is a summary of the evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement between AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) and The AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund (the “Fund”) in respect of the following Portfolios (the “Portfolios”):2
California Portfolio
National Portfolio
New York Portfolio
High Income Municipal Portfolio
The evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement was prepared by Philip L. Kirstein, the Senior Officer of the Fund for the Directors of the Fund, as required by the August 2004 agreement between the Adviser and the New York State Attorney General (the “NYAG”). The Senior Officer’s evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement is not meant to diminish the responsibility or authority of the Board of Directors to perform its duties pursuant to Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “40 Act”) and applicable state law. The purpose of the summary is to provide shareholders with a synopsis of the independent evaluation of the reasonableness of the advisory fees proposed to be paid by the Portfolios which was provided to the Directors in connection with their review of the proposed approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The Senior Officer’s evaluation considered the following factors:
| 1. | Advisory fees charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services; |
| 2. | Advisory fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services; |
| 3. | Costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the advisory agreement, excluding any intra-corporate profit; |
| 4. | Profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services; |
| 5. | Possible economies of scale as the Portfolios grow larger; and |
| 6. | Nature and quality of the Adviser’s services including the performance of the Portfolios. |
1 | | The information in the fee evaluation was completed on October 20, 2011 and discussed with the Board of Directors on November 1-3, 2011. |
2 | | Future references to the Portfolios do not include “AllianceBernstein.�� References in the fee summary pertaining to performance and expense ratios refer to Class A shares of the Portfolios. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 139 | |
These factors, with the exception of the first factor, are generally referred to as the “Gartenberg factors,” which were articulated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1982. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F. 2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982). On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court held the Gartenberg decision was correct in its basic formulation of what §36(b) requires: to face liability under §36(b), “an investment adviser must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm’s length bargaining.” Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 130 S.Ct. 1418 (2010). In Jones, the Court stated the Gartenberg approach fully incorporates the correct understanding of fiduciary duty within the context of section 36(b) and noted with approval that “Gartenberg insists that all relevant circumstances be taken into account” and “uses the range of fees that might result from arm’s length bargaining as the benchmark for reviewing challenged fees.”3
ADVISORY FEES, NET ASSETS, & EXPENSE RATIOS
The Adviser proposed that each Portfolio pay the advisory fee set forth in the table below for receiving the services to be provided pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. The fee schedule below, implemented in January 2004 in consideration of the Adviser’s settlement with the NYAG in December 2003, is based on a master schedule that contemplates eight categories of funds with almost all funds in each category having the same advisory fee schedule.4
| | | | |
Category | | Advisory Fee Schedule5 | | Portfolio |
Low Risk Income | | 45 bp on 1st $2.5 billion 40 bp on next $2.5 billion 35 bp on the balance | | California Portfolio National Portfolio New York Portfolio |
| | | | |
High Income | | 50 bp on 1st $2.5 billion 45 bp on next $2.5 billion 40 bp on the balance | | High Income Municipal Portfolio |
The Portfolios’ net assets on September 30, 2011 are set forth below:
| | | | |
Portfolio | | September 30, 2011 Net Assets ($MM) | |
California Portfolio | | $ | 649.1 | |
National Portfolio | | $ | 871.8 | |
New York Portfolio | | $ | 602.2 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | $ | 543.5 | |
3 | | Jones v. Harris at 1427. |
4 | | Most of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds, which the Adviser manages, were affected by the Adviser’s settlement with the NYAG. |
5 | | The advisory fees for each Portfolio are based on the percentage of each Portfolio’s average daily net assets, not a combination of any of the Portfolios. |
| | |
140 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
The Portfolios’ Investment Advisory Agreement provides for the Adviser to be reimbursed for certain clerical, legal, accounting, administrative and other services provided to each Portfolio. Indicated below are the reimbursement amounts, which the Adviser received from the Portfolios during their most recently completed fiscal year, expressed in dollars and as a percentage of average daily net assets:
| | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Amount | | | As a % of Average Daily Net Assets | |
California Portfolio | | $ | 84,168 | | | | 0.01 | % |
National Portfolio | | $ | 94,594 | | | | 0.01 | % |
New York Portfolio | | $ | 73,615 | | | | 0.01 | % |
High Income Municipal Portfolio6 | | $ | 65,000 | | | | 0.04 | % |
The Adviser has agreed to waive that portion of its advisory fees and/or reimburse the Portfolios for that portion of the Portfolios’ total operating expenses to the degree necessary to limit each Portfolio’s expense ratio to the amounts set forth below for each Portfolio’s current fiscal year. The waiver agreement is terminable by the Adviser at the end of the Portfolios’ fiscal year upon at least 60 days written notice. In addition, set forth below are the gross expense ratios of the Portfolios, annualized for the most recent semi-annual period: 7
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Expense Cap Pursuant to Expense Limitation Undertaking | | | Gross Expense Ratio (4/30/11)8 | | | Fiscal Year End |
California Portfolio | | Advisor Class A Class B Class C | |
| 0.45%
0.75% 1.45% 1.45% |
| |
| 0.56%
0.86% 1.58% 1.56% |
| | October 31 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | Advisor Class A Class B Class C | |
| 0.45%
0.75% 1.45% 1.45% |
| |
| 0.56%
0.86% 1.58% 1.56% |
| | October 31 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | Advisor Class A Class B Class C | |
| 0.45%
0.75% 1.45% 1.45% |
| |
| 0.56%
0.86% 1.58% 1.57% |
| | October 31 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | Advisor Class A Class C | |
| 0.50%
0.80% 1.50% |
| |
| 0.66% 0.95%
1.66% |
| | October 31 |
6 | | The Adviser waived the amount in its entirety. |
7 | | Semi-annual total expense ratios are unaudited. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 141 | |
I. | ADVISORY FEES CHARGED TO INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER CLIENTS |
The advisory fees charged to investment companies which the Adviser manages and sponsors are normally higher than those charged to similar sized institutional accounts, including pension plans and sub-advised investment companies. The fee differential reflects, among other things, different services provided to such clients, and different liabilities assumed. Services provided by the Adviser to the Portfolios that are not provided to non-investment company clients and sub-advised investment companies include providing office space and personnel to serve as Fund Officers, who among other responsibilities make the certifications required under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, and coordinating with and monitoring the Portfolios’ third party service providers such as Fund counsel, auditors, custodians, transfer agents and pricing services. The accounting, administrative, legal and compliance requirements for the Portfolios are more costly than those for institutional assets due to the greater complexities and time required for investment companies, although as previously noted, the Adviser is reimbursed for providing some of these services. Also, retail mutual funds managed by the Adviser are widely held. Servicing the Portfolios’ investors is more time consuming and labor intensive compared to institutional clients since the Adviser needs to communicate with a more extensive network of financial intermediaries and shareholders. The Adviser also believes that it incurs substantial entrepreneurial risk when offering a new mutual fund since establishing a new mutual fund requires a large upfront investment and it may take a long time for the fund to achieve profitability since the fund must be priced to scale from inception in order to be competitive and assets are acquired one account at a time. In addition, managing the cash flow of an investment company may be more difficult than managing that of a stable pool of assets, such as an institutional account with little cash movement in either direction, particularly, if a fund is in net redemption and the Adviser is frequently forced to sell securities to raise cash for redemptions. However, managing a fund with positive cash flow may be easier at times than managing a stable pool of assets. Finally, in recent years, investment advisers have been sued by institutional clients and have suffered reputational damage both by the attendant publicity and outcomes other than complete victories. Accordingly, the legal and reputational risks associated with institutional accounts are greater than previously thought, although still not equal to those related to the mutual fund industry.
Notwithstanding the Adviser’s view that managing an investment company is not comparable to managing other institutional accounts because the services provided are different, the Supreme Court has indicated consideration should be given to the advisory fees charged to institutional accounts with a similar investment style as the Portfolios.9 With respect to the Portfolios, the Adviser
9 | | The Supreme Court stated that “courts may give such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the clients in question require, but the courts must be wary of inapt comparisons.” Among the significant differences the Supreme Court noted that may exist between services provided to mutual funds and institutional accounts are “higher marketing costs.” Jones v. Harris at 1428. |
| | |
142 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
represented that there are no categories in the Form ADV for institutional products that have a substantially similar investment styles as the Portfolios. The Adviser does manage separately managed accounts that invest principally in municipal securities, but those mandates have a substantially lower risk profile (credit and interest rate risk) than that of the Portfolios.
The Adviser manages Sanford C. Bernstein Fund, Inc. (“SCB Fund”), an open-end management investment company. Several of the SCB Fund portfolios have a somewhat similar investment style as certain of the Portfolios and their advisory fee schedules are set forth below. Also presented are what would have been the effective advisory fees of the Portfolios had the SCB Fund fee schedules been applicable to the Portfolios based on September 30, 2011 net assets.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | SCB Fund Portfolio | | Fee Schedule | | SCB Fund Effective Fee (%) | | | Portfolio Advisory Fee (%) | |
California Portfolio | | Short Duration California Municipal Portfolio | | 45 bp on 1st $750 million 40 bp thereafter | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.450% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | California Municipal Portfolio | | 50 bp on 1st $1 billion 45 bp on next $2 billion 40 bp on next $2 billion 35 bp thereafter | | | 0.500% | | | | 0.450% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | Short Duration Diversified Municipal Portfolio | | 45 bp on 1st $750 million 40 bp thereafter | | | 0.443% | | | | 0.450% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Diversified Municipal Portfolio | | 50 bp on 1st $1 billion 45 bp on next $2 billion 40 bp on next $2 billion 35 bp on next $2 billion 30 bp thereafter | | | 0.500% | | | | 0.450% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | Short Duration New York Municipal Portfolio | | 45 bp on 1st $750 million 40 bp thereafter | | | 0.450% | | | | 0.450% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | New York Municipal Portfolio | | 50 bp on 1st $1 billion 45 bp on next $2 billion 40 bp on next $2 billion 35 bp thereafter | | | 0.500% | | | | 0.450% | |
The Adviser represented that it does not sub-advise any registered investment companies of other fund families with a substantially similar investment style as any of the Portfolios.
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 143 | |
II. | MANAGEMENT FEES CHARGED BY OTHER MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES FOR LIKE SERVICES. |
Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an analytical service that is not affiliated with the Adviser, compared the fees charged to the Portfolios with fees charged to other investment companies for similar services offered by other investment advisers.10 Lipper’s analysis included the comparison of each Portfolio’s contractual management fee, estimated at the approximate current asset level of the subject Portfolio, to the median of each Portfolio’s Lipper Expense Group (“EG”)11 and contractual management fee ranking.12
Lipper describes an EG as a representative sample of comparable funds. Lipper’s standard methodology for screening funds to be included in an EG entails the consideration of several fund criteria, including fund type, investment classification/objective, load type and similar 12b-1/non-12b-1 service fees, asset (size) comparability, expense components and attributes. An EG will typically consist of seven to twenty funds.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Contractual Management Fee (%)13 | | | Lipper Exp. Group Median(%) | | | Rank | |
California Portfolio | | | 0.450 | | | | 0.512 | | | | 1/12 | |
National Portfolio14 | | | 0.450 | | | | 0.472 | | | | 6/17 | |
New York Portfolio14 | | | 0.450 | | | | 0.513 | | | | 2/10 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | 0.500 | | | | 0.544 | | | | 1/10 | |
10 | | The Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since “these comparisons are problematic because these fees, like those challenged, may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length.” Jones v. Harris at 1429. |
11 | | Lipper does not consider average account size when constructing EGs. Funds with relatively small average account sizes tend to have higher transfer agent expense 3ratio than comparable sized funds that have relatively large average account sizes. Note that there are limitations on Lipper expense category data because different funds categorize expenses differently. |
12 | | The contractual management fee is calculated by Lipper using each Portfolio’s contractual management fee rate at a hypothetical asset level. The hypothetical asset level is based on the combined net assets of all classes of each Portfolio, rounded up to the next $25 million. Lipper’s total expense ratio information is based on the most recent annual report except as otherwise noted. A ranking of “1” would mean that a Portfolio had the lowest effective fee rate in the Lipper peer group. |
13 | | The contractual management fees for the Portfolios do not reflect any expense reimbursements made by the Portfolios to the Adviser for certain clerical, legal, accounting, administrative, and other services. In addition, the contractual management fees do not reflect any advisory fee waivers or expense reimbursements made by the Adviser that effectively reduce the contractual management fee. |
14 | | One of the Portfolio’s EG peer is excluded from the contractual management fee comparison because Lipper is unable to calculate the peer’s contractual management fee because of the gross income component in the peer’s advisory fee schedule. |
| | |
144 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
Lipper also compared the Portfolios’ total expense ratios to the medians of the Portfolios’ EGs and the Lipper Expense Universes (“EU”). The EU is a broader group compared to the EG, consisting of all funds that have the same investment classifications/objective and load type as the subject Portfolio.15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Expense Ratio (%)16 | | | Lipper Exp. Group Median (%) | | | Lipper Group Rank | | Lipper Exp. Universe Median (%) | | | Lipper Universe Rank |
California Portfolio | | | 0.750 | | | | 0.807 | | | 5/12 | | | 0.811 | | | 8/27 |
National Portfolio | | | 0.750 | | | | 0.786 | | | 3/18 | | | 0.810 | | | 12/52 |
New York Portfolio | | | 0.750 | | | | 0.783 | | | 4/11 | | | 0.783 | | | 8/21 |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | 0.781 | | | | 0.902 | | | 2/10 | | | 0.855 | | | 8/28 |
Based on this analysis, except for National Portfolio, which has a more favorable ranking on a total expense ratio basis than on a management fee basis, the Portfolios have a more favorable ranking on a management fee basis than on a total expense basis
III. | COSTS TO THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES OF SUPPLYING SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE MANAGEMENT FEE ARRANGEMENT, EXCLUDING ANY INTRA-CORPORATE PROFIT. |
The Adviser utilizes two profitability reporting systems, which operate independently but are aligned with each other, to estimate the Adviser’s profitability in connection with investment advisory services provided to the Portfolios. The Senior Officer has retained a consultant to provide independent advice regarding the alignment of the two profitability systems as well as the methodologies and allocations utilized by both profitability systems. See Section IV for additional discussion.
IV. | PROFIT MARGINS OF THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES FOR SUPPLYING SUCH SERVICES. |
The Portfolios’ profitability information, prepared by the Adviser for the Board of Directors, was reviewed by the Senior Officer and the consultant. The Adviser’s profitability from providing investment advisory services to the Portfolios decreased during calendar year 2010, relative to 2009. The Adviser’s profitability with respect to High Income Municipal Portfolio, which commenced operations in January 2010, was negative.
In addition to the Adviser’s direct profits from managing the Portfolios, certain of the Adviser’s affiliates have business relationships with the Portfolios and may earn a profit from providing other services to the Portfolios. The courts have
15 | | Except for asset (size) comparability, Lipper uses the same criteria for selecting an EG peer when selecting an EU peer. Unlike the EG, the EU allows for the same adviser to be represented by more than just one fund. |
16 | | Most recently completed fiscal year Class A share total expense ratio. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 145 | |
referred to this type of business opportunity as “fall-out benefits” to the Adviser and indicated that such benefits should be factored into the evaluation of the total relationship between the Portfolios and the Adviser. Neither case law nor common business practice precludes the Adviser’s affiliates from earning a reasonable profit on this type of relationship, provided the affiliates’ charges and services are competitive and the relationship otherwise complies with the 40 Act restrictions. These affiliates provide transfer agent and distribution services to the Portfolios and receive transfer agent fees, Rule 12b-1 payments, front-end sales loads and contingent deferred sales charges (“CDSC”).
AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”), an affiliate of the Adviser, is the Fund’s principal underwriter. ABI and the Adviser have disclosed in the Portfolios’ prospectus that they may make revenue sharing payments from their own resources, in addition to resources derived from sales loads and Rule 12b-1 fees, to firms that sell shares of the Fund. In 2010, ABI paid approximately 0.04% of the average monthly assets of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds or approximately $13.8 million for distribution services and educational support (revenue sharing payments).
ABI retained the following amounts for Class A front-end load sales charges from sales of the Portfolios’ Class A shares during the Portfolios’ most recently completed fiscal year:
| | | | |
Portfolio | | Amount Received | |
California Portfolio | | $ | 759 | |
National Portfolio | | $ | 666 | |
New York Portfolio | | $ | 663 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | $ | 389,705 | |
ABI received the amounts set forth below in Rule 12b-1 fees and CDSC from the Portfolios during the Portfolios’ most recently completed fiscal year:
| | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | 12b-1 Fee Received | | | CDSC Received | |
California Portfolio | | $ | 3,066,549 | | | $ | 21,782 | |
National Portfolio | | $ | 3,556,146 | | | $ | 32,293 | |
New York Portfolio | | $ | 2,528,487 | | | $ | 59,636 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | $ | 475,231 | | | $ | 161,457 | |
Fees and reimbursements for out of pocket expenses charged by AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), the affiliated transfer agent for the Portfolios, are based on the level of the network account and the class of shares held by the account. ABIS also receives a fee per shareholder sub-account for each account maintained by an intermediary on an omnibus basis. ABIS received the following net fees from the Portfolios during the Portfolios’ most recently completed fiscal year:
| | | | |
Portfolio | | ABIS Fee | |
California Portfolio | | $ | 123,919 | |
National Portfolio | | $ | 224,735 | |
New York Portfolio | | $ | 128,610 | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | $ | 13,742 | |
| | |
146 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
V. | POSSIBLE ECONOMIES OF SCALE |
The Adviser has indicated that economies of scale are being shared with shareholders through fee structures,17 subsidies and enhancement to services. Based on some of the professional literature that has considered economies of scale in the mutual fund industry, it is thought that to the extent economies of scale exist, they may more often exist across a fund family as opposed to a specific fund. This is because the costs incurred by the Adviser, such as investment research or technology for trading or compliance systems can be spread across a greater asset base as the fund family increases in size. It is also possible that as the level of services required to operate a successful investment company has increased over time, and advisory firms make such investments in their business to provide services, there may be a sharing of economies of scale without a reduction in advisory fees.
In February 2008, an independent consultant, retained by the Senior Officer, provided the Board of Directors an update of the Deli18 study on advisory fees and various fund characteristics.19 The independent consultant first reiterated the results of his previous two dimensional comparison analysis (fund size and family size) with the Board of Directors.20 The independent consultant then discussed the results of the regression model that was utilized to study the effects of various factors on advisory fees. The regression model output indicated that the bulk of the variation in fees predicted were explained by various factors, but substantially by fund AUM, family AUM, index fund indicator and investment style. The independent consultant also compared the advisory fees of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to similar funds managed by 19 other large asset managers, regardless of the fund size and each Adviser’s proportion of mutual fund assets to non-mutual fund assets.
VI. | NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ADVISER’S SERVICES, INCLUDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND |
With assets under management of approximately $402 billion as of September 30, 2011, the Adviser has the investment experience to manage and provide non-investment services (described in Section I) to the Portfolios.
17 | | Fee structures include fee reductions, pricing at scale and breakpoints in advisory fee schedules. |
18 | | The Deli study, originally published in 2002 based on 1997 data and updated for the February 2008 Presentation, may be of diminished value due to the age of data used in the presentation and the changes experienced in the industry over the last four years. |
19 | | As mentioned previously, the Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since the fees may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length. See Jones V. Harris at 1429. |
20 | | The two dimensional analysis showed patterns of lower advisory fees for funds with larger asset sizes and funds from larger family sizes compared to funds with smaller asset sizes and funds from smaller family sizes, which according to the independent consultant is indicative of a sharing of economies of scale and scope. However, in less liquid and active markets, such is not the case, as the empirical analysis showed potential for diseconomies of scale in those markets. The empirical analysis also showed diminishing economies of scale and scope as funds surpassed a certain high level of assets. |
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 147 | |
The information prepared by Lipper shows the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year performance rankings21 of the Portfolios relative to their Lipper Performance Group (“PG”) and Lipper Performance Universe (“PU”)22 for the periods ended July 31, 2011.23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Portfolio Return (%) | | | PG Median (%) | | | PU Median (%) | | | PG Rank | | PU Rank |
California Portfolio | | | | | | | | | |
1 year | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.68 | | | | 2.77 | | | 5/12 | | 13/30 |
3 year | | | 5.06 | | | | 4.87 | | | | 4.69 | | | 6/12 | | 10/30 |
5 year | | | 4.10 | | | | 3.68 | | | | 3.70 | | | 3/11 | | 5/28 |
10 year | | | 4.45 | | | | 4.27 | | | | 4.23 | | | 2/10 | | 4/23 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | | | | | | | | |
1 year | | | 3.69 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 2.87 | | | 3/18 | | 7/58 |
3 year | | | 5.12 | | | | 5.11 | | | | 5.07 | | | 9/18 | | 24/56 |
5 year | | | 4.13 | | | | 3.97 | | | | 3.99 | | | 7/18 | | 21/51 |
10 year | | | 4.23 | | | | 4.11 | | | | 4.24 | | | 8/17 | | 24/46 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | | | | | | | | |
1 year | | | 3.02 | | | | 2.38 | | | | 2.31 | | | 1/11 | | 2/24 |
3 year | | | 4.99 | | | | 4.99 | | | | 4.92 | | | 6/11 | | 10/23 |
5 year | | | 4.31 | | | | 4.07 | | | | 4.01 | | | 3/10 | | 5/22 |
10 year | | | 4.38 | | | | 4.16 | | | | 4.16 | | | 3/10 | | 7/20 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | | | | | | | |
1 year | | | 3.92 | | | | 3.10 | | | | 3.44 | | | 3/10 | | 9/33 |
Set forth below are the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year and since inception performance returns of the Portfolios (in bold)24 versus their benchmarks.25 Portfolio and benchmark volatility and reward-to-variability ratio (“Sharpe Ratio”) information is also shown.26
21 | | The performance returns and rankings of the Portfolios are for the Portfolios’ Class A shares. It should be noted that performance returns of the Portfolios were provided by Lipper. |
22 | | A Portfolio’s PG/PU may not necessarily be identical to its respective EG/EU, as the criteria for including/excluding a fund from a PG/PU is somewhat different from that of an EG/EU. |
23 | | The current Lipper investment classification/objective dictates the PG and PU throughout the life of each Portfolio even if a Portfolio had a different investment classification/objective at a different point in time. |
24 | | The performance returns and risk measures shown in the table are for the Class A shares of the Portfolios. |
25 | | The Adviser provided Fund and benchmark performance return information for periods through July 31, 2011. |
26 | | Portfolio and benchmark volatility and Sharpe Ratio information was obtained through Lipper LANA, a database maintained by Lipper. Volatility is a statistical measure of the tendency of a market price or yield to vary over time. A Sharpe Ratio is a risk adjusted measure of return that divides a fund’s return in excess of the riskless return by the fund’s standard deviation. A fund with a greater volatility would be seen as more risky than a fund with equivalent performance but lower volatility; for that reason, a greater return would be demanded for the more risky fund. A fund with a higher Sharpe Ratio would be regarded as better performing than a fund with a lower Sharpe Ratio. |
| | |
148 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Periods Ending July 31, 2011 Annualized Net Performance | |
| | 1 Year (%) | | | 3 Year (%) | | | 5 Year (%) | | | 10 Year (%) | | | Since Inception (%) | | | Annualized | | | Risk Period (Year) | |
| | | | | | Volatility (%) | | | Sharpe (%) | | |
California Portfolio | | | 2.90 | | | | 4.98 | | | | 4.04 | | | | 4.43 | | | | 6.15 | | | | 5.28 | | | | 0.45 | | | | 10 | |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | | 3.24 | | | | 5.81 | | | | 4.90 | | | | 4.94 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 4.65 | | | | 0.61 | | | | 10 | |
Inception Date: December 29, 1986 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
National Portfolio | | | 3.69 | | | | 5.02 | | | | 4.08 | | | | 4.20 | | | | 6.02 | | | | 4.77 | | | | 0.45 | | | | 10 | |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | | 3.24 | | | | 5.81 | | | | 4.90 | | | | 4.94 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 4.65 | | | | 0.61 | | | | 10 | |
Inception Date: December 29, 1986 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York Portfolio | | | 3.02 | | | | 4.91 | | | | 4.26 | | | | 4.36 | | | | 5.84 | | | | 4.40 | | | | 0.52 | | | | 10 | |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | | 3.24 | | | | 5.81 | | | | 4.90 | | | | 4.94 | | | | 2.36 | | | | 4.65 | | | | 0.61 | | | | 10 | |
Inception Date: December 29, 1986 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
High Income Municipal Portfolio | | | 3.92 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 6.59 | | | | 8.43 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 1 | |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | | | 3.24 | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | 4.90 | | | | 0.76 | | | | 0.64 | | | | 1 | |
Inception Date: January 26, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CONCLUSION:
Based on the factors discussed above the Senior Officer’s conclusion is that the proposed advisory fee for each Portfolio is reasonable and within the range of what would have been negotiated at arm’s length in light of all the surrounding circumstances. This conclusion in respect of the Portfolios is based on an evaluation of all of these factors and no single factor was dispositive.
Dated: November 28, 2011
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 149 | |
THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN FAMILY OF FUNDS
Wealth Strategies Funds
Balanced Wealth Strategy
Conservative Wealth Strategy
Wealth Appreciation Strategy
Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy
Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy
Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy
Asset Allocation/Multi-Asset
Dynamic All Market Fund
Emerging Markets Multi-Asset
International Portfolio
Real Asset Strategy
Tax-Managed International Portfolio
Growth Funds
Domestic
Growth Fund
Large Cap Growth Fund
Select U.S. Equity Portfolio
Small Cap Growth Portfolio
Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
U.S. Strategic Research Portfolio
Global & International
Global Thematic Growth Fund
International Discovery Equity Portfolio
International Focus 40 Portfolio
International Growth Fund
Value Funds
Domestic
Core Opportunities Fund
Equity Income Fund
Growth & Income Fund
Small/Mid Cap Value Fund
Value Fund
Global & International
Global Real Estate Investment Fund
Global Value Fund
International Value Fund
Taxable Bond Funds
Bond Inflation Strategy
Global Bond Fund
High Income Fund
Intermediate Bond Portfolio
Limited Duration High Income Portfolio
Short Duration Portfolio
Unconstrained Bond Fund
Municipal Bond Funds
| | |
Arizona California High Income Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy | | National New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia |
Intermediate Municipal Bond Funds
Intermediate California
Intermediate Diversified
Intermediate New York
Closed-End Funds
Alliance California Municipal Income Fund
Alliance New York Municipal Income Fund
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund
AllianceBernstein Income Fund
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
Alternatives
Market Neutral Strategy-Global
Market Neutral Strategy-U.S.
Balanced
Balanced Shares
Retirement Strategies Funds
| | | | |
2000 Retirement Strategy | | 2020 Retirement Strategy | | 2040 Retirement Strategy |
2005 Retirement Strategy | | 2025 Retirement Strategy | | 2045 Retirement Strategy |
2010 Retirement Strategy | | 2030 Retirement Strategy | | 2050 Retirement Strategy |
2015 Retirement Strategy | | 2035 Retirement Strategy | | 2055 Retirement Strategy |
We also offer Exchange Reserves,* which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AllianceBernstein mutual funds.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.
* | An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. |
| | |
150 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
AllianceBernstein Family of Funds
NOTES
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 151 | |
NOTES
| | |
152 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
NOTES
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 153 | |
NOTES
| | |
154 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
NOTES
| | | | |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND • | | | 155 | |
NOTES
| | |
156 | | • ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND |
ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105 800.221.5672
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g81g54.jpg)
| | |
| |
MI-0152-0412 | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0001193125-12-294299/g345928g22c48.jpg) |
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable to the registrant.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
Please see Schedule of Investments contained in the Report to Shareholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to the registrant.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to the registrant.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable to the registrant.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board of Directors since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-2(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective at the reasonable assurance level based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
The following exhibits are attached to this Form N-CSR:
| | |
EXHIBIT NO. | | DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
| |
12 (b) (1) | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
12 (b) (2) | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| |
12 (c) | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant): AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
| | |
By: | | /s/ Robert M. Keith |
| | Robert M. Keith |
| | President |
|
Date: June 22, 2012 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By: | | /s/ Robert M. Keith |
| | Robert M. Keith |
| | President |
|
Date: June 22, 2012 |
| |
By: | | /s/ Joseph J. Mantineo |
| | Joseph J. Mantineo |
| | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Date: June 22, 2012 |