Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | ' |
Principles of Consolidation | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rentrak Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and those entities in which we have a controlling interest. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
In Fiscal 2012, we established a Chinese joint venture, Sinotrak, and hold a 49% ownership interest in this variable interest entity (“VIE”). Sinotrak has been included in our consolidated financial statements, as we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, given our significant influence over day to day operations, among other factors. To date, the activities of Sinotrak have been limited primarily to initial cash contributions from both parties and costs associated with its formation. The equity interests of the noncontrolling party, totaling $0.9 million and $1.0 million as of March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are reported as a noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The noncontrolling party’s share of the expenses for the years ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are included in “Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Management Estimates | ' |
Management Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. We consider our most critical accounting policies to be those related to revenue recognition and those that require the use of estimates and assumptions, specifically, accounts receivable reserves, deferred tax asset valuation reserves, determining the realizable value of capitalized internally developed software costs, stock-based compensation, unrecognized tax benefits, goodwill impairment, intangible asset valuation and the determination of useful lives. |
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
We generate our revenue from the delivery of subscription services and by providing analytical services and other information obtained from our systems in the form of custom reports. Our subscription contracts do not provide customers with the right to take possession of the software supporting the applications and, as a result, are accounted for as service contracts. |
|
We recognize revenue for our services when all of the following conditions are met: |
|
| |
• | Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; |
| |
• | The products or services have been delivered; |
| |
• | The fee is fixed or determinable; and |
| |
• | Collection of the fee is reasonably assured based on our collection history. |
|
Subscription fees are recognized ratably over the period of service as of the date that our service or data is made available to the customer. Revenue related to custom reports is recognized as value is delivered to the customer. The pattern of revenue recognition for these reports varies depending on the terms of the individual contracts and may be recognized proportionally or deferred until the end of the contract term and recognized when the information has been delivered and accepted by the customer. |
|
We also enter into arrangements with multiple-elements, generally including subscription, analytic services and custom reporting. We recognize revenue under these arrangements in accordance with current guidance which requires us to allocate consideration at the inception of the arrangement to all elements, if they represent a separate unit of accounting, based on their relative selling prices. The guidance establishes a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating arrangement consideration to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available, or (iii) a best estimated selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE are available. VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by us for that deliverable on a standalone basis. BESP reflects our estimate of what the selling price of a deliverable would be if it was regularly sold on a standalone basis. |
|
We have concluded that we do not have VSOE for these types of arrangements, and TPE is generally not available because our service offerings are highly differentiated and we are unable to obtain reliable information on the pricing practices of our competitors. As such, BESP is used to allocate the total arrangement consideration at the arrangement’s inception based on each element’s relative selling price. |
|
We determine BESP for our deliverables based on our overall pricing objectives, taking into consideration several internal and external factors including, but not limited to, current pricing practices, pricing concentrations (such as industry, channel, customer class or geography), internal costs and market penetration of a product or service. The total arrangement consideration is allocated to each of the elements based on the relative selling price. Once the total arrangement consideration has been allocated to each element, we commence revenue recognition for each element on a standalone basis as the data or service is delivered. In the future, as our pricing strategies and market conditions change, modifications may occur in the determination of BESP to reflect these changes. As a result, the future revenue recognized for these arrangements could differ from results in the current period. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | ' |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at acquisition to be cash equivalents. |
Marketable Securities | ' |
Marketable Securities |
|
We classify our marketable securities as “available for sale” and, accordingly, our marketable securities are marked to market on a quarterly basis, with unrealized gains and losses being excluded from earnings and reflected as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Dividend and interest income is recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings and are derived using the specific identification method for determining the cost of securities sold. |
Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | ' |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. |
|
Credit limits are established through a process of reviewing the financial history and stability of each customer. We regularly evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable by monitoring past due balances. If it is determined that a customer may be unable to meet its financial obligations, a specific reserve is established based on the amount we expect to recover. If circumstances change related to specific customers, overall aging of accounts receivable or collection experience, our estimate of the recoverability of accounts receivable could materially change. See Schedule II included on page 62 for detail regarding our bad debt expense and allowance for doubtful accounts. |
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities |
|
We estimate the fair value of our monetary assets and liabilities based upon comparison of such assets and liabilities to the current market values for instruments of a similar nature and degree of risk. Our monetary assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accrued compensation. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | ' |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
|
Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, capitalized software and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are required to be reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell, and depreciation ceases. |
Acquisitions | ' |
Acquisitions |
|
The purchase price for acquisitions is allocated based on the estimated fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets | ' |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
In assessing the fair value of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, we first make a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If, after completing our qualitative assessment, we determine that it is more likely than not that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, we compare the fair value to our carrying value (including goodwill). If the estimated fair value is greater than the carrying value, we conclude that no impairment exists. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, a second step is performed in which the implied fair value of goodwill is compared to its carrying value. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value, goodwill must be written down to its implied fair value, resulting in goodwill impairment. We test goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter every fiscal year and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist. |
|
The qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of changes in certain factors including: (1) changes in forecasted operating results and a comparison of actual results to projections, (2) changes in the industry or our competitive environment since the acquisition date, (3) changes in the overall economy, our market share and market interest rates since the acquisition date, (4) trends in the stock price and related market capitalization and enterprise values, (5) trends in peer companies’ total enterprise value metrics, and (6) additional factors such as management turnover and changes in regulations. |
|
Based on our qualitative assessment performed during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the estimated fair values of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values as of March 31, 2014 and, therefore, determined it was not necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. |
|
We have long-term relationships with each of our Global Clients in our Movies Everywhere™ line of business. Currently, there are no competitors who provide global box office results, and we believe that the barriers to entry are quite high because the Global Clients prefer a single provider with world-wide reporting capabilities. In particular, our service provides these Global Clients with access to information relating to all other market participants. Should one terminate its relationship with us, it would no longer have access to world-wide data on all market participants and, currently, similar information is not available elsewhere. Our turnover rate of clients has been minimal over the life of our product, and, given our service offerings, we do not expect our customers to change their relationships with us. Due to the absence of any competitor who can provide world-wide coverage, the tenure of our relationships with these Global Clients, and the fact that, historically, these Global Clients have preferred only one provider, our “Global relationships” intangible asset was determined to have an indefinite life. See Note 8. There were no impairment charges related to goodwill or indefinite-lived assets during the years ended March 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. |
|
We amortize intangible assets with definite lives over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. We evaluate the estimated remaining lives of intangible assets and whether events or changes in circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining periods of amortization. We test these assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired, based on undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset or group of assets. |
Property and Equipment | ' |
Property and Equipment |
|
Depreciation of property and equipment is computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three years for furniture and fixtures, three to ten years for equipment and five years for capitalized software. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the underlying leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever are shorter. Property and equipment is reviewed for impairment as discussed above. See Note 7. |
Long-Term Investment | ' |
Long-Term Investment |
|
We have one long-term investment included in other assets, which is valued based on the cost-method and had an aggregate carrying amount of $0.5 million as of March 31, 2014 and 2013. The fair value of our cost-method investment is not estimated if there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. |
Capitalized Software | ' |
Capitalized Software |
|
Capitalized software is included in property and equipment, net, and consists of costs to purchase and develop internal-use software, as well as costs to develop internal software which is used by us to provide various services to clients. These services provide unique data collection, management, analytic and reporting functions, resulting in business information valuable to our clients. For example, our Box Office Essentials® business line reports domestic and international gross receipt theatrical ticket sales to motion picture studios and movie theater owners. Our OnDemand Essentials® business line measures and reports anonymous video on demand (“VOD”) usage data to our clients. The internal and external costs to develop the internal software used to support these services are capitalized after the technological and business feasibility of the project is determined and the preliminary project stage is completed. We continue to develop our internal software systems in order to expand our service offerings. Once we begin to utilize this software in our products, these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the software, which is five years. Capitalized software is reviewed for impairment as discussed above. Changes in technology could affect our estimate of the useful life of these assets. |
Income Taxes | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates for the years in which the taxes are expected to be paid. We evaluate our deferred tax assets on a regular basis to determine if a valuation allowance is required. To the extent it is determined the recoverability of the deferred tax assets is unlikely, we record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, we had a valuation allowance of $17.2 million and $14.1 million, respectively, against our deferred tax assets. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, net deferred tax liabilities totaled $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. |
|
We record a benefit for uncertain tax positions only when we determine that those tax positions are more-likely-than-not to be sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, excluding penalties and interest of $60,000 and $124,000, respectively. Our policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities | ' |
Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities |
|
We account for tax assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction (e.g., sales, use, value added) on a net (excluded from revenue) basis. |
Stock-Based Compensation | ' |
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted to our employees and directors, including employee stock options, DSUs, cash-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSARs”), RSUs, and ESPP shares based on the estimated fair value of the award on the grant date. We utilize the Black-Scholes options pricing model and Monte Carlo simulations for valuing our stock-based awards with a conversion or exercise price. |
|
Compensation expense is only recognized on awards that ultimately vest and market-based awards. However, we have not reduced the stock-based compensation expense for estimated forfeitures because there is no basis for estimating future forfeitures since most unvested awards are held primarily by members of senior management. We update for forfeitures as they occur and recognize any changes to accumulated compensation expense in the period of change. See Note 13. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Agreements with Non-Employees |
|
We recognize compensation expense for stock-based compensation agreements with non-employees based on the estimated fair value of the award on the grant date and at the end of each reporting period until we reach the measurement date. We utilize the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the end of period fair value of these awards and adjust the cumulative incremental change in value as compensation expense over the life of the award. |
Foreign Currency Translation | ' |
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
The U.S. dollar is the reporting currency for all periods presented. The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is generally the local currency. All assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Income and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate during the period. Equity transactions are translated using historical exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from translation are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Legal Costs | ' |
Legal Costs |
|
We may be a party to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We accrue for certain legal costs, including attorney fees, and potential settlement claims related to various legal proceedings that are estimable and probable. If not estimable and probable, legal costs are expensed as incurred. Legal costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
New Accounting Guidance | ' |
ASU 2014-09 |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under US GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We are evaluating our existing revenue recognition policies to determine whether any contracts in the scope of the guidance will be affected by the new requirements. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. |
|
ASU 2014-08 |
|
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant, and Equipment” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 amends the guidance related to reporting for discontinued operations. The amended guidance requires the assets and liabilities of a disposal group be separately presented in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and early adoption is permitted. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-08 effective as of March 31, 2014, and our adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. |
|
ASU 2013-11 |
|
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists” (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 amends the guidance related to the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits and allows for the reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward whenever the NOL or tax credit carryforward would be available to reduce the additional taxable income or tax due if the tax position is disallowed. ASU 2013-11 is effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013, and early adoption is permitted. Since ASU 2013-11 relates only to the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits, our adoption of ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2014 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. |
|
ASU 2013-02 |
|
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2013-02”). ASU 2013-02 amends the guidance related to reporting amounts reclassified out of other comprehensive income and includes identification of the line items in net earnings affected by the reclassifications. ASU 2013-02 is effective for annual and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012, and early adoption is permitted. Since ASU 2013-02 relates only to the presentation of comprehensive income, our adoption of ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of Fiscal 2014 did not have any effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. |