QUALCOMM Incorporated
Conflict Minerals Report
Reporting Period: January 1 – December 31, 2013
Qualcomm Incorporated is a world leader in 3G, 4G and next-generation wireless technologies. Qualcomm Incorporated includes our licensing business, QTL, and the vast majority of our patent portfolio. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Qualcomm Incorporated, operates, along with its subsidiaries, substantially all of our products and services businesses, including our semiconductor business, QCT, and substantially of our engineering, research and development functions. In this document, the words “we,” “our” and “us” refer only to Qualcomm Incorporated, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or their subsidiaries.
This Conflict Minerals Report (this Report) contains forward-looking statements regarding our business, products and conflict minerals efforts, including steps we intend to take to mitigate the risk that conflict minerals in our products benefit armed groups1, and our industry’s conflict minerals efforts. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements in this Report. Additionally, statements concerning future matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements.
Although forward-looking statements in this Report reflect our good faith judgment, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation the risk that information reported to us by our direct suppliers2 or industry information used by us may be inaccurate; the risk that smelters or refiners (processing facilities) may not participate in the Conflict Free Smelter Program (CFSP3); as well as risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q related to our dependence on our suppliers and our being subject to government regulations and policies. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Report. Throughout this Report, whenever a reference is made to our website, such reference does not incorporate information from the website by reference into this Report unless specifically identified as such.
Background
In 2010, the United States Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
______________________________
1 The term "armed group" means an armed group that is identified as a perpetrator of serious human rights abuses in annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices under sections 116(d) and 502B(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151n(d) and 2304(b)) relating to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or an adjoining country.
2 Direct suppliers mean those suppliers from which we directly procure finished goods, components, materials and/or services for our products.
3 The CFSP, developed by the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) in 2010, is a voluntary initiative in which an independent third party audits processing facilities' procurement and processing activities and determines if the processing facilities maintain sufficient documentation to reasonably demonstrate conflict-free sourcing.
(Dodd-Frank), which required the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to promulgate rules requiring certain companies with “conflict minerals4” that are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by or for that company to, among other things, disclose annually whether any of those conflict minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or an adjoining country5, and if so, to submit a report to the SEC that includes a description of the measures it took to exercise due diligence on the conflict minerals’ source and chain of custody. In August 2012, the SEC promulgated such rules (the Final Rule).
In anticipation of the Final Rule, the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI) established an initiative that is known today as the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI). The EICC, GeSI and CFSI, which are comprised of numerous industry members, strive to promote the improvement of human welfare and the environment through responsible and proactive supply chain management.
We are full members of the EICC and active participants in the CFSI. We support the CFSI’s responsible extractives initiatives, have adopted the EICC’s Code of Conduct and work to integrate responsible sourcing due diligence into our business operations. We, along with many other companies, rely on the CFSI’s CFSP to verify processing facilities as CFSP-compliant. The CFSP also recognizes responsible sourcing practices of processing facilities that have been validated by the London Bullion Market Association, Responsible Jewellery Council and the Tungsten Industry – Conflict Minerals Council.
Summary
We are a leading developer and supplier of integrated circuits based on CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access), OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access) and other technologies for use in voice and data communications, networking, application processing, multimedia and global positioning system products. We manufacture or contract to manufacture products for which conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of those products and which otherwise constitute products under the Final Rule (products). We primarily utilize a fabless production and assembly model, which means that we do not own or operate foundries or assemblers responsible for the production and assembly of our products.
In accordance with the Final Rule, we conducted in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) that was reasonably designed to determine whether any of the necessary conflict minerals in our products originated in the DRC or an adjoining country, or were from recycled or scrap sources. A description of our RCOI is set forth in this Report.
Based on our RCOI, we have reason to believe that some of the necessary conflict minerals used in our products originated in the DRC or an adjoining country (and may not have been from recycled or scrap sources). Accordingly, we exercised due diligence to determine the source and chain of custody of these conflict minerals. Our due diligence was designed to conform to an internationally recognized due diligence framework, specifically the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Guidance)6” promulgated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). A description of our due diligence measures is also set forth in this Report.
______________________________
4 The term “conflict minerals” means columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten.
5 The term “adjoining country” means a country that shares an internationally recognized border with the Democratic Republic of the Congo. At the time of the publication of this Report, the “adjoining countries” were Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Congo Republic, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.
6 OECD (2013), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing.
Following the exercise of our due diligence during the period covered in this Report, we determined that each of our products was “DRC conflict undeterminable7” when considering all conflict minerals in our products. However, our integrated circuit products (defined below) are “DRC conflict free8” for tantalum.
The following descriptions are also provided within this Report:
| |
• | The facilities used to process the necessary conflict minerals in our products, if known; |
| |
• | The country of origin of the necessary conflict minerals in our products, if known; |
| |
• | Our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin of the necessary conflict minerals in our products with the greatest possible specificity; and |
| |
• | The steps we have taken or will take to mitigate the risk that our necessary conflict minerals benefit armed groups including steps to improve our due diligence. |
Given that our products are “DRC conflict undeterminable,” we are not required during the temporary two-year period provided by the Final Rule to obtain, and have not obtained, an independent private sector audit of this Report.
Product Description
| |
1. | Integrated Circuit Products9 |
We are a leading developer and supplier of integrated circuits based on CDMA, OFDMA and other technologies for use in voice and data communications, networking, application processing, multimedia and global positioning system products. Our integrated circuit products are sold to manufacturers that use our products in wireless devices, particularly mobile phones, tablets, laptops, data modules, handheld wireless computers and gaming devices, access points and routers, data cards and infrastructure equipment, and in wired devices, particularly broadband gateway equipment, desktop computers, televisions, set-top boxes and Blu-ray players. Our Mobile Station Modem (MSMTM) integrated circuits, which include the Mobile Data Modem, Qualcomm Single Chip and Qualcomm® SnapdragonTM processor devices, perform the core baseband modem functionality in wireless devices providing voice and data communications, as well as multimedia applications and global positioning functions. Our Snapdragon processors provide advanced application and graphics processing capabilities. Because of our experience in designing and developing CDMA- and OFDMA-based products, we design both the baseband integrated circuit and the supporting system as well, including the RF (Radio Frequency) devices and PM (Power Management) devices.
Our wireless products also include integrated circuits for wireless local area network (WLAN), Bluetooth, frequency modulation (FM radio) and near field communications (NFC) as well as technologies that enable location data and services. Our wired connectivity products include integrated circuits for Ethernet and Powerline networks.
Revenues from the sale of integrated circuit products comprised approximately 99% of the total revenues for our products described in this Report.
_____________________________
7 The term “DRC conflict undeterminable” means, with respect to any product manufactured or contracted to be manufactured, that we are unable to determine, after exercising due diligence, whether or not such product qualifies as “DRC conflict free.”
8 The term “DRC conflict free” means that a product does not contain conflict minerals necessary to the functionality or production of that product that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the DRC or an adjoining country.
9 Our integrated circuits contain a relatively small amount of tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold, with the combined average weight of these conflict minerals per integrated circuit at less than 10% of total weight.
During calendar year 2013, we also developed and supplied a number of other wireless technology-based products, including information and position location products, air-to-ground modem cards, display modules, mobile location-awareness and commerce products, wireless health devices and wearable devices.
Revenues from the sale of such other wireless-technology products comprised approximately 1% of the total revenues for our products described in this Report.
Description of Supply Chain
We utilize a fabless production and assembly model for our integrated circuits, which means that we do not own or operate foundries or assemblers responsible for the production and assembly of our integrated circuits. Integrated circuits are die cut from silicon wafers that have been assembled into packages or modules and have received final test. We employ both turnkey and two-stage manufacturing models to purchase our integrated circuits. Turnkey is when our foundry suppliers are responsible for delivering fully assembled and tested integrated circuits. Under the two-stage manufacturing model, we purchase wafers and die from semiconductor manufacturing foundries and contract with separate third-party suppliers for probe, assembly and test services. We rely on our direct suppliers to perform the manufacturing and assembly, and most of the testing, of our integrated circuits based primarily on our proprietary designs and test programs. Our direct suppliers and, in turn, their suppliers are responsible for the procurement of the materials used in the production of our integrated circuits. Certain materials purchased by our direct suppliers may come directly or indirectly from processing facilities that treat ores, concentrates, slags or secondary materials. Because we do not purchase any materials directly from these processing facilities, we must rely on certain information provided by our direct suppliers and the CFSI or other industry organizations in order to prepare this Report.
Our other products are primarily contracted to be manufactured as finished goods with the contract manufacturer responsible for the procurement of the materials and components that comprise these products.
Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry
Prior to conducting our RCOI for the period covered in this Report, we sent a supplier awareness letter to each of our direct suppliers that communicated our conflict-free minerals policy10 and expectations to comply with the requirements of Dodd-Frank. Our conflict-free minerals policy communicates our intent to achieve a “DRC conflict free” supply chain.
To conduct our RCOI, we required our direct suppliers to provide supply chain information using the EICC-GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) on the necessary conflict minerals in their supply chain.
We conducted our RCOI with 100% of our direct suppliers that use necessary conflict minerals in our products to determine whether any of these minerals originated in the DRC or an adjoining country, or were from recycled or scrap sources. We received responses from 100% of the direct suppliers of our integrated circuit products and from 92% of the direct suppliers of our other products.
Our RCOI determined the following with respect to the countries of origin of the necessary conflict minerals in our supply chain11:
______________________________
10 Available at: http://www.qualcomm.com/company/sustainability/products/conflict-free-minerals
11 Percentages are based on the total number of our direct suppliers that declared supplying any necessary conflict minerals that are in our products.
| |
• | The vast majority of our direct suppliers reported unknown countries of origin for their necessary conflict minerals. |
| |
• | 16% of our direct suppliers reported sourcing necessary conflict minerals from the DRC or an adjoining country. |
| |
• | Less than 5% of processing facilities reported by our direct suppliers were confirmed as sourcing some necessary conflict minerals from the DRC or an adjoining country12. Each of these processing facilities has been validated as CFSP-compliant by the CFSI. |
Based on our direct suppliers’ responses to the RCOI, we have reason to believe13 that some of the necessary conflict minerals used in our products originated in the DRC or an adjoining country, but we have not identified any instances in which our sourcing of necessary conflict minerals directly or indirectly financed or benefitted armed groups in the DRC or an adjoining country. We conducted due diligence on each direct supplier of necessary conflict minerals in our supply chain regardless of whether they knowingly or unknowingly sourced our necessary conflict minerals from the DRC or an adjoining country.
Design of Due Diligence
Our due diligence measures have been designed to conform, in all material respects, to the framework provided by the OECD Guidance.
Description of Due Diligence Performed
OECD Step 1: Establish Strong Company Management Systems14
| |
• | We adopted and publicly communicated our conflict minerals policy. |
| |
• | We established an internal conflict minerals management team with representation from our finance, government affairs, internal audit, legal, regulatory, quality and supply chain departments which reported on program activities to executive management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a regular basis. |
| |
• | We used the CMRT to identify processing facilities in our supply chain as reported by our direct suppliers. |
| |
• | We communicated our conflict minerals supplier requirements to our integrated circuit direct suppliers (in the form of a document titled “Conflict-Free Minerals Requirements for Suppliers”). |
| |
• | We provided awareness letters to the direct suppliers of our other products. |
| |
• | We established a public email address15 available on our website for general inquiries and grievances regarding our conflict minerals program. |
______________________________
12 Countries of origin were provided by our direct suppliers and by the CFSI (members-only data) for CFSP-compliant processing facilities. The percentage of our direct suppliers that reported known sourcing from the DRC or an adjoining country (16%) is higher than the percentage of processing facilities in our supply chain that reported known sourcing from the DRC or an adjoining country (less than 5%) because our downstream suppliers share common processing facilities in their supply chains.
13 Some of our direct supplier responses represented their supply chain at a company-level rather than being product-specific. As such our list of processing facilities disclosed in this Report may contain more facilities than those that actually process the conflict minerals contained in our products.
14 The objective of Step 1 of the OECD Guidance is “To ensure that existing due diligence and management systems within companies address risks associated with minerals from conflict affected or high-risk areas.”
15 conflictminerals@qti.qualcomm.com
OECD Step 2: Identify and Assess Risk in the Supply Chain16
| |
• | We reviewed our direct suppliers’ due diligence activities, such as whether they had a conflict minerals policy, required their own suppliers to be “DRC conflict free” and implemented due diligence for “DRC conflict free” sourcing. |
| |
• | We used the CMRT to identify processing facilities and country of origin of our necessary conflict minerals if reported in our supply chain by direct suppliers. |
| |
• | We also obtained countries of origin (when available) for CFSP-compliant processing facilities by relying on information provided by the CFSI. |
| |
• | We determined if the processing facilities adhere to responsible sourcing practices by cross-checking with the list of CFSP-compliant processing facilities. |
OECD Step 3: Design and Implement a Strategy to Respond to Risk17
| |
• | We reported information on the source and chain of custody of conflict minerals in our supply chain to executive management and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors on a regular basis. |
| |
• | We devised a conflict minerals risk management plan that sets forth direct supplier-risk management strategies ranging from continued procurement to disengagement, the severity of which is at the discretion of senior management. |
| |
• | We participated in CFSP pre-audit site visits to processing facilities in several countries to educate on and encourage participation in the CFSP. |
OECD Step 4: Independent Third-Party Audit of Smelter/Refiner’s Due Diligence Practices18
| |
• | Because we do not source directly from conflict minerals processing facilities, we rely on the CFSP to coordinate third-party audits of these facilities. The CFSP audit protocols and procedures were designed by the CFSI for use by third-party auditors contracted by the CFSP. |
| |
• | The CFSI also recognizes processing facilities as CFSP-compliant through validations conducted by the London Bullion Market Association, Responsible Jewellery Council and the Tungsten Industry – Conflict Minerals Council. |
| |
• | We rely on the publicly-available results of the CFSP third-party audits to validate the responsible sourcing practices of processing facilities in our supply chain. |
OECD Step 5: Report Annually on Supply Chain Due Diligence19
| |
• | We will file a Form SD and Conflict Minerals Report (if necessary) with the SEC on an annual basis. Our Form SD and Conflict Minerals Report are also available on our website. |
______________________________
16 The objective of Step 2 of the OECD Guidance is “To identify and assess risks on the circumstances of extraction, trading, handling and export of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.”
17 The objective of Step 3 of the OECD Guidance is “To evaluate and respond to identified risks in order to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts.”
18 The objective of Step 4 of the OECD Guidance is “To carry out an independent third-party audit of the smelter/refiner’s due diligence for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and contribute to the improvement of smelter/refiner and upstream due diligence practices, including through any institutionalized mechanism to be established at the industry’s initiative, supported by governments and in cooperation with relevant stakeholders.”
19 The objective of Step 5 of the OECD Guidance is “To publicly report on due diligence for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas in order to generate public confidence in the measures companies are taking.”
| |
• | We will periodically provide information regarding our conflict minerals program in the Qualcomm Sustainability Report, as well as on our Sustainability website. |
Facilities Used to Process the Necessary Conflict Minerals in Our Products
We rely on the good faith efforts of our direct suppliers to provide us with reasonable representations of the processing facilities used to supply the necessary conflict minerals in our products. As reported to us by our direct suppliers, we have included a list of processing facilities (if known), their headquarter locations and whether such facility has been validated as CFSP-compliant in Tables 1, 2 and 3 at the end of this Report.
At this time, we are listing those processing facilities in the tables at the end of this Report that have been determined to be legitimate processing facilities by the CFSI. Other processing facilities were reported in our supply chain, however these processing facilities are not listed in the tables at the end of this Report as they have not yet been determined as legitimate by the CFSI.
Some of our direct supplier responses represented their supply chain at a company-level rather than being product-specific. As such our list of processing facilities disclosed in this Report may contain more facilities than those that actually process the conflict minerals contained in our products.
Country of Origin of the Necessary Conflict Minerals in Our Products
We requested country of origin information (if known) from each of our direct suppliers, most of which do not source directly from processing facilities, for the purposes of determining the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in our supply chain. We also relied on the country of origin information provided by the CFSI (when available) for CFSP-compliant processing facilities.
Based on country of origin information20, we have reason to believe that some of our necessary conflict minerals originated from the DRC and one or more adjoining country, but we have not identified any instances in which our sourcing of necessary conflict minerals directly or indirectly financed or benefitted armed groups in the DRC or an adjoining country.
Our Efforts to Determine the Mine or Location of Origin of the Necessary Conflict Minerals in Our Products
We requested mine or location of origin information from each of our direct suppliers, each of which do not source materials, for the purposes of determining the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in our supply chain. During the reporting period covered in this Report, in some instances our direct suppliers reported name or location of mine (country). However, many of our direct suppliers were unable to obtain mine or location of origin data for their necessary conflict minerals.
______________________________
20 We are disclosing country of origin of our necessary conflict minerals if we have reason to believe that our necessary conflict minerals may have originated in the DRC or an adjoining country.
Steps We Have Taken or Will Take to Mitigate the Risk that our Necessary Conflict Minerals Benefit Armed Groups
We intend to advance the effectiveness of our due diligence efforts to mitigate the risk that our necessary conflict minerals benefit armed groups in the DRC or an adjoining country by:
| |
1. | Engaging further with direct suppliers, processing facilities and the CFSI to: |
| |
• | Improve the quality of processing facility data provided by our direct suppliers via the CMRT, including country of origin and mine or location of origin. |
| |
• | Encourage non-CFSP validated processing facilities to become validated as compliant either through the CFSP or a CFSP-recognized third-party audit program. |
| |
• | Conduct pre-audit site visits at non-CFSP validated processing facilities. |
| |
2. | Refining our internal operating procedures to continue to move towards a “DRC conflict free” supply chain. |
| |
3. | Continuing to participate in the following industry coalitions and non-governmental organizations’ efforts to support the responsible sourcing of minerals: EICC, CFSI, International Tin Research Initiative, Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade and the Responsible Sourcing Network multi-stakeholder group. |
| |
4. | With our leading industry partners, encouraging cross-stakeholder engagement and information sharing to achieve “DRC conflict free” supply chains. |
Tables of Our Conflict Minerals Processing Facilities
Table 1. CFSP-compliant processing facilities as of January 31, 2014
Processing facilities reported in our supply chain validated as compliant according to the CFSP.
|
| | |
Metal | Processing Facility Name | Processing Facility Location |
Gold | Allgemeine Gold- und Silberscheideanstalt A.G. | Germany |
Gold | AngloGold Ashanti Córrego do Sítio Minerção | Brazil |
Gold | Argor-Heraeus SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Asahi Pretec Corporation | Japan |
Gold | CCR Refinery – Glencore Canada Corporation | Canada |
Gold | Dowa | Japan |
Gold | Istanbul Gold Refinery | Turkey |
Gold | Johnson Matthey Inc | United States |
Gold | Johnson Matthey Ltd | Canada |
Gold | JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Kennecott Utah Copper LLC | United States |
Gold | Kojima Chemicals Co. Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Materion | United States |
Gold | Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd | Hong Kong |
|
| | |
Gold | Metalor Technologies SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Metalor USA Refining Corporation | United States |
Gold | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Japan |
Gold | Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Nihon Material Co. LTD | Japan |
Gold | Ohio Precious Metals, LLC | United States |
Gold | PAMP SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Royal Canadian Mint | Canada |
Gold | Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp. | Taiwan |
Gold | Sumitomo Metal Mining Co. Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K. | Japan |
Gold | Umicore SA Business Unit Precious Metals Refining | Belgium |
Gold | United Precious Metal Refining, Inc. | United States |
Gold | Valcambi SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint | Australia |
Tantalum | Duoluoshan | China |
Tantalum | Exotech Inc. | United States |
Tantalum | F & X | China |
Tantalum | Global Advanced Metals | United States |
Tantalum | H.C. Starck Group | Germany |
Tantalum | Hi-Temp | United States |
Tantalum | Kemet Blue Powder | United States |
Tantalum | Mitsui Mining & Smelting | Japan |
Tantalum | Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd. | China |
Tantalum | Plansee | Austria |
Tantalum | RFH Tantalum Smeltry Co., Ltd | China |
Tantalum | Solikamsk Metal Works | Russian Federation |
Tantalum | Taki Chemicals | Japan |
Tantalum | Tantalite Resources | South Africa |
Tantalum | Telex | United States |
Tantalum | Ulba | Kazakhstan |
Tantalum | Zhuzhou Cement Carbide | China |
Tin | Alpha | United States |
Tin | Geiju Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co. Ltd. | China |
Tin | Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC) | Malaysia |
|
| | |
Tin | Minsur | Peru |
Tin | OMSA | Bolivia |
Tin | PT Bukit Timah | Indonesia |
Tin | Thaisarco | Thailand |
Tin | Yunnan Tin Company, Ltd. | China |
Table 2. CFSP participating processing facilities as of January 31, 2014
Processing facilities reported in our supply chain that have agreed to participate in the CFSP but have not yet completed the program.
|
| | |
Metal | Processing Facility Name | Processing Facility Location |
Gold | Heimerle + Meule GmbH | Germany |
Tin | CV United Smelting | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Putra Karya | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Eunido | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Tambang Timah | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Timah (Persero), Tbk | Indonesia |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd. | China |
Table 3. No known CFSP participation as of January 31, 2014
Processing facilities reported in our supply chain that have not been validated as CFSP-compliant.
|
| | |
Metal | Processing Facility Name | Processing Facility Location |
Gold | Aida Chemical Industries Co. Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC) | Uzbekistan |
Gold | Asaka Riken Co Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Atasay Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. | Turkey |
Gold | Aurubis AG | Germany |
Gold | Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines) | Philippines |
Gold | Boliden AB | Sweden |
Gold | Caridad | Mexico |
Gold | Cendres & Métaux SA | Switzerland |
|
| | |
Gold | Chimet SpA | Italy |
Gold | Chugai Mining | Japan |
Gold | Daejin Indus Co. Ltd | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | DaeryongENC | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Do Sung Corporation | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | FSE Novosibirsk Refinery | Russian Federation |
Gold | Heraeus Ltd Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Gold | Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG | Germany |
Gold | Hwasung CJ Co. Ltd | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Company Limited | China |
Gold | Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd. | Japan |
Gold | Japan Mint | Japan |
Gold | Jiangxi Copper Company Limited | China |
Gold | JSC Ekaterinburg Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant | Russian Federation |
Gold | JSC Uralectromed | Russian Federation |
Gold | Kazzinc Ltd | Kazakhstan |
Gold | Korea Metal Co. Ltd | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Kyrgyzaltyn JSC | Kyrgyzstan |
Gold | L' azurde Company For Jewelry | Saudi Arabia |
Gold | LS-Nikko Copper Inc | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Met-Mex Peñoles, S.A. | Mexico |
Gold | Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant | Russian Federation |
Gold | Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.Ş. | Turkey |
Gold | Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat | Uzbekistan |
Gold | OJSC “The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant” (OJSC Krastvetmet) | Russian Federation |
Gold | OJSC Kolyma Refinery | Russian Federation |
Gold | Pan Pacific Copper Co. LTD | Japan |
Gold | Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals | Russian Federation |
Gold | PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk | Indonesia |
Gold | PX Précinox SA | Switzerland |
Gold | Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd | South Africa |
Gold | Sabin Metal Corp. | United States |
Gold | SAMWON METALS Corp. | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Schone Edelmetaal | Netherlands |
|
| | |
Gold | SEMPSA Joyeria Plateria SA | Spain |
Gold | Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co. Ltd | China |
Gold | So Accurate Group, Inc. | United States |
Gold | SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals | Russian Federation |
Gold | The Great Wall Gold and Silver Refinery of China | China |
Gold | The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co. Ltd | China |
Gold | Tokuriki Honten Co. Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Torecom | Korea, Republic Of |
Gold | Umicore Brasil Ltda | Brazil |
Gold | Yokohama Metal Co Ltd | Japan |
Gold | Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation | China |
Gold | Zijin Mining Group Co. Ltd | China |
Tin | BML | Indonesia |
Tin | CNMC (Guangxi) PGMA Co. Ltd. | China |
Tin | Complejo Metalurico Vinto S.A. | Bolivia |
Tin | Cooper Santa | Brazil |
Tin | CV Duta Putra Bangka | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Jus Tindo | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Makmur Jaya | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Nurjanah | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Prima Timah Utama | Indonesia |
Tin | CV Serumpun Sebalai | Indonesia |
Tin | Fenix Metals | Poland |
Tin | Gejiu Zi-Li | China |
Tin | Huichang Jinshunda Tin Co. Ltd | China |
Tin | Jiangxi Nanshan | China |
Tin | Kai Unita Trade Limited Liability Company | China |
Tin | Linwu Xianggui Smelter Co | China |
Tin | Liuzhou China Tin | China |
Tin | Metallo Chimique | Belgium |
Tin | Mineração Taboca S.A. | Brazil |
Tin | Minmetals Ganzhou Tin Co. Ltd. | China |
Tin | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Japan |
Tin | Novosibirsk Integrated Tin Works | Russian Federation |
|
| | |
Tin | PT Alam Lestari Kencana | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Artha Cipta Langgeng | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Babel Inti Perkasa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Babel Surya Alam Lestari | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Kudai Tin | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Bangka Timah Utama Sejahtera | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera | Indonesia |
Tin | PT DS Jaya Abadi | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Fang Di MulTindo | Indonesia |
Tin | PT HP Metals Indonesia | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Mitra Stania Prima | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Refined Bangka Tin | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Sumber Jaya Indah | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Timah Nusantara | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Tinindo Inter Nusa | Indonesia |
Tin | PT Yinchendo Mining Industry | Indonesia |
Tin | White Solder Metalurgia | Brazil |
Tin | Yunnan Chengfeng | China |
Tungsten | A.L.M.T. Corp. | Japan |
Tungsten | ATI Tungsten Materials | United States |
Tungsten | Chaozhou Xianglu Tungsten Industry Co Ltd | China |
Tungsten | China Minmetals Nonferrous Metals Co Ltd | China |
Tungsten | Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co Ltd | China |
Tungsten | Dayu Weiliang Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Ganzhou Grand Sea W & Mo Group Co Ltd | China |
Tungsten | Global Tungsten & Powders Corp | United States |
Tungsten | HC Starck GmbH | Germany |
Tungsten | Hunan Chenzhou Mining Group Co | China |
Tungsten | Hunan Chun-Chang Nonferrous Smelting & Concentrating Co., Ltd. | China |
Tungsten | Japan New Metals Co Ltd | Japan |
Tungsten | Jiangxi Rare Earth & Rare Metals Tungsten Group Corp | China |
Tungsten | Kennametal Inc. | United States |
|
| | |
Tungsten | Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG | Austria |
Tungsten | Wolfram Company CJSC | Russian Federation |
Tungsten | Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd | China |
Tungsten | Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Group Co Ltd | China |