UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
____________________
FORM 10-K
____________________
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended September 29, 2007
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |||||
For the transition period from | to |
Commission File number 1-9273
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/10-K/0000802481-07-000096/ppclogo.jpg)
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 75-1285071 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) | |
4845 US Hwy 271 North | |
Pittsburg, Texas | 75686-0093 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (903) 434-1000 | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | |
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None |
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12B-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer x Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of March 31, 2007, was $1,340,874,524. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, all directors, executive officers and 5% beneficial owners have been deemed affiliates.
Number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 13, 2007, was 66,555,733.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held January 30, 2008 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
2
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
PART I | ||
Page | ||
Business | 4 | |
Risk Factors | 23 | |
Unresolved Staff Comments | 32 | |
Properties | 33 | |
Legal Proceedings | 35 | |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 38 | |
PART II | ||
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 39 | |
Selected Financial Data | 44 | |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results | ||
of Operations | 47 | |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 66 | |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data (see Index to Financial Statements and | ||
Schedules below) | 68 | |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial | ||
Disclosure | 68 | |
Controls and Procedures | 68 | |
Other Information | 72 | |
PART III | ||
Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 74 | |
Executive Compensation | 74 | |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related | ||
Stockholder Matters | 74 | |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 74 | |
Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 75 | |
PART IV | ||
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | 76 | |
83 | ||
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES | ||
86 | ||
87 | ||
88 | ||
89 | ||
90 | ||
91 | ||
118 |
Item 1. | Business |
(a) General Development of Business
Overview
The Company, which was incorporated in Texas in 1968 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1986, is the successor to a partnership founded in 1946 as a retail feed store. Over the years, the Company grew through both internal growth and various acquisitions of farming operations and poultry processors including the significant acquisitions in fiscal 2004 and 2007 discussed below. We are the world’s largest chicken company and have one of the best known brand names in the chicken industry. In the U.S., we produce both prepared and fresh chicken and fresh turkey; while in Mexico and Puerto Rico, we exclusively produce fresh chicken. Through vertical integration, we control the breeding, hatching and growing of chickens. We also control the processing, preparation, packaging and sale of our product lines, which we believe has made us one of the highest quality, lowest-cost producers of chicken in North America. We have consistently applied a long-term business strategy of focusing our growth efforts on the higher-value, higher-margin prepared foods products and have become a recognized industry leader in this market segment. Accordingly, our sales efforts have traditionally been targeted to the foodservice industry, principally chain restaurants and food processors, and have more recently been targeted to retailers seeking value-added products. We have continually made investments to ensure our prepared foods capabilities remain state-of-the-art and have complemented these investments with a substantial and successful research and development effort. In fiscal 2007, we sold 7.7 billion pounds of dressed chicken and 151.7 million pounds of dressed turkey and generated net sales of $7.6 billion. In fiscal 2007, our U.S. operations, including Puerto Rico, accounted for 93.3% of our net sales, with the remaining 6.7% arising from our Mexico operations.
Recent Business Acquisition Activities
On December 27, 2006, we acquired a majority of the outstanding common stock of Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”) through a tender offer. We subsequently acquired all remaining Gold Kist shares and, on January 9, 2007, Gold Kist became our wholly owned subsidiary. We sometimes refer to this acquisition as the “fiscal 2007 acquisition”. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. Gold Kist operated a fully-integrated chicken production business that included live production, processing, marketing and distribution. This acquisition has positioned us as the world’s leading chicken producer, and that position has provided us with enhanced abilities to compete more efficiently and provide even better customer service, expand our geographic reach and customer base, further pursue value-added and prepared foods opportunities, and offer long-term growth opportunities for our stockholders, employees and growers. We are also better positioned to compete in the industry both internationally and in the U.S. as consolidations occur.
On November 23, 2003, we completed the purchase of all the outstanding stock of the corporations represented as the ConAgra Foods, Inc. chicken division (“ConAgra chicken division”). We sometimes refer to this acquisition as the “fiscal 2004 acquisition.” The acquired business has been included in our results of operations since the date of the acquisition. The acquisition provided us with additional lines of specialty prepared chicken products, well-known brands, well-established distributor relationships and Southeastern U.S. processing facilities. The acquisition also included the largest distributor of chicken products in Puerto Rico.
Strategy
Our objectives are (1) to increase sales, profit margins and earnings and (2) to outpace the growth of, and maintain our leadership position in, the chicken industry. To achieve these goals, we plan to continue pursuing the following strategies:
- Capitalize on significant scale with leading industry position and brand recognition. We are the largest producer of chicken products in the U.S. We estimate that our U.S. market share, based on the total annual chicken production in the U.S., is approximately 25%, which is approximately 20% higher than the second largest competitor in the chicken industry. The complementary fit of markets, distributor relationships and geographic locations are a few of the many benefits we realized from our fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions previously discussed. We believe the acquired businesses’ established relationships with broad-line national distributors and retailers have enabled us to expand our customer base and provide nationwide distribution capabilities for all of our product lines. As a result, we believe we are one of only two U.S. chicken producers that can supply the growing demand for a broad range of price competitive standard and specialized products with well-known brand names on a nationwide basis from a single source supplier. |
- Capitalize on attractive U.S. prepared foods market. We focus our U.S. growth initiatives on sales of prepared foods to the foodservice and value-added retail markets because they continue to be two of the fastest growing and most profitable segments in the poultry industry. Products sold to these market segments require further processing, which enables us to charge a premium for our products, reducing the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improving and stabilizing our profit margins. Feed ingredient costs typically decrease from approximately 33%-49% of total production cost for fresh chicken products to approximately 17%-24% for prepared chicken products. Due to increased demand from our customers and our fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions, our sales of prepared chicken products grew from $921.1 million in fiscal 2003 to $2,492.4 million in fiscal 2007, a compounded annual growth rate of 28.3%. Prepared foods sales represented 39.5% of our total U.S. chicken revenues in fiscal 2007, which we believe provides us with a significant competitive advantage and reduces our exposure to feed price fluctuations. The addition of well-known brands, including Pierce® and Easy-Entree®, from our fiscal 2004 acquisition significantly expanded our already sizeable prepared foods chicken offerings. Similarly, our acquisition of highly customized cooked chicken products, including breaded cutlets, sizzle strips and Wing-Dings®, for restaurants and specialty foodservice customers from this acquisition complemented our existing lines of pre-cooked
breast fillets, tenderloins, burgers, nuggets, salads and other prepared products for institutional foodservice, fast-food and retail customers. |
- Emphasize customer-driven research and technology. We have a long-standing reputation for customer-driven research and development in designing new products and implementing advanced processing technology. This enables us to better meet our customers’ changing needs for product innovation, consistent quality and cost efficiency. In particular, customer-driven research and development is integral to our growth strategy for the prepared foods market in which customers continue to place greater importance on value-added services. Our research and development personnel often work directly with customers in developing products for them, which we believe helps promote long-term relationships. |
- Enhance U.S. fresh chicken profitability through value-added, branded products. Our U.S. fresh chicken sales accounted for $3,255.7 million, or 51.4%, of our U.S. chicken sales for fiscal 2007. In addition to maintaining the sales of traditional fresh chicken products, our strategy is to shift the mix of our U.S. fresh chicken products by continuing to increase sales of higher margin, faster growing products, such as fixed weight packaged products and marinated chicken and chicken parts, and to continually shift portions of this product mix into the higher value and margin prepared chicken products. Much of our fresh chicken products are sold under the Pilgrim’s Pride® brand name, which is a well-known brand in the chicken industry. |
- Improve operating efficiencies and increase capacity on a cost-effective basis. As production and sales grow, we continue to focus on improving operating efficiencies by investing in state-of-the-art technology and processes, training and our total quality management program. Specific initiatives include: |
- | standardizing lowest-cost production processes across our various facilities; |
- | centralizing purchasing and other shared services; and |
- | standardizing and upgrading technology where appropriate. |
In addition, we have a proven history of increasing capacity while improving operating efficiencies at acquired properties in both the U.S. and Mexico. As a result, according to industry data, since 1993 we have consistently been one of the lower-cost producers of chicken.
- Continue to seek strategic acquisitions. We have pursued opportunities to expand through acquisitions in the past. We expect to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities in the future that would complement our existing businesses, broaden our production capabilities and/or improve our operating efficiencies. |
- Capitalize on export opportunities. We intend to continue to focus on international opportunities to complement our U.S. chicken operations and capitalize on attractive export markets. According to the USDA, the export of U.S. chicken products increased 9.7%
from 2002 through 2006. We believe U.S. chicken exports will continue to grow as worldwide demand increases for high-grade, low-cost meat protein sources. According to USDA data, the export market for chicken is expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate of 1.8% from 2006 to 2011. Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our dark chicken meat, which is a natural by-product of our U.S. operations given our concentration on prepared foods products and the U.S. customers’ general preference for white chicken meat. As part of this initiative, we have created a significant international distribution network into several markets, including Mexico, which we now utilize not only for dark chicken meat distribution, but also for various higher margin prepared foods and other poultry products. We employ both a direct international sales force and export brokers. Our key international markets include Eastern Europe, including Russia; the Far East, including China; and Mexico. We believe that we have substantial opportunities to expand our sales to these markets by capitalizing on direct international distribution channels supplemented by our existing export broker relationships. Our export sales accounted for approximately 10.1% and 21.1% of our U.S. chicken sales and pounds, respectively, for fiscal 2007. |
(b) | Financial Information About Segments |
We operate in three reportable business segments as (1) a producer and seller of chicken products, (2) a producer and seller of turkey products and (3) a seller of other products. See a discussion of our business segments in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
(c) | Narrative Description of Business |
Products and Markets |
Our chicken products consist primarily of:
(1) Prepared chicken products, which are products such as portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated.
(2) Fresh chicken, which is refrigerated (non-frozen) whole or cut-up chicken sold to the foodservice industry either pre-marinated or non-marinated. Fresh chicken also includes prepackaged case-ready chicken, which includes various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs labeled and priced ready for the retail grocer's fresh meat counter.
(3) Export and other chicken products, which are primarily parts and whole chicken, either refrigerated or frozen for U.S. export or domestic use, and chicken prepared foods products for U.S. export.
Our turkey products consist primarily of fresh and frozen whole turkeys.
Our chicken and turkey products are sold primarily to:
(1) Foodservice customers, which are customers such as chain restaurants, food processors, foodservice distributors and certain other institutions. We sell products to our foodservice customers ranging from portion-controlled refrigerated poultry parts to fully-cooked and frozen, breaded or non-breaded poultry parts or formed products.
(2) Retail customers, which are customers such as grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We sell to our retail customers branded, pre-packaged, cut-up and whole poultry, and fresh refrigerated or frozen whole poultry and poultry parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs.
(3) Export and other product customers, who purchase chicken products for export to Eastern Europe, including Russia; the Far East, including China; Mexico; and other world markets. Our export and other chicken products, with the exception of our exported prepared foods products, consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold primarily in bulk, non-branded form, either refrigerated to distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets.
Our other products consist of: |
(1) Other types of meat along with various other staples purchased and sold by our distribution centers as a convenience to our chicken customers who purchase through the distribution centers.
(2) The production and sale of table eggs, commercial feeds and related items, live hogs and proteins.
The following table sets forth, for the periods beginning with fiscal 2003, net sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and markets served with those products. Consistent with our long-term strategy, we emphasized our U.S. growth initiatives on sales of prepared foods products, primarily to the foodservice market. This product and market segment has experienced, and we believe will continue to experience, greater growth than fresh chicken products. We based the table on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types and customers.
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sept. 29, 2007(a) | Sept. 30, 2006 | Oct. 1, 2005 | Oct. 2, 2004(a) | Sept. 27, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(52 weeks) | (52 weeks) | (52 weeks) | (53 weeks) | (52 weeks) | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Chicken Sales: | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepared Foods: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | $ | 1,897,643 | $ | 1,567,297 | $ | 1,622,901 | $ | 1,647,904 | $ | 731,331 | ||||||||||
Retail | 511,470 | 308,486 | 283,392 | 213,775 | 163,018 | |||||||||||||||
Total Prepared Foods | 2,409,113 | 1,875,783 | 1,906,293 | 1,861,679 | 894,349 | |||||||||||||||
Fresh Chicken: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | 2,280,057 | 1,388,451 | 1,509,189 | 1,328,883 | 474,251 | |||||||||||||||
Retail | 975,659 | 496,560 | 612,081 | 653,798 | 257,911 | |||||||||||||||
Total Fresh Chicken | 3,255,716 | 1,885,011 | 2,121,270 | 1,982,681 | 732,162 | |||||||||||||||
Export and Other: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Export: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prepared Foods | 83,317 | 64,338 | 59,473 | 34,735 | 26,714 | |||||||||||||||
Chicken | 559,429 | 257,823 | 303,150 | 212,611 | 85,087 | |||||||||||||||
Total Export(b) | 642,746 | 322,161 | 362,623 | 247,346 | 111,801 | |||||||||||||||
Other Chicken By-Products | 20,779 | 15,448 | 21,083 | (b) | (b) | |||||||||||||||
Total Export and Other | 663,525 | 337,609 | 383,706 | 247,346 | 111,801 | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Chicken | 6,328,354 | 4,098,403 | 4,411,269 | 4,091,706 | 1,738,312 | |||||||||||||||
Mexico Chicken Sales: | 488,466 | 418,745 | 403,353 | 362,442 | 349,305 | |||||||||||||||
Total Chicken Sales | 6,816,820 | 4,517,148 | 4,814,622 | 4,454,148 | 2,087,617 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Turkey Sales: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | 14,025 | 30,269 | 73,908 | 120,676 | 138,405 | |||||||||||||||
Retail | 104,239 | 96,968 | 125,741 | 154,289 | 154,552 | |||||||||||||||
118,264 | 127,237 | 199,649 | 274,965 | 292,957 | ||||||||||||||||
Export and other(b) | 4,100 | 3,664 | 5,189 | 11,287 | 12,721 | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Turkey Sales | 122,364 | 130,901 | 204,838 | 286,252 | 305,678 | |||||||||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||||||||||
United States | 638,738 | 570,510 | 626,056 | 600,091 | 207,284 | |||||||||||||||
Mexico | 20,677 | 17,006 | 20,759 | 23,232 | 18,766 | |||||||||||||||
Total Other Products | 659,415 | 587,516 | 646,815 | 623,323 | 226,050 | |||||||||||||||
Total Net Sales | $ | 7,598,599 | $ | 5,235,565 | $ | 5,666,275 | $ | 5,363,723 | $ | 2,619,345 | ||||||||||
Total Chicken Prepared Foods | $ | 2,492,430 | $ | 1,940,121 | $ | 1,965,766 | $ | 1,896,414 | $ | 921,063 |
(a) The fiscal 2007 acquisition on December 27, 2006 and fiscal 2004 acquisition on November 23, 2003 have been accounted for as purchases. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operation results and cash flows of the fiscal 2007 acquisition in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of the fiscal 2007 acquisition from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. The results of operations for the fiscal 2004 acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. |
(b) The Export and Other category historically included the sales of certain chicken by-products sold in international markets, as well as the export of chicken and turkey products. Prior to fiscal 2005, by-product sales were not specifically identifiable from the Export and Other category. Accordingly, a detail breakout is not available prior to such time; however, the Company believes that the relative split between these categories as shown in fiscal 2005 would not be dissimilar in the prior fiscal periods. Export items include certain poultry parts that have greater value in some overseas markets than in the U.S. |
The following table sets forth, beginning with fiscal 2003, the percentage of net U.S. chicken and turkey sales attributable to each of our primary product lines and the markets serviced with those products. We based the table and related discussion on our internal sales reports and their classification of product types and customers.
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sept. 29, 2007 (a) | Sept. 30, 2006 | Oct. 1, 2005 | Oct. 2, 2004(a) | Sept. 27, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Chicken Sales: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prepared Foods: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | 30.1 | 38.2 | 36.8 | 40.3 | 42.1 | |||||||||||||||
Retail | 8.1 | 7.5 | 6.4 | 5.2 | 9.4 | |||||||||||||||
Total Prepared Foods | 38.2 | % | 45.7 | % | 43.2 | % | 45.5 | % | 51.5 | % | ||||||||||
Fresh Chicken: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | 36.0 | 33.9 | 34.2 | 32.5 | 27.3 | |||||||||||||||
Retail | 15.4 | 12.1 | 13.9 | 16.0 | 14.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total Fresh Chicken | 51.4 | % | 46.0 | % | 48.1 | % | 48.5 | % | 42.1 | % | ||||||||||
Export and Other: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Export: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prepared Foods | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||
Chicken | 8.8 | 6.3 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||||
Total Export(b) | 10.1 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||
Other Chicken By-Products | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | (b) | (b) | |||||||||||||||
Total Export and Other | 10.4 | % | 8.3 | % | 8.7 | % | 6.0 | % | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||
Total U.S. Chicken | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total Chicken Prepared Foods as a percentage of U.S. Chicken | 39.5 | % | 47.3 | % | 44.5 | % | 46.3 | % | 53.0 | % | ||||||||||
U.S. Turkey Sales: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foodservice | 11.4 | 23.1 | 36.0 | 42.1 | 45.3 | |||||||||||||||
Retail | 85.2 | 74.1 | 61.4 | 53.9 | 50.5 | |||||||||||||||
96.6 | % | 97.2 | % | 97.4 | % | 96.0 | % | 95.8 | % | |||||||||||
Export and Other(b) | 3.4 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 4.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Turkey | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
(a) The fiscal 2007 acquisition on December 27, 2006 and fiscal 2004 acquisition on November 23, 2003 have been accounted for as purchases. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of the fiscal 2007 acquisition in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of the fiscal 2007 acquisition from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. The results of operations for the fiscal 2004 acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. |
(b) The Export and Other category historically included the sales of certain chicken by-products sold in international markets as well as the export of chicken and turkey products. Prior to fiscal 2005, by-product sales were not specifically identifiable from the Export and Other category. Accordingly, a detail breakout is not available prior to such time; however, the Company believes that the relative split between these categories as shown in fiscal 2005 would not be dissimilar in the prior fiscal periods. Export items include certain poultry parts that have greater value in some overseas markets than in the U.S. |
UNITED STATES
Product Types
Chicken Products
Prepared Foods Overview. During fiscal 2007, $2,409.1 million of our U.S. chicken sales were in prepared foods products to foodservice customers and retail distributors, as compared to $894.3 million in fiscal 2003. These numbers reflect the strategic focus for our growth and our fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions. The market for prepared chicken products has experienced, and we believe will continue to experience, greater growth, higher average sales prices and higher margins than fresh chicken products. Also, the production and sale in the U.S. of prepared foods products reduce the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient costs are the single largest component of our total U.S. cost of sales, representing approximately 35.8% of our U.S. cost of sales for fiscal 2007. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories, demand for feed ingredients and the agricultural policies of the U.S. and foreign governments. As further processing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improve and stabilize our profit margins.
We establish prices for our prepared chicken products based primarily upon perceived value to the customer, production costs and prices of competing products. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price for the products or set a price according to formulas based on an underlying commodity market, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices.
Fresh Chicken Overview. Our fresh chicken business is an important component of our sales and accounted for $3,255.7 million, or 51.4%, of our total U.S. chicken sales for fiscal 2007. In addition to maintaining sales of mature, traditional fresh chicken products, our strategy is to shift the mix of our U.S. fresh chicken products by continuing to increase sales of higher margin, faster growing products, such as marinated chicken and chicken parts, and to continually shift portions of this product mix into the higher value and margin prepared foods category.
Most fresh chicken products are sold to established customers, based upon certain weekly or monthly market prices reported by the USDA and other public price reporting services, plus a markup, which is dependent upon the customer’s location, volume, product specifications and other factors. We believe our practices with respect to sales of fresh chicken are generally consistent with those of our competitors. The majority of these products are sold pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price for the products or set a price according to formulas based on an underlying commodity market, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices.
Export and Other Chicken Products Overview. Our export and other products consist of whole chickens and chicken parts sold primarily in bulk, non-branded form, either refrigerated to
distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets, and branded and non-branded prepared foods products for distribution to export markets. In fiscal 2007, approximately $663.5 million, or 10.4%, of our total U.S. chicken sales were attributable to U.S. chicken export and other products. These exports and other products, other than the prepared foods products, have historically been characterized by lower prices and greater price volatility than our more value-added product lines.
Turkey Products
Turkey Overview. Our turkey business accounted for $122.4 million of sales in fiscal 2007. As is typical for the industry, a significant portion of the sales of fresh and frozen whole turkeys is seasonal in nature, with the height of sales occurring during the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays.
Most turkey products are sold to established customers pursuant to agreements with varying terms that either set a fixed price or are subject to a market driven formula with some agreements based upon market prices reported by the USDA and other public price reporting services, plus a markup, subject in many cases to minimum and maximum prices. This is dependent upon the customer’s location, volume, product specifications and other factors. We believe our practices with respect to sales of fresh turkey are generally consistent with those of our competitors with similar programs.
Markets for Chicken Products
Foodservice. The foodservice market principally consists of chain restaurants, food processors, broad-line distributors and certain other institutions located throughout the continental U.S. We supply chicken products ranging from portion-controlled refrigerated chicken parts to fully cooked and frozen, breaded or non-breaded chicken parts or formed products.
We believe the Company is well-positioned to be the primary or secondary supplier to many national and international chain restaurants who require multiple suppliers of chicken products. Additionally, we believe we are well suited to be the sole supplier for many regional chain restaurants. Regional chain restaurants often offer better margin opportunities and a growing base of business.
We believe we have significant competitive strengths in terms of full-line product capabilities, high-volume production capacities, research and development expertise and extensive distribution and marketing experience relative to smaller and non-vertically integrated producers. While the overall chicken market has grown consistently, we believe the majority of this growth in recent years has been in the foodservice market. According to the National Chicken Council, from 2002 through 2006, sales of chicken products to the foodservice market grew at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 7.9%, versus 4.9% growth for the chicken industry overall. Foodservice growth is anticipated to continue as food-away-from-home expenditures continue to outpace overall industry rates. According to Technomic Information Services, food-away-from-home expenditures grew at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 5.5% from 2002 through 2006 and are projected to grow at a 4.8%
compounded annual growth rate from 2007 through 2012. Due to internal growth and our fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions, our sales to the foodservice market from fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2007 grew at a compounded annual growth rate of 36.4% and represented 66.1% of the net sales of our U.S. chicken operations in fiscal 2007.
Foodservice – Prepared Foods. Our prepared chicken products sales to the foodservice market were $1,897.6 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $731.3 million in fiscal 2003, a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 26.9%. In addition to the significant increase in sales created by the fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions, we attribute this growth in sales of prepared chicken products to the foodservice market to a number of factors:
First,there has been significant growth in the number of foodservice operators offering chicken on their menus and in the number of chicken items offered.
Second,foodservice operators are increasingly purchasing prepared chicken products, which allow them to reduce labor costs while providing greater product consistency, quality and variety across all restaurant locations.
Third,there is a strong need among larger foodservice companies for a single-source supplier in the prepared chicken products market. A viable supplier must be able to ensure supply, demonstrate innovation and new product development and provide competitive pricing. We have been successful in our objective of becoming a supplier of choice by being the primary or secondary prepared chicken products supplier to many large foodservice companies because:
- We are vertically integrated, giving us control over our supply of chicken and chicken parts;
- Our further processing facilities, with a wide range of capabilities, are particularly well suited to the high-volume production as well as low-volume custom production runs necessary to meet both the capacity and quality requirements of the foodservice market; and
- We have established a reputation for dependable quality, highly responsive service and excellent technical support.
Fourth,as a result of the experience and reputation developed with larger customers, we have increasingly become the principal supplier to mid-sized foodservice organizations.
Fifth,our in-house product development group follows a customer-driven research and development focus designed to develop new products to meet customers’ changing needs. Our research and development personnel often work directly with institutional customers in developing products for these customers.
Sixth, we are a leader in utilizing advanced processing technology, which enables us to better meet our customers’ needs for product innovation, consistent quality and cost efficiency.
Foodservice – Fresh Chicken. We produce and market fresh, refrigerated chicken for sale to U.S. quick-service restaurant chains, delicatessens and other customers. These chickens have the giblets removed, are usually of specific weight ranges and are usually pre-cut to customer specifications. They are often marinated to enhance value and product differentiation. By growing and processing to customers’ specifications, we are able to assist quick-service restaurant chains in controlling costs and maintaining quality and size consistency of chicken pieces sold to the consumer.
Retail. The retail market consists primarily of grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We concentrate our efforts in this market on sales of branded, prepackaged cut-up and whole chicken and chicken parts to grocery store chains and retail distributors. For a number of years, we have invested in both trade and retail marketing designed to establish high levels of brand name awareness and consumer preferences.
We utilize numerous marketing techniques, including advertising, to develop and strengthen trade and consumer awareness and increase brand loyalty for consumer products marketed under the Pilgrim’s Pride® brand. Our co-founder, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, is the featured spokesperson in our television, radio and print advertising, and a trademark cameo of a person wearing a Pilgrim’s hat serves as the logo on all of our primary branded products. As a result of this marketing strategy, Pilgrim’s Pride® is a well-known brand name in a number of markets. We believe our efforts to achieve and maintain brand awareness and loyalty help to provide more secure distribution for our products. We also believe our efforts at brand awareness generate greater price premiums than would otherwise be the case in certain markets. We also maintain an active program to identify consumer preferences. The program primarily consists of discovering and validating new product ideas, packaging designs and methods through sophisticated qualitative and quantitative consumer research techniques in key geographic markets.
Retail – Prepared Foods. We sell retail-oriented prepared chicken products primarily to grocery store chains located throughout the U.S. Our prepared chicken products sales to the retail market were $511.5 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $163.0 million in fiscal 2003, a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 33.1%. We believe that our growth in this market segment will continue as retailers concentrate on satisfying consumer demand for more products that are quick, easy and convenient to prepare at home.
Retail – Fresh Chicken. Our prepackaged retail products include various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts in trays, bags or other consumer packs labeled and priced ready for the retail grocer’s fresh meat counter. Our retail fresh chicken products are sold in the midwestern, southwestern, southeastern and western regions of the U.S. Our fresh chicken sales to the retail market were $975.7 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $257.9 million in fiscal 2003, a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 39.5% resulting primarily from our fiscal 2004 and 2007 acquisitions. We believe the retail prepackaged fresh chicken business will continue to be a large and relatively stable market, providing opportunities for product differentiation and regional brand loyalty.
Export and Other Chicken Products. Our export and other chicken products, with the exception of our exported prepared foods products, consist of whole chickens and chicken parts
sold primarily in bulk, non-branded form either refrigerated to distributors in the U.S. or frozen for distribution to export markets. In the U.S., prices of these products are negotiated daily or weekly and are generally related to market prices quoted by the USDA or other public price reporting services. We sell U.S.-produced chicken products for export to Eastern Europe, including Russia; the Far East, including China; Mexico; and other world markets.
Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our dark chicken meat, which is a natural by-product of our U.S. operations given our concentration on prepared foods products and the U.S. customers’ general preference for white chicken meat. We have also begun selling prepared chicken products for export to the international divisions of our U.S. chain restaurant customers. We believe that U.S. chicken exports will continue to grow as worldwide demand increases for high-grade, low-cost meat protein sources. We also believe that worldwide demand for higher margin prepared foods products will increase over the next several years. Accordingly, we believe we are well positioned to capitalize on such growth. Also included in this category are chicken by-products, which are converted into protein products and sold primarily to manufacturers of pet foods.
Markets for Turkey Products
Most of our turkey sales are derived from products sold to the retail market. This market consists primarily of grocery store chains, wholesale clubs and other retail distributors. We concentrate our efforts in this market on sales of branded, prepackaged whole turkeys to grocery store chains and retail distributors in the eastern and southwestern regions of the U.S. We believe this regional marketing focus enables us to develop consumer brand franchises and capitalize on proximity to the trade customer in terms of lower transportation costs, more timely and responsive service and enhanced product freshness.
We utilize numerous marketing techniques, including advertising, to develop and strengthen trade and consumer awareness and increase brand loyalty for consumer products marketed generally under the Pilgrim’s Pride® and Pilgrim’s SignatureTMbrands. We believe our efforts to achieve and maintain brand awareness and loyalty help to provide more secure distribution for our products. We also believe our efforts at brand awareness generate greater price premiums than would otherwise be the case in certain markets in the eastern regions of the U.S. We also maintain an active program to identify consumer preferences. The program primarily consists of testing new product ideas, packaging designs and methods through sophisticated qualitative and quantitative consumer research techniques in key geographic markets.
Markets for Other Products
We have regional distribution centers located in Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas and Utah that are primarily focused on distributing our own chicken products; however, the distribution centers also distribute certain poultry and non-poultry products purchased from third parties to independent grocers and quick service restaurants. Our non-chicken distribution business is conducted as an accommodation to our customers and to achieve greater economies of scale in distribution logistics. Poultry sales from our regional distribution centers are included in the chicken and turkey sales amounts contained in the above tables; however, all non-poultry sales amounts are contained in the Other Products. We believe the
store-door delivery capabilities for our own poultry products provide a strategic service advantage in selling to quick service, national chain restaurants.
We market fresh eggs under the Pilgrim’s Pride®brand name, as well as under private labels, in various sizes of cartons and flats to U.S. retail grocery and institutional foodservice customers located primarily in Texas. We have a housing capacity for approximately 2.1 million commercial egg laying hens which can produce approximately 42 million dozen eggs annually. U.S. egg prices are determined weekly based upon reported market prices. The U.S. egg industry has been consolidating over the last few years, with the 25 largest producers accounting for more than 74.3% of the total number of egg laying hens in service during 2007. We compete with other U.S. egg producers primarily on the basis of product quality, reliability, price and customer service.
We market a high-nutrient egg called EggsPlus™. This egg contains high levels of Omega-3 and Omega-6 fatty acids along with Vitamin E, making the egg a heart-friendly product. Our marketing of EggsPlus™ has received national recognition for our progress in being an innovator in the “functional foods” category.
In addition, we produce and sell livestock feeds at our feed mill in Mt. Pleasant, Texas and at our farm supply store in Pittsburg, Texas to dairy farmers and livestock producers in northeastern Texas. We engage in similar sales activities at our other U.S. feed mills.
We also have a small pork operation that we acquired through our 2007 acquisition that raises and sells live hogs to processors.
MEXICO
Background
The Mexico market represented approximately 6.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2007. We are the second largest producer and seller of chicken in Mexico. We believe that we are one of the lower-cost producers of chicken in Mexico.
Product Types
While the market for chicken products in Mexico is less developed than in the U.S., with sales attributed to fewer, more basic products, we have been successful in differentiating our products through high quality client service and product improvements such as dry-air chilled eviscerated products. The supermarket chains consider us the leaders in innovation for fresh products. The market for value added products is increasing. Our strategy is to capitalize on this trend through our vast U.S. experience in both products and quality and our well-known service.
Markets
We sell our chicken products primarily to wholesalers, large restaurant chains, fast food accounts, supermarket chains and direct retail distribution in selected markets. We have national presence and are currently present in all but two of the 32 Mexican States, which in total represent 99% of the Mexican population.
Foreign Operations Risks
Our foreign operations pose special risks to our business and operations. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for a discussion of foreign operations risks.
GENERAL
Competitive Conditions
The chicken and turkey industries are highly competitive and our largest U.S. competitor has greater financial and marketing resources than we do. In the U.S., Mexico and Puerto Rico, we compete principally with other vertically integrated poultry companies. We are the largest producer of chicken in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, and the second largest producer in Mexico. The second largest producer in the U.S. is Tyson Foods, Inc. The largest producer in Mexico is Industrias Bachoco SA de CV.
In general, the competitive factors in the U.S. chicken and turkey industries include price, product quality, product development, brand identification, breadth of product line and customer service. Competitive factors vary by major market. In the foodservice market, competition is based on consistent quality, product development, service and price. In the U.S. retail market, we believe that product quality, brand awareness, customer service and price are the primary bases of competition. There is some competition with non-vertically integrated further processors in the U.S. prepared food business. We believe vertical integration generally provides significant, long-term cost and quality advantages over non-vertically integrated further processors.
In Mexico, where product differentiation has traditionally been limited, product quality, service and price have been the most critical competitive factors. The North American Free Trade Agreement eliminated tariffs for chicken and chicken products sold to Mexico on January 1, 2003. However, in July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the U.S. Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of 98.8% of the sales price was established. The tariff rate on import duties was reduced on January 1, 2007, to 19.8%, and on January 1, 2008 the tariff rate is scheduled to be reduced to zero. As this tariff is reduced, we expect greater amounts of chicken to be imported into Mexico from the U.S., which could negatively affect the profitability of Mexican chicken producers.
We are not a significant competitor in the distribution business as it relates to products other than chicken. We distribute these products solely as a convenience to our chicken customers. The broad-line distributors do not consider us to be a factor in those markets. The competition related to our other products such as table eggs, feed and protein are much more regionalized and no one competitor is dominant.
Key Customers
Our two largest customers accounted for approximately 18% of our net sales in fiscal 2007, and our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., accounted for 12% of our net sales.
Regulation and Environmental Matters
The chicken and turkey industries are subject to government regulation, particularly in the health and environmental areas, including provisions relating to the discharge of materials into
the environment, by the Centers for Disease Control, the USDA, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in the U.S. and by similar governmental agencies in Mexico. Our chicken processing facilities in the U.S. are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by the USDA. The FDA inspects the production of our feed mills in the U.S. Our Mexican food processing facilities and feed mills are subject to on-site examination, inspection and regulation by a Mexican governmental agency, which performs functions similar to those performed by the USDA and FDA. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations relating to the operations of our facilities.
We anticipate increased regulation by the USDA concerning food safety, by the FDA concerning the use of medications in feed and by the EPA and various other state agencies concerning discharges to the environment. Although we do not anticipate any regulations having a material adverse effect upon us, a material adverse effect may occur.
Employees and Labor Relations
As of September 29, 2007, we employed approximately 49,800 persons in the U.S. and 5,100 persons in Mexico. Approximately 16,350 employees at various facilities in the U.S. are members of collective bargaining units. In Mexico, approximately 2,950 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We have not experienced any work stoppage at any location in over five years. We believe our relations with our employees are satisfactory. At any given time, we will be in some stage of contract negotiation with various collective bargaining units.
Financial Information about Foreign Operations
The Company’s foreign operations are in Mexico. Geographic financial information is set forth in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.”
Available Information; NYSE CEO Certification
The Company’s Internet website is http://www.pilgrimspride.com. The Company makes available, free of charge, through its Internet website, the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Directors and Officers Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such materials with, or furnishing them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 and may obtain information about the operation of the Public Information Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the Company makes available, through its Internet website, the Company’s Business Code of Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the written charter of the Audit Committee, each of which is available in print to any stockholder who requests it by
contacting the Secretary of the Company at 4845 U.S. Highway 271 North, Pittsburg, Texas 75686-0093.
As required by the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, the Company submitted its unqualified Section 303A.12(a) Co-Principal Executive Officers Certification for the preceding year to the New York Stock Exchange.
We included the certifications of the Co-Principal Executive Officers and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules, relating to the quality of the Company's public disclosure, in this report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 31.3.
Executive Officers
Set forth below is certain information relating to our current executive officers:
Name | Age | Positions | ||
Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim | 79 | Senior Chairman of the Board | ||
Lonnie Ken Pilgrim | 49 | Chairman of the Board | ||
Clifford E. Butler | 65 | Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
O.B. Goolsby, Jr. | 60 | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director | ||
Richard A. Cogdill | 47 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Secretary, Treasurer and Director | ||||
J. Clinton Rivers | 48 | Chief Operating Officer | ||
Robert A. Wright | 53 | Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing | ||
Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim has served as Senior Chairman of the Board since July 2007. He served as Chairman of the Board since the organization of Pilgrim's Pride in July 1968 until July 2007. He also served as Chief Executive Officer from July 1968 to June 1998. Prior to the incorporation of Pilgrim's Pride, Mr. Pilgrim was a partner in its predecessor partnership business founded in 1946.
Lonnie Ken Pilgrim has served as Chairman of the Board since July 2007. He served as Executive Vice President, Assistant to Chairman from November 2004 until July 2007, and he served as Senior Vice President, Transportation from August 1997 to November 2004. Prior to that he served as Vice President. He has been a member of the Board of Directors since March 1985, and he has been employed by Pilgrim’s Pride since 1977. He is a son of Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim.
Clifford E. Butler serves as Vice Chairman of the Board. On October 10, 2007, Clifford E. Butler announced his retirement from his position as Vice Chairman of the Board effective December 31, 2007, and that he will not stand for re-election as a director. Mr. Butler joined us as Controller and director in 1969, was named Senior Vice President of Finance in 1973, became Chief Financial Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board in July 1983, became Executive President in January 1997 and served in such capacity through July 1998.
O.B. Goolsby, Jr. has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since September 2004. Mr. Goolsby served as President and Chief Operating Officer from November 2002 to September 2004. Prior to being named as President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2002, Mr. Goolsby served as Executive Vice President, Prepared Foods Complexes from June 1998 to November 2002. He was previously Senior Vice President, Prepared Foods Operations from August 1992 to June 1998 and Vice President, Prepared Foods Operations from September 1987 to August 1992 and was employed by the Company in other capacities from November 1969 to January 1981.
Richard A. Cogdillhas served as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer since January 1997. Mr. Cogdill became a Director in September 1998. Previously he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, from August 1992 through December 1996 and as
Vice President, Corporate Controller from October 1991 through August 1992. Prior to October 1991, he was a Senior Manager with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Cogdill is a Certified Public Accountant.
J. Clinton Rivers has served as Chief Operating Officer since October 2004. He served as Executive Vice President of Prepared Food Operations from November 2002 to October 2004. Mr. Rivers was the Senior Vice President of Prepared Foods Operations from 1999 to November 2002, and was the Vice President of Prepared Foods Operations from 1992 to 1999. From 1989 to 1992, he served as Plant Manager of the Mount Pleasant, Texas Production Facility. Mr. Rivers joined Pilgrim’s Pride in 1986 as the Quality Assurance Manager, and also held positions at Perdue Farms and Golden West Foods.
Robert A. Wright has served as Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing since June 2004. He served as Executive Vice President, Turkey Division from October 2003 to June 2004. Prior to October 2003, Mr. Wright served as President of Butterball Turkey Company for five years.
Forward Looking Statements
Statements of our intentions, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future, denoted by the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "plan," "project," "imply," "intend," "foresee" and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements that reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Such risks, uncertainties and assumptions include those described under "Risk Factors" below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of these factors, among others, many of which are beyond our control.
In making these statements, we are not undertaking, and specifically decline to undertake, any obligation to address or update each or any factor in future filings or communications regarding our business or results, and we are not undertaking to address how any of these factors may have caused changes in information contained in previous filings or communications. The risks described below are not the only risks we face, and additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations. The occurrence of any one or more of the following or other currently unknown factors could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.
Risk Factors
The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the following risks could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry or financial position or our future financial performance. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the key risk factors affecting our business, there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known or that are not currently believed to be significant that
adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position and financial performance in the future.
Cyclicality and Commodity Prices. Industry cyclicality can affect our earnings, especially due to fluctuations in commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey.
Profitability in the chicken and turkey industries is materially affected by the commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey, which are determined by supply and demand factors. As a result, the chicken and turkey industries are subject to cyclical earnings fluctuations.
The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients and the agricultural policies of the United States and foreign governments. In particular, weather patterns often change agricultural conditions in an unpredictable manner. A significant change in weather patterns could affect supplies of feed ingredients, as well as both the industry's and our ability to obtain feed ingredients, grow chickens and turkeys or deliver products.
The cost of corn and soybean meal, our primary feed ingredients, increased significantly from August 2006 to the date of this report and there can be no assurance that the price of corn or soybean meal will not continue to rise as a result of, among other things, increasing demand for these products around the world and alternative uses of these products, such as ethanol and biodiesel production.
High feed ingredient prices have had a material adverse effect on our operating results. We periodically seek, to the extent available, to enter into advance purchase commitments or financial hedging contracts for the purchase of feed ingredients in an effort to manage our feed ingredient costs. The use of such instruments may not be successful.
Livestock and Poultry Disease, including Avian Influenza. Outbreaks of livestock diseases in general and poultry diseases in particular, including avian influenza, can significantly affect our ability to conduct our operations and demand for our products.
We take precautions designed to ensure that our flocks are healthy and that our processing plants and other facilities operate in a sanitary and environmentally-sound manner. However, events beyond our control, such as the outbreaks of disease, either in our own flocks or elsewhere, could significantly affect demand for our products or our ability to conduct our operations. Furthermore, an outbreak of disease could result in governmental restrictions on the import and export of our fresh chicken, turkey or other products to or from our suppliers, facilities or customers, or require us to destroy one or more of our flocks. This could also result in the cancellation of orders by our customers and create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully and on our business, reputation and prospects.
During the first half of fiscal 2006, there was substantial publicity regarding a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza, known as H5N1, which has been affecting Asia since 2002
and which has also been found in Europe and Africa. It is widely believed that H5N1 is being spread by migratory birds, such as ducks and geese. There have also been some cases where H5N1 is believed to have passed from birds to humans as humans came into contact with live birds that were infected with the disease.
Although highly pathogenic H5N1 has not been identified in North America, there have been outbreaks of low pathogenic strains of avian influenza in North America, and in Mexico outbreaks of both high and low-pathogenic strains of avian influenza are a fairly common occurrence. Historically, the outbreaks of low pathogenic avian influenza have not generated the same level of concern, or received the same level of publicity or been accompanied by the same reduction in demand for poultry products in certain countries as that associated with the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain. Accordingly, even if the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain does not spread to North or Central America, there can be no assurance that it will not materially adversely affect demand for North or Central American produced poultry internationally and/or domestically, and, if it were to spread to North or Central America, there can be no assurance that it would not significantly affect our ability to conduct our operations and/or demand for our products, in each case in a manner having a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and/or prospects.
Contamination of Products. If our poultry products become contaminated, we may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls.
Poultry products may be subject to contamination by disease-producing organisms, or pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and generic E.coli. These pathogens are generally found in the environment, and, as a result, there is a risk that they, as a result of food processing, could be present in our processed poultry products. These pathogens can also be introduced as a result of improper handling at the further processing, foodservice or consumer level. These risks may be controlled, although not eliminated, by adherence to good manufacturing practices and finished product testing. We have little, if any, control over proper handling once the product has been shipped. Illness and death may result if the pathogens are not eliminated at the further processing, foodservice or consumer level. Even an inadvertent shipment of contaminated products is a violation of law and may lead to increased risk of exposure to product liability claims, product recalls and increased scrutiny by federal and state regulatory agencies and may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and prospects.
In October 2002, one product sample produced in our Franconia, Pennsylvania facility that had not been shipped to customers tested positive for Listeria. We later received information from the USDA suggesting environmental samples taken at the facility had tested positive for both the strain of Listeria identified in the product and a strain having characteristics similar to those of the strain identified in a Northeastern Listeria outbreak. As a result, we voluntarily recalled all cooked deli products produced at the plant from May 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002. We carried insurance designed to cover the direct recall related expenses and certain aspects of the related business interruption caused by the recall.
Product Liability. Product liability claims or product recalls can adversely affect our business reputation and expose us to increased scrutiny by federal and state regulators.
The packaging, marketing and distribution of food products entail an inherent risk of product liability and product recall and the resultant adverse publicity. We may be subject to significant liability if the consumption of any of our products causes injury, illness or death. We could be required to recall certain of our products in the event of contamination or damage to the products. In addition to the risks of product liability or product recall due to deficiencies caused by our production or processing operations, we may encounter the same risks if any third party tampers with our products. We cannot assure you that we will not be required to perform product recalls, or that product liability claims will not be asserted against us, in the future. Any claims that may be made may create adverse publicity that would have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully or on our business, reputation, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
If our poultry products become contaminated, we may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls. There can be no assurance that any litigation or reputational injury associated with product recalls will not have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products successfully or on our business, reputation, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Substantial Leverage. Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our acquisition of Gold Kist increased our indebtedness significantly. We currently have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial condition and could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:
- | Make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our debt securities; |
- | Increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions; |
- | Limit our ability to obtain necessary financing and to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements; |
- | Require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes; |
- | Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; |
- | Place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; |
- | Limit our ability to pursue acquisitions and sell assets; and |
Limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our indebtedness, our ability to borrow additional funds. Failing to comply with those covenants could
- | result in an event of default or require redemption of indebtedness. Either of these events could have a material adverse effect on us. |
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is dependent on various factors. These factors include the commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey and general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.
Additional Borrowings Available. Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more debt; this could intensify the risks described above.
Despite our significant indebtedness, we are not prohibited from incurring significant additional indebtedness in the future. If additional debt is added to our current substantial debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.
Insurance. We are exposed to risks relating to product liability, product recall, property damage and injuries to persons for which insurance coverage is expensive, limited and potentially inadequate.
Our business operations entail a number of risks, including risks relating to product liability claims, product recalls, property damage and injuries to persons. We currently maintain insurance with respect to certain of these risks, including product liability insurance, property insurance, workers compensation insurance and general liability insurance, but in many cases such insurance is expensive, difficult to obtain and no assurance can be given that such insurance can be maintained in the future on acceptable terms, or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to any such events, or at all. Moreover, even though our insurance coverage may be designed to protect us from losses attributable to certain events, it may not adequately protect us from liability and expenses we incur in connection with such events. For example, the losses attributable to our October 2002 recall of cooked deli-products produced at one of our facilities significantly exceeded available insurance coverage. Additionally, in the past, two of our insurers encountered financial difficulties and were unable to fulfill their obligations under the insurance policies as anticipated and, separately, two of our other insurers contested coverage with respect to claims covered under policies purchased, forcing us to litigate the issue of coverage before we were able to collect under these policies.
Significant Competition. Competition in the chicken and turkey industries with other vertically integrated poultry companies may make us unable to compete successfully in these industries, which could adversely affect our business.
The chicken and turkey industries are highly competitive. In both the U.S. and Mexico, we primarily compete with other vertically integrated poultry companies.
In general, the competitive factors in the U.S. poultry industry include:
- | Price; |
- | Product quality; |
- | Product development; |
- | Brand identification; |
- | Breadth of product line; and |
- | Customer service. |
Competitive factors vary by major market. In the foodservice market, competition is based on consistent quality, product development, service and price. In the U.S. retail market, we believe that competition is based on product quality, brand awareness, customer service and price. Further, there is some competition with non-vertically integrated further processors in the prepared food business.
In Mexico, where product differentiation has traditionally been limited, product quality and price have been the most critical competitive factors. The North American Free Trade Agreement eliminated tariffs for chicken and chicken products sold to Mexico on January 1, 2003. However, in July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the U.S. Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of 98.8% of the sales price was established. This tariff was reduced on January 1, 2006 to 39.5%, and was further reduced to 19.8% on January 1, 2007. On January 1, 2008, the tariff is scheduled to be reduced to zero. In connection with the reduction of the tariffs in Mexico, increased competition from chicken imported into Mexico from the U.S. may have a material adverse effect on the Mexican chicken industry in general, and on our Mexican operations in particular.
Loss of Key Customers. The loss of one or more of our largest customers could adversely affect our business.
Our two largest customers accounted for approximately 18% of our net sales in fiscal 2007, and our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., accounted for 12% of our net sales. Our business could suffer significant setbacks in revenues and operating income if we lost one or more of our largest customers, or if our customers' plans and/or markets should change significantly.
Integration of Gold Kist. There can be no assurance that Gold Kist can be combined successfully with our business.
In evaluating the terms of our acquisition of Gold Kist, we analyzed the respective businesses of the Company and Gold Kist and made certain assumptions concerning their respective future operations. A principal assumption was that the acquisition will produce operating results better than those historically experienced or expected to be experienced in the future by us in the absence of the acquisition. There can be no assurance, however, that this assumption is correct or that the businesses of the Company and Gold Kist will be successfully integrated in a timely manner.
Synergies of Gold Kist. There can be no assurance that we will achieve anticipated synergies from our acquisition of Gold Kist.
We consummated the Gold Kist acquisition with the expectation that it will result in beneficial synergies, such as cost savings and enhanced growth. Success in realizing these benefits and the timing of this realization depend upon the successful integration of the operations of Gold Kist into the Company, and upon general and industry-specific economic factors. The integration of two independent companies is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:
- | Transitioning and preserving Gold Kist's customer, contractor, supplier and other important third-party relationships; |
- | Integrating corporate and administrative infrastructures; |
- | Coordinating sales and marketing functions; |
- | Minimizing the diversion of management's attention from ongoing business concerns; |
- | Coordinating geographically separate organizations; and |
- | Retaining key employees. |
Even if we are able to effectively integrate the operations of Gold Kist into our existing operations and economic conditions remain stable, there can be no assurance that the anticipated synergies will be achieved.
Assumption of Unknown Liabilities in Acquisitions. Assumption of unknown liabilities in acquisitions may harm our financial condition and operating results.
Acquisitions may be structured in such a manner that would result in the assumption of unknown liabilities not disclosed by the seller or uncovered during pre-acquisition due diligence. For example, our acquisition of Gold Kist was structured as a stock purchase. In that acquisition we assumed all of the liabilities of Gold Kist, including liabilities that may be unknown. These obligations and liabilities could harm our financial condition and operating results.
Potential Acquisitions. We intend to pursue opportunities to acquire complementary businesses, which could increase leverage and debt service requirements and could adversely affect our financial situation if we fail to successfully integrate the acquired business.
We intend to pursue selective acquisitions of complementary businesses in the future. Inherent in any future acquisitions are certain risks such as increasing leverage and debt service requirements and combining company cultures and facilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, particularly during the period immediately following such acquisitions. Additional debt or equity capital may be required to complete future
acquisitions, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise the required capital. Furthermore, acquisitions involve a number of risks and challenges, including:
- | Diversion of management's attention; |
- | The need to integrate acquired operations; |
- | Potential loss of key employees and customers of the acquired companies; |
- | Lack of experience in operating in the geographical market of the acquired business; |
and
- | An increase in our expenses and working capital requirements. |
Any of these and other factors could adversely affect our ability to achieve anticipated cash flows at acquired operations or realize other anticipated benefits of acquisitions.
Foreign Operations Risks. Our foreign operations pose special risks to our business and operations.
We have significant operations and assets located in Mexico and may participate in or acquire operations and assets in other foreign countries in the future. Foreign operations are subject to a number of special risks, including among others:
- | Currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
- | Trade barriers; |
- | Exchange controls; |
- | Expropriation; and |
- | Changes in laws and policies, including those governing foreign-owned operations. |
Currency exchange rate fluctuations have adversely affected us in the past. Exchange rate fluctuations or one or more other risks may have a material adverse effect on our business or operations in the future.
Our operations in Mexico are conducted through subsidiaries organized under the laws of Mexico. We may rely in part on intercompany loans and distributions from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries, including trade creditors, will generally have priority as to the assets of our subsidiaries over our claims. Additionally, the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make payments and distributions to us will be subject to, among other things, Mexican law. In the past, these laws have not had a material adverse effect on the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make these payments and distributions. However, laws such as these may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our Mexican subsidiaries to make these payments and distributions in the future.
In October 2007, Mexico’s legislative bodies enacted La Ley del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (“IETU”), a new minimum corporation tax, which will be assessed on companies doing business in Mexico beginning January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the anticipated impact that IETU will have on our business and operating results. Because of IETU, there can be no assurance that we will be able to utilize the net operating loss carryovers and other deferred tax benefits generated in Mexico. There can also be no assurance that IETU will not have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Disruptions in International Markets and Distribution Channels. Disruptions in international markets and distribution channels could adversely affect our business.
Historically, we have targeted international markets to generate additional demand for our chicken dark meat, specifically leg quarters, which are a natural by-product of our U.S. operations, given our concentration on prepared foods products and the U.S. customers’ general preference for white meat. As part of this initiative, we have created a significant international distribution network into several markets, including Eastern Europe, including Russia; the Far East, including China; and Mexico. Our success in these markets could be, and in recent periods has been, adversely affected by disruptions in poultry export markets. These disruptions are often caused by restrictions on imports of U.S.-produced poultry products imposed by foreign governments for a variety of reasons, including the protection of their domestic poultry producers and allegations of consumer health issues, and may also be caused by outbreaks of disease such as avian influenza, either in our own flocks or elsewhere in the world, and resulting changes in consumer preferences. There can be no assurance that one or more of these or other disruptions in our international markets and distribution channels will not adversely affect our business.
Extreme Weather and Natural Disasters. Extreme weather or natural disasters could negatively impact our business.
Extreme weather or natural disasters, including droughts, floods, excessive cold or heat, hurricanes or other storms, could impair the health or growth of our flocks or interfere with our operations due to power outages, fuel shortages, damage to our production and processing facilities or disruption of transportation channels, among other things. Any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial results.
Government Regulation. Regulation, present and future, is a constant factor affecting our business.
Our operations are subject to federal, state and local governmental regulation, including in the health, safety and environmental areas. We anticipate increased regulation by various agencies concerning food safety, the use of medication in feed formulations and the disposal of poultry by-products and wastewater discharges.
Also, changes in laws or regulations or the application thereof may lead to government enforcement actions and the resulting litigation by private litigants. We are aware of an industry-wide investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour issues, including the compensation of employees for the
time spent on such activities such as donning and doffing work equipment. We have been named a defendant in a number of related suits brought by employees. Due, in part, to the government investigation and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, it is possible that we may be subject to additional employee claims.
Unknown matters, new laws and regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing laws or regulations may materially affect our business or operations in the future.
Immigration Legislation and Enforcement. New immigration legislation or increased enforcement efforts in connection with existing immigration legislation could cause our costs of doing business to increase, cause us to change the way in which we do business or otherwise disrupt our operations.
Immigration reform continues to attract significant attention in the public arena and the United States Congress. If new federal immigration legislation is enacted or if states in which we do business enact immigration laws, such laws may contain provisions that could make it more difficult or costly for us to hire United States citizens and/or legal immigrant workers. In such case, we may incur additional costs to run our business or may have to change the way we conduct our operations, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Also, despite our past and continuing efforts to hire only United States citizens and/or persons legally authorized to work in the United States, increased enforcement efforts with respect to existing immigration laws by governmental authorities may disrupt a portion of our workforce or our operations at one or more of our facilities, thereby negatively impacting our business.
Control of Voting Stock. Control over the Company is maintained by members of the family of Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim.
As described in more detail in Item 12. "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters," through two limited partnerships and related trusts and voting agreements, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim, Patricia R. Pilgrim, his wife, and Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, his son, control 62.225% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, they control the outcome of all actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of the Company or its assets. This ensures their ability to control the foreseeable future direction and management of the Company. In addition, an event of default under certain agreements related to our indebtedness will occur if Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim and certain members of his family cease to own at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Operating Facilities
We operate 34 poultry processing plants in the U.S. Of this total, 33 process chicken and are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. We have one turkey processing plant in Pennsylvania, one chicken processing plant in Puerto Rico and three chicken processing plants in Mexico.
The U.S. chicken processing plants have weekly capacity to process 42.5 million broilers and operated at 92.8% of capacity in fiscal 2007.
Our turkey plant has the weekly capacity to process 0.2 million birds under current inspection and line configurations and operates at 94% of capacity. Our Mexico facilities have the capacity to process 3.2 million broilers per week and operated at 89% of capacity in fiscal 2007. Our Puerto Rico processing plant has the capacity to process 0.3 million birds per week based on one eight-hour shift per day. For segment reporting purposes, we include Puerto Rico with our U.S. operations.
In the U.S., the processing plants are supported by 42 hatcheries, 31 feed mills and 12 rendering plants. The hatcheries, feed mills and rendering plants operated at 85%, 84% and 76% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2007. In Puerto Rico, the processing plant is supported by one hatchery and one feed mill which operated at 82% and 50% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2007. In Mexico, the processing plants are supported by six hatcheries, four feed mills and two rendering facilities. The Mexico hatcheries, feed mills and rendering facilities operated at 97%, 80% and 70% of capacity, respectively, in fiscal 2007.
We also operate twelve prepared foods plants. These plants are located in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. These plants have the capacity to produce approximately 1,545 million pounds of further processed product per year and in fiscal 2007 operated at approximately 87% of capacity based on the current product mix and six-day production at most facilities and 24/7 production at two facilities.
Other Facilities and Information
We own a partially automated distribution freezer located outside of Pittsburg, Texas, which includes 125,000 square feet of storage area. We operate a commercial egg operation and farm store in Pittsburg, Texas, a commercial feed mill in Mt. Pleasant, Texas and a pork grow-out operation in Jefferson, Georgia. We own office buildings in Pittsburg, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia, which house our executive offices, our Logistics and Customer Service offices and our general corporate functions as well as an office building in Mexico City, which houses our Mexican marketing offices, and an office building in Broadway, Virginia, which houses additional sales and marketing, research and development, and support activities. We lease offices in Dallas, Texas and Duluth, Georgia, which house additional sales and marketing and support activities.
We have 13 regional distribution centers located in Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah, five of which we own and eight of which we lease.
Most of our domestic property, plant and equipment is pledged as collateral on our long-term debt and credit facilities. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.”
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On July 1, 2002, three individuals, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of chicken growers, filed their original class action complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, styled “Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation.” In their lawsuit, plaintiffs initially alleged that the Company violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. Section 192) (the “PSA”) and breached fiduciary duties allegedly owed to the plaintiff growers. The plaintiffs also brought individual actions under the Packers and Stockyards Act alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. On September 30, 2005, plaintiffs amended their lawsuit to join Tyson Foods, Inc. as a co-defendant. Two additional former chicken growers were also added as plaintiffs to the lawsuit. This amendment, which occurred 38 months after the lawsuit’s initial filing, virtually re-wrote most of the allegations. Now the plaintiffs contend that the Company and Tyson are involved in a conspiracy to violate federal antitrust laws. The plaintiffs’ initial allegations, although still contained in the amended lawsuit, are no longer the sole focus of the case. On January 3, 2006, the Court entered an Order severing the plaintiffs’ Packers and Stockyards Act and antitrust claims. The Court ordered that the plaintiffs may proceed with their Packers and Stockyards Act claims as set forth in Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. The Court also ordered that the plaintiffs may proceed with their respective antitrust claims asserted against the Company and Tyson in a separate cause of action styled “Cody Wheeler, et al vs. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, et al.” On March 6, 2006, the plaintiffs filed their motion for class certification in the original lawsuit. Pilgrim’s Pride attacked the plaintiffs’ class certification brief on several grounds, and ultimately the plaintiffs voluntarily withdrew their Motion for Class Certification on May 26, 2006. As a result, the Court canceled the class certification hearing and on June 2, 2006 the Court entered an Order withdrawing Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and prohibiting the plaintiffs from filing any additional class-action claims against Pilgrim’s Pride in this lawsuit. Additionally, the two former growers who joined the lawsuit on September 30, 2005 withdrew from the case. On March 30, 2007, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the Company’s pending motion for summary judgment. In the order, the Court ruled that plaintiffs do not have to demonstrate an adverse effect on competition in order to prevail under the PSA. This ruling is inconsistent with many other jurisdictions’ interpretation of the PSA. The Court issued an order staying the lawsuit until the issue is decided by the Fifth Circuit. On June 29, 2007, the Fifth Circuit accepted the appeal. The matter is currently being briefed by the parties. The Company intends to defend vigorously against the plaintiffs’ individual claims. The Company does not expect this matter to have a material impact on its financial position, operations or liquidity.
On January 3, 2006, an action styled "Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, et al.," arising out of the original Wheeler litigation described above, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division. The lawsuit was filed by the three original plaintiffs and a former grower, both in their individual capacities and on behalf of a putative class of chicken growers. In the lawsuit, the four plaintiffs allege that the Company and Tyson are involved in a conspiracy to violate federal antitrust laws. On September 28, 2007, the court issued an order denying plaintiffs’ request to certify a class action. Plaintiffs filed the Petition for Permission to Appeal the District Court’s Order on October 15, 2007 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Company intends to defend vigorously any attempts by the Plaintiffs to reverse the District Court’s Order denying certification to the matter as a class
action and the merits of the four plaintiffs’ individual claims. The Company does not expect this matter to have a material impact on its financial position, operations or liquidity.
On December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled “Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson, Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company and Pilgrim’s Pride, Incorporated” in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. Two of the named plaintiffs, Greg Hamilton and Gloria Willis, were voluntarily dismissed from this action. The Company deposed all of the remaining plaintiffs and filed individual motions for summary judgment against each of them. On March 28, 2006, the Court issued Orders concerning the motions for summary judgment. It granted the Company’s motion against Plaintiff Robert Nelson and dismissed all of his claims in their entirety based on the theory of judicial estoppel. The Court heard oral argument on the Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Motion on August 11, 2006, and the Court took the matter under advisement. On May 15, 2007, the Court issued its order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in its entirety. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their petition to appeal to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals. Thus, the Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ class certification motion stands as a final, binding judgment. On July 18, 2007, the Court ordered the remaining six individual Plaintiffs to file their own individual lawsuits without any class action allegations. In contravention of the Court’s instructions, Plaintiffs’ counsel added new and/or dismissed allegations to each new Complaint. On October 1, 2007, Pilgrim’s moved to strike those allegations and filed its Answers subject to same. The Court entered an Order striking the errant allegations, and the Plaintiffs are in the process of redrafting their individual Complaints. The Company intends to re-file its already completed motions for summary judgment after the individual Complaints are re-filed. The Company intends to defend vigorously against the Plaintiffs’ individual claims. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these individual claims and intends to vigorously defend these claims. The ultimate liability with respect to these claims cannot be determined at this time; however, the Company does not expect this matter to have a material impact on its financial position, operations or liquidity.
The Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor conducted an industry wide investigation to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour issues, including the compensation of employees for the time spent on such activities such as donning and doffing work equipment. Due, in part, to the government investigation and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, employees have brought claims against the Company. The claims filed against the Company as of the date of this Annual Report include: “Juan Garcia, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a/k/a Wampler Foods, Inc.”, filed in Pennsylvania state court on January 27, 2006 and subsequently removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; “Esperanza Moya, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Maxi Staff, LLC”, filed March 23, 2006 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; “Barry Antee, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed April 20, 2006 in the Eastern District of Texas; “Stephania Aaron, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed August 22, 2006 in the Western District of Arkansas; “Salvador Aguilar, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed August 23, 2006 in the Northern District of Alabama; “Benford v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed November 2, 2006 in the Northern District of Alabama; and “Porter v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed December 7, 2006 in the Eastern District of Tennessee; “Freida Brown, et al
v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed March 14, 2007 in the Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division; “Roy Menser, et al v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed February 28, 2007 in the Western District of Paducah, Kentucky; “Victor Manuel Hernandez v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed January 30, 2007 in the Northern District of Georgia, Rome Division; “Angela Allen et al v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed March 27, 2007 in United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division; Daisy Hammond and Felicia Pope v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the Gainesville Division, Northern District of Georgia, filed on June 6, 2007; Gary Price v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filed on May 21, 2007; and Kristin Roebuck et al v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the U.S. District Court, Athens, Georgia, Middle District, filed on May 23, 2007. The plaintiffs generally purport to bring a collective action for unpaid wages, unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, costs, attorneys' fees, and declaratory and/or injunctive relief and generally allege that they are not paid for the time it takes to either clear security, walk to their respective workstations, don and doff protective clothing, and/or sanitize clothing and equipment. The presiding judge in the consolidated action in El Dorado issued an initial Case Management order on July 9, 2007. Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint and the parties filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. A complete scheduling order has not been issued, and discovery has not yet commenced. Plaintiffs have filed a consolidated motion for conditional certification in the consolidated case. On October 12, 2007, Pilgrim’s filed its response in opposition to that motion. As of the date of this Annual Report, the following suits have been filed against Gold Kist, now merged into Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, which make one or more of the allegations referenced above: Merrell v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Gainesville Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Harris v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Blanke v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Waycross Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Clarke v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Atchison v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, filed on October 3, 2006; Carlisle v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle Division, filed on October 2, 2006; Benbow v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, filed on October 2, 2006; Bonds v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Northwestern Division, filed on October 2, 2006. On April 23, 2007, Pilgrim’s filed a Motion to Transfer and Consolidate with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) requesting that all of the pending Gold Kist cases be consolidated into one case. Pilgrim’s withdrew its Motion subject to the Plaintiffs’ counsel’s agreement to consolidate the seven separate actions into the pending Benbow case by dismissing those lawsuits and refiling/consolidating them into the Benbow action. Motions to Dismiss have been filed in all of the pending seven cases, and all of these cases have been formally dismissed. Pursuant to the Court’s April 16, 2007 Order, the parties reached agreement on the terms of class notice and the Court granted conditional class certification. Discovery has recently been initiated. The Company intends to assert a vigorous defense to the litigation. The amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these cases cannot be determined at this time.
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with
respect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations. See Note J “Commitments and Contingencies” of Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Quarterly Stock Prices and Dividends
High and low prices of and dividends relating to the Company’s common stock for the periods indicated were:
Fiscal 2007 Prices | Fiscal 2006 Prices | Dividends | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Quarter | High | Low | High | Low | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
PPC Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
First | $ | 29.54 | $ | 23.64 | $ | 37.75 | $ | 30.11 | $ | .0225 | $ | 1.0225 | ||||||||||||
Second | 33.19 | 28.59 | 27.00 | 20.95 | .0225 | .0225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third | 38.17 | 32.77 | 28.09 | 20.85 | .0225 | .0225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fourth | 40.59 | 32.29 | 29.00 | 23.11 | .0225 | .0225 | ||||||||||||||||||
Holders
The Company’s common stock (ticker symbol “PPC”) is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company estimates there were approximately 35,000 holders (including individual participants in security position listings) of the Company’s common stock as of November 9, 2007.
Dividends
Starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors has declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.0225 per share of common stock. Additionally, in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special $1.00 dividend per share of common stock. Prior to fiscal 2006 and with the exception of two quarters in 1993, the Company's Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.015 per share of common stock (on a split adjusted basis) every fiscal quarter since the Company's initial public offering in 1986. Payment of future dividends will depend upon the Company's financial condition, results of operations and other factors deemed relevant by the Company's Board of Directors, as well as any limitations imposed by lenders under the Company's credit facilities. The Company's revolving credit facility and revolving/term borrowing facility currently limit dividends to a maximum of $26 million per year. See Note E of the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 15 for additional discussions of the Company's credit facilities.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Security in Fiscal 2007
The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities in fiscal 2007.
Total Return on Registrant’s Common Equity
The following graphs compare the performance of the Company with that of the Russell 2000 composite index and a peer group of companies with the investment weighted on market capitalization. The total cumulative return on investment (change in the year-end stock price plus reinvested dividends) for each of the periods for the Company, the Russell 2000 composite index and the peer group is based on the stock price or composite index at the beginning of the applicable period. Companies in the peer group index include Cagle's, Inc., Sanderson Farms Inc., Hormel Foods Corp., Smithfield Foods Inc. and Tyson Foods Inc.
The first graph covers the period from November 21, 2003 through September 29, 2007 and shows the performance of the Company's single class of common stock. On November 21, 2003, each share of the Company's then outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock was reclassified into one share of new common stock, which is now the only authorized class of the Company's common stock.
The second graph covers the five fiscal year period ending September 29, 2007 and shows the performance of the Company's Class A and Class B shares after giving effect to the reclassification into the Company's single class of common stock on November 21, 2003 based on a one to one exchange ratio. The third graph covers the period from September 29, 2002 through November 20, 2003, the last date on which the Company's Class A and Class B shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange prior to reclassification into a single new class of shares of common stock.
The stock price performance represented by these graphs is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/10-K/0000802481-07-000096/graph46month.jpg)
11/21/03 | 10/2/04 | 10/1/05 | 9/30/06 | 9/29/07 | ||
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation | 100.00 | 190.89 | 254.14 | 197.18 | 251.08 | |
Russell 2000 | 100.00 | 113.10 | 129.73 | 142.61 | 160.21 | |
Peer Group | 100.00 | 112.59 | 131.40 | 127.35 | 140.41 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/10-K/0000802481-07-000096/graph5yr.jpg)
9/28/02 | 9/27/03 | 11/20/03 | 10/2/04 | 10/1/05 | 9/30/06 | 9/29/07 | |
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Class A(1) | 100.00 | 180.96 | 195.33 | 383.25 | 510.23 | 395.88 | 504.10 |
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Class B(1) | 100.00 | 140.92 | 150.72 | 298.92 | 397.96 | 308.77 | 393.18 |
Russell 2000 | 100.00 | 136.01 | 146.80 | 166.94 | 191.49 | 210.50 | 236.47 |
Peer Group | 100.00 | 119.32 | 132.39 | 147.39 | 172.02 | 166.72 | 183.81 |
(1) | On November 21, 2003, each share of the Company’s then outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock was reclassified into one share of new common stock, which is now the only authorized class of the Company’s common stock. |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/10-K/0000802481-07-000096/graph13.jpg)
9/28/02 | 9/27/03 | 11/20/03 | |
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Class A(1) | 100.00 | 180.96 | 195.33 |
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Class B(1) | 100.00 | 140.92 | 150.72 |
Russell 2000 | 100.00 | 136.01 | 146.80 |
Peer Group | 100.00 | 119.32 | 132.39 |
(1) On November 21, 2003, each share of the Company’s then outstanding Class A common stock and Class B common stock was reclassified into one share of new common stock, which is now the only authorized class of the Company’s common stock.
43
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
(In thousands, except ratios and per share data) | Eleven Years Ended September 29, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
2007(a) | 2006 | 2005 | 2004(b)(c) | ||||||||||||||||
(53 weeks) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 7,598,599 | $ | 5,235,565 | $ | 5,666,275 | $ | 5,363,723 | |||||||||||
Gross profit(e) | 591,538 | 297,600 | 745,199 | 529,039 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income(e) | 232,537 | 3,002 | 435,812 | 265,314 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 125,757 | 40,553 | 43,932 | 52,129 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 26,463 | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes(e) | 91,607 | (36,317 | ) | 403,523 | 208,535 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)(f) | 44,590 | (2,085 | ) | 138,544 | 80,195 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)(e) | 47,017 | (34,232 | ) | 264,979 | 128,340 | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(g) | 1.57 | x | (f) | 7.19 | x | 4.08 | x | ||||||||||||
Per Common Share Data:(h) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.71 | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 3.98 | $ | 2.05 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends | 0.09 | 1.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||||||||||||||
Book value | 17.61 | 16.79 | 18.38 | 13.87 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Summary: | |||||||||||||||||||
Working capital | $ | 379,132 | $ | 528,836 | $ | 404,601 | $ | 383,726 | |||||||||||
Total assets | 3,774,236 | 2,426,868 | 2,511,903 | 2,245,989 | |||||||||||||||
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt | 2,872 | 10,322 | 8,603 | 8,428 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 1,318,558 | 554,876 | 518,863 | 535,866 | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,172,221 | 1,117,327 | 1,223,598 | 922,956 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Summary: | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating cash flow | $ | 463,964 | $ | 30,382 | $ | 493,073 | $ | 272,404 | |||||||||||
Depreciation & amortization(i) | 204,903 | 135,133 | 134,944 | 113,788 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of investment securities | 125,045 | 318,266 | 305,458 | -- | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities | 208,676 | 490,764 | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 172,323 | 143,882 | 116,588 | 79,642 | |||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions, net of equity consideration(a)(b) (d) | 1,102,069 | -- | -- | 272,097 | |||||||||||||||
Financing activities, net provided by (used in) | 630,229 | (38,750 | ) | 18,860 | 96,665 | ||||||||||||||
Other Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA(j) | $ | 411,073 | $ | 136,763 | $ | 580,078 | $ | 372,501 | |||||||||||
Key Indicators (as a percentage of net sales): | |||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit(e) | 7.8 | % | 5.7 | % | 13.2 | % | 9.9 | % | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 4.7 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.5 | % | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||
Operating income (e) | 3.1 | % | 0.8 | % | 7.7 | % | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 1.6 | % | 1.0 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
Net income (loss)(e) | 0.6 | % | (0.7 | ) | % | 4.7 | % | 2.4 | % |
Eleven Years Ended September 29, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001(d) | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(53 weeks) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,619,345 | $ | 2,533,718 | $ | 2,214,712 | $ | 1,499,439 | $ | 1,357,403 | $ | 1,331,545 | $ | 1,277,649 | |||||||||||||||||||
200,483 | 165,165 | 213,950 | 165,828 | 185,708 | 136,103 | 114,467 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63,613 | 29,904 | 94,542 | 80,488 | 109,504 | 77,256 | 63,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37,981 | 32,003 | 29,342 | 17,779 | 17,666 | 20,148 | 22,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- | -- | 1,433 | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
63,235 | 1,910 | 61,861 | 62,786 | 90,904 | 56,522 | 43,824 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7,199 | (12,425 | ) | 20,724 | 10,442 | 25,651 | 6,512 | 2,788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
56,036 | 14,335 | 41,137 | 52,344 | 65,253 | 50,010 | 41,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.24 | x | (g) | 2.13 | x | 3.04 | x | 4.33 | x | 2.96 | x | 2.57 | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1.36 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 0.99 | |||||||||||||||||||
0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.045 | 0.04 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.46 | 9.59 | 9.27 | 8.33 | 7.11 | 5.58 | 4.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 211,119 | $ | 179,037 | $ | 203,350 | $ | 124,531 | $ | 154,242 | $ | 147,040 | $ | 133,542 | |||||||||||||||||||
1,257,484 | 1,227,890 | 1,215,695 | 705,420 | 655,762 | 601,439 | 579,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,680 | 3,483 | 5,099 | 4,657 | 4,353 | 5,889 | 11,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
415,965 | 450,161 | 467,242 | 165,037 | 183,753 | 199,784 | 224,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
446,696 | 394,324 | 380,932 | 342,559 | 294,259 | 230,871 | 182,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 98,892 | $ | 98,113 | $ | 87,833 | $ | 130,803 | $ | 81,452 | $ | 85,016 | $ | 49,615 | |||||||||||||||||||
74,187 | 70,973 | 55,390 | 36,027 | 34,536 | 32,591 | 29,796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
53,574 | 80,388 | 112,632 | 92,128 | 69,649 | 53,518 | 50,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,499 | -- | 239,539 | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(39,767 | ) | (21,793 | ) | 246,649 | (24,769 | ) | (19,634 | ) | (32,498 | ) | 348 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 173,926 | $ | 103,469 | $ | 146,166 | $ | 115,356 | $ | 142,043 | $ | 108,268 | $ | 94,782 | |||||||||||||||||||
7.7 | % | 6.5 | % | 9.7 | % | 11.1 | % | 13.7 | % | 10.2 | % | 9.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
5.2 | % | 5.3 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.7 | % | 5.6 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
2.4 | % | 1.2 | % | 4.3 | % | 5.4 | % | 8.1 | % | 5.8 | % | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
1.5 | % | 1.3 | % | 1.3 | % | 1.2 | % | 1.3 | % | 1.5 | % | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
2.1 | % | 0.6 | % | 1.9 | % | 3.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 3.8 | % | 3.2 | % |
(a) | The Company acquired Gold Kist Inc. on December 27, 2006 for $1.139 billion. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. |
(b) | The Company acquired the ConAgra chicken division on November 23, 2003 for $635.2 million including the non-cash value of common stock issued of $357.5 million. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. |
(c) | On April 26, 2004, the Company announced a plan to restructure its turkey division, including the sale of some facilities in Virginia. The facilities were sold in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. In connection with the restructuring, the Company recorded in cost of sales-restructuring charges of approximately $64.2 million and $7.9 million of other restructuring charges. |
(d) | The Company acquired WLR Foods on January 27, 2001 for $239.5 million and the assumption of $45.5 million of indebtedness. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the results of operations for this acquisition have been included in our consolidated results of operations since the acquisition date. |
(e) | Gross profit, operating income and net income include the following non-recurring recoveries, restructuring charges and other unusual items for each of the years presented (in millions): |
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Effect on Gross Profit and Operating Income: | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales-restructuring | $ | -- | $ | (64.2 | ) | $ | -- | |||||
Non-recurring recoveries recall insurance | $ | -- | $ | 23.8 | $ | -- | ||||||
Non-recurring recoveries for avian influenza | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 26.6 | ||||||
Non-recurring recoveries for vitamin and methionine litigation | $ | -- | $ | 0.1 | $ | 19.9 | ||||||
Additional effect on Operating Income: | ||||||||||||
Other restructuring charges | $ | -- | $ | (7.9 | ) | $ | -- | |||||
Other income for litigation settlement | 11.7 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Other income for vitamin and methionine litigation | $ | -- | $ | 0.9 | $ | 36.0 |
In addition, the Company estimates its losses related to the October 2002 recall (excluding insurance recoveries) and the 2002 avian influenza outbreak negatively affected gross profit and operating income in each of the years presented as follows (in millions): |
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Recall effects (estimated) | $ | (20.0 | ) | $ | (65.0 | ) | $ | -- | ||||
Losses from avian influenza (estimated) | $ | -- | $ | (7.3 | ) | $ | (25.6 | ) |
(f) | Fiscal 2006 included income tax expense of $25.8 million associated with the restructuring of the Mexico operations and subsequent repatriation of foreign earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Fiscal 2003 included a non-cash tax benefit of $16.9 million associated with the reversal of a valuation allowance on net operating losses in the Company’s Mexico operations. Fiscal 2002 included a tax benefit of $11.9 million from changes in Mexican tax laws. |
(g) | For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income before income taxes plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalized interest) on all indebtedness, amortization of capitalized financing costs and that portion of rental expense that we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $40.6 million and $4.1 million in fiscal 2006 and 2002 respectively. |
(h) | Historical per share amounts represent both basic and diluted and have been restated to give effect to a stock dividend issued on July 30, 1999. The stock reclassification on November 21, 2003 that resulted in the new common stock traded as PPC did not affect the number of shares outstanding. |
(i) | Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $6.6 million, $2.6 million, $2.3 million, $2.0 million, $1.5 million, $1.4 million, $1.9 million, $1.2 million, $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $0.9 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. |
(j) | “EBITDA” is defined as the sum of net income (loss) plus interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is presented because it is used by us and we believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, in addition to and not in lieu of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) results, to compare the performance of companies. EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity or an alternative to net income as indicators of our operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. |
A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (loss) | $ | 47,017 | $ | (34,232 | ) | $ | 264,979 | $ | 128,340 | $ | 56,036 | $ | 14,335 | $ | 41,137 | $ | 52,344 | $ | 65,253 | $ | 50,010 | $ | 41,036 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net | 121,117 | 40,553 | 43,932 | 52,129 | 37,981 | 32,003 | 29,342 | 17,779 | 17,666 | 20,148 | 22,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I Income tax expense (benefit) | 44,590 | (2,085 | ) | 138,544 | 80,195 | 7,199 | (12,425 | ) | 20,724 | 10,442 | 25,651 | 6,512 | 2,788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization(i) | 204,903 | 135,133 | 134,944 | 113,788 | 74,187 | 70,973 | 55,390 | 36,027 | 34,536 | 32,591 | 29,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minus: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of capitalized financing costs(i) | 6,554 | 2,606 | 2,321 | 1,951 | 1,477 | 1,417 | 1,860 | 1,236 | 1,063 | 993 | 913 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA | 411,073 | 136,763 | 580,078 | 372,501 | 173,926 | 103,469 | 144,733 | 115,356 | 142,043 | 108,268 | 94,782 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Add: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 26,463 | 1,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 437,536 | $ | 146,166 |
Note: We have included EBITDA adjusted to exclude losses on early extinguishment of debt in fiscal 2007, as we believe investors may be interested in our EBITDA excluding this item as this is how our management analyzes EBITDA from continuing operations.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
§ Description of the Company
The Company is the world’s largest chicken company and has one of the best known brand names in the chicken industry. In the U.S., we produce both prepared and fresh chicken and fresh turkey. In Mexico and Puerto Rico, we exclusively produce fresh chicken. Through vertical integration we control the breeding, hatching and growing of chickens. Our products are sold to foodservice, retail and frozen entrée customers primarily through foodservice distributors, retailers and restaurants throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico and in the northern and central regions of Mexico. We operate in three business segments and two geographical areas.
§ Recent Business Acquisition
On December 27, 2006, we acquired 88.9% of all outstanding common shares of Atlanta-based Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”). Gold Kist was the third-largest chicken company in the U.S., accounting for approximately 9% of all chicken produced domestically in recent years. On January 9, 2007, we acquired the remaining Gold Kist common shares, making Gold Kist a wholly owned subsidiary of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material.
We are in the process of fully integrating the operations of Gold Kist into the Company. We intend to do this as rapidly as possible without interrupting the business. We expect the acquisition and its integration will result in significant cost-saving opportunities and enhanced growth. We are currently implementing an optimization plan for all production and distribution facilities and determining and implementing a “best practice” approach across all operations.
§ Executive Summary
Overview. Focus and concern abroad over avian influenza significantly reduced international demand for chicken products during fiscal 2006 when compared to fiscal 2005, leading at times to higher inventory levels and contributing to lower overall market pricing. At the same time, industry production levels continued to increase, creating an oversupply situation and further weakening prices. During fiscal 2006, the average market pricing for chicken leg quarters and breast meat declined approximately 19.7% and 15.8%, respectively, from fiscal 2005. Additionally, our U.S. chicken sales volume for fiscal 2006 was 2.3% less than fiscal 2005 because of avian influenza concerns in the international markets.
The cost of corn, our primary feed ingredient, increased significantly from August 2006 to the date of this report.
In response to this challenging operating environment, we executed a multi-point plan designed to improve our competitive position:
- | First, we delayed one-half of our planned expansion in the Fresh Food Service Division of our Mayfield, Kentucky plant from July 2006 until September 2006, and the other half of this expansion from July 2006 until June 2007. |
- | Second, beginning on July 1, 2006, we reduced our weekly slaughter rate by approximately 3%, which is equivalent to approximately 830,000 head per week. Beginning on January 1, 2007, we further reduced weekly slaughter to achieve a 5% year-over-year decline, which is equivalent to approximately 1.3 million head per week. |
- | Third, we reduced our capital investments for fiscal 2006 to $144 million. Our original capital investment projection for the year had been in the range of $180-$200 million. We focused only on those projects we deemed critically necessary to our business or those in which our immediate investment was judged by us to be in our best long-term interests. |
- | Fourth, we sharpened our focus on reducing costs and operating more efficiently. |
Industry-wide production cutbacks implemented early in 2007 along with strong demand for our products created an improved pricing environment for our products in the last half of fiscal 2007 when compared to the same prior year period. This allowed the Company to return to profitability in spite of further increases in the cost of feed ingredients during fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2007, the average market pricing for chicken increased from the prior fiscal year.
Additionally, our U.S. chicken sales volume in fiscal 2007 was 41.1% higher than fiscal 2006 due primarily to the Gold Kist acquisition.
We also experienced increased production and freight cost related to operational inefficiencies, labor shortages at several facilities and higher fuel costs. We believe the labor shortages are attributable in part to heightened publicity of governmental immigration enforcement efforts, ongoing Company compliance efforts and continued changes in the Company’s employment practices in light of recently published governmental best practices and the pending new labor hiring regulations.
Results. Net income for fiscal 2007 of $47.0 million is up $81.2 million from net loss of $34.2 million for fiscal 2006. This increase is primarily due to a 7.8% increase in our selling prices and an improvement in our product mix on top of a 34.7% increase in volume because of the Gold Kist acquisition, offset by the increased cost of sales, net interest charges and other costs described below.
Offsetting the price and volume improvements were the following:
· | In addition to the effects of the Gold Kist acquisition, cost of sales increased from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007 due in part to higher feed ingredient and fuel costs between the two periods, operational inefficiencies and labor shortages. Feed ingredients costs rose 38.2% and 31.3% in the U.S. and Mexico chicken divisions, respectively, due primarily to corn and soybean meal prices. |
· | Net interest expense increased $80.6 million in fiscal 2007, when compared to fiscal 2006, due primarily to the financing of the Gold Kist acquisition. |
· | We recognized $14.5 million and $12.0 million of losses on the early extinguishments of debt during the second and fourth quarters of fiscal 2007, respectively. |
§ Business Environment
Profitability in the poultry industry is materially affected by the commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey, which are determined by supply and demand factors. As a result, the chicken and turkey industries are subject to cyclical earnings fluctuations, which can be mitigated somewhat by:
- Business strategy; |
- Product mix;
- Sales and marketing plans; and
- Operating efficiencies.
In an effort to reduce price volatility and to generate higher, more consistent profit margins, we have concentrated on the production and marketing of prepared foods products. Prepared foods products generally have higher profit margins than our other products. Also, the
production and sale in the U.S. of prepared foods products reduces the impact of the costs of feed ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient purchases are the single largest component of our cost of sales, representing approximately 35.8% of our consolidated cost of sales in fiscal 2007. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural policies of the U.S. and foreign governments. The cost of corn and soybean meal, our primary feed ingredients, increased significantly from August 2006 until the date of this report, and there can be no assurance that the price of corn or soybean meal will not continue to rise as a result of, among other things, increasing demand for these products around the world and alternative uses of these products, such as ethanol and biodiesel production. As further processing is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and improve and stabilize our profit margins.
As a significant portion of the U.S. poultry production is exported, the commodity prices of chicken and turkey can be, and in recent periods have been, adversely affected by disruptions in poultry export markets. These disruptions are often caused by restrictions on imports of U.S.-produced poultry products imposed by foreign governments for a variety of reasons, including the protection of their domestic poultry producers and allegations of consumer health issues. For example, Russia, China and Japan have restricted the importation of U.S.-produced poultry for both of these reasons in recent periods. In addition, as described above, in fiscal 2006, focus and concern abroad over avian influenza significantly reduced international demand for chicken products. In July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the U.S. Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of 98.8% of the sales price was established. This tariff rate was reduced on January 1, 2007 to 19.8% and is scheduled to be reduced so that the final tariff rate at January 1, 2008 will be zero. The tariff was imposed due to concerns that the duty-free importation of such products as provided by the North American Free Trade Agreement would injure Mexico’s poultry industry. As such tariffs are reduced, we expect greater amounts of chicken to be imported into Mexico from the U.S., which could negatively affect the profitability of Mexican chicken producers, including our Mexico operations. Because these disruptions in poultry export markets are often political, no assurances can be given as to when the existing disruptions will be alleviated or that new ones will not arise.
In October 2007, Mexico’s legislative bodies enacted La Ley del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (“IETU”), a new minimum corporation tax, which will be assessed on companies doing business in Mexico beginning January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the anticipated impact that IETU will have on our business and operating results and there can be no assurance that IETU will not have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Business Segments
We operate in three reportable business segments as (1) a producer and seller of chicken products, (2) a producer and seller of turkey products and (3) a seller of other products. Our chicken segment includes sales of chicken products we produce and purchase for resale in the U.S., including Puerto Rico, and Mexico. Our chicken segment conducts separate operations in
the U.S., Puerto Rico and Mexico and is reported as two separate geographical areas. Substantially all of the assets and operations of the fiscal 2007 acquisition are included in our U.S. chicken segment since the date of acquisition.
Our turkey segment includes sales of turkey products we produce and purchase for resale in our turkey and distribution operations in the U.S.
Our other products segment includes distribution of non-poultry products that are purchased from third parties and sold to independent grocers and quick service restaurants. Also included in this category are sales of table eggs, feed, protein products, live hogs and other items, some of which are produced or raised by the Company.
Inter-area sales and inter-segment sales, which are not material, are accounted for at prices comparable to normal trade customer sales. Corporate expenses are allocated to Mexico based upon various apportionment methods for specific expenditures incurred related thereto with the remaining amounts allocated to the U.S. portions of the segments based on number of employees.
Assets associated with our corporate functions, including cash and cash equivalents and investments in available for sale securities, are included in our chicken segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses related to our distribution centers are allocated based on the proportion of net sales to the particular segment to which the product sales relate.
Depreciation and amortization, total assets and capital expenditures of our distribution centers are included in our chicken segment based on the primary focus of the centers.
The following table presents certain information regarding our segments:
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
September 29, 2007(a) | September 30, 2006 | October 1, 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net Sales to Customers: | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 6,328,354 | $ | 4,098,403 | $ | 4,411,269 | ||||||
Mexico | 488,466 | 418,745 | 403,353 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 6,816,820 | 4,517,148 | 4,814,622 | |||||||||
Turkey | 122,364 | 130,901 | 204,838 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 638,738 | 570,510 | 626,056 | |||||||||
Mexico | 20,677 | 17,006 | 20,759 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 659,415 | 587,516 | 646,815 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 7,598,599 | $ | 5,235,565 | $ | 5,666,275 | ||||||
Operating Income (Loss): | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 192,447 | $ | 28,619 | $ | 405,662 | ||||||
Mexico | 13,116 | (17,960 | ) | 39,809 | ||||||||
Sub-total | 205,563 | 10,659 | 445,471 | |||||||||
Turkey | (4,655 | ) | (15,511 | ) | (22,539 | ) | ||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 28,637 | 6,216 | 8,250 | |||||||||
Mexico | 2,992 | 1,638 | 4,630 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 31,629 | 7,854 | 12,880 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 232,537 | $ | 3,002 | $ | 435,812 | ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization: (b) | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 183,808 | $ | 109,346 | $ | 114,131 | ||||||
Mexico | 11,015 | 11,305 | 12,085 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 194,823 | 120,651 | 126,216 | |||||||||
Turkey | 1,587 | 6,593 | 3,343 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 8,278 | 7,743 | 5,196 | |||||||||
Mexico | 215 | 146 | 189 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 8,493 | 7,889 | 5,385 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 204,903 | $ | 135,133 | $ | 134,944 | ||||||
Total Assets: | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 3,247,812 | $ | 1,897,763 | $ | 2,059,579 | ||||||
Mexico | 348,894 | 361,887 | 287,414 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 3,596,706 | 2,259,650 | 2,346,993 | |||||||||
Turkey | 69,653 | 76,908 | 77,319 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 103,757 | 88,650 | 85,581 | |||||||||
Mexico | 4,120 | 1,660 | 2,010 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 107,877 | 90,310 | 87,591 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 3,774,236 | $ | 2,426,868 | $ | 2,511,903 | ||||||
Capital Expenditures (excluding acquisition): | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 164,449 | $ | 133,106 | $ | 102,470 | ||||||
Mexico | 1,633 | 6,536 | 4,924 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 166,082 | 139,642 | 107,394 | |||||||||
Turkey | 502 | 257 | 3,604 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 5,699 | 3,567 | 5,448 | |||||||||
Mexico | 40 | 416 | 142 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 5,739 | 3,983 | 5,590 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 172,323 | $ | 143,882 | $ | 116,588 |
(a) | The Company acquired Gold Kist on December 27, 2006 for $1.139 billion. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. |
(b) | Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $6.6 million, $2.6 million, and $2.3 million in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and amortization of intangible assets of approximately $6.3 million in fiscal 2007. |
The following table presents certain items as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:
Fiscal Year Ended
September 29, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | October 1, 2005 | ||||||||||
Net sales | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Cost and Expenses | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 92.2 | 94.3 | 86.8 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 7.8 | 5.7 | 13.2 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense | 4.7 | 5.6 | 5.5 | |||||||||
Operating income | 3.1 | 0.1 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 1.2 | (0.7 | ) | 7.1 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.6 | (0.7 | ) | 4.7 | ||||||||
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2007 increased $2,363.0 million, or 45.1%, over fiscal 2006. The following table provides additional information regarding net sales (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||||||||
September 29, | Change from | Percentage | |||||||||||
Source | 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | Change | ||||||||||
Chicken: | |||||||||||||
United States | $ | 6,328.3 | $ | 2,229.9 | 54.4 | % | (a) | ||||||
Mexico | 488.5 | 69.8 | 16.7 | % | (b) | ||||||||
$ | 6,816.8 | $ | 2,299.7 | 50.9 | % | ||||||||
Turkey | $ | 122.4 | $ | (8.5 | ) | (6.5 | ) % | (c) | |||||
Other products: | |||||||||||||
United States | $ | 638.7 | $ | 68.1 | 11.9 | % | (d) | ||||||
Mexico | 20.7 | 3.7 | 21.8 | % | (e) | ||||||||
$ | 659.4 | $ | 71.8 | 12.2 | % | ||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 7,598.6 | $ | 2,363.0 | 45.1 | % |
(a) | U.S. chicken sales increased primarily as the result of a 41.1% increase in volume due to the acquisition of Gold Kist on December 27, 2006, increases in the average selling prices of chicken and, for legacy Pilgrim’s Pride products, an improved product mix containing more higher-margin, value-added products. |
(b) | Mexico chicken sales increased compared to fiscal year 2006, due primarily to increases in production and a 21.2% increase in pricing per pound sold. |
(c) | Turkey sales declined due primarily to an 8.1% decrease in pricing of turkey products. |
(d) | U.S. sales of other products increased primarily due to the acquisition of Gold Kist on December 27, 2006 and improved pricing from rendering operations. |
(e) | Mexico other products sales increased due to increased sales volumes of and increased sales prices for commercial feed. |
Gross Profit. Gross profit for fiscal 2007 increased $293.9 million, or 98.8%, over fiscal 2006. The following table provides gross profit information (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
September 29, | Change from | Percentage | of Net Sales | of Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||
Components | 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | Change | Fiscal 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 7,598.6 | $ | 2,363.0 | 45.1 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost of sales | 7,007.1 | 2,069.1 | 41.9 | % | 92.2 | % | 94.3 | % | (a) | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 591.5 | $ | 293.9 | 98.8 | % | 7.8 | % | 5.7 | % | (b) |
(a) | Cost of sales in the U.S. chicken operations increased $1,995.7 million due primarily to the acquisition of Gold Kist and increased quantities and costs of energy and feed ingredients. We also experienced in fiscal 2007, and continue to experience, increased production and freight costs related to operational inefficiencies, labor shortages at several facilities and higher fuel costs. We believe the labor shortages are attributable in part to heightened publicity of governmental immigration enforcement efforts, ongoing Company compliance efforts and continued changes in the Company’s employment practices in light of recently published governmental best practices and the pending new labor hiring regulations. Cost of sales in our Mexico chicken operations increased primarily due to increased feed ingredient cost. |
(b) | Gross profit as a percent of net sales improved 2.1 percentage points due to sales prices in the industry increasing in response to the increased cost of feed ingredients. |
Operating Income. Operating income for fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 increased $229.5 million, as described in the following table (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
September 29, | Change from | Percentage | ||||||||||
Source | 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | Change | |||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 192.5 | $ | 163.9 | 573.1 | % | ||||||
Mexico | 13.1 | 31.0 | 173.2 | % | ||||||||
$ | 205.6 | $ | 194.9 | NM | ||||||||
Turkey | $ | (4.7 | ) | $ | 10.8 | 70.0 | % | |||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 28.6 | $ | 22.4 | 361.3 | % | ||||||
Mexico | 3.0 | 1.4 | 87.5 | % | ||||||||
$ | 31.6 | $ | 23.8 | 305.1 | % | |||||||
Operating Income | $ | 232.5 | $ | 229.5 | NM |
NM = Not meaningful
Fiscal Year Ended | Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||||||
September 29, | Change from | Percentage | of Net Sales | of Net Sales | ||||||||||
Components | 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | Change | Fiscal 2007 | Fiscal 2006 | |||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 591.5 | $ | 293.9 | 98.8 | % | 7.8 | % | ��5.7 | % | ||||
S Selling, general and administrative expense | 359.0 | 64.4 | 21.9 | % | 4.7 | % | 5.6 | % | (a) | |||||
Operating income | $ | 232.5 | $ | 229.5 | NM | 3.1 | % | 0.1 | % | (b) |
NM = Not meaningful
(a) | Selling, general and administrative expense increased due primarily to the acquisition of Gold Kist. |
(b) | The increase in operating income when compared to fiscal 2006 is due primarily to the acquisition of Gold Kist, increases in the average selling prices of chicken, improved product mix and a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales, offset by increased production and freight costs and the other factors described above. |
Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense increased 148.6% to $125.8 million in fiscal 2007, when compared to $50.6 million for fiscal 2006, due primarily to increased borrowing for the acquisition of Gold Kist.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased 54.0% to $4.6 million in fiscal 2007, compared to $10.0 million in fiscal 2006, due to lower investment balances.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During fiscal 2007, the Company recognized loss on early extinguishment of debt of $26.4 million, which included premiums of $16.9 million along with unamortized loan costs of $9.5 million. These losses related to the redemption of $77.5
million of our 9 1/4/% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 and all of our 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011.
Income Tax Expense. Consolidated income tax expense in fiscal 2007 was $44.6 million, compared to tax benefit of $2.1 million in fiscal 2006. The increase in consolidated income tax expense is the result of the pretax earnings in fiscal 2007 versus pre-tax loss in the U.S. and Mexico in 2006 and an increase in tax contingency reserves. In addition, fiscal 2006 included income tax expense of $25.8 million for the restructuring of the Mexico operations and subsequent repatriation of earnings from Mexico under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and a $10.6 million benefit from a change in an estimate, both of which are described in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal 2006 Compared to Fiscal 2005
Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2006 decreased $430.7 million, or 7.6%, when compared to fiscal 2005. The following table provides additional information regarding net sales (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||||||||
September 30, | Change from | Percentage | |||||||||||
Source | 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | Change | ||||||||||
Chicken: | |||||||||||||
United States | $ | 4,098.4 | $ | (312.8 | ) | (7.1 | ) % | (a) | |||||
Mexico | 418.7 | 15.3 | 3.8 | % | (b) | ||||||||
$ | 4,517.1 | $ | (297.5 | ) | (6.2 | ) % | |||||||
Turkey | $ | 130.9 | $ | (73.9 | ) | (36.1 | ) % | (c) | |||||
Other Products: | |||||||||||||
United States | $ | 570.6 | $ | (55.5 | ) | (8.9 | ) % | (d) | |||||
Mexico | 17.0 | (3.8 | ) | (18.3 | ) % | (e) | |||||||
$ | 587.6 | $ | (59.3 | ) | (9.2 | ) % | |||||||
Net Sales | $ | 5,235.6 | $ | (430.7 | ) | (7.6 | ) % |
(a) | U.S. chicken sales declined primarily due to 15.8% lower breast meat prices and 19.7% lower leg quarter prices and 2.3% reduction in volume. |
(b) | Mexico chicken sales increased compared to fiscal year 2005, due primarily to increases in production, partially offset by a 9.1% decrease in pricing per pound sold. |
(c) | Turkey sales declined due to our decision in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 to cease production of certain products at our Franconia, Pennsylvania turkey cooking operations. |
(d) | U.S. sales of other products decreased primarily due to the divesture of certain distribution centers whose sales included a large volume of non-poultry products. |
(e) | Mexico other products sales decreased due to reduced sales volumes of commercial feed. |
Gross Profit. Gross profit for fiscal 2006 decreased $447.6 million, or 60.1%, over fiscal 2005. The following table provides gross profit information (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | Change | Percentage | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | from | Percentage | of Net Sales | of Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||
Components | 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | Change | Fiscal 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 5,235.6 | $ | (430.7 | ) | (7.6 | ) % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Cost of sales | 4,938.0 | 16.9 | 0.3 | % | 94.3 | % | 86.8 | % | (a) | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 297.6 | $ | (447.6 | ) | (60.1 | ) % | 5.7 | % | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||
(a) | Cost of sales in the U.S. chicken operations increased $71.8 million due primarily to increased energy and packaging costs. Cost of sales in our turkey operations decreased significantly because of the restructuring of this division in fiscal 2004 and first quarter of fiscal 2006. Cost of sales in our Mexico chicken operations increased $71.6 million primarily due to a 9.7% increase in production volumes. |
Operating Income. Operating income for fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 decreased $432.8 million, or 99.3%, as described in the following table (dollars in millions):
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | Change from | Percentage | ||||||||||
Source | 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | Change | |||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 28.6 | $ | (377.1 | ) | (93.0 | ) % | |||||
Mexico | (17.9 | ) | (57.7 | ) | (145.0 | ) % | ||||||
$ | 10.7 | $ | (434.8 | ) | (97.6 | ) % | ||||||
Turkey | $ | (15.5 | ) | $ | 7.0 | 31.1 | % | |||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 6.2 | $ | (2.0 | ) | (24.4 | ) % | |||||
Mexico | 1.6 | (3.0 | ) | (65.2 | ) % | |||||||
$ | 7.8 | $ | (5.0 | ) | (39.1 | ) % | ||||||
Operating Income | $ | 3.0 | $ | (432.8 | ) | (99.3 | ) % |
Fiscal Year Ended | Percentage | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Change from | Percentage | of Net Sales | of Net Sales | |||||||||||||||||
Components | 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | Change | Fiscal 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | $ | 297.6 | $ | (447.6 | ) | (60.1 | ) % | 5.7 | % | 13.2 | % | ||||||||||
S Sel l ing, general and administrative expense | 294.6 | (14.8 | ) | (4.8 | ) % | 5.6 | % | 5.5 | % | (a) | |||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 3.0 | $ | (432.8 | ) | (99.3 | ) % | 0.1 | % | 7.7 | % | (b) |
(a) | Selling, general and administrative expense decreased due primarily to a decrease in costs associated with our profit-based retirement and compensation plans. |
(b) | The decrease in operating income when compared to fiscal 2005 is due primarily to lower market pricing for chicken products, as well as increased costs for energy and packaging. |
Interest Expense. Consolidated interest expense increased 2.0% to $50.6 million in fiscal 2006, when compared to $49.6 million for fiscal 2005, due primarily to higher average outstanding debt balances experienced in the fiscal year.
Interest Income. Interest income increased 75.4% to $10.0 million in fiscal 2006, compared to $5.7 million in fiscal 2005, due to higher average investment balances and slightly higher rates.
Income Tax Expense. Consolidated income tax benefit in fiscal 2006 was $2.1 million, compared to tax expense of $138.5 million in fiscal 2005. The decrease in consolidated income tax expense is the result of the pretax loss in fiscal 2006 versus significant earnings in the U.S. and Mexico in fiscal 2005. In addition, fiscal 2006 included income tax expense of $25.8 million for the restructuring of the Mexico operations and subsequent repatriation of earnings from Mexico under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and a $10.6 million benefit from a
change in an estimate, both of which are described in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table presents our available sources of liquidity as of September 29, 2007.
Facility | Amount | |||||||||
Source of Liquidity | Amount | Outstanding | Available | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 66.2 | ||||
Investments in available-for-sale securities | -- | -- | 8.2 | |||||||
Debt facilities: | ||||||||||
Revolving credit facilities | 350.0 | 26.3 | 238.8 | (a) | ||||||
Revolving/term facility | 550.0 | -- | 550.0 | |||||||
Receivables purchase agreement | 300.0 | 300.0 | -- | |||||||
(a) | At September 29, 2007, the Company had $84.9 million in letters of credit outstanding relating to normal business transactions. |
In September 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated revolver/term credit agreement with a maturity date of September 21, 2016. At September 29, 2007 this revolver/term credit agreement provides for an aggregate commitment of $1.172 billion consisting of i) a $550 million revolving/term loan commitment and ii) $622.4 million in various term loans. At September 29, 2007, the Company had nothing outstanding under the revolver and $622.4 million outstanding in various term loans. The total credit facility is presently secured by certain fixed assets with a current availability of $550.0 million. From time to time, if certain conditions are satisfied, the Company has the right to increase the revolving/term loan commitment and term loan commitment to a total maximum amount of $1.0 billion and $750 million, respectively. Borrowings under the revolving/term loan commitment are available on a revolving basis until September 21, 2011 at which time the outstanding borrowings will be converted to a term loan maturing on September 21, 2016. The fixed rate term loans bear interest at rates ranging from 6.84% to 7.06%. The voluntary converted loans bear interest at rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.0% - 2.0% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. The floating rate term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%-1.75% based on the ratio of the Company’s debt to EBITDA, as defined in the agreement. The revolving/term loans provide for interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.0%-2.0% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. Revolving/term loans converted to term loans on September 21, 2011 will be payable in equal quarterly principal payments of 10% per annum of the original principal amount beginning the calendar quarter following the conversion date with the remaining balance due on the maturity date. Of the term loans outstanding, $208.7 million must be repaid in equal quarterly principal payments of 1% per annum of the original principal
amount, with the remaining balance due on the maturity date. All borrowings are subject to the availability of eligible collateral and no material adverse change provisions. Commitment fees charged on the unused balance of this facility range from 0.20% to 0.40% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. One-half of the outstanding obligations under the revolver/term credit agreement are guaranteed by Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an entity related to our Senior Chairman, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim.
On December 15, 2006, the Company borrowed $100 million at 6.84% under our revolver/term credit agreement and used substantially all of the funds to repay, in full, term loans payable to an insurance company under a note purchase agreement maturing in 2012 and 2013.
In January 2007, the Company borrowed (1) $780 million under our revolver/term credit agreement and (2) $450 million under our bridge loan agreement to fund the Gold Kist acquisition. On January 24, 2007, the Company closed on the sale of $400 million of 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2015 (the “Senior Notes”) and $250 million of 8 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the “Subordinated Notes”), sold at par. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning November 1, 2007. We may redeem all or part of the Senior Notes on or after May 1, 2011. We may redeem all or part of the Subordinated Notes on or after May 1, 2012. Before May 1, 2010, we also may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Senior Notes and the Subordinated Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings. Each of these optional redemptions is at a premium as described in the indentures under which the notes were issued. The proceeds from the sale of the notes, after underwriting discounts, were used to (1) retire the loans outstanding under our bridge loan agreement, (2) repurchase $77.5 million of the Company’s 9 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 at a premium of $7.4 million plus accrued interest of $1.3 million and (3) reduce outstanding revolving loans under our revolver/term credit agreement. Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the $7.4 million premium along with unamortized loan costs of $7.1 million related to the retirement of these Notes.
On September 21, 2007, the Company redeemed all of its 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 at a total cost of $307.5 million. To fund a portion of the aggregate redemption price, the Company sold $300 million of trade receivables under its Receivables Purchase Agreement. Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the $9.5 million premium along with unamortized loan costs of $2.5 million related to the retirement of these Notes.
As of September 29, 2007, we had a $300.0 million commitment under a domestic revolving credit facility that provides for interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 0.75-1.75% depending upon our total debt to capitalization ratio. From time to time, if certain conditions are satisfied, the Company has the right to increase the revolving commitment to a total maximum amount of $450 million. At September 29, 2007, $215.1 million was available for borrowing under the domestic revolving credit facility. Borrowings against this facility are subject to the availability of eligible collateral and no material adverse change provisions. The obligations under this facility are secured by domestic chicken inventories. Commitment fees charged on the unused balance of this facility range from 0.175% to 0.35% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. One-half of the outstanding obligations under the domestic revolving credit facility are guaranteed by Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an entity related to our Senior Cairman, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim.
On September 25, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company, Avícola Pilgrim’s Pride de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the “Borrower”), entered into a secured revolving credit agreement of up to $75 million with a final maturity date of September 25, 2011. In March 2007, the Borrower elected to reduce the commitment under this agreement to approximately $50 million. Outstanding amounts bear interest at rates ranging from the higher of the Prime Rate or Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%; LIBOR plus 1.25%-2.75%; or TIIE plus 1.05%-2.55% depending on the loan designation. Obligations under this agreement are secured by a security interest in and lien upon all capital stock and other equity interests of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries. All the obligations of the Borrower are secured by unconditional guaranty by the Company. At September 29, 2007, $26.3 million was outstanding and approximately $23.7 million was available for borrowings. All borrowings are subject to no material adverse effect provisions.
We also maintain operating leases for various types of equipment, some of which contain residual value guarantees for the market value of assets at the end of the term of the lease. The terms of the lease maturities range from one to seven years. We estimate the maximum potential amount of the residual value guarantees is approximately $21.1 million; however, the actual amount would be offset by any recoverable amount based on the fair market value of the underlying leased assets. No liability has been recorded related to this contingency as the likelihood of payments under these guarantees is not considered to be probable and the fair value of the guarantees is immaterial. We historically have not experienced significant payments under similar residual guarantees.
At September 29, 2007, our working capital decreased to $379.1 million and our current ratio decreased to 1.42 to 1, compared with working capital of $528.8 million and a current ratio of 1.92 to 1 at September 30, 2006, primarily due to lower cash balances and receivables and higher accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by increased inventories.
Trade accounts and other receivables were $130.2 million at September 29, 2007, compared to $263.1 million at September 30, 2006. The $132.9 million, or 50.5%, decrease in trade accounts and other receivables was primarily due to the September 2007 sale of $300.0 million trade receivables under the Receivables Purchase Agreement, partially offset by receivables obtained from the Gold Kist acquisition.
Inventories were $961.9 million at September 29, 2007, compared to $585.9 million at September 30, 2006. The $376.0 million, or 64.2%, increase in inventories was primarily due to the Gold Kist acquisition and increased product costs in finished chicken products and live inventories as a result of higher feed ingredient costs.
Accounts payable increased $108.6 million, or 37.0%, to $402.3 million at September 29, 2007, compared to $293.7 million at September 30, 2006. The increase was primarily due to the Gold Kist acquisition and higher feed ingredient costs.
Accrued liabilities increased $227.2 million, or 83.3%, to $500.0 million compared to $272.8 million at September 30, 2006. This increase is due primarily to the Gold Kist acquisition.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $464.0 million and $30.4 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities for
fiscal 2007 when compared to fiscal 2006 was primarily due to increased net income and lower receivables.
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities were ($1.184) billion and $32.3 million for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash of $1.102 billion was used to acquire Gold Kist. Capital expenditures (excluding business acquisitions) of $172.3 million and $143.8 million for fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively, were primarily incurred to acquire and expand certain facilities, improve efficiencies, reduce costs and for the routine replacement of equipment. Cash was used to purchase investment securities of $125.0 million in fiscal 2007 and $318.3 million in fiscal 2006. Cash proceeds in fiscal 2007 from the sale or maturity of investment securities was $208.7 million. We anticipate spending approximately $290 million to $300 million in fiscal 2008 to improve efficiencies and for the routine replacement of equipment at our current operations. We expect to finance such expenditures with available cash and operating cash flows and existing revolving/term and revolving credit facilities.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $630.2 million and $38.8 million for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2007, when compared to fiscal 2006, was attributable to proceeds received from long-term debt, including proceeds of $1.23 billion borrowed to fund the Gold Kist acquisition.
We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. Among other considerations, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities as, based upon the likelihood of payment, the fair value of such indemnities is immaterial.
Our loan agreements generally obligate us to reimburse the applicable lender for incremental increased costs due to a change in law that imposes (i) any reserve or special deposit requirement against assets of, deposits with or credit extended by such lender related to the loan, (ii) any tax, duty or other charge with respect to the loan (except standard income tax) or (iii) capital adequacy requirements. In addition, some of our loan agreements contain a withholding tax provision that requires us to pay additional amounts to the applicable lender or other financing party, generally if withholding taxes are imposed on such lender or other financing party as a result of a change in the applicable tax law. These increased cost and withholding tax provisions continue for the entire term of the applicable transaction, and there is no limitation on the maximum additional amounts we could be obligated to pay under such provisions. Any failure to pay amounts due under such provisions generally would trigger an event of default, and, in a secured financing transaction, would entitle the lender to foreclose upon the collateral to realize the amount due.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
On June 29, 1999, the Camp County Industrial Development Corporation issued $25.0 million of variable-rate environmental facilities revenue bonds supported by letters of credit obtained by us. We may draw from these proceeds over the construction period for new sewage and solid waste disposal facilities at a poultry by-products plant to be built in Camp County, Texas. We are not required to borrow the full amount of the proceeds from these revenue bonds. All amounts borrowed from these funds will be due in 2029. The revenue bonds are supported
by letters of credit obtained by us under our revolving credit facilities which are secured by our domestic chicken inventories. The bonds will be recorded as debt of the Company if and when they are spent to fund construction.
In connection with the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1998, as amended, the Company sells, on a revolving basis, certain of its trade receivables (the “Pooled Receivables”) to a special purpose corporation wholly owned by the Company, which in turn sells a percentage ownership interest to third parties. As of September 29, 2007, $300.0 million in Pooled Receivables had been sold. During fiscal 2006 and 2005 there were no Pooled Receivables sold. The gross proceeds resulting from the sale are included in cash flows from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Losses on these sales were immaterial.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations at September 29, 2007 were as follows (dollars in millions):
Payments Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(a) | $ | 1,321.4 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 29.3 | $ | 1,285.5 | ||||||||||
Guarantee fees | 31.2 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 13.6 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 147.5 | 46.8 | 65.4 | 30.3 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations | 40.1 | 40.1 | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,540.2 | $ | 93.4 | $ | 76.1 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 1,304.1 |
(a) | Excludes $84.9 million in letters of credit outstanding related to normal business transactions. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
General. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, customer programs and incentives, allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, income taxes and product recall accounting. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized upon shipment and transfer of ownership of the product to the customer and is recorded net of estimated incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. Revisions to these estimates are charged back to net sales in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Inventory. Live poultry inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and breeder hens at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or market. The costs associated with breeder hens are accumulated up to the production stage and amortized over their productive lives using the unit-of-production method. Finished poultry products, feed, eggs and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. We record valuations and adjustments for our inventory and for estimated obsolescence at or equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon known conditions affecting inventory obsolescence, including significantly aged products, discontinued product lines, or damaged or obsolete products. We allocate meat costs between our various finished poultry products based on a by-product costing technique that reduces the cost of the whole bird by estimated yields and amounts to be recovered for certain by-product parts. This primarily includes leg quarters, wings, tenders and offal, which are carried in inventory at the estimated recovery amounts, with the remaining amount being reflected as our breast meat cost. Generally, the Company performs an evaluation of whether any lower of cost or market adjustments are required at the segment level based on a number of factors, including: (i) pools of related inventory, (ii) product continuation or discontinuation, (iii) estimated market selling prices and (iv) expected distribution channels. If actual market conditions or other factors are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory adjustments may be required.
Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. The impairment charge is determined based upon the amount the net book value of the assets exceeds their fair market value. In making these determinations, the Company utilizes certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, remaining length of service and estimated salvage values; (ii) estimated fair market value of the assets; and (iii) determinations with respect to the lowest level of cash flows relevant to the respective impairment test, generally groupings of related operational facilities.
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities. The Company is subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to employment, environmental, product and other matters, and is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, including legal defense costs, if any, for these contingencies is made when losses are determined to be probable and reasonably estimatible and after considerable analysis of each individual issue. These reserves may change in the future due to favorable or adverse judgments, changes in the
Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond the Company’s control.
Accrued Self Insurance. Insurance expense for casualty claims and employee-related health care benefits are estimated using historical experience and actuarial estimates. Stop-loss coverage is maintained with third party insurers to limit the Company’s total exposure. Certain categories of claim liabilities are actuarially determined. The assumptions used to arrive at periodic expenses are reviewed regularly by management. However, actual expenses could differ from these estimates and could result in adjustments to be recognized.
Purchase Price Accounting. The Company allocates the total purchase price in connection with acquisitions to assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values. For property, plant and equipment and intangible assets other than goodwill, for significant acquisitions, the Company has historically relied upon the use of third party valuation experts to assist in the estimation of fair values. Historically, the carrying value of acquired accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable have approximated their fair value as of the date of acquisition, though adjustments are made within purchase price accounting to the extent needed to record such assets and liabilities at fair value. With respect to accrued liabilities, the Company uses all available information to make its best estimate of the fair value of the acquired liabilities and, when necessary, may rely upon the use of third party actuarial experts to assist in the estimation of fair value for certain liabilities, primarily self-insurance accruals.
Income Taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Taxes are provided for international subsidiaries based on the assumption that their earnings are indefinitely reinvested in foreign subsidiaries and as such deferred taxes are not provided for in U.S. income taxes that would be required in the event of distribution of these earnings. We also reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We review the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet, primarily operating loss carryforwards, based on both historical and anticipated earnings levels of the individual operations and provide a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that amounts will not be recovered.
The Company has reserves for taxes that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by tax authorities. Although the Company believes that the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are reasonable, it nevertheless has established tax reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge the positions taken by the Company resulting in additional liabilities for tax and interest. The tax reserves are reviewed as circumstances warrant and adjusted as events occur that affect the Company’s potential liability for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues, release of administrative guidance, or rendering of a court decision affecting a particular tax issue.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments and Positions
The risk inherent in our market risk sensitive instruments and positions is primarily the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the price of feed ingredients, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates as discussed below. The Company does not believe its market risk related to its available-for-sale securities is material. The sensitivity analyses presented do not consider the effects that such adverse changes may have on overall economic activity, nor do they consider additional actions our management may take to mitigate our exposure to such changes. Actual results may differ.
Feed Ingredients. We purchase certain commodities, primarily corn and soybean meal. As a result, our earnings are affected by changes in the price and availability of such feed ingredients. As market conditions dictate, we will from time to time fix future feed ingredient prices using various hedging techniques, including forward purchase agreements with suppliers and futures contracts. We do not use such financial instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. Market risk is estimated as a hypothetical 10% increase in the weighted-average cost of our primary feed ingredients as of September 29, 2007. Based on our feed consumption during fiscal 2007, such an increase would have resulted in an increase to cost of sales of approximately $236.3 million. A 10% change in ending feed ingredients inventories at September 29, 2007 would be $5.0 million, excluding any potential impact on production costs of chicken and turkey inventory.
Foreign Currency. Our earnings are affected by foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to the Mexican peso net monetary position of our Mexico subsidiaries. We manage this exposure primarily by attempting to minimize our Mexican peso net monetary position, but from time to time, we have also considered executing hedges to help minimize this exposure. Such instruments, however, have historically not been economically feasible. We are also exposed to the effect of potential exchange rate fluctuations to the extent that amounts are repatriated from Mexico to the U.S. However, we currently anticipate that the future cash flows of our Mexico subsidiaries will be reinvested in our Mexico operations. In addition, the Mexican peso exchange rate can directly and indirectly impact our results of operations and financial position in several ways, including potential economic recession in Mexico resulting from a devalued peso. The impact on our financial position and results of operations resulting from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso cannot be reasonably estimated. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses, representing the change in the U.S. dollar value of the net monetary assets of our Mexico subsidiaries denominated in Mexican pesos, was a loss of $ 1.4 million in fiscal 2007, a loss of $0.1 million in fiscal 2006, and a gain of $0.5 million in fiscal 2005. On September 29, 2007, the Mexican peso closed at 10.93 to 1 U.S. dollar, compared to 11.01 at September 30, 2006. No assurance can be given as to how future movements in the peso could affect our future earnings.
Interest Rates. Our earnings are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have on our variable-rate debt instruments. We had variable-rate debt instruments representing approximately 34.5% of our long-term debt at September 29, 2007. Holding other variables constant, including levels of indebtedness, a 25 basis points increase in interest rates would have increased our interest expense by $1.1 million for fiscal 2007. These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our variable-rate long-term debt at September 29, 2007.
Market risk for fixed-rate long-term debt is estimated as the potential increase in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 25 basis points decrease in interest rates and amounts to approximately $3.4 million as of September 29, 2007, using discounted cash flow analysis.
Impact of Inflation. Due to low to moderate inflation in the U.S. and Mexico and our rapid inventory turnover rate, the results of operations have not been significantly affected by inflation during the past three-year period.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The consolidated financial statements together with the report of our independent registered public accounting firm and financial statement schedule are included on pages 86 through 118 of this report. Financial statement schedules other than those included herein have been omitted because the required information is contained in the consolidated financial statements or related notes, or such information is not applicable.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not Applicable. |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of September 29, 2007, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Senior Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Senior Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that information we are required to disclose in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Senior Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company substantially completed the integration of Gold Kist’s accounting processes into the legacy systems, policies and procedures of Pilgrim’s Pride.
In connection with the evaluation described above, the Company’s management, including the Senior Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, indentified no other change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2007and that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation’s (“PPC”) management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). PPC’s internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, PPC’s management assessed the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2007 based on the framework set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of theTreadway Commission.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that PPC’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 29, 2007. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2007. That report is included herein.
/s/ Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim
Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim
Senior Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ O. B. Goolsby, Jr.
O. B. Goolsby, Jr.
President,
Chief Executive Officer
Director
/s/ Richard A. Cogdill
Richard A. Cogdill
Chief Financial Officer
Secretary and Treasurer
Director
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
We have audited Pilgrim's Pride Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as of September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 29, 2007, of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, and our report dated November 13, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 13, 2007
Item 9B. Other Information
Not Applicable.
PART III |
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Certain information regarding our executive officers has been presented under “Executive Officers” included in Item 1. “Business,” above.
Reference is made to the section entitled “Election of Directors” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
Reference is made to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The full text of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is published on our website, at www.pilgrimspride.com, under the “Investors-Corporate Governance” caption. We intend to disclose future amendments to, or waivers from, certain provisions of this Code on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.
See Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
Item 11. Executive Compensation
See Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
See Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
As of September 29, 2007, the Company did not have any compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance by the Company.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Additional information responsive to Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Security Ownership,” “Board of Directors Independence,” “Committees of the Board of Directors,” “Election of Directors,” “Report of the Compensation Committee,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Transactions” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the section entitled “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fee Information” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) | Financial Statements | |
(1) | The financial statements and schedules listed in the index to financial statements and schedules on page 3 of this report are filed as part of this report. | |
(2) | All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted. | |
(3) | The financial statements schedule entitled “Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves” is filed as part of this report on page 118. | |
(b) | Exhibits |
Exhibit Number
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated September 15, 1986, by and among Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Texas corporation; Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Doris Pilgrim Julian, Aubrey Hal Pilgrim, Paulette Pilgrim Rolston, Evanne Pilgrim, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Greta Pilgrim Owens and Patrick Wayne Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-8805) effective November 14, 1986). | |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 27, 2000 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2 of WLR Foods, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 000-17060) dated September 28, 2000). | |
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, Protein Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.(D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006). | |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004). | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004). | |
4.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (included as Exhibit 3.1). | |
4.2 | Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.2). | |
4.3 | Indenture, dated November 21, 2003, between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and The Bank of New York as Trustee relating to Pilgrim’s Pride’s 9 ¼% Senior Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-111975) filed on January 16, 2004). |
4.4 | Form of 9 ¼% Note due 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-111975) filed on January 16, 2004). | |
4.5 | Senior Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.6 | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.7 | Form of 7 5/8% Senior Note due 2015 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.8 | Senior Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.9 | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.10 | Form of 8 3/8% Subordinated Note due 2017 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
10.1 | Pilgrim’s Industries, Inc. Profit Sharing Retirement Plan, restated as of July 1, 1987 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 1, 1992). … | |
10.2 | Senior Executive Performance Bonus Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A in the Company’s Proxy Statement dated December 13, 1999). … | |
10.3 | Aircraft Lease Extension Agreement between B.P. Leasing Co. (L.A. Pilgrim, individually) and Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (formerly Pilgrim’s Industries, Inc.) effective November 15, 1992 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.48 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.4 | Broiler Grower Contract dated May 6, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim (Farm 30) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.49 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). |
10.5 | Commercial Egg Grower Contract dated May 7, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.50 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.6 | Agreement dated October 15, 1996 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.23 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 2, 1999). | |
10.7 | Heavy Breeder Contract dated May 7, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim (Farms 44, 45 & 46) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.51 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.8 | Broiler Grower Contract dated January 9, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride and O.B. Goolsby, Jr. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). | |
10.9 | Broiler Grower Contract dated January 15, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and B.J.M. Farms (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). | |
10.10 | Broiler Grower Agreement dated January 29, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Clifford E. Butler (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). | |
10.11 | Receivables Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation, as Seller, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, as Servicer, Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation, as Purchaser, and Nesbitt Burns Securities Inc., as Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 27, 1998). | |
10.12 | Purchase and Contribution Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation and Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 27, 1998). | |
10.13 | Guaranty Fee Agreement between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., dated June 11, 1999 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1999). | |
10.14 | Broiler Production Agreement between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim dated November 15, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2005). | |
10.15 | Commercial Property Lease dated December 29, 2000 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 30, 2000). |
10.16 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 12, 2002 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 among Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation, the Company, Fairway Finance Corporation (as successor in interest to Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation) and BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp. (f/k/a Nesbitt Burns Securities Inc.) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 6, 2002). | |
10.17 | Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 18, 2003 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation (“Seller”), Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation as initial Servicer, Fairway Finance Corporation (as successor in interest to Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation) (“Purchaser”) and Harris Nesbitt Corporation as agent for the purchaser (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2003). | |
10.18 | Agricultural Lease between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (Lessor) and Patrick W. Pilgrim (Tenant) dated May 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2003). | |
10.19 | Amendment No. 4 dated as of December 31, 2003 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998, among Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as initial Servicer, Fairway Finance Company, LLC (as successor to Fairway Finance Corporation) as purchaser and Harris Nesbitt Corp. (f/k/a BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp.) as agent for the purchaser (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 4, 2004). | |
10.20 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 31, 2003 to Purchase and Contribution Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998, between Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 4, 2004). | |
10.21 | Employee Stock Investment Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004). … | |
10.22 | Purchase and Amendment Agreement between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and ConAgra Foods, Inc. dated August 3, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2005). | |
10.23 | Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2005). … | |
10.24 | Vendor Service Agreement dated effective December 28, 2005 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). |
10.25 | Transportation Agreement dated effective December 28, 2005 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). | |
10.26 | Ground Lease Agreement dated effective January 4, 2006 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). | |
10.27 | Credit Agreement by and among the Avícola Pilgrim’s Pride de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the "Borrower"), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, certain Mexico subsidiaries of the Borrower, ING Capital LLC, and the lenders signatory thereto dated as of September 25, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2006). | |
10.28 | 2006 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among CoBank, ACB, Agriland, FCS and the Company dated as of September 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2006). | |
10.29 | First Amendment to the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan Trust, dated as of November 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 05, 2006). … | |
10.30 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, the Purchaser and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.(D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006). | |
10.31 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2006, by and among the Company, as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2006). | |
10.32 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2007, by and among the Company, as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2007). | |
10.33 | Fourth Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2007, by and among the Company, To-Ricos, Ltd., To-Ricos Distribution, Ltd., Bank of Montreal, as agent, SunTrust Bank as syndication agent, U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Co-Documentation Agents, BMO Capital Market as lead arranger, and the other lenders signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 12, 2007). |
10.34 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.02 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 12, 2007). | |
10.35 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2007, by and among the Borrower, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors, ING Capital LLC, and the Lenders (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2007). | |
10.36 | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 31, 2007). | |
10.37 | Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of August 20, 2007, among the Company, Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation, Fairway Finance Company, LLC and BMO Capital Markets Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 24, 2007). | |
10.38 | Retirement and Consulting Agreement dated as of October 10, 2007, between the Company and Clifford E. Butler (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 2007). … | |
10.39 | Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto.* | |
10.40 | Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 2007). | |
12 | Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006, October 1, 2005, October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002.* | |
21 | Subsidiaries of Registrant.* | |
23 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.* | |
31.1 | Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
31.2 | Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
31.3 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.1 | Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.2 | Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.3 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
*Filed herewith |
…Represents a management contract or compensation plan arrangement |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 19h day of November 2007.
PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION
By: | /s/ Richard A. Cogdill |
Richard A. Cogdill | |
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer | |
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature | Title | Date |
/s/ Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim | Senior Chairman of the Board | 11/19/07 |
Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim | ||
/s/ Lonnie Ken Pilgrim | Chairman of the Board | 11/19/07 |
Lonnie Ken Pilgrim | ||
/s/ Clifford E. Butler | Vice Chairman of the Board | 11/19/07 |
Clifford E. Butler | ||
/s/ O.B. Goolsby, Jr. | President | 11/19/07 |
O.B. Goolsby, Jr. | Chief Executive Officer | |
Director | ||
/s/ Richard A. Cogdill | Chief Financial Officer, | 11/19/07 |
Richard A. Cogdill | Secretary and Treasurer | |
Director | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
/s/ Charles L. Black | Director | 11/19/07 |
Charles L. Black | ||
/s/ Linda Chavez | Director | 11/16/07 |
Linda Chavez | ||
/s/ S. Key Coker | Director | 11/19/07 |
S. Key Coker | ||
/s/ Keith W. Hughes | Director | 11/19/07 |
Keith W. Hughes |
/s/ Blake D. Lovette | Director | 11/19/07 |
Blake D. Lovette | ||
/s/ Vance C. Miller, Sr. | Director | 11/19/07 |
Vance C. Miller, Sr. | ||
/s/ James G. Vetter, Jr. | Director | 11/19/07 |
James G. Vetter, Jr. | ||
/s/ Donald L. Wass, Ph.D. | Director | 11/19/07 |
Donald L. Wass, Ph.D. | ||
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation as of September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 29, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation as of September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 29, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 29, 2007 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated November 13, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 13, 2007
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | September 29, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 66,168 | $ | 156,404 | ||||
Investment in available-for-sale securities | 8,153 | 21,246 | ||||||
Trade accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts | 130,173 | 263,149 | ||||||
Inventories | 961,885 | 585,940 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable | 61,901 | 39,167 | ||||||
Current deferred taxes | 8,095 | 7,288 | ||||||
Other current assets | 47,959 | 32,480 | ||||||
Total Current Assets | 1,284,334 | 1,105,674 | ||||||
Investment in Available-for-Sale Securities | 46,035 | 115,375 | ||||||
Other Assets | 138,546 | 50,825 | ||||||
Goodwill | 505,166 | -- | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: | ||||||||
Land | 115,101 | 52,493 | ||||||
Buildings, machinery and equipment | 2,391,154 | 1,702,949 | ||||||
Autos and trucks | 59,559 | 57,177 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 124,193 | 63,853 | ||||||
2,690,007 | 1,876,472 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (889,852 | ) | (721,478 | ) | ||||
1,800,155 | 1,154,994 | |||||||
$ | 3,774,236 | $ | 2,426,868 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 402,316 | $ | 293,685 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 500,014 | 272,830 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 2,872 | 10,322 | ||||||
Total Current Liabilities | 905,202 | 576,837 | ||||||
Long-Term Debt, Less Current Maturities | 1,318,558 | 554,876 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes | 326,570 | 175,869 | ||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities | 51,685 | 1,958 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | -- | -- | ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 authorized shares; none issued | -- | -- | ||||||
Common stock – $.01 par value, 160,000,000 authorized shares; 66,555,733 issued and outstanding | 665 | 665 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 469,779 | 469,779 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 687,775 | 646,750 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 14,002 | 134 | ||||||
Total Stockholders’ Equity | 1,172,221 | 1,117,328 | ||||||
$ | 3,774,236 | $ | 2,426,868 | |||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
(In thousands, except per share data) | Three Years Ended September 29, 2007 | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 7,598,599 | $ | 5,235,565 | $ | 5,666,275 | ||||||
Cost and Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales | 7,007,061 | 4,937,965 | 4,921,076 | |||||||||
Gross Profit | 591,538 | 297,600 | 745,199 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 359,001 | 294,598 | 309,387 | |||||||||
�� | ||||||||||||
Operating Income | 232,537 | 3,002 | 435,812 | |||||||||
Other Expenses (Income): | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 125,757 | 50,601 | 49,585 | |||||||||
Interest income | (4,640 | ) | (10,048 | ) | (5,653 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 26,463 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | 1,378 | 144 | (474 | ) | ||||||||
Miscellaneous, net | (8,028 | ) | (1,378 | ) | (11,169 | ) | ||||||
140,930 | 39,319 | 32,289 | ||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes | 91,607 | (36,317 | ) | 403,523 | ||||||||
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) | 44,590 | (2,085 | ) | 138,544 | ||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 47,017 | $ | (34,232 | ) | $ | 264,979 | |||||
N Net Income (Loss) per Common Share-Basic and Diluted | $ | 0.71 | $ | (0.51 | ) | $ | 3.98 | |||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Additional | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares of | Par | Paid-In | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Value | Capital | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at October 2, 2004 | 66,826,833 | $ | 668 | $ | 431,662 | $ | 492,542 | $ | (348 | ) | $ | (1,568 | ) | $ | 922,956 | |||||||||||||
Sale of common stock | 15,443,054 | 154 | 521,774 | 521,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock | (15,443,054 | ) | (154 | ) | (482,092 | ) | (482,246 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for year | 264,979 | 264,979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 264,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($.06 per share) | (3,993 | ) | (3,993 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at October 1, 2005 | 66,826,833 | 668 | 471,344 | 753,527 | (373 | ) | (1,568 | ) | 1,223,598 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of Treasury Stock | (271,100 | ) | (3 | ) | (1,565 | ) | 1,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss for year | (34,232 | ) | (34,232 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 507 | 507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | (33,725 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($1.09 per share) | (72,545 | ) | (72,545 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2006 | 66,555,733 | 665 | 469,779 | 646,750 | 134 | -- | 1,117,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for year | 47,017 | 47,017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 13,868 | 13,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 60,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared ($.09 per share) | (5,992 | ) | (5,992 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 29, 2007 | 66,555,733 | $ | 665 | $ | 469,779 | $ | 687,775 | $ | 14,002 | -- | $ | 1,172,221 | ||||||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
(In thousands) | Three Years Ended September 29, 2007 | |||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 47,017 | $ | (34,232 | ) | $ | 264,979 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 204,903 | 135,133 | 134,944 | |||||||||
Non-cash loss on early extinguishment of debt | 9,543 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Asset impairment | -- | 3,767 | -- | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on property disposals | (446 | ) | 1,781 | 4,326 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 83,884 | 20,455 | 2,247 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect of business acquired | ||||||||||||
Accounts and other receivables | 247,217 | 31,121 | 21,192 | |||||||||
Income taxes (payable) receivable | 5,570 | (55,363 | ) | (38,251 | ) | |||||||
Inventories | (129,645 | ) | (58,612 | ) | 82,669 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (2,981 | ) | (6,594 | ) | 20,800 | |||||||
Accounts payable, and accrued expenses | (5,097 | ) | (3,501 | ) | (610 | ) | ||||||
Other | 3,999 | (3,573 | ) | 777 | ||||||||
Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 463,964 | 30,382 | 493,073 | |||||||||
Investing Activities: | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment | (172,323 | ) | (143,882 | ) | (116,588 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities | (125,045 | ) | (318,266 | ) | (305,458 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale or maturity of investment securities | 208,676 | 490,764 | -- | |||||||||
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired | (1,102,069 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||
Proceeds from property disposals | 6,286 | 4,148 | 4,963 | |||||||||
Other, net | -- | (506 | ) | (524 | ) | |||||||
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities | (1,184,475 | ) | 32,258 | (417,607 | ) | |||||||
Financing Activities: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from notes payable to banks | -- | 270,500 | -- | |||||||||
Repayments on notes payable to banks | -- | (270,500 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt | 751,255 | 74,683 | -- | |||||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (1,368,700 | ) | (36,950 | ) | (16,829 | ) | ||||||
Bank overdraft activity | 39,231 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Purchases for retirement of common stock | -- | -- | (482,246 | ) | ||||||||
Sale of common stock | -- | -- | 521,928 | |||||||||
Borrowing for acquisition | 1,230,000 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Equity and debt issue costs | (15,565 | ) | (3,938 | ) | -- | |||||||
Cash dividends paid | (5,992 | ) | (72,545 | ) | (3,993 | ) | ||||||
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities | 630,229 | (38,750 | ) | 18,860 | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 46 | (53 | ) | 76 | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (90,236 | ) | 23,837 | 94,402 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 156,404 | 132,567 | 38,165 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year | $ | 66,168 | $ | 156,404 | $ | 132,567 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosure Information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | ||||||||||||
Interest (net of amount capitalized) | $ | 104,394 | $ | 48,590 | $ | 46,945 | ||||||
Income taxes paid | $ | 11,164 | $ | 37,813 | $ | 172,929 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
NOTE A – BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (referred to herein as “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or similar terms) is the world’s largest chicken company. In the U.S., we produce both prepared and fresh chicken and fresh turkey. In Mexico and Puerto Rico, we produce exclusively fresh chicken. Through vertical integration, we control the breeding, hatching and growing of chickens and the processing and preparation, packaging and sale of our product lines.
Our prepared chicken products include portion-controlled breast fillets, tenderloins and strips, delicatessen products, salads, formed nuggets and patties and bone-in chicken parts. These products are sold either refrigerated or frozen and may be fully cooked, partially cooked or raw. In addition, these products are breaded or non-breaded and either pre-marinated or non-marinated. The Company also sells fresh chicken products to the foodservice and retail markets. Our fresh chicken products consist of refrigerated (non-frozen) whole or cut-up chicken, either pre-marinated or non-marinated, and pre-packaged chicken in various combinations of freshly refrigerated, whole chickens and chicken parts.
Our turkey products include fresh and frozen whole birds. In addition, we have fully cooked whole turkeys available.
Accounting Adjustments and Reclassifications
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, we recorded certain accounting adjustments (“Accounting Adjustments”) in our 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements. These Accounting Adjustments related to the accounting for the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Plan for Union Employees and certain post-employment benefit obligations in Mexico. These Accounting Adjustments resulted in a charge of $4.6 million, net of tax, in our Consolidated Statement of Operations that related to prior periods.
We believe these Accounting Adjustments, considered individually and in the aggregate, were not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended September 30, 2006 or October 1, 2005. As a result, they were reflected as an adjustment in fiscal 2006 only. In making this assessment, we considered qualitative and quantitative factors, including the significant earnings we reported in fiscal 2005 and the impact of making these Accounting Adjustments in fiscal 2006, primarily based on their significance to other key financial measures and consideration of the trend of earnings for 2006 versus the prior periods presented.
Certain items in prior year financial statements have been reclassified to the current year’s presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and its majority owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The Company reports on the basis of a 52/53-week fiscal year that ends on the Saturday closest to September 30. As a result, fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005 each had 52 weeks.
The financial statements of the Company’s Mexico subsidiaries are remeasured as if the U.S. dollar were the functional currency. Accordingly, we translate assets and liabilities, other than non-monetary assets, of the Mexico subsidiaries at current exchange rates. We translate non-monetary assets using the historical rates in effect on the date of acquisition. We translate income and expenses at average exchange rates in effect during the period. Foreign exchange gains or losses are separately stated as a component of “Other Expenses (Income)” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon shipment and transfer of ownership of the product to the customer and is recorded net of estimated incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. Revisions to these estimates are charged back to net sales in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Costs associated with the products shipped to customers are recognized in cost of sales.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investment in Available-for-Sale Securities
The Company’s investments at September 29, 2007 are in debt and equity securities which are classified as available for sale and carried at market value. Investments are classified based on their underlying contractual maturity at date of purchase by the Company. Certain investments are held in trust as compensating balance arrangements for our insurance liability and are classified as long-term based on a maturity date greater than one year from the balance sheet date and management’s intention not to use such assets in the next twelve months. Available-for-sale investments with a remaining maturity date of one year or less from the balance sheet date are classified as current assets and those with a maturity date of greater than one year are classified as long-term assets based on management’s intention not to use such assets in the next twelve months. Investments in debt securities are primarily invested in municipal bonds. The average maturity period of the Company’s investments at September 29, 2007 was 1-3 years. All equity securities are classified as long-term. Approximately $0.9 million, net of tax, in unrealized gains related to these investments at September 29, 2007 were recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable at September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 approximated their fair values due to the short- term nature of these items. Long-term investments are adjusted to fair value on a monthly basis. The fair values of the Company’s long-term investments in available for sale securities was $46.0 million. See Note E for discussion of the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, investment securities, and trade receivables. The Company’s cash equivalents are in high-quality securities placed with major banks and financial institutions. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across geographic areas.
With the exception of one customer that accounts for approximately 14.0% of accounts receivable at September 29, 2007 and 12% of net sales for fiscal 2007 primarily related to our chicken segment, the Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of credit risk in its accounts receivable, which are generally unsecured. Credit evaluations are performed on all significant customers and updated as circumstances dictate.
Inventories
Live poultry inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and breeder hens at the lower of cost, less accumulated amortization, or market. The costs associated with breeder hens are accumulated up to the production stage and amortized over the productive lives using the unit-of-production method. Finished poultry products, feed, eggs and other inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. We record valuations and adjustments for our inventory and for estimated obsolescence at or equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon known conditions affecting the inventory’s obsolescence, including significantly aged products, discontinued product lines, or damaged or obsolete products. We allocate meat costs between our various finished poultry products based on a by-product costing technique that reduces the cost of the whole bird by estimated yields and amounts to be recovered for certain by-product parts, primarily including leg quarters, wings, tenders and offal, which are carried in inventory at the estimated recovery amounts, with the remaining amount being reflected as our breast meat cost. Generally, the Company performs an evaluation of whether any lower of cost or market adjustments are required at the segment level based on a number of factors, including: (i) pools of related inventory, (ii) product age, condition and continuation or discontinuation, (iii) estimated market selling prices and (iv) expected distribution channels. If actual market conditions or other factors are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory adjustments may be required.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, and repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of these assets. Depreciation expense was $196.4 million, $130.5 million and $130.6 million in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Estimated useful lives for building, machinery and equipment are 5 years to 33 years and for automobiles and trucks are 3 years to 10 years. The charge to income resulting from amortization of assets recorded under capital leases is included with depreciation expense.
The Company records impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. The impairment charge is determined based upon the amount the net book value of the assets exceeds their fair market value. In making these determinations, the Company utilizes certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) future cash flows estimates expected to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, remaining length of service and estimated salvage values; (ii) estimated fair market value of the assets; and (iii) determinations with respect to the lowest level of cash flows relevant to the respective impairment test, generally groupings of related operational facilities.
Accrued Expenses
The carrying values of accrued expenses were as follows:
September 29, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 231,401 | $ | 143,555 | ||||
Interest | 49,063 | 5,276 | ||||||
Other | 219,550 | 123,999 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | $ | 500,014 | $ | 272,830 |
Purchase Price Accounting
The Company allocates the total purchase price in connection with acquisitions to assets and liabilities based upon their estimated fair values. For property, plant and equipment and intangible assets other than goodwill, for significant acquisitions, the Company has historically relied upon the use of third-party valuation experts to assist in the estimation of fair values. Historically, the carrying value of acquired accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable have approximated their fair value as of the date of acquisition, though adjustments are made within purchase price accounting to the extent needed to record such assets and liabilities at fair value. With respect to accrued liabilities, the Company uses all available information to make its best estimate of the fair value of the acquired liabilities and, when necessary, may rely upon the use of third-party actuarial experts to assist in the estimation of fair value for certain liabilities, primarily pension and self-insurance accruals.
Litigation and Contingent Liabilities
The Company is subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to employment, environmental, product and other matters, and is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, including anticipated cost of defense, if any, for these contingencies is made when losses are determined to be probable and after considerable analysis of each individual issue. These reserves may change in the future due to changes in the Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of strategies, or other factors beyond the Company’s control.
Accrued Self Insurance
Insurance expense for casualty claims and employee-related health care benefits are estimated using historical and current experience and actuarial estimates. Stop-loss coverage is maintained with third-party insurers to limit the Company’s total exposure. Certain categories of claim liabilities are actuarially determined. The assumption used to arrive at periodic expenses is reviewed regularly by management. However, actual expenses could differ from these estimates and could result in adjustments to be recognized.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Taxes are provided for international subsidiaries based on the assumption that their earnings are indefinitely reinvested in foreign subsidiaries and as such deferred taxes are not provided for in U.S. income taxes that would be required in the event of distribution of these earnings. We also reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We review the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet, primarily operating loss carryforwards, based on both historical and anticipated earnings levels of the individual operations and provide a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that amounts will not be recovered.
As of September 29, 2007, the Company had reserves totaling $26.9 million for taxes that may become payable in future years as a result of audits by tax authorities. Although the Company believes that the positions taken on previously filed tax returns are reasonable, it nevertheless has established tax reserves in recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge the positions taken by the Company resulting in additional liabilities for tax and interest. The tax reserves are reviewed as circumstances warrant and adjusted as events occur that affect the Company’s potential liability for additional taxes, such as lapsing of applicable statutes of limitations, conclusion of tax audits, additional exposure based on current calculations, identification of new issues, release of administrative guidance, or rendering of a court decision affecting a particular tax issue.
Common Stock
Prior to November 21, 2003, the Company had two classes of authorized common stock, Class A common stock and Class B common stock. After the New York Stock Exchange closed on November 21, 2003, each share of Class A common stock and each share of Class B common stock was reclassified into one share of new common stock. The new common stock is our only class of authorized common stock. The new common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PPC” and registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Following the reclassification, our certificate of incorporation contains no provisions for Class A common stock or Class B common stock. In connection with the elimination of the dual class capital structure, our certificate of incorporation now authorizes 160 million shares of common stock instead of 100 million shares of Class A common stock and 60 million shares of Class B common stock.
Except as to voting rights, the rights of the new common stock are substantially identical to the rights of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock. Each share of common stock that was reclassified into our new common stock is generally entitled to cast twenty votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders until there is a change in the beneficial ownership of such share.
The reclassification had no significant effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, as the combination of the Class A and Class B shares into a new class of common stock did not affect the overall shares of common stock outstanding. Prior year balances reflect this reclassification as if it had occurred as of the earliest period presented.
As of September 29, 2007, we estimate that approximately 26 million shares of our common stock carry 20 votes per share, of which 25.3 million shares are beneficially owned by our Senior Chairman, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, or certain related entities.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. The weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic and diluted) included herein were 66,555,733 in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Pending Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company must adopt this Interpretation in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company has not completed its evaluation as to the impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some enterprises, the application of this Statement will change current practice. The Company must adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Although the Company has not completed its evaluation as to the impact that adoption will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements, it currently believes the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not require material modification of its fair value measurements and will be substantially limited to expanded disclosures in the notes to its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This Statement permits an enterprise to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 will become effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that use of the fair value measurement option on its financial instruments and other applicable items would have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE B – BUSINESS ACQUISITION
On December 27, 2006, we acquired 45,343,812 shares, representing 88.9% of shares outstanding, of Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”) common stock through a tender offer. We subsequently acquired all remaining Gold Kist shares and, on January 9, 2007, Gold Kist became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Gold Kist, based in Atlanta, Georgia, was the third largest chicken company in the United States, accounting for more than nine percent of chicken produced in the United States in recent years. Gold Kist operated a fully-integrated chicken production business that included live production, processing, marketing and distribution.
For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. We have included the acquired assets and assumed liabilities in our balance sheet using an allocation of the purchase price based on an appraisal received from a third-party valuation specialist.
The following summarizes our purchase price at December 27, 2006 (in thousands):
Purchase 50,146,368 shares at $21.00 per share | $ | 1,053,074 | ||
Premium paid on retirement of debt | 22,208 | |||
Retirement of various share-based compensation awards | 25,677 | |||
Various costs and fees | 37,740 | |||
Total purchase price | $ | 1,138,699 |
We retired the Gold Kist 10 1/4% Senior Notes due 2014 with a book value of $128.5 million at a cost of $149.8 million plus accrued interest and the Gold Kist Subordinated Capital Certificates of Interest at par plus accrued interest and a premium of one year’s interest. We also paid acquisition transaction costs and funded change in control payments to certain Gold Kist employees. This acquisition was initially funded by (1) $780 million borrowed under our revolving-term secured credit facility and (2) $450 million borrowed under our $450 million Senior Unsecured Term Loan Agreement (“Bridge Loan”) (see Note E below).
In connection with the acquisition, we elected to freeze certain of the Gold Kist benefit plans with the intent to ultimately terminate them. We recorded a purchase price adjustment of $65.6 million to increase the benefit plans liability to the $82.5 million current estimated cost of these plan terminations. We do not anticipate any material net periodic benefit costs (income) related to these plans in the future. Additionally, we conformed Gold Kist’s accounting policies to our accounting policies and provided for deferred income taxes on all related purchase adjustments.
The following summarizes our estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
Purchase price allocation:
(In thousands):
Current assets | $ | 418,583 | ||
Property, plant and equipment | 675,054 | |||
Goodwill | 505,166 | |||
Intangible assets | 64,500 | |||
Other assets | 65,597 | |||
Total assets acquired | 1,728,900 | |||
Current liabilities | 276,194 | |||
Long-term debt, less current maturities | 140,674 | |||
Deferred income taxes | 93,509 | |||
Other long-term liabilities | 79,824 | |||
Total liabilities assumed | 590,201 | |||
Total purchase price | $ | 1,138,699 | ||
Goodwill and other intangible assets reflected above were determined to meet the criteria for recognition apart from tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets related to the acquisition consisted of the following at December 27, 2006:
Estimated | Amortization | |||||||
Fair Value | Period | |||||||
(In millions) | (In years) | |||||||
I In tangible assets subject to amortization: | ||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 51,000 | 13.0 | |||||
Trade name | 13,200 | 3.0 | ||||||
Non-compete agreements | 300 | 3.0 | ||||||
Total intangible assets subject to amortization | 64,500 | |||||||
G Goodwill | 505,166 | |||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 569,666 | ||||||
Weighted average amortization period | 10.9 |
Goodwill, which is recognized in the Company’s chicken segment, represents the purchase price in excess of the value assigned to identifiable tangible and intangible assets. We elected to acquire Gold Kist at a price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill because of the following strategic and financial benefits:
- | The combined company is now positioned as the world’s leading chicken producer and that position has provided us with enhanced abilities to: |
· | Compete more efficiently and provide even better customer service; |
· | Expand our geographic reach and customer base; |
· | Further pursue value-added and prepared foods opportunities; and |
· | Offer long-term growth opportunities for our stockholders, employees, and growers. |
- | The combined company is better positioned to compete in the industry both internationally and in the United States as additional consolidation occurs. |
The amortizable intangible assets were determined by us to have finite lives. The useful life for the customer relationships intangible asset we recognized was based on our forecasts of customer turnover. The useful life for the trade name intangible asset we recognized was based on the estimated length of our use of the Gold Kist trade name while it is phased out and replaced with the Pilgrim’s Pride trade name. The useful life of the non-compete agreements intangible asset we recognized was based on the remaining life of the agreements. We amortize these intangible assets over their remaining useful lives on a straight-line basis. Annual amortization expense for these intangible assets was $6.3 million in fiscal 2007. We expect to recognize annual amortization expense of $8.4 million in fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009, $5.1 million in fiscal 2010, $3.9 million in fiscal 2011 through fiscal 2019, and $1.0 million in fiscal 2020.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information has been presented as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented.
In thousands, except share and per share data | ||||||||
Fiscal 2007 (Pro forma) | Fiscal 2006 (Pro forma) | |||||||
Net sales | $ | 8,126,409 | $ | 7,352,018 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 230,126 | $ | 228,105 | ||||
Operating income (loss) | $ | 201,986 | $ | (53,585 | ) | |||
Interest expense, net | $ | 146,928 | $ | 125,314 | ||||
Income (loss) before taxes | $ | 36,372 | $ | (172,740 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) | $ | 12,832 | $ | (118,571 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) per common share | $ | 0.19 | $ | (1.78 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 66,555,733 | 66,555,733 |
NOTE C – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
In connection with the Receivables Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1998, as amended, the Company sells, on a revolving basis, certain of its trade receivables (the “Pooled Receivables”) to a special purpose corporation wholly owned by the Company, which in turn sells a percentage ownership interest to third parties. As of September 29, 2007, $300.0 million in Pooled Receivables had been sold. During fiscal 2006 and 2005 there were no Pooled Receivables sold. The gross proceeds resulting from the sale are included in cash flows from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Losses on the sale were immaterial.
NOTE D – INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
September 29, | September 30, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||
Live chicken and hens | $ | 343,185 | $ | 196,284 | ||||
Feed and eggs | 223,631 | 132,309 | ||||||
Finished chicken products | 337,052 | 201,516 | ||||||
903,868 | 530,109 | |||||||
Turkey: | ||||||||
Live turkey and hens | $ | 8,839 | $ | 7,138 | ||||
Feed and eggs | 2,664 | 4,740 | ||||||
Finished turkey products | 25,929 | 26,685 | ||||||
37,432 | 38,563 | |||||||
Other Products: | �� | |||||||
Commercial feed, table eggs, and retail farm store | $ | 11,327 | $ | 7,080 | ||||
Distribution inventories (other than chicken & turkey products) | 9,258 | 10,188 | ||||||
20,585 | 17,268 | |||||||
Total Inventories | $ | 961,885 | $ | 585,940 |
NOTE E – NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
The following table presents our long-term debt as of September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 (in thousands):
(in thousands) | Final Maturity | September 29, 2007 | September 30, 2006 | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes, at 7 5/8% | 2015 | $ | 400,000 | $ | -- | ||||
Senior unsecured notes, at 8 3/8% | 2017 | 250,000 | -- | ||||||
Senior unsecured notes, at 9 5/8% | 2011 | -- | 299,601 | ||||||
Senior subordinated unsecured notes, at 9 1/4% | 2013 | 5,135 | 82,640 | ||||||
Secured revolving credit facility with notes payable at LIBOR plus 1.25% to LIBOR plus 2.75% | 2011 | 26,293 | 74,682 | ||||||
Note payable to an insurance company at 6.68% | 2012 | -- | 50,115 | ||||||
Notes payable to an insurance company at LIBOR plus 2.2075% | 2013 | -- | 41,333 | ||||||
Secured revolving-term/credit facility with notes payable at LIBOR or US Treasuries, plus a spread | 2016 | 622,350 | -- | ||||||
Other | Various | 17,652 | 16,827 | ||||||
1,321,430 | 565,198 | ||||||||
Less current maturities | (2,872 | ) | (10,322 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 1,318,558 | $ | 554,876 |
In September 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated revolver/term credit agreement with a maturity date of September 21, 2016. At September 29, 2007 this revolver/term credit agreement provides for an aggregate commitment of $1.172 billion consisting of i) a $550 million revolving/term loan commitment and ii) $622.4 million in various term loans. At September 29, 2007, the Company had nothing outstanding under the revolver and $622.4 million outstanding in various term loans. The total credit facility is presently secured by certain fixed assets with a current availability of $550.0 million. From time to time, if certain conditions are satisfied, the Company has the right to increase the revolving/term loan commitment and term loan commitment to a total maximum amount of $1.0 billion and $750 million, respectively. Borrowings under the revolving/term loan commitment are available on a revolving basis until September 21, 2011 at which time the outstanding borrowings will be converted to a term loan maturing on September 21, 2016. The fixed rate term loans bear interest at rates ranging from 6.84% to 7.06%. The voluntary converted loans bear interest at rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.0% - 2.0% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. The floating rate term loans bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50%-1.75% based on the ratio of the Company’s debt to EBITDA, as defined in the agreement. The revolving/term loans provide for interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 1.0%-2.0% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. Revolving/term loans converted to term loans on September 21, 2011 will be payable in equal quarterly principal payments of 10% per annum of the original principal amount beginning the calendar quarter following the conversion date with the remaining balance due on the maturity date. Of the term loans outstanding, $208.7 million must be repaid in equal quarterly principal payments of 1% per annum of the original principal amount with the remaining balance due on the maturity date. All borrowings are subject to the availability of eligible collateral and no material adverse change provisions. Commitment fees charged on the unused balance of this facility range from 0.20% to 0.40% depending upon the
Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. One-half of the outstanding obligations under the revolver/term credit agreement are guaranteed by Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an entity related to our Senior Chairman, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim.
On December 15, 2006, the Company borrowed $100 million at 6.84% under our revolver/term credit agreement and used substantially all of the funds to repay, in full, term loans payable to an insurance company under a note purchase agreement maturing in 2012 and 2013.
In January 2007, the Company borrowed (1) $780 million under our revolver/term credit agreement and (2) $450 million under our bridge loan agreement to fund the Gold Kist acquisition. On January 24, 2007, the Company closed on the sale of $400 million of 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2015 (the “Senior Notes”) and $250 million of 8 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the “Subordinated Notes”), sold at par. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning November 1, 2007. We may redeem all or part of the Senior Notes on or after May 1, 2011. We may redeem all or part of the Subordinated Notes on or after May 1, 2012. Before May 1, 2010, we also may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the Senior Notes and the Subordinated Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings. Each of these optional redemptions is at a premium as described in the indentures under which the notes were issued. The proceeds from the sale of the notes, after underwriting discounts, were used to (1) retire the loans outstanding under our bridge loan agreement, (2) repurchase $77.5 million of the Company’s 9 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 at a premium of $7.4 million plus accrued interest of $1.3 million and (3) reduce outstanding revolving loans under our revolving/term credit agreement. Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the $7.4 million premium along with unamortized loan costs of $7.1 million related to the retirement of these Notes.
On September 21, 2007, the Company redeemed all of its 9 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 at a total cost of $307.5 million. To fund a portion of the aggregate redemption price, the Company sold $300 million of trade receivables under its Receivables Purchase Agreement. Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes the $9.5 million premium along with unamortized loan costs of $2.5 million related to the retirement of these Notes.
As of September 29, 2007, we had a $300.0 million commitment under a domestic revolving credit facility that provides for interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 0.75-1.75% depending upon our total debt to capitalization ratio. From time to time, if certain conditions are satisfied, the Company has the right to increase the revolving commitment to a total maximum amount of $450 million. At September 29, 2007, $215.1 million was available for borrowing under the domestic revolving credit facility. Borrowings against this facility are subject to the availability of eligible collateral and no material adverse change provisions. The obligations under this facility are secured by domestic chicken inventories. Commitment fees charged on the unused balance of this facility range from 0.175% to 0.35% depending upon the Company’s total debt to capitalization ratio. One-half of the outstanding obligations under the domestic revolving credit facility are guaranteed by Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an entity related to our Senior Chairman, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim.
On September 25, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company, Avícola Pilgrim’s Pride de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the “Borrower”), entered into a secured revolving credit agreement of up to $75 million with a final maturity date of September 25, 2011. In March 2007, the Borrower elected to reduce the commitment under this agreement to approximately $50 million. Outstanding
amounts bear interest at rates ranging from the higher of the Prime Rate or Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5%; LIBOR plus 1.25%-2.75%; or TIIE plus 1.05%-2.55% depending on the loan designation. Obligations under this agreement are secured by a security interest in and lien upon all capital stock and other equity interests of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries. All the obligations of the Borrower are secured by unconditional guaranty by the Company. At September 29, 2007, $26.3 million was outstanding and approximately $23.7 million was available under this line. All borrowings are subject to no material adverse effect provisions.
On June 29, 1999, the Camp County Industrial Development Corporation issued $25.0 million of variable-rate environmental facilities revenue bonds supported by letters of credit obtained by us. We may draw from these proceeds over the construction period for new sewage and solid waste disposal facilities at a poultry by-products plant to be built in Camp County, Texas. We are not required to borrow the full amount of the proceeds from these revenue bonds. All amounts borrowed from these funds will be due in 2029. The revenue bonds are supported by letters of credit obtained by us under our available revolving credit facilities. The bonds will be recorded as debt of the Company if and when they are spent to fund construction.
Most of our domestic inventories and domestic fixed assets are pledged as collateral on our long-term debt and credit facilities.
Annual maturities of long-term debt for the five years subsequent to September 29, 2007 are: 2008 -- $2.9 million; 2009 -- $2.4 million; 2010 -- $1.3 million; 2011 -- $27.9 million; and 2012 -- $1.3 million and thereafter -- $1.286 billion.
The Company is required, by certain provisions of its debt agreements, to maintain levels of working capital and net worth, to limit dividends to a maximum of $26 million per year, and to maintain various fixed charge, leverage, current and debt-to-equity ratios. In fiscal 2006, waivers were obtained to permit a special $1 per share dividend. At September 29, 2007, the Company has fully complied with these covenants.
Total interest expense was $125.8 million, $50.6 million and $49.6 million in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest related to new construction capitalized in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $5.7 million, $4.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
The fair value of long-term debt, at September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 and based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues where available or by using discounted cash flow analysis, was approximately $1.338 billion and $592.3 million, respectively.
NOTE F – INCOME TAXES
Income (loss) before income taxes after allocation of certain expenses to foreign operations for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $80.0 million, ($19.7) million and $361.1 million, respectively, for U.S. operations and $11.6 million, ($16.6) million and $42.4 million, respectively, for foreign operations. The provisions for income taxes are based on pre-tax financial statement income (loss).
The components of income tax expense (benefit) are set forth below:
(In thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Current: | ||||||||||||
Federal | $ | (37,191 | ) | $ | (23,147 | ) | $ | 117,518 | ||||
Foreign | 1,573 | 5,130 | 3,880 | |||||||||
State and other | (3,676 | ) | (4,523 | ) | 14,899 | |||||||
Total current | (39,294 | ) | (22,540 | ) | 136,297 | |||||||
Deferred | ||||||||||||
Federal | 73,285 | 9,511 | (1,594 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign | (1,637 | ) | 10,221 | 4,475 | ||||||||
State and other | 12,236 | 723 | 113 | |||||||||
Total deferred | 83,884 | 20,455 | 2,994 | |||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | -- | -- | (747 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 44,590 | $ | (2,085 | ) | $ | 138,544 |
The following is a reconciliation between the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective income tax rate:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
Federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | (35.0 | ) % | 35.0 | % | ||||||
State tax rate, net | 2.6 | (0.7 | ) | 2.1 | ||||||||
Permanent Items | 2.9 | |||||||||||
D Difference in U.S. statutory tax rate and foreign country effective tax rate | (0.8 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (1. 3 | ) | ||||||
T Tax credits | (8.0 | ) | (13.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||
Tax effect of American Jobs Creation Act repatriation | -- | 68.3 | 0.6 | |||||||||
Currency related differences | 3.8 | 8.4 | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
Change in contingency reserves | 6.8 | (29.7 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Change in valuation allowance | -- | -- | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||
Change in tax rate | 3.2 | -- | -- | |||||||||
Other | 3.2 | (3.0 | ) | 0.3 | ||||||||
Total | 48.7 | % | (5.8 | ) % | 34.3 | % |
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows:
(In thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
Property and equipment | $ | 256,341 | $ | 144,361 | ||||
Inventories | 109,410 | 43,627 | ||||||
Prior use of cash accounting | 16,936 | 18,457 | ||||||
Acquisition related items | 14,820 | 15,600 | ||||||
Deferred foreign taxes | 25,002 | 24,127 | ||||||
Identified intangibles | 21,964 | -- | ||||||
Other | 58,956 | 36,570 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 503,429 | 282,742 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
Foreign net operating losses | 41,257 | 42,683 | ||||||
Expenses deductible in different years | 143,697 | 71,478 | ||||||
Total deferred tax asset | 184,954 | 114,161 | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | 318,475 | $ | 168,581 |
The Company has not provided any deferred income taxes on the remaining undistributed earnings of its Mexico subsidiaries based upon its determination that such earnings will be indefinitely reinvested. As of September 29, 2007, the cumulative undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries were approximately $92.0 million. If such earnings were not considered indefinitely reinvested, certain deferred foreign and U.S. income taxes would have been provided, after consideration of estimated foreign tax credits. However, determination of the amount of deferred income taxes is not practical.
The Mexican tax operating loss carryforwards of approximately $147.9 million will expire in the years ranging from 2008 through 2012.
The American Jobs Creation Act was enacted in October 2004 (“Jobs Creation Act”). The Jobs Creation Act includes a temporary incentive to U.S. multinationals to repatriate foreign earnings at an approximate effective 5.25% U.S. federal tax rate. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company repatriated $155.0 million in previously unremitted untaxed earnings under the provisions of the Jobs Creation Act. The total income tax effects of repatriations under the Jobs Creation Act was $28.2 million, of which $25.8 million was recorded fiscal 2006. The key components of the 2006 provision included domestic income taxes of $10.1 million to reflect federal and state taxes on the transaction, a deferred foreign tax provision of $24.1 million to accrue for future taxes that will result from certain intra-Mexican dividends undertaken in 2006 to complete this transaction, and a benefit of $6.0 million to reflect the revaluation of certain deferred tax assets in Mexico that as a result of the transaction are expected to be realized at higher enacted tax rates.
In October 2007, Mexico’s legislative bodies enacted La Ley del Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única (“IETU”), a new minimum corporation tax, which will be assessed on companies doing business in Mexico beginning January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the
anticipated impact that IETU will have on our business and operating results. Because of IETU, there can be no assurance that we will be able to utilize the net operating loss carryovers and other deferred tax benefits generated in Mexico. There can also be no assurance that IETU will not have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
NOTE G – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the period ending September 29, 2007, comprehensive income was $60.9 million, consisting of net income of $47.0 million, unrealized gains related to our investments in debt securities of $0.8 million, to pension liability gains of $7.9 million and unrealized gains on cash flow hedges of $3.4 million. This compares to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 in which comprehensive loss was $33.7 million, consisting of net loss of $34.2 million and unrealized gains related to our investments in debt securities of $0.5 million. Comprehensive income for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005 was $265.0 million, consisting of net income of $265.0 million.
Accumulated other comprehensive income at September 29, 2007 was $14.0 million net of taxes of $6.6 million and consisted of pretax adjustments for pension liability gains totaling $14.3 million accumulated unrealized gains on cash flow hedges totaling $5.3 million and accumulated unrealized gain on our investments in debt securities totaling $0.9 million.
NOTE H – SAVINGS AND PENSION PLANS
Retirement Plans
The Company maintains retirement plans for eligible employees as follows:
· | the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Savings Plan (the “RS Plan”), a Section 401(k) Salary Deferral Plan |
· | the Pilgrim’s Pride Retirement Plan for Union Employees (the “Union Plan”), a defined benefit plan |
· | the To-Rico’s Employee Cash or Deferred Arrangement Profit Sharing Plan (the “To-Rico’s Plan”), a Section 1165(e) Salary Deferral Plan |
· | the legacy Gold Kist Pension Plan (the “GK Pension Plan”), a defined benefit plan acquired with Gold Kist, Inc. |
The Company maintains three postretirement plans for eligible Mexico employees as required by Mexico law which cover primarily termination benefits. Separate disclosure of plan obligations is not considered material.
The RS Plan is maintained for certain eligible U.S. employees. Under the RS Plan, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute a percentage of their compensation and there are various Company matching provisions. The Union Plan covers certain locations or work groups within the Company. The To-Rico’s Plan is maintained for certain eligible Puerto Rican employees. Under the To-Rico’s Plan, eligible employees may voluntarily contribute a percentage of their compensation and there are various Company matching provisions. The GK Pension Plan covers certain eligible U.S. employees who were employed at locations that Pilgrim’s Pride acquired in
its acquisition of Gold Kist Inc. and participation in the GK Pension Plan was frozen as of February 8, 2007 for all participants with the exception of terminated vested participants who are or may become permanently and totally disabled. The plan was frozen for that group as of March 31, 2007.
Under all of our retirement plans, the Company’s expenses were $10.0 million and $16.0 million in fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively, including the correction of $4.6 million, pretax, as described in Note A.
The Company uses a calendar year measurement date for its defined benefits plans, while its postretirement benefit plans use a fiscal year end of September 29, 2007. Certain disclosures are listed below; other disclosures are not material to the financial statements.
Medical and Life Insurance Plans
The acquisition of Gold Kist by Pilgrim’s Pride resulted in acquiring some postretirement medical and life insurance obligations. In January 2001, Gold Kist began to substantially curtail its programs for active employees. On July 1, 2003, Gold Kist terminated medical coverage for retirees age 65 and older, and only retired employees in the closed group between ages 55 and 65 could continue their coverage at rates above the average cost of the medical insurance plan for active employees. These retired employees will all reach the age of 65 by 2012 and liabilities of the postretirement medical plan will then end.
Benefit Obligations, Plan Assets, and Assumptions
The following table sets forth the plans’ change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and economic assumptions for the years ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006:
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation: | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 9,882 | $ | 8,778 | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||
Service cost | 2,029 | 2,242 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Interest cost | 8,455 | 458 | 103 | -- | ||||||||||||
Plan participant contributions | 61 | 27 | 681 | -- | ||||||||||||
Actuarial (gains) losses | (12,933 | ) | (1,533 | ) | (41 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Acquisitions | 218,623 | -- | 2,689 | -- | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) | 237 | -- | - | -- | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (29,551 | ) | (90 | ) | (1,000 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year | 196,803 | 9,882 | 2,432 | -- | ||||||||||||
Change in plan assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | 6,252 | 5,405 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions | 139,229 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets | 11,571 | 208 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Contributions by employer | 10,462 | 702 | 319 | -- | ||||||||||||
Plan participant contributions | 61 | 27 | 681 | -- | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (29,551 | ) | (90 | ) | (1,000 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | 138,024 | 6,252 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Funded status | (58,779 | ) | (3,630 | ) | (2,432 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit) | 237 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Unrecognized net (gain) loss | (14,824 | ) | (818 | ) | (41 | ) | -- | |||||||||
Net (accrued) prepaid expense | $ | (73,366 | ) | $ | (4,448 | ) | $ | (2,473 | ) | $ | -- | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | 14,587 | -- | 41 | -- | ||||||||||||
Net amount recognized | $ | (58,779 | ) | $ | (4,448 | ) | $ | (2,432 | ) | $ | -- | |||||
Projected benefit obligation | $ | 196,803 | $ | 9,882 | $ | 2,432 | -- | |||||||||
Accumulated benefit obligation | 196,217 | 9,301 | 2,432 | -- | ||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets | 138,024 | 6,252 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation: | |||||||||||||
Discount rate | 5.06 | % | 5.75 | % | 5.87 | % | NA | ||||||
Rate of increase in compensation levels | 3.00 | % | 3.00 | % | NA | NA |
The health care cost trend rate used to determine the other postretirement benefits obligation at September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006 was 8.0% and 8.5%, respectively. The rate will decline ratably to 5.0% by fiscal 2014 and remain at that level thereafter. A 1% increase or decrease would have an insignificant impact on the other postretirement benefit obligation as of September 29, 2007.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The following table sets forth the plans’ net periodic benefit cost and economic assumptions for the years ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006:
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost (income): | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 2,029 | $ | 2,242 | $ | -- | $ | -- | ||||||||
Interest cost | 8,455 | 458 | 103 | -- | ||||||||||||
Estimated return on plan assets | (8,170 | ) | (454 | ) | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Settlement (gain) loss | (2,327 | ) | -- | -- | -- | |||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost (income) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 2,246 | 103 | $ | -- | ||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 5.06 | % | 5.25 | % | 5.50 | % | NA | |||||||||
Rate of increase in compensation levels | 3.00 | % | 3.00 | % | NA | NA | ||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | 7.75 | % | 7.75 | % | 7.75 | % | NA |
A 1% increase or decrease in the health care cost trend rate would have an insignificant impact on the other postretirement service and interest cost components for 2007.
Unrecognized Gain
The following table sets forth the plans’ accumulated other comprehensive income that has not yet been recognized for the year ended September 29, 2007:
(in thousands) | ||||
Unrecognized (gain) loss at beginning of period | $ | (818 | ) | |
Curtailment and settlement adjustments | 2,327 | |||
Actuarial (gain) loss | (12,974 | ) | ||
Asset (gain) loss | (3,400 | ) | ||
Prior service cost (credit) | 237 | |||
$ | (14,628 | ) |
Plan Assets
The fair value of plan assets for the Company’s pension plans, along with the asset allocation by category, is shown below:
Pension Benefits | |||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 138,024 | $ | 6,252 | |||
Asset allocation: | |||||||
Cash and money market funds | 2 | % | 0 | % | |||
Equity securities | 71 | % | 66 | % | |||
Debt securities | 27 | % | 34 | % | |||
Total assets | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Absent regulatory or statutory limitations, the target asset allocation for the investment of the assets for our ongoing pension plans is 25% in debt securities and 75% in equity securities. The plans only invest in debt and equity instruments for which there is a ready public market. We develop our expected long-term rate of return assumptions based on the historical rates of returns for equity and debt securities of the type in which our plans invest.
Benefit Payments
The expected benefit payments from the Company’s pension and postretirement plans for the fiscal years indicated are as follows:
Expected Benefit Payments for fiscal year: | Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
2008 | $ | 17,614 | $ | 380 | |||||
2009 | 17,502 | 243 | |||||||
2010 | 17,010 | 205 | |||||||
2011 | 16,230 | 175 | |||||||
2012 | 15,812 | 177 | |||||||
2013-2017 | 62,515 | 889 | |||||||
Total | $ | 146,683 | $ | 2,069 |
NOTE I – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, the Senior Chairman and, through certain related entities, the major stockholder of the Company (collectively, the “major stockholder”) owns an egg laying and a chicken growing operation. In addition, at certain times during the year, the major stockholder may purchase from the Company live chickens and hens and certain feed inventories during the grow-out process and then contract with the Company to resell the birds at maturity using a market-based formula, with price subject to a ceiling price calculated at his cost plus two
percent. No purchases have been made by the Company under this agreement since the first quarter of fiscal 2006 when the major stockholder recognized an operating margin of $4,539 on gross amounts paid by the Company to the major stockholder as described below in “Live chicken purchases from major stockholder.” For the fiscal year ended October 1, 2005, the formula resulted in an operating margin of $1,017,000 on gross amounts paid by the Company to the major stockholder.
Transactions with the major stockholders or related entities are summarized as follows:
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Lease payments on commercial egg property | $ | 750 | $ | 750 | $ | 750 | ||||||
Contract grower pay | 885 | 976 | 682 | |||||||||
Other sales to major stockholder | 620 | 747 | 51,258 | |||||||||
Live chicken purchases from major stockholder | -- | 231 | 50,070 | |||||||||
Loan guaranty fees | 3,592 | 1,615 | 1,775 | |||||||||
Lease payments and operating expenses on airplane | 507 | 492 | 536 |
The Company leases a commercial egg property including all of the ongoing costs of the operation from the Company’s major stockholder. The lease term runs for ten years with a monthly lease payment of $62,500.
A portion of the Company's debt obligations have been guaranteed by Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an entity related to the Company's Senior Chairman, Lonnie "Bo" Pilgrim. In consideration of such guarantees, the Company has Pilgrims Interests, Ltd. a quarterly fee equal to 0.25% of one-half of the average aggregate outstanding balance of such guaranteed debt. During fiscal 2007, we paid $3.6 million to Pilgrim Interests, Ltd.
The Company leases an airplane from its major stockholder under an operating lease agreement that is renewable annually. The terms of the lease agreement require monthly payments of $33,000 plus operating expenses. Lease expense was $396,000 for each of the years 2007, 2006 and 2005. Operating expenses were $111,210, $96,480 and $140,090 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company maintains depository accounts with a financial institution in which the Company’s major stockholder is also a major stockholder. Fees paid to this bank in 2007, 2006 and 2005 are insignificant, and as of September 29, 2007, the Company had bank balances at this financial institution of approximately $1.8 million.
The major stockholder has deposited $0.3 million with the Company as an advance on miscellaneous expenditures.
A son of the major stockholder sold commodity feed products and a limited amount of other services to the Company aggregating approximately $0.6 million in fiscal 2007. He also leases an insignificant amount of land from the Company.
The Company has entered into chicken grower contracts involving farms owned by certain of its officers and directors, providing the placement of Company-owned flocks on their farms during the grow-out phase of production. These contracts are on terms substantially the same as contracts entered into by the Company with unaffiliated parties and can be terminated by either party upon completion of the grow-out of each flock. The aggregate amounts paid by the Company to these officers and directors under these grower contracts during each of the fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 were less than $1 million in total.
NOTE J– COMMITMENTS and CONTINGENCIES
General
We are a party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in the normal course of business to third parties for various risks. Among other considerations, we have not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities as based upon the likelihood of payment, the fair value of such indemnities is immaterial.
Purchase Obligations
The Company will sometimes enter into non-cancelable contracts to purchase capital equipment and feed ingredients. At September 29, 2007, the Company was party to outstanding purchase contracts totaling $40.1 million. Payments for purchases made under these contracts are due in less than 1 year.
Leases
The Consolidated Statements of Operations include rental expense for operating leases of approximately $54.0 million, $35.1 million and $35.4 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s future minimum lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows: 2008 -- $46.8 million; 2009 -- $37.1 million; 2010 -- $28.2 million; 2011 -- $21.0 million; 2012 -- $9.3 million and thereafter $5.0 million.
Certain of the Company’s operating leases include rent escalations. The Company includes the rent escalation in its minimum lease payments obligations and recognizes them as a component of rental expense on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term.
The Company also maintains operating leases for various types of equipment, some of which contain residual value guarantees for the market value of assets at the end of the term of the lease. The terms of the lease maturities range from one to seven years. The maximum potential amount of the residual value guarantees is estimated to be approximately $21.1 million; however, the actual amount would be offset by any recoverable amount based on the fair market value of the underlying leased assets. No liability has been recorded related to this contingency as the likelihood of payments under these guarantees is not considered to be probable and the fair value of such guarantees is immaterial. The Company historically has not experienced significant payments under similar residual guarantees.
Financial Instruments
At September 29, 2007, the Company had $84.9 million in letters of credit outstanding relating to normal business transactions.
The Company’s loan agreements generally obligate the Company to reimburse the applicable lender for incremental increased costs due to a change in law that imposes (i) any reserve or special deposit requirement against assets of, deposits with or credit extended by such lender related to the loan, (ii) any tax, duty or other charge with respect to the loan (except standard income tax) or (iii) capital adequacy requirements. In addition, some of the Company’s loan agreements contain a withholding tax provision that requires the Company to pay additional amounts to the applicable lender or other financing party, generally if withholding taxes are imposed on such lender or other financing party as a result of a change in the applicable tax law. These increased cost and withholding tax provisions continue for the entire term of the applicable transaction, and there is no limitation on the maximum additional amounts the Company could be obligated to pay under such provisions. Any failure to pay amounts due under such provisions generally would trigger an event of default, and, in a secured financing transaction, would entitle the lender to foreclose upon the collateral to realize the amount due.
Litigation
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. Below is a summary of the most significant claims outstanding against the Company. In the Company’s opinion, it has made appropriate and adequate accruals for claims where necessary, and the Company believes the probability of a material loss beyond the amounts accrued to be remote; however, the ultimate liability for these matters is uncertain, and if significantly different than the amounts accrued, the ultimate outcome could have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims made and intends to vigorously defend these cases.
Among the claims presently pending against the Company are claims seeking unspecified damages brought by current and former employees seeking compensation for the time spent donning and doffing work equipment. We are aware of an industry-wide investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour issues, including the compensation of employees for the time spent on such activities such as donning and doffing work equipment. Due, in part, to the government investigation and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, it is possible that we may be subject to additional employee claims. We intend to assert vigorous defenses to the litigation. Nonetheless, there can be no assurances that other similar claims may not be brought against the Company.
On December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled “Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson, Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company and Pilgrim’s Pride, Incorporated” in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. The Court dismissed the claims of a third plaintiff Robert Nelson in their entirety
based on the theory of judicial estoppel. On May 15, 2007, the Court issued its order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in its entirety. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their petition appeal to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Thus the Court’s order denying plaintiffs class certification motion stands as a final binding order. Subsequent to the Court’s order on July 18, 2007, the six remaining plaintiffs have filed individual actions. We believe we have meritorious defenses to these individual claims and we intend to vigorously defend these individual claims.
In March 2005, the Company, through arbitration, settled litigation related to a breach of contract that occurred in a prior year. The settlement resulted in a non-recurring gain of $11.7 million being recognized and recorded in miscellaneous, net in fiscal 2005.
NOTE K – BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We operate in three reportable business segments as (1) a producer and seller of chicken products, (2) a producer and seller of turkey products and (3) a seller of other products.
Our chicken segment includes sales of chicken products we produce and purchase for resale in the U.S., including Puerto Rico, and Mexico. Our chicken segment conducts separate operations in the U.S. and Puerto Rico and in Mexico and is reported as two separate geographical areas.
Our turkey segment includes sales of turkey products we produce and purchase for resale in our turkey and distribution operations, operating in the U.S.
Our other products segment includes distribution of non-poultry products that are purchased from third parties and sold to independent grocers and quick service restaurants. Also included in this category are sales of table eggs, feed, protein products, live hogs and other items, some of which are produced or raised by the Company.
Inter-area sales and inter-segment sales, which are not material, are accounted for at prices comparable to normal trade customer sales. Corporate expenses are allocated to Mexico based upon various apportionment methods for specific expenditures incurred related thereto with the remaining amounts allocated to the U.S. portions of the segments based on number of employees.
Assets associated with our corporate functions, included cash and cash equivalents and investments in available for sale securities are included in our chicken segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses related to our distribution centers are allocated based on the proportion of net sales to the particular segment to which the product sales relate.
Depreciation and amortization, total assets and capital expenditures of our distribution centers are included in our chicken segment based on the primary focus of the centers.
The following table presents certain information regarding our segments:
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
September 29, 2007(a) | September 30, 2006 | October 1, 2005 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net Sales to Customers: | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 6,328,354 | $ | 4,098,403 | $ | 4,411,269 | ||||||
Mexico | 488,466 | 418,745 | 403,353 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 6,816,820 | 4,517,148 | 4,814,622 | |||||||||
Turkey | 122,364 | 130,901 | 204,838 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 638,738 | 570,510 | 626,056 | |||||||||
Mexico | 20,677 | 17,006 | 20,759 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 659,415 | 587,516 | 646,815 | |||||||||
Total | 7,598,599 | 5,235,565 | 5,666,275 | |||||||||
Operating Income (Loss): | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 192,447 | $ | 28,619 | $ | 405,662 | ||||||
Mexico | 13,116 | (17,960 | ) | 39,809 | ||||||||
Sub-total | 205,563 | 10,659 | 445,471 | |||||||||
Turkey | (4,655 | ) | (15,511 | ) | (22,539 | ) | ||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 28,637 | 6,216 | 8,250 | |||||||||
Mexico | 2,992 | 1,638 | 4,630 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 31,629 | 7,854 | 12,880 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 232,537 | $ | 3,002 | $ | 435,812 | ||||||
Depreciation and Amortization:(b) | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 183,808 | $ | 109,346 | $ | 114,131 | ||||||
Mexico | 11,015 | 11,305 | 12,085 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 194,823 | 120,651 | 126,216 | |||||||||
Turkey | 1,587 | 6,593 | 3,343 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 8,278 | 7,743 | 5,196 | |||||||||
Mexico | 215 | 146 | 189 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 8,493 | 7,889 | 5,385 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 204,903 | $ | 135,133 | $ | 134,944 | ||||||
Total Assets: | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 3,247,812 | $ | 1,897,763 | $ | 2,059,579 | ||||||
Mexico | 348,894 | 361,887 | 287,414 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 3,596,706 | 2,259,650 | 2,346,993 | |||||||||
Turkey | 69,653 | 76,908 | 77,319 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 103,757 | 88,650 | 85,581 | |||||||||
Mexico | 4,120 | 1,660 | 2,010 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 107,877 | 90,310 | 87,591 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 3,774,236 | $ | 2,426,868 | $ | 2,511,903 | ||||||
C Capital Expenditures (excluding acquisition): | ||||||||||||
Chicken: | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 164,449 | $ | 133,106 | $ | 102,470 | ||||||
Mexico | 1,633 | 6,536 | 4,924 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 166,082 | 139,642 | 107,394 | |||||||||
Turkey | 502 | 257 | 3,604 | |||||||||
Other Products: | ||||||||||||
United States | 5,699 | 3,567 | 5,448 | |||||||||
Mexico | 40 | 416 | 142 | |||||||||
Sub-total | 5,739 | 3,983 | 5,590 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 172,323 | $ | 143,882 | $ | 116,588 |
(a) | The Company acquired Gold Kist on December 27, 2006 for $1.139 billion. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. |
(b) | Includes amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $6.6 million, $2.3 million, and $2.0 million in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and amortization of intangible assets of approximately $6.3 million in fiscal 2007. |
The Company had one customer that represented 10% or more of annual net sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005.
As of each of the three years ended September 29, 2007, Mexico has net long lived assets of $106.2 million, $116.9 million and $122.1 million, respectively.
At September 29, 2007, Mexico has net assets of $284.8 million.
NOTE L – QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data) | Fiscal Year Ended September 29, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter (b) | Quarter(b) | Quarter(b) | Year | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,337,132 | $ | 1,993,965 | $ | 2,118,386 | $ | 2,149,116 | $ | 7,598,599 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 65,526 | 83,942 | 235,239 | 206,831 | 591,538 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (2.906 | ) | (11,699 | ) | 136,777 | 110,365 | 232,537 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (8,736 | ) | (40,077 | ) | 62,641 | 33,189 | 47,017 | |||||||||||||
Per Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | (0.13 | ) | (0.60 | ) | 0.94 | 0.50 | 0.71 | |||||||||||||
Cash dividends | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | 0.090 |
(In thousands, except per share data) | Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter(a) | Year | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,343,812 | $ | 1,265,709 | $ | 1,287,646 | $ | 1,338,398 | $ | 5,235,565 | ||||||||||
Gross profit | 118,400 | 37,201 | 42,696 | 99,303 | 297,600 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | 46,198 | (37,936 | ) | (26,737 | ) | 21,477 | 3,002 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 25,678 | (31,954 | ) | (20,473 | ) | (7,483 | ) | (34,232 | ) | |||||||||||
Per Share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.39 | (0.48 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.51 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash dividends | 1.0225 | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | 0.0225 | 1.090 | |||||||||||||||
(a) | Included in gross profit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 are charges for accounting adjustments of $6.4 million, pretax, related to certain benefit plans. Included in net income in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 is a $25.8 million tax provision for the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and a $10.6 million tax benefit for a change in estimate of contingency reserves as described in Note A and Note F. |
(b) | The Company acquired Gold Kist on December 27, 2006 for $1.139 billion. For financial reporting purposes, we have not included the operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist in our consolidated financial statements for the period from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006. The operating results and cash flows of Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 through December 30, 2006 were not material. |
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Col. A | Col. B | Col. C | Col. D | Col. E | ||||||||||||||||
ADDITIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Charged to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Charged to | Other | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||
DESCRIPTION | Beginning | Costs | Accounts- | Deductions | end | |||||||||||||||
of Period | and Expenses | Describe(a) | Describe(b) | of Period | ||||||||||||||||
Year ended September 29, 2007: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted | ||||||||||||||||||||
from asset accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 2,084,409 | $ | 4,768,272 | $ | 1,324,131 | $ | 2,313,018 | $ | 5,863,794 | ||||||||||
Year ended September 30, 2006: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted | ||||||||||||||||||||
from asset accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 4,663,155 | $ | (100,676 | ) | $ | -- | $ | 2,478,070 | $ | 2,084,409 | |||||||||
Year ended October 1, 2005: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves and allowances deducted | ||||||||||||||||||||
from asset accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | 4,244,644 | $ | 767,923 | $ | -- | $ | 349,412 | $ | 4,663,155 | ||||||||||
(a) Balance of allowance for doubtful accounts established for accounts receivable acquired from Gold Kist. | ||||||||||||||||||||
(b) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
Exhibit Index
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated September 15, 1986, by and among Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Texas corporation; Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and Doris Pilgrim Julian, Aubrey Hal Pilgrim, Paulette Pilgrim Rolston, Evanne Pilgrim, Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Greta Pilgrim Owens and Patrick Wayne Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-8805) effective November 14, 1986). | |
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 27, 2000 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2 of WLR Foods, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 000-17060) dated September 28, 2000). | |
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, Protein Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.(D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006). | |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2004). | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004). | |
4.1 | C Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (included as Exhibit 3.1). | |
4.2 | Amended and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (included as Exhibit 3.2). | |
4.3 | Indenture, dated November 21, 2003, between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and The Bank of New York as Trustee relating to Pilgrim’s Pride’s 9 ¼% Senior Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-111975) filed on January 16, 2004). | |
4.4 | Form of 9 ¼% Note due 2013 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-111975) filed on January 16, 2004). | |
4.5 | Senior Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.6 | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.7 | Form of 7 5/8% Senior Note due 2015 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). |
4.8 | Senior Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.9 | First Supplemental Indenture to the Senior Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture dated as of January 24, 2007, by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
4.10 | Form of 8 3/8% Subordinated Note due 2017 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2007). | |
10.1 | Pilgrim’s Industries, Inc. Profit Sharing Retirement Plan, restated as of July 1, 1987 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 1, 1992). … | |
10.2 | Senior Executive Performance Bonus Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A in the Company’s Proxy Statement dated December 13, 1999). … | |
10.3 | Aircraft Lease Extension Agreement between B.P. Leasing Co. (L.A. Pilgrim, individually) and Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (formerly Pilgrim’s Industries, Inc.) effective November 15, 1992 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.48 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.4 | Broiler Grower Contract dated May 6, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim (Farm 30) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.49 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.5 | Commercial Egg Grower Contract dated May 7, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.50 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.6 | Agreement dated October 15, 1996 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.23 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended January 2, 1999). | |
10.7 | Heavy Breeder Contract dated May 7, 1997 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim (Farms 44, 45 & 46) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.51 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 1997). | |
10.8 | Broiler Grower Contract dated January 9, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride and O.B. Goolsby, Jr. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.25 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). |
10.9 | Broiler Grower Contract dated January 15, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and B.J.M. Farms (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.26 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). | |
10.10 | Broiler Grower Agreement dated January 29, 1997 by and between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Clifford E. Butler (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-29163) effective June 27, 1997). | |
10.11 | Receivables Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation, as Seller, Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, as Servicer, Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation, as Purchaser, and Nesbitt Burns Securities Inc., as Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.33 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 27, 1998). | |
10.12 | Purchase and Contribution Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation and Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.34 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 27, 1998). | |
10.13 | Guaranty Fee Agreement between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., dated June 11, 1999 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1999). | |
10.14 | Broiler Production Agreement between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim dated November 15, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 10, 2005). | |
10.15 | Commercial Property Lease dated December 29, 2000 between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Pilgrim Poultry G.P. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.30 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 30, 2000). | |
10.16 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 12, 2002 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 among Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation, the Company, Fairway Finance Corporation (as successor in interest to Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation) and BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp. (f/k/a Nesbitt Burns Securities Inc.) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 6, 2002). | |
10.17 | Amendment No. 3 dated as of July 18, 2003 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998 between Pilgrim’s Pride Funding Corporation (“Seller”), Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation as initial Servicer, Fairway Finance Corporation (as successor in interest to Pooled Accounts Receivable Capital Corporation) (“Purchaser”) and Harris Nesbitt Corporation as agent for the purchaser (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2003). |
10.18 | Agricultural Lease between Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (Lessor) and Patrick W. Pilgrim (Tenant) dated May 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2003). | |
10.19 | Amendment No. 4 dated as of December 31, 2003 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998, among Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation as initial Servicer, Fairway Finance Company, LLC (as successor to Fairway Finance Corporation) as purchaser and Harris Nesbitt Corp. (f/k/a BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp.) as agent for the purchaser (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 4, 2004). | |
10.20 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 31, 2003 to Purchase and Contribution Agreement dated as of June 26, 1998, between Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation and Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed February 4, 2004). | |
10.21 | Employee Stock Investment Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004). … | |
10.22 | Purchase and Amendment Agreement between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and ConAgra Foods, Inc. dated August 3, 2005 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 4, 2005). | |
10.23 | Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan of the Company (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 2005). … | |
10.24 | Vendor Service Agreement dated effective December 28, 2005 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). | |
10.25 | Transportation Agreement dated effective December 28, 2005 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). | |
10.26 | Ground Lease Agreement dated effective January 4, 2006 between Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pat Pilgrim (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 6, 2006). | |
10.27 | Credit Agreement by and among the Avícola Pilgrim’s Pride de México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the "Borrower"), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, certain Mexico subsidiaries of the Borrower, ING Capital LLC, and the lenders signatory thereto dated as of September 25, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2006). | |
10.28 | 2006 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among CoBank, ACB, Agriland, FCS and the Company dated as of September 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 28, 2006). |
10.29 | First Amendment to the Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan Trust, dated as of November 29, 2006 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.03 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 05, 2006). … | |
10.30 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2006, by and among the Company, the Purchaser and Gold Kist Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.(D)(1) to Amendment No. 11 to the Company’s Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO filed on December 5, 2006). | |
10.31 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2006, by and among the Company, as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2006). | |
10.32 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2007, by and among the Company, as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9, 2007). | |
10.33 | Fourth Amended and Restated Secured Credit Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2007, by and among the Company, To-Ricos, Ltd., To-Ricos Distribution, Ltd., Bank of Montreal, as agent, SunTrust Bank as syndication agent, U.S. Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Co-Documentation Agents, BMO Capital Market as lead arranger, and the other lenders signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 12, 2007). | |
10.34 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as a syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.02 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 12, 2007). | |
10.35 | First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2007, by and among the Borrower, the Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors, ING Capital LLC, and the Lenders (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2007). | |
10.36 | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed July 31, 2007). |
10.37 | Amendment No. 5 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of August 20, 2007, among the Company, Pilgrim's Pride Funding Corporation, Fairway Finance Company, LLC and BMO Capital Markets Corp. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 24, 2007). | |
10.38 | Retirement and Consulting Agreement dated as of October 10, 2007, between the Company and Clifford E. Butler (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 10, 2007). … | |
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation and collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto.* | ||
10.40 | Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 7, 2007, by and among the Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as administrative agent, and the other syndication parties signatory thereto (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 2007). | |
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the years ended September 29, 2007, September 30, 2006, October 1, 2005, October 2, 2004, September 27, 2003, and September 28, 2002.* | ||
S Subsidiaries of Registrant.* | ||
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.* | ||
Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | ||
Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | ||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | ||
Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | ||
Certification of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | ||
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
*Filed herewith |
…Represents a management contract or compensation plan arrangement |
124