UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
R | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
OR
£ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-15327
CytRx Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 58-1642740 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
11726 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 650 Los Angeles, CA | 90049 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(310) 826-5648
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer R | Non-accelerated filer £ | Smaller reporting company £ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R
Number of shares of CytRx Corporation common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of November 8, 2016: 96,943,072 shares.
CYTRX CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |
PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited) | 1 |
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 12 |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 18 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 19 |
PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 20 |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | 20 |
Item 6. Exhibits | 21 |
SIGNATURES | 22 |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS | 23 |
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. — Financial Statements
CYTRX CORPORATION
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 58,875,925 | $ | 22,261,372 | ||||
Short-term investments | — | 35,035,420 | ||||||
Receivables | 108,345 | 4,621,605 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,618,919 | 2,373,708 | ||||||
Total current assets | 61,603,189 | 64,292,105 | ||||||
Equipment and furnishings, net | 2,066,392 | 1,467,681 | ||||||
Goodwill | 183,780 | 183,780 | ||||||
Other assets | 54,648 | 1,080,872 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 63,908,009 | $ | 67,024,438 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: Accounts payable | $ | 4,815,597 | $ | 8,058,624 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 5,049,006 | 9,693,359 | ||||||
Litigation settlement due in shares of common stock | — | 4,500,000 | ||||||
Warrant liability | 6,686,381 | 693,457 | ||||||
Term loan, net - current | 3,562,578 | — | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 20,113,562 | 22,945,440 | ||||||
Long-term loan, net | 20,197,992 | — | ||||||
Total liabilities | 40,311,554 | 22,945,440 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, including 25,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock; no shares issued and outstanding | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 96,943,072 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016; 66,480,065 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 96,942 | 66,480 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 431,693,072 | 409,107,292 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (408,193,559 | ) | (365,094,774 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 23,596,455 | 44,078,998 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 63,908,009 | $ | 67,024,438 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
1
CYTRX CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
License revenue | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 100,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 8,927,037 | 8,470,592 | 29,531,609 | 31,043,741 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 2,771,732 | 2,188,656 | 12,859,069 | 9,510,657 | ||||||||||||
11,698,769 | 10,659,248 | 42,390,678 | 40,554,398 | |||||||||||||
Loss before other income (loss) | (11,698,769 | ) | (10,659,248 | ) | (42,290,678 | ) | (40,554,398 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 68,635 | 68,678 | 195,809 | 171,707 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | (781,038 | ) | — | (1,939,186 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Other income (loss), net | (10,489 | ) | 2,040 | (4,398 | ) | 17,948 | ||||||||||
Gain on warrant derivative liability | 246,211 | 3,515,178 | 939,668 | 4,079,748 | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (12,175,450 | ) | $ | (7,073,352 | ) | $ | (43,098,785 | ) | $ | (36,284,995 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding | 91,042,450 | 63,848,208 | 75,001,770 | 58,462,214 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements
2
CYTRX CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
Net loss | $ | (43,098,785 | ) | $ | (36,284,995 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 364,548 | 240,391 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 5,400,604 | 4,520,307 | ||||||
Fair value adjustment on warrant liability | (939,668 | ) | (4,079,748 | ) | ||||
Amortization of loan cost and discount | 382,241 | — | ||||||
Loss on retirement of fixed assets | 9,116 | — | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Receivables | 4,485,130 | 351,388 | ||||||
Interest receivable | 28,130 | 97,873 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 781,013 | 1,545,955 | ||||||
Accounts payable | (3,254,181 | ) | (447,430 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | (4,644,353 | ) | (26,763 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (40,486,205 | ) | (34,083,022 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchase of short-term investments | — | (32,982,710 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of short-term investments | 35,035,420 | 63,581,849 | ||||||
Purchases of equipment and furnishings | (961,221 | ) | (325,471 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities | 34,074,199 | 30,273,668 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
Net proceeds from public offering | 18,309,781 | 26,780,068 | ||||||
Net proceeds from term loan | 24,012,078 | — | ||||||
Net proceeds from exercise of warrants and stock options | 704,700 | 590,001 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 43,026,559 | 27,370,069 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 36,614,553 | 23,560,715 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 22,261,372 | 32,218,905 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 58,875,925 | $ | 55,779,620 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the year for interest | $ | 1,359,028 | $ | — | ||||
Cashless warrant exercises | $ | — | $ | 3 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 800 | $ | 800 |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: | ||||||||
Warrants issued in connection with term loan | $ | 633,749 | $ | — | ||||
Equipment and furnishings purchased on credit | $ | 11,154 | $ | 2,035 | ||||
Shares issued in connection with the class action settlement | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | — | ||||
Warrants issued in connection with public offering | $ | 6,932,592 | $ | — |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
3
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Company and Basis of Presentation
CytRx Corporation ("we," "us," "our" or the "Company") is a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology. We currently are focused on the clinical development of aldoxorubicin (formerly known as INNO-206), our modified version of the widely-used chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin. We are also developing new anti-cancer drug conjugates that utilize our Linker Activated Drug Release (LADRTM ) technology.
We previously announced the initial analysis of top-line data from our on-going global, randomized Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory soft tissue sarcomas, or STS. The trial enrolled 433 patients at 79 sites in 15 countries including the U.S. and Canada.
We also previously announced that we expected to conduct a second analysis which will include longer patient follow-up. In addition, we expect to report the multiple sub-analyses of top-line data specified in the trial's statistical plan. We currently expect the second analysis to be completed in November or early December 2016.
We are currently evaluating aldoxorubicin in a global Phase 2b clinical trial in second-line small cell lung cancer in which we currently expect to announce top-line data in the first or second quarter of 2017, as the number of deaths and/or progressions needed for data analysis have not yet been reached. We are also evaluating aldoxorubicin in a Phase 1b trial in combination with ifosfamide in patients with soft tissue sarcoma, and a Phase 1b trial in combination with gemcitabine in subjects with metastatic solid tumors. We previously completed Phase 2 clinical trials of aldoxorubicin in patients with late-stage glioblastoma (brain cancer) and HIV-related Kaposi's Sarcoma, a Phase 1b clinical trial of aldoxorubicin in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors and a Phase 1b pharmacokinetics clinical trial of aldoxorubicin in patients with metastatic solid tumors.
Although we have made progress on the pre-clinical development for DK049, a novel anti-cancer drug conjugate that utilizes our LADRTM technology, we have suspended further development in order to devote our resources to the completion of the Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin and preparations for our planned pre New Drug Application ("NDA") meeting with the FDA, which we believe could occur in the first quarter of 2017. DK049 was created at our laboratory facility in Freiburg, Germany, and employs a proprietary linker that is both pH sensitive and requires a specific enzyme for the release of the cytotoxic payload. We have now expanded our pipeline of oncology candidates utilizing our LADRTM technology to attach ultra-high potency drugs to albumin (10-1000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies limited to antibodies only) to target tumors.
The accompanying condensed financial statements at September 30, 2016 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are unaudited, but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring entries, that management believes to be necessary for a fair presentation of the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Balance sheet amounts as of December 31, 2015 have been derived from the our audited financial statements as of that date.
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Following our announcement of the initial analysis of our on-going global Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin, we took measures to reduce our "burn" rate, have decreased our head count and discontinued our pre-commercialization activities pending the results of our second analysis and of our planned pre-NDA meeting with the FDA. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force." The objective of ASU No. 2016-15 is to provide specific guidance on eight cash flow classification issues and how to reduce diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are still in the process of determining the impact that the implementation of ASU 2016-15 will have on the Company's financial statements.
4
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 includes several areas of simplification to stock compensation including simplifications to the accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the Statement of Cash Flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. We did not early adopt ASU 2016-09 as of and for the period ended September 30, 2016. We are still evaluating the effect of this update.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 allows the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous leases guidance. The Update 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. We are still evaluating the effect of this update.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities ("ASU 2016-01"). ASU 2016-01 eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The standard also clarifies the need to evaluate a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires that debt issuance costs be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the related liability, consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. Further, ASU 2015-03 requires the amortization of debt issuance costs to be reported as interest expense. Similarly, debt issuance costs and any discount or premium are considered in the aggregate when determining the effective interest rate on the debt. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2015-03 must be applied retrospectively. Entities may choose to adopt the new requirements as of an earlier date for financial statements that have not been previously issued. We adopted this Accounting Standard effective January 1, 2016.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern ("Subtopic 205-40") ("ASU 2014-15"). The new guidance addresses management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management's evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect to early adopt this guidance and do not believe that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial statements.
3. Foreign Currency Remeasurement
The U.S. dollar has been determined to be the functional currency for the net assets of our laboratory facility in Germany. Transactions are recorded in the local currencies and are remeasured at each reporting date using the historical rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities and exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in other income (loss). We recognized exchange rate losses of approximately $6,000 and $500, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and an exchange rate gain of approximately $1,000 and an exchange rate loss of approximately $10,000 for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
4. Short-term Investments
We held no short-term investments at September 30, 2016, as compared to $35.0 million at December 31, 2015. We classified these investments as available for sale at December 31, 2015.
5
5. Litigation Settlement Due in Shares of Common Stock
The class-action settlement we announced in December 2015 was completed on May 25, 2016 with the issuance of 1,561,578 shares of our common stock valued at $4.5 million, or $2.88 a share, and payment of $4 million in cash, of which $3.5 million was paid by our insurance carriers and $500,000 was paid out of company funds. In accordance with ASC 480, "Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity," we classified the $4.5 million worth of shares of the common stock as a non-cash liability due in shares of common stock on the December 31, 2015 balance sheet, due to the variable number of shares issuable under the settlement.
6. Term Loan
On February 5, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. ("HTGC"), as administrative agent and lender, and Hercules Technology III, L.P., as lender, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to make long-term loans to us in an aggregate principal amount of up to $40 million, subject to certain conditions. The lenders made an initial term loan to us on February 8, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million. The term loan bears interest at the daily variable rate per annum equal to 6.00% plus the prime rate, or 9.5%, whichever is greater. We are required to make interest-only payments on the term loans through February 28, 2017, and beginning on March 1, 2017 we will be required to make amortizing payments of principal and accrued interest in equal monthly installments until the maturity date of the loan. Under the terms of the loan, we are required to maintain a minimum cash balance equal to the greater of (i) $10 million or (ii) forward three months projected cash burn. If we achieve certain milestones, we may request an additional term loan in an aggregate principal amount of up to $15 million no later than December 31, 2016, or such later date that HTGC otherwise determines in its sole discretion, but we do not expect to meet these milestones at this time. In connection with the loan and security agreement, we issued to the lenders warrants to purchase a total of 634,146 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.05. These warrants are classified on the September 30, 2016 balance sheet as equity warrants with a fair value of $633,749 as determined at the date of issuance. All outstanding principal and accrued interest on the term loans will be due and payable in full on the maturity date of February 1, 2020, subject to the lenders' right to accelerate the term loans if we were to experience a "material adverse event" (as defined in the loan and security agreement).
As security for our obligations under the loan and securities agreement, we granted HTGC, as administrative agent, a security interest in substantially all of our existing and after-acquired assets except for our intellectual property and certain other excluded assets.
The following sets forth information regarding the current and long-term portion of the term loan:
September 30, 2016 | ||||
Term Loan Principal - Current | $ | 4,311,336 | ||
Issuance Cost - Current | (122,335 | ) | ||
Loan Discount - Current | (626,423 | ) | ||
Term Loan, Net - Current | $ | 3,562,578 | ||
Term Loan Principal | $ | 20,688,664 | ||
End Fee Payable | 1,771,250 | |||
Long Term Issuance Cost | (353,919 | ) | ||
Long Term Loan Discount | (1,908,003 | ) | ||
Long Term Loan, Net | $ | 20,197,992 | ||
Interest expense on the term loan for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 was $781,038 and $1,939,186, respectively. There was no interest expense in the 2015 comparative periods.
7. Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Common share equivalents (which consist of options and warrants) are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share where the effect would be anti-dilutive. Common share equivalents that could potentially dilute net loss per share in the future, and which were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, totaled 44.0 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, and 17.4 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015.
6
8. Warrant Liabilities
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from our equity financings. In accordance with ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity ("ASC 815-40"), the warrant liabilities are recorded at fair value until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method. The gain or loss resulting from the change in fair value is shown on the Condensed Statements of Operations as gain (loss) on warrant derivative liability. We recognized a gain of $0.2 million and $3.5 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a gain of $0.9 million and $4.1 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following reflects the weighted-average assumptions for each of the nine-month periods indicated:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.52 | % | 0.21 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Expected lives | 0.8 | 0.84 | ||||||
Expected volatility | 131.3 | % | 69.1 | % | ||||
Warrants classified as liabilities (in shares) | 28,571,429 | 6,371,854 | ||||||
Our computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of its publicly traded stock. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention to do so. The risk-free interest rate used for each warrant classified as a derivative is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at September 30 of each year presented. The expected lives are based on the remaining contractual lives of the related warrants at the valuation date.
On August 1, 2016, 6,371,854 warrants expired. On July 20, 2016, we issued one-year warrants to purchase up to 28,571,429 shares of our common stock in the public offering described in Note 12.
9. Stock Based Compensation
Our 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan expired on August 6, 2010 and no further shares are available for future grant under this plan. As of September 30, 2016, there were approximately 0.6 million shares subject to outstanding stock options under this plan.
We also have a 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2016, there were 13.4 million shares subject to outstanding stock options and 16.4 million shares available for future grant.
We follow ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.
For stock options and stock warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, we recognize compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50.
Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. At the end of each financial reporting period, the value of these options, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, is determined, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. As a result, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options are fully vested.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options and warrants included in our Condensed Statements of Operations:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Research and development — employee | $ | 455,341 | $ | 402,292 | $ | 1,443,347 | $ | 1,131,072 | ||||||||
General and administrative — employee | 586,315 | 482,954 | 3,742,733 | 3,182,798 | ||||||||||||
Total employee stock-based compensation | $ | 1,041,656 | $ | 885,246 | $ | 5,186,080 | $ | 4,313,870 | ||||||||
Research and development — non-employee | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
General and administrative — non-employee | (5,938 | ) | (27,647 | ) | 214,524 | 206,437 | ||||||||||
Total non-employee stock-based compensation | $ | (5,938 | ) | $ | (27,647 | ) | $ | 214,524 | $ | 206,437 |
7
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we granted stock options to purchase 475,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at a average weighted exercise price of $1.89. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we amended the terms of stock options of a former executive in respect of a Retirement Agreement, resulting in a one-time expense of approximately $1.9 million. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, we granted stock options to purchase 550,000 shares of our common stock. The fair value of the stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.72 | % | 2.21 | % | ||||
Expected volatility | 74.9 | % | 78.2% - 84.4 | % | ||||
Expected lives (years) | 6 | 6 - 10 | ||||||
Expected dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Our computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of our publicly traded stock. We use historical information to compute expected lives. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, the contractual term of the options granted was ten years. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention to do so. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant and issuance is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of the grant and issuance for instruments with a similar expected life. Based on historical experience, for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, we estimated annualized forfeiture rates of 10% for options granted to our employees, 2% for options granted to senior management and 0% for options granted to directors and non-employees and for warrants issued to non-employees Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. We will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture rates are higher than estimated.
As of September 30, 2016, there remained approximately $4.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options granted to current and former employees, directors, to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 0.96 years. Presented below is our stock option activity:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of Options (Employees) | Number of Options (Non-Employees) | Total Number of Options | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2016 | 13,583,862 | 635,714 | 14,219,576 | $ | 3.10 | |||||||||||
Granted | 475,000 | — | 475,000 | $ | 2.05 | |||||||||||
Exercised, Forfeited or Expired | (1,221,040 | ) | (35,714 | ) | (1,256,754 | ) | $ | 3.30 | ||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 | 12,837,822 | 600,000 | 13,437,822 | $ | 3.04 | |||||||||||
Options exercisable at September 30, 2016 | 9,242,803 | 600,000 | 9,842,803 | $ | 3.27 |
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding stock options under our plans at September 30, 2016:
Range of Exercise Prices | Total Number of Options | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | Total Number of Options Exercisable | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 0.60 – $2.00 | 1,274,498 | 6.34 | $ | 1.78 | 1,224,498 | 6.19 | $ | 1.83 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 2.01 – $2.50 | 7,899,179 | 8.41 | $ | 2.33 | 4,522,874 | 8.06 | $ | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 2.51 – $4.00 | 968,291 | 7.37 | $ | 2.88 | 937,458 | 7.34 | $ | 2.87 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 4.01 – $32.55 | 3,295,854 | 6.46 | $ | 5.30 | 3,157,973 | 6.42 | $ | 5.32 | |||||||||||||||||
13,437,822 | 7.66 | $ | 3.04 | 9,842,803 | 7.23 | $ | 3.27 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding options and vested options as of September 30, 2016 was $0 and $0, respectively, representing options with exercise prices of less than the closing fair market value of our common stock on September 30, 2016 of $0.59 per share.
There were 30,559,148 and 7,225,472 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.80 and $4.28, respectively.
8
10. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure the fair value. Level inputs are as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs for the assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use to price the assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at September 30, 2016 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(In thousands) | Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | ||||||||||||
Cash equivalents | $ | 56,972 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 56,972 | ||||||||
Warrant liability | — | — | (6,686 | ) | (6,686 | ) |
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2015 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(In thousands) | Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | ||||||||||||
Cash equivalents | $ | 20,673 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,673 | ||||||||
Short-term investments | 35,035 | — | — | 35,035 | ||||||||||||
Warrant liability | — | — | (693 | ) | (693 | ) |
Liabilities measured at market value on a recurring basis include warrant liability resulting from our August 2011 equity financing. In accordance with ASC 815-40, the warrant liability are marked to market each quarter-end until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method, using assumptions consistent with our application of ASC 505-50. The $6.0 million increase in fair value of the warrant liability is due primarily to the warrants issued in connection with the July, 2016 public offering (see Note 8).
We consider carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
Our non-financial assets are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Our non-financial assets were not material at September 30, 2016 or 2015.
11. Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $58.9 million. Management believes that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. The estimate is based, in part, upon our currently projected expenditures for the remainder of 2016 and the first ten months of 2017 of approximately $37.4 million, which includes approximately $15.6 million for our ongoing clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, approximately $2.7 million for our drug discovery operations at our Freiburg, Germany laboratory, approximately $3.4 million for general operation of our clinical programs, approximately $8.3 million for other general and administrative expenses, and approximately $7.4 million for interest and payments on our outstanding term loan. These projected expenditures assume that we will not suffer a "material adverse event" which could trigger the lenders' acceleration of our outstanding term loan, and are based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and our actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections.
Following our announcement of the initial analysis of our on-going global Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin, we took measures to reduce our "burn" rate, decreased our head count and discontinued our pre-commercialization activities pending the results of our second analysis and of our planned pre-NDA meeting with the FDA. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
If we obtain marketing approval and successfully commercialize aldoxorubicin or other product candidates, we anticipate it will take several years for us to generate significant recurring revenue. We will be dependent on future financing and possible strategic partnerships until such time, if ever, as it can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain sufficient funding when needed, we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate all or a portion of our development programs or clinical trials, seek to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves, or seek to sell some or all of our assets or merge with or be acquired by another company.
9
12. Equity Transactions
As of September 30, 2016, we have reserved approximately 16.4 million of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock for future issuance pursuant to our employee stock option plans issued to employees and consultants.
On July 20, 2016, we issued 28,579,421 shares of our common stock and one-year warrants to purchase an equal number of shares of our common stock in a public offering.
In the first quarter of 2016, we issued 100,000 common shares for $0.2 million resulting from the exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase 500,000 common shares at an exercise price of $1.74.
On October 26, 2015, we retired 199,275 shares of our treasury stock at cost ($2.6 million).
13. Income Taxes
At December 31, 2015, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards as of $281.6 million and $173.7 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, which expire in 2016 through 2034, of which $219.3 million and $173.7 million, respectively, are not subject to limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.
14. Commitments and contingencies
Commitments
We have an agreement with KTB for the Company's exclusive license of patent rights held by KTB for the worldwide development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin. Under the agreement, we must make payments to KTB in the aggregate of $7.5 million upon meeting clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product's second final marketing approval. We also has agreed to pay:
· | commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement); |
· | a percentage of non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and |
· | milestones of $1 million for each additional final marketing approval that we obtain. |
In the event that we must pay a third party in order to exercise our right to the intellectual property under the agreement, we will deduct a percentage of those payments from the royalties due KTB, up to an agreed upon cap.
Contingencies
We applied the disclosure provisions of ASC 460, Guarantees ("ASC 460") to our agreements that contain guarantees or indemnities by us. We provide (i) indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain investors and other parties for certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with various types of third-party claims; and (ii) indemnifications of varying scope and size to officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to us.
10
Shareholder Derivative Action in California. On August 14, 2014, a shareholder derivative lawsuit, captioned Pankratz v. Kriegsman, et al., 2:14-cv-06414-PA-JPR, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California purportedly on our behalf against certain of our officers and each of our directors. On August 15, 2014, a virtually identical complaint was filed, captioned Taylor v. Kriegsman, et al., 2:14-cv-06451. Each of the complaints alleged breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control, insider selling and misappropriation of information in connection with our alleged retention of DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR, as well as our December 9, 2013 grant of stock options to certain board members and officers. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, corporate governance and internal procedures reforms, restitution, disgorgement of all profits, benefits, and other compensation obtained by the individual defendants, and the costs and disbursements of the action. On October 8, 2014, the Court consolidated the Pankratz and Taylor cases and appointed lead plaintiffs and co-lead counsel. After a series of procedural events including an intervening stay of the action, on November 2, 2015, the Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the consolidated action on grounds of forum non conveniens, largely based on our by-law requiring derivative actions to be filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery. On November 17, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. While the case was pending on appeal, on December 22, 2015, the parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding to settle the derivative action. On April 4, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Shareholder Derivative Settlement in the District Court. On May 31, 2016, however, the Court denied without prejudice the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement on procedural grounds that included the Court's view that the settlement could not be considered until the Court's November 2 judgment dismissing the case was vacated. The Court granted the parties the opportunity to file a motion to set aside the November 2 judgment. However, on August 17, 2016, the Court denied the parties' motion to set aside the judgment. No party took an appeal. Accordingly, the derivative litigation in California has concluded.
Shareholder Derivative Actions in Delaware. There are two competing derivative complaints pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claims related to our alleged retention of DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR. On December 14, 2015, a shareholder derivative complaint, captioned Niedermeyer et al. v. Kriegsman et al., C.A. No. 11800, was filed against certain of our officers and directors, for which a second amended complaint was filed on October 12, 2016. On September 6, 2016, one of the plaintiffs in the California litigation (discussed above) effectively refiled his complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with the case captioned Taylor v. Kriegsman, C.A. No. 12720. Absent an agreement between the two plaintiffs and their respective counsel, competing motions for assignment as lead counsel and lead plaintiff will be necessary. Following court appointment of lead counsel and lead plaintiff, a consolidated complaint will likely be filed or an operative complaint identified. We and the defendant officers and defendants will then respond appropriately to the operative complaint.
Class Actions in California. On July 25 and 29, 2016, nearly identical class action complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, titled Crihfield v. CytRx Corp., et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-05519 and Dorce v. CytRx Corp., Case No. 2:16-cv-05666 alleging that we and certain of our officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by allegedly making materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts to the effect that the clinical hold placed on the Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin for STS would prevent sufficient follow-up for patients involved in the study, thus requiring further analysis, which could cause the trial's results and/or FDA approval to be materially adversely affected or delayed. The plaintiffs allege that such wrongful acts and omissions caused significant losses and damages to a class of persons and entities that acquired our securities between November 18, 2014 and July 11, 2016, and seek an award of compensatory damages, costs and expenses, including counsel and expert fees, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On October 26, 2016, the Court entered an Order consolidating the actions titled In re: CytRx Corporation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 16-cv-05519-SJO and appointing a Lead Plantiff and Lead Counsel.
We intend to vigorously defend against the foregoing complaints. We have directors' and officers' liability insurance, which will be utilized in the defense of these matters. The liability insurance may not cover all of the future liabilities we may incur in connection with the foregoing matters. These claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and management's view of these matters may change in the future.
We evaluate developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis. If an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable, we could incur charges that could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the period in which the outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
11
Item 2. — Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
From time to time, we make oral and written statements that may constitute "forward-looking statements" (rather than historical facts) as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or by the SEC in its rules, regulations and releases, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We desire to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements made from time to time, including, but not limited to, the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report, as well as those made in our other filings with the SEC.
All statements in this Quarterly Report, including statements in this section, other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of these provisions, including statements of our current views with respect to the timing of announcements of our clinical trial results and planned pre-NDA meeting with the FDA, the sufficiency of our current cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations for the foreseeable future, possible developments regarding our business strategy, business plan and research and development activities, our future financial results, and other future events. These statements include forward-looking statements both with respect to us, specifically, and the biotechnology industry, in general. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates," "potential" or "could" or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed in this section and under the caption "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which should be reviewed carefully. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we anticipate. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of those risks as you read this Quarterly Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
12
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology. We currently are focused on the clinical development of aldoxorubicin (formerly known as INNO-206), our modified version of the widely-used chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin. We are also developing new anti-cancer drug conjugates that utilize our Linker Activated Drug Release (LADRTM) technology.
We previously announced the initial analysis of top-line data from our on-going global, randomized Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin as a treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory soft tissue sarcomas, or STS. The trial enrolled 433 patients at 79 sites in 15 countries including the U.S. and Canada. Since the initial analysis, we have continued to follow patients for overall survival (OS), a secondary endpoint of the trial.
We also previously announced that we expected to conduct a second analysis which will include longer patient follow-up. In addition, we expect to report the multiple sub-analyses of top-line date specified in the trial's statistical plan. We currently expect the second analysis to be completed in November or early December 2016.
We are currently evaluating aldoxorubicin in a global Phase 2b clinical trial in second-line small cell lung cancer in which we currently expect to announce top-line data in the first or second quarter of 2017, as the number of deaths and/or progressions needed for data analysis have not yet been reached. We are also evaluating aldoxorubicin in a Phase 1b trial in combination with ifosfamide in patients with soft tissue sarcoma, and a Phase 1b trial in combination with gemcitabine in subjects with metastatic solid tumors. We previously completed Phase 2 clinical trials of aldoxorubicin in patients with late-stage glioblastoma (brain cancer) and HIV-related Kaposi's Sarcoma, a Phase 1b clinical trial of aldoxorubicin in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors and a Phase 1b pharmacokinetics clinical trial of aldoxorubicin in patients with metastatic solid tumors.
Although we have made progress on the pre-clinical development for DK049, a novel anti-cancer drug conjugate that utilizes our LADRTM technology, we have suspended further development in order to devote our resources to the completion of the Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin and preparations for our planned pre NDA meeting with the FDA, which we believe could occur in the first quarter of 2017. DK049 was created at our laboratory facility in Freiburg, Germany, and employs a proprietary linker that is both pH sensitive and requires a specific enzyme for the release of the cytotoxic payload. We have now expanded our pipeline of oncology candidates utilizing our LADRTM technology to attach ultra-high potency drugs to albumin (10-1000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies limited to antibodies only) to target tumors.
The accompanying condensed financial statements at September 30, 2016 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are unaudited, but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring entries, that management believes to be necessary for a fair presentation of the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Balance sheet amounts as of December 31, 2015 have been derived from the our audited financial statements as of that date.
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Following our announcement of the initial analysis of our on-going global Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin, we took measures to reduce our "burn" rate, decreased our head count and discontinued our pre-commercialization activities pending the results of our second analysis and of our planned pre-NDA meeting with the U.S. food and Drug Administration, or FDA. For this reason and others, our operating results will fluctuate for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
13Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, research and development expenses and clinical trial expenses and stock-based compensation expense.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 2 to our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of license fees from strategic alliances with pharmaceutical companies, as well as service and grant revenues. Service revenue consists of contract research and laboratory consulting. Grant revenues consist of government and private grants.
Monies received for license fees are deferred and recognized ratably over the performance period in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Codification Standards ("ASC") ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple-Element Arrangements ("ASC 605-25"). Milestone payments will be recognized upon achievement of the milestone as long as the milestone is deemed substantive and we have no other performance obligations related to the milestone and collectability is reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt, or recognized upon termination of the agreement and all related obligations. Deferred revenue represents amounts received prior to revenue recognition.
Revenues from contract research, government grants, and consulting fees are recognized over the respective contract periods as the services are performed, provided there is persuasive evidence or an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Once all conditions of the grant are met and no contingencies remain outstanding, the revenue is recognized as grant fee revenue and an earned but unbilled revenue receivable is recorded.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist of direct and overhead-related research expenses and are expensed as incurred. Costs to acquire technologies, including licenses, that are utilized in research and development and that have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Costs of technology developed for use in our product candidates are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established.
14
Clinical Trial Expenses
Clinical trial expenses, which are included in research and development expenses, include obligations resulting from our contracts with various clinical research organizations conducting clinical trials for our product candidates. We recognize expenses for these activities based on a variety of factors, including actual and estimated labor hours, clinical site initiation activities, patient enrollment rates, estimates of external costs and other activity-based factors. We believe that this method best approximates the efforts expended on a clinical trial with the expenses we record. We adjust our rate of clinical expense recognition if actual results differ from our estimates. If our estimates prove incorrect, clinical trial expenses recorded in future periods could vary.
Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based employee compensation plans are described in Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report. We follow ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.
For stock options and warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, we recognize compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ("ASC 505-50").
Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. At the end of each financial reporting period prior to performance, the value of these options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. Since the fair market value of options granted or issued to non-employees is subject to change in the future, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options or warrants are fully vested.
The fair value of each stock option and warrant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the stock options and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on an expected forfeiture rate that is adjusted for our actual experience. If our Black-Scholes option-pricing model assumptions or our actual or estimated forfeiture rate are different in the future, it could materially affect our compensation expense recorded in future periods.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31, or on an interim basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of such assets below their carrying values. An impairment loss would be recognized based on the difference between the carrying value of the asset and its estimated fair value, which would be determined based on either discounted future cash flows or other appropriate fair value methods. If our estimates used in the determination of either discounted future cash flows or other appropriate fair value methods are not accurate as compared to actual future results, we may be required to record an impairment charge.
Net Income (Loss) per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Potentially dilutive stock options and warrants to purchase 44.0 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, and 17.4 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Warrant Liabilities
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from our July 2016 equity financing. In accordance with ASC 815-40, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in a Company's Own Stock ("ASC 815-40"), the warrant liabilities are recorded at fair value each quarter-end until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method. The gain or loss resulting from the change in fair value is shown on the statements of operations as a gain or loss on warrant derivative liabilities.
15
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have relied primarily upon proceeds from sales of our equity securities and the exercise of options and warrants, and to a much lesser extent upon payments from our strategic partners and licensees, to generate funds needed to finance our business and operation.
At September 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $58.9 million. Management believes that our current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future. The estimate is based, in part, upon our currently projected expenditures for the remainder of 2016 and the first ten months of 2017 of approximately $37.4 million, which includes approximately $15.6 million for our ongoing clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, approximately $2.7 million for our drug discovery operations at our Freiburg, Germany laboratory, approximately $3.4 million for general operation of our clinical programs, approximately $8.3 million for other general and administrative expenses, and approximately $7.4 million for interest and payments on our outstanding term loan. These projected expenditures assume that we have not and will not suffer a "material adverse event" which could trigger the lenders' acceleration of our outstanding term loan, and are based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and our actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections.
If we obtain marketing approval and successfully commercialize aldoxorubicin or other product candidates, we anticipate it will take several years for us to generate significant recurring revenue. We will be dependent on future financing and possible strategic partnerships until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain sufficient funding when needed, we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate all or a portion of our development programs or clinical trials, seek to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves, or seek to sell some or all of our assets or merge with or be acquired by another company. Following our announcement of the initial analysis of our on-going global Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin, we took measures to reduce our "burn" rate, decreased our head count and discontinued our pre-commercialization activities pending the results of our second analysis of the initial top-line data and preparation for our planned pre-NDA meeting with the FDA. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
We recorded a net loss in the nine-months ended September 30, 2016 of $43.1 million as compared to a net loss in the nine-months ended September 30, 2015 of $36.3 million, or an increase of $6.8 million. This was due primarily to an increase in our general and administrative expenditures in the current nine-month period of $3.3 million as compared to comparative 2015 period, resulting primarily from an increase in legal fees, interest expense of $1.9 million related to our term loan, a reduction in the gain on warrant derivative liability of $3.1 million offset by a decrease of $1.5 million from a reduction in expenditures associated with our clinical program for aldoxorubicin.
We sold $35.0 million of short-term investments in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. We purchased $33.0 million and sold $63.6 million of short-term investments, for a net decrease of $30.6 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015. We utilized approximately $1.0 million for capital expenditures in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to approximately $0.3 million in the comparable 2015 period. We do not expect any significant capital spending during the next 12 months.
We raised net proceeds of $18.3 million from a public offering in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, and we raised net proceeds of $26.8 million from a public offering in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015. We received a net amount of $24.0 million from a long-term loan financing with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, as compared to no financing activites in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015. We received $0.7 million from the exercise of options in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $0.6 million in the comparative 2015 period.
We continue to evaluate potential future sources of capital, as we do not currently have commitments from any third parties to provide us with additional capital. The results of our technology licensing efforts and the actual proceeds of any fund-raising activities will determine our ongoing ability to operate as a going concern. Our ability to obtain future financings through joint ventures, product licensing arrangements, royalty sales, equity financings, grants or otherwise is subject to market conditions and our ability to identify parties that are willing and able to enter into such arrangements on terms that are satisfactory to us. Depending upon the outcome of our fundraising efforts, the accompanying financial information may not necessarily be indicative of our future financial condition
16
We expect to incur significant losses and negative cash flow from operating activities for the foreseeable future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate revenues from our product candidates and become profitable. Even if we become profitable, we may not be able to sustain that profitability.
Following our announcement of the initial analysis of our on-going global Phase 3 clinical trial of aldoxorubicin, we took measures to reduce our "burn" rate, decreased our head count and discontinued our pre-commercialization activities pending the results of our second analysis of the initial top-line data and of our planned pre-NDA meeting with the FDA. For these reasons and others, our operating results may fluctuate from period to period, and the results of prior periods should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
We expect to complete the second analysis of the top line results of our pivotal Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin in STS in November or early December 2016. Following that analysis, we plan to schedule a pre-NDA meeting with the FDA, seek marketing approval, and commercialize or partner aldoxorubicin. Pending the meeting with the FDA, which we believe could occur in the first quarter of 2017, we intend to review our product development and strategic alternatives, including a possible sale or merger of our company or possible acquisition or business combination, and may determine to change our business strategy.
Results of Operations
We recorded a net loss of approximately $12.2 million and $43.1 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to a net loss of approximately $7.1 million and $36.3 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The increase of $5.1 million in our net loss during the current three-month period resulted from a reduction of $3.3 million in the gain on warrant derivative liability in the current quarter, an increase in our expenditures of $0.5 million in our aldodoxorubicin program, an increase in interest expense of $0.8 million as compared to $0 in the comparative period, and an increase in general and administrative expenses of $0.6 million, primarily legal fees.
We recognized $0.1 million of licensing revenue in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $0 in the comparative 2015 periods. All future licensing fees under our current licensing agreements are dependent upon successful development milestones being achieved by the licensor. During the remainder of 2016, we do not anticipate receiving any significant licensing fees.
Research and Development
Three-Month Period Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses | $ | 8,331 | $ | 8,002 | $ | 27,756 | $ | 29,709 | ||||||||
Employee stock option expense | 455 | 402 | 1,443 | 1,131 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 141 | 67 | 333 | 204 | ||||||||||||
$ | 8,927 | $ | 8,471 | $ | 29,532 | $ | 31,044 | |||||||||
Research expenses are expenses incurred by us in the discovery of new information that will assist us in the creation and the development of new drugs or treatments. Development expenses are expenses incurred by us in our efforts to commercialize the findings generated through our research efforts. Our research and development expenses, excluding stock option expense and depreciation and amortization, were $8.3 million and $27.8 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $8.0 million and $29.7 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively.
Research and development expenses incurred during the three-month period ended September 30, 2016 related primarily to our aldoxorubicin clinical program. In the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, the development expenses of our program for aldoxorubicin were $6.7 million and $22.9 million, respectively, as compared to $6.8 million and $25.9 million for the same periods in 2015, respectively. We incurred $0.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, for our German lab operations, as compared to $0.4 million and $1.3 million in the 2015 comparative periods. The remainder of our research and development expenses primarily related to research and development support costs. We recorded approximately $0.5 million and $1.4 million of employee stock option expense in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the same periods in 2015, respectively.
17
General and Administrative Expenses
Three-Month Period Ended September 30, | Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | $ | 2,181 | $ | 1,727 | $ | 8,869 | $ | 6,086 | ||||||||
Non-employee warrant expenses | (6 | ) | (28 | ) | 215 | 206 | ||||||||||
Employee stock option expense | 587 | 483 | 3,743 | 3,183 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 10 | 7 | 32 | 36 | ||||||||||||
$ | 2,772 | $ | 2,189 | $ | 12,859 | $ | 9,511 |
General and administrative expenses include all administrative salaries and general corporate expenses, including legal expenses. Our general and administrative expenses, excluding stock option expense, non-cash expenses and depreciation and amortization, were $2.2 million and $8.9 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and $1.7 million and $6.1 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2015.
Employee stock option expense relates to options granted to retain and compensate directors, officers and other employees. In the three-month period ended September 30, 2016, we amended the terms of stock options of a former executive in respect of a Retirement Agreement, resulting in a one-time expense of approximately $1.9 million. We recorded, in total, approximately $0.6 million and $3.7 million of employee stock option expense in the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, as compared $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2015. We recorded approximately ($6,000) and $0.2 million of non-employee stock option expense in the three-month and nine-month periods, ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and ($28,000) and $0.2 million for the comparative 2015 periods.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation expense reflects the depreciation of our equipment and furnishings.
Interest Income and Expense
Interest income was approximately $69,000 and $196,000 for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to $69,000 and $172,000, respectively, for the same periods in 2015. This decrease was related to the reduction in cash and cash equivalents and short term investments.
Interest expenses was approximately $0.8 million and $1.9 million for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively. This expense resulted from the term loan of $25 million received on February 5, 2016. There was no interest expense in the comparative 2015 periods.
Item 3. — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk is limited primarily to interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly because a significant portion of our investments are in short-term debt securities issued by the U.S. government and institutional money market funds. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal. Due to the nature of our short-term investments, we believe that we are not subject to any material market risk exposure. We do not have any speculative or hedging derivative financial instruments or foreign currency instruments. If interest rates had varied by 10% in the three-month period ended September 30, 2016, it would not have had a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows for that period.
18
Item 4. — Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2016, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Changes in Controls over Financial Reporting
As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 we identified a material weakness related to our internal control over a significant and unusual non-cash transaction. The material weakness resulted in an inaccurate conclusion related to the accrual and presentation of an obligation incurred in connection with the litigation settlement referred to in Note 5 of the financial statements that was payable in a variable number of shares of our common stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, Management implemented new controls and strengthened existing controls over the identification and accounting for significant and unusual transactions. As of September 30, 2016, management has tested the remedial controls for a sufficient period of time and has concluded that these controls are operating effectively. Therefore, we have concluded that the material weakness in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting has been fully remediated.
Except as noted above, there has been no change in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of September 30, 2016, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
We continually seek to assure that all of our controls and procedures are adequate and effective. Any failure to implement and maintain improvements in the controls over our financial reporting could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations under the SEC's rules and regulations. Any failure to improve our internal controls to address the weakness we have identified could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative impact on the trading price of our common stock.19
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. — Legal Proceedings
The disclosure set forth in Note 14 to our financial statements is herein incorporated by reference.
Item 1A. — Risk Factors
We intend to review our drug development activities and strategic alternatives, and may determine to change our business strategy.
We expect to complete the second analysis of the top-line data from our pivotal Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin in STS in November or early December 2016. Following the analysis, we plan to schedule a pre-NDA meeting with the FDA, seek marketing approval, and commercialize or partner aldoxorubicin. Pending the meeting with the FDA, which we believe could occur in the first quarter of 2017, we may consider possible strategic transactions, including a possible sale or merger of our company or possible acquisition or business combination. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain FDA approval of aldoxorubin. There also is no assurance that we would be successful in pursuing any strategic transaction. If we complete a strategic transaction our future business could change, perhaps materially, from our current business, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of a strategic transaction.
To finance strategic transactions, we may choose to issue shares of our common stock or preferred stock, which would dilute your ownership interest in us. Alternatively, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds through public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, may result in dilution to our stockholders.
Because we have no source of significant recurring revenue, we must depend on financing to sustain our operations.
Our revenue was $0.1 million respectively for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016. We will have no significant recurring revenue unless we are able to commercialize aldoxorubicin or one or more product candidates that we may develop or acquire, which commercialization may require us to first enter into license or other strategic arrangements with third parties.
We had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $58.9 million as of September 30, 2016, which includes the proceeds from a $25 million debt financing earlier this year.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with the net proceeds of this offering, will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
Even if we obtain marketing approval and successfully commercialize aldoxorubicin or other product candidate, we anticipate it will take a minimum of two years, and likely longer, for us to generate significant recurring revenue, and we will be dependent on future financing until such time, if ever, as we can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide us with any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain adequate financing would adversely affect our ability to operate as a going concern. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to security holders may result and new investors could have rights superior to holders of the shares issued in this offering. In addition, debt financing, if available, may include restrictive covenants. If adequate funds are not available to us, we may have to liquidate some or all of our assets or to delay or reduce the scope of or eliminate some portion or all of our development programs or clinical trials. We also may have to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourselves.
20
Our common stock may be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market.
On August 24, 2016, we received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") that the closing bid price for our common stock had been below $1.00 for the previous 30 consecutive business days, and that we are therefore not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued inclusion on The Nasdaq Capital Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). The notice indicates that we will have 180 calendar days, or until February 21, 2017, to regain compliance with this requirement.
We can regain compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid listing requirement if the closing bid price of our common stock is at least $1.00 for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during the 180-day compliance period. If we do not regain compliance during the initial compliance period, we may be eligible for additional time to regain compliance. To qualify, we will be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of our publicly held shares and all other Nasdaq initial listing standards, except the bid price requirement, and will need to provide written notice to Nasdaq of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period. If we meet these requirements, we expect that Nasdaq will grant us an additional 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement. If it appears to Nasdaq that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if we are otherwise not eligible, we expect that Nasdaq will notify us that our common stock will be subject to delisting.
We have been, and in the future may be, subject to legal or administrative actions that could adversely affect our results of operations and our business.
In May 2016, we settled federal securities class actions lawsuits filed in 2014 against us and certain of our officers and directors, and two stockholder derivative claims are pending against us and certain of our officers and directors in the Delaware Chancery Court.
In July, 2016, two class action complaints were filed against us and certain of our executive officers in the U.S. District Court of California. On October 26, 2016, the Court entered an order consolidating the actions.
Securities-related class action lawsuits and derivative litigation have often been brought against biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies such as ours, which often experience significant stock price volatility in connection with their product development programs.
Although we carry director's and officer's and other liability insurance which will be utilized in the defense of these matters, the insurance may not be sufficient to cover future liabilities that we may incur in connection with pending or future legal or administrative actions.
Item 6. — Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report and incorporated herein by reference.
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CytRx Corporation | |||
Date: November 9, 2016 | By: | /s/ JOHN Y. CALOZ | |
John Y. Caloz | |||
Chief Financial Officer | |||
22
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | Description | |
1.1 | Engagement Letter, dated as of July 14, 2016, between CytRx Corporation and Rodman & Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016) | |
4.1† | Amendment No. 3 to Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement | |
4.2 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2016) | |
10.1 | Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 15., 2016, among CytRx Corporation and the purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8‑K filed on July 15, 2016) | |
31.1† | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) | |
31.2† | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) | |
32.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Schema Document | |
101.CAL | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.LAB | XBRL Label Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | |
† Filed herewith.
* Furnished herewith.
23