Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Jan. 30, 2015 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Fiscal Year |
The Company’s fiscal year end is on the Friday preceding the Saturday closest to January 31 each year. Fiscal Years 2014 and 2013 each consisted of 52 weeks while Fiscal Year 2012 consisted of 53 weeks. Unless the context otherwise requires. The following fiscal periods are presented in this report. |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Year | | Ended | | Weeks | | | | | | | |
2014 | | 30-Jan-15 | | 52 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
2013 | | 31-Jan-14 | | 52 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
2012 | | 1-Feb-13 | | 53 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Seasonality |
The Company’s operations have historically been seasonal, with a disproportionate amount of net sales occurring in the fourth fiscal quarter, reflecting increased demand during the year-end holiday selling season. The impact of seasonality on results of operations is more pronounced since the level of certain fixed costs, such as occupancy and overhead expenses, do not vary with sales. The Company’s results of operations also may fluctuate based upon such factors as the timing of certain holiday seasons and promotions, the amount of net sales contributed by new and existing stores, the timing and level of markdowns, competitive factors, weather and general economic conditions. |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reportable amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company includes deposits in-transit from banks for payments related to third-party credit card and debit card transactions within cash. |
Restricted cash |
The Company classifies cash balances pledged as collateral for an employee benefit trust fund as Restricted cash on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based on both historical experience and specific identification. Allowances for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable balances were $0.7 million and $1.0 million as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. Accounts receivable balance is presented net of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and is comprised of various customer-related accounts receivable. |
Changes in the balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows for the following years: |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Fiscal 2012 | |
Beginning balance | $ | 1,031 | | | $ | 1,316 | | | $ | 1,293 | | |
|
Provision | 371 | | | 444 | | | 721 | | |
|
Write-offs | (714 | ) | | (729 | ) | | (698 | ) | |
Ending balance | $ | 688 | | | $ | 1,031 | | | $ | 1,316 | | |
|
Inventory |
Inventories primarily consist of merchandise purchased for resale. For financial reporting and tax purposes, the Company’s United States inventory, primarily merchandise held for sale, is stated at last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost, which is lower than market. The Company accounts for its non-United States inventory on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The United States inventory accounted for using the LIFO method was 83% and 85% of total inventory as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. If the FIFO method of accounting for inventory had been used, the effect on inventory would have been immaterial as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014. |
The Company maintains a reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. The reserve is calculated based on historical experience related to liquidation/disposal of identified inventory. The excess and obsolescence reserve balances were $18.2 million and $26.0 million January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. |
Deferred Catalog Costs and Marketing |
Costs incurred for direct response marketing consist primarily of catalog production and mailing costs that are generally amortized within two months from the date catalogs are mailed. Unamortized marketing costs reported as prepaid assets were $20.7 million and $15.6 million as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. The Company expenses the costs of marketing for website, magazines, newspaper, radio and other general media when the marketing takes place. Marketing expenses, including catalog costs amortization, website-related costs and other print media were $208.0 million, $198.6 million and $204.1 million for Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. These costs are included within Selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Operations. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Additions and substantial improvements are capitalized and include expenditures that materially extend the useful lives of existing facilities and equipment. Maintenance and repairs that do not materially improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. As of the balance sheet dates, Property and equipment, net consisted of the following: |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Asset Lives | | 30-Jan-15 | | 31-Jan-14 | | | | | |
Land | — | | 3,529 | | | 3,563 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Buildings and improvements | 15-30 | | 100,583 | | | 101,249 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 10-Mar | | 76,938 | | | 75,625 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Computer hardware and software | 5-Mar | | 73,062 | | | 65,810 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Leasehold improvements | 7-Mar | | 12,781 | | | 12,517 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Gross property and equipment | | | 266,893 | | | 258,764 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Accumulated depreciation | | | (165,670 | ) | | (157,668 | ) | | | | | |
Total property and equipment, net | | | 101,223 | | | 101,096 | | | | | | |
| | | | |
|
Depreciation expense is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the associated lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation expense included within Depreciation and amortization expense reported in the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Operations was $17.1 million, $19.0 million and $20.5 million for Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets |
Long-lived assets, including property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets (customer lists) are subject to a review for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset or asset group is less than its carrying amount, the Company then determines the fair value of the asset generally by using a discounted cash flow model. When an impairment loss is recognized, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value as determined based on quoted market prices or through the use of other valuation techniques. There were no impairments recognized in Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 or Fiscal 2012. |
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment Assessments |
Goodwill, trade name and other intangible assets are tested separately for impairment on an annual basis, or are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The majority of the Company's goodwill and intangible assets relate to Kmart Holding Corporation’s acquisition of Sears Roebuck in March 2005. The calculation for an impairment loss compares the carrying value of the asset to that asset’s estimated fair value, which may be based on estimated future discounted cash flows or quoted market prices. Lands' End recognizes an impairment loss if the asset’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. |
Frequently the Company's impairment loss calculations contain multiple uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting cash flows under different scenarios. Lands' End performs annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests on the last day of the Company's November accounting period each year and updates the tests between annual tests if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying amount. However, if actual results are not consistent with the Company's estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, the Company may be exposed to losses that could be material. |
Goodwill impairment assessments. The Company's goodwill resides in the Direct reporting unit. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. Lands' End estimates fair value using the best information available, using both a market approach, as well as a discounted cash flow model, commonly referred to as the income approach. The market approach determines a value of the reporting unit by deriving market multiples for the reporting unit based on assumptions potential market participants would use in establishing a bid price for the reporting unit. This approach therefore assumes strategic initiatives will result in improvements in operational performance in the event of purchase, and includes the application of a discount rate based on market participant assumptions with respect to capital structure and access to capital markets. The income approach uses a reporting unit’s projection of estimated operating results and cash flows that is discounted using a weighted-average cost of capital that reflects current market conditions appropriate to the Company's reporting unit. The projection uses management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period, including growth rates in sales, costs, estimates of future expected changes in operating margins and cash expenditures. Other significant estimates and assumptions include terminal value growth rates, future estimates of capital expenditures and changes in future working capital requirements. The Company's final estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit is developed by weighting the fair values determined through both the market participant and income approaches, where comparable market participant information is available. |
If the carrying value of the reporting unit is higher than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The amount of impairment is determined by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to the carrying value of the goodwill in the same manner as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. Specifically, the Company allocates the fair value to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any unrecognized intangible assets, in a hypothetical analysis that would calculate the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill, the Company records an impairment charge for the difference. |
During Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value and, as such, the Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges. |
Indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessments. Lands' End reviews the Company's indefinite-lived intangible asset, the Lands’ End trade name, for impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The Company considers the income approach when testing the intangible asset with indefinite life for impairment on an annual basis. Lands' End determined that the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty method, was most appropriate for analyzing the Company's indefinite-lived asset. This method is based on the assumption that, in lieu of ownership, a firm would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of this asset class. The relief from royalty method involves two steps: (1) estimation of reasonable royalty rates for the assets and (2) the application of these royalty rates to a net sales stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine a value. The Company multiplied the selected royalty rate by the forecasted net sales stream to calculate the cost savings (relief from royalty payment) associated with the asset. The cash flows are then discounted to present value by the selected discount rate and compared to the carrying value of the asset. |
During Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeded its carrying value and, as such, the Company did not record any intangible asset impairment charges. |
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk |
Lands' End entered into the ABL Facility, which provides for maximum borrowings of $175.0 million for Lands' End, subject to a borrowing base, with a $30.0 million sub facility for the UK Borrower. The ABL Facility has a sub-limit of $70.0 million for domestic letters of credit and a sub-limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit for the UK Borrower. The ABL Facility is available for working capital and other general corporate purposes, and was undrawn at the Separation and at January 30, 2015, other than for letters of credit. The Company had borrowing availability under the ABL Facility of $159.5 million as of January 30, 2015, net of outstanding letters of credit of $15.5 million. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments in accordance with accounting standards pertaining to fair value measurements. Such standards define fair value and establish a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP. Under fair value measurement accounting standards, fair value is considered to be the exchange price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date. The Company reports the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the fair value hierarchy prescribed by accounting standards for fair value measurements, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. |
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. Total accounts receivable were $30.1 million and $33.6 million as of January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively. Bad debt expense was $0.4 million and $0.5 million in Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2013, respectively. At January 30, 2015 accounts receivable included $5.7 million due from Sears Holdings. |
Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts payable and Other current liabilities are reflected in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. |
Long-term debt is reflected in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets at amortized cost. The fair value of debt was determined utilizing level 2 valuation techniques based on the closing inactive market bid price on January 30, 2015. See Note 8—Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities. |
Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions |
The Company translates the assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries from their respective functional currencies to United States dollars at the appropriate spot rates as of the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses of operations are translated to United States dollars using weighted average exchange rates during the year. The foreign subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity. The Company recognized net foreign exchange transaction losses of $4.7 million, $1.8 million and $3.7 million in Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively, in the accompanying Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Operations. |
Revenue Recognition |
Revenues include sales of merchandise and delivery revenues related to merchandise sold. Revenue is recognized for the Direct segment when the merchandise is expected to be received by the customer and for the Retail segment at the time of sale in the store. |
Revenues from merchandise sales and services are reported net of estimated returns and allowances and exclude sales taxes. Estimated returns and allowances are recorded as a reduction of sales and cost of sales. The reserve for sales returns and allowances is calculated based on historical experience and future expectations and is included in Other current liabilities on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets. |
Reserves for sales returns and allowances consisted of the following: |
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Fiscal 2012 | |
Beginning balance | $ | 13,805 | | | $ | 13,524 | | | $ | 14,607 | | |
|
Provision | 187,000 | | | 211,505 | | | 231,817 | | |
|
Write-offs | (186,937 | ) | | (211,224 | ) | | (232,900 | ) | |
Ending balance | $ | 13,868 | | | $ | 13,805 | | | $ | 13,524 | | |
|
The Company sells gift certificates, gift cards and e-certificates (collectively, “gift cards”) to customers through both the Direct and Retail segments. The gift cards do not have expiration dates. Revenue from gift cards are recognized when (i) the gift card is redeemed by the customer for merchandise, or (ii) after 3 years when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (“gift card breakage”) and the Company does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. Revenue recognized from gift card breakage was $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.5 million in Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. |
Cost of Sales |
Cost of sales are comprised principally of the costs of merchandise, in-bound freight, duty, warehousing and distribution (including receiving, picking, packing, store delivery and value added costs), customer shipping and handling costs and physical inventory losses. Depreciation and amortization is not included in the Company's cost of sales. |
The Company participates in Sears Holdings’ Shop Your Way Rewards member loyalty program. The expenses for this program are recorded in Cost of sales, as described in Note 10—Related Party Agreements and Transactions. |
Selling and Administrative Expenses |
Selling and administrative expenses are comprised principally of payroll and benefits costs for direct, retail and corporate employees, marketing, occupancy costs of retail stores and corporate facilities, buying, pre-opening costs and other administrative expenses. All stock-based compensation is recorded in Selling and administrative expenses. See Note 5—Stock-Based Compensation. |
Prior to the Separation, expenses related to the Lands’ End Shops at Sears were allocated to the Company by Sears Holdings, as well as shared services, co-location and services costs. Subsequent to the Separation, these expenses were charged to the Company by Sears Holdings. Selling and administrative expenses included $62.3 million, $68.4 million and $75.4 million in Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively, of costs allocated or charged to the Company by Sears Holdings. See Note 10—Related Party Agreements and Transactions. |
In September 2012, the Company recognized $2.5 million of restructuring expenses, primarily severance, related to an initiative to reduce the corporate cost structure. The liability on the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2014 was not material. |
Other Operating Expense |
Other operating expense in Fiscal 2014 consisted primarily of $3.0 million in costs associated with a recall of selected styles of children's sleepwear that did not meet the federal flammability standard. See Note 15—Subsequent Event. |
Income Taxes |
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial and tax basis of assets and liabilities based on currently enacted tax laws. The tax balances and income tax expense recognized are based on management’s interpretation of the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions. Income tax expense also reflects best estimates and assumptions regarding, among other things, the level of future taxable income and tax planning. Future changes in tax laws, changes in projected levels of taxable income, tax planning and adoption and implementation of new accounting standards could impact the effective tax rate and tax balances recorded. |
For purposes of the Combined Financial Statements, the tax provision represents the tax attributable to these operations as if the Company were required to file a separate tax return. Sears Holdings paid all United States federal, state and local taxes attributable to the Lands’ End business prior to the Separation and the related taxes payable and tax payments are reflected directly in Net parent company investment in the Combined Balance Sheets. Prior to the Separation taxes paid by Lands' End only represent taxes for its wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. Following the Separation, Lands' End is responsible for all taxes due. Taxes paid by Lands' End were $19.8 million, $4.1 million and $5.3 million for Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. |
Lands’ End and Sears Holdings Corporation entered into the Tax Sharing Agreement in connection with the Separation which governs Sears Holdings Corporation’s and Lands’ End’s respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Separation with respect to liabilities for United States federal, state, local and foreign taxes attributable to the Lands’ End business. In addition to the allocation of tax liabilities, the Tax Sharing Agreement addresses the preparation and filing of tax returns for such taxes and dispute resolution with taxing authorities regarding such taxes. Generally, Sears Holdings Corporation is liable for all pre-Separation United States federal, state and local income taxes. Lands’ End generally is liable for all other taxes attributable to its business, including all foreign income taxes. |
Tax positions are recognized when they are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. The Company is subject to periodic audits by the United States Internal Revenue Service and other state and local taxing authorities. These audits may challenge certain of the Company’s tax positions such as the timing and amount of income and deductions and the allocation of taxable income to various tax jurisdictions. The Company evaluates its tax positions and establishes liabilities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance on uncertainty in income taxes. These tax uncertainties are reviewed as facts and circumstances change and are adjusted accordingly. This requires significant management judgment in estimating final outcomes. Interest and penalties are classified as Income tax expense in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Operations. See Note 3—Income Taxes. |
Self-Insurance |
The Company has a self-insured plan for health and welfare benefits and provides an accrual to cover the obligation. The accrual for the self-insured liability is based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. The Company considers a number of factors, including historical claims information, when determining the amount of the accrual. Costs related to the administration of the plan and related claims are expensed as incurred. Total expenses were $14.1 million, $16.2 million and $15.8 million for Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012, respectively. |
The Company also has a self-insured plan for certain costs related to workers’ compensation. The Company obtains third-party insurance coverage to limit exposure to this self-insured risk. |
Postretirement Benefit Plan |
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company decided to indefinitely suspend eligibility to the postretirement medical plan for future company retirees. In addition, the Company elected to immediately recognize all existing net actuarial losses and prior service costs. All future actuarial gains or losses were recognized in the year they occurred and were not material in Fiscal 2014, Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012. At the time of the Separation the $1.5 million liability related to postretirement benefits was transferred to Sears Holdings Corporation as it assumed administration and funding of the plan after the Separation. This transaction was accounted for as an adjustment to Net parent company investment and did not result in cash flows. The net liability of the plan was $1.5 million and is included in the Combined Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2014. See Note 7—Postretirement Benefits and Retirement Plan. |
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) encompasses all changes in equity other than those arising from transactions with stockholders, and is comprised solely of foreign currency translation adjustments and net income. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Fiscal 2012 |
Beginning balance: Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax of $1,211, $1,938 and $942, respectively) | | $ | (1,995 | ) | | $ | (3,161 | ) | | $ | (1,538 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax (expense) benefit of $2,720, $(727), and $996, respectively) | | (5,303 | ) | | 1,166 | | | (1,623 | ) |
|
Ending balance: Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax of $3,931, $1,211, and $1,938, respectively) | | $ | (7,298 | ) | | $ | (1,995 | ) | | $ | (3,161 | ) |
Comprehensive income—no amounts were reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive loss during any of the periods presented. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
Stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock units is determined based on the grant date fair value. The fair value is determined based on the Company's stock price on the date of the grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost net of estimated forfeitures and revises the estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from the estimates. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical data as well as expected future behavior. Stock-based compensation is recorded in Selling and administrative expense in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Operations over the period in which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the restricted stock units. |
Earnings per Share |
The numerator for both basic and diluted EPS is net income attributable to Lands’ End. The denominator for basic EPS is based upon the number of weighted average shares of Lands’ End common stock outstanding during the reporting periods. The denominator for diluted EPS is based upon the number of weighted average shares of Lands’ End common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the reporting periods using the treasury stock method in accordance with the FASB ASC. For periods ended April 4, 2014 and prior, basic EPS is computed using the number of shares of Lands’ End common stock outstanding on April 4, 2014, the date on which the Lands’ End common stock was distributed to the stockholders of Sears Holdings Corporation. The same number of shares was used to calculate basic and diluted EPS for Fiscal 2013 and Fiscal 2012 as there were no dilutive securities during these periods. |
The following table summarizes the components of basic and diluted EPS: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | | Fiscal 2014 | | Fiscal 2013 | | Fiscal 2012 |
Net income | | $ | 73,799 | | | $ | 78,847 | | | $ | 49,827 | |
|
| | | | | | |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | | 31,957 | | | 31,957 | | | 31,957 | |
|
Dilutive effect of stock awards | | 59 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | | 32,016 | | | 31,957 | | | 31,957 | |
|
| | | | | | |
Basic earnings per share | | $ | 2.31 | | | $ | 2.47 | | | $ | 1.56 | |
|
Diluted earnings per share | | $ | 2.31 | | | $ | 2.47 | | | $ | 1.56 | |
|
Anti-dilutive stock awards are comprised of awards which are anti-dilutive in the application of the treasury stock method. There were no anti-dilutive securities excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding. |
New Accounting Pronouncements |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under today’s guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. This guidance will be effective for Lands' End in the first quarter of its fiscal year ending February 2, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on the Company's Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. |
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity |
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which modifies the requirements for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations and expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance will be effective for Lands' End in its fiscal year ending January 29, 2016. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. |
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs |
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which changes the required presentation of debt issuance costs from an asset on the balance sheet to a deduction from the related debt liability. This guidance will be effective for Lands' End in its fiscal year ending January 27, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements. |